forgetting intro 2009

51
William James, philosopher & psychologist ‘’In the practical use of our intellect, forgetting is as important as remembering’’

Upload: hoja0602

Post on 26-May-2015

1.098 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Forgetting intro 2009

William James, philosopher & psychologist

‘’In the practical use of our intellect, forgetting is as important as remembering’’

Page 2: Forgetting intro 2009

forgetting – a definition

The inability to recall or recognise material which was previously stored in memory. A distinction can be made between:

Lack of availability – material that was placed in memory and which has now disappeared.

Lack of accessibility – material that is still in

memory but cannot be recalled

Page 3: Forgetting intro 2009

why do we forget?

1. Encoding failure

2. Storage decay

3. Retrieval failure

4. Motivated forgetting

Page 4: Forgetting intro 2009

but first…a quick attention test

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ahg6qcgoay4&feature=related

Page 5: Forgetting intro 2009

forgetting or failure to encode?

"We must never underestimate one of the most obvious reasons for forgetting, namely, that the information was never stored in the first place" Loftus

Page 6: Forgetting intro 2009

1. Failure to encode

Remember that everything in short term memory is lost unless it is moved to long term memory. That isn’t so much forgetting as the failure to encode and store incoming data.

Such transference to LTM requires attention and usually intention.

Page 7: Forgetting intro 2009

The Brown-Peterson experiment 1) on each trial you will see three words that you will

try to remember 2) following the three words you will see a three digit

number (eg. 526) 3) As soon as that number appears you are to begin

silently counting backwards from that number in 3’s (eg. 526, 523, 520, 517)

4) Keep counting until you see a set of question marks. This is your cue to write down the three words you saw at the beginning of the trial

5) This same procedure will continue for several trials 6) Questions?

Page 8: Forgetting intro 2009

DOG SHIRT TREE

Page 9: Forgetting intro 2009

8 4 1

Page 10: Forgetting intro 2009

? ? ?

Page 11: Forgetting intro 2009

CAR LEG MOUSE

Page 12: Forgetting intro 2009

3 1 5

Page 13: Forgetting intro 2009

? ? ?

Page 14: Forgetting intro 2009

PENCIL SPOON ARM

Page 15: Forgetting intro 2009

4 4 2

Page 16: Forgetting intro 2009

? ? ?

Page 17: Forgetting intro 2009

CUP TABLE SHOE

Page 18: Forgetting intro 2009

7 5 5

Page 19: Forgetting intro 2009

? ? ?

Page 20: Forgetting intro 2009

BOOK CORD TOE

Page 21: Forgetting intro 2009

2 1 4

Page 22: Forgetting intro 2009

? ? ?

Page 23: Forgetting intro 2009

FINGER WORD RUG

Page 24: Forgetting intro 2009

3 7 8

Page 25: Forgetting intro 2009

? ? ?

Page 26: Forgetting intro 2009

SOCK WINDOW GRASS

Page 27: Forgetting intro 2009

5 3 2

Page 28: Forgetting intro 2009

? ? ?

Page 29: Forgetting intro 2009

BACK COFFEE PAGE

Page 30: Forgetting intro 2009

4 8 2

Page 31: Forgetting intro 2009

? ? ?

Page 32: Forgetting intro 2009

VOICE HAT PEN

Page 33: Forgetting intro 2009

6 3 4

Page 34: Forgetting intro 2009

? ? ?

Page 35: Forgetting intro 2009

Scoring

1. DOG SHIRT TREE

2. CAR LEG MOUSE

3. PENCIL SPOON ARM

4. CUP TABLE SHOE

5. BOOK CORD TOE

6. FINGER WORD RUG

7. SOCK WINDOW GRASS

8. BACK COFFEE PAGE

9. VOICE HAT PEN

Find the total # you got right on the following sets of trials:

6 sec: trials 1,5,712 sec: trials 2,4,918 sec: trials 3, 6, 8

Page 36: Forgetting intro 2009

class data

Page 37: Forgetting intro 2009

Typical Data

Page 38: Forgetting intro 2009

2. Storage Decay (Lack of availability)

Trace Decay theory proposes that unless information in memory is regularly refreshed or used it will spontaneously begin to fade or weaken over time.

This is based on the assumption that memories have a physical basis, the trace. Over time, metabolic processes break down this trace (decay) making the information unavailable. Conversely, with rehearsal, the trace becomes stronger and is less likely to be forgotten

Page 39: Forgetting intro 2009

Ebbinghaus (1885)

First person to conduct systematic scientific research on forgetting

Had subject memorize lists of 13 nonsense syllables

Measured retention at different intervals

Page 40: Forgetting intro 2009

Ebbinghaus (1885)

Ebbinghaus’s findings suggests forgetting occurs early, suggestingthat the information was never properly placed in long term memory.

Page 41: Forgetting intro 2009

Evaluation of trace decay

Peterson and Peterson (1959) (+)Research demonstrated that all but 10% of memories were lost after 18 seconds when rehearsal was prevented through an interference task. This is evidence that trace decay occurs within 18 seconds

Low ecological validity (-)The use of nonsense trigrams and lists of numbers doesn’t represent learning in everyday life and thus findings cannot be easily generalised

Page 42: Forgetting intro 2009

But...is it trace decay or displacement?

Forgetting in STM is usually attributed to the limited capacity (displacement) and duration (trace decay) of STM

Displacement theory explains forgetting in terms of capacity (7 +/- 2: Miller, 1956). Once STM is full, any new information to be remembered must push out old information. The old information is forgotten

Participants in Peterson & Peterson’s study were given a distractor task which might have led to interference or displacement of the original trigrams.

Ideally you would study decay by having participants learn material and recall it later without doing anything in between learning and recall. However, it is difficult to prevent rehearsal without an interference task.

Page 43: Forgetting intro 2009

3. Retrieval Failure (Lack of accessibility )

Rapunzel – available but not accessible

Page 44: Forgetting intro 2009

Types of retrieval task

Recall

Recognition

Relearningi

Page 45: Forgetting intro 2009

Tip of the tongue phenomenon

Memory cues or prompts can sometimes aid retrieval

Page 46: Forgetting intro 2009

Interference - a cause of retrieval failure

Interference or ‘inhibition’ by other material is a common problem. Learning some items may interfere with the retrieval of another.

Two types of

interference: Retroactive inhibitionProactive inhibition

Page 47: Forgetting intro 2009

Interference in studying

Page 48: Forgetting intro 2009

4. Motivated forgetting

This is a type of forgetting which seems to be motivated by unpleasant events. For example, forgetting a dentist appointment

Freud argued that all forgetting was motivated by an UNCONSCIOUS willingness not to remember information which is in some way uncomfortable

Freudian idea of repression Traumatic events pushed below consciousness

Page 49: Forgetting intro 2009

Evaluation motivated forgetting

Little empirical support for this idea

If anything, traumatic events are too easily remembered: i.e., Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

Page 50: Forgetting intro 2009

conclusion

Forgetting has several possible causes Encoding failure: the memory never gets stored Decay: the memory deteriorates and fades Retrieval failure: we just can’t find the memory Motivated forgetting: we don’t want to find the memory

Page 51: Forgetting intro 2009

Can We Trust Memory?

A memory is a sheet of paper in a filing cabinet.

We take it out of the file.

Look at it.

Edit it!

And put it back.

What do we take out the next time?

The edited version!