for procuring electricity in the italian market. page 2 agenda italian energy industry outlook risks...
TRANSCRIPT
for
Procuring electricity in the Italian market
Page 2
Agenda
Italian Energy industry outlook
Risks and opportunities in the Italian Market
EnergyQuote solution
Example of Italian Tenders
The Return on Investment: a business case
Page 3
Italian Energy industry outlook
Page 4
Industry highlights
Regulatory & Market environment– Eligibility for all commercial & industrial customers since July
2004 – Regulated Network Access– Supply separated from Distribution– Very complex and dynamic regulatory framework
Generation and transmission context– Fossil fuels-dependent Generation mix– Very limited competition in the generation market (Enel 50%
market share)– Dependence on cheaper imported energy from neighbouring
countries (14-17% of energy needs)– 1 Transmission Company, 170 Local Distribution companies
Taxes and levies– Very high energy taxes contribute to make the cost of energy
for end users disproportionately high
Potential suppliers– 35+ Domestic Suppliers– 9 International supply companies– Industrial Switch rate is 8%
Page 5
Italian Power Generation - 2002
nuclear0%
coal0%
oil14%
gas10%
other conventional thermal40%
hydro17%
other unspecif ied0%
links16%
renew able3%
nuclear
coal
oil
gas
other conventional thermal
hydro
renewable
other unspecified
links
Page 6
Electricity bill breakdown
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Italy
Average
€c/kWh
Production Balancing / capacity Transportation Retail margin Tax excl. VAT
Indicative cost breakdown in major user prices (24 GWh, 6,000 hours per year)
Page 7
Risks and Opportunitiesin the Italian market
Page 8
Product choice
5+ pricing options: which one is the best according to market trend?
Fixed price
Ct indexed price
IPEX indexed price
Discount on the regulated tariff
Fossil fuel basket indexed
14.00
15.00
16.00
17.00
18.00
19.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
23.00
24.00
25.00
26.00
27.00
28.00
02/0
9/2
001
02/1
0/2
001
02/1
1/2
001
02/1
2/2
001
02/0
1/2
002
02/0
2/2
002
02/0
3/2
002
02/0
4/2
002
02/0
5/2
002
02/0
6/2
002
02/0
7/2
002
02/0
8/2
002
02/0
9/2
002
£/K
Wh
Tranding down: Variable
£19
£21
£23
£25
£27
£29
£31
£33
£35
£37
£39
£41
£43
£45
£47
£49
19/0
1/2
004
09/0
2/2
004
01/0
3/2
004
22/0
3/2
004
12/0
4/2
004
03/0
5/2
004
24/0
5/2
004
14/0
6/2
004
05/0
7/2
004
26/0
7/2
004
16/0
8/2
004
06/0
9/2
004
27/0
9/2
004
18/1
0/2
004
Date
£ / M
Wh
Trending up: Fixed
Page 9
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
How metered data quality affects price?
Consumption (kWh) Maximum demand (kWh)
Consumption Data Quality
Between 20% and 30% of metered data is significantly in error and requires independent verification.
Page 10
Market competition
Over 35 suppliers active in the market: which one is the most competitive?
ACEA Electrabel Eneco Trade
ACAM Spa ENEL Trade
AEM Energia Energ.it S.p.A.
AE-EW Energia s.p.a.
AEB Energia e Territorio s.p.a.
AGAC Energia ENI Power
AGSM Energia s.r.l. E.ON Italia
AlpEnergie ERG
AMPS ERGON ENERGIA
ATEL Energetic Source SpA
C.V.A. Trading Espansione Energia
Dynameeting EstEnergy
Dalmine Energie HERACOMM
EDF Energia Italia s.r.l. META Energy s.r.l.
Edison Energia s.p.a. MPE - MP Energy
EGL Italia Net
Egea SIET - AEM Torino
Electra Italia Trafigura Italia
Page 11
Interpretation of tariffs
4+ tariff structures: which one to choose & how to compare them?
F1 band –peak
F2 band – high usage
F3 band – medium usage
F4 band - offpeak
Seasonal Time of Day
offpeak – 8pm to 8am /weekends and holidayspeak – 8am to 8pm
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00
offpeak – 8pm to 8amweekendspeak – 8am to 8pm
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00
2 Rate - peak / offpeak (holidays excluded)
2 Rate - peak / offpeak (holidays included)
0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00
Flat rate
Unique daily price
Page 12
EnergyQuote solution
Page 13
Our approach
Market Intelligence and Strategic Consultancy– Research to assess the market trend– Support on the definition of a risk management policy– Selection of the most appropriate products in the market
Data management– Accurate and complete site data to ensure suppliers quote their lowest prices.– Information stored on web-based data-warehouse for facilitating data
management
E-Tender– Ability to monitor every supplier in the market– Ability to rapidly compare all tariff structures and quotations – Real time feedback to suppliers for favouring new quotations– The ability to complete a tender in 1 day
How to take advantage of the market opportunities?
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
Page 14
Examples of Italian Tenders
Page 15
Customer’s Home Page
Page 16
Italian Tender - Overall ranking
Page 17
Italian Tender - Overall ranking
Offer size ranged from 865 GWh on 12 sites, down to 134 GWh on 4 sites.
By tendering each site individually, we allowed smaller “out-sider” suppliers
to compete against the few large playersable to provide the entire lot.
Page 18
Italian Tender - Overall ranking
The incumbent supplier for the previous two years, EGL Italia, was substantially outcompeted
by another supplier.
The Multi-Supplier option (optimum combinationof supply) proved to be the cheapest way
to allocate the contract.
Page 19
Italian Tender – site list
Page 20
Italian Tender – site list
As the Multi-Supplier option showed,any one supplier proved to be the most competitive for all the sites.
Page 21
Italian Tender – site tender ranking
Page 22
Italian Tender – site tender ranking
The competitive environment created by the e-auction
pushed some suppliers to bideven 3 times in 1 day
Page 23
Italian Tender – site tender ranking
The e-auction induces players to squeeze their margins as
much as possible:
the best supplier bid 3 times, and had to reduce its second offer by more than €90k
- just on one site - in order to beat competitors.
Page 24
Italian Tender – tariff breakdown
Page 25
Italian Tender – site tender ranking
Page 26
Italian Tender – site tender ranking
Some suppliers bid 4 times, one even 5 times in 1 day.
The winner secured the businessby reducing its initial
offer by almost €122k - on just one site.
Page 27
Italian E-Tender - 2003
Page 28
The Return on Investment:A business case
Page 29
Comparing all the possible supply options: single supplier or multi-supplier combination
Our actions for minimising the risk-related costs
Energy Purchasing Risks
Risk variance:% min–max Higher cost (€)
Total potential risk
0,5 – 1,5% € 25k – 75k
1 - 3% € 50k – 150k
1,5 – 5% € 75k – 250k
1 - 6% € 50k – 300k
0 - 2% € 0 – 100k
€ 5 million expenditure € 15 million expenditure
Verification of consumption data:reduces the risk premium due to inaccurate data
Day-long E-Tender
Involvement of all the active suppliers
Possibility to bid multiple times up to tender deadline
Real-time comparison of different tariff schemes
0 - 1% € 0 – 50k
4 – 18,5% € 200k–925k
0,5 – 1,5% € 75k – 225k
1 - 3% € 150k – 450k
1,5 – 5% € 225k – 750k
1 - 6% € 150k – 900k
0 - 2% € 0 – 300k
0 - 1% € 0 – 150k
4 – 18,5% €600k–2.775k
Risk variance:% min–max Higher cost (€)
Page 30
www.energyquote.co.uk