following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · following this...

79
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Upload: others

Post on 01-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

Page 2: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

CHARLENE K. SNODGRASS, Individually andas Executrix of the Estate of ORVAL G.SNODGRASS, Deceased,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

NYCAL

RiciSfii]JUN 14 2017_

^PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index Nos.: 114402/07

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants. :X

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

4/1]/7BELLUCAttorneys

F LLPti

Jord Fox, Esq.

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyeaj/Canada Inc.

546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(646) 248-6015

Dated: New York, New York

^ Lawrence G. Lee/Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

SO ORDERED:

P I L E DJUN 16 20/7

Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

NEW7ORSK0FF'CB

Page 3: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

KENNETH H. TODD, as Executor of the Estate ofVICTOR ALFRED TODD, Deceased,

X

X

NYCAL

K1 E1¥E0JUN 1 4 2017

kPART 50_ NY$ SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index Nos.: 109984/2008

Plaintiffs),

-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkJejApIBELLUCK & BOX, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff

Jor ox, Esq.

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company

By: cDan Gagliardi, Esq.

546 Fif th Avei lufe, 4th FloorNew York, NfeW York 10036(212) 681-1^75

Dated: New York, New York

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

SO ORDERED:^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

HON.PETER H.MOULTON

F I L E DJUN 1 6 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 4: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

BETTY G. PAINTER, Individually and as Executrix :of the Estate of GEORGE A. PAINTER, Deceased, :

NYCAL

[RECEIVE®JUN 1 4 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL

Index No: 190344/2009

Plaintiff(s),

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

By:Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

F I L E DDated: New York, New York

JUN 16 2017

Dated: New York, New YorkmBELLUCK ^ FOX, LLJ?

Attorneys far Ph intiffs/

Jordan F

Floorork 10036

546 FiftH Ave^'New YorKr-N^Wj(212) 681-1575

SO ORDERED:

^Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON.perm H.MOULTON

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 5: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

FffiCEflVEBJUN 14 2017

-YS SUpREMERCQURT . CIVIL

XBARRY KASVEN as Executor of the Estate of :IRENE KASVEN and NATHAN KASVEN, :Indivdually, :

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

IndexNo: 110879/2008

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., :

Defendants. :X

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff’scomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New Yo$kMy

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

Bv: ML)

BELLUCKAttorneys f r

Jo ox, Esq.an

e, 4th Floorew York 10036

575

546 FiNew York.(212) 681-

Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:Ffon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

F I L E DJUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 6: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

X

NYCAL

BARRY KASVEN as Executor of the Estate ofIRENE KASVEN and NATHAN KASVEN,Indivdually,

Index Nos.: 110879/2008

Plaintiff(s),NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,

IAS Part 50Defendants.

X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.E

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400 ^

Attorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP

Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

F I L E DDated: New York, New YorkJUN 1 g 2017

SO ORDERED:

HON.PETER H. MOULTON/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

Page 7: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

THEODORE MAJKA,

RICEaw DJUN 14 20 ] 7

NYS SUPREME*^URT crwL

Plaintiff(s),

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

Index No: 190054/2009

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, Ney

BELLUCK St F(bX , LLP.;Attorneys for Pli intif

yvYMork17

Jo:d o sq

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

By: .Gagliardi, Esq.

546 Fifth AveHRh foorNew York, Nei Yofrk 10036(212) 681-1575

Dated: New York, New York

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

SO ORDERED: 4irAPeter H. Moulton, J.S^T"HON. PETER H.MOULTON

J.S.C.

F i L E DJUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S ^WY^FICE

Page 8: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

MOTJUOM .M w:* *

Page 9: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THEODORE MAJKA,X

NYCAL/ JIJN 14 20 )7 /

Index Nos.: 190054/2009

Plaintiff(s),

-against- :

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., :

Defendants. :

X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

BELLUCK &TFOX,Attorneys for Ph inti

Jord ox, Esq.

546 FifthN^viNew York/Ne(212) 681-157

Lth Floorfork 10036

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &RubbepCompany

BY: ODan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York F I L E DJUN 16 2017

SO ORDERED: — —^ j3oiLPetCTlLMouiton^Ts!a ^ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEHON.PETER H. MOULTON NEW YORK

J.S.C.

Page 10: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

SAMUEL MARTINO and ANGELA MARTINO, :

NYCAL

Index Nos.: 119'

EClEfiWEDJUN 1 4 2017

PART soJ SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Plaintiffs),

against-A.W. CHESTERTON, CO., et al.,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Defendants. ;

X

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Companye\

BELLUCK & FOX,Attorneys for Plamtif

(4m

Jord Fd#By:

Cj arfGagliardi, Esq.

546 Fifth Avenue;mMFloorNew York, New Yo# 10036(212) 681-1575

Dated: New York, New York

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

F I L E DSO ORDERED: / y A-—Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

JUN 1 6 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 11: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

BARBARA MAZER, Individually and as Executrixof the Estate of MICHAEL MAZER, JR., Deceased,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

Defendants.

: NYCAL

Index No:190181/2010

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

iOEUVio1 4 2017

CIVIL

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.Dated: New York, New York

TLBELLUCK$FOX, L/P.Attorneys lpr/Plaint

Jord ox, Esq.

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

By: oDan Gagliardi, Esq.

546 Fifth Aye, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

Dated: New York, New York

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

F I L E DSO ORDERED: /P —/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

MON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

JUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 12: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

BARBARA MAZER, Individually and as Executrix :of the Estate of MICHAEL MAZER, JR., Deceased, :

NYCAL

Index Nos.: 190181/2010

KQEHVEIDJUN 1 4 2017

NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Plaintiff(s),

against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants. :X

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

BELLUCK &Attorneys for lai

Jo x, Esq.

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company

By: . .Q.

546 Fifth Aven\», 4th FloorNew York, New^York 10036(212) 681-1575

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

//f!on. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON. PETER H.MOULTON

J.S.C.

F I L E DJUN 1 6 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 13: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

PHYLLIS “SUE” MELANCON, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of NEAL LOUISMELANCON, Deceased,

Plaintiffs),

against-

NYCAL

G?ECEIVBDJUN 14 2017

. PART 50_ NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No: 190212/2009

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

Defendants. :X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff’scomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

W l f i TLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

BELLUCK/& FOX LLtfAttorneys/for Plafem/ffs/

Jor ox, Esq.

546 Fifth Avey4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

Dated: New York, New York

By:Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

F I L E DJUN 16 2017

SO ORDERED: COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 14: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

PHYLLIS “ SUE” MELANCON, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of NEAL LOUISMELANCON, Deceased,

Plaintiffs),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

NYCAL

[Si©!vl© iI JIM 14 2(|l 7 IIndex Nos.: 190212/2009

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

Defendants. :X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yor]

BELLUCKJ& FOX, LL?Attorneys for Plaimttf

ew Yp

Jord Esq.

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber-Company

Bv: V dr N

546 Fiflh Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 68 *575

Dated: New York, New York

Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

SO ORDERED:/lion. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON, PETER H. MOULTON

J.S.C.

F I L E DJUN 16 20/7

Page 15: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

PENRYN A. NAUMOFF, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of HAROLD NAUMOFF,Deceased,

X

X

Plaintiffs),

-against-

NYCAL

P^SwMSl/ JUN 1 4 2017 /

Index No: 190204/2009

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

Defendants. :X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff’scomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New Yorkt f l j nBELLUCIC& FO;Attorneysfor Plai

LP.s

Jor ox, Esq.

546 Fifth Avey4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

Bv:GD>— -vDan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

F I L E DJUN 16

SO ORDERED: ^ A —HON’.PETERf.'Dlt^ON

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 16: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

PENRYN A. NAUMOFF, Individually and as :Executrix of the Estate of HAROLD NAUMOFF, :Deceased, :

Plaintiffs),

-against- :

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., :

Defendants. :X

NYCAL

l^iOilVE©JUN 1 4 2017

^„ PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index Nos.: 190204/2009

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

hi ,

BELLUCK & FOXjLjAttorneys for Plaintiff /

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &RubbepCompany

By:Jor< fx, Esqr

By:Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

Dated: New York, New York

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 1Q001(212) 302-2400 F I L E D

JUN 1 6 2017

SO ORDERED:/ Hon. PeterH. Moulton, J.S.C.HON.PETER H.MOULTON

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK E

Page 17: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

BETTY G. PAINTER, Individually and as Executrixof the Estate of GEORGE A. PAINTER, Deceased,

Plaintiffs),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

^ECEIJWEDJ U N 1 4 2017

: NYCAL

Index Nos.: 190344/2009

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

NVSSUPREMKURT - CIVIL

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiff’s complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

17BELLUCKAttorneys fdr PI;

LLPntiff

Jord F x q*

4th Floorork 10036

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &RubberXkynpany

By:'an Gagliardi, Esq.

546 Fift i AvemNew York, New(212) 68M57^

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:' Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

HON.PETER a MOULTON

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

F I L E DJUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 18: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

DECEIVEDJUN 14 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

EFREN CARBONELL, Individually andas Special Administrator to the Estate ofPUBLIO CARBONELL, Deceased,

Plaintiffs),

Index No: 190452/2010

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against-

A.W. CHESTERTON., et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

Defendants. :X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New YorkqtfijrBELLUCK1Attorneys/ fc

& FJpX , LLP.i/p/jiintiffs

x, Esq.Vl?

546 Fifth Ave, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

By: -IIXDan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400 mm , . _

F I L E DJUN 1 6 2017

SO ORDERED: ^ ~ — -4lon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON. PETER H. MOULTON

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 19: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

EFREN CARBONELL, Individually andas Special Administrator to the Estate ofPUBLIO CARBONELL, Deceased,

BEQEOVEDJUN 1 4 2017

, PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL

Plaintifffs),

-against-

A.W. CHESTERTON., et al.,

Defendants.

Index Nos.: 190452/2010

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yo^k, New York

V7

BELLUCKAttorneys foi

FOX, Pamt

dJi F sq.

e

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company

By:Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

546 FifthNew Yor](212) 68

ae,Ath Floorfork 10036

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:4 Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON. PETER H. MOULTON

J.S.C.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400 F|L E D

JUN 1 6 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 20: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX

DAISY CHABOUDY, Individually and as Executrixfor the Estate of ROBERT CHABOUDY, Deceased,

NYCALJUN 1 4 2gj7

Index No: 190211/2009

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

ALFA LAVAL, INC., et al.,

Defendants. :X

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

Dated: New York,

BELLUCK & FpX, LAttorneys for Plaiptiffj

By:

Yo

, Esq.Jord;

546 Fifth Avi/4th FloorNew York, Na^/fork 10036(212) 681-1575

Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:/Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

F I L E DJUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 21: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

X: NYCAL

• XDAISY CHABOUDY, Individually and as Executrixfor the Estate of ROBERT CHABOUDY, Deceased,

^EOES¥E~':’

JUN 1 4 2017

Plaintiff(s),

-against-ALFA LAVAL, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index NosTl90211/2009

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

• X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

L(c\nLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber-Company

BELLUCKt &AttorneysTor

By: .

, LLPntiff

By: _SJorc ar Box, Esq.

546 FiftmAre Lue, 4th FloorNew YorVN^w York 10036(212) 681-1575

Dated: New York, New York

Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

_F I L E D

JUN 16 2017

SO ORDERED:/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON. PETER H. MOULTON

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 22: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :x

ANNE RUTH HELTON, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of JERRY HELTON,

Plaintiff(s),

-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.

: NYCAL

Index Nos.: 190284/2010

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

JUN 1 4 20 J 7

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York

BELLUCK & FOX,Attorneys for Plainl

YAx, Esq.or

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubbei CQmpany

Bv: V1 3 - Co546 Fifth/ AyeniLet 4th FloorNew Yot^c/NeW(212) 681-1575

ork 10036

Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:fion. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

HON. PETER H.MOULTON

F I L E DJUN 1 s 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 23: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

ANNE RUTH HELTON, Individually and as :Executrix for the Estate of JERRY HELTON, :

Plaintiff(s), :

-against-

NYCAL

pSoevis]/ J U N 1 4 2017 j

Index No: 190284®ee9-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., :

Defendants. :X

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

i orK,.mBELLUCK & FOXYLJAttorneys for Plaintiffs

ox, Esq.Jo

546 Fifth Are^th FloorNew Yoifc, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

Dated: New York, New York

!oBy: _£

Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

F I L E DJUN 1 6 2017

SO ORDERED:Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON. PETER H. MOULTON

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 24: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

BEGEDVEDJUN 1 4 2017

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DONALD E. STEWART SR. and FALYNSTEWART

NYCALIAS. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

PART 50 INYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index Nos: 110268/2002 & 125709/2002

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc Ag Company,

n/k/a Bayer Cropscience Inc. (“ Amchem Products, Inc.” ), hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

, 2017

Cl/arles M/Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yayitz, Esq.DARGEKISRRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products,/inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300 F / L E D

SO ORDERED, /7/*Hon. Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

JUN 1 6 2017

Page 25: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

JUN 1 4 2017

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

This Document Relates to: Index Nos: 110268/2002 & 125709/2002

DONALD E. STEWART SR and FALYNSTEWART

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York\ . 2017

Charles WFerguson, Esq.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

HON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C

Page 26: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JUN 1 4 2017IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

This Document Relates to: Index No: 115822/2001

MILES R. PEDERSEN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Charles htyferguson, 4.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A IDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

i toral

F I L E DSO ORDERED, JUN 1 6 2017

HON. PETER H.MOULTONHon. Peter H. Moulton

Page 27: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DONALD E. STEWART SR. and FALYNSTEWART

NYCALI A S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

IREOE1VEDJUN 14 2017

PART $0NYS S'J°REMF_ COURT - CIVIL

Index Nos: 110268/2002 & 125709/2002

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New York

^ , 2017

Charles Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. YavitzA&q. 7DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZf & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, ELC116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor fNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,

^Hon. Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

F I L E DJUN 1 6 2017

C0UNnK» ZSK°FF'*

Page 28: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DONALD E. STEWART SR. and FALYNSTEWART

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

IREOEIWEDJUN 14 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL

Index Nos: 110268/2002 & 125709/2002

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkj

S 2017

YlUffAAJUCj/arles KlJFerguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

Judith A. YavitzyDARGER EIUJANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

7 ^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

F , L E D1 $ 2017

cou^zi°

Page 29: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

KCEtiWED14 2017

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

STEVEN E. BLAIR, as Executor for the Estate ofSTANLEY BLAIR

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

CIVIL

Index No: 125273-00NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc Ag Company, n/k/a Bayer

Cropscience Inc. (“ Amchem Products, Inc/’), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled

case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against

defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Amchem Products, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

jvyvfc ^ 2017

ChariesVM. Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, E&f. 7DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZI & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, pc.116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor lNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton t

HON.PETER H.MOULTON

F I L E DJUN 1 6 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 30: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

STEVEN E. BLAIR, as Executor for the Estate ofSTANLEY BLAIR

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

RECEIVEDJUN 14 201?

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No: 125273-00

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint

against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

Juftt ^ . 2017

Cnarles Nj/rerguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Ya/itz/Esq. 7DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed uorporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FldorNew York, NY 10016 {(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED, /i<Hon. Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.

F,teom 1 6 2017

C°UNTYClt;r,

*£%%***

Page 31: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

JUN 1 4 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to: Index Nos: 125273-00 & 119390-00STEVEN E. BLAIR, as Executor for the Estate ofSTANLEY BLAIR

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint

against defendant Dana Companies, LLC, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Dana Companies, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

9 2017, 2017

WEITZ LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Chiles Nf. Ferguson, Esq. '' v Judith A. YaviWEITZ <sLUXENBERG, P.C. DARGER EH AU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for 1700 Broadway 116 East 27* 5New York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300

HON. PETER H. MQULTON COt^

Page 32: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to: Index No: 125273-00

STEVEN E. BLAIR, as Executor for the Estate ofSTANLEY BLAIR

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint

against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Union Carbide Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

, 2017

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yav(t£< Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLP

r(t£< Esq. JAttorneys for Union CarbiddCorporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERE

HON. PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.L.

Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Page 33: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DAVID PAROUSE, as Administrator of the Estate ofCHARLES SULLIVAN, Deceased

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

IBICSWIOII J U N 1 4 20 I 7 j

Index No: 190105/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkf

, 2017

rCo,5 <3 Avv/NAPOLI SHKOLNIK, PLLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 397-1000

Jonathan B^?romberg, Esq.DARGEtfTRRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,( ' Hon. Peter H. Moulton'""' ^ 6 2017

HON. PETER H.MOULTON COUNTY CLB^OJ.S.C. NEWYORK0FFI

Page 34: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

PATRICIA POWELL and RONALD E. POWELL

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

HEOEDVIDJUN 1 4 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No: 190198/2010

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

C71+ f, 2017

(fL-g-J1NAPOLI SHKOLNIK, PLLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 1 F’1 FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 397-1000

Jonathan B^Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27,h Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

F I L E DJUN 16 2017

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 35: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

CAROL BRADY-ROSE AND VINCENT ROSE

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

REOEIWEDJUN 1 4 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No: 10-190420

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant

CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

^ . 2017

C-O -NAPOLI SHKOLNIK, PLLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 397-1000

Jonathan B^Kromberg, Esq.DARGERTRRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

F I L E DSO ORDERED,

~C Hon. Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.

JUN 1 6 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 36: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

V

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

STEPHEN D. HALL AND JOAN C. HALL

against

A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY)

IAS. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 01-122295

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, KOHLER CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, KOHLER CO., with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, KOHLER CO., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

DATED: 5~ )l~ 17New York, New York

*

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

- <^QrrHRI DEWIT, ESQ. .EBANK-QRTIZ, ESQ., ESQ^frar ]SHAZIA CHAUDHRI DEWIT, ESQ.

HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,KOHLER CO.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

JLRANK-QRTIZ, ESQ., ESQWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. F rSUSCAAttorneys for Plaintiffs), Q pcAStephen D. Hall and Joan C. Hall ^ ‘700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED:Honorable PeterhJ. Wpuljoifo *rf)W

HON. PET r

Page 37: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

EDWARD BENDERSKI

against

A.C. AND S„INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY)

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 99-106277

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs./7 3 8'ODATED: U&w York

Z25JASMIN R. GfOSNELL, ESQ.HOAGtAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST &JDOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

-MATTHEW MACINTYfrg-ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG ^had SAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Edward Benderski (J700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED:

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

$\1

00<S^

udge Moulton

'dm

Page 38: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

, %

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

46 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

VIRGINIA S.FLOOD, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of RICHARD C.FLOOD, deceased,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)INDEX NO.: 106562/07

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International Corporation, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, York International Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.DATED: New Brunswick,NJ

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

SO ORDERED: *\V

JORDAM/E0X, ESQ.BELLUICKO FOX, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Virginia S. Flood, Individually and as Executrixof the Estate of Richard C. Flood, deceased546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036

l

0°,#vHonorable Peter H. Moulton

HON.PfcffcftU

Page 39: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

BARBARA MAZER, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of MICHAEL MAZER,JR., deceased,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY,et al.,

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 190181/10

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as

Successor to Frick Company,, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against

defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick

Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

<

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick

Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with pr^jLjaicejand/Without costs.

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation, Individuallyand as Successor to Frick Company^48 Wall Street, Suite 1100 ^New York, New YodOQOOt v* ^

\ ^

JORDAftLCTBOX, ESQ.BELLUOK &TOX, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Barbara Mazer, Individually and as Executrixfor the Estate of Michael Mazer, Jr., deceased546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036

SO ORDERED:S' Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOULTON7

Page 40: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 01-111220

PATRICIA MURRAY, as Executrix for theEstate of THOMAS J. MURRAY, andPATRICIA MURRAY, Individually,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

against

ACandS, INC., et al., |

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.DA

JASHODUAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street,Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

Patricia Murray, as Executrix for the Estate ofThomas J. Murray, and Patricia Murray,Individually700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

HOAGLAND, LONGO,

SO ORDERED:

jUU 1648 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

Page 41: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T. SLEVIN,

against

A.W. CHESTERTON CO., INC., et al.,

I.A.S. Part 30(Moulton, P.)INDEX NO.: 190406/10

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, hereby requests summary/

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International Corporation, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, York International Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

DATED:New York, NY

j\ /A ^—MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

JOHN-P. GUINAN, ESQ.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Mark V. Slevin, as Executor of the Estate ofPatrick T. Slevin800 Third Ave, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SO ORDERED:f \ \-£° 7 Z' I IHonorable Peter H. Moulton

HON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 42: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

SUSAN L. MASONE, as Executrix for theEstate of JOSEPH C. NEMEC, deceased,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

IAS. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 190139/10

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as

Successor to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick

Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutcosts.

DATED: New Brunswick, NJGW>

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation, Individuallyand as Successor to Frick Company48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

e \ \^°SO ORDERED^ » ^•ISM

JORDAN FCBELLUCKf FOX7LLPAttorneys forPlaintiff(s),Susan L. Masone, as Executrix for the Estateof Joseph C. Nemec, deceased546 Fifth Ave, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036

0 'c£

Honorable Peter H. MouRdn ^

HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 43: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HI .

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

F I L E D1g ;?0J7

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MYRIAM GALEANO, Individually and asProposed Executrix of the Estate of MANUELGALEANO, deceased,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

I.A.S. Part 50COUNtY CLERK'S OFF,(Moulton, P.) NEW YORK ^E

INDEX NO.: 190438/11

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as

Successor to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick

Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudi* ithout costs.

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

nd

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation, Individuallyand as Successor to Frick Compaq48 Wall Street, Suite 1100 ^ VNew York, New York 100^V>

HON. PETER H. MOULTON

JORDAN F<JK, ESQ.BELLUCM^FOX, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Myriam Galeano, Individually and as ProposedExecutrix of the Estate of Manuel Galeano,deceased546 Fifth Ave, 4,h FloorNew York, NY 10036

SO ORDERED:Honorable Peter H. Moulton

t

Page 44: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

HOAGLAND. LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ig 2Q|7IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

KATHLEEN KEARNEY, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of DANIEL KEARNEYa/k/a DANIEL T. KEARNEY, deceased,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.) COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKINDEX NO.: 190004/11

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation and Frick Company,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law

and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International

Corporation and Frick Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, York International Corporation and Frick Company, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: N^Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation and FrickCompany48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

O Q.

SO ORDERED:*0

JORDAN/

BELLUGK &M)X, LLPAttorneys WrPlaintiff(s),KathleeWearney, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of Daniel Kearney a/k/aDaniel T. Kearney, deceased546 Fifth Ave, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036

&Hnnnrahlia FHonorable Peter H. MoultonHON.PETER H.MOULTON

J.S.C.

Page 45: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IAS. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 190284/10

ANNE RUTH HELTON, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of JERRY HILTON,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as

Successor to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick

Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation, Individuallyand as Successor to Frick Company48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

Anne Ruth Helton, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of Jerry Hilton546 Fifth Ave, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law SO ORDERED:48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

f r Honorable Peter H. MoultonHON,PETER H. MOULTON

J.S.C

Page 46: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

THEODORE MAJKA,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

IAS. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 190054/09

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International Corporation, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, York International Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ(^4 [ |Y

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

YJORDAN FJOX, (ESQ.BELLfJCW FOX, LLPAttorrfeys'for Plaintiff,Theodore Majka546 Fifth Ave, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

ORDERED:

^ \L0' ^

-/ Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON.PETER H. MOULTONoff"*

Page 47: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

ESTHER SHEMBERG, INDIVIDUALLY ANDAS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ZEVSHEMBERG,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL,

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 190221/10

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Johnson Controls, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Johnson Controls, Inc., with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Johnson Controls, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

DATED:New York, New Yorkmil?

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND. LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Johnson Controls, Inc.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York

SO ORDERED:

c.1100* \1^»o\^

NfCHOLAG NOVA-GK, E3Q.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Esther Shemberg, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of Zev Shemberg800 Third Ave, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022

Honorable Peter H. Moultonft *.HON.PETER H. MOULTO

J.S.C.

Page 48: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

SIXTO MAYA,

against

ACandS, INC., et al.,

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)INDEX NO.: 00-106667

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: New,Brunswick, NJ(A* [ 1?

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

JOHN C. DEARIE, ESQ.ILAJN OFFICES OF JOHN C. DEARIE &

5SOCIATESAttorneys for Plaintiff,Sixto Maya3265 Johnson AveRiverdale, NY 10463

SO ORDERED:

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law F I L E D48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

JUNUW7

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE^ NEW YORK

^/ Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 49: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MANUEL PEREZ,

against

ACandS, INC., et al.,

I.A.S.Part 50(Moulton, P.)INDEX NO.: 00-116821

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

Sf /^y0HN C. DEARIE, ESQ.

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN C. DEARIE &ASSOCIATESAttorneys for Plaintiff,Manuel Perez3265 Johnson AvenueRiverdale, NY 10463

SO ORDERED:

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law was ®1

X?— -— -7 Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOULTON

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

CLEBKS OFF'cE

wmm

Page 50: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MANUEL PEREZ,

against

ACandS, INC., etal.,

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 05-104674

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.DATED: Ne^ljlrupswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTFgEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

JOHN C. DEARIE, ESQ.LAW OFFICES OF JOHN C. DEARIE &ASSOCIATESAttorneys for Plaintiff,Manuel Perez3265 Johnson AvenueRiverdale, NY 10463

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SO ORDERED:

0FF\cE

Honorable Peter H. MoultonHON. PETER H.BOULTON

J.S.C.

Page 51: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

MARK PARENTE, as Administrator for theEstate of ALEXANDER PARENTE, and DORISPARENTE, Individually,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,P.)

INDEX NO.: 190285/11

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.3-s-n

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTR2EWA, BWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

VVESTDHA3C (J

DAVID -JrDARRVWEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Mark Parente, as Administrator for the Estateof Alexander Parente, and Doris Parente,Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SO ORDERED:

*1^^ Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 52: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE

x NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 50

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONV

(Judge Moulton)A

BARBARA MAZER, Individually and as Index No.: 190181/10Executrix for the Estate of MICHAEL

JR - |=]LEDiPlaPinTrifts, NO-OPPOSITION

JUN 16SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

- against -

A.0. SMITH WATER P R O D U C‘D, Y O R K

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be

dismisse/3)with prejudice and without costs.

Dated

JordBelldckAttorneyMichael

NewApr

brk, New York8, 2017

, Esq.3?ox/A<hJsq

Sc /Fox, LLPfor Plaintiffsazer, Jr.

546 Fifth Avenue,New York, NY 10036

4th Floor

yM (f^nd(!aHtudL,Esq.Raghu N. Bandlamudi, Esq.Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantGoulds Pumps, Inc.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000File No.: 6754-10985

So Ordered:• X?^bn7 Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

HOM.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 53: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

EILEEN GREEN as Executrix for the Estate ofPATRICK J. BRENNAN,

against

ACandS, INC., et al.,

I.A.S.Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 119388-00

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.3- S-n

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

PRANK ORTIZ, CSQ.'cWEITZ & LUXENBERG ftMUStnAttorneys for Plaintiffs), (JEileen Green as Executrix for the Estate ofPatrick J. Brennan700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED:

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

*o ^2=/ ^ Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H, MOULTON

ictmfcs

Page 54: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

CAROL S. SABIN, as Executrix for the Estateof ANTHONY SABIN, and CAROL S. SABIN,Individually,

against

ACANDS, INC., etal.,

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 104096/99

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

-FRANK ORTIZ,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Carol S. Sabin, as Executrix for the Estate ofAnthony Sabin, and Carol S. Sabin,Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SO ORDERED:

*x*

^Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

wmm

Page 55: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

GEORGE E. ALLEN and JEAN ALLEN,

against

ACandS, INC., etal.,

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 02-122052

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.3' S' f7

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

FRANK ORTTZTESCb^fl/TfeS'WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiffs,George E. Allen and Jean Allen700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

ICrjJASOn

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SO ORDERED:

OHonorable Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.w.

wmm

Page 56: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOHN B.EFFINGER and CAROLINEEFFINGER,

against

ACandS, INC., et al.,

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 02-105715

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

IWHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.DATED: New ^riv4wick, N1

MONICA R. KOSTRZB VA, EsferJHOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

Charles'DANA M NORTHQWEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC fcrtSjUSOTlAttorneys for Plaintiffs, UJohn B. Effinger and Caroline Effinger700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SO ORDERED:

*O'

Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

#

0o^p

CS-CORT

Page 57: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

, KMA53484/legal/nosjm/febniary2014SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-XTHOMAS LEAHY and EVELYN LEAHY,

Plaintiff,

BidHVIDJUN 1 5 2017

PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

-against-3M COMPANY, et al,;

Index No,: 190162/09

Defendants,j X

WHEREFORE, defendants JOHN CRANE INC. hereby request summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs1

complaint against defendants JOHN CRANE INC with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants KMN CRANE INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Jordan iFoxJAttorney for Pl&int|Bellucl^rTm546 Fifth AvenueNew York, New York 10036

Jos^plfEfig^egorio, Esq.Forneys for DefendantJohn Crane Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

» »M

Page 58: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

*

KMA54675/)cgaVnosjmSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XEFREN CARBONELL, Individually and asSpecial Administrator to the Estate of PUBLIOCARBONELL SOTO, Deceased,

Plaintiff,

RECEIVEDJUN 15 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No.: 190452/10

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION

-against-A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ET AL,

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, defendants JOHN CRANE INC. hereby request summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendants JOHN CRANE INC with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants JOHN CRANE INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Jordan ]Belluck546 Fifth .New Yoric,[New York 10036

Joseph Digregorio, Esq.Dmeys for Defendant

John Crane Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED, — -Hon. Peter Moulton

HON.PETER H.MOULTONF I L E D

JUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 59: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

X:LUM/SS670Jleeamn.<;JM/MA ¥ 2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-XPEGGY JANE SMITH, Individually and as ExecutrixOf the Estate of DANA “ GENE” SMITH, deceased,

Plaintiff(s),

IREOEOWEDJUN 1 5 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

against - Index No.: 190211/11

84 LUMBER COMPANY, et al.;

Defendants.X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 30

WHEREFORE, defendants 84 LUMBER COMPANY hereby request summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs' complaint against defendants 84 LUMBER COMPANY with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants 84 LUMBER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

ffsJordan Fox, ]Attorney fqrjBelluck & Fc546 Fifth A^nueNew York, New York 10036

^G^^OVBrian Feld, Esq.

^ Attorneys for 84 LUMBER COMPANYBarry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter Moulton

HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

Page 60: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

KENNETH H. TODD, as Executor of the Estate of :VICTOR ALFRED TODD, Deceased, :

NYCAL

Index No: 109984/2008

RECEmE©1 4 2017

NYS SUPREMECOURT crviL

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendants.Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

BELLUCK & FOX,UJ.Attorneys for Plaintiff/

Jordan Foxj Esa.

546 Fifth Ave, 4t] t FloorNew York, New(212) 681-1575

>rk 10036

Dated: New York, New York

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

BVCIX- — yDan Gagliardi, Esq.

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

F I L E DSO ORDERED:

JUN 16 2017

MSlRKtiSSuTONj.s.c.

Page 61: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JOHN B. EFFINGER and CAROLINEEFFINGER,

against

ACandS, INC., et al.,

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

INDEX NO.: 02-110212

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

r

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

/

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.3 -8 -17

DATED: New Brunswick, NJ

\-w vMt&fllGA R. KOsfk^BWA, ESQJHOAfil ANn lONfinlMORAMHOAGLAND, LONGO,‘MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

iRA&ViSQr^DANA M. NORTHCRAFT, ESCWEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC fcsGUSOnAttorneys for Plaintiffs, UJohn B. Effinger and Caroline Effinger700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003

SO ORDERED:

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

Honorable Peter H. Moulton

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

F I L E DJUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK CS-CURT-19

Page 62: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

JAN 1 8 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 50

NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX NYCAL —I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

-XThis document relates to: Index No.: 106999/2002

RAYMOND JOSEPH JABLONSKI,

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

-against-

Defendant.

Plaintiff,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

-X

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

SO ORDERED:

HON.PETER H.MOULT°NJ.S.C COUNTY CLi

Page 63: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis document relates to:

tpfeiwiSI1 m 18 »17 I

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

1 PART 50 t

(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 106580/2002113244/2002

DAVE JAMES (DEC.),

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIYER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

Dated: fj f\Harrison, New York If ) f\

Charts RrCMWtfEM .WEITZ & LUXENBHRG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

Russell 'S Jamison, EsqMARIN GOODMAN,/LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

SO ORDERED: F I L E DHonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C

HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

JUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 64: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

X

X

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

JSICWED ]I JAN 1 8 2017 I[ NYS. SUPREME COURT - gvn j

Index No.: 104103/02,120392/01

RICHARD L. BOSSEY and JANE BOSSEY,

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.- X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs. f\ (1Dated: /'3"/7

Harrison, New York

~

Charles FerguSWesa.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 1Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

Russell S Jamison, E?qMARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for Defendant

&

KEELER/DORR-OIJVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

SO ORDERED:

Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C

HON.PETEB H.MOULTON

F I L E D1 6 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFF/CPNEW YORK E

Page 65: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis document relates to:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

IBEOEOWEDJAN 18 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL

Index No.: 106706/2002114870/2002

JOHN W. MAHNKEN (DEC.),

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

Dated: I " 3 -' llHarrison, New York

& — *

ChQH-fl pfn5|Ui^, {Tsa .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. ^Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

SO ORDERED.

f \

VRussell S Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

F I L E DHonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 66: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

— XThis document relates to:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 5&(Moulton, P.)

[REOiBVEOJAN 18 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL

Index No.: 110054/2002105875/2002

RONALD S. TANNER ,

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: / "3— / ~7

Harrison-New 1fork

tt~ChGrt -ef Rrmsovh

WEITZ & LUXENBBRG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

Russen S Jamison, Esq. \MARIN GOODMAN, iiLR.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

SO ORDERED:

Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C

HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ,S.Cc

F I L E DJUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 67: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

— XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

- XThis document relates to:

IRECEWEBJAN 1 8 20 W

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No.: 106808/2002110586/2002

EDWARD LAZORE,

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIYER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: ( *"

Harrison, New York

ftra\ASQY\^q .rEITZ & LUXENBgRG, P.C. 1

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

SO ORDERED:

\Y —Russell S Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLAttorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

F I L E DFfonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C

^PETEB H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

JUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 68: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis document relates to:

RECEIVEDJAN 1 8 2017

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIV

Index No.: 106457/2002

GEORGE A. WALKER SR.,

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.— X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: /'3 - 1 1Harrison, New York — -

£klflrl*J PcrmhnlEsq .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 1

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

SO ORDERED:

Russell S Jamison, Esq. |MARIN GOODMAN, LlAttorneys for DefendantvKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

F I L E DHopdfable Peter H. Moulton, J.SG

NON. PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C,

JUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 69: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis document relates to:

FEDERICO FOCELLA and JOSEPHINE FOCELLA,

Plaintiff,

-against-KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al

Defendant.X

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

Dated: /'3'/ "7Harrison, New York — -

~C\mrWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 1Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

Russell S Jamison, EsqMARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 118978/2002106695/2002

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

BiCEflViOJAN 18 2017

PART 50NYg SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

SO ORDERED:

honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

F I L E DJUN l 6 20J7

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENBVYORK CE

Page 70: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This document relates to:

X

X

IREOEWiDJAN 18 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

NYCAL l— —I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 107006/02,117982/02

GARY FARNHAM,

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al

Defendant.X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIYER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: /-3~/7

HarriseiTr'New York

Cl/ia A-cs ft rf[ uson; esq .WEITZ & LUXENRERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

J Lkl )!LRussel S Jamison, Esq./ 1MARIN GOODMAN, LDP.Attorneys for Defendant !KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

SO ORDERED: F I L E D2.

H^norablePeterH. Moulton, J.S.C

HON, PETER H. MOULTOi,J.S.C.

JUN 16 2017COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK

Page 71: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

x NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

1ECEWEDJAN 18 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

V(Moulton, P.)

This document relates to: Index No.: 101479/02

EDMUND R. EMMA (DEC.),NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY

Plaintiff, JUDGMENTMOTION AND

-against- ORDER AS TODEFENDANT

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al. KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER

Defendant.x

COMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated:

Harrison, New York

C Kories FtrtiASWrE&t .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

Russell S Jamison, Esq. / IMARIN GOODMAN, LLRAttorneys for DefendantX IKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

SO ORDERED: F I L E DHonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C JUN 16 ZM7

HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ,S,C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

Page 72: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

- XThis document relates to:

[RECEOWEDJAN 1 8 2017

NYCAT pART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILI.A.S. Part*50 — —

(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 114898/02

JOAN BO, as Personal Representative for the Estate ofED K. BO, and JOAN BO, Individually,

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.x

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

Dated: / "3"/?Harrison, New York

Gkarlzi EM.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CLAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

SO ORDERED:

0LP.

4tER BOILER

Russelll S Jamison,MARIN GOODMANAttorneys for DefenKEELER/DORR-OLCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-11£ l L E D

JUN 1 6 2017ffonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 73: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis document relates to:

[REOEBWIDJAN 18 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 117991/2002107006/2002

JOHN J. HUDSON,

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.— - X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.Dated: l~3 '/"?

Harrison, New York

Cfaari-eS ftrauWi, esqWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 1

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

SO ORDERED:

/

Russell S Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLf .|Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151F I L E D

Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C

"ON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.

JUN 16

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEc NEW YORK

Page 74: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis document relates to:

ALBERT HIDALGO,

BESEDWEID)

JAN 18 2017

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

PART 50NYS.SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No.: 101105/2002120432/2001

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.- X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

Dated:. /'3-/7Harrison, New York

SOrTIfsa .Chari-eJ Ferguson, essf .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

RusselUS Jamison, EsqMARIN GOODMAN, LLf .Attorneys for DefendanKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

SO ORDERED: F I L E DHonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C

HON,PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.

JUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 75: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

!

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis document relates to:

NYCAL

IREOEIWEDJAN 18 2017

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No.: 103452/2002

PATRICK MYERS,

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs. A

Dated: /"3'/7 I /1 (\Harrison-New York

ftnaujOHWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. IAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

SO ORDERED:

Russell S Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantsKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

F I L E D

Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C

HON. PETER H. MOULTON

JUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 76: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

— -XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis document relates to:

BICEIIVEDJAN 1 8 2017

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Index No.: 102837/2002

JOHN J. O’BRIEN,

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.X

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.

Dated: I ~ 3 /”7— , HarrfOTrS^ew York

rUftrlfS hrqulon, £s?WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

/

Russell S Jamison, Esjq.MARIN GOODMANYLLP.Attorneys for DefendahKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151

SO ORDERED:

Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C

HON.PETER H.MOULTON

F I L E DJUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 77: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

xEDWARD BORST and PATRICIA BORST, :

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCAL

Index Nos.: lyoz^o/ n

Plaintiff(s),

-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,

Defendants. Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

•X

WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York. New York

Attorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP

Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

Dated: New York, New York

HON. PETER H. MOULTON

Page 78: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL

ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X

EDWARD BORST and PATRICIA BORST,

JUN 1 4 jmv*. pART SO JNYS SUPREME COURT .^ j

Plaintiff(s),

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al,

Defendants.

Index Nos.: 190296/11

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50

— X

WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York

U7

BELLUCAttorneys

F LBlao

rd Fo ; Esq.

LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.

By:Dan Gagliardi, Esq.

546 Fifth^yenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575

Dated: New York, New York

SO ORDERED:iW. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S-G-

137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400

F I L E DJUN 16 2017

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 79: Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

x Index No.: 190208/2011DAMIANO P.LOMONACO,

RECEIVEDNOV 2 3 2016

PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL

Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITION-against- SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

Defendants.x

WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hen

to either party.

Dated: New York, New York

dismissed with prejudice and without costs

y

O'

Adam Dreksler, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBURG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Nicole G. IVTarkoN^itz, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022

SO

J.S.C.