following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · following this cover page are...

82
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the selected date. The documents are displayed in no particular order. However, all of these documents are searchable. To find a specific order, please use the Search/Find function within a PDF viewer. 1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f (Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac); 2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the form field provided and press Enter or Return. In most applications, the first appearance of the index number, the word, or the phrase in the document will be highlighted. Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications, including browsers and PDF viewers.

Upload: others

Post on 22-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.

To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.

1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);

2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.

In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.

Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.

Page 2: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-x

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

LEON J. HURBAN and JULIA HURBAN, NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)Plaintiffs,

Index No.: 101846/2005-against-

NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: \YNew York.

2!3, AcYUw YorkNe

'tPuMJasj&r Yampolsky.Esq-r

WEITX & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney's for Plaintiff(s)7ObJifoa)]wayNew Yorli NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Kirsten Alford Kneis, Esq.K&L GATES LLP

/

Kr Attorneys for Defendant"CRANE CO.A i0&-Lexington Avenue

OÿNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

-7 .

zsjtihhSO ORDERED,

‘ Hon. Peter H. Moulton IMAR ') 3 J,6

Nvs St

-n'iL

Page 3: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

\

Rt-C Vff .0

FEB 26 2016

\r--!

IFEB 26 cOio

i

PATES

Page 4: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

MAR®2 2016SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ' CIVIL

THOMAS RUTHLEDGE AND MARYRUTHLEDGE,

New York City Asbestos Litigation (NYCAL)

Index No.: 103446-02Plaintiffs,

-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER ASTO DEFENDANT AT&T CORP. ONLY

ABB LUMUS CREST, et al.,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant AT&T Corp hereby requests summary judgment in the aboveentitled case, pursuant to CPLR §3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint against defendantAT&T Corp. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant AT&T Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Qj f 9- 'i 2016

By: By:

Wft v-Sagar Chadha, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558 - [email protected] for Plaintiffs

Christopher P. DePliillips, Esq.GIBBONS P.C.One Pennsylvania Plaza, 37th FloorNew York, NY 101 19-3701(212) [email protected] for Defendant AT&T Corp.

c\v.£°SO ORDEREDÿ2ÿIHon. Peter H. Moulton V

Office

Page 5: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-x

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

LEONARD PANZICA and PAT PANZICA,

Plaintiffs),

Index No.: 190441-11-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al, : NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY: JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., formerly known as

Square D Company, (hereinafter "SQUARE D"), hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant SQUARE D with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant SQUARE D be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

New York, New YorkDated:

. £ •

Michael Fanelli, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Angelax)iGiglio, EscfJ IIK&L GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantSCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC.,

(f/k/a SQUARE D COMPANY)599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030(212) 536-3900

o*9ÿ

00ÿ3\Tj,hSO ORDERED, /AT?7 »MS o m

rHon. Peter H. Moulton' 50

Page 6: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 109913/07

PHILOMAE S. DONOVAN, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of John J. Donovan

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as successor-by¬

merger to Borg-Warner Corporation, ("Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs._

ADATED: ,2016

\ÿoAnna M. DiLonardoAttorneys for DefendantBorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. assuccessor-by-merger to Borg-WarnerCorporationMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin888 Veterans Memorial Highway

0fF\C£ Hauppauge, NY 11788

Attorney sBelluck &546 Fiftra ,

New Yowc

fo/JPIaiptiffL

venue- 4th FloorNY 10036fiV-EO

!4

SO ORDERED,

1 '016

c Hon. Peter H. Moulton

MAR o IA.VS S‘0'WT ..

cHlL

Page 7: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 101607/07

DEBRA M. REIS, Individually and as Executrix of theEstate of GEORGE A. REIS, JR.

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. as successor-by-

merger to Borg-Warner Corporation ("Morse TEC"), hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Morse TEC, with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Morse TEC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

DATED: ,2016

/

4Attornefyslfibr PlaintiffBellucllMFox LLP546 Finn Avenue - 4th FloorNew York, NY 1003ÿ £Q

£ JJL'LAna M. DiLonardo

Attorneys for DefendantBorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. assuccessor-by-merger to Borg-WarnerCorporationMarshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin888 Veterans Memorial HighwayHauppauge, NY 11788

SO ORDERED,

//Won. Peter H. MoultonMAR0 1 20]sL

Cÿ!L

Page 8: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:Index No. 113056/06

PHYLLIS N. SEGAL, Individually and as Executrix ofthe Estate of ELI J. SEGAL

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, BorgWarner Morse TEC Inc. as successor-by-merger to

Borg-Warner Corporation, ("Morse TEC") hereby requests summary judgment in the

above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Morse TEC with prejudice in this action, and

there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant Morse TEC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs, /-i

DATED: ,20167

4ÿ2AÿaM.DiLonafdoAttorneys for DefendantBorgWarner Morse TEC, Inc. assuccessor-by-merger to Borg-WarnerCorporation

\ 4 Marshall, Dennehey, Warner,Coleman & Goggin

OFF\C§88 Veterans Memorial HighwayNY 11788

hAttorneys!fdr/Pla ntjffÿBelluck 8J FMfLUP/546 Fifth Avenue - 4th Floor ONew Yorlÿ, N/ 10036 C \ U

W

Hauppauge

2M MMJ]SO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton

MR o i iMis

C-*IL

Page 9: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

CLB5SI28/legal/nosjm/NOVEMBER20M

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK• COUNTY OF NEW YORK

JOSEPH TOTO and PATRICIA TOTO:NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),

Index No.: 107328/01-against-

NYCALI.A.S.

CONGOLEUM CORP., et al.,Parÿf

Defendant(s),•

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

I \VL

Shawnefte-Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

LfafiJeertaTEsq.ÿAttorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 1 0003

SO ORDERED, lb. mlion. 31jerry Klein-Heiiler

HON.PETERH.MOULTpt \ D few o 3

IVYS' CIV'.’l

Page 10: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

X:CLB57922AeeaI/NOSJM/feb2Ql5

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

FLORENCE PITAK, as Executrix for the Estate ofJOHN PITAK and FLORENCE PITAK, individually,

Plaintiff(s),

Index No.: 109974/00- against -

A.C. & S. INC., et ah; NYCALI.A.S. Part

Defendants.-X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

d the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice anddefendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INCU beÿn

F\L£Dwithout costs.

m 4 4 2016

coÿr<;

!

'-Ftan'k'Oniz, Esq. KAPFDAttorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 Broadway

._

___NewJYorL.New York10003 ...

Shawnetfe FluittfEsq.Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14,h FloorNew-York,-New-York 10006(212)313-3600

:— r

HON.PETER H.MOULTON

SO ORDERED,4lÿSha Li u

MAR 0 3 ' J ; S

f'ivS

Page 11: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

CLB55293/legal/nosjm/November 2013

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

JOHN B. EFFINGER,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),

Index No.: 110212/02'&105715/02

-against-

A.C. & S. INC., et al., NYCAL /> tr~'I.A.S. Part 3/

Defendant(s),-X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

• judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. /

Dana Norther Esq.for Defendant

CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

/

Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10036 0

-mv'3SO ORDERED,

4fon. Sherry Klcin-Ilcitlo3 ;

HON. PETER H.MOULTON

Page 12: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

A-FB]V/390R6./iMUl/NOS.JM/avril2Q16

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-XNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

EDWARD T. PALMER,

Plaintiff(s),

Index No.: 109280/00- against -

NYCALA.C. & S. INC., et al.;I.A.S, Part SO

Defendants.•X

WHEREFORE, defendants FUL TON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

withdefendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereb

prejudice and without costs.

MAR J ;lots

Coo,s.f / I

¥ IAMAttorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)3131

uzaiiie\Ratcliffe, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitzw Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

j

Li -U

SO ORDERED, k.73 ; 3Hern. Peter Moulton

HON.PETER H.MOULTON

Page 13: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

I

CLB/55706/legal/nosjm

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

•XJOSEPH T. SANDER and JOAN SANDER,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),

I

Index No.: 190391/11,-against-

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,

Defendant(s),X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto, «

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and!

without costs.

WLChelsea Beshore, fesq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006 1(212)313-3600

Ambre. Diaiulis, Esq. /%,Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

I

Fz2iSO ORDERED, 3Hon. Peter Moulton

HON.PETER H.MOUL1

MAR l 4 F.5

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 14: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK| COUNTY OF NEW YORK

X NYCAL

I.A.S. Part 50(Judge Moulton)

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis Document Relates to:LAURA DE FORNE, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate ofJOHN V. DE FORNE,

Index No. : 190023/12

Plaintiff (s) ,- against - NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al .

Defendant (s) .X

WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

J Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-def endants , all claims

and cross-claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC. be

dismissed with prejudice and without costs. » / t

I Dated:

i

* &New York, New York, 2016 MAR U

Esq. ' 'QeAustin D. O'Malley,Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for Defendant

GOULDS PUMPS, INC.44 Wall Street

New York, New York 10005

212-732-2000Our File No. : ~6L754-12192

, Esq.

Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.

Attorneys for PlaintiffJOHN V. DE FORNE

700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

1iwm\So Ordered:

/Hon. Peter H. Moulton:; j

S

i---j

Page 15: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, ft)

This Document Relates to:Index No.: 112602/00, 122200/99

JAMES L. WATSONAND

IRENE WATSON NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corp., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkfrfc). l"2_ ,2015 MAR j4?016

N£lv yoÿsK°FFic£C0UhlTy

S'

;// cmunAttorney for Plaintiff(s)James L. Watson and Irene WatsonWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

L Cook, Esq.Attorney for DefendantTishman Liquidating Corp.MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.80 Broad Street-Suite 2300New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Kei

ib— o.SO ORDERED,HOT. Peter H. Moulton

E 2383-26058J

iy

F-24 2016

NysI 50

Ch,L

Page 16: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Party$Sd(Moulton,'?.)

m<j)

s m% o® fu'i]

,

2This Document relates to: I

TJIndex No. 190080/12 !oA

TOCO MARY KNEISEL and WILLIAM KNEISEL,

cz>

CDPlaintiffs, {nnlNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTSMOTION AND ORDER —

§

©o -against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiff s complaint against defendant, Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., with prejudice in this action,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

m MAR1< 20tsC°UlvT

AMBenjamin Darche, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsMary Kneisel and William KneiselWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003212.558.5500

Stephen Babineci<'Esq.Attorney for DefendantKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005212.232.1300File No. 29510.673

SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

4825-3823-1572.1

Page 17: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

"UAiO - J.UH03 3hi3£!df)S S M

OSJMVfi jz IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL

9IOM0-Ww ''Index No. 1004(|5ljgÿjjgjg)gji: j

0)This Document relates to:-<

Z GEORGE MASTROIANNI, as Executor of the Estate ofFRANK CHARLES MASTROIANNIO

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER AS TODEFENDANT PEERLESSINDUSTRIES. INC.

Plaintiff,-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,, et al,

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this

action, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice

and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

2015

Ajrÿ7Steven Babinecz, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212)232-1300

Jordon Fox! Esq*

PlaintiffAttorljevGeorge Mastroianni, as Executor of the Estate of FrankCharles MastroianniBELLUCK & FOX546 5th Avenue, 4st FloorNew York, New York 10036(212)558-5500 £O1863-8984

MAR l4?0;s

Nÿf$°FFlCE3/V//fo <***SO ORDERED,

TyHon. Peter H. Moulton

4817-2390-5577.1

Page 18: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

I

•*

I

I

INSYNC LITIGATION SUPPORT

c 4 2016

Page 19: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

; ;

tv'AR 0 2 2016

'

: ‘.'0.IV; CIVIL

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

xIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50 (Moulton)

xThis Document Relates To: Index No: 190234/11

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

Gloria F. Cassano, Individually and as Executrix of theEstate of Richard M. Cassano

x

WHEREFORE, defendant THE BOEING COMPANY, Individually and as Successorto MCDONNELL DOUGLAS hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint againstdefendant THE BOEING COMPANY, Individually and as Successor to MCDONNELLDOUGLAS, without prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant THE BOEING COMPANY, Individually and as Successor to MCDONNELLDOUGLAS, be and tKe same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

New Yo/k, New York

Avy oi(,Dated:

Efflc DiMarco, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantTHE BOEING COMPANY,Individually and as Successor toMCDONNELL DOUGLAS150 East 42nd StreetNew York, New York 10017Our File No. 07040.00027

Jordan Fo: I, Iy;q.BELLUCK&FOX LLPAttomdÿs for Plaintiff546 Fifth AvenueNew York, New York 10036

ftON'reTER H. MOULTON, J.S.C.SO ORDERED,

F'i.eMAR i

NEÿVORSKQFriCE

4 20iS

COUNT7274616v.l

Page 20: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

insMAR 0 2 2016

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK p.-'

" FO

NYY SLY'KFYY UY • ;T - c;vxx

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

xIndex No: 190227/11This Document Relates To:

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER

Daphne King and Delane Davis as Co-Executor’s for the Estateof Kenneth E. Durden

x

WHEREFORE, defendant PUGET SOUND COMMERCE CENTER, INC.,incorrectly s/h/a TODD SHIPYARDS CORP. (Individually and as Successor to TODDCOMBUSTION EQUIPMENT, INC., (hereinafter “PUGET SOUND COMMERCECENTER, INC.”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant toCivil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendantPUGET SOUND COMMERCE CENTER INC. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant PUGET SOUND COMMERCE CENTER INC., be and the same are herebydismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

I. W&

MattheyÿPpriq Esq. /The Early Law Firm /Attorney for Plaintiff /360 Lexington Avemae, 20th FloorNew York, New York 10017

iVirginia Squitieri, Esq.WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,EDELMAN & DICKER LLPAttorney for DefendantPUGET SOUND COMMERCECENTER INC150 East 42nd StreetNew York, New York 10017File No: 04693.00PILED

SO ORDERED,M.4/? i 4 ?G,gHon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

COUNTY

7059230v.1

Page 21: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

Ini ifSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 0 2 2016

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

BILLIE J. ROWLING, as Executrix for the Estate ofRAYMOND R. ROWLING, and BILLIE J. ROWLINGIndividually,

Index No.: 102118/07

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., includingMORSE DIESEL, INC.,

Defendants,

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgement in the

above-entities case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York., 2016

V

Y2iVchetta, Esq.Rosari

MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285

Phan Alvarado, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsBillie J. Rowling, as Executrixfor the Estate ofRaymond R. Rowling, and Billie J. Rowling,Individually700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

IfcOn*Ty

0fyGSO ORDERED, /j/ _

Hon. Peter H. MoultonDated:

Page 22: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 0 2 20 IS

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 5f)(Moulton)

. : IL

RICHARD RYDER JR. as Executor for the Estate ofRICHARD RYDER SR.,

Index No.: 121479/97

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A.C. and S., INC., et al., includingMORSE-DIESEL CONSTRUCTION CO.,

Defendants,

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as “Morse-Diesel

Construction Co.”), hereby requests summary judgement in the above-entities case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Morse

Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York, 2016

,-.Matthew MacIntyre, Esq- pft ft (y OJTOUJXD

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsRichard Ryder Jr. as Executorfor the Estate ofRichard Ryder Sr.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10Qj8(212) 791-0285

klAf? *4 2016C°ÿTySO ORDERED, Dated:

in. Peter H. Moulton

Page 23: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

rIf ii I

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 0 2 2018

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Pari .(Moulton)

50

KEVIN BARRETT and IRENE BARRETT,Index No.: 109675/99

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A.C. and S., INC., et al., includingMORSE-DIESEL CONSTRUCTION CO.,

Defendants,

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as “Morse-Diesel

Construction Co.”), hereby requests summary judgement in the above-entities case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Morse

Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkIJ VZÿ 2016

Phan "Alvarado, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsKevin Barrett and Irene Barrett700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.

\dS0 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285

aG

IMMSO ORDERED, Dated:IdrlfPeter H. Moulton

Page 24: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

;Y7SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK IMAIi 02 m

NYCAL ,

I.A.S. Part/iO(Moulton)

NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

IN RE

DONALD E. MORTON JR. and BEVERLY J. MORTON,Index No.: 113324/02

107402/02

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Plaintiffs,

A.C. and S., INC. et al., includingMORSE DIESEL, INC.,

Defendants,

•x

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., hereby requests summary judgement in the

above-entities case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against defendant Morse Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkJ*_, 2016

Justin Weitz, E$q.-DWEITZ & LUXEMBURG, PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsDonald E. Morton Jr. and Beverly J. Morton700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Rosario Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LI CAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285

JhdlkSO ORDERED, Dated:'idnja'rPeter H. Moulton

Page 25: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

\

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,$

This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 06-101665

GAIL BUCKHEIT, as Executrix for the Estate ofPETER PACIFICO,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International Corporation, with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, York International Corporation, be and the same thereby dismissed with

1prejudice and without costs.

D£XED: XNew Brunswick, NJ

/v

MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ES<HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

JORDAN FM/EBQ|.BELLU ZK f ROX LLP

Attorneys 1 wPlaintiff(s),Gail Bufckheit, as Executrix for the Estate ofPeter Paeifico546 Fifth AvenueNew York, New York 10036

\ Peter H. Moulton

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

SO ORDERED:

\ 448 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY OFFICE

Page 26: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

*

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f.)

INDEX NO.: 99-105478This Document Relates to:

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

JAN FLEMING-SPILLANE, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFLEE M. SHORTS, AND JAN FLEMING-SPILLANE, AS PERSONALREPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OFANN M. SHORTS, FILED

MAR 1 4 2016against

A.C. AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY) COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

K-o t0»,2CiV>New York, New York

DATED:

(\W/T) C. 6/xtlkHAJrRANttORTgrCSQ. C rWloAWEITZ & LUXENBERGAttorneys for Plaintiff(s),JAN FLEMING-SPILLANE, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of LEE M.SHORTS, and JAN FLEMING-SPILLANE, asPersonal Representative for the Estate of ANNM. SHORTS,700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

(

lirfSHA SHAH, ESCr--'HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SO ORDERED:

Z' honorable Peter H. Moulton

Page 27: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

BlNYCALIAS Part 50(Moulton, jp.)

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK MAR 0 2 2016

IN RE NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

f'A.Tr 51.)NYS -L" cC55 COL i,r CIVIL

INDEX NO: 190488/2011GENE SPINELLI and JOAN SPINELLI,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

Plaintiffs),

-against-

A.L. EASTMOND & SONS, individually, and as successor toEasco Boiler Corp, et al.

Defendant(s)X

WHEREFORE, defendant Armstrong International, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled action, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Armstrong International, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Armstrong International Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: White Pldins, New York

THOMAS M. BENEVENTANOLa Sorsa & BeneventanoAttorney for DefendantARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC.3 Barker Avenue, White Plains, NY 10601Tel: (914) 682-3300

BeUuck & Fox LLPAttorney for Plaintiff546 Fifth Avenue- 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036Tel: (212)681-1575

----/'Horn Peter H. Moulton

Page 28: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, fl)

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 190438/11

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

MYRIAM GALEANO, Individually and asProposed Executrix of the Estate of MANUELGALEANO, Deceased,

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.

WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as

Successor to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against

defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick

Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick

Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED! JW York, New York

_ÿjtfRDAIBELLUC

JASOr/RIEMER, ESQ.

HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation, Individuallyand as Successor to Frick Company48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

IJESQ.OX, LLP

Attorne\fs/for Plaintiff(s),Myriam/Galeano, Individually and as ProposedExecutrlix of the Estate of Manuel Galeano,deceased546 Fifth Ave, 4th FI.New York, NY 10036

HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law S.048 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

SO ORDERED:PT Honorable Peter H. Moulton

C0ÿ

Page 29: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)

This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 190025/12

MICHELE ALFANO, AS EXECUTRIX OF THEESTATE OF ANTOINETTE A. KISKIEL A/K/AANN KISZKIEL, DECEASED,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

against

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.,

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:

t! New York, New York

lLitllSHA'SHAH, ESQ.

HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

JORDAN FpX, ESQ.

BBLLUPK & FOX, LLPAtlorpeys for Plaintiff(s),Micnele Alfano, as Executrix of the Estate ofAntoinette A. Kiszkiel a/k/a Ann Kiszkiel546 Fifth Ave, 4th FI.New York, NY 10036

o 3MkSO ORDERED:s >flonorable Peter H. Moulton

#HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

•&# s*o,(J»48 Wall Street

Suite 1100New York, NY

CO-TROOP-22

Page 30: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

N.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE

X NYCAL

I.A.S. Part ,#6(Judge Moulton)

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

XX

Index Nos.: 115785/9611327ÿ/97 111062/98108752/99 190360/15

OLIVIA CASTAGLIOLA, as Executrix forthe Estate of GERALD CASTAGLIOL, andOLIVIA CASTAGLIOLA, Individually,

Plaintiffs , SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER

F \ l_£- against

MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO.,

ET AL . ,INC. ,

m1

K'SDefendants .X

WHEREFORE, defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC.,

hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,

pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section §3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' Complaint against defendant MARIO & DIBONO

PLASTERING CO., INC., with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims

and cross claims against defendant MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO.,

INC., be dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

New York, New York

201&Dated:

C2-/C Z

te ilUX. /-ÿ, Esq. IZKristen L. Morrissy, Esq.

CULLEN and DYKMAN LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC.

44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000File No. :

MATTHi=WAttorneys for PlaintiffWEITZ Sc LUXENBERG, P.C.

700 Broadway

New York, New York(212) 558-5500

10003

r~

10924-01Is

So Ordered:Hon. Peter H. Moulton, 1C

Page 31: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, f)

This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 112676-07

ALAN IRGANG, AS ADMINISTRATOR FORTHE ESTATE OF DORIS IRGANG, AND ALANIRGANG, INDIVIDUALLY

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

against

A.O. SMITH WATER CORP., ET AL

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

DATED:New York, York

PRANKWEITS & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs),Alan Irgang, as Administrator for the Estate1Doris Irgang, and Alan Irgang, Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10036

CARL FIGUEROA, ESQlXHOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

£.0SO ORDERED:

f \ v. Peter H. MoultonHOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law *•

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

Nres«“®S,,,srJD07 20J6

Page 32: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XROBERT HOPE,

Plaintiff. INDEX NO.;190009/20F5

-against- NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDERA.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, et al.;

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, Defendant, PIPING SPECIALTIES, INC., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

Plaintiffs complaint against Defendant, PIPING SPECIALTIES, INC., with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

Defendant, PIPING SPECIALTIES, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkFebruary ,2016

o

Solbihon Liss, Esq.Klein & Liss LLPAttorney for DefendantPIPING SPECIALTIES, INC.626 RXR Plaza, Suite 6762Uniondale, New York 11556(347) 880-0280

Ruth D. Marcus, Esq.Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiff10 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, New York 10038 - \

(212)267-3091 C \ V*

Jÿage Peter H. Moulton ' ’NVSSUPRERMSECV1STJDlbSO ORDERED:

MAR o 1 2016

SWSaJKB

Page 33: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

>

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

O IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALZ>ÿ

This Document relates to:(/)

Z Index No.: 190338/11SAM ANGELO AND NORMA ANGELO,

Plaintiffs,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

-against-

KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC., ct al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’

complaint against Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto, it is hereby:

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

againstKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs/ ';

Datecy New.Vork, New Yorky/-2°iP

David Pagtgy, EsOjÿÿAttorney for DefendantKaiser Gypsum Company, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, Suite 2100New York, New York 10005(212)232-1300

WEITZ& LUXENBERG, PC700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

<2SO ORDERED: —nHON.PETER H.MOULTON n

FILED \\

4836-3716-5840.1

MAR 1 4

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 34: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

(

ih

INSYNC LITIGATION SUPPORT

MAR 0 ', 2016

Page 35: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

i

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,

This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 119873-98

PATRICIA A. HOTNICH, ASADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OFJOHN HOTNICH, AND PATRICIA A.HOTNICH, INDIVIDUALLY,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERFILED

1 4 2016MARagainst

A.C. AND S, INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY) COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

- NEW YORK

WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the

above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'

complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

yi-d.DATED:

>New York, New York

1A

ISHA SHAH, ESQ.

HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005

WEITZ & LUXENBERG Oz/o3Attorneys for Plaintiff(s),PATRICIA A. HOTNICH, as Administratrix forthe Estate of JOHN HOTNICH, and PATRICIAA. HOTNICH, Individually,700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

HOAGLAND. LONGO,

MORAN. DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law

SO ORDERED:Honorable Peter H. Moulton

48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY

1

1 CO-EDITOR-17\ V\

Page 36: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL

X I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 104046/01119382/00

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION,

This Document Relates to: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARIO MAIORIELLO and SANTA MAIORIELLO, MOTION AND ORDER-X

WHEREFORE, defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, ADIENCE, INC.

F/K/A BMI, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

<3/ÿ

C)hKtfn C- 6mku

Dated: , 2016

lFiank Qitiz, Eatfr-$jocn c ftWoui, ioti/EITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. '

James M. SkellyÿUsq.

W '’NEILL, O’BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC.,530 Saw Mill River RoadElmsford, New York 10523(914) 345-7301File No.: 473.99203

MAIAttorneys for PlaintiffsMARIO MAIORIELLOand SANTA MAIORIELLO700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

31pI /u

FILEDSO ORDERED,

Hon. PeterJU Moulton-;

MAR 1 4 2016

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

:ÿ

i>

{NY283119.1}

Page 37: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL

X I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 109471/00122187/99

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

This Document Relates to:MARJORIE MOYER, as Exexutrix for the Estate ofPAUL O. MOYER and MARJORIE MOYER,Individually,

XWHEREFORE, defendant, PREMIER REFRACTORIES INC., F/K/A

ADIENCE, INC., F/K/A BMI, INC., hereby requests summary judgment in the above-

entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, PREMIER REFRACTORIES INC., F/K/A

ADIENCE, INC., F/K/A BMI, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant, PREMIER REFRACTORIES INC., F/K/A ADIENCE, INC.,

F/K/A BMI, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: , 2016sO-

mMCti C. tadot/jJames M/'Skelly,Frank Ortiz, Esqj ;q.

MARXSÿO’NEILL, O’BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantPREMIER REFRACTORIES INC.,F/K/A ADIENCE F/K/A BMI, INC.,

530 Saw Mill River RoadElmsford, New York 10523(914) 345-7301File No.: 473.99201

Attorneys for PlaintiffsPAUL O. MOYER andMARJORIE MOYER700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

j/2/e'v-SO ORDERED,Hon, Peter II. Moulton

O

1{NY204495.1}

Page 38: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL

I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 105478/99

XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION,

This Document Relates to: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERJAN FLEMING-SPILLANE, as Personal

Representative for the Estate of LEE M. SHORTS,and JAN FLEMING-SPILLANE, as PersonalRepresentative for the Estate of ANN M. SHORTS,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, ADIENCE, INC.

F/K/A BMI, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

3 / 30?

QhJs/fn C.. _Frank Ortiz,

vSrf& fy'

Dated: ., 2016

James fo.fckellyjTSsq.

’NEILL, O’BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC.,530 Saw Mill River RoadElmsford, New York 10523(914) 345-7301File No.: 473.99208

MAIAttorneys for PlaintiffsLEE M. SHORTS, ANN M. SHORTSand JAN FLEMING-SPILLANE700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

p l L E D_2SO ORDERED,

/ÿ Hon. Peter H. Moulton---: m 4 4 z0'6

K'S OFFICEi

{NY283126.1}

Page 39: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL

X I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 104903/01IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION,

This Document Relates to: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

DANIEL J. MURPHY and ROSE MARY MURPHY, MOTION AND ORDERX

WHEREFORE, defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, ADIENCE, INC.

F/K/A BMI, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Q.j -26?

Oiitu/n C. PxnhixJFrank Ortiz, Esq.

Ovett) c.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. <ÿ

Dated: ., 2016

James MASkelw, Esq.

MARKS; O’NEILL, O’BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC.,530 Saw Mill River RoadElmsford, New York 10523(914) 345-7301File No.: 473.99204

Attorneys for PlaintiffsDANIEL J. MURPHYand ROSE MARY MURPHY700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

A \ U3/oSO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton

14

:

{NY283120.1}

Page 40: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL

X I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 118415/99IN RE: NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION,

This Document Relates to: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERRONALD P. AYEN and SUSAN AYEN,

X

WHEREFORE, defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, ADIENCE, INC.

F/K/A BMI, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Q Mi , 20Dated: j2_

QuWO LFrank Ortiz, 'Esq.

6uixn c.fyfhdjooWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. '

Jame§ M. Shelf ,sq.

MARKSrOÿNEILL, O’BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC.,530 Saw Mill River RoadElmsford, New York 10523(914) 345-7301File No.: 473.99211

Attorneys for PlaintiffsRONALD P. AYEN andSUSAN AYEN700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED, x2_

S Hon. Peter H. Moulton

\ 4mOFFICE

{NY283129.1}

Page 41: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

TMcMQpk)in/15

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION,

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Index No. 113057/98

WILLIAM DOUGHTY, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New

York, Inc. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against

defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross¬

claims against defendant, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., be and

the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New,York,. NewJYork

Peter Tambini, Esq. ~7WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 Broadway

Timothy M. McCann, Esq.DAVID M. SANTORO, ESQ.Attorney for DefenoamConsolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.4 Irving PlaceNew York, New York 10003-3598

New York. New York 10003

PILEDMR \ 4 2016

c°n*r! i -)lHON. Peter |f Moulton L Li L .:. ,

Our File #:S-5392-98 MAR 0 9 2016

iVv'T SfiNYS YUYYY ;Y COiJi'T • Civil

Page 42: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI. A. S. Part 50(Moulton, P)

This document relates to: Index No.: 112401/01

DANIEL SALVATORE NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

•X

WHEREAS, Defendant CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC. (“CON-ED”) requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against CON-ED without prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

CON-ED, be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New YorK-New YorkSeptgmljer, ,2015

/3, W/S

CckJEsq.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLP800 Third Ave, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counselfor Plaintiff

Echolaÿ Timothy McCarth, Esq.Consolidated Eflison, Inc.4 Irving PlWRM 1618New York, New York 10003Counselfor Consolidated Edison, Inc.

3l(ol lbSO ORDEREDÿ

Hon. Peter H. Moulton- ••• i

r~“'14

CQU*ÿVO«-

M 0 9 2::<o

PA't.:vq SlPÿ1

Page 43: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

•mmmmn

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-XIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONIndex No.: 190266/11

-—X NYCALBERNADETTE HRUBY, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE I.A.S. Part 5*0

.(HeMerpL)-O ESTATE OF JOHN FRANKENBERG, JR.,

z Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER

>CO -against-

zA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS Co., et al.

X

WHEREFORE, Defendant KAISER GYPSUM COMPANY INC., and its past andpresent parents, affiliates and subsidiaries and its predecessors and successors in interest andtheir agents, heirs and assigns (“Defendants”), hereby request Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’Complaint against Defendants with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendants, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York_,2012

WEITZ & LI >G, P.C. LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP

By: By:Kelly McGee; Esq.Attorneysfor DefendantKAISER GYPSUM COMPANY, INC.77 Water Street, Suite 2100New York, New York 10005(212)232-1300

Daniel Wassefberg, Esq.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDEREDÿ2, - Date:HON.PETERH.MOULTON,Justice of the Supreme Courtof the State of New York

nFILED ri >

i uMAR 1 4 2016

4833-1633-66S6.1

- SO- C'COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

Page 44: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN THE CITY OF NEW YORK NYCAL

X I.A.S. Part 50, (Moulton, P.)

Index No: 102153/03127887/02

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION,

This Document Relates to: NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT

GIOVANNI COLONNA and ASSUNTA COLONNA, MOTION AND ORDERX

WHEREFORE, defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant, ADIENCE, INC.

F/K/A BMI, INC., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims

against defendant, ADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC., be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

__Dated: , 2016

Jjluin (/).Kevin W. Connolly, Esq. 'Susan Barlow, Esq.

MARKS, O’NEILL, O’BRIEN,DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantADIENCE, INC. F/K/A BMI, INC.,530 Saw Mill River RoadElmsford, New York 10523(914) 345-7301File No.: 473.80878

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffsGIOVANNI COLONNA andASSUNTA COLONNA700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,/s Hon. Peter H. Moulton

? !

7#Ij'ULUU

{NY284254.1}

Page 45: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

•X Index No. 102153-2003GIOVANNI COLONNA and ASSUNTA COLONNA,

February 2017 FIFOTrial GroupPlaintiffs,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, et al„

Defendants.X

WHEREFORE, Defendant GOODRICH CORPORATION, s/h/a The B.F. Goodrich

Company, hereby requests Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules, Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ Complaint against Defendant

GOODRICH CORPORATION, s/h/a B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all Co-Defendants, all Claims and Cross-Claims against

Defendant GOODRICH CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

FILEDwithout costs.

MAR 1 4 2016

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Dated: New York, New York

3/H ,2016

/tSusan C. Barlow, Esq.

BY:BY:/Patrick J. D\yyer (J

SMITH, STRATTON, WISE, HEHER &BRENNAN, LLP2 Research Way,Princeton, NJ 08540

Attorneys for GOODRICH CORPORATION

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS

3Jio/iiofjMoultonSO ORDERED

Page 46: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 102153/03,127887/02

GIOVANNI COLONNA AND ASSUNTACOLONNA

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company, hereby requests

summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Safeguard Industrial Equipment Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

fW-Dated: New York, New York

IS AJL 2016 \1\oÿ°e

LI&ENBERG, KerryarÿCookHÿsq.MCGIVNTAttorneys for DefendantsSafeguard Industrial Equipment Company80 Broad Street-23rd FloorNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

LUGER, P.C.Attorneys for PlaintiffGiovanni Colonna and Assunta Colonna700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

*3 lo I <PSO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton

324-7255J

{N0497729-1 }

Page 47: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 102153/03,127887/02

GIOVANNI COLONNA AND ASSUNTACOLONNA

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Atwood & Morrill Co., Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

£0f \twithout costs.

cou««$f$§*Dated: New York, New York

?)/3 2016 OFFICE

QJMO C. fynkiuQy5ÿluisNBE&p KerryamCoojs/Esq.

MCGIVNEY&KLUGER, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantsAtwood & Morrill Co., Inc.80 Broad Street - 23rd FloorNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Attorneys for PlaintiffGiovanni Colonna and Assunta Colonna700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

toVM&SO ORDERED,

”ÿHon. Peter II. Moulton S0ÿctc

{N0497639-1}

Page 48: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 102153/03,127887/02

GIOVANNI COLONNA AND ASSUNTACOLONNA

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Courter & Company, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment

in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant, Courter & Company, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no

opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Courter & Company, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

.2016

Kewfann Cpok, Esq.1Y & KLUGER, P.C.

Attorneys for DefendantsCourter & Company, Inc.80 Broad Street-23rd FloorNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

MOT

Attorneys for PlaintiffGiovanni Colonna and Assunta Colonna700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

SO ORDERED,

1122-24555

z Hon. Peter M. Moulton

{N0497637-1}

Page 49: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 102153/03,127887/02

GIOVANNI COLONNA AND ASSUNTACOLONNA

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Treadwell Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in

the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing plaintiffs

complaint against defendant, Treadwell Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition

thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Treadwell Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York

3/d 2016

OuMB L . lKerryanjrCook, JEsq.McGivi .LUGER, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantsTreadwell Corporation80 Broad Street - 23rd Floor

Attorneys for PlaintiffGiovanni Colonna and Assunta Colonna700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

New York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456

Cÿ,SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter M. Moulton

1235-24785

{N0497635-X }

Page 50: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALIA.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

THIS DOCUMENT REFERS TO:Index No.: 102153/03,127887/02

GIOVANNI COLONNA AND ASSUNTACOLONNA

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing

plaintiff’s complaint against defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Tishman Liquidating Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New Yorkf2) L\ 2016

D(.Jyyn CittjL Kerrÿrm Cook, Esq.

MCGIVNEY & KLUGER, P.C.Attorneys for DefendantsTishman Liquidating Corporation80 Broad Street-23rd FloorNew York, New York 10004(212) 509-3456 C \ V

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.Attorneys for PlaintiffGiovanni Colonna and Assunta Colonna700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

4

2383-26114J

SO ORDERED,

£ “'Hon. Peter H. Moulton

{N0497631-1}

Page 51: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

•xIN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

ANN T. MEZIK, Individually and as Executrix for theEstate of RONALD A. MEZIK,

Index No.: 120142/01

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A.C. and S., INC., et al., includingMORSE-DIESEL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendants,

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as “Morse-Diesel

International, Inc.”), hereby requests summary judgement in the above-entities case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Morse

Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: Ne; :, New York., 2016

Qi&m L tokJfrJatthÿ*' MacIntyre, Ecq C.C flQKJk Rosario Chetta, Esq.

MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor Plaintiff?,Ann T. Mezik, Individually and as Executrixforthe Estate of Ronald A. Mezik700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038 _ __(212) 791-,0285---------7:

~ '71f\v.£°'

'

. .liu- '41-

UM 0 9 20fiff\CE

n. Peter H. Moulton 'Dated: 3SO ORDERED/ xiv

Page 52: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

WILLIAM SCHMIDT and ROSEMARIE SCHMIDT, Index No. 112962/99

Plaintiffs,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO. et al.,

including, MORSE-DIESEL, CONSTRUCTION CO.,INC.

Defendants,

-x

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as “Morse-Diesel

Construction Co., Inc.”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Morse

Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York'U>, 20\<& £O// y 1

?SGQC/A'Ty

c,Ma&Mw MacIntyre, Fsq._ X/ior, Y>r~WEITO & LUXENBERG, PC.

Attorneysfor Plaintiffs,Wilmu$\Schmidt and Rosemarie Schmidt700 BroidwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

folsÿ Rosario ta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212)791-0285

\%

SO ORDERED, \Dated:Hon. Peter H. Moulton

Vi'"'

Page 53: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITY

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCAL

I.A.S. Part 50

This Document Relates to: Index No. 107289/99

PATRICIA L. GIALLELA, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of JAMES J. GIALLELLA JR.

NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, Defendant Reynolds Metals Company, incorrectly sued herein as

“Reynolds Metals Company, as successor in interest to Atlantic Asbestos Corporation,” hereby

requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant Reynolds Metals Company,

with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant, Reynolds Metals Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

*'4Dated: New York, New York

X Dio ,2016

%U0*ÿ ferz c0Malthcw \XjOMl C. &£r}fri/ Michael J. Curtis, Esq.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCÿ Ocÿ700 Broadway 150 Broadway, Suite 600

A

New York, New York 10003 New York, New York 10038

Attorneysfor Plaintijf(s) Attorneysfor Defendant(212) 558-5500 (212) 791-0285

Dated:SO ORDERED.\

Hon. Peter H. Moulton \3\\..... o

\

Page 54: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

•xDONALD D. WILSON,

Index No.: 112387/02107168/02

Plaintiff, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A.C. and S., INC., et al., includingMORSE-DIESEL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendants,

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as “Morse-Diesel

International, Inc.”), hereby requests summary judgement in the above-entities case, pursuant to Civil

Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Morse

Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: New York, New York. 2016

i

A;Michael F-aneftf, Esq. fYVWEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffDonald D. Wilson700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

Rosario cftetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038

791-0285cf-

\\

Dated: QSO ORDEREDÿHra. Peter H. Moulton

\

'r;

\\

Page 55: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton)

•xSALVATORE D. LOVERDE and JEAN LOVERDE,

Index No.: 109117/00121983/99

Plaintiffs, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

A.C. and S., INC., et al., includingMORSE-DIESEL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.,

Defendants,

•x

WHEREFORE, Defendant Morse Diesel, Inc. (incorrectly named herein as “Morse-Diesel

Construction Co., Inc.”), hereby requests summary judgement in the above-entities case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Morse

Diesel, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant

Morse Diesel, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

FILEDDated: New York, New York. . 2016

CokM(\ L frnhZLWASO423''6

Peter Tambini, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneysfor PlaintiffsSalvatore D. Lo Verde and Jean Lo Verde700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500

io Chetta, Esq.MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneysfor DefendantMorse Diesel, Inc.150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285 —\

t

njÿeter2DatedO/ÿ//6SO ORDERED,\W * 0Flo eter H. Moulton

..-lt

L

Page 56: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:INDEX NO.: 101665/2006

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND

ORDER

PETER PACIFICO

WHEREFORE, Stewart Warner Corporation (‘'Stewart Warner”), hereby requests

summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section

3212, dismissing plaintiffs Complaint against Stewart Warner, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Stewart Warner be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

New Y/jprk, New York

3/9 , 2016Dated:

—"

Joseph R La Sala, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLPAttorneys for DefendantStewart Warner Corporation88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005

Jordan C. Fo: ,Attorneys iorÿulintiffBelluck & FoxÿLP546 Fifth AVehue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036 F

* 4

OFFICE

JjiobbSO ORDERED,Peter H. Moulton

I 0 zoigI

2217525J

Page 57: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

iX:CLB/55S> 70./tHsmissals/nosim/SEPTEMBER2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK;

! XNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

PATRICIA A. MESEC, as Executrix for the Estate ofTERRY J. MESEC and PATRICIA A. MESEC,Individually,

1

Plaintiff(s),

Index No.: 103514/03- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

A

;P- i /

Shawnqt-ÿ©Un\ Esq.Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 1 0003

SO ORDERED,19 ?Hon. Peter Moulton

Aty-.

Page 58: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

X:FBW/46519./dismissals/nosim,SEPTEMBER2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

PATRICIA A. MESEC. as Executrix for the Estate ofTERRY J. MESEC and PATRICIA A. MESEC,Individually,

Plaintiff(s),

Index No.: 103514/03- against -

A..O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

Defendants.-X

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants FLJLTON BOILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Briafrl-eld. Esq.L

Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

3 to ftSO ORDERED, 7/Plon. Peter Moulton

/r

/' --J

Page 59: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

FB\v/33650/legal/nosjm/SEPTEMBl£R2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

XNO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

ELLIS WOODS,

Plaintiffs),

Index No.: 112524/98-against-

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

A.C.&S. INC., et al.,

Defendants),

X

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212.

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Esq.Attorney for PUiAtiffWeitz & Luxenberg\700 Broadway \New York, New York 10003

Cc. /

JOVY'.VS Brian Feld, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street. 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

3*hoh(oSO ORDERED, LHon. Peter Moulton Q 7

1 0 ?

MAR 1 4 2016

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 60: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

X:CLB/5655l.Aeeal/NOSJM/seDtembcr20I4

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

•XNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

MARY HANNA, as Proposed Executrix for the EstateOf WILLIAM E. HANNA, and MARY HANNA,Individually,

Plaintiffs),

Index No.: 190092/12- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part

Defendants. —X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

*s#Dana Northcraft, Esq.

Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

cÿCBrian Feld, Esq.for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.

w Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

CP

/>3 /o fSO ORDERED,

~7Soil. Slicx'iy Klein-Hcjllci 1

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

ii i

!

/

;

Page 61: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

iCLB58347/legal/nosjm/may2014

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-XROSARIA MUSCHTER,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),

-against- IndexNo.: 190347/10

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part 5ÿ

Defendant(s),-X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

ShawnetteTTTutt; Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

Matthew MacIntyre,Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

-sj/ojjioSO ORDERED,mil

""7

MAR 1 4 2016/

COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORK j)

Page 62: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

CLB/60100/dismissals/nosjm/september2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

-XJUNE V. NICOTRA, as Executrix of the Estate ofJOSEPH P. NICOTRA, deceased, NO OPPOSITION

SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlai

f VIndex No.: 122145/00-against-

#5ÿ

C0<ÿDefendant(s),

off'c£A.C. & S. INC., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

£sq!Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Shawhefte Fluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

r~SO ORDERED, //-—/Hon. Peter Moulton

Ly (oh <p !

|

/J

Page 63: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

X:FBW/mS4./leeaI/NOSJM/SEPTEMBER2QIS

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

MILDRED ORGEK, Individually and as Administratrix NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYFor the Estate of WILLIAM E. ORGEK,

Plaintiff(s),JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

Index No.: 104235/97- against -

A.C.&S. INC., et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Partÿ/5ÿ

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Brian Feld, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

Jusl ,sq.Attomey)fori51§intiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

SO ORDERED,Peter Moÿdtorÿÿ

i

MAR 1 4

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

J

Page 64: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

X:CLB/60064Jleeal/NQSJM/SEPTEMBER20I5

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

' MILDRED ORGEK, Individually and as Administratrix NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

For the Estate of WILLIAM E. ORGEK,Plaintiff(s),

Index No.: 104235/97- against -

NYCALI.A.S. Part 3d

A.C.&S. INC., et al.;

iDefendants.

-X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

i

Justin Weitz. EsqSÿkAttorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

Shawnette"Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

rq.

SO ORDERED,

' Hon. Peter Moulton

FILED :

MAR 14 2016

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 65: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

FILEDMAR 1 4 Z016

FBW3514I/Legal/nosjm/AUGUST 2013

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORKWILLIAM LONG,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),

Index No.: 122024/98-against-

NYCALI.A.S. PartySS'e)

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO, et al„

Defendant(s),X

WHEREFORE, defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs.

Chaples Neal, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

DigÿT. BMySEsq. (JAttorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

FT.'sj/ojjkzr L"SO ORDERED, nShnrry FlHn Heillsi

HON.PETERH.MOULTON/'

/

Page 66: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

CLB59384/legaI/nosjm/febraury2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. COUNTY OF NEW YORK

-XWILLIAM SLAGHT and NANCY SLAGHT,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),

/as>7oS797-IndexNo.: 123048/97:-against-

NYCALI.A.S. Part?0 L, £>

A.C. & S. INC., et al.,

Defendant(s),

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

>0 PAviaracb Sha\ [uitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

£yj-_

SO ORDERED,

FILED L ;Hoir-Shcrry Kkm-Heiller.

/HON.PETER H.MOULTON /, ;MAR1 4 2016

Cl'UNTV CLERK'SNEW YORK

!yOFFICE

Page 67: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

1X:/FBiV/30901/let?al/fehruarv2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

•XNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

WILLIAM SLAGHT and NANCY SLAGHT,

Plaintiffs),poi/ot/q ?

Index No.: 123048#?-- against -

NYCALI.A.S. Part SO

A.C. & S, Inc., et al.

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. with

prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant FULTON BOILER WORKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with

prejudice and without costs

ft\VCKQ±)Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Charles Neal, Esq.Attorneys for Fulton Boiler Works, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

3/A>,SO ORDERED,

K j? y

FiurtpERH.MOULTON /Vo /

iiMAR 1 4 2016 /

COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK

Page 68: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

4

CLB.i58l 05/legal/nosjm/MARCH 20H

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK'

COUNTY OF NEW YORK-X

WILLIAM T. TAYLOR and BARBARA TAYLOR,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiff(s),

Index No.: 190053/11-against-

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS, et al.s NYCALI.A.S. Partÿ/ <70

Defendant(s),

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS. INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs,

7TFFTW'

Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

ShawnettVÿluitt, r)sqrAttorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

3/p//fcr_ .SO ORDERED,

F'<.£TDw

Hon-Shorry KjemTlcitlcr

HON.PETERH.MOULTON/

/'S -

I

I'•--J

Page 69: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

CLB55777/legal/nosjm/November 2013• SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

COUNTY OF NEW YORK•~X

WALTER JOHANNESEN,NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),

Index No.: 126686/02-against-

NYCALI.A.S. PartÿO J U

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.;

Defendant(s),

—X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant's CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. f\ / ‘"M

£&&&> rAttorney for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant

CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10036

Sp ORDERED,//ÿ;Shell y Kleiii-Hcillci—

O H0N- PCTER H.MOULTON "7% f7cO(j I

V/y/

Page 70: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

CLB/56144/legaI/nosjm/NOVEMBER2014

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

i/

-XARLENE FLYNN, as Executrix for the Estate ofWALTER FLYNN, Individually,

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),

Index No.: 190465/11-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part

Defendants),X

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

[tXTVblfcrVlAttorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

DWxd*** 2, 2fl*\

ShawnettijTuitxfEsq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

*'L 7% /Hon. Sherry/><°0, % J% /HON.PETERH.MOULTON

/

Page 71: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

FILEDMAR 1 4 2016CLB57813/legal/nosjm/November 2013

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

____X COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE

NEW YORK

NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER

THOMAS O’CONNOR,

Plaintiffs),

Index No.: 112730/00 &122202/99

-against-

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part}(f5?)

Defendant(s),

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

-Trank Ortiz, Es$./ ft 'luitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212)313-3600

Sha1Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10036

'2/r~~

7o.l/bSO ORDERED,i nHorn ShruTj THrlfl TTiTiTli i

HON.PETERH.MOULTON

//

•J //

/- -J

Page 72: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

X:CLB/60102./dismissuls/nosim/SEPTEMBER2015

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

•XNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER

DAMIANO P. LOMONACO,

Plaintiff(s),

Index No.: 190208/11ÿ- against -

A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

Defendants.

WHEREFORE, defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. hereby request summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendants CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and |

FILEDwithout costs.

v-X H\, Esq. c

Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003

ShawnetteTtuftf, Esq.Attorneys for Cleaver-Brooks, Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600

ii

SO ORDERED, r 1Hon. Peter Moulton

:

Page 73: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Peter H. Moulton)

XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION

XThis document relates to: Index No.: 112602/2000

122200/1999

JAMES L. WATSON and IRENE WATSON, NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY

Plaintiff,

-against-

KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.

Defendant.X

WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby

requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules

Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVERBOILER COMPANY, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against

defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby

dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dated: , 2015Harrison, New York

<4Paul B. Josephs, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.attorneysfor DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Avenue

WEITZ & LUXENBERG,Attorneysfor Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500

Harrison, New York 10528(914)412-7300 ~ÿ! '--1 ' ..vc ::. .' j

SO ORDERED. c: ..

9102 6 O UUiHonorable Paul H. Moulton

2..;4ÿ "A

, rCeÿS?

5

IEAR 0 9 2016

NYS c

Page 74: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 190385/2011

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

RICHARD J. HOLLIS as Executor for theEstate of JOHN HOLLIS

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

F \\-£°without costs.

Dated: New York, New York,2016 14ÿ°

iCE

CO'

AcWx pÿE*. Judith A. YaW, Esq.XENBERG, P.C. L DARGER ERRANTE Y4 VITZ & BLAU, LLP

-Atfornp-ys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for Union Carbide Corporation700 Roadway 116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212)452-5300

IT;

[u-SO ORDERED,

MAR 0 9/ÿHon. Peter I I. Moulton, J.S.C

J

Page 75: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 190269/2011This Document Relates to:

BERTA MASON, as Executrix for theEstate of HARLEY N. MASON, andBERTA MASON, Individually

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary

judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,

dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice,

and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

FILEDwithout costs.

Dated: New York, New YorkVeWwf-rv _, 2016 MAR 1 4

; CLERK'S OFF1

NEW YORK

7

COUNTY

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor

JgWlÿfl'Upgrguson, Esq-McÿÿG-p*.-, E*-AVEJTÿLLUXENBERG, P.C. *A0#fneys for Plaintiffs4()0 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

2/ÿSO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

Page 76: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 118415/1999

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

SUSAN AYEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF

RONALD AYEN

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

FILEDwithout costs.

Dated: New York, New York2016 ttMtlU"'6

ooumÿS0""Matthew Mathilyic, Esq. £ -WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

Judith A. Yavitz, Esq. /5(clOfjJ DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLP

Attorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

i\ 0IM:/2MjieSO ORDERED,

mi o 9 ?r.oHon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

N'/S ‘

Page 77: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 104903/2001

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

DANIEL J. MURPHY AND ROSE MARYMURPHY

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs. FILEDDated: New York, New York

X/JZ .2016 mR 14*; CLERK'S OFFlCNEW YORKCOUNTY

Matthew MacIntyre, Esq.gKlScn C. D&flaÿr Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

LjyjAR 0 9 Z013SO ORDERED,

Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

MY5 C-Y"

Page 78: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50

(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 104903/2001

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

This Document Relates to:

DANIEL J. MURPHY AND ROSE MARYMURPHY

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

(“Dana Companies”) hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant

Dana Companies with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

costs.

Dated: New York, New York(dL . 2016 \ 42 m

OFFICE

h _ .Matthew-MaelntyrerBsq.ÿMSftl L &CflOj Judith A. YavitkfEsq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

DARGER ERRANTE YA VITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Comj anies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

;

'u

J/n/fc !£.;?. 0 9SO ORDERED,'Hon. Peter H. Moulton

i-rs

Page 79: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 107289/1999

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

This Document Relates to:

PATRICIA L. GIALLELLA,INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIXFOR THE ESTATE OF JAMES J.GIALLELLA, JR._

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

FtLEDwithout costs.

DatediTlXk, New York1_, 2016

00 NE'N''oW——4g>T,-Charloa M- Forgmnn, C Baflcuj Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.

WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeea Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

J

h222 0 9 2013

SO ORDERED,,/Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

Page 80: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 112429/1999

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

l 2.1 i %This Document Relates to:

MARJORIE MOYER, AS EXECUTRIX FOR THE

ESTATE OF PAUL MOYER, AND MARJORIEMOYER, INDIVIDUALLY_

WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC sued herein as Dana Corporation

(“Dana Companies”), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to

Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant

Dana Companies, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Dana Companies, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without

FILEDcosts.

Dated:sm., New York_, 2016 m 1 4 m

COn&0FF,C<B -Ou.

Malibu w Machilyie, B,sC[ÿx>ÿco C /<x</ Judith A. Yavitz/Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, LLC116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212)452-5300

:

0 /(*SO ORDERED,Eton. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

PAC 50- c:v:o

Page 81: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 121880/98

NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

JANE DOE,AS PROPOSED EXECUTRIX FOR

THE ESTATE OF EUGENE CUNNINGHAM

WHEREFORE, defendant Hobart Brothers Company hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant Hobart Brothers Company, with prejudice, and there

being no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant Hobart Brothers Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

FILE0without costs.

Mf\R 1 4Dated-ÿNew York, New YorkoC/,2ÿ 2016

K'S OFFICECOUNTYCtEBow

'IMMA, a—,Charles M. ,00:560 C.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

7nennifer W. Daÿgef, Esq.DA/RGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU/ LLPAttorneys for Hobart Brothers Company116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

iLid/toSO ORDERED,ffdn. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

Page 82: Following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2016/03/14  · Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and orders filed on the

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK

IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION

NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)

Index No: 125872/1999This Document Relates to:

JAMES MCHUGH NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER

WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment

in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing

plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being

no opposition thereto,

ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against

defendant CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

without costs.

Dated: New York, New York2016 \ 4*0*

cou

u3on, Esq. CXISKYI D-ÿLwjudith A. Yavitz, Esq.MrWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500

DARGER ERRANTE YA VITZ & BLAU, LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300

’Ju/& i

SO ORDERED, IPeter H. Moulton, J.S.C.

L—