foga road high school - jis.gov.jm

FOGA ROAD HIGH SCHOOL

INSPECTION REPORT

Principal: Ms. Kerinth Campbell Board Chair: Ms. Lelith Atkins-Bryan

Report Issued: August 14, 2012

National Education Inspectorate

Inspection Date: March 19 – 23, 2012

National Education Inspectorate © May 2013 School Inspection Report ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1

Key Questions ............................................................................................................ 1

The Five-point Scale .................................................................................................. 2

Consistency in terminology ........................................................................................ 2

Profile ......................................................................................................................... 3

School‟s Demographics ................................................................................... 3

Socio-economic Context .................................................................................. 3

Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 4

Overall effectiveness of the school .................................................................. 4

Findings of School Inspection .................................................................................... 6

1) School Leadership and Management .......................................................... 6

2) Teaching Support for Learning .................................................................... 8

3) Students‟ Academic Performance ............................................................... 9

4) Students‟ Academic Progress ................................................................... 10

5) Students‟ Personal and Social Development............................................. 11

6) Use of Human and Material Resources .................................................... 12

7) Curriculum and Enhancement Programmes.............................................. 14

8) Student Safety, Security, Health and Wellbeing ........................................ 15

RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................ 17

Further Action ........................................................................................................... 17

List of Abbreviations and Acronyms ......................................................................... 18

Appendices .............................................................................................................. 19

Appendix 1 - Record of Inspection Activities ................................................. 20

Appendix 2 - Inspection Indicators ................................................................. 21

Appendix 3 - National Test Data .................................................................... 41

National Education Inspectorate © May 2013 School Inspection Report

1

Introduction The National Education Inspectorate (NEI) is responsible for making an assessment of the standards attained by the students in our primary and secondary schools at key points during their education. It is the aim of the NEI to report on how well students perform or improve, as they progress through their schooling and learning life. The NEI is also charged with the responsibility to make recommendations to support improvement in the quality of the provision and outcomes for all learners. During school inspections, our trained inspectors observe classroom lessons, interview members of the school‟s staff, students individually and in small groups. Inspectors also look at samples of student work and study various school documents provided before and during the inspection. Additionally, School Inspectors hold meetings with the principal and senior members of the staff to get clarity on their roles and responsibilities at the school. Please see the Inspection Indicators (Appendix 2) used by School Inspectors to assist in forming judgements about a school‟s progress.

Key Questions The inspection indicators are structured as a set of eight key questions that inspectors ask about the educational provision and performance of every school. These are:

1. How effectively is the school led and managed by the Board, the principal and senior management team and middle leadership?

2. How effectively does the teaching support the students´ learning?

3. How well do students perform in national and/or regional tests and assessments? (For infants: in relation to age-related expectations)

4. How much progress do students make in relation to their starting points?

5. How good is the students´ personal and social development?

6. How effectively does the school use the human and material resources at its disposal

to help the students achieve as well as they can?

7. How well do the curriculum and any enhancement programmes meet the needs of the students?

8. How well does the school ensure everyone‟s security, health, safety and wellbeing?


2

The Five-point Scale Inspectors make judgements according to a five-point scale. The five levels on the scale are defined as follows: Level 5 – Exceptionally high quality of performance or provision Level 4 – Good: the expected level for every school. Achieving this level in all

aspects of its performance and provision should be a realistic goal for every school

Level 3 – Satisfactory: the minimum level of acceptability required. All key aspects of

performance and provision in every school should reach or exceed this level Level 2 – Unsatisfactory: quality not yet at the level acceptable for schools. Schools

are expected to take urgent measures to improve the quality of any aspect of their performance or provision that is judged at this level. Action on the inspectors‟ recommendations for improvement is mandatory

Level 1 – Needs Immediate Support: quality is very low. Schools are expected to take

immediate action to improve the quality of any aspect of their performance or provision that is judged at this level. Action on the inspectors‟ recommendations for improvement is mandatory. These schools are also at risk of direct interventions for improvement by the HME.

Consistency in terminology The following terms are used consistently throughout the indicators with the following definitions: All 100% Almost all 90% to 99% Most 75% to 89% Many 50% to 74% Some 21% to 49% Few 1% to 20% None 0


3

Profile

School’s Demographics Locale: Urban Parish: Clarendon

School Code: 13130 Gender: Co-educational

School Organization: Whole Day

Size: NA Attendance Rate: 83%

Capacity: 800 Enrolment: 902

No. of Teachers: 43

Pupil-Teacher Ratio: 19: 1 Owned by: Government

Socio-economic Context

Foga Road High is located close to Denbigh, approximately three miles from May Pen. It opened as a new school in September 2007 in response to a critical need for additional high school spaces in Region Vl. The ground work for the school began in 2007, when the school started operations in rented space, shared with Knox Community College in a factory building owned by Factories Corporation of Jamaica. The school started with 250 Grade 7 students on a single shift. An upper grade was added each year. In 2008, the shift system was introduced to accommodate the growing student population. However, in 2009, the school was relocated from the shared facilities to its present site in a newly renovated factory building accommodating all facilities under one roof; canteen facilities, classrooms, administrative blocks, laboratories and sick bay. In September 2010, sections of the new facilities were reconfigured to house additional classrooms. In addition to this, a new block with three classrooms has since been added. As at 2011, the school has a student population of over 900 students and has expanded to accommodate Grade 11. There are small and medium sized business entities as well as many self-employed skilled persons in and around the community. Some persons are involved in small farming, goat rearing, fishery and shop keeping. A few parents are employed to the Jamaica Aluminium Company (JAMALCO) Bauxite Company. Students come from a wide cross section of communities such as; Mineral Heights, Caanan Heights, Milk River, Osbourne Store, Milk River, Mocho, Old Harbour, Porus, Rock River Chapelton, Palmers Cross and Bucknor. There are 302 students on the Programme of Advancement Through Health and Education (PATH).


4

Executive Summary

The overall effectiveness of the school

The overall effectiveness of Foga Road High School is satisfactory Leadership and management is good The school is defined by strong visionary leadership with clear focus on improvement which the Principal has communicated through a range of documented policies and procedures: these provide useful guidance to staff, students and parents. The Principal encourages staff teamwork, and has appropriately delegated responsibility for leading aspects of the work of the school. A range of methods is deployed for effective self-evaluation. The School Board supports the school in a number of ways, including assisting with fund raising and staff development. There are productive links with local schools, business enterprises, parents, external support agencies and community groups. Teaching and learning is satisfactory Most teachers have a good knowledge of their subject, show confidence in presenting lessons to help students understand concepts. Though some teachers have satisfactory knowledge, they do not utilize effective teaching methods to demonstrate their knowledge of how students learn. Many teachers do continuous assessment of students understanding during lessons, through questions, chalkboard activity, seatwork and group activities. In many classes students are enthusiastic during lesson. In some cases, however, students responses are lack-lustre; they behave well during lessons but show little enthusiasm. Performance in English and mathematics is not applicable (This cannot be judged as no cohort has yet sat the Grade 11 terminal examinations) Students at Foga Road High will sit national examinations in June 2012. Therefore, the usual process for assessing performance does not apply. Progress in English and mathematics is satisfactory Most students entering Foga Road High School in 2007, not only performed well below the national averages at 30 per cent but most entered reading well below their grade level. For example, of the students in the first cohort many were reading two levels below the Grade 1 at pre primer and the primer levels and only about 40 per cent were reading at the Grade 5 level. There are no national examinations results against which to compare and assess the progress of this cohort of students since they will enter fifth forms to sit CSEC examinations in June of 2012. However, 48 students were entered in 3rd and 4th forms, to sit two subjects (Math and Social Studies). Four (4) students passed mathematics at Grade 2 and Six (6) students passed at Grade 3. One student, who sat and passed mathematics at Grade 2, entered the school reading at the Primer Level. Overall, students’ personal and social development is satisfactory Students‟ behaviour is satisfactory in lessons and around school compound. Some students arrive late for devotion and for school. However, most attendance registers do not reflect unpunctuality. Most students have good awareness and understanding of national identity


5

and civic responsibility as well as economic issues. They also have sound knowledge and understanding of national and global environmental issues. The school’s use of its human and material resources is satisfactory There are sufficient suitably qualified and knowledgeable teaching and support staff. Teachers are deployed according to their skills; they attend school regularly and are punctual. All academic staff are afforded regular opportunities for professional development. The premises are clean spacious of good quality and are appropriate for the operation of a controlled school environment. Under one roof, staff and students benefit from good-sized classrooms and additional facilities including, for example, a large hall, a ICT room, and a library. Students have good access to supervised areas, which are well maintained. Curriculum and enhancement programmes are good The quality of the curricula which are supported by enhancement programme are very good. Teachers provide broad, balanced and varied learning experiences for students. Curriculum review is done once per term through staff development where best practices among teachers are shared. Since last school year, in a bid to help students perform and make better progress, weekly planning sessions have focussed on facilitating consistency in the progression of work within grades. The curriculum is enriched by an outstanding range of activities, which greatly extends students‟ all-round educational experience. Overall, provisions for safety, security, health and wellbeing are good The school provides a welcoming environment, under one roof, and safety and security is exceptionally high. Overall, the quality of the indoor facilities is good and well maintained; complemented with bathrooms that are immaculately kept. The emergency arrangements are among the best that can be offered. The main gate is effectively manned by a security guard who monitors visitors to the compound. Students and teachers feel safe at school. The school‟s arrangements for the care and welfare of students are very good. Students say all staff are caring and approachable and committed to promoting students‟ social, emotional and physical wellbeing.

Inspectors identified the following key strengths in the work of the school:

Visionary leadership

Ideal location with good security- safety; security procedures are outstanding

Clean environment beautifully organized.

Print rich environment

Outstanding record keeping and Inventory Management

Good variety of extra-curricular activities.

Frequent professional development activities

How effective is the school overall?

The overall effectiveness of the school is satisfactory


6

Findings of School Inspection

1) School Leadership and Management

How effectively is the school led and managed by the Board, the principal and senior management team and middle leadership?

Overall, the quality of leadership and management of the school is good School-based leadership and management is good The Principal who built the foundation for a solid working relationship with stakeholders is providing strong but fair leadership which earning her respect from all stakeholders. The Chairman speaks highly of the Principal, describing her as a transactional leader who is approachable, open to ideas but insists on high standards. She displays very strong vision and purpose, and communicates a clear philosophy about what the school stands for and where it is going. She admits to believing in preparation; a strict disciplinarian for planning and insists that responsibilities are executed timely. There is good working relationship among the School Management Team (SMT). Openness and frequent collaboration in planning, stimulates teamwork in the execution of responsibilities. Senior teachers are all aware of their responsibilities and the Principal and Vice Principal work closely with the teachers. The SMT is committed to making sure that all school staff, including the administrative workers are provided with opportunities for relevant professional development, evident through the many workshops they are allowed to attend. The SMT provides both students and teachers with opportunities to develop leadership. The school has extensive documentation of all school activities. However, while middle managers are hardworking and committed, some junior staff members are not very strong working on their own. Self-evaluation and school improvement planning is good There are established activities for the school‟s self-evaluation. Information is shared and feedback is encouraged to enable stakeholders to have a good knowledge of the school and to be able to give specific information on strengths and weaknesses of various aspects of its operation. The School Improvement Plan (SIP) was developed with the involvement of PTA, senior staff, student leaders, bursar, and the Board. During the process, different group sessions were held to analyse data and exchange ideas. For example, the decision was taken to strengthen studies in the vocational areas, and plans are far advanced to realize this. Throughout the year, frequent monitoring of the SIP is done, led by the Principal and the senior staff. Targets are revisited and changes made to the school‟s operations. At year end, the senior staff retreat supports the management of the SIP, for example, the strategies governing GSAT entry and diagnostic test results are evaluated. Appraisals are regularly done and development meetings are held regularly to address weaknesses derived from appraisal findings. However, not all staff members are trained in the administration of the appraisal process. Governance is good Most members of the current Board have expertise that enhances the support that is provided to the school. For example, the Chairman who is a retired educator conducts professional training seminars with staff, and helps with students who are non-readers.


7

Other members have experience in government, construction and finance. There are a number of sub-committees, including, the Finance and Personnel Sub-committees. These sub-committees meet as the need arises and report to the Board on their activities. In particular, the work of the finance subcommittee ensures that the Board is actively involved in the financial decisions and approves financial proposals. The Principal is held accountable by presenting a report at Board meetings. Additionally, members of the Board and the Chairman visit regularly and talks to staff and students to heighten their governance over school operations. Relationship with parents and local community is good The school has good structures to facilitate communication with parents. These include formal reports from the school twice per year regarding students‟ progress, phone contacts, written notices regarding school activities and sending text messages. In addition, parent conference days are organised for different grades, as well as a number of grade meetings. Parents are frequently called in and may also arrange to meet members of staff on an individual basis. Principal and staff have very good relationship with parents. Parents enjoy an open door policy to the school and they find „texting‟ an effective means of communication. The school makes good efforts to encourage parental involvement in the life of the school. For example, the school create leaflets with suggestions on how parents can help their children learn. The community is also supportive of the school and in return makes use of the facilities, such as the playing field. Teachers conducted classes preparing community members and ancillary works for JSC examination, and some were successful.

How effectively is the school led and managed by the Board, the principal and senior management team?

Grades 7-11

School-based leadership and management Good

Self-evaluation and improvement planning Good

Governance Good

Relations with parents and community Good


8

2) Teaching Support for Learning

How effectively does the teaching support the students’ learning? Overall, teaching in support of learning is satisfactory

The teachers’ knowledge of the subjects they teach is satisfactory Most teachers have a good knowledge of their subject. They are confident in delivery, presenting lessons in a variety of ways and are able to provide information which help students to understand concepts. Some however, though they have satisfactory knowledge pass on the wrong concepts, for example explanations and examples are given to show that „the phenotype of an individual results from dominant traits.‟ Many teachers show their knowledge of how best to teach their subject by doing a recap of work previously done to allow continuity and to ensure that students understand. While other teachers use effective questioning and interesting examples to stimulate students‟ interest and participation. Regrettably, some teachers dictate notes, and work lacks differentiation, resulting in some students not being engaged and others not challenged in lessons. Teaching methods are satisfactory Almost all teachers produce detailed lesson plans with clearly stated objectives, and some interact well with their students in providing a supportive learning environment. Activities however, are not always appropriate to support learning. Most teachers manage their time efficiently with satisfactory pace in lesson by holding students‟ interest, while a few resort to writing notes on the chalk board for students to copy, resulting in slow paced and incomplete lessons. Some teachers do not sufficiently utilize resources to enhance lessons and the use of ICT is mostly ineffective. Many teachers employ a limited range of teaching strategies with limited differentiation and many lessons are too reliant on teacher centred delivery. Opportunities for collaborative learning are inadequate. Some teachers fail to motivate students and cater for the less able. However, some teachers make effective use of resources such as hand-outs, multimedia projectors, computer and text books. Students’ assessment is satisfactory An assessment policy exists and well organized records of students‟ performance are kept and used effectively to ascertain students‟ strengths and weaknesses. Students are encouraged to examine critically, their work to ensure that comprehension of concepts is achieved. A range of questions are used to test students‟ understanding of concepts. Computers are sometimes used in lessons to encourage student self-assessment. In some lessons, written work is checked and students given helpful feedback to improve their learning. However, in some classes, students sometimes answer in chorus; making it difficult for the teacher to determine their levels of understanding. Student learning is satisfactory Most students are highly motivated and display positive attitude to work. They participate actively in class activities and have good relationship with each other. Most students help each other through cooperative learning to help each other understand concepts. In a lesson on characterization, for example, the students‟ motivation led them to encourage others to participate and encouraged their peers to behave well. Some students display enquiry and research skills and most are able to apply their learning to new situations and real life. In some cases, however, the students are unable to relate their life experiences to lesson contents.


9

3) Students’ Academic Performance

How well do the students perform in national and/or regional tests and assessments?

Overall, students’ performance in national tests is undetermined Students’ performance in English and mathematics is undetermined

The first cohort at Foga Road High will sit the Caribbean Secondary Education Certificate (CSEC) examinations in 2012. Therefore, the usual process for assessing performance does not apply.

How effectively does the teaching support the students´ learning?

Grades 7-11

Teachers´ subject knowledge and how best to teach the subject

Satisfactory

Teaching methods Satisfactory

Assessment Satisfactory

Students´ learning Satisfactory

How well do the students perform in national and/or regional tests and assessments?

Grades 7-11

How well do the students perform in National or regional tests and examinations in English?e

Not Applicable

How well do the students perform in National or regional tests and examinations in mathematics?l

Not Applicable


10

4) Students’ Academic Progress

How much progress do the students make in relation to their starting points?

Overall, students make satisfactory progress in relation to their starting points Students’ progress in relation to their starting point in English is satisfactory The school received a mixed ability group of students in 2007 in which 45 per cent of those students were reading at the highest level of the reading test administered by the school. In that same cohort, only a few students were at or below the primer level. The gender gap in performance was wide as 53 per cent of the boys were reading at or below level three. Further, all students reading below level one were boys. The cohort showed significant improvement each year, and by 2010, most students were reading at acceptable levels. Students show more progress in English language than in Literature and girls perform better than boys. In reading comprehension, most students are able to explain the gist of a passage and explain the effectiveness of characterization as a literary element. Some students are able to correctly punctuate sentences containing direct speech. Students’ progress in relation to their starting point in mathematics is satisfactory The school has progressed to the point where many students made steady improvement over the four year period. A student, who entered the school reading at the primer level, attained a grade 2 at Caribbean Secondary Education Certificate (CSEC) mathematics. Most students make satisfactory progress during lessons. Some Grade 7 students are able to divide decimal by decimal and correctly represent fractions as decimal and percentage. In Grade 9, most students are able to calculate addition and subtraction operations on algebraic terms, but some had difficulty understanding integers. In Grade 11, most students are able to draw a histogram and frequency polygon. Most are also able to calculate the area of compound shapes by calculating the dimensions of the plane surfaces.

How much progress do the students make, in relation to their starting points?

Grades 7-11

How much progress do the students make in relationship to their starting points in English?e

Satisfactory

How much progress do the students make in relationship to their starting points in mathematics?

Satisfactory


11

5) Students’ Personal and Social Development

How good is the students’ personal and social development?

Overall students’ personal and social development is satisfactory The students’ behaviour and attitudes are satisfactory Students are friendly, polite and proud of their school. They are orderly around school compound, and obey directional signs. Relationships between staff and students are positive. Most students display satisfactory behaviour in lesson, by being attentive, and they display commitment to learning. For example, in one Grade 11 class, students show good commitment to learning as they worked well and stayed on task on their own. Despite the impressive attitude toward learning by many students, some display a poor work ethic. Punctuality and attendance is satisfactory Attendance is satisfactory with an average attendance at 83 per cent. The school makes good effort to monitor and improve punctuality. However, some students arrive late thus missing morning devotion and the first lesson. In a few classes, the attendance rate is low. The civic understanding and spiritual awareness of the students are good The civic understanding and spiritual awareness of the students are good. Most students are aware of the process of hoisting and lowering the flag. The school has established the culture that the entire school family pauses, wherever they are and stand at attention, as a mark of respect when the flag is being hoisted in the mornings. Most students demonstrate good knowledge of Jamaica‟s national heroes and heroine as they are able to explain why the status was conferred on those individuals. Most students are aware of civic functions and special days including the Governor Generals‟ Award for excellence, Independence Day, Emancipation Day and Heroes Day. Many students are aware of cultural activities at the community level, and they can describe in detail the activities done on these occasions. Almost all students know about Jamaican music, food and dances; for example, „Dinkie Minnie,‟ quadrille and the maypole. Many students see “Kumina” as both as a dance and a religious practice based on knowledge from Religious Education lessons. Students‟ enthusiastically participate in daily devotions. Religious Education classes also provide opportunities for greater appreciation of religious practices and good spiritual understanding. Students’ economic awareness is good The economic awareness and understanding of the students are good. Many Grade 7 to 9 students are able to identify sources of income for Jamaica, for example, exports and various forms of taxes (GCT, Income tax). Most students also show awareness of the relevance of income from tourism and remittance services in boosting the economy. Most students, particularly at the Grades 10 to11 level, are aware of Jamaica‟s borrowing relationship with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and of the debt burden it places on Jamaicans. Buying things that are made in Jamaica and eating what Jamaica grows, along with studying hard, getting good jobs and working in Jamaica are ways that most students see themselves contributing to Jamaica‟s economic progress.


12

The students’ knowledge and understanding of their environment is good Many students are aware of the effects of hurricanes, earthquakes, tsunamis, volcanoes, tidal waves, droughts and tornadoes on the environment, and are able to use the last Haitian earthquake as an example of the devastation that can be caused by natural disasters. In most instances, students are able to explain the effects garbage disposal by burning has on the environment, particularly the ozone layer and many upper school students are able to speak to the effects of global warming on the environment. Most students are aware of the effects of improper disposal of garbage on the environment and are able to speak to diseases caused by air pollution and water pollution. Many students are able to explain the impact of cutting down trees. They are able to explain the importance of planting trees to prevent soil erosion. Most students are environmentally aware and take good care of the environment. The students participate in the beautification of the compound and in keeping it clean.

How good is the students´ personal and social development?

Grades 7-11

Students´ behavior and attitudes Satisfactory

Punctuality and attendance Satisfactory

Civic understanding and spiritual awareness

Good

Economic awareness and understanding Good

Environmental awareness and understanding

Good

6) Use of Human and Material Resources

How effectively does the school use the human and material resources at its disposal to help the students achieve as well as they can?

Overall, the use of human and material resources is satisfactory

The quality of human resources is good The school is sufficiently staffed with 52 suitably qualified and knowledgeable teachers with qualifications ranging from diploma to Masters Degrees. The academic staff is ably supported by 20 ancillary and 11 administrative staff. Staff are supported and offered regular training. For example, all mathematics teachers attended a CSEC strategic workshop in February 2012, which resulted in the introduction of the twinning of mathematical concepts. The use of human resources is good The academic staff members all are efficiently deployed, which optimizes the teaching and learning experience. In some instances where classes are overcrowded, two teachers are assigned to a lesson, positively impacts the needs of slow learners. The school has an


13

elaborate and robust system in tracking and managing teachers‟ attendance, and most staff attends school regularly. Most academic staff members are on time for school. A few teachers arrive exactly at 8 am or later. The ancillary staff members carry out their duties in a structured and business-like manner. They keep the premises immaculately clean, especially the bathrooms. Professional development of staff is keenly monitored and the HOD‟s organize in-house workshops to enhance the skills of teachers in their departments. The ancillary and administrative staff are given work related training, as well as personal development training, such as money management. The quality and quantity of material is good The quality and appropriateness of the school premises is of good quality and quantity. The classrooms are sufficiently spacious and furnished to adequately facilitate a conducive learning environment. The school premises are clean, and are complemented with well laid out building, which facilitate a variety of teaching learning activities. The quality and sufficiency of resources for teaching and learning is appropriate. The school has a well-equipped reading laboratory. The school operates the textbook rental scheme which satisfies the demand for text and resource books. In few instances, the students do not have sufficient textbooks, because the rented books are left at home. The use of material resources is satisfactory The school has a robust data management system that offers a number of monitoring benefits. There is also effective use of the school premises especially with an unparalleled print rich school environment. Many sections of the school walls have very informative and relevant details to complement curriculum material, and form an excellent enhancement to the curriculum and by extension support to students‟ learning. The effective organization and the use of available resources for teaching and learning is accentuated with a robust management system, characterized by superb documentation, monitors the movement of all resources used in lessons. All desks and all chairs have the relevant class inscribed on it to ensure proper management of the material resources. However, resources including textbooks, audio-visual materials, ICT and resource persons are insufficiently used to enhance learning.

How effectively does the school use the human and material resources at its disposal to help the students achieve as well as they can?

Grades 7-11

Human resources Good

Use of human resources Good

Material resources – quality and quantity Good

Use of material resources Satisfactory


14

7) Curriculum and Enhancement Programmes

How well do the curriculum and any enhancement programmes meet the needs of the students?

Overall, curriculum and enhancement programmes are good Provisions for curriculum are good The curricula offer general education that meets the needs of most students. The Reform of Secondary Education (ROSE) curriculum has modified versions, in print, for each subject area. The CSEC syllabus is used in the upper school. Physical education is offered as one of the vocation subjects that modifies the curriculum coverage in Grade 11, and coupled with the addition of Health and Family Life Education (HFLE) students‟ personal development is enhanced. Curriculum review is done once per term through staff development workshops, where best practices among teachers are shared. The lesson plans are the documentary proof of management in the execution of the modified curriculum. Since the 2010 to 2011 school year, the mathematics department has introduced a strategy to emphasize algebra from Grade 7 in an effort to provide more support to students. Each teacher has an active action plan with SMART objectives, and the Heads of Department (HODs) monitor to ensure continuity, progression and coverage within each school term. Walls are print rich with very informative material to enhance to the curriculum and support students‟ learning. However, the tardiness of the students in applying themselves in some lessons is impeding the continuity of the curriculum, and in some instances there is insufficient coverage. Enhancement programmes are good The curriculum is enriched by an outstanding range of co-curricular and extra-curricular activities, which greatly extends students‟ all-round educational experience. The quality of students‟ personal development is the central feature of the school holistic educational programme. The school has fifteen active clubs that are timetabled for Mondays and Wednesdays, and they are all geared to add value to all students‟ learning. Notably among them is the National Inter-schools Brigade (NIB); this corps of students went through their drills without the presence of a teacher and smartly hoist the National Flag each morning. The science club functions as a homework centre and provides opportunities for students to develop inquiry and research skills. The „Student of the Month‟ appraisal exercise, functions as a motivation to students; and the criteria for selection is based on academic performance. A mathematics club is in place and functions to support and improve students‟ numeracy skills. Many students excel in several extra-curricular activities. For example, students excel at Jamaica Cultural Development Commission (JCDC) speech, music and culinary arts and have been awarded gold, silver, bronze medals. The school has also done fairly well in the Ministry of Education‟s (MOE) poster competition, sports and quiz, the Jamaica Library Service national reading competition, and debating competitions. The school went on to the second round of the Math Olympiad in March 2012.


15

How well do the curriculum and any enhancement programmes meet the needs of the students?

Grades 7-11

How well does the curriculum meet the needs of the students?

Good

How well do the enhancement programmes meet the needs of the students?

Good

8) Student Safety, Security, Health and Wellbeing

How well does the school ensure everyone’s safety, security, health and wellbeing?

Overall student safety, security, health and wellbeing is good Provisions for safety and security are exceptionally high Safety and security is exceptionally high. There are policies and procedures in place to ensure the safety and security of all stakeholders. There is a safety committee led by a safety coordinator; members are identified by specially marked badges. The school is completely fenced and there is 24 hours security presence. The license number of all vehicles entering the premises is noted, and drivers are issued passes that are returned on exit. All visitors entering the school building are fitted with a visitor‟s tag and their names recorded in a log book. Students are issued with a pass to go outside of the main building during contact hours. The school has regular earthquake and fire drills. There are emergency exits for quick escape; approximately six persons at strategic points around the school have keys to these exits. There is a labelled Emergency Assembly Post of which staff and students are aware. Smoke detectors are in every classroom and various other parts of the building. Fire extinguishers are strategically placed at several points of the school‟s compound with guidelines on how to operate them and signs are placed to remind persons not to interfere with them. Safety procedures are written along walls of corridors, for example, „Walk on the left of corridors.‟ Walk in lines.‟ There are posters providing guidance for what to do if there is a chemical spill, civil disturbance, police action in the vicinity and black outs/power failure. School has a fire handler‟s hose and fire hydrant strategically placed with instructions on how to operate it. Instructions for emergency procedures are placed at strategic points around the school giving instructions on evacuation procedures and how to proceed in various types of emergencies in colour code; for example, fire and toxic fumes are coded in yellow, outside disturbances in blue, earthquake, storm, explosion in green, intruders and critical incidents in red. Specially selected personnel are responsible for internal safety. Provisions for students’ health and wellbeing are good The school is governed by a health policy. All relevant staff have current food handlers‟ permits. The nurse provides first aid services, and accompanies students to the hospital in case of medical emergency. She also manages a welfare programme to include meals, sanitary supplies and uniforms for students who need it. The canteen and kitchen are clean,


16

meshed and there are provisions in place for the proper disposal of garbage. Bathroom facilities are kept in very good condition and girls‟ bathrooms are outstandingly clean. Student and staff have good relationships; some students were observed hugging the Principal. Students say their favourite feature at the school is the relationship with teachers; they feel loved and cared for as teachers go the extra mile to get them to learn and there is mutual respect. The school has an assigned Dean of Discipline and a School Resource Officer, who, along with the disciplinary committee, deal with behavioural problems. There is a chain of command in dealing with disciplinary matters as outlined in students‟ handbook and a structured guidance and counselling programme in place. All Grade 7 classes are timetabled for guidance along with other classes deemed as having critical needs or serious behavioural problems. Teachers are a part of the school‟s mentoring programme; each teacher has at least five students to mentor. The Dean of Discipline, the Guidance Counsellor, the Vice Principal and the school nurse liaise with each other as referrals sometimes have to be made among them. They all have access to students‟ records and telephone numbers for contact with parents in cases of an emergency. Teachers keep track of students‟ attendance through registers and prolonged absences are reported to the Guidance Counsellor who does intervention by calling or visiting as deemed necessary. Arrangements are in place for the suspension and expulsion of students. However there is an over reliance on suspension as a disciplinary option; forty-two students have been suspended since this school year.

How well does the school ensure everyone´s safety, security, health and wellbeing?

Grades 7-11

Provisions for safety and security Exceptionally high

Provision for health and wellbeing Good


17

Recommendations

We recommend that the school takes the following actions to make further improvement:

1. The Principal and SMT should: a. Design and implement a comprehensive system of discipline that will take into

account alternative measures that will reduce the school‟s over-reliance on suspensions.

2. Heads of Department, supported by the SMT, should: a. Identify weaknesses in the teaching skills among some the teachers and put

strategies in place to eliminate them. b. Ensure that all teachers‟ lesson plans are critically examined for content,

reflection, and creativity of strategies, including the use of ICT.

3. Teachers should: a. Include learning activities in lessons that will stimulate more students to be

involved in their own learning b. Take responsibility for improving the range of teaching strategies and learning

activities used to address the needs of all students.

Further Action

The school has been asked to prepare an action plan indicating how it will address the recommendations of this report. The action plan will be sent to the National Educational Inspectorate and the Regional Education Authority within two months of the school‟s receiving the written report. The next inspection will report on the progress made by the school.

Maureen Dwyer Chief Inspector of Education National Educational Inspectorate


18

List of Abbreviations and Acronyms

CAPE Caribbean Advanced Proficiency Examination CCSLC Caribbean Certificate of Secondary Level Competence CSEC Caribbean Secondary Education Certificate GNAT Grade Nine Achievement Test GSAT Grade Six Achievement Test HEART Human Employment and Resource Training ICT Information and Communication Technology IT Information Technology ISSA Inter Secondary Schools‟ Association JSAS Jamaica Schools Administration System JTA Jamaica Teachers Association MOE Ministry of Education NEI National Education Inspectorate PATH Programme of Advancement Through Health and Education PTA Parent Teacher Association SIP School Improvement Plan SJE Standard Jamaican English SMT School Management Team


19

Appendices Appendix 1 - Record of Inspection Activities Appendix 2 - Inspection Indicators Appendix 3 – National Test Data


20

Appendix 1 - Record of Inspection Activities

Evidence for this report was based on the following:

Total number of lessons or part lessons observed

66

English Maths Other

Number of lessons or part lessons observed

[Primary]

Number of lessons or part lessons observed

[Secondary, either grades 7 – 11 or 7 – 9 in an all-age school]

21 24 21

Number of scheduled interviews completed with members of staff, governing body and parents

12

Number of scheduled interviews completed with students

6

Parents Students Teachers

Number of questionnaires returned and analysed


21

Appendix 2 - Inspection Indicators Inspection indicators serve a number of purposes:

They establish the vocabulary for a conversation with, and between, schools about the purposes of schooling and the key determinants of educational success

They provide schools with a picture of educational excellence to which they can

aspire

They provide schools with a clear understanding of levels of provision and performance that are considered unacceptable and must be improved

Schools can use the indicators to evaluate their own provision and performance, and

to help them to make improvements

The use of indicators ensures that inspectors concentrate on weighing evidence to make consistent judgements in all schools

The publication of indicators helps to make inspection a transparent process for

schools and the wider public.


22

Inspection Indicators

1. How effectively is the school led and managed by the Board, the Principal and

SMT and middle leadership?

1.1 School-based leadership and management

Key features: Leadership qualities Vision, direction and guidance Culture and ethos Instructional leadership Impact on standards and progress Development of relationships with staff Accountability School information and document management system

Short descriptions to illustrate the five-point scale:

Level 1

Needs Immediate Support

Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

The school‟s leadership lacks drive and authority. There is widespread lack of confidence in the leadership among the staff. The leadership holds the staff accountable for their performance in a very limited way. Most students are under-achieving and make very little progress

Staff in leadership positions are insufficiently rigorous in focussing on improvement. The leadership holds the staff accountable in a limited way for their performance. Many students in one or more age groups do not make enough progress in their work and personal development.

The school has a strong sense of direction, which focuses on improving students‟ achievements and wellbeing. The staff share a common purpose. The leadership consistently holds the staff accountable for their performance. Most students make satisfactory progress and all groups are supported well

Leadership is firm and decisive. The staff work well together, with clear lines of responsibility. The staff respond positively to initiatives. Staff accountability systems are rigorously applied. The needs of most students are well catered for and most students make good progress

Leadership is dynamic and often inspirational. A clear vision for the future directs and guides staff and students. The leadership holds the staff highly accountable for their performance. The school is successful with all groups of students, including those who do not respond well to school or have difficulties with learning


23

1.2 Self-evaluation and improvement planning

Key features: Process and activities for school self-evaluation Monitoring and analysis of the school‟s performance, including views of parents and

students Process for staff appraisal and development Process for school improvement planning, implementation and monitoring


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Self-evaluation is poorly developed. There is almost no monitoring or evaluation of the school‟s provision and performance, including teaching and learning. As a result, the school has no clear agenda for improvement

Self-evaluation is inadequately developed, so managers do not have a realistic view of the school‟s strengths and weaknesses, including teaching and learning. Planning for improvement is not based on realistic priorities

The school‟s priorities are based on sound analysis of its performance. The work of the school is monitored effectively, including the performance of staff and students, and appropriate actions are taken

Through effective self-evaluation, which takes into account the views of parents, managers know their school well. They use the outcomes of self-evaluation to plan and take action promptly to make necessary improvements. Staff appraisal procedures are effective.

Systematic and rigorous self-evaluation is embedded in the school‟s practice at all levels. Staff appraisal is rigorous and staff development is well-planned and highly effective. Strategic thinking is clear. Ambitious improvement planning results in the achievement of identified goals.


24

1.3 Governance

Key features: Strategic and advisory role of the Board Operational support for the management of the school Accountability


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

The Board has almost no influence on the work of the school. It does almost nothing to support the efficient and effective management of the school. The Board holds the school leadership accountable for its performance in a very limited way.

The Board has little influence on the work of the school. It does little to support the efficient and effective management of the school. The Board holds the school leadership accountable in a limited way for its performance.

The Board meets all its responsibilities. It gives clear support and advice to the school leadership. The Board consistently holds the school leadership accountable for their performance.

The Board has a positive influence on the work of the school. It plays a significant strategic and advisory role in leading the school’s development. . The school leadership is rigorously held to account for its performance.

The Board makes a significant contribution to the leadership of the school and its successes. It works most effectively in support of the school‟s educational leaders. The Board holds the school leadership highly accountable for its performance.


25

1.4 Relations with parents and the local community

Key features: Communications with parents Parents‟ involvement in their children‟s learning and the life of the school Links with the local community and agencies


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Communications with parents are infrequent and of poor quality. Many parents know too little about the work their children are doing to be able to help them effectively. The school has very little to do with its local community. Opportunities are missed to enrich the curriculum through the use of community resources

The school gives parents insufficient information about their children‟s progress and wellbeing. Community involvement is limited and the school does not actively seek relationships with outside agencies to support the wellbeing and progress of students

Parents receive regular, detailed reports about their children‟s progress. There are regular opportunities to talk to teachers and some parents are actively involved in school life.

The school works with outside agencies to enhance the wellbeing and progress of students

Methods for communicating between home and school are well established. Many parents are involved in school activities.

The school has productive links with the local community and uses them to enrich the curriculum and strengthen teaching and learning

The school has a strong educational partnership with parents, who are actively involved in many aspects of school life and play an important role in decision-making.

The school capitalises on the expertise and resources in the community to improve its performance and benefit students


26

2. How effectively does the teaching support the students´ learning?

2.1 Teachers‟ knowledge of the subjects they teach and how best to teach them

Key features: Teachers‟ knowledge of their subjects Teachers‟ knowledge of how best to teach their subjects Teachers‟ understanding of how students learn best in their subjects Teacher reflect on their teaching


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Many teachers have insufficient knowledge of the subjects and the curriculum they teach. This seriously limits the progress that many students make and the standards they reach

Some teachers have insufficient knowledge of the subjects and the curriculum and of how to teach effectively. This results in ineffective and inaccurate teaching and incomplete curriculum coverage

Most teachers have a secure understanding of the subjects they teach. There is evidence that teachers reflect on the impact of their practice. Curriculum coverage is secure

All teachers have good subject knowledge and reflect regularly on the impact of their teaching. Coverage of curriculum is complete.

Teaching of a consistently high quality stems from the teachers‟ expert knowledge of their subjects and how to teach them. They reflect regularly and rigorously on the impact of their teaching


27

2.2 Teaching methods

Key features: Quality and effectiveness of lesson planning Management of time Effective use of resources – textbooks, audio and visual materials, resource persons

and ICT Quality of teacher and student interactions including questions and dialogue Teaching strategies which challenge and cater to the needs of all students


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

The teaching methods in many lessons are poorly matched to the needs of the students. Activities are often only loosely related to the achievement of learning objectives. Lessons are frequently dull and unchallenging for the students

Although their planning may be detailed, the methods the teachers use often take little account of what the students already know. The work they set frequently lacks challenge and lesson objectives are often unclear

Teachers plan their lessons well and teaching methods are effective. They manage time well and make the work interesting, with realistic levels of challenge. They make sure the students have the resources they need to complete tasks successfully

Lessons are well planned with teaching methods that are effective in securing intended outcomes. The needs of individual students are well catered for. Teachers challenge and extend the students‟ thinking, which helps them to make good progress and achieve high standards

The teaching methods are effective. Lessons are often imaginative and consistently stimulate and challenge the students to achieve as well as they can. Activities are chosen to match the needs of the students, to secure intended outcomes and to achieve excellent standards


28

2.3 Assessment

Key features: Assessment as part of teaching and learning Assessment practices including policies, implementation and record keeping Student self-assessment Use of assessment information by teachers and students to inform teaching and

learning Quality of feedback by teachers, in lessons and in written work, to help students

identify and make improvements Teachers‟ knowledge of students‟ strengths and weaknesses


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

There is little, if any, systematic internal assessment of students‟ work. Teachers have very little detailed knowledge of students´ progress and achievements

Assessment is not well developed. Teachers do not have sufficient detailed knowledge of students‟ progress and achievements

Assessment is used to track the achievements of students, to indicate what they have learned and to help them understand what they need to do next.

Consistent and effective assessment practices are in place for monitoring students‟ progress. Most staff use them to focus sharply on what students need to do to improve. Students are sometimes involved in evaluating their own work

A thorough programme of assessment and review, including students‟ evaluation of their work, is used consistently throughout the school. Teachers are highly effective in helping students to identify and make improvements in their work


29

2.4 Student learning

Key features: Attitudes and motivation to learn Interactions and collaboration between students Application of learning to new situations and real life Inquiry and research skills Problem-solving skills


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Most students show little motivation to learn. They require constant supervision to stay on task

Many students find it difficult to work without supervision and too much of the teachers‟ time is spent managing students‟ behaviour

Most students use their time well in lessons. They can explain clearly what they have learned.

They can work constructively with others when required

Most students are keen to learn. Many can apply what they have learned to new situations and show initiative in solving problems. They are able to work well, both independently and as part of a team

Almost all students are highly motivated to learn. Almost all students understand how current learning relates to previous work. They can apply what they have learned to new situations. They frame their own questions and solve problems independently of the teachers, working well together in teams

3. How well do students perform in national and/or regional tests and assessments? (For infants: in relation to age-related expectations)

Key features: Performance in national and/or regional assessments Performance in comparison to similar schools


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

The performance of most students is very low in comparison with those in similar schools

The performance of many students is low in comparison with those in similar schools

The students‟ performance is generally in line with those in similar schools

The performance of many students is good in relation to those in similar schools

The performance of most students is very high in relation to those in similar schools


30

4. How much progress do students make in relation to their starting points?

Key features: Progress against starting points Progress over time Progress during lessons Appropriateness of levels achieved


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Most students are under-achieving and make almost no progress

Many students are under-achieving and progress is unsatisfactory

The achievement of most students is adequate and they make satisfactory progress

The progress of most students is good. Most students achieve well compared with their earlier attainment

Almost all students make excellent progress and achieve very well in relation to their earlier attainment

5. How good is the students´ personal and social development?

5.1 Students‟ behaviour and attitudes

Key features: Observed behaviour and attitudes in lessons and around the school compound Students‟ relationships with students and all school staff Social graces


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Most students show little self-discipline. They disobey school rules and disrupt many lessons. Many students display poor mannerism especially to adults and their peers.

The poor behaviour of some students disrupts some lessons and causes difficulties. Students often do not obey rules and regulations. Many students display poor mannerism especially to their peers.

Behaviour and relationships are generally good. Rules are respected. The school is orderly and safe. Many students are well mannered and display this to their peers and adults.

Good behaviour and relationships prevail throughout the school. Most students exercise self-control. Most students display mastery of the social graces all around.

Almost all students are self-disciplined, respond very well to adults and resolve difficulties in mature ways. Almost all students display excellent mastery of the social graces all around.


31

5.2 Punctuality and Attendance Key features: Punctuality to school lessons Attendance to school


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Most students attend school and classes poorly and are unpunctual as well. Attendance overall is 69% and less.

Many students attend school and classes irregularly and are unpunctual as well. Attendance overall is 70 - 79%.

Many students attend school and classes regularly and are punctual as well. Attendance overall is 80 - 89%.

Most students attend school and classes regularly and are punctual as well. Attendance overall is 90 – 95 %.

Almost all students attend school and classes regularly and are punctual as well. Attendance overall is 96% and higher.

5.3 Students‟ civic understanding and spiritual awareness

Key features: Understanding of national identity and civic responsibility Spiritual understanding and awareness Appreciation of local and regional traditions and culture


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Most students have little or no understanding of national identity and/or spiritual awareness and little appreciation of local traditions and culture

Many students lack understanding of national identity and/or spiritual awareness. Many students lack appreciation of local traditions and culture.

Many students are developing an understanding of national identity, and an appreciation of local traditions and culture together with spiritual understanding

Most students understand the concept of national identity. They understand and appreciate local traditions and culture. They have a good spiritual understanding

Almost all students understand and appreciate the defining characteristics of Jamaican society, and the region‟s traditions and culture. They have a high level of spiritual understanding


32

5.4 Students‟ economic awareness and understanding

Key features: Awareness and understanding of Jamaica‟s economic progress and importance both

regionally and globally Awareness of their potential contribution to Jamaica


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Most students are unaware of the importance of Jamaica‟s continued economic progress and of their potential to contribute to it. Most students have little or no understanding and awareness of economic issues.

Many students are unaware of the importance of Jamaica‟s continued economic progress and of their potential to contribute to it.

Many students understand the importance of Jamaica‟s continued economic progress and that they will have a role in contributing to it.

Most students understand the importance of

Jamaica’s continued economic progress and know that they can contribute to it.

Almost all students understand the importance of securing Jamaica‟s economic progress and are well equipped and willing to contribute to it.


33

5.5. Environmental awareness and understanding Key features: Knowledge and understanding of national and global environmental issues Concern and care for the environment


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Most students have little or no awareness of national or global environmental issues and they show little concern for their immediate environment

Many students have little awareness of national or global environmental issues and make little effort to take care of their immediate environment

Many students are aware of national and global environmental issues and they take care of their immediate environment

Most students know that national and world resources need to be protected and used responsibly and they take care of their immediate environment

Almost all students understand the importance of securing a sustainable environment. They take care of their immediate environment and some are involved in related co-curricular activities


34

6. How effectively does the school use the human and material resources at its disposal to help the students achieve as well as they can?

6.1. Human resources

Key features: Sufficiency of suitably qualified and knowledgeable teaching and support staff Effective deployment of staff


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

The school is inadequately staffed to deliver its curriculum effectively. The quality of the education the students receive is seriously reduced in consequence

The school lacks, or fails to deploy, teaching and support staff with the knowledge and expertise required to deliver the curriculum in full

The school retains and deploys sufficient qualified staff to deliver the curriculum and achieve satisfactory standards

The school has the well qualified teaching and support staff it needs to deliver the curriculum and enable the students to achieve good standards

The school has a full complement of well qualified staff and deploys them to achieve the best standards possible for students


35

6.2 Use of human resources Key features

Effective deployment of staff Attendance and punctuality to class and school Professional development


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Members of the academic staff are inefficiently deployed to enable the school to achieve satisfactory standards for students. Most teachers attend classes and school irregularly and are regularly late. Most teachers seldom engage in professional development opportunities

Many members of the academic staff are inefficiently deployed to enable the school to achieve satisfactory standards for students. Some teachers attend classes and school irregularly and are regularly late. Many teachers seldom engage in professional development opportunities.

Many members of the academic staff are efficiently deployed to enable the school to achieve satisfactory standards for students. Staff attendance to classes and school is regular and punctuality rate is fair. Teachers are adequately engaged in professional development opportunities.

Most members of the academic staff are efficiently deployed to enable the school to achieve good possible standards for students. Staff attendance and punctuality to school and classes are good. Teachers regularly engage in professional development opportunities.

Members of the academic staff are efficiently deployed to enable the school to achieve the best standards possible for students. Staff attendance and punctuality to school and classes are good. Teachers often engage in professional development opportunities.


36

6.3 Material resources – Quality and Quantity Key features: Appropriateness and quality of the school premises Appropriateness, quality and sufficiency of resources for teaching and learning


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Premises and resources are significantly below expected quality and quantity

There are significant deficiencies in premises and/or resources

Premises and resources are sufficient in quality and quantity

Premises and resources are of good quality and sufficiency

Premises and resources are plentiful and of high quality

6.4 Use of material resources

Key features: Effective use of school premises Effective organisation and use of available resources for teaching and learning


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

The staff make poor use of the available premises and/or resources

Deficiencies in premises and/or resources restrict some aspects of the students‟ academic achievement and personal development

Premises and resources are maintained and organised to satisfactorily support teaching and learning

Premises and resources are well maintained, and well organised. Staff and students have easy access to resources and make good use of them

The school is creative in its use of premises and resources and makes exceptionally good use of the available resources to achieve high standards


37

7. How well do the curriculum and any enhancement programmes meet the needs of the students?

7.1 Relevance Key features:

Adaptation and modification of curriculum Review and planning Continuity progression and coverage Relevance to all students


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

There is almost no adaptation or modification of the curriculum or curriculum guides. Most teachers do not adapt or enrich the curriculum to meet the students´ needs

There is discontinuity in the modified or adapted curriculum in some subjects from year to year. There are significant gaps in content. Additional support for students is minimal

The curriculum is modified or adapted and regularly reviewed to make learning worthwhile. There are few significant gaps in content. Some additional support is provided for students who need it

The curriculum is well balanced, and reviewed and updated regularly to maintain its relevance to all students. There are no significant gaps in content. Additional support is provided for most students who need it

There is imaginative modification and/or adaptation of curriculum. The curriculum is broad, balanced and regularly evaluated to ensure that it meets changing needs and maintains the students‟ interest. There is extensive additional support for all students who need it


38

7.2 Enhancement Programmes Key features:

Cross-curricular links and extra-curricular activities Links with the local environment and community

Short descriptions to illustrate the five-point scale

Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Links between subject areas is basically lacking and do not allow students to make connections. Opportunities for students to participate in extra-curricular activities are limited and little effort made to integrate the community in the development of the curriculum.

Attempts to create links between the subject areas are inadequate to make meaningful connections. Some opportunities exist for extra-curricular activities and there is some community impact on the curriculum.

Links between the many subject areas are adequate and many students are able to make connection between subjects. Many Students have opportunities to participate in a variety of extra-curricular activities and the community is used to enhance the curriculum.

Links between the most subject areas are adequate and most students are able to make connection between subjects. Most students have opportunities to participate in a variety of extra-curricular activities and the community is used to enhance the delivery of the curriculum.

Links between the subject areas are adequate and students are able to make connection between subjects. Students have opportunities to participate in a variety of extra-curricular activities and the community is well used to enhance the delivery of the curriculum.


39

8. How well does the school ensure everyone’s safety, security, health and wellbeing?

8.1 Safety and security

Key features: Policies and procedures to ensure the safety and security of all members of the

school community Quality of monitoring and maintenance


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Policies for safety and security are non-existent or ignored. There are almost no safety and security checks. Many parts of the buildings and equipment are unsafe and poorly maintained

Policies for safety and security are poorly implemented.

Safety and security checks are irregular and not rigorous. Some parts of the buildings or equipment are unsafe.

Policies and procedures are implemented and accidents are rare. Requirements for maintaining the safety and security of students are met. Buildings and equipment are safe and securely maintained in sound repair

Regular and thorough checks are made and acted upon to ensure that a safe and secure environment is maintained. Buildings and equipment are kept in a good state of repair

The school provides an exceptionally safe and secure environment for students and staff. Buildings and equipment are regularly maintained in excellent condition


40

8.2 Health and wellbeing

Key features: Policies governing health Staff relationship with students Staff management of behavioural issues Staff support of , and advice to students Guidance and counselling arrangements Tracking of students‟ wellbeing Management of student attendance and punctuality Arrangements for suspension and exclusion of students – number of students out of

school due to suspension and exclusion Number of school drop-outs


Level 1


Level 2

Unsatisfactory

Level 3

Satisfactory

Level 4

Good

Level 5

Exceptionally high

Most members of staff have poor relationships with most students. Guidance and Counselling arrangements are poor and the school is ineffective in responding to students´ needs. Arrangements for the suspension and exclusion of students are poorly handled

Many parts of the buildings are unhygienic and students‟ nutritional needs are not addressed.

Most members of staff are slow to diagnose and respond to students‟ needs. Guidance and Counselling arrangements are weak or are not applied consistently. Arrangements for the suspension and exclusion of students are unsatisfactory

Some parts of the buildings are unhygienic and provisions for students‟ nutritional needs are inadequate.

Most members of staff know students well. They show them respect and respond promptly to their personal needs. Students know they can trust and confide in staff. Arrangements for the suspension and exclusion of students are satisfactory.

Most buildings are hygienic and provisions in place to satisfy nutritional needs.

Students’ personal wellbeing is a high priority for staff. There are systems for tracking students’ personal welfare and for supporting individuals and groups. Arrangements for the suspension and exclusion of students are well-handled.

Buildings are hygienic and good provisions in place to satisfy students’ nutritional needs

and other health concerns

Staff has very good relationships with all students. There are well developed systems for tracking students´ personal welfare and for supporting individuals or groups. Staff consistently provides well-judged advice and guidance. Arrangements for the suspension and exclusion of students are exceptionally well-handled.

Buildings are hygienic and a health policy provision in place to satisfy nutritional needs and other health needs


41

Appendix 3 - National Test Data

Please note: Foga Road High was instituted in 2007. Therefore, there is lack of sufficient school examination data in order to complete the usual school profile. The following data was provided to NEI by Foga Road High.

CSEC: The school has not yet established Fifth Forms but will do so in the 2011/2012 academic year. They submitted entries for mathematics and social studies in the May/June 2011 CSEC examinations. However, the students were drawn from Grades 9 and 10. Nine (9) boys and thirty-nine (39) girls were entered (some sat both subjects while others sat either mathematics or social studies). Of the 48 students submitted, the passes are as follows: CSEC Mathematics and Social Studies Passes by Gender Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Mathematics Males 0 3 0 Females 0 1 6 Total Math 0 4 6 Social Studies Males 0 1 5 Females 0 5 13 Total S Studies 0 6 18

foga road high school - jis.gov.jm

Documents