fls implementation – a national approach, rotterdam 2015

35
FLS Implementation – A National Approach Friday 4 September 2015 Hilary Arden, Head of Service Delivery Sonya Stephenson, Service Development Manager Tim Jones, Commissioning Advisor

Upload: national-osteoporosis-society

Post on 16-Feb-2017

475 views

Category:

Healthcare


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

FLS Implementation – A National Approach

Friday 4 September 2015

Hilary Arden, Head of Service DeliverySonya Stephenson, Service Development Manager

Tim Jones, Commissioning Advisor

Page 2: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

The National Osteoporosis Society• The only UK-wide charity dedicated to

improving the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis

• Vision: A future without fragility fractures• Mission: Working together for a brighter

future for people with or at risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures across the UK, putting an end to preventable broken bones and helping people to live without pain and disability

Page 3: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015
Page 4: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015
Page 5: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015
Page 6: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015
Page 7: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

• 300,000 fragility #• 85,000 are hip #• 1.8M hospital bed days• 20% die in 4 months• 33% become totally

dependent • £1.9B in hospital costs

Impact of Fractures in the UK

Page 8: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

What is the solution?

Page 9: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

A Fracture Liaison Service (FLS)• A proven model for fragility fracture prevention• All patients > 50 years who fracture are targeted• 50% of hip fracture patients have had a prior

fragility fracture• Where treatment is initiated, up to 50% hip

fractures could be avoided in future

• Clinically and cost effective

Find them

Assess them

Treat where appropriate Follow-up

Page 10: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

National Osteoporosis SocietyPriorities and Plans for 2015Aim 1: Every person aged over 50 who breaks a bone is assessed for osteoporosis and managed appropriately.Priority 1:

Extend coverage of Fracture Liaison Services

Priority 2:Improve quality of Fracture Liaison Services and osteoporosis services

Page 11: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

• FLS Implementation Group• UK FLS Clinical Standards• FLS Implementation Toolkit• FLS Implementation Workshops• Fracture Prevention Practitioner (FPP)

Training• Peer Review• Service Delivery Team

A National Approach to FLS

Page 12: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

FLS Implementation Group• National stakeholders & Government• Provide strategic leadership and coordination

across projects• Ensure good communication and partnership

across FLS stakeholders• Plan and deliver agreed actions and

milestones• Ensure delivery of high quality, efficient and

cost-effective FLS

Page 13: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

Definition of an FLS‘‘A Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) systematically

identifies, treats and refers to appropriate services all eligible patients aged over 50 years within a local population who have suffered a fragility fracture, with the aim of reducing their risk of

subsequent fractures.’’

Page 14: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

• FLS Implementation Group• UK FLS Clinical Standards• FLS Implementation Toolkit• FLS Implementation Workshops• Fracture Prevention Practitioner (FPP)

Training• Peer Review• Service Delivery Team

A National Approach to FLS

Page 15: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

Service Delivery Team

Sonya StephensonService Development

Project Manager

Will CarrService Development

Project Manager

Hilary ArdenHead of

Service Delivery

Tim Jones Commissioning

Advisor

Mayrine FraserService Development

Project Manager

Debbie StoneService Development

Project Manager

Fiona GardnerOperation Projects

Officer

Henry MaceProfessional

Development Lead

Page 16: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

• Facilitate stakeholder engagement• Help establish patient/care pathway• Project manage commissioning/funding:

o The economic and business caseo Service specificationo Resource and capacity planning

• Work with commissioners to ensure services are sustained.

How We Help

Page 17: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

• Provide input to enable the development of an FLS meets the UK FLS Clinical Standards

• Help establish data collection, analysis, evaluation and reporting

• Identify gaps in service provision, put in place improvement plans and monitor against agreed actions

• Peer review

How We Help

Page 18: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

FLS: Some Localities

Page 19: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

UK FLS Clinical StandardsThe 5IQ approach describes the key objectives of an FLS:

• Identification

• Investigation

• Information

• Intervention

• Integration

• Quality www.nos.org.uk/fls

Page 20: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

UK FLS Clinical Standards Summary of Standards

CRITERIA RATIONALE MEASURES OUTCOMES Identification

1 All patients aged 50 years and over with a new fragility fracture or a newly reported vertebral fracture, whether managed as inpatients or outpatients, will be systematically and proactively identified.

Patients who have sustained a fracture are at higher relative risk of fracture than those who have not. Targeted interventions in this population will have most impact on reducing future fracture burden.

Proportion of fracture patients aged over 50 years identified by the FLS.

Denominator for all fragility fractures can be best estimated by multiplying total hip fractures in over 50 year olds by 5 (1).

Systematic identification of at risk patient population who would benefit from investigation.

Investigation

2 Patients will have a bone health assessment and their need for a comprehensive falls risk assessment will be evaluated within 3 months of the incident fracture.

Assessments need to be conducted promptly as the risk of having a further fracture is increased in the first year.

% of identified patients who have a bone health assessment within 3 months of incident fracture.

% of identified patients who have their need for a falls risk assessment evaluated within 3 months of incident fracture.

Improved identification of the population who will benefit from interventions leading to appropriate targeting of resources.

Information

3 All patients identified will be offered written information about bone health, lifestyle, nutrition and bone-protection treatments.

Anyone aged over 50 years who has had a fracture needs to be aware of the steps they can take to maintain healthy bones.

% of identified patients given information.

Improved patient understanding leading to confident self-management and engagement with recommended interventions.

Intervention

4 Patients at risk of further fracture will be offered appropriate bone-protection treatments.

Appropriately targeted interventions reduce future fracture risk.

% of assessed patients offered bone-protection treatment.

The right people receive the right interventions for bone health and falls leading to reduced fracture risk and fewer fractures.

Patient mobility and independence is maintained.

5 Patients at risk of further falls will be offered appropriate assessment or interventions to reduce future falls.

Evidence-based falls interventions are effective at reducing falls risk.

% of assessed patients offered referral for assessment or an intervention.

Page 21: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

  Integration      6 Management plans will be patient centred and integrated between

primary and secondary care.

Effective communication is essential to ensure that long-term management is achieved and that patients are supported to engage with recommended interventions.

Measure of communication – patients copied in/discharge letters

Written/verbal.

Patient feels supported.

Issues with treatment compliance and adherence are identified promptly.

Adherence to treatments is improved leading to greater patient benefit.

 

 

7 Patients who are recommended a drug to reduce risk of fracture will be reviewed within 4 months to ensure appropriate treatment has been started; and every 12 months to monitor concordance with the treatment plan.

 

Treatments must be taken consistently and appropriately over many years to be effective. Follow-up allows early identification of issues (side effects, compliance) with prescribed medications, reinforces need to take treatments and supports long-term concordance. Long-term management and follow-up should be carried out in primary care.

% of patients on treatment who are reviewed within 4 months

% of patients on treatment who are assessed annually.

  Quality      8 Core clinical data from patients identified by the FLS will be

recorded on a database. Regular audit and patient experience measures will be performed and the FLS will participate in any national audits undertaken.

Data recorded will allow the FLS to audit and improve the service they provide ensuring that high standards are met and maintained. Initial data will provide a baseline from which improvements can be assessed.

Date of last audit against FLS standards.

Date of last patient satisfaction survey.

Excellent quality of care is provided and best practice is shared.

9 The FLS team will have appropriate competencies in secondary fracture prevention and supported to maintain relevant CPD.

All staff need appropriate knowledge, skills and experience to fulfil their role. Engagement with relevant CPD activities ensures that these are up to date.

Review of competencies and training needs in annual appraisals.

Assessment of CPD attained.

 

10 The FLS should engage in a regular peer-review process of quality assurance.

Clinical peer review facilitates quality standard assurance, equitable access to services and provides a means of benchmarking and sharing best practice.

Date of last peer review and progress against an agreed action plan.

UK FLS Clinical Standards

Page 22: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

UK - Gap analysis All patients aged 50 years and over with a new fragility fracture or a newly reported vertebral fracture will be systematically and proactively identified.  

outline process for identifying (include numbers seen where able)In-Patient hip fractures 50-75 75+

Outline process for identifying (include numbers seen where able)In-Patient hip fractures 50-75 75+     

In-patient non-hip fracture50-75 75+      

Out-patient fractures50-75 75+      

Spinal fractures  

Page 23: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

Assist with Stakeholder Meetings • Lead clinician/local

champion• Consultants:

o Endocrinologisto Rheumatologisto Geriatriciano Radiologisto Orthopaedic surgeon

• Osteoporosis nurse specialists

• DXA radiographers• Service manager/s

• Pharmacist• Prescribing advisors• Physiotherapist• GPs/Primary care• CCGs• Commissioners• Health & Wellbeing

Board/s• Public Health• IT• Site services• Patient rep (NOS!)

Page 24: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

Assist with FLS Pathway

FALLS RISKASSESSMENT

NEW CLINICAL FRACTURE

NEW VERTEBRALFRACTURE

(RADIOLOGY REPORT)

PREVIOUS FRACTURE OR FRACTURE NOT PRESENTING

TO ACUTE CARE

ORTHO IP

Virtual/#CLINIC

‘CASE-FINDING’ BY FLS‘CASE-FINDING’ BY COTE

‘CASE-FINDING’ BY GP/SEC CARE/CH

FLS RISK ASSESSMENTONE-STOP CLINIC

WITH DXA

EXERCISECLASSES

Rx FOR FRACTURE 2Y PREVENTION

EDUCATIONPROGRAMME

CARE OF THE

ELDERLY

4 & 12 MONTH FOLLOW UP

CLINIC

COMPLEX CLINIC

(IF REQUIRED)

Page 25: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

25

FLS Implementation Toolkit1. Promotes commissioning of effective high-quality

services that are integrated within a system-wide approach

2. Ensures services are in accord with the evidence base and able to demonstrate outcomes

3. Stimulates provision of services that are sustainable

4. Make implementation easier, cheaper and more effective for commissioners and providers.

Page 26: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

Contents Name Description Format

UK FLS Standards Clinical standards for FLS PDF

Call to action A summary of evidence for providers and commissioners PDF

Service Specification A part populated service specification suitable for use with NHS Standard Contracts

MS Word

Benefits Calculator A financial model demonstrating potential cost savings Web

Cost Calculator A financial model to calculate the service requirements Web

Service Improvement Guide A descriptive guide setting out step-by-step actions for providers to achieve a service improvement

PDF

Outcome and Performance Indicators

Practical, evidence-based indicators to demonstrate service improvement

MS Excel

Improvement Project Plan A list of tasks and activities for a development project MS Excel

Business Case Part populated case for investment in FLS MS Word

Page 27: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

An FLS is both clinically and cost effective

Page 28: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

FLS Benefits Calculator• Additional resource within the

FLS-IT• Designed for use by hospitals, community

services and commissioning organisations to help develop an FLS

• Estimates the benefits in terms of reduced fragility fracture incidence and cost savings that can be realised in a local health economy as a result of implementing an effective FLS.

Page 29: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

What is the Impact of an FLS?Economic benefits in the UK:

• Reduction in hip fractures • Hip fractures cost £1.9 billion/year• For every 1000 FLS patients assessed in

FLS • 18 fractures are prevented• 11 of those are hip fractures

Page 30: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

What Investment is Required?• Cost of staff required:

• Consultant• Nurse specialist• Clerical/admin

• Set up costs – FLS accommodation, IT, DXA scanner and other associated costs:

• DXA scans/reporting• Other diagnostics• Drug costs

Page 31: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

FLS MappingArea Population

Salisbury 278,000

Stoke on Trent 215,000

Vale of York 348,000

Rotherham 255,000

TOTAL 1,096,000

Page 32: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

Activity in 2015Aim 1: Every person aged over 50 who breaks a bone is assessed for osteoporosis and managed appropriately.Priority 1:

Extend coverage of Fracture Liaison ServicesPriority 2:

Improve quality of Fracture Liaison Services and osteoporosis services

Contact made

Implementation from no service

Quality improvement Intervention concluded

Total sites

Peer support Commissioning

35 34 30 12 6 117

Page 33: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

How Good is Your FLS?

Page 34: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

“You must be the change you wish

to see in the world.”

Mahatma Gandhi

Page 35: FLS Implementation – A National Approach, Rotterdam 2015

Hilary Arden+44 (0)1761 473112 [email protected]