final san diego venture group keynote 2016
TRANSCRIPT
San Diego Venture Group - Keynote
@msuster msuster
Mark Suster
BothSidesofTheTable.com
1 Basecamp - Choosing Your Market
2 Funding the Expedition
3 How Venture Capital Actually Works
4 Picking Your Crew
2
Startup Journey
4
The first step for a startup should be to focus on basecamp.
Many investors are too focused on the peak.
5
Experienced climbers have the luxury of skipping basecamp as they know the mountain
-Academic breakthroughs -Industry knowledge -Worked with VC investors before -History of exits
6
If there’s one thought I’d like to leave you with about planning an Internet business it’s that at scale the Internet drives deflationary economics.
Unit Price of a Good
Time
Deflation
7
But in dramatically increasing the market reach / size the Internet has created enormous companies that scale quickly.
Unit Price of a Good
Time
Deflation
Market Size
Market
8
The most successful new entrants enter the market with less functionality but massively cheaper prices - The Innovator’s Dilemma.
Performance/ Functionality
Time
New EntrantIncumbent
9
This is the most misunderstood thing about “disruption” - it’s a combination of 4 factors in which incumbents literally can’t respond
PricePerformance/ Functionality Margin
Market Size
10
Initially incumbent's customers’ requirements are high enough that the startup can’t meet their needs. Eventually startup is good enough and market trades down
Time
Performance/
Functionality
Incumbent
New Entrant
Incumbent
Customer
Requirements
Market trades down. Performance
good enough
12
And disruptive technologies that have a structural advantage form the basis of many of our best investments
New Entrants Incumbents with Innovator’s Dilemma
13
I would encourage you to think about solving harder problems in bigger markets with fewer startups.
Defense/ Intelligence Education Healthcare
ProvisionHealthcare Back-End
Virtual Reality Transportation Manufacturing
Food Production/ Distribution
Angels & Seed Accelerators
Crowd funding/Angellist
The 3 F’s: Friends, Family &
Fools
15
The good news is the sources of capital have increased dramatically in the past 5 years
16
At the earliest stage it is almost certain that your capital will need to be local - unless you’re going straight to venture / seed. The table stakes in 2016 are;
Product (or prototype)
1
Team
2
Engineering capabilities in-
house
3
17
The most important part of funding is finding your initial “anchor” investor
Then leveraging to find more
20
Start building relationships early. When we first meet, you’re just a “dot” to me.
Performance
Time
The first time we meet
21
If I got excited on the basis of our first meeting I am really only judging your
presentation skills
That’s why Demo Days are artificial
22
Over time I start to see a pattern and get to know who you are. It’s much easier to invest when you understand somebody’s character.
Performance
Time
Meet investors early / often
25
VCs raise money on the expectations of delivering at least a 4x gross return (3x net)
$300m
$1.2Bn
Fund Size Expected Returns
4x
LP’s• Universities • Personal Funds • Insurance • Corporates
26
>80% of our returns are driven by <20% of our investments, following the Power Law
Retu
rns
10X
20X
30X
40X
50X
Deals
5-6 Deals 24 - 25 Deals
≤1X
27
Let’s take what by most standard is considered an amazing outcome - an $80 million exit in 5 years.
$10M Post
$80M Acquisition
Initial Investment Exit
$2M$8M
$16M
$64M
+ Additional $2M over 5 years to keep pro rata
20%
20%
28
The press will write about what a great outcome this is. Friends will congratulate us on our spectacular 4x. For us this is literally “average.”
$4M
$16M
4x
Invested Returned
29
It represents just 5% of our fund returned and 1.33% of our expected returns. This doesn’t even make a dent in venture.
$16M
$16M
$300M
$16M
$1.2B
~5% of fund returned 1.33% of expectations
30
Now let’s imagine a whopping $800 million exit.
$10M Post
$800M Acquisition
Initial Investment Exit
$2M
$8M
$160M
$640M
+ Additional $8M over 7-10
years
20%
20%
Even at 16x, returning $160 million is still just half of our fund and only 13% of our expected returns.
$10M
$160M
16x $160M
$300M
$160M
$1.2B
>50% of fund returned
13.33% of return expectations
Invested Returned
32
Which is why the VC model is really about the $3Bn+ outcomes
$10M Post
$3Bn Exit
Initial Investment
$2M
$8M
$450M
$2.55B
+ Additional $13M over 7-10
years
15%
20%
33
And even still this would just be 33% of our expected returns. Venture is truly only aligned with enormous outcomes. That’s the business.
$15M
$450M
33x
$450M
$300M
$450M
$1.2B
150% of fund returned
>1/3 of return expectations
Invested Returned