fender's blue

10
Conservation of Fender s Blue Butterfly through Land Management Methods Used in the Upland Prairies of the Willamette Valley Photo by Donovan Kim  

Upload: donovank87

Post on 05-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

7/31/2019 Fender's Blue

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fenders-blue 1/10

Conservation of Fender s Blue Butterfly through

Land Management Methods Used in the Upland

Prairies of the Willamette Valley 

Photo by Donovan Kim 

7/31/2019 Fender's Blue

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fenders-blue 2/10

Current Fender s Blue Work

  There is currently no recovery plan submittedfor Fender s Blue Butterfly (Schultz 2003)

  Research has taken place in resourcerestoration

  Research has taken place in dispersalbehavior 

  ESA requirements have only recently begunto be fulfilled using Population Viability Analysis (PVA)

7/31/2019 Fender's Blue

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fenders-blue 3/10

Resource Restoration

  Three experimental methods were used intwo sites to test resource restoration:

  Tilling  Removes existing vegetation and allows newly planted

species to establish

  Solarization  Lay a sheet of clear plastic over freshly tilled soil,

reduces competition from weeds  Reverse Fertilization

  Restores historically nutrient poor soil conditions,reduces soil nitrogen

7/31/2019 Fender's Blue

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fenders-blue 4/10

Fig. 1. Experimental design. Dark shaded boxes are high forb : low grass plantings and lightshaded boxes are low forb : high grass plantings. Each plot is randomly divided into a weededhalf and a non-weeded half. Dotted lines indicate areas within which weeds were clipped to

assess weed biomass in 1996. Note, solarization treatments are larger than other treatmentsbecause Wilson, Ingersoll & Wilson (1994) found effective solarization requires a 2-3 m buffer

from the edge of the plastic.

(Schultz 2001)

7/31/2019 Fender's Blue

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fenders-blue 5/10

Dispersal Behavior 

  Less than 0.5% of prairie habitat remains in

patches (Schultz 2005; Wilson 1997)

  Flight paths were followed by dropping a flagevery 20 seconds and the following behaviors

were recorded:

  Fly, perch, bask, nectar, oviposit, and chase

  Habitat bias was recorded on an individual

and population level

7/31/2019 Fender's Blue

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fenders-blue 6/10

Dispersal Distance From Kincaids

Lupine Habitat

(Schultz 1998)

7/31/2019 Fender's Blue

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fenders-blue 7/10

Population Viability Analysis

  Three regions studied: Northern,

Central, and Southern

  Two survey methods were used to

estimate butterfly population size: mark-

recapture-release, and walking transect

method  This study does make four assumptions

7/31/2019 Fender's Blue

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fenders-blue 8/10

Management Methods  Resource restoration research suggests that

solarization is the best method to provide minimum

nectar levels (Severns 2003)  Dispersal behavior suggests that stepping-stone

patches of lupine will move Fender s Blue Butterfly

between populations at a rate 8 times faster than a

corridor of habitat (Jensen 1998)

  PVA produced numbers for the a 95% probability of survival over the next 100 yearsMy Thoughts

  Collaboration of methods is needed to sustain 

7/31/2019 Fender's Blue

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fenders-blue 9/10

What should be done?

  With these three experiments a

recovery plan can be devised for 

Fender s Blue Butterfly

  Resource management can be chosen

based on dispersal behavior, patch

size, distance between patches, andwhether or not three sites can fulfill the

PVA analysis

7/31/2019 Fender's Blue

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/fenders-blue 10/10

Works Cited  Jensen, M.N. 1998. Butterfly May Use Flowery Stepping Stone. Science News 153: 262.

  Schultz, Cheryl B. 1998. Dispersal Behavior and Its Implications for Reserve Design in aRare Oregon Butterfly. Conservation Biology 12: 284-292.

  Schultz, Cheryl B. 2001. Restoring Resources for an Endangered Butterfly. Journal of  Applied Ecology 38: 1007-1019.

  Schultz, Cherly b., Elizabeth E. Crone. 2005. Patch Size and Connectivity Thresholds for Butterfly Habitat Restoration. Conservation Biology 19: 887-896.

  Schultz, Cheryl B., Paul C. Hammond. 2003. Using Population Viability Analysis to DevelpRecovery Criteria for Endangered Insects: Case Study of the Fender s Blue Butterfly.Conservation Biology 17: 1372-1385.

  Severns, Paul M. 2003. Propagation of a Long-Lived and Threatened Prairie Plant, Lupinussulphureus ssp. Kincaidii. Restoration Ecology 11: 334-342.

  Wilson, Mark V. 1996. A Survey of the Native Upland Prairies of the Willamette Valley.

Bureau of Land Management Eugene District.  Wilson, Mark V., Paul C. Hammond, Cheryl B. Schultz. 1997. The Interdependence of 

Native Plants and Fender s Blue Butterfly. Oregon State University. 25 Apr 2007 <http://oregonstate.edu/~wilsomar/PDF/WHS_NPSO_97.pdf>.

  Wilson, Mark V., Cheryl A. Ingersoll, Mark G. Wilson. 1995. Pest Plant and Seed BandReduction. Report to the US Army Corps of Engineers and Fishman EnvironmentalServices. Corvallis, Or.