fall research final presentation

20
Manipulating Cell Migration Using Amphiphiles Final Presentation

Upload: sam-boland

Post on 13-Feb-2016

18 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

yee

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Fall Research Final Presentation

Manipulating Cell Migration Using

AmphiphilesFinal Presentation

Page 2: Fall Research Final Presentation

BackgroundAmphiphiles are molecules that are both

hydrophilic and lipophilicExamples include cholesterol, fatty acids, and some

alcohols

Previous research performed by the Mechanobiology Laboratory at Penn State suggests that amphiphiles can modify a cell’s ability to adhere to a surface

Page 3: Fall Research Final Presentation

HypothesisIf amphiphiles are applied to cellular media, then

the number of cells that migrate across a demarcation line will be different compared to a control because amphiphiles can manipulate the

grouping of cellular adhesion molecules.

Amphiphile to be tested: Benzyl Alcohol

Page 4: Fall Research Final Presentation

Experimental SetupCells are grown until confluentCells removed from region, samples are imagedAmphiphiles applied to half of samplesCells migrate for 8 hours and are then imaged

again• Number of cells that

migrate are counted

• Numbers from samples containing amphiphiles compared to controls

Page 5: Fall Research Final Presentation

Trial 1: Razor Blade Assay

Demarcation line created using razor blade. Cells then scratched away with blade

Number of migrated cells countedBenzyl alcohol and ethanol tested

DAPI Phase

Page 6: Fall Research Final Presentation

Trial 1 AnalysisEthanol correlated with control as expectedHigh numbers from Benzyl Alcohol experiment

suggested cells were not being effectively scraped away

New Experimental design was needed

Page 7: Fall Research Final Presentation

Trial 2: Pipet Wound Pipet scratched along surface of cell culture to

remove cellsCells imaged and then location of image is marked

on lidAfter migration, cells are imaged again

Pre-migration Post-migration DAPIRegion of interest

*Incorrect excitation filter used resulting in no DAPI image*

Page 8: Fall Research Final Presentation

Trial 2 AnalysisNumbers conformed to expectations but

experimental setup had issuesCells removed much more effectively than in razor

woundBorders of region of interest much more poorly

definedLocation of imaging difficult to mark – pre-

migration and post-migration images probably not the same

Page 9: Fall Research Final Presentation

Trial 3: PDMS SquareSquare of PDMS

material placed on bottom of culture before cells are seeded

Once cells become confluent, PDMS is removed revealing open region

Images taken before and after migration

Page 10: Fall Research Final Presentation

Trial 3 AnalysisExperiment cut short by contamination due to

improperly sterilized PDMSResults encouraging

Page 11: Fall Research Final Presentation

Trial 4: PDMS ColumnsExperiment designed to mirror typical cell

migration kits that can be purchased

Columns made of PDMS placed in contact with bottom on one end and lid on other

Cells grow to confluence, then columns removed

Page 12: Fall Research Final Presentation

Homemade Columns

Micropipet containers filled with PDMS. Micropipets placed in containers and then filled with PDMS

Cut to size of wells in well plate

Page 13: Fall Research Final Presentation

Trial 4 ResultsImages stitched together using ImageJ softwareNumber of cells migrated in Benzyl Alcohol

sample barely different from Control

Ctrl Pre-migration Ctrl Post-migration BA Pre-migration BA Post-migration

Page 14: Fall Research Final Presentation

Trial 4 Issues

Entire region of interest not captured by images – area of each image not held constant

In order to be a valid experiment, entire area created by PDMS columns would need to be imaged

There are cells here that were not captured in an image

Page 15: Fall Research Final Presentation

Trial 5: Smaller Columns

Originally tried just using small pipet tips – not effective

Filled pipets with PDMS, let small bit drip out bottom

New columns taped to bottom of well plate

Page 16: Fall Research Final Presentation

Trial 5 AnalysisBoundaries not very well-definedSome wells unusable - not enough to complete

experiment

• Experimental design getting too complicated – introducing new variables

Page 17: Fall Research Final Presentation

Trial 6 OverviewRepeat of trial 2 but modified

Experiment performed in well plate instead of cell culture

Wells marked underneath with marker so it is easy to match up pre- and post-migration images

Page 18: Fall Research Final Presentation

Benzyl Alcohol Results

Pre-migration Post-migration

• 3 wells, 3 images from each well

• Total # of migrated cells: 206

• Average # of migrated cells per well: 69

Page 19: Fall Research Final Presentation

Control Results Pre-migration Post-migration

• 3 wells, 3 images from each well

• Total # of migrated cells: 296

• Average number of migrated cells per well: 99

Page 20: Fall Research Final Presentation

Conclusions90 more cells migrated in the control model than

in the Benzyl Alcohol modelOn average, 30 more per wellWells treated with BA saw 30% less migration

This experiment confirms the hypothesis that amphiphiles affect cell migration, most likely by manipulating adhesion

More trials can be completed to confirm results