final presentation mae188 fall quarter 2011

24
UCI Engineering Design in Industry Water Pump Project - Fall 2011 Final Presentation Students Advisor OC Great Park Kevin Anglim Andrea Mariani Brandon Nilles Phong Phan Gagan Singh John Garman Glenn Chalkley Tom Grimm Tom Larson Jordan Perkins

Upload: andrea-mariani

Post on 16-Jul-2015

169 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

UCI Engineering Design in IndustryWater Pump Project - Fall 2011

Final Presentation

Students Advisor OC Great Park

Kevin AnglimAndrea MarianiBrandon NillesPhong PhanGagan Singh

John Garman Glenn ChalkleyTom GrimmTom LarsonJordan Perkins

Page 2: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

The Goal

The goal of this project was the design anddevelopment of a water pump apparatus thatwould be used as an educational exhibit in the OCGreat Park’s Farm & Food Lab.

As a secondary objective, this pump wouldadvertise a utilitarian pumping system that will bedeveloped for nations with water-pumping needs,alleviating some of the hardships people mustendure in order to get the water they need.

Page 3: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Water Awareness - California

• 200 million acre- feet of water fall in CA/ year▫ Over half soaks into ground/ evaporates/ used by

vegetation

▫ Leaves 86 million acre-feet of water for use

48%- environmental uses

41%- agriculture

9%- cities & industries

75% of CA’s available water occurs N. of Sacramento, while 80% of the demand occurs in the southern 2/3 of the state

*1 acre foot is 326,000 gallons- enough water for 2 families for a year

Page 4: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Water Awareness – CA Water Delivery

• Surface Water Projects

▫ Provide major portion of water

▫ 1000+ federal, state, local reservoirs & hundreds of miles of canals and pipelines

▫ 2 major:

Central Valley Project (CVP, federal)

State Water Project (SWP, state)

Page 5: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Water Awareness - Key Water Projects

Water Projects Amount of Water

Central Valley Project 7 MAF- per year

State Water Project 2.3 MAF- per year

All- American Canal 3 MAF- per year

Colorado River Aqueduct 1.2 MAF-per year

Los Angeles Acqueduct 200,000 AF- per year

Mokelumne Aqueduct 364,000 AF- per year

San Francisco Hetch Hetchy Project 330,000 AF- per year

Page 6: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Water Awareness - CVP

• Begins in Cascade Mtn’s near Redding, and goes down to near Bakersfield

• 20 damns and reservoirs, 11 power plants, 500 miles of major canals

• Manages 9 million acre-feet of water

• 600,000 acre-feet for municipal and industrial use ~1 million households for a year

• 800,000 acre-feet/ year to fish and wildlife; 410,000 acre- feet to State and Federal wildlife refuges and wetlands

Page 7: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Water Awareness - CVP

Courtesy: U.S. Dept. of the Interior

Page 8: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Water Awareness - SWP

• Nation’s largest state built system

• Water for 23 million & 755,000 acres of farmland

• Includes the 444 mile CA aqueduct

▫ Delivers to San Joaquin Valley, SF Bay, S. CA

Page 9: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Water Awareness - SWP

Courtesy: Legislative Analysts Office

Page 10: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Water Awareness - Irvine

• We get our water from 3 sources:

▫ State water project

▫ Colorado River

▫ Groundwater

Page 11: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Design Issue

• Main Issues▫ Durability

Frequency of maintenance?

How long it would last?

▫ Accessibility

Age and size?

Handicap?

▫ Availability

Off the shelf products?

▫ Ease of Manufacture

Difficulty of assembly and fabrication

▫ Safety

Does it satisfy safety regulations?

Page 12: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Initial Requirements

Requirement Units Nominal Optimal Weight

User: - - - -

Age Years 6 to 16 4 to 21 3

Quantity People / Day 100 1000 4

Engineering: - - - -

ADA Accessibility Need Yes Yes 4

Flow Rate Gallons/Minute 5 10 5

Optimized Volume Pumped Need Yes Yes 4

Budget Dollars ($) $500-$1000 <$500 4

Design: - - - -

Longevity Years 5 10 5

Maintenance Minutes/month 5 0 5

Production Quality 1 - 5 (5=best) 5 5 5

Aesthetic 1 - 5 (5=best) 4 5 4

Safety 1 - 5 (5=safest) 4 5 5

Page 13: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Initial Ideas

• Handcart

• Treadmill

• Wheel

• Pendulum pump

• Archimedes screw

• Pulley

• Bicycle powered pump

Page 14: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Updated RequirementsRequirement Units Nominal Optimal Weight

User: - - - -

Age Years 6 to 11 4 to 21 3

Quantity People / Day 100 1000 4

Engineering: - - - -

ADA Accessibility Need Yes Yes 1

Optimized Volume Pumped Need Yes Yes 4

Design: - - - -

Longevity Years 5 10 5

Maintenance Minutes/month 5 0 5

Production Quality 1 - 5 (5=best) 5 5 5

Aesthetic 1 - 5 (5=best) 4 5 4

Safety 1 - 5 (5=safest) 4 5 5

Representative of Exportable 1 - 5 3 5 5

Budget Dollars ($) $500-$1000 <$500 4

Cycle Specific Requirements: - - - -

Cadence Range RPM 60 to 90 Any 3

Crank-to-Seat Length Inches 16 16-24 3

Pump Specific Requirements:

Flow Rate Gallons/Minute 6 to 10 15 to 20 3

Cadence Range Rotations/Minute 90 to 120 150 to 200 4

Page 15: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Bicycle System

• Two main design concerns:

▫ Drive Train

Chain

Belt

Shaft

▫ Seat Configuration

Upright

recumbent

Page 16: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Shaft Drive

• Pros

Safe

Gears are enclosed

No exposable moving parts

Lower maintenance frequency

Bevel gears protected from impacts/debris

Durable

• Cons

Heavier

Inability to repair

shaft must be replaced

More expensive

Page 17: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Seat Selection

RecumbentPros:

• More comfortable• Safer due to lower

center of gravityCons:

• Unable to shift weight to balance

UprightPros:

• Commonly found• Light-weight• Can have multiple riding

positionsCons:

• Uncomfortable over long periods of time

Page 18: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Down-Selection of Drive Train

Selection Criteria Chain Drive Rubber Belt Drive Kevlar Belt Drive Drive Shaft

Durability 2-3 Months* 1 Year* 1+ Year 1+ Year

Safety(1-5)

3 3 3 5

Maintenance(1-5)

4 3 3 5

Maintenance Frequency

2 Weeks* 1 Week* 2 Weeks* 1 Month*

Outdoor Use (1-5)

3 3 5 5

Replaceability(1-5)

5 4 3 2

Cost $100* $200* $300* $100*

Ease of Manufacture(1-5)

5 5 5 5

Rank 3 4 2 1

Continue? No No No Yes

* = estimation

Page 19: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Status at Midterm

• Had selected our final design

• Completed two proof of concept tests

Need to:

• Construct a final working prototype

Page 20: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Final Steps

Page 21: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Final Production Steps

• Detail components and materials for actual parts sourced

• Fabricate prototype to verify design

• Analyze prototype performance

• Recommend design revisions

Page 22: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Final Product

Page 23: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Recommendations

• The use of components other than those used in our prototype is acceptable and occasionally preferable (i.e. pump selection). Details of the final design would be changed to account for this, but the fabricator judgment can account for these variations. Details of our prototype design have been included.

• Optimizing some features (e.g. seat geometry, pump selection) can only be done with further iteration of the whole system, which we hadn’t the resources for. A design that will last for years would call for this.

• The above holds true for exportable versions of this concept as well as they would demand durability perhaps beyond even that required in a park full of children.

Page 24: Final Presentation MAE188 Fall Quarter 2011

Special Thanks!

• AbioBikes.com▫ Provided the drive shaft

• BambooDNA.com▫ Provided fabrication shop

• OC Great Park▫ Provided the opportunity to work on a great project