experiences and lessons learnt, 28 october 2009

52
UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 1 Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009 Development of a TDA and SAP for the Protection of the Western Indian Ocean Coastal and Marine Environment from Land- based Sources and Activities “People of the region prospering from a healthy Western Indian Ocean”

Upload: ivor-tyson

Post on 31-Dec-2015

33 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Development of a TDA and SAP for the Protection of the Western Indian Ocean Coastal and Marine Environment from Land-based Sources and Activities. “People of the region prospering from a healthy Western Indian Ocean”. Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009. Overview of the presentation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 1

Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

Development of a TDA and SAP for the Protection of the Western Indian Ocean Coastal and Marine

Environment from Land-based Sources and Activities

“People of the region prospering from a

healthy Western Indian Ocean”

Page 2: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 2

Overview of the presentationOverview of the presentation

ContextThe TDA development processThe SAP development processImplementing the SAPLessons learnt

Page 3: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project

The TDA/SAP Approach as a The TDA/SAP Approach as a Management Tool for the WIOManagement Tool for the WIO

Context

Page 4: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB ProjectUNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project

Addressing land-based activities in the Western Indian Ocean

Page 5: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 5

ContextContext

Nairobi Convention Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from land-based Activities

Page 6: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 6

Mbabne

Moroni

Victoria

Kigali

Lilongwe

Bujumbura

Port Louis

Harare

Lusaka

Kampala

Pretoria

Djibouti

Antananarivo

Maputo

Nairobi

Mogadishu

Addis Ababa

Dar es Salaam

Durban

Mombasa

TZ TZ

ET ET

MZ MZ

SD SD SO SO

KE KE

MG MG

ZA ZA

ZM ZM

CD CD

ZW ZW

UG UG

MW MW

BW BW

Lake Victoria

Lake Nyasa

Lake Tanganyika

Lake Turkana

Lake Albert

Lake Tana

Equator Equator

Tropic of Capricorn Tropic of Capricorn

Indian Ocean

30E

60E

50E

40E

10S

30S

20S

10N

30°0'0"E

30°0'0"E

40°0'0"E

40°0'0"E

50°0'0"E

50°0'0"E

60°0'0"E

60°0'0"E

30°0'0"S

30°0'0"S

20°0'0"S

20°0'0"S

10°0'0"S

10°0'0"S

0°0'0" 0°0'

0"

10°0'0"N

10°0'0"N

SOMALI LME

AGULHAS LME

SOUTH AFRICA

MOZAMBIQUE

TANZANIA

KENYA

SEYCHELLES

COMORES

MAURITIUS

FRANCE

MADAGASCAR

ContextContext

The Agulhas and Somali Current Large Marine Ecosystem

Page 7: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 7

Context:Context:

The UNEP implemented West Indian Ocean Land Based Sources of Pollution Project (WIO-LaB)

The World Bank implemented Southwest Indian Ocean Fisheries Project (SWIOFP)

The UNDP implemented Agulhas and Somali Current Large Marine Ecosystem (ASCLME) Project

Three Projects:

Page 8: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 8

Scope of the WIO-LaB TDAScope of the WIO-LaB TDA

Geographical scope: WIO and its catchment area

Thematic scope: Land-based activities

Page 9: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 9

(Political) framework provided by the Nairobi Convention WIO-LaB TDA and SAP to be coordinated with ASCLMEs and

SWIOFP Projects Dedicated TDA and SAP Task Teams for drafting of TDA and SAP Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee to provide scientific

leadership and means of validation of TDA SAP development linked to the development of specific National

Action Plans (NAP)

Key characteristics of the WIO-LaB Key characteristics of the WIO-LaB TDA/SAP processTDA/SAP process

Page 10: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 10

Current statusCurrent status

Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis finalised

Strategic Action Programme prepared and negotiated

Page 11: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project

The TDA/SAP Approach as a The TDA/SAP Approach as a Management Tool for the WIOManagement Tool for the WIO

The WIO-LaB TDA process

Page 12: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 12

Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis

Process OutputsInputs

Preliminary TDA ASCLME Project

Document

Fact finding (datacollection and analysis)

First TDA/SAP workshop

Detailed root causeanalysis

Review and finalization ofTDA

Preliminary overview oftransboundary problems and

data availability

WIO-LaB TechnicalReports

Other TechnicalReports

Meetings with WIO-LaB Task Forces

Consultations

Validation of TDA/SAPprocess and workplan

Validation of perceivedpriority problems

Initial root causeanalysis

Identification of datagaps and sources

Definition of criteria forprioritization

TDA drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Draft TDA

STAC National expert groups

Final draft TDA

Establishment of TDADrafting Team

Initial review oftransboundary problems

and establishment ofdetailed workplan

Final TDAEndorsement

Establishment of a TDA Drafting Team

Initial review of transboundary problems

Fact finding (data collection and analysis)

Causal chain and governance analysis

Validation

Page 13: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 13

Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis

Process OutputsInputs

Preliminary TDA ASCLME Project

Document

Fact finding (datacollection and analysis)

First TDA/SAP workshop

Detailed root causeanalysis

Review and finalization ofTDA

Preliminary overview oftransboundary problems and

data availability

WIO-LaB TechnicalReports

Other TechnicalReports

Meetings with WIO-LaB Task Forces

Consultations

Validation of TDA/SAPprocess and workplan

Validation of perceivedpriority problems

Initial root causeanalysis

Identification of datagaps and sources

Definition of criteria forprioritization

TDA drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Draft TDA

STAC National expert groups

Final draft TDA

Establishment of TDADrafting Team

Initial review oftransboundary problems

and establishment ofdetailed workplan

Final TDAEndorsement

Establishment of a TDA Drafting Team

Initial review of transboundary problems

Fact finding (data collection and analysis)

Causal chain and governance analysis

Validation

Page 14: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 14

The TDA Drafting TeamThe TDA Drafting Team Pollution:

– Dr. Susan Taljaard (CSIR) – Dr. Sixtus Kayombo (UDSM)

PADH:– Dr. Salomao Bandeiro (UEM)– Dr. James Kairo (KMFRI)

Legal and Institutional– Mr. Akunga Momanyi (Nairobi University) – Regional Legal Expert– Prof. Jan Glazewski (UCT) - Legal Task Force member

Socio-economics– Dr. Jacob Ochiewo (KMFRI)

River-coast interaction– Dr. Anton Earle (ACWR)– Dr. Daniel Malzbender (ACWR)

Page 15: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 15

TDA Management StructureTDA Management Structure

COORDINATED BY THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT UNIT

(PMU)

THE TDA DRAFTING TEAM

Page 16: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 16

Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis

Process OutputsInputs

Preliminary TDA ASCLME Project

Document

Fact finding (datacollection and analysis)

First TDA/SAP workshop

Detailed root causeanalysis

Review and finalization ofTDA

Preliminary overview oftransboundary problems and

data availability

WIO-LaB TechnicalReports

Other TechnicalReports

Meetings with WIO-LaB Task Forces

Consultations

Validation of TDA/SAPprocess and workplan

Validation of perceivedpriority problems

Initial root causeanalysis

Identification of datagaps and sources

Definition of criteria forprioritization

TDA drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Draft TDA

STAC National expert groups

Final draft TDA

Establishment of TDADrafting Team

Initial review oftransboundary problems

and establishment ofdetailed workplan

Final TDAEndorsement

Establishment of a TDA Drafting Team

Initial review of transboundary problems

Fact finding (data collection and analysis)

Causal chain and governance analysis

Validation

Page 17: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 17

Pollution from land-based sources

Page 18: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 18

Physical alteration and destruction of habitats

Page 19: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 19

Alteration in river flow and sediment loads

Page 20: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 20

Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis

Process OutputsInputs

Preliminary TDA ASCLME Project

Document

Fact finding (datacollection and analysis)

First TDA/SAP workshop

Detailed root causeanalysis

Review and finalization ofTDA

Preliminary overview oftransboundary problems and

data availability

WIO-LaB TechnicalReports

Other TechnicalReports

Meetings with WIO-LaB Task Forces

Consultations

Validation of TDA/SAPprocess and workplan

Validation of perceivedpriority problems

Initial root causeanalysis

Identification of datagaps and sources

Definition of criteria forprioritization

TDA drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Draft TDA

STAC National expert groups

Final draft TDA

Establishment of TDADrafting Team

Initial review oftransboundary problems

and establishment ofdetailed workplan

Final TDAEndorsement

Establishment of a TDA Drafting Team

Initial review of transboundary problems

Fact finding (data collection and analysis)

Causal chain and governance analysis

Validation

Page 21: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 21

Fact-finding and assessment for TDA development ongoing as part of scope of work of specific Task Forces:

Fact findingFact finding

• Task Force on Water, Sediment and Biota Quality• MWW Task Force• PADH Task Force• EIA Task Force• Legal and Technical Review Task Force

Page 22: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 22

Main building blocks for the WIO-Main building blocks for the WIO-LaB TDALaB TDA

Pollution

PADH

Regional Status of Pollution Assessment

Regional Status of MWW Assessment

Regional Marine Litter Assessment

Regional PADH Assessment

Assessment of Shoreline Changes in the WIO

Assessment of Socio-economic Implications of PADH

Assessment of existing Policy, Legal and Institutional Frameworks for LBA Management

Assessment of the Status of Ratification of International Conventions Related to LBA

Review of Legislation, and Institutions Relevant to PADH

Governance

River basinsAssessment of River-coast Interactions in the WIO Region

Page 23: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 23

Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis

Process OutputsInputs

Preliminary TDA ASCLME Project

Document

Fact finding (datacollection and analysis)

First TDA/SAP workshop

Detailed root causeanalysis

Review and finalization ofTDA

Preliminary overview oftransboundary problems and

data availability

WIO-LaB TechnicalReports

Other TechnicalReports

Meetings with WIO-LaB Task Forces

Consultations

Validation of TDA/SAPprocess and workplan

Validation of perceivedpriority problems

Initial root causeanalysis

Identification of datagaps and sources

Definition of criteria forprioritization

TDA drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Draft TDA

STAC National expert groups

Final draft TDA

Establishment of TDADrafting Team

Initial review oftransboundary problems

and establishment ofdetailed workplan

Final TDAEndorsement

Establishment of a TDA Drafting Team

Initial review of transboundary problems

Fact finding (data collection and analysis)

Causal chain and governance analysis

Validation

Page 24: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 24

Causal chain and governance Causal chain and governance analysisanalysis

Root causes

Transboundary problem

Environmental impacts

Socio-economic Consequences

The consequences of the environmental impacts in terms of social and economic effects, both direct and indirect, such as loss of revenue, lowering quality of life, health

Socio-economic consequences

Underlying sector and immediate causes

The effects of activities on the biophysical environment, e.g. changes in species composition or mortality of marine organisms

The effects of biophysical changes on the social and economic well-being of the population, e.g. reduced revenues from fisheries or health risks

The immediate causes of the problem, including the sectors associated with such causes, e.g. effluent streams related to industries and coastal settlements; soil

erosion related to agriculture and forestry, etc.

The underlying (fundamental) reasons for the problem, e.g. poverty, bad governance or financial constraints

Page 25: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 25

Salt water intrusion

Clearing of natural vegetation for human settlement

Wastewater discharge/pollution

Urbanization & Coastal Dev

IMPA

CT

S A

ND

C

ON

SEQ

UEN

CES

UN

DERLY

ING

SEC

TO

RS A

ND

ASSO

CIA

TED

CA

USES

Root Causes

Coastal Forests degradation

Increased coastal erosion

Environmental Impacts Increased sedimentation & turbidity

in coastal areas

Salt water intrusion

Drying of rivers Increase vulnerability to natural calamities and tsunami

Reduction of biodiversity

Loss of cultural heritage

Socio-economic Consequences

Reduced sequestration of green house gases

Reduced tourism and aesthetic value

Increased poverty

Conversion of habitat for aquaculture

Fisheries & aquaculture

Clearing land for farming and settlement

Over harvesting for fuel and charcoal

Over-grazing associated with high cattle production

Uncontrolled wildfires

Alteration in freshwater flows and sediment loads

Over harvesting for fuel and charcoal

Uncontrolled wild fires

Agriculture & forestry

Clearing of natural vegetation for tourism

Wastewater discharge/pollution

Tourism Conversion of habitats to

industrial zones

Wastewater discharge/pollution

Conversion of habitat for saltworks

Alteration in freshwater flows and sediment loads

Deforestation to meet timber and fuel needs

Industry & Mining

Threats to public health

Reduced biomass & cover of habitat

Inappropriate governance

Economic drivers

Climate change and natural processes

Population pressure

Poverty & inequality

Inadequate knowledge and awareness

Inadequate financial resources

Page 26: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 26

Sample of problem rankingTRANSBOUNDARY PROBLEM

Mangroves Seagrasses Coral reefs Coastal forests

Shore-line change

DIRECT CAUSES

H L Coastal flooding as a result of sea level rise H H M Sedimentation associated with heavy river sediment discharge M L Alteration of fresh water flow M Salt water intrusion L Destruction and/or degradation of wetlands

L VH M Clearance of natural vegetation for human settlement

L M L M Pollution (discharge of municipal wastewater agricultural and industrial effluents, including accidental oil spillage)

L L L Land reclamation

M Increased sea urchin population associated with reduction in predators (due to inappropriate fishing practices or changes in environmental conditions)

L Seaweed harvesting for commercial purposes M Increased reef activity M Anchor damage M M Over-fishing and bad fishing practices VH Coral bleaching

M M L Conversion of habitats for aquaculture/mariculture L H Conversion of habitats to industrial zones L Mining of beach sand and removal of corals L Dredging for port and harbours

M L L M M Alteration in freshwater flows and sediment loads due to dam construction H M L Conversion of habitats for saltworks H VH Deforestation to meet timber and fuelwood needs H Seagrass beds removal for clam collection and bathers (tourists)

H VH Over-harvesting for supply of fuelwood and charcoal M Overgrazing associated with high cattle population VH L Land clearance for agriculture H Uncontrolled wild fires

Key: L: Limited M: Medium H: High VH: Very High

Page 27: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 27

Governance and stakeholder analysis

Page 28: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 28

Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis

Process OutputsInputs

Preliminary TDA ASCLME Project

Document

Fact finding (datacollection and analysis)

First TDA/SAP workshop

Detailed root causeanalysis

Review and finalization ofTDA

Preliminary overview oftransboundary problems and

data availability

WIO-LaB TechnicalReports

Other TechnicalReports

Meetings with WIO-LaB Task Forces

Consultations

Validation of TDA/SAPprocess and workplan

Validation of perceivedpriority problems

Initial root causeanalysis

Identification of datagaps and sources

Definition of criteria forprioritization

TDA drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Draft TDA

STAC National expert groups

Final draft TDA

Establishment of TDADrafting Team

Initial review oftransboundary problems

and establishment ofdetailed workplan

Final TDAEndorsement

Establishment of a TDA Drafting Team

Initial review of transboundary problems

Fact finding (data collection and analysis)

Causal chain and governance analysis

Validation

Page 29: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 29

The role of the Scientific and Technical The role of the Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC)Advisory Committee (STAC)

1. Act as a Scientific and Technical Advisory Board for the TDA Drafting Team throughout the various stages of development of the TDA report.

2. Review and comment upon the draft WIO TDA report as prepared and submitted by the TDA Drafting Team.

3. Facilitate and coordinate, where appropriate, the review of the above-described draft TDA report by relevant scientific constituencies at the national and regional levels.

4. Recommend appropriate intervention measures to be considered for inclusion in the Strategic Action Plan (SAP) for the WIO Region.

Page 30: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project

The TDA/SAP Approach as a The TDA/SAP Approach as a Management Tool for the WIOManagement Tool for the WIO

Process of development of the SAP

Page 31: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 31

Strategic Action Plan

Process OutputsInputs

Establishment of SAPDrafting Team

Preliminary SAP Draft TDA Bridging the TDA and

SAP

Second TDA/SAPworkshop

Detailed examination ofstrategic actions

Third TDA/SAPworkshop

Candidate EQOs Proposed areas of SAP

intervention and possiblepriority actions

Definition of long-termvision

Definition of candidateEQOs

Definition of priority(medium-term) actions

Identification ofpossible long-termstrategic actions

SAP drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Initial SAP (with options andscenarios)

Evaluation andprioritization of optionsand scenarios

National and regionalconsultations on the SAP

Project SteeringCommittee

National Inter-Ministerial Committees

Preliminary SAP

Finalisation of SAP

SAP drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Final SAP

Endorsement of SAP NC COP

Establishment of a SAP Drafting Team

Bridging the TDA and SAP

Analysis and definition of strategic action

National and regional stakeholder consultations

Finalisation and validation

Page 32: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 32

Strategic Action Plan

Process OutputsInputs

Establishment of SAPDrafting Team

Preliminary SAP Draft TDA Bridging the TDA and

SAP

Second TDA/SAPworkshop

Detailed examination ofstrategic actions

Third TDA/SAPworkshop

Candidate EQOs Proposed areas of SAP

intervention and possiblepriority actions

Definition of long-termvision

Definition of candidateEQOs

Definition of priority(medium-term) actions

Identification ofpossible long-termstrategic actions

SAP drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Initial SAP (with options andscenarios)

Evaluation andprioritization of optionsand scenarios

National and regionalconsultations on the SAP

Project SteeringCommittee

National Inter-Ministerial Committees

Preliminary SAP

Finalisation of SAP

SAP drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Final SAP

Endorsement of SAP NC COP

Establishment of a SAP Drafting Team

Bridging the TDA and SAP

Analysis and definition of strategic action

National and regional stakeholder consultations

Finalisation and validation

Bridging the TDA and SAP

Analysis and definition of strategic action

National and regional stakeholder consultations

Finalisation and validation

Page 33: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 33

Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis and Strategic Transboundary Diagnostic Analysis and Strategic Action Programme (TDA/SAP)Action Programme (TDA/SAP)

• Government representatives

• Civil society

• Academic institutions

• Technical experts

Constitution of the SAP drafting team:

Page 34: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 34

Strategic Action Plan

Process OutputsInputs

Establishment of SAPDrafting Team

Preliminary SAP Draft TDA Bridging the TDA and

SAP

Second TDA/SAPworkshop

Detailed examination ofstrategic actions

Third TDA/SAPworkshop

Candidate EQOs Proposed areas of SAP

intervention and possiblepriority actions

Definition of long-termvision

Definition of candidateEQOs

Definition of priority(medium-term) actions

Identification ofpossible long-termstrategic actions

SAP drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Initial SAP (with options andscenarios)

Evaluation andprioritization of optionsand scenarios

National and regionalconsultations on the SAP

Project SteeringCommittee

National Inter-Ministerial Committees

Preliminary SAP

Finalisation of SAP

SAP drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Final SAP

Endorsement of SAP NC COP

Establishment of a SAP Drafting Team

Analysis and definition of strategic action

National and regional stakeholder consultations

Finalisation and validation

Bridging the TDA and SAP

Analysis and definition of strategic action

National and regional stakeholder consultations

Finalisation and validation

Page 35: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 35

Structure of the Framework SAPStructure of the Framework SAP

1. Pollution from land-bases sources and consequent degeneration of water quality

2. Physical alteration and destruction of habitats3. Alteration in fresh water flows and sediment

loads from rivers4. Governance and other cross-cutting issues

Four thematic areas of intervention:

Page 36: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 36

Strategic Action Plan

Process OutputsInputs

Establishment of SAPDrafting Team

Preliminary SAP Draft TDA Bridging the TDA and

SAP

Second TDA/SAPworkshop

Detailed examination ofstrategic actions

Third TDA/SAPworkshop

Candidate EQOs Proposed areas of SAP

intervention and possiblepriority actions

Definition of long-termvision

Definition of candidateEQOs

Definition of priority(medium-term) actions

Identification ofpossible long-termstrategic actions

SAP drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Initial SAP (with options andscenarios)

Evaluation andprioritization of optionsand scenarios

National and regionalconsultations on the SAP

Project SteeringCommittee

National Inter-Ministerial Committees

Preliminary SAP

Finalisation of SAP

SAP drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Final SAP

Endorsement of SAP NC COP

Establishment of a SAP Drafting Team

Bridging the TDA and SAP

National and regional stakeholder consultations

Bridging the TDA and SAP

Analysis and definition of strategic action

Finalisation and validation

Page 37: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 37

Structure of the SAPStructure of the SAP

Vision

EQ Objective

EQ Objective

EQ Objective

Target Target Target

Action

Action

Action

Page 38: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 38

Five key principles: •Equity•Sharing responsibility and management•Harmony between resource users and nature•An informed society, and•Lifestyles adjusted to sustainability.

A common vision for the regionA common vision for the region

“People of the region prospering from a

healthy Western Indian Ocean”

Page 39: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 39

Environmental Quality ObjectivesEnvironmental Quality Objectives

By 2032 in the WIO region:A. Critical coastal habitats will be protected, restored

and managed for sustainable use;

B. Water quality will meet international standards; and

C. River flows will be wisely and sustainably managed

By 2013, there will be: D. Effective collaboration at regional level in

addressing transboundary challenges

Page 40: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 40

TargetsTargets

Specific short (5 year), medium (5-15 year) and long-term (15-25 year) targets defined for each objective:

– Policy and legal reforms

– Information generation and analysis

– Capacity and awareness building

– Investments

Page 41: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 41

Strategic Action Plan

Process OutputsInputs

Establishment of SAPDrafting Team

Preliminary SAP Draft TDA Bridging the TDA and

SAP

Second TDA/SAPworkshop

Detailed examination ofstrategic actions

Third TDA/SAPworkshop

Candidate EQOs Proposed areas of SAP

intervention and possiblepriority actions

Definition of long-termvision

Definition of candidateEQOs

Definition of priority(medium-term) actions

Identification ofpossible long-termstrategic actions

SAP drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Initial SAP (with options andscenarios)

Evaluation andprioritization of optionsand scenarios

National and regionalconsultations on the SAP

Project SteeringCommittee

National Inter-Ministerial Committees

Preliminary SAP

Finalisation of SAP

SAP drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Final SAP

Endorsement of SAP NC COP

Establishment of a SAP Drafting Team

National and regional stakeholder consultations

Bridging the TDA and SAP

Analysis and definition of strategic action

Finalisation and validation

Page 42: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 42

Consultative steps in SAP Consultative steps in SAP preparationpreparation

SAP Drafting Workshop

MWW Task Force

PADH Task Force

LTR Task Force

WSQ Working Group

Regional SAP Stakeholder Workshop

National SAP Stakeholder Workshops

Final SAPFinal

Technical Discussions

Page 43: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 43

Strategic Action Plan

Process OutputsInputs

Establishment of SAPDrafting Team

Preliminary SAP Draft TDA Bridging the TDA and

SAP

Second TDA/SAPworkshop

Detailed examination ofstrategic actions

Third TDA/SAPworkshop

Candidate EQOs Proposed areas of SAP

intervention and possiblepriority actions

Definition of long-termvision

Definition of candidateEQOs

Definition of priority(medium-term) actions

Identification ofpossible long-termstrategic actions

SAP drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Initial SAP (with options andscenarios)

Evaluation andprioritization of optionsand scenarios

National and regionalconsultations on the SAP

Project SteeringCommittee

National Inter-Ministerial Committees

Preliminary SAP

Finalisation of SAP

SAP drafting team, inconsultation with: MWW Task Force PADH Task Force W&S Quality Working

Group Legal and Technical

Review Task Force EIA Task Force

Final SAP

Endorsement of SAP NC COP

Establishment of a SAP Drafting Team

National and regional stakeholder consultations

Bridging the TDA and SAP

Analysis and definition of strategic action

Finalisation and validation

Page 44: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 44

Principal mechanisms for Principal mechanisms for endorsement of the SAPendorsement of the SAP

Project Steering Committee Conference of Parties to the Nairobi Convention

Page 45: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 45

Implementing the SAPImplementing the SAP

1. Mainstreaming into national development plans2. Identification of partners for SAP

implementation3. Development of concrete proposals for partner

support4. Designation of Regional Activity Centers5. Monitoring and evaluation of SAP

implementation by the Nairobi Convention Secretariat

Page 46: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 46

National roll-outNational roll-out

A new Protocol on Land-based Sources and

Activities for the Nairobi Convention

A Strategic Action Programme on Land-

based Sources and Activities Management

Mainstreaming Land-based Sources and Activities Management at the

National Level

Page 47: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 47

Regional versus national actionRegional versus national action

Regional Strategic Action Programme (SAP)

NationalAction Plan

NationalAction Plan

NationalAction Plan

NationalAction Plan

NationalAction Plan

A two-way process Linked to LBSA Protocol

Page 48: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 48

Mainstreaming / Development of National Mainstreaming / Development of National Programmes of ActionProgrammes of Action

6 countries engaged in mainstreaming / developing National Programmes of Action:

• Tanzania• Kenya• South Africa (completed)• Mauritius• Seychelles• Mozambique

Page 49: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project

The WIO-LaB TDA and SAPThe WIO-LaB TDA and SAP

Lessons learnt

Page 50: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 50

Three plussesThree plusses

1. Involvement of regionally-accepted experts in the TDA development facilitates regional acceptance

2. Inclusive SAP development process has led to strong partnerships and ownership

3. The attachment to the Nairobi Convention secures a relatively straightforward governance mechanism

Page 51: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 51

Three minusesThree minuses

1. The thorough process, with high level of stakeholder involvement, has caused considerable delay

2. The overall coordinative functions assigned to the PMU have placed quite a burden on its limited capacity

3. The national mainstreaming processes are very time- and resource intensive

Page 52: Experiences and Lessons Learnt, 28 October 2009

UNEP/GEF WIO-LaB Project 52

Thank you for your attention