examples of meeting minutes

64
Examples of meeting minutes (departments, committees, councils and divisions) when the SLOAC process is discussed.

Upload: anthony-chan

Post on 27-May-2017

227 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Examples  of  meeting  minutes  (departments,  committees,  councils  and  divisions)  when  the  SLOAC  process  is  discussed.    

Page 2: Examples of Meeting Minutes

PALOMAR COLLEGE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA

Wednesday, October 17, 2012 Room AA-140 at 3:00 p.m.

I. CALL TO ORDER II. MINUTES OF October 3, 2012 (Attachment A) III. ANNOUNCEMENTS IV. AGENDA CHANGES V. ACTION ITEMS

Details of all program and course proposals can be viewed at: http://www.curricunet.com/palomar

Select “track,” From the list of pending proposals, select the Check Status button for the program or course you wish to

view. Select the Pencil icon in order to navigate through the various pages of the proposal, or Select the “COR” or “WR” icon to view the Course Outline of Record or Program Report, or Select the “CC” icon to view a report that displays proposed changes for the course outline of record or

program Select the “CR” icon to view a report that displays ALL proposed changes for the course

To View Packages

Select Packages under Create/Edit Proposals, select the Pencil icon to see individual proposals included in the Package. Various icons will be accessible for creating Reports or viewing the pages of each proposal.

VI. CONSENT CALENDAR

There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Curriculum Committee member or guest requests that a particular item be removed from the Consent Calendar. Items so removed will be considered separately. All matters remaining under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be approved by one motion.

The following curricular changes, pending appropriate approvals, will be effective FALL 2013:

A. Credit Course/Program Packages

1. There are no Credit Course/Program Packages for this agenda.

B. Non-Credit Course/Program Packages

1. There are no Non-Credit Course/Program Packages for this agenda.

C. New Programs

1. There are no new Programs for this agenda.

D. New Vocational Programs

1. There are no new Vocational Programs for this agenda.

E. Program Reactivations

1. There are no Program Reactivations for this agenda.

F. Program Changes

1. There are no Program Changes for this agenda.

G. Program Deactivations

1. There are no Program Deactivations for this agenda

H. Vocational Program Changes

1. There are no Vocational Program Changes for this agenda.

I. Vocational Program Deactivations

1. There are no Vocational Program Deactivations for this agenda.

J. Credit Courses – New

Page 3: Examples of Meeting Minutes

SSPC Minutes 05.11.11

CHAIR: Mark W. Vernoy MEMBERS PRESENT: D. Casey, S. Cathcart, J. Conway ,T. Cruz, L. Halttunen, M. Large, H. Lee, L. Meyers, J. Moss, T. Nguyen, L. Romain, J. Sanchez, E. Tubbs, M. Vernoy RECORDER: Janeice Pettit MEMBERS ABSENT: P.J. DeMaris,K. Huskey, J. Molina, L. Romain, J. Sanchez, S. Sivert, D. Studinka, S. Titus GUESTS:

I. Approval of Minutes for April 27, 2011 MSC (Halttunen/ Moss) to approved the Minutes of April 27, 2011 as presented

II. Selection of ASG Club Rooms Workgroup The ASG representative was not present at the meeting. The agenda item was tabled until the next SSPC meeting in September when a new ASG representative will be assigned to the Council.

III. Four Day Work Week For Summer

Vernoy reported that the labor unions, the PFF and the CCE, are now in the process of reviewing the District’s proposal to change the work hours during the summer from eight hours to ten hours a day for Monday through Thursday and off on Fridays. It is hoped that this adjustment will save the cost in utilities and will extend the current budget monies for this fiscal year.

IV. Service Area Outcomes (SAO’s) and Student Learning Outcomes (SLO’s)

Student Services is on target and will meet the May 13th deadline for entering SAOs and SLOs into the Palomar Outcomes Database (POD).

V. Program Review and Planning (PRP) Priorities Update There was no new information on this agenda item.

Vernoy extended a special thank you to Eddie Tubbs of the Career Center for an outstanding Job Fair this year! The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 a.m. The meeting for May 25, 2011 has been cancelled.

STUDENT SERVICES PLANNING COUNCIL MEETING

MINUTES May 11, 2011

Next Meeting: September 14, 2011

Page 4: Examples of Meeting Minutes

PALOMAR COLLEGE MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT

Minutes of the Mathematics Department Meeting

September 14, 2012

PRESENT: Alidaee, Bob; Anfinson, Cynthia; Chakkanakuzhi, Mathews; Chamberlin,

Craig; Clark, Mark; Clegg, Dan; Ellis, Mona; Johnston, Tracy; Jones, Robert; Larson, Greg; Lienhart, Shannon; Lowenkron, David; Martinez, Martha; Mifflin, Karen; Miller, Kelli; Nguyen, Chuong; Snow, Susan; Squires, Annette; Tian, Yan; Towfiq, Fari; Walker, Mark; Wiestling, Jay.

Recorder: Kelli Miller ABSENT: Brannick, Monika; Brock, Perri; Harland, John; Metzger, Wendy;

Mumford, Michael; Smith, Mona; Torgison, Cindy; Voth, Anne; GUESTS: None CALL TO ORDER: Jay Wiestling, Mathematics Department Chair, called the meeting to

order at 2:02pm PM in room E-1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 17th minutes on the 1st page under Department Chair Report #1,

should be Dean’s address not President’s. It was M/S (M. Clark/T. Johnston) to approve the minutes as corrected.

REPORTS: Sabbatical Project Report Shannon Lienhart reported:

1. Students have been using the 7th instead of the 8th edition of the calculus book, asking what the differences are in the homework problems. Shannon created a set of problems with the answers so that students could use whichever book they chose for resources but have one set of problems to work on.

2. Shannon is willing to make them available to anyone who would like them and then individual instructors can modify them as then need. It is posted on her blackboard site if you want to look at them.

3. Fari suggested that if Shannon was okay with it, they could be put on the Math Tutorial website so all faculty had access (it can only be accessed from the Palomar campus) and Shannon said this was fine.

Summer Bridge Cindy Anfinson reported:

1. 74.36% of the students passed. They were also given 8 1/2 hours of reading instruction which made a big improvement in their reading levels. Martha also worked with ESL Summer Bridge and 13 of 17 students passed. 12 of those 13 increased their ESL placement.

Page 5: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Math Center Cindy Anfinson reported:

1. The Math Center made the newspaper with a quote from Jay Wiestling in it.

Website Cindy Anfinson reported:

1. Myedu.com, a website that lists grade distribution, gives GPA, histogram for all classes, has comments about instructors – looks to have been operating for about a year now. It is nationwide.

Obs. from SLO Assessments Jay Wiestling reported:

1. Cindy T suggested input for the SLO before we give them out.

2. Wendy was not here to report. 3. Greg already made a presentation previously. 4. Mona Ellis will send out an email. 5. David gave problems at the final and 16 of 17 students

were able to answer. Copier Jay Wiestling reported:

1. Copier should be here on the Monday following this meeting.

2. District signed an exclusive agreement with Konica so we could not go with the former company we had used.

3. It will be a scanner and fax machine as well as a copier/printer. When the printer at Mona and Kelli’s desk dies, it will not be replaced. This copier will be networked for all.

4. There will be the same but smaller sized copier in the Math Center and it will be networked as well.

5. Each person will have their own code/account for the copiers.

Assessment Coordinator Position Jay Wiestling reported:

1. Diane McAllister is retiring and he feels it is important that we have a Math faculty member on the committee for input.

2. Fari nominated Mathews as a committee member and he accepted. Jay will notify the committee chairperson.

Workshop Jay Wiestling reported:

1. Next month there will be a workshop on Concepts of Numbers (Wendy and Anne have been working with this in their classes this semester as a pilot). It is a new way of teaching arithmetic/algebra. It will be 2-5pm on Friday October 19, 2012. Consider it mandatory. It can be used for PD, code is 112.

2. Karen and Cindy A spoke about substituting in Wendy/Anne class and the success the students seemed to be having so far.

3. STEM grant is paying for this training and tutors will be trained as well.

Substitutes Jay Wiestling reported:

Page 6: Examples of Meeting Minutes

1. There will be no substitutes for 50 minute or less classes. The District spent $300000.00 on substitutes last year and the cost has to be brought down.

Learning Outcomes Jay Wiestling reported:

1. His previous statement about only putting the Learning Outcome on your syllabus for SLO’s being assessed was wrong. It must be on for all of them every semester. He suggested cutting and pasting from the website.

2. Shannon suggested that you add, that accreditation mandates this be included but that it is not the only standard that students will be held too, that they will be expected to learn more than just what is said in the Learning Outcome.

Cheating Jay Wiestling reported:

1. A recommendation that you put consequences on your syllabus for students caught cheating.

2. You need to fill out an incident report with Sherri Titus for each student you catch cheating so that there is a record.

3. Jay also recommended that you put in your syllabus that students must keep all their graded paperwork for the semester if they want to dispute a grade.

4. Mark Walker stated that he gives his students two weeks to dispute a grade not entered properly with verification.

Adjunct Evaluations Jay Wiestling reported:

1. He would be asking some faculty members to help out with evaluations.

2. There is a revised form with the first 2 pages having little change. On the 3rd page the question regarding the syllabus has been changed to a yes/no question. There is still a summary, but there is now a page for department chairperson input. Please don’t send in the evaluation without getting this from Jay.

3. Shannon expressed that if you are doing an evaluation DON’T be nice if the instructor is not doing their job. Once an instructor is on the preference list, even if they are a bad instructor, it is difficult to get them off the list. If they are on the list Jay has to offer them a class.

4. Jay said that yes there is a problem hiring adjunct, but some that are not doing their jobs need to be removed.

5. Some discussion ensued about setting two levels of standards, maybe a level of experience, so that instructors are meeting qualifications for class levels.

PD Contract Jay Wiestling reported:

1. Your contracts are due September 15, 2012. Get on it if you haven’t done it.

Dept. Policy/Over Enroll Jay Wiestling reported:

1. The original 40 (or whatever your enrollment number is), should be given priority seating until the class starts. If one of them is late to class, they do not get priority

Page 7: Examples of Meeting Minutes

seating. Once class starts students you have added can take seats.

2. Jay relayed the issue he had with one parent about their child not getting priority seating and without allowing Jay to work on the problem, immediately called the Mayor’s office and the fire department. We were able to make some changes to classes with Berta’s help so that the fire marshal wasn’t called in.

3. Jay has been trying for 10 years to get someone on this campus to admit to him what the fire marshal code (regarding room capacity) is and no one has an answer.

ANNOUNCEMENTS: November 12th is Veteran’s Day and December 14th is the last day of

classes ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 2:53 PM.

Page 8: Examples of Meeting Minutes

PALOMAR COLLEGE MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT

Minutes of the Mathematics Department Meeting

November 16, 2012

PRESENT: Alidaee, Bob; Anfinson, Cynthia; Brannick, Monika; Brock, Perri;

Chakkanakuzhi, Mathews; Chamberlin, Craig; Clark, Mark; Clegg, Dan; Ellis, Mona; Harland, John; Johnston, Tracy; Jones, Robert; Larson, Greg; Lienhart, Shannon; Metzger, Wendy; Mifflin, Karen; Smith, Mona; Snow, Susan; Squires, Annette; Tian, Yan; Torgison, Cindy; Towfiq, Fari; Walker, Mark; Wiestling, Jay.

Recorder: Mona Smith ABSENT: Lowenkron, David; Martinez, Martha; Mumford, Michael; Nguyen,

Chuong; Voth, Anne; GUESTS: None CALL TO ORDER: Jay Wiestling, Mathematics Department Chair, called the meeting to

order at 2:05 PM in room E-1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of 11/16/2012. MSC: Larson, Johnston. REPORTS: Department Chair Jay Wiestling reported:

1. Prerequisite validation a. Monika Brannick presented Power Point presentation that

was given at Chairs and directors meeting with handouts emailed to faculty.

i. This separate review of pre-requisites is now a Title V regulation.

2. Greg Larson reported issues brought to light by the implementation of Math 47 within curriculum.

a. Change of language in COR an issue re: articulation between schools (particularly CSUSM).

b. For future reference, please speak with Gloria Kirkhoff in matriculation before implementation.

c. Discussion d. Proposed possibly creating a topics course that has a M15

pre-requisite. 3. Tracy Johnston (CPI Coordinator) reported on the Stem I Grant.

a. Pedagogy Seminar hosted at CSUSM STEM i. Friday, Dec. 7th. 2pm-4pm. Topic still TBD.

b. Reminder about the email sent out by her requesting a short story about what STEM has done for you or your students.

c. April 2013, Saturday Faculty Forum

Page 9: Examples of Meeting Minutes

i. STEM Faculty invited ii. Discussion re: Brining in more math into science

and vice-versa. iii. Interested in ideas on how to implement this. iv. More details coming soon.

4. Tracy Johnston reported on syllabi project a. Wants to survey about what items belong on syllabus

according to our department. b. What is required/recommended c. Tracy compiled a list and would like feedback form the

Dept. on it. d. Jay mentioned how this will be helpful when

administering adjunct evaluations since there is a question specifically about t syllabi.

5. Tracy Johnston reported of a tentative Math and Chemistry Learning Community.

a. As a math 56 and a Chem 110? b. Taught by Tracy and Geetha. c. Tracy would like to pick the 56 first in fall to build this

LC on. d. Discussion e. Department approves first pick, only if STEM is paying

for class. f. Jay/Tracy to investigate STEM to pay for an extra Math

56. 6. Cindy A. presented BSI/HIS Info

a. AMATYC will be in Anaheim next fall 2013 b. Math Center newsletter has been published. c. CMC3 will be the last week of Feb. 2013 d. About $17,000 has been allotted for more embedded

tutors e. There will be a 20% release position to research

embedded tutors effectiveness. 7. SLO Assessments

a. Wendy has math 50, get info from her. b. Craig, Perri, Rob – No info. c. Tracy already reported on Math 106. d. Jay still working on creating class survey.

8. Budget a. Proposition 30 passed – Hooray! b. Budget remains at status quo as LY, and stops the

situation from getting worse. However it does not fix the budget.

c. About 150 classes will be added back into spring 2013. d. Hiring – will be based on FON (Faculty Obligation

Number). e. Math may be about #18 on the list.

9. Posted Office hours a. STEM Center would like to post office hours of faculty to

notify students in case they need help and the STEM center is busy.

b. Discussion c. Jay will bring the discussion to Dean Sourbeer.

10. Department Chair election a. Jay nominated. MSC: Mifflin, Johnston.

11. Summer 2013 class picks

Page 10: Examples of Meeting Minutes

ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 3:18 PM.

Page 11: Examples of Meeting Minutes

PALOMAR COLLEGE MATHEMATICS DEPARTMENT

UNAPPROVED Minutes of the

Mathematics Department Meeting February 8, 2013

PRESENT: Alidaee, Bob; Anfinson, Cynthia; Brannick, Monika; Brock, Perri;

Chakkanakuzhi, Mathews; Chamberlin, Craig; Clark, Mark; Ellis, Mona; Harland, John; Johnston, Tracy; Jones, Robert; Larson, Greg; Lienhart, Shannon; Lowenkron, David; Martinez, Martha; Metzger, Wendy; Mifflin, Karen; Mumford, Michael; Nguyen, Chuong; Smith, Mona; Snow, Susan; Squires, Annette; Tian, Yan; Torgison, Cindy; Towfiq, Fari; Voth, Anne; Walker, Mark; Wiestling, Jay.

Recorder: Mona Smith ABSENT: Clegg, Dan; GUESTS: None CALL TO ORDER: Jay Wiestling, Mathematics Department Chair, called the meeting to

order at 2:00 PM in room E-9. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MSC: Larson, Clark (with corrections). REPORTS: Tracy Johnston reported:

1. On Sat April 13, 2013 there will be a Stem I Grant seminar discussing improvement of curriculum and pedagogy.

2. February 22-24th there will be a seminar regarding ways to improve the way we teach/classroom strategies.

3. Tracy will forward information via emails.

Mona Ellis reported: 1. Math Success Workshop (Feb 28th and March 7th) is

experiencing low enrollment, please encourage students to attend.

Department Chair Jay Wiestling reported:

1. Program SLO’s • Jay created and posted a survey on BlackBoard asking

students if they thought that Palomar College adequately prepared them to transfer to a university in any of the fields of mathematics, physics, or engineering.

• 290 student responded

Page 12: Examples of Meeting Minutes

• Discussed results which were favorable to this (over 78%)

• Discussion followed regarding updates and changes to survey.

• Changes will include: a. Change questions to included “all STEM majors” b. Change to a College or University

2. Colored Paper Costs • As part of the new copier contract, we realized that

white paper is included in our contract but colored paper is not, meaning we pay additional for colored paper.

• Department will reduce colors used to 2 colors to reduce costs (white and Goldenrod)

• Discussion Followed 3. Fall 2013 Class Picks

ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 3:45pm (roughly).

Page 13: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Minutes of the MEETING OF THE FACULTY SENATE

August 20, 2012 APPROVED

PRESENT: Melinda Carrillo, Haydn Davis, Ken Dodson, Katy French, Barb Kelber, Greg Larson,

Teresa Laughlin, Jackie Martin, Pam McDonough, Christina Moore, Linda Morrow, Patrick O’Brien, Lillian Payn, Perry Snyder, Diane Studinka, Katie Townsend-Merino, Fari Towfiq

ABSENT: Lesley Williams GUESTS: Angel Jimenez, ASG CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by the President, Greg Larson, at 2:00 p.m., in Room

SU-30. Approval of Minutes: Motion 1 MSC Laughlin, Morrow: Faculty Senate approval of the minutes of May 14, 2012, as

amended. The motion carried. Public Comments: There were no public comments. Announcements: Greg Larson announced that he has been called to Federal Jury Duty for the month of

October, but he intends to continue as President during that time. Committee Appointments: Motion 2 MSC O’Brien, Laughlin: Faculty Senate approval of the following committee

appointments:

Academic Technology Committee (12-14) Mathematics and the Natural and Health Sciences Nirmala Kashyap/Mathematics Committee on Service Learning (12-14) Languages and Literature Erica Duran/English (12-14) Library Katy French/Library (12-14) Mathematics and the Natural and Health Sciences Wing Cheung/ Earth, Space, and Aviation Sciences (12-14) Social and Behavioral Sciences Laurel Anderson/Child Development

Page 14: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, August 20, 2012 Page 2 Elections Committee (12-14) Mark Clark/Mathematics (12-14) Jon Panish/English Learning Outcomes Council (11-13) AMB&S Michael Gilkey/Business Administration Strategic Planning Council (12-14) Teresa Laughlin/Economics/History and Political Science (12-14) Kate Stewart/Economics/History and Political Science The motion carried. Motion 3 MSC O’Brien, Laughlin: Faculty Senate approval of the ballot for the following committee appointments: Academic Review Committee (12-14) Bruce Bishop/ Speech Communications Disability Resource Center Advisory Committee (12-14) Kathleen Young/Behavioral Sciences Perkins Planning and Advisory Committee (12-14) Wing Cheung/Earth, Space, and Aviation Sciences Personnel Standards & Practices Committee (12-14) Juliane Van Houten/Nursing Education Team Life Committee (12-14) Cord (Buck) Taylor/Kinesiology/Athletics The motion carried. Patrick O’Brien announced that Senators are needed to serve on the following committees: Academic Standards & Practices Committee Accreditation Steering Committee Committee on Committees Faculty Service Area Review Committee Human Resource Services Planning Council Professional Procedures Committee

After some discussion, some Senators volunteered to fill vacancies and a motion was brought forward for approval.

Motion 4 O’Brien, Laughlin: Faculty Senate approval of the following committee appointments: Elections Committee Barb Kelber

Page 15: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, August 20, 2012 Page 3 Professional Procedures Committee Pam McDonough Human Resources Planning Council Christina Moore The motion carried. Distinguished Faculty Award Governance Structure: Senators were provided with a copy of the Governance Structure Group Request form currently being proposed by the Distinguished Faculty Award Committee. Role: To select faculty members to be recipients of the Distinguished Faculty Award. Reporting Relationship: Faculty Senate Meeting Schedule: At least three times a year.

Chair: The Chair will be the DFA full-time faculty winner from two years prior. The Vice-Chair will be the DFA full-time faculty winner of the previous year. The Chair and the Vice-Chair will work closely together to prepare the Vice-Chair for the next year’s Chair position. The Chair will then serve one more year on the committee as a member. Faculty Members: Up to 8 full time Faculty at-large (at least 3 of whom are former recipients) and up to 3 adjunct Faculty. Patrick O’Brien indicated that he would be bringing this item back for Action at next week’s meeting.

Team Life Governance Structure: Greg Larson stated that the Team Life Committee is seeking a Faculty Senate

representative. There was some question from Senators as to why it had to be a Senate representative rather than a faculty member at-large. Copies of the proposed Governance Structure will be brought to next week’s meeting.

Student Services Resources: Lillian Payn brought forward a recommendation of the Academic Technology Committee

(ATC) to address Title V requirements that students be offered the same services made available to face-to-face students. While one solution would be for online instructors to include a services page on their syllabi, another would be to have a global page on Palomar.edu with those services. The ATC recommends that rather than instructors providing their own page, that all instructors direct students to the same online page (hht://www.palomar.edu/students/) as this would save instructors from having to duplicate something available elsewhere, and it would be easier to keep a single page up-to-date. The ATC also recommended specific things to make the page more useful, including fixing broken links and adding phone numbers. The ATC also recommends placing a link to the page in “Quick Links,” a link in eServices for students (both face-to-face and online) to see when they register, and a reference to this page in Palomar Online Education Training (POET) as a recommendation for instructors to include the link on their syllabi.

Page 16: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, August 20, 2012 Page 4 This item will be brought for Action at next week’s meeting. Student Success Task Force Recommendations: Greg Larson reminded Senators that the Governance Structure for the Faculty Advisory

Board on Student Success Task Force Recommendations was approved by the Senate at its May 7, 2012, meeting. The structure for the board is as follows:

CHAIR: Two Faculty Senators: Co-Chairs Members: One faculty representative from each of the following: Basic Skills Committee Curriculum Committee Learning Outcomes Council Student Services Planning Council Other members: VP of Instruction Invited as needed: Faculty at large Representation of constituencies such as Matriculation Articulation Counseling Student Services Financial Services Research and Planning

Lengthy discussion followed on the roles and responsibilities, as well as membership of the Board. There was some concern expressed that there may be overlap with other groups, such as the Student Services Planning Council (SSPC), although there is probably overlap with other groups as well. Some Senators questioned whether instead of the Faculty Advisory Board, a work group should be formed to discuss strategies and then meet with the appropriate committee(s) and bring those ideas together. However, one Senator noted that the Senate discussed this issue over several weeks last semester and agreed that the formation of the Faculty Advisory Board (FAB) was the appropriate course of action, particularly when there are only two instructional faculty members currently serving on the SSPC. The spirit behind the recommendation to form the Faculty Advisory Board was to ensure that faculty had a voice in important decisions made in response to the Student Success Task Force Recommendations. Another Senator reminded the Senate that the Committee Structure was approved last year, so now it is time to choose the co-chairs. Once the Board is formed the members can begin to more clearly focus their goals. Senators agreed to review the Governance Structure again and bring this item back for further discussion and/or action next week.

In relation to the actual recommendations, Greg Larson indicated that there are a total of 22, with 9 slated for immediate implementation. Among the 9 that are highly prioritized are:

--Collaboration with K-12 to establish common academic standards --Common assessments

--Enrollment priorities for students based on how successfully they follow the mission of the college and adhere to an educational plan.

Page 17: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, August 20, 2012 Page 5 --Enrollment Management

--Student Success Score Card .

Discussion followed on the recommendations, the ways in which they might affect students and the college as a whole, and the need to provide resources for students.

ASG: Angel Jimenez provided the following report from the ASG: One introduction event has been held to allow an opportunity for students to meet the

new ASG President and Vice President, with another one scheduled. Because of the success of the day, an Orientation has been scheduled for next week to provide additional information about service in Student Government.

Palomar will work with CSUSM and Mira Costa to collaborate on an event to support the

passage of Proposition 30 and the importance of voting. The ASG will schedule a “Scholarship Day” with numerous organizations, including the

Palomar College Foundation, to provide information on scholarship opportunities available to students.

Jiminez is working to create a program to acknowledge “Star Students” each month.

Faculty will be asked to identify those “star” students who stand out in their classes and submit those names to the ASG. The ASG will then acknowledge those students by visiting the classroom and presenting them with a certificate of recognition. It is hoped that such a program will not only elevate school spirit, but promote the ASG and increase membership interest.

Over the summer, Jiminez was elected as the SSCCC Regional Advocacy Senator and

will travel to Sacramento each month to attend those meetings. She was also appointed as Region X Advocacy Senator on the SSCCC Council (Equity and Diversity Committee Academic Senate Student Rep for Standards, Equity, Access and Practices Committee).

The first meeting of the ASG for the semester will be held on Wednesday, August 22,

2012, at 1:00 p.m. Learning Outcomes Council: Katy French reported that many of the colleges have begun submitting their reports to the

ACCJC, with Palomar’s due in the spring. The first round of assessments for Information Literacy and Critical and Creative

Thinking for General Education/Institutional Learning Outcomes (GE/ILO’s) is complete, and a draft report has been completed with the results, observations, ideas, and recommendations. This draft will go to the Learning Outcomes Council (LOC) for approval in the next few weeks. It will then be brought to the Senate before it is distributed college-wide.

French added that she and Marty Furch have been invited to speak by the Research &

Planning group at the Student Success Conference about Palomar’s GE Assessment Plans and the approach used in their implementation.

Page 18: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, August 20, 2012 Page 6 Strategic Planning Council: Greg Larson stated that members of the Strategic Planning Council held their Orientation

meeting last week. The group has scheduled its next meeting early in September. Governing Board: Greg Larson indicated that the Governing Board meetings over the summer were focused

on upcoming projects. There was also much discussion on Proposition 30 and efforts underway by ASG President Jonathan Farmer and Trustee Chadwick to promote its passage.

Palomar Faculty Federation: Jackie Martin reported that the Palomar Faculty Federation (PFF) was very active over

the summer. The annual audit has been completed and went well despite the challenges involved with a change of leadership and the hiring of a new administrative assistant.

Faculty members are encouraged to check the PFF blog to keep up-to-date on the

activities of the PFF, and they have hopefully participated in the recent survey to provide alternatives to potential salary cuts.

Instructional Planning Council: Linda Morrow reminded all that PRP’s are due to deans on September 14, 2012. Academic Technology: Lillian Payn provided the following report on Academic Technology: Six new POET Certificates were issued over the summer months, and twenty-five faculty

members are currently enrolled. A “Blackboard Learn” upgrade was completed in June, and on August 2-5 Blackboard was closed down to complete a major upgrade. To address any further database issues, David Gray has been approved to obtain some additional “My Sequel” training.

The Academic Technology Committee will hold their first meeting of the semester on Thursday, August 23.

ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 3:29 p.m. Respectfully submitted,

Pam McDonough, Secretary

Page 19: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Minutes of the

MEETING OF THE FACULTY SENATE January 30, 2012

APPROVED

PRESENT: Bruce Bishop, Monika Brannick, Melinda Carrillo, Haydn Davis, Jenny Fererro, Katy French, Lori Graham, Barb Kelber, Greg Larson, Teresa Laughlin, Jackie Martin-Klement, Christina Moore, Linda Morrow, Pam McDonough, Patrick O’Brien, Wendy Nelson, Lillian Payn, Perry Snyder, Diane Studinka, Fari Towfiq

ABSENT: GUESTS: Armando Telles, ASG CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by the President, Monika Brannick, at 2:00 p.m., in

Room SU-30. Approval of Minutes: Motion 1 MSC Laughlin, Morrow: Faculty Senate approval of the minutes of January 23, 2012, as

amended. The motion carried. Public Comments: There were no public comments. Announcements: Monika Brannick announced that faculty are invited to attend the Accreditation Institute

hosted by the Academic Senate on February 10 and 11at the Sheraton Park Hotel in Sacramento. Those interested should contact Katy French or Berta Cuaron for more information.

Monika Brannick reminded Senators that Beth Smith of the Statewide Academic Senate

will be attending next week’s meeting. Committee Appointments: Motion 2 MSC O’Brien, Bishop: Faculty Senate approval of the following committee

appointments: Matriculation and Transfer Committee (10-12) English Benedict Jones/English Tenure & Evaluations Review Board (11-13) Social and Behavioral Sciences Tamara Weintraub/Library The motion carried.

Page 20: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, January 30, 2012 Page 2 Patrick O’Brien indicated that faculty are still needed to serve on the following councils: Human Resources Planning Council – meets the 1st and 3rd Tuesday from 4:00 – 5:00

p.m. Finance & Administrative Services Planning Council – meets the 2nd and 4th Thursday

from 2:00 – 3:30 p.m. Motion 3 MSC Laughlin, Fererro: Faculty Senate approval of the appointment of Christina Moore

to the Human Resources Planning Council. The motion carried. Curriculum: Copies of the Palomar College Curriculum Committee Meeting Action Items were

provided last week. Motion 4 MSC Larson, O’Brien: Faculty Senate ratification of the Palomar College Curriculum

Committee Meeting Action Items and the Attachment dated December 7, 2011. The motion carried.

Greg Larson indicated that the next meeting of the Curriculum Committee is on

Wednesday, February 1. GE/ILO Assessment Plans 2012: Copies of the GE/ILO Spring 2012 Assessment plans were distributed for information: FE/ILO Spring Assessment Plans LOC report to Faculty Senate January 30, 2012 GE/ILOs to be assessed in Spring 2012 Critical and Creative Thinking Information Literacy Description of Assessment Project Together with the Office of Institutional Research and Planning, LOC will identify a random sample of courses

with one or more course SLOs mapped to one of the GE/Institutional Learning Outcomes being assessed this semester (critical and creative thinking; information literacy).

Faculty teaching those identified courses will be invited to participate in the assessment of the outcome(s).

Participating faculty will select student work (e.g. exam, assignment, portfolio) that demonstrates students’ ability to meet the outcome. They will assess the outcome by applying a common rubric to student work. The draft rubrics were developed by a PC faculty group in the summer of 2011. Participating faculty will refine and norm the rubrics prior to using them.

After assessment, the faculty will provide summary reports to an LOC-appointed faculty group who will

compile the data, including feedback about the assessment process and the viability of the rubrics. The faculty who participate will be compensated via the Strategic Planning Priority Funding approved by the Strategic Planning Council.

1. To be eligible to participate, the course must have at least one course SLO mapped to the GE/ILO to be

assessed. 2. Topics, independent study, noncredit, and cross-listed courses are not eligible for selection. 3. Sections must have more than five (5) students in the section, and class must start by January 30 (census

day). 4. Institutional Research & Planning staff will provide a random sample of courses/sections to be assessed. 5. If an adequate number of sections is not selected in the first sample, a second sample will be pulled until

LOC confirms 20 sections for each GE/ILO being assessed. 20 sections are ample for a pilot program of this nature.

6. A student roster will be re-pulled at the time of the assessment due date to ensure that students are enrolled in the section.

7. Faculty whose courses are selected will be contacted individually by the SLOAC Coordinators and/or POD Squad members and asked to participate. Faculty are not obligated to participate.

Page 21: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, January 30, 2012 Page 3

8. POD Squad members representing each division will contact participating faculty in the division to offer to serve as a guide/contact during the process. POD Squad members will be compensated with 2011-12 SPPF money.

9. Faculty must sign an agreement outlining their responsibilities and LOC responsibilities throughout the process.

10. Faculty must participate in training and must review, revise, and norm the rubrics. Faculty will administer the assessment and score student artifacts using the rubrics.

11. Faculty will report the rubric scores for each student using a reporting form developed by IR&P. Rubric scores must be submitted to LOC by early May.

12. Faculty will report their experiences throughout the process via surveys, focus groups, and/or other means as appropriate.

13. Upon completion of the process, faculty will receive a $500 stipend from SPPF money for their participation.

14. A group appointed by LOC will analyze the assessment data and the process in Summer 2012. 15. Information should be disseminated to faculty. Assessment planning information – including the timeline,

the process, and the rubrics – should be included on the Learning Outcomes website.

Katy French also provided drafts for GE/Institutional SLO Critical & Creative Thinking, and GE/Institutional SLO Information Literacy rubrics. French indicated that the documents were developed over the summer. The rubrics will be reviewed and amended as necessary by faculty who will then participate in the assessment. More information on how the data will be used will be available later this semester. A lengthy question and answer period followed as Senators reviewed the documents. French indicated that, after the initial study, if the college decides to move forward with this assessment method, the number of participating sections will rise to approximately 40-50 sections. In response to a question regarding student anonymity, French indicated that all student and faculty names will be removed before analysis.

Grant Procedure: At last week’s meeting, Senators discussed the process used for grant application, and questioned whether a formal process exists at Palomar. Currently, a faculty member would discuss their intent to apply for a grant with their dean and the Vice President of Instruction. Michelle Barton would also be included in the discussion because of her expertise in the grant writing process.

There was additional discussion on the current process, noting that grants including

significant release time or stipends need to go through the Palomar Faculty Federation. Rather than coming up with a formal procedure, Senators agreed that the Senate President should provide general directions via email to all department chairs, deans, the Vice President of Instruction, the Palomar College Foundation, and Michelle Barton, outlining the various steps needed for a successful outcome.

Student Success Task Force: Monika Brannick indicated that, in an effort to keep everyone informed of the progress

toward implementation of the Student Success Task Force recommendations, the Chancellor’s Communications Office has launched a monthly newsletter. The newsletter will be distributed to all Chief Instructional Officers in an attempt to keep everyone updated on the progress, key dates, legislation, and other topics relevant to the student success recommendations.

The Senate Education and Assembly Higher Education committees have scheduled a

February 1 joint hearing to review the Student Success Task Force (SSTF) recommendations. The hearing will be held 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. in the Capitol, room 4202. The Education Budget Subcommittees from both houses have also been invited to

Page 22: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, January 30, 2012 Page 4 participate. The legislation that formed the SSTF (SB 1143, Liu) included a provision

that the recommendations be presented to the Legislature no later than March 2012. After the Board of Governors unanimously endorsed the recommendations of the SSTF at

its January meeting, the California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office is moving toward a phased-in, coordinated implementation of the recommendations that will include consultation with a wide range of stakeholders. Some of the recommendations can be moved on rather quickly, others will take longer. Working groups are being identified and will develop strategies for the most effective implementation of the recommendations.

Discussion followed on the impact to students as more and more class sections are

removed. Monika Brannick reminded all of the need for the formation of a Palomar College task force to review the recommendations and determine the best way to proceed for Palomar students and faculty.

Accreditation: Monika Brannick reported that the Governing Board continues their review and

discussion of the Accreditation Mid-Term Report. Policies & Procedures: Monika Brannick provided a review of AP 7120, Recruitment & Hiring, on the overhead.

She reminded all that this had come to the Senate previously, where some changes were recommended and the document was sent back to the Policies & Procedures Task Force for their input on those changes.

Brannick indicated that Vice President Tortarolo was supportive of all of the

recommendations suggested by the Senate, with the exception of the following addition: “For faculty hiring, the Superintendent/President relies primarily on the recommendation of the selection committee.” Currently, in accordance with Article 7.1 of the contract, the Superintendent/President makes the final decision after two candidates are brought forward and supported equally by the selection committee.

Discussion followed on the language in the document and whether the Senate should

request that members of the Policy & Procedures Task Force review the recommendation again for reconsideration. Brannick noted that the document has been brought before the group several times and the changes suggested by the Senate were not supported.

The document will be brought to the next Policies & Procedures Task Force in February

with the Senate’s request for reconsideration. ASG: Armando Telles reported that members of the ASG are preparing to elect members of the

Elections Committee and the Executive Board President and Vice President for the next term.

February is African American History month with several events scheduled for students

to celebrate the contributions of African Americans to our society. Learning Outcomes Council: Katy French reported that, at the last Learning Outcomes Council meeting, the group

discussed adding the program Learning Outcomes to the online college catalog. President Deegan: Monika Brannick and Fari Towfiq will meet with President Deegan for their bi-monthly

meeting on February 7.

Page 23: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, January 30, 2012 Page 5 Palomar Faculty Federation: Teresa Laughlin reported that members of the Palomar Faculty Federation have approved

the Tenure & Evaluations Review forms that were brought to the Faculty Senate last semester.

Instructional Planning Council: Linda Morrow indicated that the PRP Allocations have been made and will be distributed

very soon. Members of the Instructional Planning Council are currently discussing Staffing Requests.

Faculty Service Area Committee: Lori Graham reported that members of the Faculty Service Area Committee are

scheduled to meet on February 7. Strategic Planning Council: Monika Brannick stated that members of the Strategic Planning Council will meet for a

Special Meeting on Friday, February 3, at 9:00 a.m. to discuss the budget. Student Services Planning Council: Diane Studinka indicated that members of the Student Services Planning Council are

currently discussing SPPF funding, including the Student Equipment Technology Priority Master List, and the vacant, budgeted, and proposed positions for the Student Services List. Studinka indicated that she has requested that those positions funded by grants be placed in a separate category than those funded by the district.

Academic Technology Committee: Lillian Payn reported that members of the Academic Technology Committee held another

POET (Palomar Online Education Training) session on Friday, January 27. One-on-one sessions will also be offered to those who request them.

Payn added that she met with Accreditation Co-Chair Brent Gowen last week to discuss

POET training and how it can be tied in to the Accreditation Report. Members of the Academic Technology Committee met on January 26 and established

their goals, addressing topics such as future training and lab space. The group also discussed a recommendation regarding the Distance Education Policy, and made recommendations regarding Digital Information Literacy as a basic skill and how that training and testing could be implemented. There was also discussion of possibly reformatting the check-list. The group will meet again on February 9.

ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 3:36 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Melinda Carrillo, Secretary

Page 24: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Minutes of the

MEETING OF THE FACULTY SENATE February 6, 2012

APPROVED

PRESENT: Bruce Bishop, Monika Brannick, Melinda Carrillo, Haydn Davis, Jenny Fererro, Katy French, Lori Graham, Barb Kelber, Greg Larson, Teresa Laughlin, Jackie Martin-Klement, Christina Moore, Linda Morrow, Pam McDonough, Patrick O’Brien, Wendy Nelson, Lillian Payn, Perry Snyder, Diane Studinka, Fari Towfiq

ABSENT: GUESTS: Mireya Gutierrez-Aguero, Title V HSI STEM Project Supervisor, Armando Telles, ASG CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by the President, Monika Brannick, at 2:00 p.m., in

Room SU-30. Approval of Minutes: Motion 1 MSC Snyder, Morrow: Faculty Senate approval of the minutes of January 30, 2012, as

amended. The motion carried. Public Comments: There were no public comments. Announcements: Mireya Gutierrez-Aguero provided information to Senators on the Palomar College

STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) Project, whose goal is to increase STEM awareness as well as the number of Hispanic and low-income students obtaining Bachelor degrees.

As part of Palomar’s STEM Grant, a STEM Club has been created and is dedicated to

serving STEM scholars and those who are interested in pursuing STEM careers. For the Spring 2012 semester, the STEM Club will be hosting speakers from various careers in STEM fields. This is a great opportunity to learn about some of the more interesting pathways that STEM graduates have pursued fulfilling their career fields. Recently, a STEM Informational Workshop was offered providing Summer Research opportunities for undergraduate students presented by the CSUSM Office for Biomedical Research and Training (OBRT), where those in attendance learned about paid summer programs.

Gutirrez-Aguero also provided information on Palomar’s STEM Scholar Program (SSP),

which offers tutoring, internships, visits to academic and scientific facilities, opportunities to work with faculty mentors, and student support workshops. Academic Advising is offered by Palomar College counselors and student support services are provided by a CSUSM Advisor. More information is available on these and other opportunities by visiting the STEM Center, which is expected to be open on February 15. The center will be located in the Natural Sciences Building, rooms 310 and 312. Additional information is available at www.palomar.edu/stem.

Page 25: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 6, 2012 Page 2 Lori Graham announced that she recently attended a Chancellor’s Office Consumer &

Design Education committee meeting and learned that the title of Career & Technical Education at the Chancellor’s Office has been changed to Career Education Practices Unit.

Graham also indicated that new laws also require for-profit institutions to disclose that

they are non-accredited, particularly as it relates to those fields that require licensing and certification in California. Changes have also been made to the eligibility requirements for the California Dream Act to allow undocumented students who qualify for in-state tuition to receive scholarships from the University of California, California State Colleges, and California Community Colleges that are derived from non-state funds (AB 130). Eligibility requirements have also changed to allow undocumented students who qualify for in-state tuition to receive financial aid from the University of California, California State Colleges, and Community Colleges that are state funded. This includes Cal Grant programs, the Community College Board of Governors Fee Waiver, and a variety of statewide campus grant and loan programs.

Committee Appointments: Motion 2 MSC O’Brien, Nelson: Faculty Senate approval of the following committee appointment: Sabbatical Leave Committee (11-13) Student Services Veronica Aguilera/EOP&S The motion carried. Motion 3 MSC Laughlin, Towfiq: Faculty Senate approval of the following committee

appointment: Course Identification Numbering System (C-ID) Course Outline of Record Reviewer Paul Kurokawa/Music The motion carried. Curriculum: The following Curriculum items were forwarded to Senators electronically: PALOMAR COLLEGE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION ITEMS Wednesday, February 1, 2012 Room AA-140 at 3:00 p.m. I. ACTION ITEMS Details of all program and course proposals can be viewed at: http://www.curricunet.com/palomar Select “track,” From the list of pending proposals, select the Check Status button for the program or course you wish to

view. Select the Pencil icon in order to navigate through the various pages of the proposal, or Select the “COR” or “WR” icon to view the Course Outline of Record or Program Report, or Select the “CC” icon to view a report that displays proposed changes for the course outline of record or

program Select the “CR” icon to view a report that displays ALL proposed changes for the course To View Packages

Page 26: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 6, 2012 Page 3 Select Packages under Create/Edit Proposals, select the Pencil icon to see individual proposals included in

the Package. Various icons will be accessible for creating Reports or viewing the pages of each proposal. II. CONSENT CALENDAR There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Curriculum Committee member or guest requests

that a particular item be removed from the Consent Calendar. Items so removed will be considered separately. All matters remaining under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be approved by one motion.

The following curricular changes, pending appropriate approvals, will be effective FALL 2012: A. Credit Course/Program Packages 1. There are no Credit Course/Program Packages for this agenda. B. Vocational Credit Course/Program Packages 1. There are no Vocational Credit Course/Program Packages for this agenda. C. Non-Credit Course/Program Packages 1. There are no Non-Credit Course/Program Packages for this agenda. D. New Programs 1. There are no New Programs for this agenda. E. New Vocational Programs 1. There are no New Vocational Programs for this agenda. F. Program Reactivations 1. There are no Program Reactivations for this agenda. G. Vocational Program Reactivations 1. There are no Vocational Program Reactivations for this agenda. H. Program Changes 1. Program Title: English Discipline: English (ENG) Award Type: A.A. Degree Major Total Units: 22.00 - 25.00 Added ENG 255 and ENG 290 to elective block. Rocco L. Versace I. Vocational Program Changes 1. Program Title: Kitchen Design Discipline: Interior Design (ID) Award Type: Certificate of Achievement Total Units: 17.00 - 18.00 Changed program title from Interior Design to Kitchen Design, removed BUS 125 from requirement block,

removed ID 135 and ID 150 from second semester block, added ID 125 and ID 160 to second semester block. Sandra Andre J. Program Deactivations 1. Program Title: Africana Studies Discipline: Africana Studies (AS) Award Type: Certificate of Proficiency Total Units: 15 Reason for Deactivation: Not the proper certification for an academic program; anticipating development of an

AA degree. Martin Japtok K. Vocational Program Deactivations 1. There are no Vocational Program Deactivations for this agenda. L. Credit Courses - New

Page 27: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 6, 2012 Page 4 1. Course Number and Title: IT 115 Industrial Safety Discipline: Industrial Technology (IT) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Distance Learning Offering(s): Computer Assisted, Online Standalone Course Jay Miller 2. Course Number and Title: WELD 136 Welding Symbols Discipline: Welding (WELD) Course Included in the following programs: A. Ultrasonic Testing Level I, Certificate of Achievement Transfer Acceptability: CSU Distance Learning Offering(s): Computer Assisted, Online Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Also proposed for Welding Technology A.S. degree major or Certificate of Achievement. Jay Miller 3. Course Number and Title: WELD 165 Visual Inspection Level I Discipline: Welding (WELD) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Standalone Course Proposed for a new certificate in Welding Inspection. Jay Miller 4. Course Number and Title: WELD 166 Visual Inspection Level II Discipline: Welding (WELD) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Standalone Course Proposed for a new certificate in Welding Inspection. Jay Miller 5. Course Number and Title: WELD 167 Visual Inspection Level III Discipline: Welding (WELD) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Standalone Course Proposed for a new certificate in Welding Inspection. Jay Miller 6. Course Number and Title: WELD 170 Liquid Penetrant Testing Level I Short Title: Liquid Penetrant Testing I Discipline: Welding (WELD) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Standalone Course Proposed for a new certificate in Welding Inspection. Jay Miller 7. Course Number and Title: WELD 171 Liquid Penetrant Testing Level II Short Title: Liquid Penetrant Testing II Discipline: Welding (WELD) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Standalone Course Proposed for a new certificate in Welding Inspection. Jay Miller 8. Course Number and Title: WELD 172 Liquid Penetrant Testing Level III Short Title: Liquid Penetrant Testing III Discipline: Welding (WELD) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Standalone Course

Page 28: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 6, 2012 Page 5 Proposed for a new certificate in Nondestructive Testing. Jay Miller 9. Course Number and Title: WELD 175 Magnetic Particle Testing Level I Short Title: Mag particle Testing Level I Discipline: Welding (WELD) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Standalone Course Proposed for a new certificate in Nondestructive Testing. Jay Miller 10. Course Number and Title: WELD 182 Ultrasonic Testing Level III Discipline: Welding (WELD) Associate Degree General Education - E: Lifelong Learning and Self- Development Transfer Acceptability: CSU Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Standalone Course Proposed for a new certificate in Nondestructive Testing. Jay Miller 11. Course Number and Title: WELD 183 Ultrasonic Phased Array Inspection Short Title: Ultrasonic Phased Array Insp Discipline: Welding (WELD) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Repeatability: May be taken 4 times. Standalone Course Proposed for a new certificate in Nondestructive Testing. Jay Miller M. Credit Courses - Change 1. Course Number and Title: CSIT 121 Advanced Computer Applications Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Prerequisites: CSIT 120 Transfer Acceptability: CSU Distance Learning Offering(s): Computer Assisted, Telecourse, Online Updated textbook. Ronald Burgher 2. Course Number and Title: CSWB 197 Topics in Web Technology Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Web Technology (CSWB) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Repeatability: May be taken 3 times. Reduce repeatability. Stephen R. Perry 3. Course Number and Title: EME 209 Paramedic Obstetrical and Pediatric Training (Lecture) Short Title: Paramedic OB/PED Trng (Lec) Discipline: Emergency Medical Education (EME) Prerequisites: Admission into Paramedic program, Co-requisites: EME 209L, and EME 212 Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Updated repeatability justification. Debi Workman 4. Course Number and Title: EME 209L Paramedic Obstetrical and Pediatric Skills (Laboratory) Short Title: Paramedic OB/PED Skills (Lab) Discipline: Emergency Medical Education (EME) Prerequisites: Admission into Paramedic program, Co-requisites: EME 209, EME 212 Grading Basis: Pass/No Pass Only Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Added EME 212 as a corequisite, updated repeatability justification. Debi Workman

Page 29: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 6, 2012 Page 6 5. Course Number and Title: EME 210 Hospital Clinical Experience Discipline: Emergency Medical Education (EME) Prerequisites: Admission into Paramedic program Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Added paramedic program admission as prerequisite, updated textbook and assignments. Debi Workman 6. Course Number and Title: EME 215 Field Internship Discipline: Emergency Medical Education (EME) Prerequisite: Completion of or concurrent enrollment in EME 210 (minimum grade of ‘B’) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Removed EME 210 as a prerequisite, added EME 210 with minimum grade requirement of ‘B,’ updated

suggested reading and repeatability justification. Debi Workman 7. Course Number and Title: WELD 196 Special Problems in Welding Discipline: Welding (WELD) Repeatability: May be taken 4 times. Standalone Course Updated course description, methods of instruction, assignments, methods of assessment and repeatability

justification. Jay Miller M. Credit Courses – Reactivations 1. There are no Credit Course Reactivations for this agenda. N. Credit Courses - Deactivations 1. Course Number and Title: CHIN 130 Chinese Civilization Discipline: Chinese (CHIN) (CHIN) Associate Degree General Education - C: Humanities CSU GE Area C: Arts and Humanities - C2: Humanities IGETC Area 3: Arts and Humanities - 3B: Humanities Transfer Acceptability: UC, CSU Reason for Deactivation: CHIN 130 has not been taught in 5 years. Chantal R. Maher 2. Course Number and Title: HIST 152 The World War II Generation Discipline: History (HIST) (HIST) Associate Degree General Education - D: Social and Behavioral Sciences CSU GE Area D: Social Sciences - D6: History IGETC Area 4: Social and Behavioral Sciences - 4F: History Transfer Acceptability: UC, CSU Reason for Deactivation: Course is not being offered at this time. Christopher S. Johnson 3. Course Number and Title: POSC 125 Contemporary World Problems Discipline: Political Science (POSC) IGETC Area 4: Social and Behavioral Sciences - 4H: Political Science, Government and Legal Institutions Transfer Acceptability: UC, CSU Reason for Deactivation: Has not been taught or offered. Peter Bowman O. Non Credit Course – New 1. There are no New Noncredit Courses for this agenda. P. Non Credit Course - Change 1. There are no Non Credit Course Changes for this agenda. Q. Non Credit Course - Deactivation 1. There are no Non Credit Course Deactivations for this agenda. R. Distance Learning* The following courses may be offered as distance learning and meet Title 5 Regulations 55200-55210, effective

Fall 2012.

Page 30: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 6, 2012 Page 7 Catalog/Subject Number Distance Learning Offerings (s) IT 115 Computer Assisted, Online WELD 136 Computer Assisted , Online CSIT 121 Computer Assisted, Telecourse, Online *underline indicates new, strikethrough indicates deletion, plain text indicates no change S. Requisites and Advisories* The establishment of the following advisories meets Title 5 Regulations 55003, effective Fall 2012. Catalog Number Type Description Proposal Type CSIT 121 Prerequisite CSIT 120 Credit/Change EME 209 Prerequisite Admission into Paramedic Program Credit/Change EME 209 Co-Requisite EME 209L and EME 212 Credit/Change EME 209L Prerequisite Admission into Paramedic Program Credit/Change EME 209L Co-requisite EME 209 and EME 212 Credit/Change EME 210 Prerequisite Admission into Paramedic Program, EME 209 and 209L Credit/Change EME 215 Prerequisite Completion of or concurrent enrollment in EME 210 (minimum grade of ‘B’) Credit/Change *underline indicates new, strikethrough indicates deletion, plain text indicates no change VII. RESUMPTION OF REGULAR AGENDA A. PUBLISHING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES B. INFORMATION a. Academic Senate – Legislative Updates b. Status of Course Outline Reviews The following courses have completed the course outline review process between December 2, 2011 and

January 27, 2012 and are effective Fall 2012. CSIT 120 Computer Applications c. 2011-2012 Curriculum Activity Summary Current 2011-12 Agenda Cumulative New Courses 11 23 Course Revisions 7 60 Course Deactivations 3 34 Course Reviews (12/2/2011– 1/27/2012) 0 3 New Programs 0 3 Program Revisions 2 27 Program Deactivations 1 6 Total Activity 24 156 These items will be brought back for Faculty Senate ratification at next week’s meeting. The next meeting of the Curriculum Committee will be held on February 15, 2012. Governance Structure Group Request: Tutoring Subcommittee: This item has been postponed. Service Points: Monika Brannick reminded Senators of discussions by the Faculty Senate last semester

regarding Service Points awarded to faculty working on advisory and working groups. Members of the Professional Development Review Board were asked to discuss the issue and create guidelines, and the item is scheduled for discussion by that group at their February meeting. Those guidelines will then be brought to the Senate for input.

Page 31: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 6, 2011 Page 8 Brannick also indicated that the list of Committees in eServices is in need of updating,

and Senators agreed that Committee on Committees Chair Patrick O’Brien should work with the Professional Development Review Board on keeping the information up-to-date.

GE/ILO Assessment Project: At last week’s meeting, Katy French provided Senators with a copy of the GE/ILO

Spring 2012 Assessment plan, drafts for GE/Institutional SLO Critical & Creative Thinking, and GE/Institutional Information Literacy rubrics, and lengthy discussion occurred on the upcoming process.

This week, French provided Senate members with a copy of the Palomar College 2012

GE/ILO Assessment Project Faculty Agreement: Description of Assessment Project Together with the Office of Institutional Research and Planning (IR&P), the Learning Outcomes Council (LOC)

identified a random sample of courses with one or more course SLOs mapped to one of the GE/Institutional Learning Outcomes being assessed this semester (critical and creative thinking; information literacy).

Faculty teaching those identified courses will be invited to participate in the assessment of the outcome(s).

Participating faculty will select student work (e.g. exam, assignment, portfolio) that demonstrates students’ ability to meet the outcome. They will assess the outcome by applying a common rubric to student work. The draft rubrics were developed by a PC faculty group in the summer of 2011. Participating faculty will refine and norm the rubrics prior to using them.

After assessment, the faculty will provide summary reports to an LOC-appointed faculty group who will

compile the data, including feedback about the assessment process and the viability of the rubrics. The faculty who participate will be compensated via the Strategic Planning Priority Funding approved by the Strategic Planning Council.

The two GE/ILOs being assessed this semester are Critical and Creative Thinking, and Information Literacy. Faculty Expectations By agreeing to participate in this project, you agree to the following:

1. Attend one 3 hour session where the SLOAC Coordinators will describe the assessment process. You will also use this time to work with other participating faculty to review, revise, and norm the assessment rubric. You may choose to attend one of the following three sessions: [pick some dates]

2. Select a student project that you will use to assess the outcome. 3. Share the assessment rubric with students before they complete the project so they are clear on your

expectations. 4. After students have completed the project, you will score student artifacts using the rubric. 5. Submit the rubric scores for each student to IR&P no later than May 4, 2012. 6. Report your experiences throughout the assessment process by either completing a survey or attending a focus

group during finals week. 7. After submitting the rubric reporting form and after completing the survey or participating in a focus group, you

will receive a $500 stipend. LOC Expectations The Learning Outcomes Council agrees to provide you with support as described below and to abide by the

following guidelines in carrying out this assessment project.

1. You will be assigned a faculty mentor from our POD squad to assist you throughout the assessment process. 2. A student roster will be re-pulled when you are ready to report your assessment results to ensure an accurate

student roster. 3. A group appointed by LOC will analyze the assessment data and the process in Summer 2012. 4. All faculty and student names will be removed from the data before analysis begins. 5. We have identified a random selection of course sections in order to assess a random sample of students. This

project is not assessing individual courses or instructors. We are assessing students’ ability to meet one of two GE/ILOs at a given point during their academic career. Our analysis will involve looking at groups of students, e.g. student who have completed 3 units, 15 units, 30 units or more; transfer students, CTEE students, basic skills students; gender; race, etc.

6. In fall 2012, LOC will share results of the assessment project with the College and facilitate dialog regarding the results.

Page 32: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 6, 2012 Page 9 By signing below, I agree to these guidelines for the 2012 GE/ILO Assessment Project. Name (printed)______________________________________ Date_____________________ Signature _____________________________________________________________________ Katy French reported that Learning Outcomes Council Coordinator Marty Furch

distributed an email to all faculty earlier in the day describing the Assessment Plans again. Faculty members who are randomly selected to participate will be notified this week. Lengthy discussion occurred on issues such as the timeline, departmental involvement, and maintaining privacy for faculty and students.

Senate members agreed that, although there may be concerns or reservations about this

process, in order to comply with Accreditation requirements it is crucial to be supportive of the Learning Outcomes Council as the work begins and revisit any issues that arise after the first cycle is complete. Senators agreed that there is a need for the Faculty Senate to pass a motion or resolution expressing the Senate’s support of the council’s efforts in meeting the Accreditation Standards by creating the process, even while serious concerns remain.

This issue will be brought back for Faculty Senate Action at next week’s meeting. Student Success Task Force Recommendations: Monika Brannick reported that a revised copy of the Student Success Act of 2012, along

with a bill summary highlighting key changes, has been distributed to all faculty via email. Amendments have been proposed to update what is now the matriculation program to frame the Task Force’s vision of student success and support services. The amendments would provide the statutory authority for the Board of Governors (BOG) to require that: 1) students participate in orientation, assessment and education planning; 2) colleges or districts receiving Student Success and Support Program funds implement the common assessment and accountability scorecard; and 3) students meet academic requirements to be eligible for the BOG Fee Waiver as determined by the Board.

This is a first draft and will be the subject of significant ongoing discussions that likely

will lead to language changes as the bill moves through the legislative process. The deliberations around this legislation will focus on how to most effectively implement the Student Success Task Force recommendations, and will include discussions about fine-tuning the policy, time lines, and resources. The Chancellor’s Office plans to use a combination of existing advisory committees and new work groups to assist in this process. The bill language was recently reviewed in detail with the Matriculation Advisory Committee and Financial Aid Regional Representatives Technical Advisory Committee and the input from these groups was incorporated to improve the first draft. These groups and others will continue to provide input and advice as the proposal advances.

The proposed bill language will be brought to the next Consultation Council meeting for

a full discussion prior to the bill deadline of February 24. Each month thereafter, this body will have the opportunity to review and discuss new changes and ongoing implementation issues. Copies of the documents can be reviewed at:

Page 33: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 6, 2012 Page 10 Student Success Act of 2012 Bill Summary Student Success Act of 2012 Proposed Senators discussed the need for a local task force to drive the discussion and keep faculty

informed. The following Senate members and ASG member will meet each Monday after the Senate meeting:

Monika Brannick Haydn Davis Jenny Fererro Greg Larson Jackie Martin-Klement Wendy Nelson Patrick O’Brien Armando Telles, ASG Monika Brannick added that two additional forums have been scheduled: Tuesday,

February 14, at 10:00 a.m., and Thursday, February 16, at 4:00 p.m. All faculty, staff, and students are invited to attend. An email will be distributed soon with more information as well as the location.

Accreditation: Monika Brannick reported that Governing Board members were presented with the Mid-

Term Accreditation Report at their recent workshop. Policies & Procedures: Copies of AP 4045 Tutorial Services Programs, were provided electronically (Exhibit A).

Monika Brannick briefly noted the proposed changes and Senators supported forwarding the document on to the Policies & Procedures Task Force.

ASG: Armando Telles indicated that members of the ASG continue to plan and host events for

African History month in February. Several ASG students are preparing for a trip to Washington D.C. and are collecting data

on issues pertaining to community college students. On March 5, approximately 15 students will be traveling to Sacramento for “A Day of

Action.” The group will be uniting with community college students, as well as four-year college students to march to the Capitol on behalf of all college students.

Strategic Planning Council: Monika Brannick stated that members of the Strategic Planning Council held a Special

Meeting on Friday, February 3 to discuss the budget. The district is discussing a possible hiring freeze as well as potentially cutting additional class sections next year.

ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 3:33 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Melinda Carrillo, Secretary

Page 34: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting Exhibits, February 6, 2012 Page 1 EXHIBIT A Palomar Community College District Procedure CCLC No. 4045 Student Services DRAFT as of 11/23/11 AP 4045 TUTORIAL SERVICES PROGRAMS References: Education Code Section 70902

From current Palomar College Procedure 418.2 titled Disenrollment Procedures TUTORIAL SERVICES

• Tutorial Services at Palomar College are designed to provide assistance in most academic subjects to Palomar College students. Students in Palomar’s tutoring centers are served on a walk-in basis and/or by appointment and must be registered in the course(s) for which they are seeking assistance. All tutors are carefully selected and trained in tutoring methods and learning strategies to do the best job possible in helping students achieve academic success. Services provided include:

• one-on-one tutoring • group tutoring • embedded tutoring • supplemental instruction (SI) • workshops • end-of-semester review sessions • study resources • tutoring for categorical populations • tutor training

Tutoring services are currently located in: 1st floor of the library (General Tutoring), BE-1 (The English Department

Writing Center), A-13 (ESL Tutoring Center), E-2 (Math Learning Center), RC-1 (Reading Services), and the Escondido Teaching Learning Center.

Also see Page 32 in the 2011-12 Palomar College Catalog Office of Primary Responsibility: ____________________________ NOTE: The wording in blue ink is additional language to consider including in this procedure. The information in

black ink is from current Procedure 418.2 titled Disenrollment Procedures with no date. Date Approved: (Replaces current Palomar College Procedure 418.2)

Page 35: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Minutes of the

MEETING OF THE FACULTY SENATE February 27, 2012

APPROVED

PRESENT: Bruce Bishop, Monika Brannick, Melinda Carrillo, Haydn Davis, Jenny Fererro, Katy French, Lori Graham, Barb Kelber, Greg Larson, Teresa Laughlin, Jackie Martin-Klement, Christina Moore, Linda Morrow, Pam McDonough, Patrick O’Brien, Wendy Nelson, Lillian Payn, Perry Snyder, Diane Studinka, Fari Towfiq

ABSENT: GUESTS: Armando Telles CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by the President, Monika Brannick, at 2:00 p.m., in

Room SU-30. Approval of Minutes: Motion 1 MSC O’Brien, French: Faculty Senate approval of the minutes of February 13, 2012, as

amended. The motion carried. Public Comments: There were no public comments. Announcements: Armando Telles invited all to participate in the Phi Theta Kappa “Relay for Life” event

currently scheduled for June 2nd and 3rd at Orange Glen High School. Members of the ASG will be contacting faculty members and departments to provide information on various fundraising efforts currently under way.

Agenda Changes: With no objections from Senate members, Information item A, TERB Revised Forms,

was moved forward for discussion. TERB Revised Forms: Barb Kelber reminded Senators of their review of the Peer Review Form for Instructional

Faculty (full-timers) last year. The document was approved by members of the Tenure & Evaluations Review Board (TERB), the Faculty Senate, the district, as well as the Palomar Faculty Federation (PFF). Discussion centered around item # 9 of the document which included Learning Outcomes. Kelber added that members of TERB continue their work on revisions of the language pertaining to Learning Outcomes for all part-time faculty members (instructional faculty, librarians, and counselors).

Review of the forms for fulltime faculty, counselors, and librarians is currently

underway, and Kelber has met with members of the Counseling Department.

Page 36: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 27, 2012 Page 2 The department proposed changes to the document which mirror some of those made in

the forms for instructional faculty as well as the addition of a Chairs Supplement to the Peer Review form. Kelber distributed draft copies of the form for information, as well as drafts of the Counselor Peer Evaluation Report.

Lengthy discussion followed on the process for review of both full-time and part-time

faculty members, and Kelber answered questions regarding the documents. This item will be brought back to next week’s meeting for further discussion and/or action.

Kelber also distributed copies of the Library Faculty Peer Evaluation Report. She noted

the change in language for #7 relating to the development and assessment of student learning and/or service area outcomes. This item will also be brought back to next week’s meeting for further discussion and/or action.

Committee Appointments: Motion 2 MSC O’Brien, Laughlin: Faculty Senate approval of the following committee

appointments: Strategic Planning Council (11-13) Craig Thompson/English Student Services Planning Council (10-12) EOP&S Faculty member (at-large) Elisabeth Nicholes/Behavioral Sciences The motion carried. Patrick O’Brien noted that the faculty member appointed to the Student Services

Planning Council is an at-large member because no faculty members from the EOP&S department submitted their names for consideration.

Motion 3 MSC Kelber, Nelson: Faculty Senate approval of the following Peer Review Committee

Chair appointment: Terrie Cannon, Peer Committee Chair for Rand Green. The motion carried. Professional Development Coordinator: Senators reviewed the application packet received from Leanne Maunu for consideration

of the position of Professional Development Coordinator. Motion 4 MSC Fererro, Morrow: Faculty Senate support of the appointment of Leanne Maunu as

the Professional Development Coordinator through 2014. The motion carried. Curriculum: The following Curriculum items were distributed to Senators electronically: PALOMAR COLLEGE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MEETING ACTION ITEMS Wednesday, February 15, 2012 Room AA-140 at 2:30 p.m. I. ACTION ITEMS Details of all program and course proposals can be viewed at: http://www.curricunet.com/palomar Select “track,”

Page 37: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 27, 2012 Page 3 From the list of pending proposals, select the Check Status button for the program or course you wish to

view. Select the Pencil icon in order to navigate through the various pages of the proposal, or Select the “COR” or “WR” icon to view the Course Outline of Record or Program Report, or Select the “CC” icon to view a report that displays proposed changes for the course outline of record or

program Select the “CR” icon to view a report that displays ALL proposed changes for the course To View Packages Select Packages under Create/Edit Proposals, select the Pencil icon to see individual proposals included in

the Package. Various icons will be accessible for creating Reports or viewing the pages of each proposal. II. CONSENT CALENDAR There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Curriculum Committee member or guest requests

that a particular item be removed from the Consent Calendar. Items so removed will be considered separately. All matters remaining under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be approved by one motion.

The following curricular changes, pending appropriate approvals, will be effective FALL 2012: A. Credit Course/Program Packages 1. Package Title: CSIT Course Deactivations Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Description: Courses to be deactivated June 2012 Ronald Burgher a. CSIT Course Deactivations i. Course Number and Title: CSIT 132 Excel Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Course Included in the Following Programs: A. Microsoft Office User Specialist, Certificate of Proficiency B. Engineering Technician, Certificate of Proficiency Transfer Acceptability: CSU Distance Learning Offering(s): Computer Assisted, Telecourse, Online Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Reason for Deactivation: Budget constraints restrict offering this course. Ronald Burgher ii. Course Number and Title: CSIT 133 PowerPoint Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Course Included in the Following Programs: A. Microsoft Office User Specialist, Certificate of Proficiency Transfer Acceptability: CSU Distance Learning Offering(s): Computer Assisted, Telecourse, Online Repeatability: May be taken 2 times. Reason for Deactivation: Budget constraints restrict offering this course. Ronald Burgher iii. Course Number and Title: CSIT 197 Topics in Information Technology Short Title: Topics in Info Technology Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Repeatability: May be taken 4 times. Reason for Deactivation: Budget constraints restrict offering this course. Ronald Burgher iv. Course Number and Title: CSIT 271 Visual Basic III Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Prerequisites: CSIT 270 Course Included in the Following Programs: A. Information Technology A.A. Degree Major or Certificate of Achievement B. Visual Basic Certificate of Proficiency Visual Basic Certificate of Proficiency Transfer Acceptability: CSU Distance Learning Offering(s): Computer Assisted, Telecourse, Online Reason for Deactivation: Technology change indicates no longer needed in program

Page 38: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 27, 2012 Page 4 Ronald Burgher v. Course Number and Title: CSIT 290 Systems Analysis and Design Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Prerequisites: CSIT 170, or CSCI 110, or CSCI 220 Course Included in the Following Programs: A. Computer Science A.S. Degree Major/Cert. Achievement 18 units/more B. Computer Science with Emphasis in Video Gaming A.A. Degree Major or Certificate of

Achievement Transfer Acceptability: UC, CSU Distance Learning Offering(s): Computer Assisted, Telecourse, Online Reason for Deactivation: Budget constraints restrict offering this course. Ronald Burgher vi. Course Number and Title: CSIT 50 Practical PC Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Distance Learning Offering(s): Online Repeatability: May be taken 3 times. Reason for Deactivation: Budget constraints restrict offering this course. Ronald Burgher vii. Course Number and Title: CSIT 60 Introduction to Online Learning Short Title: Intro to Online Learning Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Distance Learning Offering(s): Telecourse, Online Reason for Deactivation: Budget constraints restrict offering this course. Ronald Burgher viii. Course Number and Title: CSIT 70 Web 2.0 - The Web's Edge Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Course Included in the Following Programs: A. E-Marketing A.A. Degree Major or Certificate of Achievement B. Information Technology A.A. Degree Major or Certificate of Achievement C. Web 2.0 Certificate of Proficiency Distance Learning Offering(s): Online Reason for Deactivation: Budget constraints restrict offering this course. Ronald Burgher ix. Course Number and Title: CSIT 74 Gmail Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Course Included in the Following Programs: A. Web 2.0 Certificate of Proficiency Distance Learning Offering(s): Online Reason for Deactivation: Budget constraints restrict offering this course. Ronald Burgher x. Course Number and Title: CSIT 75 Google Docs Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Course Included in the Following Programs: A. Web 2.0 Certificate of Proficiency Distance Learning Offering(s): Online Reason for Deactivation: Budget constraints restrict offering this course. Ronald Burgher xi. Course Number and Title: CSIT 77 Google Apps I Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Course Included in the Following Programs: A. Web 2.0 Certificate of Proficiency Distance Learning Offering(s): Online Reason for Deactivation: Budget constraints restrict offering this course. Ronald Burgher xii. Course Number and Title: CSIT 78 Google Apps II Discipline: Computer Science and Information Systems - Information Technology (CSIT) Course Included in the Following Programs:

Page 39: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 27, 2012 Page 5 A. Web 2.0 Certificate of Proficiency Distance Learning Offering(s): Online Reason for Deactivation: Budget constraints restrict offering this course. Ronald Burgher C. Non-Credit Course/Program Packages 1. There are no Credit Course/Program Packages for this agenda. D. New Programs 1. There are no New Programs for this agenda. E. Program Reactivations 1. There are no Program Reactivations for this agenda. F. Program Changes 1. Program Title: Adult Fitness/Health Management Discipline: Kinesiology (KINE) Award Type: Certificate of Achievement Total Units: 35.00 - 36.00 Removed HE 100L from program requirements, reduced group three minimum requirements from three to one,

deleted KINE 112 and KINE 125 from group three, added KINE 125, KINE 130, KINE 165, KINE 168, KINE 231 and KINE 232 to group three, added Group four Health/Fitness Courses, deleted KINE 129, KINE 130, KINE 151, KINE165, KINE 168, KINE 170, KINE 231, and KINE 232, added HE 100L. KINE 135, KINE 136, KINE 140, KINE 141, KINE 142, KINE 150 and KINE 151, decreased total unit range.

Robert C. Vetter 2. Program Title: Kinesiology Discipline: Kinesiology (KINE) Award Type: A.A. Degree Major Total Units: 31.00 - 33.00 Removed HE 100L from program requirements, added KINE 118 to second block, added KINE 128, KINE

135, KINE 140, KINE 141 and KINE 142 to third block, deleted KINE 118, KINE 127, KINE 129, KINE 136, KINE 141 and KINE 231, reduced minimum requirement from third block, reduced total unit range.

Robert C. Vetter G. Credit Courses – New 1. Item pulled. 2. Item pulled. H. Credit Course - Change 1. Course Number and Title: BUS 180 Access Basic Discipline: Business Education (BUS) Transfer Acceptability: CSU Distance Learning Offering(s): Online Repeatability: May be taken 4 times. Added open entry/open exit option, changed title, updated textbook. Judy Dolan 2. Course Number and Title: HE 100 Health Education and Fitness Dynamics Short Title: Health Ed/Fitness Dynamics Discipline: Health (HE) Associate Degree General Education - E: Lifelong Learning and Self- Development Associate Degree Health Requirement - Health Lecture - HE 100L CSU GE Area E: Lifelong Learning and Self-Development - E: Lifelong Learning and Self-Development Transfer Acceptability: UC, CSU Distance Learning Offering(s): Telecourse, Online Removed HE 100L as a corequisite. Robert C. Vetter 3. Course Number and Title: HE 100L Health Performance Lab Discipline: Health (HE) Associate Degree Health Requirement - PE/Activity Lab - He 100 Transfer Acceptability: UC, CSU Repeatability: May be taken 3 times.

Page 40: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 27, 2012 Page 6 Removed HE 100 as a corequisite, updated description, outline, assignments, methods of assessment, added

repeatability and repeatability justification. Robert C. Vetter 4. Course Number and Title: OIS 101 Beginning Keyboarding Discipline: Office Information Systems (OIS) Course Included in the following programs: A. Accounting, A.S. Degree Major/Cert. Achievement 18 units/more Transfer Acceptability: CSU Distance Learning Offering(s): Online Decreased lab hours from six to three, added one lecture hour and updated textbooks. Judith L. Dolan 5. Course Number and Title: OIS 102 Intermediate Keyboarding Discipline: Office Information Systems (OIS) Recommended Prep: OIS 101, or a keyboarding speed of 30 net words per minute Transfer Acceptability: CSU Distance Learning Offering(s): Online Decreased lab hours from six to three, added one lecture hour, updated catalog description, updated textbooks

and methods of assessment. Judith L. Dolan 6. Course Number and Title: RTV 180 Sports Broadcasting Discipline: Radio and Television (RTV) Associate Degree General Education - C: Humanities CSU GE Area C: Arts and Humanities - C2: Humanities Transfer Acceptability: CSU Distance Learning Offering(s): Online Grading Basis: Grade Only Repeatability: May be taken 4 times. Updated repeatability justification, added online. Patrick J. Hahn I. Credit Courses – Reactivations 1. There are no Credit Course Reactivations for this agenda. J. Credit Courses - Deactivations 1. Course Number and Title: ENGR 231 Engineering Measurement Analysis Short Title: Engr Measurement Analysis Discipline: Engineering (ENGR) Prerequisites: MATH 140 Transfer Acceptability: UC, CSU Reason for Deactivation: The Course has not been offered for last 15 years. Currently this course is not transferable to most four year universities. Takashi Nakajima K. Non Credit Course – New 1. There are no New Noncredit Courses for this agenda. L. Non Credit Course - Change 1. There are no Non Credit Course Changes for this agenda. M. Non Credit Course - Deactivation 1. There are no Non Credit Course Deactivations for this agenda. N. Distance Learning* The following courses may be offered as distance learning and meet Title 5 Regulations 55200-55210, effective

Fall 2012. Catalog/Subject Number Distance Learning Offerings (s) BUS 180 Online HE 100 Telecourse, Online OIS 101 Online OIS 102 Online RTV 180 Online

Page 41: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 27, 2012 Page 7 *underline indicates new, strikethrough indicates deletion, plain text indicates no change O. Requisites and Advisories* The establishment of the following advisories meets Title 5 Regulations 55003, effective Fall 2012. Catalog Number Type Description Proposal Type HE 100 Corequisite HE 100L Credit/Change HE 100L Corequisite HE 100 Credit/Change OIS 102 Recom Prep. OIS 101, or a keyboarding speed of 30 net words per minute Credit/Change *underline indicates new, strikethrough indicates deletion, plain text indicates no change VII. RESUMPTION OF REGULAR AGENDA A. INFORMATION a. Technical Updates by Instructional Services The technical updates listed below are effective Fall 2012. These updates will be entered into the 2012-13

College Catalog and into Curricunet. COURSE DESCRIPTION OF UPDATE ACCT 110 Prerequisite Course Number Changes From BUS 105 To ACCT 101, And From ACCT 103 To ACCT 201 ACCT 205 Prerequisite Course Number Change From ACCT 108 To ACCT 202 ACCT 120 Prerequisite Course Number Change From ACCT 103 To ACCT 201 DISCPL. PROGRAM NAME DESCRIPTION OF TECHNICAL UPDATE ART Pictorial Arts-Painting AA Remove Deactivated PHOT 110 From Electives ART Pictorial Arts-Printmaking AA Remove Deactivated PHOT 110 From Electives ART Three-Dimensional Arts- Jewelry And Metalsmithing AA Remove Deactivated PHOT 110 From Electives ART Three Dimensional Arts - Ceramics AA Remove Deactivated PHOT 110 From Electives ART Three Dimensional Arts - Crafts AA Remove Deactivated PHOT 110 From Electives ART Three Dimensional Arts - Glass AA Remove Deactivated PHOT 110 From Electives ART Three Dimensional Arts - Sculpture AA Remove Deactivated PHOT 110 From Electives AVIA Aviation Operations And Management AA,CA Number Change Of ACCT 103 To ACCT 201 BMGT Business Management AA Title Change For BUS 180 BUS Entrepreneurship CP Number Change Of BUS 105 To ACCT 101; Number Change Of BUS 105L To ACCT 101L; Course Title Change For BUS 180; Add BUS 181 And Bus 182 As Electives BUS E-Marketing AA, CA Number Change Of BUS 105 To ACCT 101; Number Change Of BUS 105L To ACCT 101L; Remove Deactivated CSIT 70 From Electives BUS Internet - Business Education Emphasis AA, CA Remove Deactivated LT 154; Reduce Total Units From 27 To 24 BUS Retail Management CA Change Course Number Of ACCT 103 To ACCT 201 CSCI Computer Science With Emphasis In Video Gaming AA, CA Decrease Unit Value Of CSCI 222 From 4.5 To 3.5; Remove Deactivated CSIT 290 From Electives CSIT Visual Basic CP Remove Deactivated CSIT 271; Reduce Total Units

From 15 To 11 GCIP Graphic Communications - Emphasis In Management AA, CA Number Change Of BUS 105 To ACCT 101; Number Change Of BUS105L To ACCT 101L GCMW Web Data Base Design CP Title Change For BUS 180 INS Commercial And Personal Insurance Services AS Title Change For BUS 180 OIS Medical Office Specialist AA, CA Increase Units Of OIS 80 From 3 To 4; Increase Total Units From 22-23 To 23-24; Program Is Pending Approval By Chancellor's Office OIS Medical Language Specialist AA, CA Increase Units Of OIS 80 From 3 To 4; Increase Total Units From 22-25 To 23-26 PA Public Administration AA, CA Change Course Number Of ACCT 103 To ACCT 201

Page 42: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 27, 2012 Page 8 PHOT Photography AA, CA Remove Deactivated PHOT 110 And PHOT 115 From Electives; No Impact On Total Units RE Real Estate Salesperson License Prep CP Change Course Number Of ACCT 103 To ACCT 201 COUN University Studies All Necessary Course Additions, Deletions, Number

Changes, Title Changes COUN General Studies All Necessary Course Additions, Deletions, Number

Changes, Title Changes b. 2011-2012 Curriculum Activity Summary Current 2011-12 Agenda Cumulative New Courses 2 25 Course Revisions 6 66 Course Deactivations 13 47 Course Reviews (12/2/2011– 1/27/2012) 0 3 New Programs 0 3 Program Revisions 2 29 Program Deactivations 0 6 Total Activity 23 179 These items will be brought back for Faculty Senate ratification at next week’s meeting. Greg Larson noted that the Curriculum Committee would hold their next meeting on

March 14. GE/ILO Assessment Plans Resolution: At the February 6 and February 13 Senate meetings, there was discussion on the

possibility of bringing forward a resolution supporting the members of the Learning Outcomes Council (LOC) in their work even though there may be reservations about the process itself. Monika Brannick expressed her concerns about bringing forward such a resolution at this time. It was suggested that perhaps the Senate would like to consider making a motion endorsing the process while noting that changes may need to be made as the process moves forward.

Senators discussed their support of the LOC while still having concern for the Student

Learning Outcomes process including issues relating to instructor and student confidentiality, access, and academic freedom, and the need to have those concerns voiced publicly and on the record.

Motion 5 MS Bishop: The Faculty Senate endorses the work of the Learning Outcomes Council

and the product, while recognizing that it is inherently flawed. The motion died for a lack of a second.

Motion 6 MSC Kelber, Laughlin: The Faculty Senate supports the GE/ILO Assessment Plan and

requests special consideration of the following elements of the plan, as these are areas of particular concern for the Faculty Senate: privacy, the role of department chairs, the effect of the stipend, and questions regarding statistical significance. The motion carried.

Service Points: Monika Brannick referred to an email she received from Professional Development

Coordinator Leanne Maunu. Members of the Professional Development Advisory Board have brought forward recommendations regarding Service Points:

Academic Technology Committee – change to 2 points a semester since it meets twice a month. Learning Outcomes Council – change to 2 points a semester since it meets twice a month.

Page 43: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 27, 2012 Page 9 Any Hiring Committee – change to 2 points a semester since hiring committees require many hours

of work. STEM I and II Steering Committee should each have 1 Service Point per semester attached to

them. Senate members noted that an increase should be brought forward for serving on the

Faculty Senate since it meets once per week. It was also stated that Service Points should be provided to those assigned to formal working groups, which usually meet frequently.

Motion 7 MSC Laughlin, Bishop: Faculty Senate support of the increase in the number of Service

Points to 2 per semester to those serving on the Academic Technology Committee, the Learning Outcomes Council, and any hiring committee. The motion carried.

Motion 8 MSC Bishop, Laughlin: Faculty Senate support of providing 2 Service Points per

semester to those evaluating part-time faculty members. The motion carried. Motion 9 MSC Bishop, Fererro: Faculty Senate support of providing 1 Service Point per semester

to those serving on the STEM I and II Steering Committees. The motion carried. Motion 10 MSC Laughlin, Fererro: Faculty Senate support of providing 1 Service Point per semester

to those serving on formal Working Groups. The motion carried. Motion 11 MSC Bishop, Laughlin: Faculty Senate support of providing 4 Service Points per

semester to those serving on the Faculty Senate. The motion carried. Faculty Senate Student Success Task Force: Monika Brannick reported that Senators on the Faculty Senate Student Success Task

Force continue to meet each week. The group is currently discussing the creation of a steering committee.

She added that the two forums held last week were well attended by faculty. Student Success Task Force: On Friday, February 24, Senate Bill 1456, the Student Success Act of 2012, was

introduced. The author of the bill is Senator Lowenthal and the co-author is Senator Liu. It is expected that the first Senate Education Committee policy hearing will be held in Mid-April. A copy of the bill can be accessed at http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_1451-1500/sb_1456_bill_20120224_introduced.pdf.

Senators discussed ways to keep faculty and students informed of the ongoing changes

relating to these issues. Wendy Nelson added that she is encouraging reporters from The Telescope to do a series on Student Success and the Student Success Task Force.

Accreditation: Katy French shared part of a letter sent to Vice President Cuaron from the ACCJC on

when and how they will assess whether Palomar has reached Proficiency Level for Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment:

…Colleges are expected to be at the sustainable, continuous, quality improvement level in the areas

of Program Review and Planning. Beginning in Fall of 2012, colleges are expected to be at the proficiency level with Student

Learning Outcomes. In order to validate their implementation level of Student Learning Outcomes Assessment, colleges will be asked to submit a report to the Commission. The format for this report

Page 44: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting, February 27, 2012 Page 10 will be finalized by the Commission at its Commission Development Workshop and will be

distributed to the colleges by the first week in April… French added that Palomar’s report will be due in Spring of 2013. Wendy Nelson added that the ACCJC is considering a close examination not only of the

number of assessments but of the quality of the assessments as well. Policies & Procedures: Monika Brannick shared BP 4231, Grade Changes (Exhibit A), and BP 7361, Academic

Due Process (Exhibit B), on the overhead. Senators discussed the documents and Brannick noted the minor changes. With no objections, these will be forwarded on to the Policies & Procedures Task Force.

Academic Technology Committee: Lillian Payn reported that a third instructor has completed the POET (Palomar Online

Educational Training) Series. She noted issues with the Sandbox last week, and stated that there are some issues with

Blackboard that need to be addressed. In the meantime, the old version of Blackboard has been reinstalled and it is up and running.

Payn also shared copies of the Spring 2011 version of Palomar’s Validation of

Preparedness to Teach Online as well as the updated Online Course Best Practices Checklist. She noted some of the changes and encouraged Senators to review the documents and provide suggestions at next week’s meeting.

ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 3:34 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Melinda Carrillo, Secretary

Page 45: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting Exhibits, February 27, 2012 Page 1 EXHIBIT A Palomar Community College District Policy CCLC No. 4231

Instructional Services DRAFT as of 11/20/09

BP 4231 GRADE CHANGES References: Education Code Sections 76224 and 76232;

Title 5 Section 55025

This policy will be reviewed at the December 18, 2009 Task Force Meeting. (Shannon explained that the Faculty Senate and PFF are still in discussions)

The Superintendent/President shall implement procedures to assure the accuracy and integrity of all grades awarded by faculty. The procedures shall include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following:

• Assurance that in the absence of mistake, bad faith, fraud, or incompetence, the grades awarded by faculty shall be final

• Procedures for students to challenge the correctness of a grade • The installation of security measures to protect grade records and grade storage systems from unauthorized

access • Limitations on access to grade records and grade storage systems • Discipline for students or staff who are found to have gained access to grade records without proper

authorization or to have changed grades without proper authorization • Notice to students, faculty, transfer institutions, accreditation agencies and law enforcement agencies, as

appropriate, if unauthorized access to grade records and grade storage systems is discovered to have occurred

Also see BP 3310 titled Records Retention and Destruction, AP 4231 titled Grade Changes, and BP/AP 5040 titled Student Records NOTE: This policy is legally required. The language in red ink is recommended from the Community College League and legal counsel (Liebert Cassidy Whitmore). The language in green ink is recommended by the Office of Instruction, Faculty Senate, and Student Services. The Task Force reviewed this policy at the August 28, 2009, September 18, 2009, and November 20, 2009 Task Force Meetings.

Date Adopted: (This is a new policy recommended by the CC League and the League’s Legal Counsel)

Page 46: Examples of Meeting Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting Exhibits, February 27, 2012 Page 2 EXHIBIT B Proposed Palomar Community College District Policy CCLC No. 7361

Human Resources DRAFT as of 12/12/08

BP 7361 ACADEMIC DUE PROCESS Should it be moved into chapter 4?

Monika requested that this policy be reviewed again at the February 20, 2009 Meeting

From current Palomar Policy 177 titled Academic Due Process (81-8903) The Governing Board endorses the principles of academic due process. The principle embodied in the legal concept of confrontation of witnesses and examination of evidence should govern academic due process. Each individual must be informed of all the charges and all the evidence against him/her; he/she must be given full opportunity to deny, refute, and rebut. It is a fundamental principle of fairness that charges against a person are to be made the basis of action only when proven, and that the burden of proof rests upon those who bring the charges. Personnel issues may involve contractual grievances or non-contractual disputes or problems. The former will be resolved through the grievance procedure of the collective bargaining agreement between the District and the appropriate union: CCE/AFT or PFF/AFT. Non-contractual employment disputes for administrative, supervisory, and confidential employees are resolved by the procedures in their respective employee handbooks. Other c Conflicts between or among faculty members may be addressed through the District’s Faculty Senate’s Academic Due Process Policy and Procedure, which is available may be found on the Faculty Senate’s web page. Claims of discrimination on the basis of sex, race, or handicap are grievable. To ensure implementation of academic due process in the disposition of any personnel issue on campus, the College adopts the following principles:

A. All issues will be processed in the sequence of preliminary action, informal conciliation, formal hearing and final action within a reasonable time schedule. In the case of extenuating circumstances or pressing vacation problems AND with the mutual consent of both parties, the time limits indicated in the Guidelines and Procedures may be extended.

B. Informal conciliation shall be conducted by an ombudsperson, a person dispassionate to the issues of the dispute and acceptable to both parties in accordance with the following principles:

1. Charges or complaints will be presented in writing to the ombudsperson, who will provide copies to the other party.

2. Only parties to the dispute and the ombudsperson shall be present at the conciliatory conference. No tape or other recording of these informal proceedings shall be made.

3. The person making the charge shall assume the burden of proof. 4. The ombudsperson will keep all proceedings at this stage confidential.

C. The committee responsible for the formal hearing on the issues shall conduct its proceedings according to the following guidelines:

1. The committee shall receive a signed, written charge specifying the time, place, and nature of the charge and transmit a copy to each party with due notification of rights and responsibilities in the procedure for disposing of the charge.

2. The committee shall discuss the charge, examine witnesses and receive all available evidence pertaining to the charge.

3. Both parties shall have the right to present statements, testimony, evidence, and witnesses. Each party shall have the right to be represented by counsel and to question witnesses.

4. The accused person may be present at the hearing and be represented by a person of his/her choice.

5. The person making the charge shall assume the burden of proof. 6. The hearing shall be closed to the public unless the accused person desires a public hearing.

Privileged information will not be disclosed or discussed outside the hearing except at the express

Page 47: Examples of Meeting Minutes

request of the accused. 7. The committee shall judge the relevance and weight of testimony and evidence. It shall make its

findings of fact, limiting its investigation to the formal charge. It shall make recommendations for disposition of the charges.

8. A transcript of the proceedings shall be kept in a confidential file and shall be available at all times to the accused person.

D. It is desired and anticipated that the Superintendent/President of the College, or designee, and the Governing Board shall be governed by the recommendation of the hearing committee.

GB 4-13-82 Also see AP 7216 titled Employees: Grievance/Complaint Procedures Office of Primary Responsibility: Human Resource Services NOTE: The information in blue type is additional language to consider including in this policy. The information in black ink is current Palomar Policy 177 titled Academic Due Process adopted on 4-13-82. The language in green ink reflects revisions/additions made by Human Resource Services. This policy was reviewed at the December 12, 2008 Task Force Meeting.

Date Adopted: (Replaces current Palomar Policy 177)

Page 48: Examples of Meeting Minutes
Page 49: Examples of Meeting Minutes

MINUTES  BUSINESS  ADMINISTRATION  DEPARTMENT  MEETING  

Wednesday,  Sept.  5,  2012  /  3  p.m.  /  MD-­‐332    

PRESENT:   Albie  Armistead,  Carol  Bruton,  Mary  Cassoni,  Angelo  Corpora,  Judy  Dolan,  Michael  Gilkey,  Joel  Glassman,  Jackie  Martin,  Gil  Noble,  Jenny  Al-­‐Shafie,  Kathy  Dunham  

ABSENT:   Lourdes  Runk        

The  meeting  was  called  to  order  by  Chair  Carol  Bruton  at  3  p.m.  

Action  Items  

1. Approval  of  May  5,  2012  meeting  minutes  (MSCU  Cassoni/Gilkey)  

Information  

1. Announcements  –  Faculty  Meetings  on  Wednesdays:    10/10,  11/14  and  12/12  finals  week.    Meetings  are  now  at  3  p.m.  but  may  move  to  4  p.m.    Make  sure  your  calendar  is  correct.    Meetings  have  changed  a  few  times.      

2. Celebrations  (and  other):    Welcome  back  and  Happy  Birthday  to  Lourdes  (Sept.  5)  and  Albie  (Sept.  7).    Also,  happy  belated  birthday  to  our  summer  birthdays:    Gil  (June  22),  Angelo  (July  2),  Jackie  (July  7)  and  Carol  (July  19).      

3. Thank  a  Part-­‐Timer  Program:    Gil  will  be  retiring  this  year  and  we  will  not  be  authorized  to  hire  another  full  time  instructor  for  a  while.    We  will  be  depending  on  our  part-­‐time  instructors  more  than  ever.    It  is  important  to  thank  them.  

4. Part-­‐time  Faculty  Evaluation  Reports:    We  have  not  received  this  year’s  part-­‐time  instructor  list  but  all  should  have  completed  last  year’s  evaluations.    If  you  have  not,  please  complete.  

5. Priorities:    Legislative  Mandated  Priorities:    Specifically  required  four  year  transfer  courses  –  at  this  point  ACCT  201,  ACCT  202,  BUS  117,  BUS  205  (later  BUS  100  may  be  added),  Degree  Certificate  classes  (where  students  are  getting  the  degree  and  certificate).  

6. Repeatability:    Courses  can  only  be  taken  3  times.    Withdrawals  count  as  taking  the  course.    In  the  future  there  will  be  a  statewide  database  so  it  will  show  any  school  the  student  has  attended.  

7. Co-­‐Op  Work  Education  and  Business  Administration  Dept.    Instruction  is  looking  for  a  new  home  for  Co-­‐op  Education.    Business  is  the  logical  choice.    Mary  said  that  Business  is  a  good  fit  for  this  program.    The  Department  discussed  the  process  for  the  transition.    Mary  will  bring  back  more  information  about  the  program  to  the  next  meeting.    The  department  would  like  to  discuss  the  program  with  Bruce  McDonough,  the  former  Director.      

8. Meeting  with  CSUSM,  MiraCosta  and  Palomar:    Mary  passed  out  an  agenda  for  the  meeting  at  CSUSM  on  Sept.  21,  a.m.,  Friday.    She  will  invite  the  part-­‐timers.    The  PD  code  for  full-­‐timers  is  127  and  for  part  timers  it  is  121.    It  will  be  an  opportunity  to  build  relationships.  

9. SLO’s:    Michael  explained  the  status  of  SLOs  assessment  and  distributed  a  list  of  what  needs  to  be  completed  and  by  whom  this  semester.  

10. International  Business:    Albie  would  like  to  move  international  business  classes  to  the  BUS  discipline  and  add  IBUS  100  to  General  Education  category  of  Lifelong  learning.    All  agreed  that  she  can  do  that.  

11. Lab  Conversion  to  classroom:    Carol  will  follow  up  regarding  MD-­‐331  being  converted  to  classroom.    

The  meeting  was  adjourned  at  4:35  p.m.    Minutes  submitted  by  Jenny  Al-­‐Shafie.    

Cc:    Norma  Miyamoto      Berta  Cuaron  

Page 50: Examples of Meeting Minutes

MINUTES  BUSINESS  ADMINISTRATION  DEPARTMENT  MEETING  

Wednesday,  Oct.  10,  2012  /  4  p.m.  /  MD-­‐332    

PRESENT:   Albie  Armistead,  Mary  Cassoni,  Angelo  Corpora,  Judy  Dolan,  Michael  Gilkey,  Joel  Glassman,  Jackie  Martin,  Gil  Noble,  Jenny  Al-­‐Shafie,  Kathy  Dunham  

 ABSENT:   Carol  Bruton,  Lourdes  Runk      

The  meeting  was  called  to  order  by  Mary  Cassoni  at  4:10  p.m.    

ACTION  ITEMS:  

1. Approval  of  Sept.  5,  2012  meeting  minutes  (MSCU  Corpora/Armistead)  2. Coop  Education  to  become  part  of  Business  Administration  Department  –  No  vote  

 

INFORMATION:  

1. Announcements  –  Carol  was  out  ill.  2. Celebrations  (and  other):    Happy  birthday  to  Kathy  (Oct.  20).  3. Part-­‐time  Faculty  Evaluation  Reports:    Continue  with  the  evaluations  of  part-­‐time  faculty.  4. IPC  Meeting:    Joel  handed  out  highlights  from  the  IPC  Meetings.        IPC  has  prepared  

Enrollment  Management  Scheduling  Priorities  to  achieve  its  FTES  Cap  (which  includes  growth).  

5. Co-­‐Op  Work  Education:    Mary  went  to  a  Coop  Ed  Meeting  in  Riverside  with  other  colleges.    She  said  that  the  program  is  in  some  business  departments  and  in  some  college,  it  is  autonomous.    The  Coordinator  of  the  program  receives  20%  release  time.    The  department  discussed  this  and  would  like  to  invite  Bruce  McDonough  to  get  information  about  what  is  involved  with  running  the  program.  

6. SLO’s:    Michael  revised  assignments  for  this  semester  for  SLO  assessment.  7. Online  Teaching:    Linda  Amor  and  Kathy  Anspach,  part  time  Instructors  who  teach  in  the  

self-­‐paced  lab,  were  nominated  for  excellence  in  online  teaching  at  Mesa  College.  

   

The  meeting  was  adjourned  at  5:25  p.m.    Minutes  submitted  by  Jenny  Al-­‐Shafie.    

   Cc:    Norma  Miyamoto     Berta  Cuaron  

Page 51: Examples of Meeting Minutes

MINUTES  BUSINESS  ADMINISTRATION  DEPARTMENT  MEETING  

Wednesday,  Dec.  5,  2012  /  3  p.m.  /  MD-­‐332    

PRESENT:   Albie  Armistead,  Carol  Bruton,  Mary  Cassoni,  Angelo  Corpora,  Judy  Dolan,  Michael  Gilkey,  Joel  Glassman,  Jackie  Martin,  Gil  Noble,  Jenny  Al-­‐Shafie  

ABSENT:    Kathy  Dunham,  Lourdes  Runk      

 

The  meeting  was  called  to  order  by  Jackie  Martin  at  2:00  p.m.    

 

ACTION  ITEMS:  

1. Approval  of  Minutes  of  Nov.  2012  (MSCU  Cassoni/Noble)  2. Cooperative  Education.    Vote  tabled  until  next  department  meeting  (MSCU  Gilkey/Cassoni)    

   

INFORMATION:  

1. Part  Time  Evaluation  Reports  –  Mary  completed  her  part-­‐time  faculty  evaluation.    The  others  are  in  process.  

2. Coop  Ed  –  there  was  more  discussion  regarding  bringing  Cooperative  Education  into  the  Business  Administration  Department.  The  program  would  be  a  duty  of  the  Department  Chair  or  designee  (20%  release  time).    Mary  said  she  would  commit  to  it  in  Fall  2013.      Jackie  and  Albie  also  committed  to  running  the  program.    The  pros:    strategic  fit,  additional  enrollment,  a  resource  ADA,  student  benefit.    Cons:    Faculty  were  concerned  about  the  additional  responsibility  for  the  Chair.    Voted  to  table  the  vote  until  next  semester’s  department  meeting.  

3. Use  of  travel  monies.    Joel  will  be  using  the  total  travel  money  funds  for  this  year,  $246.33.    ($27.37  per  faculty  member).    In  future  years,  these  funds  will  be  assigned  to  other  faculty  members.  

4. Sabbatical  –  Mary  will  be  on  sabbatical  Spring  13.    She  will  focus  on  digital  and  online  marketing  with  the  ideal  of  helping  the  Department  and  students.    She  will  be  adding  a  new  course  to  the  curriculum  based  on  her  sabbatical.  

5. SLO’s  “Party”  immediately  followed  the  end  of  this  meeting.    

The  meeting  was  adjourned  at  2:45  p.m.    Minutes  submitted  by  Jenny  Al-­‐Shafie.    

Cc:    Norma  Miyamoto     Berta  Cuaron  

Page 52: Examples of Meeting Minutes

AGENDA   

Division Meeting Aug. 19, 2011  *  P‐31, PCTV Studio 

   

I. Welcome/Sharing  

II. Introduction of New Faculty  

III. Student Discipline: Sherry Titus, Director of Student Affairs  

IV. Budget Update  

V. SLOAC Goals and Progress  SLOAC Data   Courses   Courses   Programs  Programs Entered into POD  May 2011  May 2012  May 2011  May 2012    One SLO    87%    100%    40%    100% One SLO w/plan  82%    100%    25%    100% One SLO w/results  20%    80%    13%    75% 

 VI. Curriculum cycle (earlier this fall) 

 VII. PCTV promo (optional tour after session) 

 VIII. Q & A 

  

Page 53: Examples of Meeting Minutes

 AMBCS Division Meeting Agenda 

    February 3, 2012  *  MD‐155C  

I. Welcome  

II. Budget review – Interim VP Joe Newmyer 

Designated accounts  

III. Accreditation Update – SLOACs http://www.palomar.edu/accreditation/ 

 Review Midterm Report   Midterm Report will be submitted to ACCJC on March 15, 2012; annual report due March 31. 

    ***Extremely important to enter assessment results.  

Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment home page:  http://www.palomar.edu/learningoutcomes/   (geared toward students) http://www.palomar.edu/learningoutcomes/LOCJan2010/PODsquad.aspx POD squad representatives for AMBCS:  Brian Canfield and Wendy Nelson Contact email:  [email protected] 

 Entered into POD:   Goal for Spring 2012 is to increase SUBSTANTIALLY the number of courses with assessment results.    In AMBCS, there are 533 courses; 204 have assessment results (38%)   Goal is to increase that to 80% by the end of Spring semester.  As of Jan. 26, 2012, Learning Outcomes Council reports: 

Courses with SLOs      94% Courses with assessment plans    91% Courses with assessment results   38% Programs with SLOs      75% Programs with assessment plans  Unavailable Programs with assessment results  25% 

     IV. Curriculum issues: 

Look at courses with TBA and decide if curriculum changes are needed. 

Transfer Model Curricular (TMCs) degrees 

Programs with 30+ units  

V. Part‐time faculty hiring 

Preference list  

Handout:  How to calculate non‐instructional load (NOHE)  

VI. 2011‐2012 Planning Calendar (Review Spring Semester activities so you’ll be ready!)    

VII. Administrative items 

Cal Card Procedures  

VIII. Other/Sharing  

Page 54: Examples of Meeting Minutes

AMBCS Division Meeting Agenda May 11, 2012  *  MD‐155C 

 I. Welcome/Potluck . . . Sharing during lunch 

Acknowledgements:  Retirements of Peter Gach, Anthony Lugo, Paul Stachelek 

 II. Accreditation Update 

http://www.palomar.edu/accreditation/ College will be notified in early July regarding outcome of midyear report   

III. Important “Discussions” and items to continue FY 2012/13 

Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment home page:  http://www.palomar.edu/learningoutcomes/   (geared toward students) http://www.palomar.edu/learningoutcomes/LOCJan2010/PODsquad.aspx Please continue entering assessment results in POD! 

Repeatability 

Student Success Task Force 

Guidelines for Title 5 Regulations Section 55003 (Policies for Prerequisites, Corequisites and Advisories on Recommended Preparation) 

Planning for Southern Education Center (possible opening Fall 2015) 

PRPs due September 14: http://www.palomar.edu/irp/Institutionalreview.htm 

Senate resolution on Enrollment Management Policies Will vote on resolution to convene group to develop EM guidelines  

Emergency Preparedness 

Budget reductions:  10% in 23000s/24s; 20% in 40000 and 50000s      

IV. Curriculum issues: 

Look at courses with TBA and decide if curriculum changes are needed. 

Transfer Model Curricular (TMCs) degrees 

Programs with 30+ units 

Remember that deadlines are early (September to pre‐launch) for the Fall 2013  

V. Faculty hiring 

Preference list (submit to the Division Office; a summer project) 

Faculty hiring priority list for 2013‐14  

VI. Enrollment Management 

Summer enrollments: 20   2 weeks before:  cancel classes in single digits 1 week before:  cancel classes under 15 Day before the start:  cancel if under 20 

Fall enrollments:  20 with applicable contract language 

Probable reductions for Spring 2013  

VII. Administrative items 

SIS sheet (add, delete; provide explanation) 

Year’s highlights submitted before semester end  

Requisitions cut‐off date May 18 

Submit Directed Studies contracts to Division Office by May 18  

VIII. Other/Sharing 

Page 55: Examples of Meeting Minutes

  

Page 56: Examples of Meeting Minutes

CURRICULUM COMMITTEE AGENDA October 17, 2012 Page 2 of 4

 1. There are no New Credit Courses for this agenda.

K. Credit Course – Change

1. Course Number and Title: ACCT 101 Bookkeeping Discipline: Accounting (ACCT) Course Included in the following programs:

A. Administrative Assistant, A.A. Degree Major or Certificate of Achievement B. Advertising, Marketing, and Merchandising, A.S. Degree Major/Cert. Achievement

18 units/more C. Bookkeeping/Accounting Clerk, Certificate of Proficiency D. Business-General, A.S. Degree Major E. E-Marketing, A.A. Degree Major or Certificate of Achievement F. Entrepreneurship, Certificate of Proficiency G. Graphic Communications Emphasis in Management A.A. Degree Major or

Certificate of Achievement H. Virtual Assistant, Certificate of Proficiency

Transfer Acceptability: CSU Decreased LEC hours, decreased unit value, removed ACCT 101L corequisite, updated description and textbook. Carol Bruton

2. Course Number and Title: MATH 245 Discrete Mathematics Discipline: Mathematics (MATH) Prerequisites: MATH 130, or MATH 140 Associate Degree General Education - A2: Communication and Analytical Thinking CSU GE Area B: Scientific Inquiry and Quantitative Reasoning (mark all that apply) - B4: Mathematics/Quantitative Reasoning IGETC Area 2: Mathematical Concepts and Quantitative Reasoning - 2A: Mathematical Concepts and Quantitative Reasoning Transfer Acceptability: UC, CSU Removed placement test as prerequisite option, updated course objectives, outline, and textbooks. Jay R. Wiestling

3. Course Number and Title: PSYC 115 The Psychology of Personal Growth and Development Short Title: PSYC OF PERSONAL GROWTH/DEV Discipline: Psychology (PSYC) Associate Degree General Education - E: Lifelong Learning and Self-Development CSU GE Area E: Lifelong Learning and Self-Development - E: Lifelong Learning and Self-Development Transfer Acceptability: CSU Updated description, objectives, outline, textbooks and suggested reading. Haydn Davis

4. Course Number and Title: ZOO 101 General Zoology (Lecture) Discipline: Zoology (ZOO) Course Included in the following programs:

A. Biology-General A.A. Degree Major or Certificate of Achievement General Studies-Emphasis in Science and Mathematics A.S. Degree Major

B. University Studies - Emphasis in Mathematics and Science A.S. Degree Major Associate Degree General Education - B: Natural Sciences CSU GE Area B: Scientific Inquiry and Quantitative Reasoning - B2: Life Science IGETC Area 5: Physical and Biological Sciences - 5B: Biological Science Transfer Acceptability: UC, CSU Changed title to match corresponding ZOO 100 course. Elizabeth A. Pearson

L. Credit Courses – Reactivations

Page 57: Examples of Meeting Minutes

CURRICULUM COMMITTEE AGENDA October 17, 2012 Page 3 of 4

 1. There are no Credit Course Reactivations for this agenda.

M. Credit Courses - Deactivations

1. Course Number and Title: PHOT 155 Digital Photography II Discipline: Photography (PHOT) Prerequisites: PHOT 150 Reason for Deactivation: Program reorganization made this course redundant. Robert M. Barry

N. Non Credit Course – New

1. There are no New Noncredit Courses for this agenda.

O. Non Credit Course - Change

1. There are no Non Credit Course Changes for this agenda.

P. Non Credit Course - Deactivation

1. There are no Non Credit Course Deactivations for this agenda.

Q. Distance Learning*

The following courses may be offered as distance learning and meet Title 5 Regulations 55200-55210, effective Fall 2013.

Catalog/Subject Number Distance Learning Offerings (s) There are no Distance Learning approvals for this agenda. *underline indicates new, strikethrough indicates deletion, plain text indicates no change

R. Requisites and Advisories*

The establishment of the following advisories meets Title 5 Regulations 55003, effective Fall 2013. Catalog Number Type Description Proposal Type MATH 245 Prerequisite MATH 30 or MATH 140 or a passing score

on the appropriate placement test Change

*underline indicates new, strikethrough indicates deletion, plain text indicates no change

VII. RESUMPTION OF REGULAR AGENDA A. Items Removed from the Consent Calendar

B. Technical Corrections

1. The Curriculum Committee approved the deactivation of the Astronomy A.A. Degree/Certificate of Achievement at the September 19 Curriculum Committee meeting. Upon further discussion, the department has decided to retain this degree/certificate. As such, it will remain an active program in the college’s catalog and program inventory. This deactivation was not approved by the Faculty Senate.

Program Title: Astronomy Discipline: Astronomy (ASTR) Award Type: A.A. Degree Major or Certificate of Achievement Total Units: 38 – 40 Reason for Deactivation: Lack of enrollment. Program being retained. James P. Pesavento

C. Curriculum Committee Goals 2012-2013 – (Attachment B)

D. The Curriculum Committee recommends the purchase of the newest version of Curricunet, CurricUNET Meta, with the District signing a Letter of Intent before December 31, 2012 and planning the implementation of the new version no later than Fall 2014.

E. Discussion

Page 58: Examples of Meeting Minutes

CURRICULUM COMMITTEE AGENDA October 17, 2012 Page 4 of 4

 1. Prerequisites, Corequisites and Limitations on Enrollment/Content Review

§ 55003. Policies for Prerequisites, Corequisites and Advisories on Recommended Preparation. (a) The governing board of a community college district may establish prerequisites, corequisites, and advisories on recommended preparation, but must do so in accordance with the provisions of this article. Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to require a district to establish prerequisites, corequisites, or advisories on recommended preparation; provided however, that a prerequisite or corequisite shall be required if the course is to be offered for associate degree credit and the curriculum committee finds that the prerequisite or corequisite is necessary pursuant to sections 55002(a)(2)(D) or 55002(a)(2)(E). Unless otherwise specified in this section, the level of scrutiny required to establish prerequisites, corequisites, and advisories on recommended preparation shall be based on content review as defined in subdivision (c) of section 55000 or content review with statistical validation as defined in subdivision (f) of this section. Determinations about prerequisites and corequisites shall be made on a course-by-course or program-by-program basis.

2. Repeatability

3. Other

F. Information

1. Student Success Taskforce

2. GE/ILO Assessment

3. Status of Course Outline Reviews

The following courses have completed the course outline review process between September 26, 2012 and October 9, 2012 and are effective Fall 2013. MATH 200 Introduction to Linear Algebra

3. 2012-2013 Curriculum Activity Summary

Current Agenda 2012-13 Cumulative

New Courses 0 0

Course Revisions 4 13 Course Reactivations 0 0 Course Deactivations 1 3 Course Reviews (9/26/2012– 10/9/2012) 1 9

New Programs 0 2

Program Revisions 0 0

Program Deactivations 0 1

Total Activity 6 28

G. Reports 1. Academic Technology-Payn/Hiro 2. Accreditation-Cuaron 3. Articulation–Kerkhoff 4. Basic Skills-Sosa 5. Distance Learning-Gushansky 6. Learning Outcomes-Nelson 7. Multicultural Subcommittee-Locklear 8. Prerequisite Subcommittee-Eckhart

VIII. Future Items for Discussion IX. Next Meeting - November 7, 2012 X. Adjournment

Page 59: Examples of Meeting Minutes

PALOMAR COLLEGE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES

Wednesday, October 17, 2012 Room AA-140 at 3:00 p.m.

I. CALL TO ORDER – Meeting was called to order at 3:05 pm Members Present – Daniella Ashburn, Carol Bruton, Judy Cater, Berta Cuaron, Judy Eckhart, Jim Eighmey, Marlene Forney, Brent Gowen, Gene Gushansky, Erin Hiro, Gloria Kerkhoff, Greg Larson, Pam McDonough, Norma Miyamoto, Wendy Nelson, Lillian Payn, Lorraine Peterson, Shayla Sivert, Gary Sosa, Dan Sourbeer ASG Representative – James Warren Staff – Cheryl Kearse (Recorder), Diane Veach Absent – Eric Duvall, Linda Locklear, Wilma Owens, Leila Safaralian, Carla Thomson

II. MINUTES OF October 3, 2012 MSC Cater, Gowen to approve the Minutes of the October 3, 2012 Curriculum Committee meeting with corrections.

III. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mr. Sourbeer announced Earth Sciences week continues in the NS building. Ms. Cater announced the continuance of Political Economy Days.

IV. AGENDA CHANGES – There were none. V. ACTION ITEMS

Details of all program and course proposals can be viewed at: http://www.curricunet.com/palomar

Select “track,” From the list of pending proposals, select the Check Status button for the program or course you wish to

view. Select the Pencil icon in order to navigate through the various pages of the proposal, or Select the “COR” or “WR” icon to view the Course Outline of Record or Program Report, or Select the “CC” icon to view a report that displays proposed changes for the course outline of record or

program Select the “CR” icon to view a report that displays ALL proposed changes for the course

To View Packages

Select Packages under Create/Edit Proposals, select the Pencil icon to see individual proposals included in the Package. Various icons will be accessible for creating Reports or viewing the pages of each proposal.

VI. CONSENT CALENDAR

There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Curriculum Committee member or guest requests that a particular item be removed from the Consent Calendar. Items so removed will be considered separately. All matters remaining under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and will be approved by one motion.

The following curricular changes, pending appropriate approvals, will be effective FALL 2013: Mr. Larson asked that Item R of the Consent Calendar, Requisites and Advisories, be pulled. MSC Sourbeer, Eckhart to approve the remaining items of the October 17, 2012 Curriculum Committee Consent Calendar.

A. Credit Course/Program Packages

1. There are no Credit Course/Program Packages for this agenda.

B. Non-Credit Course/Program Packages

1. There are no Non-Credit Course/Program Packages for this agenda.

C. New Programs

1. There are no new Programs for this agenda.

D. New Vocational Programs

1. There are no new Vocational Programs for this agenda.

Page 60: Examples of Meeting Minutes

CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MINUTES October 17, 2012 Page 2 of 6

 E. Program Reactivations

1. There are no Program Reactivations for this agenda.

F. Program Changes

1. There are no Program Changes for this agenda.

G. Program Deactivations

1. There are no Program Deactivations for this agenda

H. Vocational Program Changes

1. There are no Vocational Program Changes for this agenda.

I. Vocational Program Deactivations

1. There are no Vocational Program Deactivations for this agenda.

J. Credit Courses – New

1. There are no New Credit Courses for this agenda.

K. Credit Course – Change

1. Course Number and Title: ACCT 101 Bookkeeping Discipline: Accounting (ACCT) Course Included in the following programs:

A. Administrative Assistant, A.A. Degree Major or Certificate of Achievement B. Advertising, Marketing, and Merchandising, A.S. Degree Major/Cert. Achievement

18 units/more C. Bookkeeping/Accounting Clerk, Certificate of Proficiency D. Business-General, A.S. Degree Major E. E-Marketing, A.A. Degree Major or Certificate of Achievement F. Entrepreneurship, Certificate of Proficiency G. Graphic Communications Emphasis in Management A.A. Degree Major or

Certificate of Achievement H. Virtual Assistant, Certificate of Proficiency

Transfer Acceptability: CSU Decreased LEC hours, decreased unit value, removed ACCT 101L corequisite, updated description and textbook. Carol Bruton

2. Course Number and Title: MATH 245 Discrete Mathematics Discipline: Mathematics (MATH) Prerequisites: MATH 130, or MATH 140 Associate Degree General Education - A2: Communication and Analytical Thinking CSU GE Area B: Scientific Inquiry and Quantitative Reasoning (mark all that apply) - B4: Mathematics/Quantitative Reasoning IGETC Area 2: Mathematical Concepts and Quantitative Reasoning - 2A: Mathematical Concepts and Quantitative Reasoning Transfer Acceptability: UC, CSU Removed placement test as prerequisite option, updated course objectives, outline, and textbooks. Jay R. Wiestling

3. Course Number and Title: PSYC 115 The Psychology of Personal Growth and Development Short Title: PSYC OF PERSONAL GROWTH/DEV Discipline: Psychology (PSYC) Associate Degree General Education - E: Lifelong Learning and Self-Development CSU GE Area E: Lifelong Learning and Self-Development - E: Lifelong Learning and Self-Development

Page 61: Examples of Meeting Minutes

CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MINUTES October 17, 2012 Page 3 of 6

 Transfer Acceptability: CSU Updated description, objectives, outline, textbooks and suggested reading. Haydn Davis

4. Course Number and Title: ZOO 101 General Zoology (Lecture) Discipline: Zoology (ZOO) Course Included in the following programs:

A. Biology-General A.A. Degree Major or Certificate of Achievement General Studies-Emphasis in Science and Mathematics A.S. Degree Major

B. University Studies - Emphasis in Mathematics and Science A.S. Degree Major Associate Degree General Education - B: Natural Sciences CSU GE Area B: Scientific Inquiry and Quantitative Reasoning - B2: Life Science IGETC Area 5: Physical and Biological Sciences - 5B: Biological Science Transfer Acceptability: UC, CSU Changed title to match corresponding ZOO 100 course. Elizabeth A. Pearson

L. Credit Courses – Reactivations

1. There are no Credit Course Reactivations for this agenda.

M. Credit Courses - Deactivations

1. Course Number and Title: PHOT 155 Digital Photography II Discipline: Photography (PHOT) Prerequisites: PHOT 150 Reason for Deactivation: Program reorganization made this course redundant. Robert M. Barry

N. Non Credit Course – New

1. There are no New Noncredit Courses for this agenda.

O. Non Credit Course - Change

1. There are no Non Credit Course Changes for this agenda.

P. Non Credit Course - Deactivation

1. There are no Non Credit Course Deactivations for this agenda.

Q. Distance Learning*

The following courses may be offered as distance learning and meet Title 5 Regulations 55200-55210, effective Fall 2013.

Catalog/Subject Number Distance Learning Offerings (s) There are no Distance Learning approvals for this agenda. *underline indicates new, strikethrough indicates deletion, plain text indicates no change

R. Removed for separate approval.

VII. RESUMPTION OF REGULAR AGENDA A. Items Removed from the Consent Calendar

1. This item was removed in order to correct the description which should read MATH 130 not MATH 30.

Requisites and Advisories*

The establishment of the following advisories meets Title 5 Regulations 55003, effective Fall 2013. Catalog Number Type Description Proposal Type MATH 245 Prerequisite MATH 130 or MATH 140 or a passing

score on the appropriate placement test Change

Page 62: Examples of Meeting Minutes

CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MINUTES October 17, 2012 Page 4 of 6

 *underline indicates new, strikethrough indicates deletion, plain text indicates no change

MSC, Cater Gowen, to approve the Requisites and Advisories of the October 17, 2012 agenda.

B. Technical Corrections

1. The Curriculum Committee approved the deactivation of the Astronomy A.A. Degree/Certificate of Achievement at the September 19 Curriculum Committee meeting. Upon further discussion, the department has decided to retain this degree/certificate. As such, it will remain an active program in the college’s catalog and program inventory. This deactivation was not approved by the Faculty Senate.

Program Title: Astronomy Discipline: Astronomy (ASTR) Award Type: A.A. Degree Major or Certificate of Achievement Total Units: 38 – 40 Reason for Deactivation: Lack of enrollment. Program being retained. James P. Pesavento

MSC, Sourbeer, Cater, to approve the technical correction to retain the Astronomy A.A. Degree/Certificate of Achievement.

C. Curriculum Committee Goals 2012-2013

MSC, Sourbeer, Gowen, to approve the 2012-2013 Curriculum Committee goals as amended.

D. The Curriculum Committee recommends the purchase of the newest version of Curricunet, CurricUNET Meta, with the District signing a Letter of Intent before December 31, 2012 and planning the implementation of the new version no later than Fall 2014.

MSC, Cater, Eckhart to purchase CurricUNET Meta, the newest version of Curricunet.

E. Discussion

1. Prerequisites, Corequisites and Limitations on Enrollment/Content Review § 55003. Policies for Prerequisites, Corequisites and Advisories on Recommended Preparation. (a) The governing board of a community college district may establish prerequisites, corequisites, and advisories on recommended preparation, but must do so in accordance with the provisions of this article. Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to require a district to establish prerequisites, corequisites, or advisories on recommended preparation; provided however, that a prerequisite or corequisite shall be required if the course is to be offered for associate degree credit and the curriculum committee finds that the prerequisite or corequisite is necessary pursuant to sections 55002(a)(2)(D) or 55002(a)(2)(E). Unless otherwise specified in this section, the level of scrutiny required to establish prerequisites, corequisites, and advisories on recommended preparation shall be based on content review as defined in subdivision (c) of section 55000 or content review with statistical validation as defined in subdivision (f) of this section. Determinations about prerequisites and corequisites shall be made on a course-by-course or program-by-program basis. Dr. Eckhart reported that the subcommittee has met once and are still researching the pros and cons of Content Review. Once the research is completed, the subcommittee will report their findings.

2. Repeatability

Mr. Larson reported meetings between himself, Vice President Cuaron, Dean Miyamoto, Ms. Kerkhoff and faculty from Music, Dance and Art to assist with the development of families and ensure a smooth transition as repeatability is removed from courses.

3. Other – Enrollment Management and Planning: Guiding Principles. Schedule Development Priorities, and Data Elements for Planning Decisions

Page 63: Examples of Meeting Minutes

CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MINUTES October 17, 2012 Page 5 of 6

 Vice President Cuaron distributed a packet of materials related to Enrollment Management and Planning. Palomar’s Faculty Senate requested that the Instructional Planning Council discuss and develop guidelines for the scheduling of courses. The packet consisted of information regarding the cessation of repeatability, Student Success Taskforce recommendations, removing lifelong learning from the California Community College mission statement, class schedule development guidelines, course category breakdowns and section offerings. She encouraged the committee to look at all of the information and offer input on the draft of recommendations.

F. Information

1. Student Success Taskforce

Mr. Larson reported that the Faculty Senate is working with the Vice Presidents to develop a spreadsheet/flowchart for implementation. Dr. Haydn Davis is heading up those efforts on behalf of the Faculty Senate.

2. GE/ILO Assessment

Ms. Nelson gave a presentation summarizing the GE/ILO Assessment project. The Learning Outcomes Council is currently looking at next steps as a result of the findings of the project as well as feedback from the participants. A final report is being prepared for presentation to the entire campus.

3. Status of Course Outline Reviews

The following courses have completed the course outline review process between September 26, 2012 and October 9, 2012 and are effective Fall 2013. MATH 200 Introduction to Linear Algebra

3. 2012-2013 Curriculum Activity Summary

Current Agenda 2012-13 Cumulative

New Courses 0 0

Course Revisions 4 13 Course Reactivations 0 0 Course Deactivations 1 3 Course Reviews (9/26/2012– 10/9/2012) 1 9

New Programs 0 2

Program Revisions 0 0

Program Deactivations 0 1

Total Activity 6 28

G. Reports 1. Academic Technology-Payn/Hiro

Dr. Payn reported that the 16 members continue to meet regularly. The group has scheduled and prioritized its goals distributing the work to its organized workgroups. She discussed the Resource Center which offers a large range of training opportunities. The group has been asked to look at faculty webpages and develop a set of recommendations which will serve as guidelines. The recommendations are currently awaiting Faculty Senate approval.

2. Accreditation-Cuaron Co-Chair Cuaron reported on her participation at a conference designed to assist with the writing of the college’s Student Learning Outcomes Proficiency Report due in March of 2013. She also reported that a timeline for Accreditation is currently being generated as the college prepares for another Institutional Evaluation.

Page 64: Examples of Meeting Minutes

CURRICULUM COMMITTEE MINUTES October 17, 2012 Page 6 of 6

 3. Articulation–Kerkhoff

Ms. Kerkhoff reported that she has been approached by faculty from the Kinesiology department about establishing a TMC degree.

4. Basic Skills-Sosa Ms. Sivert reported that Basic Skills is preparing for their 4th year evaluation of the HIS grant. They are refining the Summer Bridge program in anticipation of 200 students and establishing a definition of the first year experience. They have an upcoming meeting on October 18.

5. Distance Learning-Gushansky

Mr. Gushansky reported the approval of PWM 56.

6. Learning Outcomes-Nelson

Ms. Nelson reported on her attendance at the Student Success Conference where she attended a workshop on how to complete the SLO Proficiency Report due in March. Individual reports will not be submitted to the ACCJC Board. A summary of the reports will be compiled and submitted. However, the Board may still take action on individual reports. Katie French and Marty Furch gave a presentation about Palomar’s GE/ILO project which was well received. Other assessment models were also presented. Changes are being made to the Palomar Outcomes Database (POD). There will be a new pull down menu to sort active and inactive courses. Departments are being encouraged to determine inactive courses and indicate as such in the POD.

7. Multicultural Subcommittee-Locklear – There was no report.

8. Prerequisite Subcommittee-Eckhart Dr. Eckhart reported the approval of the following course requisites: DA 70, 71, 75, 85 ACCT 104 MATH 200, 245 PHYS 130, GEOG 134, 139, 144 PSYC 225 ARAB 102, 201, TA 114, 124 PHOT 105, 124, 130, 135, 210, 220, 225

VIII. Future Items for Discussion There was discussion about how departments should proceed with the establishment of TMC degrees and their effects on local degrees and local degree requirements.

IX. Next Meeting - November 7, 2012 X. Adjournment

The meeting was adjourned at 4:20 p.m.