european patent office the european patent system serving innovation paul schwander epo, the hague

23
European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

Upload: tyler-gibson

Post on 27-Mar-2015

231 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

EuropeanPatent Office

The European Patent System serving innovation

Paul SchwanderEPO, The Hague

Page 2: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

2

Roadmap

• History

• Practical issues

• Facts and figures

• Conclusion

Page 3: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

3

Patent law:striving for harmonisation

An invention is universal

Page 4: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

4

Paris Convention 1883

Before: simultaneous filings

After 1883

12 Months

Page 5: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

5

A bit of history: a European idea

• 1958 Treaty of Rome• 1960 Idea of a European Patent • 1968 Splitted into 2 projects: a European

Convention – the Community Patent• 1973 Convention signed• 1977 European Patent Office

Page 6: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

6

Example of an international patent procedure when the EPO did not exist

       

                       

Page 7: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

7

The Patent filed in 1975

SYSTEMS FOR STORING AND TRANSFERRING DATA

Page 8: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

8

First filing followed by geographic extensions

Page 9: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

9

The Smart Card Patent procedure

12 monthsPriority

National patents

Page 10: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

10

The European Patent System

(National & European) or European Direct

National Patents

Common grant procedure

Priority period

Page 11: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

11

Grant procedure: Search and Examination

EP822788 Drug Release Coated StentA stent for implantation in a body comprising a tubular metal body (10) having open ends and an open lattice sidewall structure and a layer on the surface of said sidewall structure, said layer comprising a hydrophobic elastomeric material incorporating an amount of biologically active material therein for timed delivery therefrom.

Page 12: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

12

Prior art search: closest prior art documents

WO9112779

A prosthesis for insertion into a lumen to limit

restenosis of the lumen. The prosthesis carries

restenosis-limiting drugs which elute after the

device is positioned in the lumen.

Page 13: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

13

Examination

Page 14: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

14

Granted patent vs. Application

1. A stent for implantation in a body comprising a tubular metal body (10) having open ends and an open lattice sidewall structure and a layer on the surface of said sidewall structure, said layer comprising a hydrophobic elastomeric material incorporating an amount of biologically active material therein for timed delivery therefrom.

Page 15: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

15

What advantages doesa European patent have?

Unitary protection standards in the contracting states

• One application/one language

• “A la carte” market by designation of countries

Cost-effective

• Costs less than 3 separate national patents

Strong

• Thorough search – 50 million documents

• Substantive examination = sound legal protection

Page 16: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

16

Average costs: EP Patent 8 countries 10 years

Patent Office 4 300 € 14%

Attorney 6 100 € 20%

Renewal fees 8 900 € 28%

Translation 11 800 € 38%

Total 31 100 €

8.5 € day

100%

Page 17: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

17

Facts and Figures

•In 2004: 178 000 filings•6 000 staff members – 3 500 examiners•Munich-The Hague-Berlin-Vienna-Brussels•55 million patent documents in its database

Page 18: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

18

Applicant’s origin

Page 19: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

19

European Patent Organisation: Member States

The European patent system

Page 20: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

20

The European PatentOrganisation

European Patent Organisation

European

Patent Office

Administrative

Council

The executive body

The Office's task is to grant European patents.

The legislative body

Important functions:

• to adopt the budget• to approve the President´s actions

in implementing the budget• to amend the Implementing

Regulations and Rules relating to Fees

The Administrative Council consists of delegates from the member states.

Page 21: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

21

EPO and PCT

• Different: Granted Patent vs. Common file

• Linked: EPO can be an International

Searching Authority and an International

Preliminary Examining Authority

• If you want to delay decisions on geographic

coverage: PCT usually preferred.

Page 22: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

22

To conclude

• A unexpected success: 5 times more

applications than initially expected

• A continuous harmonisation process

• An application of the subsidiarity

principle

Page 23: European Patent Office The European Patent System serving innovation Paul Schwander EPO, The Hague

EuropeanPatent Office

Thank you for your attention

www.european-patent-office.org

Paul SchwanderEPO, The Hague11 May 2005