erasmus centralised actions overview of selection results 2007 gilles gervais eacea
DESCRIPTION
Brussels, February 25 and 26, 2008. ERASMUS Centralised Actions Overview of Selection Results 2007 Gilles GERVAIS EACEA. First LLP C all 2007 / Number of Applications by Action. First LLP C all 2007 / Number of Applications by Action. * including ineligible applications. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ERASMUS Centralised ActionsOverview of Selection Results 2007
Gilles GERVAIS EACEA
Brussels, February 25 and 26, 2008
2
First LLP Call 2007 / Number of Applications by Action
Multilateral Actions
53 (42%) ECD
28 (23%) EVC
23 (19%) EMHE
20 (16%) ECUE
3
*including ineligible applications
First LLP Call 2007 / Number of Applications by Action
4
First LLP Call 2007 – Applications by Coordinating CountryMultilateral Actions
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
N° of Applicant Organisations 8 14 2 1 1 13 3 1 15 11 6 3 4 1 10 1 5 4 4 6 4 4 2 6
AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR UK
Thematic Networks
0
1
2
3
4
N° applicant organisations 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 2
AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR UK
5
First LLP Call 2007 – Applications by Partner Country
Multilateral Actions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
No Partner Organisations 21 30 19 3 16 56 16 18 46 49 42 22 30 11 2 52 2 18 3 7 5 30 6 29 21 35 14 14 12 12 39
AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR UK
Thematic Networks
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
N° of Partner Organisations 8 25 9 4 14 24 10 9 16 15 16 13 12 12 5 37 1 9 5 11 3 19 7 11 17 9 10 4 11 17 26
AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR UK
6
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
ECD ECUE EMHE EVC EAM ENW
First LLP Call 2007 – Success Rate by Action
7
Multilateral Actions
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
N° of applications received 8 14 2 1 1 13 3 1 15 11 6 3 4 1 0 10 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 4 4 6 0 4 4 2 6
N° of applications selected 4 7 0 0 0 1 1 0 8 3 2 3 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 3 2 0 3 1 0 3
AT BE BG CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR UK
First LLP Call 2007 – Success Rate by Country
8
Networks
Applications received: BE, CZ, GR, IT, LT, NL, RO, SE, UK
Networks selected: GR, IT, NL, RO, SE, UK
First LLP Call 2007 – Success Rate by Country
9
Average Size of the Consortium/Network
5,5 7 6,3 7,114,8
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
ECD ECUE EMHE EVC EAM ENW
Average Size of Partnership/Network
10
Well covered - To improve the quality and to increase the volume
of multilateral cooperation between HEI in Europe (62%)
- To support the realisation of a European Higher Education Area (48%)
Less well covered - To reinforce the contribution of HE and advanced
vocational education to the process of innovation (22%) - To increase the degree of transparency and
compatibility between HE and advanced vocational education qualifications gained in Europe (21%)
First LLP Call 2007 – Priority Coverage
11
Curriculum Development
Well covered - Developing or revising integrated
programmes covering a complete cycle of study (55%)
Less well covered - Curricula which actively promote
multilingualism, linguistic diversity, interculturalism in European Society (27%)
12
Cooperation HEIs - Enterprises
Well covered - Developing strategies for cooperation
between higher education and enterprises which has to include a clear concept of guidance and counselling (60%)
Less well covered - Stimulating cooperation between regions
and sectors with little history with cross-border contacts (0%)
13
Modernisation of Higher Education
Well covered - Enhance the quality of the performance,
contribute to the accountability and enhance their
attractiveness (67%)
Less well covered - Develop pro-active funding strategies,
matching the diversity of the institutional profiles with the variety of funding sources (0%)
14
Virtual CampusesWell covered - Providing open educational resources online
ensuring that organisational, technical and quality related issues are addressed in order to share content and make it easily accessible at European level (64%);
- Testing innovative E-learning concepts (64%)
Less well covered - Conducting a systematic critical review of
existing experience or projects on virtual mobility (42%)
15
Networks
Well covered - Define and update generic and subject
specific competences using the same method as the pilot project “Tuning Educational Structure in Europe” (63%)
- Develop standards for quality assurance in their particular field (Bologna Process) (63%)
Less well covered - Address issue relating to governance and
diversification of higher education institutions (13%)
16
Accompanying Measures
Well covered- Communication and valorisation
activities (83%)
Less well covered- Thematic monitoring of projects (33%)