enrolment predictors for an hiv prevention open label
TRANSCRIPT
Enrolment Predictors for an HIV prevention Open Label Clinical Trial
Thando Gwetu, Annalene Nel, Mariëtte Malherbe, Leonard Solai , Zonke Mabude
Presented at the 9th SAAIDS Conference, Durban ICC,
11-14 June 2019
Presentation Outline
• The past trial – IPM 027
• The present trial – IPM 032
• Objectives of current ancillary study
• Methods used
• Results
• Recommendations
Previous Phase III trials
• Parallel phase III Trials IPM 027 and MTN-020
• Conducted 2012-2016
• IPM Dapivirine Ring-004
IPM 027 and MTN-020 : Trial Designs
The Ring Study ASPIRE
ObjectivesSafety and efficacy
(fixed 2 year follow-up)
Safety and effectiveness
(HIV-1 endpoint driven)
Enrolment
Total: 1959 women2:1 randomization
ages 18-45
Active arm: 1307Placebo arm: 652
Total: 2629 women1:1 randomisation
ages 18-45
Active arm: 1313Placebo arm: 1316
All participants received a comprehensive HIV-1 prevention package
IPM 027 and MTN-020 : Results
• The IPM monthly vaginal ring containing dapivirine was safe and effective for HIV-1 risk reduction when used (~30%)
• HIV-1 protection was greater in subgroupswith evidence of better adherence to ring use
• Results demonstrated that a vaginal ring providing sustained delivery of an antiretroviral medication may be an important HIV-1 prevention option for women at risk for HIV-1 infection
Follow-up Open Label Extension (OLE) Clinical Trials
Phase III Trial Continuation
• IPM 032 and MTN-025
IPM
Dapivirine Vaginal Ring-004
The Dream & Hope Ring OLE Trials
IPM 032 MTN-025
Primary Objective Long-term safety and Adherence
Follow-up RegimensInitially 1-monthly
Routinely 3-monthly (2 additional rings)
Treatment Regimen 1-monthly ring replacement
Start date 2016
Objectives of the current ancillary IPM 032 Trial
• To investigate differences between
participants who chose to consent for further
study participation or declined to continue
follow-up study participation in the open-label
Dapivirine Vaginal Ring clinical trial (IPM 032)
at the MatCH research centre.
Method
• Data from MatCH Research Unit (Edendale)
which was one of six research centers that
conducted the IPM 032 trial.
• Retrospective analysis of recruitment data for
the IPM 032 trial.
• Data was collected for the period from August
2016 to March 2018.
• Predictors of recruitment were described.
Recruitment Summary
• 336/383 (87.7%) participants were eligible for
IPM 032 enrolment after exiting IPM 027
– 19 roll-overs and 317 previously exited.
• 26 participants were lost to follow-up
• 2 deceased participants who died during the
interval between the two trials
• 198/336 (63.5%) consented and 114/336
(36.5%) declined follow-up OLE involvement
Summary of IPM 032 Recruitment Statistics for the follow-up OLE at MatCH
Number of
Participants%
Total enrolled in IPM 027 (Phase III) 383
Eligible for IPM 032 upon exiting IPM 027 336 87.7 (336/383)
Lost to Follow-up/Death post exiting
IPM 02728 8.3 (28/336)
Participants eligible for IPM 032 Screening 312 92.9 (312/336)
Participants screened on-site for IPM 032 198 58.9 (198/336)
Decliners 114 33.9 (114/336)
Reasons provided by participants for declining further study involvement
Decliners
Number of
participants
114
%
33.9
(114/336)
Reasons for declining
Relocation 175.4
(17/312)
Not interested 54 17.3 (54/312)
Planning to fall pregnant 41.3
(4/312)
Working/Scholar 175.4
(17/312)
Other 206.4
(20/312)
HIV infection during inter-trial interval
• Participants reporting HIV seroconversion
post IPM 027 trial completion 6/336 (1.8%)
• At IPM 032 screening 12/336 (3.6%)
participants tested positive for HIV infection
post IPM 027 trial completion
• Total HIV seroconversions post IPM 027 trial
completion 18/336 (5.4%)
Predictors of OLE trial participation (p<0.05)
• Mean number of months since IPM 027 trial
completion at the time of IPM 032 recruitment
(<12 months participants vs. >12 months
decliners)
• Social harm occurrence in the IPM 027 trial
(social harm reported in IPM 027 vs. no social
harm reported in IPM 027)
• IP unblinding after exit from IPM 027 trial (IP vs.
placebo) was not a predictor of OLE participation
Previous IPM 027 factors associated with reduced odds of consenting to OLE follow-up
• Young age (<24 years)
• Low parity
• Single marital status
• Employment
• Student
Targeted strategies to enhance future OLE study recruitment efforts
• Identifying and addressing factors associated with lack of willingness to continue trial participation may improve some steps in the initial parent trial performance cascade and enhance subsequent follow-up for OLE trial participation.
• Investigators may formulate concrete actions to address any reported social harms as part of routine clinical research practice.
• Continued stakeholder and community engagementactivities between trials may assist OLE trial follow-up recruitment efforts particularly, as it may not be possible to shorten the interval time between Phase III trial exit and OLE trial start.
Acknowledgements
• IPM team
• MRU IPM study research participants
• Local stakeholders
• MRU research centre staff