employee compensation & hr practices in pork...
TRANSCRIPT
EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION
& HR PRACTICESIN PORK
PRODUCTION
2016 - 2017 Report
2
© 2017 Pork Board, Des Moines, IA, USA. This message funded by America’s Pork Producers and the Pork Checkoff.
3
Table of Contents
Section I: Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4
1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................4
2. Contributor Profile ..........................................................................................................................5
3. Key Findings ...................................................................................................................................6
4. What’s Changed .............................................................................................................................7
Section 2: Analysis ............................................................................................................................................8
1. Compensation ................................................................................................................................8
• Animal Caretaker Wages
• Average Annual Salary / Wage Ranges
• Bonus / Incentive Plans
2. Benefits .......................................................................................................................................35
• Vacation / Sick / PTO / Holidays
• Benefits by Employee Category
• Employee & Family Members Coverage
3. HR Management ..........................................................................................................................44
• Average Number of Hours Worked per Week
• Weekend Work Schedule
• Workforce Diversity
• Turnover
• Performance Appraisals
• Motivation Tactics
4. Recruitment .................................................................................................................................49
• Recruiting Methods - Manager
• Recruiting Methods - Animal Caretaker
• Difficult-to-Fill Positions
• International Recruitment
5. Part-Time Staff ...........................................................................................................................54
• Number of Part-Time Staff
• Average Hourly Wage
• Average Number of Hours Worked per Week
6. Worker Safety .............................................................................................................................58
4
Introduction
In the fall of 2016, the National Pork Board commissioned AgCareers.com to conduct the Compensation and HR Practices in Pork Production survey. AgCareers.com conducted a similar version of the survey in 2011 on behalf of the National Pork Board. The 2016 survey would provide an update to current pay and practice trends occurring within the industry since 2011.
Pork producers were categorized into two target groups, large producers and small to mid-size producers. For the purpose of this survey, the ‘large producers’ audience represents farms with 25,000 or more sows in production. The second audience, ‘small to mid-size producers,’ represents producers of a significant size that employ full-time employees other than family members. Small to mid-size producers are defined as those operations with less than 25,000 sows in production or over 1,000 head finishing. A customized online survey was created for each target audience.
Requests to complete surveys were sent to 38 large producers and 1,994 small to mid-size operations. The number of participants completing the survey in both target audiences increased as compared to the 2011 survey. Twenty-nine large producers (76%) completed the survey. Two hundred and fifty-two small to mid-size producers (13%) completed the survey. Topics covered in both surveys included Compensation, Benefits, HR Management, Recruitment, Part-Time Staff, and Safety.
The overall survey was conducted to provide an accurate reflection of compensation and human resources practices that can be used within the pork industry to help recruit talent and ensure current practices are in-line with competition.
Data was captured via direct communication with the target audiences through an online survey. The information was then collated and is presented in the following document. This document provides key findings, analysis commentary and detailed results from collated data of the small to mid-size operations survey and the large operations survey. Data was not combined as the number of small to mid-size producers responding heavily outweighed the number of large producers, however, the large survey respondents represent more employees within the industry overall.
The Compensation and HR Practices in Pork Production Survey analysis has been compiled using data which, to the best of AgCareers.com and the National Pork Board’s knowledge and information at the time of collection and printing, was accurate and correct.
4
5
Contributor Profile
Survey participants reported where they had hog operations. The largest states represented by large producers were Iowa (62.07%), Illinois (37.93%), and Missouri (34.48%). Small to mid-size producers were similar with Iowa (30.56%) leading, but differed from there with Minnesota (21.43%) and Indiana (12.30%) having the next most representation.
Large Organizations: How many full-time employees are employed by your company?
6.90% 37.93% 17.24% 20.69% 6.90%
1 to 100 101 to 250 251 to 500 501 to 1000 1001 to 2500
10.34%
2500+
Small to Mid-Size Organizations: How many full-time employees are employed by your company?
41.27% 22.62% 12.70% 13.10% 5.16%
4 or less 5 to 9 10 to 19 20 to 50 51 to 100
5.16%
100+
Which category best describes your company?
The figures below show the number of full-time employees per contributor group. A large majority of respondents were from small to mid-size producers, however, as mentioned, the large survey respondents represent more employees within the industry overall.
Participants were asked to provide descriptors of their operation. While almost half of small to mid-size growers were in the independent grower category (44.05%) (owns pigs, sold at any life stage), most of the large producers classified their operations as an integrator (68.97%) (owns pigs from birth to finished pork product).
Contract Grower
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Large Producers
Small to Mid-Size Producers
Integrator
Independent Grower
68.97%
30.95%
17.24%
44.05%
13.79%
25.00%
6
Key Findings
• While most small to mid-size producers are in the independent grower category (44.05%), most of the large producers were categorized as an integrator (68.97%).
• Large producers are more likely to provide a bonus plan for their farm employees (86.21%), compared to 46.03% of small to mid-sized producers.
• Both large and small producers noted that their most common performance measurement was based on pigs weaned/sow/year.
• On average for animal caretakers, small to mid-size producers paid a bonus of $2,937 versus $2,721 by large producers. In contrast, large producers paid more bonus to farm managers, $5,761 versus $5,093 paid by small to mid-size producers.
• A greater percentage of large producers provided medical insurance to their employees and their employees’ family members.
• Small to mid-size producers on average had a less diverse workforce population. Large producers had 15.30% more employees that identified as Hispanic and had 11.76% more females in their workforce.
• Turnover rates were lower among animal caretakers with small to mid-size producers, while large producers saw a lower turnover rate for farm manager roles.
• Both small to mid-size and large producers cited bonuses as the most utilized method to motivate their workforce.
• Though bonuses were the most common motivator cited, small to mid-size producers also offered flexible hours to motivate staff, while large producers leveraged the use of promotions to motivate employees.
• Referrals are a heavily relied upon method of recruiting manager level employees, no matter the size of the company.
• Most large producers looked to internet job boards (79.31%), and referrals (68.97%) to fill manager positions, while most small to mid-size producers used word of mouth (63.10%), and referrals (48.81%).
• For animal caretaker positions, word of mouth and referrals dominated as methods of recruitment.
• Both large and small to mid-size producers noted that production workers and production managers were the most difficult roles to recruit.
• Large companies are more likely to utilize part-time animal caretakers, 86.21% compared to 61.10% for small to mid-size producers.
• Vital components such as ear and eye protection are common safety mechanisms for both large and small to mid-size producers.
• Large producers are more likely to keep records of accidents and injuries, and have written procedures for emergency situations.
6
77
What’s Changed?
AgCareers.com and the National Pork Board produced a similar survey in 2011. The following are key highlights of what has changed or remained the same for both large and small to mid-size producers since 2011 as it relates to compensation and HR practices within the pork industry. The 2011 Employee Compensation in Pork Production survey is available at www.pork.org.
• For large producers, in 2011, 100% of large companies paid less than $12.50 per hour for an animal caretaker with no experience. In 2016, there was a shift and nearly a quarter (24.14%) of companies now pay more than $12.50 per hour.
• For small to mid-size producers, a similar shift was seen. In 2011, 89% of respondents paid less than $12.50 per hour for an animal caretaker with no experience compared to 71.44% that paid less than $12.50 per hour in 2016.
• When looking at the large producers, in 2011, 86.96% of respondents paid less than $13.50 per hour for an animal caretaker with five or more years of experience. In 2016, there was a shift and a larger percentage (48.27%) of companies paid more than $13.50 per hour for an animal caretaker with five or more years of experience.
• Similarly for small to mid-size producers, in 2011, 51.32% of respondents paid less than $12.50 per hour for an animal caretaker with more than five years of experience. In 2016, a larger percentage of respondents (75%) are now paying more than $12.50 per hour for the same position.
• Relatively the same number of large producers from the 2016 survey have an incentive program in place as compared to the 2011 survey. Around 13% fewer small to mid-size producers reported having a bonus plan in place than those that responded in 2011.
• Pigs weaned/sow/year remained the most common performance measurement indicator for both large and small to mid-size producers in both the 2011 and 2016 surveys. Large producers noted an 11% increase in this response in 2016 results; similarly, small to mid-size noted a 12.09% increase.
• There was a slight increase in the percentage of large producers offering medical, dental, and vision insurance in the 2016 survey and a slight decrease in the percentage of companies offering disability and life insurance.
• The percentage of small to mid-size producers offering medical coverage for employees declined from 2011 to 2016 by 16.41%.
• Bonuses remained the top motivator used by large producers and small to mid-size producers in both surveys. For large producers they also consistently continued to use promotions and training and development. New in the 2016 results, small to mid-size producers are utilizing flexible hours more often to motivate staff.
• The percentage of large employers using internet job boards increased 14.09%, the use of referrals decreased 9.29%, and word of mouth decreased roughly 15.29% for recruiting manager level employees.
• Referrals, word of mouth and help wanted ads continued to dominate as recruiting methods of animal caretakers for both the large and small to mid-size groups.
• Production workers and production managers were consistently noted as the most difficult roles to recruit for by both the large and small to mid-size producers in both the 2011 survey as well as the 2016 survey.
8
COMPENSATION
9
$13.51 - $14.50
$14.51 - $15.50
$15.51+
Not Applicable
3.45%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
3.97%
3.97%
2.78%
2.78%
$7.50 or less 0.00%
$7.51 - $8.50
$8.51 - $9.50
$9.51 - $10.50
$10.51 - $11.50
$11.51 - $12.50
$12.51 - $13.50
24.14%
17.24%
3.45%
6.90%
24.14%
20.69%
2.38%
17.86%
19.05%
4.37%
8.73%
19.05%
15.08%
Animal Caretaker Wages
Participants were asked to provide a baseline benchmark for overall compensation. The starting compensation ranges for animal caretakers with both no experience and with five years of swine experience were reported.
Participants from the large producers group most commonly reported a starting wage between $9.51 – $11.50 (48.28%), while the most common starting wage for small to mid-size producers was slightly higher at $10.51-$12.50 (38.10%). Starting salaries for large producers were more concentrated between $9.51 to $13.50 while small to mid-size producers saw a wide range of responses in each category.
Large Percentage
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
What is the average starting wage for someone with no swine experience hired as an animal caretaker?
Animal caretakers with five years of experience mostly have a higher hourly wage. Most (27.59%) large producers indicated that they paid $12.51 - $13.50, the most common response from small to mid-size producers was $15.51+ per hour (28.97%). Again, animal caretakers with five years of experience, in the large producer survey saw more concentrated pay levels, while the small to mid-size producers saw salary levels in all categories. This variation may be due to the size of the operation as well as the absence of a more structured compensation function.
$13.51 - $14.50
$14.51 - $15.50
$15.51+
Not Applicable
13.79%
17.24%
17.24%
0.00%
16.27%
28.97%
12.70%
5.95%
$7.50 or less 0.00%
$7.51 - $8.50
$8.51 - $9.50
$9.51 - $10.50
$10.51 - $11.50
$11.51 - $12.50
$12.51 - $13.50
0.00%
20.69%
0.00%
0.00%
3.45%
27.59%
1.19%
5.56%
5.95%
0.40%
1.19%
4.76%
17.06%
Large Percentage
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
What is the average wage for someone employed as an animal caretaker with your company for 5 years?
10
Salary Offerings by Job Title
Participants were asked to select the salary range that best described the average annual salary or wage for typical roles within the organization. Large operations provided average salary/ wage information for farm positions and production support positions, as well as program support positions, program and facility specialist positions, program and facility manager positions, and senior management. Each of these categories reflects typical levels of management within large operations’ organizational structures. Small to mid-size operations provided information on just two employee categories, the farm positions and program support positions. Positions were selected based on research of the prevalence of the role within organizations by size.
The following tables outline the most prevalent salary range/hourly wage paid to each position within the employee category. Within each employee category, tables are shown by individual role with responses and percentage of response by tar-get audience. In the case that the employee category was only reported by large operations or only by small to mid-size, only their responses are provided within the table.
11
Sow Farm Dept./Asst. Manager $35,001 - $40,000
Small to MId-SizeMajority Range
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Sow Farm Manager (one farm)
Sow Farm Area Manager (multiple farms)
Sow Farm Division Manager
Grower Finisher Area Manager (multiple sites)
Grower Finisher Division Manager
Farm Manager Trainee
N/A
N/A
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$40,001 - $50,000
N/A
18.65%
N/A
N/A
24.21%
8.33%
19.05%
N/A
Position Title
$30,001 - $35,000
LargeMajority Range
Large Percentage
$80,000+
$60,001 - $70,000/ $80,000+
$40,001 - $50,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$35,001 - $40,000
34.48%
34.48%
24.14% (each)
48.28%
34.48%
44.83%
31.03%
Farm Management Positions
Farm Management Positions
Sow Farm Department or Assistant Manager was more prevalent among large producers and most commonly paid an annual salary of $30,001-$35,000 (34.48%) or $35,001 - $40,000 (31.03%). Most (38.49%) small to mid-size producers reported that they do not have this position, of those that did, $35,001- $40,000 was the most common salary range (18.65%).
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,000+
16
0
4
0
6.35%
0.00%
1.59%
0.00%
Not Applicable 97
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Less than $20,000
$20,001 - $25,000
$25,001 - $30,000
$30,001 - $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
18
47
1
7
32
30
38.49%
7.14%
18.65%
0.40%
2.78%
12.70%
11.90%
Pay Range
1
0
1
0
3.45%
0.00%
3.45%
0.00%
1
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
2
9
0
0
10
5
3.45%
6.90%
31.03%
0.00%
0.00%
34.48%
17.24%
Totals 252 100.00%29 100.00%
Farm Management: Sow Farm Department or Assistant Manager
The table below is a compilation of the most prevalent salary range for each role within the Farm Management category. More detailed information on each role individually follows. Those listed as N/A were not asked to report on that particular role.
12
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,000+
41
5
18
5
16.27%
1.98%
7.14%
1.98%
Not Applicable 78
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Less than $20,000
$20,001 - $25,000
$25,001 - $30,000
$30,001 - $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
6
20
1
4
13
61
30.95%
2.38%
7.94%
0.40%
1.59%
5.16%
24.21%
Pay Range
11
1
0
0
37.93%
3.45%
0.00%
0.00%
0
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
0
3
0
0
0
14
0.00%
0.00%
10.34%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
48.28%
Totals 252 100.00%29 100.00%
Farm Management: Sow Farm Manager (one farm)
Sow Farm Managers of large producers were reported to make $40,001-$50,000 by 48.28% or $50,001-$60,000 by 37.93% of respondents. Most (30.95%) small to mid-size producers reported that they did not have this position and of those that did, the most common salary range was $40,001-$50,000 (24.21%).
Sow Farm Area Manager was noted as not applicable by 67.06% of small to mid-size producers, while 34.48% of large producers reported paying $60,001-$70,000 annually for the position.
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,000+
21
14
14
10
8.33%
5.56%
5.56%
3.97%
Not Applicable 169
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Less than $20,000
$20,001 - $25,000
$25,001 - $30,000
$30,001 - $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
2
4
0
3
3
12
67.06%
0.79%
1.59%
0.00%
1.19%
1.19%
4.76%
Pay Range
8
4
10
0
27.59%
13.79%
34.48%
0.00%
5
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
0
0
0
0
0
2
17.24%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
6.90%
Totals 252 100.00%29 100.00%
Farm Management: Sow Farm Area Manager (multiple sow farms)
13
For Sow Farm Division Managers, the most common range was $80,000+ (34.48%), followed by $70,001-$80,000 (24.14%). This position was only available for response by large producers.
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,000+
1
7
4
10
3.45%
24.14%
13.79%
34.48%
Not Applicable 6
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $20,000
$20,001 - $25,000
$25,001 - $30,000
$30,001 - $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
0
0
0
0
0
1
20.69%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
3.45%
Pay Range
Totals 29 100.00%
Farm Management: Sow Farm Division Manager
Grower Finisher Area Managers were reported to make $50,001-$60,000 (44.83%) from large producers and small to mid-size producers most commonly reported $40,001-$50,000 (19.05%).
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,000+
28
4
12
6
11.11%
1.59%
4.76%
2.38%
Not Applicable 91
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Less than $20,000
$20,001 - $25,000
$25,001 - $30,000
$30,001 - $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
13
19
7
9
15
48
36.11%
5.16%
7.54%
2.78%
3.57%
5.95%
19.05%
Pay Range
13
1
3
0
44.83%
3.45%
10.34%
0.00%
2
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
0
4
0
0
0
6
6.90%
0.00%
13.79%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
20.69%
Totals 252 100.00%29 100.00%
Farm Management: Grower Finisher Area Manager (multiple finishing sites)
14
Grower Finisher Division Manager was only available for response by large producers. Salary responses were between $60,001-$70,000 (24.14%), $80,000+ (24.14%) and $70,001-$80,000 (17.24%).
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,000+
2
5
7
7
6.90%
17.24%
24.14%
24.14%
Not Applicable 7
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $20,000
$20,001 - $25,000
$25,001 - $30,000
$30,001 - $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
0
1
0
0
0
0
24.14%
0.00%
3.45%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Pay Range
Totals 29 100.00%
Farm Management: Grower Finisher Division Manager
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,000+
0
0
0
0
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Not Applicable 9
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $20,000
$20,001 - $25,000
$25,001 - $30,000
$30,001 - $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
2
9
0
0
3
6
31.03%
6.90%
31.03%
0.00%
0.00%
10.34%
20.69%
Pay Range
Totals 29 100.00%
Farm Management: Farm Manager Trainee
The Farm Manager Trainee position was also only available for response by large producers. Farm Manager Trainees were most likely to make $35,001-$40,000 (31.03%).
15
Program & Facility Manager Positions
Survey respondents from the large producers group were asked to indicate the average salary range of program and facility manager positions. The figures on the following pages display the survey findings of large producers. These roles were not relevant to the small to mid-size group.
The table below is a compilation of the most prevalent salary range for each role within the Program & Facility Manager category. More detailed information on each role individually follows.
Regional Environmental Manager $60,001 - $70,000 20.69%
Accounting Controller $80,001 - $90,000
Large Majority Range Large Percentage
Feed Mill Manager
Maintenance Manager
Construction Manager
Logistics Manager
Marketing Manager
Regional Veterinarian
$60,001 - $70,000 /$70,001 - $80,000
$40,001 - $50,000 /$60,001 - $70,000
$40,001 - $50,000 /$60,001 - $70,000 /$70,001 - $80,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$50,001 - $60,000 /$70,001 - $80,000
$80,001 - $90,000
17.24%
13.79% (each)
6.90% (each)
17.24% (each)
20.69%
17.24% (each)
13.79%
Position Title
Program & Facility Manager Positions
16
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
5
3
4
3
17.24%
10.34%
13.79%
10.34%
Not Applicable 6
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
2
2
0
0
0
2
20.69%
6.90%
6.90%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
6.90%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000 1 3.45%
$130,000+ 1 3.45%
Totals 29 100.00%
Program & Facility Manager: Accounting Controller
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
1
2
0
0
3.45%
6.90%
0.00%
0.00%
Not Applicable 7
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
5
5
0
1
3
5
24.14%
17.24%
17.24%
0.00%
3.45%
10.34%
17.24%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000 0 0.00%
$130,000+ 0 0.00%
Totals 29 100.00%
Program & Facility Manager: Feed Mill Manager
Feed Mill Manager: Salary ranges were clustered from $40,001-$80,000 with the majority of the individual ranges within the larger overall spread at 17.24% each.
Accounting Controller: Salary ranges were most commonly reported at $80,001-$90,000 (17.24%) and $90,001-$100,000 (13.79%).
17
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
5
0
1
0
17.24%
0.00%
3.45%
0.00%
Not Applicable 5
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
5
4
0
1
6
2
17.24%
17.24%
13.79%
0.00%
3.45%
20.69%
6.90%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000 0 0.00%
$130,000+ 0 0.00%
Totals 29 100.00%
Program & Facility Manager: Maintenance Manager
Maintenance Manager: Salary ranges were reported across a wide array of pay ranges from $40,001-$90,000 with $50,001-$60,000 receiving the highest percentage (20.69%).
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
2
0
1
0
6.90%
0.00%
3.45%
0.00%
Not Applicable 15
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
1
4
0
0
2
4
51.72%
3.45%
13.79%
0.00%
0.00%
6.90%
13.79%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000 0 0.00%
$130,000+ 0 0.00%
Totals 29 100.00%
Program & Facility Manager: Construction Manager
Construction Manager: The most prevalent salary ranges reported were $60,001-$70,000 and $70,001-$80,000, both selected by 13.79% of participants.
18
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
2
1
1
0
6.90%
3.45%
3.45%
0.00%
Not Applicable 9
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
2
2
0
0
5
5
31.03%
6.90%
6.90%
0.00%
0.00%
17.24%
17.24%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000 1 3.45%
$130,000+ 1 3.45%
Totals 29 100.00%
Program & Facility Manager: Logistics Manager
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
1
1
1
1
3.45%
3.45%
3.45%
3.45%
Not Applicable 19
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
2
2
0
0
1
1
65.52%
6.90%
6.90%
0.00%
0.00%
3.45%
3.45%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000 0 0.00%
$130,000+ 0 0.00%
Totals 29 100.00%
Program & Facility Manager: Marketing Manager
Marketing Manager: A large percentage (65.52%) did not report a salary for the Marketing Manager role, possibly indicating that they did not have the position within their company. Other respondents reported a wide salary range from $40,001-$120,000.
Logistics Manager: The majority of participants listed salary ranges of $50,001 - $60,000 or $70,001 - $80,000 (17.24% each).
19
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
4
0
3
1
13.79%
0.00%
10.34%
3.45%
Not Applicable 14
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
0
1
0
0
1
2
48.28%
0.00%
3.45%
0.00%
0.00%
3.45%
6.90%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000 2 6.90%
$130,000+ 1 3.45%
Totals 29 100.00%
Program & Facility Manager: Regional Veterinarian
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
3
2
1
0
10.34%
6.90%
3.45%
0.00%
Not Applicable 13
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $35,000
$35,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
1
6
0
0
1
2
44.83%
3.45%
20.69%
0.00%
0.00%
3.45%
6.90%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000 0 0.00%
$130,000+ 0 0.00%
Totals 29 100.00%
Program & Facility Manager: Regional Environmental Manager
Regional Environmental Manager: The most popular response for pay was $60,001-$70,000 as reported by 20.69%.
Regional Veterinarian: Respondents reported a wide salary range from $50,001 - $130,000+. 13.79% reported they paid $80,001-$90,000 and 10.34% reported they paid $90,001-$100,000.
20
Program & Facility Specialist Positions
Large producers reported the salary ranges for program and facility specialist positions. This employee category was reported by large operations only.
The table below is a compilation of the most prevalent salary range for each role within the Program & Facility Specialist category. More detailed information on each role individually follows.
Truck Wash Manager $40,001 - $50,000 34.48%
Accounting/Finance $50,001 - $60,000
Large Majority Range Large Percentage
Facilities & Maintenance
Payroll/Benefits/HR Generalists
Safety
Recruiting/Training
Purchasing
Communications Manager
$40,001 - $50,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$40,001 - $50,000
24.14%
24.14%
31.03%
31.03%
27.59%
31.03%
10.34%
Position Title
Program & Facility Specialist Positions
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,000+
Totals
0
29
0
0.00%
100.00%
0.00%
Not Applicable 6
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $30,000
$30,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
6
2
1
5
7
2
20.69%
20.69%
6.90%
3.45%
17.24%
24.14%
6.90%
Pay Range
Program & Facility Specialist: Accounting/Finance
The most common salary range for the following three roles, Accounting/Finance, Facilities and Maintenance, and Payroll/ Benefits/HR Generalist, was reported at $50,001 - $60,000.
21
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,000+
Totals
0
29
0
0.00%
100.00%
0.00%
Not Applicable 8
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $30,000
$30,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
4
1
0
7
9
0
27.59%
13.79%
3.45%
0.00%
24.14%
31.03%
0.00%
Pay Range
Program & Facility Specialist: Facilities & Maintenance
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,000+
Totals
0
29
0
0.00%
100.00%
0.00%
Not Applicable 7
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $30,000
$30,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
7
1
0
6
8
0
24.14%
24.14%
3.45%
0.00%
20.69%
27.59%
0.00%
Pay Range
Program & Facility Specialist: Payroll/Benefits/HR Generalist
22
The most common salary range for Safety, Recruiting/Training, Purchasing, Communications Manager, and Truck Wash Manager, was reported as $40,001-$50,000.
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,000+
Totals
1
29
1
3.45%
100.00%
3.45%
Not Applicable 11
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $30,000
$30,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
7
3
0
0
4
2
37.93%
24.14%
10.34%
0.00%
0.00%
13.79%
6.90%
Pay Range
Program & Facility Specialist: Safety
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,000+
Totals
0
29
0
0.00%
100.00%
0.00%
Not Applicable 12
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $30,000
$30,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
9
1
0
2
5
0
41.38%
31.03%
3.45%
0.00%
6.90%
17.24%
0.00%
Pay Range
Program & Facility Specialist: Recruiting/Training
23
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,000+
Totals
2
29
0
6.90%
100.00%
0.00%
Not Applicable 9
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $30,000
$30,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
9
0
0
4
5
0
31.03%
31.03%
0.00%
0.00%
13.79%
17.24%
0.00%
Pay Range
Program & Facility Specialist: Purchasing
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,000+
Totals
1
29
0
3.45%
100.00%
0.00%
Not Applicable 20
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $30,000
$30,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
3
2
0
1
2
0
68.97%
10.34%
6.90%
0.00%
3.45%
6.90%
0.00%
Pay Range
Program & Facility Specialist: Communications Manager
$80,001 - $90,000
$90,000+
Totals
0
29
0
0.00%
100.00%
0.00%
Not Applicable 11
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $30,000
$30,001 - $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
10
1
2
2
3
0
37.93%
34.48%
3.45%
6.90%
6.90%
10.34%
0.00%
Pay Range
Program & Facility Specialist: Truck Wash Manager
24
Office Manager $14.01 - $16.00 12.30%N/A N/A
Program Support Positions
Both large and small to mid-size producers were asked to report pay ranges for program support positions. While large producers were likely to pay more for each of the program support positions, small to mid-size producers seemed to pay a wider range of salaries for those roles they reported on.
The table below is a compilation of the most prevalent salary range for each role within the Program Support category. More detailed information on each role individually follows. Those listed as N/A were not asked to report on that particular role.
Environmental Technician N/A
Small to Mid-SizeMajority Range
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Truck Driver
Mechanic
Truck Wash
Feed Mill Technician
Maintenance
Administrative Support
N/A
$14.01 - $16.00
$14.01 - $16.00
$14.01 - $16.00
N/A
$12.01 - $14.00
N/A
N/A
16.67%
15.08%
10.32%
N/A
13.49%
Position Title
$14.01 - $16.00
LargeMajority Range
Large Percentage
$14.01 - $16.00
$14.01 - $16.00
$16.01 - $18.00
$16.01 - $18.00 / $20.01 - $22.00
$12.01 - $14.00
$12.01 - $14.00 / $14.01 - $16.00
17.24%
27.59%
34.48%
31.03%
20.69% (each)
27.59%
27.59% (each)
Program Support Positions
25
$28.00+
Totals 29
0
100.00%
Environmental Technician: This role was reported by large producers only. Many respondents (62.07%) indicated that an Environmental Technician was not applicable to their company. For those who do have the role, most (17.24%) indicated they paid between $14.01-$16.00.
$18.01 - $20.00
$20.01 - $22.00
$22.01 - $24.00
0
0
0
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Not Applicable 18
Large Responses Large Percentage
$8.00 or less
$8.01 - $10.00
$10.01 - $12.00
$12.01 - $14.00
$14.01 - $16.00
$16.01 - $18.00
2
5
0
0
2
1
62.07%
6.90%
17.24%
0.00%
0.00%
6.90%
3.45%
Pay Range per Hour
$24.00 - $26.00
$26.01 - $28.00
1
0
3.45%
0.00%
0.00%
Program Support: Environmental Technician
26
$28.00+ 0 0.00%0 0.00%
Totals 252 100.00%29 100.00%
$18.01 - $20.00
$20.01 - $22.00
$22.01 - $24.00
$24.00 - $26.00
18
4
7
5
7.14%
1.59%
2.78%
1.98%
Not Applicable 121
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
$8.00 or less
$8.01 - $10.00
$10.01 - $12.00
$12.01 - $14.00
$14.01 - $16.00
$16.01 - $18.00
7
38
1
3
25
23
48.02%
2.78%
15.08%
0.40%
1.19%
9.92%
9.13%
Pay Range per Hour
2
0
1
2
6.90%
0.00%
3.45%
6.90%
4
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
0
8
0
0
2
9
13.79%
0.00%
27.59%
0.00%
0.00%
6.90%
31.03%
$26.01 - $28.00 0 0.00%1 3.45%
Program Support: Truck Driver
Truck Driver: Average hourly wage ranges for large producers were reported to be between $14.01-$16.00 (27.59%) and $16.01-$18.00 (31.03%). Average wages for small to mid-size producers were reported to be between $14.01-$16.00 (15.08%).
$28.00+ 2 0.79%1 3.45%
Totals 252 100.00%29 100.00%
$18.01 - $20.00
$20.01 - $22.00
$22.01 - $24.00
$24.00 - $26.00
22
1
8
4
8.73%
0.40%
3.17%
1.59%
Not Applicable 141
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
$8.00 or less
$8.01 - $10.00
$10.01 - $12.00
$12.01 - $14.00
$14.01 - $16.00
$16.01 - $18.00
5
26
2
5
15
19
55.95%
1.98%
10.32%
0.79%
1.98%
5.95%
7.54%
Pay Range per Hour
2
0
6
0
6.90%
0.00%
20.69%
0.00%
7
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
0
3
0
0
4
6
24.14%
0.00%
10.34%
0.00%
0.00%
13.79%
20.69%
$26.01 - $28.00 2 0.79%0 0.00%
Program Support: Mechanic
Mechanic: Average hourly wage ranges for mechanic positions with large producers were reported as $16.01 - $18.00 (20.69%) or $20.01 - $22.00 (20.69%). Small to mid-size producers more commonly paid $14.01 - $16.00 (10.32%) or $18.01 - $20.00 (8.73%).
27
Truck Wash: This role was reported on by large producers only. Over half of the companies responded that an hourly rate of $12.01 -$14.00 (24.14%) or $ 14.01-$16.00 (27.59%) was paid.
Feed Mill Technician: This role was also only reported on by large producers. Most (27.59%) companies responded that they paid $12.01-$14.00 per hour.
$28.00+
Totals 29
0
100.00%
$18.01 - $20.00
$20.01 - $22.00
$22.01 - $24.00
0
0
0
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Not Applicable 9
Large Responses Large Percentage
$8.00 or less
$8.01 - $10.00
$10.01 - $12.00
$12.01 - $14.00
$14.01 - $16.00
$16.01 - $18.00
4
8
0
1
7
0
31.03%
13.79%
27.59%
0.00%
3.45%
24.14%
0.00%
Pay Range per Hour
$24.00 - $26.00
$26.01 - $28.00
0
0
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Program Support: Truck Wash
$28.00+
Totals 29
0
100.00%
$18.01 - $20.00
$20.01 - $22.00
$22.01 - $24.00
0
0
1
0.00%
0.00%
3.45%
Not Applicable 10
Large Responses Large Percentage
$8.00 or less
$8.01 - $10.00
$10.01 - $12.00
$12.01 - $14.00
$14.01 - $16.00
$16.01 - $18.00
2
4
0
2
8
2
34.48%
6.90%
13.79%
0.00%
6.90%
27.59%
6.90%
Pay Range per Hour
$24.00 - $26.00
$26.01 - $28.00
0
0
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Program Support: Feed Mill Technician
28
$28.00+ 1 0.40%0 0.00%
Totals 252 100.00%29 100.00%
$18.01 - $20.00
$20.01 - $22.00
$22.01 - $24.00
$24.00 - $26.00
14
2
9
2
5.56%
0.79%
3.57%
0.79%
Not Applicable 93
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
$8.00 or less
$8.01 - $10.00
$10.01 - $12.00
$12.01 - $14.00
$14.01 - $16.00
$16.01 - $18.00
13
42
5
3
33
34
36.90%
5.16%
16.67%
1.98%
1.19%
13.10%
13.49%
Pay Range per Hour
1
1
3
0
3.45%
3.45%
10.34%
0.00%
2
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
3
10
0
0
5
4
6.90%
10.34%
34.48%
0.00%
0.00%
17.24%
13.79%
$26.01 - $28.00 1 0.40%0 0.00%
Program Support: Maintenance
Maintenance: Most (34.48%) large companies surveyed pay $14.01-$16.00, and most (16.67%) small to mid-size producers also noted $14.01-$16.00.
$28.00+ 1 0.40%0 0.00%
Totals 252 100.00%29 100.00%
$18.01 - $20.00
$20.01 - $22.00
$22.01 - $24.00
$24.00 - $26.00
17
2
2
3
6.75%
0.79%
0.79%
1.19%
Not Applicable 117
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
$8.00 or less
$8.01 - $10.00
$10.01 - $12.00
$12.01 - $14.00
$14.01 - $16.00
$16.01 - $18.00
19
30
5
3
34
18
46.43%
7.54%
11.90%
1.98%
1.19%
13.49%
7.14%
Pay Range per Hour
3
0
1
0
10.34%
0.00%
3.45%
0.00%
2
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
2
8
0
0
8
5
6.90%
6.90%
27.59%
0.00%
0.00%
27.59%
17.24%
$26.01 - $28.00 1 0.40%0 0.00%
Program Support: Administrative Support
Administrative Support: This role most commonly reported to pay $12.01-$14.00 and $14.01- $16.00 by both large producers and small to mid-size producers.
29
Office Manager: This role was reported on by only the small to mid-size producers. Average wages were reported to mostly be $14.01 - $16.00 (12.30%) per hour.
$28.00+
Totals 252
7
100.00%
$18.01 - $20.00
$20.01 - $22.00
$22.01 - $24.00
22
4
15
8.73%
1.59%
5.95%
Not Applicable 107
Small to Mid-Size Responses Small to Mid-Size Percentage
$8.00 or less
$8.01 - $10.00
$10.01 - $12.00
$12.01 - $14.00
$14.01 - $16.00
$16.01 - $18.00
14
31
4
5
17
19
42.46%
5.56%
12.30%
1.59%
1.98%
6.75%
7.54%
Pay Range per Hour
$24.00 - $26.00
$26.01 - $28.00
4
3
1.59%
2.78%
1.19%
Program Support: Office Manager
Senior Management Positions
Senior management roles were only reported on by large producers. Due to the differing size of the participants within the large producer survey, there was generally a wide array of responses for salary ranges of senior management positions. In addition, nearly half of participants did not include salary data for each of the roles, with the exception of Human Resource Manager.
The table below is a compilation of the most prevalent salary range for each role within the Senior Management category. More detailed information on each role individually follows.
Chief Operations Officer $150,000+
Large Majority Range Large Percentage
Chief Financial Officer
Human Resources Manager
Veterinarian
Nutritionist
Environmental Manager
Facilities & Maintenance Manager
$80,001 - $90,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$150,000+
$100,001 - $110,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$60,001 - $70,000
27.59%
17.24%
13.79%
27.59%
13.79%
13.79%
13.79%
Position Title
Senior Management Positions
30
Totals 29 100.00%
Chief Operations Officer: Eight respondents (27.59%) indicated a salary between the broader range of $100,000-$150,000 and eight (27.59%) participants also noted a salary of $150,000+.
$140,001 - $150,000
$150,000+ 8
1
27.59%
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
0
2
2
0.00%
6.90%
6.90%
Not Applicable 11
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,001 - $90,000
0
1
0
0
0
1
37.93%
0.00%
3.45%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
3.45%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000
$130,001 - $140,000
1
2
3.45%
3.45%
6.90%
Senior Management: Chief Operations Officer
Chief Financial Officer: Six respondents (20.69%) indicated a salary between the broader range of $100,000-$150,000. Eight participants (27.59%) noted a salary of $150,000+.
Totals 29 100.00%
$140,001 - $150,000
$150,000+ 8
2
27.59%
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
1
0
1
3.45%
0.00%
3.45%
Not Applicable 12
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,001 - $90,000
0
2
0
0
0
0
41.38%
0.00%
6.90%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000
$130,001 - $140,000
2
1
6.90%
6.90%
3.45%
Senior Management: Chief Financial Officer
31
Totals 29 100.00%
Human Resource Manager: A wide array of salary responses were received. Respondents reported a range of $40,001-$150,000+. The range that received the largest concentration was a salary of $100,001-$110,000 (13.79%).
$140,001 - $150,000
$150,000+ 2
0
6.90%
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
2
0
4
6.90%
0.00%
13.79%
Not Applicable 8
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,001 - $90,000
3
2
0
2
2
2
27.59%
10.34%
6.90%
0.00%
6.90%
6.90%
6.90%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000
$130,001 - $140,000
1
1
3.45%
0.00%
3.45%
Senior Management: Human Resource Manager
Veterinarian: Five respondents (17.24%) indicated a salary between $80,001-$90,000, eight participants (27.59%) noted a salary between the broader range of $100,001-$130,000.
Totals 29 100.00%
$140,001 - $150,000
$150,000+ 0
1
0.00%
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
0
3
3
0.00%
10.34%
10.34%
Not Applicable 14
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,001 - $90,000
0
1
0
0
0
5
48.28%
0.00%
3.45%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
17.24%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000
$130,001 - $140,000
2
0
6.90%
3.45%
0.00%
Senior Management: Veterinarian
32
Totals 29 100.00%
Nutritionist: 20.69% of participants noted that their nutritionist roles had a salary range of $70,001 - $90,000.
$140,001 - $150,000
$150,000+ 2
1
6.90%
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
1
1
1
3.45%
3.45%
3.45%
Not Applicable 15
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,001 - $90,000
1
4
0
0
0
2
51.72%
3.45%
13.79%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
6.90%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000
$130,001 - $140,000
1
0
3.45%
3.45%
0.00%
Senior Management: Nutritionist
Environmental Manager: While the salary responses ranged from $60,001 - $120,000, the greatest concentration of responses (13.79%) was $60,001 - $70,000.
Totals 29 100.00%
$140,001 - $150,000
$150,000+ 0
1
0.00%
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
1
2
2
3.45%
6.90%
6.90%
Not Applicable 15
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,001 - $90,000
0
2
0
0
4
2
51.72%
0.00%
6.90%
0.00%
0.00%
13.79%
6.90%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000
$130,001 - $140,000
0
0
0.00%
3.45%
0.00%
Senior Management: Environmental Manager
33
Totals 29 100.00%
Facilities and Maintenance Manager: Salary levels were most concentrated at $60,001 - $70,000 (13.79%) or $90,001 - $100,000 (10.34%).
$140,001 - $150,000
$150,000+ 1
0
3.45%
$90,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $110,000
$110,001 - $120,000
3
1
0
10.34%
3.45%
0.00%
Not Applicable 14
Large Responses Large Percentage
Less than $40,000
$40,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $60,000
$60,001 - $70,000
$70,001 - $80,000
$80,001 - $90,000
2
1
0
1
4
0
48.28%
6.90%
3.45%
0.00%
3.45%
13.79%
0.00%
Pay Range
$120,001 - $130,000
$130,001 - $140,000
2
0
6.90%
0.00%
0.00%
Senior Management: Facilities & Maintenance Manager
Bonus/Incentive Plans
In addition to salary, most organizations offered a bonus or incentive plan to farm employees. While the large majority of large producers (86.21%) provided an incentive plan for farm employees, a little under half of small to mid-size producers (46.03%) offered an incentive plan to farm employees. The figure below outlines the breakdown of bonus (incentive) plans offered for each group.
Does your organization have a bonus plan for farm employees?
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Large Producers Small to Mid-Size Producers
Yes
No
86.21%
46.03%
13.79%
53.97%
100%
34
Survey participants also shared average annual bonuses awarded to animal caretakers and farm managers. Survey results indicated that animal caretakers of small to mid-size producers on average received a higher incentive payout than those of large producers, while large producers offered a higher incentive payout for farm manager employees.
Average Bonus Awarded
$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000
Large Producers Small to Mid-Size Producers
Animal Caretaker
Farm Manager
$2,721.27
$2,937.06
$5,092.98
$5,000 $6,000
$5,760.56
Mortality rate (death loss)
Financial benchmarks
Other
Question Respondents
23
16
33
204
19.83%
13.79%
28.45%
Pigs farrowed / sow / year 8
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Pigs weaned / sow / year
Pigs / space / year
Conception rate
Farrowing rate
Feed efficiency
Pounds of pork produced / year
9
12
70
4
16
13
6.90%
7.76%
10.34%
60.34%
3.45%
13.79%
11.21%
Measure
7
7
6
70
28.00%
28.00%
24.00%
8
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
3
5
19
2
9
4
32.00%
12.00%
20.00%
76.00%
8.00%
36.00%
16.00%
On what performance measure is the bonus (incentive) plan based?
*Percentages do not total 100%; respondents were allowed to select more than one response. Responses are calculated by dividing the number of responses by respondents.
Of those producers that provided an incentive plan, both large and small to mid-size producers noted that their most common performance measurement was based on pigs weaned/sow/year.
35
BENEFITS
36
Paid Holidays
Though the large majority of small to mid-size producers noted they do not offer paid holidays, of those that do, five or less holidays was the most common response at 25%. Large producers gave slightly more as the majority noted they give either six or seven paid holidays, 31.03% each.
Paid Time Off Plan
Large producers were most likely to adopt a paid time off program (62.07%), as compared to small to mid-size producers (26.19%).
Which of the following best describes your company’s time off policy?
Do not offer either
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Large Producers
Small to Mid-Size Producers
Traditional paid vacation/sick program
Paid time off or PTO program
34.48%
49.21%
Other
62.07%
26.19%
0.00%
16.67%
3.45%
7.94%
11
12+
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
1.59%
None N/A
Large Percentage
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
5 or less
6
7
8
9
10
31.03%
3.45%
13.79%
31.03%
10.34%
10.34%
30.56%
15.87%
0.00%
25.00%
21.43%
3.57%
1.98%
How many paid holidays do you give employees per year?
37
Small to Mid-Size Producers
Vacation Offered - Those with Traditional Vacation/Sick Plan
Of those that offer a traditional vacation/sick plan, most respondents in both the large and small to mid-size groups indicated they offer ten to fourteen vacation days per year to employees.
Employees with 5 years employment with your company: how many vacation days do you offer?
7 to 9 days
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Large Producers
Small to Mid-Size Producers
1 to 3 days
4 to 6 days
10 to 14 days
7.26%
30.00%
22.58%
70.00%
54.03%
15 to 18 days10.48%
18+ days5.65%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
38
Sick Days Offered - Those with Traditional Vacation/Sick Plan
The number of sick days given to employees in traditional vacation/sick offerings varied slightly from large to small to mid-size producers. While small to mid-size producers generally gave one to three sick days per year, the large producers were split, as they gave one to three or four to six days per year.
Employees with 5 years employment with your company: how many sick days do you offer?
7 to 9 days
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Large Producers
Small to Mid-Size Producers
1 to 3 days
4 to 6 days
10 to 14 days
29.03%
14.52%
10.48%
15 to 18 days4.84%
18+ days
50.00%
41.13%
50.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
39
Paid Time Off (PTO) Offered - Those with a PTO Plan
For employers that offer time off as PTO or Paid Time Off, small to mid-size producers provided 11 to 15 days, while large producers most commonly responded they provide 16 to 20 days of PTO per year.
Employees with 5 years employment with your company: how many PTO days do you offer?
11 to 15 days
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Large Producers
Small to Mid-Size Producers
1 to 5 days
6 to 10 days
16 to 20 days
15.15%
27.78%56.06%
33.33%
18.18%
21 to 25 days3.03%
25+ days
0.00%
7.58%
22.22%
16.67%
0.00%0.00%
40
In addition to average salary ranges by employee category, both participating audiences were asked to provide benefits data for their employees. Listed below are responses by producer size and role type.
Benefits by Employee Category
Fresh or Processed Pork
Housing / Allowance
Utilities / Allowance
140
47
56
55.56%
18.65%
22.22%
Retirement Plan 105
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Training & Development
Bonus / Profit-Sharing Plan
Unemployment Benefits
Continuing Education
Vehicle / Gas / Allowance
Mobile Phone
131
52
151
99
76
39
41.67%
51.98%
20.63%
59.92%
39.29%
30.16%
15.48%
Benefit
13
3
6
44.83%
10.34%
20.69%
25
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
24
7
26
20
13
1
86.21%
82.76%
24.14%
89.66%
68.97%
44.83%
3.45%
Animal Caretaker
*Percentages do not total 100%; respondents were allowed to select more than one response. Responses are calculated by dividing the number of responses by respondents.
Fresh or Processed Pork
Housing / Allowance
Utilities / Allowance
133
59
66
52.78%
23.41%
26.19%
Retirement Plan 110
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Training & Development
Bonus / Profit-Sharing Plan
Unemployment Benefits
Continuing Education
Vehicle / Gas / Allowance
Mobile Phone
116
89
133
103
83
106
43.65%
46.03%
35.32%
52.78%
40.87%
32.94%
42.06%
Benefit
12
3
10
41.38%
10.34%
34.48%
25
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
24
13
27
23
21
18
86.21%
82.76%
44.83%
93.10%
79.31%
72.41%
62.07%
Farm Manager
*Percentages do not total 100%; respondents were allowed to select more than one response. Responses are calculated by dividing the number of responses by respondents.
41
Fresh or Processed Pork
Housing / Allowance
Utilities / Allowance
106
30
32
42.06%
11.90%
12.70%
Retirement Plan 99
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Training & Development
Bonus / Profit-Sharing Plan
Unemployment Benefits
Continuing Education
Vehicle / Gas / Allowance
Mobile Phone
100
58
104
71
64
75
39.29%
39.68%
23.02%
41.27%
28.17%
25.40%
29.76%
Benefit
12
0
2
41.38%
0.00%
6.90%
26
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
24
19
26
22
21
23
89.66%
82.76%
65.52%
89.66%
75.86%
72.41%
79.31%
Mid-Level Management
*Percentages do not total 100%; respondents were allowed to select more than one response. Responses are calculated by dividing the number of responses by respondents.
Fresh or Processed Pork
Housing / Allowance
Utilities / Allowance
94
22
23
37.30%
8.73%
9.13%
Retirement Plan 93
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Training & Development
Bonus / Profit-Sharing Plan
Unemployment Benefits
Continuing Education
Vehicle / Gas / Allowance
Mobile Phone
97
61
99
60
56
63
36.90%
38.49%
24.21%
39.29%
23.81%
22.22%
25.00%
Benefit
11
1
3
37.93%
3.45%
10.34%
26
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
24
12
25
18
15
13
89.66%
82.76%
41.38%
86.21%
62.07%
51.72%
44.38%
Production Support
*Percentages do not total 100%; respondents were allowed to select more than one response. Responses are calculated by dividing the number of responses by respondents.
42
Employee Insurance Coverage
Respondents provided specific information on insurance benefits and coverage for employees. This is another area where major differences were noted between the two target audiences. In terms of insurance benefits, large operations are more readily providing coverage for employees.
Medical Coverage 100.00%
Large Percentage
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Dental Coverage
Vision/Eye Care Coverage
Disability Insurance
Life Insurance
Question Respondents
72.41%
29
82.76%
75.86%
82.76%
51.59%
21.03%
252
21.43%
14.29%
26.19%
Employee Insurance Coverage
Of those offering insurance options, participants were also asked to provide the average percent the employee pays for varying insurance offerings. The table below depicts the breakout by large and small to mid-size producers.
It should be noted that for disability insurance, more than two thirds (66.67%) of large producers covered 100% of the premium and more than one third (39.62%) of small to mid-size producers covered 100% of the premium. For life insurance, approximately 75% of large producer respondents covered 100% of the premium. More than half (54.54%) of small to mid-size respondents covered 100% of the premium. The premium contributions listed below are for those where the premium was not covered 100%.
Medical Coverage 32.48%
Large Percentage Paid
Small to Mid-Size Percentage Paid
Dental Coverage
Vision/Eye Care Coverage
Disability Insurance
Life Insurance
26.19%
59.71%
66.14%
16.25%
33.28%
36.66%
44.44%
46.67%
30.38%
What percentage of the premium does the employee pay for employee only coverage?
43
Respondents extending these benefits to employees’ families were also asked to provide the percentage contribution the employee pays for family coverage.
Similarly, respondents were asked to provide what types of insurance or coverage were provided to employees’ families. Again, this was an area of difference between the two audiences. The table below outlines the percentage of respondents in the large and small to mid-size segments.
Employee Family Members Insurance Coverage
Medical Coverage 100.00%
Large Percentage
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Dental Coverage
Vision/Eye Care Coverage
Question Respondents 29
82.76%
75.86%
35.32%
252
17.86%
12.70%
Employee Family Insurance Coverage
Medical Coverage 48.17%
Large Percentage Paid
Small to Mid-Size Percentage Paid
Dental Coverage
Vision/Eye Care Coverage
66.71%
74.09%
45.22%
51.78%
55.31%
What percentage of the premium does the employee family member pay for coverage?
44
HR MANAGEMENT
45
30 or less 31-35
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 55+
70%
60%
5.56%0.79%
6.90%
21.03%
51.72%
36.11%
31.03%
25.00%
9.13%0.00%
2.38%10.34%
0.00%
Participants were asked to share the average number of hours worked by animal caretakers. The majority of respondents in each audience fell into an average range of 41 to 45 hours each week. This was according to 36.11% of small to mid-size producers and 51.72% of large producers.
Average Number of Hours Worked per Week
What is the average number of hours total an animal caretaker is expected to work each week?
90%
80%
0.00%
1 2
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
3 4 None Flexible;No set schedule
N/A
70%
60%
9.13%
50.79%
17.06%
0.00%
10.34%
0.00%
In addition, participants were then asked to respond to how they scheduled weekend work for employees. A majority of both large and small to mid-size producers stated employees work two weekends per month, which implies they have roughly two weekends off per month as well.
Weekend Work Schedule
How many weekends total do animal caretakers have off each month?
90%
80%
89.66%
0.00%0.00%0.00%
2.38% 2.38%
14.68%
3.57%
Large Producers Small to Mid-Size Producers
Large Producers Small to Mid-Size Producers
46
Participants were asked to provide insight into how employees that worked weekends and holidays were compensated for this service. Respondents within each audience approached pay and weekend work hours for animal caretakers differently.
Structure work hours during the week to limit hours to 40
37
Small to Mid-SizeResponses
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Allow employees to take comp time
Pay overtime
Do not pay overtime
Not applicable
Totals
74
54
48
76
289
14.68%
29.37%
21.43%
19.05%
30.16%
Response
1
LargeResponses
Large Percentage
11
2
8
10
32
3.45%
37.93%
6.90%
27.59%
34.48%
When full-time animal caretakers work weekends or holidays, does your company:
*Percentages do not total 100%; respondents were allowed to select more than one response. Responses are calculated by dividing the number of responses by respondents.
Participants that paid overtime were also asked if they were required to do so by law.
You indicated that you “pay overtime.” Is this required by state law?
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Large Producers Small to Mid-Size Producers
Yes
No
45.45%
43.24%
56.76%54.55%
100%
Overall, large producers reported a higher percentage of workers that identified as Hispanic (36.03%). Small to mid-size producers noted that 20.73% of their workforce identified as Hispanic.
Larger producers also had a larger female workforce (29.31%) as compared to 17.55% reported by the small to mid-size respondents.
Diversity
Annually
Quarterly
Semi-Annually
Never
Other
47
Turnover rates were significantly lower at 20.34% among animal caretakers within small to mid-size producers than the turnover rate for animal caretakers within large producers (35.03%). The turnover rate for farm managers was similar for both audiences. Turnover rates were calculated as an average of reported turnover rates.
Turnover Rate
Turnover Rate by Role
0% 20% 40% 60%
Animal Caretaker
Farm Manager
35.03%
20.34%
9.26%9.12%
82.76% of large producers noted they conduct performance appraisals on an annual basis and 51.19% of small to mid-size producers noted the same.
Performance Appraisals
If performance appraisals are used, how often are they conducted?
Annually
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Large Producers
Small to Mid-Size Producers
Quarterly
Semi-Annually
Never
8.73%
82.76%51.19%
3.45%
26.59%
Other 3.57%
6.90%
9.92%
6.90%
0.00%
100%
Large Producers
Small to Mid-Size Producers
48
Motivation Tactics
One of the biggest challenges for an employer of any size is keeping their employees motivated. Participants were asked how they motivated employees to keep them productive and challenged by their roles. Organizations of both audiences used a variety of strategies. Though bonuses were the most commonly reported motivator amongst both groups, small to mid-size producers also offered flexible hours to motivate staff, while large producers leveraged the use of promotions to motivate employees.
How do you motivate employees to keep them productive and challenged by their role?
Remuneration
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Succession Planning
Bonus
Promotion
54.76%
13.79%
11.90%
79.31%
19.44%
Flexible Hours52.38%
Recognition Programs
41.38%
12.30%
82.76%
17.24%
62.07%
16.27%
Training & Development 79.31%
34.52%
Other5.95%
3.45%
100%
Large Producers Small to Mid-Size Producers
*Percentages do not total 100%; respondents were allowed to select more than one response. Responses are calculated by dividing the number of responses by respondents.
49
RECRUITMENT
50
Internet job boards (e.g. AgCareers.com)
International talent
Social media (e.g. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn)
Other
79.31%
44.83%
10.34%
6.90%
15.48%
15.08%
1.59%
8.33%
Military veterans 17.24% 2.38%
Help wanted ads
Word of mouth
Family
Referrals
31.03%
24.14%
58.62%
68.97%
23.41%
37.70%
63.10%
48.81%
Recruiting Methods - Manager
To benchmark successful recruitment practices, participants were asked to provide the most frequently utilized options for recruiting managers. Most large producers looked to internet job boards (79.31%), and referrals (68.97%) to fill manager positions, while most small to mid-size producers turned to word of mouth (63.10%), and referrals (48.81%).
College / University placement services 55.17%
Large Percentage
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Vocational / Technical school placement
Professional placement services
College / University career days
Vocational / Technical career days
High school recruitment
Help wanted ads (magazine and newspaper)
51.72%
13.79%
24.14%
41.38%
27.59%
44.83%
11.90%
6.75%
8.73%
7.94%
4.76%
6.35%
23.81%
Please select the most frequently utilized options for recruiting a manager.
*Percentages do not total 100%; respondents were allowed to select more than one response. Responses are calculated by dividing the number of responses by respondents.
51
Internet job boards (e.g. AgCareers.com)
International talent
Social media (e.g. Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn)
Other
58.62%
55.17%
10.34%
3.45%
9.92%
15.87%
1.59%
2.78%
Military veterans 13.79% 1.98%
Help wanted ads
Word of mouth
Family
Referrals
68.97%
55.17%
86.21%
93.10%
33.73%
41.27%
72.22%
51.98%
Recruiting Methods - Animal Caretaker
Similarly, participants were asked about recruitment tactics for animal caretakers. Word of mouth and referrals were noted as top methods for recruiting an animal caretaker among both large and small to mid-size producers.
College / University placement services 17.24%
Large Percentage
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Vocational / Technical school placement
Professional placement services
College / University career days
Vocational / Technical career days
High school recruitment
Help wanted ads (magazine and newspaper)
31.03%
48.28%
13.79%
10.34%
44.83%
79.31%
5.16%
5.56%
15.48%
5.95%
2.38%
5.16%
25.00%
Please select the most frequently utilized options for recruiting an animal caretaker.
*Percentages do not total 100%; respondents were allowed to select more than one response. Responses are calculated by dividing the number of responses by respondents.
52
Inevitably, there are positions that can be difficult to fill. Participants were asked to provide a list of those positions most challenging to fill including various production and support roles. Both large and small to mid-size producers reported that production workers and production managers were the most difficult roles to recruit for. In addition, 31.75% of small to mid-size producers reported that no role was too difficult to recruit.
Difficult-to-Fill Positions
What roles do you find difficult to recruit for?
None
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Production Workers
Production Managers21.83%
6.90%
31.75%
79.31%
52.38%
58.62%
100%
*Percentages do not total 100%; respondents were allowed to select more than one response. Responses are calculated by dividing the number of responses by respondents.
Large Producers Small to Mid-Size Producers
53
The clear majority of small to mid-size producers noted they are not recruiting internationally (91.27%) and over half of large producers noted the same (58.62%). Of those that are, large producers varied in the types of visas utilized while small to mid-size producers utilized the Permanent Resident (Green Card) most predominantly.
International Recruitment
*Percentages do not total 100%; respondents were allowed to select more than one response. Responses are calculated by dividing the number of responses by respondents.
J1 H1B
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
H2-A TN Permanent Resident(Green Card)
Not RecruitingInternationally
70%
60%
1.19%0.79%
13.79%
31.03%
2.38%
58.62%
5.95%
20.69%
13.79%
If recruiting internationally, which types of visas are you using for initial entry?
90%
80%
100%
20.69%
1.19%
91.27%
Large Producers Small to Mid-Size Producers
54
PART-TIME STAFF
55
Many pork production operations employ part-time staff. Survey participants were asked to share how many part-time staff they currently employ. Small to mid-size producers were more likely to have no part-time employees (38.89%), and nearly 50% had less than five. Large producers were split on the number of part-time employees employed likely due to the size and nature of each operation.
How many part-time animal caretakers does your organization employ?
5 to 10
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
None
Less than 5
10 to 20
49.60%
17.24%
8.33%
13.79%
1.59%
20 to 300.79%
30+
13.79%
38.89%
31.03%
3.45%
20.69%
0.79%
100%
Large Producers Small to Mid-Size Producers
56
What is the average number of hours a part-time animal caretaker employee works each week in your company/operation?
15-20 hours
0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
10 hours or less
10-15 hours
20-25 hours
32.00%
26.62%
36.00%
16.88%
25-29 hours12.34%
Not Applicable
8.00%
27.27%
12.00%
8.00%
4.00%
0.00%
100%
Large Producers Small to Mid-Size Producers
Respondents that employed part-time animal caretakers were asked the average number of hours worked. Large producers noted 20 to 25 hours (36%). Responses were slightly lower at 15 to 20 hours (26.62%) for small to mid-size participants.
16.88%
57
$12.01 - $13.00
$13.01 - $14.00
$14.01 - $15.00
$15.00+
24.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
10.39%
7.14%
5.84%
3.25%
Less than $6.00 0.00%
Large Percentage
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
$6.01 - $7.00
$7.01 - $8.00
$8.01 - $9.00
$9.01 - $10.00
$10.01 - $11.00
$11.01 - $12.00
8.00%
32.00%
0.00%
0.00%
16.00%
20.00%
1.30%
12.99%
22.73%
0.00%
0.65%
18.18%
17.53%
Which of the following is closest to the hourly wage paid to part-time animal caretaker employees?
For producers that employ part-time animal caretakers, the most common pay range for both small to mid-size and large producers was $10.01-$11.00.
Totals 100.00% 100.00%
58
WORKER SAFETY
59
Regular workplace safety training
Dust mask
Ear protection
Eye protection
88.89%
92.59%
85.19%
92.59%
44.14%
90.09%
90.99%
71.62%
Written worker safety program 88.89%
Large Percentage
Small to Mid-Size Percentage
Written emergency action plan for fire and extreme weather
Safety policy manual
Records of accidents and injuries
Records of days away from work, transfer to light duty, or transfers due to injuries
Regular safety program audits
Regular facilities safety audits
96.30%
59.26%
92.59%
81.48%
77.78%
74.07%
46.40%
45.05%
25.68%
58.56%
40.99%
32.88%
31.08%
Please indicate which of the following are used in your operation to improve worker safety.
Participants were asked to share which safety practices they currently utilize within their operations. Vital components such as ear and eye protection are common safety mechanisms for both large and small to mid-size producers.
Protective footwear 74.07% 64.86%
*Percentages do not total 100%; respondents were allowed to select more than one response. Responses are calculated by dividing the number of responses by respondents.
For more information, please contact the National Pork Board at 1-800-456-7675
or visit www.pork.org
Contributing Partner: AgCareers.com is the leading online job board and human resource services provider for agriculture and food. Providing global
talent solutions in agriculture and food remains our mission. Additional human resource products and services include an
agribusiness salary survey, the Compensation BenChmark review™.
© 2017 Pork Board, Des Moines, IA, USA. This message funded by America’s Pork Producers and the Pork Checkoff.