electronic contracts
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Electronic ContractingElectronic Contracting
Electronic Commerce Law
2006
2
OutlineOutline
1. Online contracts
2. Legal requirements
3. Terms
4. Formation
5. Governing law
Online contractsOnline contracts
4
What can I contract to buy online?What can I contract to buy online?
5
How do I make an online contract?How do I make an online contract?
6
Who can I make an online contract with?Who can I make an online contract with?
ANYONE, ANYWHERE!
7
How do I enforce an online contract?How do I enforce an online contract?
Does the contract satisfy all legal requirements?
What are the terms of the contract?
When was the contract formed?
What is the governing law of the contract?
Legal requirementsLegal requirements
Online contracts
9
Legal requirementsLegal requirements
Common law elements
Electronic Transactions Acts
Form and signature
10
Common law elementsCommon law elements
The elements of a contract at common lawOffer and acceptance
An intention to create legal relations
Consideration, i.e. a price paid for a promise
Capacity to contract, e.g. age, mental capacity
Consent, i.e. lack of misrepresentation, duress, undue influence, mistake, etc
Legality
11
Common law elementsCommon law elements
Generally, contracts do not need to be in writing, or even verbal
Property Law Act 1974 (Qld)10 (1) No assurance of land shall be valid to pass an interest at law unless made by deed or in writing signed by the person making such assurance.
Insurance contracts
IP assignments
12
Electronic Transactions ActsElectronic Transactions Acts
The Acts seek to remove legal impediments to the use of electronic documents and digital signatures
They are based on the UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce
13
ETAs - CommencementETAs - Commencement
Thai – April 2002
Aust, 1st stage - 24 March 2000 – 2nd stage 1 July 2001
Vic - 1 September 2000
Tas - 1 June 2001
NT - 13 June 2001
ACT - 1 July 2001
NSW - 7 December 2001
Qld - 1 November 2002
SA - 7 December 2002
WA - 2 May 2003
14
Electronic Transactions ActsElectronic Transactions Acts
Two key principles:
FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENCE
As far as possible, paper based commerce and electronic commerce should be treated equally by the law..
TECHNOLOGY NEUTRALITY
The law should not discriminate between different forms of technology..
15
UNCITRALUNCITRAL
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL)
Model Law for consumer protection in an electronic environment
Purpose to remove legal obstacles to e-commerce and to create a more secure legal environment
16
Model Law on Electronic CommerceModel Law on Electronic Commerce
http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/electcom/05-http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/texts/electcom/05-89450_Ebook.pdf89450_Ebook.pdf
Aim - to provide national legislatures with a templateAim - to provide national legislatures with a template
Facilitates - use of electronic communication and Facilitates - use of electronic communication and storage of information (electronic data interchange storage of information (electronic data interchange and electronic mail)and electronic mail)
Gaining international acceptanceGaining international acceptance
17
Model Law on Electronic CommerceModel Law on Electronic Commerce
Singapore, Illinois, Columbia, Australia, Canada, Singapore, Illinois, Columbia, Australia, Canada, United States, New Zealand, ThailandUnited States, New Zealand, Thailand
18
www.uncitral.org/english/texts/electcom/m-ec.htmwww.uncitral.org/english/texts/electcom/m-ec.htm
6 Requirement of Writing
7 Signature
8 Original Copy
9 Admissibility and evidential weight of data messages
10 Retention of data messages
11Formation and validity of contracts
12 Recognition by parties of data messages
13 Attribution of data messages
14 Acknowledgement of receipt
15 Time and place of dispatch and receipt of data messages
19
UNUN
General Assembly recommended:
all States give favourable consideration to the Model Law
all efforts be made to ensure that the Model Law, together with the Guide, become generally known and available
20
PurposePurpose
Set of internationally acceptable rules as to how a number of such legal obstacles may be removed
For individual users for contractual solutions
UNCITRAL’s response to countries existing legislation which was inadequate or outdated In certain cases, existing legislation imposes restrictions on modern means of communication - prescribing "written", "signed" or "original" documents.
21
ObjectsObjects
Enabling or facilitating the use of electronic commerce
Provide equal treatment for fostering economy and efficiency in international trade
Provide media-neutral environment
22
Electronic Transactions ActsElectronic Transactions Acts
Validity of transactions:
For purpose of complying with a law, a transaction will not be invalid simply because it is made wholly or partly by an electronic communication (unless regulations provide otherwise)
23
Electronic Transactions ActsElectronic Transactions Acts
The following legal requirements can now be met in electronic form:
a requirement to give information in writing
a requirement to provide a signature
a requirement to produce a documents
a requirement to record information
a requirement to retain a document
24
Electronic Transactions ActsElectronic Transactions Acts
Provided that:it must be readily accessible for subsequent reference (i.e. recipient must be able to decipher it)
USA, Australia, NZ, Ireland - the recipient consents to the information or document being provided electronically
25
Consent ProvisionConsent Provision
Explanatory Memorandum
“This provision is based on the Government's general policy that a person should not be compelled to use an electronic communication to conduct a transaction in order to satisfy requirements or permissions to give information in writing under Commonwealth law.”
26
Time and place of dispatch and receipt of Time and place of dispatch and receipt of electronic communicationselectronic communications
Section 14
Postal Acceptance RuleAdams v Lindsell (1818) 1 B & Ald 681, 106 ER 250.
27
AttributionAttribution
UNCITRAL and Thailand
Compare to Australia
28
Writing and signatureWriting and signature
When is writing and signature legally obligatory?Real property transactions
Wills
Cheques
Insurance contracts
Consumer credit transactions
29
Writing and SignatureWriting and Signature
What is writing?
The apocryphal cow.
30
Writing and signatureWriting and signature
Why is some form of writing or signature often desirable?
To ensure the availability of reliable evidence that the party intended to proceed with the transaction
To encourage deliberation and reflection and to emphasise that the transaction may have significant legal consequences
To authenticate the identity of the other party
31
Writing and signatureWriting and signature
How do you ‘sign’ an online contract?
What is electronic writing?
32
Writing and signatureWriting and signature
Electronic Transactions Acts:
Writing see ss 9-13 (Qld)
Signature see ss 14-15 (Qld)
33
Electronic agentsElectronic agents
It is possible for users of a computer to instruct the computer to carry out transactions automatically. Eg., electronic agents may be used by a person:
to initiate or respond on their behalf to electronic messages without review by the personas an online shopping agent programmed to surf the internet and make purchasesas an inventory control system programmed to place orders when stocks reach a particular level
Although the legal status of electronic agents is still uncertain, the better view is that a computer tool programmed by or with a person’s authority to implement their intention can make and accept contractual offers on their behalf
TermsTerms
Online contracts
35
Terms of the contractTerms of the contract
The terms of a contract may be expressed in writing or orally, implied by conduct or by custom, or be a combination of these things
Subject to certain important exceptions (eg. consumer protection laws) parties are generally free to set whatever terms they like
The commercial reality is that the terms of the contract are usually set by the seller
36
Terms of the contractTerms of the contract
Clearly expressed terms are important because:The risk that terms will be implied into the contract by a court is reduced
The parties will usually be deemed to have read the contract and accepted the written terms, making it difficult for either party to deny the existence of the written contract
When properly drafted, the parties should know with certainty their respective obligations
37
Common terms – Online transactionsCommon terms – Online transactions
The names of the parties
The subject matter of the transaction, including a clear description of the goods or services to be supplied
Price, delivery and payment terms
Warranties, liability, insurance, intellectual property and dispute resolution
38
Common terms – Online transactionsCommon terms – Online transactions
How orders are to be placed and accepted including use of electronic agents
Record keeping, audit trails and evidence
Security, format and authentication of messages
When and where messages are sent and received
Responsibility for lost, incomplete or garbled messages
The law governing the transaction
39
Common terms - WebsitesCommon terms - Websites
Disclaimers
40
Incorporation of termsIncorporation of terms
Terms are incorporated into a contract by:Signature
Reasonable notice
Course of dealing
41
Shrinkwrap ContractsShrinkwrap Contracts
42
Shrinkwrap ContractsShrinkwrap Contracts
Step-Saver Data Sys Inc v Wyse Tech 939 F 2d 91 (1991)
ProCD Inc v Zeidenberg 86 F 3d 1447 (7th Cir 1996)
43
Incorporation of termsIncorporation of terms
Is click-wrap reasonable notice?
44
Incorporation of termsIncorporation of terms
CASE: Hotmail Corporation v Van$ Money Pie Inc (1998)
45
Steven J Caspi v Microsoft (NJ App Div 1999)
46
BrowswrapBrowswrap
Specht v. Netscape (SDNY 2001)
Ticketmaster Corp v Tickets.com Inc (Wash 1999)
Net2 Phone Inc v Los Angeles Superior Court (Cal CA 2002)
Thorton v Shoe Lane Parking Station Ltd [1971]
47
Incorporation of termsIncorporation of terms
CASE: Specht v. Netscape (2001)
Please review and agree to the terms of the Netscape SmartDownload software license agreement before
downloading and using the software.
Unless otherwise agreed in writing, all disputes relating to this Agreement … shall be subject to final
and binding arbitration in Santa Clara County, California, under the auspices of JAMS/EndDispute, with the losing party paying all costs of arbitration.
48
Incorporation of termsIncorporation of terms
CASE: Specht v. Netscape (2001)
‘Promises become binding when there is a meeting of the minds and consideration is exchanged. So it was at King’s Bench in common
law England; so it was under the common law in the American colonies; so it was through more than two centuries of jurisprudence
in this country; and so it is today. Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer mouse transmitted
across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even wilful inaction, as long as it is
unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract.’
49
Incorporation of termsIncorporation of terms
CASE: Specht v. Netscape (2001)
‘Where click-wrap license agreements and the shrink-wrap agreement at issue in ProCD require users to perform an affirmative action
unambiguously expressing assent before they may use the software, that affirmative action is equivalent to an express declaration stating,
‘I assent to the terms and conditions of the license agreement’ or something similar. For example, Netscape’s Navigator will not function without a prior clicking of a box constituting assent.
Netscape’s SmartDownload, in contrast, allows a user to download and use the software without taking any action that plainly manifests
assent to the terms of the associated license or indicates an understanding that a contract is being formed.’
Governing lawGoverning law
Online contracts
51
What is the governing law (proper law) of What is the governing law (proper law) of the contract?the contract?
In the absence of agreement to the contrary, the governing law is the law where the contract was formed
Webpage - invitation to treat or offer
If the buyer makes the offer online and the seller communicates acceptance of that offer to the buyer through the website, the contract is formed in the jurisdiction of the buyer
52
Jurisdiction clausesJurisdiction clauses
If a jurisdiction clause is effectively incorporated into the terms and conditions of the contract of sale, this may alter the outcome
NB. In certain circumstances a court may override the effect of a jurisdiction clause
53
Jurisdiction clausesJurisdiction clauses
Amazon: www.amazon.com
“By visiting Amazon.com, you agree that the laws of the state of Washington, without regard to principles of conflict of laws, will govern these Conditions of Use and any dispute of any sort that might arise between you and Amazon.com or its affiliates.”
54
Telstra Big Pond: www.bigpond.com
16.1 This agreement is governed by the law in force in the State of New South Wales, Australia, and the parties irrevocably submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of New South Wales, Australia and courts of appeal from them for determining any dispute concerning this agreement.
55
HotmailHotmail
If this Agreement is with Microsoft Corporation, claims for enforcement, breach or violation of duties or rights under this Agreement will be adjudicated under the laws of the State of Washington, without reference to conflict of laws principles. If this Agreement is with a Microsoft affiliate, claims for enforcement, breach or violation of duties or rights under this Agreement will be adjudicated under the laws of the place of incorporation for such Microsoft affiliate, without reference to conflict of laws principles. All other claims, including, without limitation, claims under or for violation of consumer protection laws, unfair competition laws, and in tort, will be adjudicated under the laws of your state of residence in the United States, or, if you reside outside the United States, under the laws of the country to which the subject MSN Web Sites are directed. If this Agreement is with Microsoft Corporation, you hereby irrevocably consent to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of state or federal courts in King County, Washington, USA in all disputes arising out of or relating to the use of the MSN Web Sites. If this Agreement is with a Microsoft affiliate, you hereby consent to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the courts located in the place of incorporation for such Microsoft affiliate in all disputes arising out of or relating to the use of the MSN Web Sites.
Online contractsOnline contracts
Electronic Commerce Law