electronic contracts presentation

56
1 ELECTRONIC CONTRACTS 6 th Edition Negotiating and Drafting Major Business Agreements November 5, 2007 Toronto, Ontario Richard F.D. Corley 21634300

Upload: zzaieyinuddin

Post on 24-Oct-2014

57 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Electronic Contracts Presentation

1

ELECTRONIC CONTRACTS

6th EditionNegotiating and

Drafting Major Business AgreementsNovember 5, 2007Toronto, Ontario

Richard F.D. Corley

21634300

Page 2: Electronic Contracts Presentation

2

Overview

• The Law Governing Electronic Contracting:– Legislation– Case Law

• Practical Suggestions for Creating Enforceable Electronic Contracts

Page 3: Electronic Contracts Presentation

3

Elements of E-Contract Formation

• Offer/Acceptance (a.k.a. Enforceability)• Time and Location of Formation• Electronic Signatures• Legal requirements for written documents

Page 4: Electronic Contracts Presentation

4

An Equal Playing Field –Electronic Commerce Acts

• Common law continues to apply supplemented by Electronic Commerce Acts

• All of the provinces, two territories, and the federal government have enacted legislation regarding electronic commerce and contracting.

• But for Québec, these statutes are substantially similar and are based on the Uniform Electronic Commerce Act(“UECA”) which was adopted by the Uniform Law Conference of Canada as of September 30, 1999.

• The UECA is influenced by the United Nations Model Law on Electronic Commerce adopted by the United Nations Commission On International Trade Law.

Page 5: Electronic Contracts Presentation

5

Main Principles of UECA Based Acts

• Functional Equivalence: Establishing rules for electronic information and documents to satisfy legal requirements such as those for written documents, signatures and the provision or retention of originals of documents.

• Electronic Communications and Contracting:Establishing rules for the formation and operation of electronic contracts (e.g., time and place of sending and receiving) and the use or involvement of electronic agents.

• Public Bodies: Establishing rules by which government bodies and organizations may communicate and transact with the public.

Page 6: Electronic Contracts Presentation

6

Ontario’s Electronic Commerce Act

• Ontario’s Electronic Commerce Act, 2000 (the “Ontario ECA”) is typical of the provincial/territorial UECA legislation, but there are a number of variations in the e-commerce laws enacted across the country.

• It is important to carefully review the applicable legislation in the jurisdiction of interest.

Page 7: Electronic Contracts Presentation

7

Application: Ontario ECA• The Ontario ECA applies generally to all legal

relationships governed by Ontario law.• The Ontario ECA applies to all legal documents

except for specific identified documents such as:– Wills and codicils– Trusts created by wills and codicils– Powers of attorney in respect of financial affairs or personal care– Documents that transfer interests in land– Negotiable instruments

Page 8: Electronic Contracts Presentation

8

Consent and Contracting Out: Ontario ECA

• Important principle: Section 3 states that nothing in the Ontario ECA requires a person to use electronic means without that person’s consent.

• However, consent can be inferred from a person’s conduct where there are reasonable grounds to believe it is genuine and relevant.

• The ability to contract out of the provisions regarding electronic transactions and electronic agents.

Page 9: Electronic Contracts Presentation

9

Enforceability• A major issue in online or electronic contracting is

the method or arrangement used to enter into an agreement.

• General categories of contract formation in an electronic world:– Shrink-Wrap;– Click-Wrap; and– Browse-Wrap.

Page 10: Electronic Contracts Presentation

10

Enforceability: Ontario ECA• “An offer, the acceptance of an offer, or any other

matter that is material to the formation or operation of a contract may be expressed,

(a) by means of electronic information or an electronicdocument; or

(b) by an act that is intended to result in electroniccommunication, such as,(i) touching or clicking on an appropriate icon or

other place on a computer screen, or(ii) speaking.” (Section 19).

Page 11: Electronic Contracts Presentation

11

Enforceability: Ontario ECA

• Section 20 of the Ontario ECA: A contract may be formed by the interaction of an electronic agent and an individual or by the interaction of electronic agents.

Page 12: Electronic Contracts Presentation

12

Enforceability: Shrink-Wrap

• Theories underlying the enforceability of electronic contracts are based on the physical (i.e., in a box or package) sale of software pursuant to “shrink-wrap”printed license conditions.

• Cases in the Canada and the U.S. have generally held that such licences are enforceable where the customer (or licensee) is given proper notice of the terms and those terms are not unconscionable.

Page 13: Electronic Contracts Presentation

13

Enforceability: Click-Wrap

• Click-Wrap licences are those where the terms are displayed on the screen for the user to accept before the software or web-site can be installed or used.

• In Rudder v. Microsoft (1999), 2 C.P.R. (4th) 474, the plaintiffs were presented with a Member Agreement upon loading the software from disk onto their computers and again when going online to access the MSN website.

Page 14: Electronic Contracts Presentation

14

Enforceability: Click-Wrap

• Rudder, continued…• Both presentations of the Member Agreement allowed the

terms to be viewed by scrolling through the text and required the user to click on an “I Agree” button before proceeding.

• The Ontario court enforced the choice of law and forum selection clause (requiring that claims be brought in Washington) in the Member Agreement.

• Rudder has been followed recently by the Quebec Superior Court in Rogers Media Inc. v. Machesseault, [2006] J.Q. no 13107.

Page 15: Electronic Contracts Presentation

15

Enforceability: Browse-Wrap

• The enforceability of terms and conditions that are posted on a website (and accessible by hyperlink but not “clicked-through”) was previously the subject of inconsistent Court decisions but has recently been affirmed, in certain circumstances, by the Supreme Court of Canada

Page 16: Electronic Contracts Presentation

16

Enforceability: Browse-Wrap

• In the “brokerage cases”, Zhu v. Merrill Lynch HSB, 2002 BCPC 535 (B.C.S.C.) and Robet v. Versus Brokerage Services Inc, [2001] O.J. No. 1341, the Superior Courts of B.C. and Ontario refused to enforce legal disclaimers (that virtually eliminated liability for errors) contained in terms of use accessible through various links on defendant’s website.

Page 17: Electronic Contracts Presentation

17

Enforceability: Browse-Wrap• A series of Quebec cases had created confusion as to

the enforceability of browse-wrap agreements• In Canadian Real Estate Association v. Sutton, [2003]

J.Q. no. 3606, the Quebec Superior Court suggested that a link to terms of use may be binding on a user of the site.

• In Aspencer1.com v. Paysystems Corporation, [2005] J.Q. no 1573, the Court of Quebec held that the addition of an exclusive arbitration clause was not enforceable for lack of consent. The defendant had posted notice of the amendment on the opening screen of its site.

Page 18: Electronic Contracts Presentation

18

Enforceability: Browse-Wrap

• In Dell Computer Corporation v. Union des consommateurs, 2007 SCC 34 the SCC overturned the decisions of the Quebec Court of Appeal and the trial judge found that an arbitration clause included in hyperlinked terms and conditions was enforceable because it was accessible through a link to Dell’s terms of sale at the bottom of each screen.

Page 19: Electronic Contracts Presentation

19

Enforceability: Dell Computer• The Dell case dealt with a class action brought by

consumers in Quebec who had ordered handheld computers on the Dell web site at prices which were displayed in error on the order page. (The order pages on Dell’s English-language Web site indicated prices of $89 rather than $379 and of $118 rather than $549 for two models of Axim handheld computers.) Once it learned of the errors, Dell blocked access, through the usual address, to the erroneous order pages. The plaintiff Dumoulin circumvented the measures taken by Dell, used a deep link that to access the order pages, and ordered a computer at the lower price.

Page 20: Electronic Contracts Presentation

20

Enforceability: Dell Computer• Dell then posted a price correction notice and also

announced that it would not process orders for computers at the prices of $89 and $118. The Union des consommateurs and Dumoulin filed a motion for authorization to institute a class action against Dell. Dell applied for referral of D’s claim to arbitration pursuant to an arbitration clause contained in the terms and conditions of sale, and dismissal of the motion for authorization to institute a class action. The Superior Court and the Court of Appeal held, for different reasons, that the arbitration clause could not be enforced against Dumoulin.

Page 21: Electronic Contracts Presentation

21

Enforceability: Dell Computer• In Dell the Supreme Court held that arbitration clause in issue, which could

be accessed by means of a hyperlink in a contract entered into via the Internet, was not an external clause within the meaning of art. 1435 C.C.Q. and was valid. Analogously to paper documents, some Web documents contain several pages that can be accessed only by means of hyperlinks, whereas others can be viewed by scrolling down them on the computer’s screen. The traditional test of physical separation, which is applied to determine whether contractual stipulations in paper documents are external, cannot be transposed without qualification to the context of electronic commerce. To determine whether clauses on the Internet are external clauses, therefore, it is necessary to consider the precondition of accessibility. A clause that requires operations of such complexity that its text is not reasonably accessible cannot be regarded as an integral part of the contract. Likewise, a clause contained in a document on the Internet to which a contract on the Internet refers, but for which no hyperlink is provided, will be an external clause.

Page 22: Electronic Contracts Presentation

22

Enforceability: Dell Computer• It is clear from the interpretation of art. 1435 C.C.Q. and from the

principle of functional equivalence that underlies the Act to establish a legal framework for information technology that access to the clause in electronic format must be no more difficult than access to its equivalent on paper. In the instant case, the evidence shows that the consumer could access the page of Dell’s Web site containing the arbitration clause directly by clicking on the highlighted hyperlink entitled “Terms and Conditions of Sale”. This link reappeared on every page the consumer accessed. When the consumer clicked on the link, a page containing the terms and conditions of sale, including the arbitration clause, appeared on the screen. From this point of view, the clause was no more difficult for the consumer to access than would have been the case had he or she been given a paper copy of the entire contract on which the terms and conditions of sale appeared on the back of the first page.

Page 23: Electronic Contracts Presentation

23

Amendments to Electronic Contracts

• In Kanitz v. Rogers Cable Inc., [2002] O.J. No. 665, the court considered a provision in a user agreement (signed in writing by the users) that allowed Rogers to amend the user agreement by posting notices of such amendment on the Rogers’website, or sending notice via e-mail or postal mail. The continued use of the service following notice of such change deemed the user to have agreed to the amendment.

Page 24: Electronic Contracts Presentation

24

Amendments to Electronic Contracts

• Kanitz, continued...• The court found that posting a revised user

agreement on the website and noting on the main page of Rogers’ Customer Support Site in the “News and Highlights” section that the agreement had been amended constituted reasonable notice under the user agreement.

• The court noted that the terms of the user agreement placed an obligation on the user to check the website from time to time to determine if amendments had been made.

Page 25: Electronic Contracts Presentation

25

Amendments to Electronic Contracts

• Kanitz, continued...• The court also noted that persons who wish to avail

themselves of an electronic environment should have their relationship with an entity in such environment defined in relation to that environment.

• Despite Kanitz, query whether onerous terms, including power to amend contract unilaterally and practical effect of arbitration clause, may give rise to unconscionability concerns.

Page 26: Electronic Contracts Presentation

26

When and Where of Contract Formation: Ontario ECA

• Section 22(3): Creates a presumption that where an addressee has designated or uses an information system designed to receive the type of information or document sent, the information is received when it enters that information system and becomes capable of being retrieved or processed; where no such system has been designated or is used as such, the information is presumed to be received when it becomes capable of being retrieved and processed.

Page 27: Electronic Contracts Presentation

27

When and Where of Contract Formation: Ontario ECA

• Section 22(4) and (6): Electronic information or documents are deemed to be received at the addressee’s place of business:– If the addressee has more than one place of

business, it is deemed to be the location of the one with the closest relationship to the underlying transaction or, if there is no such transaction, the person’s principal place of business

– If the addressee does not have a place of business, the place of business is deemed to be that person’s habitual residence.

Page 28: Electronic Contracts Presentation

28

When and Where of Contract Formation: Common Law

• Ontario Court of Appeal has applied the “instantaneous communications” rule to contracts completed via facsimile (Eastern Power Ltd. v. Azienda Comunale Energia & Ambiente (1999), 178 D.L.R. (4th) 409).

• Instantaneous communications rule states that acceptance is communicated (and thus the contract is formed) when and where the offeror receives notice of the acceptance.

Page 29: Electronic Contracts Presentation

29

Example

• B.C. company advertises goods on a website that can be purchased by filling out an online purchase form.

• Purchaser is in Ontario.• The location of the contract is in B.C., and it is formed

when the B.C. company’s website server receives the request and makes it available to be processed by someone at the company.

• What if the B.C. company has an office in Ontario that ships the product to the purchaser? Is the contract now made in Ontario?

• Important Note: The parties can specify the location of the contract in the contract itself.

Page 30: Electronic Contracts Presentation

30

Signature Requirements

• No general requirement in contract law that an agreement be signed in order to be enforceable.

• However, three major reasons why agreements are signed:– Specific legislative or common law requirements– Evidence of assent to the terms and conditions of an

agreement– Form of identity that ensures the parties know who

they are contracting with

Page 31: Electronic Contracts Presentation

31

Signature Requirements

• Electronic world presents new proxies for a written signature, e.g.,:– Sending an e-mail to the other party;– Clicking on an “I Agree” button or check box;– Digital signatures using encryption and

certification authorities.

Page 32: Electronic Contracts Presentation

32

Signature Requirements:Ontario ECA

• Section 11: “a legal requirement that a document be signed is satisfied by an electronic signature”.

• “electronic signature” means electronic information that a person creates or adopts in order to sign a document that is in, attached to, or associated with the document.

Page 33: Electronic Contracts Presentation

33

Signature Requirements:Common Law

• A facsimile of a signature or another representation of a person’s name can be accepted as a signature if there is evidence to prove that it is the customary way of identification of the person (Milliken & Co. v. Interface Flooring Systems (Canada) Inc. [1998] 3 F.C. 103 (F.C.T.D.), affirmed (2000) 5 C.P.R. (4th) 209 (F.C.A.)).

Page 34: Electronic Contracts Presentation

34

Formal Requirements:Ontario ECA

• Many statutes have express requirements that certain agreements or documents be in writing (e.g., the Ontario Statute of Frauds).

• Important that the Ontario ECA be read in conjunction with all other relevant legislation.

• Section 5: A legal requirement that a document be in writing is satisfied where the electronic document is “accessible so as to be usable for subsequent reference”.

Page 35: Electronic Contracts Presentation

35

Formal Requirements:Ontario ECA

• Section 6: A legal requirement that someone provide a document in writing is satisfied where it is(a) accessible so as to be usable for subsequent Ontario ECA

reference; and

(b) capable of being retained.

• The Ontario ECA contains other rules for the provision of documents in specified non-electronic form and the provision, retention or examination of original documents.

Page 36: Electronic Contracts Presentation

36

Formal Requirements:Ontario ECA

• Section 9: A document is not “capable of being retained” where the person providing it prevents or hinders its printing or storage.

• Section 10: Electronic information is not provided if it is merely made available for access by the person, e.g., on a website.

• However, sending electronic information by e-mail or displaying it to the person in the course of a transaction that is being conducted electronically are examples of actions that constitute providing such information (Section 10).

Page 37: Electronic Contracts Presentation

37

Other Applicable Legislation

• Consumer Protection Legislation• Competition Act• Privacy Legislation

Page 38: Electronic Contracts Presentation

38

Consumer Protection Legislation

• Most provinces and territories have general application consumer protection legislation.

• In 2001, federal, provincial and territorial ministers endorsed the Internet Sales Harmonization Template(the “Template”) which provides for a harmonized set of rules for consumer protection across the country covering topics such as contract formation, disclosure requirements and cancellation rights and credit card charge-backs

• Template has been adopted in several Canadian provinces

Page 39: Electronic Contracts Presentation

39

Ontario Consumer Protection Act

• The Template was adopted in Ontario as part of the Consumer Protection Act, 2002(the “CPA”)

• The CPA applies to all consumer transactions where, the consumer orthe person with whom the consumer is engaging in the transaction is located in Ontario

Page 40: Electronic Contracts Presentation

40

Ontario Consumer Protection Act

• Some highlights of the rights granted to consumers:– Suppliers are deemed to warrant that services

are of a reasonably acceptable quality– Can’t contract out of the implied warranties

and conditions under the Sale of Goods Act or any deemed condition or warranty under the CPA

Page 41: Electronic Contracts Presentation

41

Ontario Consumer Protection Act

• CPA does not limit any right or remedy that a consumer may have in law

• Substantive and procedural rights given under the CPA apply despite any agreement or waiver to the contrary

• Class proceedings permitted despite agreement to the contrary

• And many other specific consumer rights….

Page 42: Electronic Contracts Presentation

42

Ontario Consumer Protection Act

• Rigorous requirements for specific classes of agreements:– direct agreements– future performance agreements– time share agreements– personal development services agreements– Internet agreements– remote agreements

Page 43: Electronic Contracts Presentation

43

Ontario Consumer Protection Act

• Generally, each type of agreement has: – minimum potential payment obligation– disclosure requirements– delivery requirements– cancellation rights

Page 44: Electronic Contracts Presentation

44

Competition Bureau Guidelines• “Information Bulletin: Application of the Competition

Act to Representations on the Internet”, February 18, 2003.– Clarifies Bureau's position that misleading representation and

deceptive marketing provisions in the Competition Act, Consumer Packaging and Labeling Act applies to the online context - commercial websites, marketing e-mails, communications in chat rooms, newsgroups and message boards.

– “General impression” of a representation: evaluated in the context of the medium used. Businesses should not assume that consumers read an entire website, just as they do not read every word on a printed page.

Page 45: Electronic Contracts Presentation

45

Competition Bureau Guidelines• As in the offline world, disclaimers can clarify or

add information, but cannot contradict the main representation. Disclaimers should be presented clearly and conspicuously, and the following factors should be taken into account:– Disclaimers should be on the same screen and close to

the representation, although this is not always possible.– Hyperlinks may be used, but may not be sufficient where

the information is critical and the disclaimer is on a separate linked page. Hyperlinks to disclaimers should be clearly labelled.

Page 46: Electronic Contracts Presentation

46

Competition Bureau Guidelines- When using attention-grabbing graphics, sounds or images,

these should not distract attention from a disclaimer;- Attention should be given to font size and colour; disclaimer

should not be buried or hidden;- Disclaimers should be displayed for sufficient time to be read

and understood, and may need to be printable;- Consider how consumers navigate through a website and

whether multiple disclaimers or links are required.• Where there are specific disclosure requirements,

consumers should not have to take an active step (e.g., send an e-mail) to get the required information, although a hyperlink is not an "active step" in this context.

Page 47: Electronic Contracts Presentation

47

Privacy Legislation• The Federal Personal Information Protection and

Electronic Documents Act:– Applies to all commercial activities of organizations.– Gives individuals positive rights in respect of collection, use and

disclosure of their personal information by organizations.– When collecting personal information of an online customer, an

organization must identify the purposes of collecting that information at or prior to the time of collection. Collection must be limited to the identified purposes.

– Consent is required for collection, use and disclosure of personal information, subject to limited exceptions.

Page 48: Electronic Contracts Presentation

48

Privacy Legislation– Form of consent depends on the sensitivity of the information.

Consent may be implied, but express consent may be required where information is sensitive (e.g., financial, health information).

– Organizations cannot require consent to the collection, use or disclosure of personal information as a condition of the supply of a product or service, beyond that required to fulfill specified and legitimate purposes. "Opt out" must be given for all secondary uses of collected information (e.g., marketing).

– On-line forms and contracts should identify the purpose for which personal information is being collected, identify all usesand disclosures of that information, and expressly seek consent of the customer for those uses and disclosures.

Page 49: Electronic Contracts Presentation

49

Privacy Legislation– PIPEDA also requires organizations to use security safeguards

appropriate to the sensitivity of the information, which may include technological measures including passwords and encryption. More sensitive information will require a higher level of security.

Page 50: Electronic Contracts Presentation

50

Practical Suggestions for Creating Enforceable Electronic Contracts

• Statutory Analysis• Methods for Creating Enforceable

Contracts

Page 51: Electronic Contracts Presentation

51

Suggested Analysis for Statutory Requirements

• Use a careful case-by-case analysis of relevant legislation (e.g., consumer protection, privacy, etc.) in each jurisdiction that may apply to the business in question.

• Consider whether there has been consent to use information in electronic form (e.g., see Section 3 of the Ontario ECA)?

• Identification of the specific requirements of the legislation (e.g., writing, signatures, original copies, place of contract).

Page 52: Electronic Contracts Presentation

52

Suggested Analysis for Statutory Requirements

• Apply the tests set out in the legislation to see if the requirements can be met and how they should be met.

• Also important to consider record keeping and storage practices that accord with the Ontario ECA (i.e., accessibility, ability to retain and integrity).

• As a general rule of thumb: When in doubt, use paper and obtain the express agreement of the other party to the use of electronic communications to provide greater certainty.

Page 53: Electronic Contracts Presentation

53

Suggestions for Creating Electronic Contracts

• Consider the structure of the transaction, e.g., what constitutes offer and acceptance? Is placing goods for sale on a website an offer that can be accepted by a customer or is it merely an invitation in response to which the customer makes an offer?

• Make sure the customer is aware of and understands this structure (e.g., include it in the terms and conditions of use of the website).

• Electronic agreements should be clearly readable on the screen and written in plain English; bold fonts should be used for important clauses.

Page 54: Electronic Contracts Presentation

54

Suggestions for Creating Electronic Contracts

• Recommendations for enhancing the enforceability of electronic contracts:– Present the user with the license terms, website use terms

or contract before the user is allowed to interact (i.e., download software, use a website’s services, purchase a product, etc.) online;

– Make the user scroll through the terms or agreement in order to get to an “I Accept” button;

– Particularly in the case of the purchase of goods or services, use a second verification button to guard against accidental acceptances and provide opportunities for the user to terminate the transaction.

Page 55: Electronic Contracts Presentation

55

Suggestions for Creating Electronic Contracts

• Recommendations, continued...– Have the user click on an “I Accept” button or icon next to

particularly important, onerous or sensitive clauses.

– Maintain secure, date stamped records or logs that store the information relating to the identity of the user, the version ofthe agreement, date and time of the transaction.

• Notwithstanding Kanitz, it is preferable that users be given notice of amendments to an agreement they have entered into made by e-mail or postal mail.

Page 56: Electronic Contracts Presentation

56

THE END

Questions?Richard [email protected]