e-learning and the future of distance education
DESCRIPTION
A presentation to the UNED International Conference on Distance Education, San José, Costa Rica, November 5, 2004TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education
XII Congreso Internacional de Tecnología y Educación a Distancia
5 Noviembre 2004San Jose, Costa Rica
Mark BullenUniversity of British Columbia, Canada
![Page 2: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Distance Education Under Attack
• DE threatened by new movement: e-learning• Ironically, focus on efficiency, effectiveness and
quality has made DE vulnerable– Our focus on these issues has blinded us to the
emergence of this new movement– More significantly, it is the prevailing organizational
and management model of DE that is making it vulnerable to this new movement
• Threat is to DE in conventional higher education but has implications for all of DE
![Page 3: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Distance Education Under Attack
• What is the threat?• What is e-learning?• How are quality, management, sustainability and
organizational issues related to this threat?• What can we do about it?
![Page 4: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Qualifications
• Argument based on:– observations and experiences with DE in Canada &
US– In conventional universities
• Relevance to Latin American DE?• Relevance to single mode DE?
![Page 5: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
What is e-learning?
![Page 6: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Meaning of E-learning
• E-learning means different things to different people
• Massy & Zemsky suggest three categories of e-learning:– E- learning as distance education– E-learning as facilitated transaction software– E-learning as electronically-mediated learning
![Page 7: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Meaning of E-learning
![Page 8: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Meaning of E-Learning
• E-learning has been appropriated by people whose main interest is in e-learning as technology-enhanced teaching, not distance education (ELTET)
• This new movement has little interest in the distance learner or the historical mandate of DE to provide access
![Page 9: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Meaning of E-Learning
• Main priority is providing technologically-enhanced teaching to on-campus learners
![Page 10: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
What is the threat?
![Page 11: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
The Threat to Distance Education
• E-learning is emerging as a movement in conventional universities
• Competing for same resources• Gaining attention of university administrators
and academics • New movement is much closer to the core
mission of traditional universities• Threatening to displace DE• Distance educators need to pay attention to this
new force or else gains may be lost
![Page 12: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Social Mandate of Distance Education
• DE has had a mandate to provide access to underserved populations, particularly in developing countries
• DE has been extremely successful at providing quality education to disadvantaged groups
• Existed on the “margins” of conventional universities for many years
![Page 13: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Social Mandate of Distance Education
• Acceptance of DE grew as more and more conventional universities began using it
• Most North American universities now have DE programs
![Page 14: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
The Threat to Distance Education
• Status and respectability of DE due in part to the acceptance it has achieved in conventional universities
• Single mode institutions like UNED, UOC, UKOU have contributed greatly to the legitimacy of DE
• But the legitimacy has been enhanced by growth in DE in conventional universities
![Page 15: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
The Threat to Distance Education
• Why is e-learning a threat?• E-learning has a different philosophical
orientation• No social mandate• If resources are diverted from distance
education to e-learning, the social goals of DE may be longer be addressed by higher education
![Page 16: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The Threat to Distance Education
• Growth of e-learning will cause DE to lose its newly-gained status and recede to the margins of conventional universities
• This will have an impact on the DE professional community and ultimately the status of DE
• The future of distance education as a socially-progressive movement is in danger
![Page 17: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
How are quality, sustainability and management of DE related to this threat?
![Page 18: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Organizational Issues
• Modern DE has been obsessed with quality, efficiency and effectiveness
• Organized very differently from traditional higher education
• Creates an inherent conflict in traditional universities
![Page 19: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Organizational Issues
• Two types of e-learning tend to be organized differently:
• E-learning as distance education:– organized and funded centrally – managed approach with professional staff– courses developed by teams– attention to quality and sustainability
![Page 20: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The Project Development Process
![Page 21: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Organizational Issues
• E-Learning as technology-enhanced teaching (ELTET):– Faculty/department-based– Driven by individual professor– Funded on a grant or project basis– Quality is variable– Sustainability not usually a consideration
![Page 22: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Sustainability, Quality & Management• Organizational culture is a key issue• Berquist (1992) - institutional cultures:
– Managerial– Collegial– Developmental– Negotiated
• Clash between two distinctly different organizational cultures: collegial & managerial
• Sustainable, high quality distance e-learning requires a managed approach
![Page 23: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Sustainability, Quality & Management
• Requires course development that is organized using a project management approach
• Teams of experts: professor, instructional designer, web designer, multimedia developer
• The distance e-learning course is a collective effort
![Page 24: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Sustainability, Quality & Management
• Quality is ensured through the use of professionals, by building in external academic review and by building in formative and summative evaluation
• Sustainability is ensured by paying attention to quality and cost which is intimately linked to managed approach that is used
![Page 25: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Sustainability, Quality & Management
• Most faculty are more comfortable with the “collegial culture”
• Course development is seen as in individual endeavor
• The course “belongs” to the professor
• Online course development tends to be experimental
![Page 26: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Sustainability, Quality & Management
• Costs are not monitored
• Quality is difficult to control because of approach used
• No built in academic review or evaluation
![Page 27: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Organizational Issues
• E-Learning as technology-enhanced teaching much closer to the core mission of the university
• Given higher priority than distance education which serves “other” learners who are often not considered “real” university students
• Organizational model more consistent with traditional university
![Page 28: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Organizational Issues
• DE in conventional universities has borrowed its organizational model from single mode DE institutions
• Garrison & Anderson (1999) distinguish between “big” and “little” distance education
![Page 29: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Big Distance Education
• Industrialized form of higher education• Teachers are all-powerful• Students are passive receivers of information, in
a "dominated and alienated" position within the distance teaching and learning.
• Uses mass technologies like broadcast television, the large-scale production of correspondence materials, and computer assisted instruction
![Page 30: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Big Distance Education
• Capital (technology of curriculum production) is substituted for labor (classroom teacher)
• Flexibility for the student is provided at the cost of severely reducing interaction and increasing learner isolation
![Page 31: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Little Distance Education
• Maximizes interaction• collaborative learning, pacing, learning communities
• Focuses on meaningful learning outcomes• challenges the student to dig deeply into the subject content and
explore the implications of this knowledge with regard to personal and societal constructs
• Maximizes active learning• extensive use of active learning activities, including simulations,
explorations and explanatory assessment
• Flexible in design• course materials are created in hyper-linked, hypermedia format
and stored such that they can be easily modified, augmented, annotated, or printed by both instructor and learners as needed
![Page 32: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Little Distance Education
• Supports a systems view• effective little DE systems provide for learner support
services, registration flexibility, credit transfer, accreditation, provision of learning and research resources through electronic delivery and virtual libraries
• Compatible with research practice• creates learning environments focused on problem solving,
collaborative projects, and exploration of complex environments
• Cost-effective• substantially increases access as courses become available
at any time of the day or night and anywhere that Internet access is available.
![Page 33: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Big vs. Little Distance Education
• Most DE in conventional universities is not “big” but perceived as such
• Seen as alien to the prevailing organizational culture
![Page 34: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Competition for Resources
• Resources are being diverted from distance education to support e-learning as technology-enhanced teaching
• Organizational restructuring around the needs of ELTET
• One of the side effects of decisions made without a full understanding of DE and how it differs from ELTET
![Page 35: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
UBC Example
• Successful DE department with nearly 60 years of experience is being “decentralized”
• Rationale: only way that university can increase its use of e-learning and integrate with ELTET
![Page 36: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
UBC Example
• Reorganization fails to recognize that DE learners have distinct needs
• Supported more effectively and efficiently by centrally-organized department that specializes in DE than by having each Faculty deal with DE separately
![Page 37: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Concluding Remarks
• Distance educators have been so focused on quality, cost, and sustainability that they have not recognized the significance of e-learning
• ELTET represents a new movement in higher education
• Poses a threat to social mandate of distance education
![Page 38: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Concluding Remarks
• ELTET has stronger connections to the core mandate of conventional universities
• Distance educators need to cultivate support, build connections, seek allies
• Need support at senior levels• Need to “appropriate” e-learning• Can no longer rely on “marginal
champions”
![Page 39: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Canadian Association for Distance EducationMay 7-11, 2005 - Vancouver, Canada
![Page 40: E-Learning and the Future of Distance Education](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081602/54bcbe514a795986348b4586/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
For Further Information
• Mark Bullen– [email protected]– http://www2.cstudies.ubc.ca/~bullen/
• UBC Distance Education & Technology– http://det.ubc.ca
• UBC Centre for Managing & Planning E-Learning (MAPLE)– http://maple.ubc.ca