ds tools 12 - final - fidic spear - final.pdf ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Water EnergyDesign Guide
Option Appraisal
Construction GuideOp&M Guide
SPeAR® does not offer guidelines for sustainable design, rather it focuses on multi-‐criteria appraisal, and is used in combination with ARUP's sustainability consulting services.
Countries
Fee Fee is dependent on the consultancy services provided to the client.
Decision-‐Support Tool: SPeAR® www.arup.com/Projects/SPeAR.aspx
Applicable sectors
Summary
The Sustainable Project Appraisal Routine (SPeAR®) is a holistic sustainability decision-‐making framework to support project development and communicate outcomes. It is a software tool based on quantitative and qualitative appraisal. Results are presented graphically on the SPeAR® diagram using a traffic light system to indicate sustainability performance against key themes.
Organisations
Function
All Infrastructure
Arup consultants engage with the client on sustainability aspirations. Following development of design options, these are assessed using the SPeAR® framework. The assessment boundaries are defined and key stakeholders are identified. A Materiality Review is used to identify relevant indicators and sub-‐indicators. Data gathering on performance is conducted through desktop study, site visits and through a SPeAR® Workshop. The resulting SPeAR® diagram enables discussion on underperforming areas and the Appraisal Report poses recommendations for selection or performance improvement.
Deployment & developments
SPeAR® is currently offered as part of Arup's sustainability services. However the software may become commercially available on the web. It will be targeted to clients who want to employ Arup's services as well to help with tailoring the assessment, interpretation and action on results.
UK. Soon applicable internationally Process summary
Developer: ARUP
Guidelines for sustainable design
Use with other tools
Used for sectors that do not yet offer rating & certification, or where a client wants to test readiness for certification (e.g. BREEAM) and improve performance.
Design option appraisal functions
Indicators comprised of 3-‐6 sub-‐indicators assess project performance against a traffic-‐light system scale. Regulatory compliance is set at zero of scoring scale. Materiality enables the selection and elimination of indicators. There is no weighting of indicators although elimination of sub-‐indicators puts greater importance on others. There is no overall sustainability scoring. Results for each indicator are presented on the SPeAR® wheel. The software generates a tabulated summary of the input data.
Level of support services
These come in the form of ARUP sustainability consulting services which guide in the use, tailoring and interpretation of SPeAR® results.
Sustainability criteria
SPeAR® is based on 23 core indicators: 1. Social (community facilities, culture, form and space, health and well-‐being, transport, stakeholder engagement) 2. Environmental (soil and land, biodiversity, waste, materials, water use, wastewater, energy, climate change, air quality) 3. Economic (economic effect, facilities management, site selection, employment and skills, equality, governance and reporting, risk, procurement)
Level of materiality (tailoring)
Materiality is assisted by an Arup sustainability professional to ensure unbiased assessment, regulatory compliance, stakeholder interests, innovation and best practice. The client chooses which indicators to consider, although omission needs to be justified. Core indicators relevant to most projects are included and clients can choose from additional sector or geography-‐specific indicators. There is a choice to only do a SPeAR® Social or Environmental Assessment.
Outputs possible from SPeAR®; with and without the Segments displayed; SPeAR® Social; and SPeAR® Environmental.
Project: Site selection for a new reservoir.Client: Bristol Water.
Brief description: SPeAR® was used for site selection of a potential new reservoir for Bristol Water. The client had selected a number of sites and wanted a sustainability appraisal of each option to inform selection of the final site. Several sustainability issues were considered for each site including their ecological capacity, energy and carbon footprint (e.g. from pumping water to treatment works), transport links for materials and whether the site was near communities which could use it as recreational facility. SPeAR® enabled the identification of risks, impacts and opportunities and advised in the selection of the final reservoir site.
Case study