drwg june 10, 2013 holyoke , ma
DESCRIPTION
DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA. Doug Smith. Manager of Demand Resource Administration. Active Resource Audit Results Passive Resource Performance December 2012 and January 2013. Winter Performance Update for Demand Resources. Presentation Notes. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
DRWG JUNE 10, 2013 HOLYOKE, MA
Doug SmithMANAGER OF DEMAND RESOURCE ADMINISTRATION
Active Resource Audit Results
Passive Resource Performance
December 2012 and January 2013
Winter Performance Update for Demand Resources
![Page 2: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Presentation Notes• For comparability, All performance is reported in DRV and all CSO is
reported as Net CSO, which is a non-grossed up value (typically CSO/1.08 except for multi-year obligations incurred in FCA1 and 2.)
• In the rare cases of multiple audits for a resource, highest performance was used. The impact from this is trivial.
• MW values and % data are rounded.
• Performance from the RTDR Dispatch on 1/28/13 covered in May DRWG – see http://www.iso-ne.com/committees/comm_wkgrps/mrkts_comm/dr_wkgrp/mtrls/2013/may12013/a04_rtdr_performance_on_1_28_2013.ppt.
2
![Page 3: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ACTIVE (RTDR AND RTEG) AUDIT RESULTS DURING WINTER 2012 - 2013
![Page 4: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Audit Results by Resource TypeWinter 2012-2013
Resource Type
Performance (MW)
Net CSO (MW)
Percent Net CSO
RTDR 446 377 118%
RTEG 258 261 99%
Total 703 638 110%
4
![Page 5: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
RTDR Audit ResultsWinter 2012 - 2013
Load Zone Dispatched
MW (net CSO)Performance
(MW)Percentage
CT 75 86 116%ME 141 207 146%
NEMA 19 28 146%NH 22 17 75%RI 18 22 122%
SEMA 13 15 112%VT 36 36 99%
WCMA 51 35 68%
Total 377 446 118%5
![Page 6: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Winter 2012 - 2013 RTDR Audit Results Capped at Load Zone Net CSO
Load Zone Dispatched
MW (net CSO)
Performance Capped at Load Zone Net CSO
(MW)
Percentage
CT 75 75 100%
ME 141 141 100%
NEMA 19 19 100%
NH 22 17 75%
RI 18 18 100%
SEMA 13 13 100%
VT 36 36 99%
WCMA 51 35 68%
Total 377 354 94%6
![Page 7: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
RTDR Audit Results – Winter 2012 - 2013
7
![Page 8: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
RTEG Audit ResultsWinter 2012 - 2013
Load Zone Dispatched MW
(net CSO)Performance
(MW)Percentage
CT 115 116 101%ME 11 14 126%
NEMA 34 33 96%NH 22 22 98%RI 20 18 90%
SEMA 19 18 93%VT 6 7 120%
WCMA 34 30 88% Total 261 258 99%
8
![Page 9: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
RTEG Audit Results Capped at Load Zone NET CSO – Winter 2012 - 2013
Load Zone Dispatched
MWPerformance
(MW)Percentage
CT 115 115 100%ME 11 11 100%
NEMA 34 33 96%NH 22 22 98%RI 20 18 90%
SEMA 19 18 93%VT 6 6 100%
WCMA 34 30 88% Total 261 252 97%
9
![Page 10: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
RTEG Audit Results – Winter 2012 - 2013
10
![Page 11: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
PASSIVE (ON PEAK AND SEASONAL PEAK) RESOURCES - PERFORMANCE
Average of Performance Months (Dec 2012 -Jan 2013)
![Page 12: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Total Passive Winter Performance & Net CSO by Load Zone
Load Zone Winter 2012-13
Performance (MW)Winter 2012-13
Net CSO (MW)
Percentage of Performance vs
Net CSO
CT 488 301 162%ME 131 59 223%
NEMA 293 164 179%NH 66 52 126%RI 84 59 142%
SEMA 162 99 164%VT 98 59 168%
WCMA 189 110 173% Total 1,513 903 168%
12
![Page 13: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Total Passive Winter 2012-2013 - Range of Performance & Net CSO
13
![Page 14: DRWG June 10, 2013 holyoke , MA](https://reader036.vdocuments.site/reader036/viewer/2022062422/568139d4550346895da18686/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14