UIC ERTMS Benchmark ERTMS Economic Evaluation
Vi C i lliVincenzo CarpinelliUIC Project Manager
The project1
2 The analysis2 The analysis
Some results3
2 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
Background of the projectPHASE 1 PHASE 3PHASE 2 PHASE 5PHASE 4
Continuation of Real data
Continuation of real data
Continuation of real data
Framing the Benchmark, Pilot case
t di
real data collection, Task Force
O ti d
Real data collection,
first activities on SEU for
collection, Maintenance
best practices t l
collection, in deep data analysis,
P tstudies Operation and Maintenance
on SEU for ERTMS catalogue,
Cost drivers Analysis
Procurement best practices
catalogue
March 2008
Sept 2008
Oct 2008
Sept 2009
Oct 2009
Febr2011
March 2011
Febr2012
March 2012
Jan 2013
3 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS BenchmarkUIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
19 companies involved / 32 case studies
1Strategic analysis ERTMS
R&D
1 2
Operation & i t
R&D
3
6
maintenanceProcurement
-RFP
(Request For 5Proposal)
Proposals & evaluation
4Equipment & implementation
decision
4 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS BenchmarkUIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
Costs are only the visible part of the iceberg
Costs figures Costs drivers
Procurement strategies
Maintenance strategiesstrategies strategies
Structure of the company Project Description
5 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS BenchmarkUIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
1 The project
The analysis2
Some results3 Some results3
6 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
New case studies analysed with original cost structure
•General costs•Trainbornesubsystem
•GSM-R on board•Taking into
i
•Studies•Prototype & tests
service •Commissioning
Research & Development Investment
Operation &Phase o t
ERTMS on board cost table
•Modifications•Disposal
Operation & Maintenance
Phase out, disposal
7 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
But also we try to draw up different costs’ view
Variable costs per
Variable Costs
pOBU
Simulation f 50
Total LCC
Costs for 50 OBU
variable
ETCS On-Board
C t
costsvariable
costs as % of the Total
Estimated O&M costsTotal LCC Costs Estimated O&M costs
O&M costs as % of the Total
Fixed
costs per OBU
Fixed (One off) project costs
Fixed costs as % of the Total
8 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
Context analysis
Year of orderYear of deliveryN° of trains or locosN°of OBU’sUpgrade plannedType of fitting
For up to 16 different
classes ofTypes and time of testsN° of countries for certificationDuration of certification
classes of locos and
close to 800 OBUs from
Equipment complexity of the cabinFitting time per vehicleRehomologation of existing legacy systemsExisting Prototype
OBUs from
Existing PrototypeSTMSRS Version
9 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
Length of the line (km)Single or double trackYear of contract attributionYear of taking into commercial serviceType of ERTMS (L1): centralized or localLevel of experienceHigh speed line / conventional lineResignaling / new lineSRS Version
For 9 differentlines for
UpgradesBorder crossing optionNr of stations equipped with ERTMSFallback system
instance in Level 2 case t di Nr of system transitions and interfaces
Type and duration of testsDuration of certification processDuration of homologation process
studies
Rehomologation of existing legacy systemNr of SEUSpeed of the lineCapacity of lineG
10 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
Global complexity level
Catalogue of ERTMS procurement practices
1. Elaboration of a detailed and comprehensive questionnaire;
2. Analysis of each returned questionnaire and choice of the WG Members (best
practices) for detailed interviews; p ) ;
3. Interviews with 10 Members in order to analyze best ERTMS implementation
practices;
4. Summary of the results and organization of a “best practice” validation
meeting .
a catalogue of best ERTMS implementation practices has been produced and presented in the UIC ERTMS Benchmark Final Report 2011.
11 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
Lessons learnt Speed up authorization process with a ""one stop shop"" solution (no multiple p p p p p ( p
national authorization processes anymore);
Stabilize the ERTMS/ETCS specifications for all application forms (L1 LS/FS, L2, Regional/L3) and clarify and homogenize the technical SRS versions throughout Europe no more “customization of ERTMS”:
Reduce requirements for additional change requests on a national basis; Reduce requirements for additional change requests on a national basis;
Finalize a stabilized SRS leading to a truly interoperable ERTMS;
Coordinate infrastructure and on-board deployment: “there is no profit from ERTMS without ETCS equipped trains!”;
Improve homologation and certification processes as well as testing procedures;
12 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
The project1
2 The analysis
Some results3
13 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
L1
The CAPEX data’s quality is quite goodL1
L2L2
14 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS BenchmarkUIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
The OPEX costs are heterogeneous
15 205 15 956
18 792
16 000
18 000
20 000
Trackside Case Studies ERTMS/ETCS Level 1 ‐O&M costs [€/km DT]OPEX (O + M phase for 20 years)[€/km]
15 205
6 093 6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
14 000
16 000
€/km
Average
‐‐
2 000
4 000
A B C D E
15 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
The On Board Capex costs can be analysed in two different ways:
16 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
The On-board pool can be divided in various sub-categories
High Speed trains
1 214 5661 200 000
1 400 000 CAPEX I / OBU CAPEX I(R+D and Investment h )
Retrofit Projects601 405 595 907616 972
600 000
700 000 CAPEX I / OBU CAPEX I(R+D and Investment h )
Projects with STM (anyway we have
931 5791 000 000
1 200 000 phase)[€/OBU]
Average500 000
600 000 phase)[€/OBU]
Average
( y ydifferent STM complexities)
601 405 595 907
800 000
OBU
300 179337 500
362 000400 000
OBU
Not High Speed trains416 594
595 907
300 179 337 500400 000
600 000
€/O
178 706151 328
300 179253 500
200 000
300 000
€/O
178 706 153 495 138 268 151 328249 012
300 179253 500
200 000
151 328
100 000
0 A B C D E G H I M N O P Q
0 A C G I L N P Q R
17 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
Call for participation for new case studiesThe benchmark group needs to enlarge its costs database and its ERTMS casestudies catalogue in order to give a real and wide ERTMS implementation’s
ioverview.
Therefore the Rail System Department of UIC will warmly welcome all the UICMembers interested in developing new case studiesMembers interested in developing new case studies.
UIC ERTMS B h k W ki G
The data are always presented in a
anonymous way, only If I bring my
t d tUIC ERTMS Benchmark Working Group
Project Management:
y y, ymembers can look at the confidential data
between peers in private meetings
costs data, how will they be used?Emilio Maestrini: [email protected]
Vincenzo Carpinelli: [email protected]
p gused?
18 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark
Thank you for your kind attentionThank you for your kind attention
19 UIC ERTMS World Conference UIC ERTMS Benchmark