FeedbackfortheimplementationofEADIninthenational/organizationalstructuresofthepartnerorganizations

TheEADInprojectwillbeimplementedwithinthestructuresofthepartnerorganizations.Inordertohaveastructuredrecordofthenational/organizationalimplementationsandyourexperiences,pleasefillinthisformforeveryinterventionyouorganize.

FACTSNameofPartnerOrganization:Sloveniananti‐dopingorganization

Date:10.11.2011

Lengthofintervention:1,5hour

Location:Bežigradhighschool,Ljubljana

Numberofparticipants:45

Targetgroup/addressees:highschoolathletes

Trainers/staff/Anti‐DopingJuniorAmbassadorsthatwereinvolved:JaniDvorška,NinaMakuc,KarmenGec,MatejDrinovec,VeronikaDvoršak,TadejJug,MarušaKončar,LukaPirec,JanDružina,TjašaHojnik

REPORTABOUTTHEIMPLEMENTATION

Whatwastheaim?

Our main goal was to inform high school athletes about the problem of doping inprofessionalsport.

Whatcontentwasconveyed?

WepresentedthecaseofAndreas‐HeidiKriegeranddopinginEastGermanybetween1970and1990,followedbygeneral informationondoping(thepresentationofWADA,SLOADO,“Whatisdoping?”,TUE,athletes...).Inthesecondpart,weusedtheconceptofworkshops,with which we wanted to make young athletes openly discuss about the use of drugs insport.Wedividedpeopleinto4groupsanddistributedpapersheetswithdifferenttasksallofthem concerning on the topic of doping.Inside each group we divided athletes into twogroups,onegroupwasfordopingandanotrheronewasagainstdoping.Eachgrouphad15minutes to talk about the task and to give clear answers and explanations. After the

discussioneachgrouppresentedtheirconclusionstoeverybody.Ambassadorsweretheretoguide,supportandmaybehelptopointthemintherightdirectiontogetthegeneralviewonthe given issue.After each presentation we had time to answer the questions thatmighthavepoppedup.

Attheendofworkshopsathleteshadachancetosignapublicpromise,thattheywillactinaccordanse to the World Anti‐Doping Code and that they will not use any prohibitedsubstancesormethodsintheirsportcareer.

Whichmethodologieswereused?

Presentationandworkshops

Whatweretheimpressionsofthestaff/trainers/ADJA?(foreg:howdidtheaddresseesreacttothegiveninformation,wasiteasytoconveytheinformation,weretherediscussions…):

In our opinion and the opinion of teachers the lecture was very interesting. It has beennoticedthatmostofathletesdonothavealotofknowledgeabouttheproblemofdoping,butwecouldseethattheyhaveshown interestandcooperationtofindoutnewthings. Inparticular,theinterestandsurpriseofallpresentwasshown.Duringtheworkshopsmostofthemweretalkingandexchangingtheirviews.

Whatweretheresults?

Webelievethatallparticipantswillthinkaboutdangersofdopinginthefutureandconsidertheconsequencesinadifferentwaythantheydidbeforeourlecture.

Didyoureachthedesiredoutcome?How?Why?

Wethinkthattheresponsesoftheparticipantsweregood,becausetheyhavelearnedalotnewthings.Wecansaythatourgoalwasmorethansuccessfullyachieved.

WhatwerethechallengesinimplementingEADIninyourownstructure?

No.

Whatwouldyoudodifferentlynexttime?

Wewilltrywithsomenewworkshops,justtoseethereactionfromtheathletes.