Transcript
Page 1: Dynamics of radiostrontium leaching from radioactively contaminated floodplain soils of the Yenisei River

103

ISSN 1066-3622, Radiochemistry, 2008, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 103�108. � Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2008.Original Russian Text � E.K. Legin, Yu.I. Trifonov, M.L. Khokhlov, D.N. Suglobov, E.E. Legina, V.K. Legin, 2008, published in Radiokhimiya, 2008,Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 91�96.

������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

Dynamics of Radiostrontium Leaching from RadioactivelyContaminated Floodplain Soils of the Yenisei River

E. K. Legin, Yu. I. Trifonov, M. L. Khokhlov, D. N. Suglobov,E. E. Legina, and V. K. Legin

Khlopin Radium Institute, Research and Production Association, Federal State Unitary Enterprise,St. Petersburg, Russia

Received December 27, 2006

Abstract�Gleyzation-mediated leaching of radiostrontium from floodplain soils of the Krasnoyarsk Miningand Chemical Combine (MCC) activity zone [Atamanovskii Island (front part), Oseredysh Island (front part),and Berezovyi Island (rear part)] is studied with model systems. Leaching of radiostrontium from waterloggedsoils is analyzed in terms of the model of anaerobic biosolubilization of gel films. The leaching of radiostron-tium is found to correlate with that of iron, confirming the cosolubilization model. Addition of glucose (0.5%)as a stimulant for growth of iron-reducing microorganisms increases the dynamic coefficient of radiostrontiumleaching, particularly in soils with lower organic matter content. The model experiments showed that theradiostrontium leaching rate from floodplain soil is higher by 2�3 orders of magnitude than that of radio-cesium, suggesting the possibility of escape of radiostrontium from the floodplain of the Yenisei River withthe intrasoil runoff. This conclusion is supported by the experimental data on the 90Sr/137Cs ratio in the flood-plain of the Yenisei River downstream of MCC (0.01�0.1).

PACS numbers: 89.60.-kDOI: 10.1134/S1066362208010177

Leaching of radionuclides from waterlogged soilsvia a long-term low-rate intrasoil runoff (infiltration ofthe soil solution) is an insufficiently explored problemof environmental radiochemistry. Such a water regimeis typical of radioactively contaminated floodplains ofrivers, e.g., the Techa and Yenisei Rivers contami-nated through activities of the Mayak Plant and MCC(Krasnoyarsk Mining and Chemical Combine), respec-tively. Floodplain soils are formed in the course ofperiodical floods accompanied by deposition of freshalluvium transferred from the catchment area and bot-tom sediment [1]. As a result, floodplains play therole of a geochemical barrier to the migration ofchemical elements, among them radionuclides [2].Since the radioactively contaminated floodplain soilswere formed via deposition of radioactively contami-nated suspended matter, radionuclides in them aredistributed throughout the profile [3�5], and thosefrom each horizon could enter the intrasoil runoff.

Field study of the leaching of radionuclides fromwaterlogged soils is a very difficult task [6, 7]. There-fore, it is advisable to perform laboratory leachingexperiments with model systems. Previously we re-ported on leaching of 238U, 239, 240Pu, Co, and otherradionuclides from floodplain soils collected from the

MCC’s activity zone downstream [8, 9]. Under gley-zation conditions (stagnant-drainage water regime),the leaching of MCC-derived radionuclides was dem-onstrated to correlate linearly with that of iron. Weconcluded that hydrolyzable radionuclides are pre-dominantly fixed on the soil gel films, and radionu-clides and iron are leached via cosolubilization underthe action of anaerobic microorganisms. Also wereported on biosolubilization of synthetic Pu-contain-ing Ca,Fe-fulvate gel films in aqueous soil extracts[10]. Later [11] we have demonstrated that leaching ofradiostrontium from soils under the gleyzation condi-tions also correlates with that of iron. In terms of ourapproach this means that, like strongly hydrolyzableradionuclides, radiostrontium is fixed on the gel films,and, in the stagnant-drainage water regime, it mayenter the intrasoil runoff through solubilizationmediated by anaerobic microorganisms.

This model is consistent with the experimental dataon the speciation of radiostrontium in soils [12�14],suggesting that 90Sr is preferentially associated withiron�humus and iron hydroxide components of theclay�humus complex.

Keeping in mind that the intrasoil runoff takes agreat part in the formation of secondary radioactive

Page 2: Dynamics of radiostrontium leaching from radioactively contaminated floodplain soils of the Yenisei River

RADIOCHEMISTRY Vol. 50 No. 1 2008

104 LEGIN et al.

Fig. 1. Correlation between the Fe loss and radiostrontiumleaching with simulated water of the Yenisei River (1) with-out and (2) with 0.5% glucose additive. Total volume ofthe liquid phase passed, ml: (1) 2050 and (2) 2140.

contamination of surface and ground waters, in thisstudy we examined the dynamics of radiostrontiumleaching from various soils of the floodplain of theYenisei River under the gleyzation conditions.

In carrying out experiments and interpreting data,we used experimental and conceptual approachesdescribed in [8, 11]. The experimental setup wasdesigned so as to monitor the leaching of radionu-clides from waterlogged soils in continuous many-month slow drainage of water through a soil sample[11]. Colloidal and truly soluble species from theleachate move upward along a paper filter arranged atthe outlet, being accumulated at the top of the filter.After changing the filter, the leaching products areanalyzed.

The primary impact of waterlogging is the fillingof soil pores with water, resulting in poor oxygensupply (anaerobiosis). Under such conditions, thedominating microorganisms in the soil are anaerobesgrowing on the surface of the gel films [15, 16]. Asa result, the condition of the gel films formed on thesurface of clay minerals through coordination copoly-merization of Fe and Ca fulvates and humates [17�19]is directly associated with vital functions of anaerobes[20, 21]. Thanks to the occurrence of a great numberof active sites, the gel films are the primary sorption-active component of the clay�humus complex.

In the gel films, Fe(III) is the most efficient ac-ceptor for the electrons liberated in anaerobic respira-

Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics of the soilsamples studied����������������������������������������

Characteristic� Sample � Sample � Sample� no. 1 � no. 2 � no. 3

����������������������������������������Calcination loss, % � 3.4 � 3.4 � 12.6pH of aqueous suspension � 7.5 � 7.4 � 8.0Cation-exchange capacity, � 4.7 � 0.75 � 24.4mg-equiv/100 g � � �Total Fe, wt % � 4.2 � 4.5 � 2.1����������������������������������������

tion of microorganisms [20]. In the anaerobic respira-tion cycle, Fe(III) is reduced to Fe(II), which can formsoluble complexes with fatty acids (fermentation prod-ucts), fulvic acids, and carbonic acid.

Reduction of iron is the most significant chemicalprocess occurring in anaerobic soils [22]. Iron(III) losspromotes gleyzation, a soil formation process typicalof hydromorphic soils [23]. Gleyzation involves de-gradation of the gel films, followed by their solubili-zation with formation of truly soluble and colloidspecies. The solubilization involves both the macro-and microcomponents, including radionuclides as-sociated with organomineral complexes. The gleyza-tion dynamics may be monitored by the iron loss [23].Gleyzation can be promoted by adding a nutrient sub-strate capable of fermentation [22]. Glucose, as a fer-mentation product of polysaccharides from plantresidues, is a particularly efficient additive promotinggleyzation. In the current study, glucose was used assuch an additive.

Figure 1 shows the interrelation between the leach-ing of radiostrontium and the iron loss from flood-plain-meadow peat soil under the gleyzation condi-tions. As a liquid phase, we used simulated water ofthe Yenisei River with glucose additive (0.5%) orwithout it.

Despite much more clearly pronounced iron loss inthe presence of glucose, in both systems (with andwithout additive), the radiostrontium leaching cor-relates linearly with the iron loss, confirming thecosolubilization mechanism [11].

As the gleyzation is being developed, Fe(II) isaccumulated in the system, inhibiting the electrontransfer to Fe(III) in anaerobic respiration. Further-more, our experiments showed that Fe(II) inhibitsfermentation of glucose, thus reducing the amount ofthe nutrition substrate for iron-reducing anaerobes.

EXPERIMENTAL

In the experiments we used representative samplesof floodplain soil (horizon 10�20 cm), collected fromthe front part of the Atamanovskii Island (sampleno. 1, 5 km downstream of MCC), front part of theOseredysh Island (sample no. 2, 44 km downstream ofMCC), and rear part of the Berezovyi Island (sampleno. 3, 21 km downstream of MCC). Sample nos. 1and 2: floodplain-meadow saturated layered soil; sam-ple no. 3: floodplain-meadow peat soil. Characteris-tics of the soil samples are given in Table 1.

The study performed at the Khlopin Radium Insti-tute revealed that the 90Sr activity in the floodplain

Page 3: Dynamics of radiostrontium leaching from radioactively contaminated floodplain soils of the Yenisei River

RADIOCHEMISTRY Vol. 50 No. 1 2008

DYNAMICS OF RADIOSTRONTIUM LEACHING 105

Table 2. Parameters of 85Sr leaching from floodplain soils of the Yenisei River*������������������������������������������������������������������������������������Liquid phase � t, days � V, ml � ASr, % � A0,i�103, Bq � �Vi, ml � Kl,i �105, ml�1 � Kd,i, ml g�1

������������������������������������������������������������������������������������Atamanovskii Island (front part)

SW � 12 � 136 � 8.5 � 43.6 � 136 � 62.4 � 12.2SW � 21 � 260 � 14.2 � 39.9 � 124 � 50.5 � 15.5SW � 49 � 583 � 23.4 � 37.4 � 323 � 33.1 � 22.5SW � 95 � 953 � 30.0 � 33.4 � 370 � 23.5 � 32.4SW-G � 117 � 1126 � 40.8 � 30.5 � 173 � 89.1 � 7.9SW-G � 147 � 1400 � 52.8 � 25.8 � 214 � 94.2 � 7.1SW-G � 178 � 1598 � 64.4 � 20.6 � 198 � 125.0 � 5.0

Oseredysh Island (front part)

SW � 12 � 240 � 3.3 � 43.6 � 240 � 13.8 � 58.6SW � 21 � 376 � 6.0 � 42.2 � 136 � 20.7 � 39.1SW � 49 � 713 � 12.4 � 41.0 � 337 � 20.1 � 38.6SW � 95 � 1076 � 18.5 � 38.2 � 363 � 19.4 � 39.9SW-G � 117 � 1274 � 30.1 � 35.5 � 198 � 71.6 � 10.0SW-G � 147 � 1568 � 47.8 � 30.5 � 294 � 86.2 � 7.2SW-G � 178 � 1715 � 57.6 � 22.8 � 147 � 127.1 � 5.3

Atamanovskii Island (rear part)

SW � 12 � 124 � 9.8 � 43.6 � 124 � 78.5 � 9.6SW � 21 � 249 � 13.8 � 39.6 � 124 � 35.9 � 22.2SW � 49 � 534 � 20.0 � 37.6 � 285 � 25.3 � 30.5SW � 95 � 933 � 25.2 � 34.8 � 398 � 16.1 � 48.5SW-G � 117 � 1100 � 30.0 � 32.6 � 166 � 39.0 � 19.9SW-G � 147 � 1371 � 36.2 � 30.5 � 271 � 32.5 � 23.4SW-G � 178 � 1611 � 39.9 � 27.8 � 240 � 24.1 � 32.6������������������������������������������������������������������������������������* (SW) Simulated water of the Yenisei River, (SW-G) simulated water + 0.5% glucose, (t) leaching time, (V) volume of the liquid

phase passed through the soil sample in time t, (ASr) fraction of radiostrontium leached from the sample in time t, (A0,i)85Sr activ-

ity in the sample at the origin of the ith section of the leaching curve, (�Vi) volume of the liquid phase passed through the samplein the ith section of the leaching curve, (Kl,i) dynamic coefficient of radiostrontium leaching with the volume �Vi, and(Kd,i) dynamic distribution coefficient of radiostrontium between the soil and the volume of the liquid phase �Vi passed throughthe sample.

soils of the Yenisei River ranges from 1 to 20 Bq kg�1

[24]. At such a low specific activity of radiostrontium,it is a difficult task to examine its leaching dynamics.Therefore, carrier-free 85Sr (4.36 �104 Bq) was intro-duced into the slurry prepared by adding water to120 g of the sample. The resulting radioactively con-taminated soil sample was allowed to stand for twoweeks with intermittent stirring. Then the sample wasair-dried and placed in the corresponding compart-ment of the experimental setup.

Simulated calcium hydrocarbonate water, reproduc-ing the mineral composition of water of the YeniseiRiver [25], was prepared as follows. To 1 l of distilledwater, CaO (27 mg), MgO (6.63 mg), 0.1 M NaOH(0.65 ml), 0.1 M HCl (0.73 ml), and 0.05 M H2SO4(0.52 ml) were added, and the resulting suspensionwas saturated with CO2 until complete dissolution of

the salts. Excess CO2 was removed either by purgingthe solution with nitrogen gas or by vigorously stir-ring it until constant pH (8.2�8.5) was established.

In the leaching experiments, the collecting filterswere renewed at fixed intervals. The spent filters weretreated with 3 M HNO3, and the resulting solutionswere analyzed for 85Sr (�-spectrometrically) and iron(colorimetrically in the form of the o-phenanthrolinecomplex).

To determine the 85Sr loss for sorption on the setupcomponents, after termination of the experiment, thesetup was disassembled, and radiostrontium sorbed onits parts was stripped with 3 M HNO3 and determined�-spectrometrically. The 85Sr loss for sorption wasfound to be about 5% in both reference system andsystems with glucose additive.

Page 4: Dynamics of radiostrontium leaching from radioactively contaminated floodplain soils of the Yenisei River

RADIOCHEMISTRY Vol. 50 No. 1 2008

106 LEGIN et al.

Fig. 2. Flow rate of the liquid phase through the soilsample as a function of time. Figures at the curves corre-spond to the sample numbering; the same for Fig. 4.

Fig. 3. 85Sr leaching curve. Soil: (AE) Atamanovskii Is-land (front part), (AF) Oseredysh Island (front part), and(AG) Berezovyi Island (rear part). Liquid phase: (AB, AC,AD) simulated water of the Yenisei River and (BE, CG,DF) simulated water + 0.5% glucose. (V) Volume of theliquid phase passed through the soil.

Fig. 4. Evolution of pH in the course of the leachingexperiments.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In our experiments, the soil samples were continu-ously eluted for 6 months in the slow infiltrationmode (stagnant-drainage water regime). In the firstthree months, simulated water of the Yenisei Riverwas used as the liquid phase, and then it was changedfor simulated water containing 0.5% glucose to stimu-late gleyzation (this additive modeled the import oforganic nutrition substrate to the floodplain in thehigh-water period). The steady-state flow rate of theliquid phase through the soil sample insignificantlyfluctuated at about 10 ml day�1 (0.14 ml h�1) through-out the experiment (Fig. 2).

After 5�6 days, reducing conditions were es-tablished in the waterlogged soil. The redox potentialdecreased from +(450�500) to �(10�20) mV in theabsence of glucose, and to �(100�120) mV after addi-tion of glucose (0.5%).

Parameters of radiostrontium leaching from flood-

plain soils of the Yenisei River are presented inTable 2 and Fig. 3.

Evolution in pH of the soil (aqueous suspension) inthe six-month experiment is shown in Fig. 4.

The decrease in pH, observed after introduction ofglucose into the liquid phase, was temporary, and sub-sequently pH returned to nearly the initial neutralvalue. The ability to maintain pH in the neutral orweakly basic range is typical of waterlogged soils[15].

Figure 3 shows that, in all the systems studied,both without and with glucose, we observed regularleaching of radiostrontium, suggesting continuoustransfer of its mobile forms from the soil to the liquidphase flow.

In three months of leaching with the simulatedwater containing no glucose (Fig. 3, sections AB, AC,and AD), the 85Sr loss from sample nos. 1, 2, and 3was 30, 18.5, and 25%, respectively. In the next threemonths of leaching with the simulated water contain-ing 5% glucose (Fig. 3, sections BE, DF, and CG),the corresponding values were 34.4, 39.1, and 14.7%.

As can be seen, the 85Sr leaching curve withthe simulated water from sample no. 3 (CEC24.4 mg-equiv/100 g) is arranged between the leach-ing curves from sample nos. 1 and 2 (CEC 4.7 and0.75 mg-equiv/100 g, respectively), suggesting nosimple interrelation between CEC and the leachingrate, i.e., in the systems in hand, ion exchange is nota mechanism controlling the remobilization of radio-strontium.

The leaching curve plotted in the coordinates 85Srleaching (%) vs. V (ml) (Fig. 3) does not provide aninstructive view of the dynamics of radiostrontiumremobilization in different stages of the process.The reasons are both the continuous loss of radio-strontium and biotransformation of macro- and micro-components of the system [26, 27]. As a result, eachfollow-up point in the leaching curve refers to analready altered system. To extract more adequate in-formation from the experimental data, we determinedparameters of the 85Sr leaching for particular sectionsof the leaching curves. As such parameters we usedthe dynamic coefficient of radiostrontium leachingKl,i and dynamic distribution coefficient of radiostron-tium between the soil and the liquid phase Kd,i [11]:

Kl,i = (�Ai/A0,i)/�Vi, Kd,i = (A0,i � �Ai)�Vi /�Aim,

where �Ai is the amount of radiostrontium leachedwith the volume �Vi (ml); A0,i, radiostrontium activity

Page 5: Dynamics of radiostrontium leaching from radioactively contaminated floodplain soils of the Yenisei River

RADIOCHEMISTRY Vol. 50 No. 1 2008

DYNAMICS OF RADIOSTRONTIUM LEACHING 107

Fig. 5. Dynamic coefficient of radiostrontium leaching Kl,i as a function of the liquid phase volume passed through the sample.Sample no.: (a) 1, (b) 2, and (c) 3; the same for Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Dynamic coefficient of radiostrontium distribution Kd,i as a function of the liquid phase volume passed throughthe sample.

in the soil sample at the origin of the ith section ofthe leaching curve; and m, sample weight (g).

Since the sample weight loss and radiostrontiumloss for sorption on the setup parts were insignificantduring the experiment, these factors were ignored inestimating the leaching parameters.

Figures 5 and 6 show the dynamic coefficients ofradiostrontium leaching and distribution as functionsof the liquid phase volume passed. In leaching fromsample nos. 1 and 3 with simulated water (sectionAB), the radiostrontium remobilization efficiencygradually decreases (leaching coefficient decreasesand distribution coefficient increases) (Figs. 5a, 5cand 6a, 6c). According to our theoretical model, theobserved deceleration of the leaching of radiostronti-um can be attributed to the accumulation of Fe(II)inhibiting microbiological processes associated withfermentation and electron transfer to the acceptor.Therefore, under the gleyzation conditions, the leach-ing rate should depend on the efficiency of Fe(II)removal from the system.

In contrast to sample nos. 1 and 3, for sample no. 2and simulated water, as a liquid phase, the leachingcoefficient remains practically unchanged (Figs. 5band 6b, section AB), i.e., in this case, none of factorsdecreases the radiostrontium leaching efficiency. In allcases, addition of glucose abruptly increases Kl,i anddecreases Kd,i. In sample nos. 1 and 2 with relativelylower humus content and high content of the iron hy-droxide fraction, we observed the most distinct ac-

celeration of leaching in the presence of glucose. Inthis case, the efficiency of radiostrontium leachingregularly increases (Figs. 5a, 5b; section BC). The in-crease becomes sixfold by the end of the experiment.Presumably, in these soils, iron hydroxides are lesstightly bound to organic matter, which results inhigher electron-acceptor capacity of Fe(III). In sampleno. 3 with high humus content, the initial increase inthe leaching changes for its subsequent decrease. Itshould be pointed out that previously we observedsimilar trends in the leaching experiments with soddy-meadow soil [11].

Our results show that the dynamics of radionuclideleaching from waterlogged soils is a resultant of op-positely directed factors, whose relative contributionsdepend on the soil type. Evidently, it is such a com-plexity of concerted transformation of the gel filmsand radiostrontium into mobile forms under the gley-zation conditions that is responsible for the lack ofcorrelation between the radiostrontium leaching andcation-exchange capacity.

For comparison sake, we examined the leaching of137Cs under similar conditions (it is well known thatthe mechanism of radiocesium fixation in the soil dif-fers from that of radiostrontium). It was demonstratedin a three-month experiment with floodplain soil col-lected from the Atamanovskii Island and simulatedwater of the Yenisei River (stagnant-drainage waterregime) that the 137Cs leaching is <0.016 and 0.07%for the in situ contaminated soil and the soil con-

Page 6: Dynamics of radiostrontium leaching from radioactively contaminated floodplain soils of the Yenisei River

RADIOCHEMISTRY Vol. 50 No. 1 2008

108 LEGIN et al.

taminated with this radionuclide in the laboratory,respectively.

Our results show that the leaching of radiostronti-um from waterlogged floodplain soils of the YeniseiRiver (20�30%) is considerably higher than that ofradiocesium, causing the possibility of predominantescape of radiostrontium with the intrasoil runoff tothe Yenisei River. This conclusion is supported bythe experimental data on the 90Sr/137Cs ratio in thefloodplain of the Yenisei River downstream of MCC(0.01�0.1), which is considerably lower than that inthe MCC discharge (0.6 [28]).

Finally, our experimental approach to model studyof the leaching of radionuclides from waterloggedsoils open the door for adequate modeling of the mig-ration of radionuclides in radioactively contaminatedriver floodplains in the activity zones of nuclear fuelcycle facilities.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The study was financially supported by the RussianFoundation for Basic Research (project no. 05-03-32 399).

REFERENCES

1. Dobrovol’skii, G.V., Pochvy rechnykh poim tsentraRusskoi ravniny (Soils of River Floodplains of theCentral Russian Plain), Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ.,1968.

2. Tyuryukanov, A.N., Izv. Vses. Geol. O�va., 1964,no. 4, pp. 306�312.

3. Nosov, A.V., Ashanin, M.V., Ivanov, A.B., and Mar-tynova, F.M., At. Energ., 1993, vol. 74, no. 2,pp. 144�150.

4. Mikhailovskaya, L.N., Molchanova, I.V., Pozoloti-na, V.N., and Karavaeva, E.N., Pochvovedenie, 2002,no. 9, pp. 1129�1133.

5. Mokrov, Yu.G., Reconstruction and Prognosis ofRadioactive Contamination of the Techa River,Doctoral (Phys.-Mat.) Dissertation, Ozersk, 2005.

6. Morris, K., Brian, N.D., and Liven, F.R., J. Environ.Radioact., 2001, vol. 56, pp. 259�267.

7. Kaurichev, I.S., Teoriya i praktika metoda sorbtsion-nykh lizimetrov v ekologicheskikh issledovaniyakh(Theory and Practice of the Sorption LysimetricMethod in Environmental Research), Moscow: Mosk.Sel’skokhoz. Akad., 1986.

8. Legin, E.K., Suglobov, D.N., Trifonov, Yu.I., et al.,Radiokhimiya, 2003, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 91�96.

9. Legin, E.K., Trifonov, Yu.I., Khokhlov, M.L., et al.,

C. R. Acad. Sci., Chim., 2004, vol. 7, pp. 1173�1178.10. Legin, E.K., Suglobov, D.N., and Khokhlov, M.L.,

Ross. Khim. Zh., 2005, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 127�130.11. Legin, E.K., Trifonov, Yu.I., Khokhlov, M.L., et al.,

Radiokhimiya, 2007, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 173�178.12. Pavlotskaya, F.I., Karyakin, A.V., et al., Geokhimiya,

1976, no. 7, pp. 1092�1099.13. Drozhko, E.G., Ivanov, I.A., Samsonov, B.G., et al.,

Vopr. Radiats. Besopasn., 1996, no. 2, pp. 22�25.14. Kuznetsova, V.A., Onoshko, M.P., and Generalo-

va, V.A., Radiokhimiya, 2003, vol. 45, no. 5,pp. 466�470.

15. Rowell, D.L., Soil Science: Methods and Applica-tions, Harlow, Essex: Longman, 1994.

16. Kostenkov, N.M. and Strel’chenko, N.E., Okislitel’no-vosstanovitel’noe sostoyanie pereuvlazhnennykh pochvi transformatsiya nekotorykh elementov (Redox Con-dition of Waterlogged Soils and Transformation ofCertain Elements), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 1992.

17. Pavlotskaya, F.I., Migratsiya radioaktivnykh produk-tov global’nykh vypadenii v pochvakh (Migration inSoils of Radioactive Products from Global Fallout),Moscow: Atomizdat, 1974.

18. Fedotov, G.N., Pozdnyakov, A.I., and Zhukov, E.I.,Pochvovedenie, 2004, no. 6, pp. 691�696.

19. Legin, E.K., Trifonov, Yu.I., Khokhlov, M.L., andSuglobov, D.N., Radiokhimiya, 1998, vol. 40, no. 2,pp. 183�188.

20. Zavarzin, G.A. and Kolotilova, N.N., Vvedenie v pri-rodovedcheskuyu mikrobiologiyu (Introduction toNatural Historical Microbiology), Moscow: KnizhnyiDom, 2001.

21. Vinogradskii, S.N., Mikrobiologiya pochvy (SoilMicrobiology), Moscow: Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1952.

22. Lovely, D.R., Microbiol. Rev., 1991, vol. 55, no. 2,pp. 259�287.

23. Zaidel’man, F.R., Protsess gleeobrazovaniya i egorol’ v formirovanii pochv (Gleyzation and Its Con-tribution to Soil Formation), Moscow: Mosk. Gos.Univ., 1998.

24. Kuznetsov, Yu.V., Legin, V.K., Strukov, V.N., et al.,Radiokhimiya, 2000, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 470�477.

25. Alekin, O.A., Osnovy gidrokhimii (The Principles ofHydrochemistry), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1970.

26. Plekhanova, I.O., Pochvovedenie, 1999, no. 5,pp. 568�574.

27. Plekhanova, I.O., Pochvovedenie, 2003, no. 11,pp. 1326�1334.

28. Aturova, V.P., Kovalenko, V.V., Kurtakov, S.V., andChevelyev, A.V., Extended Abstracts, 5th Int. Conf.on Nuclear and Radiochemistry, Pontresina (Switzer-land), September 3�8, 2000, vol. 2, pp. 409�411.


Top Related