1
Grant proposal writing and research policy 29 August 2014- Maren Pannemann PhD – Advisor Research FundingUniversity of Amsterdam
2
Structure of the talk Why research grants
Overview research funding possibilities (EU, other international, national)
Best practices in grant writing
CV building and bridging a funding gap
3
Why research grants?
More focus and time for research New research projects/ groups Research visits abroad Material/conference organisations
CV improvement Publications, invited talks, international network,
(PhD) supervising experience, Enter the “funding circuit”
9
Bottom up: investigator driven, subject of own choice
Top Down: Predefined calls in Work Programmes
11
Pilar 1 – Excellent ScienceMarie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (IF)
Objective: Training and diversification of skills Support the career development of “Experienced Researchers” (ER) ER: at the deadline for the submission of proposals, be in possession
of a doctoral degree or have at least four years of full-time equivalent research experience
Mobility is a key word: always cross a border (country/sector) to be eligible
European Fellowships (EF) Global Fellowship (GF)
12
Marie S. Curie European Fellowship (EF)
MSC fellow applies in collaboration with host Fellow goes to host organisation in Europe for 12 – 24
months Also researchers from non-EU country coming to the EU Funding for: full salary of Experienced Researcher +
contribution to host organisation
13
Marie S. Curie Global Fellowships (GF) Experienced Researcher applies in collaboration with host Outgoing phase: 12-24 months,
mandatory return phase: 12 months Fellow goes to host organisation outside Europe, and
comes back to host organisation in Europe (secondment) Any nationality, but previously long-term EU resident
(>5 yrs) For the GF the partner organisations in TC (Third
Country) must include a letter of commitment
14
Marie S. Curie Secondments
MSC: partner organisations provide additional training and host researchers during secondments
15
Marie S. Curie Structure of Proposal
1. SUMMARY 2. EXCELLENCE 50%3. IMPACT 30%4. IMPLEMENTATION 20%-----------------------------------------------------------------10 pages
5. CV OF THE EXPERIENCED RESEARCHER 6. CAPACITIES OF THE PARTICIPATING ORGANISATIONS 7. ETHICAL ASPECTS 8. LETTERS OF COMMITMENT OF PARTNER ORGANISATIONS
16
Marie S. Curie EvaluationExcellence 50% Quality, innovative aspects and credibility of the research Clarity and quality of transfer of knowledge/training Capacity of the researcher Quality of the supervision and the hosting arrangementsImpact 30% Enhancing research- and innovation-related human resources, skills, and
working conditions to realise the potential of individuals and to provide new career perspectives
communication and results dissemination Implementation 20% Overall coherence and effectiveness of the work plan Appropriateness of the management structures and procedures Appropriateness of the institutional environment Competences, experience and complementarity of the participating
organisations and institutional commitment
17
Marie S. Curie Evaluators
3 experts in the field, not necessarily all of them experts on your specific topic
Might be non-native English speakers
Choice of panel (strongest/most innovative elements of your proposal)
Choice of keywords (basis for identifying experts)
18
Valorization – Research Impact
relevance of the results to current economic, societal, cultural, policy-related or technological problems
effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed approach to knowledge utilisation with respect to meeting the needs of third parties both within and outside the academic sector;
the period over which potential knowledge utilisation is expected to occur;
what, if anything, the researcher intends to do to bring about knowledge utilisation
Who are the ‘stakeholders’? Who is interested in your results?
19
Marie S. Curie: Submit proposal… Annual deadline in September Next deadline 11 September 2014 at 17:00 Electronic Proposal Submission System Chose your Panel: 8 Panels
Social Sciences and Humanities (SOC) Chose keywords The choice of panel and keywords will guide the REA in
the selection of experts for proposal evaluation. Relevant Documents on the page:
Guide for Applicants
Work Programme People 2014
20
Pilar 1 – Excellent ScienceERC- three main types of grantsERC STARTING 2-7 years after PhD1,5 Mill. EUR – 5 years PI is starting first research team
Transition to independence3 February 2015
ERC CONSOLIDATOR 7-12 years after PhD2 Mill. EUR – 5 years PI is consolidating team
Consolidation of independence12 March 2015
ERC ADVANCED > 12 years after PhD2,5 Mill. EUR – 5 years Internationally recognised
research leaders21 October 2014, 2 June 2015
21
Profile ERC Starting Grant
A competitive Starting Grant candidate must have potential for independence and evidence of maturity
at least one important publication without the participation of their PhD supervisor
demonstrate a promising track record of early achievements appropriate to their research field and career stage, including significant publications (as main author) in major international peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journals, or in the leading international peer-reviewed journals of their respective field.
They may also demonstrate a record of invited presentations in well-established international conferences, granted patents, awards, prizes etc.
22
ERC - Excellence of the Project
Ground-breaking nature and potential impact Methodology (feasible / appropriate) High risk / High gain balance
Commitment: 50% of PI working time on the project
23
ERC - Panel StructureSOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES
SH1 Markets, individuals and institutions: SH2 The social world, diversity and common ground: SH3 Environment, space and population: SH4 The human mind and its complexity: SH5 Cultures and cultural production: SH6 The study of the human past:
24
Grants at different stages of career
ERC consolidator7-12 y*
ERC advanced>12 y*
ERC starting2-7 y*
Marie Skłodowska Curie
Participation Consortia H2020 Coordinator Consortia H2020
26
EURIAS Fellowshipshttp://www.2015-2016.eurias-fp.eu/
humanities - social sciences 10-month residencies in one of the 14
participating Institutes: Berlin, Bologna, Budapest, Cambridge, Delmenhorst, Edinburgh, Freiburg, Helsinki, Jerusalem, Lyon, Marseille, Paris, Uppsala, Vienna, Wassenaar, Zürich.
27
Other examples possible funding Volkswagenstiftunghttp://www.volkswagenstiftung.de
Fyssen foundation (postdoctoral study grants, Logic) http://www.fondationfyssen.fr/
Google research grants (topics among others: Software engineering and programming languages, Machine learning/translation/perception)
http://research.google.com/university/relations/research_awards.html
Canon Foundation (all research topics)https://www.canonfoundation.org/
AXA Research Fund (risks)http://www.axa-research.org/
30
The Netherlands NWO Innovational Research Incentive Scheme
in a nutshell: promotes innovation in the academic research field individual researchers at various stages of their careers annual deadlines: VENI: January, VIDI: October, VICI: March
VENI 0-3 years after completion of PhD 250,000 €, duration 3 years
VIDI 3-8 years after completion of PhD 800,000 €, duration 5 years
VICI 8-15 years after completion of PhD 1,500,000 €, duration 5 years
Impact criterion: use of knowledge in society and industry!
http://www.nwo.nl/en/funding/our-funding-instruments/nwo/innovational-research-incentives-scheme/index.html
31
Germany
Humboldt Research Fellowship for Postdoctoral Researchers For candidates who completed doctorate in the last four years 6-24 months at a research institution in Germanyhttp://www.humboldt-foundation.de/web/humboldt-fellowship-postdoc.html
German Science Foundation (DFG): Emmy Noether Programme Postdocs gain the qualifications required for a university teaching
career lasting five years, in which they lead their own research grouphttp://www.dfg.de/en/research_funding/programmes/individual/emmy_noether/index.html
32
Other examples
Max Plank Society Germany French National Research Agency Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and
Research Science Foundation Ireland Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation
33
Disclaimer
The list of grants here is not exhaustive, but is intended to give you an idea about the possibilities
Please do also your own research, e.g. local postdoc grants
e.g. http://www.scholarships-links.com/category/Postdoc-Scholarships.html
34
Structure of the talk Why research grants
Overview research funding possibilities (EU, other international, national)
Best practices in grant writing
CV building and bridging a funding gap
36
The proposal (1)
State of mind:
You ask the funding organisation to fund your research
You help the EU/society/science etc to solve their problems
38
How to structure your text?
Stand out from the pile of applications Catchy title/ Acronym Start with a very short introduction which states the
objectives of the research proposal Summary essential part of proposal, sets the tone
Pitch training: focus on the essential information, preparation for interviews
39
Make it as easy as possible for the evaluators
not a detective story: Start directly with the most important thing
Clear and compact : use figures, bullets, numbers, charts
Put everything where “they” want it: Follow the subheadings
provided. Start writing in the template provided, including CV
Add additional subheadings if necessary for emphasis of certain
issues
Write the proposal for different readers (both expert and non-expert)
Circulate your draft early among colleagues and non-experts
40
State of the art is a bottle neck
What is a problem in your field ?
What is the scientific or technological bottle neck to solvethis problem ?
How is YOUR project going to solve this bottle neck ?
What are the opportunities once the bottle neck is solved ?
41
State of the art is a bottle neck
Example:
“So far, no one has investigated [this topic]. This project will fill this gap by …”
The fact that something has not been investigated yet, does not mean that it is interesting or relevant.
42
State of the art – why?
Help the evaluator understand the problem
Help the evaluator understand where the technological / methodological challenge lies
Show that you know what other research has been done(refer to specific publications/ work)
Show that your research will attempt something new
(if relevant) show any proof of principle or reason why youthink a particularly challenging approach might succeed
43
Formulating your objectives: SMART Specific – Objectives should specify what they want to
achieve. Measurable – You should be able to measure whether
you are meeting the objectives or not. Achievable - Are the objectives you set, achievable and
attainable? Realistic – Can you realistically achieve the objectives
with the resources you have? Time – When do you want to achieve the set objectives?
44
Pitch excercise Pair up Describe in 1 minute the essence of your
research project to your neighbour Include
the bottle neck in your field
what, how, why, when
stakeholders – who is waiting
for your results Switch roles
46
“Worst practices”
“The proposal as written takes up far too much of the permitted word count in telling us about the topic rather than in explaining in detail the what, how, and why of the actual work to be carried out. As it stands, the proposal comes across as a compelling introduction to the topic, but it lacks any development of exactly what is going to be done.”
47
“Worst practices”
“No clear research question; much too broad set of concepts and research themes; serious doubts about the feasibility of proposed analysis of historical sources; no clear contribution to the field; candidate's quality is good but not exceptional; knowledge utilization is not convincing.”
“The author's hypotheses and objectives are not always clearly documented and supported.”
48
Structure of the talk Why research grants
Overview research funding possibilities (EU, other international, national)
Best practices in grant writing
CV building and bridging a funding gap
49
CV section of proposalDo not start filling in the CV section at last, include it in the draft proposal when you are circulating it.
Quality of the researcher: Researchers who have already demonstrated an
outstanding talent for academic research Publications and other relevant achievements in the field List prizes and awards Supervision experience
Have a look at grant criteria andStart building your CV NOW
50
ERC CV requirements (ERC guide for applicants stg/cons 2014)
The ‘funding ID’ must specify any current research grants and their subject.
c. Early achievements track-record (max. 2 pages): The Principal Investigator (PI) must provide a list of achievements reflecting their track record. The PI should list his/her activity as regards: 1. Publications in major international peer-reviewed multi-disciplinary scientific
journals and/or in the leading international peer-reviewed journals, peer-reviewed conferences proceedings and/or monographs of their respective research fields, highlighting five (Starting Grant) or ten (Consolidator Grant) representative publications, those without the presence as co-author of their PhD supervisor, and the number of citations (excluding self-citations) they have attracted (if applicable).
2. Granted patent(s) (if applicable). 3. Invited presentations to peer-reviewed, internationally established conferences
and/or international advanced schools (if applicable). 4. Prizes and Awards (if applicable).
51
Smaller grants – work on your “funding ID”
Research stays abroade.g. USA: Fulbright Grants, annual deadline 1 December, min. 3 months
Travel grants for conferences “Seed money” Best paper awards
http://www.scholarshipportal.eu http://www.nuffic.nl/en
52
What to do when rejected
Read the reviews and any other feedback in a balanced way
Speak with the funding body if possible
Stay positive (rethink, revise, resubmit)
Try to learn as much as possible from the experience
Remember that most grants don’t get funded first time
Do not fire off an e-mail that you might regret!
Did you give yourself the best chance last time?
Look for a mentor and talk to your Research Officers(Courtesy of DCU)
53
Final tips and recommendations.
Give yourself at least four months to write a grant proposal with the goal to have the grant ready about one month prior to submission.
Use the last month to polish the writing and the style of presentation.
Circulate the draft proposal among colleagues.
(Courtesy of DCU)
54
Further Support
Local Grant Officers Technology Transfer Office
National Contact Points H2020http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/support/national_contact_points.html#c,contact=country/sbg/Belgium/1/1/0&+contact_name/asc