dkist safety review safety program status
TRANSCRIPT
DKIST Safety Review Safety Program Status
Steve Shimko
Safety Manager
August 26, 2014
Agenda
• Hazard assessments
• Safety by design
• Emergency preparedness
• Construction safety
• Safety staffing
• The year
Hazard assessments process
• Hazard Analysis Team (HAT) HAs
– GIS design specifics from Facility, FTS
– IT&C tasks - M1 Cell integration, TEOA Install etc..
• Residual Risk acceptance
• Add HA to DKIST System Requirements document
• Develop a compliance matrix for mitigations
Residual risk acceptance
Safety by design
• Final design safety issues
– Individually worked by COTR engineer, contractor, HAT, safety
– Some tracked in JIRA
– To be reviewed at Factory Acceptance Tests (FAT)
• Hazard analysis mitigation implementation – Visual inspections, functional test observations
• Operations and Maintenance manuals
Enclosure (pre) Factory Acceptance Test
Ladder arch girder fall protection
Arch girder stairway
Enclosure trap keys
Coudé rotator Factory Acceptance Test
LOTO
Covers
Hatches
Guarding
TMA rails
Emergency response
• Evacuation vehicle
– Outfitted with emergency equipment
• Haleakalā Emergency Medical Response Group
– Other sites not interested in joint training
• DKIST Emergency Medical Trainer
– Training refreshers for Maui staff
– New service provider to be evaluated
• Plans updated
Outfitting EEV
Confined space rescue
Haleakalā National
Park
Construction safety processes
• Implementation and sustainment
– POD – Plan of the Day
• Serial processing with each supervisor
• Draft flow down process developed
– AHA – Activity Hazard Analyses (or JSA etc.)
• Revised processes
– Daily / weekly documentation maintenance
• Some changes didn’t work out
POD flow down
Contractor Pre-work Performance
• Same contractors all last year • New sub contractors coming on board
– Applying SPEC-0030
Incidents
• One recordable injury
• One near miss
• Many first aid
Recordable injury
• Elbow scrape (minor) became infected
– Cable wrap work
– Multiple physician treatments
– Lost 7 days
– Occurred on mainland
Near miss incident
• Steel template 30 ft. dia. being constructed on ground stuck by forklift
– fell off its supports (~3 ft. high)
• Welder worker fell onto template from unexpected motion
– Sore shoulder
• No workers were contacted by work piece
Root causes
• Forklift backing up and turning on uneven ground in congested roadway area. – Operator was moving slowly, the forks dropped as
rear end rose, contacted the template, which fell quickly
• Insufficient lateral support for work piece stand
• Lack of equipment spotter congested area
• Workers not suspending work and standing clear when heavy equipment moves through their work area
Actions
• Site wide safety meeting held on operator and spotter requirements
• Ensure proper work piece securing • Clearing personnel when moving heavy
equipment / materials • Site inspected for unstable, unsecure or
insufficiently supported materials – Added to daily checklist
• Relocation of equipment to help relieve congested area
First aid incidents
8
2
1 1 1 1
DKIST Oversight
• Daily – Site open and site close inspection – Observations and inspections throughout the day – One-on-one training with S&H Reps – Friendly reminders
• Weekly – Summary report – Incidents reporting
• Near misses / Warnings / Corrective actions
• Monthly – Report to contractors on safety performance
• Needed actions and recommendations
Contractor Performance
• Safety & Environmental compliance training
– Updating JSAs and training - good
– Need more detailed employee training updates
• Fall Protection
• Scaffolds
• Need improvements on timely paperwork completion – Process sustainment
Stretch and bend
Lifting equipment
Location on job / lift description: ATST site
Date of lift: 7/31/14 Pro ject # ATST Type of crane AC435Demag
C rane P lacement: Any deviation from level compact surface in area? None
Electrical hazards in the area? None
Obstacles or obstructions to lift and swing? None
Swing direction and degree (boom swing) North to Northwest
Lif t arrangement: P lanned lif t path: Jib
Lift radius 64 ft. [ ] 360o
[ ] over front Erected [ ] Stored [X ]
[ ] over rear [ X ] over side Is Jib to be used: Yes [ ] No [ ]
Boom length 152 ft. Length of jib: ft.
Boom angle at lift 64 deg. Lif t path cleared? Angle of jib: deg.
Boom angle at set 64 deg. [ ] yes [ ] no Rated capacity o f jib: lbs.
Lo ad line: Whip line:
360o
41,000 lbs. Number of parts cable: 3 Number of parts cable:
Over side lbs. Size of cable: 7/ 8" Size of cable:
Over front lbs. Length 80ft x 3 Length
Over rear lbs. lbs/ft 1 lbs/ft
to tal weight: 240 lbs total weight: 0 lbs
Weight o f lif t Sling select io n
Weight o f load: 32,000 lbs. Type of arrangement
Weight o f lifting beam 0 lbs. Size 10 to n chain falls 4 ea 20000 cap 200 lbs
Weight o f rigging 385 lbs. Size 0 ea 0 cap 0 lbs
Weight o f auxiliary rigging 0 lbs. Size 0 ea 0 cap 0 lbs
A ddit io nal weight: Shackle select io n
Headache ball/ Load-block 1,400 lbs. Size 80 to n masterlink 1 ea 160000 cap 80 lbs
Load line 240 lbs. Size 35 to n shackle 1 ea 70000 cap 25 lbs
Whip line 0 lbs. Size 25 to n shackle 4 ea 50000 cap 20 lbs
Jib deduction 0 lbs. Wieght o f rigging: 385 lbs
A llo wance: A uxilliary rigging:
Unaccounted material 0 lbs. Come-a-long 0 ea 0 cap 0 lbs
T o tal weight: 34,025 lbs. Chainfall 0 ea 0 cap 0 lbs
Other 0 ea 0 cap 0 lbs
% o f crane capacity*: 83% Weight o f auxilliary rigging: 0 lbs
Source of load weight: Verified test lift
Weights verified by: William Shelburne
P R E-LIF T C H EC K LIST YES / N O YES / N O
1. M atting acceptable? [ X] [ ] 8. Experienced operator? [ ] [ ]
2. Outriggers fully extended? [ X ] [ ] 9. Experienced flagman? [ ] [ ]
3. Crane in good condition? [ X ] [ ] 10. Qualified rigger? [ ] [ ]
4. Swing room? [ X ] [ ] 11. Load chart in crane? [ ] [ ]
5. Head room checked? [ X ] [ ] 12. Wind conditions:
6. M ax counterweights used? (X) 13. Crane inspected by:
7. Tag line used? (X) 14. Functional test o f crane by:
Sketch Required! 10%
Special instructions or restrictions for crane, rigging, lift, etc.
1 Job supervisor 3. William Shelburne PM /Superintendent
2 Operator reviewed 4 IISN HSSE
* M ultiple crane lifts require a separate lift plan for each crane. Any changes in configuration, placement, rigging, etc. require that a new plan be developed.
LIFTING PLANNOTE: A LIFT PLAN MUST BE COMPLETED FOR EACH LIFT OR SERIES OF LIFTS FROM ONE LOCATION
Unacco unted M aterial=
*(If load exceeds 75 % of rated capacity, attach sketch rigging plan, crane placement and swing path .)
(center pin of crane to center o f lift)
R ated capacity o f crane:
Document updates
• Updated and new – Confined Space Program
– Training Plan
– Emergency plans
– Updated altitude health and environmental
• Need updates – Project Specific Safety Orientations
• Still need new – Respiratory Protection Program et al
Training
• Completed Training Plan
– Implementation
• OSHA 10 hour construction safety
– On-line procured
• Driving Safety, Respiratory Protection
– Updated
• Emergency medical drills
– Simple drills monthly
Process improvements
• Daily Inspection checklist revised – Lessons learned checklist items
• Vehicle safety inspection checklist – Scheduled maintenance frequency increased
• Forklift, Heavy equipment, Aerial Work Platform inspection checklist created
• Accident/Incident Reporting process on line – Automatically emailed to the personnel’s Manager and
Safety
• Positive reinforcement system – Safety recognition hard hat stickers
New check in sign
Safety trailer use
Environmental
• NPDES maintenance
• Environmental protection deficiency
– Co-mingling food waste and construction waste
– Corrected
Storm monitoring
Hurricanes and Tropical Storms Preparedness Guide DKIST utilizes National Hurricane Center’s Wind Speed Probabilities “bloom” as guidelines for our
planning and Civil Defense announcements as thresholds to trigger actions
ALERT
CAT.
Storm Wind Speed
Probabilities
Possibility Good (40-50%) Actions
Tropical Storm
Winds ≥ 39 mph
Enters the Central Pacific
Management to monitor the storm via the internet or radio/news.
Review sec 9.2 Determine critical staff possibly needed and allow
them leave to prepare personal matters so they can be available
during if NWS issues Watch (48 hrs) or Warning (36 hrs)
4
Tropical Storm
Winds ≥ 39 mph
Any time within 72 hours
Management to review our Hurricane and Storm protocols
All Staff - monitor the storm via the internet or radio/news
3
Tropical Storm
Winds ≥ 58 mph (50 kts)
Any time within 48 hours
Management to determine if there are special circumstances that
would trigger early below actions – storm is moving fast, very strong
or large, moving unpredictably, occurring during weekends or holidays,
or other as appropriate
Civil Defense
Announcements Summit Site Remote Operations Building
2
Hurricane Watch
Winds ≥ 74 mph
Any time within 48 hours
Implement Adverse Summit
Weather Process, Cancel
Operations, Optional
Evacuation of Summit
Implement ROB Adverse Weather
Process (TBD)
1
Hurricane Warning
Winds ≥ 74 mph
Any time within 36 hours
Evacuate Summit Evacuate ROB
Other Civil Defense Announcements
Flash Flood Watch
Possible in the area, stay
alert
Staff to individually to ask permission to be released from work site, depending on their circumstance
Flash Flood Warning
Imminent or occurring, take
immediate action
Staff to individually to ask permission to be released from work site, depending on their circumstance
Safety staffing issues
• Safety Officer left the project in January
– Delayed some program development and implementation actions
– Priority to ensure adequate site safety support and monitoring of the site work
• Safety Technician hired in June
– Construction Safety Officer experience
– EMT and Firefighter experience
Since the last Safety Review
17 Jun 2013
21 Aug 2013
Sep 18 2013
18 Oct 2013
20 Nov 2013
12 Dec 2013
16 Jan 2013
20 Feb 2013
13 March 2014
17 April 2014
16 May 2014
23 June 2014
17 July 2014
20 August 2014
Safety Recognition Award Stickers
Mahalo!
• Questions ?