development of an analytical data management system (adms) to

1
Introduction The aim of salt and polymorph screening is to lay the foundation for a successful and surprise-free development effort by exploring salt and polymorph formation feasibility, physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties, and identifying forms at an early stage (1). Selection of a suitable form through salt and polymorph screening is a critical step that occurs between late drug discovery and early drug development phases, which has far-reaching effects on the ultimate efficacy, ease of manufacturing, and profitability of the final active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). A delicate balance must be maintained between speed and risks when deciding which form to focus development efforts on. The decision process is complex, involving large quantities of chemical and physicochemical data from disparate sources that need to be evaluated—in a coordinated way— across multiple criteria. With the advent of high throughput screening (HTS) technology, scientists are being asked to explore even greater numbers of potentially developable forms than before. Nevertheless, the data evaluation and final decision must still be made in the same amount of time or faster. These pressures create a need for a physicochemical information management system to accelerate the selection process while facilitating the organization and analysis of the increased number of experiments being considered. In this work, we discuss the acceleration of the API form selection by improving data management efficiency through state-of-the-art software systems. With such systems, real-time analytical data obtained from disparate instrument types are integrated into a single user-friendly interface. The implemented pilot Analytical Data Management System (ADMS) solution provides end users with significant capability for visualizing, processing, and comparing data across large groups of experiments, which ultimately facilitates decision making. Efficiency gains of 20% to 80% have been demonstrated for various steps in our workflow. Salt and Polymorph Screening for API Form Selection Figure 1 shows a typical salt and polymorph screening workflow. The key points indicated in the blue boxes correspond to the following general actions and goals: Discovery occurs via HT Screening and/or manual experiments with • Numerous solvent systems • Assorted salt forming agents • Various salt formation/crystallization conditions Characterization is refined in Scale-Up Experiments by using multiple analytical techniques like XRPD, Raman, NMR, elemental analysis, TGA, DSC, etc. • Best Candidate Selection is finally performed based on different desirable and sometimes competing aspects: • Physical properties improvements: solubility, stability, packing density, etc. • Better manufacturing process: simpler, more robust, less costly, etc. • Enhanced patent protection, etc. Figure 1 A typical workflow for salt and polymorph screening. Other details on the actions, experimental output, and analyses of results for the HT Screening and Scale-Up phases are also described in Figure 1. ADMS Pilot Evaluation Criteria The first step of this study was to compile User Requirement Specifications (URS) for a working laboratory that is set up according to the workflow details in Figure 1. Schema A describes the required integration between the existing instrument and software systems and the ADMS. Critical network connections to the systems are shown as solid lines and secondary ones with dashed lines. Schema A Connection between laboratory instruments and software with the pilot ADMS. ACD/Labs Software Zinsser CRISSY ® System Bruker XRD Raman Microscope HTS Instrument Computers Data Browsing (Processing) Computers Satellite Instrument Computers High Throughput Screening Initial Decision Point Scale-Up Experiment Final Decision Point Design of Experiment Obtain and analyze Raman spectra for selected expts. Perform experiments in 96 well blocks Obtain and Analyze XRPD spectra in the 96 well blocks Raman spectrum (*.spc) for each selected expts. (up to 96) One spectrum (*.raw) and image (*.jpg) file per well in 96 well blocks Verify salt formation or polymorph modification Polymorph Grouping according to XRPD Pattern Amorphous or Crystalline Choose experimental conditions based on best hits ACTIONS PERFORMED INPUT/OUTPUT PRODUCED RESULTS FROM ANALYSES Conditions that yield the best crystallinity for each grouping Experimental conditions for each block in text (*.csv) files Scale-up experiments based on best hits Characterize solids in details Confirm salt/polymorph formation with high degree of confidence Crystallinity & Polymorphism: XRPD, Raman... Thermal Properties: DSC, TGA... Hygroscopicity: DVS... And more... NMR, Elemental Analysis, Headspace Karl Fisher... Eliminate poor candidates and select better ones for further evaluation Select Best Candidates Report Many Iterations A first pilot ADMS prototype was built to meet core requirements using off-the-shelf software from ACD/Labs—ACD/Curve Manager—with some custom programming involving macros and some executables. The pilot ADMS was then evaluated by the intended users against the original URS. In a second step, the URS was expanded to incorporate more advanced requirements and modified with the insight gained from the first pilot. As shown in Schema B, additional ACD/Labs’ software components were added to the pilot in order to meet the new set of requirements. This second pilot adds the ACD/UV-IR Manager, ACD/Automation Server and ACD/Web Librarian and software capabilities to the original ACD/Curve Manager pilot with some additional custom programming. Schema B ACD/Labs software description for expanded pilot ADMS. The final evaluation criteria included: 1. Flexibility: Sufficient adaptability to meet the pharmaceutical company’s form selection needs, present and future, is required. 2. Harmonization: Ability to incorporate various types of analytical data in a single interface. 3. Automation: Capability to upload, organize, and process data automatically in real time from various instrumental computers. 4. User Friendliness: Must enable users to process, view, search, and create reports in a way that facilitates and accelerates the form selection process. 5. Information Retrieval and Visualization: Must ensure ease of use and speed of retrieval and comparison of data. 6. Web Access: Ability to share and visualize data via a Web browser. 7. Knowledge Base: Must facilitate the ability to archive, extract, and leverage knowledge from previous studies. Performance of the Pilot ADMS Data Unification, Flexibility, and Harmonization: The pilot ADMS systems allowed us to load multiple types of data from selected experimental data and results into a single database. A list of the various required data types that were incorporated in the database is given in Table 1. Three methods were used to incorporate analytical data into a centralized system: 1. User data entry 2. Direct uploading of instrument data such as plots, tables. 3. Web links, capable of launching external applications. Data compiled in a single database facilitates retrieval evaluation, reporting, and archival processing. The extensive support of a wide variety of analytical and chemical data underscores the ability of this system to evolve and adapt to changing needs. Table 1 List of data types considered in the URS for the salt and polymorph screening. Raw data generated in HTS experiments CRISSY Automation Platform (one Excel file, * .CSV) XRPD (96 or less Bruker DIFFRACT Plus *.raw files and corresponding well image *.jpg files) and PolySnap Raman (96 or less Kaiser Optics *.spc files) Scale-up samples or selected samples in HTS experiments * XRPD * Raman and UV/IR * NMR * Elemental analysis * TGA/DSC * DVS * Solubility * Dissolution Test * SEM image * Polysnap * Particle size analysis * HPLC General file types which may need to be stored in database * Image files * Excel spreadsheet * IsisDraw; ChemDraw * ASCII text file * Microsoft office _____________________ Green: user input Blue: data plot or image Brown: a link ACD/Curve Manager ACD/UV-IR Manager XRPD & Analytical curves... Analysis, Processing, Visualization, Searching, & Reporting Raman spectra ... Analysis, Processing, Visualization, Searching, & Reporting Web Browser Database Access Visualization, Searching, & Reporting ACD/Web Librarian Centralized Local & Remote Databases ACD/Automation Server Automatic ... New Records Upload XRD Raw Data Raman Raw Data CRISSY Raw Data Etc. AUTO- DETECTION Removing the HTS Data Upload Bottleneck by Automation: The application of HTS technology can cause workflow bottlenecks due to large volumes of data created in a short time. Time can be saved and errors reduced if data is automatically collected and organized with minimal human intervention. The upload capabilities are summarized in Figure 2. Routine data handling task could be managed efficiently as follows: User involvement was minimized with a customized Basic program and ACD/Labs group custom macro capabilities to load and process multiple input files at a time. User involvement was removed in the expanded pilot ADMS by using ACD/Automation Server to perform the tedious data collection task: • *.csv files from the Zinsser CRISSY Automated Dispenser • *.raw spectra and *.jpg image files from the Bruker XRPD • *.spc spectra files from the Kaiser Raman instrument Figure 2 Transferring HTS data to the pilot ADMS *. User-Friendliness and Improved Information Retrieval and Access: The single centralized database increases information access. A wide selection of structural, spectral, analytical, and text query tools as well as interactive browsing and data selection functionalities help ensure that information can be found in a relatively facile manner. Figure 3 shows two powerful ways of visualizing data in which large array of data can be presented in an intuitive interface. In Figure 3a, all data associated with the selected sample are shown through a Web browser. In Figure 3b, the database Table view is shown which is useful for reviewing and comparing data from different experiments. Figure 3a Web browser access *. Figure 3b Database in Table View mode. Solvents, Reagents, ... Spectra RAW ANALYTICAL DATA Images AUTOMATED PLATFORM *.RAW *.JPG *.CSV e.g. CRISSY ® (System for Crystalization) e.g. Bruker XRD DATA UPLOADING ACD/Automation Server ACD/SpecManager group macros ACD/Labs Central Database Fully-automated, semi-automated, or manual N NH O O O O H O CH 3 CH 3 e.g. Raman microscope 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 4 12 11 10 A B C D E F G H Structure, Properties *.SDF e.g. API structure, pK a , LogD profile... *.SPC Development of an Analytical Data Management System (ADMS) to Accelerate the Selection of a Suitable API Form Through Salt and Polymorph Screening Karim Kassam, Michel R.J. Hachey, and Michael Boruta ACD/Labs, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Raeann Wu, Peter Karpinski, Patrick Drumm Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ, USA Faster HT Screening Evaluation and Ergonomic Customization: Data evaluation and final decision as to the API form selection must be made quickly. The ability to create task-focused custom data layouts for the database windowpane and templates for the report editor helps accelerate data review and comparison. These templates and forms help hide extraneous data and highlight relevant ones. Collecting all the information in one window further avoids the need to constantly switch from one place to another to review different aspects of the same sample. It also helps create reports quickly that can be exported to Microsoft® Office applications. Figure 4 shows a database custom display layout created to make HT Screening data evaluation and review easier. The evaluation window includes: Friendly navigation with clickable well plate positions Color-coded wells according to selected key parameters, e.g., crystallinity, salt forming agent, polymorph Ability to collect all relevant data in one window: plots, well plate images, XRPD spectrum, reaction conditions, % crystallinity, and polymorph forms It is easy to create new layouts or to reorganize existing ones. Ultimately, the display flexibility offered by the software directly supports faster and smarter evaluation and decision making. Figure 4 Example of a custom evaluation window (screen view) created for HTS *. Further features are especially useful for HT Screening Data evaluation: The ability to display (analyze and annotate) different types of spectra with experimental conditions in the same processing window is useful for in depth evaluations Several sample data can be collected in a single window as a series to help the evaluation A fully adjustable sliding zoom window allows detailed comparisons of particular regions in a spectral series or synchronized windows. Fostering Salt and Polymorph Knowledge Base Creation: Knowledge bases can be created dynamically. The generalized access to data helps ensure high data quality through greater chances of having more than one independent reviewer. Conclusion To meet the User Requirement Specifications (URS) related to data management for salt and polymorph screening, a pilot ADMS was implemented using off-the-shelf software from ACD/Labs: ACD/Curve Manager, ACD/UV-IR Manager, ACD/Automation Server, and ACD/Web Librarian. With some customization, the needs set forth in the pilot project were met within the scope of a typical HT Screening workflow and user experiences. Suggestions for future improvements include interface and customizability enhancements as well as the addition of specific capabilities to enable or facilitate the form selection workflow. Acknowledgement Marilyn DeLaCruz; Lili Feng; Eric Loeser; Ada Skorodinsky; Paul Sutton; Beata Sweryda-Krawiec References 1. P. Heinrich Stahl, Camille G. Wermuth (Editors), Handbook of Pharmaceuticals Salts, Properties, Selection and Use. Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta, Zuerich (2002). * For illustration purposes only: to protect proprietary data, a generic structure (Enalpril Maleate) is shown. ACD/Labs 110 Yonge St. 14th floor Toronto, Canada M5C 1T4 Tel: (416) 368-3435 Toll Free: 1-800-304-3988 Email: [email protected] www.acdlabs.com Novartis Pharmceuticals Corp. One Health Plaza East Hanover, NJ, 07936 Email: [email protected] www.novartis.com

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

IntroductionThe aim of salt and polymorph screening is to lay the foundation for a successful and surprise-freedevelopment effort by exploring salt and polymorph formation feasibility, physicochemical andbiopharmaceutical properties, and identifying forms at an early stage (1). Selection of a suitable formthrough salt and polymorph screening is a critical step that occurs between late drug discovery andearly drug development phases, which has far-reaching effects on the ultimate efficacy, ease ofmanufacturing, and profitability of the final active pharmaceutical ingredient (API).

A delicate balance must be maintained between speed and risks when deciding which form to focusdevelopment efforts on. The decision process is complex, involving large quantities of chemical andphysicochemical data from disparate sources that need to be evaluated—in a coordinated way—across multiple criteria. With the advent of high throughput screening (HTS) technology, scientistsare being asked to explore even greater numbers of potentially developable forms than before.Nevertheless, the data evaluation and final decision must still be made in the same amount of timeor faster. These pressures create a need for a physicochemical information management system toaccelerate the selection process while facilitating the organization and analysis of the increasednumber of experiments being considered.

In this work, we discuss the acceleration of the API form selection by improving data managementefficiency through state-of-the-art software systems. With such systems, real-time analytical dataobtained from disparate instrument types are integrated into a single user-friendly interface. Theimplemented pilot Analytical Data Management System (ADMS) solution provides end users withsignificant capability for visualizing, processing, and comparing data across large groups ofexperiments, which ultimately facilitates decision making. Efficiency gains of 20% to 80% have beendemonstrated for various steps in our workflow.

Salt and Polymorph Screening for API Form SelectionFigure 1 shows a typical salt and polymorph screening workflow. The key points indicated in theblue boxes correspond to the following general actions and goals:

• Discovery occurs via HT Screening and/or manual experiments with• Numerous solvent systems• Assorted salt forming agents• Various salt formation/crystallization conditions

• Characterization is refined in Scale-Up Experiments by using multiple analytical techniques likeXRPD, Raman, NMR, elemental analysis, TGA, DSC, etc.

• Best Candidate Selection is finally performed based on different desirable and sometimescompeting aspects:

• Physical properties improvements: solubility, stability, packing density, etc.• Better manufacturing process: simpler, more robust, less costly, etc.• Enhanced patent protection, etc.

Figure 1 A typical workflow for salt and polymorph screening.

Other details on the actions, experimental output, and analyses of results for the HT Screening andScale-Up phases are also described in Figure 1.

ADMS Pilot Evaluation CriteriaThe first step of this study was to compile User Requirement Specifications (URS) for a workinglaboratory that is set up according to the workflow details in Figure 1. Schema A describes therequired integration between the existing instrument and software systems and the ADMS. Criticalnetwork connections to the systems are shown as solid lines and secondary ones with dashed lines.

Schema A Connection between laboratory instruments and software with the pilot ADMS.

ACD/Labs Software

Zinsser CRISSY®

System

Bruker XRD Raman MicroscopeHTS Instrument Computers

Data Browsing (Processing) Computers

Satellite Instrument Computers

High Throughput Screening

Initial Decision

Point

Scale-Up Experiment

Final Decision

Point

Design of Experiment

Obtain and analyze Raman spectra for selected expts.

Perform experiments in 96 well blocks

Obtain and Analyze XRPD spectra in the 96 well blocks

Raman spectrum (*.spc) foreach selected expts. (up to 96)

One spectrum (*.raw) and image (*.jpg) file per well in 96 well blocks

Verify salt formation or polymorph modification

Polymorph Grouping according to XRPD Pattern

Amorphous or Crystalline

Choose experimental conditions based on best hits

ACTIONS PERFORMED INPUT/OUTPUT PRODUCED RESULTS FROM ANALYSES

Conditions that yield the best crystallinity for each grouping

Experimental conditions for each block in text (*.csv) files

Scale-up experiments based on best hits

Characterize solids in details

Confirm salt/polymorph formation with high degree of confidence

Crystallinity & Polymorphism: XRPD, Raman...

Thermal Properties: DSC, TGA...

Hygroscopicity: DVS...

And more...

NMR, Elemental Analysis, Headspace Karl Fisher...

Eliminate poor candidates and select better ones for further evaluation

Select Best Candidates Report

Many Iterations

A first pilot ADMS prototype was built to meet core requirements using off-the-shelf software fromACD/Labs—ACD/Curve Manager—with some custom programming involving macros and someexecutables. The pilot ADMS was then evaluated by the intended users against the original URS.

In a second step, the URS was expanded to incorporate more advanced requirements and modifiedwith the insight gained from the first pilot. As shown in Schema B, additional ACD/Labs’ softwarecomponents were added to the pilot in order to meet the new set of requirements. This second pilotadds the ACD/UV-IR Manager, ACD/Automation Server and ACD/Web Librarian and softwarecapabilities to the original ACD/Curve Manager pilot with some additional custom programming.

Schema B ACD/Labs software description for expanded pilot ADMS.

The final evaluation criteria included:1. Flexibility: Sufficient adaptability to meet the pharmaceutical company’s form selection needs,

present and future, is required.2. Harmonization: Ability to incorporate various types of analytical data in a single interface. 3. Automation: Capability to upload, organize, and process data automatically in real time from

various instrumental computers.4. User Friendliness: Must enable users to process, view, search, and create reports in a way that

facilitates and accelerates the form selection process. 5. Information Retrieval and Visualization: Must ensure ease of use and speed of retrieval and

comparison of data.6. Web Access: Ability to share and visualize data via a Web browser.7. Knowledge Base: Must facilitate the ability to archive, extract, and leverage knowledge from

previous studies.

Performance of the Pilot ADMSData Unification, Flexibility, and Harmonization:

The pilot ADMS systems allowed us to load multiple types of data from selected experimental dataand results into a single database. A list of the various required data types that were incorporated inthe database is given in Table 1. Three methods were used to incorporate analytical data into acentralized system:1. User data entry2. Direct uploading of instrument data such as plots, tables.3. Web links, capable of launching external applications.

Data compiled in a single database facilitates retrieval evaluation, reporting, and archival processing.The extensive support of a wide variety of analytical and chemical data underscores the ability ofthis system to evolve and adapt to changing needs.

Table 1 List of data types considered in the URS for the salt and polymorph screening.

• Raw data generated in HTS experiments• CRISSY Automation Platform (one Excel file, * .CSV)• XRPD (96 or less Bruker DIFFRACT Plus *.raw files and

corresponding well image *.jpg files) and PolySnap• Raman (96 or less Kaiser Optics *.spc files)

• Scale-up samples or selected samples in HTS experiments* XRPD * Raman and UV/IR* NMR * Elemental analysis* TGA/DSC * DVS* Solubility * Dissolution Test* SEM image * Polysnap* Particle size analysis * HPLC

• General file types which may need to be stored in database* Image files * Excel spreadsheet* IsisDraw; ChemDraw * ASCII text file* Microsoft office

_____________________Green: user input Blue: data plot or image Brown: a link

ACD/Curve Manager ACD/UV-IR Manager

XRPD & Analytical curves...

Analysis, Processing, Visualization, Searching, & Reporting

Raman spectra ...

Analysis, Processing, Visualization, Searching, & Reporting

Web Browser Database Access

Visualization, Searching, & Reporting

ACD/Web Librarian

Centralized

Local & Remote

Databases

ACD/Automation Server

Automatic ...

New Records Upload

XRD Raw Data

Raman Raw Data

CRISSY Raw Data

Etc.

AUTO-

DETECTION

Removing the HTS Data Upload Bottleneck by Automation:

The application of HTS technology can cause workflow bottlenecks due to large volumes of datacreated in a short time. Time can be saved and errors reduced if data is automatically collected andorganized with minimal human intervention. The upload capabilities are summarized in Figure 2.

Routine data handling task could be managed efficiently as follows:• User involvement was minimized with a customized Basic program and ACD/Labs group custom

macro capabilities to load and process multiple input files at a time. • User involvement was removed in the expanded pilot ADMS by using ACD/Automation Server to

perform the tedious data collection task:• *.csv files from the Zinsser CRISSY Automated Dispenser• *.raw spectra and *.jpg image files from the Bruker XRPD• *.spc spectra files from the Kaiser Raman instrument

Figure 2 Transferring HTS data to the pilot ADMS *.

User-Friendliness and Improved Information Retrieval and Access:

The single centralized database increases information access. A wide selection of structural, spectral,analytical, and text query tools as well as interactive browsing and data selection functionalities helpensure that information can be found in a relatively facile manner. Figure 3 shows two powerfulways of visualizing data in which large array of data can be presented in an intuitive interface. InFigure 3a, all data associated with the selected sample are shown through a Web browser. In Figure3b, the database Table view is shown which is useful for reviewing and comparing data fromdifferent experiments.

Figure 3a Web browser access *.

Figure 3b Database in Table View mode.

Solvents, Reagents, ...

Spectra

RAW ANALYTICAL DATA

Images

AUTOMATED PLATFORM

*.RAW

*.JPG

*.CSV

e.g. CRISSY®

(System for Crystalization)

e.g. Bruker XRD

DATA UPLOADING

ACD/Automation Server

ACD/SpecManager group macros

ACD/Labs Central Database

Fully-automated, semi-automated, or manual

NN H

O

O

OOH

OC H 3

C H 3

e.g. Raman microscope

1 2 3 5 6 7 8 94 121110

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

Structure, Properties *.SDF

e.g. API structure, pKa,LogD profile...

*.SPC

Development of an Analytical Data Management System (ADMS) to Accelerate

the Selection of a Suitable API Form Through Salt and Polymorph Screening

Karim Kassam, Michel R.J. Hachey, and Michael BorutaACD/Labs, Toronto,

Ontario, Canada

Raeann Wu, Peter Karpinski, Patrick Drumm

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.,East Hanover, NJ, USA

Faster HT Screening Evaluation and Ergonomic Customization:

Data evaluation and final decision as to the API form selection must be made quickly. The ability tocreate task-focused custom data layouts for the database windowpane and templates for the reporteditor helps accelerate data review and comparison. These templates and forms help hideextraneous data and highlight relevant ones. Collecting all the information in one window furtheravoids the need to constantly switch from one place to another to review different aspects of thesame sample. It also helps create reports quickly that can be exported to Microsoft® Officeapplications.

Figure 4 shows a database custom display layout created to make HT Screening data evaluation andreview easier. The evaluation window includes:

• Friendly navigation with clickable well plate positions• Color-coded wells according to selected key parameters, e.g., crystallinity, salt forming agent,

polymorph• Ability to collect all relevant data in one window: plots, well plate images, XRPD spectrum,

reaction conditions, % crystallinity, and polymorph forms

It is easy to create new layouts or to reorganize existing ones. Ultimately, the display flexibilityoffered by the software directly supports faster and smarter evaluation and decision making.

Figure 4 Example of a custom evaluation window (screen view) created for HTS *.

Further features are especially useful for HT Screening Data evaluation:

• The ability to display (analyze and annotate) different types of spectra with experimentalconditions in the same processing window is useful for in depth evaluations

• Several sample data can be collected in a single window as a series to help the evaluation • A fully adjustable sliding zoom window allows detailed comparisons of particular regions in a

spectral series or synchronized windows.

Fostering Salt and Polymorph Knowledge Base Creation: Knowledge bases can be createddynamically. The generalized access to data helps ensure high data quality through greater chancesof having more than one independent reviewer.

ConclusionTo meet the User Requirement Specifications (URS) related to data management for salt andpolymorph screening, a pilot ADMS was implemented using off-the-shelf software from ACD/Labs:ACD/Curve Manager, ACD/UV-IR Manager, ACD/Automation Server, and ACD/Web Librarian. Withsome customization, the needs set forth in the pilot project were met within the scope of a typical HTScreening workflow and user experiences.

Suggestions for future improvements include interface and customizability enhancements as well asthe addition of specific capabilities to enable or facilitate the form selection workflow.

AcknowledgementMarilyn DeLaCruz; Lili Feng; Eric Loeser; Ada Skorodinsky; Paul Sutton; Beata Sweryda-Krawiec

References1. P. Heinrich Stahl, Camille G. Wermuth (Editors), Handbook of Pharmaceuticals Salts, Properties,Selection and Use. Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta, Zuerich (2002).

* For illustration purposes only: to protect proprietary data, a generic structure (Enalpril Maleate) is shown.

ACD/Labs110 Yonge St. 14th floor

Toronto, Canada M5C 1T4Tel: (416) 368-3435

Toll Free: 1-800-304-3988Email: [email protected]

www.acdlabs.com

Novartis Pharmceuticals Corp. One Health Plaza

East Hanover, NJ, 07936 Email: [email protected]

www.novartis.com