default and the maturity structure in sovereign bonds
TRANSCRIPT
DEFAULT AND THE MATURITY STRUCTURE IN SOVEREIGN BONDS
Written by: Cristina Arellano and Ananth Ramanaraynan
Presented by: Daniela Vargas, Li Jiayao
WHAT IS THIS PAPER ABOUT?
Maturity composition and the term structure of interest rate spreads of government debt in emerging markets
As interest rate spread , debt maturity shortens– spread on short bond rise more than long-term spread.
Analyzes the optimal maturity structure
OUTLINE
1. Introduction2. Emerging market bond data3. Difference between Default and Maturity4. Quantitate analysis 5. Simultaneous results 6. Risk Premia in Sovereign bonds7. Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
Model of sovereign debt: borrowing country choose a time-varying maturity structure of debt. Bond prices compensate lenders for the expected loss from
default and interest rate spreads. Interest rate spreads , maturity debt , short-term
spread more than long-term spreads. When high spreads, maturity . Estimate spread curves and duration of bonds issued of
emerging economies. 1 year spread is below 50th percentile: average new
debt 7.3 yrs. 1-year spreads are above 50th percentile, average new debt 5.8 yrs.
Slope of spread curves is 2 %. Bond Price= f(debt maturity, income): optimal debt
maturity
INTRODUCTION
debt+ income= spreads: long-term spreads are higher than short-term spreads
debt + income= spreads: long-term spreads rises less than short-term spreads.
P(low default, upward-sloping spread) P(high default, inverted spread): Portfolio
shifts Brazil: 10th yr spread is on average 1.8%
higher than 1-year spread above 90th %
EMERGING MARKET BOND DATA
Observe the behavior of interest rates spread over default-free bonds across different maturities, and the maturity of new debt issued covaries with spreads.
Yield is related to Spreads: March 1996-April 2011 Zero-coupon bonds are estimated with
secondary market data of the price of coupon-bearing bonds.
TIME SERIES OF SHORT AND LONG SPREADS
SPREADS AND MATURITY COMPOSITION OF DEBT
Maturity of bond is measured: Number of years from the issue date until the
maturity date Bond’s duration: weighted average of the
number of years until each of the bond’s future payments (Macaulay 1938).
AVERAGE SPREADS, MATURITY AND DURATION, CONDITIONAL ON LEVEL OF 1-YEAR SPREAD
Maturity yields on Emerging market bonds are high, principal payment at maturity date is severely discounted. Bound’s value comes from coupon payments made before maturity.
Argentina, Brazil: average time-to-maturity of bonds issued during periods of high spreads compared to low spreads. Brazil bonds mature 5 years sooner when spreads are high.
MODEL
Dynamic model: International borrowing with endogenous default and multiple maturities of debt. Long-term debt: hedge against future fluctuations
in interest rate spreads Short-term: more effective at providing incentives
to repay. Trade-offs: quantitatively important for
understanding maturity structure in emerging markets
Allow risk premia in sovereign bonds’ prices: changing equilibrium bond price function, and borrowing/default behavior.
Time-varying risk in analyzed but tradeoff of risk-neutral lenders is highlighted
MODEL
THE BENEFIT OF SHORT TERM DEBT
Short debt allows larger borrowing because of an incentive benefit relative to long-term debt.
Two key assumption behind the incentive benefit of short-term debt: Lack of commitment in debt policies inherent in
the Markov equilibria Punishment arises only in the event of an explicit
default. If lenders could instead impose a punishment
deviating from a given debt policy or could enrich debt contracts with future debt limits then the incentive benefit of short-term debt would be diminished.
BENEFIT OF LONG-TERM DEBT
Assume borrower has concave utility + Uncertainty default risk varies
Borrower’s utility
Suppose endowments and the default punishment satisfy
Equilibrium the borrower defaults if income in t2 is and repays in all other states
BORROWER’S BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
This is an equilibrium because the allocation maximizes expected utility subject to borrower’s budget constraints:
Write the FOC for borrower’s utility
S.T.
CYCLICAL MATURITY STRUCTURE & DISCUSSION
When income reaches a certain level, long-term debt becomes constrained, and the borrower shifts to issuing short-term debt more heavily.
In our model: short-term debt has an incentive benefit relative to long-term debt that arises solely from the borrower’s lack of commitment (to repayment and to future debt decisions), and how it affects price functions for short-term and long-term debt.
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS Utility function of the borrower: =2
Income=
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS Average debt to GDP ratio is about half of that
observed in the data.
BONDS PRICES AND POLICY FUNCTIONS FOR DEBT
Trade off between the incentive benefit of short-term debt and the hedging benefit of long-term debt with the bond price functions and decision rules from the calibrated model
Short term debt has more lenient borrowing limits—incentive to repay is less sensitive to level of short-term debt than long-term debt.
BOND PRICES AND POLICY FUNCTIONS FOR DEBT
Debt decision rules as a f(short-term debt ( Incentives effects of both types of debt as f(potential
choices for debt Short-term debt is used
more heavily –incentives to
repay falls faster as a
function of long-term
loans than as a function of
short-term loans
SIMULATION RESULTS
Simulate the model and report statistics on the dynamic behavior of spreads and the maturity composition of debt from limiting distribution of debt holdings.
The probability of default is mean-reverting and persistent.
The effect of mean-reverting and persistent default probabilities on the spread curve are the same as in the case of credit spreads for corporate debt.
SIMULATION RESULTS
Maturity composition: Quantitative predictions for the maturity composition of debt.
The model the duration for short and long bonds equal.
Short-term debt always has an incentive benefit because ratio is less than 1.
SIMULATION RESULTS
Table below quantifies the incentives and hedging benefits that determine the maturity composition.
Maturity shortens Maturity of debt is determined by the shapes
of the bond prices function
RISK PREMIA IN SOVEREIGN BONDS
Risk Premia – compensation for risk aversion We consider actuarially fair pricing for bonds to
illustrate the main mechanism driving the maturity structure.
We define the pricing kernel as a function of only the borrower’s income because it is a parsimonious way to model risk premia that vary with the probability of default.
RESULTS Risk premia:
Model: + average spread curve of 0.6% Volatility short spread , short spread closer ≠ Tight connection between average spreads & default
probabilities
RESULTS Actuarially fair yields: Risk premia for each maturity:
Short: (0.9/2.4)= 40% Long: (0.8/3.0)= 30% Risk premia= better fit However, it changes the equilibrium quantities of debt in a
way that worsen the fit to data on quantities. It lowers debt levels and shorten average maturity.
CONCLUSION
In data for emerging markets, changes in the maturity composition of debt commove with changes in the term structure of spreads: When spreads on short-term debt are low, long-
term spreads are higher than short-term spreads, and the maturity of debt issued is long.
When short-term spreads , long-term spread (but less)and the maturity of debt shortens.
Highlight this trade-off between the benefits of short-term and long-term debt in quantitative, dynamic model with endogenous default and multiple, long-term assets.
THANK YOU!