# De Broglie wave and Compton wave

Post on 21-Jun-2016

221 views

Embed Size (px)

TRANSCRIPT

<ul><li><p>Volume 102A, number 8 PHYSICS LETTERS 4 June 1984 </p><p>DE BROGLIE WAVE AND COMFFON WAVE </p><p>S.N. DAS Theoretical Physics Centre, Department of Physics, Midnapore College, Midnapore- 721101, India </p><p>Received 10 June 1983 Revised manuscript received 7 March 1984 </p><p>In contrast to the three-wave hypothesis (TWH) presented earlier [ l ], it is argued in this letter that a massive particle in motion in a Lorentz frame will actually be associated with only two types of waves: (i) a transformed Compton wave and (ii) a superluminal de Broglie wave (B-wave). The subluminal wave (D-wave or D'-wave [2]) cannot be simultaneously cor- related with the particle under consideration. </p><p>In the three-wave hypothesis (TWH) presented ear- lier [ 1 ], it has been assumed that in a Lorentz frame where the particle is at rest, it is associated with an in- trinsic nondispersive Compton wave (C-wave). However, in a Lorentz frame where the particle moves with ve- locity o, i t is assumed to be associated with [ apart from the existing superluminal de Broglie wave (B- wave)] two more waves, viz. (i) a transformed C-wave and (ii) a subluminal wave whose phase velocity is the particle velocity o (D-wave). </p><p>It may be remarked that both in refs. [1] and [2], the main emphasis was on the introduction of the concept of a dual wave (D-wave or D'-wave [2] but no theoretical grounds except the statement have been given to introduce the idea of an intrinsic Compton wave (C-wave) and the transformed C-wave that may be associated with the particle respectively at rest and in motion in a Lorentz frame. In view of this fact, this letter presents a simple derivation which leads to the result that the above-mentioned wave properties may consistently be associated with the particle. Further it will be argued that in a Lorentz frame, where the par- ticle is moving, it may be associated with only two waves: (i) a transformed Compton wave (C-wave) and (ii) a superluminal de Broglie wave (B-wave). The sub- luminal D-wave or D'-wave [2] cannot be simulta- neously associated with the particle under consider- ation. </p><p>It is well know [3] that the fundamental expres- </p><p>338 </p><p>sions for the wave-particle dualism can be written in the form </p><p>E=hv, IPBI =h/X B. (1,2) </p><p>Here E is the energy of the particle and v is its de Broglie frequency, PB is the momentum of the particle and X B is the wavelength of the de Broglie wave (B- wave). Although the above expressions are true both for matter and radiation, an interesting observation may be noted that E cc v, IPBI ~ I/~.B and E oc 1/XB for photons, but E cc v, IPBI cx 1/XB and E q: 1/X B for massive particles. </p><p>So in order to restore the symmetry between the relations valid for photons as well as massive particles, we now propose that there might exist a new kind of wave of wavelength X k which is supposed to be pro- portional to the energy of the particle and that X k = ~'B for photons but X k :~ X B for the massive particles. Then one can have E cc v, IPI31 ~ l/X13 and E ~x 1/X k for photons (with X k = XB); E cx v, LPBI ~ 1/'hi3 and E o: 1/hk for massive particles (with X k ~TB)- </p><p>Actually we define here that apart from the relation between the energy and frequency of radiation or massive particles, a new wavelength h k can also be re- lated with the energy such that </p><p>E = O/X k , (3) </p><p>where the constant of proportionality D is determined from the consideration that ~'k = ~-B for photons but </p><p>0.375-9601/84/$ 03.00 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland Physics Publishing Division) </p></li><li><p>Volume 102A, number 8 PHYSICS LETTERS 4 June 1984 </p><p>X k ~ X B for massive particles. It is significantly noted that the energy-momentum relation E 2 = p2c2 + m2c 4 provides the proper hints. From this relation one can have </p><p>E2/h2c 2 = p2B/h2 + E2/h2c 2 , (4) </p><p>where E 0 = mOc2 is the energy of the particle. Now putting eq. (3) in eq. (4), one gets </p><p>x2/X 2 = 1/~,2B + x2/(',/k) 2 , </p><p>where x = D/he and in particular, i fx = 1 i.e. D = he, the above relation turns out to be </p><p>1/X~ = 1/XB 2 + 1/('fk) 2 . (5) </p><p>Eq. (5) fulfils the condition that X k 4: X B for mas- sive particles and X k = X B for photons (m 0 = 0) and thus it seems that the value of D should equal hc. Therefore, one can have from eq. (3) </p><p>E = hc/X k . </p><p>That is, </p><p>X k = hc/E = h/(p 2 + m2c2) I /2 (6a) </p><p>and </p><p>(Xk ) 0 = h /moc . (6b) </p><p>Needless to say, X k and (Xk) are connected in the form </p><p>X k = (Xk) 0 (1 - t32) 1/2 , (7) </p><p>where/3 = o/c. This new wave aspect of matter differs from the de </p><p>Broglie wave in the sense that the de Broglie wave (B- wave) becomes mathematically undefined for a par- ticle at rest whereas the latter one suggests a finite value even for the rest particle and given (Xk) 0 = h/moc. It is interesting to note that (Xk) 0 is identified with the Compton wavelength ~C = h/mac of the particle arid so X k = (Xk) 0 (1 -/32)1/2 = XC(1 _/32)1/2 for the moving particle may be termed as the transformed Compton wave. </p><p>We have thus presented a simple derivation that has consistently supported the statement [1 ] that a particle at rest and in motion in a Lorentz frame may respec- tively be associated with an intrinsic non-dispersive Compton wave [X C = (Xk) 0 = h/moc ] and the trans- formed Compton wave [X k = XC(I - /32)1/2]. From the above discussion, we then find that any massive particle in motion may actually be associated with </p><p>two types of matter waves viz. (i) the de Broglie wave (B-wave) that corresponds to the three-momentum PB of the particle [X B = IPB1-1 ] and (ii) the trans- formed Compton wave that corresponds to the energy E of the particle [X k = E - 1 ], the proportionality constants being different and are respectively h and hc. </p><p>Suppose we now define a space (S') dual to real space (S) such that in the dual space, the energy and momentum of the particle becomes E' = pB c and IP'I = E/c. It is then easy to see that the phase velocity of of the matter-waves associated with the particle in S'- space is v and consequently the group velocity O'g = c2/v. Needless to say, the four-momentum of the </p><p> ! t S - - </p><p>particle P u = ( E / c, p ) = (PB, E /c) is tl,en a space- time vector. </p><p>The wavelength of the de Broglie wave (X~) and the transformed Compton wave (X~) of the particle moving in dual space (S') are now given as </p><p>x' B = h~ ~'1 = he~L" = Xk, (8a) </p><p>and </p><p>X' k = hc/E' = h/[PBI = XB, (Sb) </p><p>implying that the de Broglie wavelength and the trans- formed Compton wavelength of matter waves (with of = v, Og = c2/v) in the dual space are respectively the same as the transformed Compton wavelength of matter waves (with of = c2/v, Vg = o)in the real space ,x. This fact thus leads to the conclusion that the concept of the three-wave hypothesis (TWH) [1] seems irrelevant. In fact, a massive particle in motion will be associated in the absolute sense with only two types of waves (XB, Xk) whether the phase velocity of the matter waves is of = c2/v or of = o. </p><p>The author is grateful to Professor S.R. Maiti of Midnapore College for helpful discussions. </p><p>,1 It is gratifying to note that in ref. [2] the wavelength of the D'-wave (with of = o) is also nothing but the trans- formed Compton wavelength h k of matter waves with of = c2/v. </p><p>[1] R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. 87A (1981) 95. [21 R. Horodecki, Phys Lett. 91A (1982) 269. [3] L. de Broglie, C.R. Acad Sci. 180 (1925) 498. [4] J. Aharoni, The special theory of relativity (Clarendon, </p><p>Oxford). </p><p>339 </p></li></ul>

Recommended

View more >