covariant quantum spaces, the ikkt model and gravity
TRANSCRIPT
Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Modeland Gravity
Harold Steinacker
Department of Physics, University of Vienna
Paris, march 2017
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
Motivation
need “fundamental” quantum theory of space-time and matter
issues with string theory:
compactification (why 4D? landscape?)constructive definition
proposal:
Matrix Models as fundamental theories of space-time & matter
IKKT model (IIB model) (this talk!), BFSS model (M-theory)
conjecture:4D physics arises on suitable “brane” solutionswithout target space compactification (avoid landscape!)
goal:identify promising “matrix geometries” for space-timeunderstand mechanism of 4D physics, 4D gravity
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
Motivation
need “fundamental” quantum theory of space-time and matter
issues with string theory:
compactification (why 4D? landscape?)constructive definition
proposal:
Matrix Models as fundamental theories of space-time & matter
IKKT model (IIB model) (this talk!), BFSS model (M-theory)
conjecture:4D physics arises on suitable “brane” solutionswithout target space compactification (avoid landscape!)
goal:identify promising “matrix geometries” for space-timeunderstand mechanism of 4D physics, 4D gravity
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
outline:
the IKKT model
covariant quantum spaces: fuzzy S4, generalizations
fluctuation modes & higher spins
geometry: metric, vielbein
realization in IKKT model:eom, (lineariz.) Einstein equations
discussion & outlook
HS, arXiv:1606.00769Marcus Sperling & HS, in preparation
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
The IKKT model
IKKT or IIB model Ishibashi, Kawai, Kitazawa, Tsuchiya 1996
S[Y ,Ψ] = −Tr(
[Y a,Y b][Y a′,Y b′
]ηaa′ηbb′ + Ψγa[Y a,Ψ])
Y a = Y a† ∈ Mat(N,C) , a = 0, ...,9, N large
gauge symmetry Y a → UY aU−1, SO(9,1), SUSY
proposed as non-perturbative definition of IIB string theory
origins:
quantized Schild action for IIB superstring
reduction of 10D SYM to point, N large
N = 4 SYM on noncommutative R4θ
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
numerical results:Kim, Nishimura, Tsuchiya arXiv:1108.1540 ff
”expanding universe“, 3+1-dim. space-time emerges
time evolution of size R(t):
3+1 large dimensions
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
leads to “matrix geometry”: (≈ NC geometry)
S ∼ Tr [X a,X b]2 ⇒ configurations with small [X a,X b] 6= 0should dominate
i.e. “almost-commutative” configurations, geometry
∃ basis of quasi-coherent states |x〉, (overcomplete)
minimize∑
a〈x |∆X 2a |x〉 = O([X a,X b]) � (X a)2,
X a ≈ simult. diagonal,spectrum =: M ⊂ R10
〈x |X a|x ′〉 ≈ δ(x − x ′)xa, x ∈M
embedding of branes in target space R10
X a ∼ xa : M ↪→ R10
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
examples of matrix geometries:
2× 2 matrices
X a =
(xa
(1)
xa(12)
xa(21)
xa(2)
)= xa
(1)|1〉〈1|+ xa(2)|2〉〈2|, a = 1, ...,D
+xa(12)|2〉〈1|+ xa
(2)|1〉〈2|
describe two points at x(1), x(2) ∈ RD
• • (“point branes”)
off-diagonal matrices ≈ strings connecting branes
spectrum of X a ↔ location in RD
choose X 3 = σ3 diagonal, & off-diagonal X 1 = σ1, X 2 = σ2
→ minimal fuzzy sphere S22 ↪→ R3
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
examples of matrix geometries:
2× 2 matrices
X a =
(xa
(1) xa(12)
xa(21) xa
(2)
)= xa
(1)|1〉〈1|+ xa(2)|2〉〈2|, a = 1, ...,D
+xa(12)|2〉〈1|+ xa
(2)|1〉〈2|
describe two points at x(1), x(2) ∈ RD
• 66(( • (“point branes”)
off-diagonal matrices ≈ strings connecting branes
spectrum of X a ↔ location in RD
choose X 3 = σ3 diagonal, & off-diagonal X 1 = σ1, X 2 = σ2
→ minimal fuzzy sphere S22 ↪→ R3
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
examples of matrix geometries:
2× 2 matrices
X a =
(xa
(1) xa(12)
xa(21) xa
(2)
)= xa
(1)|1〉〈1|+ xa(2)|2〉〈2|, a = 1, ...,D
+xa(12)|2〉〈1|+ xa
(2)|1〉〈2|
describe two points at x(1), x(2) ∈ RD
• 66(( • (“point branes”)
off-diagonal matrices ≈ strings connecting branes
spectrum of X a ↔ location in RD
choose X 3 = σ3 diagonal, & off-diagonal X 1 = σ1, X 2 = σ2
→ minimal fuzzy sphere S22 ↪→ R3
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
The fuzzy 2-sphere S2N : Hoppe, Madore
choose X a = Ja(N) ... irrep of SU(2) on H = CN
[X a,X b] = iεabcX c , X aXa =14
(N2 − 1) =: R2N .
quantized symplectic space (S2, ωN)
X a ∼ xa : S2 ↪→ R3
fully covariant under SO(3)
functions on S2N : A = End(H) =
N−1⊕l=0
(2l + 1)︸ ︷︷ ︸Y l
m
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
The Moyal-Weyl quantum plane R4θ:
[X a,X b] = iθab 1l ... Heisenberg algebra
quantized symplectic space (R4, ω)
admits translations, breaks rotations
functions on R4θ: A = End(H) 3 φ =
∫d4k eikX φ(k)
any quantized symplectic spaceM⊂ RD
matrices X a = quantized embedding maps
X a ∼ xa : M ↪→ RD
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
(quasi)coherent states & string states
given matrix geometry X a and point xa ∈ RD
quasi-coherent state = ground state |x〉 of∑a
(X a − xa)2|x〉 = E(x)|x〉
Berenstein - Dzienkowski arXiv:1204.2788, Ishiki arXiv:1503.01230,Schneiderbauer - HS arXiv:1606.00646
string state: |x〉〈y | ∈ End(H)
strings connecting different branes ↔ block-diagonal matrices
Xa =
(X a |x〉〈y ||y〉〈x | Y a
)string states dominate quantum effects! (UV/IR mixing)
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
can measure matrix geometries {X a}:
measure energy E(x) of string connectingM with point x ∈ RD
location ofM⊂ RD ↔ minima of E(x),
Mathematica package “Bprobe” DOI 10.5281/zenodo.45045Schneiderbauer - HS arXiv:1606.00646
examples:
squashed fuzzy CP2N ⊂ R6 fuzzy torus T 2
N
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
in IKKT model:IIB supergravity interactions between branesarise upon integrating out off-diagonal “strings”
X a =
(∗
∗
)→ correct ∼ 1
(x−y)8 propagators (gravitons, ...) in R10
IKKT, Kabat-Taylor, van Raamsdonk, Chepelev-Tseytlin,...
H.S. arXiv:1606.00646
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
back to IKKT model: perturbative approach:
background = set of matrices (2 + µ2
2 )X a = 0, 2 = [X a, [Xa, .]]
X a ∼ xa : M ↪→ R10
add fluctuations Y a = X a +Aa
expand action to second oder in Aa
S[Y ] = S[X ] +2g2 TrAa
((2 +
12µ2)δa
b + 2[[X a,X b], . ]− [X a, [X b, .]])Ab
fluctuations A describe
gauge theory (NCFT) onM (”open strings“ ending onM)
effective metric Gµν(x) ∼ θµµ′(x)θνν
′(x)gµ′ν′(x) , dynamical
⇒ dynamical geometry, ”emergent gravity“ onM(6= 10D gravity!!) (review: H.S. arXiv:1003.4134 )
cf. Rivelles, H-S. YangH. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
how to choose the background braneM⊂ R10?
quantized 4D symplecticM4 ⊂ R10 :
θµν breaks local Lorentz-invariance”invisible“ semi-classically, significant in quantum corrections
look for Lorentz / SO(4) covariant 4D quantum space:
∃ fully covariant fuzzy four-sphere S4N
Grosse-Klimcik-Presnajder; Castelino-Lee-Taylor; Ramgoolam; Kimura;
Hasebe; Azuma-Bal-Nagao-Nisimura; Karabail-Nair; ...
price to pay: “internal structure” → higher spin theory
here:work out lowest spin modes on S4
Λ in IKKT model→ (linearized) Einstein equations HS arXiv:1606.00769
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
how to choose the background braneM⊂ R10?
quantized 4D symplecticM4 ⊂ R10 :
θµν breaks local Lorentz-invariance”invisible“ semi-classically, significant in quantum corrections
look for Lorentz / SO(4) covariant 4D quantum space:
∃ fully covariant fuzzy four-sphere S4N
Grosse-Klimcik-Presnajder; Castelino-Lee-Taylor; Ramgoolam; Kimura;
Hasebe; Azuma-Bal-Nagao-Nisimura; Karabail-Nair; ...
price to pay: “internal structure” → higher spin theory
here:work out lowest spin modes on S4
Λ in IKKT model→ (linearized) Einstein equations HS arXiv:1606.00769
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
covariant fuzzy four-spheres
5 hermitian matrices Xa, a = 1, ...,5 acting on HN∑a
X 2a = R2
covariance: Xa ∈ End(HN) transform as vectors of SO(5)
[Mab,Xc ] = i(δacXb − δbcXa),
[Mab,Mcd ] = i(δacMbd − δadMbc − δbcMad + δbdMac) .
Mab ... so(5) generators acting on HN
denote[X a,X b] =: iΘab
particular realization so(6) ∼= su(4) generatorsMab:
X a = rMa6, a = 1, ...,5 , Θab = r2Mab
(cf. Snyder, Yang 1947)
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
covariant fuzzy four-spheres
5 hermitian matrices Xa, a = 1, ...,5 acting on HN∑a
X 2a = R2
covariance: Xa ∈ End(HN) transform as vectors of SO(5)
[Mab,Xc ] = i(δacXb − δbcXa),
[Mab,Mcd ] = i(δacMbd − δadMbc − δbcMad + δbdMac) .
Mab ... so(5) generators acting on HN
denote[X a,X b] =: iΘab
particular realization so(6) ∼= su(4) generatorsMab:
X a = rMa6, a = 1, ...,5 , Θab = r2Mab
(cf. Snyder, Yang 1947)H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
basic fuzzy 4-sphere S4N :
Grosse-Klimcik-Presnajder 1996; Castelino-Lee-Taylor
Ramgoolam; Medina-o’Connor, Dolan, ...
choose HN = (0,0,N)so(6)∼= (C4)⊗SN
satisfiesXaXa = R21l, R2 ∼ 1
4 r2N2
εabcdeXaXbXcXdXe = (N + 2)R2r3 (volume quantiz.)
generalized fuzzy 4-spheres S4Λ:
H.S, arXiv:1606.00769, M. Sperling - H.S in preparation
choose e.g. HΛ = (n,0,N)so(6)
... thick sphere; R2 := XaXa not sharp
bundle over S4N with fiber CP2
n (→ fuzzy extra dim’s!)
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
local description: pick north pole p ∈ S4
→ tangential & radial generators
X a =
(Xµ
X 5
), xµ ∼ Xµ, µ = 1, ...,4...tangential coords at p
separate SO(5) into SO(4) & translations
Mab =
(Mµν Pµ−Pµ 0
)where Pµ =Mµ5
rescalePµ =
1R
gµνPν (cf. Wigner contraction)
algebra[Pµ,X ν ] ' iδνµ,
[Pµ,Pν ] = iR2Mµν → 0
[Xµ,X ν ] =: iθµν = ir2Mµν ≈ 0
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
start with basic S4N : HN = (0,0,N)so(6)
∼= (0,N)so(5)∼= (C4)⊗SN
geometry from coherent states |p〉:
{pa = 〈p|Xa|p〉} = S4
minimal uncertainty
〈p|∑
(∆Xa)2|p〉 ≈ 4R2
N=: ∆2
closer inspection:
∃ degenerate space of coherent states at p ∈ S4
→ “internal” fuzzy S2N+1 fiber
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
start with basic S4N : HN = (0,0,N)so(6)
∼= (0,N)so(5)∼= (C4)⊗SN
geometry from coherent states |p〉:
{pa = 〈p|Xa|p〉} = S4
minimal uncertainty
〈p|∑
(∆Xa)2|p〉 ≈ 4R2
N=: ∆2
closer inspection:
∃ degenerate space of coherent states at p ∈ S4
→ “internal” fuzzy S2N+1 fiber
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
hidden bundle structure:
CP3 3 ψ↓ ↓S4 3 ψγ iψ = x i
Ho-Ramgoolam, Medina-O’Connor, Abe, ...
fuzzy S4N is really fuzzy CP3
N , hidden extra dimensions S2 !
local Poisson tensor (↔ commutation relations)
−i[Xµ,X ν ] ∼ θµν(x , ξ)
rotates along fiber ξ ∈ S2 !
is averaged [θµν(x , ξ)]0 = 0 over fiber → local SO(4) preserved,
4D “covariant” quantum space
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
fields and harmonics on S4N
”functions“ on S4N :
φ ∈ End(HN) ∼=⊕
m≤n≤N
(n −m,2m)so(5)
(n,0) modes = scalar functions on S4:
φ(X ) = φa1...an X a1 ...X an
(n,2) modes = selfdual 2-forms on S4
φbc(X )Mbc = φa1...an;bcX a1 ...X anMbc ( ∼= φbc(x)dxb ∧ dxc )
etc.tower of higher spin modes
from ”twisted“ would-be KK modes on S2
(local SO(4) acts non-trivially on S2 fiber)H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
Fluctuation modes on S4Λ
organize tangential fluctuations at p ∈ S4 as
Aµ = θµνAν
where
Aν(x) = Aν(x) +Aνρ(x)Pρ + Aνρσ(x)Mρσ︸ ︷︷ ︸AνabMab ...SO(5) connection
+...
rank 2 tensor field
Aνρ(x) =12
(hνρ + aνρ) hνρ = hρν ... metric fluctuation
rank 3 tensor field
Aνρσ(x)Mρσ ... so(4) connection
rank 1 field Aν(x) ... gauge fieldH. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
gauge transformations:
Y a → UY aU−1 = U(X a +Aa)U−1 leads to (U = eiΛ)
δAa = i[Λ,X a] + i[Λ,Aa]
expand
Λ = Λ0 +12
ΛabMab + ...
... U(1)× SO(5)× ... - valued gauge trafosdiffeos from δv := i[vρPρ, .]
δhµν = (∂µvν + ∂νvµ)− vρ∂ρhµν + (Λ · h)µν
δAµρσ = 12∂µΛσρ(x)− vρ∂ρAµρσ + (Λ · A)µρσ
etc.
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
metric and vielbein
consider scalar field φ = φ(X ) (= transversal fluctuation Aa(X ))
kinetic term
−[Xα, φ][Xα, φ] ∼ eαφeαφ = γµν∂µφ∂νφ,
vielbeineα := {Xα, .} = eαµ∂µ
eαµ = θαµ
note: Poisson structure → frame bundle!metric (open string)
γµν = gαβeαµ eβν = 14 ∆4 gµν
averaging over internal S2:
[eαν ]0 = 0, [γµν ]0 = γµν =∆4
4gµν ... SO(5) invariant !
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
metric and vielbein
consider scalar field φ = φ(X ) (= transversal fluctuation Aa(X ))
kinetic term
−[Xα, φ][Xα, φ] ∼ eαφeαφ = γµν∂µφ∂νφ,
vielbeineα := {Xα, .} = eαµ∂µ
eαµ = θαµ
note: Poisson structure → frame bundle!metric (open string)
γµν = gαβeαµ eβν = 14 ∆4 gµν
averaging over internal S2:
[eαν ]0 = 0, [γµν ]0 = γµν =∆4
4gµν ... SO(5) invariant !
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
perturbed vielbein:
Y a = X a +Aa
ea := {Y a, .} ∼ eaµ[A]∂µ ... vielbein
eαµ[A] ∼ θαβ(δµβ + Aβρgρµ) + 1r2 θ
ανθρσ{Aνρσ, xµ}
using {Pρ,Xµ} ∼ gρµ (!)
effective (open string!) metric (drop radial vielbein)
−[Y a, φ][Ya, φ] ∼ eaφeaφ = γµν∂µφ∂νφ+ ...
γµν ∼ eαµ[A]e να [A]
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
linearize & average over fiber →
γµν = γµν + [δγµν ]0
metric fluctuation:
[δγµν ]0 = ∆4
4
(hµν + kµν
)=: ∆4
4 hµν
kµν ∼ ∂ρAµρν + ∂ρAνρµ
note:
metric hµν = combination of
momentum modes hµν
kµν ∼ ∂ρAµρν + (µ↔ ν)
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
effective metric & conformal factor
kinetic term for scalar fields:
S[φ] ∼∫M
d4x γµν∂µφ∂νφ ∼∫M
d4x√|Gµν |Gµν∂µϕ∂νϕ
effective metric
Gµν = c∆4 γ
µν , c =√
∆4|γ−1µν | = 1− 1
2 h + ...
metric fluctuation
Gµν = gµν + Hµν , Hµν = hµν − 12
gµν h
de Donder gauge
∂µHµν − 12∂νH = 0
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
action for gravitational modes:
quadratic action
S2[A] ∼∫M
d4x(
L2R
(Aµν(2 + 8r2 + 1
2µ2)Aµν
+R4Aνσρ(2 + 8r2 + r2P0 + 1
2µ2)Aνσρ + 2αR4 r2 Aνσρ∂σAνρ︸ ︷︷ ︸
mixing
)
where α = 1 and
L2R = ∆4[pµpµ]0 ... thickness of S4
Λ
Λ = (n1,n2,N)
need L2R > 0, generalized fuzzy sphere S4
Λ with Λ = (n,0,N), n > 0
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
coupling to matter:
δAS[matter] ∼∫M
d4x hµνTµν
equations of motion
(2 + 12µ
2)Aµν =g2
YM∆4
4L2R
Tµν + 4αR2
L2R∂σAµσν(
2 + µ2
2
)Aνσρ = (PSD)
(4αR2 ∂σAνρ +
4g2YM∆4
R2 ∂σTνρ).
PSD ... projector on SD antisymm.
set aµν = 0 (decouples)
mixing α → two scaling regimes:
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
regime G: p2 � α2
L2R
= m2 : neglect mass terms,
... ”gravity” regime (requires “thick” fuzzy sphere S4Λ !)
e.o.m.2 hµν ∝ Tµν
→ linearized Einstein equations
regime C: extreme IR: p2 � α2
L2R
= m2, (“cosmological”)
kµν ∝ Tµν2hµν ≈ 0
mass terms dominate, no propagation, no gravity
or: α = 0, no mixingarises for momentum embedding (below), or self-dual action(add FµνFρσεµνρσ )
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
regime G: p2 � α2
L2R
= m2 : neglect mass terms,
... ”gravity” regime (requires “thick” fuzzy sphere S4Λ !)
e.o.m.2 hµν ∝ Tµν
→ linearized Einstein equations
regime C: extreme IR: p2 � α2
L2R
= m2, (“cosmological”)
kµν ∝ Tµν2hµν ≈ 0
mass terms dominate, no propagation, no gravity
or: α = 0, no mixingarises for momentum embedding (below), or self-dual action(add FµνFρσεµνρσ )
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
linearized curvature and Einstein equations
assume regime G
lin. Einstein tensor
Gµν [g + H] ≈ − 3R2 gµν +
12∂ · ∂hµν
drop background curvature ∼ 1R2 (& local effects)
Gµν ≈ 8πGNTµν (linearized)
Newton constant
GN =(
(α +32
)(α
3+ 1)− 4L2
Rµ2)g2
YM∆4
48πL2R
.
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
gravity mechanism requires generalized fuzzy sphere S4Λ with
a) thick fuzzy sphere with√
N � n� N
b) or decoupling of ∂σAµσν via α = 0
thick S4Λ:
fuzzy extra dimensions (squashed CP2)H.S. arXiv:1504.05703 , H.S. & J. Zahn, arXiv:1409.1440
interesting for particle physics (chiral gauge thy)
dim. red. to 4D (mass gap?!)
IR cutoff for gravity: only wavelengths ≤ LRα gravitate
details (IR cutoff) depend on representation Λ
(in progress)
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
alternative: momentum embedding in M.M.:
Yµ = Pµ, µ = 1, ...,4
fluctuations
Yµ = Pµ + δYµ =(δµν + hµν(x)
)Pν + ...
... avoids mixing term α, no mass term for graviton (Goldstone boson)
(work in progress w/ M. Sperling)
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
generalized spheres from coadjoint SO(6) orbits
(co)adjoint orbits
O[Λ] = {g · HΛ · g−1; g ∈ SO(6)} ⊂ so(6) ∼= R15
embedding functions mab : O[Λ] ↪→ R15 defined by
mab = tr(X Σab), a,b = 1, ...,6, X ∈ O[Λ]
Σab ... generators of so(6)
project to R5 via the projection
Π : O[Λ] ⊂ R15 → R5
only xa = ma6 describe embedding in R5
xa = tr(XΣa6) = −12
tr(Xγa)
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
generalized spheres from coadjoint SO(6) orbits
(co)adjoint orbits
O[Λ] = {g · HΛ · g−1; g ∈ SO(6)} ⊂ so(6) ∼= R15
embedding functions mab : O[Λ] ↪→ R15 defined by
mab = tr(X Σab), a,b = 1, ...,6, X ∈ O[Λ]
Σab ... generators of so(6)
project to R5 via the projection
Π : O[Λ] ⊂ R15 → R5
only xa = ma6 describe embedding in R5
xa = tr(XΣa6) = −12
tr(Xγa)
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
basic sphere S4N : Λ = (0,0,N)so(6), HΛ = N|ψ0〉〈ψ0|
O[Λ] = SU(4)/SU(3)× U(1) ∼= CP3
projection to 4-sphere (=Hopf map):
CP3 3 ψ↓ ↓S4 3 ψγaψ = xa
xaxa = R2N
mµν selfdual, describes S2
CP3 is a S2 bundle over S4.
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
generalized sphere S4Λ: Λ = (n,0,N)so(6)
HΛ = N|ψ0〉〈ψ0|+ n|ψ1〉〈ψ1|
Let P ... spectral projection n→ 0
O[Λ]
P ↓O[NΛ1] ∼= CP3 xa
→ S4 ↪→ R5 .
S4Λ = CP2 bundle over CP3 ∼= S4 × S2
R2 ... non-trivial spectrum, ”thick“ 4-sphere embedded in R5
[R2,X b] 6= 0.
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
quantized (“fuzzy”) coadjoint orbits S4Λ
replace functions mab on O[Λ] by generatorsMab acting on HΛ,
Λ ... (dominant) integral weight.
End(HΛ) ... quantized algebra of functions
cf. E. Hawkins, q-alg/9708030
same geometry in target space as O[Λ]
semi-classical limit: [., .]→ i{., .}
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
Quantization
defined by
e−Γeff[X ] =
∫dAdΨe−S[X+A,Ψ]
well-behaved due to max. SUSY
one-loop results: using string states H.S. arXiv:1606.00646
TrEnd(H)O =(dimH)2
(VolM)2
∫M×M
dxdy(|x〉〈y |)O(|y〉〈x |) .
stabilization of S4N via vacuum energy, bare mass µ2 > 0
(cf. H.S. : arXiv:1510.05779)
tangential fluctuations:
Γ1−loop[F2] = −8π2
3(dimH)2
(VolM4)2
∫M4
dx Fµν− (ξ)F−µν(ξ)
... anti-selfdual, absorbed via αH. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
summary:
4D covariant quantum spaces in IKKT model→ tower of higher spin modesPoisson structure → frame bundlethick fuzzy sphere S4
Λ → ≈ (lin.) 4-D Einstein equations( provided dim. red. )
classical mechanism, protected by max. SUSY
IR modifications (“cutoff”), additional modes
many open issues(mass gap, Minkowski, non-lin. regime, conf. factor, ...)
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
outlook
more general embeddings of S4Λ: (ongoing w/ M. Sperling)
fuzzy extra dim’s→ mass gap, 4D ?!momentum embeddings Pa
chiral gauge theory expected
new view on string theory: no target space compactification !4D gravity on brane independent of bulk gravity
issues, open questions:
nonlinear case, higher spin modes, fermions, ...more complete mode expansion
Lorentzian case
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
→ equations of motion
L2R(2 + 8r2 + 1
2µ2)Aµν = − g2
YM∆8
16 Tµν + αR2∆4∂σAµσν
R2(2 + 8r2 + µ2
2
)Aνσρ = (PSD)σ
′ρ′
σρ
(− α∆4∂σ′Aνρ′ + g2
YM∆8∂σ′Tνρ′)
(2 + 4r2 + 12µ
2)κ = − g2YM∆8
8R T .
P0SD = 1
4 (δδ − δδ + ε) ... SD antisymmetric projector
neglect radial fluctuations κ, set aµν = 0
use 2 = [X a, [Xa, .]] ∼ ∆4
4 ∂ · ∂
→ equations for kµν ∼ ∂ρAµρν and hµν :
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity
Motivation IKKT model Matrix geometry Fuzzy S4N fields & kinematics Fluctuations Gravity Generalized spheres Quantization
separate kµν into a “local” and a propagating ”gravitational“ part,
kµν = k (loc)µν + k (grav)
µν , k (loc)µν ∝ −Tµν .
eom
(∂ · ∂ −m2k ) k (grav)
µν =g2
YM∆4
3
(α
2L2R−m2
k
)Tµν + 4α
3 m2 hµν ,
(∂ · ∂ − 4m2)hµν =g2
YM∆4
2L2R
Tµν − αL2
Rkµν
where m2k := 4m2 − α2
3L2R≥ 0
formal solutions:
k (grav)µν =
g2YM∆4
3L2R
(α3
(α + 3
2
)− 4L2
Rm2)
12g−m2
kTµν
hµν =g2
YM∆4
3L2R
( (α+ 3
2
)2g−4m2 Tµν −
α
L2R
(α3
(α+ 3
2
)−4L2
Rm2
)(2g−m2
k )(2g−4m2)Tµν
).
effective gravitational metric
h(grav)µν := hµν + k (grav)
µν
(drop ”contact term“ k (loc)µν )
H. Steinacker Covariant Quantum Spaces, the IKKT Model , and Gravity