council on foreign relations patent roundtable · [the paper’s] most interesting finding is the...

18
Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2008 Council on Foreign Relations Patent Roundtable April 7, 2009 LPAdvisors 3 Patent Crisis? Harnessing the power of innovation

Upload: ngoquynh

Post on 25-Apr-2019

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2008

Council on Foreign RelationsPatent Roundtable

April 7, 2009

LPAdvisors3

Patent Crisis?

Harnessing the power of innovation

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Too many patents?

2

Relative to what?

Thousandsof granted

patents

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Relative to the past?

3

1791-1913CAGR=5.8%

1913-1980CAGR=0.66%

1980-2008CAGR=3.4%

Thousands of granted

patents

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Relative to population?

4

Patents per

M population

Well over half of the US population lived on farms until after

the Civil War

Presenter
Presentation Notes
1875: 53% of work force in agriculture 1885: 50% of work force in agriculture

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Relative to the non-farm labor force?

5

Patents per

K workers

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Relative to knowledge workers?

6

Patents per

K scientific,technical,

professionalworkers

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

ChinaChinese Taipei

Hungary

Poland

Slovak RepublicEstonia RomaniaLatvia

United StatesJapan

Germany

FranceUnited KingdomSweden

Netherlands ItalyCanada

KoreaFinland BelgiumAustraliaIsrael

Austria DenmarkSpainNorway

Russia

Singapore

IrelandNew ZealandSouth Africa

Mexico Czech RepublicArgentina

GreeceSloveniaIceland Portugal Turkey

Cyprus

Lithuania

EU 15

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1 10 100 1000 10000 100000 1000000

Low IP productivity

High IP productivity

Relative to National R&D spending?

TriadicPatents (1)

“World Patents”

GERD (2)

“R&D Investment”

(1) Avg # of Triadic Patent Families1996-2002(2) Average Industry Financed GERD in 2000 U.S.$ 1995-2001)Source: OECD 2005 Compendium of Patent Statistics

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Relative to the economy?

8

Patents per

2000 $Bof GDP

1979

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Too much litigation?

9

Cases filed

Patents

Relative to what?

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Relative to other IP cases?

10

Cases filed

Patents

Copyrights

Trademarks

Source: “Judicial Business of the US Courts” between 1997 and 2008 – Table C2A “Cases Commenced, by Nature of Suit”.

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Relative to patents granted?

11

Patent cases /grants

Presenter
Presentation Notes
periodpatentscases% 1770-17991418211.5% 1800-18293510611.7% 1830-18392453471.8% 1840-184945811282.8% Source: Dutton 1984, p. 71

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Relative to case quality?

Attorney Confidential 12

Patent holder success rate

(%)

Trial success rate

Overall success rate

Source: PricewaterhouseCoopers, “A Closer Look: 2008 Patent Litigation Study”

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

One material change:More open markets for technology exchange

From To

Technology markets Barter trade in cross licensing networks

Price-based exchange in licensing markets

Business models Bundled with products Open market exchange

Nature of cases One to one One to many

Nature of defendants Product competitors Technology aggregators

Firm structure Vertical integration Specialization

Attorney Confidential 13

Is this a crisis or simply creative destruction at work?

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Be careful what you wish for

"Everything that can be invented has been invented."- Charles H. DuellDirector of U.S. Patent Office, 1899

[The paper’s] most interesting finding is the apparent decline…in patenting per scientists and engineer between the late 1960s and 70s. This supposedly occurred because the pool of inventive possibilities became depleted…[or] “fished out”...I find his observation consistent with my own qualitative observations on what happened in a number of industries that…entered a period of technological maturity.

- FM Scherer (former chief FTC economist), 1984

14

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

U.S. balance of trade by sector, 2007

0 50 100(50)(100)(150)Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, September 2008:

Surplus

Deficit

($B)

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

“Royalties and license fees”Trade balance for selected countries in 2006

0 10 20 30 40(10)(20)

Surplus

Deficit

($B)Sources: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD Statistics on International Trade in Services; Chinese Ministry of Commerce, China Trade In Services, 2008

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Patents are America’s most valuable strategic reserve

“Patent Reserves(1)” by CountryProven Oil Reserves by Country

TriadicPatents (K)

Billionbarrels

Source: Energy Information Administration Estimate 2008; 2008 OECD Compendium of Patent Statistics 1) Triadic patents granted over the last 20 years

Saudi Arabia holds 20% of the world’s oil reserves, while the U.S. holds 33% of the worlds patent reserves

Copyright 3LP Advisors - 2009

3LPAdvisors-Attorney Confidential-

Conclusions

There is no patent crisisPatent filings are driven by the opportunity in technology investments and are a sign of an advanced and thriving knowledge-based economy

There is no litigation crisisPatent suits are an expected and necessary part of a functioning patent system. There is no evidence of rising abuse or increased bias in favor of patent owners. Indeed, the trend is the opposite.One material change is an expanding market for technology exchange and the business response to these increasingly open and liquid markets. What’s wrong with that?

However, a sustained assault on patent rights risks compromising America’s national competitiveness

18