corporate presentation - investors & media
TRANSCRIPT
Corporate PresentationDecember 2020
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
2
This press release contains forward-looking statements for the purposes of the safe harbor provisions under The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. The use of words such as “intended”, "may," "might," "will," "would," "should," "expect," "believe," "estimate," and other similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. For example, all statements Sio makes regarding costs associated with its operating activities are forward-looking. All forward-looking statements are based on estimates and assumptions by Sio’s management that, although Sio believes to be reasonable, are inherently uncertain. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those that Sio expected. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on our operations, the initiation and conduct of preclinical studies and clinical trials; the availability of data from clinical trials; the development of a
suspension-based manufacturing process for Axo-Lenti-PD; the scaling up of manufacturing, the expectations for regulatory submissions and approvals; the continued development of our gene therapy product candidates and platforms; Sio’s scientific approach and general development progress; and the availability or commercial potential of Sio’s product candidates. These statements are also subject to a number of material risks and uncertainties that are described in Sio’s most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2020, as updated by its subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it was made. Sio undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
SIO: AIMING FOR TRANSFORMATIVE
3
40+ employees across NYC and Raleigh
Gene therapy expertise in neurogenerative diseases
Partnered with leading gene therapy academic
organizations including the NIH and UMass
Focusing on preclinical and analytical development in our
new North Carolina lab facility
PLATFORM PARTNERSHIPS PEOPLE
Combining cutting-edge science with bold imagination to develop genetic medicines that aim to radically improve the lives of patients
Serve the rare disease and Parkinson’s patient
communities as a resource and partner
Partnered with top AAV and Lentiviral manufacturers
including Viralgen and Oxford Biomedica
Clinical data in Parkinson’s disease with 21 patients
across 5 dose cohorts
Use both AAV and Lentiviral vectors tailored
to each disease
Potential to be first-in-class (GM1/2) and best in class
(PD) gene therapy
LEADERSHIP AND ADVISORS TEAM WITH BROAD CNS AND GENE THERAPY EXPERIENCE
Pavan Cheruvu, MDChief Executive Officer
David Nassif, JDChief Financial Officer & General Counsel Gavin Corcoran, MD FACP
Chief R&D OfficerParag Meswani, PharmD
Chief Commercial Officer
Frank Torti, MDChairperson
Berndt ModigBoard Member
Atul Pande, MDLead Independent Director
Senthil SundaramBoard Member
Eric Venker, MD, PharmDBoard Member
Kristiina Vuori, MD, PhDBoard Member
Pavan Cheruvu, MDBoard Member
Guanping Gao, PhDChief AAV Scientific Advisor
Man
agem
ent
Advi
sor
Board of Directors
THREE CLINICAL-STAGE GENE THERAPY PROGRAMS
5
Candidate Indication Vector Gene Phase
AXO-Lenti-PD
Research Pre-clinical Clinical
Parkinson’s disease Lentivirus TH, CH1, AADC
AXO-AAV-GM1 GM1 gangliosidosis AAV9 GLB1
AXO-AAV-GM2 Tay-Sachs/Sandhoffdisease
AAVrh.8 HEXA, HEXB
Phase 2
Phase 1/2
Phase 1/2
Geographic rights: WorldwideFDA Designations: Orphan Drug Designation
Rare Pediatric Disease Designation
Geographic rights: WorldwideFDA Designations: Orphan Drug Designation
Rare Pediatric Disease Designation
Geographic rights: Worldwide
6
AXO-Lenti-PD Program Update
AXO-Lenti-PD has the potential to provide clinically meaningful benefits to patients with advanced PD continuing to progress on medical therapy
Clinically Meaningful Data Next Steps
• Complete the development of suspension process clinical trial material
• File the IND in the US and IMPD in EU
• Dose patients with the higher dose in the open label SUNRISE-PD study
• Proceed to a controlled study (EXPLORE-PD) with the appropriate dose based on the results of SUNRISE-PD
• Cohort 2 shows:• Favorable safety profile similar to cohort 1 & Prosavin• Positive assessments focused on the change in motor
function and activities of daily living• Large change from baseline in UPDRS II and III - 14
and 21 points, respectively• Clinically meaningful improvement in Hauser Diary
OFF and good ON time• Reduction in the LEDD in the face of the stabilization
or improvement
• Totality of data supports moving to a higher dose and greater putaminal coverage
• Achieved with a 3-fold increase in volume administered
Rare fatal pediatric diseasesFirst clinical-stage gene therapies for GM1 gangliosidosis, Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases
7
GM1 GANGLIOSIDOSIS AND GM2 GANGLIOSIDOSIS (TAY-SACHS/SANDHOFF DISEASE): DEVASTATING PEDIATRIC DISEASES
• Mutation in the HEXA or HEXB gene leads to impaired β-hexosaminidase A heterodimer (α-β) enzyme
• HEXA gene mutation: Tay-Sachs disease• HEXB gene mutation: Sandhoff disease
• Accumulation of GM2 ganglioside in the central nervous system leads to significant neurological disease
• Naturally occurring models: feline and sheep
• Mutation in the GLB1 gene leads to impaired β-galactosidase enzyme
• Accumulation of GM1 ganglioside in multiple organ systems causes significant defects:
• Severe progressive neurological decline• Hepatosplenomegaly• Blindness and ocular deficits• Osteoporosis and skeletal dysfunction
• Naturally occurring model: feline
Fatal, pediatric lysosomal storage disorders with monogenic autosomal recessive inheritance pattern
Combined Prevalence: ~750-1,350 US+EU patients with NO APPROVED TREATMENTS
8
GM1 Gangliosidosis Tay-Sachs/Sandhoff Disease
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
50 1 62 3 74 8
NATURAL HISTORY OF INFANTILE GM1 GANGLIOSIDOSIS AND TAY-SACHS/SANDHOFF DISEASE1,2
GM1 GangliosidosisTay-Sachs/Sandhoff
Perc
ent S
urvi
val
Age (years)
Dysphagia Requiring
Feeding Tube Lose Head Control
~50% mortality by 3.5 years
~75% mortality by 5 yearsCannot Sit
AloneLose Head
Control
OsteoporosisBlindnessSeizure Onset
Clinical course illustrates rapidly progressive and uniformly fatal nature of both diseases
1: Bley, et al, Pediatrics. 2011; 128(5):1233-1241.2: Utz, et al, Mol Genet Metab. 2017; 121(2):170-179.
Life expectancy curve derived from natural history study in GM2 patients
9
ATTRACTIVE TARGETS FOR GENE THERAPY: WELL-UNDERSTOOD BIOLOGY UNDERLYINGBOTH DISEASES
10
Broad distribution achieved via one-time administration
Underlying neurobiology supports the use of gene
therapy for long-term enzyme restoration
Clinically relevant biomarkers paired with
well-accepted neurodevelopmental
measures
GM1 Ganglioside β-galactosidase
GM2 Ganglioside
β-Hexosaminidase A(α-β heterodimer)
GM3 Ganglioside GM1 Gangliosidosis
HEXA Gene: Tay-Sachs disease
GM2 Gangliosidosis
HEXB Gene: Sandhoff diseaseGLB1 Gene
AXO-AAV-GM1: GENE THERAPY FOR GM1 GANGLIOSIDOSIS
11
Only Clinical-Stage Gene Therapy Program Targeting the Full Spectrum of Patients with Type I and Type II GM1 Gangliosidosis
GM1 Gangliosidosis AXO-AAV-GM1 Gene Therapy Rationale
• One time delivery of a functional copy of the GLB1 gene via intravenous administration of AAV9 vector system
• Intravenous delivery addresses the multisystem manifestations of GM1 gangliosidosis
• Only gene therapy to demonstrate restoration of wild-type survival in a naturally-occurring GM1 feline model
• Positive six-month enzyme activity and preliminary clinical outcomes data in late-infantile/juvenile (Type II) children treated with low-dose gene therapy (1.5x1013 vg/kg)
• High dose cohort (4.5x1013 vg/kg) initiated in November 2020; two patients now dosed without complications
• Fatal, pediatric lysosomal storage disorder with monogenic autosomal recessive inheritance pattern that affects ~450-900 US+EU patients
• Single gene (GLB1) defect leads to decreased β-galactosidase enzyme activity and ganglioside accumulation
• Disease hallmark is progressive neurodegeneration due to storage of GM1 ganglioside in lysosomes
• Late infantile/juvenile (Type II) have a life expectancy of 10-20 years
• Currently no treatments available
INTRAVENOUS DELIVERY TO ADDRESS THE MULTISYSTEM MANIFESTATIONS OF GM1 GANGLIOSIDOSIS
12
CEREBRAL ATROPHY
HEPATOSPLENOMEGALY
CHERRY-RED SPOT
SKELETAL DYSPLASIA
CARDIAC ABNORMALITIES
Cisterna magna Delivery Intravenous Delivery
Invasiveness Medium Minor
CNS Distribution
Outer surface of brain and spinal cord*
Whole brain and spinal cord
Body Distribution
Low, highly variable vector delivery to body organs
• Heart• Liver-Spleen• Gastrointestinal• Musculoskeletal• Peripheral nerves
*Data on file
ONLY GENE THERAPY TO DEMONSTRATE RESTORATION OF WILD-TYPE SURVIVAL IN A GM1 FELINE MODEL1
13
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36
Clin
ical
Rat
ing
Scor
e
Age (months)
Normal GM1 feline + one-time gene therapy GM1 feline
GM1 Felines Treated with 1.5E13 vg/kg via Intravenous Injection at 5 Weeks of Age
IV infusion
1: UMass Data on File; WPRE included in construct administered to felines Note: Felines were treated with the first-generation construct and the AXO-AAV-GM1 vector has been optimized prior to dosing patients in the ongoing clinical trial.
INDEPENDENT STUDY CONFIRMS AAV9 IV ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION HAS SUPERIOR CNS DISTRIBUTION IN GM1 FELINES
All feline animals were treated with 1.5e13 vg/kg and used a similar vector backbone
1: Data from Auburn University.Note: Felines were treated with a vector that includes a WPRE component; AXO-AAV-GM1 does not include this component.
INDEPENDENT STUDY DEMONSTRATES AAV9 GENE THERAPY IV ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION IS MOST EFFECTIVE IN EXTENDING SURVIVAL AND IMPROVING CLINICAL FUNCTION
15
All feline animals were treated with 1.5e13 vg/kg and used a similar vector backbone
1: Data from Auburn University.Note: Felines were treated with a vector that includes a WPRE component; AXO-AAV-GM1 does not include this component.
EXTENSIVE PRECLINICAL DATA SUPPORT DIFFERENTIATED CLINICAL APPROACH
16
AAV9 outperforms AAVRh10 acrossadministration routesOptimized Vector
Intravenous administration has superior CNSdistribution and βGal activity with potential toaddress multisystem manifestations
Optimized Delivery
Restoration of white and grey matter, and corticalvolume, as measured by MRI observed in felinemodel
Restored Cortical Volume
Only gene therapy to demonstrate restoration of wildtype survival in naturally occurring feline modelSuperior Outcomes
Independent preclinical studies show consistent superiority of vector, delivery and efficacy with AXO-AAV-GM1 IV delivery
Stabilization of neuromuscular decline and survival prolongation observed in naturally occurring feline model
17
ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION • Intravenous
CLINICAL MEASURES (TYPE II)
• Safety and tolerability
• Developmental changes and disease progression measured by: Vineland-3 Adaptive Behavior Scales, Bayley Scales of Infant Development (Type I only) and Clinical Global Impressions Scale
• Changes to MRI/MRS
• Motor function and disease severity
• Skeletal survey, swallow/speech assessment
• Exploratory objectives include systemic and CSF biomarkers and neurological symptoms
NEXT STEPS
• High dose cohort (4.5x1013 vg/kg) initiated in November 2020; two patients now dosed without complications
• Continued dosing of infantile (Type I) and late-infantile/juvenile (Type II) patients in high-dose cohort of ongoing study
• Obtain data in both Type I and Type II children as part of clinical and regulatory strategy to obtain broad indication
Low-Dose Cohort1.5 x 1013 vg/kg Type I (infantile) and Type II
(juvenile)
STAGE 1: DOSE-RANGING STAGE 2: EFFICACY STUDY
High-dose Cohort4.5 x 1013 vg/kg
6-month data readout December 2020
Stage 1 and Stage 2 will include a mix of Type I (infantile) and Type II (late-infantile/juvenile)
AXO-AAV-GM1: CLINICAL STUDY DESIGN
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03952637
Ongoing
18
Biomarkers of Disease Activity• Rates severity and improvement based on clinical opinion from 1-7
• 1 = “normal” or “very much improved since initiation of treatment”
• “7” = “among the most extremely ill patients” or “very much worse since the initiation of treatment”
• Stabilization in CGI relative to natural history has not been reported previously
1Normal, not
at all ill
2Minimally
ill
3Mildly ill
4Moderately
ill
5Markedly
ill
6Severely
ill
7Very
severely ill
Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI)
Vineland-3 Adaptive Behavior Assessment (VABS-III)• GM1 presents with regression in function or loss of achieved milestones
• Vineland-3 is a measure of adaptive behavior that is widely used to assess intellectual ability in patients with neurodevelopmental disabilities
• Evaluates communication, daily living, and social skills
• VABS-III demonstrates predictable decline in natural history studies and stabilization has not been reported previously.
Ability
Scor
e
Growth Scale Value (GSV)
GSV Score has predictable relationship to ability
• Level of residual enzyme correlates inversely with the severity of the disease
• 10-20% enzyme activity threshold thought to aid in clearance of stored lysosomal substrates and associated with slower disease progression of various lysosomal storage disorders.
• Lower the level of enzymatic activity, the more severe the phenotype
(1) Lang et al., Mol Genet Metab, 2020; (2) NIH data on file; (3) Utz et al., Mol Genet Metab, 2017; (4) Yogalingam et al., J. Biol. Chem. 2019.
AXO-AAV-GM1: CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL ASSESSMENTS OF THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE
AXO-AAV-GM1: 6-Month Data ReadoutBiomarkersClinical and Functional Outcomes
OVERALL SAFETY SUMMARY (6-MONTH DATA)
• AXO-AAV-GM1 was generally safe and well-tolerated at the low dose (1.5x1013 vg/kg) delivered intravenously in Type II (late-infantile and Juvenile) patients.
• There have been no serious adverse events (SAEs) related to gene therapy. o One SAE was described: a single patient experienced bacterial sepsis due to a PICC line infection,
which was considered to be unrelated to the investigational drug product, and which resolved within a few days following line removal and administration of IV antibiotics.
• The most common adverse events were considered mild to moderate. Transient AST elevations were observed in 4 subjects, none of which required clinical intervention or had associated clinical sequelae. There were no other adverse events indicative of impaired liver function including serum bilirubin, GGT, and ALT. No clinically relevant changes were observed in platelet count.
• The favorable safety profile in the low-dose cohort supports continued enrollment of patients in the high-dose cohort (4.5x1013 vg/kg), in which two patients have now been dosed without complications.
20
β-galactosidase ENZYME ACTIVITY IN SERUM ACROSS 9 DISTINCT TIMEPOINTS Increase from baseline between 71-138% (mean: 110%) during the 6-month observation period
21
123
106
74
132138
123
109114
71
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Day 7 Day 14 Day 21 Day 30 Day 45 Day 60 Day 75 Day 90 Day 180
% I
NCR
EASE
FRO
M B
ASEL
INE
IN S
ERU
M
BETA
-GAL
ACTO
SIDA
SE E
NZY
ME
ACTI
VITY
Data Collection Timepoint
% Change from Baseline
N = 5
Cohort Mean: 110%
β-galactosidase ACTIVITY IN SERUM BY SUBJECT:Enzyme activity restored to 23-57% (mean: 38%) of normal* reference levels at Month 6
22.7
56.5
25.7
37.3
48.5
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0%
of N
orm
al R
efer
ence
Lev
els
22
DAY 180 DAY 180 DAY 180 DAY 180 DAY 180
*The reference level was defined by the lowest level of enzyme activity in serum from 30 healthy adult volunteers using the samevalidated assay of beta-galactosidase enzyme activity as was used to assess the patients in the study.
001-003 001-006 001-008001-004 001-007
N = 5
Cohort Mean: 38%
BIOMARKER SUMMARY: Positive Increase in β-Galactosidase Serum Levels Over Six Months
• Serum beta-galactosidase enzyme activity was sampled at 9 distinct timepoints between Day 7 and Month 6
• The proportional increase from baseline across the patients ranged between 71-138% (mean: 110%) during the 6-month observation period, representing an approximate doubling in enzyme activity after gene transfer. At Month 6, serum enzyme activity increased by an average of 71% from baseline (range: 33%-127%) across the five patients.
• At month 6, serum enzyme activity on average was restored to 38% of normal reference levels at Month 6, with individual patients ranging from 23-57% of these normal levels.
• The reference level was defined by the lowest level of serum enzyme activity consistent with a normal clinical presentation in 30 healthy adult volunteers using a validated assay of beta-galactosidase enzyme activity.
• Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected in all patients over the 6-month period. Development and validation of biomarker assays for CSF is currently ongoing.
23
FLOOR AND UPRIGHT MOBILTY SCORES BY SUBJECT AT MONTH 6All subjects demonstrate disease stability
5 5 5 55 5 5 5 5 5 5 55 5
0
1
2
3
4
5
24 34 44 54 64 74 84
Floo
r Mob
ility
Sco
re
Age (in months)001-003 001-004 001-006 001-007 001-008
24
5 5 5 5
2 2 2 2
3 3 3 3
4 4 4 44 4 4 4
0
1
2
3
4
5
24 34 44 54 64 74 84
Upr
ight
Mob
ility
Sco
re
Age (in months)001-003 001-004 001-006 001-007 001-008
Motor Scoring- Floor Mobility: 0 = Unable to roll1 = Rolls Independently2 = Sits with support3 = Sits without support4 = Scoots independently when sitting5 = Crawls in 4-point independently
Upright Mobility Scale: 0 = Non-ambulatory, dependent for wheeled mobility (WC or stroller)1 = Able to pull to stand, unable to ambulate2 =Ambulates only with the assistance of another person (with or without a mobility aid) due to unsteady gait3 =Ambulates independently with mobility aid due to unsteady gait4 =Independent ambulation, may be unsteady5 =Ambulation is normal for age
Visit Schedule: ScreeningDay 30Day 90Day 180
CLINICAL GLOBAL IMPRESSION SCALE (CGI) AT MONTH 6Improved in 4/5 patients and remained stable in the 5TH child over evaluation period.
2
4
3 3 3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CGI-S
ever
ityat
Bas
elin
e
25
SCREENING (SCR)
4 4 4 4 44
3 3 3 3
4
3 3 3 3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CGI-C
ompa
red
to B
asel
ine
D30D90
D180SCR SCR SCR SCR
CGI Baseline Severity :1 = Normal2 = Borderline ill 3 = Mildly ill4 = Moderately ill5 = Markedly ill6 = Severely ill7 = Among the most extremely ill patients.
CGI Compared to Baseline: 1 = Very much improved 2 = Much improved3 = Minimally improved 4 = No change5 = Minimally worse 6 = Much worse7 = Very much worse
D30D90
D180 D30D90
D180 D30D90
D180 D30D90
D180
001-003 001-006 001-004 001-007
001-008
001-003 001-003001-004 001-004001-006 001-006 001-007 001-007001-008 001-008
VINELAND-3: GROWTH VALUE SCORES DEFINITIONS BY DOMAIN
26
VINELAND-3: SUBDOMAIN GROWTH SCALE VALUE SCORES MONTH 6 (1/2)
117 117 121
8782 82
100
118113109 109 106
107114
109
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
24 36 48 60 72 84
Receptive Communication
27
142
154
166
87 87
69
125 126133
137 133136
125 134
135
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
24 36 48 60 72 84
Expressive Communication
4247
10 2940 42
2529 32
2940 42
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
24 36 48 60 72 84
Written Communication[1]
3644
10
37 37 34
3436
31
36 37 34
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
24 36 48 60 72 84
Community[1]
41 45
1034 38 42
38 39 42
39 39 42
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
24 36 48 60 72 84
Domestic[1]
110 110117
7670
75
93100 99
100 10096
102106
101
0
30
60
90
120
150
24 36 48 60 72 84
Personal
Age in Months
Gro
wth
Sca
le V
alue
Sco
re
001-003 001-006 001-008 001-004 001-007
Com
mun
icat
ion
Dai
ly L
ivin
g Sk
ills
Visit Schedule: Screening, Baseline, Day 180
[1] Domestic, Community and Written subdomains are applicable to subjects 3 years and older. Subject 004 turned 3 years old between Day 90 and Day 180.
VINELAND-3: SUBDOMAIN GROWTH SCALE VALUE SCORES MONTH 6 (2/2)
113
97106
73 73 70
8896 99
9297 93
9197 99
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
24 36 48 60 72 84
Interpersonal Relationships
28
10696
108
62 62 58
8393 95
93 9593
87 9692
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
24 36 48 60 72 84
Play and Leisure Time
6857
67
46 45 4651
6459
55 57 5657 59 57
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
24 36 48 60 72 84
Coping Skills
120 118 117
75 72
54
108 112 112
100108
117105112 112
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
24 36 48 60 72 84
Fine
148 148155
8681
68
118 118 119
128 124 126
128 125 126
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
24 36 48 60 72 84
Gross
Age (in Months)
Gro
wth
Sca
le V
alue
Sco
re
001-003 001-006001-004 001-007
001-008
Soci
aliza
tion
Mot
or
Visit Schedule: Screening, Baseline, Day 180
AXO-AAV-GM1 LOW-DOSE TYPE II PATIENT COHORT: 6-MONTH SUMMARY• Generally well-tolerated with a favorable safety
profile• Serum beta-galactosidase enzyme activity
increased in all patients at all timepoints between Day 7 and Month 6, representing an approximate doubling in enzyme activity after gene transfer
• All five children demonstrated signs of clinical disease stability across multiple measures of neurodevelopment
• High-dose cohort (4.5x1013 vg/kg) for Type II patients initiated in November 2020 with two patients dosed without complications; study ongoing 29
AXO-AAV-GM2: GENE THERAPY FOR GM2 GANGLIOSIDOSISStage 1: Clearance of investigational new drug application received November 2020
30
The Only Gene Therapy in Development That has Already Been Tested in Human Patients Through an Expanded Access Protocol
Tay-Sachs / Sandhoff Disease AXO-AAV-GM2
• One-time delivery of two vectors using AAVrh8 vector encoding HEXA and HEXB genes directly to the CNS
• Dual intrathalamic and intrathecal routes of administration allow for transduction across entire neuraxis
• Reported the first evidence of disease stabilization in two infants with Tay-Sachs disease following administration
• Therapy has been generally well-tolerated to date, with no serious adverse events
• Fatal, pediatric lysosomal storage disorder with monogenic autosomal recessive inheritance pattern that affects ~250-450 US+EU patients
• Well-characterized natural history demonstrating developmental regression, blindness and epilepsy with focal seizures
• Caused by a mutation in the HEXA or HEXB genes, which prevents β-hexosaminidase A enzyme formation
• Infantile (Type I) is the most common form of the disease; patients have a life expectancy of 3-4 years
• Currently no treatments available
NATURAL HISTORY OF INFANTILE GM2: TAY-SACHS AND SANDHOFF DISEASES
31
AGE (months)
Clinical course illustrates rapidly progressive and uniformly fatal nature of infantile form of both diseases
Bley, et al, Pediatrics. 2011; 128(5):1233-1241.Jarnes Utz, et al, Mol Genet Metab. 2017; 121(2):170-179
43210
Sitting without propping
Transfer from hand to hand
Head control
Reach for object
Seizure onset
Blindness
Deafness
Gain
Gain
Gain
Gain
Loss
Loss
Loss
Loss
Endpoints include: • Motor milestone gain / loss • Auditory assessments• Visual assessments• MRI changes
Most early motor milestones are gained and subsequently
lost within a ~1-year time frame
AXO-AAV-GM2: COMBINED INTRAPARENCHYMAL AND CSF DOSING DELIVERS OPTIMAL OUTCOMES
32
Bilateral Thalamic + Unilateral ICV (BiTh/ICV) Injections in SD Cats Transduce Entire Neuraxisand Dramatically Improve Function with Significantly Increased Survival (P < 0.0001)
Neuraxial Distribution of Reconstituted Enzyme with Combination Delivery(cross sections stained for HEXA enzyme activity)
Rockwell, et al. ASN Neuro. 2015: 1-13UMMS data on file
CASE STUDY: PATIENT TSD-002 DOSED WITH AXO-AAV-GM2 VIA EXPANDED ACCESS
33
A Mildly Symptomatic Infantile Tay-Sachs Disease Patient Dosed Bilaterally into Thalamus and Cisterna Magna
• Total 4.6x1013 vg as equimolar mix of rAAVrh8HexA and HexB split between thalamus (bilateral) and intrathecal
• Immune Suppression: Rituximab, Sirolimus, Prednisone beginning 6 days prior to administration
• Current status:
• Clinically well at present with a stable exam
• No evidence of seizures or exaggerated startle responses
Cisterna magna and
Lumbar spinal cord
Birth
3 to 4 months – Disease onset• Cherry red spot on macula
10 months• Clinically stable
6 months – Screened
Age: 7-month-old, female
Family History: Two untreated older siblings with Tay Sachs disease• Siblings exhibited rapid disease progression,
clinical regression and seizure onset at 12-18 months of age
Thalamus
7 months – Dosed
34
PRE-TREATMENT
3 MONTH POST-TX
6 MONTH POST-TX
CM = Contrast Media FA = Fractional AnisotropyRD = Radial Diffusivity
No injury to thalamus;
Normal new myelin
deposition
Nestrasil, et al, Molecular Genetics and Metabolism. 2018
CASE STUDY: PATIENT TSD-002 SHOWED NORMAL BRAIN ANATOMY AND INCREASED MYELINATION CONSISTENT WITH NORMAL BRAIN DEVELOPMENT AT THIS AGE
048
1216202428323640444852566064
Baseline Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 6 Month 12
CHO
P IN
TEN
D S
core
Time from Administration TSD-001 TSD-002 Clinically Meaningful Improvement Range
FIRST TWO PATIENTS DOSED WITH AXO-AAV-GM2: STABILIZATION OF MOTOR SKILLS AS MEASURED BY CHOP INTEND*
35
Clinically Meaningful Improvement: Total scores sustained >40 points indicates a clinically meaningful improvement
*CHOP INTEND (Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders) is a 16-item measure of motor skills with a total range of 0 – 64, where zero equals no response and 64 equals a complete response
AXO-AAV-GM2: CLINICAL STUDY DESIGN
36
Low-Dose(n=1)
Registrational study using target dose from Stage 1
(n≈8-10)
Mid-dose(n≈4)
High-dose(n≈3)
STAGE 1: DOSE-ESCALATION STAGE 2: EFFICACY STUDY
ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION
• Vector administered via a catheter directly into the thalamus on both sides and into the CSF through an intrathecal (IT) catheter:
o 75% of the intended intrathecal dose will be administered into the cisterna magna
o 25% of the intended dose will be infused to the thoracolumbar area
CLINICAL MEASURES (TYPE
II)
• Safety and tolerability
• Enzyme activity in CSF and serum
• GM2 ganglioside levels in CSF
• Changes to MRI/MRS
• Motor function and disease severity
• Exploratory objectives include other systemic and CSF biomarkers and neurological symptoms
NEXT STEPS• IND cleared November 2020
• Expects to begin patient identification and site startup activities in preparation for dosing promptly
AAV PROGRAM PARTNERSHIPS WITH LEADING GLOBAL GENE THERAPY INSTITUTIONS
37
• Rare disease programs originated from University of Massachusetts Medical School and Auburn University
• Andelyn Biosciences: premier manufacturer of AAV technology; formed by Nationwide Children’s Hospital
• Viralgen: Leading CDMO built as a joint venture between AskBio and Columbus Venture Partners in Spain
• Secured cGMP capacity and resources to support development and commercialization
Adult neurodegenerative diseasesParkinson’s disease
38
AXO-LENTI-PD: GENE THERAPY FOR PARKINSON’S DISEASE
39
Moderate to Advanced Parkinson’s disease AXO-Lenti-PD
• One-time treatment using a lentiviral vector with three key genes to produce endogenous dopamine
• Development plan integrates robust preclinical and clinical data from 1st generation vector, ProSavin
• SUNRISE-PD Cohort 1: 17-22 point improvement from baseline in UPDRS III “OFF” scores at 6 and 12 months
• Cohort 2: Positive 6-month data demonstrating 21-point improvement from baseline in UPDRS III “OFF” score
• Addressable market of > 200k patients
• Progressive and chronic disease that impacts more than 1 million patients in the US
• 50% of people with PD develop motor problems after 5 years, despite best medical treatment
• >80% experience ON/OFF fluctuations
• Levodopa, the gold standard therapy, causes treatment side effects such as dyskinesias and has a high pill burden with modest improvements of 4-8 points in UPDRS III “OFF” Scores
• Substantial opportunity to improve motor function and quality of life
Clinical Data From 21 Patients Across 5 Different Dose Cohorts Demonstrates Dose Dependent Efficacy and Favorable Safety Profile
OVERVIEW OF AXO-LENTI-PD
40
AXO-Lenti-PD encodes three enzymes required for endogenous dopamine synthesis• Tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) and Cyclohydrolase 1 (CH1): converts tyrosine to L-dopa• Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC): converts L-dopa to dopamine
Utilizes a lentiviral vector with large gene packaging capacity to accommodate all three genes
Tyrosine Levodopa DopamineCH1
TH AADC
Stereotactic delivery via one-time infusion directly into the putamen• Neuroimaging with MRI performed before and after procedure to ensure localization• No intraoperative MRI required for localization
AXO-LENTI-PD: RE-ENGINEREED VECTOR LEVERAGES PROSAVIN NONCLINICAL AND CLINICAL EXPERIENCE
41
AADC CH1
IRES
CMVp TH WPRE
IRES
ProSavinSIN LTR SIN LTR
AADCCH1 WPRE
IRES
AXO-Lenti-PDSIN LTR
CMVp TH
SIN LTR
ProSavin AXO-Lenti-PD
• CH1 moved closer to promoter to enhanceexpression
• TH and CH1 joined by flexible linker to ensure co-localization
VECTOR DESIGN
PROSAVIN CLINICAL EFFICACYMean UPDRS-III OFF Change from
Baseline to 12 Months• Cohort 1: -7 points (-27%)
• Cohort 2: -11 points (-29%)
• Cohort 3: -15 points (-29%)
ProSavin - PHASE 1/2 STUDY
n=3n=6
n=6
15 patients treated with ProSavin to inform AXO-Lenti-PD’s development plan
Cohort 11.9 x 107 TU
Cohort 24.0 x 107 TU
Cohort 31.0 x 108 TU
• 5-10x improvement indopamine production in vitro with AXO-Lenti-PD
• Enhanced PK and PD observed in vitro and in vivo with AXO-Lenti-PD
• Evidence of dose-dependent efficacy and biomarker activity vs. control observed in animal models of disease (MPTP macaque monkeys)
• Long-term studies showed no evidence of carcinogenicity in multiple species
PRE-CLINICAL DATA
1: Stewart, et al, Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev. 2016;27(3):100-110.2: Palfi, et al. The Lancet. 2014;383(9923):1138-1146
AXO-Lenti-PD – Optimized Vector ConstructSUNRISE-PD Phase 2 Clinical Study
Dose Escalation
Cohort 14.2 x 106 TU
600 µL total infusion volume
Volume Expansion Cohort 3
4.2 x 107 TU1800 µL total infusion volume
AXO-Lenti-PDEXPLORE-PD Phase 2
Clinical Study
Randomized, double-blinded clinical trial with
highest safe dose vs. sham surgical procedure
N=2 N=4 Evaluates safety, tolerability, and efficacy of higher volume and flow rate
Cohort 21.4 x 107 TU
600 µL total infusion volume
ENROLLMENT CRITERIA• Patients with advanced, idiopathic Parkinson Disease• Age: 30-70• Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) OFF Stage: 3-4• UPDRS Part III (motor) OFF score: 30-60• Levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD): ≥ 900 mg• ≥ 2.5 hours diary “OFF” time (Cohort 2)
Cohort 3 and EXPLORE-PD Clinical Study
AXO-LENTI-PD CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN: CURRENT STATUS
42
SYSTEMATIC DATA COLLECTION EVALUATING PATIENT OUTCOMES
• Adverse event collection• Focused ongoing surveillance of gene therapy
Safety and Tolerability
• Hauser Patient Diary• UPDRS Part III OFFMotor Function
• UPDRS Part II OFFActivities of Daily
Living
• Levodopa Equivalent Daily Dose (LEDD) Effect on Current Medication Regimen
Hauser Diary is completed by the patient at home every 30 mins over 3 consecutive days.• OFF• ON without troublesome dyskinesia• ON with troublesome dyskinesia• ON without dyskinesia• Sleep
UPDRS II and III evaluations• Objective scale completed by a trained
neurologist after a 12-hour Levodopa washout to evaluate patients without the effects of background medical therapy
LEDD: calculated based on patient’s daily medication doses of Levodopa & other dopamine agonists
43
AXO-LENTI-PD COHORT 1 AND COHORT 2 CHANGE FROM BASELINE TO 6 MONTHS
Patient Hauser Diary OFF Time (hrs)
Hauser Diary“Good ON” Time
(hrs)
LEDD Change(mg)
UPDRS Part II (ADL)OFF
UPDRS Part III (MOTOR)
OFF
1001 +2.8 -2.4 -98 -26 -20
1003 -0.5 +2 -150 -13 -14
Cohort 1 Mean +1.2 -0.2 -124 (11%) -19.5 (65%) -17 (29%)
2002 -0.6 +0.6 0 -12 -22
2004 -0.2 +0.1 -700 - -
2006 -3.9 +3.5 -466 - -
2007 -4.6 +4.5 +81 -15 -19
Cohort 2 Mean -2.3 +2.2 -271 (13%) -13.5 (71%) -20.5 (40%)
• Patient 2004 – Declined to participate in UPDRS OFF evaluations at 6-month assessment. We do not expect this patient to participate in future UPDRS evaluations.
• Patient 2006 – Unable to complete UPDRS OFF assessments due to COVID-related site closure.• Patients 2002, 2006, and 2007 are expected to participate in future assessments provided all sites are open.44
AXO-LENTI-PD: POTENTIALLY TURNING BACK THE CLOCK FOR PATIENTS WITH PARKINSON’S DISEASE
45
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
CHANGE FROM BASELINE ON UPDRS PART III “OFF” SCORE
ProSavin Low-dose ProSavin Medium-dose ProSavin High-DoseALPD Low-dose ALPD Medium-dose Expected Natural History*
Baseline Month 12 Month 24 Month 36 Month 48 Month 60Month 6
*UPDRS III Off score is expected to worsen by 3-4 points per year as the PD progresses; Palfi, et al. Lancet. 2014
Impr
ovem
ent
Wor
seni
ng
TOTALITY OF AXO-LENTI-PD DATA ACROSS COHORTS SUGGESTS CONSISTENT PATIENT BENEFIT
• Generally well-tolerated with no serious adverse events related to therapySafety and Tolerability
•17-21-point mean improvement in the UPDRS Part III (motor) OFF score at 6 months Improved Motor Function
•Increase in “Good” ON time” and decrease in “OFF” time•Increased ON time without dyskinesia and ON time with non-
troublesome dyskinesia•Decrease in ON time with troublesome dyskinesia
Improved Dyskinesias
•Improvement in UPDRS Part II (activities of daily living) OFF score•Decrease in LEDD Improved Quality of Life
46
Next Steps File Investigational New Drug (IND) with US FDA File Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier (IMPD) in EU
Gating item for filing Developing reliable, suspension-based manufacturing process
Volume Expansion Cohort 3
4.2 x 107 TU1800 µL total infusion
volume
AXO-Lenti-PDEXPLORE-PD Phase 2
Clinical Study
Randomized, double-blinded clinical trial with
highest safe dose vs. sham surgical procedure
Cohort 3 and EXPLORE-PD Clinical Study
ENROLLMENT CRITERIA • Bilateral idiopathic PD
• Age: 30-80
• H&Y OFF Stage: 3-4
• Levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD): ≥ 450 mg
• ≥ 2.5 hours diary “OFF” time
AXO-LENTI-PD CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN: NEXT STEPS
Evaluates safety, tolerability, and efficacy of higher volume
and flow rate
47
AXO-LENTI-PD: POTENTIALLY BEST-IN-CLASS INVESTIGATIONAL THERAPY FOR PARKINSON’S DISEASE
48
AXO-Lenti-PDOther
Dopaminergic Gene Therapy
Deep Brain Stimulation
Restores 3 critical enzymes in endogenous dopamine synthesis pathway1 One-time striatal infusion without need for intra-operative MRI2
5+ years of durable efficacy in the clinic5
10+ years of demonstrated safety and tolerability in the clinic5
Potential (based on MoA) to significantly reduce reliance on long-term oral levodopa therapy1,2,5 Potential to improve motor function without worsening troublesome side effects of therapy (e.g. dyskinesias)2,5
No implanted hardware or requirement for long-term device interrogation and maintenance2,3,4,5
1: Stewart, et al, Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev. 2016;27(3):100-110.2. Palfi, et al. The Lancet. 2014;383(9923):1138-11463: Christine, et al. Ann Neurol. 2019.4: VerciseTM DBS Summary, Timmermann, et al. Lancet. 2015 and Deuschl ,et al, N Engl J Med. 2006; DBS Package Inserts.5.. Palfi, et al. The Lancet . 2018 and Data on file
AXO-LENTI-PD HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BECOME A MULTIBILLION-DOLLAR GENE THERAPY OPPORTUNITY
49
~150 K~70 K
~700 K
0 K
100 K
200 K
300 K
400 K
500 K
600 K
700 K
800 K
Base Case (Patients Aged 30-80with H&Y Stage 3-4)
Patients with Dementia Label Expansion Opportunities Total Potential Market
Tota
l Ind
icat
ed A
XO-L
enti-
PD P
opul
atio
n in
US
and
EU5
TOTAL ADDRESSABLE MARKET
~480 K
Source: LEK Consulting, Internal Analysis, NCBI, etc.
Corporate PresentationNovember 2020