cornell universityliepe/webpage/docs/p4456l19.pdfenergy density for te mode 2,2-1-0.5 0 0.5 1-1-0.5...
TRANSCRIPT
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 1
5. RF Systems and Particle Acceleration5.1 Waveguides
5.1.3 Cylindrical Waveguides5.2 Accelerating RF Cavities
5.2.1 Introduction5.2.2 Traveling wave cavity: disk loaded
waveguide5.2.3 Standing wave cavities5.2.4 Higher-Order-Modes5.2.5 The pillbox cavity5.2.6 SRF primer
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 2
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 3
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 4
Mode for particle acceleration: TM01 )cos()()(00 tzkJExE zrr
zz ω−=
)sin()(')(101 tzkJkrExE zrr
zzr ω−−=
0)( =xE ϕ
0)( =xBr
)sin()(')(12 01 tzkJrExB zrr
cz ωωϕ −−=
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 5
ϕinRS
nzz erJBxBxE nm )()(,0)( 0==
R)(
)(
2222
222
zczzki
zzzki
EBkB
BEkE
zc
zc
×∇−∇=
×∇+∇=
⊥⊥−⊥
⊥⊥−⊥
ωω
ωω
( )( )
( )( )
)cos()(
)cos()(
)sin()('
0
)sin()('
)cos()(
0
10
12
10
2
10
2
10
12
2
2
tzknrJBB
tzknrJRnkBBikB
tzknrJRkBBikB
E
tzknrJRBBiE
tzknrJRnBBiE
zRS
nz
zRS
nrR
SzzrSR
z
zRS
nSzzrSR
zr
z
zRS
nSzrSR
zRS
nrR
SzrSR
r
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nmnm
nm
nmnm
nm
nmnm
ωϕ
ωϕ
ωϕ
ωϕωω
ωϕωω
ϕϕ
ϕ
ϕ
−+=
−+−=∂=
−+−=∂=
=
−+=∂−=
−+−=∂=
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
E
B
Bx
z
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 7
0)(,)()( 0 == xBerJExE zin
RZ
nznm
ϕ
R)(
)(
2222
222
zczzki
zzzki
EBkB
BEkE
zc
zc
×∇−∇=
×∇+∇=
⊥⊥−⊥
⊥⊥−⊥
ωω
ωω
0
)sin()('
)cos()(
)cos()(
)cos()(
)sin()('
2
2
0
10
1
0
10
1
0
=
−+−=∂=
−+=∂−=
−+=
−+−=∂=
−+−=∂=
z
zRZ
nczrZR
zRZ
nrR
ZczrZR
r
zRZ
nz
zRZ
nrR
ZzzrZRk
zRZ
nzzrZRk
r
B
tzknrJEEiB
tzknrJnEEiB
tzknrJEE
tzknrJnkEEiE
tzknrJkEEiE
nm
nm
nm
nmnm
nm
nm
nmnm
z
nm
nm
z
ωϕ
ωϕ
ωϕ
ωϕ
ωϕ
ωωϕ
ωϕ
ω
ϕϕ
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 8
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
E
B
Bx
z
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
TES
TMS
TESx
z
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 10
Energy density for TE mode 2,2
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
010002000
3000
4000
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
Energy density for TM mode 2,2
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
020004000
6000
8000
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
Energy density for TM mode 2,2
-1-0.5
00.5
1 0
2
4
6
02000400060008000
-1-0.5
00.5
TEUTMU TMU
x x
xy y z
x
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 11
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 12
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 13
• Use high DC voltage to accelerate particles
• No work done by magnetic fields
Cockroft and Walton's electrostatic accelerator (1932)
Protons were accelerated and slammed into lithium atoms
producing helium and energy.
DC Accelerators:
Use time-varying fields!
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 14
Taiwan Light Source cryomodule
RF Cavities
• The main purpose of using RF cavities in accelerators is to provide energy gain to charged-particle beams
• The highest achievable gradient, however, is not always optimal for an accelerator. There are other factors (both machine-dependent and technology-dependent) that determine operating gradient of RF cavities and influence the cavity design, such as accelerator cost optimization, maximum power through an input coupler, necessity to extract HOM power, etc.
• In many cases requirements are competing.
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 15
• NC or SC• Relatively low
gradient (1…9 MV/m)
• Strong HOM damping (Q ~ 102)
• High average RF power (hundreds of kW)
CESR cavities
KEK cavity
PEP II Cavity
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 16
• NC or SC• High gradients• Moderate HOM
damping reqs. • High peak RF power
ILC: 21,000 cavities!ILC / XFEL cavities
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 17
• SRF cavities• Moderate to low
gradient (8…20 MV/m)
• Relaxed HOM damping requirements
• Low average RF power (5…13 kW)
CEBAF cavities
ELBE cryomodule
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 18
• SRF cavities• Moderate
gradient (15…20 MV/m)
• Strong HOM damping (Q = 102…104)
• Low average RF power (few kW)
Cornell ERL cavities
BNL ERL cavity
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 19
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 20
Standing wave cavity. Traveling wave cavity (wave guide).
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 21
• Cylindrical Waveguide: TM01 has longitudinal electric field and could in principle be used for particle acceleration
• But: phase velocity of wave > c > speed of particle-> no average energy transfer to beam !
• Solution: Disc Loaded Waveguide• Iris shaped plates at constant separation in waveguide lower phase
velocity• Iris size is chosen to make the phase velocity equal the particle
velocity
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 22
Vgroup = Vparticle
ωoperation
koperation
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 23
• Irises form periodic structure in waveguide-> Irises reflect part of wave-> Interference-> For loss free propagation: need disk spacing d
p=integer
d
pd zλ=
pdkz
π2=
π
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 24
Selection of integer “p”:
Long initial settling or filling time,not good for pulsed operation with very short pulses.
Small shunt impedance per length (shunt impedance determines how much acceleration a particle can get for a given power dissipation in a cavity).
Common compromise.
λ
p=2
p=3
p=4
c
csh P
VR2
=
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 25
• Time dependent electromagnetic field inside metal box
• Energy oscillates between electric and magnetic field!
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 26
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 27
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 28
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 29
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 30
500MHz Cavity of DORIS:GHz4967.01.23 )(
010 == Mfcmr
l The frequency is increased and tuned bya tuning plunger.
l An inductive coupling loop excites themagnetic field at the equator of the cavity.
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 31
LC1
=ω
TE TM
TM010
0ˆ,0ˆ =⋅=× HE nn
01 22 =
∂
∂−∇
HE
tc
0
0010
10
00
,405.2
405.2
405.2
εµ
ηω
ηω
ϕ
ω
==
−=
=
Rc
eRrJEiH
eRrJEE
ti
tiz
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 32
Higher Frequency (Order) Standing Wave Modes
TMmnp (TEmnp),m, n, p Ez (Hz) ϕ, r, z
TM010
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 33
T
T = 2/π Eacc Eacc = Vc/d
d = βλ/2
( )∞
∞−
== dzezEV czizc
βωρ 0,0
TdE
cdcd
dEdzeEVd
czic ⋅=
== 00
0
00
0
2
2sin
0
βω
βω
βω
dEVdTttT centerexittransit 00 222 π
βλ ===−=ωωωω t
E z
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 34
• Surface currents (∝ H) result in dissipation proportional to the surfaceresistance (Rs):
• Dissipation in the cavity wall given bysurface integral:
Energy density in electromagnetic field:
Because of the sinusoidal time dependence and 90° phase shift, the energy oscillates back and forth between the electric and magnetic field. The stored energy in a cavity is given by
==VV
dvdvU 20
20 2
121 EH εµ
( )2221 HE ⋅+⋅= µεu
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 35
Quality factor•
2π ~104 ~1010
( )0
000
0
000
12losspower average
energy storedωω
τωπωω
Δ====
⋅≡
cc PU
TPUQ
=
Ss
V
dsR
dvQ 2
200
0H
Hµω
-1000 -500 0 500 10000
1
cavi
ty fi
eld
[arb
. uni
ts]
Frequency – 1.3 GHz [Hz]
Bandwidth
(1) The RF system has a resonant frequency
(2) The resonance curve has a characteristic width
0ω
Q20ωω =Δ
Geometry factor
G
G = 257Ohm
sRGQ =0
=
S
V
ds
dvG 2
200
H
Hµω
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 37
Shunt impedance and R/Q
Pc
R/Q = 196 Ohm
c
csh P
VR2
2=
c
csh P
VR2
=
c
accsh P
Er4
=2
UV
QR csh
0
2
0 ω=
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 38
G⋅R/Q
)/()/)(()/( 0
2
00
2
00
22
QRGRV
RQRQRV
QRQV
RVP
sh
sc
sshs
c
sh
c
sh
cc ⋅
⋅=
⋅=
⋅==
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 39
270 88 /cell
2.552 Oe/(MV/m)
Cornell SC 500 MHz
Hpk Epk R/Q
Pillbox vs. “real life” cavity
Matthias Liepe, P4456/7656, Spring 2010, Cornell University Slide 40