contribution model committee -- membership / sponsorship for oht committee report may 25, 2011
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT
Committee Report
May 25, 2011
![Page 2: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Committee Members
Ron Byers Tim Elwell -- Chair Roger Maduro Skip McGaughey -- Advisor John Piescik Ken Rubin
![Page 3: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Objective
To come up with a contribution model recommendation comprising of membership and/or sponsorship
![Page 4: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Process
Weekly teleconferences– 7 in total with Minutes posted to the OHT BB
3 Interviews Mike Milinkovich
– The Eclipse Foundation Brian Behlendorf
– The Apache Foundation– The Mozilla Foundation– Benetech
Chris Mackie– The Mellon Foundation
Survey– Solicitation– Review– Posting
Recommendations
![Page 5: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Considerations for Recommendations
Needed to work within a 501(c)6 (“Trade Organization”) Structure
Target receipts: $360,000/year– Membership– Sponsorship– Other
Model needs to be flexible– So non-cash contributions are also acceptable
Track Governance-related issues– Recommendations outside the scope of this workgroup
![Page 6: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Interview Themes
Create clear membership categories– Permit members to self select
Projects and/or Control/Influence is NOT for sale– Decisions on projects based on merit not monetary
contribution
Make it simple Remain flexible Offer alternatives for companies that can’t pay
– IP, Resources, Payments for services
![Page 7: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Additional Revenue Sources
Publishing journals Running Trade Events Job Banks Annual Meeting registration Advertisements Bid on RFPs OHT Consulting OHT Training OHT Certification
![Page 8: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Other Budgetary Alternatives
Supplement paid positions with more volunteer positions
![Page 9: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Survey Summary
Survey Monkey Tool Statistics:
Size of Organizations
Organization Type
Response Response
Percent Count
1-50 61.90% 26
51-500 21.40% 9
501-2,500 2.40% 1
2,501-10,000
4.80% 2
>10,000 9.50% 4
Government 4.80% 2
Not-for-profit 23.80% 10
For-profit 69.00% 29
None of the above
2.40% 1
Total Distribution Size 73Bounced 3Total Organizations Represented 61Total Sent 70Total Responses 42Response Rate 60%
![Page 10: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Perceived Value (Strongly Agree/Agree)
Identify partners for collaboration and/or co-development. 35.0% (14) 45.0% (18)
Shared development infrastructure and tools so that members can contribute on higher order value.
37.5% (15) 30.0% (12)
Ability to network. 47.5% (19) 30.0% (12)
Ability to obtain new ideas. 30.0% (12) 42.5% (17)
Access to low cost technology. 2.5% (1) 40.0% (16)
Improved access to open source projects and technology. 15.4% (6) 56.4% (22)
Ability to share ideas and improve solutions. 40.0% (16) 40.0% (16)
Access to smart people who really understand open source. 42.5% (17) 32.5% (13)
Improved ability to track health care market industry trends. 18.4% (7) 39.5% (15)
Strongly Agree
Agree
![Page 11: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
What is Expected for Payment?
Ability to be on the OHT Board of Stewards.
37.5% (15) 22.5% (9) 27.5% (11)
Voting priviledges on project reviews, membership participation, and Bylaws.
40.0% (16) 30.0% (12) 17.5% (7)
Ability to participate in OHT projects, workgroups, and Councils.
52.5% (21) 35.0% (14) 10.0% (4)
Access to CollabNet. 22.5% (9) 27.5% (11) 30.0% (12)
Logo placement on the OHT website.
20.0% (8) 32.5% (13) 32.5% (13)
Access to discounted advertisement space.
5.1% (2) 17.9% (7) 33.3% (13)
Ability to use the OHT Logo and name in press releases (with OHT permission.)
17.9% (7) 28.2% (11) 28.2% (11)
Discounts for OHT-related conferences.
2.5% (1) 37.5% (15) 37.5% (15)
Direct access to the OHT Leadership.
30.0% (12) 37.5% (15) 17.5% (7)
Ability to sponsor OHT events with attribution.
5.4% (2) 27.0% (10) 32.4% (12)
Very Important
ImportantSomewhat Important
![Page 12: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Survey Self Recommended Payment Levels
Response Response
Percent Count
$0 21.40% 9
$1,000 42.90% 18
$5,000 23.80% 10
$10,000 4.80% 2
$15,000 4.80% 2
$20,000 2.40% 1
![Page 13: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Concerns
42
0
Response Response
Percent Count
Yes 33.30% 14
No 14.30% 6
Unsure 52.40% 22
8. If required to make a monetary contribution as a requirement for membership, would your organization remain a member of OHT?
answered question
skipped question
42
0
Response Response
Percent Count
Yes 35.70% 15
No 21.40% 9
Unsure 42.90% 18
2. Would your organization financially contribute to OHT if a membership fee were instituted?
answered question
skipped question
• Expect uncertainty until fee has been set.• Membership cancellations are quite possible and should be factored into the revenue projections.
![Page 14: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
ISSUE
Overall Average Recommended Membership Fee
– $2,800 to $3,200 Results
– $170,000 to $195,000 Average time to pay
– 4 months Hits ~50% of Target
– Assuming no attrition
SizeAverage
ContributionExtrapolated No. Members
Extapolated Contributions
Ave. Months to Pay
1-50 2,000$ 36.6 $ 73,200 451-2,500 6,000$ 12.2 $ 73,200 4
2,501->10K 5,000$ 6.1 $ 30,500 5
TOTAL $ 176,900 Goal $ 360,000
% of Goal 49%
![Page 15: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Options
Ask membership to extend Address value gap Look at alternative funding mechanisms to fill
the gap
Option ------------> 1 1.5 2 3Small (1-50) 2,000$ 2,000$ 3,200$ 4,000$ Medium (51-2500) 6,000$ 6,000$ 7,500$ 10,000$ Large (>2500) 5,000$ 7,500$ 10,000$ 15,000$ % of Goal (1) 49% 53% 75% 100%
(1) Assumes no Attrition
![Page 16: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Backup
![Page 17: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Contribution Range by Company Size
Size (x-axis):– 1=1-50 employees– 2=51-500– 3=501-2500– 4=2501-10K– 5=>10K.
Variance Chart
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Size of Company
Co
ntr
ibu
tio
n L
evel
s ($
Ks)
![Page 18: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Contribution regardless of Company Size
Scattergram
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 10 20 30 40 50
Individual Company Inputs
$1,0
00s
![Page 19: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Option 1 – Get’s Us to nearly 50% of Target
Annual Target360,000$
Category Number Full VotingSmall 1-50 Employees 36.6 36.6Medium 51-2500 Employees 12.2 12.2Large >2,500 Employees 6.1 6.1
Number Full VotingSmall 1-50 Employees 0 2,000$ Medium 51-2500 Employees 10 6,000$ Large >2,500 Employees 10 5,000$
Revenue
Number Full VotingSmall 1-50 Employees 36.6 73,200$ Medium 51-2500 Employees 12.2 73,200$ Large >2,500 Employees 6.1 30,500$ Total 176,900$ Percentage of Target 49%
![Page 20: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Option 2 – Get’s us to 75% of Goal
Annual Target360,000$
Category Number Full VotingSmall 1-50 Employees 36.6 36.6Medium 51-2500 Employees 12.2 12.2Large >2,500 Employees 6.1 6.1
Number Full VotingSmall 1-50 Employees 0 3,200$ Medium 51-2500 Employees 10 7,500$ Large >2,500 Employees 10 10,000$
Revenue
Number Full VotingSmall 1-50 Employees 36.6 117,120$ Medium 51-2500 Employees 12.2 91,500$ Large >2,500 Employees 6.1 61,000$ Total 269,620$ Percentage of Target 75%
![Page 21: Contribution Model Committee -- Membership / Sponsorship for OHT Committee Report May 25, 2011](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56649f335503460f94c4fce7/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Option 3 – Get’s Us to 100% of Target
Annual Target360,000$
Category Number Full VotingSmall 1-50 Employees 36.6 36.6Medium 51-2500 Employees 12.2 12.2Large >2,500 Employees 6.1 6.1
Number Full VotingSmall 1-50 Employees 0 4,000$ Medium 51-2500 Employees 10 10,000$ Large >2,500 Employees 10 15,000$
Revenue
Number Full VotingSmall 1-50 Employees 36.6 146,400$ Medium 51-2500 Employees 12.2 122,000$ Large >2,500 Employees 6.1 91,500$ Total 359,900$ Percentage of Target 100%