comparing long-term placements for young children in care: the care pathways and outcomes study –...
TRANSCRIPT
Comparing long-term placements
for young children in care:
The Care Pathways and Outcomes
Study –
Northern Ireland
Book launch
11 September 2013
Council Chambers, QUB
Care Pathways and Outcomes Study
• Research team: Dominic McSherry, Montserrat Fargas Malet, Kerrylee Weatherall,
and Greg Kelly
• What is it about? Longitudinal study that examines placement patterns for a
population of children (n=374) under 5 years old and in care in Northern Ireland on
the 31st March 2000. It explores how the children & their parents/carers get on
within different types of placement – Key question, does care placement matter?
• Location: Institute of Child Care Research, School of Sociology, Social Policy and
Social Work, Queen's University, Belfast
• Funded by: The HSC Development Division of the Public Health Agency
• Book publisher: British Association for Adoption and Fostering (BAAF)
History of the Study – Phases 1 & 2
PHASE 1 - Care Pathways and Outcomes: Multiple Placements (2000-2003)
- Developed a placement history for the study population to 31st March 2002, and
established baseline characteristics for the study population prior to 31st March 2000
- MAIN FINDINGS: Multiple placement not common in Northern Ireland; but unexpectedly
high percentage of the study population had been adopted by 2002 (18%)
PHASE 2 – Care Pathways and Outcomes: The Carers’ Perspective (2003-2006)
- Further developed the placement profile for the study population from 2002 – 2004, and
involved interviews with parents/carers in adoption, foster care, and at home
- Adopted children were doing marginally better than children in foster care, and both these
groups were doing significantly better than those children returned to birth parents, with
the high levels of parental stress in the birth parents group being particularly concerning
Phase 3
Care Pathways and Outcomes: The Children’s Perspective (2006-2010)
• Developed a placement profile for the study population from 2004 to
2007
• Interviewed sub-groups of children and their parents/carers
• Profile of children interviewed:Adopted Foster Care Kinship
CareResidence Order
Birth Parents
Av. age enter placement
1yr 8 mts 4 yrs 3 yrs 5 mts 1 yr 5 mts 4 yrs 6 mts
Av. time in placement
10yrs 1mt 8yrs 5mts 8yrs 11 mts 10yrs 3 mts 8 yrs 3 mts
Quantitative Data - Children
• Piers-Harris Children’s Self-Concept Scale (Piers & Hertzberg, 2002)
- Examined children’s self-concept across 6 dimensions
- Applied using post-box activity developed by the research team
• Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment - Revised Version (Gullone & Robinson, 2005)
- Examined parent and peer attachment across 3 dimensions
- Applied using poster activity developed by the research team
• The British Picture Vocabulary Scale – Second Edition (Dunn et al., 1997)
- Examined children’s verbal ability and verbal intelligence
- Proxy measure of scholastic aptitude
Physical appearance and attributes
Intellectual and school status
Happiness and satisfaction
Freedom from anxiety
Behavioural adjustment
Popularity
Trust
Communication
Alienation
Quantitative Data – Parents/Carers
• Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) (Goodman, 1997)
- Commonly used behavioural screening questionnaire for assessing psychological
morbidity in children and adolescents, as perceived by their parents/carers
- Comprised of 25 items divided into 5 sub-scales, which in combination provide a
‘Total Difficulties’ score
• Parenting Stress Index – Short Form (PSI-SF) (Abidin, 1990)
- Measures stress in the parent-child relationship
- Composed of 36 items divided into 4 sub-scales. A combination of scores across
the sub-scales provides a ‘Total Stress’ score
Emotional symptoms
Conduct problems
Hyperactivity / inattention
Peer relationship problems
Pro-social behaviour
Defensive responding
Parental distress
Parent-Child Dysfunctional interaction
Difficult child
Qualitative Data - Children
• A standard face-to-face interview with a stranger might be uncomfortable for the
child.
• A storybook was developed, the ‘Me-Book’, that acted as a catalyst for the semi-
structured interview - Downloadable from: http://www.qub.ac.uk/cpo
• Each page referred to a topic, and involved activities (e.g. writing, drawing, using
stickers, circling pictures), covering a range of key issues deemed important for
understanding the children’s lives
• Children who piloted the ‘Me-Book’ described it as providing a ‘protective cover’,
where they didn't feel they were being analysed, and could express themselves
more freely.
Family membership
Degree of closeness to family members & friends
People important to child’s life
Family activities
School life
Interests / hobbies
Health and happiness
Feelings about the past / present/ future
Future aspirations (employment / accommodation)
Qualitative Data – Parents/Carers
• Semi-structured interview with parents that covered 12 key areas:
How the placement was progressing
The child’s attachment to them, and the bonding with child
The child’s behaviour
Contact with birth family or previous carers
Supports
Involvement with social services
Family activities
School and child’s peer relationships
The child’s health
Communication with the child
Feelings and expectations regarding child’s future
Findings
• Placement profile 2000 – 2007
• Care pathway and regional variations
• Placement stability
• Attachment
• Self-esteem and happiness
• Behaviour
• Education
• Parental/carer stress
• Contact with birth family
• Social service involvement and social support
Placement Profile 2000 - 2007
2000 2002 2004 20070
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
AdoptedBirth parentsFoster careKinship careResidence OrderProspective Adoption
Care Pathway Regional Variations 2007
NorthernSouthern
South EasternWestern
BelfastTotal Population
63
69
39
25
32
45
18
15
36
14
23
209
6
15
43
23
207
2 5
14
11
9
38
54
10
6
AdoptionBirth ParentFoster careKinship careResidence Order
Placement Stability
Adoption Foster care Kinship care Residence order
Birth parents
99
87
9695 95
Placement stability achieved
Children’s attachments to their parents/carers
IPPA-R results
Adoption Foster care Kinship care Residence order
Birth parents
HighMediumLow
Children’s self-esteem and happiness
Piers-Harris self-concept scale
Adoption Foster care Kinship care Residence order
Birth parents
High
Average
Low
Children’s health and behaviour
• Who had behavioural difficulties according to SDQ?
Adoption
Foster care
Kinship care
Residence Order
Birth parents
Gen. Pop.
28
44
25
14
50
10
% clinically high difficulties
Children’s health and behaviour (contd.)
• Which children had serious health problems according to parents/carers:
- 1/11 in kinship care (9%)
- 5/15 in foster care (33%)
- 6/15 on Residence Order (40%)
- 5/12 with birth parents (42%)
- 11/18 Adopted (61%)
• Children had a range of conditions, BUT these most prevalent in the adoption
group, e.g. 8 diagnoses of FAS in total (n=77), with 5 of these in the adopted group.
• The majority believed that child’s behaviour had stayed the same or improved.
• Many parents/carers highlighted the strengths of children and positive behaviours.
Children’s education
• The majority of children had poor scores in the BPVS
• The majority of children adopted by previous foster carers and nearly half of those
in foster care were receiving some additional supports at school. Most children
living with birth parents were not receiving supports, despite needing it most.
• The majority of parents/carers believed children were coping very well/ “alright” at
school (considering their limitations), a few identified problems (e.g. bullying and
behavioural problems).
• A few children appeared to do very well at school and had passed the Eleven Plus
test – but low expectations from teachers and social services.
39
50 50
36
78
25
% low scores
Parent/carer stress
PSI/SF results
Adoption (n=18)
Foster c
are (n=16)
Kinship ca
re (n=12)
Residence
order (
n=14)
Birth parents
(n=12)
Gen. Pop.
22
44
33
21
50
15
% clinically high stress
Contact with birth families
• Majority had some sort of contact
• Regular face-to-face contact with parents/siblings common for foster, kinship and
RO children but adopted children – post-box contact.
• Contact arrangements changed over time, reducing or stopping altogether
• Many children, especially in foster or kinship care, used to have negative reactions
to contact in the past, but for the majority, the situation had improved.
• Some children were happy with the level of contact, others longed for more
contact with birth family or even wished to live with them.
• The majority of parents/carers whose children had face-to-face contact had no
issues, but where tensions existed - in kinship care.
Social Services’ Involvement
• Birth parents were the most critical of the support provided by social services
(feeling marginalised, undermined and distrusted by social services).
• Some adoptive parents advocated for a continued role of social services; while
others in addition to some RO carers felt a sense of ‘abandonment’ by social
services post-adoption/post-Residence Order.
• A few kinship carers experienced a sense of disregard and lack of support, and felt
less valued/supported by social services precisely because they were relatives.
• Some Residence Order carers were happy that social services were no longer
there, leading ‘normal’ family lives; others advocated a continued role for social
services, in terms of the provision of financial support.
• Most kinship carers were happy with the support being provided by social
services.
Social support
• The most important source of support provided for the parents and carers
was their family.
• Birth parents had the least extensive network of support, in relation to
both family and friends.
• Foster carers and Residence Order carers had access to the most extensive
family support networks. Their extended family were closely involved in
the lives of their children.
• Support from extended family also provided on an extensive basis for the
majority of adoptive parents who also fostered the child.
Summary
• Placements characterised by stability, not much evidence of instability, BUT mostly
entering teenage years – What happens next is critical
• All long-term placements have the potential to nurture positive outcomes for
children in terms of their attachment to parents/carers and self-concept
• Highlights the importance of speaking to children
- Children perspective, most securely attached and happy
- Parental/carer perspective, higher level of problem behaviours and clinical stress
for foster carers and birth parents
• Significant health problems most prevalent in adoption
• In educational terms, those with greatest need, i.e. children living with birth
parents, received least amount of support
Thank you!
Book launch
11 September 2013
Council Chambers, QUB