city council august 30, 2011 agenda packet

City Council Agenda of 4 August 30, 2011

NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING

AN AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

9:00 A.M. - Tuesday, August 30, 2011 McNease Convention Center, South Meeting Room

500 Rio Concho Drive THE MCNEASE CONVENTION CENTER IS ACCESSIBLE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES. ACCESSIBLE ENTRIES AND SPECIALLY MARKED PARKING SPACES ARE AVAILABLE AT BOTH MAIN ENTRANCES AT SURBER DRIVE AND RIO CONCHO DRIVE. IF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE IS NEEDED TO OBSERVE OR COMMENT, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, ROOM 202, CITY HALL, 657-4405, AT LEAST 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. City Council meetings are broadcast on Channel 17-Government Access at 10:30 A.M. and 6:30 P.M. every day for two weeks beginning on the Thursday after each meeting.

As a courtesy to those in attendance, please place your cell phone on “Silent” or “Vibrate” Thank You!

I. OPEN SESSION (9:00 A.M.)

A. Call to Order

B. Prayer and Pledge

"Honor the Texas flag; I pledge allegiance to thee, Texas, one state under God, one and indivisible.”

C. Proclamation

“Retired and Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) Volunteer Recognition Day”, Thursday, September 8, 2011, to be accepted by Dolores Schwertner, RSVP Director, Concho Valley RSVP

D. Recognitions

Anita Savala, Social Service Assistant, the first recipient of the Women Infant & Children (WIC) Certification Specialist (WCS) certificate in Texas under the WCS Pilot Program

Keep San Angelo Beautiful/Great American Clean Up Event, to be accepted by City of San Angelo Department representatives: Operations: Jesus Hernandez, Alex Maldonado, Steven Olascuaga, Keith Zak, Ed Bara, Ray Martinez, Tony Gonzales, Manuel Martinez, Uvalde Ramirez, Antonio Mendoza, Raul Rojas, David Jones, Jimmy Rodriguez, Ismael Flores, Roberto Heredia, Manuel Pineda, Joe Gomez; Parks: Steven Grafa, Marcus Hinojosa, Victor Mendoza, Johnny Lopez, Rodney Halfmann, Jason Gamez; Stormwater: Doug Kirkham, Joe Mata, Jason Haines, Jake Alberts, Jason Franco, Abel Villarreal, Martin Moreno; Code Compliance: Blanca Briseno, Carlos Carrillo, Johnny O’Neal, Art Rangel, Adam Busenlehner; Sam’s Club: Charlotte Anderson, Stripes Convenience Store #5: Stephanie Reyes, Store Manager, and Cathy Mayberry, Regional Manager; Goodfellow Air Force Base: Michael Berkley, Staff Sergeant; 1st Community Federal Credit Union: Betty Borne; Lifepoint Baptist Church: Shane Dunlap

E. Public Comment

The Council takes public comment on all items in the Regular Agenda. Public input on a Regular Agenda item will be taken at its appropriate discussion. Public input on an item not on the Agenda or Consent Agenda may be identified and requested for consideration by the Council at this time. The Council may request an item to be placed on a future agenda, or for a Consent Agenda item, to be moved to the Regular Agenda for public comment.


II. CONSENT AGENDA

1. Consideration of approving the August 2, 2011 City Council Regular meeting minutes

2. Consideration of awarding bids for WU-07-11 Water Utilities Inventory Supplies to various vendors (Benmark Supply, Municipal Waterworks, HD Supply Waterworks, Morrison Supply and Western Industrial Supply) based on lowest unit bid in compliance with the bid requirements for each specific item

3. Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo awarding bid to Price Construction, Ltd. (Big Spring, TX), and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a Performance Agreement in the sum of $3,029,464.00 and related documents for Hickory Aquifer Well Field Pipelines, RFB No. WU-10-11

4. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute the agreement and related documents with Sharyland Utilities (sole source provider) for the construction, installation, and furnishing of said facility to provide electric service to the City of San Angelo Hickory Well Field project not to exceed the amount of $3,000,000.00

5. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a third amendment to the Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) with Texas Department of Transportation for the provision of state services in the preservation and adaptive use of Lone Wolf Bridge as a historic bridge off the state system, and any future action in connection thereto

6. Consideration of adopting Resolutions authorizing the adoption of Investment Policies for the City of San Angelo and Lake Nasworthy

7. Consideration of ratifying a Resolution adopted by the City of San Angelo Development Corporation on August 10, 2011 to close bank accounts, one Texpool account, and to consolidate remaining account balances

III. REGULAR AGENDA:

F. EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION

Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.071 to consult with attorney on a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the governmental body under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with this chapter on issues related to redistricting and the legislative changes associated with conducting general elections

Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to a company or companies with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development negotiations and which the City of San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo

G. PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT

8. Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas (“City”) approving a settlement between Atmos Energy Corp’s Mid-Tex Division (“Atmos”) and Atmos Texas Municipalities (“ATM”) resulting in no change in base rates and approving tariffs which reflect costs related to the steel pipe replacement program; finding the rates set by the attached tariffs to be just and reasonable; requiring delivery of the Resolution to the company and legal counsel; determining that the meeting at which this Resolution was approved complied with the Open Meetings Act; making other findings and provisions related to the subject; and declaring an effective date

(Presentation by Attorney Jim Boyle of Herrera & Boyle, PLLC)


9. Presentation of the Second Quarter 2011 Report from the Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Council and the Convention & Visitors Bureau (CVB)

(Presentation by CVB Chairman Fred Key, CVB Vice President Pamela Miller, and Vice President for Economic Development John Dugan)

10. Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing staff to negotiate and authorizing City Manager to execute an Interlocal Agreement between the City of San Angelo and Tom Green County for sharing expense of the maintenance and capital improvements of the TDCJ Work Camp 3 located at 3282 N. US Highway 277, San Angelo, Texas

(Presentation by Facilities/Maintenance Manager Ron Lewis)

11. Discussion and possible action to initiate annexation of property (to San Angelo’s City limits) within revised boundaries including certain properties located northeast of San Angelo, encompassing an area bounded roughly by North U.S. Hwy. 67 on the south, North U.S. Hwy. 277 on the east, Farm-to-Market Hwy. 2105 on the north, and a combination of Schwertner and Pruitt Roads on the west

(Presentation by Planning Manager AJ Fawver)

12. First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-10: San Angelo Planning Commission

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot at northwest corner of Country Club Road and US Hwy 277, specifically 8.614 acres of the J. Burkhardt Subdivision, abstract number 0037, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY


13. Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of proposed zone change, and, possible first public hearing and consideration of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-09: City of San Angelo

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot located on the northeast corner of Knickerbocker Road and American Legion Road, specifically Lot 1 and a portion of an abandoned alley in Block C in the Lake Nasworthy Subdivision, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY


14. Discussion of August 13, 2011 flood issues

(Presentation by City Engineer Clinton Bailey)

15. First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending the Water Conservation/Drought Contingency Plan

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11, ARTICLE 11.200 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, ENTITLED “WATER CONSERVATION AND


DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN”, BY REPEALING ARTICLE 11.200 IN ITS ENTIRETY, AND ADOPTING A NEW ARTICLE 11.200; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

(Presentation by Water Utilities Director Will Wilde)

16. First Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance of the City of San Angelo approving and adopting the budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011, and ending September 30, 2012; adopting employee compensation schedules; providing for the general appropriation of funds; reserving unto the City Council the authority to transfer appropriations budgeted; ratifying transfers of appropriations occurring in the 2010-2011 fiscal year and amending that budget ordinance accordingly; reserving unto the City Council the power, only as permitted by law, to amend or make changes in the budget for municipal purposes; providing authority for the City Manager or his designee to make certain adjustments from time to time in or between budgeted allocations; and, providing for filing of the budget

This budget will raise less total property taxes than last year’s budget by $163,572.00 (-0.60%), and of that amount, $530,877.00 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the roll this year

(Presentation by Finance Director Michael Dane)

17. Consultation with redistricting legal counsel regarding:

a. Redistricting standards and development of new city council districts redistricting plan(s) b. Presentation by redistricting counsel of draft redistricting plans, and discussion c. Redistricting plan map-drawing session with redistricting legal counsel, if necessary

(Presentation by Attorney David Mendez of Bickerstaff, Heath, Delgado, Acosta, L.L.P.)

18. Discussion and possible action to designate one or more draft redistricting plans as Illustrative Plan(s) to be proposed for public consideration and comment; and, to schedule one or more public hearings at which to receive comments on designated redistricting Illustrative Plan(s) from members of the public

(Presentation by Attorney David Mendez of Bickerstaff, Heath, Delgado, Acosta, L.L.P.)

19. Preliminary discussion regarding the legislative changes associated with the future procedure for conducting the general election to elect municipal officers in the City of San Angelo and any action in connection thereto

(Presentation by City Clerk Alicia Ramirez)

H. FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

20. Consideration of matters discussed in Executive/Session, if needed

21. Consideration of Future Agenda Items

22. Adjournment

Given by order of the City Council and posted in accordance with Title 5, Texas Government Code, Chapter 551, Thursday, August 25, 2011, at 5:00 P.M.

/s/________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS, The Concho Valley RSVP will be recognizing and celebrating RSVP

Volunteers for 30 years of service in the Concho Valley with the theme: RSVP Volunteers – A Gift To The Community; and

WHEREAS, RSVP Volunteers exemplify the American idea that we can change things,

make things better, and solve problems when we work together; and WHEREAS, the giving of oneself in service to another empowers the giver and the

recipient; and WHEREAS, RSVP has helped build the capacity of local organizations to tackle their

own problems by investing in social innovation and volunteer cultivation; and

WHEREAS, volunteers are vital to our future as a caring and productive community;

and WHEREAS, the entire community can effect positive change with any volunteer action

no matter how big or small. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Alvin New, Mayor of the City of San Angelo, Texas, on behalf of

the City Council, do hereby proclaim Thursday, September 8, 2011 as

“RSVP VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION DAY” in the Concho Valley and urge our fellow citizens to volunteer. By volunteering and recognizing those who serve, we can replace disconnection with understanding and compassion, and achieve a hopeful future for all.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City to be affixed this 30TH

day of August, 2011.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ALVIN NEW, MAYOR

Commending

Anita Savala Social Service Assistant

As the first recipient of the Women Infant & Children (WIC) Certification Specialist (WCS) certificate in Texas under the WCS Pilot Program

For doing more, doing it better, and exceeding our expectations.

Your high standards inspire us all.

_____________ ____________ Mayor Date

Commending

Operations Division Employees Jesus Hernandez, Alex Maldonado, Steven Olascuaga,

Keith Zak, Ed Bara, Ray Martinez, Tony Gonzales, Manuel Martinez, Uvalde Ramirez, Antonio Mendoza, Raul Rojas, David Jones, Jimmy Rodriguez, Ismael Flores, Roberto Heredia,

Manuel Pineda, and Joe Gomez For doing more, doing it better, and exceeding our expectations.


_____________ ____________ Mayor Date

Commending

Parks Division Employees Steven Grafa, Marcus Hinojosa, Victor Mendoza,

Johnny Lopez, Rodney Halfmann, and Jason Gamez



_____________ ____________ Mayor Date

Commending

Stormwater Division Employees Doug Kirkham, Joe Mata, Jason Haines, Jake Alberts,

Jason Franco, Abel Villarreal, and Martin Moreno



_____________ ____________ Mayor Date

Commending

Code Compliance Division Employees Blanca Briseno, Carlos Carrillo, Johnny O’Neal,

Art Rangel, and Adam Busenlehner For doing more, doing it better, and exceeding our expectations.


_____________ ____________ Mayor Date

Commending

Charlotte Anderson SAM’S Club San Angelo Store



_____________ ____________ Mayor Date

Commending

Stephanie Reyes & Cathy Mayberry Stripes Convenience Store #5



_____________ ____________ Mayor Date

Commending

Michael Berkley, Staff Sergeant Goodfellow Air Force Base



_____________ ____________ Mayor Date

Commending

Betty Borne 1st Community Federal Credit Union



_____________ ____________ Mayor Date

Commending

Shane Dunlap Lifepoint Baptist Church



_____________ ____________ Mayor Date

CITY COUNCIL MINUTE RECORD The City of San Angelo Page 865 Tuesday, August 2, 2011 Vol. 102

OPEN SESSION

BE IT REMEMBERED City Council convened in a regular meeting at 9:04 A.M., Tuesday, August 2, 2011, in the San Angelo McNease Convention Center, 500 Rio Concho Drive, San Angelo, Texas. All duly authorized members of the Council, to-wit:

Mayor, Alvin New Councilmember Paul Alexander Councilmember Dwain Morrison Councilmember Johnny Silvas Councilmember Fredd B. Adams, II Councilmember Kendall Hirschfeld Councilmember Charlotte Farmer

were present and acting, with the exception of Councilmember Morrison, thus constituting a quorum. Whereupon, the following business was transacted:

An invocation was given by Bea Torres of the Nazarene Church and pledge was led by Jonathan Thompson, 2nd Grader and son of Juanita Thompson, Cashier at the Water Billing Department and Steven Thompson with the Information Technology Department.

“

PROCLAMATION

United Way of the Concho Valley's Children's Day Parade”, Saturday, August 13, 2010, 10:00 A.M., at Kirby Park and Held in Conjunction with the United Way of the Concho Valley's Campaign Kickoff, was accepted by Donna Brosh, Campaign Director of the United Way and Brenda Gunter, Campaign Chair.

Public comments were made by Randall Severance and Ron Knight of Butler Farms Estate regarding increasing the speed limit on Foster Road from Loop 306 to River Valley Lane from 30 to 35 MPH.

PUBLIC COMMENT

CONSENT AGENDA

APPROVAL OF THE JULY 19, 2011 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES

APPROVAL OF THE CONTRACTORS SELECTED UNDER THE PRE-QUALIFICATION REQUEST FOR BIDDING (WU-08-11A) FOR THE HICKORY WATER SUPPLY TRANSMISSION MAIN PROJECT

AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER #1 (ES-1-11) TO THE 50TH STREET CONSTRUCTION & GRAPE CREEK ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS AWARDED TO REECE ALBERT, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $86,454.04 FOR THE EXTENSION OF SCHROEDER AVENUE FROM PRODUCERS PARK TO MAGNOLIA STREET

SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO (ANNEX A, PAGE 871, ORDINANCE #2011-08-080)

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY

SU 11-02: RAY ZAPATA

Minutes Vol. 102 August 2, 2011 OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: a 1.722 acre tract located approximately 285’ west of the intersection of Old Knickerbocker Road and South Bryant Boulevard, approving a Special Use to allow placement of a “band stand” or “stage” (categorized as major entertainment event) in a Light Manufacturing (ML) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

SECOND HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 402.A.2 PROVIDING A MAXIMUM PERMITTED ACCESSORY BUILDING FLOOR AREA IN RANCH & ESTATE (R&E) DISTRICTS; BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 203.B.1; PROVIDING FOR ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENTS PERMITTED FOR FLOOR AREA OF RESIDENTIAL ACCESSORY BUILDINGS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE

AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT "A" OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING THE MAXIMUM PERMITTED ACCESSORY BUILDING FLOOR AREA IN RANCH & ESTATE DISTRICTS (ANNEX B, PAGE 873, ORDINANCE #2011-08-081)


AN ORDINANCE AMENDING APPENDIX A, ARTICLE 8.000 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO TEXAS, BY AMENDING SECTION 8.200 “MONTHLY WATER RATES” TO REPEAL SUBSECTION 8.200(a)(1) IN ITS ENTIRETY; AND ADOPTING A NEW SUBSECTION 8.200(a)(1) ESTABLISHING NEW MONTHLY BASE RATES FOR VARIOUS METER SIZES AND USAGE RATES, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

AMENDING THE MONTHLY WATER BASE RATES AND USAGE RATES (ANNEX C, PAGE 875, ORDINANCE #2011-08-082)

Motion, to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented, with the exception of the amended established boundaries for single Member District 1, was made by Councilmember Alexander and seconded by Councilmember Silvas. Motion carried unanimously.

Councilmember Farmer announced and invited the public to attend a neighborhood meeting on August 4, 2011 at 5:30 p.m. at the Tree of Life Church, 5687 Melrose Ave.

REGULAR AGENDA: PUBLIC HEARING AND COMMENT


AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES OF SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT NUMBER 1 FOR THE PURPOSE OF INCORPORATING NEWLY UNINHABITED ANNEXED AREAS INTO SAID DISTRICT, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE

AMENDING ESTABLISHED BOUNDARIES OF SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICT 1 (ANNEX D, PAGE 866, ORDINANCE #2011-08-083)

Councilmember Adams noted the action of the item was to establish the boundaries of single member district 1 based on the recent annexation and was separate and apart from the redistricting process. City Manager Harold Dominguez and Alicia Ramirez City Clerk confirmed the action.

Motion, to adopt the Ordinance, as presented, was made by Councilmember Adams and seconded by Councilmember Hirschfeld. Motion carried unanimously.

Minutes Page 867 August 2, 2011 Vol. 102 UPDATE BY SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC.

Assistant City Manager Elizabeth Grindstaff, Martha Senf and Chad Nobles with Siemens Technology presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the permanent supplement file.

REGARDING THE FEASIBILITY OF A LANDFILL GAS PROJECT AS OUTLINED IN THE LETTER OF INTENT (APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL IN DECEMBER 2010)

Discussion was held on the potential and possible end user, the term of the service over a twenty year period, grant fund opportunities, performance costs, approximate operating and maintenance costs, acquiring a net price equal to the cost of selling the methane gas, and sample radiation levels of various items. In conclusion, Council directed staff to continue working with Siemens representatives to secure a potential end user. APPROVAL OF MODIFICATIONS TO THE WATER CONSERVATION/DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN Water Utilities Director Will Wilde presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the permanent supplement file. Councilmember Morrison arrived to the meeting at 9:46 A.M.

At 9:46 A.M., Mayor New called a recess.

RECESS

At 9:56 P.M., Council reconvened, and the following business was transacted:

RECONVENE

Mr. Wilde continued with his presentation. Discussion was held on adding the verbiage “written notice” to Section 11.202(9); enforcement of the ordinance, specifically the assigned watering days as opposed to one day and the result of such extreme pressure on the water system; hand watering versus sprinkler system; residential lot calculation for one inch of water per lot; washing cars on lots; residential, landscape, and combined meters; and adding reclaimed or gray water provisions to the ordinance. City Manager Harold Dominguez reviewed and displayed charts on water pumpage and lake levels from 1980 to 2010, and monthly rainfall levels for San Angelo from the National Weather Service. Motion, to approve modifications, as presented, was made by Councilmember Adams and seconded by Councilmember Hirschfeld. AYE: New, Morrison, Silvas, Adams, Hirschfeld, and Farmer. NAY: Alexander. Motion carried 6-1. Council directed staff to present the draft ordinance on Channel 17 and post on the website for public review. Responding to a question from Councilmember Morrison, Mr. Wilde noted he was not aware of a contractual agreement between the City and Angelo State University exclusively utilizing the city’s water system. He noted he will research the underground water source and the issues raised to utilized such source.

At 11:08 A.M., Mayor New called a recess.

RECESS


RECONVENE

APPROVAL OF THE REVERSE OSMOSIS TEST PROCESS AS THE WATER TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE FOR THE HICKORY WATER SUPPLY PROJECT

Minutes Vol. 102 August 2, 2011 Water Utilities Director Will Wilde and Carollo Engineering representative Hutch Musallam presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the permanent supplement file. Councilmember Farmer left the meeting at 12:32 P.M. and returned at 12:37 P.M. Motion, to approve the reverse osmosis test process as an alternative to the single use ion exchange process, as presented, was made by Councilmember Alexander and seconded by Councilmember Silvas. AYE: New, Alexander, Silvas, Adams, Hirschfeld, and Farmer. NAY: Morrison. Motion carried 6-1.

At 12:35 P.M., Mayor New called a recess.

RECESS

EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION

At 12:57 P.M., Council convened in Executive Session under the provision of Government Code, Title 5. Open Government; Ethics, Subtitle A. Open Government, Chapter 551. Open Meetings, Subchapter D. Exceptions to Requirement that Meetings be Open, Section 551.087 to discuss an offer of financial or other incentive to a company or companies with whom the City of San Angelo is conducting economic development negotiations and which the City of San Angelo seeks to have, locate, stay or expand in San Angelo; and Section 551.072 to discuss the purchase, sale, exchange, lease, or value of real property

At 1:28 P.M., Mayor New called a recess.

RECESS


RECONVENE

DISCUSSION OF THE 2011-2012 BUDGET GOALS, POLICY, AND ALL CITY FUNDS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO:

General Fund, Water Fund, Waste Water Fund, other funds, and fund balances, and any action in connection thereto

Finance Director Michael Dane presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the permanent supplement file. He noted staff will continue to work on the franchise fee increases, landfill ordinance changes, and other recommended changes for final presentation at the next meeting. Councilmember Hirschfeld questioned the Water Fund allocation for Lake Police personnel and suggested such be paid from the General Fund or decrease the amount incrementally.

Finance Director Michael Dane and City Manager Harold Dominguez presented background information. Mr. Dane stated staff will continue to review the rate and may recommend to further decrease the rate.

Approval of a record vote to propose a property tax rate for FY 2011-2012 at $0.7975/per $100 valuation

Motion, to set the ad valorum property tax rate at $0.7975/per $100 valuation for FY 2011-2012, was made by Councilmember Alexander and seconded by Councilmember Adams. Motion carried unanimously. Due to scheduling conflicts, Council tentatively postponed the August 16, 2011 regularly scheduled meeting to August 30, 2011.

DISCUSSION OF STORMWATER UTILITY FEE REVENUE, BUDGET EXPENDITURES AND PROGRAM ACTIVITIES

Minutes Page 869 August 2, 2011 Vol. 102 City Engineer Clinton Bailey presented background information. A copy of the presentation is part of the permanent supplement file.

Discussion was held on staff coordinating the street sweeping days in order to have residents remove any obstacles in the street, the number of street sweeper equipment, proposed budget, number of existing and proposed personnel, the number of times the function within each district, the preventative measures conducted to prevent the least amount of debris going into the river, auctioned sweepers and the proceeds returned to a general fund account, establishing an equipment replacement fund and allocating the proceeds from the sale of assets to this account, paying for the function with the correct funds and recognizing this is a stormwater program and not a beautification program

City Manager Harold Dominguez and Water Utilities Director Will Wilde presented background information. A copy of the lake level chart document is part of the permanent supplement file.

DISCUSSION AND CONSIDERATION OF PUMPING WATER FROM THE SOUTH POOL OF THE TWIN BUTTES RESERVOIR

Discussion was held on the creating a plan to pump the water in the future, recreational uses, Direction to staff

FOLLOW UP AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES

No action was taken on matters discussed in Executive/Closed Session.

CONSIDERATION OF MATTERS DISCUSSED IN EXECUTIVE/CLOSED SESSION

APPROVAL OF A BOARD NOMINATION BY COUNCIL AND DESIGNATED COUNCILMEMBERS:

Downtown Development Commission: Tim Edwards to an unexpired term February 2013

Motion, to approve the board nomination by Council and designated Councilmembers, was made by Councilmember Hirschfeld and seconded by Councilmember Farmer. Motion carried unanimously.

APPROVAL OF DESIGNATING TIM EDWARDS AS CHAIRPERSON AND JIM CUMMINGS AS CO-CHAIRPERSON FOR THE DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION

Councilmember Farmer nominated Mr. Edwards as chairperson and Mayor New nominated Jim Cummings as co-chair.

Motion, to designate Tim Edwards as Chairperson and Jim Cummings as co-chairperson, was made by Councilmember Farmer and seconded by Councilmember Adams. Motion carried unanimously.

CONSIDERATION OF FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

City Manager Harold Dominguez distributed the proposed August 16, 2011 Agenda and solicited Council comments and suggestions. As stated earlier, due to scheduling conflicts, Council tentatively postponed the August 16, 2011 regularly scheduled meeting to August 30, 2011.

Water contingency and Drought Level ordinance enforcement

Water billing statement discussion and review

ADJOURNMENT

Motion, to adjourn, was made by Councilmember Morrison and seconded by Councilmember Silvas. Motion carried unanimously.

The meeting adjourned at 3:12 P.M.

Minutes Vol. 102 August 2, 2011

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO ___________________________________ Alvin New, Mayor

ATTEST: _______________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Annexes A-D In accordance with Chapter 2, Article 2.300, of the Official Code of the City of San Angelo, the minutes of this meeting consist of the preceding Minute Record and the Supplemental Minute Record. Details on Council meetings may be obtained from the City Clerk’s Office or a video of the entire meeting may be purchased from the Public Information Officer at 481-2727. (Portions of the Supplemental Minute Record video tape recording may be distorted due to equipment malfunction or other uncontrollable factors.)

City of San Angelo

Memo Date: August 26, 2011

Mayor and Councilmembers To:

From: Tom Kerr, Assistant Director of Water Utilities

Agenda Item for August 30, 2011 Council Meeting Subject:

Tom Kerr, 657-4209 Contact:

Consent Item Caption:

Consideration of award of bids for WU-07-11 Water Utilities Inventory Supplies to various vendors based on lowest unit bid in compliance with the bid requirements for each specific item.

Bids have been received from five (5) vendors for Water Utility Inventory Supplies. The five vendors are Benmark Supply, Municipal Waterworks, HD Supply Waterworks, Morrison Supply and Western Industrial Supply.

Summary:

The City bids inventory items to establish pricing for purchase of materials as necessary at the best price and availability.

History:

Financial Impact Funded within the Water Distribution and Wastewater Collections operations budgets.

:

Related Vision Item N/A

Other Information/ Recommendation

The bid includes over 300 individual items including valves, fittings, meter boxes, etc. Purchases are made based on the lowest unit bid in compliance with the bid requirements. It is recommended that the bid be awarded to Benmark Supply, Municipal Waterworks, HD Supply Waterworks, Morrison Supply and Western Industrial Supply.

:

Attachments: Bid Tab

Presentation None :

Publication N/A :

Reviewed by Service Area Director

Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director, August 5, 2011

:

1 of 8

CITY OF SAN ANGELORFB No. WU-07-11 July 25, 2011

BID TABMorrison:Morrison:

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery

1 BA040OG 100 NO BID #VALUE! $ 15.82 $ 1,582.00 FORD 14 $ 15.88 $ 1,588.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 16.14 $ 1,614.00 FORD NET 30 $ 19.15 $ 1,915.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

2 BA0401G 100 NO BID #VALUE! $ 24.25 $ 2,425.00 FORD 14 $ 24.30 $ 2,430.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 24.75 $ 2,475.00 FORD NET 30 $ 29.35 $ 2,935.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS



5 BA0700G 150 NO BID #VALUE! $ 20.25 $ 3,037.50 FORD 14 $ 21.29 $ 3,193.50 MUELLER 3-5 $ 20.63 $ 3,094.50 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!6 BA0701G 150 NO BID #VALUE! $ 27.67 $ 4,150.50 FORD 14 $ 29.17 $ 4,375.50 MUELLER 3-5 $ 28.24 $ 4,236.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!


7 BC0500H 200 NO BID #VALUE! $ 15.85 $ 3,170.00 FORD 14 $ 16.71 $ 3,342.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 16.15 $ 3,230.00 FORD NET 30 $ 19.15 $ 3,830.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

8 BC0501H 200 NO BID #VALUE! $ 24.22 $ 4,844.00 FORD 14 $ 25.50 $ 5,100.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 24.67 $ 4,934.00 FORD NET 30 $ 29.25 $ 5,850.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

9 BC0700H 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 17.02 $ 851.00 FORD 14 $ 17.91 $ 895.50 MUELLER 3-5 $ 17.36 $ 868.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!10 BC0701H 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 25.75 $ 1,287.50 FORD 14 $ 27.13 $ 1,356.50 MUELLER 3-5 $ 26.26 $ 1,313.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery11 BE0400D 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 27.25 $ 1,362.50 FORD 14 $ 29.68 $ 1,484.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 27.78 $ 1,389.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!12 BE0401D 100 NO BID #VALUE! $ 41.69 $ 4,169.00 FORD 14 $ 45.46 $ 4,546.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 42.56 $ 4,256.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

13 BE0500D 200 NO BID #VALUE! $ 31.75 $ 6,350.00 FORD 14 $ 34.86 $ 6,972.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 32.64 $ 6,528.00 FORD NET 30 $ 38.70 $ 7,740.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

14 BE0501D 260 NO BID #VALUE! $ 44.25 $ 11,505.00 FORD 14 $ 48.73 $ 12,669.80 MUELLER 3-5 $ 45.63 $ 11,863.80 FORD NET 30 $ 54.10 $ 14,066.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

15 BE0503D 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 66.01 $ 1,320.20 FORD 14 $ 77.54 $ 1,550.80 FORD 1 WEEK $ 69.38 $ 1,387.60 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery16 BG0400D 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 26.95 $ 539.00 IB647 14 $ 11.27 $ 225.40 HAMMOND 1 WEEK $ 28.54 $ 570.80 HAMMOND * NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!17 BG0401D 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 36.55 $ 731.00 IB647 14 $ 13.18 $ 263.60 HAMMOND 1 WEEK $ 34.35 $ 687.00 HAMMOND * NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!18 BE0403D 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 55.00 $ 1,100.00 IB647 14 $ 20.93 $ 418.60 HAMMOND 1 WEEK $ 50.18 $ 1,003.60 HAMMOND * NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!19 BE0405D 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 62.30 $ 1,246.00 IB647 14 $ 26.68 $ 533.60 HAMMOND 1 WEEK $ 59.56 $ 1,191.20 HAMMOND * NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!20 BG0407D 60 NO BID #VALUE! $ 86.25 $ 5,175.00 IB647 14 $ 40.80 $ 2,448.00 HAMMOND 1 WEEK $ 75.13 $ 4,507.80 HAMMOND * NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!


21 CC0309O 100 NO BID #VALUE! $ 46.15 $ 4,615.00 FORD 14 $ 48.65 $ 4,865.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 47.12 $ 4,712.00 FORD NET 30 $ 55.82 $ 5,582.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS




24 CD0003O 400 NO BID #VALUE! $ 5.05 $ 2,020.00 FORD 14 $ 4.98 $ 1,992.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 5.05 $ 2,020.00 FORD NET 30 $ 5.98 $ 2,392.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS



27 CD0405O 200 NO BID #VALUE! $ 7.48 $ 1,496.00 FORD 14 $ 10.46 $ 2,092.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 7.56 $ 1,512.00 FORD NET 30 $ -


28 CD0302O 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 5.35 $ 267.50 FORD 14 $ 6.73 $ 336.50 FORD 1 WEEK $ 5.37 $ 268.50 FORD NET 30 $ 6.37 $ 318.50 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

29 CD0302O 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 9.79 $ 489.50 FORD 14 $ 12.40 $ 620.00 FORD 1 WEEK $ 9.88 $ 494.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery30 CD5600O 150 NO BID #VALUE! $ 26.55 $ 3,982.50 FORD 14 $ 29.11 $ 4,366.50 MUELLER 3-5 $ 29.85 $ 4,477.50 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery31 HA0203A 46 $ 2.90 $ 133.40 LEE 5-10 $ 1.99 $ 91.54 ANDERSON 14 $ 2.28 $ 104.88 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 1.98 $ 91.08 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!32 HA0204A 50 $ 3.00 $ 150.00 LEE 5-10 $ 2.63 $ 131.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 2.99 $ 149.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 2.59 $ 129.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!33 HA0206A 50 $ 4.22 $ 211.00 LEE 5-10 $ 3.83 $ 191.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 4.36 $ 218.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 3.77 $ 188.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!34 HA0301A 50 $ 3.05 $ 152.50 LEE 5-10 $ 1.51 $ 75.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 1.74 $ 87.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 1.50 $ 75.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!35 HA0302A 100 $ 3.15 $ 315.00 LEE 5-10 $ 1.96 $ 196.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 2.18 $ 218.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 1.90 $ 190.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!36 HA0303A 50 $ 3.30 $ 165.00 LEE 5-10 $ 2.55 $ 127.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 2.93 $ 146.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 2.54 $ 127.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!37 HA0304A 50 $ 3.45 $ 172.50 LEE 5-10 $ 3.39 $ 169.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 3.82 $ 191.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 3.31 $ 165.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!38 HA0306A 50 $ 4.96 $ 248.00 LEE 5-10 $ 4.96 $ 248.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 5.58 $ 279.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 4.83 $ 241.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!39 HA0401A 200 $ 2.35 $ 470.00 LEE 5-10 $ 2.31 $ 462.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 2.56 $ 512.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 2.22 $ 444.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!40 HA0402A 50 $ 3.10 $ 155.00 LEE 5-10 $ 2.78 $ 139.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 3.16 $ 158.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 2.74 $ 137.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!41 HA0403A 100 $ 4.11 $ 411.00 LEE 5-10 $ 3.77 $ 377.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 4.25 $ 425.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 3.68 $ 368.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

*Price good for 6 months**Price good for 120 days

Morrison Supply Western Industrial SupplyBenmark Supply Municipal Waterworks HD Supply WaterworksDescriptionsAngle Stop

Corporation Valve

Curb Stop

Gate Valve, Brass

Meter Relocator

Meter Coupling

Brass Meter Adapter

Meter Flange

Nipple

2 of 8

Morrison Supply Western Industrial SupplyBenmark Supply Municipal Waterworks HD Supply WaterworksDescriptions42 HA0404A 150 $ 5.35 $ 802.50 LEE 5-10 $ 4.92 $ 738.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 5.53 $ 829.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 4.79 $ 718.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!43 HA0406A 150 $ 7.88 $ 1,182.00 LEE 5-10 $ 7.23 $ 1,084.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 8.15 $ 1,222.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 7.05 $ 1,057.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!44 HA0503A 150 $ 5.71 $ 856.50 LEE 5-10 $ 5.25 $ 787.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 5.91 $ 886.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 5.12 $ 768.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!45 HA0506A 50 $ 10.99 $ 549.50 LEE 5-10 $ 10.08 $ 504.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 11.36 $ 568.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 9.83 $ 491.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!46 HA0601A 50 $ 4.86 $ 243.00 LEE 5-10 $ 4.46 $ 223.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 5.03 $ 251.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 4.35 $ 217.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!47 HA0603A 50 $ 7.21 $ 360.50 LEE 5-10 $ 6.62 $ 331.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 7.45 $ 372.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 6.45 $ 322.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!48 HA0606A 50 $ 13.87 $ 693.50 LEE 5-10 $ 12.58 $ 629.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 14.35 $ 717.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 12.41 $ 620.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!49 HA0701A 100 $ 7.40 $ 740.00 LEE 5-10 $ 6.82 $ 682.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 7.66 $ 766.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 6.63 $ 663.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!50 HA0703A 100 $ 10.25 $ 1,025.00 LEE 5-10 $ 8.48 $ 848.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 9.55 $ 955.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 8.26 $ 826.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!51 HA0704A 200 $ 11.15 $ 2,230.00 LEE 5-10 $ 11.08 $ 2,216.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 12.50 $ 2,500.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 10.81 $ 2,162.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!52 HA0706A 150 $ 16.45 $ 2,467.50 LEE 5-10 $ 16.36 $ 2,454.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 18.45 $ 2,767.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 15.96 $ 2,394.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!53 HA0710A 150 $ 27.50 $ 4,125.00 LEE 5-10 $ 27.00 $ 4,050.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 30.49 $ 4,573.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 26.36 $ 3,954.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!


54 KA0202C 150 NO BID #VALUE! $ 6.78 $ 1,017.00 FORD 14 $ 7.98 $ 1,197.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 6.92 $ 1,038.00 FORD NET 30 $ 8.20 $ 1,230.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

55 KA0303B 200 NO BID #VALUE! $ 9.65 $ 1,930.00 FORD 14 $ 12.39 $ 2,478.00 FORD 1 WEEK $ 9.87 $ 1,974.00 FORD NET 30 $ 11.70 $ 2,340.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

56 KA0306B 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 50.00 $ 2,500.00 FORD 14 $ 64.08 $ 3,204.00 FORD 1 WEEK $ 51.08 $ 2,554.00 FORD NET 30 $ 60.53 $ 3,026.50 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

57 KA0402B 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 7.60 $ 380.00 FORD 14 $ 8.61 $ 430.50 MUELLER 3-5 $ 7.77 $ 388.50 FORD NET 30 $ 9.22 $ 461.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

58 KA0403A 200 NO BID #VALUE! $ 9.02 $ 1,804.00 FORD 14 $ 9.70 $ 1,940.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 9.21 $ 1,842.00 FORD NET 30 $ 10.92 $ 2,184.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery59 KB0102A 50 $ 4.75 $ 237.50 LEE 5-10 $ 4.77 $ 238.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 4.56 $ 228.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 4.31 $ 215.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!60 KB0103A 200 $ 7.75 $ 1,550.00 LEE 5-10 $ 8.12 $ 1,624.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 7.78 $ 1,556.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 7.34 $ 1,468.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!61 KB0106A 50 $ 29.41 $ 1,470.50 LEE 5-10 $ 29.10 $ 1,455.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 27.97 $ 1,398.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 26.36 $ 1,318.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery62 KB0602F 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 19.45 $ 972.50 FORD 14 $ 11.41 $ 570.50 MUELLER 1 WEEK $ 17.58 $ 879.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!63 KB0603F 0 NO BID #VALUE! $ - NO BID #VALUE! $ 25.16 $ - NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery64 KC0102A 50 $ 7.15 $ 357.50 LEE 5-10 $ 6.76 $ 338.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 6.49 $ 324.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 6.12 $ 306.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!65 KC0103A 150 $ 12.90 $ 1,935.00 LEE 5-10 $ 12.20 $ 1,830.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 11.70 $ 1,755.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 11.04 $ 1,656.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!66 KC0106A 150 $ 41.50 $ 6,225.00 LEE 5-10 $ 37.15 $ 5,572.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 37.73 $ 5,659.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 35.56 $ 5,334.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery67 KD0201O 50 $ 2.90 $ 145.00 LEE 5-10 $ 2.69 $ 134.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 2.58 $ 129.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 2.44 $ 122.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!68 KD0202O 100 $ 3.60 $ 360.00 LEE 5-10 $ 3.40 $ 340.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 3.25 $ 325.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 3.07 $ 307.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!69 KD0203O 100 $ 5.90 $ 590.00 LEE 5-10 $ 5.45 $ 545.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 5.19 $ 519.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 4.90 $ 490.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!70 KD0206O 100 $ 16.29 $ 1,629.00 LEE 5-10 $ 15.57 $ 1,557.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 14.94 $ 1,494.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 14.09 $ 1,409.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!71 KD0207O 100 $ 3.65 $ 365.00 LEE 5-10 $ 3.40 $ 340.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 3.25 $ 325.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 0.08 $ 8.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery72 KE0102A 50 $ 5.75 $ 287.50 LEE 5-10 $ 5.45 $ 272.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 5.19 $ 259.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 4.90 $ 245.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!73 KE0103A 50 $ 9.25 $ 462.50 LEE 5-10 $ 8.82 $ 441.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 8.45 $ 422.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 7.97 $ 398.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!74 KE0106A 50 $ 29.75 $ 1,487.50 LEE 5-10 $ 28.09 $ 1,404.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 27.30 $ 1,365.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 25.73 $ 1,286.50 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery75 KE0706H 50 $ 44.00 $ 2,200.00 LEE 5-10 $ 41.30 $ 2,065.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 39.67 $ 1,983.50 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 37.40 $ 1,870.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!76 KE0103H 50 $ 12.76 $ 638.00 LEE 5-10 $ 12.20 $ 610.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 11.70 $ 585.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 11.04 $ 552.00 MERIT ** NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery77 KG0302D 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 7.55 $ 377.50 FORD 14 $ 7.15 $ 357.50 MUELLER 3-5 $ 7.71 $ 385.50 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!78 KG0303D 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 11.65 $ 582.50 FORD 14 $ 11.76 $ 588.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 11.89 $ 594.50 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!


79 KH0302G 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 8.56 $ 428.00 FORD 14 $ 9.21 $ 460.50 MUELLER 3-5 $ 8.74 $ 437.00 FORD NET 30 $ 10.36 $ 518.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

80 KH0303G 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 14.97 $ 748.50 FORD 14 $ 16.13 $ 806.50 MUELLER 3-5 $ 15.28 $ 764.00 FORD NET 30 $ 18.12 $ 906.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS


81 KH0402D 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 9.27 $ 463.50 FORD 14 $ 10.01 $ 500.50 MUELLER 3-5 $ 9.46 $ 473.00 FORD NET 30 $ 11.25 $ 562.50 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

82 KH0403D 200 NO BID #VALUE! $ 10.65 $ 2,130.00 FORD 14 $ 10.92 $ 2,184.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 10.83 $ 2,166.00 FORD NET 30 $ 12.85 $ 2,570.00 FORD/MUELLER STK-4WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery83 KI0202D 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 8.35 $ 417.50 FORD 14 $ 8.53 $ 426.50 MUELLER 3-5 $ 8.52 $ 426.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!84 KI0203D 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 13.89 $ 694.50 FORD 14 $ 14.74 $ 737.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 14.17 $ 708.50 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!85 KI0203G 100 NO BID #VALUE! $ 8.35 $ 835.00 FORD 14 $ 7.42 $ 742.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 8.52 $ 852.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!86 KI0203G 100 NO BID #VALUE! $ 13.89 $ 1,389.00 FORD 14 $ 12.35 $ 1,235.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 12.29 $ 1,229.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!


Brass Male Adapters

90 Degree Street Elbow

Two-Part Unions

Three-Part Unions

Three-Part Union

Brass Coupling

Brass Lead Adapters

Brass Tee

Brass Plugs

90 Degree Elbow

Quarter Bend Adapter

Bronze Flare Nuts

3 of 8

Morrison Supply Western Industrial SupplyBenmark Supply Municipal Waterworks HD Supply WaterworksDescriptions

87 KP0502A 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 5.54 $ 277.00 FORD 14 $ 9.80 $ 490.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 6.65 $ 332.50 FORD NET 30 $ 6.70 $ 335.00 FORD STK-4WKS

88 KP0503A 100 NO BID #VALUE! $ 9.35 $ 935.00 FORD 14 $ 17.85 $ 1,785.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 9.54 $ 954.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery89 MA0102A 50 $ 3.95 $ 197.50 LEE 5-10 $ 3.77 $ 188.50 ANDERSON 14 $ 3.60 $ 180.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 1.94 $ 97.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!90 MA0103B 300 $ 4.96 $ 1,488.00 LEE 5-10 $ 4.77 $ 1,431.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 4.56 $ 1,368.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 2.41 $ 723.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!91 MA0104B 200 $ 8.55 $ 1,710.00 LEE 5-10 $ 8.12 $ 1,624.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 7.78 $ 1,556.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 5.77 $ 1,154.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!92 MA0104C 200 $ 8.55 $ 1,710.00 LEE 5-10 $ 8.12 $ 1,624.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 7.78 $ 1,556.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 4.64 $ 928.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!93 MA0107C 100 $ 14.99 $ 1,499.00 LEE 5-10 $ 14.20 $ 1,420.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 13.65 $ 1,365.00 MERIT 1 WEEK $ 8.61 $ 861.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!94 MA0203B 50 $ 4.99 $ 249.50 LEE 5-10 $ 6.42 $ 321.00 ANDERSON 14 $ 8.20 $ 410.00 FORD 1 WEEK $ 6.54 $ 327.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery95 BS0025O 200 $ 13.36 $ 2,672.00 EJIW 5-10 $ 14.75 $ 2,950.00 EJIW 14 $ 16.28 $ 3,256.00 EJIW 1 WEEK $ 13.51 $ 2,702.00 EAST JORDAN NET 30 $ 13.54 $ 2,708.00 EJIW 2-4 WKS 96 BS0026O 200 $ 22.27 $ 4,454.00 EJIW 5-10 $ 23.50 $ 4,700.00 EJIW 14 $ 27.14 $ 5,428.00 EJIW 1 WEEK $ 22.51 $ 4,502.00 NET 30 $ 22.56 $ 4,512.00 EJIW 2-4 WKS 97 BS0028O 200 $ 25.83 $ 5,166.00 EJIW 5-10 $ 27.26 $ 5,452.00 EJIW 14 $ 31.48 $ 6,296.00 EJIW 1 WEEK $ 26.11 $ 5,222.00 NET 30 $ 26.16 $ 5,232.00 EJIW 2-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery98 CB0011P 150 $ 27.51 $ 4,126.50 EJIW 5-10 $ 29.75 $ 4,462.50 EJIW 14 $ 32.23 $ 4,834.50 EJIW 1 WEEK $ 26.42 $ 3,963.00 NET 30 $ 26.48 $ 3,972.00 EJIW 2-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery99 CB0011B 150 $ 15.53 $ 2,329.50 EJIW 5-10 $ 16.80 $ 2,520.00 EJIW 14 $ 18.20 $ 2,730.00 EJIW 1 WEEK $ 14.93 $ 2,239.50 NET 30 $ 14.96 $ 2,244.00 EJIW 2-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery100 CB0019C 100 $ 47.25 $ 4,725.00 EJIW 5-10 $ 51.08 $ 5,108.00 EJIW 14 $ 60.43 $ 6,043.00 EJIW 1 WEEK $ 71.96 $ 7,196.00 NET 30 $ 45.49 $ 4,549.00 EJIW 2-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery101 CB0019P 100 $ 62.20 $ 6,220.00 EJIW 5-10 $ 67.23 $ 6,723.00 EJIW 14 $ 72.88 $ 7,288.00 EJIW 1 WEEK $ 45.39 $ 4,539.00 NET 30 $ 59.88 $ 5,988.00 EJIW 2-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery102 UA0001P 50 $ 101.05 $ 5,052.50 EJIW 5-10 $ 109.25 $ 5,462.50 EJIW 14 $ 118.41 $ 5,920.50 EJIW 1 WEEK $ 100.95 $ 5,047.50 NET 30 $ 97.28 $ 4,864.00 EJIW 2-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery103 UB0002O 50 $ 11.11 $ 555.50 EJIW 5-10 $ 11.75 $ 587.50 EJIW 14 $ 14.61 $ 730.50 EJIW 1 WEEK $ 11.89 $ 594.50 NET 30 $ 10.45 $ 522.50 EJIW 2-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery104 UD0011O 100 $ 145.50 $ 14,550.00 EJIW 5-10 $ 157.29 $ 15,729.00 EJIW 14 $ 170.49 $ 17,049.00 EJIW 1 WEEK $ 143.52 $ 14,352.00 NET 30 $ 101.02 $ 10,102.00 EJIW 2-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery105 UD0012O 100 $ 104.93 $ 10,493.00 EJIW 5-10 $ 113.45 $ 11,345.00 EJIW 14 $ 122.95 $ 12,295.00 EJIW 1 WEEK $ 120.51 $ 12,051.00 NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery106 GA0104O 40 NO BID #VALUE! $ 91.25 $ 3,650.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 93.96 $ 3,758.40 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 107.35 $ 4,294.00 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!107 GA0106O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 125.85 $ 2,517.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 125.32 $ 2,506.40 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 131.09 $ 2,621.80 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!108 GA0108O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 175.85 $ 3,517.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 186.03 $ 3,720.60 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 184.42 $ 3,688.40 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!109 GA0110O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 290.25 $ 5,805.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 409.28 $ 8,185.60 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 302.53 $ 6,050.60 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!110 GA0112O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 338.50 $ 6,770.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 359.73 $ 7,194.60 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 359.07 $ 7,181.40 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!111 GA0116O 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 645.00 $ 2,580.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 738.52 $ 2,954.08 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 716.08 $ 2,864.32 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery112 GB0104O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 85.35 $ 1,707.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 87.25 $ 1,745.00 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 100.78 $ 2,015.60 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!113 GA0106O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 115.75 $ 2,315.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 113.96 $ 2,279.20 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 119.98 $ 2,399.60 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!114 GB0108O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 160.60 $ 3,212.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 168.49 $ 3,369.80 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 166.84 $ 3,336.80 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!115 GB0110O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 255.25 $ 5,105.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 372.11 $ 7,442.20 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 266.15 $ 5,323.00 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!116 GB0112O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 306.25 $ 6,125.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 326.18 $ 6,523.60 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 326.23 $ 6,524.60 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!117 GB0116O 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 579.95 $ 4,639.60 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 644.58 $ 5,156.64 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 624.13 $ 4,993.04 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!118 GC0104O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 84.25 $ 1,685.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 86.22 $ 1,724.40 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 99.77 $ 1,995.40 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!119 GC0106O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 112.00 $ 2,240.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 109.83 $ 2,196.60 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 115.94 $ 2,318.80 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!120 GC0108O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 159.00 $ 3,180.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 166.42 $ 3,328.40 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 164.82 $ 3,296.40 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!121 GC0110O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 254.74 $ 5,094.80 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 371.08 $ 7,421.60 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 265.14 $ 5,302.80 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!122 GC0112O 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 289.03 $ 3,468.36 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 306.57 $ 3,678.84 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 307.03 $ 3,684.36 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!123 GC0116O 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 563.50 $ 4,508.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 631.68 $ 5,053.44 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 611.49 $ 4,891.92 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery124 GD0104B 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 130.50 $ 2,610.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 134.48 $ 2,689.60 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 154.71 $ 3,094.20 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!125 GD0106B 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 172.25 $ 3,445.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 175.13 $ 3,502.60 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 187.55 $ 3,751.00 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!126 GD0106C 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 184.62 $ 3,692.40 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 185.91 $ 3,718.20 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 194.62 $ 3,892.40 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!127 GD0108B 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 209.95 $ 4,199.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 219.85 $ 4,397.00 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 224.81 $ 4,496.20 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!128 GD0108C 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 229.70 $ 4,594.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 238.89 $ 4,777.80 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 239.97 $ 4,799.40 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!129 GD0108D 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 262.78 $ 5,255.60 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 277.76 $ 5,555.20 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 274.77 $ 5,495.40 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!130 GD0112B 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 342.25 $ 2,738.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 371.87 $ 2,974.96 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 378.64 $ 3,029.12 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!131 GD0112C 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 363.90 $ 2,911.20 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 380.06 $ 3,040.48 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 383.19 $ 3,065.52 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!132 GD0112E 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 467.90 $ 3,743.20 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 562.30 $ 4,498.40 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 508.32 $ 4,066.56 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!133 GD0112F 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 484.65 $ 3,877.20 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 518.69 $ 4,149.52 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 518.15 $ 4,145.20 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!134 GD0116F 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 813.42 $ 6,507.36 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 902.12 $ 7,216.96 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 879.71 $ 7,037.68 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!135 GD0116H 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 980.20 $ 7,841.60 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 1,112.16 $ 8,897.28 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 1,078.42 $ 8,627.36 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!


Clean Out Lid

Manhole Ring

Manhole Lid

90 Degree Bend Cast Fitting

Bushing

Adjustable Valve Box w Lid

Oval Meter Box

Oval Meter Box Lid

Rectangular Meter Box Lid

Rectangular Meter Box

Clean Out Boot

45 Degree Bend Cast Fitting

Tee Cast Fitting

Cross Cast Fitting

4 of 8

Morrison Supply Western Industrial SupplyBenmark Supply Municipal Waterworks HD Supply WaterworksDescriptions136 GE0104B 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 197.55 $ 3,951.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 217.33 $ 4,346.60 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 243.49 $ 4,869.80 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!137 GE0106B 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 218.00 $ 2,616.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 233.72 $ 2,804.64 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 252.59 $ 3,031.08 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!138 GE0106C 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 242.50 $ 1,940.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 257.86 $ 2,062.88 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 269.26 $ 2,154.08 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!139 GE0108B 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 299.75 $ 2,398.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 332.64 $ 2,661.12 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 342.91 $ 2,743.28 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!140 GE0108C 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 271.25 $ 2,170.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 291.22 $ 2,329.76 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 295.41 $ 2,363.28 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!141 GE0108D 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 290.45 $ 2,323.60 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 318.91 $ 2,551.28 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 316.00 $ 2,528.00 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!142 GE0112C 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 410.98 $ 1,643.92 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 445.30 $ 1,781.20 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 451.26 $ 1,805.04 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!143 GE0112D 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 463.75 $ 1,855.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 509.63 $ 2,038.52 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 507.73 $ 2,030.92 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!144 GE0112F 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 648.75 $ 2,595.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 725.13 $ 2,900.52 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 723.71 $ 2,894.84 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery145 GF0104O 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 24.45 $ 293.40 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 44.66 $ 535.92 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 29.13 $ 349.56 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!146 GF0106O 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 40.15 $ 481.80 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 62.66 $ 751.92 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 43.28 $ 519.36 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!147 GF0108O 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 54.59 $ 655.08 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 94.31 $ 1,131.72 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 59.79 $ 717.48 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!148 GF0110O 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 94.25 $ 377.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 216.51 $ 866.04 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 97.03 $ 388.12 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!149 GF0112O 6 NO BID #VALUE! $ 91.45 $ 548.70 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 168.25 $ 1,009.50 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 99.81 $ 598.86 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!150 GF0116O 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 218.00 $ 872.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 391.19 $ 1,564.76 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 251.76 $ 1,007.04 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!151 GF0204O 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 40.89 $ 490.68 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 42.59 $ 511.08 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 49.38 $ 592.56 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!152 GF0206O 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 56.98 $ 683.76 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 56.98 $ 683.76 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 59.99 $ 719.88 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!153 GF0208O 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 83.75 $ 1,005.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 88.11 $ 1,057.32 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 87.21 $ 1,046.52 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!154 GF0210O 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 127.19 $ 1,017.52 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 183.99 $ 1,471.92 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 131.05 $ 1,048.40 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!155 GF0212O 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 152.45 $ 1,219.60 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 160.51 $ 1,284.08 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 16.59 $ 132.72 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!156 GF0216O 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 293.00 $ 1,172.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 322.55 $ 1,290.20 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 312.22 $ 1,248.88 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!157 GF0304O 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 34.56 $ 414.72 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 21.68 $ 260.16 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 21.22 $ 254.64 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!158 GF0306O 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 56.64 $ 679.68 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 35.10 $ 421.20 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 34.36 $ 412.32 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!159 GF0308O 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 76.80 $ 614.40 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 48.00 $ 384.00 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 46.99 $ 375.92 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!160 GF0310O 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 120.96 $ 967.68 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 74.32 $ 594.56 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 72.76 $ 582.08 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!161 GF0312O 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 138.24 $ 1,105.92 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 85.68 $ 685.44 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 83.87 $ 670.96 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!162 GF0316O 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 1,047.00 $ 4,188.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 588.39 $ 2,353.56 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 576.00 $ 2,304.00 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery163 GG0104A 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 81.97 $ 983.64 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 171.49 $ 2,057.88 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 153.67 $ 1,844.04 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!164 GG0106B 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 95.25 $ 762.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 95.96 $ 767.68 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 105.83 $ 846.64 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!165 GG0108B 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 119.87 $ 958.96 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 124.51 $ 996.08 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 130.53 $ 1,044.24 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!166 GG0108C 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 129.00 $ 1,032.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 131.68 $ 1,053.44 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 134.06 $ 1,072.48 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!167 GG0112B 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 202.82 $ 1,622.56 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 210.84 $ 1,686.72 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 217.55 $ 1,740.40 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!168 GG0112C 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 198.32 $ 1,586.56 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 204.59 $ 1,636.72 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 207.95 $ 1,663.60 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!169 GG0112D 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 212.95 $ 1,703.60 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 221.78 $ 1,774.24 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 221.53 $ 1,772.24 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!170 GG0112E 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 255.88 $ 1,023.52 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 316.12 $ 1,264.48 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 263.85 $ 1,055.40 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!171 GG0116C 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 381.95 $ 1,527.80 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 429.59 $ 1,718.36 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 421.32 $ 1,685.28 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!172 GG0116F 2 NO BID #VALUE! $ 426.28 $ 852.56 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 456.74 $ 913.48 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 447.14 $ 894.28 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery173 GH0104O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 65.95 $ 1,319.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 86.46 $ 1,729.20 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 110.80 $ 2,216.00 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!174 GH0106O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 113.00 $ 2,260.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 134.40 $ 2,688.00 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 126.47 $ 2,529.40 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!175 GH0108O 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 140.00 $ 2,800.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 220.07 $ 4,401.40 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 196.71 $ 3,934.20 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!176 GH0110O 8 NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE! $ 29.34 $ 234.72 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!177 GH0112O 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 582.20 $ 4,657.60 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 654.96 $ 5,239.68 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 592.71 $ 4,741.68 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery178 GI0106C 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 164.50 $ 3,290.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 198.20 $ 3,964.00 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 185.49 $ 3,709.80 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!179 GI0108C 12 NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE! $ 235.38 $ 2,824.56 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!180 GI0108C 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 222.97 $ 2,675.58 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 255.82 $ 3,069.84 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 297.37 $ 3,568.44 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery181 GS0104O 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 81.75 $ 981.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 84.15 $ 1,009.80 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 97.75 $ 1,173.00 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!182 GS0106O 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 112.36 $ 1,348.32 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 113.38 $ 1,360.56 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 117.45 $ 1,409.40 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!183 GS0108O 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 153.74 $ 1,844.88 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 160.23 $ 1,922.76 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 158.76 $ 1,905.12 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!184 GS0110O 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 259.87 $ 2,078.96 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 369.53 $ 2,956.24 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 263.62 $ 2,108.96 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!185 GS0112O 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 287.45 $ 2,299.60 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 296.24 $ 2,369.92 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 296.93 $ 2,375.44 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!186 GS0116O 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 589.58 $ 2,358.32 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 646.13 $ 2,584.52 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 625.64 $ 2,502.56 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery187 IE0404B 10 NO BID #VALUE! $ 86.32 $ 863.20 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 87.25 $ 872.50 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 93.71 $ 937.10 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!188 IE0406B 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 120.54 $ 964.32 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 119.64 $ 957.12 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 111.39 $ 891.12 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!189 IE0408B 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 180.35 $ 1,442.80 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 186.55 $ 1,492.40 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 148.65 $ 1,189.20 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!190 IE0410B 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 254.50 $ 1,018.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 374.70 $ 1,498.80 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 256.55 $ 1,026.20 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!191 IE0412B 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 301.75 $ 2,414.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 313.79 $ 2,510.32 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 276.21 $ 2,209.68 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery192 LB0104A 10 NO BID #VALUE! $ 37.22 $ 372.20 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 29.42 $ 294.20 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 41.76 $ 417.60 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!193 LB0106A 10 NO BID #VALUE! $ 52.60 $ 526.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 43.87 $ 438.70 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 55.91 $ 559.10 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!194 LB0108A 10 NO BID #VALUE! $ 68.85 $ 688.50 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 59.87 $ 598.70 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 72.42 $ 724.20 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!195 LB0110A 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 100.95 $ 403.80 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 97.03 $ 388.12 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 109.66 $ 438.64 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!196 LB0112A 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 108.00 $ 432.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 98.06 $ 392.24 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 121.98 $ 487.92 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!197 LB0116A 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 235.95 $ 943.80 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 246.91 $ 987.64 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 271.97 $ 1,087.88 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!


11 1/4 Degree Bend Cast Fitting

Solid Sleeve Cast Fitting

Tapped Plug Cast Fitting

Tapped Tee Cast Fitting

Reducer Cast Fitting

Swivel Adapter Cast Fitting

Swivel Tee Cast Fitting

Plug Cast Fitting

5 of 8

Morrison Supply Western Industrial SupplyBenmark Supply Municipal Waterworks HD Supply WaterworksDescriptions198 LC0104A 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 112.20 $ 897.60 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 118.22 $ 945.76 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 131.09 $ 1,048.72 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!199 LC0106A 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 140.00 $ 1,120.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 136.67 $ 1,093.36 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 142.21 $ 1,137.68 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!200 LC0108A 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 206.50 $ 1,652.00 TYLER ND 7-14 $ 239.20 $ 1,913.60 TYLER/UNION 1 WEEK $ 213.33 $ 1,706.64 TYLER NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!


201 AF6034F 1200 NO BID #VALUE! $ 4.27 $ 5,124.00 Wolverine Wieland 7-21 $ 6.12 $ 7,344.00 CERRO 2 WEEKS NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE!

202 AF6099F 6000 NO BID #VALUE! $ 5.12 $ 30,720.00 Wolverine Wieland 7-21 $ 7.97 $ 47,820.00 CERRO 2 WEEKS NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE!

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery203 DA0036O 40 $ 1,332.41 $ 53,296.40 CLOW 5-10 $ 1,302.00 $ 52,080.00 EJIW 7-30 $ 1,429.56 $ 57,182.40 MUELLER 1 WEEK $ 1,303.10 $ 52,124.00 MH NET 30 $ 1,458.35 $ 58,334.00 AMERICAN 1-4 WKS 204 DA0042O 40 $ 1,363.37 $ 54,534.80 CLOW 5-10 $ 1,319.24 $ 52,769.60 EJIW 7-30 $ 1,464.35 $ 58,574.00 MUELLER 1 WEEK $ 1,346.02 $ 53,840.80 MH NET 30 $ 1,493.00 $ 59,720.00 AMERICAN 1-4 WKS 205 DA0048O 36 $ 1,394.95 $ 50,218.20 CLOW 5-10 $ 1,351.50 $ 48,654.00 EJIW 7-30 $ 1,499.28 $ 53,974.08 MUELLER 1 WEEK $ 1,410.11 $ 50,763.96 MH NET 30 $ 1,527.60 $ 54,993.60 AMERICAN 1-4 WKS 206 DA0060O 20 $ 1,458.70 $ 29,174.00 CLOW 5-10 $ 1,414.96 $ 28,299.20 EJIW 7-30 $ 1,568.87 $ 31,377.40 MUELLER 1 WEEK $ 1,498.48 $ 29,969.60 MH NET 30 $ 1,596.90 $ 31,938.00 AMERICAN 1-4 WKS


207 AA0102A

5584 NO BID #VALUE! $ 0.46 $ 2,568.64

Vinylplex;Silverline; Diamond; Napco:JM 7-21

$ 0.52 $ 2,903.68

JM/NAPCO 1 WEEK

NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE!

208 AA0104A

2000 NO BID #VALUE! $ 1.52 $ 3,040.00


$ 1.76 $ 3,520.00

JM/NAPCO 1 WEEK


209 AA0106A

2000 NO BID #VALUE! $ 4.10 $ 8,200.00


$ 4.79 $ 9,580.00

JM/NAPCO 1 WEEK


210 AA0108A

4000 NO BID #VALUE! $ 7.08 $ 28,320.00


$ 8.29 $ 33,160.00

JM/NAPCO 1 WEEK


211 AA0110A

1000 NO BID #VALUE! $ 10.72 $ 10,720.00


$ 12.45 $ 12,450.00

JM/NAPCO 1 WEEK


212 AA0112A

1000 NO BID #VALUE! $ 15.15 $ 15,150.00


$ 17.58 $ 17,580.00

JM/NAPCO 1 WEEK


213 AA0116A

1000 NO BID #VALUE! $ 27.10 $ 27,100.00


NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE!


214 AN0004A

3000 NO BID #VALUE! $ 0.85 $ 2,550.00


$ 0.99 $ 2,970.00

JM/NAPCO 1 WEEK


215 AN0006A

3000 NO BID #VALUE! $ 1.82 $ 5,460.00


$ 2.16 $ 6,480.00

JM/NAPCO 1 WEEK


216 AN0008A

2400 NO BID #VALUE! $ 3.29 $ 7,896.00


$ 3.88 $ 9,312.00

JM/NAPCO 1 WEEK


217 AN0012A

1000 NO BID #VALUE! $ 7.52 $ 7,520.00


$ 8.73 $ 8,730.00

JM/NAPCO 1 WEEK


218 AN0015A

800 NO BID #VALUE! $ 11.17 $ 8,936.00


$ 12.97 $ 10,376.00

JM/NAPCO 1 WEEK


219 AN0018A

800 NO BID #VALUE! $ 16.61 $ 13,288.00



220 AN0021A

200 NO BID #VALUE! $ 23.45 $ 4,690.00



Copper Tubing

Fire Hydrant

PVC Pipe

PVC Gravity Sewer Pipe

6 of 8

Morrison Supply Western Industrial SupplyBenmark Supply Municipal Waterworks HD Supply WaterworksDescriptions

221 AN0024A

200 NO BID #VALUE! $ 28.32 $ 5,664.00



Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery222 IC0504A 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 112.85 $ 902.80 FORD 7-14 $ 116.87 $ 934.96 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 116.51 $ 932.08 FORD NET 30 $ 110.72 $ 885.76 S-B/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 223 IC0506A 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 139.50 $ 1,116.00 FORD 7-14 $ 148.27 $ 1,186.16 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 139.42 $ 1,115.36 FORD NET 30 $ 140.46 $ 1,123.68 S-B/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 224 IC0508A 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 193.15 $ 1,545.20 FORD 7-14 $ 205.34 $ 1,642.72 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 193.12 $ 1,544.96 FORD NET 30 $ 194.54 $ 1,556.32 S-B/ROMAC 1-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery225 IC0510A 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 123.00 $ 492.00 FORD 7-14 $ 123.68 $ 494.72 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 102.63 $ 410.52 FORD NET 30 $ 117.17 $ 468.68 S-B/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 226 IC0512A 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 134.05 $ 1,072.40 FORD 7-14 $ 148.92 $ 1,191.36 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 122.28 $ 978.24 FORD NET 30 $ 141.08 $ 1,128.64 S-B/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 227 IC0516A 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 276.00 $ 1,104.00 FORD 7-14 $ 333.18 $ 1,332.72 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 232.47 $ 929.88 FORD NET 30 $ 315.62 $ 1,262.48 S-B/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 228 IC0518A 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 372.00 $ 1,488.00 FORD 7-14 $ 318.48 $ 1,273.92 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 352.87 $ 1,411.48 FORD NET 30 $ 301.72 $ 1,206.88 S-B/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 229 ID0410A 6 NO BID #VALUE! $ 111.32 $ 667.92 FORD 7-14 $ 123.48 $ 740.88 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 92.27 $ 553.62 FORD NET 30 $ 117.17 $ 703.02 S-B/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 230 ID0412A 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 134.05 $ 536.20 FORD 7-14 $ 148.92 $ 595.68 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 106.46 $ 425.84 FORD NET 30 $ 141.08 $ 564.32 S-B/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 231 ID0416A 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 299.87 $ 1,199.48 FORD 7-14 $ 333.18 $ 1,332.72 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 232.47 $ 929.88 FORD NET 30 $ 315.64 $ 1,262.56 S-B/ROMAC 1-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery232 JA0604D 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 37.00 $ 740.00 SB 7-14 $ 37.01 $ 740.20 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 35.06 $ 701.20 S-B 1-4 WKS 233 JA0404D 60 NO BID #VALUE! $ 35.37 $ 2,122.20 SB 7-14 $ 35.76 $ 2,145.60 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 33.87 $ 2,032.20 S-B 1-4 WKS 234 JA0404H 30 NO BID #VALUE! $ 59.70 $ 1,791.00 SB 7-14 $ 60.36 $ 1,810.80 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 57.18 $ 1,715.40 S-B 1-4 WKS 235 JA0604H 24 NO BID #VALUE! $ 59.70 $ 1,432.80 SB 7-14 $ 60.36 $ 1,448.64 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 57.18 $ 1,372.32 S-B 1-4 WKS 236 JA0404P 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 97.18 $ 1,943.60 SB 7-14 $ 98.26 $ 1,965.20 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 93.08 $ 1,861.60 S-B 1-4 WKS 237 JA0406D 40 NO BID #VALUE! $ 43.15 $ 1,726.00 SB 7-14 $ 43.67 $ 1,746.80 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 41.37 $ 1,654.80 S-B 1-4 WKS 238 JA0406H 100 NO BID #VALUE! $ 69.00 $ 6,900.00 SB 7-14 $ 69.86 $ 6,986.00 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 66.18 $ 6,618.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 239 JA0406P 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 116.30 $ 2,326.00 SB 7-14 $ 117.62 $ 2,352.40 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 111.43 $ 2,228.60 S-B 1-4 WKS 240 JA0408D 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 51.65 $ 1,033.00 SB 7-14 $ 52.24 $ 1,044.80 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 49.49 $ 989.80 S-B 1-4 WKS 241 JA0408I 50 NO BID #VALUE! $ 82.75 $ 4,137.50 SB 7-14 $ 83.67 $ 4,183.50 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 79.26 $ 3,963.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 242 JA0408P 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 136.50 $ 2,730.00 SB 7-14 $ 138.11 $ 2,762.20 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 130.84 $ 2,616.80 S-B 1-4 WKS 243 JA1002H 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 55.30 $ 1,106.00 SB 7-14 $ 55.93 $ 1,118.60 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 52.99 $ 1,059.80 S-B 1-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery244 JB0404D 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 51.30 $ 1,026.00 SB 7-14 $ 51.91 $ 1,038.20 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 49.18 $ 983.60 S-B 1-4 WKS 245 JB1006I 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 89.38 $ 1,787.60 SB 7-14 $ 90.37 $ 1,807.40 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 85.61 $ 1,712.20 S-B 1-4 WKS 246 JB0408I 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 99.35 $ 1,987.00 SB 7-14 $ 100.40 $ 2,008.00 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 95.12 $ 1,902.40 S-B 1-4 WKS 247 JB1010H 10 NO BID #VALUE! $ 142.00 $ 1,420.00 SB 7-14 $ 143.67 $ 1,436.70 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 136.11 $ 1,361.10 S-B 1-4 WKS 248 JB1012H 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 171.00 $ 2,052.00 SB 7-14 $ 173.11 $ 2,077.32 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 164.00 $ 1,968.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 249 JB0112K 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 190.00 $ 2,280.00 SB 7-14 $ 192.20 $ 2,306.40 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 182.08 $ 2,184.96 S-B 1-4 WKS 250 JB02112S 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 315.00 $ 3,780.00 SB 7-14 $ 319.50 $ 3,834.00 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 302.68 $ 3,632.16 S-B 1-4 WKS 251 JB0312P 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 250.00 $ 3,000.00 SB 7-14 NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE! $ 239.83 $ 2,877.96 S-B 1-4 WKS 252 JB0313P 10 NO BID #VALUE! $ 377.00 $ 3,770.00 SB 7-14 $ 381.23 $ 3,812.30 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 361.17 $ 3,611.70 S-B 1-4 WKS 253 JB0112N 10 NO BID #VALUE! $ 385.00 $ 3,850.00 SB 7-14 $ 389.78 $ 3,897.80 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 369.26 $ 3,692.60 S-B 1-4 WKS 254 JB0118N 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 428.00 $ 3,424.00 SB 7-14 $ 433.03 $ 3,464.24 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 410.24 $ 3,281.92 S-B 1-4 WKS 255 JB0120N 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 421.00 $ 3,368.00 SB 7-14 $ 425.80 $ 3,406.40 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 403.39 $ 3,227.12 S-B 1-4 WKS 256 JB0220P 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 529.00 $ 4,232.00 SB 7-14 $ 535.02 $ 4,280.16 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 506.86 $ 4,054.88 S-B 1-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery257 JC1002A 150 NO BID #VALUE! $ 4.65 $ 697.50 SB 7-14 $ 4.73 $ 709.50 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 4.48 $ 672.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 258 JC1003A 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 6.14 $ 49.12 SB 7-14 $ 6.20 $ 49.60 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 5.87 $ 46.96 S-B 1-4 WKS 259 JC1095A 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 3.45 $ 13.80 SB 7-14 $ 3.52 $ 14.08 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 3.50 $ 14.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 260 JC1096A 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 3.50 $ 70.00 SB 7-14 $ 3.59 $ 71.80 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 3.50 $ 70.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 261 JC1097A 120 NO BID #VALUE! $ 3.85 $ 462.00 SB 7-14 $ 3.92 $ 470.40 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 3.75 $ 450.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 262 JC1098A 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 3.95 $ 79.00 SB 7-14 $ 4.03 $ 80.60 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 3.85 $ 77.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 263 JC1099A 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 4.25 $ 85.00 SB 7-14 $ 4.33 $ 86.60 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 4.15 $ 83.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 264 JC1002B 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 8.45 $ 169.00 SB 7-14 $ 8.58 $ 171.60 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 8.15 $ 163.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 265 JC1098B 10 NO BID #VALUE! $ 7.44 $ 74.40 SB 7-14 $ 7.52 $ 75.20 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 7.15 $ 71.50 S-B 1-4 WKS 266 JC1099B 10 NO BID #VALUE! $ 8.05 $ 80.50 SB 7-14 $ 8.17 $ 81.70 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 7.74 $ 77.40 S-B 1-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery267 JE1002D 60 NO BID #VALUE! $ 27.10 $ 1,626.00 SB 7-14 $ 27.40 $ 1,644.00 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 25.96 $ 1,557.60 S-B 1-4 WKS 268 JH0404B 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 54.05 $ 648.60 SB 7-14 $ 54.69 $ 656.28 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 51.81 $ 621.72 S-B 1-4 WKS 269 JH0404H 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 77.45 $ 929.40 SB 7-14 $ 78.32 $ 939.84 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 74.20 $ 890.40 S-B 1-4 WKS 270 JH0406D 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 60.65 $ 1,213.00 SB 7-14 $ 61.36 $ 1,227.20 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 58.13 $ 1,162.60 S-B 1-4 WKS 271 JH0406H 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 86.55 $ 1,731.00 SB 7-14 $ 87.53 $ 1,750.60 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 82.93 $ 1,658.60 S-B 1-4 WKS 272 JH0408B 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 69.15 $ 1,383.00 SB 7-14 $ 69.93 $ 1,398.60 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 66.25 $ 1,325.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 273 JH0408I 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 100.20 $ 1,202.40 SB 7-14 $ 101.34 $ 1,216.08 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 96.01 $ 1,152.12 S-B 1-4 WKS 274 JH0410I 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 175.50 $ 2,106.00 SB 7-14 $ 177.58 $ 2,130.96 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 168.26 $ 2,019.12 S-B 1-4 WKS 275 JH0412I 10 NO BID #VALUE! $ 174.25 $ 1,742.50 SB 7-14 $ 176.19 $ 1,761.90 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 166.92 $ 1,669.20 S-B 1-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery276 UD1001C 48 NO BID #VALUE! $ 7.95 $ 381.60 SB 7-14 $ 8.06 $ 386.88 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 7.63 $ 366.24 S-B 1-4 WKS 277 UD1002C 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 9.25 $ 185.00 SB 7-14 $ 9.37 $ 187.40 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 8.87 $ 177.40 S-B 1-4 WKS 278 UD1003C 100 NO BID #VALUE! $ 10.45 $ 1,045.00 SB 7-14 $ 10.58 $ 1,058.00 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 10.02 $ 1,002.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 279 UD1004C 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 13.60 $ 272.00 SB 7-14 $ 13.77 $ 275.40 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 13.04 $ 260.80 S-B 1-4 WKS 280 UD1005C 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 15.40 $ 308.00 SB 7-14 $ 15.57 $ 311.40 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 NO BID #VALUE! $ 14.75 $ 295.00 S-B 1-4 WKS 281 UD1006D 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 25.45 $ 509.00 SB 7-14 $ 25.73 $ 514.60 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 35.69 $ 713.80 FORD NET 30 $ 24.38 $ 487.60 S-B 1-4 WKS

Repair Clamps, Single Band

Cast Coupling

Cast Coupling

Repair Clamps, Double Band

Repair Patch Clamp

Full Circle

Compression Coupling

7 of 8

Morrison Supply Western Industrial SupplyBenmark Supply Municipal Waterworks HD Supply WaterworksDescriptions282 UD1007E 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 39.30 $ 786.00 SB 7-14 $ 39.76 $ 795.20 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 53.06 $ 1,061.20 FORD NET 30 $ 37.66 $ 753.20 S-B 1-4 WKS 283 UD1008E 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 41.15 $ 823.00 SB 7-14 $ 41.63 $ 832.60 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 53.23 $ 1,064.60 FORD NET 30 $ 39.44 $ 788.80 S-B 1-4 WKS


284 EA0106B60 NO BID #VALUE! $ 73.20 $ 4,392.00

FORD 7-14 $ 91.59 $ 5,495.40

FORD 2 WEEKS $ 70.12 $ 4,207.20

FORD NET 30 $ 89.25 $ 5,355.00

FORD202B/ROMAC 1-4 WKS

285 EA0108B60 NO BID #VALUE! $ 90.50 $ 5,430.00

FORD 7-14 $ 113.34 $ 6,800.40

FORD 2 WEEKS $ 86.77 $ 5,206.20

FORD NET 30 $ 109.72 $ 6,583.20

FORD202B/ROMAC 1-4 WKS

286 EA0202B 40 NO BID #VALUE! $ 14.45 $ 578.00 FORD 7-14 $ - $ 13.84 $ 553.60 FORD NET 30 $ 16.52 $ 660.80 FORD 570 1-4 WKS

287 EA0204B 40 NO BID #VALUE! $ 22.45 $ 898.00 FORD 7-14 $ 27.25 $ 1,090.00 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 21.48 $ 859.20 FORD NET 30 $ 25.71 $ 1,028.40 FORD 570/ROMAC 1-4 WKS

288 EA0206B 40 NO BID #VALUE! $ 33.45 $ 1,338.00 FORD 7-14 $ 40.66 $ 1,626.40 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 32.06 $ 1,282.40 FORD NET 30 $ 38.27 $ 1,530.80 FORD 590/ROMAC 1-4 WKS

289 EA0208B 40 NO BID #VALUE! $ 46.85 $ 1,874.00 FORD 7-14 $ 56.91 $ 2,276.40 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 44.88 $ 1,795.20 FORD NET 30 $ 53.57 $ 2,142.80 FORD 590/ROMAC 1-4 WKS

290 EA0212B 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 136.40 $ 2,728.00 FORD 7-14 $ 165.70 $ 3,314.00 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 130.66 $ 2,613.20 FORD NET 30 $ 155.95 $ 3,119.00 FORD/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 291 EA0310B 10 NO BID #VALUE! $ 112.00 $ 1,120.00 FORD 7-14 $ 140.41 $ 1,404.10 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 121.28 $ 1,212.80 FORD NET 30 $ 135.20 $ 1,352.00 FORD/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 292 EA0312B 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 131.00 $ 2,620.00 FORD 7-14 $ 244.55 $ 4,891.00 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 125.80 $ 2,516.00 FORD NET 30 $ 157.71 $ 3,154.20 FORD/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 293 EA0314B 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 265.95 $ 2,127.60 FORD 7-14 $ 332.78 $ 2,662.24 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 254.76 $ 2,038.08 FORD NET 30 $ 316.27 $ 2,530.16 FORD/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 294 EA0316B 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 321.60 $ 1,286.40 FORD 7-14 $ 402.40 $ 1,609.60 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 343.62 $ 1,374.48 FORD NET 30 $ 360.73 $ 1,442.92 FORD/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 295 EA0702A 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 14.45 $ 173.40 FORD 7-14 NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE!296 ED0108B 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 103.80 $ 1,245.60 FORD 7-14 $ 87.60 $ 1,051.20 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 99.44 $ 1,193.28 FORD NET 30 $ 125.31 $ 1,503.72 FORD/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 297 ED0204B 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 48.30 $ 579.60 FORD 7-14 $ 74.48 $ 893.76 FORD 2 WEEKS NO BID #VALUE! NO BID #VALUE!298 ED0206B 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 63.15 $ 1,263.00 FORD 7-14 $ 76.73 $ 1,534.60 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 60.49 $ 1,209.80 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!299 ED0208B 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 72.10 $ 576.80 FORD 7-14 $ 87.60 $ 700.80 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 69.07 $ 552.56 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!300 ED0212B 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 136.40 $ 2,728.00 FORD 7-14 $ 165.71 $ 3,314.20 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 130.66 $ 2,613.20 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!301 ED0306B 20 NO BID #VALUE! $ 91.95 $ 1,839.00 FORD 7-14 $ 176.19 $ 3,523.80 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 88.07 $ 1,761.40 FORD NET 30 $ 111.32 $ 2,226.40 FORD/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 302 ED0310B 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 132.35 $ 529.40 FORD 7-14 $ 165.63 $ 662.52 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 126.79 $ 507.16 FORD NET 30 $ 160.11 $ 640.44 FORD/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 303 ED0312B 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 150.80 $ 603.20 FORD 7-14 $ 188.69 $ 754.76 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 144.45 $ 577.80 FORD NET 30 $ 180.64 $ 722.56 FORD/ROMAC 1-4 WKS 304 ED0316B 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 377.00 $ 1,508.00 FORD 7-14 $ 471.84 $ 1,887.36 FORD 2 WEEKS $ 361.21 $ 1,444.84 FORD NET 30 $ 447.13 $ 1,788.52 FORD/ROMAC 1-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery305 FE0104C 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 315.50 $ 3,786.00 FORD 7-14 $ 379.53 $ 4,554.36 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 302.22 $ 3,626.64 FORD NET 30 $ 321.55 $ 3,858.60 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 306 FE0106C 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 328.60 $ 3,943.20 FORD 7-14 $ 392.76 $ 4,713.12 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 314.80 $ 3,777.60 FORD NET 30 $ 335.10 $ 4,021.20 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 307 FE0106D 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 374.00 $ 4,488.00 FORD 7-14 $ 420.77 $ 5,049.24 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 358.39 $ 4,300.68 FORD NET 30 $ 382.15 $ 4,585.80 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 308 FE0108C 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 386.00 $ 4,632.00 FORD 7-14 $ 404.63 $ 4,855.56 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 369.84 $ 4,438.08 FORD NET 30 $ 346.95 $ 4,163.40 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 309 FE0108D 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 429.00 $ 5,148.00 FORD 7-14 $ 438.57 $ 5,262.84 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 411.11 $ 4,933.32 FORD NET 30 $ 385.90 $ 4,630.80 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 310 FE0108E 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 532.00 $ 6,384.00 FORD 7-14 $ 561.65 $ 6,739.80 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 510.16 $ 6,121.92 FORD NET 30 $ 479.40 $ 5,752.80 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 311 FE0110C 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 418.00 $ 3,344.00 FORD 7-14 $ 468.93 $ 3,751.44 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 401.32 $ 3,210.56 FORD NET 30 $ 376.80 $ 3,014.40 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 312 FE0110D 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 454.50 $ 3,636.00 FORD 7-14 $ 507.76 $ 4,062.08 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 435.74 $ 3,485.92 FORD NET 30 $ 409.25 $ 3,274.00 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 313 FE0110E 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 576.00 $ 4,608.00 FORD 7-14 $ 616.94 $ 4,935.52 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 551.79 $ 4,414.32 FORD NET 30 $ 518.90 $ 4,151.20 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 314 FE0110F 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 839.00 $ 3,356.00 FORD 7-14 $ 942.56 $ 3,770.24 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 804.33 $ 3,217.32 FORD NET 30 $ 859.84 $ 3,439.36 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 315 FE0112C 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 436.00 $ 1,744.00 FORD 7-14 $ 523.39 $ 2,093.56 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 417.64 $ 1,670.56 FORD NET 30 $ 445.80 $ 1,783.20 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 316 FE0112D 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 479.00 $ 3,832.00 FORD 7-14 $ 580.27 $ 4,642.16 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 459.33 $ 3,674.64 FORD NET 30 $ 490.50 $ 3,924.00 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 317 FE0112E 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 579.00 $ 4,632.00 FORD 7-14 $ 728.02 $ 5,824.16 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 554.97 $ 4,439.76 FORD NET 30 $ 593.05 $ 4,744.40 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 318 FE0112G 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 1,086.00 $ 4,344.00 FORD 7-14 $ 1,070.98 $ 4,283.92 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 1,040.29 $ 4,161.16 FORD NET 30 $ 1,112.68 $ 4,450.72 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 319 FE0118E 2 NO BID #VALUE! $ 932.50 $ 1,865.00 FORD 7-14 $ 1,057.83 $ 2,115.66 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 893.38 $ 1,786.76 FORD NET 30 $ 947.14 $ 1,894.28 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 320 FE0204C 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 315.00 $ 2,520.00 FORD 7-14 $ 394.24 $ 3,153.92 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 302.22 $ 2,417.76 FORD NET 30 $ 321.55 $ 2,572.40 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 321 FE0206C 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 328.50 $ 3,942.00 FORD 7-14 $ 392.76 $ 4,713.12 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 314.80 $ 3,777.60 FORD NET 30 $ 335.10 $ 4,021.20 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 322 FE0206D 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 374.00 $ 2,992.00 FORD 7-14 $ 420.77 $ 3,366.16 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 358.39 $ 2,867.12 FORD NET 30 $ 382.15 $ 3,057.20 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 323 FE0208C 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 386.00 $ 3,088.00 FORD 7-14 $ 404.63 $ 3,237.04 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 369.84 $ 2,958.72 FORD NET 30 $ 346.95 $ 2,775.60 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 324 FE0208D 12 NO BID #VALUE! $ 429.00 $ 5,148.00 FORD 7-14 $ 438.57 $ 5,262.84 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 411.11 $ 4,933.32 FORD NET 30 $ 385.87 $ 4,630.44 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 325 FE0208E 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 532.00 $ 4,256.00 FORD 7-14 $ 561.65 $ 4,493.20 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 510.16 $ 4,081.28 FORD NET 30 $ 479.40 $ 3,835.20 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 326 FE0210C 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 418.50 $ 1,674.00 FORD 7-14 $ 468.93 $ 1,875.72 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 401.32 $ 1,605.28 FORD NET 30 $ 376.80 $ 1,507.20 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 327 FE0210D 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 454.50 $ 1,818.00 FORD 7-14 $ 507.76 $ 2,031.04 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 435.74 $ 1,742.96 FORD NET 30 $ 409.25 $ 1,637.00 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 328 FE0210E 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 576.00 $ 2,304.00 FORD 7-14 $ 616.94 $ 2,467.76 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 551.79 $ 2,207.16 FORD NET 30 $ 518.90 $ 2,075.60 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 329 FE0210F 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 839.50 $ 3,358.00 FORD 7-14 $ 942.56 $ 3,770.24 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 804.33 $ 3,217.32 FORD NET 30 $ 859.85 $ 3,439.40 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 330 FE0212C 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 435.00 $ 1,740.00 FORD 7-14 $ 523.39 $ 2,093.56 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 417.64 $ 1,670.56 FORD NET 30 $ 445.80 $ 1,783.20 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 331 FE0212D 8 NO BID #VALUE! $ 484.50 $ 3,876.00 FORD 7-14 $ 580.27 $ 4,642.16 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 459.33 $ 3,674.64 FORD NET 30 $ 490.50 $ 3,924.00 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 332 FE0212E 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 579.00 $ 2,316.00 FORD 7-14 $ 728.02 $ 2,912.08 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 554.97 $ 2,219.88 FORD NET 30 $ 593.02 $ 2,372.08 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS 333 FE0212G 4 NO BID #VALUE! $ 1,086.00 $ 4,344.00 FORD 7-14 $ 1,070.98 $ 4,283.92 SMITH/BLAIN 3-5 $ 1,040.29 $ 4,161.16 FORD NET 30 $ 1,112.70 $ 4,450.80 ROMAC/S-B 1-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery334 BB0104A 20 $ 363.42 $ 7,268.40 CLOW 5-10 $ 358.29 $ 7,165.80 7-21 $ 375.51 $ 7,510.20 MUELLER 3-5 $ 372.74 $ 7,454.80 MH NET 30 $ 397.10 $ 7,942.00 AFC(DARLING) 1-4 WKS 335 BB0106A 10 $ 457.68 $ 4,576.80 CLOW 5-10 $ 448.10 $ 4,481.00 7-21 $ 486.07 $ 4,860.70 MUELLER 3-5 $ 456.17 $ 4,561.70 MH NET 30 $ 505.70 $ 5,057.00 AFC 1-4 WKS 336 BB0108A 30 $ 716.99 $ 21,509.70 CLOW 5-10 $ 707.90 $ 21,237.00 7-21 $ 756.20 $ 22,686.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 707.92 $ 21,237.60 MH NET 30 $ 792.45 $ 23,773.50 AFC 1-4 WKS 337 BB0110A 8 $ 1,136.23 $ 9,089.84 CLOW 5-10 $ 1,116.70 $ 8,933.60 7-21 $ 1,175.18 $ 9,401.44 MUELLER 3-5 $ 1,116.86 $ 8,934.88 MH NET 30 $ 1,247.60 $ 9,980.80 AFC 1-4 WKS 338 BB0112A 8 $ 1,397.88 $ 11,183.04 CLOW 5-10 $ 1,376.21 $ 11,009.68 7-21 $ 1,485.36 $ 11,882.88 MUELLER 3-5 $ 1,378.79 $ 11,030.32 MH NET 30 $ 1,541.70 $ 12,333.60 AFC 1-4 WKS 339 BB0116A 8 $ 4,429.45 $ 35,435.60 CLOW 5-10 $ 4,402.64 $ 35,221.12 7-21 $ 4,987.23 $ 39,897.84 MUELLER 3-5 $ 4,367.38 $ 34,939.04 MH NET 30 $ 4,917.45 $ 39,339.60 AFC 1-4 WKS 340 BB0204A 12 $ 318.88 $ 3,826.56 CLOW 5-10 $ 322.94 $ 3,875.28 7-21 $ 357.49 $ 4,289.88 MUELLER 3-5 $ 329.44 $ 3,953.28 MH NET 30 $ 358.10 $ 4,297.20 AFC 1-4 WKS 341 BB0204B 30 $ 301.53 $ 9,045.90 CLOW 5-10 $ 313.21 $ 9,396.30 7-21 $ 348.00 $ 10,440.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 305.02 $ 9,150.60 MH NET 30 $ 335.80 $ 10,074.00 AFC 1-4 WKS 342 BB0206A 30 $ 423.21 $ 12,696.30 CLOW 5-10 $ 423.13 $ 12,693.90 7-21 $ 469.11 $ 14,073.30 MUELLER 3-5 $ 420.94 $ 12,628.20 MH NET 30 $ 476.60 $ 14,298.00 AFC 1-4 WKS 343 BB0206B 20 $ 398.38 $ 7,967.60 CLOW 5-10 $ 324.51 $ 6,490.20 7-21 $ 465.20 $ 9,304.00 MUELLER 3-5 $ 400.13 $ 8,002.60 MH NET 30 $ 448.70 $ 8,974.00 AFC 1-4 WKS 344 BB0208A 30 $ 653.19 $ 19,595.70 CLOW 5-10 $ 652.25 $ 19,567.50 7-21 $ 730.71 $ 21,921.30 MUELLER 3-5 $ 649.30 $ 19,479.00 MH NET 30 $ 736.30 $ 22,089.00 AFC 1-4 WKS 345 BB0208B 20 $ 619.56 $ 12,391.20 CLOW 5-10 $ 652.60 $ 13,052.00 7-21 $ 726.97 $ 14,539.40 MUELLER 3-5 $ 625.18 $ 12,503.60 MH NET 30 $ 701.70 $ 14,034.00 AFC 1-4 WKS 346 BB0210A 4 $ 1,046.27 $ 4,185.08 CLOW 5-10 $ 1,053.65 $ 4,214.60 7-21 $ 1,149.59 $ 4,598.36 MUELLER 3-5 $ 1,036.34 $ 4,145.36 MH NET 30 $ 1,176.35 $ 4,705.40 AFC 1-4 WKS

Service Saddles

Stainless Steel Tapping Sleeves

Resilent Seated Gate Valve

8 of 8

Morrison Supply Western Industrial SupplyBenmark Supply Municipal Waterworks HD Supply WaterworksDescriptions347 BB0212A 12 $ 1,248.07 $ 14,976.84 CLOW 5-10 $ 1,258.60 $ 15,103.20 7-21 $ 1,421.49 $ 17,057.88 MUELLER 3-5 $ 1,238.89 $ 14,866.68 MH NET 30 $ 1,388.00 $ 16,656.00 AFC 1-4 WKS 348 BB0212B 4 $ 1,197.89 $ 4,791.56 CLOW 5-10 $ 1,258.60 $ 5,034.40 7-21 $ 1,394.77 $ 5,579.08 MUELLER 3-5 $ 1,198.38 $ 4,793.52 MH NET 30 $ 1,382.55 $ 5,530.20 AFC 1-4 WKS 349 BB0216B 4 $ 4,045.68 $ 16,182.72 CLOW 5-10 $ 4,154.09 $ 16,616.36 7-21 $ 4,718.44 $ 18,873.76 MUELLER 3-5 $ 4,050.96 $ 16,203.84 MH NET 30 $ 4,620.15 $ 18,480.60 AFC 1-4 WKS

Qty Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery Unit Extended Brand Delivery350 GL1604O 40 $ 27.84 $ 1,113.60 EBAA 5-10 $ 23.90 $ 956.00 FORD 7-14 $ 24.19 $ 967.60 FORD 1 WEEK $ 22.41 $ 896.40 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!351 GL1606O 40 $ 34.52 $ 1,380.80 EBAA 5-10 $ 29.25 $ 1,170.00 FORD 7-14 $ 29.59 $ 1,183.60 FORD 1 WEEK $ 27.41 $ 1,096.40 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!352 GL1608O 40 $ 46.91 $ 1,876.40 EBAA 5-10 $ 41.25 $ 1,650.00 FORD 7-14 $ 41.72 $ 1,668.80 FORD 1 WEEK $ 38.64 $ 1,545.60 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!353 GL1610O 20 $ 67.02 $ 1,340.40 EBAA 5-10 $ 59.55 $ 1,191.00 FORD 7-14 $ 60.24 $ 1,204.80 FORD 1 WEEK $ 55.80 $ 1,116.00 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!354 GL1612O 20 $ 89.95 $ 1,799.00 EBAA 5-10 $ 79.05 $ 1,581.00 FORD 7-14 $ 79.94 $ 1,598.80 FORD 1 WEEK $ 75.63 $ 1,512.60 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!355 GL1614O 20 $ 115.05 $ 2,301.00 EBAA 5-10 $ 104.25 $ 2,085.00 FORD 7-21 $ 108.97 $ 2,179.40 FORD 1 WEEK $ 100.94 $ 2,018.80 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!356 GL1616O 20 $ 155.25 $ 3,105.00 EBAA 5-10 $ 135.95 $ 2,719.00 FORD 7-21 $ 142.15 $ 2,843.00 FORD 1 WEEK $ 131.67 $ 2,633.40 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!357 GL1618O 20 $ 209.83 $ 4,196.60 EBAA 5-10 $ 185.42 $ 3,708.40 FORD 7-21 $ 193.84 $ 3,876.80 FORD 1 WEEK $ 179.56 $ 3,591.20 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!358 GL1620O 20 $ 256.33 $ 5,126.60 EBAA 5-10 $ 221.50 $ 4,430.00 FORD 7-21 $ 236.59 $ 4,731.80 FORD 1 WEEK $ 219.16 $ 4,383.20 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!359 GL1624O 16 $ 347.13 $ 5,554.08 EBAA 5-10 $ 328.50 $ 5,256.00 FORD 7-21 $ 355.13 $ 5,682.08 FORD 1 WEEK $ 328.96 $ 5,263.36 FORD NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!360 GL1630O 8 $ 850.15 $ 6,801.20 EBAA 5-10 $ 689.00 $ 5,512.00 FORD 7-21 $ 751.60 $ 6,012.80 FORD 1 WEEK $ 770.67 $ 6,165.36 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!361 GL1636O 0 NO BID #VALUE! EBAA 5-10 $ 871.00 $ - FORD 7-21 NO BID #VALUE! $ 978.54 $ - EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!362 GL1642O 0 NO BID #VALUE! EBAA 5-10 $ 1,337.44 $ - FORD 7-21 NO BID #VALUE! $ 1,500.67 $ - EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!363 GL1648O 0 NO BID #VALUE! EBAA 5-10 $ 1,699.00 $ - FORD 7-21 NO BID #VALUE! $ 1,905.54 $ - EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!364 GL1804O 8 $ 65.96 $ 527.68 EBAA 5-10 $ 66.69 $ 533.52 FORD 7-21 $ 38.85 $ 310.80 FORD 1 WEEK $ 63.87 $ 510.96 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!365 GL1806O 12 $ 96.84 $ 1,162.08 EBAA 5-10 $ 97.99 $ 1,175.88 FORD 7-21 $ 37.47 $ 449.64 FORD 1 WEEK $ 93.79 $ 1,125.48 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!366 GL1808O 16 $ 153.05 $ 2,448.80 EBAA 5-10 $ 154.75 $ 2,476.00 EBAA 7-21 $ 66.52 $ 1,064.32 FORD 1 WEEK $ 148.22 $ 2,371.52 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!367 GL1810O 8 $ 217.08 $ 1,736.64 EBAA 5-10 $ 219.50 $ 1,756.00 EBAA 7-21 $ 102.88 $ 823.04 FORD 1 WEEK $ 210.22 $ 1,681.76 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!368 GL1812O 16 $ 278.28 $ 4,452.48 EBAA 5-10 $ 281.50 $ 4,504.00 EBAA 7-21 $ 133.47 $ 2,135.52 FORD 1 WEEK $ 269.49 $ 4,311.84 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!369 GL1814O 8 $ 473.11 $ 3,784.88 EBAA 5-10 $ 478.50 $ 3,828.00 EBAA 7-21 NO BID #VALUE! $ 458.18 $ 3,665.44 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!370 GL1816O 8 $ 695.75 $ 5,566.00 EBAA 5-10 $ 703.50 $ 5,628.00 EBAA 7-21 NO BID #VALUE! $ 673.78 $ 5,390.24 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!371 GL1818O 8 $ 779.24 $ 6,233.92 EBAA 5-10 $ 779.25 $ 6,234.00 EBAA 7-21 NO BID #VALUE! $ 754.63 $ 6,037.04 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!372 GL1820O 8 $ 859.95 $ 6,879.60 EBAA 5-10 $ 859.75 $ 6,878.00 EBAA 7-21 NO BID #VALUE! $ 832.79 $ 6,662.32 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!373 GL1824O 8 $ 1,048.64 $ 8,389.12 EBAA 5-10 $ 1,040.00 $ 8,320.00 EBAA 7-21 NO BID #VALUE! $ 1,015.53 $ 8,124.24 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!374 GL1830O 8 $ 1,364.13 $ 10,913.04 EBAA 5-10 $ 1,350.00 $ 10,800.00 EBAA 7-21 NO BID #VALUE! $ 1,321.04 $ 10,568.32 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!375 GL1836O 8 $ 2,087.27 $ 16,698.16 EBAA 5-10 $ 2,065.00 $ 16,520.00 EBAA 7-21 NO BID #VALUE! $ 2,021.36 $ 16,170.88 EBBA NET 30 NO BID #VALUE!

Requests for Bids were mailed to:

Big Country TXMorrison Supply TXMunicipal Water Works TXPlastic Wholesale TXWestern Industrial TXOdessa

BrownwoodSan AngeloRoyse CityAbilene

*Price good for 6 months**Price good for 120 days

Megalug

City of San Angelo



From: Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director


Kevin Krueger, Water Utilities Engineering Manager, 657-4260 Contact:

Consent Caption:

Consideration of adopting a Resolution of the City of San Angelo awarding bid to Price Construction, Ltd. (Big Spring, TX), and authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a Performance Agreement in the sum of $3,029,464.00 and related documents for Hickory Aquifer Well Field Pipelines, RFB No. WU-10-11

Summary: The City has received bids from twelve contractors to install 20”, 16”, 12” and 8” water mains to connect the existing wells with the proposed 30” transmission main. Low bid was submitted by Price Construction, Ltd. and the bid had no exceptions to the specifications.

History: This project is a part of the Hickory Aquifer development project.

Financial Impact Bid amount - $3,029,464.00 Budgeted under Capital Improvement funds. :

Related Vision Item

(if applicable)

None.

:


Approximately 50,700 feet of water mains and valves will be installed under this contract. Price Construction has listed the following sub-contractors, Darnell & Dickson Construction, Inc. (placement of water lines), Custom Trenching, Cedar Eaters of Texas (brush clearing), Rockin’ J Fence, and SKG Engineering (staking).

:

Staff recommends that the low bid be accepted and the City Manager be authorized to execute the contract.

Attachments “: WU-10-11” Bid Tabulation, Resolution, and Contract

Presentation None. :

Publication None. :

Reviewed by Director

Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director, August12, 2011. :

6/30/11 Approved by Legal:

Y:\11-RFX\Water Utilities\WU1011 Well Field\WU-10-11 BID TAB/Summary Page 1 of 1

Vendor Reynolds Inc SJ LouisLewis

Contractors HollomanBowles

ConstructionWright

ConstructionPrice

ConstructionTexas Water &

Soil Housley RES

Construction

SPEC Construction

ServicesTOTAL BID 3,812,500.00$ 3,303,501.00$ 3,651,100.00$ 3,450,000.00$ 3,193,100.00$ 3,834,070.00$ 3,029,464.00$ 3,407,796.00$ 3,782,156.00$ 4,707,996.27$ 3,698,360.40$

BID BOND? Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Bid Invitations Sent To:American Ductile Iron Pipe Dallas, TX MasTec North America, Inc. Dallas, TX

Barnard Construction Company, Ltd. Bozeman, MT McClean Construction, Inc Kileen, TX

Benmark Supply Midland, TX McGraw-Hill Dodge Reports Hot Springs, AR

Big Country Water Works Brownwood, TX Morrison Supply San Angelo, TX

BRH-Garver Construction, LP Houston, TX Reece Albert San Angelo, TX

Capitol Concrete Contractors, Inc. Liberty Hill, TX Reynolds, Inc Denver, CO

CAS Construction Co. Wimberly, TX Roberts Construction San Angelo, TX

Cleburne Utilities Cleburne, TX SJ Louis Mansfield, TX

Darnell & Dickson San Angelo, TX Tech Excavation Midland, TX

Davis Excavation Melissa, TX Texas Rd & Utilities Inc Cedar Creek, TX

Don Kelly Construction Arlington, TX Texas United Excavators Carrollton, TX

DW Utility Supply Waxahachie, TX Texas Water & Soil San Angelo, TXGajeske, Inc. Helotes, TX US Filter Waco, TX

Garney Companies, Inc. Kansas City, MO Utility Contractor of America Wolfforth, TX

Hall Albert Construction Fort Worth, TX Western Industrial Supply Amarillo, TX

HD Supply Waterworks Waco, TX Western Summit Fort Worth, TX

Holloman Utilities Converse, TX Wright Construction Co., Inc. Grapevine, TX

Hoot Johnson Construction Hillsboro, TX

Housley Communication Inc San Angelo, TX

Joe Moore Pipeline Abilene, TX

Key Enterprises Odessa, TX

MasTec Dallas, TX

Y:\11-RFX\Water Utilities\WU1011 Well Field\WU-10-11 BID TAB/Detail Page 1 of 1

C I T Y O F S A N A N G E L O BID PROPOSAL * RFB NO: WU-10-11 Hickory Well Field August 12, 2011 / 2:00 P.M.

Item Quantity Unit Unit Price Ext Price Unit Price Ext Price Unit Price Ext Price Unit Price Ext Price Unit Price Ext Price Unit Price Ext Price Unit Price Ext Price Unit Price Ext Price Unit Price Ext Price Unit Price Ext Price Unit Price Ext Price Unit Price Ext Price

1 17,500 LF 80.00$ 1,400,000.00$ 80.00$ 1,400,000.00$ 78.00$ 1,365,000.00$ 86.00$ 1,505,000.00$ 78.00$ 1,365,000.00$ 73.00$ 1,277,500.00$ 87.50$ 1,531,250.00$ 70.51$ 1,233,925.00$ 96.00$ 1,680,000.00$ 79.35$ 1,388,625.00$ 95.99$ 1,679,825.00$ 80.00$ 1,400,000.00$

2 5,500 LF 51.00$ 280,500.00$ 61.00$ 335,500.00$ 55.00$ 302,500.00$ 60.00$ 330,000.00$ 58.00$ 319,000.00$ 53.00$ 291,500.00$ 62.40$ 343,200.00$ 50.00$ 275,000.00$ 63.00$ 346,500.00$ 61.67$ 339,185.00$ 75.67$ 416,185.00$ 62.09$ 341,495.00$

3 27,200 LF 36.00$ 979,200.00$ 47.00$ 1,278,400.00$ 39.00$ 1,060,800.00$ 43.00$ 1,169,600.00$ 42.00$ 1,142,400.00$ 39.00$ 1,060,800.00$ 49.10$ 1,335,520.00$ 35.58$ 967,776.00$ 45.00$ 1,224,000.00$ 40.70$ 1,107,040.00$ 57.19$ 1,555,568.00$ 46.91$ 1,275,952.00$

4 500 LF 33.00$ 16,500.00$ 41.00$ 20,500.00$ 37.00$ 18,500.00$ 38.00$ 19,000.00$ 38.00$ 19,000.00$ 39.00$ 19,500.00$ 62.00$ 31,000.00$ 30.62$ 15,310.00$ 36.58$ 18,290.00$ 45.98$ 22,990.00$ 52.04$ 26,020.00$ 57.73$ 28,865.00$

5 1 EA 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 42,800.00$ 42,800.00$ 38,400.00$ 38,400.00$ 45,000.00$ 45,000.00$ 39,300.00$ 39,300.00$ 42,000.00$ 42,000.00$ 27,100.00$ 27,100.00$ 23,222.00$ 23,222.00$ 22,630.00$ 22,630.00$ 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 51,104.35$ 51,104.35$ 39,169.67$ 39,169.67$

6 4 EA 20,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 19,300.00$ 77,200.00$ 11,000.00$ 44,000.00$ 16,000.00$ 64,000.00$ 15,500.00$ 62,000.00$ 14,000.00$ 56,000.00$ 12,900.00$ 51,600.00$ 13,054.00$ 52,216.00$ 11,980.00$ 47,920.00$ 15,579.00$ 62,316.00$ 39,773.95$ 159,095.80$ 17,830.72$ 71,322.88$

7 1 EA 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 9,300.00$ 9,300.00$ 6,600.00$ 6,600.00$ 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 6,900.00$ 6,900.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 6,900.00$ 6,900.00$ 6,650.00$ 6,650.00$ 5,600.00$ 5,600.00$ 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 19,790.83$ 19,790.83$ 7,786.13$ 7,786.13$

8 6 EA 7,500.00$ 45,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 21,000.00$ 3,400.00$ 20,400.00$ 4,500.00$ 27,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 2,800.00$ 16,800.00$ 3,400.00$ 20,400.00$ 2,752.00$ 16,512.00$ 2,040.00$ 12,240.00$ 3,045.00$ 18,270.00$ 9,514.94$ 57,089.64$ 4,148.64$ 24,891.84$

9 9 EA 5,500.00$ 49,500.00$ 2,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 2,700.00$ 24,300.00$ 3,200.00$ 28,800.00$ 2,200.00$ 19,800.00$ 2,000.00$ 18,000.00$ 2,400.00$ 21,600.00$ 1,996.00$ 17,964.00$ 1,220.00$ 10,980.00$ 2,085.00$ 18,765.00$ 7,310.50$ 65,794.50$ 3,292.29$ 29,630.61$

10 5 EA 12,000.00$ 60,000.00$ 9,700.00$ 48,500.00$ 6,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 5,800.00$ 29,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 5,500.00$ 27,500.00$ 3,864.00$ 19,320.00$ 4,230.00$ 21,150.00$ 4,249.00$ 21,245.00$ 7,037.13$ 35,185.65$ 10,460.80$ 52,304.00$

11 11 EA 9,500.00$ 104,500.00$ 9,000.00$ 99,000.00$ 5,300.00$ 58,300.00$ 4,500.00$ 49,500.00$ 4,700.00$ 51,700.00$ 3,200.00$ 35,200.00$ 4,600.00$ 50,600.00$ 3,063.00$ 33,693.00$ 3,400.00$ 37,400.00$ 3,631.00$ 39,941.00$ 5,399.73$ 59,397.03$ 6,614.91$ 72,764.01$

12 2 EA 7,000.00$ 14,000.00$ 7,400.00$ 14,800.00$ 4,100.00$ 8,200.00$ 3,700.00$ 7,400.00$ 2,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 3,400.00$ 6,800.00$ 3,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 1,547.00$ 3,094.00$ 908.00$ 1,816.00$ 2,606.00$ 5,212.00$ 3,173.18$ 6,346.36$ 4,053.71$ 8,107.42$

13 9 EA 2,700.00$ 24,300.00$ 6,000.00$ 54,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 1,200.00$ 10,800.00$ 2,400.00$ 21,600.00$ 3,000.00$ 27,000.00$ 3,300.00$ 29,700.00$ 3,040.00$ 27,360.00$ 2,420.00$ 21,780.00$ 3,523.00$ 31,707.00$ 17,571.03$ 158,139.27$ 1,717.20$ 15,454.80$

14 1 LS 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 75,000.00$ 17,500.00$ 17,500.00$ 55,000.00$ 55,000.00$ 44,200.00$ 44,200.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 39,000.00$ 39,000.00$ 31,752.00$ 31,752.00$ 16,850.00$ 16,850.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 105,217.48$ 105,217.48$ 25,242.84$ 25,242.84$

15 1 LF 50,700.00$ 50,700.00$ 18,500.00$ 18,500.00$ 1.00$ 1.00$ 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 14,100.00$ 14,100.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 12,700.00$ 12,700.00$ 5,670.00$ 5,670.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3.32$ 3.32$ 5,374.20$ 5,374.20$

16 1 LS

Bid Bond

3,107,796.00$

3,456,000.00$ Total Bid

300,000.00$

3,194,200.00$ 3,512,500.00$ 3,003,501.00$ 3,351,100.00$ Total Base Bid (items 1-15, inclusive)

Allowance for additional work 300,000.00$ 300,000.00$ 300,000.00$ 300,000.00$

3,494,200.00$ 3,812,500.00$ 3,303,501.00$ 3,651,100.00$

3,156,000.00$

19300

Design, furnish, install and maintain trench safety system..

#REF! Reynolds Inc SJ Louis Bowles Construction

Description

Provide and install 8" resilient seated gate valve (RSGV)

Provide and install 3" combination air/vacuum relief valve..

Provide and install 2" combination air/vacuum relief valve..

Provide and install 1" blow off valve assemblies..

Remove existing fence, install H braces, gates, posts, provide temporary fencing..

Provide, place and contruct 20" water main

Provide, place and construct 16" water main







Prepare soil, drill seed for vegetation..

2,893,100.00$

300,000.00$

3,193,100.00$

Wright Construction

3,534,070.00$

300,000.00$

3,834,070.00$

2,729,464.00$

Price Construction

300,000.00$

3,029,464.00$

Housley

3,482,156.00$

300,000.00$

3,782,156.00$

RES Construction

4,394,762.23$

300,000.00$

3,407,796.00$

300,000.00$

4,694,762.23$

SPEC Construction Services

3,398,360.40$

300,000.00$

3,698,360.40$

Lewis Contractors Texas Water & SoilHolloman

Yes Yes YesYes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AWARDING BID TO PRICE CONSTRUCTION, LTD., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT IN THE SUM OF $3,029,464.00 AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR HICKORY AQUIFER WELL FIELD PIPELINES, RFB NO. WU-10-11.

WHEREAS, the City of San Angelo issued an RFB on July 7, 2011, for bidding on the construction of the Hickory Aquifer Well Field Pipelines, RFB NO. WU-10-11; and, WHEREAS, all legal procedures for the request, submission and opening of bids have been properly performed; and, WHEREAS, Price Construction, Ltd. is the lowest qualified, responsive and responsible bidder, the bid being $3,029,464.00; and, WHEREAS, a performance agreement is necessary to commence construction for installation of water mains to connect the existing wells with the proposed transmission main for the Hickory water pipeline for transporting water to the City of San Angelo; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT: The City Council hereby accepts the bid of Price Construction, Ltd. for construction of the Hickory aquifer Well Field Pipelines, RFB WU-10-11; hereby awards the contract to Price Construction, Ltd. for the sum of $3,029,464.00, and, directs the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute on behalf of the City of San Angelo a performance agreement and related documents therefore. PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2011. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: Alvin New, Mayor Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

City of San Angelo



From: Tom Kerr, Assistant Director of Water Utilities


Tom Kerr, 657-4209 Contact:


Consideration of resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement and related documents with Sharyland Utilities (sole source provider) for the construction, installation and furnishing of said facility to provide electric service to the City of San Angelo Hickory Well Field project not to exceed the amount of $3,000,000.00.

Electric service will be required for the pumping of water from the wells to a central pump station that will deliver the Hickory groundwater to the City of San Angelo. Sharyland Utilities is the sole electric service provider for the area. An agreement is required with Sharyland Utilities so that facilities may be constructed and services delivered.

Summary:

This is part of the overall Hickory groundwater development project. History:

Financial Impact Funded within the Capital Improvement Program. Total cost of facility construction is projected not to exceed $3,000,000.

:

Related Vision Item N/A


It is recommended that the City Manager or his designee be authorized to negotiate and execute all related documents necessary for electric service from Sharyland Utilities for the Hickory groundwater project.

:

Attachments: Resolution and Draft Agreement Form

Presentation None :

Publication N/A :


Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director, August 24, 2011.

:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE AN ELECTRIC SERVICE AGREEMENT AND ANY DOCUMENTS RELATED THERETO WITH SHARYLAND UTILITIES, L.P. FOR ELECTRICAL UTILITY SERVICES AND PROVIDING FOR CONTRIBUTIONS IN AID TO CONSTRUCTION FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE TO THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO HICKORY WELL FIELD PROJECT.

WHEREAS, the City Council has approved the Hickory Aquifer Water Supply Project that will consist of the development of the Hickory well field project in McCulloch County, construction of a pipeline conveying water to the City of San Angelo, and construction of a new Water Treatment Facility; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has authorized the process for acquisition of the necessary right of way for the water pipeline, which process has been commenced; and, WHEREAS, electrical utility infrastructure and service is necessary for construction and operation of the Hickory well field project and Sharyland Utilities, L.P. is the sole source provider for electrical utility at the Hickory well field project; and, WHEREAS, the total cost of facility construction for necessary electrical utility service at the Hickory well field project is not to exceed THREE MILLION DOLLARS ($3,000.000.00); NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT: The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute an Electric Service Agreement with Sharyland Utilities, L.P., and related documents, for the construction, installation and furnishing of electric service for the Hickory Well Field Project in McCulloch County, Texas, including provision for contributions in aid to construction by the City of San Angelo in an amount not to exceed THREE MILLION DOLLARS ($3,000,000.00). PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2011. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: Alvin New, Mayor Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM Will Wilde, Dir. Water Utilities Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

SAN ANGELO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU

CITY COUNCIL REPORT

2011 – 2nd QUARTER REPORT

1. MARKETING EFFORTS & RESULTS……………… 1 – 19

2. CONVENTION ACTIVITY…………………………… 20 - 32

3. LATEST FINANCIAL STATEMENT………………... 33 - 36

San Angelo CVBFor the month of: June 2011

Percent Change from June 2010

2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 Occ ADR RevPAR Room RevRoom Avail

Room Sold

San Angelo 72.1 59.0 71.21 70.94 51.38 41.85 22.3 0.4 22.7 28.6 4.8 28.1Abilene 67.4 57.5 74.34 70.98 50.13 40.81 17.3 4.7 22.8 21.5 -1.1 16.0Midland 80.2 59.6 87.04 75.86 69.79 45.21 34.5 14.7 54.4 54.3 -0.0 34.5Odessa 84.8 64.3 81.35 69.90 68.99 44.97 31.8 16.4 53.4 65.5 7.9 42.2Lubbock 68.2 62.3 73.49 70.00 50.09 43.60 9.4 5.0 14.9 15.2 0.2 9.7Kerrville 54.1 63.9 80.58 82.98 43.60 53.00 -15.3 -2.9 -17.7 -15.6 2.6 -13.1Amarillo 76.7 77.4 71.21 67.29 54.60 52.08 -0.9 5.8 4.8 4.7 -0.1 -1.1Wichita Falls 57.7 56.6 65.91 67.32 38.03 38.12 1.9 -2.1 -0.2 -1.7 -1.5 0.4Killeen 70.5 64.5 70.56 69.97 49.72 45.15 9.2 0.8 10.1 3.7 -5.8 2.9Longview 59.5 58.3 63.26 65.32 37.61 38.09 2.0 -3.2 -1.3 2.2 3.5 5.5

Percent Change from YTD 2010

2011 2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 Occ ADR RevPAR Room RevRoom Avail

Room Sold

San Angelo 62.6 53.1 70.17 70.35 43.96 37.38 17.9 -0.3 17.6 24.3 5.7 24.6Abilene 57.4 48.2 72.07 70.66 41.39 34.04 19.2 2.0 21.6 24.8 2.6 22.3Midland 72.1 52.4 80.76 75.22 58.21 39.40 37.6 7.4 47.7 47.7 -0.0 37.5Odessa 79.3 56.5 75.90 69.72 60.15 39.41 40.2 8.9 52.6 62.7 6.6 49.4Lubbock 62.8 56.8 72.79 69.84 45.69 39.68 10.5 4.2 15.2 16.2 0.9 11.5Kerrville 44.9 46.8 74.61 77.01 33.53 36.01 -3.9 -3.1 -6.9 -4.9 2.2 -1.8Amarillo 59.6 57.0 66.67 63.83 39.73 36.35 4.6 4.5 9.3 7.6 -1.6 3.0Wichita Falls 48.8 47.6 63.66 64.78 31.04 30.81 2.5 -1.7 0.7 -0.8 -1.5 0.9Killeen 59.4 60.9 70.07 69.27 41.63 42.17 -2.4 1.2 -1.3 -7.0 -5.8 -8.0Longview 55.1 53.1 62.01 64.44 34.17 34.21 3.8 -3.8 -0.1 2.2 2.4 6.2

Census Sample Census Sample

San Angelo 24 17 1956 1435Abilene 42 25 3295 2012Midland 34 18 2785 1780Odessa 33 18 2651 1931Lubbock 55 37 4953 3806Kerrville 14 10 1092 864Amarillo 64 37 5440 3489Wichita Falls 28 22 2441 2055Killeen 35 21 2410 1571Longview 36 22 2484 1613

Participation

Occ % ADR RevPAR

Properties Rooms

Current Month - June 2011 vs June 2010Occ % ADR RevPAR

Year to Date - June 2011 vs June 2010

1

2nd Quarter Surveys

April through June, 2011

How did you hear about San Angelo/Reason for Coming Information from another visitor center 20% Internet 19% Texas Travel Guide 16% Texas Monthly 11% Friends & Family 10% Convention Packet 8% Brochure 7% Magazine 4% Travel agent 3% USA Today 2% Room Nights Hotel 43% With Friends and Family 40% Camping 14% Goodfellow 2% Purpose of trip Vacation 43% Weekend Getaway 20% Business 11% Attending an event 6% ASU Grad. 3% Shopping 3% Visiting Friends/Family 3% Convention 2% Goodfellow 1%

Top Texas Cities visiting this quarter that participated in survey Midland Houston Del Rio Big Spring Odessa San Antonio Abilene Fort Worth Amarillo

2

INTERNATIONAL COUNT # DAYS STAYCanada 85 3Mexico 59 3United Kingdom 29 6Germany 28 4Australia 24 6Russia 11 1Norway 11 11Korea 14 1Sweden 9 6Switzerland 7 1Denmark 2 1Egypt 2 30Ireland 2 3Japan 1 30Brazil 1 1China 1 1

286 108Cumulative 6241

3

January 1, 2011 - June 31, 2011

TEXAS CITY COUNT DAYS STAYOdessa 186 2San Antonio 174 2Midland 147 2Houston 145 2Abilene 139 2Fort Worth 132 3Austin 129 2Lubbock 108 3Del Rio 69 2Dallas 68 2Big Spring 68 2Waco 56 2Amarillo 55 2Granbury 53 2El Paso 50 2Laredo 48 2Leander 47 2Poolville 40 4Marble Falls 38 3Mansfield 34 3Corpus Christi 33 2Seminole 32 2No City 31 9Pecos 27 4Arlington 24 3Boerne 23 2Littlefield 20 2Killeen 20 2Pipe Creek 20 4Rio Vista 20 4Hutto 19 2Round Rock 19 2Tyler 19 2Allen 18 4Kerrville 18 2Humble 18 2Fredericksburg 17 3Eldorado 17 3Sterling City 17 2De Leon 17 2Georgetown 17 2Garland 17 3Christoval 17 1

4

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

TEXAS CITIES VISITING SAN ANGELO

January 1, 2011 - June 30, 2011PURPOSE OF VISIT COUNT AVERAGE DAY STAYLeisure 2476 3

Coaches Clinic 962 2

Dragboat Races 891 4

Visiting Friends and Family 834 5

Business 389 8

Other 266 3

Passing through 238 1

Horseman 182 8

Sports 3 2

6241

5

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

PURPOSE OF VISIT

STATE COUNT # DAYS STAYTX 3807 2NM 197 3OK 179 3CO 149 4CA 133 5OH 120 6MO 105 5FL 84 7KS 83 4MN 71 4IL 70 7AZ 69 4WI 69 5WA 65 4AR 44 4NV 44 4GA 43 7NY 42 4PA 39 5IA 39 6OR 38 6MI 38 5NC 37 5TN 31 12LA 31 4IN 28 5WY 27 11AL 25 8VA 24 3ND 22 3NE 21 1NH 20 3MD 17 8MA 15 2AK 14 5SC 14 5MS 13 3ID 12 6CT 10 2RI 9 8SD 8 4MT 8 4VT 6 5ME 6 2DE 6 4KY 6 3UT 5 16HI 4 6PR 4 1NJ 4 4

5955 247

6

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

San Angelo Convention & Visitor Center By States Jan-June, 2011

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

AIR TRAVEL

June 2011 Visitor Center Sign-Ins

Out of 739 visitors, 17 said they traveled by air.

DFW 7

Midland 4

San Antonio 3

Houston 1

July 2011 Visitor Center Sign-Ins

Out of 915 visitors, 65 said they traveled by air.

From those 65 that traveled by air, there were 29 that old us what airport they arrived at as

follows:

DFW 18 San Antonio 9 Midland 2

8

25

12

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

14

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

Summer Texas Events

SPLASHAWAY . SPLASHAWAY . SPLASHAWAY . . ALL

Showdown in San Angelo Drag Boat Races

Pearl of the Concho Cruises

Water Sports

Fishing

Discover an OASIS of Summertime Fun: www.visitsanangelo.org

15

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

TEXAS Monthly - June, 2011

17

LHofheins

Typewritten Text

Banner Ad - Tour Texas

1st Saturday at the

Old Chicken Farm Art Center

May 7th

Works of special invited guest

artists plus all center artist

studios open for visitors. Located at 2505 Martin Luther

King Blvd. FMI: 325-653-4936

www. Chickenfarmartcenter.com

Simply Texas Blues Festival

May 7th

San Angelo Blues Society hosts

This jazz festival with performers

competing for sponsorship at the

International BLUES Challenge in

Memphis, Tennessee.

Oakes Street—Downtown San Angelo

FMI: 325-949-5552

www.sanangelobluessociety.com

Wooly Bully Festival

May 21st

Downtown San Angelo hosts this

great family event which includes events for the kids —

Mutton Bustin’, Boot Scramble, Dummy Steer Roping,

Rodeo Clown Contest and Stick-horse Barrel Races.

9:00am—12:00pm

112 E. Concho Avenue

FMI: 325-655-2345

www.downtownsanangelo.com

Time Warp– Town CNBC Travel Ideas - names San Angelo, TX one of the Time-Warp Town in the United States. Time-warp towns are those out-of-time discoveries that make for road-trip gold: downtowns populated with - antiques booth malls, neon signs, gingerbread detailing on downtown buildings, town squares, monuments, cobblestones, and/or apple pie! The buildings where the local history was made are still standing, and if you squint it seems like you’ve gone back in time.

Texas Historical Commission names San Angelo recipient of the distinctive Preserve America Award in January, 2011. Preserve America recognizes and designates communities, including municipalities, counties, neighborhoods in large cities, and tribal communities, that protect and celebrate their heritage. Since the program began in 2003, more than 800 communities have been designated as Preserve America Communities from throughout the country. Participants come from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories. Kudos to SAN ANGELO for this prestigious designation.

National Trust for Historic Preservation Selects San Angelo, Texas, as one of America’s Dozen Distinctive Destinations for 2011 San Angelo, nominated by Downtown San Angelo,Inc., was selected for its authentic western heritage, a vibrant downtown and the community’s dedication to

protecting and sharing its history and culture.

San Angelo Highlights……….

Fort Concho

Angelo State University Goodfellow Air Force Base

Water Lily Collection Cactus Hotel

San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts

San Angelo Visitor Center Newsletter

Historic Murals

May - June - July 2011

18

Time to come BAAA-ck

to San Angelo!

San Angelo CVB will soon kick off a

new marketing program called

―Sheep Thrills‖ a special dollar saving

package that will help you fill up your

gas tank with the money you save.

The new ―Sheep Thrills‖ package

must be booked directly with a

participating San Angelo hotel and

will offer discounts on

a c c o m m o d a t i o n s ,

shopping, and

restaurants and two for one tickets at

select San Angelo museums and

San Angelo Colts Baseball at Foster

Field. The program will run from

Memorial Day through Labor Day.

Watch ewe’r email for further

information!

We’re on the web:

visitsanangelo.org

Live Music in the Courtyard

June 9th

FREE yard concert. Bring your

Lawn chair and a cooler—find

A nice shady spot– sit back and

enjoy the music. 2505 Martin Luther King Blvd.

FMI: 325–653-4936 www.chickenfarmartcenter.com

Line Drives and Lipstick

June 16th - July 31st

At Fort Concho Quartermaster

Galleries - an exhibit of the

All-American Girls Professional

Baseball League. Exhibit includes photographs &

artifacts. 630 S. Oakes Street

FMI: 325-481-2646 www.fortconcho.com

July 3rd Pops Concert

July 3rd

The San Angelo Symphony celebrates its 24th year by bringing together

approximately 35,000 people from surrounding local communities and from as far

away as Houston, Dallas and Austin. At the Bill Aylor Riverstage along the Concho

River, the event begins at 8:30 with cannon fire then featuring performance by the

Twin Mountain Tonesmen. Free shuttles to and from the event will be available from the Cactus Hotel and Central

High School. OPTION: May purchase ticket for seat closer to stage. FMI: 325-658-5877

San Angelo Texas will put on its fifth annual drag boat races. Come see one

of the fastest shows on the water, SHOWDOWN IN SAN ANGELO. At lake

Nasworthy, this venue has been seen by many of the regular boat racers

and spectators as the BEST on the circuit. Boats will line up side by side

and run a liquid quarter mile at speeds of up to 250 miles per hour in less

than 5 seconds. The liquid quarter mile lies between two of the most awe-

some spectator areas that you will see on the circuit. Walk the pits and see

the boats up close. Talk to the drivers and crew and see them working on

the boats for the next round. Buy t-shirts, photos, cards or posters and have

your favorite driver autograph them. FMI: www.visitsanangelo.org Drag Boat Races June 24-26th

Showdown in San Angelo

4th of July Fireworks - Lake Nasworthy July 4th

Sponsored by the Lake Nasworthy Residents Association this venue will offer trolley service to lake side. Fire-

works begin at sunset. Further information can be obtained by visiting website www.visitsanangelo.org ( to be

posted mid-June) Pack your picnic favorites, gather up the kids—and come enjoy the Independence Day

celebration on the Lake.

19

SAN ANGELO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 2011 2nd QUARTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT REPORT TO:

CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SAN ANGELO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

TOM GREEN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL

I. GENERAL ACTIVITES

II. MARKETING

III. JUNE 30, 2011 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GENERAL ACTIVTIES APRIL – JUNE 2011

Assistance was provided: Demographic and general community information was provided to a company with a branch in San Angelo. The company is looking at an expansion opportunity. The Chamber provided shovels and helped promote the Western Towers new facility groundbreaking on Monday, May 23rd. Staff later attended a luncheon at the Western Towers facility where the company demonstrated their articulated arm antenna. Demographic information was sent to a local radio station to be used in recruiting a potential advertiser. Staff assisted representatives from AT&T Corporation in updating local media on the merge of AT&T and T-Mobile. Meetings and events: John spoke with new owners of a vacant building in town. They are looking to sublease the back part of the building, which has high ceilings. Hope met with a member of the "Link 2 Business" committee to discuss particulars of the database, and an advertising spot was secured at an SBDC seminar. Staff later met with faculty and students from ASU who will be working on our database. The two students will be creating the database as a class project, and have a target completion date of August 1. Staff attended the regularly scheduled COSADC meetings. John presented on the topic of economic development to the Leadership San Angelo class on April's Chamber day. Staff attended an investor dinner where several companies presented to the group, including a medical device company we have been working with for a year. Staff and economic development partners attended a network luncheon hosted by Texas Midwest Community Network (TMCN) in San Angelo. Representatives from San Angelo, Bronte, Menard, Ballinger, Eden, Coleman and Baird discussed engaging the youth in our communities and methods to get community involvement in projects. Nicki Harle, Executive Director of TMCN, presented an overview to the Economic Development Council about the organization and its components at its April meeting. Staff attended the SBDC’s “Doing Business with the Government” seminar. Link2Business sponsored the event, and John gave a short presentation about the initiative.

John met with members of the BRC group to select an architectural firm for the renovations on the building.

John and Hope participated in and assisted with the Lone Star Solar Summit in April. The event was a success, and we look for the Summit to be held in San Angelo again next year.

Staff met with an airport consultant to discuss the flight traffic in San Angelo. An information packet was mailed to the consultant following her visit to San Angelo. A survey was distributed to local business, and we assisted in distributing the information. John attended a book release in the Dallas/Fort Worth area. Mayor Bob Dixson of Greenburg, Kansas, the keynote speaker, discussed economic development practices his community ensued after a tornado demolished their town. Hope attended the “Lunch & Learn” series workshop which focused on the topic of economic development incentives. John met with a site selector representing a family who owns a parcel of land on Old Christoval Road that would be a great location for a business. We are working with him to get the land listed on all of our available real estate listings. John met with the owners and real estate developers of the Circuit City building to do a tour and to discuss possible uses of the building and adjacent pad sites. John attended the West Texas Training Center Advisory Board meeting and a final presentation on the development review process for the City. Staff attended TMCN’s “Dinner and Conversation” at Perini Ranch in Buffalo Gap. Carlton Schwab, keynote speaker, reported that the state’s economic development funds are retaining their current funding, which is good news for economic development. Prospects: San Angelo hosted two prospect visits in this quarter. Both companies were impressed with the way our economic development partners work together and the lunch format we use. A response to “Project Upstream” was submitted in April. Preparations continued for several days for the site visit, including finalizing the agenda for the day, reserving a venue for lunch, and assembling welcome baskets containing San Angelo made products. Staff spent most of the day Monday, April 25th hosting the company representatives. Economic development partners met for lunch to overview what the community could offer the prospect. Following lunch, several available buildings were visited. Unfortunately, the company selected another location closer to their customer base. In May, staff hosted a prospect visit this week for a medical device company that we have been working with on an ongoing basis. A site tour was held Tuesday afternoon (May 10th), the company presented to COSADC in executive session the following morning, and the economic development partners joined the gentlemen for lunch following the meeting. The company was pleased with San Angelo, and we received positive feedback.

An information packet was mailed to developer interested in San Angelo. Work continued with the medical device prospect. Additional information was sent to them, and a final incentive offer was submitted to the company in May. A new manufacturing lead came into our office from Mexico; an overview of our business climate was provided over the phone, and an information packet was mailed to them following the conversation. A response to “Project Demeter” was submitted at the end of June. The lead came in from a site selection company working on behalf of a snack food manufacturing company based in California. A proposal was submitted to the company. The project could potentially create 100 jobs. A lead from a San Angelo native was received. The prospective company, in the infant stage of the site selection process, could create up to 1,000 jobs in the electronic component industry. Information was compiled and sent to the company. Miscellaneous: Preparations continued for the economic development awards luncheon, and the script was finalized in early April. Six awards were given at the annual Economic Development Awards luncheon on April 12th. Gold Star Medical Business Services, Concho Collision, Angelo Transportation/Welch Transfer, Shannon Medical Center, and Ener-Tel received expansion awards for their growth in 2010. San Angelo Stock Show and Rodeo received a Special Economic Impact award for their 2010 events. Data was collected and submitted for the second quarter cost of living survey. The available commercial properties listing on our section of our website (and COSADC’s) continues to be updated, and will be maintained as new property information is received. At the May Economic Development Council meeting, the group discussed target and demand occupations that the Workforce Board will use to define the types of jobs that are allowed assistance through workforce training programs. Staff continued to work with members of the City staff and the architects who are working on the BRC building. We walked through the building multiple times, discussed office spaces, and brainstormed design aspects for the interior. Staff made travel arrangements for Tony Villarreal who represented the Chamber at the Ports to Plains conference in Mexico.

MARKETING APRIL – JUNE 2011

Trade Shows John spent four days at the American Wind Energy Show in Anaheim, California. We placed an advertisement in the show guide (reported in 1st quarter) and participated in the following sponsorships: The High Ground of Texas Beer Bash 2011: This Special Hospitality Event was held on Tuesday, May 24th in the High Ground Pavilion at the Anaheim Convention Center. It was a great wind-down at the end of a busy conference day and a perfect pre-event before the official AWEA Dinner and other Networking events held that evening. Guests enjoyed our Famous Texas hospitality, bootscootin music by the Texas Crossroads Band, and lots of delicious Texas snacks. The event was an opportunity to interact with manufacturing companies, equipment suppliers, developers, service industries and special guests who have business dealings or an interest in the High Ground region. Approximately 3,000 people came by the booth during the bash. High Ground T-Shirts: The High Ground team and our co-exhibitors also distributed special High Ground T-shirts from our booths as part of our pre-show and at-show booth marketing campaign. The shirts had a special High Ground of Texas Wind Power graphic on the front and the logos of our sponsors on the back, including the San Angelo Chamber of Commerce. Marketing and Recruitment Trips John traveled to New York City with TexasOne and the First Lady of Texas, Anita Perry. The group was given entrée to some of the largest site selection firms in the country and was able to share information about our community with those firms in hopes that they will keep San Angelo in their minds as they work with their clientele. They had an opportunity to sit down with them and discuss what needs they are seeing in relocation efforts nationwide. The feedback we received has already been implemented in our marketing efforts. Magazine Advertisements One full page ad was submitted in Business Xpansion Journal for the August edition. (See media kit on page 6 and ad on page 8.) One full page ad was submitted in both the July/August and September/October editions of Trade & Industry Development. (See media kit on page 7 and ad on page 8.)

ONLINEAND SOCIAL MEDIA CONTENT

ONLINE CONTENTAt www.bxjmag.com we offer display advertising opportunities to further promote your message to growingcompanies. Our Article Exclusives section features content related to tips in navigating the site selection process,and general business topics and trends.The section also includes Community Profiles andWhite Papers.

DIGITAL MEDIAWith the digital edition, www.bxj-digital.com, readers can view your rich media messages and click on live Internet ande-mail links located throughout articles and ads.They can also search content and archives; share articles with friends;download the publication, and more. Our Digital Media Special Editions showcase your state, region and/or communitiesto prospective, progressive and innovative companies.The digitalWeb site is available in a mobile format to accommodatesmart phone users.

SOCIAL MEDIAVisit BXJ’s Facebook page to learn more about how we provide coverage of the site selectionprocess to some of the fastest growing and emerging companies in their respective industries.

Keep up to date with BXJ by viewing our short, timely Tweets in regard to the site selectionprocess, the economy and business topics by following us at www.twitter.com/bxjmag.

BXJ DELIVERSTHE RIGHTAUDIENCE

Each digital issue is delivered to 133,000 readers; we also deliver several thousand print subscriptions of eachissue. BXJ’s content reaches decision makers whose job functions include: executive management, finance/administrativemanagement, senior vice presidents, executive vice presidents, real estate managers and facilities managers.

BXJ is delivered to decision makers in the following industries:

COMPANY SIZE1-49 Employees .......................................................19%50-99 Employees .....................................................11%100-499 Employees ................................................22%500-999 Employees ...................................................9%1,000+ Employees ...................................................39%

PAGE 1 2 3 4 5 6

2011M E D I A K I T

• Aerospace/Defense• Alternative Energy• Automotive• Chemical• Construction/Engineering• Economic DevelopmentProfessionals

• Financial Services/Insurance• Health Care• High-Tech Manufacturing• Industrial Manufacturing• Life Sciences• Manufacturing• Oil and Gas

• Professional Services• Public Sector (Government)• Relocation Consultants• Retail/Wholesale Distribution•Telecom•Transportation• Utilities

EXECUTIVETITLESCEO, COO, CFO, Partner ....................................26%VP/Other C-Level ...................................................40%Corporate Manager/Director ..............................24%Economic Development Manager .........................5%Other Company Manager .......................................5%

46% 45%

3%4%1%

Focus & ScopeTrade & Industry Development is the bimonthly publication dedicated to site selection in a ver-tical format. As the only publication of its kind, T&ID reaches more decision makers per indus-try than any other publication dedicated to site selection. This vertical form of targeted marketingallows for greater market penetration in a publication where the editorial fits the audience.

EditorialOur approach is simple: Provide a publication to executive decision makers with pertinent, use-ful site selection and business knowledge for their market. That is why we work with the leadingsite selection, real estate and industry consultants to deliver cutting edge editorial. Additionally,we work closely with the leading trade associations representing these industries.

CirculationOur process is complex: T&ID is unique in its vertical market approach. Each issue focuses onrelated industries, and is mailed SOLELY to those industries. We also take our method a step fur-ther with the help of the leading data-mining company for economic development – AppliedMarketing. With their help, we focus on two key indicators of location activity: CORPORATECHANGE and EMPLOYMENT GROWTH. Our efforts are even more streamlined by the useof the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS). By using this method we areable to more effectively reach specific markets, thus matching the editorial with the audience.All of these elements combined allow T&ID to have an unrivaled circulation.

Each issue is mailed to:21,000 Specific related industry segments+4,000 Corporate Real Estate Executives and Site Selection Consultants25,000 Total circulation per issue

The T&ID circulation reaches the corporate site selection team involved in location activity.In addition to corporate real estate executives and site selection consultants, this team is gen-erally comprised of executives and officers in functions of Operations, Corporate General,Finance and HR. Following is a breakdown, by title, of the May/June 2010 issue. Each industry,and therefore each issue, varies somewhat.

*VP Level is broken down by job function as well:38% Planning/Development/Real Estate27% Finance12% Technology7% Operations8% Administration5% Manufacturing2% Sales/Marketing1% Human Resources

� 46% CEO, CFO, COO, CAO, President, Partner, Founder, Owner, Principal, Chairman� 1% Executive Vice President� 45% *Vice President (excluding Executive VP), Director, General Manager, Controller,

Attorney/Counsel� 3% Manager, Foreman, Supervisor, Superintendent, Administrator� 4% Consultant, Analyst� 1% Other

“Trade & IndustryDevelopment is a greatresource for economicdevelopment for theLone Star State.

Advertising with thispublication allows usto feature the manyincentives Texas hasto offer and to showexactly why Texas

is Wide Openfor Business.”

—Aaron DemersonExecutive Director -

Economic Development& Tourism, Office ofthe Governor of Texas

Rick Perry

1%

You know your targets…Use us to hit the mark!

www.tradeandindustrydev.com

sanangelo.orgClick on Business & Economic Development

Shhh! It’s a secret!

Blending a true Texas Experience with a Trained Workforce can make your business a success.

Share the secret.

City of San Angelo

Memo Date:

August 2, 2011

To:

Mayor and Councilmembers

From:

Doray Hill, Jr. Interim MPO Director

Subject:

Consent agenda item for 08-30-11 Council meeting

Contacts: -And-

Doray Hill Jr., Interim MPO Director 481-2800

Kristan Hereford, San Angelo TxDOT 947-9242

Caption:

Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a third amendment to the Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) with Texas Department of Transportation for the provision of state services in the preservation and adaptive use of Lone Wolf Bridge as a historic bridge off the state system, and any future action in connection thereto.

Summary:

The Texas Department of Transportation is requesting approval of an Amendment No. 3 to the Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) executed June 23, 2009. The AFA was amended on October 20, 2009 (Amendment No. 1). A second amendment was approved on May 18, 2010 (Amendment No. 2). This Amendment No. 3 is a change requested by the administrator of the project – the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) pertaining to Exhibit C-3 of the Advance Funding Agreement.

History:

This project’s funding was awarded under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) in March 2009. The contract for this project was awarded on April 29, 2010 to SCR Construction Company, Inc. of Richmond Texas. There were four bidders on the project and SCR Construction had the low bid of $1,399,601.86. The amount of ARRA funds authorized for the project was $1,200,000. Per the advance funding agreement dated June 23, 2009, the City was responsible for paying any overruns. However, TxDOT identified and made available additional ARRA funds in the amount of $199,601.86 in order to fully fund the base bid. Additional funding was contributed towards the project with the 2nd amendment, which made the City responsible for any costs over $1,399,601.86. This amendment No. 3 is to show additional funding ($79,945.84) that TxDOT has put toward the project and requires the City to pay for any costs over the increased amount. Total approved funds for the Lone Wolf Bridge project is $1,479,547.70.

AFA-Amendment No. 2 Exhibit C-2 stated: The Local Government:

(1) will incorporate the Bridge at its current location into a Bike-Pedestrian Path and will allow the State necessary access for construction activities at the location;

(2) will pay for utility line and attachment components material; (3) will pay for cost of electricity for lighting upon project completion; (4) will be responsible for the project cost overrun in excess of approved $1,399,601.86

(5) will maintain the bridge after rehabilitation at its own cost in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement.

Advance Recovery and Reinvestment (ARRA) funds for this project;

AFA-Amendment No. 3 Exhibit C-3 states: The Local Government:

(1) will incorporate the Bridge at its current location into a Bike-Pedestrian Path and will allow the State necessary access for construction activities at the location.

(2) will pay for utility line and attachment components material. (3) will pay for cost of electricity for lighting upon project completion. (4) will be responsible for the project cost overrun in excess of approved $1,479,547.70

(5) will maintain the bridge after rehabilitation at its own cost in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement.

Advance Recovery and Reinvestment (ARRA) funds for this project. Any cost overrun must be approved by City Council prior to obligation.

Financial Impact: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) through TxDOT funded this project. According to this amendment, the City will be responsible for any cost over $1,479,547.70. This change does not obligate the City to provide any funds at this time, but in the event that project costs exceed the before mentioned amount, then the City will be responsible for paying these costs. Related Vision Item (if applicable):

Neighborhood Vision

– Provide good infrastructure.

Industry Vision

– Capitalize on alternative transportation modes.

Transportation Vision

– Develop sidewalks and bicycle facilities in conjunction with roadway construction.

Parks and Open Space Vision

– Develop a pedestrian/bike network between park facilities, activity centers, and downtown.

Recommendation: City Staff recommends authorizing the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute a third amendment to the Advance Funding Agreement (AFA) with Texas Department of Transportation for the provision of state services in the preservation and adaptive use of Lone Wolf Bridge as a historic bridge off the state system, and any future action in connection thereto. Attachments: Resolution (authorizing execution of AFA-Amendment No. 3) Advance Funding Agreement Amendment No. 3 Presentation: Not applicable Publication: Not applicable Reviewed by: Sarah Tackett (August 3, 2011)

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT (AFA) WITH TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE PROVISION OF STATE SERVICES IN THE PRESERVATION AND ADAPTIVE USE OF LONE WOLF BRIDGE AS A HISTORIC BRIDGE OFF THE STATE SYSTEM

WHEREAS, the Lone Wolf Bridge (hereinafter “Historic Bridge”) is a 350-foot two-lane

bridge that is located on East Avenue K at its intersection with the South Concho River; and,

WHEREAS, on June 23, 2009 the City Council resolved to retain ownership and preserve the

Historic Bridge under the provisions of the Historic Bridge Program; and, WHEREAS, on June 24, 2009, the City executed an Advance Funding Agreement with the

Texas Department of Transportation, effective July 13, 2009, pursuant to which the City of San Angelo retained ownership and control of the Historic Bridge, and the State of Texas, Department of Transportation accepted the City’s plan for preservation of the Historic Bridge and awarded funding therefore; and

WHEREAS, on October 20, 2009, the City executed an Amendment No. 1 to the Advance

Funding Agreement, providing in part for an increase in state funding for preservation of the Historic Bridge; and,

WHEREAS, on May 18, 2010, the City executed an Amendment No. 2 to the Advance

Funding Agreement, providing in part for a second increase in state funding for preservation of the Historic Bridge; and,

WHEREAS, Amendment No. 3 to the Advance Funding Agreement provides for a second

increase in State Funding for preservation of the Historic Bridge, which amendment continues the provision for the City to be responsible for the cost overrun above the state funded amount as provided in the original Advance Funding Agreement and in each of the prior, two amendments:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO; that the Advance Funding Agreement for the Preservation and Adaptive Use of a Historic Bridge (the Lone Wolf Bridge), effective July 13, 2009, and Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 thereof, are hereby ratified.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to

negotiate and execute Amendment No. 3 to the Advance Funding Agreement For the Preservation and Adaptive Use of a Historic Bridge (the Lone Wolf Bridge) with the Texas Department of Transportation in substantially the form of Exhibit A attached to this resolution and made a part

hereof for all purposes, and to take such related action in connection therewith as may be necessary or desirable. PASSED and APPROVED THIS _______DAY OF___________________2011.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO

______________________________ Alvin New, Mayor

Attest:

______________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

Approved As to Form: Approved As to Content:

______________________________ ______________________________ Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Doray Hill, Jr., Interim Director, San Angelo

Metropolitan Planning Organization

City of San Angelo

Memo Date: 8/15/11

To: Mayor and Councilmembers

From: Douglas Cooper, Finance Department

Subject: Agenda Item for August 30th Council Meeting

Contact: Douglas Cooper, Finance Department, 481-2649

Caption:

Adoption of Resolutions Authorizing the Adoption of Investment Policies for the City

Consent Item

of San Angelo.

Summary:

With the exception of three minor changes, these policies are the same as the previous policies. The changes are: (1) add brokered CD’s as an authorized investment, (2) add procedure to monitor FDIC status of issuing banks, (3) add procedure to monitor credit ratings for investments requiring credit ratings. These policies have been reviewed by the Investment Oversight Committee and are presented here with the Committee’s recommendation for approval.

The Public Funds Investment Act requires that a city’s investment policy be reviewed annually. The Act also requires that the governing body (Council) take action (documented in the minutes) on the policies yearly.

History: Both policies were previously adopted on October 5th 2010. Adopting the two 2011 policies will keep the City in compliance with the public funds investment which requires the City to review and adopt new policies yearly.

Financial Impact

: Depending upon the market and the size of the City’s portfolio, investment income has been as high as 1 million dollars per year.

Related Vision Item (if applicable): None

Other Information/Recommendation

: Staff recommends the two policies be approved as presented for the current year.

Attachments: 2011 Investment Policy, 2011 Resolution Adopting Investment Policy, 2011 Lake Nasworthy Investment Policy, 2011 Resolution Adopting Lake Nasworthy Investment Policy

Presentation

: No special equipment is required.

Publication

: None


: Michael Dane, Finance Department, 08/11/11

City of San Angelo Investment Policy 2011

1

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

2011 INVESTMENT POLICY

It is the policy of the City of San Angelo (the “City”) to invest public funds in a manner which will provide the highest reasonable market return with the maximum security while meeting the daily cash flow demands of the City and conforming to all state and local statutes governing the investment of public funds. This policy satisfies the requirement of the Public Funds Investment Act (the “Act”), Texas Government Code 2256, which requires the creation and annual adoption of a written investment policy and its addendums. The City Council shall review and adopt, no less than annually, the Investment Policy and its incorporated strategies. Any changes to the Policy will be detailed in the adopting resolution. Section One: Scope This investment policy applies to all the financial assets of the City except funds of Lake Nasworthy. The funds are accounted for in the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and include:

Operating Funds Debt Service Funds Bond, Capital and Special Project Funds Reserve Funds Non-expendable Trust Funds

Section Two: Investment Objectives and Standard of Care The objectives of the City's investment program shall be, in order of priority, safety, liquidity and yield. Safety of principal shall be the foremost objective of the City's investment program. Each investment transaction shall seek to first insure that capital losses are avoided, whether they are from securities, defaults or erosion of market value. The portfolio shall be managed with the objective of obtaining a reasonable market yield. The standard of prudence to be used by investment officers shall be the prudent person standard and shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio. Investments shall be made with judgment and care under circumstances then prevailing which a person of prudence, discretion and intelligence would exercise in the management of his/her own affairs with consideration given to the probable safety of capital as well as the probable income to be derived. Investments shall not be made for speculative purposes. Investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures and the Investment Policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal liability for an individual security's credit or market risk, provided that deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. Section Three: Investment Strategy The City of San Angelo funds shall be commingled for investment purposes recognizing the cash flow needs of the individual funds which makeup the portfolio. The total portfolio will maintain a maximum weighted average maturity of one (1) year which is based on the cash flow analysis and cash requirements of the City.


2

The City of San Angelo's investment portfolio shall be diversified for safety and shall consist of a variety of securities and maturities which may include any or all of the authorized investments listed in Section Four, Authorized Investments, of this Policy. In order to meet Policy objective, securities will be of the highest credit quality and marketability. The portfolio’s objectives can be attained by utilization of high credit quality securities and a modified ladder structure in the short-term area to match known liabilities.

(1) Operating Funds - Operating funds assure that anticipated cash flows are matched for adequate liquidity on major payment obligations such as payroll. (2) Debt Service Funds - Debt service funds must cover the upcoming debt service obligations on the required payment dates. (3) Bond, Capital and Special Project Funds - Bond proceeds and special project funds are used for anticipated liabilities on the projects. (4) Reserve Funds - Reserve funds provide liquidity for fund obligations and generate a dependable revenue stream from securities. (5) Non-expendable Trust Funds - Non-expendable trust funds generate dependable revenue streams for their designated uses.

It is the City of San Angelo's intent to hold purchased securities to maturity investing in such a manner as to insure both the safety and liquidity of such transactions. However, under conditions defined and procedures approved by the Oversight Committee securities may be sold or "swapped" before maturity to capture capital gains and allow for reinvestment into the portfolio. Securities purchased specifically for non-expendable trust funds shall be valued continuously and may be sold prior to the stated maturity date in order to capture capital gains.

The City of San Angelo's investment officers, or designated investment advisors, will evaluate the City's cash position daily to determine the amount of funds available for investment and to project the term for such investments and will then decide on placement of the investment based on fund type and market conditions, fund cash flow, the offering yield for eligible investment and diversity in the portfolio Section Four: Authorized Investments The City shall invest only in those instruments authorized by law of the State of Texas (Texas Government Code 2256, Public Funds Investment Act) as further defined by this policy. Insofar as they meet this requirement, the City may invest in the following: (1) Certificates of deposit issued by state and national banks doing business in Texas that do not exceed one (1) year to maturity from date of issue, and :

a. are guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or its successor: or b. are collateralized at 1O2% by obligations of the United States or its agencies and

instrumentalities (excluding letters of credit) or direct obligations of any state, its subdivisions, or its agencies which have been rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm and have received a rating of not less that “A" or the equivalent.

. (2) Obligations of the United States Government, its agencies and instrumentalities not to exceed 3 years to their stated maturity date; (3) Fully collateralized repurchase agreements having a defined termination date not to exceed six (6) months, secured by obligations of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities, collateralized at 102%, executed under a written Master Repurchase Agreement, with securities safe-kept with a third


3

party selected or approved by the City, and placed through a bank doing business in Texas or a primary government securities dealer as defined by the Federal Reserve. Flex repurchase agreements used for bond funds or special project funds may have a stated termination date not to exceed the estimated completion date of the project(s). (4) Constant dollar, local government investment pools as defined by the Act, which are rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized credit rating agency and have received a rating of not less than "AAA" or its equivalent. Investment in each pool must be specifically authorized by Resolution of the City Council. (5) AAA, SEC registered money market mutual funds as defined by the Public Funds Investment Act. (6) General obligation bonds of states, agencies, counties, cities and other political subdivisions of any state rated A or better or its equivalent by two nationally recognized rating agencies and with a stated maturity not to exceed two (2) years. (7) FDIC insured brokered certificate of deposit securities from banks in any US state, delivered versus payment to the City’s safekeeping depository, not to exceed one year to maturity. Before purchase, the Investment Officer or adviser must verify the FDIC status of the bank on www.fdic.gov to assure that bank is FDIC insured. (8) Fully insured or collateralized, interest bearing accounts of any bank doing business in Texas. In order to provide diversification in the portfolio which reduces market and credit risk exposures the following diversification parameters are established for the Portfolio. Diversification parameters must be met at the time of purchase although cash flows may change the percentages over time. Effort will be made to maintain the diversification guidelines through cyclical cash flow periods.

Security Type CDs 40 %

Max. % in Overall Portfolio

Per bank 10 % US Treasuries 80 % US Agencies & Instrumentalities 80 % Repurchase Agreements 50 % Flex for bond funds 100 % Constant Dollar LGIP 80 % Ownership of the pool 10 % Money Market Mutual Funds 75 % Municipal and State Obligations 20 % Issuer limitation 5 % FDIC Brokered CDs 20 %

Delivery versus Payment All security transactions (with the exception of pool or fund participation) by the City shall be purchased "delivery versus payment". That is, the City shall authorize release of its funds only after a purchased security has been received by its safekeeping agent or after the City has received notification from its safekeeping agent that a purchased security has been received in the City's safekeeping account. Competitive Bidding Required All investments shall be purchased or sold on a competitive basis with bids or offers from three City authorized broker/dealers for the best yield and maturity. Offers of new issue agencies need not be competitively bid but must be made from City authorized broker/dealers.

http://www.fdic.gov/�


4

Loss of Rating The City is not required to liquidate investments that were authorized investments at the time of purchase. (2256.017) However, should a security that requires a minimum rating under state law not have that required rating, the investment officer shall take all prudent measures to liquidate the security. (2256.021) Monitoring FDIC Coverage The Investment Officer or Investment Adviser shall monitor, on no less than a weekly basis, the status and ownership of all banks issuing brokered CDs owned by the City based upon information from the FDIC. If any bank has been acquired or merged with another bank in which brokered CDs are owned, the Investment Officer or Adviser shall immediately liquidate any brokered CD which places the City above the FDIC insurance level. Section Five: Collateral and Safekeeping Time and Demand Bank Deposits Pledged Collateral Collateralization is required on all bank time and demand deposits over the applicable FDIC insurance coverage. All securities pledged to the City for these deposits shall be held by an independent third party institution outside the holding company of the pledging bank. In order to anticipate market changes and provide a level of additional security for all funds, the market value of the collateral will be maintained at 102% of total principal and accrued interest. The depository will be responsible for monitoring and maintaining the collateral and margins at all times. The custodian will provide monthly reports to the City detailing the collateral. Collateral will be pledged under the terms of a written tri-party depository agreement executed under the terms of FIRREA1

. (If the custodian is the Federal Reserve the City will execute as an alternate a FRB Pledgee Agreement of Circular 7 form.) The agreement shall be approved by resolution of the bank’s board or loan committee.

Acceptable collateral shall include only obligations of the U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentalities, including mortgage backed securities passing the bank test and excluding letters of credit, and municipal securities rated A or better by two nationally recognized rating agencies. Repurchase Agreements Owned Collateral Collateral under a repurchase agreement is owned by the City. It will be held by an independent third party safekeeping agent approved by the City under an executed SIFMA2

Master Repurchase Agreement. Collateral with a market value totaling 102% of the principal and accrued interest is required and the counter-party is responsible for the monitoring and maintaining of collateral and margins at all times.

Safekeeping The laws of the State, this Policy, and prudent treasury management require that all securities be settled on a delivery versus payment basis and be held in safekeeping by an independent third party financial institution approved by the City. Securities shall not be bought from the banking services bank in order to perfect delivery versus payment separation in the transaction. All safekeeping arrangements shall be approved by the Investment Officers and an agreement of the terms executed in writing. The third party custodian shall be required to issue safekeeping receipts to the City listing each specific security, rate, description, maturity, cusip, and other pertinent information. Each safekeeping receipt shall be clearly marked that the security is held for the City.

1 The Financial Institutions Resource and Recovery Enforcement Act (FIRREA) governs the deliberations of the FDIC in the case of default or bankruptcy of the bank. 2 Security Industry and Financial Markets Association, formerly the Bond Market Association.


5

Section Six: Investment Officer Designation The City Council hereby designates the Finance Director, or his designated representative, and the Finance Department position handling the daily treasury functions (currently the Operations Manager), as duly authorized investment officers of the City and grants to them the authority to invest City funds as outlined herein. The City may further contract with a registered investment advisor to advise in the management of the City's portfolio. No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this Policy and supporting procedures. Any disbursement of City funds for the purchase of investment instruments must bear the signature of two investment officers. The investment officers will establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program consistent with this Investment Policy. Officers, employees and advisors involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper and unbiased execution of the investment program or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Section Seven: Training All City officials designated herein as investment officers and their designated representatives within the parameters of this Policy shall attend ten hours of training within twelve months of taking the position and ten hours in each succeeding two year period relating to investment responsibilities. The training provider must be an independent source approved by the Investment Oversight Committee. A list of approved training sources is attached as Addendum A. Section Eight: Investment Activity Reporting Reporting for investments will be made in accordance with the state law. (Chapter 2256.023) Reports of investments should be prepared and presented at least quarterly to the City Council and City Manager and should reflect the cost, term, yield, market value, purchase date, maturity date, description and cusip number for each investment. Market values shall be obtained at least monthly from the trust department of the City's depository bank or other independent source as approved by the Oversight Committee. On a quarterly basis the investment officer, or his designee, shall prepare a series of detail and management level signed investment reports in accordance with the Act, disclosing at a minimum:

1) The investment activity for the previous quarter; 2) The book and market value of investments at the beginning and end of the quarter;

3) Assessments of the market value of each investment and change in market value; 4) Fully accrued interest and earnings for the period in accordance with generally accepted

accounting principles; 5) The change in market value, and 6) Compliance with the Public Funds Investment Act and this Policy.

Prices for the valuation of securities' market value shall be obtained from an independent source. Section Nine: Investment Oversight Committee The City Council shall appoint an Investment Oversight Committee to review the City's investment portfolio with the Finance Director and City Manager at least quarterly and to then report to the City Council. The Committee shall be comprised of two City Council members, two citizens with experience as investment advisors or analysts, the City's independent auditor (as a non-voting member), and the City's Internal Auditor. The duties of the Oversight Committee shall include:

1) Review of the quarterly report submitted by the Investment Officers of the City, 2) Review and adoption of a list of authorized qualified brokers and counter-parties that have

provided the required certification and are authorized to engage in investment transactions with the City,

3) Review of the list of authorized brokers at least annually, and 4) Approval of the independent training provider as required in this Policy (Addendum A).


6

The Oversight Committee shall have the authority, subject to City Council review, to make such rules as deemed necessary for the orderly operation of the Committee. All changes to the Policy must be reviewed and adopted by the City Council before changes are made in the investment process. Section Ten: Audit The City's independent auditor shall formally review the quarterly investment reports prepared in accordance with this Policy and applicable state statutes (Chapter 2256.023). The review shall be conducted annually and the results of the review shall be reported to the City Council. In addition, in conjunction with the annual audit the City shall perform a compliance audit of management controls on investments and adherence to this Policy. Results of this audit will be reported to the oversight Committee. (Chapter 2256.005(m)). Section Eleven: Authorized Financial Institutions and Broker/Dealers The Investment Officer will maintain a list of financial institutions and broker/dealers authorized to do business with the City. These firms will be selected according to credit worthiness and service. Brokers may include "primary dealers" or regional dealers that qualify under the SEC's Rule 15C3-1 (uniform net capital rule). All broker/dealers must provide the Investment Officer with:

Proof of Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) registration, Proof of registration with the Texas State Securities Commission, Completed City questionnaire, and Certification of having read the City's Investment Policy.

In accordance with the Public Funds Investment Act (Chapter 2256.005(k)) a copy of the City's Investment Policy shall be presented to any firm offering to engage in an investment transaction with the City. The firm must execute a written instrument in a form acceptable to the City that they have (1) reviewed the Investment Policy and (2) acknowledged that they have implemented reasonable procedures to preclude investment transactions which are not authorized by the Policy. The list of authorized counter-parties is shown as Addendum B of this Policy and approved with adoption of this Policy. Section Twelve: Policy Adoption and Revisions The City Council will review the Policy not less than annually and adopt a resolution stating that the Policy and incorporated strategies have been reviewed and including all changes to the Policy. This Policy may be amended only by action of the City Council. The City Manager and Oversight Committee are authorized to recommend revisions to the Policy to the City Council whenever such revisions are necessary and prudent due to changes in State Law, the needs of the City, or the economy and market opportunities. All changes to the Policy must be reviewed and adopted by the City Council before changes are made in the investment process. ADOPTED on this the __________ day of __________, 2011 CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk


7

ADDENDUM A

By adoption of this Investment Policy, the following associations and organizations are approved for Investment Officer training.

- Texas Municipal League - Government Finance Officers Association of Texas - Government Treasurers Organization of Texas


8

ADDENDUM B

Financial Counter-party List

The authorized list for City of San Angelo is shown below. Each of these firms, and the individual covering the account, are sent the current Investment Policy. In accordance with the Public Funds Investment Act (TX Gov’t Code 2256.005(k)) before any broker/dealer transacts business with the City it will have had to certify in writing to a review of the Policy and have certified that procedures are in place to assure compliance with that Policy. The City’s Policy establishes specific criteria for the brokers and requires that the list of broker/dealers be approved annually by the City Council or Investment Committee established by the Council. A standardized City certification form is used for certification purposes. The City’s investment adviser, Patterson & Associates, maintains the brokerage compliance files for the City. When any material changes are made to the Investment Policy the new Policy is sent out for re-certification. The broker/dealers certified by the City are: Bank of America/Merrill Lynch

Cantor Fitzgerald Citigroup Goldman Sachs G.X. Clarke & Co.

Mizuho Securities Morgan Keegan Vining Sparks Wells Fargo

Lake Nasworthy Investment Policy 2011

1

LAKE NASWORTHY - SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

2011 INVESTMENT POLICY

It is the policy of the City of San Angelo (the “City”) to invest public funds in a manner which will provide the highest reasonable market return with the maximum security while meeting the objectives of the City and conforming to all state and local statutes governing the investment of public funds.

This policy satisfies the requirement of the Public Funds Investment Act (the “Act”), Texas Government Code 2256 which requires the creation and annual adoption of a written investment policy. The City Council shall no less than annually review and adopt the Investment Policy and its incorporated strategies. Any changes to the Policy will be detailed in the adopting resolution. Section One: Scope This investment policy applies solely to the financial assets applied to the maintenance and support of Lake Nasworthy, San Angelo, Texas. Section Two: Investment Objectives and Standard of Care The objective of the Lake Nasworthy portfolio is to produce a revenue stream which can be used in the maintenance of the Lake Nasworthy area. The principal is not intended to be used for operational purposes. The objectives of this Investment Policy shall be, in order of priority, safety, liquidity, diversification, and yield. Safety of principal shall be the foremost objective of the City’s investment program. Each investment transaction shall seek to first ensure that capital losses are avoided, whether they be from market, credit or collateral risk. Investments shall not be made for speculative purposes. The portfolio shall be managed with the objective of obtaining a reasonable market yield in keeping with the capital appreciation and cash flow requirements of the fund. The standard of prudence to be used by investment officers shall be the prudent person standard and shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio. The standard states: Investments shall be made with judgement and care under circumstance then prevailing which a person of prudence, discretion and intelligence would exercise in the management of his or her own affairs with consideration given to the probable safety of capital as well as the probable income to be derived. Investment officers acting in accordance with written procedures and the Investment Policy and exercising due diligence shall be relieved of personal liability for an individual security's credit or market risk, provided that deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. Section Three: Investment Strategy The investment strategy for Lake Nasworthy funds will focus on utilization of high credit quality, intermediate term securities which will generate a reasonable stream of income for the ongoing maintenance of the Lake. The principal of the fund is not expected to be used for any ongoing expenditures. The investment strategy is designed to generate a revenue stream and a low


2

degree of volatility and market risk. Securities will be of a high quality, with short to intermediate term maturities chosen to hold their market value. The portfolio will use a range of maturities dependent on market conditions. The City, or its designated investment advisors, will evaluate cash flow needs and the portfolio’s position on a regular basis to determine ongoing market strategy. Market conditions and interest rate forecasts will determine portfolio structure. Securities may be sold or “swapped” before maturity to capture capital gains and allow for reinvestment into the portfolio. The portfolio will maintain a maximum weighted average maturity (WAM) of three (3) years and the maximum expected or stated maturity in the fund will be ten (10) years for any individual security. The benchmark for risk and performance on the portfolio will be the three year Treasury Note for the comparable period in accordance with the anticipated WAM. Section Four: Authorized Investments The City shall invest only in those instruments authorized by law of the State of Texas (Texas Government Code 2256, Public Funds Investment Act). Insofar as they meet this requirement, the City may invest in the following: (1) Depository Certificates of Deposit issued by state and national banks doing business in Texas that do not exceed two (2) years to maturity from date of issue, and : a. are guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or its

successor: or b. are collateralized at 1O2% by obligations of the United States or its agencies and

instrumentalities or direct obligations of the State of Texas, its subdivisions, or its agencies which have been rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm and have received a rating of not less that “A" or the equivalent.

. (2) Obligations of the United States Government, its agencies and instrumentalities not to exceed ten (10) years to their stated maturity date, to include mortgaged backed securities passing the bank test; (3) Fully collateralized repurchase agreements including reverse repurchase agreements, having a defined termination date not to exceed six (6) months, secured by obligations of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities, collateralized at 102%, executed under a written Bond Market Association Master Repurchase Agreement, safe-kept with a third party selected or approved by the City, and placed through a bank doing business in Texas or a primary government securities dealer as defined by the Federal Reserve. Flex repurchase agreements used for bond funds or special project funds may have a stated termination date not to exceed the estimated completion date of the project(s): (4) Constant dollar, local government investment pools as defined by the Act, as amended, which are rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized credit rating agency and have received a rating of not less than "AAA" or its equivalent. Investment in each pool must be specifically authorized by Resolution of the City Council. (5) AAA SEC registered money market mutual funds as defined by the Public Funds Investment Act. (6) General debt obligation bonds of states, agencies, counties, cities and other political subdivisions of any state rated A or better or its equivalent by two nationally recognized rating agencies and with a stated maturity not to exceed two (2) years.


3

(7) FDIC insured brokered certificate of deposit securities from banks in any US state, delivered versus payment to the City’s safekeeping depository, not to exceed one year to maturity. Before purchase, the Investment Officer or Adviser must verify the FDIC status of the bank on www.fdic.gov to assure that bank is FDIC insured. (8) Fully insured or collateralized, interest bearing accounts of any bank doing business in Texas. Diversification The Fund will strive for diversification in the portfolio by market sector and maturity to reduce market and credit risk exposures. Delivery versus Payment All security transactions (with the exception of pool or fund participation) by the City shall be purchased "delivery versus payment". That is, the City shall authorize release of its funds only after a purchased security has been received by its safekeeping agent or after the City has received notification from its safekeeping agent that a purchased security has been received in the City's safekeeping account. Competitive Bidding Required All investments shall be purchased or sold on a competitive basis with bids or offers from three City authorized broker/dealers for the best yield and maturity. Offers of new issue agencies need not be competitively bid but must be made from City authorized broker/dealers. Loss of Rating The City is not required to liquidate investments that were authorized investments at the time of purchase. (2256.017) However, should a security that requires a minimum rating under state law not have that required rating, the investment officer shall take all prudent measures to liquidate the security. (2256.021)

Monitoring FDIC Coverage The Investment Officer or Investment Adviser shall monitor, on no less than a weekly basis, the status and ownership of all banks issuing brokered CDs owned by the City based upon information from the FDIC. If any bank has been acquired or merged with another bank in which brokered CDs are owned, the Investment Officer or Adviser shall immediately liquidate any brokered CD which places the City above the FDIC insurance level. Time and Demand Bank Deposits Pledged Collateral Collateralization is required on all bank time and demand deposits over the applicable FDIC insurance coverage. All securities pledged to the City for these deposits shall be held by an independent third party institution outside the holding company of the pledging bank. In order to anticipate market changes and provide a level of additional security for all funds, the market value of the collateral will be maintained at 102% of total principal and accrued interest. The depository will be responsible for monitoring and maintaining the collateral and margins at all times. The custodian will provide monthly reports to the City detailing the collateral. Collateral will be pledged under the terms of a written tri-party depository agreement executed under the terms of FIRREA1

1 The Financial Institutions Resource and Recovery Enforcement Act governs the deliberations of the FDIC in the case of default or bankruptcy of the bank.

. (If the custodian is the Federal Reserve the City will execute the

http://www.fdic.gov/�


4

Pledgee Agreement of Circular 7 form.) The agreement shall be approved by resolution of the bank’s board or loan committee. Acceptable collateral shall include only obligations of the U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentalities, including mortgage backed securities passing the bank test. Repurchase Agreements Owned Collateral Collateral under a repurchase agreement is owned by the City. It will be held by an independent third party safekeeping agent approved by the City under an executed Bond Market Master Repurchase Agreement. Collateral with a market value totaling 102% of the principal and accrued interest is required and the counter-party is responsible for the monitoring and maintaining of collateral and margins at all times. Safekeeping The laws of the State, this Policy, and prudent treasury management require that all securities be settled on a delivery versus payment basis and be held in safekeeping by an independent third party financial institution approved by the City. Securities shall not be bought from the banking services bank in order to perfect delivery versus payment separation in the transaction. All safekeeping arrangements shall be approved by the Investment Officers and an agreement of the terms executed in writing. The third party custodian shall be required to issue safekeeping receipts to the City listing each specific security, rate, description, maturity, cusip, and other pertinent information. Each safekeeping receipt shall be clearly marked that the security is held for the City. Section Five: Investment Officer Designation The City Council has designated the Finance Director, or his designated representative, and the Finance Department position handling the daily treasury functions (currently the Operations Manager), as duly authorized investment officers of the City and grants to them the authority to invest Lake Nasworthy funds as outlined herein. The City may further contract with a registered investment advisor to advise in the management of this portfolio. No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this Policy and supporting procedures. Any disbursement of City funds for the purchase of investment instruments must bear the signature of two investment officers. The investment officers will establish written procedures for the operation of the investment program consistent with this Investment Policy. Officers, employees and advisors involved in the investment process shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper and unbiased execution of the investment program or which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Section Six: Training All City officials designated herein as investment officers and their designated representatives within the parameters of this Policy shall attend ten hours of training within twelve months of taking the position and ten hours in each succeeding two year period relating to investment responsibilities. The training provider must be an independent source approved by the Investment Oversight Committee. A list of approved training sources is attached as Addendum A.


5

Section Seven: Investment Activity Reporting Reporting for investments will be made in accordance with the state law. (Chapter 2256.023) Reports of investments should be issued at least quarterly to the City Council and City Manager and should reflect the cost, term, yield, market value, purchase date, maturity date, description and cusip number for each investment. Market values shall be obtained monthly from the trust department of the City's depository bank or other independent source as approved by the Oversight Committee. On a quarterly basis the investment officer, or his designee, shall prepare a series of detail and management level signed investment reports in accordance with the Act, disclosing at a minimum:

1) The investment activity for the previous quarter; 2) The book and market value of investments at the beginning and end of the quarter;

3) Assessments of the market value of each investment and change in market value; 4) Fully accrued interest and earnings for the period in accordance with generally

accepted accounting principles; 5) The change in market value, and 6) Compliance with the Public Funds Investment Act and this Policy.

Prices for the valuation of securities' market value shall be obtained from an independent source. Section Eight: Oversight Committee The City Council shall appoint an Investment Oversight Committee to review the City's investment portfolio with the Finance Director and City Manager at least quarterly and to then report to the City Council. The Committee shall be comprised of two City Council members, two citizens with experience as investment advisors or analysts, the City's independent auditor (as a non-voting member), and the City's Internal Auditor. The duties of the Oversight Committee shall include:

1) Review of the quarterly report submitted by the Investment Officers of the City, 2) Review and adopt the list of counter-parties that have provided the required

certification and are authorized to engage in investment transactions with the City, 3) Review of the list of authorized brokers at least annually, and

4) Approval of the independent training provider as required in this Policy. The Oversight Committee shall have the authority, subject to City Council review, to make such rules as deemed necessary for the orderly operation of the Committee. All changes to the Policy must be reviewed and adopted by the City Council before changes are made in the investment process.

Section Nine: Audit The City's independent auditor shall formally review the quarterly investment reports prepared in accordance with this Policy and applicable state statutes (Chapter 2256.023). The review shall be conducted annually and the results of the review shall be reported to the City Council. In addition, in conjunction with the annual audit the City shall perform a compliance audit of management controls on investments and adherence to this Policy. Results of this audit will be reported to the oversight Committee. (Chapter 2256.005(m)). Section Ten: Authorized Financial Institutions and Broker/Dealers The Investment Officer will maintain a list of financial institutions and broker/dealers authorized to do business with the City. These firms will be selected according to credit worthiness and service. Brokers may include "primary dealers" or regional dealers that qualify under the SEC's


6

Rule 15C3-1 (uniform net capital rule). All broker/dealers must provide the Investment Officer with:

Proof of National Association of Securities Dealers certification, Proof of registration with the Texas State Securities Commission, Completed City questionnaire, and Certification of having read the City's Investment Policy.

In accordance with the Public Funds Investment Act (Chapter 2256.005(k)) a copy of the City's Investment Policy shall be presented to any firm offering to engage in an investment transaction with the City. The firm must execute a written instrument in a form acceptable to the City that they have (1) reviewed the Investment Policy and (2) acknowledged that they have implemented reasonable procedures to preclude investment transactions which are not authorized by the Policy. The list of authorized counter-parties is shown as Addendum B of this Policy and approved with Council adoption of this Policy. Section Eleven: Policy Adoption and Revisions The City Council will review the Policy not less than annually and adopt a resolution stating that the Policy and its incorporated strategies has been reviewed and including all changes to the Policy. This Policy may be amended only by action of the City Council. The City Manager and Oversight Committee are authorized to recommend revisions to the Policy to the City Council whenever such revisions are necessary and prudent due to changes in State Law, the needs of the City, or the economy and market opportunities. All changes to the Policy must be reviewed and adopted by the City Council before changes are made in the investment process. ADOPTED on this the __________ day of __________, 2011

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk


7

ADDENDUM A

By adoption of this Investment Policy, the following associations and organizations are approved for Investment Officer training.

- Texas Municipal League - Government Finance Officers Association of Texas - Government Treasurers Organization of Texas


8

ADDENDUM B

Financial Counter-party List

The authorized list for City of San Angelo is shown below. Each of these firms, and the individual covering the account, are sent the current Investment Policy. In accordance with the Public Funds Investment Act (TX Gov’t Code 2256.005(k)) before any broker/dealer transacts business with the City it will have had to certify in writing to a review of the Policy and have certified that procedures are in place to assure compliance with that Policy. The City’s Policy establishes specific criteria for the brokers and requires that the list of broker/dealers be approved annually by the City Council or Investment Committee established by the Council. A standardized City certification form is used for certification purposes. The City’s investment adviser, Patterson & Associates, maintains the brokerage compliance files for the City. When any material changes are made to the Investment Policy the new Policy is sent out for re-certification. The broker/dealers certified by the City are: Bank of America/Merrill Lynch Cantor Fitzgerald

Citigroup Barclays Securities Stifel Nicolaus G.X. Clarke & Co.

Mizuho Securities Morgan Keegan Vining Sparks Wells Fargo

RESOLUTION ADOPTING INVESTMENT POLICY, STRATEGY, AND BROKER/DEALERS

WHEREAS the Public Funds Investment Act requires the City to review and adopt its investment

policy and investment strategies by rule, order, ordinance of or resolution governing the investment of funds under its control; and

WHEREAS the Public Funds Investment Act requires the governing body to review and adopt its

investment policy and investment strategies not less than annually, recording any change made thereto; and,

WHEREAS the City Council has chosen to make the changes summarized below;

- Added “brokered certificates of deposit securities” as an authorized investment, - Added a procedure to monitor the FDIC status of any issuing bank of brokered CDs

owned by the City, - Added a procedure to monitor the credit rating of any investment requiring a credit rating

by this Policy or the Act. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS: That, the City has complied with the requirements of the Public Funds Investment Act, and the Investment Policy and Strategy as amended, attached hereto is hereby adopted as the Investment Policy, Strategy and Broker/Dealer List of the City effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the ____day of_______, 2011. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS _____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form: ____________________________ __________________________________ Michael Dane, Finance Director Lysia Bowling, City Attorney

RESOLUTION ADOPTING LAKE NASWORTHY INVESTMENT POLICY, STRATEGY, AND

BROKER/DEALERS WHEREAS the Public Funds Investment Act requires the City to review and adopt its investment

policy and investment strategies by rule, order, ordinance of or resolution governing the investment of funds under its control; and

WHEREAS the Public Funds Investment Act requires the governing body to review and adopt its

investment policy and investment strategies not less than annually, recording any change made thereto; and,

WHEREAS the City Council has chosen to make the changes summarized below;

- Added “brokered certificates of deposit securities” as an authorized investment, - Added a procedure to monitor the FDIC status of any issuing bank of brokered CDs

owned by the City, - Added a procedure to monitor the credit rating of any investment requiring a credit rating

by this Policy or the Act. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS: That, the City has complied with the requirements of the Public Funds Investment Act, and the Investment Policy and Strategy as amended, attached hereto is hereby adopted as the Investment Policy, Strategy and Broker/Dealer List of the City effective immediately. APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the ____day of_______, 2011. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS _____________________________ Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST: ______________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form: ____________________________ __________________________________ Michael Dane, Finance Director Lysia Bowling, City Attorney

RESOLUTION TO CLOSE BANK ACCOUNT 63000315661 (DEV CORP I) AND 63000317352 (GRANT ACCOUNT) AND MOVE PROCEEDS FROM

CLOSED ACCOUNTS TO 63110005343 (DEV CORP II), PLUS TRANSFER FUNDS FROM TEXPOOL ACCOUNT 2261100002 (DEV CORP I) TO

TEXPOOL ACCOUNT 2261100003 (COSA DEV CORP II). WHEREAS the Board of Directors of the City of San Angelo Development

Corporation desires to close two unused bank accounts at First Financial into the current bank account at First Financial (63110005343). In addition to closing the bank accounts at First Financial, the Board also desires to combine the Texpool accounts (226110002 and 226110003) into one account (226110003 COSA Dev Corp II)

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATON BOARD OF DIRECTORS THAT: Bank accounts 63000315661 and 63000317352 located at First Financial Bank will be closed and the remaining balances in both accounts will be transferred to the current bank account (63110005343) for the Development Corporation at First Financial Bank. Texpool account 2261100002 will be closed into account 2261100003. APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the10th day of August, 2011. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION _____________________________ Larry Teague, President ATTEST: ______________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, Secretary

City of San Angelo

Memo Date: 8/17/11


From: Finance Department, Douglas Cooper

Subject: Agenda Item for (8/30/11) Council Meeting

Contact: Douglas Cooper, Finance Department, Phone# 481-2649

Caption:

Consent Item

Consideration of ratifying a Resolution adopted by the City of San Angelo Development Corporation on August 10, 2011 to close bank accounts, one Texpool account, and to consolidate remaining account balances.

Summary:

The Development Corporation currently has three bank accounts at First Financial

Bank and two accounts at Texpool. Staff would like to propose closing two of the bank accounts and

one Texpool account. Bank accounts Development Corporation I and the Grant account have not had

any activity in the last few years so staff would propose closing these two accounts. All funds from the

two closed accounts would be moved into the primary Development Corporation II account. The

original Texpool Development Corporation I account was established to accommodate funds in the

beginning. No activity has occurred in this account recently. After the account is closed, remaining

funds would be moved into Texpool Development Corporation II account.

History: Development Corporation board approved the attached resolution to perform the closures on August 10th

, 2011.

Financial Impact

: None.

Related Vision Item (if applicable): None.


: Staff recommends approval of resolution thus allowing the closure and consolidation of the bank and Texpool accounts.

Attachments: 2011 Resolution Closing Dev Corp accounts. Presentation

: No special equipment is required.

Publication

: None.


: Michael Dane, Finance, 8/10/11

Approved by Legal:

City of San Angelo



From: Harold Dominguez, City Manager


Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Contact:

Regular Agenda Caption:

Consideration of adopting “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, (“City”) approving a settlement between Atmos Energy Corp’s Mid-Tex Division (“Atmos”) and Atmos Texas Municipalities (“ATM”) resulting in no change in base rates and approving tariffs which reflect costs related to the steel pipe replacement program; finding the rates set by the attached tariffs to be just and reasonable; requiring delivery of the resolution to the company and legal counsel; determining that the meeting at which this resolution was approved complied with the Open Meetings Act; making other findings and provisions related to the subject; and declaring an effective date.

A settlement between ATM Cities and Atmos Energy concerning: no base rate increase for 2011, slight customer charge adjustment for steel pipe replacement program, and working on long term rate issues.

Summary:

For the last four years ATM Cities have worked to resolve rate cases brought by Atmos Energy Corp. (“Atmos”) under a regime known as the Rate Review Mechanism (“RRM”). This mechanism has operated since a February 2008 settlement agreement where a number of items that can be very contentious under traditional rate making, like the rate of return on equity and the capital structure of the utility, were stipulated.

History:

During last year’s RRM negotiations the retroactive true-up provision of RRM was eliminated. This lead to a much smaller base rate increase request by Atmos. Last year Atmos requested an increase of $70 million in base rates and this year the requested increase in base rates, excluding the steel pipe replacement program, was approximately $9 million.

Financial Impact: ATM engaged Utilitech, a rate consulting firm located in Lee’s Summitt, Missouri. The firm spent several months investigating the merits of Atmos’ $9 million increase in base rates. It issued a report which ATM’s negotiating team relied upon in trying to resolve contested issues with Atmos. After lengthy negotiations, Atmos agreed to withdraw its request for a base rate increase as part of the overall settlement.

NO BASE RATE INCREASE

Over the past few years there have been a number of explosions involving steel service lines. The worst of these lines need to be replaced rapidly. Some of the lines have been in the ground since the ‘50s. Atmos did a risk assessment which attempted to target the lines most likely to have problems. This is the second year of the steel pipe replacement program. As part of the settlement last year it was

STEEL PIPE REPLACEMENT

expected that the residential customer charge would increase this year by 40 cents as a result of steel pipe replacements. In fact, the increase in the residential customer charge turned out to be lower than expected. The increase for the residential customer charge turned out to be 35 cents, of which 29 cents of that sum is for the steel pipe replacement program. The additional 6 cents is offset by a reduction in consumption or volumetric charges. The commercial customer charge will increased by $1.22. Even with these increases, the customer charge for Atmos customers in the Mid-Tex region is among the lowest in Texas.

As part of the settlement, working groups for Atmos and ATM will begin to meet to work on issues that are difficult to resolve. In particular, under the RRM process there is not enough time to review many of the capital projects for reasonableness and prudence. The working groups should start meeting during the next 30 days. The working groups will also decide if the RRM process should be extended. If by December 15, 2011 no agreement is reached on the appropriate treatment of rate issues identified by the working groups or no agreement has been reached to extend RRM , then, Atmos will file a general rate case with all cities, other than the City of Dallas, no later than January 15, 2012. If an extension in the RRM is agreed to before December 15, 2011, then Atmos will file an RRM no sooner than April 1, 2012.

WORKING GROUPS

If a city should choose not to approve the settlement it is likely that the decision will be appealed to the Railroad Commission by Atmos. A litigated appeal of this sort could cost well over $1 million, including the rate case expenses of Atmos and the city. An appeal of this sort will be extremely difficult to pursue if most of the cities located in the Mid-Tex Division have adopted the settlement.

FAILURE TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT


Staff recommends that the settlement be adopted. It is the belief of Counsel that a litigated outcome is unlikely to result in a better outcome for ratepayers. The settlement is effective on September 1, 2011. It is important for ATM cities use their best efforts to adopt the resolution implementing the new tariffs by September 1, 2011.

:

• RRM 4 Summary of Settlement Terms o $6.6 million increase for steel service line program (undisputed).

o There shall be no increase in base rates. o Rate design changes (R, C, I and T Tariffs attached)

$7.50 residential customer charge (inclusive of $0.44 for the steel service line program)

$16.75 commercial customer charge (inclusive of $1.22 for the steel service line program)

Consumption charge based on residential volumes of 80,048,320 Mcf and commercial volumes of 51,011,265 Mcf.

o Report quarterly on the progress of the SSL program, indicating the cumulative services replaced by location and costs incurred, along with a narrative discussion of any problems encountered or departures from budgeted activity levels.

o Put new tariff into effect on September 1, 2011. • Process for Extension of RRM Process

o August 15, 2011 Company and Cities agree on list of issues to review Company and Cities establish working groups for issues that include

company representatives, city settlement committee representatives and city consultants and attorneys as necessary

Company and Cities agree on meeting schedule for special review period

o Special Review Period - September 1 – November 15, 2011 Working groups receive and review information related to identified

issues and consider company and consultant recommendations o Negotiation Period - November 15, 2011 – December 15, 2011

Negotiate extension to RRM process with appropriate treatment of

items from working groups o If no extension to the RRM is reached, the Company will file a Statement of

Intent with the cities no sooner than January 15, 2012 o If an extension to the RRM is reached, the Company will file RRM no

sooner than April 1, 2012.

Attachments: Resolution and Tariffs

Presentation Jim Boyle of Herrera & Boyle, PLLC will be available to answer questions. :


Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

:

August 23, 2011 Approved by Legal:

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, (“CITY”) APPROVING A SETTLEMENT BETWEEN ATMOS ENERGY CORP’S MID-TEX DIVISION (“ATMOS”) AND ATMOS TEXAS MUNICIPALITIES (“ATM”) RESULTING IN NO CHANGE IN BASE RATES AND APPROVING TARIFFS WHICH REFLECT COSTS RELATED TO THE STEEL PIPE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM; FINDING THE RATES SET BY THE ATTACHED TARIFFS TO BE JUST AND REASONABLE; REQUIRING DELIVERY OF THE RESOLUTION TO THE COMPANY AND LEGAL COUNSEL; DETERMINING THAT THE MEETING AT WHICH THIS RESOLUTION WAS APPROVED COMPLIED WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT; MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT; AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

WHEREAS, the City is a regulatory authority under the Gas Utility Regulatory

Act (“GURA”) and under §103.001 of GURA has exclusive original jurisdiction over Atmos

Energy Corporation – Mid-Tex Division (“Atmos”) rates, operations, and services as a gas utility

within the municipality; and,

WHEREAS, the City has participated in prior cases regarding Atmos as part of a

coalition of cities known as the Atmos Texas Municipalities (“ATM”), and,

WHEREAS, on or about April 1, 2010 Atmos filed for an increase in rates,

pursuant to the Rate Review Mechanism (“RRM”), of approximately $15.6 million; which

represents approximately a $9 million base rate increase and an approximate $6.6 million for the

steel pipe replacement program; and,

WHEREAS, after months of investigation by ATM’s rate experts and weeks of

negotiations by ATM’S negotiation team a settlement was arrived at which provides: (1) the steel

service line replacement program for this last year be funded through a monthly increase of the

residential customer charge of twenty-nine cents and an increase in the commercial customer

charge of a dollar and twenty-two cents; (2) there will be no increase in base rates; and (3)

Atmos and representatives of ATM will begin meeting in mid-August to begin working on rate-

related issues, especially those that are difficult to resolve in the time period called for by the

RRM process.

WHEREAS, the Executive Committee of ATM and its lawyers recommend that

the Council approve the attached tariffs which are consistent with the understandings between

Atmos and the ATM Executive Committee.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT:

Section 1. That the findings set out in the preamble to this resolution are hereby

in all things approved and adopted..

Section 2. The rates contained in the attached tariffs are just and reasonable and

are hereby approved subject to a prudence review of the steel pipe replacement expenditures in

the next general rate proceeding.

Section 3. That a copy of this Resolution shall be sent to Mr. David Park, Vice

President for Rates and Regulation, Mid-Tex Division, Atmos Energy Corporation, 5420 LBJ

Freeway, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75204, and to Jim Boyle, Counsel for ATM, at Herrera &

Boyle, PLLC, 816 Congress Avenue, Suite 1250, Austin, TX 78701.

Section 4. That the meeting at which this resolution was approved was in all

things conducted in strict compliance with the Texas Open Meetings Act, Texas Government

Code, Chapter 551.

Section 5. That this resolution shall become effective immediately from and after

its passage.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON THE DAY OF , 2011

.

THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS

Alvin New, Mayor

Attest: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

Adopted: 5/30/03 Revised: 6/21/10

City of San Angelo



From: Ron Lewis, Construction and Facilities Maintenance


325.234.8609 Contact:


Consideration of adopting a Resolution authorizing the approval of an Interlocal Agreement between the City of San Angelo and Tom Green County for sharing expense of the maintenance and capital improvements of the TDCJ Work Camp 3 located at 3282 N. US Highway 277, San Angelo, Texas

COSA Staff has been working closely with TGC staff since 2010 to complete an Interlocal Agreement to share O & M expenses, capital expenses and emergency expenses for the TDCJ Wilderness Camp. The Interlocal Agreement will be in force for a 5-year term and City Council will be asked through the budget process to provide funding each fiscal year.

Summary:

Refer to background attachment TDCJ Inmate Assistance to San Angelo and the Concho Valley

History:

Financial Impact $13,306 FY 10 – 11 O&M and $28,000 FY10 – 11 Capital Improvements : $13,316.50 FY 11 –12 O&M and $5,000.00 FY11 – 12 Emergency Contingency

Related Vision Item

(if applicable)

:


Staff recommends that the City Council authorize the Mayor or City Manager to sign all related documents to execute an Interlocal Agreement between COSA and TGC and approve allocating funds from FY 10 – 11General Fund Fund Balance in the amount of $41,306.00. Also, direct staff to budget funds through the FY11-12 Budget process in the amount of $18,316.50.

:

Attachments: Interlocal Agreement Resolution, TDCJ Inmate Project Assistance to San Angelo and the Concho Valley, TDCJ Inmate Project Assistance 2007 - 2011, CFM TDCJ to Judge Brown MOU for Work Camp 3 Sept 7, 2010.PDF Powerpoint

Presentation: Ron Lewis will Present to City Council, review background attachments and answer Questions

Publication :

Rick Weise, Assistant City Manager Reviewed by

Director:

Approved by Legal:

TDCJ Inmate Assistance to San Angelo and

the Concho Valley The TDCJ Inmates have been assembling and disassembling the Christmas Light displays along the scenic Concho River in downtown San Angelo since 1995. TDCJ Inmates began performing regular and routine maintenance activities for the City of San Angelo Street and Bridge Department in 2005. Tree trimming, brush removal and weed eating activities in the Red Arroyo and many other drainage ways and ROW’s throughout San Angelo to insure that rainwater runoff flows freely off the streets and through our tributaries reaching one of three local reservoirs / lake storage areas. Annually, approximately 10,000 man-hours at a value of $10 per man-hour =

Annual – $100,000 savings. The TDCJ Inmates provide assistance with setup for annual events in several city venues including the Coliseum, Convention Center, River Stage, Ft. Concho, Boat Races at Lake Nasworthy. Annually, approximately 6,500 man-hours at a value of $10 per man-hour =

Annual – $65,000 savings. Additional beneficiaries include: San Angelo State Park (trail maintenance and brush clearing), Texas Department of Transportation, Colorado River Municipal Water District (storage tank cleaning), Several ISD’s in a 75 mile radius have access and frequently use the TDCJ Inmates squads to accomplish short-term projects in the summer months. San Angelo Stock Show and Rodeo Association – Rodeo setup and take down in Coliseum and various Horse events in the Spur Arena. Several counties in the 13 county CVCOG also have access to and use TDCJ Inmate help for isolated projects such as tree and brush trimming and clearing in county parks, community centers, 4-H and FFA facilities.

Annual Savings to

City of San Angelo

$165,000

TDCJ Inmate Project Assistance 2007 – 2011

• City Hall / Health Bldg.

o Demolition of Interior Spaces (over 8 months of work) (approx. $300,000 savings)

o Salvaged Concrete Masonry Units (CMUs) and Glass Block from 3rd and 4th

o Salvaged Aluminum, Copper and Steel from City Hall and Health Bldg. (approx. $2,500 revenue)

floors of City Hall (stored at Ft. Concho) (approx. $1,000 value)

o Salvaged ¾ “ plywood approx. 60 sheets and approx. 2000 sq. ft. of floor joist from Health Bldg. (stored in Ft. Concho Warehouse Basement)

(approx. $2,500 value) • City Manager’s Office – 30 S. Chadbourne (approx. $1,500 savings)

o Built walls o Painted walls o Moved boxes and furniture as part of relocation of City Hall

• Municipal Offices – 106 S. Chadbourne (approx. $2,500 savings) o Remove furniture and fixtures in building when leased o Painted walls o Moved boxes and furniture as part of relocation of City Hall

• Animal Shelter - Temporary Kennel in 4H Bldg. CFM personnel, TDCJ Inmates and

TGC Inmates (approx. $1,500 savings)

• Community Tennis Center (approx. $25,000 savings) o Demolition of chain link fence fabric and reworked and painted all existing pipe

framing. o Paver Installation at Tennis Project – Approx. 7,000 square feet

• Fire Station # 4 (approx. $1,000 savings)

o Demolished Kitchen ceiling after water leak and reconstructed.

• Santa Fe Golf Course (approx. $5,000 savings) o Assisted Operations personnel and Two-Pro to demolition and install 10 total

greens

• Ft Concho (approx. $600 savings) o Processed Firewood at Ft. Concho and Settling ponds on 19th

Street

• Parks Department (approx. $1,000 savings) o Dug out 10 total tree wells along Oakes for SAMFA and Parks Dept.

• Swimming Pool - Joint Resealing (approx. $1,000 savings)

• Santa Fe Crossing – 702 S. Chadbourne Street (Senior Center and Recreation Offices)

(approx. $5,000 savings) o Scraping and Repainting the entire exterior

• Fire Station # 2, 4702 Southland Blvd. (approx. $25,000 savings) o Built porch and stairs for Portable Building o Interior Demolition of Living and training quarters

• Municipal Swimming Pool (approx. $25,000 savings)

o Interior Demolition for renovation o Demolition of pool related exterior fixtures and furniture

• Business Resource Center (Old Coke Bldg.) (approx. $90,000 savings)

o Interior Demolition for Remodel (approx. $15,000 savings to-date o Demo entire interior after asbestos abatement (approx. $75,000)

• City Auditorium Restrooms (approx. $5,000 savings)

o Demolition or walls, tile, fixtures and toilet partitions. o Removed Marble wall panels from original toilets for reuse.

• River Bank Stabilization and Improvement Project (approx. $20,000 savings)

o Demolition of approx. 85 path lights, poles and concrete piers over a two mile section of the Concho River.

o Removal and salvage of approx. 15 pallets of concrete landscape block. (approx. $4,000 value)

• Painting – Southside/Carl Ray Johnson Recreation Centers (approx. $5,000 savings)

• Tree Trimming and mowing at Convention Center, Ft. Concho, Animal Shelter,

Edgewater Property (approx. $5,000 savings)

• Fencing of Spur Parking Garage (approx. $3,000 savings)

• Animal Shelter (approx. $4,000 savings) o Remove all dead and sick trees and scrubs from front of building. o Trim trees throughout 10 acre site. o Prepare soil for new beds and gravel trail.

• Producers Park (approx. $2,000 savings)

o Assist Operations with tree planting, irrigation and playground installation

• Ft. Concho (approx. $3,500 savings) o Assist with setup and take down of several events (National Cavalry Competition,

Christmas at Old Ft. Concho, Frontier Day). Cut and stack firewood

• Water Conservation – Installation and maintenance of the Bluffs Nature Trail (approx. $1,000 savings)

General Fund and Capital Project Savings / Value

$542,600

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH TOM GREEN COUNTY PROVIDING FOR SHARED EXPENSES AND OPERATION OF THE WILDERNESS CAMP TO PROVIDE OFFENDER LABOR AND FACILITIES FOR COMMUNITY PROGRAMS.

WHEREAS, Tom Green County (TGC) and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (“TDCJ”) have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding, effective October 1, 2010, defining commitments made by each entity for the purposes of the work program pursuant to which TGC, through property, assets and improvements owned by TGC, provides housing for prisoners (TDCJ Work Camp W-3, the “Wilderness Camp”) who are assigned to TDCJ’s work program; and, WHEREAS, TGC and the City of San Angelo have each previously incurred expenses of constructing, improving, maintaining, and operating the Wilderness Camp facilities in conjunction with the TDCJ and desire to provide for its continued operation through the sharing of operating and maintenance expenses of the work camp: WHEREAS, The Council determines that there are benefits available to TGC, the City and non-profit entities through operation of the Wilderness Camp and provision for the use of prisoner labor by the County and City through the TDCJ Work Program; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS THAT: The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager or his designee to negotiate and execute an interlocal agreement with Tom Green County that makes provision for the sharing of expenses related to operation of the TDCJ Work Camp W-3, the “Wilderness Camp”. The Agreement shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit “A” attached to this resolution. PASSED and APPROVED THIS DAY OF , 2011. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: Alvin New, Mayor Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM Ron Lewis, Facilities Maintenance Mgr. Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

Interlocal Agreement between COSA & TGC for Wilderness Camp Page 1 of 7

1

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN

TOM GREEN COUNTY and the CITY OF SAN ANGELO Shared Expense and Operation of the Wilderness Camp to Provide Offender Labor and

Facilities for Community Programs

THIS AGREEMENT is entered into to be effective , 2011 (“Effective Date”) by and between the CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, a Texas home-rule municipality (“COSA”) and TOM GREEN COUNTY (“TGC”), a political subdivision of the State of Texas. RECITALS WHEREAS, TGC and Texas Department of Criminal Justice (the “TDCJ”) have entered into a

Memorandum of Understanding, effective October 1, 2010, defining commitments made by each entity for the purposes of the work program pursuant to which TGC, through property, assets and improvements owned by TGC, provides housing for prisoners (TDCJ Work Camp W-3, the “Wilderness Camp”) who are assigned to TDCJ’s work program A copy of that Memorandum of Understanding is attached hereto as Attachment 1; and,

WHEREAS, The governing bodies of TGC and COSA have determined that there are benefits

available to the County, City and non-profit entities through operation of the Wilderness Camp and provision for the use of prisoner labor available to the County and City through the TDCJ Work Program; and,

WHEREAS, TGC and COSA have each previously incurred expenses of constructing ,

improving, maintaining, and operating the Wilderness Camp facilities in conjunction with the TDCJ and desire to provide for its continued operation:

NOW THEREFORE, under the authority of the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Texas Government Code, Chapter 791, the parties agree as follows: 1. Conditions Precedent. This Agreement is conditioned upon authorization by the

governing body of each of the parties hereto.

2. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to establish a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship between the parties and to delineate the respective responsibilities of the parties as they relate to the operation and maintenance of the Wilderness Camp, a prisoner housing facility provided by TGC in conjunction with the TDCJ for use in the TDCJ Work Program.

3. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from October 1, 20110, tothrough


2

September 30, 2011

, and shall automatically renew annually through September 30, 20165, unless earlier terminated as herein provided.

4. Definitions. The following definitions shall apply: A. Capital Improvement Expenses. Capital improvement expenses shall include labor

and materials for building improvements such as the construction of or replacement of roofs, floors, flooring, windows, mechanical systems, electrical systems, plumbing systems, and HVAC systems. Capital improvement expenses exceeding $ , shall not be incurred by TGC without prior notice to COSA and the concurrence of the parties.

B. Regular Maintenance Expenses. Regular maintenance expenses shall include only

those usual and necessary expenses for labor and material for the regular maintenance of the camp facilities such as minor carpentry and repairs, painting, repair or replacement of appliances, servicing of HVAC systems, plumbing and electrical repairs. Any maintenance expense exceeding $ shall be incurred by TGC only upon prior notice to COSA and upon the concurrence of both parties.

C. Emergency Maintenance and Repair Expenses. Emergency maintenance and

repairs expenses shall include expenses for labor and materials for maintenance and repairs that are necessary to preserve property as the result of unforeseen events such as fire or storm. Where practical, TGC shall give COSA notice of the need for emergency maintenance or repairs prior to incurring such expense.

D. Other Operating Expenses. Operating expenses such as utilities and other regular

expenses that are for capital improvements or for regular maintenance as defined in paragraphs A and B of this Part 4 above shall be borne solely by TDCJ and TGC as they may agree. COSA shall not be responsible for contributing to or providing reimbursement for Other Operating Expenses.

5. Obligations of TGC.

A. Operate the Work Camp Facilities. TGC shall operate the Wilderness Camp

facilities that provide housing for prisoners who are assigned to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) Work Program.

B. Maintenance, Repairs, and Capital Improvements. TGC shall be responsible for

the regular maintenance, emergency maintenance and repair, and capital improvements of the Wilderness Camp facilities, subject to the provision herein for annual payment by COSA to TGC in partial reimbursement for those expenses to be incurred by TGC.


3

B.C. TGC Budget. TGC shall provide COSA on or before May 1st

of each year with a copy of its anticipated budget for the next fiscal year for regular maintenance and capital expenses, as well as any reserves for emergency repair expenses.

C.D. Presentation of Invoices and Statement. TGC shall make available for inspection or copying upon the request of COSA copies of its records and third party invoices for every expense incurred by TGC during the term of this Agreement related to TGC’S operation of the Wilderness Camp.

Response to Requests for Laborers by COSA. TGC shall timely respond to requests from COSA for laborers from the TDCJ work program, and shall be responsible for the scheduling of Laborers and for their transport from the Wilderness Camp to and from work sites as requested by COSA and scheduled by TGC.

6. Obligations of COSA for Operation and Maintenance. A. Reimbursement of Expenses. COSA shall make an annual payment to TGC for the

term of this agreement, and an annual payment thereafter on or before December 31st

for each year that this Agreement is extended as herein provided. The annual payment due shall be in an amount determined by COSA to reflect 50% of the anticipatedbuddgeted expenses of to be incurred by TGC for regular maintenance andplus agreed to capital expenses. , plus a contribution to eEmergency repair expenses incurred by TGC, if any, in relation to operation of the Wilderness Camp will be reimbursed as invoiced by TGC. COSA’S first annual payment to TGC under this Agreement shall be made on or before September 30, 2011, for fiscal year 2010-2011, in the sum of at least $41,306.00.

Requests for Laborers. COSA shall submit its requests for laborers to TGC in writing and in a form and with the information as required by TGC and TDCJ. Such requests for laborers shall be timely submitted pursuant to policies and procedures of TGC and TDCJ.

7. Payments From Current Revenues. Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement to the contrary, the payment obligations of the parties hereunder are subject to the availability of current revenues for that purpose. Each party paying for the performance of any obligation hereunder shall make payment from current revenues available to the paying party.

8. Civil Liability, HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION.

A. Any civil liability for property damage, personal injury, or death relating to the

furnishing of services and facilities under this Agreement shall be the responsibility of the culpable and negligent party. TGC shall be responsible for the consequences of the negligence of its officials, officers, boards, commissions, volunteers, agents and employees; and, COSA shall be responsible for the


4

consequences of the negligence of its officials, officers, boards, commissions, volunteers, agents and employees.

B. To the extent allowed by law, TGC AGREES TO PROTECT, DEFEND,

INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD HARMLESS COSA, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from any claim for personal injury or property damage including attorney fees resulting from the negligence of TGC, its officials, officers, boards, commissions, volunteers, agents or employees, under this Agreement. In the event that COSA, or any of its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers were also negligent, then TGC is relieved of its obligation to defend COSA, and the obligation to indemnify and hold harmless is limited to the amount representing the comparative share of negligence as between TGC and COSA.

C. To the extent allowed by law, COSA AGREES TO PROTECT, DEFEND,

INDEMNIFY, AND HOLD HARMLESS TGC, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from any claim for personal injury or property damage including attorney fees resulting from the negligence of COSA, its officials, officers, boards, commissions, volunteers, agents or employees, under this Agreement. In the event that TGA, or any of its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, or volunteers were also negligent, then COSA is relieved of its obligation to defend TGC, and the obligation to indemnify and hold harmless is limited to the amount representing the comparative share of negligence as between TGC and COSA.

D. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to create a liability or

right of indemnification in any third party. E. The provisions of this Part 8 shall survive the termination or expiration of this

Agreement. 9. Insurance.

A. TGC Maintenance of Current Insurance. During all times that this Agreement is in effect, TGC shall continue to maintain, uninterrupted and at TGC’s expense, casualty insurance coverage in an amount sufficient to replace all of the Wilderness Camp improvements, plus contents belonging to TGC on the Premises. TGC shall maintain in effect at all times under the term of this Agreement and any extensions thereof, at its expense, a commercial general liability policy in an amount not less than $1,000,000.00statutory limits on an occurrence basis naming COSA as an additional insured.


5

B. Waiver of Subrogation. TGC shall require its insurance carrier(s), with respect to all insurance policies, to waive all rights of subrogation against COSA, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees.

C.. COSA Required Insurance Coverage. During all times that this Agreement is

in effect, COSA must, at its expense, maintain self insurance as follows:

a. for general liability in an amount not less than statutory limits; and,

b. for property damage arising from and related to COSA’s business operations and contents on the Premises.

D. Waiver of Subrogation. COSA with respect to its self insurance hereunder shall waive all rights of subrogation against TGC, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees.

E. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability. COSA self-insures workers’ compensation under the terms and provisions of the Texas Workers Compensation Act and will comply with the terms and provisions of the Statute.

10. Sovereign Immunity. By entering into this Agreement, neither party waives sovereign

immunity defenses or any other limitation of liability. No provision of this Agreement is intended to modify or waive any provision of the Texas Tort Claims Act as amended

11. Not a Joint Enterprise. This Agreement does not create a joint enterprise between the Parties. By entering into this Agreement, the Parties are undertaking a governmental function or service the purpose of which is to further the public good. The Parties do not jointly or severally have a pecuniary purpose or profit motive in executing or performing this Agreement.

12. Termination. Either party may terminate this agreement without cause by giving the other party a 90

days written notice of termination.

12.13. Amendment. This Agreement shall not be amended or modified other than in a written Agreement signed and duly executed by both parties.


6

143. Controlling Law. This Agreement shall be deemed to be made under, governed by and

construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. EXECUTED to be effective on the date first hereinabove stated. CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS By: _________________________________ Harold Dominguez, City Manager Date: _______________________________ ATTEST: ____________________________________ Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk TOM GREEN TGC, TEXAS By: _________________________________ Michael D. Brown, acting in his

official capacity and not individually Date: ________________________________ ATTEST: ____________________________________ Elizabeth McGill, County Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT BY: _________________________________ BY: Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney Ron Lewis, Facilities/Maint. Mgr.

APPROVED AS TO INSURANCE


7

BY: John Seaton, Risk Manager

Texas Depar tment of C r i m i n a l J u s t i c e

Brad LivingstonExecut ive Director

September?, 2010

Mike Brown, County JudgeTom Green County112 West BeauregardSan Angelo, Texas 76903

Dear Judge Brown:

Enclosed are two copies of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the TexasDepartment of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) and Tom Green County for the San Angelo Work Camp.The purpose of this MOU is to document the parties' approval for the TDCJ to provide offenderlabor to Tom Green County for a period of 12 months.

Please review and sign both copies where indicated. You will retain one copy while forwardingthe other signed contract to this office.

If you should have any further questions regarding this matter, you may call Angie Jordan at(936) 437-6706.

Sincerely,

Q C <L^zJ^~

Rick Thaler, DirectorCorrectional Institutions DivisionTexas Department of Criminal Justice

RT/amj

cc: File

r o p y

P.O. Box 99Huntsville, Texas 77342-0099

www.rdci.state.tx.us

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDINGEffective October 1, 2010

This MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING between Texas Department of Criminal Justice(TDCJ) and Tom Green County (referred to as county) is developed to define and formalizecommitments made by each entity for the proposed work program and to ensure resident safety.

TDCJ-shall provide offender labor service to Tom Green County at the request of the CountyGovernment to assist with accomplishing proposed public work projects. Those projects include,but are not limited to, general cleaning, maintenance, and land clearing.

All laundry and food service shall be coordinated by TDCJ. TDCJ shall provide security andother services for the offenders' care, such as medical. Projects dealing with hazardousmaterials, demolition, or construction shall have safety documentation on file and approved byTDCJ Risk Management prior to starting the project.

The County shall provide housing for offenders. TDCJ shall pay for the cost of utilities tooperate the housing location. The utilities shall be authorized on a separate contract.

The County shall provide any mechanical or motorized type equipment, such as dump trucks,required to accomplish the work projects. With respect to the contemplated work program, theCounty represents and warrants to TDCJ that it shall maintain all motor vehicles and motorizedequipment, which it provides to or for the benefit of TDCJ, in a safe and operable condition.

The County shall maintain and repair the building and other structures in which TDCJ offendersare housed and work so as to be in a safe condition suitable for such purposes and in compliancewith appropriate codes and regulations.

The TDCJ shall ensure that offenders, upon initial assignment to the work camp have a completecriminal history check. TDCJ shall not assign any offender to staff the premises who have beenconvicted of any offense listed on Exhibit A attached hereto. The TDCJ shall maintaindocumentation of the criminal history.

Either Party may terminate this Memorandum of Understanding, without cause, upon thirty- (30)days prior written notice to the other party.

This Memorandum of Understanding shall be effective October 1, 2010 and shall terminateSeptember 30, 2011.

Rick Thaler, Director DATECorrectional Institutions DivisionTexas Department of Criminal Justice p v

Mike Brown, County Judge DATETom Green County

Memorandum of UnderstandingTom Green County Work Camp

Effective October 2010Exhibit A

Page 2 of 2

An offense under Chapter 19, Penal Code (criminal homicide)

An offense under Chapter 20, Penal Code (kidnapping and unlawful restraint)

An offense under Chapter 21, section 11, Penal Code (indecency with a child)

An offense under Chapter 25, section 031, Penal Code (agreement to abduct fromcustody)

An offense under Chapter 25, section 08, Penal Code (solicitation of a child)

An offense under Chapter 25, section 11, Penal Code (sale or purchase of a child)

An offense under Chapter 28, section 02, Penal Code (arson)

An offense under Chapter 29, section 02, Penal Code (robbery)

An offense under Chapter 29, section 03, Penal Code (aggravated robbery)

An offense under Chapter 22, Penal Code (assaultive offenses)

An offense under Chapter 30, Penal Code (burglary and criminal trespass)

An offense under Chapter 31, Penal Code (theft)

An offense under Chapter 46, Penal Code (weapons)

A felony violation of a statute intended to control the possession or distribution of asubstance included in Chapter 48, Texas Government Code, (Texas Controlled SubstanceAct)

An offense under Chapter 32, Penal Code (fraud)

An offense under Chapter 21, section 07, Penal Code (public lewdness)C O P Y

An offense under Chapter 21, section 08, Penal Code (indecent exposure)

An offense under Chapter 43, Penal Code (public indecency)

8/26/2011

1

City CouncilAugust 30, 2011

City Hall / Health Bldg. – Demolition of Interior Spaces over 8 months $311,000

Business Resource Center (Old Coke Bldg.) $90,000

Fire Station # 4 and # 2 $26,000

Municipal Swimming Pool $26,000

Community Tennis Center $25,000

River Bank Stabilization and Improvement Project $24,000

Parks and Recreation Projects $19,000

Animal Shelter $7,500

Ft. Concho $6,100

Relocation of City Manager’s Office and Municipal Offices $4,000

Fencing of Spur Parking Garage $3,000

Water Conservation $1,000

General Fund and Capital Project Savings / Value from 2007 through 2011 $542,600

8/26/2011

2

Annual Savings for cleanup in drainage ways throughout the City $100,000

Annual Savings with Events at various City Venues $65,000

A S i f G SAnnual Savings for General Fund and Storm Water Fund from 2005 - 2011 $165,000

Number of Years COSA has received TDCJ Assistance 6

Total Savings for General Fund and Storm Water Fund from 2005 - 2011 $990,000

Total Savings to-date $1,532,600

City of San Angelo

Memo Meeting Date:

August 30, 2011

To:

Mayor and City Council members

From:

AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

Subject:

possible annexation (to San Angelo’s City limits) of certain properties located northeast of San Angelo

Location: area bounded roughly by North U.S. Hwy. 67 on the south, North U.S. Hwy. 277 on the east, Farm-to-Market Hwy. 2105 on the north, and a combination of Schwertner and Pruitt Roads on the west

Contacts:

A J Fawver, Planning Manager 657-4210

Caption:

Discussion and possible action to initiate annexation of property (to San Angelo’s City limits) within revised boundaries including certain properties located northeast of San Angelo, encompassing an area bounded roughly by North U.S. Hwy. 67 on the south, North U.S. Hwy. 277 on the east, Farm-to-Market Hwy. 2105 on the north, and a combination of Schwertner and Pruitt Roads on the west

Summary:

City Council discussed this item on February 1, of 2011, at which time they instructed staff, by way of a 5-2 vote, to initiate discovery of this process. As part of this process, Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government code requires that a “development agreement” be offered to all property owners within the prospective area of annexation whose properties are categorized as agricultural for ad valorem tax purposes. This agreement offers a guarantee of fifteen years to the owner, during which the City would agree to not annex their property. However, the property must continue to be used in a way consistent with the agricultural designation. Furthermore, they agree to follow the regulations and restrictions of the City’s Ranch and Estate (R&E) zoning district, to follow subdivision regulations, and to follow requirements for construction as if they were part of the city. They further agree to

notify both the city and any prospective purchaser of the property in writing if an ownership change is planned. The fifteen-year term can be renewed two times, for a maximum of forty-five years, at the mutual agreement of both parties.

The proposed northeast annexation area includes 60+ parcels of land, each with its own property tax account. Fifteen of these 60+ parcels are appraised for agricultural use; however, just these fifteen parcels together encompass the greater portion of land within the proposed northeast annexation area.

The affected landowners (the fifteen parcels described above) had the following options: (1) accept the agreement; (2) negotiate new language in the agreement; or (3) decline to make the agreement and, thereby, be made subject to annexation more-or-less immediately.

Planning and Legal staff members have performed the required notification of these property owners, composed a draft agreement, met with several property owners and spoken via phone with others. At this time, staff will present to the Council the results of this effort, which will affect the proposed annexation area by reducing it. Of the fifteen parcels mentioned above, fourteen have or are in the process of accepting the development agreements. The maps attached show the original area as endorsed by the City Council in February, and the revised area after eliminating those parcels whose owners have or are entering into an agreement are removed as required.

Reason(s) for Proposed Annexation:

As a reminder, the proposed annexation of land located northeast of San Angelo was prompted by the following concerns:

• A perceived need to annex property directly accessible to municipal water mains extended outside City limits. The availability of water service is the single most important factor in the development of land; without it, rural property may not be developable at all. Since 1989, San Angelo’s subdivision regulations have generally prohibited extending municipal water mains outside City limits, unless the owner(s) of property served by such extensions formally petition for annexation. In 1989, more than a few municipal water mains were already extended to areas outside City limits. San Angelo’s annexation efforts since 1989 have primarily been aimed toward incorporating such areas; however, some municipal water mains remain outside City limits. These include water mains extended alongside Old Ballinger Highway and into the Paul Gregory Addition,* within the proposed annexation area. So long as such water mains remain outside corporate limits, the City’s legal authority to consistently deny future extensions outside City limits may be in jeopardy.†

•

A perceived need to exert authority for zoning, fire and construction-related codes on property alongside along North U.S. Hwy. 67, which serves as a major gateway to San Angelo. By doing so, it is hoped the aesthetic appeal and security (fire safety) of this corridor can be maintained and not degraded any further.

* including the Chaparral Commercial Center

† i.e., without a petition for annexation, from the owner(s) of property served by such water main extensions

•

A perceived need to limit the extent and density of development around the existing Regional Landfill and its planned expansion northward. This will help minimize incompatible mix of uses, and also help limit the City’s exposure to liability stemming from undesirable external impacts of the Regional Landfill.

Related Vision Item: San Angelo’s 2009 Comprehensive Plan identifies two general goals for future annexation:

Goal 1: Use annexation to ensure that new housing and business activity is incorporated within the City limits of San Angelo, in a way which minimizes up-front municipal expenditures (for capital improvements in newly annexed areas) but maximizes suitability of such development within the urban context of San Angelo. Annex areas before extensive development of home sites and business properties occurs, guiding any such development within a framework of municipal regulations on zoning, subdivision, signs, fire prevention and building construction. Goal 2: Balance short-term costs of making measured capital improvements in possible annexation areas, with long-term costs of not annexing these same areas. Recognize that determining the best areas for annexation involves anticipating realistic potential for development of new home sites and new business activity all around the urban fringe, annexing the most promising such areas where timely application of urban development standards can have an effective impact.

Financial Impact: not applicable, yet

Recommendation: City staff recommends moving forward with an annexation of the areas as shown on the advised parcel map.

Attachments

: maps illustrating City staff’s original and revised proposed annexation of land located northeast of San Angelo

remainder of annexation schedule Presentation

: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

Publication: No legal notice required at this time. However, during the second stage of this two-stage process, legal notices of required public hearings are required to be published (in the newspaper) and posted on the City’s web site.

Reviewed by: AJ Fawver, Planning Manager

Area of proposed annexation after agreements have been extended/accepted

•

Tuesday, November 1 of 2011

First public hearing on proposed annexation.

• Tuesday, November 15 of 2011

Second public hearing on proposed annexation.

•

Tuesday, December 6 of 2011

Introduction of draft annexation ordinance and service plan.

• Tuesday, December 20 of 2011 or Tuesday, January 3 of 2012

Second public hearing on draft annexation ordinance and service plan.

* Notice of public hearings on proposed annexation should also be “posted” onto City of San Angelo’s website

City of San Angelo

Memo Meeting Date:

August 30, 2011

To:


From:

Kari LeBoeuf, Planner

Subject:

Z 11-10, a proposal to change the zoning from RS-1 (Single-Family Residence) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial) on the following property:

Location: 528 Country Club Road, located on the northwest corner of Country Club Road and US Hwy 277, specifically 8.614 acres of the J. Burkhardt Subdivision, in southwest San Angelo.

Contacts:

AJ Fawver, Planning Manager 325-657-4210

Caption: First

Public Hearing and consideration of introduction of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-10: San Angelo Planning Commission

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot at northwest corner of Country Club Road and US Hwy 277, specifically 8.614 acres of the J. Burkhardt Subdivision, abstract number 0037, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Summary:

The site was the subject of a sign variance request at the June 20, 2011 Planning Commission meeting. At that time, the Planning Commission directed the planning staff to initiate a zone change to Neighborhood Commercial (CN) on this property. Thus, we initiated the request at their direction.

In considering this application, the City Council may:

(1) recommend approving the proposed zone change;

(2) modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be more appropriate; or

(3) recommend denying the proposed zone change. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:

North PD single-family residence, commercial East RS-1, ML Frontage Rd, US Hwy 87 South RS-1 single-family residences West RS-1 single-family residences

In June 2011, a representative from Southgate Church of Christ requested from the Planning Commission a variance from the sign ordinance so that they could have a 24’ tall, 162 square foot large sign on their property. They desire this large sign to address their lack of visibility from Highway 87/277 to the east.

Background:

The Planning Commission granted the variance with the condition that a zone change for the subject property be brought forward for action by the planning staff. This rezoning, from RS-1 to CN, would more accurately represent the unique features of this location, while still providing a buffer for the residences, primarily located to the south and west. The type of signage the church would like to place is allowed by right in commercial zoning districts and more appropriate in those types of areas.

Analysis:

The subject property, as mentioned above, is located at the intersection of two local streets. This intersection, however, is only approximately 400 feet north of the intersection of US Highway 87/277 and Grand Canal Road. The highway is, obviously, a heavily traveled thoroughfare and Grand Canal is a major arterial which is intended to provide high-speed traffic movement and act as the backbone of a street network, carrying cars from centers of activity to the rest of the community. The subject property is currently zoned RS-1, with a conditional use approved to allow nonresidential. Sections 12.604.a.2.A, 12.604.a.2.B, and 12.604.a.2.C of the Sign Ordinance state that no sign for a nonresidential use in a residential zone may exceed a maximum of 64 square feet in size, exceed a maximum of 8 feet in height, nor have more than one sign per street frontage, respectively. The larger sign that was allowed by the variance granted would fall well within the acceptable range for signage in a commercial district. With the zone change from RS-1 to CN, the sign would then fully conform to zoning ordinance regulations.

The Neighborhood Commercial zoning classification is the least intensive of the commercial classifications and would therefore be the least intrusive to the surrounding residential areas. The intensity of CN-allowed uses would have little, if any, adverse impact on the neighborhood, especially since the infrastructure to contain traffic is immediately adjacent; thus, traffic does not have to wind through residential streets to access the site. Additionally, the subject property already contains a substantial parking area such that commercial parking would not invade the neighboring residential areas. Any other commercial zoning classification would be too intensive for the area.

In addition, the use of Neighborhood Commercial zoning here would function just as it is intended to; to buffer a residential area from a nearby high-speed thoroughfare. Also, CN would provide a buffer from the ML (Light Manufacturing) zoning district immediately to the east of the subject property as well as the CH (Heavy Commercial) zoning district immediately to the south. Further, such a change is consistent with the “neighborhood” classification called for in the Vision Plan map component of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan.

The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to approve this zone change request as presented. Planning staff received three (3) written favorable responses to the zone change notification.

Recommendation:

The Planning Commission and City staff recommends approving this zone change request as presented.

Notification: Twenty-eight (28) owners of nearby property were

formally notified of this application for zone change. Related Vision Item: City Council Commerce Vision Revitalize older commercial areas Compatibility of adjoining commercial and

neighborhood districts

Attachments

: excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property of proposed zone change;

excerpt from zoning map, highlighting properties with written favorable comments on proposed zone change;

aerial photo of same vicinity (as above-mentioned

map) highlighting subject property of proposed zone change; and

draft ordinance.

Presentation



AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot at northwest corner of Country Club Road and US Hwy 277, specifically 8.614 acres of the J. Burkhardt Subdivision, abstract number 0037, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: Z 11-10:

San Angelo Planning Commission

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1

: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: 8.614 acres of the J. Burkhardt Subdivision, abstract number 0037, located at the northwest corner of Country Club Road and US Hwy 277 in south central San Angelo shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District.

The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2

: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.

SECTION 3

: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:

SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4

: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:

PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.

INTRODUCED on the 30th day of August, 2011 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 6th

day of September, 2011.


by:_______________________________

Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST: by:_________________________________

Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

EXHIBIT “A” legal description of area bounded by zone change case number Z 11-10, as proposed by the Planning Commission for City of San Angelo, Texas: BEGINNING at a point at the intersection of the west line of right-of-way for South US Highway 277 Frontage Road and the north line of right-of-way for Country Club Road; THENCE in a northwestern direction along the west line of right-of-way for South US Highway 277 Frontage Road to a point at the intersection of said west line of right-of-way for South US Highway 277 Frontage Road and the south line of the Crossings subdivision at the southeastern corner of Section 1 Lot 1; THENCE in a western direction along the south line of the Crossings subdivision Section 1 to a point at the intersection of said subdivision and Trinity Park subdivision Section 1 Lot 9 and Lot 8; THENCE in a southward direction along the west line of the Trinity Park subdivision to a point at the intersection of Trinity Park subdivision Section 1 Lot 1 and the north line of the right-of-way for Country Club Road; THENCE in an eastward direction along the north line of right-of-way for Country Club Road to the point of the BEGINNING.

City of San Angelo

Memo Meeting Date:

August 30, 2011

To:


From:

Kari LeBoeuf, Planner

Subject:

Z 11-09, a proposal to change the zoning from RS-1 (Single-Family Residence) to CN (Neighborhood Commercial) on the following property:

Location: 6002 Knickerbocker Road, located on the northeast corner of Knickerbocker Road and American Legion Road, specifically Lot 1 and a portion of an abandoned alley in Block C in the Lake Nasworthy subdivision, Group 2 in southwest San Angelo.

Contacts:

AJ Fawver, Planning Manager 325-657-4210

Caption:

Consideration of an appeal of the Planning Commission’s denial of proposed zone change, and, possible first public hearing and consideration of an Ordinance amending Chapter 12, Exhibit “A” (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of Ordinances, City of San Angelo

Z 11-09: City of San Angelo

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot located on the northeast corner of Knickerbocker Road and American Legion Road, specifically Lot 1 and a portion of an abandoned alley in Block C in the Lake Nasworthy Subdivision, changing the zoning

classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

Summary:

The subject property is a City-owned property and, because the owner must initiate a zone change, this falls to the Council speaking for the City. On June 28, 2011, City Council instructed the planning staff to begin the zone change process. Thus, we initiated the request at their direction. As the Planning Commission voted to deny the zone change, an approval of this zone change by Council must be made by a three-fourths (3/4) majority vote as stated in Zoning Ordinance Section 212(E)(4).

In considering this application, the City Council may:

(1) approve the proposed zone change;

(2) modify the application to some alternative zoning classification believed to be more appropriate; or

(3) deny the proposed zone change. Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:

North CG undeveloped field East CN self-service storage South RS-1 single-family residences West RS-1 single-family residences

In June 2011, a representative from Glen Meadows Baptist Church approached the planning staff about selling the church to a performance arts troupe.

Background:

With the current zoning classification of RS-1, entertainment-oriented businesses, which are classified under the umbrella of “retail sales and service”, are not allowed. Any development in Neighborhood Commercial districts should be low-intensity with small floor areas and limited traffic generation, and the character of development should be compatible with the surrounding residential

neighborhood. Also, Neighborhood Commercial districts should ideally be clustered around intersections of major thoroughfares.

The ordinance goes on to regulate the maximum size allowed to insure that businesses in these areas are not comparable in size to big box retailers and the like, by placing a cap on the floor area ratio within this district to 60% of the size of the tract. For example, a lot of 10,000 square feet in a General Commercial district would allow a building size up to 20,000 square feet; in contrast, this same lot in a Neighborhood Commercial district would only allow a maximum building size of 6,000 square feet, or roughly one-third the size. This regulation protects the surrounding neighborhood from massive commercial enterprises being placed immediately adjacent to them.

Another important distinction of the Neighborhood Commercial district includes a maximum height, not a feature of all commercial districts, and the most restrictive level of outside storage, called “outside display”. This storage designation limits displays outdoors to no more than 5 feet from the wall.

Analysis:

The subject property, as mentioned above, is located at the intersection of two streets. Knickerbocker Road is classified as an arterial street, intended to provide high-speed traffic movement and act as the backbone of a street network, carrying cars from centers of activity to the rest of the community. American Legion Road is classified as a collector street. Collectors are intended to provide access to neighborhoods and move traffic to arterial streets or freeways; they essentially act as ‘feeder’ streets. Both the 2003 and 2009 versions of the San Angelo Comprehensive Plan encourage clustering of commercial at intersections. The presence of nearby residential areas to the east and commercial to the west of the subject property indicates the appropriateness of Neighborhood Commercial in this area.

The intensity of CN-allowed uses would have little, if any, adverse impact on the neighborhood, especially since the infrastructure to contain traffic is immediately adjacent; thus, traffic does not have to wind through residential streets to access the site. Additionally, the subject property already contains a substantial parking area such that commercial parking would not invade the neighboring residential areas. Any other commercial zoning classification would likely be too intensive for the area. In addition, the use of Neighborhood Commercial zoning here would function just as it is intended to; to buffer a residential area from a nearby high-speed thoroughfare. Also, such a change is consistent with the “neighborhood” classification called for in the Vision Plan map component of the 2009 Comprehensive Plan.

The Planning Commission voted to deny the request. Bill Lawrence made the motion to deny the request as presented, which Sam Tambunga seconded. The

motion passed, 3-2, with David Eaton and Bill Wynne voting in opposition of the motion.

Planning staff received twelve (12) written letters of opposition to this zone change request. The letters of opposition from within the 200’ notification area constitutes a total land area of approximately 14%.

Recommendation:

Planning Commission recommends denying this zone change request. City staff recommends approving this zone change request as presented.

Notification: Seventeen (17) owners of nearby property were formally notified of this application for zone change.

Related Vision Item: City Council Commerce Vision Revitalize older commercial areas; Compatibility of adjoining commercial and

neighborhood districts

Attachments

: excerpt from zoning map, highlighting subject property of proposed zone change;

aerial photo of same vicinity (as above-mentioned map) highlighting subject property of proposed zone change; and

excerpt from zoning map, highlighting properties within

200’ notification area in opposition of proposed zone change;

draft ordinance.

Presentation



AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPER 12, EXHIBIT “A” OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, WHICH SAID EXHIBIT “A” OF CHAPTER 12 ADOPTS ZONING REGULATIONS, USE DISTRICTS AND A ZONING MAP, IN ACCORDANCE WITH A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, BY CHANGING THE ZONING AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE FOLLOWING PROPERTY, TO WIT: lot at northeast corner of Knickerbocker Road and American Legion Road, specifically Lot 1 and a portion of an abandoned alley in Block C in the Lake Nasworthy Subdivision, changing the zoning classification from a Single-Family Residential (RS-1) to a Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROVIDING A PENALTY

RE: Z 11-09:

City of San Angelo

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission for the City of San Angelo and the governing body for the City of San Angelo, in compliance with the charter and the state law with reference to zoning regulations and a zoning map, have given requisite notice by publication and otherwise, and after holding hearings and affording a full and fair hearing to all property owners and persons interested, generally, and to persons situated in the affected area and in the vicinity thereof, is of the opinion that zoning changes should be made as set out herein; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO: SECTION 1

: That the basic zoning ordinance for the City of San Angelo, as enacted by the governing body for the City of San Angelo on January 4, 2000 and included within Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, be and the same is hereby amended insofar as the property hereinafter set forth, and said ordinance generally and the zoning map shall be amended insofar as the property hereinafter described: Lot 1 and a portion of an abandoned alley in Block C in the Lake Nasworthy Subdivision, northeast corner of Knickerbocker Road and American Legion Road, in soutwest San Angelo shall henceforth be permanently zoned as follows: Neighborhood Commercial (CN) District.

The Director of Planning is hereby directed to correct zoning district maps in the office of the Director of Planning, to reflect the herein described changes in zoning. SECTION 2

: That in all other respects, the use of the hereinabove described property shall be subject to all applicable regulations contained in Chapter 12 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo, as amended.

SECTION 3

: That the following severability clause is adopted with this amendment:

SEVERABILITY: The terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that, if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

SECTION 4

: That the following penalty clause is adopted with this amendment:

PENALTY: Any person who violates any provisions of this article shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, shall be subject to a fine as provided for in Section 1.106 of the Code of Ordinances for the City of San Angelo. Each day of such violation shall constitute a separate offense.

INTRODUCED on the 30th day of August, 2011 and finally PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on this the 6th

day of September, 2011.


by:_______________________________

Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST: by:_________________________________

Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk

City of San Angelo



From: Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director

Subject: Agenda Item for August 30, 2011 and September 6, 2011 Council Meeting

Contact: Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director, 657-4209

Caption:

Consideration of an Ordinance amending the Water Conservation/Drought Contingency Plan and any action in connection thereto.

Summary: The proposed ordinance will modify the existing Water Conservation/Drought Contingency Plan by reducing the waste of water runoff provision from 150 feet to 75 feet; establishing designated watering days based on the property address; lowering the allowable usage amount at which rate surcharges are applied; and by increasing surcharge rates.

History: The Water Conservation/Drought Contingency Plan establishes practices that encourage conservation and provides a procedure for management of City water supplies during a drought.

Financial Impact: Fees collected from surcharges go into the Water Operating Fund.

Related Vision Item (if applicable)

: Long Term Water Supply


: The proposed changes incorporate the items discussed at previous Council meetings. It is recommended the ordinance be amended.

Attachments: Proposed Ordinance

Presentation

: None

Publication

: None


: Will Wilde, Water Utilities Director, August 22, 2011.

of 12

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11, ARTICLE 11.200 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, ENTITLED “WATER CONSERVATION AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN”, BY REPEALING ARTICLE 11.200 IN ITS ENTIRETLY, AND ADOPTING A NEW ARTICLE 11.200, PROVIDING FOR A DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN AND FOR A PENALTY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABLILITY, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE

BE IT ORDANED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO:

Section 1

ARTICLE 11.200

. That Chapter 11, Article 11.200 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of San Angelo, Texas, entitled “Water Conservation and Drought Contingency Plan” is hereby repealed and that a new Article 11.200 entitled “Water Conservation and Drought Contingency Plan” is hereby adopted to read as follows:

Sec. 11.201 Purpose

WATER CONSERVATION AND DROUGHT CONTINGENCY PLAN

The purpose of the water conservation and drought contingency plan is to encourage water conservation at all times and to establish a procedure for identifying, classifying and handling a water supply and/or a water demand emergency effectively and efficiently.

Sec. 11.202 Water Conservation Measures

The city will utilize the following strategies to encourage, promote and require citizens to conserve water at all times.

(1) Conservation Plan

(A)

. The “City of San Angelo Water Conservation Plan,” dated March 2, 2009, which is on file in the office of the city clerk, and available for public inspection, is adopted and incorporated herein.

Implementation

(2)

. The director of water utilities will act as the administrator of the water conservation plan. The administrator will oversee the execution and implementation of all elements of the program and will be responsible for supervising the promulgation and retention of records for program verification.

Plumbing Code

(3)

. The city plumbing code has provision for water conserving plumbing devices. The city will enforce the requirements of the code to ensure the use of water saving devices.

Universal Metering

(4)

. All users of municipal treated water, except for fire sprinkler lines, will be metered.

Water Supply Meters. The city metering devices will record water use with an accuracy of plus or minus 5.0% in order to measure and account for the amount of raw water diverted from the source of supply.

of 12

(5) Restaurants

(6)

. Restaurants shall not serve water to their customers except when specifically requested by the customer.

Waste of Water

(A) Allowing treated city water, raw city water, grey water, reclaimed water or well water to run off property to a gutter, street, alley, ditch or drainage facility and drain for more than 75 feet downgrade of the point of entry into such gutter, street, alley, ditch or drainage facility.

. As defined below shall be prohibited.

(B) Failure to repair a controllable leak.

(7) Prohibited Watering Hours

(8)

. The use of treated or raw city water for watering lawns, gardens, landscape areas, trees, golf courses, shrubs or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be prohibited between the hours of 12:00 noon and 6:00 p.m. daily from April 1 through October 31.

Allowable Watering Frequency

(9)

. The use of treated or raw city water for watering lawns, landscape areas, trees, gardens, golf courses (except greens), shrubs or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be allowed at a frequency of twice every seven days for each area being watered during the period of April 1 through October 31 and once every seven days for each area being watered during the period of November 1 through March 31. Golf course greens may be watered once per day year round.

New Landscape

(A) Days 1-14 from planting; three times per day every day of such period at any time of day.

. Watering of newly seeded or sodded lawns or newly planted trees, shrubs or landscape plants will be allowed at the following frequency provided notification is given to the city code compliance division or water conservation division of the watering schedule: (add written notification/ Councilmember Farmer)

(B) Days 15-28 from planting; twice per day every day of such period at any time of day.

(10) Allowable Application Rates

(11)

. The maximum amount of treated or raw city water applied to established lawns, landscape plants, golf courses (except greens) or shrubs should not exceed 1 inch per week.

Drip Irrigation. Landscape watering with a drip irrigation system shall be permitted on any day and at any time of day provided that the total amount of water applied shall not exceed 1 inch per week. For the purpose of this article, drip irrigation shall mean a water saving irrigation system that uses buried drip pipe or tape.

of 12

(12) Excessive Usage Fee

(A) For single-family residential accounts, an additional fee of $2.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 45,000 and 55,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 55,000 gallons during a billing period.

. A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts set forth below. This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage.

(B) For residential landscape water meters, an additional fee of $2.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 35,000 and 45,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 45,000 gallons during a billing period.

(C) For all other landscape meters, except those at schools, colleges, parks, cemeteries, golf courses or athletic facilities, an additional fee of $2.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 110,000 and 130,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 130,000 gallons during a billing period.

(13) Contracts with Other Political Subdivisions, Water Supply Corporations or Water Suppliers. Any political subdivision, water supply corporation, or water supplier that contracts with the city for the purchase of water shall adopt applicable provisions of the city’s water conservation and drought contingency plan. Contracts for the sale of water that are already in effect will be revised to reflect the applicable provisions of the city’s most current water conservation and drought contingency plan when the contracts are renewed or extended. To the extent of the city’s legal authority, the city shall require the city’s wholesale customers to issue a public notice advising their water customers of required drought management measures declared in the city as follows in Section 11.203.

(A) In the event that the triggering criteria specified in Section 11.203(e) of the Plan for Water Supply Stage – Drought Level III – have been met, the city manager is hereby authorized to initiate allocation of water supplies on a pro rata basis in accordance with Texas Water Code Section 11.039 and according to the following water allocation policies and procedures.

(B) A wholesale customer’s monthly allocation shall be a percentage of the customer’s water usage baseline. The percentage will be set by resolution of the San Angelo City Council based on the administrator’s assessment of the severity of the water shortage condition and the need to curtail water diversions and/or deliveries and may be adjusted periodically by resolution of the city council as conditions warrant. Once pro rata allocation is in effect, water diversions by or deliveries to each wholesale customer shall be limited to the allocation established for each month.

(C) Upon initiation of pro rata water allocation, water utility director shall provide notice, by certified mail, to each wholesale customer informing them of

http://z2.franklinlegal.net/sanangelo-flp/DocViewer.jsp?docid=104&z2collection=sanangelo#JD_11.203�


of 12

their monthly water usage allocations and shall notify the news media and the executive director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.

(14) Water Demand Emergency

(15)

. In the event the quantity of water usage from the city’s water distribution system reaches a level that exceeds the amount which may be treated or safely delivered through the system, the water utilities director shall notify the city manager and the city council of such an occurrence. The city council shall be authorized to limit the use of water by passage of a resolution outlining such limitations which shall remain in effect until the water demand emergency can be met. Upon initiation of a water demand emergency, the water utility director shall provide notice, by certified mail, to the executive director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and shall notify the news media.

Water Supply Emergency

(16)

. In the event of a water system failure or emergency (i.e. pressure zone deficiencies, chemical spills, broken water mains, power outages, failures of storage tanks or other equipment, treatment plant breakdown and/or water contamination) which limits the amount of water which may be treated or safely delivered through the system, the water utilities director shall notify the city manager and city council of such occurrence. The city council shall be authorized to limit the use of water by passage of a resolution outlining such limitations which shall remain in effect until the water supply emergency can be met. Upon initiation of a water supply emergency, the water utility director shall provide notice, by certified mail, to the executive director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality and shall notify the news media.

Public Information

(17)

. The water utilities director will provide regular public education and information about the importance of year-round water efficiency as delineated in the plan, and will provide general information about water supply conditions and drought plan provisions on at least an annual basis. The purpose of this effort shall be to keep the citizenry informed about the drought and conservation plans and their importance to the city’s water supply.

Watering Days.

(A) Watering Frequency-Twice every seven days. The designated watering days shall be:

The days upon which watering is allowed shall be as determined by the property address as set forth in this section for each frequency of watering. Watering on an allowable day may be done during the hours of 12:00 midnight to 12:00 noon, and 6:00 p.m. to 12.00 midnight during the period of April 1 to October 31 and any time of day during the period of November 1 to March 31.

Last Digit of Address Watering Days

0 or 1 Monday, Thursday, Saturday

2 or 3 Tuesday, Friday Sunday

4 or 5 Monday, Thursday Saturday

of 12

6 or 7 Tuesday, Friday, Sunday

8 or 9 Monday, Thursday, Saturday

(B) Watering Frequency-Once every seven days. The designated watering day shall be:

Last Digit of Address Watering Day

0 or 1 Monday, Thursday

2 or 3 Tuesday, Friday


6 or 7 Tuesday, Friday


(C) Watering Frequency-Once every fourteen days. The designated watering day shall be:

(1) Week One

Last Digit of Address Watering Day

0 or 1 Monday

2 or 3 Tuesday

4 or 5 Monday

6 or 7 Friday

8 or 9 Thursday

(2) Week Two. No watering allowed.

(18) Residential Vehicle Watering

(19)

. Washing of vehicles or other equipment is allowed only on a designated watering day. A hose with an automatic shut-off nozzle or bucket of five gallons or less may be used. Water should not be allowed to run off of the property more than 75 feet.

Charity Car Washes

Sec. 11.203 Drought Stages and Water Management Measures

. Charity car washes are allowed on any day. A hose with an automatic shutoff nozzle or bucket of five gallons or less may be used. Water should not be allowed to run off the property more than 75 feet.

of 12

(a) Water Supply Sources

When local reservoirs are full, the city’s primary water supply will be from these reservoirs along with nonlocal or groundwater sources as needed. When local reservoirs are below full but above drought trigger points, the local sources may be utilized along with water brought in from nonlocal sources or groundwater sources. During drought conditions, the primary source of supply will be nonlocal sources, subject to the maximum amount available from each source, with the remaining amount of water coming from the local sources or groundwater.

. The city has several water supply sources that it can draw upon to meet its needs. Local surface water sources include Lake Nasworthy, Twin Buttes Reservoir, O.C. Fisher Reservoir and the South Concho River. Nonlocal surface water supplies are available to the city from O.H. Ivie Reservoir and Spence Reservoir. The city also has the Hickory groundwater source in the McCulloch county area.

(b) Drought Trigger Point

The water utilities director shall notify the city manager and city council upon entering the threshold of a drought stage. The council shall implement each stage by resolution. Such resolution shall be published one time in the local newspaper. The criteria for each stage and the water management measures which shall be enforced are as follows in subsections (d) to (f).

. Whenever the total amount of water available to the city falls below the minimum criteria established for each water supply stage level, the city shall be deemed to have entered a drought stage for management of its water supplies.

(c) Public Information

(d)

. The water utilities director will provide reports to the news media with information regarding current water supply conditions, projected water supply and demand conditions if the current drought conditions continue, and consumer information on water conservation measures and practices. Information describing each water supply stage trigger point and drought level restrictions on water use shall be prepared and published on the city’s website.

Water Supply Stage – Drought Level I

(1) The minimum criteria for this drought stage shall be the following.

.

The total amount of water available, as determined by the water utilities director, to the city from its developed water sources is less than a 24-month supply.

(2) In addition to the conservation measures stated in Section 11.202 of this article, the following additional water conservation measures shall be in force during Water Supply Stage – Drought Level I.

(A) The use of treated or raw city water for watering lawns, gardens, landscape areas, trees, shrubs, golf courses (except greens, tees and athletic fields) or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be prohibited at all times provided however a person may do such watering which shall be once every seven days for each area being watered during the period of April 1 through October 31 and once every 14 days for each area being watered during the period of November 1 through March 31 except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.



of 12

(B) Golf courses greens may be watered daily.

(C) Tees and athletic fields, except those used only for practice, may be watered twice every seven days except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(D) Watering of newly seeded or sodded lawns, newly planted trees, shrubs, landscape plants or golf course greens or tee areas that have been over-seeded with winter grass or that have been replanted, resodded or newly constructed shall be allowed in accordance with the provisions as stated in Section 11.202 for “new landscape.”

(E) The days upon which watering may be done shall be as specified in Section 11.202(17).

(3) A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts as set forth below.

This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage and shall be in lieu of the “excessive usage fee” as defined in Section 11.202.


(B) For residential landscape and raw water meters, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 30,000 and 40,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 40,000 gallons during a billing period.

(C) For all landscape meters, except those at schools, colleges, parks, cemeteries, golf courses or athletic facilities, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 95,000 and 115,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 115,000 gallons during a billing period.

(e) Water Supply Stage – Drought Level II


.

The total amount of water available, as determined by the water utilities director, to the city from its developed water sources is less than an 18-month supply.

(2) In addition to the conservation measures stated in Section 11.202 of this article, the following additional water conservation measures shall be in force during Water Supply Stage – Drought Level II.





of 12

(A) The use of treated or raw city water for watering lawns, gardens, landscape areas, trees, shrubs, golf courses (except greens, tees and athletic fields) or other plants being grown outdoors (not in a nursery) shall be prohibited at all times provided however a person may do such watering which shall be once every fourteen days for each area being watered during the period of April 1 through October 31 and once every 14 days for each area being watered during the period of November 1 through March 31 except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(B) Golf course greens may be watered daily.

(C) Tees and athletic fields, except those used only for practice, may be watered once every seven days except during the “prohibited watering hours” as stated in Section 11.202.

(D) Hand watering, with a hose that has an automatic shut off nozzle or a bucket of five gallon or less, of newly planted trees or shrubs may be done twice every seven days for sixty days after planting.

(E) Golf course greens that have been over-seeded with winter grass may be watered in accordance with the provisions as stated in Section 11.202 for “new landscape”.

(F) The days upon which watering may be done shall be as specified in Section 11.202(17).

(3) A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts as set forth below.

This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage and in lieu of the water usage fee set out in Section 11.203(d) (3) the “excessive usage fee” as defined in Section 11.202.


(B) For residential landscape or raw water meters, an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 20,000 and 30,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $8.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 30,000 gallons during a billing period.

(C) For all landscape meters, an additional fee of $5.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage between 80,000 and 100,000 gallons during a billing period, and an additional fee of $8.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 100,000 gallons during a billing period.

(f) Water Supply Stage – Drought Level III.






of 12


The total amount of water available, as determined by the water utilities director, to the city from its developed water sources is less than a 12-month supply.

(2) In addition to the water conservation measures stated in Section 11.202 of this article, the following water conservation measures shall be in force during Water Supply Stage - Drought Level III.

(A) The use of treated or raw city water for watering of lawns, gardens, landscape areas, trees, golf courses (including greens and tee areas), shrubs or other plants being grown outdoors is prohibited.

(B) The use of treated or raw city water to fill, refill or maintain the level of any fountain or swimming pool is prohibited.

(C) Washing of automobiles, trucks, trailers, boats, or other types of vehicles or mobile equipment is prohibited except if the health, safety and welfare of the public is contingent upon vehicle cleaning, as determined by the director of city health services; then the washing of such vehicles shall be allowed.

(3) A fee shall be charged for water usage in the amounts as set forth below. This fee shall be in addition to the standard fee charged for water usage and shall be in lieu of the water usage fee set out in Sections 11.203(d)(3) and 11.203(e)(3) and the “excessive usage fee” as defined in Section 11.202.

(A) For single-family residential accounts, an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over 15,000 gallons during a billing period.

(B) For apartment unit accounts, an additional fee of $6.00 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage over an amount equal to the number of units in the apartment times 3,000 gallons during a billing period.

(C) For all other water users, an additional fee of $3.50 per 1,000 gallons shall be charged for all usage.

Sec. 11.204 Exception and Variance

(a) Exceptions

(1) Use of water for installing, testing and repairing sprinkler systems.

. There shall be an exception to the prohibitions of this article regarding watering restrictions, as follows:

(2) Watering days for public parks, athletic facilities, schools, colleges and cemeteries shall be as approved by the City Council.

(b) Variance.





of 12

(1) A person desiring an exemption from any provision of this article shall file a petition for variance with the city manager. All petitions for variances shall be reviewed and acted upon by the city council. The petition shall include at a minimum the following information:

(A) Name and address of the petitioner(s).

(B) Purpose and estimated amount of water use.

(C) Specific provision(s) of the article from which the petitioner is requesting an exemption.

(D) Detailed statement as to how the specific provision of the article adversely affects the petitioner or what damage or harm will occur to the petitioner or others if petitioner complies with this article.

(E) Description of the relief requested.

(F) Period of time for which the variance is sought.

(G) Alternative water use restrictions or other measures the petitioner is taking or proposes to take to meet the intent of this article and the effective date of such other measures.

(H) Other pertinent information.

(I) Statement that petitioner has not within the last six months intentionally violated the current ordinance for which a variance is sought or, if such violations have occurred, a statement setting out all reasons why such ordinance was violated.

(2) The city council may grant a variance from the requirements of this article after determining that because of special circumstances applicable to the applicant, compliance with this article:

(A) Cannot be technically accomplished during the expected duration of the water supply shortage or other condition for which the article is in effect; or

(B) Will cause undue hardship on a program or service offered by a public entity; or

(C) Substantially threatens the applicant’s primary source of income.

(3) Additionally, the city council may grant a variance from the requirements of this article if it determines that the applicant can implement alternative water use restrictions which meet or exceed the intent of this article. The city council shall approve specific alternative water use restrictions.

of 12

(4) Any variance granted by the city council may be revoked after a determination by the city council that revocation is necessary for the public health and safety or upon a finding that the holder of a variance allowing alternative water use restrictions has not complied with such alternative restrictions.

Sec. 11.205 Implementation and Enforcement

(a) Implementation

(1) The water utilities director for the city will act as the administrator of the water conservation drought contingency plan. The administrator will oversee the execution and implementation of all elements of the program. He will be responsible for supervising the promulgation and retention of adequate records for program verification.

:

(2) The water conservation plan will be maintained for the duration of the city’s financial obligation to the state under the State Revolving Loan Fund program.

(b) Contracts With Other Political Subdivisions, Water Supply Corporations or Water Suppliers

(c)

: Any political subdivision, water supply corporation, or water supplier that contracts with the city for the purchase of water shall adopt applicable provisions of the city’s water conservation and drought contingency plan. Contracts for the sale of water that are already in effect will be revised to reflect the applicable provisions of the city’s most current water conservation and drought contingency plan when the contracts are renewed.

Enforcement

(1) Water service taps will not be provided to customers not meeting the plan requirements.

: The water conservation and drought contingency plan will be enforced in the following manner:

(2) The inclining block water rate structure should encourage retrofitting of old plumbing fixtures which use large quantities of water.

(3) Customers who do not pay their water bills will have service discontinued

(4) The building inspection department will not certify new construction which fails to meet the plan requirements.

(5) Persons violating the prohibitions of this article will be subject to prosecution in municipal court.

Sec. 11.206 Penalty

It shall be unlawful to violate any of the prohibitions contained in this article. Any person violating such prohibitions shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined in accordance with the general penalty provision found in Section 1.106 of this code.

of 12

Section 2. That the terms and provisions of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be severable in that if any portion of this Ordinance shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the other provisions of this Ordinance.

Section 3. This Ordinance shall be effective on the 1st

INTRODUCED on the ______ day of _______________, 2011, and finally PASSED,

APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the _____ day of _______________2011.

day of October, 2011, after publication as required by law.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS Alvin New, Mayor ATTEST: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO CONTENT APPROVED AS TO FORM Will Wilde, Director of Water Utilities Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

City of San Angelo Finance Department



From: Don Maynard, Budget Manager

Subject: Agenda Item for August 30, 2012 Council Meeting

Contact: Don Maynard, Budget Manager, 481-2757

Caption:

Regular Item

FIRST PUBLIC HEARING AND INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2011, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2012; ADOPTING EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SCHEDULES; PROVIDING FOR THE GENERAL APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER APPROPRIATIONS BUDGETED; RATIFYING TRANSFERS OF APPROPRIATIONS OCCURRING IN THE 2010-2011 FISCAL YEAR AND AMENDING THAT BUDGET ORDINANCE ACCORDINGLY; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE POWER, ONLY AS PERMITTED BY LAW, TO AMEND OR MAKE CHANGES IN THE BUDGET FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES; PROVIDING AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO MAKE CERTAIN ADJUSTMENTS FROM TIME TO TIME IN OR BETWEEN BUDGETED ALLOCATIONS; AND, PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE BUDGET

THIS BUDGET WILL RAISE LESS TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES THAN LAST YEAR’S BUDGET BY $163,572 (-0.60%), AND OF THAT AMOUNT, $530,877 IS TAX REVENUE TO BE RAISED FROM NEW PROPERTY ADDED TO THE ROLL THIS YEAR

This is the first public hearing and introduction of the budget ordinance for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011 and ending September 30, 2012.The ordinance appropriates funds for the 2011-2012 Fiscal Year (Exhibit A), and approves the Pay Schedule for all City employees (Exhibit B). It also determines and approves budget amendment authorizations for the City Council and the City Manager. Lastly, the ordinance authorizes the City Manager to apply for the grants listed in Exhibit C and execute any documents related to the grants, including agreements accepting those listed grants.

Summary:

History: Staff has discussed with Council during June, July, and August 2011 the budget, budget process, and proposed property tax rate of $0.7860/$100 valuation. City Council voted on $0.7975/$100 valuation, but gave direction to lower to $0.7860/$100 valuation if possible. The proposed budget is based on the $0.7860/$100 valuation.

Financial Impact

: See the attached budget ordinance and related exhibits.

Related Vision Item (if applicable)

: Financial Vision.


: Staff recommends approval of the budget ordinance as presented.

Attachments: Budget Ordinance and Exhibits A – C; Financial Summary for the 2011-2012 Budget

Presentation

: Yes

Publication: August 2, 2011 – Notice of Effective Tax Rate August 18, 2011 – Notice of Public Hearing on the City Budget informing the

citizens of the public hearings on August 30 and September 6, 2011. Reviewed by Service Area Director

: Michael Dane, Finance

2011 Property Tax Rates in CITY OF SAN ANGELOThis notice concerns the 2011 property tax rates for CITY OF SAN ANGELO. It presents information about three tax rates. Last year's tax rate is the actual tax rate the taxing unit used to determine property taxes last year. This year's effective tax rate would impose the same total taxes as last year if you compare properties taxed in both years. This year's rollback tax rate is the highest tax rate the taxing unit can set before taxpayers start rollback procedures. In each case these rates are found by dividing the total amount of taxes by the tax base (the total value of taxable property) with adjustments as required by state law. The rates are given per $100 of property value.

Last year's tax rate:

Last year's operating taxes $25,442,428

Last year's debt taxes $2,759,857

Last year's total taxes $28,202,285

Last year's tax base $3,449,820,795

Last year's total tax rate $0.81750/$100

This year's effective tax rate:

Last year's adjusted taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property)

$27,825,787

÷ This year's adjusted tax base (after subtracting value of new property)

$2,765,360,753

=This year's effective tax rate $1.00622/$100

This year's rollback tax rate:

Last year's adjusted operating taxes (after subtracting taxes on lost property and adjusting for any transferred function, tax increment financing, state criminal justice mandate, and/or enhanced indigent healthcare expenditures)

$25,076,300

÷ This year's adjusted tax base $2,765,360,753

=This year's effective operating rate $0.90680/$100

x 1.08=this year's maximum operating rate $0.97934/$100

+ This year's debt rate $0.07808/$100

= This year's total rollback rate $1.05742/$100

Statement of Increase/DecreaseIf CITY OF SAN ANGELO adopts a 2011 tax rate equal to the effective tax rate of $1.00622 per $100 of value, taxes would increase compared to 2010 taxes by $4,659,143.

Schedule A - Unencumbered Fund BalanceThe following estimated balances will be left in the unit's property tax accounts at the end of the fiscal year. These balances are not encumbered by a corresponding debt obligation. Type of Property Tax Fund Balance

Maintenance & Operating 4,566,864 Interest & Sinking 146,740

Schedule B - 2011 Debt ServiceThe unit plans to pay the following amounts for long-term debts that are secured by property taxes. These amounts will be paid from property tax revenues (or additional sales tax revenues, if applicable).

Description of DebtPrincipal or Contract Payment to be Paid from Property Taxes

Interest to be Paid from Property Taxes

Other Amounts to be Paid

Total Payment

2005 Tax/Rev C.O.

(19,750,000) Sales Tax 1,055,000 502,568 0 1,557,568

2006 Tax/Rev C.O.

(2,500,000) Landfill 275,000 66,256 0 341,256

2007 Tax/Rev C.O.

(6,970,000) 1,325,000 99,063 0 1,424,063

2008 Tax/Rev C.O.

(10,145,000) Sales Tax 100,000 448,325 0 548,325

2009 Tax/Rev C.O.

(14,600,000) 55,000 632,801 0 687,801

2009 Tax/Rev G.O.

Refunding (4,605,000) 825,000 82,338 0 907,338

2011A Tax/Rec C.O.

(13,780,000) 155,000 590,675 0 745,675

Total required for 2011 debt service $6,212,026

- Amount (if any) paid from Schedule A $0

- Amount (if any) paid from other resources $3,691,860

- Excess collections last year $20,934

= Total to be paid from taxes in 2011 $2,499,232

+ Amount added in anticipation that the unit will collect only 98.00% of its taxes in 2011

$51,005

= Total debt levy $2,550,237

This notice contains a summary of actual effective and rollback tax rates' calculations. You can inspect a copy of the full calculations at 2302 Pulliam St, San Angelo, TX 76905. Name of person preparing this notice: Bill Benson Title: Chief Appraiser Date Prepared: 07/27/2011

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2011, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30 2012; ADOPTING EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION SCHEDULES; PROVIDING FOR THE GENERAL APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER APPROPRIATIONS BUDGETED; RATIFYING TRANSFERS OF APPROPRIATIONS OCCURRING IN THE 2010-2011 FISCAL YEAR AND AMENDING THAT BUDGET ORDINANCE ACCORDINGLY; RESERVING UNTO THE CITY COUNCIL THE POWER, ONLY AS PERMITTED BY LAW, TO AMEND OR MAKE CHANGES IN THE BUDGET FOR MUNICIPAL PURPOSES; PROVIDING AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO MAKE CERTAIN ADJUSTMENTS FROM TIME TO TIME IN OR BETWEEN BUDGETED ALLOCATIONS; AND, PROVIDING FOR FILING OF THE BUDGET.

WHEREAS, a budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011, and ending September 30, 2012, has been proposed and submitted by the City Manager to the City Council as required by law; and, WHEREAS, the proposed budget has been filed with the City Clerk and has been posted on the website for the City of San Angelo, for inspection by any person for more than thirty (30) days immediately prior to the public hearing upon said budget; and, WHEREAS, proper notice of public hearing upon this budget has been posted and published in accordance with applicable law; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted the necessary public hearings as required by law; and, WHEREAS, after a full and final consideration of the financial condition and estimated revenues and proposed expenditures as set forth in the budget as filed and amended, it is the consensus of opinion that the budget as filed and amended should be approved. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS, that:

SECTION 1 The facts and matters set forth in the preamble of this Ordinance are bound to be true and correct.

SECTION 2 The budget as filed with the City Clerk and as amended by the City

Council, for the fiscal year October 1, 2011, to September 30, 2012, (hereinafter the “Budget”) is hereby approved and adopted. A copy of the Budget, as amended, approved, and adopted, is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof for all purposes.

SECTION 3 The Competitive Pay Plan Grade and Step Tables for Fire and Police Civil Service employees and the Salary Ranges for all other City employees set forth in the Budget are attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and made a part hereof for all purposes. Employee compensation schedules that are in accordance with the Competitive Pay Plan and Grade Step Tables for Fire and Police Civil Service employees and the Salary Ranges for all other City employees as set forth are hereby authorized.

SECTION 4 By virtue of the adoption of the Budget, there are hereby appropriated out

of available cash funds and out of the general and special revenues of the City that will be received in the treasury during the course of the 2011-2012 fiscal year, the amounts set forth in the Budget for the purposes therein stated.

SECTION 5 The City Council reserves the authority to transfer appropriations budgeted

from one account or activity to another within the objects covered by the Budget. All transfers of appropriations budgeted from one account or activity to another within the objects of the budget for the fiscal year 2010-2011, are hereby ratified and the Budget Ordinance for fiscal year 2010-2011, heretofore enacted by the City Council, be, and the same is hereby, amended to the extent of such transfers for all purposes.

SECTION 6 The expenditures of the City shall be made in accordance with the

financial summaries included within the Budget approved by this ordinance provided however: 1. The City Council may, from time to time and as permitted by law, amend

this ordinance to authorize changes that increase the total appropriation of any fund or otherwise make changes in the budget for municipal purposes.

2. The City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve changes that

move budgeted amounts between accounts within a fund. 3. The City Manager is authorized to implement a “vacancy rate” which

allows him to freeze budgeted payroll sums associated with unfilled positions.

4. The City Manager is authorized to approve budget amendments that reduce

the total amount of budgeted revenues and expenditures in a fund. Under this authorization the reduction in budgeted expenses must equal or exceed any reduction in budgeted revenues.

SECTION 7 Certain grants are identified in the Budget, and where possible estimated

revenues and expenditures are included as listed on Exhibit “C”, attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. The City Manager or his designee is hereby authorized to apply for those grants and execute any related documents.

SECTION 8 The City Clerk is hereby directed to provide a certified copy of this budget

ordinance and the Budget as amended, approved and adopted to the County Clerk of Tom Green County for recording after final passage hereof.

SECTION 9 Should any section, provision, clause, or word of this Ordinance be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be affected thereby.

INTRODUCED on the day of , 2011, and finally PASSED,

APPROVED and ADOPTED on this the day of , 2011.

CITY OF SAN ANGELO, TEXAS ATTEST: BY:

Alvin New, Mayor By: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Approved as to Content: Approved as to Form: Michael T. Dane, Finance Director Lysia H. Bowling, City Attorney

Exhibit A (1 of 2)

City of San AngeloConsolidated Statement of Funds

Schedule of Revenues and ExpendituresFiscal Year Beginning October 1, 2011

Fund Beginning Operating Transfers Amount Operating Transfers Total Rev Over/ EndingNo. Fund Name Balance Revenues In Available Expenditures Out Expenditures (Under) Exp Balance

101 General $4,566,864 $55,466,577 $820,000 $60,853,441 $52,274,327 $4,012,250 $56,286,577 $0 $4,566,864105 General Debt Service 146,740 2,794,330 2,105,894 5,046,964 4,900,224 0 4,900,224 0 146,740501 Equipment Replacement 23,500 52,000 1,201,373 1,276,873 1,253,373 0 1,253,373 0 23,500502 Capital Projects 55,773 2,072 1,670,954 1,728,799 1,673,026 0 1,673,026 0 55,773103 Intergovernmental 320,431 2,153,343 373,715 2,847,489 2,527,058 0 2,527,058 0 320,431106 TIRZ (797,357) 465,229 0 (332,128) 465,229 0 465,229 0 (797,357)453 Community Development Block Grant 0 850,827 0 850,827 850,827 0 850,827 0 0483 HOME Grant 0 468,019 0 468,019 468,019 0 468,019 0 0601 Designated Revenue (569) 5,600 0 5,031 5,600 0 5,600 0 (569)640 Lake Nasworthy Trust 10,250,010 637,000 0 10,887,010 50,000 76,500 126,500 510,500 10,760,510202 Golf Course (357,083) 0 75,000 (282,083) 75,000 0 75,000 0 (357,083)203 Texas Bank Sports Complex 91,450 113,000 427,651 632,101 540,651 0 540,651 0 91,450410 Civic Events (80,922) 1,841,400 0 1,760,478 1,841,400 0 1,841,400 0 (80,922)420 Fort Concho 42,542 529,750 301,431 873,723 831,181 0 831,181 0 42,542440 Fairmount Cemetery (191,241) 304,750 16,732 130,241 321,482 0 321,482 0 (191,241)201 State Office Building 75,277 1,189,800 0 1,265,077 1,106,214 0 1,106,214 83,586 158,863220 Airport Operating 407,409 1,380,503 0 1,787,912 1,380,503 0 1,380,503 0 407,409529 Airport PFC 574,314 203,481 0 777,795 0 203,481 203,481 0 574,314531 Airport Capital Projects 55,153 0 0 55,153 0 0 0 0 55,153230 Solid Waste Enterprise (2,442,233) 994,675 0 (1,447,558) 674,675 320,000 994,675 0 (2,442,233)240 Stormwater (147) 2,570,000 95,000 2,664,853 2,665,000 0 2,665,000 0 (147)260 Water Operating 1,473,921 23,359,296 208,290 25,041,507 23,567,586 0 23,567,586 0 1,473,921261 Water Debt Service 567,824 2,400 6,889,895 7,460,119 6,892,295 0 6,892,295 0 567,824510 Water Capital Projects 5,000 0 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 5,000512 Water / Supply Capital Projects 6,053 6,186,000 0 6,192,053 4,682,105 1,503,895 6,186,000 0 6,053270 Wastewater Operating 3,206,635 10,165,600 0 13,372,235 4,980,538 5,150,826 10,131,364 34,236 3,240,871271 Wastewater Debt Service 579,285 5,000 4,412,220 4,996,505 4,417,220 0 4,417,220 0 579,285520 Wastewater Capital Projects 1,025,216 1,706,000 0 2,731,216 1,249,280 456,720 1,706,000 0 1,025,216

Operating Totals $19,603,845 $113,446,652 $18,598,155 $151,648,652 $119,692,813 $11,723,672 $131,416,485 $628,322 $20,232,167

301 Vehicle Maintenance $113,365 $6,604,908 $0 $6,718,273 $6,604,908 $0 $6,604,908 $0 $113,365305 Communications 11,165 825,321 0 836,486 717,013 0 717,013 108,308 119,473310 City Health 321,061 8,049,213 0 8,370,274 8,046,921 0 8,046,921 2,292 323,353320 Property/Casualty 1,881,811 597,051 0 2,478,862 597,051 0 597,051 0 1,881,811330 Workers' Compensation 2,108,435 989,294 0 3,097,729 989,294 0 989,294 0 2,108,435

Total Internal Service Funds $4,435,837 $17,065,787 $0 $21,501,624 $16,955,187 $0 $16,955,187 $110,600 $4,546,437

Exhibit A (2 of 2)

Description ExplanationProposed2011-2012

Sale of CVCED 2006 Appraisal of $270,000 plus $20,000 improvements $290,000Income-Sales & Use Tax Sales Tax Receipts based on Finance Dept Estimate 6,664,251Interest on Investments Interest based on 5/31/11 Receipts 14,150Lease Income L-3 & CVCED 18,480

Total Revenue $6,986,881

Total Administration 41,203Dues and Subscriptions Memberships 1,985

Bank Charges First Financial Bank Service Charges, Fees Etc, 120Economic Development Investment Program Affiliations 81,353City Services ED Staff/Finance/Legal/City Clerk 315,162Industrial Park Ops & Maint 11,288Debt Service Principal & Interest 4,349,569Debt Service Reserve Contribution Reserve for adverse sales tax receipts 200,000Contract Services Contract services-outside legal 5,000Marketing/Advertising - Chamber Chamber Economic Development Contract 225,000Annual Report Design and printing of annual report 10,000Promotion/Awareness Building Business Retention & Expansion Program marketing materials 5,000Software Expense Newsletter & Website 3,280Project-Affordable Housing Pay-As-You-Go 335,000Project-Sports Facility Maint Pay-As-You-Go with Annually COL Adjustment of 2% 253,386Texas Bank Sports Complex Annual Appropriation 150,000Downtown San Angelo Downtown economic development services contract 75,000Annual CVCED Contract D&O Insurance, annual audit 5,000CVCED Expenses Costs associated with current CVCED building and function 14,233Economic Development Projects Incentives 905,302

Total Expenditures $6,986,881

Revenue Over/(Under) Expenditures $0

Estimated Balance of Existing Economic Development Projects $2,910,059

CITY OF SAN ANGELO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONSCHEDULE OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES

FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2011

Grade Min Mid Max

47 $120,536 $150,670 $180,80443 $99,165 $123,957 $148,74742 $94,443 $118,054 $141,66538 $77,699 $97,123 $116,54837 $73,999 $92,499 $110,99835 $67,119 $83,898 $100,67834 $63,923 $79,903 $95,88433 $60,879 $76,099 $91,31932 $57,980 $72,475 $86,96930 $52,589 $65,736 $78,88429 $50,085 $62,606 $75,12828 $49,131 $61,414 $73,69727 $45,428 $56,786 $68,14326 $44,563 $55,703 $66,84525 $42,441 $53,052 $63,66224 $40,420 $50,526 $60,63023 $38,496 $48,120 $57,74422 $36,663 $45,828 $54,99321 $33,899 $42,375 $50,84920 $32,285 $40,357 $48,42819 $31,670 $39,588 $47,50618 $29,283 $36,605 $43,92617 $27,889 $34,862 $41,83416 $26,561 $33,201 $39,84215 $26,056 $32,570 $39,08314 $24,815 $31,018 $37,22213 $23,633 $29,541 $35,45012 $22,508 $28,134 $33,76111 $21,435 $26,794 $32,15510 $19,821 $24,776 $29,7319 $19,443 $24,304 $29,1648 $18,517 $23,146 $27,7757 $17,635 $22,044 $26,4526 $16,796 $20,994 $25,1945 $15,996 $19,994 $23,9933 $14,509 $18,135 $21,763

Grade Min Mid Max

GR 30M $59,413 $63,173 $66,933GR 29M $51,969 $55,261 $58,553

GR 27M, GR 27A $35,871 $43,878 $51,885

Non-Civil Service Public Safety

City of San AngeloSalary Ranges

Effective 10-1-11

Exhibit B (1 of 2)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13GR 23 Recruit $34,466GR 26 Probationary PO $36,444GR 27 Police Officer $40,005 $40,577 $41,157 $41,745 $42,341 $42,946 $43,560 $44,182 $44,814 $45,454 $46,103 $46,762 $47,430GR 29 Sergeant $53,155 $53,959 $54,776 $55,604 $56,446 $57,300 $58,167 $59,047 $59,940GR 30 Lieutenant $61,139 $62,064 $63,004 $63,957 $64,925 $65,907 $66,904 $67,917 $68,944

14 15 16 17 18 19GR 27 Police Officer $48,108 $48,796 $49,493 $50,200 $50,917 $51,645

Effective 10/1/2011

City of San AngeloCivil Service Grade and Step Plan

Police Department

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11GR 24 Recruit $34,003GR 26 Probationary FF $34,907GR 27 FF II $36,013 $36,559 $37,092 $37,652 $38,185 $38,760 $39,320 $39,909 $40,525 $41,113GR 28 Driver $44,759 $45,446 $46,103 $46,790 $47,491 $48,191 $48,892 $49,636 $50,380 $51,123GR 29 Lieutenant $54,079 $54,889 $55,712 $56,546 $57,386 $58,236 $59,113 $59,990 $60,895 $61,812GR 30 Captain $61,907 $62,839 $63,769 $64,728 $65,700 $66,685 $67,683 $68,696GR 31 Battalion Chief $69,640 $70,679 $71,732 $72,798 $73,878 $74,998GR 32 Asst Chief $78,750 $79,924 $81,139 $82,353 $83,582 $84,837

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

GR 27 FF II $41,730 $42,346 $42,964 $43,608 $44,253 $44,896 $45,569 $46,257 $46,928 $47,629 $48,344GR 28 Driver $51,866 $52,653 $53,437

Effective 10/1/2011

City of San AngeloCivil Service Grade and Step Plan

Fire Department

Exhibit B (2 of 2)

City of San Angelo Budget Ordinance Exhibit C City Council authorized application for the following grants: Atmos Energy Grant Bureau of Justice Assistance Edward Byrne Memorial Local Justice Assistance Grant Community Development Block Grant Emergency Food and Shelter Program Grant Emergency Management Performance Grant Environmental Health Service and Bureau of Regional Local Health Operations Grant Federal Aviation Administration Grants - Entitlements and Discretionary HOME Grant Office of Justice Programs Bulletproof Vest Partnership Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant San Angelo Cultural Affairs Council Grant Senior Nutrition Grant Texas Department of Transportation Routine Airport Maintenance Program Texas Department of Transportation Click It or Ticket Grant Transit and Transportation Planning Grants - Federal and State Women, Infant, and Children Grant

Exhibit C

CITY OF SAN ANGELO

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING

This budget will raise less total property taxes than last year’s

budget by $163,572 (-0.60%), and of that amount $530,877* is tax

revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this

year.

*Note that $694,449 is a tax revenue decrease due to a reduction in the ad valorem property tax rate.

Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of San Angelo, Texas, will hold two public

hearings on the proposed City Budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2011, and ending

September 30, 2012. The hearings will take place during regularly scheduled City Council sessions

which will begin at 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, August 30, 2011, and September 6, 2011, at the McNease

Convention Center, South Meeting Room, 500 Rio Concho Drive.

The complete proposed budget may be examined on weekdays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. in

the office of the City Clerk on the first floor of the Municipal Center, 106 S. Chadbourne.

City of San Angelo

106 S. Chadbourne

San Angelo, Texas 76903

Attention: Don Maynard, Budget Manager

City of San Angelo, Texas

Financial Summary

October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012

City of San AngeloConsolidated Statement of Funds

Schedule of Revenues and ExpendituresFiscal Year Beginning October 1, 2011

Fund Beginning Operating Transfers Amount Operating Transfers Total Rev Over/ EndingNo. Fund Name Balance Revenues In Available Expenditures Out Expenditures (Under) Exp Balance

101 General $4,566,864 $55,466,577 $820,000 $60,853,441 $52,274,327 $4,012,250 $56,286,577 $0 $4,566,864105 General Debt Service 146,740 2,794,330 2,105,894 5,046,964 4,900,224 0 4,900,224 0 146,740501 Equipment Replacement 23,500 52,000 1,201,373 1,276,873 1,253,373 0 1,253,373 0 23,500502 Capital Projects 55,773 2,072 1,670,954 1,728,799 1,673,026 0 1,673,026 0 55,773103 Intergovernmental 320,431 2,153,343 373,715 2,847,489 2,527,058 0 2,527,058 0 320,431106 TIRZ (797,357) 465,229 0 (332,128) 465,229 0 465,229 0 (797,357)453 Community Development Block Grant 0 850,827 0 850,827 850,827 0 850,827 0 0483 HOME Grant 0 468,019 0 468,019 468,019 0 468,019 0 0601 Designated Revenue (569) 5,600 0 5,031 5,600 0 5,600 0 (569)640 Lake Nasworthy Trust 10,250,010 637,000 0 10,887,010 50,000 76,500 126,500 510,500 10,760,510202 Golf Course (357,083) 0 75,000 (282,083) 75,000 0 75,000 0 (357,083)203 Texas Bank Sports Complex 91,450 113,000 427,651 632,101 540,651 0 540,651 0 91,450410 Civic Events (80,922) 1,841,400 0 1,760,478 1,841,400 0 1,841,400 0 (80,922)420 Fort Concho 42,542 529,750 301,431 873,723 831,181 0 831,181 0 42,542440 Fairmount Cemetery (191,241) 304,750 16,732 130,241 321,482 0 321,482 0 (191,241)201 State Office Building 75,277 1,189,800 0 1,265,077 1,106,214 0 1,106,214 83,586 158,863220 Airport Operating 407,409 1,380,503 0 1,787,912 1,380,503 0 1,380,503 0 407,409529 Airport PFC 574,314 203,481 0 777,795 0 203,481 203,481 0 574,314531 Airport Capital Projects 55,153 0 0 55,153 0 0 0 0 55,153230 Solid Waste Enterprise (2,442,233) 994,675 0 (1,447,558) 674,675 320,000 994,675 0 (2,442,233)240 Stormwater (147) 2,570,000 95,000 2,664,853 2,665,000 0 2,665,000 0 (147)260 Water Operating 1,473,921 23,359,296 208,290 25,041,507 23,567,586 0 23,567,586 0 1,473,921261 Water Debt Service 567,824 2,400 6,889,895 7,460,119 6,892,295 0 6,892,295 0 567,824510 Water Capital Projects 5,000 0 0 5,000 0 0 0 0 5,000512 Water / Supply Capital Projects 6,053 6,186,000 0 6,192,053 4,682,105 1,503,895 6,186,000 0 6,053270 Wastewater Operating 3,206,635 10,165,600 0 13,372,235 4,980,538 5,150,826 10,131,364 34,236 3,240,871271 Wastewater Debt Service 579,285 5,000 4,412,220 4,996,505 4,417,220 0 4,417,220 0 579,285520 Wastewater Capital Projects 1,025,216 1,706,000 0 2,731,216 1,249,280 456,720 1,706,000 0 1,025,216

Operating Totals $19,603,845 $113,446,652 $18,598,155 $151,648,652 $119,692,813 $11,723,672 $131,416,485 $628,322 $20,232,167

301 Vehicle Maintenance $113,365 $6,604,908 $0 $6,718,273 $6,604,908 $0 $6,604,908 $0 $113,365305 Communications 11,165 825,321 0 836,486 717,013 0 717,013 108,308 119,473310 City Health 321,061 8,049,213 0 8,370,274 8,046,921 0 8,046,921 2,292 323,353320 Property/Casualty 1,881,811 597,051 0 2,478,862 597,051 0 597,051 0 1,881,811330 Workers' Compensation 2,108,435 989,294 0 3,097,729 989,294 0 989,294 0 2,108,435

Total Internal Service Funds $4,435,837 $17,065,787 $0 $21,501,624 $16,955,187 $0 $16,955,187 $110,600 $4,546,437

Other GrandFunds Total

Funding Sources

Property Taxes 25,195,798 465,229 2,786,446 28,447,473Other Taxes 19,817,974 1,390,000 21,207,974Licenses and Permits 643,584 643,584Grants 3,134,711 300,000 3,434,711Charges for Services 5,850,859 337,478 1,336,750 539,000 47,088,824 17,046,391 72,199,302Fines & Forfeitures 3,289,925 3,289,925Interest & Miscellaneous 482,401 5,600 2,150 98,000 15,284 366,531 19,396 989,362Other Financing Sources 3,932,435 373,715 880,814 13,408,009 303,290 18,898,263

Total Revenues & Other 59,212,976 4,316,733 3,609,714 637,000 16,209,739 48,058,645 17,065,787 149,110,594 Financing Sources

Beginning Fund Balances 1,846,821 (477,495) (138,171) 10,250,010 146,740 7,975,940 4,435,837 24,039,682

Total Available Resources 61,059,797 3,839,238 3,471,543 10,887,010 16,356,479 56,034,585 21,501,624 173,150,276

Expenditures

General Government 4,668,940 151,872 1,583,984 6,404,796Human Resources & Risk Mgt. 478,980 9,633,266 10,112,246Administrative Svcs. 2,258,886 717,013 2,975,899Community & Eco. Develop. 2,617,657 720,729 3,338,386Neighborhood & Family Svcs. 400,094 2,438,322 2,838,416Police & Fire 29,265,602 5,600 29,271,202Operations 7,281,978 6,604,908 13,886,886Parks & Rec 3,649,716 435,743 3,534,714 680,802 8,300,975Health 924,217 564,467 1,488,684Water & Wastewater 126,500 41,590,950 41,717,450Stormwater 2,665,000 2,665,000Debt Service 16,204,739 425,412 16,630,151Other 8,736,581 5,000 8,741,581

Total Expenditures 60,282,651 4,316,733 3,534,714 126,500 16,209,739 46,946,148 16,955,187 148,371,672

Ending Fund Balances 777,146 (477,495) (63,171) 10,760,510 146,740 9,088,437 4,546,437 24,778,604

Total Fund Commitments & Fund Balances 61,059,797 3,839,238 3,471,543 10,887,010 16,356,479 56,034,585 21,501,624 173,150,276

CITY OF SAN ANGELOBUDGET SUMMARY BY FUND TYPE

FY 2011-2012

General Fund*

Special Revenue

Debt Service

Enterprise Fund

Internal Service

Expendable Trust

Increase

FY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11

Category Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

101 REVENUES:

Taxes Property Tax 24,247,972 25,393,541 25,195,798 ($197,743)

Sales Tax 14,002,075 12,552,401 13,635,690 1,083,289

Franchise Tax 4,947,607 5,161,627 6,182,284 1,020,657

Total Taxes 43,197,654 43,107,569 45,013,772 1,906,203

Licenses and Licenses 22,265 40,000 35,330 (4,670)

Permits Permits 567,933 727,664 608,254 (119,410)

Total Permits

and Fees 590,198 767,664 643,584 (124,080)

Charges for Ambulance 2,288,799 2,155,000 2,260,000 105,000

Services Recreation 536,631 549,617 670,735 121,118

River Stage 0 0 0 0

Animal Control 99,406 186,375 142,074 (44,301)

Public Safety 584,048 518,120 509,295 (8,825)

Other 1,568,466 2,393,053 2,268,755 (124,298)

Total Charges for Service 5,077,350 5,802,165 5,850,859 48,694

Fines and Municipal Court 3,231,844 2,994,150 3,289,925 295,775

Forfeitures

Interest and Interest 4,977 70,000 40,000 (30,000)

Miscellaneous Miscellaneous 253,769 446,990 390,401 (56,589)

Total Interest and

Miscellaneous 258,746 516,990 430,401 (86,589)

Transfers In 888,167 4,629,804 820,000 (3,809,804)

Administrative Charges 163,975 238,036 238,036 0

Total General Fund Revenues 53,407,934 58,056,378 56,286,577 2,040,003

City of San Angelo

General Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenditures

Franchise Tax

Fines & Forfeitures

Transfers In

Licenses & Permits

Interest & Misc.

Admin. Charges

City of San AngeloGeneral Fund RevenuesFiscal Year 2011‐2012

Graph Description:The property tax is the largest revenue source for the City of San Angelo. Property, sales and franchise taxesaccount for almost 80% of the General Fund's revenue. All other revenue sources combined total approximately 20% of General Fund Revenue.

0 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 25,000,000 30,000,000

Property Tax

Sales Tax

Charges for Service

Increase




101 EXPENDITURES:

General City Council 119,564 121,743 121,543 ($200)

Government City Manager 822,374 606,464 617,388 10,924

Legal 724,242 579,036 596,545 17,509

City Clerk 255,983 215,433 221,479 6,046

Public Information 150,927 146,113 149,540 3,427

Municipal Court 2,170,575 2,762,974 2,244,783 (518,191)

Construction Management 65,610 246,366 133,213 (113,153)

Facilities Maintenance 262,296 557,043 584,449 27,406

Total General

Government 4,571,571 5,235,172 4,668,940 (566,232)

Human Resources Human Resources 355,491 378,025 364,785 (13,240)

& Risk Mgt. Youth Employment 19,032 0 0 0

Crossing Guards 117,223 114,195 114,195 0

Total Human Resources

& Risk Mgt. 491,746 492,220 478,980 (13,240)

Administrative Finance 403,419 408,016 473,348 65,332

Services Accounting 475,533 465,470 478,414 12,944

Billing & Receipts 0 551,379 559,098 7,719

Information Technology 602,841 608,564 551,471 (57,093)

Purchasing 149,103 169,856 174,814 4,958

Property Management 16,453 31,741 21,741 (10,000)

Total Administrative

Services 1,647,349 2,235,026 2,258,886 23,860

Community & Development Corporation 0 180,581 139,362 (41,219)

Economic Develop. Administration 233,506 201,145 130,993 (70,152)

Engineering 524,973 486,672 509,678 23,006

Planning 283,845 269,446 259,600 (9,846)

GIS 189,423 193,962 237,163 43,201

Permits & Inspections 690,812 698,539 717,641 19,102

Fire Marshal 622,043 629,771 623,220 (6,551)

Total Community &

Economic Develop. 2,544,602 2,660,116 2,617,657 (42,459)

Neighborhood & Code Compliance 319,029 373,817 400,094 26,277

Family Services

Total Neighborhood & Family Svcs 319,029 373,817 400,094 26,277

City of San Angelo

General Fund


Increase




Health Services Health Administration 80,339 57,006 110,506 53,500

Animal Services 760,197 730,088 758,288 28,200

Social Service Contribution 55,423 55,423 55,423 0

Total Health Services 895,959 842,517 924,217 81,700

Police Police 14,681,579 14,362,951 14,639,314 276,363

DARE Program 8,501 0 0 0

Traffic Safety 263,869 206,516 209,184 2,668

DWI Step 36,154 38,722 39,222 500

Public Safety Communications 1,248,059 1,219,255 1,233,522 14,267

Total Police 16,238,162 15,827,444 16,121,242 293,798

Fire Fire/Ambulance 13,495,994 12,678,381 13,144,360 465,979

Total Fire 13,495,994 12,678,381 13,144,360 465,979

Operations Operations Admin 385,190 318,520 328,186 9,666Signal System 743,576 785,542 801,584 16,042Street and Bridge 2,279,063 2,355,687 2,365,678 9,991Street Lighting 978,512 1,118,829 1,118,829 68,912

Total Operations 4,386,341 4,578,578 4,614,277 35,699

Parks & Rec Parks 2,381,936 2,422,800 2,473,738 50,938Water Lily Garden 97,180 86,100 86,100 0Recreation 1,127,601 950,572 1,014,878 64,306

Total Parks & Rec 3,606,717 3,459,472 3,574,716 115,244

Other Non-Departmental 2,892,667 3,304,557 3,470,958 166,401

Transfers Out 2,331,511 2,970,077 4,012,250 1,042,173

Total Other 5,224,178 6,274,634 7,483,208 1,208,574

Total General Fund Expenditures $53,421,648 $54,657,377 $56,286,577 $1,629,200

Increase/(Decrease) in Fund Balance (13,714) 3,399,001 0 ($3,399,001)

Beginning Fund Balance 1,181,577 1,167,863 4,566,864 3,399,001

Ending Fund Balance $1,167,863 $4,566,864 $4,566,864 $0

City of San Angelo

General Fund


General Government8%

Human Resources & Risk Mgt.1%

Administrative Services4%

Health Services 2%

Neighborhood & Family Svcs.1%

Parks & Recreation6%

Operations8%

Parks & Rec.6%

Other13%

City of San AngeloGeneral Fund

Expenditures by DepartmentFiscal Year 2011‐2012

Graph Description:The graph above shows the City's commitment to provide a safe environment for its citizens by devoting 52% of authorized expenditures for the use of public safety.

Police29%

Fire23%

Operations & Maintenance

19%

Transfers Out7%

CITY OF SAN ANGELOGeneral Fund Expenditures by Category

Fiscal Year 2011‐2012

Graph Description:The single largest General Fund expense for the City of San Angelo is personnel. This category consists of salaryand benefits for employees. Operations & maintenance and transfers account for just over one quarter of GeneralFund expenses.

Personnel 74%

IncreaseFY11 FY12 (Decrease)

FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current105 REVENUES:

Current Taxes 3,178,833 2,683,815 2,744,330 $60,515Delinquent Taxes 54,396 35,000 42,116 7,116Transfers In 2,037,475 2,035,713 2,105,894 70,181Interest 3,420 6,000 7,884 1,884

Total Revenues $5,274,124 $4,760,528 $4,900,224 $139,696

105 EXPENSES:

Principal on Debt 3,616,500 2,849,178 2,948,543 99,365Interest on Debt 2,146,582 1,867,832 1,946,681 78,849Issue Costs 9,350 5,000 5,000 0

Total Expenditures $5,772,432 $4,722,010 $4,900,224 $178,214

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses (498,308) 38,518 0 (38,518)

Beginning Fund Balance 606,530 108,222 146,740 38,518

Ending Fund Balance $108,222 $146,740 $146,740 $0

City of San AngeloGeneral Debt Service Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expense


FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Descriptions Actual Budget Budget Current

501 REVENUES:

Transfers In 814,144 1,218,857 1,201,373 (17,484)Sale of Fixed Assets 39,939 50,000 50,000 $0Other 11,276 3,790 2,000 (1,790)

Total Revenue $865,359 $1,272,647 $1,253,373 ($19,274)

501 EXPENDITURES:

Vehciles & Equipment 1,314,257 1,281,813 1,253,373 (28,440)

Total Expenditures $1,314,257 $1,281,813 $1,253,373 ($28,440)

Excess of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (448,898) (9,166) 0 9,166

Beginning Fund Balance 481,564 32,666 23,500 (9,166)


City of San AngeloGeneral Fund Equipment Replacement




502 REVENUES:

Transfers In 525,000 620,954 1,670,954 $1,050,000Other Revenue 75,615 906,756 2,072 (904,684)

Total Revenue $600,615 $1,527,710 $1,673,026 $145,316

502 EXPENDITURES

City Hall Plaza Rehabilitation 102,838 874,778 0 ($874,778)Street Improvements 241 254,554 1,673,026 1,418,472Aquatics Facility 0 500,000 0 (500,000)Police Facility 0 120,000 0 (120,000)Fire Machinery 0 250,000 0 (250,000)

Total Expenditures $103,079 $1,999,332 $1,673,026 ($326,306)

Excess of Revenues over (under) Expenditures 497,536 (471,622) 0 471,622



City of San AngeloGeneral Fund Capital Projects



FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Actual Budget Budget Current

103 REVENUES: Health Department Revenue 177,380 157,000 166,000 9,000Health Department Grants 1,661,448 2,372,283 1,249,160 (1,123,123)Transportation Grant 208,708 553,500 255,500 (298,000)Nutrition Program Revenue 184,563 201,534 171,478 (30,056)Police Grants 266,219 61,300 0 (61,300)Parks Grants and Donations 238,785 899,871 175,000 (724,871)Planning Grants and Donations 1,124,922 46,827 0 (46,827)Emergency Management Grant 181,175 108,205 136,205 28,000Historical Commission 0 20,000 0 (20,000)Fire Prevention Grant 2,500 0 0 0Interest 1,569 0 0 0Transfers In 757,211 380,987 373,715 (7,272)

Total Revenue 4,804,480 4,801,507 2,527,058 (2,274,449)

103 EXPENDITURES:

Nursing 298,754 305,872 296,051 (9,821)Environmental Health Services 40,595 52,790 48,430 (4,360)RLSS/LPHS 139,897 142,658 119,443 (23,215)Bioterrorism 53,195 171,514 100,543 (70,971)WIC 938,857 1,652,016 970,772 (681,244)Social Services 776,958 474,274 148,704 (325,570)Transportation Planning Grant 210,394 553,500 255,500 (298,000)Nutrition 259,892 289,223 260,743 (28,480)Police Grants 261,083 63,355 0 (63,355)Parks 343,015 798,058 175,000 (623,058)Down-town Façade 1,121,210 50,539 0 (50,539)Emergency Management 196,662 245,357 151,872 (93,485)Historical Grant 48,129 18,992 0 (18,992)Fire Prevention 385 2,114 0 (2,114)Transfers Out 0 254,202 0 (254,202)

Total Expenditures 4,689,026 5,074,464 2,527,058 (1,432,225)

Excess /(Deficiency) of Revenue over Expenses 115,454 (272,957) 0 $272,957



City of San AngeloIntergovernmental Fund




104 REVENUES:

Interest 153 0 0 0

Total Revenue $153 $0 $0 $0

104 EXPENDITURES

Capital Outlay 28,446 0 0 0

Total Expenditures $28,446 $0 $0 $0

Excess of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (28,293) 0 0 0

Beginning Fund Balance 28,293 0 0 0

Ending Fund Balance $0 $0 $0 $0

City of San AngeloNarcotics Awarded Forfeitures



FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current106 REVENUES:

Downtown Property Tax 110,459 22,276 134,085 $111,809North Property Tax 348,342 313,608 331,144Interest 4,695 0 0 0

Total Revenues $463,496 $335,884 $465,229 $129,345

106 EXPENSES:

Downtown Projects 3,110 174,576 134,085North Projects 48,378 1,111,308 331,144 (780,164)

Total Expenditures $51,488 $1,285,884 $465,229 ($820,655)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 412,008 (950,000) 0 950,000

Beginning Fund Balance (259,365) 152,643 (797,357) (950,000)

Ending Fund Balance $152,643 ($797,357) ($797,357) $0

City of San AngeloTIRZ FUND



Current Proposed from FY11Description Budget Budget Current

453 REVENUES:

Grant Income 1,068,247 808,977 ($259,270)Rehab Loans 46,500 41,850 (4,650)Transfers In 60,000 0 (60,000)

Total Revenues $1,174,747 $850,827 ($323,920)

453 EXPENDITURES:

Administration 337,433 335,462 ($1,971)Debt Service 40,000 175,000 135,000Public Service Projects 299,000 104,000 (195,000)Rehab Grants and Loans 438,314 236,365 (201,949)

Total Expenditures $1,114,747 $850,827 ($263,920)

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures 60,000 0 (60,000)

Beginning Fund Balance 0 0 0

Ending Fund Balance $0 $0 $0

City of San AngeloCommunity Development Block Grant



Current Proposed from FY11Description Budget Budget Current

483 REVENUES:

Grant Income 580,872 402,019 ($178,853)Rent 34,000 34,000 0Loan Payments 25,000 22,000 (3,000)Miscellaneous 0 10,000 10,000

Total Revenues $639,872 $468,019 ($171,853)

483 EXPENDITURES:

Administration 71,958 76,401 $4,443Galilee CDC 120,000 75,000 (45,000)MHMR Contribution 58,699 58,000 (699)Tenant-Based Rental Assistance 10,215 0 (10,215)Homebuyers Assistance 90,000 93,000 3,000Neighborhood Revitalization 155,000 155,618 618Low Income Housing Tax Credits 124,000 0 (124,000)Duplex Maintenance 10,000 10,000 0

Total Expenditures $639,872 $468,019 ($171,853)

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures 0 0 0

Beginning Balance 0 0 0

Ending Balance $0 $0 $0

City of San AngeloHOME Program




601 REVENUES:

Police Donations 6,079 7,100 5,600 (1,500)Parks Donations 7,202 227,750 0 (227,750)Recreation Donations 3,412 900 0 (900)Other Donations 9,862 33,000 0 (33,000)Interest 1,165 0 0 0

Total Revenue $27,720 $268,750 $5,600 ($263,150)

601 EXPENDITURES

Police Projects 13,292 78,212 5,600 (72,612)Parks Projects 7,614 262,754 0 (262,754)Recreation Projects 4,775 16,606 0 (16,606)Other 26,952 84,869 0 (84,869)

Total Expenditures $52,633 $442,441 $5,600 ($436,841)

Excess of Revenues over (under) Expenditures (24,913) (173,691) 0 173,691

Beginning Fund Balance 198,035 173,122 (569) (173,691)

Ending Fund Balance $173,122 ($569) ($569) $0

City of San AngeloDesignated Revenue Fund



FY10 Current Proposed from FY11Description Actual Budget Budget Current

640 REVENUES:

Lot Sales 198,880 515,000 520,000 5,000Lake Lease Income 19,558 33,000 19,000 ($14,000)Interest 89,976 85,000 98,000 13,000

Total Revenues $308,414 $633,000 $637,000 $4,000

640 EXPENDITURES:

Professional Services 9,254 50,000 50,000 $0Transfers Out 76,500 76,500 76,500 0

Total Expenditures $85,754 $126,500 $126,500 $0

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures 222,660 506,500 510,500 4,000

Beginning Fund Balance 9,520,850 9,743,510 10,250,010 506,500

Ending Fund Balance $9,743,510 $10,250,010 $10,760,510 $510,500

City of San AngeloLake Nasworthy Trust




202 REVENUES:

Golf Fees 51,845 0 0 $0General Fund Transfer 20,000 75,000 75,000 0

Total Revenues $71,845 $75,000 $75,000 $0

202 EXPENDITURES:

Personnel 98,889 0 0 $0Operating Expense 57,679 75,000 75,000 0

Total Expenditures $156,568 $75,000 $75,000 $0

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures (84,723) 0 0 0

Beginning Fund Balance (272,360) (357,083) (357,083) 0

Ending Fund Balance ($357,083) ($357,083) ($357,083) $0

City of San AngeloGolf Course Fund




203 REVENUES:

Program Fees 106,838 118,500 103,000 ($15,500)Transfers In 450,000 470,000 427,651 (42,349)Other Revenue 21,820 7,000 10,000 3,000

Total Revenues $578,658 $595,500 $540,651 ($54,849)

203 EXPENSES:

Facilities Maintenance 443,740 496,800 445,371 ($51,429)Sports Programs 69,084 96,200 95,280 (920)

Total Expenses $512,824 $593,000 $540,651 ($52,349)

Excess/(Deficiency) of

Revenues over Expenses 65,834 2,500 0 (2,500)



City of San AngeloTexas Bank Sports Complex Fund

Schedule of Revenues and Expenses



410 REVENUES:

Hotel/Motel Tax 1,420,333 1,411,058 1,390,000 ($21,058)Coliseum Revenue 197,138 228,300 221,000 (7,300)Auditorium Revenue 31,924 0 0 0Convention Center Revenue 149,940 134,200 156,000 21,800River Stage Revenue 13,022 30,500 13,000 (17,500)Pavilion Revenue 4,704 6,500 6,000 (500)Pecan Creek Revenue 5,025 3,500 10,400 6,900Other 42,563 42,000 45,000 3,000

Total Revenues $1,864,649 $1,856,058 $1,841,400 ($14,658)

410 EXPENDITURES:

Coliseum 189,328 203,836 202,650 ($1,186)Auditorium 22,158 0 0 0Convention Center 116,686 123,737 124,740 1,003River Stage 7,090 6,800 7,000 200Pavilion 1,360 1,500 1,000 (500)Administration 1,497,982 1,453,313 1,506,010 52,697Capital 42,552 0 0 0

Total Expenditures $1,877,156 $1,789,186 $1,841,400 $52,214

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures (12,507) 66,872 0 (66,872)

Beginning Fund Balance (135,287) (147,794) (80,922) 66,872


City of San AngeloCivic Events Fund




420 REVENUES:

Sales & Donations 481,023 505,712 527,600 $21,888Transfers In 311,756 292,547 301,431 8,884Other 3,724 1,150 2,150 1,000

Total Revenues $796,503 $799,409 $831,181 $31,772

420 EXPENDITURES:

Personnel 564,578 554,831 575,952 $21,121Supplies and Maintenance 245,967 235,872 254,229 18,357Capital Outlay 0 1,000 1,000 0

Total Expenditures $810,545 $791,703 $831,181 $39,478




City of San AngeloFort Concho




440 REVENUES:

Charges for Service 239,932 255,150 254,750 ($400)Trust Income 43,278 50,000 50,000 0Transfers In 56,500 16,732 16,732 0Other Revenue (881) 0 0 0

Total Revenues $338,829 $321,882 $321,482 ($400)

440 EXPENDITURES:

Personnel 233,402 220,360 221,392 $1,032Operating Expense 90,988 101,522 100,090 (1,432)Capital 10,843 0 0

Total Expenditures $335,233 $321,882 $321,482 ($400)

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures 3,596 0 0 0

Beginning Fund Balance (194,837) (191,241) (191,241) 0


City of San AngeloFairmount Cemetery




201 REVENUES:

Rental Income 1,159,996 1,175,762 1,182,800 $7,038Other Revenue 4,496 10,000 7,000 (3,000)

Total Revenues $1,164,492 $1,185,762 $1,189,800 $4,038

201 EXPENDITURES:

Personnel 110,616 99,789 105,208 $5,419Operating 573,625 1,205,616 575,594 (630,022)Debt Principal 483,500 345,822 345,822 0Debt Interest 142,701 78,590 78,590 0Issue costs 589 1,000 1,000 0

Total Expenditures $1,311,031 $1,730,817 $1,106,214 ($624,603)

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures (146,539) (545,055) 83,586 628,641


Ending Fund Balance $620,332 $75,277 $158,863 $83,586

City of San AngeloState Office Building




220 REVENUES:

Leases/Rentals 1,120,008 1,127,736 1,073,076 (54,660)Concessions 140,565 286,000 242,950 (43,050)Landing Fees 45,013 41,400 31,977 (9,423)Advertising 22,265 20,000 25,000 5,000Interest 3,216 1,500 3,000 1,500Other Income 5,373 8,206 4,500 (3,706)

Total Revenues $1,336,440 $1,484,842 $1,380,503 ($104,339)

220 EXPENSES:

Personnel 682,706 724,444 677,314 (47,130)Operations 675,196 748,538 635,489 (113,049)Capital Outlay 34,352 63,022 67,700 4,678Transfers Out 50,000 0 0 0

Total Expenses $1,442,254 $1,536,004 $1,380,503 ($155,501)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses (105,814) (51,162) 0 51,162



City of San AngeloAirport Operating Fund




529 REVENUES:

Passenger Facility Charges 229,434 328,284 201,450 (126,834)Interest 3,570 4,000 2,031 (1,969)

Total Revenues $233,004 $332,284 $203,481 ($128,803)

529 EXPENSES:

Transfer to Capital Fund 213,823 332,284 203,481 (128,803)

Total Expenses $213,823 $332,284 $203,481 ($128,803)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 19,181 0 0 0

Beginning Fund Balance 555,133 574,314 574,314 0


City of San AngeloAirport PFC Fund




531 REVENUES:

Transfers In 50,000 0 0 0Other 146 0 0 0

Total Revenues $50,146 $0 $0 $0

531 EXPENSES:

Capital Outlay 42,374 0 0 0

Total Expenses $42,374 $0 $0 $0

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 7,772 0 0 0



City of San AngeloAirport Capital Fund




230 REVENUES:

Landfill Fees 777,659 850,000 850,000 0Leases 77,128 83,698 91,675 7,977Other 42,863 50,000 50,000 0Transfers In 0 344,082 0 (344,082)Interest 4,714 6,000 3,000 (3,000)

Total Revenues $902,364 $1,333,780 $994,675 ($339,105)

230 EXPENDITURES:

Maintenance and Utilities 175,674 191,500 171,500 (20,000)Inspection Fee 162,837 180,000 180,000 0Professional Services 383,765 546,400 322,175 (224,225)Capital 1,145 6,000 1,000 (5,000)Misc 10,000 0 0 0Debt Service 0 344,082 0 (344,082)Transfers Out 320,000 65,798 320,000 254,202

Total Expenditures $1,053,421 $1,333,780 $994,675 ($339,105)

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures (151,057) 0 0 0

Beginning Fund Balance (2,291,176) (2,442,233) (2,442,233) 0

Ending Fund Balance ($2,442,233) ($2,442,233) ($2,442,233) $0

City of San AngeloSolid Waste Enterprise Fund




240 REVENUES:

Stormwater Fee 1,642,192 2,564,268 2,570,000 5,732Transfers In 0 95,000 95,000 0Other 8,657 0 0 0

Total Revenues $1,650,849 $2,659,268 $2,665,000 $5,732

240 EXPENSES:

Personnel 746,398 890,009 992,338 102,329Operations 408,156 581,151 494,972 (86,179)Capital 528,855 1,092,446 1,177,690 85,244

Total Expenses $1,683,409 $2,563,606 $2,665,000 $101,394

Excess/(Deficiency) of

Revenues over Expenses (32,560) 95,662 0 (95,662)

Beginning Fund Balance 0 (95,809) (147) 95,662

Ending Fund Balance ($95,809) ($147) ($147) $0

City of San AngeloStormwater Fund




260 REVENUES:

Water Sales 11,967,192 12,945,000 20,376,000 $7,431,000Lake Use Revenues 309,508 376,476 390,296 13,820Billing and Collection 1,995,869 1,640,500 1,820,000 179,500Paving Cuts 23,306 15,000 17,500 2,500Taps and Connections 417,064 459,000 451,000 (8,000)Other Operating Revenue 113,596 41,500 71,500 30,000Aid to Construction 2,150 3,000 3,000 0Misc 187,593 0 200,000 200,000Transfers In 368,285 206,390 208,290 1,900Interest 17,434 50,000 30,000 (20,000)

Total Revenues $15,401,997 $15,736,866 $23,567,586 $7,830,720

260 EXPENSES:

Administration 3,946,079 4,360,258 5,358,118 997,860Supply 4,322,096 4,224,558 5,959,630 1,735,072Treatment 2,030,533 2,501,672 2,290,254 (211,418)Distribution 3,579,728 3,883,969 3,940,196 56,227Capital 1,427,077 1,116,717 633,388 (483,329)Transfers Out 0 0 5,386,000 5,386,000

Total Expenses $15,305,513 $16,087,174 $23,567,586 $7,480,412

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 96,484 (350,308) 0 350,308

Beginning Fund Balance 1,727,745 1,824,229 1,473,921 (350,308)


City of San AngeloWater Enterprise Fund


Water Sales86.5%

Lake Use Revenues1.7%

Billing and Collection7.7%

Taps and Connections1.9%

Other2.3%

CITY OF SAN ANGELOWater Enterprise Fund

FY 2011‐2012 Revenues by Source

CITY OF SAN ANGELO

Administration23%

Supply25%

Treatment10%

Distribution17%

Capital14%

Transfers Out23%

Water Enterprise FundFY 2011‐2012 Expenditures by Category



261 REVENUES:

Transfer in from Water 1,462,000 1,489,000 6,889,895 5,400,895Interest 3,039 3,420 2,400 (1,020)

Total Revenues $1,465,039 $1,492,420 $6,892,295 $5,399,875

261 EXPENDITURES:

Debt Service 1,474,157 1,492,417 6,892,295 5,399,878

Total Expenses $1,474,157 $1,492,417 $6,892,295 $5,399,878

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses (9,118) 3 0 (3)



City of San AngeloWater Debt Service Fund




510 REVENUES:

Interest 980 5,000 0 (5,000)

Total Revenues $980 5,000 0 (5,000)

510 EXPENDITURES:Planning and Other 0 0 0 0Capital Improvements 162,909 0 0 0System Maintenance 0 0 0 0Transfer Out 23,895 0 0 0

Total Expenses $186,804 0 0 0


Beginning Fund Balance 185,824 0 5,000 5,000

Ending Fund Balance $0 $5,000 $5,000 $0

City of San AngeloWater Capital Projects Fund




512 REVENUES:

Water Sales 5,463,187 5,851,000 5,851,000 0Grant Revenue 0 0 300,000 300,000Interest 31,826 50,000 35,000 (15,000)

Total Revenues $5,495,013 5,901,000 6,186,000 285,000

512 EXPENDITURES:

Capital Improvements 2,731,431 9,943,380 4,448,065 (5,495,315)Franchise Fee 218,528 234,040 234,040 0Transfers Out 1,462,000 1,489,000 1,503,895 14,895

Total Expenses $4,411,959 11,666,420 6,186,000 (5,480,420)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 1,083,054 (5,765,420) 0 5,765,420

Beginning Fund Balance 4,688,419 5,771,473 6,053 (5,765,420)

Ending Fund Balance $5,771,473 $6,053 $6,053 $0

City of San AngeloWater Supply Capital Projects




270 REVENUES:

Wastewater Charges 9,947,388 9,890,000 9,890,000 $0Farm Use Revenues 200,471 189,600 193,600 4,000Connections 17,825 15,000 15,000 0Paving Cuts 28,642 15,000 23,000 8,000Non-Refundable Aid 2,380 1,000 2,000 1,000Miscellaneous (25,746) 4,000 27,000 23,000Interest 6,311 20,000 15,000 (5,000)

Total Revenues $10,177,271 $10,134,600 $10,165,600 $31,000

270 EXPENSES:

Wastewater Treatment 2,428,292 2,830,118 2,829,210 (908)Wastewater Collection 1,042,408 1,265,965 1,326,328 60,363Administration 479,557 456,238 685,000 228,762Capital 314,839 306,549 140,000 (166,549)Transfers Out 4,156,823 5,274,076 5,150,826 (123,250)

Total Expenses $8,421,919 $10,132,946 $10,131,364 ($1,582)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 1,755,352 1,654 34,236 32,582


Ending Fund Balance $3,204,981 $3,206,635 $3,240,871 $34,236

City of San AngeloWastewater Enterprise Fund


Sewer Fees97%

Other3%

CITY OF SAN ANGELOWastewater Revenue by Source

FY 2011‐2012

Collection

CITY OF SAN ANGELOWastewater Expenses by Category

FY 2011‐2012Collection

13%

Treatment28%

Administration7%

Capital1%

Transfers Out51%



271 REVENUES:

Transfers In 3,899,593 4,399,320 4,412,220 12,900Interest 6,569 10,470 5,000 ($5,470)

Total Revenues $3,906,162 $4,409,790 $4,417,220 $7,430

271 EXPENDITURES:

Debt Service 4,403,034 4,400,020 4,417,220 17,200

Total Expenses $4,403,034 $4,400,020 $4,417,220 $17,200


Beginning Fund Balance 1,066,387 569,515 579,285 9,770


City of San AngeloWastewater Debt Service Fund




520 REVENUES:

Wastewater Charges 1,665,147 1,666,000 1,666,000 0Interest 38,305 65,000 40,000 -25,000

Total Revenues $1,703,452 $1,731,000 $1,706,000 ($25,000)

520 EXPENDITURES:

Capital Projects 581,913 6,961,614 1,182,640 (5,778,974)Franchise Fee 66,606 66,640 66,640Transfers Out 0 456,720 456,720 0

Total Expenses $648,519 $7,484,974 $1,706,000 ($5,778,974)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 1,054,933 (5,753,974) 0 5,753,974

Beginning Fund Balance 5,724,257 6,779,190 1,025,216 (5,753,974)


City of San AngeloWastewater Capital Projects Fund




301 REVENUES:

Gas and Oil 2,198,656 3,063,220 4,841,687 $1,778,467Material 783,803 630,000 750,000 120,000Labor 953,133 953,016 876,816 (76,200)Rent 120,000 120,000 120,000 0Transfers In 8,900 0 0 0Other Revenue 17,745 18,405 16,405 (2,000)

Total Revenues $4,082,237 $4,784,641 $6,604,908 $1,820,267

301 EXPENSES:

Personnel 797,437 843,150 851,571 $8,421Supplies and Maintenance 3,119,324 3,840,712 5,723,337 1,882,625Capital Outlay 29,225 82,969 30,000 (52,969)

Total Expenses 3,945,986 4,766,831 6,604,908 1,838,077

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 136,251 17,810 0 (17,810)

Beginning Fund Balance (40,696) 95,555 113,365 17,810


City of San AngeloVehicle Maintenance Internal Service Fund




305 REVENUES:

Radio 1,028,209 211,202 162,584 ($48,618)Voice Over IP 0 276,039 399,405 123,366Internet 0 69,684 60,022 (9,662)Cell Phones 0 175,092 203,310 28,218

Total Revenues $1,028,209 $732,017 $825,321 $93,304

305 EXPENSES:

Radio 186,198 211,202 223,226 $12,024Voice Over IP 242,702 186,039 267,745 81,706Internet 1,999 159,684 60,022Cell Phones 0 175,092 166,020 (9,072)

Total Expenses 430,899 732,017 717,013 (15,004)

Excess/(Deficiency) of Revenues over Expenses 597,310 0 108,308 108,308

Beginning Fund Balance (586,145) 11,165 11,165 0

Ending Fund Balance $11,165 $11,165 $119,473 $108,308

City of San AngeloCommunications Internal Service FundSchedule of Revenues and Expenses



310 REVENUES: Clinic Revenue 140,608 132,400 132,084 ($316)Self Insurance Revenue 5,955,062 7,226,044 7,917,129 691,085Pharmacy Revenue 828,833 0 0 0Interest 3,548 4,000 0 (4,000)

Total Revenues $6,928,051 $7,362,444 $8,049,213 $686,769

310 EXPENSES:

Clinic Personnel 348,401 150,281 0 (150,281)Clinic Operation Expense 148,548 382,488 551,940 169,452Self Insurance Personnel 105,223 74,003 95,885 21,882Self Insurance Operation Exp. 5,644,153 6,755,672 7,399,096 643,424Pharmacy Personnel 70,607 0 0 0Pharmacy Operation Expense 510,696 0 0 0

Total Expenses $6,827,628 $7,362,444 $8,046,921 $684,477

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures 100,423 0 2,292 2,292

Beginning Balance 220,638 321,061 321,061 0

Ending Balance $321,061 $321,061 $323,353 $2,292

City of San AngeloCity Health Internal Service Fund




320 REVENUES: Premium Contributions 468,312 455,940 468,988 $13,048Special Event Insurance 31,744 35,000 35,000 0Insurance Proceeds 3,082 82,824 83,295 471Interest 12,252 12,746 9,768 (2,978)

Total Revenues $515,390 $586,510 $597,051 $10,541

320 EXPENSES:

Claims 628,495 425,661 401,301 ($24,360)Insurance Premiums 59,306 91,000 91,000 0Claims Management 44,133 68,595 99,750 31,155Capital 2,254 0 5,000 5,000

Total Expenses $734,188 $585,256 $597,051 $11,795




City of San AngeloProperty/Casualty Internal Service Fund




330 REVENUES: Premium Contributions 981,109 976,380 929,666 ($46,714)Insurance Proceeds 0 34,000 50,000 16,000Interest 10,448 10,715 9,628 (1,087)Discounts 0 0 0 0

Total Revenues $991,557 $1,021,095 $989,294 ($31,801)

330 EXPENSES:

Personnel 287,217 290,497 293,355 $2,858Supplies and Maintenance 32,616 73,035 57,805 (15,230)Claims 399,047 263,631 268,908 5,277Insurance Premiums 52,194 54,315 54,315 0Capital 0 0 314,911 314,911

Total Expenses $771,074 $681,478 $989,294 $307,816

Excess of Revenues over/ (under) Expenditures 220,483 339,617 0 (339,617)

Beginning Balance 1,548,335 1,768,818 2,108,435 339,617

Ending Balance $1,768,818 $2,108,435 $2,108,435 $0

City of San AngeloWorkers' Compensation Internal Service Fund


City of San Angelo



From: Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk


Alicia Ramirez, City Clerk Contact:

Regular Item Caption:

Preliminary discussion regarding the legislative changes associated with the future procedure for conducting the general election to elect municipal officers in the City of San Angelo and any action in connection thereto

During the 82Summary: nd

Legislative Session of the Texas Legislature, Senate Bill 100 was introduced to the Texas Senate (and House Bill 111 to the Texas House of Representatives). The bill was passed by the Senate and House and was signed into law by the Governor on June 17, 2011. The purpose of the bill is to adopt voting procedures necessary to implement the federal Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act (MOVE Act) which is aimed at making the voting process easier and faster for military and overseas voters. Among other things, the bill states that counties are no longer required to contract with and provide electronic voting equipment to municipalities and school districts for the May uniform election date in even numbered years. This means that if an election were to be called by the City Council in even numbered years, the County would not have to assist the City as in the past. Senate Bill 100 does not affect the May uniform election date in odd numbered years.

Based on the changes to the Election Code, the City of San Angelo must choose how future elections will be conducted. There are 5 options available which are described in more detail as follows. The pros and cons of each option are also included. Option 1 – Changing to the November Uniform Election Date If the City Council wishes to maintain the staggered terms, the Council may opt to change the City’s election to the November uniform election date. This would also be done by resolution adopted by the Council. As in the prior option, any places with terms expiring in May 2012 would holdover in office until November 2012. The places with terms expiring in May 2013 would also holdover in office until November 2013. If this option is chosen, the municipal governing body election would be added to the ballot for County, State and Federal elections. The November uniform election date is the second Tuesday of November.

o Increased voter turnout Pros to Moving Election to November

o Possibility of decreased votes due to partisan voting options on the November ballot (If a voter chooses straight party voting, no votes would be cast for the City portion of the ballot unless the voter specifically chooses to vote in the City election before casting their ballot.)

Cons to Moving Election to November

o Placement of local options on the ballot may be at the end of the ballot. o Increased cost to the City as we may be required to share the cost of the additional voting locations, increased early voting days, and election workers with the County Option 2 – Purchase or Lease Electronic Voting Machines If the City Council does not wish to unstagger terms or move to the November uniform election date, then the City would purchase or lease the electronic voting machines from a company other than the County at least in even numbered years. There are not many companies however that will lease the equipment which means there is no guarantee that the City would be able to find available machines to rent. Most companies offer to sell the equipment but there are additional costs such as annual maintenance and programming.

o Able to continue elections as currently held Pros to Obtaining Equipment from Vendor

o Much more expensive because of the initial cost to purchase the equipment, the annual maintenance fees and programming fees in addition to the purchase price

Cons to Obtaining Equipment from Vendor

o Sufficient staff not available; possible solution would be to recruit exempt employees to provide assistance with election process

o Require protected storage space o Extensive knowledge and experience of election laws, including recently adopted

legislative changes, specifically new Voter ID law o Develop method to process voters and procure necessary paperwork (EA

provides laptops to each Election Judge) o City would need to sync voter information to update all voting history to reflect the

voter voted in the City election o As required by law, we would contract with the schools to conduct their elections,

with the exception of Water Valley and Christoval (hold in November) (EC Sec. 11.0581) – Wall, Veribest, & Grape Creek

o Ability of EA assisting will be very limited, if at all o In 2005, Counties received funds under the Help America Vote Act (HAVA)

funds to purchase equipment Option 3 – Partner with the San Angelo Independent School District (SAISD) and other Independent School Districts (ISDs) to purchase additional equipment and provide necessary staff to continue holding elections in even numbered years If the City Council wishes to keep the elections as currently conducted, the City, SAISD, and other ISDs would agree to partner via interlocal agreement to purchase the additional equipment and hire staff, thereby providing the Elections Administrator the means and support to continue holding elections in even numbered years. Pros to Obtaining Equipment from Vendor o Able to continue elections as currently held Cons to Obtaining Equipment from Vendor o Much more expensive because of the initial cost to purchase the equipment o Elections Administrator would hire additional staff; possible solution would be to

recruit exempt employees to provide assistance throughout the election process o Potential problems or issues that may result from holding two concurrent

elections and possibly a runoff election o County Auditor has raised concerns regarding the billing of the additional

equipment and personnel o Purchase of additional server and computer equipment will be necessary to run

concurrent elections o Additional extensive services previously provided by the Elections Administrator

may be conducted through the Office of City Clerk

o Any decisions must be authorized through the TGC Commissioners Court Option 4 – Unstaggering Terms of Office Senate Bill 100 provides that a home rule law municipality may adopt a resolution providing for the election of all members of the governing body at the same election. If the City Council chooses this option, all members of the Council, the Mayor, and Chief of Police would be elected in May of odd numbered years. The places with terms expiring in May 2012 would holdover in office until May 2013. Then, in May 2013, a general election would be called for the purpose of electing the Mayor, all 6 Council members, and the Chief of Police. • Pros to Unstaggering Terms

o Keep the May election date and continue to contract with the County o Reduced election costs since elections would be held only once every two

years instead of annually

• Cons to Unstaggering Terms o Risk of having an entirely new governing body at one time; no guarantee

on continuity

Option 5 – Change Length of Terms from 2 to 4 years and maintain the staggered terms If the City Council chooses this option and as part of the transition plan, all members of the Council, the Mayor, and Chief of Police would be elected in May of odd numbered years. The places with terms expiring in May 2012 would holdover in office until May 2013. Then, in May 2013, a general election would be called for the purpose of electing the Mayor, all 6 Council members, and the Chief of Police. In order to keep the staggered terms, the transition plan for SMDs 1, 3, & 5 terms would be heldover until May 2013 with the understanding that their term would expire in May 2015. The Mayor, SMDs 2, 4, & 6 terms currently expire in May 2013 and would then expire in May 2017. The Chief of Police’s term would be heldover until May 2013 and that term would expire in May 2017. This option would require a Charter Election in November 2012 to change the terms from 2 to 4 years. Should the measure fail, the election terms would revert back to 2 year terms.

Financial Impact $60,000 to $500,000 depending on which option is chosen. :

Related Vision Item

(if applicable)

N/A

:


At this time, staff is looking for input from Council on the direction that should be pursued or additional research that is requested. The City Clerk has met with the Tom Green County Elections Administrator to solicit information from the County on their thoughts as well as to ask questions about the ramifications of each of the above options.

:

Should Council chose the option to move the election to November, a resolution will be required to hold over the current council member terms for SMD 1, 3, & 5 to November 2012 and SMD 2, 4, 6, Mayor until November 2013. No action is required at this time; however, the Council should direct staff in how to proceed.

Attachments Senate Bill 100 (final version), Option Chart, and Transition Chart :

Presentation Powerpoint :

Publication N/A :


City Manager Harold Dominguez and City Attorney Lysia H. Bowling :

City Attorney Lysia H. Bowling Approved by Legal:

city council august 30, 2011 agenda packet

News & Politics