choosing the best collection vehicle now and for the future · 2020. 2. 21. · • (semi...
TRANSCRIPT
Choosing the Best Collection Vehicle
Now and For the Future
Presentation OverviewCorporate Overview
History / Mission / Qualifications
Factors to consider when selecting a collection vehicle
Waste Generation
Collection Days
Community Design/ Layout
Material Streams
Collection Equipment
Equipment Available
Summary
Comparison
Questions?
2
Corporate Overview
3
Company History
• Founded as a Blacksmith shop in the 1930’s
• Manufactured agriculture & farm equipment in the 1960’s
• Began manufacturing waste management equipment in the 1970’s
4
Our MissionThe Haul-All division designs, manufactures, and markets systems for the storage, collection, and transfer of solid waste and recyclables in niche markets throughout North America.
Haul-All is driven to improve the practice of integrating municipal waste management to achieve social, environmental and economic benefits.
5
Qualifications
• Over 50 years waste industry experience
• In-house Engineering, Research & Development
• Over 40 patents and trademarks
• Today we have a team of over 120 employees with two manufacturing faculties with over 100,000 sq. ft. of manufacturing space
• Strategic partnerships to achieve or mission
6
PAYLOAD
7
Factors to ConsiderWaste Generation
• Number of households
• Volume and density of waste
8
Factors to ConsiderWaste Generation
A) Scale tickets
B) Estimate
9
Factors to ConsiderWaste Generation
Per Person:• Population: 1,000
Estimate: 1.1kg (2.42 lbs) per person/ day
= 1,100kg (2,420 lbs) waste generated per day
= 2,420 lbs x 7 days = 16,940 lbs per week
10
Factors to ConsiderWaste Generation
Per Household:• Homes : 400 homes (est. 2.5 persons home)
Estimate: 1.1kg x 2.5 people = 2.75kg (6.05 lbs) per home/ day
= 6.05 lbs x 7 days = 42.35 lbs per household/ week
42.35 lbs per house x 400 homes = 16,940 lbs per week
11
Factors to ConsiderCollection Days
Collection Days per Week to Work?
• Dedicated unit• Versatility (eg. Hooklift)
• Labour• Dedicated position
• Part-time position
12
Factors to ConsiderCommunity Design
13
• Layout/ Route/ Rural
• Roads
• Seasonal Impact
• Distance to Landfill• Dumps, Landfill Closures
• Transfer vs. Direct Hall
Factors to ConsiderMaterial Streams
14
Commodity• MSW• Recycling• Bulky
• C & D• Wood• Organics
Factors to ConsiderMaterial Streams
15
Source
• Commercial
• Residential• Manual
• Semi-Automated
• Automated
Factors to ConsiderStorage Equipment
16
Containment
*VECTORS
• Boxes• Wooden Boxes
• Carts• Animal resistant
• 23-95gal
• Large Bins• HL/ CFL
• Animal resistant
Factors to ConsiderCollection Equipment
17
• Weight/ Size• Maneuverability, Roads
• Maintenance Cost• Access to Support, Location of Service Department
• Licensing/ Manpower• Access to Manpower, Special Licensing Requirements
• Compaction/ Payload• Cost per Ton/ Hidden Costs
• Purchase Price• Up-Front Costs/ Life-Cycle Cost
Factors to ConsiderCollection Type
Front Load Collection Vehicles
18
Factors to ConsiderFront Load Collection
Pros:
- High compaction / High payload
- Can service commercial or residential with Curotto can
Cons:
- Costs
- Operating Cost (Fuel)
- Equipment Cost
- Maintenance Cost
- Licensing
- Hidden Cost - Road Wear
- Size / Weight
- Turning Radius – Tire Scrub
- Over head power lines
- Shop Space
19
Factors to ConsiderRear Load Collection
20
Rear Load Collection Vehicles
Factors to ConsiderRear Load Collection
21
Pros:
- High compaction / High payload
- Can service commercial or residential
• (semi automated) Ability to collect cart– less operator Fatigue
- Ability to accept Bulky items
Cons:
- Size / Weight distribution
- Clearance on rural roads
- 2 – 3 man operation
- More labor intensive
- Costs
- Operating Cost (Fuel) (tandem)
- Equipment Cost (tandem)
- Maintenance Cost (Tandem)
- Licensing (tandem)
- Hidden Cost - Road Wear
Factors to ConsiderSide-Load Collection
22
Side Load Collection Vehicles
Manual
Semi-Automated
Fully Automated
Factors to ConsiderSide-Load Collection
Pros:- Lower body / Chassis cost- Lower maintenance costs- Size / weight- Ability to accept Bulky items- Variety of applications – utilization - (semi automated) Ability to collect cart– less operator Fatigue- (Fully Automated) Single operator
Cons:- low compaction- More labor intensive - (semi automated / Automated) Another moving part to Maintain- Container selection and placement very important
23
Manual
Factors to ConsiderPopulation
24
• Population Size: 1,000 400 homes
• Volume: 16,940 lbs
• Layout of Community:
• Distance to Landfill• Under 1 hr?
• Future Programs?
Summary
There is more to cost per ton than payload
Size matters
Choose your system wisely
25
• What Volume Does Your Community Have?
• What’s the Layout?
• What are Your Requirements?
• Which System will Fill those Needs?
26
Thank you for your time.
Please stop by our booth
to further discuss
your system requirements.