china ets - k.upston-hooper

11
Roundtable on the Evolution of GHG Emissions Trading in China © GreenStream Karl Upston-Hooper 9 October 2014

Upload: greenstream-network-ltd

Post on 20-Jun-2015

162 views

Category:

Environment


0 download

DESCRIPTION

GreenStream General Councel Karl Upston-Hooper's presentation about China Emission Trading Scheme in the 14th IEA-IETA-EPRI Annual Workshop on Greenhouse Gas Emission Trading, on the 9th Oct 2014 in Paris, France.

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: China ETS - K.Upston-Hooper

Roundtable on the Evolution of GHG Emissions Trading in China

© GreenStream

Karl Upston-Hooper

9 October 2014

Page 2: China ETS - K.Upston-Hooper

GreenStream in China

2 © GreenStream

Page 3: China ETS - K.Upston-Hooper

GreenStream in China

3 © GreenStream

Page 4: China ETS - K.Upston-Hooper

GreenStream in China

© GreenStream 4

Page 5: China ETS - K.Upston-Hooper

The Seven Sisters • Prompt operationalization of the Pilots

• Registration of CCER projects

• MRV protocols developed

• Increased capacity in both private and public

stakeholders

• Continued strong political support

• Exchange based spot trading

5 © GreenStream

Allowance Price Information – Week 35 2014

• Shenzhen 59 yuan 11,733

• Tianjin 20 yuan 200

• Guangdong 41 yuan 0

• Beijing 53 yuan 2,200

• Shanghai 39 yuan 0

• Hubei 23 yuan 92,088

• Chongqing 30 yuan 0

• Coverage of just 7% of Chinese total GHG emissions

• Very low market liquidity

• Firm (not installation) based data

• Non-involvement of financial sector

• Limited compliance regimes without legal foundation (except for Shenzhen)

Page 6: China ETS - K.Upston-Hooper

The Challenges & Opportunities of the Chinese Pilots

• China’s CO2 intensity (t/1000 USD) is seven times the EU-28

• The political direction of the 12th Five Year Plan provides macro certainty

• Cumulative emissions covered by the Pilots are nearly 50% of the coverage of the EU ETS

• Energy consumption and associated GHG emissions will continue to grow in absolute terms

• The implementation of a carbon price creates an ecosystem based around the compliance obligations of covered entities including an offsets market

• Carbon pricing is still subject to the strictures of the Chinese economy (regulated electricity, the dominance of SOEs & financial restrictions)

• Fragmentation/Localisation due to the nature of conceded informality of “shidian” policy making

• Allocation models still grandfathering based (often with weak data sets) and transitioning to benchmarking a herculean task

• Trading opportunities limited by lack of futures contract (and the consequent lack of liquidity)

6 © GreenStream

Is the policy tool being implemented to enable the market to drive behavioural change?

Page 7: China ETS - K.Upston-Hooper

Establishing a National ETS in China

© GreenStream 7

Source: Market Readiness Proposal of China to PMR

Page 8: China ETS - K.Upston-Hooper

Business Partnership for Market Readiness (“BPMR”)

© GreenStream 8

Page 9: China ETS - K.Upston-Hooper

The BPMR in China

• Initial “Mission” to Shenzhen & Guangdong in February 2013 with strong

political support by Vice Mayor Tang Jie in Shenzhen and by the

Guangdong Low Carbon Development Promotion Association.

• 2nd Mission to Shanghai in October 2013, with notable contributions from the

floor by CITIC, Bao Steel, PetroChina and others. Over 160 participants.

• 3rd Mission to Beijing and Tianjin in February 2014, with opening remarks by

Sir David King, UK Special Representative for Climate Change

• Next Mission is a follow-up to Shenzhen and Guangdong in October 2014

• Other BPMR events have been conducted in Seoul, Astana, Warsaw,

Cologne and Mexico City

© GreenStream 9

Page 10: China ETS - K.Upston-Hooper

Q&A from the BPMR Missions

© GreenStream 10

Under a market-based mechanism the covered entities usually pass

on the compliance cost to the end consumers. How does this affect

the competitiveness of the companies?

Energy efficiency measures provide long-term mitigation solutions but

require substantial capital investment while purchasing offsets is a

short-term solution but cost-effective and simple. Which approach is

the best according to you?

Under a market-based mechanism the covered entities usually pass

on the compliance cost to the end consumers. How does this affect

the competitiveness of the companies?

How can top management of a compliance entity be persuaded to take

an interest in carbon trading?

Is MRV carried out by real-time monitoring or by regulatory

authority? If it is monitored by regulatory authority, how will it be

insured that the company is not involved in undesirable practices, such

as manual change of the emission data or manual change of the

parameter of the monitoring equipment?

I want to know in Europe, how is the allowance being allocated to

companies? Is it based on the historical emission data? If it is based

on the historical data, does it mean if a company did well in the first

year, then they have to better in the second year, does it mean they

will face more pressure from emission reduction?

Is there simulation software available to practice trading? What kind of

strategies does your company practice while trading instruments?

I want to know whether [BP] have a new organization under the group

involved in the carbon asset management; for example a carbon

management department or carbon trading department and what is

the function of the organization?

During the third phase of the of the EU ETS a huge surplus of

emission allowances exists, will the government come forward and

purchase them?

Page 11: China ETS - K.Upston-Hooper

BEIJING OFFICE: ROOM 1502, ENTRANCE C,TOWER 2, WANGJING SOHO,NO 1, FUTONGDONG STREET, WANGJING, CHAOYANG DISTRICT, BEIJING, CHINA, 100102 北京市朝阳区望京阜通东大街1号院望京SOHO塔2C单元1502 100102 HELSINKI OFFICE: LAPINLAHDENKATU 3, FI-00180 HELSINKI, FINLAND