children's services management reportchildren’s services management report i research and...
TRANSCRIPT
Department of Social Services Children's Division
Children's Services Management Report
January 2020
Missouri Department of Social Services Research & Data Analysis
221 W. High Street Jefferson City, MO 65101
Children’s Services Management Report
I Research and Data Analysis
State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement:
“We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure and sustain healthy, safe, and productive lives." The Department of Social Services is an equal opportunity employer. Services provided by the Department of Social Services are offered on a non-discriminatory basis.
Children’s Services Management Report II Research and Data Analysis
Table of Contents
Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this publication is intended for monthly use only.
Although the information presented is the best available at the time of publication, because of delays in processing, data may be incomplete. Accordingly, data should NOT simply be summed from one month
to the next to obtain 3 month, 6 month or 12 month (etc.) values.
Figure 1. Map – Department of Social Services Regions ...............................................................V
Child Abuse and Neglect (CA/N)
Table 1. Incidents and Children Reported During the Month Compared to Those
Reported for the Same Month Last Year ....................................................................... 2
Table 2. Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During the Month ....................................................................................... 4
Table 3. Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During the Month .................................................................. 6
Table 4. Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month .................................. 8
Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month ................................ 10
Table 6. CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During the Month .......................................... 12
Figure 2. CA/N Reports for Four Years Through the Current Month ............................................ 14
Figure 3. CA/N Reports Comparing the Last Two Years.............................................................. 14
Figure 4. Percentage Change in CA/N Reports Made Twelve Months Apart ................................. 15
Figure 5. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 15
Figure 6. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 16
Figure 7. Time Between Report and Child Contact for Investigations/Assessments
Completed in the Month ............................................................................................ 16
Figure 8a. CA/N Investigations Completed During the Month ....................................................... 17
Figure 8b. CA/N Assessments Completed During the Month ......................................................... 17
Notes Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures ............................................................... 18
Family-Centered Services (FCS)
Table 7. FCS Cases Open at the End of the Month by Reason for Opening ................................. 22
Table 8. FCS Cases Active During the Month by Reason for Opening ......................................... 24
Table 9. Persons in Family-Centered Services During the Month ............................................... 26
Table 10. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 28
Children’s Services Management Report III Research and Data Analysis
Table 11. FCS Cases By Region Closed During the Month by Close Reason .................................. 30
Table 12. FCS Cases Active During the Month Which Have Had Court Involvement ...................... 32
Table 13. FCS Cases By Region Active During the Month Which Have Had No Court Involvement . 34
Figure 9. FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month Over the Previous Four Years .................. 36
Figure 10. Percentage Change in FCS Cases by Region Active as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months Apart ................................................................................................ 36
Figure 11. FCS Cases by Region Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ....................... 37
Figure 12. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 37
Figure 13. FCS Cases by Region Closed During the Month by Reason for Closing .......................... 38
Figure 14. FCS Cases Active During the Month With Court Involvement
By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 38
Figure 15. FCS Cases Active During the Month With No Court Involvement By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 39
Notes Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures .............................................................. 40
Out-of-Home Placement
Table 14. Children Entering Children’s Division Custody for the First Time During the Month By Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ................................... 44
Table 15. Children Re-Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ............................................... 46
Table 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Last Two Years ............... 48
Table 17. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Length of Stay and Region ........................................................................................ 49
Table 18. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month
By Length of Stay and Case Manager County .............................................................. 50
Table 19. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case
Manager County and Placement Category ................................................................... 52
Table 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case Manager County and Placement Type......................................................................... 54
Table 21. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Placement Category and Case Manager County........................................................... 64
Table 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System During the Month
Grouped by Reason for Case Closing .......................................................................... 66
Children’s Services Management Report IV Research and Data Analysis
Table 23. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody ................................................................................ 68
Table 24. Currently Licensed Children’s Division Foster Homes by Vendor Type ........................... 70
Table 25. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Legal Status ................................................................. 72
Table 26. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped
By Case Manager County and Goal ............................................................................. 74
Table 27. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped
By Case Manager County and Number of Previous Placements..................................... 76
Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year .............................................................................. 78
Figure 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month ............................ 80
Figure 17. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month During
the Last Two Years ................................................................................................... 80
Figure 18. Children Closing from Alternative Care During the Month by Reason for Case Closing and Region ...................................................................................... 81
Figure 19. Adoptions Finalized During the Last Two Years ........................................................... 81
Figure 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last of the Month by Age and Placement Type ........................................................................................... 82
Figure 21. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last Day of the Month By Placement Category for Four Years ........................................................................ 82
Figure 22. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody by Quarter and
Subsequent Disposition ............................................................................................. 83
Notes Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures ............................................................... 84
Intensive In-Home Services (IIS)
Table 29. Families Referred to IIS During the Month Grouped by Referral County ........................ 90
Table 30. Families and Children Accepted in IIS During the Month Grouped by Household County ................................................................................................ 92
Table 31. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS During the Month .................................................... 94
Table 32. Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ...................................................... 96
Table 33. Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ................................................ 98
Notes Intensive In-Home Services Tables ......................................................................... 100
Children’s Services Management Report V Research and Data Analysis
Figure 1. Department of Social Services Regions
Child Abuse and Neglect
Table 1.
Incidents and Children Reported During January 2020
Compared to Those Reported During January 2019
Current Incidents Current Children
Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage
Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change
Northwest Andrew 10 12 -16.67% 12 17 -29.41%
Atchison 2 5 -60.00% 2 11 -81.82%
Buchanan 112 108 3.70% 187 153 22.22%
Caldwell 4 6 -33.33% 8 10 -20.00%
Carroll 4 6 -33.33% 4 7 -42.86%
Cass 73 72 1.39% 101 105 -3.81%
Chariton 8 6 33.33% 10 7 42.86%
Clay 156 176 -11.36% 207 235 -11.91%
Clinton 8 19 -57.89% 10 27 -62.96%
Cooper 22 11 100.00% 38 13 192.31%
Daviess 5 8 -37.50% 5 14 -64.29%
De Kalb 6 3 100.00% 8 5 60.00%
Gentry 7 2 250.00% 9 2 350.00%
Grundy 9 16 -43.75% 10 20 -50.00%
Harrison 8 8 0.00% 17 12 41.67%
Holt 1 8 -87.50% 3 11 -72.73%
Johnson 36 35 2.86% 51 47 8.51%
Lafayette 32 22 45.45% 45 28 60.71%
Linn 11 12 -8.33% 15 18 -16.67%
Livingston 4 16 -75.00% 8 22 -63.64%
Mercer 0 1 -100.00% 0 1 -100.00%
Nodaway 11 15 -26.67% 19 18 5.56%
Pettis 32 44 -27.27% 52 65 -20.00%
Platte 62 42 47.62% 78 57 36.84%
Putnam 6 4 50.00% 7 8 -12.50%
Ray 21 23 -8.70% 40 32 25.00%
Saline 28 23 21.74% 36 28 28.57%
Sullivan 6 4 50.00% 6 11 -45.45%
Worth 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00%
* Region Total * 684 707 -3.25% 988 984 0.41%
Northeast Adair 20 15 33.33% 24 18 33.33%
Audrain 32 19 68.42% 50 36 38.89%
Boone 137 119 15.13% 182 157 15.92%
Callaway 51 41 24.39% 76 57 33.33%
Clark 7 6 16.67% 11 12 -8.33%
Cole 53 59 -10.17% 70 77 -9.09%
Franklin 91 98 -7.14% 123 138 -10.87%
Gasconade 14 24 -41.67% 19 36 -47.22%
Howard 12 10 20.00% 19 12 58.33%
Knox 3 2 50.00% 4 3 33.33%
Lewis 9 5 80.00% 13 5 160.00%
Lincoln 74 56 32.14% 108 71 52.11%
Macon 15 6 150.00% 18 9 100.00%
Marion 35 34 2.94% 49 42 16.67%
Monroe 4 6 -33.33% 4 9 -55.56%
Montgomery 5 12 -58.33% 8 21 -61.90%
Osage 8 8 0.00% 11 10 10.00%
Pike 22 13 69.23% 29 24 20.83%
Ralls 4 6 -33.33% 4 10 -60.00%
Randolph 27 39 -30.77% 40 65 -38.46%
Schuyler 2 5 -60.00% 2 7 -71.43%
Scotland 5 6 -16.67% 6 10 -40.00%
Shelby 3 1 200.00% 4 1 300.00%
St Charles 202 185 9.19% 255 241 5.81%
Warren 45 30 50.00% 63 43 46.51%
* Region Total * 880 805 9.32% 1,192 1,114 7.00%
Southeast Bollinger 12 7 71.43% 16 13 23.08%
Butler 50 64 -21.88% 64 98 -34.69%
Cape Girardeau 59 54 9.26% 73 73 0.00%
Carter 6 8 -25.00% 8 10 -20.00%
Crawford 35 31 12.90% 52 38 36.84%
Dent 18 20 -10.00% 23 30 -23.33%
2Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 1.
Incidents and Children Reported During January 2020
Compared to Those Reported During January 2019
Current Incidents Current Children
Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage
Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change
Southeast Dunklin 43 33 30.30% 64 51 25.49%
Howell 56 65 -13.85% 77 92 -16.30%
Iron 9 13 -30.77% 13 17 -23.53%
Jefferson 134 151 -11.26% 207 201 2.99%
Madison 7 18 -61.11% 13 22 -40.91%
Maries 0 8 -100.00% 0 14 -100.00%
Mississippi 15 12 25.00% 29 13 123.08%
New Madrid 22 23 -4.35% 33 30 10.00%
Oregon 13 15 -13.33% 16 23 -30.43%
Pemiscot 20 22 -9.09% 27 28 -3.57%
Perry 16 18 -11.11% 25 24 4.17%
Phelps 46 39 17.95% 62 49 26.53%
Pulaski 36 43 -16.28% 67 56 19.64%
Reynolds 7 8 -12.50% 12 13 -7.69%
Ripley 10 12 -16.67% 18 21 -14.29%
Scott 42 56 -25.00% 65 95 -31.58%
Shannon 6 4 50.00% 7 6 16.67%
St Francois 90 67 34.33% 126 89 41.57%
Ste Genevieve 4 14 -71.43% 9 23 -60.87%
Stoddard 24 30 -20.00% 32 43 -25.58%
Texas 25 20 25.00% 38 25 52.00%
Washington 29 22 31.82% 43 30 43.33%
Wayne 14 14 0.00% 22 22 0.00%
* Region Total * 848 891 -4.83% 1,241 1,249 -0.64%
Southwest Barry 47 39 20.51% 65 53 22.64%
Barton 15 16 -6.25% 17 19 -10.53%
Bates 14 14 0.00% 31 17 82.35%
Benton 15 19 -21.05% 20 27 -25.93%
Camden 51 33 54.55% 65 38 71.05%
Cedar 13 23 -43.48% 20 30 -33.33%
Christian 83 90 -7.78% 110 128 -14.06%
Dade 6 7 -14.29% 10 11 -9.09%
Dallas 18 14 28.57% 22 19 15.79%
Douglas 13 14 -7.14% 22 19 15.79%
Greene 376 415 -9.40% 489 546 -10.44%
Henry 31 24 29.17% 47 38 23.68%
Hickory 8 6 33.33% 12 13 -7.69%
Jasper 143 155 -7.74% 213 207 2.90%
Laclede 54 49 10.20% 78 75 4.00%
Lawrence 51 47 8.51% 69 57 21.05%
McDonald 16 32 -50.00% 26 55 -52.73%
Miller 22 36 -38.89% 33 50 -34.00%
Moniteau 12 15 -20.00% 15 19 -21.05%
Morgan 18 23 -21.74% 24 38 -36.84%
Newton 57 37 54.05% 78 57 36.84%
Ozark 13 11 18.18% 26 15 73.33%
Polk 43 49 -12.24% 51 71 -28.17%
St Clair 8 5 60.00% 11 5 120.00%
Stone 30 32 -6.25% 37 47 -21.28%
Taney 68 67 1.49% 89 91 -2.20%
Vernon 28 26 7.69% 34 38 -10.53%
Webster 32 43 -25.58% 47 63 -25.40%
Wright 24 31 -22.58% 36 45 -20.00%
* Region Total * 1,309 1,372 -4.59% 1,797 1,891 -4.97%
Kansas City Jackson 660 641 2.96% 907 889 2.02%
* Region Total * 660 641 2.96% 907 889 2.02%
St. Louis St Louis City 331 308 7.47% 460 399 15.29%
St Louis County 622 546 13.92% 827 733 12.82%
* Region Total * 953 854 11.59% 1,287 1,132 13.69%
Other Out Home Inv 162 159 1.89% 215 224 -4.02%
Out Of State 8 11 -27.27% 9 20 -55.00%
Stat Unit 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00%
* Region Total * 170 170 0.00% 224 244 -8.20%
State Total 5,504 5,440 1.18% 7,636 7,503 1.77%
3Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 2.
Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During January 2020
Substan- Total
tiated Children
Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per
tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand
Northwest Andrew 2 0 6 6 0 14 0.48 3.36
Atchison 0 0 0 6 0 6 0.00 5.08
Buchanan 13 2 40 103 3 161 0.62 7.68
Caldwell 2 0 3 2 0 7 0.83 2.91
Carroll 1 0 4 6 0 11 0.46 5.02
Cass 3 0 12 53 0 68 0.11 2.58
Chariton 0 0 0 5 0 5 0.00 2.83
Clay 7 5 38 144 3 197 0.12 3.44
Clinton 0 0 3 7 0 10 0.00 1.96
Cooper 0 0 0 5 0 5 0.00 1.26
Daviess 0 1 0 5 0 6 0.00 2.66
De Kalb 0 0 3 1 0 4 0.00 1.73
Gentry 0 0 1 3 1 5 0.00 3.02
Grundy 3 1 0 6 0 10 1.22 4.05
Harrison 1 0 4 5 0 10 0.45 4.50
Holt 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.00 3.09
Johnson 1 0 5 29 0 35 0.08 2.91
Lafayette 1 0 3 27 0 31 0.12 3.79
Linn 0 2 4 4 0 10 0.00 3.17
Livingston 0 0 1 16 0 17 0.00 5.11
Mercer 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.00 2.08
Nodaway 3 1 2 15 0 21 0.70 4.93
Pettis 0 0 8 17 0 25 0.00 2.32
Platte 8 0 24 60 2 94 0.36 4.27
Putnam 0 1 1 8 0 10 0.00 8.62
Ray 0 0 7 12 0 19 0.00 3.24
Saline 3 2 6 29 0 40 0.56 7.41
Sullivan 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.62
Worth 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.00 2.25
* Region Total * 48 15 176 580 9 828 0.22 3.82
Northeast Adair 0 8 3 15 0 26 0.00 5.23
Audrain 0 0 5 39 0 44 0.00 6.91
Boone 5 0 18 53 2 78 0.15 2.28
Callaway 12 5 22 38 1 78 1.20 7.80
Clark 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.58
Cole 2 1 23 52 0 78 0.11 4.35
Franklin 4 6 26 93 1 130 0.16 5.18
Gasconade 1 0 6 23 0 30 0.30 8.92
Howard 1 0 6 3 0 10 0.46 4.59
Knox 0 0 0 5 0 5 0.00 4.84
Lewis 0 0 1 2 0 3 0.00 1.25
Lincoln 6 0 14 63 0 83 0.41 5.64
Macon 2 0 5 9 0 16 0.53 4.23
Marion 1 7 5 38 0 51 0.15 7.40
Monroe 0 0 1 5 0 6 0.00 2.91
Montgomery 0 0 3 16 0 19 0.00 6.66
Osage 1 0 2 5 0 8 0.29 2.33
Pike 2 3 4 25 2 36 0.49 8.77
Ralls 1 1 0 4 0 6 0.42 2.52
Randolph 7 4 8 38 0 57 1.19 9.70
Schuyler 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.88
Scotland 1 2 0 7 0 10 0.73 7.34
Shelby 0 0 2 2 0 4 0.00 2.50
St Charles 24 2 89 225 5 345 0.26 3.72
Warren 0 2 4 19 1 26 0.00 3.20
* Region Total * 70 42 247 780 12 1,151 0.27 4.42
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 3 8 0 11 0.00 3.77
Butler 6 6 14 34 2 62 0.60 6.22
Cape Girardeau 6 0 5 20 0 31 0.36 1.87
Carter 0 0 1 3 0 4 0.00 2.64
Crawford 8 3 5 39 0 55 1.33 9.17
Dent 2 2 1 19 0 24 0.55 6.57
4Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 2.
Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed During January 2020
Substan- Total
tiated Children
Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per
tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand
Southeast Dunklin 1 0 3 13 0 17 0.12 2.10
Howell 11 2 17 49 2 81 1.09 8.05
Iron 0 0 0 7 0 7 0.00 2.91
Jefferson 16 9 11 148 3 187 0.29 3.40
Madison 1 0 2 18 0 21 0.34 7.16
Maries 1 0 2 4 0 7 0.46 3.25
Mississippi 2 0 2 36 0 40 0.63 12.55
New Madrid 6 0 0 12 0 18 1.33 3.99
Oregon 0 0 2 20 0 22 0.00 9.07
Pemiscot 5 5 11 26 3 50 0.99 9.93
Perry 8 0 1 5 0 14 1.68 2.94
Phelps 0 3 8 13 1 25 0.00 2.55
Pulaski 20 3 15 50 1 89 1.60 7.10
Reynolds 0 0 1 4 0 5 0.00 3.26
Ripley 0 1 8 13 0 22 0.00 6.65
Scott 9 0 16 80 0 105 0.91 10.66
Shannon 0 0 0 10 0 10 0.00 5.07
St Francois 7 2 35 80 1 125 0.49 8.68
Ste Genevieve 2 1 7 20 1 31 0.47 7.34
Stoddard 0 0 3 10 1 14 0.00 2.05
Texas 8 0 8 13 0 29 1.40 5.07
Washington 3 1 14 21 2 41 0.49 6.76
Wayne 0 1 5 5 0 11 0.00 3.92
* Region Total * 122 39 200 780 17 1,158 0.55 5.26
Southwest Barry 0 1 7 23 1 32 0.00 3.70
Barton 2 0 2 12 0 16 0.62 4.98
Bates 0 3 4 12 0 19 0.00 4.47
Benton 1 0 3 8 0 12 0.29 3.49
Camden 3 1 8 15 0 27 0.36 3.22
Cedar 5 0 5 8 0 18 1.51 5.44
Christian 1 1 28 61 0 91 0.05 4.30
Dade 4 0 3 7 0 14 2.24 7.84
Dallas 4 1 4 23 0 32 0.96 7.68
Douglas 0 0 3 6 0 9 0.00 2.94
Greene 17 3 95 348 8 471 0.29 8.07
Henry 0 0 5 26 0 31 0.00 6.26
Hickory 0 1 3 3 0 7 0.00 4.20
Jasper 3 5 48 101 2 159 0.10 5.25
Laclede 1 0 29 60 0 90 0.11 10.10
Lawrence 0 1 19 26 0 46 0.00 4.52
McDonald 2 1 6 18 0 27 0.31 4.17
Miller 0 1 7 30 0 38 0.00 6.18
Moniteau 1 1 7 12 0 21 0.25 5.35
Morgan 0 0 4 18 0 22 0.00 4.85
Newton 3 1 8 62 4 78 0.20 5.28
Ozark 0 0 3 9 0 12 0.00 6.16
Polk 0 1 23 33 0 57 0.00 7.44
St Clair 0 0 8 10 0 18 0.00 9.18
Stone 0 2 5 29 0 36 0.00 5.97
Taney 9 4 22 61 1 97 0.79 8.49
Vernon 1 0 8 25 1 35 0.19 6.65
Webster 7 4 11 51 1 74 0.70 7.37
Wright 2 1 6 21 0 30 0.41 6.16
* Region Total * 66 33 384 1,118 18 1,619 0.25 6.21
Kansas City Jackson 31 11 182 467 32 723 0.19 4.37
* Region Total * 31 11 182 467 32 723 0.19 4.37
St. Louis St Louis City 13 6 65 223 18 325 0.19 4.81
St Louis County 10 9 50 90 8 167 0.04 0.71
* Region Total * 23 15 115 313 26 492 0.08 1.63
Other Out Home Inv 9 0 110 36 4 159 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 9 0 110 36 4 159 0.00 0.00
State Total 369 155 1,414 4,074 118 6,130 0.26 4.30
5Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 3.
Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During January 2020
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6
Buchanan 9 8.11% 2 1.80% 28 25.23% 69 62.16% 3 2.70% 111
Caldwell 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6
Carroll 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8
Cass 2 3.64% 0 0.00% 12 21.82% 41 74.55% 0 0.00% 55
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Clay 7 4.80% 4 2.74% 27 18.49% 107 73.29% 1 0.69% 146
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Daviess 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 5
Grundy 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8
Harrison 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Johnson 1 4.17% 0 0.00% 5 20.83% 18 75.00% 0 0.00% 24
Lafayette 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 3 15.00% 16 80.00% 0 0.00% 20
Linn 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 12 92.31% 0 0.00% 13
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Nodaway 2 18.18% 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11
Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 38.89% 11 61.11% 0 0.00% 18
Platte 4 6.06% 0 0.00% 16 24.24% 45 68.18% 1 1.52% 66
Putnam 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 6 85.71% 0 0.00% 7
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 40.00% 9 60.00% 0 0.00% 15
Saline 3 10.00% 1 3.33% 6 20.00% 20 66.67% 0 0.00% 30
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 35 5.85% 12 2.01% 131 21.91% 414 69.23% 6 1.00% 598
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 3 15.79% 3 15.79% 13 68.42% 0 0.00% 19
Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 12.90% 27 87.10% 0 0.00% 31
Boone 3 5.17% 0 0.00% 13 22.41% 40 68.97% 2 3.45% 58
Callaway 7 13.46% 2 3.85% 15 28.85% 27 51.92% 1 1.92% 52
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cole 2 3.33% 1 1.67% 16 26.67% 41 68.33% 0 0.00% 60
Franklin 4 3.67% 6 5.51% 26 23.85% 73 66.97% 0 0.00% 109
Gasconade 1 4.35% 0 0.00% 5 21.74% 17 73.91% 0 0.00% 23
Howard 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
Lincoln 4 6.90% 0 0.00% 12 20.69% 42 72.41% 0 0.00% 58
Macon 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 2 22.22% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9
Marion 1 2.94% 7 20.59% 2 5.88% 24 70.59% 0 0.00% 34
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 4
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 21.43% 11 78.57% 0 0.00% 14
Osage 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8
Pike 2 9.52% 1 4.76% 3 14.29% 14 66.67% 1 4.76% 21
Ralls 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5
Randolph 3 8.11% 4 10.81% 6 16.22% 24 64.87% 0 0.00% 37
Schuyler 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 7
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
St Charles 18 6.48% 2 0.72% 71 25.54% 184 66.19% 3 1.08% 278
Warren 0 0.00% 2 8.70% 4 17.39% 16 69.57% 1 4.35% 23
* Region Total * 51 5.88% 31 3.57% 193 22.24% 585 67.40% 8 0.92% 868
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 7 87.50% 0 0.00% 8
Butler 5 13.89% 1 2.78% 10 27.78% 19 52.78% 1 2.78% 36
Cape Girardeau 6 26.09% 0 0.00% 3 13.04% 14 60.87% 0 0.00% 23
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
Crawford 3 8.82% 2 5.88% 5 14.71% 24 70.59% 0 0.00% 34
Dent 2 10.53% 1 5.26% 1 5.26% 15 78.95% 0 0.00% 19
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated OtherFamily Assessment
6Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 3.
Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments
Completed by Conclusion During January 2020
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 2 16.67% 9 75.00% 0 0.00% 12
Howell 7 12.28% 2 3.51% 13 22.81% 33 57.90% 2 3.51% 57
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 7
Jefferson 13 9.85% 6 4.55% 9 6.82% 101 76.52% 3 2.27% 132
Madison 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 11 84.62% 0 0.00% 13
Maries 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6
Mississippi 1 4.17% 0 0.00% 2 8.33% 21 87.50% 0 0.00% 24
New Madrid 5 31.25% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11 68.75% 0 0.00% 16
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 10 90.91% 0 0.00% 11
Pemiscot 3 10.35% 2 6.90% 6 20.69% 16 55.17% 2 6.90% 29
Perry 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7
Phelps 0 0.00% 3 14.29% 6 28.57% 11 52.38% 1 4.76% 21
Pulaski 15 22.06% 3 4.41% 12 17.65% 37 54.41% 1 1.47% 68
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3
Ripley 0 0.00% 1 8.33% 4 33.33% 7 58.33% 0 0.00% 12
Scott 6 10.17% 0 0.00% 9 15.25% 44 74.58% 0 0.00% 59
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 6
St Francois 5 6.02% 1 1.21% 26 31.33% 50 60.24% 1 1.21% 83
Ste Genevieve 2 9.09% 1 4.55% 7 31.82% 11 50.00% 1 4.55% 22
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 6
Texas 6 25.00% 0 0.00% 7 29.17% 11 45.83% 0 0.00% 24
Washington 1 3.33% 1 3.33% 12 40.00% 14 46.67% 2 6.67% 30
Wayne 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 7
* Region Total * 86 11.05% 25 3.21% 146 18.77% 506 65.04% 15 1.93% 778
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 1 4.35% 5 21.74% 16 69.57% 1 4.35% 23
Barton 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 2 15.39% 9 69.23% 0 0.00% 13
Bates 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 2 18.18% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11
Benton 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8
Camden 3 12.50% 1 4.17% 6 25.00% 14 58.33% 0 0.00% 24
Cedar 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 5 41.67% 5 41.67% 0 0.00% 12
Christian 1 1.43% 1 1.43% 21 30.00% 47 67.14% 0 0.00% 70
Dade 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 9
Dallas 1 5.26% 1 5.26% 3 15.79% 14 73.68% 0 0.00% 19
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6
Greene 15 4.32% 3 0.87% 71 20.46% 252 72.62% 6 1.73% 347
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 21.05% 15 78.95% 0 0.00% 19
Hickory 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7
Jasper 3 2.54% 4 3.39% 37 31.36% 72 61.02% 2 1.70% 118
Laclede 1 1.70% 0 0.00% 22 37.29% 36 61.02% 0 0.00% 59
Lawrence 0 0.00% 1 2.70% 16 43.24% 20 54.05% 0 0.00% 37
McDonald 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 3 20.00% 11 73.33% 0 0.00% 15
Miller 0 0.00% 1 3.85% 4 15.39% 21 80.77% 0 0.00% 26
Moniteau 1 8.33% 1 8.33% 3 25.00% 7 58.33% 0 0.00% 12
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 23.53% 13 76.47% 0 0.00% 17
Newton 3 5.36% 1 1.79% 8 14.29% 43 76.79% 1 1.79% 56
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 6
Polk 0 0.00% 1 2.08% 19 39.58% 28 58.33% 0 0.00% 48
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 40.00% 6 60.00% 0 0.00% 10
Stone 0 0.00% 2 9.52% 4 19.05% 15 71.43% 0 0.00% 21
Taney 7 9.46% 4 5.41% 17 22.97% 45 60.81% 1 1.35% 74
Vernon 1 3.23% 0 0.00% 8 25.81% 21 67.74% 1 3.23% 31
Webster 6 12.77% 2 4.26% 7 14.89% 31 65.96% 1 2.13% 47
Wright 2 10.53% 1 5.26% 3 15.79% 13 68.42% 0 0.00% 19
* Region Total * 51 4.38% 28 2.41% 290 24.91% 782 67.18% 13 1.12% 1,164
Kansas City Jackson 25 4.97% 11 2.19% 134 26.64% 312 62.03% 21 4.18% 503
* Region Total * 25 4.97% 11 2.19% 134 26.64% 312 62.03% 21 4.18% 503
St. Louis St Louis City 11 4.87% 6 2.66% 43 19.03% 155 68.58% 11 4.87% 226
St Louis County 7 5.51% 6 4.72% 42 33.07% 68 53.54% 4 3.15% 127
* Region Total * 18 5.10% 12 3.40% 85 24.08% 223 63.17% 15 4.25% 353
Other Out Home Inv 9 7.90% 0 0.00% 81 71.05% 23 20.18% 1 0.88% 114
* Region Total * 9 7.90% 0 0.00% 81 71.05% 23 20.18% 1 0.88% 114
State Total 275 6.28% 119 2.72% 1,060 24.21% 2,845 64.98% 79 1.80% 4,378
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated Family Assessment Other
7Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 4.
Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During January 2020
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 7 77.78% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9
Atchison 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Buchanan 79 76.70% 24 23.30% 0 0.00% 103
Caldwell 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 6
Carroll 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Cass 42 80.77% 10 19.23% 0 0.00% 52
Chariton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Clay 117 89.31% 11 8.40% 3 2.29% 131
Clinton 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Cooper 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Daviess 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4
De Kalb 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Gentry 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4
Grundy 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Harrison 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Holt 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Johnson 19 86.36% 3 13.64% 0 0.00% 22
Lafayette 18 94.74% 1 5.26% 0 0.00% 19
Linn 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Livingston 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13
Mercer 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Nodaway 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10
Pettis 16 94.12% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17
Platte 51 82.26% 8 12.90% 3 4.84% 62
Putnam 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Ray 12 80.00% 3 20.00% 0 0.00% 15
Saline 28 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 28
Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 475 85.28% 75 13.47% 7 1.26% 557
Northeast Adair 17 89.47% 2 10.53% 0 0.00% 19
Audrain 27 90.00% 3 10.00% 0 0.00% 30
Boone 32 61.54% 18 34.62% 2 3.85% 52
Callaway 46 93.88% 3 6.12% 0 0.00% 49
Clark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cole 59 98.33% 1 1.67% 0 0.00% 60
Franklin 89 86.41% 11 10.68% 3 2.91% 103
Gasconade 12 60.00% 6 30.00% 2 10.00% 20
Howard 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Knox 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Lewis 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lincoln 50 89.29% 3 5.36% 3 5.36% 56
Macon 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Marion 29 85.29% 5 14.71% 0 0.00% 34
Monroe 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Montgomery 11 78.57% 3 21.43% 0 0.00% 14
Osage 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 8
Pike 16 80.00% 4 20.00% 0 0.00% 20
Ralls 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Randolph 32 91.43% 1 2.86% 2 5.71% 35
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Shelby 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
St Charles 226 86.26% 34 12.98% 2 0.76% 262
Warren 16 88.89% 2 11.11% 0 0.00% 18
* Region Total * 704 85.96% 101 12.33% 14 1.71% 819
Southeast Bollinger 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Butler 33 94.29% 2 5.71% 0 0.00% 35
Cape Girardeau 22 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 22
Carter 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Crawford 25 75.76% 7 21.21% 1 3.03% 33
Dent 12 63.16% 7 36.84% 0 0.00% 19
0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact
8Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 4.
Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During January 2020
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 10 83.33% 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 12
Howell 45 81.82% 10 18.18% 0 0.00% 55
Iron 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7
Jefferson 91 73.98% 29 23.58% 3 2.44% 123
Madison 11 84.62% 1 7.69% 1 7.69% 13
Maries 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 6
Mississippi 22 91.67% 2 8.33% 0 0.00% 24
New Madrid 13 92.86% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 14
Oregon 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10
Pemiscot 20 76.92% 6 23.08% 0 0.00% 26
Perry 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Phelps 13 65.00% 7 35.00% 0 0.00% 20
Pulaski 53 79.10% 11 16.42% 3 4.48% 67
Reynolds 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Ripley 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12
Scott 52 89.66% 5 8.62% 1 1.72% 58
Shannon 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
St Francois 67 83.75% 6 7.50% 7 8.75% 80
Ste Genevieve 19 90.48% 2 9.52% 0 0.00% 21
Stoddard 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5
Texas 20 83.33% 3 12.50% 1 4.17% 24
Washington 20 76.92% 6 23.08% 0 0.00% 26
Wayne 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
* Region Total * 610 81.77% 117 15.68% 19 2.55% 746
Southwest Barry 21 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21
Barton 10 83.33% 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 12
Bates 9 90.00% 0 0.00% 1 10.00% 10
Benton 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Camden 19 79.17% 5 20.83% 0 0.00% 24
Cedar 11 91.67% 1 8.33% 0 0.00% 12
Christian 59 86.77% 8 11.77% 1 1.47% 68
Dade 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Dallas 17 94.44% 1 5.56% 0 0.00% 18
Douglas 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Greene 256 81.27% 55 17.46% 4 1.27% 315
Henry 15 83.33% 2 11.11% 1 5.56% 18
Hickory 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 7
Jasper 105 93.75% 7 6.25% 0 0.00% 112
Laclede 47 87.04% 7 12.96% 0 0.00% 54
Lawrence 35 94.60% 2 5.41% 0 0.00% 37
McDonald 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13
Miller 20 76.92% 6 23.08% 0 0.00% 26
Moniteau 9 75.00% 3 25.00% 0 0.00% 12
Morgan 10 66.67% 4 26.67% 1 6.67% 15
Newton 49 94.23% 3 5.77% 0 0.00% 52
Ozark 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Polk 35 76.09% 9 19.57% 2 4.35% 46
St Clair 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Stone 17 89.47% 2 10.53% 0 0.00% 19
Taney 60 84.51% 11 15.49% 0 0.00% 71
Vernon 26 86.67% 4 13.33% 0 0.00% 30
Webster 42 91.30% 4 8.70% 0 0.00% 46
Wright 16 84.21% 3 15.79% 0 0.00% 19
* Region Total * 939 85.91% 144 13.18% 10 0.92% 1,093
Kansas City Jackson 344 73.98% 84 18.07% 37 7.96% 465
* Region Total * 344 73.98% 84 18.07% 37 7.96% 465
St. Louis St Louis City 100 55.25% 70 38.67% 11 6.08% 181
St Louis County 76 64.41% 41 34.75% 1 0.85% 118
* Region Total * 176 58.86% 111 37.12% 12 4.01% 299
Other Out Home Inv 106 92.98% 8 7.02% 0 0.00% 114
* Region Total * 106 92.98% 8 7.02% 0 0.00% 114
State Total 3,354 81.95% 640 15.64% 99 2.42% 4,093
0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact
9Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During January 2020
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Northwest Andrew 2 28.57% 2 28.57% 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Buchanan 28 27.18% 11 10.68% 55 53.40% 9 8.74% 0 0.00% 103
Caldwell 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Carroll 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Cass 6 12.77% 8 17.02% 16 34.04% 13 27.66% 4 8.51% 47
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Clay 33 24.27% 5 3.68% 96 70.59% 2 1.47% 0 0.00% 136
Clinton 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Daviess 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
De Kalb 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Gentry 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Grundy 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Harrison 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Johnson 6 26.09% 0 0.00% 16 69.57% 1 4.35% 0 0.00% 23
Lafayette 4 23.53% 0 0.00% 11 64.71% 2 11.77% 0 0.00% 17
Linn 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Livingston 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 6 54.55% 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 11
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Nodaway 3 27.27% 1 9.09% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Pettis 3 17.65% 4 23.53% 5 29.41% 5 29.41% 0 0.00% 17
Platte 10 16.67% 10 16.67% 25 41.67% 15 25.00% 0 0.00% 60
Putnam 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 6 85.71% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Ray 3 20.00% 3 20.00% 9 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15
Saline 4 15.39% 6 23.08% 12 46.15% 4 15.39% 0 0.00% 26
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 119 21.76% 59 10.79% 304 55.58% 61 11.15% 4 0.73% 547
Northeast Adair 5 26.32% 1 5.26% 13 68.42% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19
Audrain 2 7.69% 2 7.69% 20 76.92% 2 7.69% 0 0.00% 26
Boone 4 6.90% 13 22.41% 15 25.86% 25 43.10% 1 1.72% 58
Callaway 11 22.00% 13 26.00% 15 30.00% 11 22.00% 0 0.00% 50
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cole 17 29.31% 2 3.45% 34 58.62% 5 8.62% 0 0.00% 58
Franklin 19 19.79% 17 17.71% 47 48.96% 12 12.50% 1 1.04% 96
Gasconade 3 15.00% 3 15.00% 11 55.00% 3 15.00% 0 0.00% 20
Howard 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Lewis 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Lincoln 7 12.96% 9 16.67% 26 48.15% 12 22.22% 0 0.00% 54
Macon 2 22.22% 2 22.22% 3 33.33% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9
Marion 8 23.53% 2 5.88% 23 67.65% 1 2.94% 0 0.00% 34
Monroe 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Montgomery 3 21.43% 0 0.00% 10 71.43% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 14
Osage 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Pike 1 4.76% 5 23.81% 9 42.86% 6 28.57% 0 0.00% 21
Ralls 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Randolph 5 13.89% 8 22.22% 19 52.78% 3 8.33% 1 2.78% 36
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 4 57.14% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
Shelby 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
St Charles 37 14.34% 55 21.32% 65 25.19% 72 27.91% 29 11.24% 258
Warren 6 26.09% 0 0.00% 16 69.57% 1 4.35% 0 0.00% 23
* Region Total * 141 17.30% 136 16.69% 345 42.33% 161 19.76% 32 3.93% 815
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 4 57.14% 7
Butler 8 22.86% 9 25.71% 14 40.00% 4 11.43% 0 0.00% 35
Cape Girardeau 3 13.64% 6 27.27% 4 18.18% 4 18.18% 5 22.73% 22
Carter 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Crawford 1 3.03% 9 27.27% 9 27.27% 14 42.42% 0 0.00% 33
Dent 1 6.25% 3 18.75% 3 18.75% 6 37.50% 3 18.75% 16
Investigations Assessments
0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days 0 - 45 Days 46 - 90 Days Over 90 days
Note: Investigations and Assessments reported
separately beginning July 2016. 10Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 5.
The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,
Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During January 2020
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total
Southeast Dunklin 0 0.00% 3 25.00% 5 41.67% 3 25.00% 1 8.33% 12
Howell 15 26.79% 8 14.29% 24 42.86% 9 16.07% 0 0.00% 56
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 5
Jefferson 6 4.62% 22 16.92% 32 24.62% 41 31.54% 29 22.31% 130
Madison 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 8 72.73% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11
Maries 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6
Mississippi 2 8.33% 1 4.17% 13 54.17% 6 25.00% 2 8.33% 24
New Madrid 1 6.25% 4 25.00% 5 31.25% 4 25.00% 2 12.50% 16
Oregon 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 7 70.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10
Pemiscot 6 23.08% 6 23.08% 6 23.08% 4 15.39% 4 15.39% 26
Perry 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 7
Phelps 2 11.77% 8 47.06% 4 23.53% 2 11.77% 1 5.88% 17
Pulaski 0 0.00% 31 47.69% 12 18.46% 15 23.08% 7 10.77% 65
Reynolds 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Ripley 3 25.00% 2 16.67% 5 41.67% 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 12
Scott 9 16.98% 6 11.32% 22 41.51% 7 13.21% 9 16.98% 53
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
St Francois 16 19.51% 17 20.73% 31 37.81% 17 20.73% 1 1.22% 82
Ste Genevieve 3 13.64% 7 31.82% 8 36.36% 3 13.64% 1 4.55% 22
Stoddard 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Texas 0 0.00% 13 59.09% 0 0.00% 3 13.64% 6 27.27% 22
Washington 10 33.33% 6 20.00% 9 30.00% 5 16.67% 0 0.00% 30
Wayne 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7
* Region Total * 94 12.65% 171 23.02% 237 31.90% 162 21.80% 79 10.63% 743
Southwest Barry 5 22.73% 1 4.55% 16 72.73% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 22
Barton 4 30.77% 0 0.00% 9 69.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13
Bates 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Benton 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7
Camden 9 47.37% 1 5.26% 6 31.58% 3 15.79% 0 0.00% 19
Cedar 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11
Christian 20 29.85% 3 4.48% 43 64.18% 1 1.49% 0 0.00% 67
Dade 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Dallas 5 26.32% 0 0.00% 14 73.68% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19
Douglas 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Greene 53 16.72% 39 12.30% 158 49.84% 59 18.61% 8 2.52% 317
Henry 4 22.22% 0 0.00% 13 72.22% 1 5.56% 0 0.00% 18
Hickory 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Jasper 41 36.61% 5 4.46% 64 57.14% 2 1.79% 0 0.00% 112
Laclede 10 16.95% 13 22.03% 28 47.46% 8 13.56% 0 0.00% 59
Lawrence 17 50.00% 0 0.00% 17 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 34
McDonald 4 28.57% 0 0.00% 10 71.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14
Miller 2 7.69% 3 11.54% 9 34.62% 9 34.62% 3 11.54% 26
Moniteau 2 18.18% 3 27.27% 3 27.27% 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 11
Morgan 3 18.75% 1 6.25% 5 31.25% 7 43.75% 0 0.00% 16
Newton 13 25.00% 0 0.00% 39 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 52
Ozark 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Polk 15 31.92% 5 10.64% 21 44.68% 6 12.77% 0 0.00% 47
St Clair 4 40.00% 0 0.00% 6 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Stone 6 28.57% 0 0.00% 15 71.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21
Taney 8 11.27% 20 28.17% 31 43.66% 9 12.68% 3 4.23% 71
Vernon 10 33.33% 0 0.00% 20 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 30
Webster 12 30.77% 3 7.69% 24 61.54% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 39
Wright 5 27.78% 1 5.56% 9 50.00% 3 16.67% 0 0.00% 18
* Region Total * 276 25.28% 100 9.16% 590 54.03% 112 10.26% 14 1.28% 1,092
Kansas City Jackson 99 21.57% 79 17.21% 181 39.43% 89 19.39% 11 2.40% 459
* Region Total * 99 21.57% 79 17.21% 181 39.43% 89 19.39% 11 2.40% 459
St. Louis St Louis City 25 11.52% 39 17.97% 71 32.72% 72 33.18% 10 4.61% 217
St Louis County 8 6.50% 49 39.84% 18 14.63% 29 23.58% 19 15.45% 123
* Region Total * 33 9.71% 88 25.88% 89 26.18% 101 29.71% 29 8.53% 340
Other Out Home Inv 80 70.18% 10 8.77% 24 21.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 114
* Region Total * 80 70.18% 10 8.77% 24 21.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 114
State Total 842 20.49% 643 15.65% 1,770 43.07% 686 16.69% 169 4.11% 4,110
Investigations Assessments
0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days 0 - 45 Days 46 - 90 Days Over 90 days
Note: Investigations and Assessments reported
separately beginning July 2016. 11Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 6.
CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During January 2020
CA/N CA/N Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N
CA/N Family Juvenile Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality
Investigations Assessment Assessment Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total
Northwest Andrew 4 5 1 2 0 0 0 12
Atchison 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2
Buchanan 29 78 5 8 16 28 0 164
Caldwell 1 3 0 2 0 2 0 8
Carroll 0 3 1 1 2 3 0 10
Cass 29 39 5 7 8 9 0 97
Chariton 1 7 0 0 0 1 0 9
Clay 47 103 6 25 21 17 0 219
Clinton 5 3 0 1 0 1 0 10
Cooper 8 14 0 1 1 3 0 27
Daviess 3 2 0 0 1 3 0 9
De Kalb 1 4 1 0 0 2 0 8
Gentry 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 7
Grundy 4 4 1 0 0 3 0 12
Harrison 4 4 0 0 4 0 0 12
Holt 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2
Johnson 10 24 2 6 5 7 0 54
Lafayette 9 20 3 6 4 7 0 49
Linn 2 9 0 0 0 5 0 16
Livingston 2 1 1 1 3 4 0 12
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 2 8 1 0 2 0 0 13
Pettis 13 18 1 1 3 3 0 39
Platte 20 40 2 4 9 7 0 82
Putnam 3 3 0 0 1 1 0 8
Ray 9 12 0 1 3 3 0 28
Saline 10 17 1 2 4 3 0 37
Sullivan 4 2 0 0 0 3 0 9
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 226 427 31 68 88 115 0 955
Northeast Adair 3 16 1 0 1 6 0 27
Audrain 10 21 1 1 1 8 0 42
Boone 41 88 8 15 13 23 0 188
Callaway 17 32 2 3 3 20 0 77
Clark 2 5 0 0 0 4 0 11
Cole 14 36 3 5 1 11 0 70
Franklin 35 50 6 8 9 24 0 132
Gasconade 2 12 0 2 1 1 0 18
Howard 6 6 0 1 1 2 0 16
Knox 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3
Lewis 1 8 0 1 1 0 0 11
Lincoln 29 41 4 3 8 11 0 96
Macon 4 11 0 1 1 4 0 21
Marion 9 26 0 3 1 7 0 46
Monroe 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 4
Montgomery 1 4 0 2 0 0 0 7
Osage 3 5 0 1 0 0 0 9
Pike 12 7 3 0 4 6 0 32
Ralls 1 3 0 0 0 1 0 5
Randolph 9 16 2 0 1 9 0 37
Schuyler 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3
Scotland 2 3 0 0 0 1 0 6
Shelby 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3
St Charles 65 126 11 21 32 36 0 291
Warren 11 32 2 3 5 8 0 61
* Region Total * 280 557 43 70 83 183 0 1,216
Southeast Bollinger 7 5 0 3 3 3 0 21
Butler 17 32 1 1 4 7 0 62
Cape Girardeau 14 42 3 1 4 16 0 80
Carter 1 5 0 1 0 4 0 11
Crawford 10 25 0 3 2 12 0 52
Dent 5 11 2 3 0 6 0 27
12Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 6.
CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During January 2020
CA/N CA/N Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N
CA/N Family Juvenile Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality
Investigations Assessment Assessment Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total
Southeast Dunklin 16 26 1 2 9 2 0 56
Howell 19 35 2 6 4 11 0 77
Iron 2 7 0 1 0 2 0 12
Jefferson 37 96 1 25 10 24 0 193
Madison 5 2 0 3 1 1 0 12
Maries 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 6
Mississippi 3 12 0 1 2 5 0 23
New Madrid 7 13 2 1 3 10 0 36
Oregon 3 8 2 0 3 3 0 19
Pemiscot 4 16 0 2 2 6 0 30
Perry 2 11 3 1 1 1 0 19
Phelps 9 31 6 4 6 11 0 67
Pulaski 9 26 1 4 2 9 0 51
Reynolds 2 5 0 0 1 2 0 10
Ripley 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 10
Scott 16 22 4 4 1 9 0 56
Shannon 3 3 0 1 0 1 0 8
St Francois 35 51 4 14 4 18 0 126
Ste Genevieve 1 3 0 1 3 3 0 11
Stoddard 11 13 0 3 2 7 0 36
Texas 9 15 1 0 3 3 0 31
Washington 7 21 1 3 1 8 0 41
Wayne 2 10 2 0 1 1 0 16
* Region Total * 260 552 36 91 74 186 0 1,199
Southwest Barry 11 35 1 6 1 15 0 69
Barton 5 10 0 1 3 2 0 21
Bates 7 7 0 0 0 3 0 17
Benton 8 6 1 1 0 1 0 17
Camden 20 30 1 1 8 9 0 69
Cedar 5 8 0 1 0 5 0 19
Christian 23 56 4 1 8 16 0 108
Dade 0 6 0 0 0 1 0 7
Dallas 11 6 1 2 2 6 0 28
Douglas 2 11 0 1 3 0 0 17
Greene 106 255 15 37 57 85 0 555
Henry 7 24 0 3 2 6 0 42
Hickory 2 6 0 2 0 3 0 13
Jasper 47 90 6 6 11 35 0 195
Laclede 21 32 1 7 4 15 0 80
Lawrence 23 26 2 3 9 20 0 83
McDonald 7 9 0 2 3 2 0 23
Miller 6 15 1 0 3 5 0 30
Moniteau 4 8 0 2 1 1 0 16
Morgan 6 12 0 0 1 3 0 22
Newton 15 39 3 4 2 8 0 71
Ozark 6 6 1 1 2 0 0 16
Polk 11 30 2 6 5 10 0 64
St Clair 2 6 0 1 1 0 0 10
Stone 10 19 1 4 3 2 0 39
Taney 19 44 5 14 9 21 0 112
Vernon 8 19 1 4 2 8 0 42
Webster 11 20 1 5 11 5 0 53
Wright 10 14 0 0 4 4 0 32
* Region Total * 413 849 47 115 155 291 0 1,870
Kansas City Jackson 249 382 29 115 69 130 0 974
* Region Total * 249 382 29 115 69 130 0 974
St. Louis St Louis City 101 216 14 58 20 64 0 473
St Louis County 234 364 24 73 61 91 0 847
* Region Total * 335 580 38 131 81 155 0 1,320
Other Out Home Inv 160 2 0 0 1 2 0 165
Out Of State 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 8
Stat Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 56
* Region Total * 165 5 0 0 1 2 56 229
State Total 1,928 3,352 224 590 551 1,062 56 7,763
13Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500Ja
n-1
6
Ap
r-1
6
Jul-
16
Oct
-16
Jan
-17
Ap
r-1
7
Jul-
17
Oct
-17
Jan
-18
Ap
r-1
8
Jul-
18
Oct
-18
Jan
-19
Ap
r-1
9
Jul-
19
Oct
-19
Jan
-20
Figure 2.
Child Abuse & Neglect Reports
January 2016 Through January 2020
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
5,500
6,000
6,500
7,000
7,500
Feb
Mar
Ap
r
May Jun
Jul
Au
g
Sep
Oct
No
v
De
c
Jan
Figure 3.
Child Abuse & Neglect Reports
February 2018 Through January 2020
Feb 2018 to Jan 2019 Feb 2019 to Jan 2020
14Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
-30%
-25%
-20%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 4.
Percentage Change in CA/N Reports
Made Twelve Months ApartJanuary 2019 and January 2020
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 5.
CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed
During January 2020 by Conclusion
Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstianted Family Assessment Other
15Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0% 0%
Substantiated6%
Unsubstantiated P S I3%
Unsubstantiated23%
Family Assessment66%
Other2%
Figure 6.
CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed
During January 2020 by Conclusion
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 7.
Time Between Report and Child Contact
For Investigations/Assessments Completed in January 2020
Within 24 Hours After 24 Hours No Contact
16Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 8a.
CA/N Investigations Completed
During January 2020
Within 45 Days More Than 45 Days
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 8b.
CA/N Assessments Completed
During January 2020
Within 45 Days Within 46-90 Days More Than 90 Days
17Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 18 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures
Table 1.
• Based upon incidents and children reported during the month.
• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents
during any given month).
Table 2.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents
during any given month).
• Conclusions are as follows:
Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence, Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified
Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated
Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-
Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe,
Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days, Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,
Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed
Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation),
Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)
• Population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.
Table 3.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence,
Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated
Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated
Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-
cooperative/Child Safe, Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days,
Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,
Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed
Children’s Services Management Report 19 Research and Data Analysis
Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State,
Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School
Investigation)
Table 4.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include
information on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G-
Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already Investigated.
Table 5.
• Based upon incidents concluded during the month.
Table 6.
• Based upon incidents and referrals reported during the month.
• Administrative referrals are not included.
Figure 2. and Figure 3.
• Based upon incidents reported during the month.
Figure 4.
• Based upon incidents reported during the month compared to incidents reported during the same month of the previous year.
Figure 5. and Figure 6.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.
• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence,
Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified
Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated
Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-
cooperative/Child Safe,
Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days, Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,
Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed
Children’s Services Management Report 20 Research and Data Analysis
Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State,
Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School
Investigation)
• Figures do not include Out-of-Home Investigation, STAT Unit, or Out of State categories.
• Figures do not include information on expunged reports and reports where the only
alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already
Investigated.
Figure 7.
• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include
information on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G-
Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already Investigated.
Figure 8a. and Figure 8b.
• Based upon investigations and assessments completed during the month.
Family-Centered Services
Table 7.
Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of January 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Atchison 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Buchanan 4 1 1 5 24 1 36
Caldwell 0 0 0 1 3 0 4
Carroll 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Cass 2 3 7 0 4 2 18
Chariton 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Clay 0 5 4 0 14 0 23
Clinton 0 1 1 0 2 0 4
Cooper 0 1 1 1 3 0 6
Daviess 0 2 0 1 3 0 6
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Grundy 0 1 0 0 8 0 9
Harrison 0 2 0 1 4 0 7
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 0 2 1 3
Lafayette 0 0 0 1 6 0 7
Linn 0 3 2 0 2 0 7
Livingston 0 3 0 0 2 0 5
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 1 0 1 4 0 6
Pettis 2 3 1 0 7 0 13
Platte 0 2 0 2 2 0 6
Putnam 1 2 0 0 2 0 5
Ray 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Saline 0 0 0 0 5 0 5
Sullivan 0 1 2 0 2 0 5
Worth 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 10 33 19 14 106 4 186
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 7 0 7
Audrain 3 0 1 2 9 3 18
Boone 6 11 2 1 25 9 54
Callaway 4 1 1 0 23 5 34
Clark 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Cole 0 6 0 0 11 2 19
Franklin 3 8 0 6 17 0 34
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 2 0 0 7 0 9
Knox 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Lewis 0 1 0 0 1 1 3
Lincoln 0 3 4 0 17 0 24
Macon 0 2 1 0 2 0 5
Marion 1 0 4 0 3 0 8
Monroe 0 3 0 0 0 0 3
Montgomery 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Osage 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Pike 1 2 1 1 5 0 10
Ralls 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Randolph 0 5 1 2 15 0 23
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Scotland 0 2 0 1 1 0 4
Shelby 0 1 1 0 0 0 2
St Charles 2 1 2 0 27 0 32
Warren 1 3 0 1 5 0 10
* Region Total * 21 53 18 14 186 20 312
Southeast Bollinger 1 0 1 0 12 0 14
Butler 2 16 2 4 14 0 38
Cape Girardeau 2 3 1 1 59 5 71
Carter 1 0 0 1 1 0 3
Crawford 0 3 1 2 15 0 21
Dent 0 0 1 0 8 0 9
22Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 7.
Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of January 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 0 0 1 2 9 0 12
Howell 2 2 0 8 31 2 45
Iron 0 2 0 1 3 0 6
Jefferson 0 3 2 6 36 2 49
Madison 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Maries 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Mississippi 0 2 0 3 5 0 10
New Madrid 0 3 0 3 17 0 23
Oregon 1 1 0 0 4 1 7
Pemiscot 1 1 0 1 15 0 18
Perry 0 2 0 0 13 0 15
Phelps 0 3 1 1 24 0 29
Pulaski 1 2 2 1 18 0 24
Reynolds 0 1 0 0 6 0 7
Ripley 0 2 0 0 2 0 4
Scott 0 2 0 4 18 0 24
Shannon 0 2 0 1 3 0 6
St Francois 0 7 0 1 25 0 33
Ste Genevieve 0 2 0 0 10 0 12
Stoddard 0 2 0 1 12 0 15
Texas 0 0 1 0 12 0 13
Washington 0 0 0 0 6 1 7
Wayne 0 0 0 1 12 0 13
* Region Total * 11 61 13 43 395 11 534
Southwest Barry 0 4 0 0 9 0 13
Barton 0 1 1 1 5 0 8
Bates 0 2 0 0 3 0 5
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 1 5 0 1 10 0 17
Cedar 0 2 1 0 4 0 7
Christian 0 3 0 3 9 0 15
Dade 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Dallas 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Douglas 0 0 1 0 4 0 5
Greene 2 4 0 0 89 0 95
Henry 0 3 0 2 15 0 20
Hickory 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
Jasper 0 23 1 4 67 1 96
Laclede 1 5 1 2 6 0 15
Lawrence 0 2 0 0 6 0 8
McDonald 0 3 0 0 10 0 13
Miller 0 4 0 0 14 0 18
Moniteau 1 1 0 0 8 0 10
Morgan 0 1 0 0 7 0 8
Newton 0 2 0 0 8 0 10
Ozark 0 0 1 0 1 0 2
Polk 1 0 0 0 2 0 3
St Clair 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Stone 0 1 0 0 6 0 7
Taney 0 3 0 1 28 1 33
Vernon 0 0 0 0 3 1 4
Webster 1 1 0 2 8 0 12
Wright 0 0 1 1 7 0 9
* Region Total * 7 73 7 18 333 3 441
Kansas City Jackson 0 7 11 14 142 46 220
* Region Total * 0 7 11 14 142 46 220
St. Louis St Louis City 1 1 1 0 52 2 57
St Louis County 6 5 14 3 16 10 54
* Region Total * 7 6 15 3 68 12 111
State Total 56 233 83 106 1,230 96 1,804
23Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 8.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During January 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Atchison 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Buchanan 4 2 1 6 28 1 42
Caldwell 0 0 0 1 3 0 4
Carroll 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Cass 2 3 7 0 4 2 18
Chariton 0 1 1 0 0 0 2
Clay 0 6 4 0 15 0 25
Clinton 1 1 1 0 2 1 6
Cooper 0 1 1 1 3 0 6
Daviess 0 2 0 1 4 0 7
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Gentry 0 0 0 0 5 0 5
Grundy 0 1 0 0 8 0 9
Harrison 0 2 0 1 6 0 9
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 1 0 2 1 4
Lafayette 0 1 0 1 6 0 8
Linn 0 3 2 0 2 0 7
Livingston 0 3 0 0 4 0 7
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 1 0 1 5 0 7
Pettis 3 3 1 0 8 0 15
Platte 0 2 0 2 3 0 7
Putnam 1 2 0 0 3 0 6
Ray 0 2 0 0 1 0 3
Saline 0 1 0 0 5 0 6
Sullivan 0 1 2 0 2 0 5
Worth 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 12 38 21 15 125 5 216
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 8 0 8
Audrain 3 0 1 2 10 3 19
Boone 6 13 2 2 30 9 62
Callaway 4 1 1 0 23 5 34
Clark 0 1 0 0 3 0 4
Cole 0 6 0 0 12 3 21
Franklin 3 8 0 6 21 0 38
Gasconade 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Howard 0 2 0 0 7 0 9
Knox 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Lewis 0 2 0 0 1 1 4
Lincoln 0 3 4 0 18 0 25
Macon 0 2 1 0 3 0 6
Marion 2 0 4 0 5 0 11
Monroe 0 4 0 0 0 0 4
Montgomery 0 3 0 0 3 0 6
Osage 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Pike 1 2 1 1 5 0 10
Ralls 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Randolph 0 5 1 2 15 0 23
Schuyler 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Scotland 0 2 1 1 1 0 5
Shelby 0 1 1 0 0 0 2
St Charles 2 1 2 1 31 0 37
Warren 1 3 0 1 6 0 11
* Region Total * 22 62 19 16 211 21 351
Southeast Bollinger 1 0 1 0 13 0 15
Butler 2 22 2 4 15 0 45
Cape Girardeau 3 6 2 1 64 6 82
Carter 1 0 0 1 1 0 3
Crawford 0 3 1 2 15 0 21
Dent 0 0 1 0 8 0 9
24Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 8.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During January 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 0 0 1 3 9 0 13
Howell 4 3 0 10 31 2 50
Iron 0 2 0 2 3 0 7
Jefferson 0 3 2 6 48 2 61
Madison 0 0 0 0 6 0 6
Maries 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Mississippi 0 2 0 3 6 0 11
New Madrid 0 3 0 3 17 0 23
Oregon 1 1 1 0 4 1 8
Pemiscot 1 2 0 1 15 0 19
Perry 0 2 0 0 14 0 16
Phelps 0 3 1 1 24 0 29
Pulaski 1 2 2 1 20 0 26
Reynolds 0 2 0 0 7 0 9
Ripley 1 3 0 0 2 0 6
Scott 0 2 0 4 19 0 25
Shannon 0 2 0 1 3 0 6
St Francois 0 8 0 1 32 0 41
Ste Genevieve 0 2 0 0 10 0 12
Stoddard 0 2 0 1 13 0 16
Texas 0 0 1 0 15 0 16
Washington 0 0 0 0 9 1 10
Wayne 0 0 0 1 12 0 13
* Region Total * 15 75 15 47 436 12 600
Southwest Barry 0 4 0 0 11 0 15
Barton 0 2 2 2 6 0 12
Bates 0 2 0 0 6 0 8
Benton 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Camden 1 5 0 1 11 0 18
Cedar 0 3 1 0 5 1 10
Christian 0 5 0 3 11 0 19
Dade 0 2 0 0 1 0 3
Dallas 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Douglas 0 0 1 0 5 0 6
Greene 2 5 0 0 104 0 111
Henry 0 3 0 2 17 0 22
Hickory 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
Jasper 0 25 1 4 85 2 117
Laclede 1 5 1 2 8 0 17
Lawrence 0 3 0 0 7 0 10
McDonald 0 4 0 0 10 0 14
Miller 1 4 0 0 19 0 24
Moniteau 1 1 0 0 10 0 12
Morgan 0 1 0 0 9 0 10
Newton 0 3 0 0 9 1 13
Ozark 0 1 1 0 1 0 3
Polk 1 0 0 0 3 0 4
St Clair 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Stone 0 2 0 0 8 0 10
Taney 0 3 0 1 29 1 34
Vernon 0 0 0 0 4 1 5
Webster 1 1 0 2 10 0 14
Wright 0 0 1 1 11 0 13
* Region Total * 8 87 8 20 406 6 535
Kansas City Jackson 0 8 13 22 155 55 253
* Region Total * 0 8 13 22 155 55 253
St. Louis St Louis City 1 1 1 0 57 3 63
St Louis County 6 6 16 3 18 10 59
* Region Total * 7 7 17 3 75 13 122
State Total 64 277 93 123 1,408 112 2,077
25Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 9.
Persons in Family-Centered Services During January 2020
Child Total Persons with
Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action
Northwest Andrew 3 2 0 5 0
Atchison 4 6 0 10 0
Buchanan 77 90 0 167 8
Caldwell 7 11 0 18 2
Carroll 1 2 0 3 0
Cass 31 32 0 63 23
Chariton 4 4 0 8 0
Clay 56 60 0 116 6
Clinton 11 15 0 26 2
Cooper 12 11 0 23 2
Daviess 17 21 0 38 8
De Kalb 2 1 0 3 1
Gentry 7 11 0 18 3
Grundy 20 20 0 40 9
Harrison 14 21 0 35 6
Holt 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 5 4 0 9 2
Lafayette 13 15 0 28 0
Linn 12 15 0 27 4
Livingston 12 14 0 26 1
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 11 19 0 30 7
Pettis 32 34 0 66 8
Platte 22 24 0 46 2
Putnam 14 13 0 27 1
Ray 7 8 0 15 0
Saline 13 8 0 21 1
Sullivan 8 9 0 17 4
Worth 2 2 0 4 0
* Region Total * 417 472 0 889 100
Northeast Adair 17 29 0 46 10
Audrain 38 44 0 82 17
Boone 131 143 0 274 55
Callaway 68 73 0 141 22
Clark 7 10 0 17 4
Cole 40 48 0 88 13
Franklin 105 92 1 198 24
Gasconade 5 5 0 10 4
Howard 22 25 0 47 4
Knox 4 1 0 5 0
Lewis 7 11 0 18 4
Lincoln 42 61 0 103 22
Macon 10 13 0 23 8
Marion 17 29 1 47 7
Monroe 12 7 0 19 0
Montgomery 8 12 0 20 4
Osage 8 5 0 13 4
Pike 19 28 0 47 11
Ralls 7 10 0 17 2
Randolph 48 55 0 103 12
Schuyler 4 5 0 9 1
Scotland 11 10 0 21 3
Shelby 4 6 0 10 0
St Charles 75 76 0 151 15
Warren 22 26 0 48 5
* Region Total * 731 824 2 1,557 251
Southeast Bollinger 24 40 0 64 14
Butler 75 105 0 180 16
Cape Girardeau 137 203 0 340 43
Carter 6 7 0 13 0
Crawford 39 49 0 88 13
Dent 24 18 0 42 4
26Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 9.
Persons in Family-Centered Services During January 2020
Child Total Persons with
Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action
Southeast Dunklin 23 35 0 58 7
Howell 112 104 0 216 21
Iron 14 14 0 28 2
Jefferson 139 129 1 269 53
Madison 11 15 0 26 0
Maries 2 2 0 4 0
Mississippi 22 33 0 55 12
New Madrid 35 47 0 82 11
Oregon 14 22 0 36 8
Pemiscot 29 42 0 71 6
Perry 28 57 0 85 4
Phelps 63 63 0 126 8
Pulaski 58 61 0 119 13
Reynolds 22 21 0 43 7
Ripley 10 16 0 26 3
Scott 43 54 0 97 4
Shannon 15 11 0 26 0
St Francois 81 94 1 176 17
Ste Genevieve 24 33 0 57 5
Stoddard 29 39 0 68 11
Texas 35 30 0 65 6
Washington 18 19 1 38 5
Wayne 41 35 0 76 16
* Region Total * 1,173 1,398 3 2,574 309
Southwest Barry 28 29 0 57 10
Barton 23 23 1 47 10
Bates 13 15 0 28 4
Benton 2 1 0 3 0
Camden 35 42 0 77 8
Cedar 15 19 0 34 11
Christian 32 35 1 68 8
Dade 5 9 0 14 2
Dallas 6 13 0 19 7
Douglas 13 11 0 24 3
Greene 248 257 3 508 62
Henry 36 49 1 86 18
Hickory 5 3 0 8 0
Jasper 219 289 0 508 85
Laclede 32 41 0 73 11
Lawrence 18 30 0 48 10
McDonald 23 39 0 62 3
Miller 61 53 0 114 9
Moniteau 27 34 0 61 0
Morgan 18 20 0 38 1
Newton 21 26 0 47 7
Ozark 4 6 0 10 4
Polk 9 12 0 21 4
St Clair 7 4 0 11 2
Stone 20 26 0 46 6
Taney 61 74 0 135 14
Vernon 8 7 0 15 1
Webster 28 34 0 62 9
Wright 25 26 0 51 11
* Region Total * 1,042 1,227 6 2,275 320
Kansas City Jackson 455 594 0 1,049 259
* Region Total * 455 594 0 1,049 259
St. Louis St Louis City 113 156 1 270 33
St Louis County 105 119 0 224 41
* Region Total * 218 275 1 494 74
State Total 4,036 4,790 12 8,838 1,313
27Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 10.
Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During January 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 1 1 0 3 3 0 8
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 2 0 0 4 0 6
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 1 0 1 0 2
Livingston 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pettis 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Platte 0 1 0 1 1 0 3
Putnam 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Sullivan 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Worth 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
* Region Total * 2 8 2 4 17 0 33
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Audrain 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Boone 0 1 0 0 5 1 7
Callaway 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Clark 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Cole 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Franklin 0 4 0 1 4 0 9
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Knox 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Lewis 0 1 0 0 1 1 3
Lincoln 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Macon 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Marion 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 0 1 0 3 0 4
Schuyler 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Scotland 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Shelby 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
St Charles 0 0 0 0 10 0 10
Warren 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
* Region Total * 1 12 2 1 43 2 61
Southeast Bollinger 1 0 0 0 1 0 2
Butler 1 2 0 0 5 0 8
Cape Girardeau 0 1 0 0 7 0 8
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crawford 0 0 0 1 6 0 7
Dent 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
28Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 10.
Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During January 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total
of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active
Southeast Dunklin 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Howell 0 1 0 1 4 0 6
Iron 0 1 0 0 1 0 2
Jefferson 0 0 0 1 10 0 11
Madison 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Oregon 0 0 1 0 1 0 2
Pemiscot 1 1 0 0 3 0 5
Perry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Phelps 0 0 0 1 6 0 7
Pulaski 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
Scott 0 1 0 1 3 0 5
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 1 0 0 5 0 6
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Stoddard 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Texas 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Washington 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Wayne 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
* Region Total * 3 10 1 6 77 0 97
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Barton 0 1 0 1 2 0 4
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 1 0 0 2 0 3
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 3 0 0 2 0 5
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Greene 0 0 0 0 10 0 10
Henry 0 1 0 0 3 0 4
Hickory 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Jasper 0 5 1 0 15 0 21
Laclede 0 0 0 1 1 0 2
Lawrence 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
McDonald 0 1 0 0 5 0 6
Miller 0 1 0 0 4 0 5
Moniteau 1 0 0 0 2 0 3
Morgan 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Newton 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Taney 0 0 0 0 4 0 4
Vernon 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Webster 1 0 0 0 1 0 2
Wright 0 0 1 1 2 0 4
* Region Total * 2 14 2 4 64 0 86
Kansas City Jackson 0 1 2 6 38 2 49
* Region Total * 0 1 2 6 38 2 49
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 0 6 0 6
St Louis County 0 1 2 0 2 3 8
* Region Total * 0 1 2 0 8 3 14
State Total 8 46 11 21 247 7 340
29Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 11.
Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During January 2020
by Close Reason
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Buchanan 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 6
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Chariton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clay 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Clinton 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
De Kalb 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Gentry 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lafayette 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Pettis 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Platte 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Putnam 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Ray 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Saline 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 16 53.33% 14 46.67% 30
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Audrain 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Boone 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 8
Callaway 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Clark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Cole 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Franklin 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4
Gasconade 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lincoln 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Macon 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Marion 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Monroe 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Montgomery 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Schuyler 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Scotland 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 5
Warren 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
* Region Total * 23 56.10% 18 43.90% 41
Southeast Bollinger 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Butler 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 7
Cape Girardeau 7 63.64% 4 36.36% 11
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Goal Achieved Other
30Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 11.
Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During January 2020
by Close Reason
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed
Southeast Dunklin 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Howell 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5
Iron 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Jefferson 4 33.33% 8 66.67% 12
Madison 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Pemiscot 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Perry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Reynolds 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Ripley 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Scott 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 4 50.00% 4 50.00% 8
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Texas 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Washington 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 3
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 28 42.42% 38 57.58% 66
Southwest Barry 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Barton 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Bates 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Benton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Camden 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Cedar 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Christian 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4
Dade 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Dallas 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Douglas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Greene 6 37.50% 10 62.50% 16
Henry 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 12 57.14% 9 42.86% 21
Laclede 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lawrence 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
McDonald 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Miller 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6
Moniteau 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Morgan 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Newton 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Ozark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Polk 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Clair 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Stone 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Taney 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Vernon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Webster 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Wright 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
* Region Total * 53 56.38% 41 43.62% 94
Kansas City Jackson 26 78.79% 7 21.21% 33
* Region Total * 26 78.79% 7 21.21% 33
St. Louis St Louis City 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6
St Louis County 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5
* Region Total * 6 54.55% 5 45.46% 11
State Total 152 55.27% 123 44.73% 275
Goal Achieved Other
31Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 12.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During January 2020
Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Caldwell 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 7 53.85% 2 15.39% 4 30.77% 0 0.00% 13
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Clinton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cooper 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Daviess 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
De Kalb 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Gentry 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Grundy 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Harrison 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Linn 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Livingston 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Pettis 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5
Platte 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Putnam 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Sullivan 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 39 67.24% 12 20.69% 4 6.90% 3 5.17% 58
Northeast Adair 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Audrain 2 25.00% 4 50.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 8
Boone 10 34.48% 8 27.59% 4 13.79% 7 24.14% 29
Callaway 5 38.46% 2 15.39% 2 15.39% 4 30.77% 13
Clark 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Cole 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Franklin 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 7
Gasconade 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lincoln 4 36.36% 3 27.27% 1 9.09% 3 27.27% 11
Macon 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Marion 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 5
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Osage 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pike 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 4
Ralls 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Randolph 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 7
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 3 33.33% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 9
Warren 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
* Region Total * 55 43.65% 29 23.02% 14 11.11% 28 22.22% 126
Southeast Bollinger 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Butler 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Cape Girardeau 12 54.55% 7 31.82% 3 13.64% 0 0.00% 22
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Crawford 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Dent 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months
32Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 12.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During January 2020
Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Southeast Dunklin 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Howell 5 45.46% 4 36.36% 1 9.09% 1 9.09% 11
Iron 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Jefferson 13 41.94% 3 9.68% 5 16.13% 10 32.26% 31
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
New Madrid 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 6
Oregon 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Pemiscot 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Perry 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Phelps 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5
Pulaski 4 50.00% 3 37.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Reynolds 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3
Ripley 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Scott 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Ste Genevieve 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Stoddard 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Texas 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Washington 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Wayne 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
* Region Total * 94 58.75% 35 21.88% 13 8.13% 18 11.25% 160
Southwest Barry 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Barton 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6
Bates 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Cedar 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Christian 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6
Dade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dallas 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Douglas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Greene 9 29.03% 16 51.61% 1 3.23% 5 16.13% 31
Henry 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 7
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 16 40.00% 11 27.50% 8 20.00% 5 12.50% 40
Laclede 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6
Lawrence 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 4
McDonald 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Miller 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 7
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Newton 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Ozark 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2
Polk 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Clair 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Stone 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Taney 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 1 11.11% 4 44.44% 9
Vernon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Webster 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Wright 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
* Region Total * 69 42.59% 47 29.01% 25 15.43% 21 12.96% 162
Kansas City Jackson 55 39.29% 31 22.14% 32 22.86% 22 15.71% 140
* Region Total * 55 39.29% 31 22.14% 32 22.86% 22 15.71% 140
St. Louis St Louis City 6 35.29% 4 23.53% 0 0.00% 7 41.18% 17
St Louis County 14 53.85% 4 15.39% 3 11.54% 5 19.23% 26
* Region Total * 20 46.51% 8 18.61% 3 6.98% 12 27.91% 43
State Total 332 48.19% 162 23.51% 91 13.21% 104 15.09% 689
0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months
33Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 13.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During January 2020
Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Northwest Andrew 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Atchison 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Buchanan 20 55.56% 10 27.78% 3 8.33% 3 8.33% 36
Caldwell 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Carroll 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cass 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 5
Chariton 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Clay 13 59.09% 6 27.27% 3 13.64% 0 0.00% 22
Clinton 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5
Cooper 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Daviess 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Grundy 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Harrison 1 16.67% 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lafayette 4 50.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
Linn 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Livingston 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Pettis 4 40.00% 3 30.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 10
Platte 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Putnam 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5
Ray 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Saline 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Sullivan 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 89 55.98% 49 30.82% 14 8.81% 7 4.40% 159
Northeast Adair 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Audrain 6 54.55% 2 18.18% 2 18.18% 1 9.09% 11
Boone 18 54.55% 9 27.27% 1 3.03% 5 15.15% 33
Callaway 12 57.14% 6 28.57% 2 9.52% 1 4.76% 21
Clark 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Cole 8 57.14% 4 28.57% 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 14
Franklin 20 64.52% 8 25.81% 0 0.00% 3 9.68% 31
Gasconade 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Howard 6 75.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Knox 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lewis 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lincoln 7 50.00% 3 21.43% 4 28.57% 0 0.00% 14
Macon 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Marion 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6
Monroe 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Montgomery 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Pike 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Ralls 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Randolph 13 76.47% 2 11.77% 0 0.00% 2 11.77% 17
Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Scotland 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Shelby 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
St Charles 27 96.43% 1 3.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 28
Warren 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8
* Region Total * 155 68.58% 43 19.03% 15 6.64% 13 5.75% 226
Southeast Bollinger 7 63.64% 3 27.27% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11
Butler 19 54.29% 3 8.57% 5 14.29% 8 22.86% 35
Cape Girardeau 27 45.00% 11 18.33% 19 31.67% 3 5.00% 60
Carter 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3
Crawford 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15
Dent 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months
34Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 13.
Family-Centered Services Cases Active During January 2020
Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases
Southeast Dunklin 6 60.00% 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10
Howell 20 51.28% 8 20.51% 4 10.26% 7 17.95% 39
Iron 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Jefferson 19 63.33% 8 26.67% 3 10.00% 0 0.00% 30
Madison 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Mississippi 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 7
New Madrid 10 58.82% 4 23.53% 3 17.65% 0 0.00% 17
Oregon 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5
Pemiscot 11 68.75% 4 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 6.25% 16
Perry 7 53.85% 5 38.46% 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 13
Phelps 15 62.50% 5 20.83% 2 8.33% 2 8.33% 24
Pulaski 11 61.11% 5 27.78% 2 11.11% 0 0.00% 18
Reynolds 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Ripley 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4
Scott 14 66.67% 4 19.05% 2 9.52% 1 4.76% 21
Shannon 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6
St Francois 18 56.25% 10 31.25% 3 9.38% 1 3.13% 32
Ste Genevieve 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10
Stoddard 3 27.27% 6 54.55% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 11
Texas 9 64.29% 4 28.57% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 14
Washington 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6
Wayne 5 62.50% 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
* Region Total * 257 58.28% 101 22.90% 56 12.70% 27 6.12% 441
Southwest Barry 4 36.36% 4 36.36% 2 18.18% 1 9.09% 11
Barton 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6
Bates 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5
Benton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Camden 8 57.14% 2 14.29% 2 14.29% 2 14.29% 14
Cedar 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5
Christian 9 69.23% 4 30.77% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13
Dade 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Dallas 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Douglas 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5
Greene 38 47.50% 25 31.25% 8 10.00% 9 11.25% 80
Henry 6 40.00% 5 33.33% 3 20.00% 1 6.67% 15
Hickory 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Jasper 43 55.84% 22 28.57% 9 11.69% 3 3.90% 77
Laclede 8 72.73% 2 18.18% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11
Lawrence 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 6
McDonald 9 69.23% 3 23.08% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13
Miller 10 58.82% 4 23.53% 2 11.77% 1 5.88% 17
Moniteau 9 75.00% 0 0.00% 2 16.67% 1 8.33% 12
Morgan 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Newton 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7
Ozark 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Polk 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3
St Clair 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Stone 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6
Taney 7 28.00% 8 32.00% 3 12.00% 7 28.00% 25
Vernon 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4
Webster 4 40.00% 5 50.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10
Wright 7 77.78% 1 11.11% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 9
* Region Total * 205 54.96% 98 26.27% 38 10.19% 32 8.58% 373
Kansas City Jackson 86 74.78% 19 16.52% 6 5.22% 4 3.48% 115
* Region Total * 86 74.78% 19 16.52% 6 5.22% 4 3.48% 115
St. Louis St Louis City 29 63.04% 13 28.26% 2 4.35% 2 4.35% 46
St Louis County 14 42.42% 8 24.24% 2 6.06% 9 27.27% 33
* Region Total * 43 54.43% 21 26.58% 4 5.06% 11 13.92% 79
State Total 835 59.94% 331 23.76% 133 9.55% 94 6.75% 1,393
0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months
35Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Note: FCS cases with associated AC functions opened were automatically closed March 1, 2017 due to a policy change.
1,500
2,500
3,500
4,500
5,500
6,500
7,500
8,500
9,500
10,500
11,500
Jan-1
6
Mar-
16
May-1
6
Jul-16
Sep-1
6
Nov-1
6
Jan-1
7
Mar-
17
May-1
7
Jul-17
Sep-1
7
Nov-1
7
Jan-1
8
Mar-
18
May-1
8
Jul-18
Sep-1
8
Nov-1
8
Jan-1
9
Mar-
19
May-1
9
Jul-19
Sep-1
9
Nov-1
9
Jan-2
0
Figure 9.
FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month
January 2016 Through January 2020
-40%
-30%
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 10.
Percentage Change in FCS Cases Active
as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months ApartJanuary 2019 and January 2020
36Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 11.
FCS Cases Opened During January 2020
by Reason for Opening
Preponderance of Evidence Preventive Services Court Ordered
Newborn Crisis Assessment Family Assessment AC Closed/FCS Reopen
Court Ordered3%
Preponderance of Evidence
2%Newborn Crisis
Assessment6%
Family Assessment73%
AC Closed/FCS Reopen2%
Preventive Services14%
Figure 12.
FCS Cases Opened During January 2020
by Reason for Opening
37Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 13.
FCS Cases Closed During January 2020
by Reason for Closing
Goal Achieved Other Reason
0 to 3 Months48%
4 to 7 Months24%
8 to 11 Months13%
12+ Months15%
Figure 14.
FCS Cases Active During January 2020
With Court Involvement by theNumber of Months Open
38Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0 to 3 Months60%
4 to 7 Months24%
8 to 11 Months9%
12+ Months7%
Figure 15.
FCS Cases Active During January 2020
With No Court Involvement by theNumber of Months Open
39Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 40 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures
Table 9.
Counts of persons are unduplicated.
Child caretakers are persons under legal age who are also parents.
Table 11.
Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;
function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist;
all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved;
services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and family can/will access such resources;
no child under age 18 is still in the home;
Close reason of "Other" includes;
client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;
client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified;
referred to other appropriate resource;
other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;
family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;
progress no longer being made; resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;
Table 12.
All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.
Figure 9.
On March 1, 2017, memorandum CD17-16 was issued and informed staff they will no longer
open FCS functions on families when children are placed in alternative care. When the change
was implemented on March 1, 2017, all FCS cases with associated AC functions opened wereautomatically closed. The closure of the FCS cases associated with AC functions explains the
large decline in the number of FCS cases.
Children’s Services Management Report 41 Research and Data Analysis
Figure 13.
Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;
function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist;
all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved;
services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and
family can/will access such resources; no child under age 18 is still in the home;
Close reason of "Other" includes;
client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;
client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified;
referred to other appropriate resource;
other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;
family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;
progress no longer being made;
resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;
Figure 14.
All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.
Out-of-Home Placement
Table 14.
Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During January 2020
by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category
Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Buchanan 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.14 8.33
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cass 0 2 4 0 0 6 0.23 0.33
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clay 0 1 8 1 0 10 0.17 6.30
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.43 11.00
Gentry 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.60 1.00
Grundy 0 1 0 0 2 3 1.22 4.67
Harrison 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.90 1.50
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Johnson 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.33 5.00
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Livingston 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.60 4.00
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Nodaway 0 0 6 0 0 6 1.41 4.33
Pettis 0 1 1 1 0 3 0.28 9.67
Platte 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.09 0.50
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ray 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.51 3.67
Saline 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.19 15.00
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 11 31 2 3 47 0.22 4.87
Northeast Adair 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.20 12.00
Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Boone 0 0 7 0 0 7 0.20 4.43
Callaway 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.30 13.67
Clark 0 0 2 0 1 3 1.75 12.67
Cole 0 0 4 1 0 5 0.28 11.80
Franklin 0 3 13 0 1 17 0.68 5.94
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Howard 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.92 11.50
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lincoln 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.07 14.00
Macon 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.53 2.00
Marion 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.15 1.00
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Montgomery 0 0 3 0 0 3 1.05 8.33
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Randolph 0 1 2 0 0 3 0.51 10.67
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Charles 0 7 12 0 1 20 0.22 3.50
Warren 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.49 5.75
* Region Total * 0 14 52 1 5 72 0.28 6.58
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 4 0 0 4 1.37 3.75
Butler 0 0 5 0 1 6 0.60 5.83
Cape Girardeau 0 0 5 0 1 6 0.36 1.67
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
44Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 14.
Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During January 2020
by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category
Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 3 5 0 0 8 1.33 8.13
Dent 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.55 4.00
Dunklin 0 2 1 0 1 4 0.49 12.25
Howell 0 1 0 2 0 3 0.30 7.33
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jefferson 0 6 12 0 3 21 0.38 4.62
Madison 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.34 0.00
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mississippi 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.31 6.00
New Madrid 0 1 1 2 0 4 0.89 9.25
Oregon 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.82 5.00
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Phelps 0 1 3 1 1 6 0.61 6.00
Pulaski 0 0 5 0 1 6 0.48 8.50
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ripley 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.30 0.00
Scott 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.10 15.00
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Francois 0 2 11 0 0 13 0.90 6.85
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.24 15.00
Stoddard 0 7 1 2 2 12 1.76 3.00
Texas 0 0 0 1 1 2 0.35 12.50
Washington 0 3 6 0 1 10 1.65 1.70
Wayne 0 0 2 0 1 3 1.07 10.33
* Region Total * 0 29 65 10 13 117 0.53 5.72
Southwest Barry 0 3 1 1 1 6 0.69 7.83
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Bates 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.47 7.00
Benton 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.29 14.00
Camden 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.12 0.00
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Christian 0 0 8 0 0 8 0.38 7.13
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dallas 0 1 3 0 0 4 0.96 6.25
Douglas 0 2 1 0 1 4 1.31 8.00
Greene 0 14 33 2 2 51 0.87 5.82
Henry 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.81 8.75
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jasper 0 6 6 1 1 14 0.46 5.29
Laclede 0 0 3 1 0 4 0.45 7.75
Lawrence 0 1 7 3 1 12 1.18 10.58
McDonald 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.46 8.00
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Moniteau 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.25 14.00
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Newton 0 4 1 0 2 7 0.47 3.71
Ozark 0 0 2 0 0 2 1.03 7.50
Polk 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.13 15.00
St Clair 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.51 2.00
Stone 0 0 1 2 1 4 0.66 8.75
Taney 0 7 4 0 0 11 0.96 4.27
Vernon 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.19 16.00
Webster 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.30 11.00
Wright 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.21 12.00
* Region Total * 0 42 84 10 10 146 0.56 6.79
Kansas City Jackson 0 20 18 5 8 51 0.31 4.88
* Region Total * 0 20 18 5 8 51 0.31 4.88
St. Louis St Louis City 0 4 15 0 0 19 0.28 4.37
St Louis County 0 19 35 2 3 59 0.25 4.59
* Region Total * 0 23 50 2 3 78 0.26 4.54
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
State Total 0 139 300 30 42 511 0.36 5.81
45Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 15.
Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During January 2020
by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category
Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Buchanan 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.05 14.00
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cass 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.11 12.33
Chariton 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.57 11.00
Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Grundy 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.41 15.00
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Johnson 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.08 2.00
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Platte 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.09 3.50
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Saline 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.19 16.00
Sullivan 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.62 14.00
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 2 8 0 1 11 0.05 10.55
Northeast Adair 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.60 10.67
Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Boone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Callaway 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.10 14.00
Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cole 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Franklin 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.04 17.00
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Macon 0 0 3 1 0 4 1.06 7.00
Marion 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Charles 0 3 2 2 0 7 0.08 11.57
Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 3 8 5 0 16 0.06 10.75
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Butler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Cape Girardeau 0 1 0 1 0 2 0.12 16.00
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
46Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 15.
Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During January 2020
by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category
Entries
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.33 13.00
Dent 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.55 7.50
Dunklin 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.12 14.00
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jefferson 0 1 5 0 0 6 0.11 9.33
Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Mississippi 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.31 7.00
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pemiscot 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.60 10.00
Perry 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.42 7.50
Phelps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Pulaski 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.08 15.00
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Scott 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.30 4.33
Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Ste Genevieve 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.24 7.00
Stoddard 0 0 2 7 0 9 1.32 10.89
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 7 17 9 0 33 0.15 9.94
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Camden 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.12 13.00
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Christian 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Greene 0 0 5 0 0 5 0.09 11.00
Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Jasper 0 2 0 4 1 7 0.23 10.00
Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Lawrence 0 1 2 0 0 3 0.29 11.67
McDonald 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Newton 0 0 2 3 0 5 0.34 10.60
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Polk 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.13 11.00
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Taney 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.09 12.00
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Webster 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
* Region Total * 0 4 11 7 1 23 0.09 10.83
Kansas City Jackson 0 1 4 2 0 7 0.04 9.57
* Region Total * 0 1 4 2 0 7 0.04 9.57
St. Louis St Louis City 0 1 1 1 0 3 0.04 11.00
St Louis County 0 3 3 1 1 8 0.03 6.88
* Region Total * 0 4 4 2 1 11 0.04 8.00
State Total 0 21 52 25 3 101 0.07 10.10
47Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 16.
Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody
January 2018 Through December 2019
Total
Month/Year Entries Reentries (Re)Entries
Jan-2018 507 100 607
Feb-2018 453 112 565
Mar-2018 547 115 662
Apr-2018 544 103 647
May-2018 498 103 601
Jun-2018 480 74 554
Jul-2018 404 73 477
Aug-2018 557 118 675
Sep-2018 487 83 570
Oct-2018 489 78 567
Nov-2018 428 78 506
Dec-2018 451 82 533
Jan-2019 498 98 596
Feb-2019 396 92 488
Mar-2019 456 86 542
Apr-2019 624 85 709
May-2019 492 100 592
Jun-2019 408 88 496
Jul-2019 474 92 566
Aug-2019 583 136 719
Sep-2019 554 112 666
Oct-2019 583 109 692
Nov-2019 455 65 520
Dec-2019 490 79 569
Total 11,858 2,261 14,119
48Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 17.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During January 2020
by Length of Stay and Region
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Northwest 20 48.78% 4 9.76% 17 41.46% 41 24.88 10.24
Northeast 8 21.05% 13 34.21% 17 44.74% 38 27.26 9.05
Southeast 28 30.77% 23 25.28% 40 43.96% 91 20.07 8.91
Southwest 26 30.59% 35 41.18% 24 28.24% 85 21.13 8.52
Kansas City 17 53.13% 7 21.88% 8 25.00% 32 19.84 7.31
St. Louis 10 26.32% 9 23.68% 19 50.00% 38 24.45 8.42
Other 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0.00
State Total 109 33.54% 91 28.00% 125 38.46% 325 22.28 8.78
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
49Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 18.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Length of Stay and Case Manager County
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0.00
Atchison 2 28.57% 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 7 16.86 5.00
Buchanan 54 54.55% 28 28.28% 17 17.17% 99 16.22 8.35
Caldwell 4 33.33% 4 33.33% 4 33.33% 12 16.25 8.33
Carroll 4 57.14% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 7 8.00 12.71
Cass 67 34.18% 71 36.22% 58 29.59% 196 21.15 10.35
Chariton 3 18.75% 1 6.25% 12 75.00% 16 47.75 15.31
Clay 56 41.18% 28 20.59% 52 38.24% 136 22.19 7.88
Clinton 14 29.17% 11 22.92% 23 47.92% 48 30.46 8.85
Cooper 2 15.39% 4 30.77% 7 53.85% 13 24.92 12.62
Daviess 13 72.22% 2 11.11% 3 16.67% 18 25.00 7.56
De Kalb 11 45.83% 11 45.83% 2 8.33% 24 15.17 7.38
Gentry 8 53.33% 3 20.00% 4 26.67% 15 14.87 7.13
Grundy 16 43.24% 16 43.24% 5 13.51% 37 13.62 5.92
Harrison 10 33.33% 8 26.67% 12 40.00% 30 19.63 8.87
Holt 7 35.00% 5 25.00% 8 40.00% 20 20.45 8.40
Johnson 53 49.53% 36 33.65% 18 16.82% 107 18.92 7.37
Lafayette 27 55.10% 10 20.41% 12 24.49% 49 19.24 7.88
Linn 28 35.90% 18 23.08% 32 41.03% 78 26.32 10.17
Livingston 21 38.89% 23 42.59% 10 18.52% 54 19.24 7.13
Mercer 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4 17.25 6.50
Nodaway 36 53.73% 15 22.39% 16 23.88% 67 18.72 7.46
Pettis 30 39.47% 14 18.42% 32 42.11% 76 26.97 9.34
Platte 24 52.17% 13 28.26% 9 19.57% 46 19.28 8.89
Putnam 12 63.16% 0 0.00% 7 36.84% 19 23.47 9.95
Ray 9 52.94% 3 17.65% 5 29.41% 17 12.29 7.76
Saline 23 50.00% 8 17.39% 15 32.61% 46 22.09 6.07
Sullivan 9 28.13% 10 31.25% 13 40.63% 32 19.88 10.16
Worth 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3 13.33 9.67
* Region Total * 548 42.95% 348 27.27% 380 29.78% 1,276 21.08 8.63
Northeast Adair 37 41.11% 34 37.78% 19 21.11% 90 19.79 8.76
Audrain 17 34.00% 12 24.00% 21 42.00% 50 25.40 9.16
Boone 133 39.35% 98 28.99% 107 31.66% 338 23.94 9.72
Callaway 59 39.87% 47 31.76% 42 28.38% 148 19.57 8.77
Clark 20 54.05% 9 24.32% 8 21.62% 37 17.73 7.95
Cole 67 41.36% 62 38.27% 33 20.37% 162 17.18 8.28
Franklin 116 35.69% 97 29.85% 112 34.46% 325 23.98 8.09
Gasconade 13 43.33% 10 33.33% 7 23.33% 30 15.87 8.73
Howard 16 41.03% 15 38.46% 8 20.51% 39 16.64 11.23
Knox 7 58.33% 4 33.33% 1 8.33% 12 13.33 8.58
Lewis 6 33.33% 9 50.00% 3 16.67% 18 22.94 9.33
Lincoln 51 38.93% 37 28.24% 43 32.82% 131 20.03 8.53
Macon 48 55.81% 27 31.40% 11 12.79% 86 13.14 8.51
Marion 54 27.55% 65 33.16% 77 39.29% 196 25.85 9.10
Monroe 13 46.43% 9 32.14% 6 21.43% 28 15.64 8.04
Montgomery 10 22.73% 12 27.27% 22 50.00% 44 29.73 8.80
Osage 3 27.27% 2 18.18% 6 54.55% 11 22.64 6.45
Pike 19 52.78% 2 5.56% 15 41.67% 36 22.50 9.97
Ralls 7 31.82% 6 27.27% 9 40.91% 22 27.45 10.77
Randolph 79 53.74% 39 26.53% 29 19.73% 147 15.73 9.72
Schuyler 7 43.75% 6 37.50% 3 18.75% 16 16.19 8.94
Scotland 7 29.17% 14 58.33% 3 12.50% 24 20.13 9.67
Shelby 14 43.75% 9 28.13% 9 28.13% 32 19.34 9.91
St Charles 105 39.62% 66 24.91% 94 35.47% 265 24.01 9.33
Warren 32 35.96% 32 35.96% 25 28.09% 89 18.18 8.96
* Region Total * 940 39.56% 723 30.43% 713 30.01% 2,376 21.40 8.99
Southeast Bollinger 38 52.78% 17 23.61% 17 23.61% 72 14.14 8.04
Butler 113 46.31% 55 22.54% 76 31.15% 244 21.20 8.48
Cape Girardeau 89 42.79% 70 33.65% 49 23.56% 208 17.73 8.04
Carter 13 86.67% 0 0.00% 2 13.33% 15 10.00 4.93
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
50Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 18.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Length of Stay and Case Manager County
Average
Length of Average
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age
Southeast Crawford 85 64.89% 21 16.03% 25 19.08% 131 14.42 9.14
Dent 29 44.62% 16 24.62% 20 30.77% 65 21.14 8.94
Dunklin 66 64.71% 18 17.65% 18 17.65% 102 16.99 8.00
Howell 48 42.48% 40 35.40% 25 22.12% 113 19.80 9.38
Iron 9 25.00% 21 58.33% 6 16.67% 36 19.36 7.50
Jefferson 232 35.05% 252 38.07% 178 26.89% 662 19.63 7.96
Madison 16 34.04% 15 31.92% 16 34.04% 47 24.34 8.32
Maries 15 68.18% 4 18.18% 3 13.64% 22 11.91 10.77
Mississippi 25 49.02% 20 39.22% 6 11.77% 51 13.76 8.12
New Madrid 55 39.29% 44 31.43% 41 29.29% 140 19.73 8.63
Oregon 24 44.44% 12 22.22% 18 33.33% 54 20.30 9.43
Pemiscot 62 57.41% 19 17.59% 27 25.00% 108 21.44 10.07
Perry 31 63.27% 14 28.57% 4 8.16% 49 11.76 6.80
Phelps 111 47.03% 48 20.34% 77 32.63% 236 18.15 8.81
Pulaski 69 43.40% 45 28.30% 45 28.30% 159 19.25 8.87
Reynolds 17 51.52% 6 18.18% 10 30.30% 33 20.73 7.27
Ripley 13 28.26% 14 30.44% 19 41.30% 46 32.74 9.93
Scott 61 42.07% 50 34.48% 34 23.45% 145 17.14 7.71
Shannon 4 17.39% 11 47.83% 8 34.78% 23 24.91 9.87
St Francois 144 45.57% 82 25.95% 90 28.48% 316 19.22 7.96
Ste Genevieve 10 25.00% 9 22.50% 21 52.50% 40 24.80 9.50
Stoddard 130 77.38% 18 10.71% 20 11.91% 168 11.31 8.40
Texas 26 32.91% 23 29.11% 30 37.98% 79 18.56 7.95
Washington 49 27.53% 67 37.64% 62 34.83% 178 23.47 8.87
Wayne 37 55.22% 13 19.40% 17 25.37% 67 19.57 9.67
* Region Total * 1,621 44.92% 1,024 28.37% 964 26.71% 3,609 18.93 8.44
Southwest Barry 41 27.15% 52 34.44% 58 38.41% 151 22.09 8.85
Barton 4 22.22% 1 5.56% 13 72.22% 18 39.78 10.89
Bates 12 44.44% 6 22.22% 9 33.33% 27 23.93 9.37
Benton 10 43.48% 8 34.78% 5 21.74% 23 19.43 9.96
Camden 53 50.00% 24 22.64% 29 27.36% 106 19.04 8.64
Cedar 9 30.00% 13 43.33% 8 26.67% 30 20.53 11.27
Christian 55 39.01% 65 46.10% 21 14.89% 141 18.31 8.55
Dade 3 42.86% 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 7 13.71 8.86
Dallas 23 56.10% 7 17.07% 11 26.83% 41 24.54 8.15
Douglas 24 77.42% 3 9.68% 4 12.90% 31 10.29 10.16
Greene 355 51.83% 190 27.74% 140 20.44% 685 19.47 8.04
Henry 28 47.46% 15 25.42% 16 27.12% 59 22.61 8.88
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 6 48.83 6.00
Jasper 239 48.78% 123 25.10% 128 26.12% 490 19.03 8.95
Laclede 48 33.10% 47 32.41% 50 34.48% 145 22.81 8.08
Lawrence 63 38.18% 46 27.88% 56 33.94% 165 23.62 9.18
McDonald 35 57.38% 13 21.31% 13 21.31% 61 13.30 10.82
Miller 27 43.55% 4 6.45% 31 50.00% 62 23.81 8.02
Moniteau 8 42.11% 8 42.11% 3 15.79% 19 11.58 11.79
Morgan 38 59.38% 14 21.88% 12 18.75% 64 16.11 7.42
Newton 104 67.53% 26 16.88% 24 15.58% 154 13.41 8.65
Ozark 16 57.14% 6 21.43% 6 21.43% 28 13.14 11.21
Polk 27 42.86% 15 23.81% 21 33.33% 63 22.06 9.24
St Clair 17 70.83% 4 16.67% 3 12.50% 24 11.42 9.88
Stone 25 30.49% 25 30.49% 32 39.02% 82 22.88 9.22
Taney 129 44.03% 78 26.62% 86 29.35% 293 19.41 7.94
Vernon 11 42.31% 4 15.39% 11 42.31% 26 30.50 10.81
Webster 42 58.33% 10 13.89% 20 27.78% 72 16.86 8.90
Wright 64 57.14% 25 22.32% 23 20.54% 112 16.29 8.48
* Region Total * 1,510 47.41% 835 26.22% 840 26.37% 3,185 19.56 8.67
Kansas City Jackson 707 41.91% 471 27.92% 509 30.17% 1,687 21.55 8.25
* Region Total * 707 41.91% 471 27.92% 509 30.17% 1,687 21.55 8.25
St. Louis St Louis City 233 35.79% 152 23.35% 266 40.86% 651 28.02 8.53
St Louis County 428 37.74% 316 27.87% 390 34.39% 1,134 22.07 7.86
* Region Total * 661 37.03% 468 26.22% 656 36.75% 1,785 24.24 8.10
Other Icama 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 6 31.67 11.17
* Region Total * 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 6 31.67 11.17
State Total 5,989 43.01% 3,871 27.80% 4,064 29.19% 13,924 20.70 8.54
0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More
51Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 19.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Category
Children
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
Atchison 0 0 7 0 0 7 5.92 5.00
Buchanan 0 54 23 20 2 99 4.72 8.35
Caldwell 0 1 10 0 1 12 4.99 8.33
Carroll 0 2 3 2 0 7 3.19 12.71
Cass 0 58 95 25 18 196 7.43 10.35
Chariton 0 4 4 6 2 16 9.04 15.31
Clay 0 35 76 18 7 136 2.37 7.88
Clinton 0 22 17 8 1 48 9.42 8.85
Cooper 0 3 4 5 1 13 3.27 12.62
Daviess 0 9 7 0 2 18 7.99 7.56
De Kalb 0 8 13 3 0 24 10.39 7.38
Gentry 0 4 10 1 0 15 9.07 7.13
Grundy 0 11 24 0 2 37 15.00 5.92
Harrison 0 9 18 3 0 30 13.51 8.87
Holt 0 3 14 3 0 20 20.60 8.40
Johnson 0 35 52 11 9 107 8.88 7.37
Lafayette 0 19 23 6 1 49 5.99 7.88
Linn 0 33 27 11 7 78 24.71 10.17
Livingston 0 16 32 5 1 54 16.22 7.13
Mercer 0 0 3 0 1 4 4.15 6.50
Nodaway 0 13 48 3 3 67 15.72 7.46
Pettis 0 34 26 10 6 76 7.05 9.34
Platte 0 18 16 7 5 46 2.09 8.89
Putnam 0 7 10 0 2 19 16.38 9.95
Ray 0 5 11 1 0 17 2.90 7.76
Saline 0 12 29 1 4 46 8.52 6.07
Sullivan 0 12 15 5 0 32 19.69 10.16
Worth 0 0 2 0 1 3 6.76 9.67
* Region Total * 0 427 619 154 76 1,276 5.89 8.63
Northeast Adair 0 29 42 14 5 90 18.10 8.76
Audrain 0 23 21 3 3 50 7.85 9.16
Boone 0 92 172 54 20 338 9.87 9.72
Callaway 0 37 88 17 6 148 14.80 8.77
Clark 0 7 26 2 2 37 21.55 7.95
Cole 0 41 85 26 10 162 9.03 8.28
Franklin 0 115 159 27 24 325 12.95 8.09
Gasconade 0 11 16 3 0 30 8.92 8.73
Howard 0 11 16 8 4 39 17.91 11.23
Knox 0 4 7 0 1 12 11.63 8.58
Lewis 0 8 7 1 2 18 7.52 9.33
Lincoln 0 45 70 9 7 131 8.90 8.53
Macon 0 35 31 16 4 86 22.76 8.51
Marion 2 70 97 20 7 196 28.46 9.10
Monroe 0 10 13 4 1 28 13.59 8.04
Montgomery 0 14 23 2 5 44 15.42 8.80
Osage 0 2 9 0 0 11 3.20 6.45
Pike 0 14 16 4 2 36 8.77 9.97
Ralls 2 12 6 2 0 22 9.25 10.77
Randolph 0 47 72 21 7 147 25.00 9.72
Schuyler 0 0 14 2 0 16 14.04 8.94
Scotland 0 5 13 4 2 24 17.62 9.67
Shelby 0 4 16 6 6 32 20.04 9.91
St Charles 3 84 137 17 24 265 2.85 9.33
Warren 0 31 44 10 4 89 10.95 8.96
* Region Total * 7 751 1,200 272 146 2,376 9.12 8.99
Southeast Bollinger 0 4 60 5 3 72 24.68 8.04
Butler 0 63 131 34 16 244 24.47 8.48
Cape Girardeau 1 62 107 24 14 208 12.53 8.04
Carter 0 8 3 4 0 15 9.90 4.93
52Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis Unit
Table 19.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Category
Children
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average
Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age
Southeast Crawford 1 49 58 20 3 131 21.83 9.14
Dent 1 20 30 7 7 65 17.80 8.94
Dunklin 0 26 50 16 10 102 12.62 8.00
Howell 0 36 49 12 16 113 11.23 9.38
Iron 3 12 16 4 1 36 14.98 7.50
Jefferson 1 186 416 37 22 662 12.04 7.96
Madison 1 10 27 5 4 47 16.04 8.32
Maries 0 9 12 1 0 22 10.21 10.77
Mississippi 0 14 31 6 0 51 16.00 8.12
New Madrid 0 16 104 19 1 140 31.01 8.63
Oregon 3 24 15 10 2 54 22.26 9.43
Pemiscot 0 22 62 16 8 108 21.45 10.07
Perry 0 5 38 6 0 49 10.29 6.80
Phelps 0 78 105 45 8 236 24.10 8.81
Pulaski 0 46 77 29 7 159 12.68 8.87
Reynolds 0 2 27 1 3 33 21.54 7.27
Ripley 0 8 24 8 6 46 13.91 9.93
Scott 0 23 107 12 3 145 14.72 7.71
Shannon 1 10 6 3 3 23 11.67 9.87
St Francois 2 93 171 35 15 316 21.93 7.96
Ste Genevieve 0 9 16 12 3 40 9.48 9.50
Stoddard 0 37 86 38 7 168 24.59 8.40
Texas 0 18 49 11 1 79 13.81 7.95
Washington 0 34 119 16 9 178 29.36 8.87
Wayne 0 22 28 13 4 67 23.88 9.67
* Region Total * 14 946 2,024 449 176 3,609 16.39 8.44
Southwest Barry 0 68 58 17 8 151 17.48 8.85
Barton 0 9 6 1 2 18 5.60 10.89
Bates 0 10 13 1 3 27 6.35 9.37
Benton 0 5 9 6 3 23 6.69 9.96
Camden 0 40 59 5 2 106 12.63 8.64
Cedar 0 9 15 2 4 30 9.07 11.27
Christian 0 34 83 14 10 141 6.66 8.55
Dade 0 3 4 0 0 7 3.92 8.86
Dallas 0 19 14 3 5 41 9.83 8.15
Douglas 0 6 19 2 4 31 10.13 10.16
Greene 4 245 316 69 51 685 11.73 8.04
Henry 0 29 20 5 5 59 11.90 8.88
Hickory 0 3 2 1 0 6 3.60 6.00
Jasper 3 140 243 72 32 490 16.18 8.95
Laclede 0 42 78 15 10 145 16.28 8.08
Lawrence 0 52 77 24 12 165 16.22 9.18
McDonald 0 17 35 6 3 61 9.42 10.82
Miller 0 17 31 12 2 62 10.09 8.02
Moniteau 0 3 14 2 0 19 4.84 11.79
Morgan 0 28 30 4 2 64 14.12 7.42
Newton 1 65 61 18 9 154 10.43 8.65
Ozark 0 6 8 6 8 28 14.37 11.21
Polk 0 25 31 4 3 63 8.22 9.24
St Clair 0 11 10 2 1 24 12.24 9.88
Stone 0 23 41 13 5 82 13.59 9.22
Taney 0 158 104 18 13 293 25.64 7.94
Vernon 0 7 8 4 7 26 4.94 10.81
Webster 0 24 24 17 7 72 7.17 8.90
Wright 0 44 60 6 2 112 22.99 8.48
* Region Total * 8 1,142 1,473 349 213 3,185 12.21 8.67
Kansas City Jackson 8 619 800 143 117 1,687 10.19 8.25
* Region Total * 8 619 800 143 117 1,687 10.19 8.25
St. Louis St Louis City 1 244 277 82 47 651 9.64 8.53
St Louis County 7 395 563 113 56 1,134 4.84 7.86
* Region Total * 8 639 840 195 103 1,785 5.92 8.10
Other Icama 0 4 1 0 1 6 0.00 11.17
* Region Total * 0 4 1 0 1 6 0.00 11.17
State Total 45 4,528 6,957 1,562 832 13,924 9.77 8.54
53Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis Unit
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0
Chariton 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Clinton 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Pettis 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
Platte 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 36 8 1 0 0 0
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
Audrain 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Boone 0 0 0 19 1 1 0 0 0
Callaway 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Clark 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Cole 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0
Franklin 0 0 0 9 5 1 0 0 0
Gasconade 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Marion 1 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 0 0 3 13 3 0 0 0 0
Warren 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 3 0 4 75 16 4 0 0 0
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Butler 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
54Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH
Southeast Crawford 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dent 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 0 0 1 23 2 0 0 0 0
Madison 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Oregon 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0
Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shannon 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 5 0 6 37 6 8 3 0 0
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Christian 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 0 0 4 24 3 0 0 0 0
Henry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 3 0 0 23 5 2 0 0 0
Laclede 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0
Lawrence 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0
McDonald 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Taney 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0
Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0
Wright 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 4 0 4 87 14 7 0 0 0
Kansas City Jackson 4 0 4 109 5 1 0 0 0
* Region Total * 4 0 4 109 5 1 0 0 0
St. Louis St Louis City 1 0 0 33 3 1 0 0 0
St Louis County 0 0 4 53 2 1 3 0 0
* Region Total * 1 0 4 86 5 2 3 0 0
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 17 0 22 430 54 23 6 0 0
55Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB KHM
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 6 1 2 41 0 0 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 3 0 0 52 2 0 0 0
Chariton 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 2 0 5 26 0 0 0 0
Clinton 0 0 0 1 19 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Johnson 0 1 0 0 30 3 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 1 0 1 14 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 0 1 30 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 2 2 1 11 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 3 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Pettis 0 2 0 0 30 2 0 0 0
Platte 0 1 0 0 16 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 1 0 9 1 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 1 0 9 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 25 5 14 347 8 0 0 0
Northeast Adair 0 1 0 0 24 0 0 0 0
Audrain 0 2 0 1 18 1 0 0 0
Boone 0 2 1 2 68 3 0 0 0
Callaway 0 0 0 0 34 2 0 0 0
Clark 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 1 0 1 39 0 0 0 0
Franklin 0 3 6 9 88 7 0 0 0
Gasconade 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 2 0 5 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 2 0 3 40 5 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0
Marion 0 4 1 4 57 1 0 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 12 2 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 2 0 1 9 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 3 0 1 7 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 1 1 0 40 1 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 4 3 0 0 0
St Charles 0 7 4 1 59 7 0 0 0
Warren 0 0 6 2 20 1 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 30 22 25 599 33 0 0 0
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0
Butler 0 0 0 0 62 2 0 1 0
Cape Girardeau 0 1 0 6 54 1 0 0 0
Carter 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
56Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB KHM
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 1 48 0 0 0 0
Dent 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 0 5 1 20 0 0 0 0
Howell 0 2 0 0 34 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 0 9 5 3 146 6 0 0 0
Madison 0 0 1 2 7 1 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 2 0 0 13 0 0 0 0
Oregon 0 1 0 2 21 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 21 3 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 3 0 1 72 1 0 0 0
Pulaski 0 1 0 0 45 1 0 0 0
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Scott 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 1 4 5 83 5 0 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 1 8 1 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 0 6 4 24 1 0 0 0
Texas 0 2 0 0 16 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 1 0 0 32 0 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 23 21 26 839 23 0 1 0
Southwest Barry 0 7 0 3 56 0 0 0 0
Barton 0 0 0 0 9 1 0 0 0
Bates 0 1 0 1 8 1 0 0 0
Benton 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 1 0 0 39 0 0 0 0
Cedar 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 3 0 2 22 2 0 0 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 2 0 0 15 1 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 2 4 1 0 0 0
Greene 0 19 0 19 183 11 0 0 0
Henry 0 3 0 1 25 4 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Jasper 0 5 0 10 102 4 0 0 0
Laclede 0 0 0 1 36 3 0 0 0
Lawrence 0 2 0 3 41 2 0 0 0
McDonald 0 1 0 0 15 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 1 0 1 15 1 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 1 0 1 24 0 0 0 0
Newton 0 1 0 2 59 0 0 0 0
Ozark 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 2 0 0 23 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 1 0 5 4 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 4 0 1 18 0 0 0 0
Taney 0 11 2 14 123 3 0 0 0
Vernon 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 0 0
Webster 0 1 0 4 18 0 0 0 0
Wright 0 0 0 3 39 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 67 3 73 912 36 0 0 0
Kansas City Jackson 0 58 23 45 384 28 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 58 23 45 384 28 0 0 0
St. Louis St Louis City 0 25 7 21 158 13 0 0 0
St Louis County 0 30 20 39 253 8 0 0 1
* Region Total * 0 55 27 60 411 21 0 0 1
Other Icama 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0
State Total 0 258 102 244 3,494 149 0 1 1
57Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
KHO KHU LGS MMD MMF MMH MMW RFA RFP
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 0
Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clay 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 0 0
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
Johnson 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0
Platte 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 7 24 9 2 0
Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0
Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Boone 1 0 0 2 3 5 3 7 0
Callaway 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 8 0
Clark 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Cole 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 0
Franklin 0 0 0 1 1 7 2 0 0
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 0
Marion 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 4 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 0
St Charles 1 0 0 1 2 4 4 0 0
Warren 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
* Region Total * 2 0 2 12 16 33 24 27 1
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 2 0 0 2 0 7 1 1 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 1 0 5 1 0 0
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
58Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
KHO KHU LGS MMD MMF MMH MMW RFA RFP
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0
Dent 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 0
Howell 0 0 2 2 2 10 2 1 2
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Jefferson 2 1 0 3 0 6 0 0 1
Madison 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 2
Pulaski 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 0
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1
Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0
St Francois 0 0 0 1 1 4 0 0 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 10 0
Texas 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 0 0 1 0 6 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 0
* Region Total * 5 1 2 16 11 72 8 13 9
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0
Camden 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0
Christian 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0
Greene 2 0 0 2 1 18 7 1 2
Henry 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 1 0 0 2 1 9 3 4 1
Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 1
Lawrence 0 0 0 1 2 6 0 0 2
McDonald 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0
Newton 0 0 0 1 3 2 1 0 3
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Stone 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0
Taney 1 0 0 1 2 6 0 0 0
Vernon 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0
Webster 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 7 1
Wright 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
* Region Total * 4 0 0 15 18 68 19 12 12
Kansas City Jackson 0 1 1 10 4 33 6 3 22
* Region Total * 0 1 1 10 4 33 6 3 22
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 2 5 4 1 1 2 2
St Louis County 2 0 0 3 3 9 0 2 3
* Region Total * 2 0 2 8 7 10 1 4 5
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
State Total 13 2 7 61 63 241 67 61 49
59Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RF2 RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 2 3 13 0 2 0 0 0 0
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 4 18 0 0 1 0 1 0
Chariton 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0
Clay 1 3 14 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clinton 0 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Johnson 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lafayette 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 1 0
Linn 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 1 0
Livingston 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1
Pettis 0 1 5 1 0 0 0 2 0
Platte 0 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 3 20 111 2 3 1 0 7 2
Northeast Adair 1 0 9 0 1 0 0 1 0
Audrain 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0
Boone 2 6 23 0 13 0 0 0 3
Callaway 0 2 2 1 4 0 0 0 3
Clark 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cole 0 4 14 0 5 0 0 1 0
Franklin 0 5 15 2 5 0 0 0 0
Gasconade 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Howard 1 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0
Macon 0 0 9 1 0 0 0 1 0
Marion 0 2 17 0 1 0 0 0 2
Monroe 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0
Montgomery 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 1 1 12 1 1 0 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0
Shelby 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Charles 0 2 11 0 3 0 0 0 1
Warren 0 4 4 0 1 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 5 27 148 8 37 0 0 6 9
Southeast Bollinger 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0
Butler 0 12 16 0 1 0 0 2 1
Cape Girardeau 0 15 7 1 0 0 0 1 0
Carter 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
60Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RF2 RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB
Southeast Crawford 0 6 8 0 5 0 0 0 0
Dent 0 1 5 0 1 0 0 0 0
Dunklin 0 6 7 0 2 0 0 1 0
Howell 1 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 0 7 16 0 12 0 0 1 2
Madison 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Maries 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 0 7 7 1 2 0 0 1 0
Oregon 0 3 4 2 0 0 0 0 0
Pemiscot 0 4 8 0 2 0 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0
Phelps 0 13 18 1 8 0 0 2 0
Pulaski 0 4 16 1 5 0 0 0 0
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0
Scott 0 4 7 1 0 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Francois 0 20 9 1 1 0 0 2 0
Ste Genevieve 0 7 4 0 1 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 10 11 3 2 0 0 2 0
Texas 0 3 2 1 3 0 0 0 0
Washington 0 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wayne 0 5 2 5 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 1 151 177 20 49 0 0 14 3
Southwest Barry 0 4 9 1 2 0 0 1 1
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0
Cedar 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 2 8 0 3 0 0 0 0
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 0 10 30 6 15 0 0 2 3
Henry 0 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0
Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jasper 0 11 32 2 17 0 1 0 1
Laclede 0 3 4 1 6 0 0 0 1
Lawrence 0 3 13 0 3 0 0 2 0
McDonald 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0
Miller 0 2 7 2 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Newton 0 0 9 3 1 0 0 1 0
Ozark 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
Stone 0 3 7 1 1 0 0 1 0
Taney 2 4 3 0 8 0 0 0 0
Vernon 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Webster 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 0
Wright 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 2 59 156 17 63 0 1 8 6
Kansas City Jackson 1 18 65 8 8 2 1 2 16
* Region Total * 1 18 65 8 8 2 1 2 16
St. Louis St Louis City 0 7 43 2 23 0 0 1 4
St Louis County 2 12 57 3 30 0 0 1 9
* Region Total * 2 19 100 5 53 0 0 2 13
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 14 294 757 60 213 3 2 39 49
61Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 7
Buchanan 0 16 7 1 0 0 0 0 99
Caldwell 0 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 12
Carroll 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Cass 0 54 41 2 1 2 0 6 196
Chariton 0 3 1 1 0 0 1 0 16
Clay 5 52 19 0 0 0 0 0 136
Clinton 0 15 2 1 0 0 0 0 48
Cooper 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 0 13
Daviess 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 18
De Kalb 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 24
Gentry 0 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 15
Grundy 0 18 6 0 0 0 0 0 37
Harrison 0 13 5 0 0 0 0 0 30
Holt 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 20
Johnson 0 37 15 1 0 0 0 0 107
Lafayette 0 20 3 0 0 0 0 0 49
Linn 0 20 7 1 0 0 0 0 78
Livingston 1 23 8 0 0 0 1 0 54
Mercer 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Nodaway 0 19 28 0 0 0 0 1 67
Pettis 0 21 5 0 0 0 1 0 76
Platte 0 11 5 1 0 0 0 1 46
Putnam 0 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 19
Ray 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 17
Saline 6 15 8 0 0 0 0 0 46
Sullivan 1 9 5 0 0 0 0 0 32
Worth 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3
* Region Total * 13 412 192 8 1 2 5 8 1,276
Northeast Adair 1 31 10 0 0 0 2 1 90
Audrain 0 10 11 0 0 0 0 0 50
Boone 5 102 61 1 0 0 3 1 338
Callaway 2 63 20 0 0 0 0 0 148
Clark 0 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 37
Cole 5 48 32 0 0 0 2 1 162
Franklin 1 105 53 0 0 0 0 0 325
Gasconade 1 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 30
Howard 0 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 39
Knox 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 12
Lewis 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 18
Lincoln 3 57 10 0 0 0 1 0 131
Macon 0 16 15 0 0 0 1 0 86
Marion 5 76 12 0 0 0 0 0 196
Monroe 0 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 28
Montgomery 0 17 6 0 0 0 0 0 44
Osage 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
Pike 0 9 7 0 0 0 0 0 36
Ralls 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 22
Randolph 0 53 19 1 0 0 1 0 147
Schuyler 0 6 8 0 0 0 0 0 16
Scotland 0 12 1 0 0 0 1 0 24
Shelby 0 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 32
St Charles 1 86 48 1 0 0 1 2 265
Warren 1 35 8 0 0 0 1 0 89
* Region Total * 26 818 343 3 0 0 13 5 2,376
Southeast Bollinger 2 33 25 0 0 0 0 0 72
Butler 1 86 40 1 0 0 2 2 244
Cape Girardeau 7 63 37 1 0 1 0 1 208
Carter 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 15
62Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Type
RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL
Southeast Crawford 0 34 24 0 0 0 1 0 131
Dent 1 11 18 0 0 0 0 1 65
Dunklin 1 25 24 1 0 0 0 3 102
Howell 0 27 20 0 0 0 0 0 113
Iron 1 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 36
Jefferson 11 264 136 5 0 0 0 0 662
Madison 0 23 4 0 0 0 0 0 47
Maries 0 9 3 0 0 0 0 0 22
Mississippi 0 12 19 0 0 0 0 0 51
New Madrid 3 67 34 0 0 0 1 1 140
Oregon 0 9 6 0 0 0 1 1 54
Pemiscot 1 37 24 0 0 0 2 0 108
Perry 2 18 18 0 0 0 0 0 49
Phelps 0 75 30 1 0 0 1 1 236
Pulaski 0 50 27 1 0 0 2 1 159
Reynolds 1 18 8 0 0 0 0 0 33
Ripley 0 22 2 0 0 0 0 1 46
Scott 1 73 33 1 0 2 0 0 145
Shannon 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 23
St Francois 2 108 61 2 0 0 2 2 316
Ste Genevieve 1 13 2 0 0 0 0 0 40
Stoddard 3 50 33 0 0 1 0 1 168
Texas 1 39 8 0 0 0 2 0 79
Washington 1 72 46 0 0 0 0 0 178
Wayne 0 17 11 0 0 0 1 0 67
* Region Total * 40 1,273 699 13 0 4 15 15 3,609
Southwest Barry 1 46 10 1 0 0 0 1 151
Barton 0 5 1 0 0 0 1 0 18
Bates 0 3 10 0 0 0 0 1 27
Benton 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 23
Camden 1 36 22 0 0 0 0 0 106
Cedar 0 9 6 0 0 0 0 1 30
Christian 1 61 21 0 0 0 1 1 141
Dade 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 7
Dallas 0 11 3 1 0 0 1 0 41
Douglas 1 8 10 0 0 0 0 0 31
Greene 3 218 90 0 0 0 3 9 685
Henry 0 9 11 0 0 0 0 0 59
Hickory 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 6
Jasper 4 178 59 1 0 1 4 4 490
Laclede 3 55 19 1 0 0 0 2 145
Lawrence 1 47 29 0 0 0 1 0 165
McDonald 0 21 14 0 0 0 0 0 61
Miller 0 23 8 0 0 0 1 0 62
Moniteau 0 8 6 0 0 0 0 0 19
Morgan 0 16 14 0 0 0 0 0 64
Newton 0 33 28 0 0 0 1 1 154
Ozark 2 0 6 6 0 0 1 1 28
Polk 1 24 6 0 0 0 1 1 63
St Clair 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 0 24
Stone 2 34 5 0 0 0 0 0 82
Taney 1 69 33 0 0 0 1 1 293
Vernon 1 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 26
Webster 0 17 7 0 0 0 3 1 72
Wright 4 46 10 0 0 0 0 1 112
* Region Total * 26 992 445 10 0 1 19 25 3,185
Kansas City Jackson 12 368 402 15 1 0 13 14 1,687
* Region Total * 12 368 402 15 1 0 13 14 1,687
St. Louis St Louis City 3 177 91 7 0 0 2 12 651
St Louis County 14 325 212 13 0 0 3 17 1,134
* Region Total * 17 502 303 20 0 0 5 29 1,785
Other Icama 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
* Region Total * 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
State Total 134 4,366 2,384 69 2 7 70 96 13,924
63Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 21.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total
Home Home Home Care Other Exits
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 0 2 5 0 0 7
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 0 0 3 2 2 7
Chariton 0 1 0 0 1 2
Clay 0 0 2 1 0 3
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 0 0 1 0 0 1
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 2 0 0 2
Holt 0 0 3 0 0 3
Johnson 0 1 4 1 0 6
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Livingston 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mercer 0 0 1 0 0 1
Nodaway 0 0 1 1 0 2
Pettis 0 3 0 1 1 5
Platte 0 0 1 0 0 1
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 7 23 6 5 41
Northeast Adair 0 2 1 0 0 3
Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0
Boone 0 2 4 0 0 6
Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clark 0 0 0 0 1 1
Cole 0 0 3 5 0 8
Franklin 0 0 2 0 1 3
Gasconade 0 0 1 0 0 1
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 2 0 0 2
Lincoln 0 1 0 0 1 2
Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marion 0 0 0 0 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 2 0 0 2
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 0 0 3 0 0 3
St Charles 0 0 6 0 0 6
Warren 0 0 1 0 0 1
* Region Total * 0 5 25 5 3 38
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 1 0 0 1
Butler 0 1 2 1 0 4
Cape Girardeau 0 10 3 0 1 14
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
64Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 21.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During January 2020
by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit
Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total
Home Home Home Care Other Exits
Southeast Crawford 0 0 1 0 0 1
Dent 0 0 2 0 0 2
Dunklin 0 1 0 0 0 1
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 0 2 21 0 0 23
Madison 0 0 1 0 0 1
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 1 0 1
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oregon 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pemiscot 0 0 1 0 0 1
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 0 1 5 1 0 7
Pulaski 0 0 2 0 0 2
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 0 0 3 1 0 4
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shannon 0 1 0 0 0 1
St Francois 0 5 7 1 0 13
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 0 2 5 2 1 10
Texas 0 1 2 0 1 4
Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 24 56 7 4 91
Southwest Barry 0 0 3 0 1 4
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 0 0 4 0 0 4
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 0 1 0 0 0 1
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 3 1 9 0 3 16
Henry 0 0 3 0 0 3
Hickory 0 0 6 0 0 6
Jasper 0 0 0 4 0 4
Laclede 0 1 0 0 0 1
Lawrence 0 4 3 1 0 8
McDonald 0 1 5 0 0 6
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 0 6 4 0 0 10
Ozark 0 0 1 0 0 1
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 0 0 1 1
Stone 0 1 1 0 1 3
Taney 0 2 3 0 1 6
Vernon 0 1 2 0 0 3
Webster 0 4 1 0 1 6
Wright 0 0 2 0 0 2
* Region Total * 3 22 47 5 8 85
Kansas City Jackson 0 10 18 1 3 32
* Region Total * 0 10 18 1 3 32
St. Louis St Louis City 0 2 8 0 2 12
St Louis County 0 7 12 2 5 26
* Region Total * 0 9 20 2 7 38
Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Total 3 77 189 26 30 325
65Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 22.
Children Closed from Alternative Care During January 2020
by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing
Returned Other Living with Achieved Total
Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buchanan 6 0 0 0 2 8
Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 4 1 0 3 1 9
Chariton 1 0 0 0 1 2
Clay 1 0 0 0 0 1
Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0
De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gentry 1 0 0 0 0 1
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0
Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johnson 6 0 0 0 0 6
Lafayette 0 0 0 0 1 1
Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Livingston 1 0 0 0 0 1
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nodaway 2 0 0 0 1 3
Pettis 4 0 0 1 0 5
Platte 1 0 0 0 0 1
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 27 1 0 4 6 38
Northeast Adair 1 0 0 0 0 1
Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0
Boone 2 0 0 0 2 4
Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0
Clark 1 0 0 0 0 1
Cole 9 0 0 0 2 11
Franklin 1 0 0 0 3 4
Gasconade 0 0 0 0 1 1
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 2 0 0 0 0 2
Lincoln 1 0 0 0 0 1
Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marion 0 0 0 0 0 0
Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0
Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0
Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0
Randolph 0 0 0 0 0 0
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 3 0 0 0 0 3
St Charles 2 0 1 0 0 3
Warren 0 0 0 1 1 2
* Region Total * 22 0 1 1 9 33
Southeast Bollinger 1 0 0 0 0 1
Butler 1 0 1 0 1 3
Cape Girardeau 7 0 0 3 1 11
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0
66Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 22.
Children Closed from Alternative Care During January 2020
by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing
Returned Other Living with Achieved Total
Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings
Southeast Dent 2 0 0 0 0 2
Dunklin 1 0 0 0 0 1
Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jefferson 9 0 0 1 2 12
Madison 2 0 0 0 0 2
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 1 0 0 0 0 1
New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oregon 1 0 0 0 0 1
Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 0 0
Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0
Phelps 6 0 0 1 1 8
Pulaski 2 0 0 0 3 5
Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ripley 1 0 0 0 0 1
Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shannon 1 0 0 0 0 1
St Francois 2 0 0 0 2 4
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stoddard 3 0 0 1 0 4
Texas 4 0 0 0 0 4
Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 44 0 1 6 10 61
Southwest Barry 2 0 0 2 1 5
Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0
Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0
Camden 4 0 0 0 0 4
Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0
Christian 1 0 0 0 2 3
Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0
Greene 7 0 1 2 3 13
Henry 1 0 0 0 0 1
Hickory 6 0 0 0 0 6
Jasper 1 0 0 2 3 6
Laclede 1 0 0 0 0 1
Lawrence 3 0 1 0 0 4
McDonald 6 0 0 0 0 6
Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newton 6 0 0 0 1 7
Ozark 1 0 0 0 0 1
Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 3 0 0 0 2 5
Taney 2 0 0 1 0 3
Vernon 3 0 0 0 0 3
Webster 3 0 0 1 0 4
Wright 2 0 0 0 0 2
* Region Total * 52 0 2 8 12 74
Kansas City Jackson 25 1 0 3 2 31
* Region Total * 25 1 0 3 2 31
St. Louis St Louis City 9 0 0 2 0 11
St Louis County 8 0 0 1 13 22
* Region Total * 17 0 0 3 13 33
Other Icama 0 1 0 0 22 23
* Region Total * 0 1 0 0 22 23
State Total 187 3 4 25 74 293
67Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 23.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of January 2020
With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody
Temporary Adoptions No Identified
Legal Status 1 Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total Adoptive
TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children Resource
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 0 2 0 0 2 0
Buchanan 19 5 0 0 24 12
Caldwell 2 0 0 0 2 0
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 9 5 0 0 14 11
Chariton 2 1 0 0 3 2
Clay 4 4 0 2 10 1
Clinton 17 1 0 0 18 2
Cooper 2 0 0 0 2 0
Daviess 3 0 0 0 3 0
De Kalb 1 0 0 0 1 0
Gentry 5 0 0 0 5 5
Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0
Harrison 1 1 0 0 2 1
Holt 4 4 0 3 11 2
Johnson 3 1 0 0 4 2
Lafayette 5 3 0 0 8 3
Linn 11 6 0 0 17 2
Livingston 9 0 0 0 9 1
Mercer 0 0 0 1 1 0
Nodaway 4 1 0 0 5 4
Pettis 8 3 1 0 12 1
Platte 0 1 0 0 1 1
Putnam 0 1 0 0 1 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 4 6 0 0 10 3
Sullivan 11 0 0 0 11 3
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 124 45 1 6 176 56
Northeast Adair 5 6 0 2 13 3
Audrain 10 2 0 0 12 6
Boone 43 14 0 0 57 23
Callaway 21 2 0 0 23 9
Clark 3 1 0 0 4 1
Cole 36 3 1 0 40 19
Franklin 58 15 0 0 73 34
Gasconade 4 0 0 0 4 0
Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0
Knox 3 1 0 0 4 2
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 28 9 0 0 37 16
Macon 4 0 0 0 4 3
Marion 20 5 0 0 25 3
Monroe 7 0 0 0 7 1
Montgomery 16 0 0 0 16 0
Osage 0 1 0 0 1 0
Pike 2 1 0 0 3 2
Ralls 1 2 0 0 3 1
Randolph 16 0 1 0 17 9
Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0
Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shelby 2 0 0 0 2 2
St Charles 42 14 0 3 59 13
Warren 17 3 0 0 20 2
* Region Total * 338 79 2 5 424 149
Southeast Bollinger 2 0 0 0 2 1
Butler 33 25 0 3 61 44
Cape Girardeau 6 3 0 5 14 6
Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0
Crawford 9 7 0 0 16 11
Note: Column "No Identified Adoptive Resource" added July 2016 68
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 23.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of January 2020
With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody
Temporary Adoptions No Identified
In Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total Adoptive
TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children Resource
Southeast Dent 5 9 0 0 14 12
Dunklin 6 0 1 0 7 6
Howell 9 0 1 0 10 8
Iron 8 1 0 0 9 5
Jefferson 86 20 0 3 109 73
Madison 3 5 0 0 8 3
Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0
New Madrid 1 5 0 0 6 5
Oregon 0 1 0 0 1 1
Pemiscot 6 4 0 0 10 6
Perry 5 0 0 0 5 1
Phelps 12 3 0 0 15 8
Pulaski 27 4 1 0 32 15
Reynolds 5 2 0 0 7 4
Ripley 4 4 0 3 11 6
Scott 1 0 1 0 2 0
Shannon 5 1 0 0 6 3
St Francois 17 25 0 9 51 29
Ste Genevieve 8 1 0 0 9 8
Stoddard 2 1 3 0 6 3
Texas 20 0 0 0 20 9
Washington 5 13 0 0 18 9
Wayne 9 10 0 0 19 16
* Region Total * 294 144 7 23 468 292
Southwest Barry 44 6 0 0 50 15
Barton 5 1 0 0 6 6
Bates 7 0 0 0 7 1
Benton 8 0 0 0 8 7
Camden 18 4 0 0 22 19
Cedar 7 0 0 0 7 2
Christian 18 4 1 0 23 11
Dade 1 0 0 0 1 0
Dallas 3 3 0 0 6 1
Douglas 1 1 0 0 2 1
Greene 135 83 0 3 221 80
Henry 13 1 0 0 14 6
Hickory 5 1 0 0 6 1
Jasper 98 8 2 0 108 60
Laclede 17 4 0 0 21 14
Lawrence 40 12 0 4 56 16
McDonald 8 3 0 0 11 8
Miller 5 0 0 0 5 2
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 1 0 0 0 1 0
Newton 13 8 0 4 25 6
Ozark 6 0 0 0 6 5
Polk 11 0 0 0 11 9
St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stone 15 4 0 0 19 3
Taney 59 14 0 1 74 29
Vernon 5 0 0 0 5 1
Webster 5 0 0 3 8 1
Wright 27 2 0 0 29 10
* Region Total * 575 159 3 15 752 314
Kansas City Jackson 288 143 1 2 434 329
* Region Total * 288 143 1 2 434 329
St. Louis St Louis City 110 24 4 4 142 94
St Louis County 182 34 2 4 222 174
* Region Total * 292 58 6 8 364 268
Other Icama 2 0 33 0 35 1
* Region Total * 2 0 33 0 35 1
State Total 1,913 628 53 59 2,653 1,409
Note: Column "No Identified Adoptive Resource" added July 2016 69
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 24.
Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of January 2020
by Vendor Type and County
Large Current Licensed
Level B Foster Family Newly Number of Vendors
Foster Adoptive Resource Foster Relative Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage
Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 16 3 1 13 17 13 30.77%
Atchison 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 1 100.00%
Buchanan 5 0 0 44 20 1 38 55 53 3.77%
Caldwell 0 0 0 3 4 0 7 7 7 0.00%
Carroll 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 2 2 0.00%
Cass 3 0 0 45 35 7 45 73 71 2.82%
Chariton 0 0 0 2 5 0 6 7 10 -30.00%
Clay 3 0 0 106 69 5 117 161 143 12.59%
Clinton 0 0 0 13 4 1 9 15 25 -40.00%
Cooper 0 0 0 3 7 1 7 8 4 100.00%
Daviess 0 0 0 2 7 0 9 9 11 -18.18%
De Kalb 1 0 0 5 4 0 9 9 12 -25.00%
Gentry 0 0 0 2 4 0 3 5 11 -54.55%
Grundy 0 0 0 3 8 0 6 11 11 0.00%
Harrison 0 0 0 1 10 0 7 11 12 -8.33%
Holt 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 7 6 16.67%
Johnson 1 1 0 24 19 5 27 40 45 -11.11%
Lafayette 3 0 0 13 16 0 17 26 22 18.18%
Linn 1 0 0 13 12 0 19 21 17 23.53%
Livingston 0 0 0 9 17 2 18 23 16 43.75%
Mercer 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 4 1 300.00%
Nodaway 1 0 0 9 13 0 13 20 25 -20.00%
Pettis 2 0 0 15 16 3 21 26 30 -13.33%
Platte 1 0 0 31 20 3 28 49 35 40.00%
Putnam 0 0 0 4 4 0 7 8 9 -11.11%
Ray 1 0 0 6 3 1 5 8 6 33.33%
Saline 3 0 0 6 12 1 11 15 17 -11.77%
Sullivan 0 0 0 2 4 1 4 5 4 25.00%
Worth 1 0 0 2 3 0 3 4 6 -33.33%
* Region Total * 26 1 0 382 332 33 461 648 625 3.68%
Northeast Adair 3 0 0 24 19 0 29 36 38 -5.26%
Audrain 0 0 0 12 14 0 19 25 31 -19.36%
Boone 6 0 0 43 34 2 51 71 76 -6.58%
Callaway 0 0 0 11 37 2 41 47 52 -9.62%
Clark 0 0 0 3 16 1 12 19 12 58.33%
Cole 1 0 0 36 20 2 42 50 39 28.21%
Franklin 4 0 0 53 56 1 86 106 110 -3.64%
Gasconade 0 0 0 5 9 0 12 14 16 -12.50%
Howard 1 0 0 5 6 0 6 10 10 0.00%
Knox 0 0 0 2 1 0 3 3 1 200.00%
Lewis 1 0 0 7 12 0 12 16 16 0.00%
Lincoln 2 0 0 44 41 1 52 77 51 50.98%
Macon 0 1 0 14 14 0 22 27 23 17.39%
Marion 3 0 0 29 32 3 46 53 63 -15.87%
Monroe 1 0 0 12 6 0 13 16 18 -11.11%
Montgomery 0 0 0 9 15 1 17 24 17 41.18%
Osage 0 0 0 2 5 0 7 7 7 0.00%
Pike 0 0 0 9 8 0 13 17 22 -22.73%
Ralls 0 0 0 10 16 0 21 25 23 8.70%
Randolph 3 0 0 15 22 0 28 36 39 -7.69%
Schuyler 0 0 0 1 10 1 7 10 6 66.67%
Scotland 0 0 0 2 9 0 8 9 8 12.50%
Shelby 0 0 0 5 5 1 7 9 9 0.00%
St Charles 13 0 0 100 69 5 114 157 143 9.79%
Warren 0 0 0 25 22 2 23 45 42 7.14%
* Region Total * 38 1 0 478 498 22 691 909 872 4.24%
Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 2 16 2 15 18 20 -10.00%
Butler 1 0 0 43 53 2 64 89 90 -1.11%
Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 44 53 3 66 95 110 -13.64%
Carter 0 0 0 5 4 0 7 9 11 -18.18%
70Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 24.
Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of January 2020
by Vendor Type and County
Large Current Licensed
Level B Foster Family Newly Number of Vendors
Foster Adoptive Resource Foster Relative Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage
Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change
Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 9 25 1 27 34 34 0.00%
Dent 1 0 0 11 14 0 19 23 21 9.52%
Dunklin 0 0 0 19 26 0 35 44 46 -4.35%
Howell 0 0 0 20 31 0 36 51 51 0.00%
Iron 0 0 0 9 8 0 11 16 22 -27.27%
Jefferson 4 0 0 59 96 4 127 151 161 -6.21%
Madison 0 0 0 6 20 0 21 26 22 18.18%
Maries 0 0 0 5 6 0 8 10 8 25.00%
Mississippi 0 0 0 6 17 0 15 23 15 53.33%
New Madrid 0 1 0 16 34 5 38 49 50 -2.00%
Oregon 0 0 0 8 5 0 8 12 12 0.00%
Pemiscot 1 1 0 16 21 2 22 36 43 -16.28%
Perry 0 0 0 9 19 0 23 28 27 3.70%
Phelps 3 0 0 26 32 2 42 57 50 14.00%
Pulaski 0 0 0 16 23 1 34 38 47 -19.15%
Reynolds 0 0 0 4 8 0 10 12 12 0.00%
Ripley 0 0 0 17 24 1 25 35 31 12.90%
Scott 0 0 0 25 52 4 52 76 52 46.15%
Shannon 1 0 0 7 1 0 5 8 13 -38.46%
St Francois 0 0 0 41 58 3 84 97 85 14.12%
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 6 13 0 15 19 15 26.67%
Stoddard 0 0 0 17 23 0 31 37 44 -15.91%
Texas 0 0 0 15 15 1 23 30 36 -16.67%
Washington 0 0 0 8 30 0 36 38 30 26.67%
Wayne 0 0 0 6 9 0 14 15 25 -40.00%
* Region Total * 12 2 0 475 736 31 913 1,176 1,183 -0.59%
Southwest Barry 0 0 0 18 20 0 28 36 35 2.86%
Barton 0 0 0 15 5 0 16 18 25 -28.00%
Bates 1 0 0 15 5 0 13 19 22 -13.64%
Benton 2 0 0 9 8 1 14 17 16 6.25%
Camden 1 0 0 11 19 0 21 30 27 11.11%
Cedar 0 0 0 7 5 1 9 12 16 -25.00%
Christian 10 0 0 100 37 12 83 128 120 6.67%
Dade 1 0 0 4 2 0 4 5 5 0.00%
Dallas 0 0 0 8 8 3 10 15 19 -21.05%
Douglas 0 0 0 18 9 0 17 26 24 8.33%
Greene 13 0 0 234 101 16 182 285 283 0.71%
Henry 1 0 0 24 8 0 17 30 43 -30.23%
Hickory 0 0 0 3 6 0 6 9 12 -25.00%
Jasper 12 0 0 89 100 10 134 171 150 14.00%
Laclede 3 0 0 29 25 0 39 50 59 -15.25%
Lawrence 2 0 0 35 22 0 40 48 57 -15.79%
McDonald 2 0 0 13 16 1 24 28 32 -12.50%
Miller 1 0 0 13 13 2 19 26 20 30.00%
Moniteau 0 0 0 9 4 1 9 12 13 -7.69%
Morgan 0 0 0 7 13 2 14 19 18 5.56%
Newton 4 0 0 37 27 3 48 61 70 -12.86%
Ozark 0 0 0 1 6 0 4 6 5 20.00%
Polk 3 0 0 27 17 0 28 40 49 -18.37%
St Clair 0 0 0 6 4 0 8 9 8 12.50%
Stone 4 0 0 28 21 3 29 40 43 -6.98%
Taney 9 0 0 74 33 1 68 101 94 7.45%
Vernon 0 0 0 16 5 0 10 21 23 -8.70%
Webster 1 0 0 27 13 4 21 37 48 -22.92%
Wright 1 0 0 17 19 1 31 35 45 -22.22%
* Region Total * 71 0 0 894 571 61 946 1,334 1,381 -3.40%
Kansas City Jackson 50 0 0 373 222 10 376 502 553 -9.22%
* Region Total * 50 0 0 373 222 10 376 502 553 -9.22%
St. Louis St Louis City 17 0 0 70 68 1 86 125 140 -10.71%
St Louis County 57 3 0 226 216 8 266 387 426 -9.16%
* Region Total * 74 3 0 296 284 9 352 512 566 -9.54%
State Total 271 7 0 2,898 2,643 166 3,739 5,081 5,180 -1.91%
71Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 25.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Legal Status
Total
LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2
Atchison 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 13
Buchanan 99 0 0 1 123 0 0 75 0 298
Caldwell 12 0 0 0 162 0 0 73 0 247
Carroll 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Cass 196 0 0 0 297 1 2 75 0 571
Chariton 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16
Clay 136 0 0 13 491 0 0 131 0 771
Clinton 48 0 0 0 7 0 0 14 0 69
Cooper 13 0 0 0 28 0 0 12 0 53
Daviess 18 0 0 0 15 0 0 6 0 39
De Kalb 24 0 0 0 157 0 0 71 0 252
Gentry 15 0 0 0 5 0 0 14 0 34
Grundy 37 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 41
Harrison 30 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 33
Holt 20 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 31
Johnson 107 0 0 2 135 1 1 56 0 302
Lafayette 49 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 53
Linn 78 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 86
Livingston 54 0 0 0 11 0 0 9 0 74
Mercer 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 5
Nodaway 67 0 0 0 31 0 0 36 0 134
Pettis 76 1 0 0 125 0 0 62 0 264
Platte 46 0 0 4 156 0 0 24 0 230
Putnam 19 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20
Ray 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
Saline 46 0 0 2 149 0 3 46 0 246
Sullivan 32 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 33
Worth 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 0 14
* Region Total * 1,276 1 0 24 1,924 2 6 722 0 3,955
Northeast Adair 90 0 0 0 74 0 0 48 0 212
Audrain 50 0 0 1 69 1 0 44 0 165
Boone 338 0 0 3 374 0 0 259 0 974
Callaway 148 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 156
Clark 37 0 0 0 6 0 0 20 0 63
Cole 162 1 0 27 195 0 0 105 0 490
Franklin 325 0 0 4 400 0 0 130 0 859
Gasconade 30 0 0 0 17 0 0 4 0 51
Howard 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 54
Knox 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Lewis 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 21
Lincoln 131 0 0 3 133 1 0 86 0 354
Macon 86 0 0 0 42 0 0 32 0 160
Marion 196 0 0 1 107 0 0 58 0 362
Monroe 28 0 0 0 14 0 0 10 0 52
Montgomery 44 0 0 0 16 0 0 23 0 83
Osage 11 0 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 21
Pike 36 0 0 0 26 0 0 16 0 78
Ralls 22 0 0 0 8 0 0 3 0 33
Randolph 147 1 0 0 111 0 0 89 0 348
Schuyler 16 0 0 0 9 0 0 3 0 28
Scotland 24 0 0 0 6 0 0 10 0 40
Shelby 32 0 0 0 28 0 0 9 0 69
St Charles 265 0 0 9 471 1 1 187 0 934
Warren 89 0 0 1 97 0 0 53 0 240
* Region Total * 2,376 2 0 49 2,210 3 1 1,218 0 5,859
Southeast Bollinger 72 0 0 0 22 0 1 16 0 111
Butler 244 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 260
Cape Girardeau 208 0 0 5 159 0 1 198 0 571
Carter 15 0 0 1 12 0 0 5 0 33
Crawford 131 0 0 2 27 0 0 21 0 181
72Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 25.
Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Legal Status
Total
LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children
Southeast Dent 65 0 0 0 14 0 1 2 0 82
Dunklin 102 1 0 0 9 0 0 13 0 125
Howell 113 1 0 6 49 0 0 36 0 205
Iron 36 0 0 1 96 0 0 59 0 192
Jefferson 662 0 0 6 542 2 2 509 0 1,723
Madison 47 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 52
Maries 22 0 0 0 22 0 1 13 0 58
Mississippi 51 0 0 0 9 0 0 46 0 106
New Madrid 140 0 0 0 5 0 0 33 0 178
Oregon 54 0 0 0 32 0 0 6 0 92
Pemiscot 108 0 0 0 94 0 0 144 0 346
Perry 49 0 0 0 37 0 0 14 0 100
Phelps 236 0 0 0 88 0 3 78 0 405
Pulaski 159 1 0 2 232 0 0 119 0 513
Reynolds 33 0 0 0 12 0 1 10 0 56
Ripley 46 0 0 0 256 1 0 182 0 485
Scott 145 1 0 0 76 0 0 184 0 406
Shannon 23 0 0 0 31 0 0 14 0 68
St Francois 316 0 0 0 495 0 3 138 0 952
Ste Genevieve 40 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 41
Stoddard 168 3 0 0 240 0 0 251 0 662
Texas 79 0 0 0 52 0 0 30 0 161
Washington 178 0 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 185
Wayne 67 0 0 4 110 0 0 65 0 246
* Region Total * 3,609 7 0 27 2,748 3 14 2,187 0 8,595
Southwest Barry 151 0 0 0 116 1 0 36 0 304
Barton 18 0 0 2 76 0 0 16 0 112
Bates 27 0 0 3 15 0 0 10 0 55
Benton 23 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 26
Camden 106 0 0 0 7 0 0 6 0 119
Cedar 30 0 0 0 38 0 0 5 0 73
Christian 141 1 0 1 380 0 0 45 0 568
Dade 7 0 0 2 27 0 0 4 0 40
Dallas 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 42
Douglas 31 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 36
Greene 685 0 0 19 1,261 4 6 177 0 2,152
Henry 59 0 0 0 137 1 0 70 0 267
Hickory 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Jasper 490 2 0 1 699 4 7 148 1 1,352
Laclede 145 0 0 1 424 1 0 121 0 692
Lawrence 165 0 0 1 33 0 0 2 0 201
McDonald 61 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 62
Miller 62 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 64
Moniteau 19 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 20
Morgan 64 0 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 70
Newton 154 0 0 1 444 0 1 102 0 702
Ozark 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 31
Polk 63 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 0 71
St Clair 24 0 0 0 6 0 0 1 0 31
Stone 82 0 0 0 318 0 0 79 0 479
Taney 293 0 0 1 183 2 0 97 0 576
Vernon 26 0 0 0 31 1 0 4 0 62
Webster 72 0 0 3 432 0 0 127 0 634
Wright 112 0 0 0 143 1 0 80 0 336
* Region Total * 3,185 3 1 38 4,783 15 14 1,143 1 9,183
Kansas City Jackson 1,687 1 1 57 2,629 26 5 520 0 4,926
* Region Total * 1,687 1 1 57 2,629 26 5 520 0 4,926
St. Louis St Louis City 651 4 0 3 866 7 0 484 0 2,015
St Louis County 1,134 2 0 36 1,180 6 9 588 0 2,955
* Region Total * 1,785 6 0 39 2,046 13 9 1,072 0 4,970
Other Icama 6 33 0 32 2,045 0 0 40 0 2,156
* Region Total * 6 33 0 32 2,045 0 0 40 0 2,156
State Total 13,924 53 2 266 18,385 62 49 6,902 1 39,644
73Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 26.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Goal
Total
01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Atchison 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 7
Buchanan 60 24 0 3 6 4 2 99
Caldwell 4 2 0 0 6 0 0 12
Carroll 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Cass 148 14 0 16 7 1 10 196
Chariton 3 3 0 5 5 0 0 16
Clay 105 8 0 10 13 0 0 136
Clinton 22 18 0 4 4 0 0 48
Cooper 8 2 0 3 0 0 0 13
Daviess 13 3 0 2 0 0 0 18
De Kalb 18 1 0 1 3 1 0 24
Gentry 7 5 0 0 2 0 1 15
Grundy 30 0 0 0 4 1 2 37
Harrison 22 2 0 1 5 0 0 30
Holt 11 8 0 0 1 0 0 20
Johnson 92 4 0 6 3 0 2 107
Lafayette 32 8 0 4 5 0 0 49
Linn 38 17 0 8 9 1 5 78
Livingston 32 9 0 6 2 0 5 54
Mercer 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 4
Nodaway 43 5 0 5 9 1 4 67
Pettis 49 11 0 2 12 1 1 76
Platte 33 1 0 7 0 0 5 46
Putnam 15 1 0 1 2 0 0 19
Ray 10 0 0 0 4 0 3 17
Saline 29 10 0 1 3 0 3 46
Sullivan 15 11 0 2 1 1 2 32
Worth 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 3
* Region Total * 854 169 0 88 107 11 47 1,276
Northeast Adair 62 11 0 7 9 1 0 90
Audrain 24 12 0 7 3 3 1 50
Boone 210 57 0 26 30 4 11 338
Callaway 104 23 0 6 13 0 2 148
Clark 23 4 0 2 5 2 1 37
Cole 90 39 0 8 17 5 3 162
Franklin 180 73 0 28 30 3 11 325
Gasconade 25 4 0 1 0 0 0 30
Howard 22 0 0 4 5 0 8 39
Knox 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 12
Lewis 15 0 0 2 1 0 0 18
Lincoln 67 37 0 12 14 0 1 131
Macon 75 4 0 5 1 0 1 86
Marion 122 25 0 16 25 2 6 196
Monroe 18 7 0 3 0 0 0 28
Montgomery 23 16 0 4 1 0 0 44
Osage 6 1 0 1 3 0 0 11
Pike 15 3 0 6 8 0 4 36
Ralls 12 3 0 5 2 0 0 22
Randolph 88 16 0 4 22 2 15 147
Schuyler 9 0 0 0 7 0 0 16
Scotland 17 0 0 2 5 0 0 24
Shelby 25 2 0 4 1 0 0 32
St Charles 139 56 0 38 16 2 14 265
Warren 49 20 0 9 11 0 0 89
* Region Total * 1,428 417 0 200 229 24 78 2,376
Southeast Bollinger 66 2 0 0 4 0 0 72
Butler 118 58 0 26 32 6 4 244
Cape Girardeau 168 9 0 12 12 0 7 208
Carter 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 15
74Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 26.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and Goal
Total
01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children
Southeast Crawford 90 16 0 4 15 1 5 131
Dent 38 14 0 5 4 2 2 65
Dunklin 57 6 0 8 15 2 14 102
Howell 77 9 0 9 10 4 4 113
Iron 16 9 0 1 10 0 0 36
Jefferson 357 106 0 39 125 18 17 662
Madison 32 8 0 4 3 0 0 47
Maries 20 0 0 1 1 0 0 22
Mississippi 39 0 0 3 9 0 0 51
New Madrid 107 6 0 5 17 4 1 140
Oregon 46 1 0 6 0 0 1 54
Pemiscot 58 10 0 12 24 1 3 108
Perry 36 5 0 1 5 0 2 49
Phelps 184 15 0 10 25 0 2 236
Pulaski 91 31 0 14 15 0 8 159
Reynolds 12 7 0 1 10 0 3 33
Ripley 17 8 0 12 7 1 1 46
Scott 94 1 0 4 46 0 0 145
Shannon 14 6 0 2 0 0 1 23
St Francois 213 42 0 29 10 10 12 316
Ste Genevieve 25 9 0 2 4 0 0 40
Stoddard 108 3 0 15 34 0 8 168
Texas 36 20 0 3 19 0 1 79
Washington 138 18 0 13 6 2 1 178
Wayne 41 19 0 2 3 0 2 67
* Region Total * 2,312 438 0 244 465 51 99 3,609
Southwest Barry 76 50 0 13 11 1 0 151
Barton 9 6 0 3 0 0 0 18
Bates 11 7 0 5 4 0 0 27
Benton 7 8 0 7 0 0 1 23
Camden 68 22 0 5 10 0 1 106
Cedar 16 7 0 3 4 0 0 30
Christian 75 22 0 6 28 5 5 141
Dade 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 7
Dallas 27 6 0 5 2 1 0 41
Douglas 23 2 0 2 1 0 3 31
Greene 349 218 0 56 29 1 32 685
Henry 31 14 0 8 2 0 4 59
Hickory 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6
Jasper 307 106 0 40 32 1 4 490
Laclede 104 21 0 16 3 0 1 145
Lawrence 67 52 0 17 15 0 14 165
McDonald 40 11 0 6 4 0 0 61
Miller 42 5 0 5 9 1 0 62
Moniteau 12 0 0 0 6 0 1 19
Morgan 56 1 0 0 0 0 7 64
Newton 107 21 0 8 13 0 5 154
Ozark 15 6 0 3 0 0 4 28
Polk 29 11 0 9 11 1 2 63
St Clair 22 0 0 2 0 0 0 24
Stone 40 19 0 1 20 0 2 82
Taney 162 73 0 18 26 1 13 293
Vernon 17 5 0 3 1 0 0 26
Webster 53 5 0 8 6 0 0 72
Wright 68 29 0 6 7 0 2 112
* Region Total * 1,839 734 0 255 244 12 101 3,185
Kansas City Jackson 938 431 0 116 90 21 91 1,687
* Region Total * 938 431 0 116 90 21 91 1,687
St. Louis St Louis City 320 134 0 60 74 22 41 651
St Louis County 581 216 0 78 124 32 103 1,134
* Region Total * 901 350 0 138 198 54 144 1,785
Other Icama 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 6
* Region Total * 1 2 0 2 1 0 0 6
State Total 8,273 2,541 0 1,043 1,334 173 560 13,924
75Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 27.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous
Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell
Number of Placements Average
Total Number of
1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00
Atchison 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 7 2.57
Buchanan 32 33 9 4 3 4 6 8 99 4.84
Caldwell 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1.50
Carroll 3 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 7 3.00
Cass 48 47 34 12 12 25 4 14 196 5.38
Chariton 0 3 1 1 0 1 2 8 16 21.25
Clay 57 31 10 4 11 4 10 9 136 4.32
Clinton 12 14 8 2 0 8 0 4 48 4.60
Cooper 2 0 3 1 0 5 0 2 13 8.92
Daviess 7 3 1 4 0 2 1 0 18 3.22
De Kalb 7 10 1 0 2 4 0 0 24 3.00
Gentry 5 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 2.33
Grundy 15 12 5 2 1 2 0 0 37 2.22
Harrison 14 6 4 2 0 1 2 1 30 4.10
Holt 14 1 0 0 0 1 1 3 20 5.55
Johnson 37 26 13 5 7 11 7 1 107 3.44
Lafayette 17 19 1 0 1 7 0 4 49 4.76
Linn 17 21 10 9 4 9 6 2 78 4.88
Livingston 7 25 8 6 2 5 0 1 54 3.20
Mercer 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 4 4.00
Nodaway 33 9 6 9 3 5 1 1 67 2.94
Pettis 29 16 8 6 3 7 3 4 76 4.83
Platte 11 14 2 5 2 5 2 5 46 6.09
Putnam 6 5 3 0 4 1 0 0 19 2.68
Ray 5 5 6 1 0 0 0 0 17 2.18
Saline 24 8 4 1 3 1 0 3 46 3.57
Sullivan 10 13 1 0 0 6 0 2 32 4.03
Worth 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.33
* Region Total * 423 340 145 74 58 115 47 72 1,276 4.50
Northeast Adair 28 27 8 6 5 6 6 4 90 4.17
Audrain 12 5 9 4 3 6 3 8 50 9.24
Boone 102 79 37 17 14 49 18 22 338 5.28
Callaway 43 38 19 11 5 19 5 8 148 4.76
Clark 15 2 5 6 2 3 1 2 37 4.41
Cole 44 33 35 12 8 19 5 5 162 4.30
Franklin 125 60 45 20 24 29 10 12 325 3.66
Gasconade 13 7 1 2 1 3 1 2 30 3.93
Howard 11 4 8 2 0 9 1 3 39 6.64
Knox 7 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 12 1.75
Lewis 7 1 5 0 1 0 4 0 18 4.50
Lincoln 47 28 16 15 5 12 3 4 131 3.71
Macon 39 20 12 4 0 6 1 4 86 3.36
Marion 68 38 28 19 6 14 10 12 196 4.26
Monroe 12 7 2 1 2 1 2 1 28 4.11
Montgomery 15 5 11 7 1 3 0 2 44 3.91
Osage 5 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 11 1.73
Pike 15 12 1 0 0 5 1 2 36 3.75
Ralls 9 5 0 3 0 2 2 1 22 4.00
Randolph 48 35 14 9 9 14 8 8 147 4.21
Schuyler 7 4 0 0 0 3 0 2 16 6.25
Scotland 7 5 2 3 1 3 1 2 24 6.00
Shelby 9 9 1 3 1 2 0 7 32 11.38
St Charles 92 65 28 19 6 32 14 8 265 3.87
Warren 28 24 11 3 7 10 5 1 89 3.69
* Region Total * 808 520 300 168 101 250 101 120 2,376 4.45
Southeast Bollinger 29 15 12 4 6 3 0 3 72 3.57
Butler 87 56 27 21 8 17 13 13 244 4.34
Cape Girardeau 79 46 25 13 11 22 5 6 208 3.66
Carter 2 7 1 3 0 1 1 0 15 3.33
76Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 27.
Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of January 2020
by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous
Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell
Number of Placements Average
Total Number of
1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements
Southeast Crawford 53 26 12 8 10 8 6 7 131 4.00
Dent 18 17 11 1 1 7 6 4 65 5.09
Dunklin 46 26 4 4 2 10 4 5 102 3.83
Howell 29 31 15 11 6 9 4 8 113 4.67
Iron 17 7 6 3 0 1 0 2 36 3.44
Jefferson 287 149 60 46 33 53 14 17 662 3.16
Madison 15 10 5 3 6 2 0 6 47 5.34
Maries 10 8 1 0 1 2 0 0 22 2.36
Mississippi 22 13 4 6 0 2 1 3 51 3.55
New Madrid 62 32 11 11 1 13 4 6 140 3.88
Oregon 14 17 4 5 6 3 4 1 54 3.80
Pemiscot 34 26 9 5 4 13 7 10 108 5.55
Perry 21 17 4 1 1 1 0 4 49 5.76
Phelps 89 58 28 14 7 21 6 12 236 3.97
Pulaski 48 45 19 9 14 13 5 5 159 3.69
Reynolds 15 12 1 2 0 0 2 1 33 2.91
Ripley 13 9 2 9 2 3 4 4 46 5.87
Scott 66 27 9 13 7 18 3 2 145 3.16
Shannon 7 6 2 2 1 3 0 2 23 4.52
St Francois 119 67 39 19 10 34 11 16 316 4.49
Ste Genevieve 7 10 13 2 1 2 3 2 40 4.58
Stoddard 41 67 25 4 5 12 6 6 168 3.51
Texas 34 10 7 7 3 16 1 1 79 3.47
Washington 44 43 29 18 3 17 10 13 178 5.24
Wayne 11 22 10 1 5 13 3 2 67 4.25
* Region Total * 1,319 879 395 245 154 319 123 161 3,609 3.98
Southwest Barry 41 46 26 11 7 8 7 4 151 4.03
Barton 7 1 0 5 0 2 2 1 18 8.94
Bates 10 9 2 2 1 3 0 0 27 2.56
Benton 4 8 2 2 3 1 2 1 23 4.52
Camden 42 27 11 12 3 5 2 4 106 3.47
Cedar 7 11 1 4 0 3 1 3 30 6.57
Christian 65 23 17 14 7 9 3 2 141 2.78
Dade 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1.71
Dallas 11 13 3 3 2 4 1 4 41 5.22
Douglas 13 9 4 1 1 0 1 1 31 2.87
Greene 316 136 58 41 27 59 19 29 685 3.55
Henry 24 9 7 6 2 7 0 4 59 4.05
Hickory 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 6 11.00
Jasper 160 117 57 29 24 50 26 26 490 4.24
Laclede 53 32 13 8 11 19 3 6 145 3.88
Lawrence 70 23 12 12 15 10 14 8 165 4.55
McDonald 23 13 8 5 1 7 3 1 61 3.49
Miller 12 21 5 8 2 9 1 4 62 5.16
Moniteau 9 5 2 0 1 1 0 1 19 2.95
Morgan 24 19 9 4 2 6 0 0 64 2.53
Newton 74 31 21 5 3 13 1 5 154 2.92
Ozark 9 6 3 0 0 4 0 0 28 2.43
Polk 26 15 4 2 2 9 1 4 63 4.38
St Clair 14 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 24 3.88
Stone 33 13 12 6 4 7 2 4 82 3.66
Taney 113 81 34 14 15 20 4 11 293 3.55
Vernon 6 6 4 1 1 2 3 3 26 6.88
Webster 31 18 6 4 1 3 2 6 72 4.22
Wright 46 26 18 6 2 4 1 7 112 3.61
* Region Total * 1,246 727 342 206 140 266 100 141 3,185 3.83
Kansas City Jackson 651 345 189 99 102 157 64 72 1,687 3.81
* Region Total * 651 345 189 99 102 157 64 72 1,687 3.81
St. Louis St Louis City 195 138 77 49 40 80 28 39 651 4.78
St Louis County 416 254 158 82 63 95 30 32 1,134 3.58
* Region Total * 611 392 235 131 103 175 58 71 1,785 4.01
Other Icama 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 6 10.83
* Region Total * 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 2 6 10.83
State Total 5,058 3,206 1,607 923 658 1,282 493 639 13,924 4.06
77Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 28.
Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County
(FY 2020 Adoptions are Year to Date January 2020)
Total
FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Adoptions
Northwest Andrew 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
Atchison 0 1 3 2 0 0 6
Buchanan 5 4 16 19 25 8 77
Caldwell 14 10 3 3 2 6 38
Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cass 18 25 32 36 23 22 156
Chariton 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Clay 43 41 46 58 54 21 263
Clinton 1 2 3 0 0 1 7
Cooper 2 0 2 5 7 4 20
Daviess 0 0 3 3 7 3 16
De Kalb 10 24 20 43 32 23 152
Gentry 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
Grundy 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Holt 0 2 2 0 0 3 7
Johnson 12 7 15 12 16 13 75
Lafayette 0 0 1 0 0 2 3
Linn 0 0 0 0 3 3 6
Livingston 0 4 0 0 4 3 11
Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
Nodaway 0 4 2 0 4 0 10
Pettis 6 5 6 15 9 7 48
Platte 17 12 21 17 13 11 91
Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Saline 20 6 20 9 17 9 81
Sullivan 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
* Region Total * 148 150 198 223 217 141 1,077
Northeast Adair 10 6 15 8 6 6 51
Audrain 13 10 15 8 7 5 58
Boone 30 42 40 42 50 23 227
Callaway 0 1 2 1 2 0 6
Clark 0 3 1 0 2 1 7
Cole 10 33 24 19 19 10 115
Franklin 36 22 29 64 53 40 244
Gasconade 2 0 2 6 3 1 14
Howard 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lincoln 13 15 10 30 14 5 87
Macon 5 4 3 4 2 6 24
Marion 15 12 13 10 14 6 70
Monroe 2 1 0 2 8 0 13
Montgomery 0 1 0 2 2 4 9
Osage 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
Pike 2 1 0 2 11 2 18
Ralls 2 1 3 1 1 0 8
Randolph 1 9 10 16 23 6 65
Schuyler 0 2 0 1 0 0 3
Scotland 0 2 1 0 1 0 4
Shelby 2 6 2 2 0 0 12
St Charles 34 42 40 48 50 43 257
Warren 3 3 15 12 7 5 45
* Region Total * 180 216 227 279 275 163 1,340
Southeast Bollinger 5 0 3 2 3 3 16
Butler 1 4 1 0 2 10 18
Cape Girardeau 3 16 24 22 32 21 118
Carter 2 1 1 6 0 0 10
Crawford 0 0 0 10 13 3 26
78Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 28.
Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County
(FY 2020 Adoptions are Year to Date January 2020)
Total
FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Adoptions
Southeast Dent 1 0 2 1 11 0 15
Dunklin 0 0 1 2 4 1 8
Howell 3 3 1 9 10 3 29
Iron 3 4 16 8 20 14 65
Jefferson 46 47 41 59 61 23 277
Madison 1 0 0 2 1 0 4
Maries 0 5 2 8 0 7 22
Mississippi 0 0 4 2 1 1 8
New Madrid 0 3 0 0 1 3 7
Oregon 1 2 0 0 2 7 12
Pemiscot 0 1 16 9 15 10 51
Perry 3 2 6 4 9 3 27
Phelps 9 16 17 9 18 12 81
Pulaski 13 24 14 19 16 9 95
Reynolds 0 0 5 4 4 0 13
Ripley 27 56 43 30 13 15 184
Scott 8 8 9 9 4 4 42
Shannon 1 0 4 0 1 9 15
St Francois 34 30 34 48 74 61 281
Ste Genevieve 1 0 1 0 0 0 2
Stoddard 18 17 24 31 35 12 137
Texas 8 10 21 3 10 2 54
Washington 0 1 1 2 1 0 5
Wayne 1 14 14 8 8 2 47
* Region Total * 189 264 305 307 369 235 1,669
Southwest Barry 2 1 0 0 3 4 10
Barton 11 3 2 9 7 4 36
Bates 0 1 0 8 4 2 15
Benton 1 0 2 0 0 0 3
Camden 1 0 3 2 0 2 8
Cedar 8 1 5 0 7 1 22
Christian 20 39 50 42 37 30 218
Dade 2 3 2 6 6 0 19
Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Douglas 2 0 0 0 0 0 2
Greene 91 133 134 118 141 52 669
Henry 13 14 9 20 8 6 70
Hickory 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Jasper 73 68 56 62 57 21 337
Laclede 43 29 42 59 60 7 240
Lawrence 2 6 9 4 5 8 34
McDonald 0 3 2 0 0 0 5
Miller 0 0 0 0 2 0 2
Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 5 5
Newton 46 57 34 28 39 21 225
Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Polk 0 0 1 1 0 3 5
St Clair 0 0 1 0 0 1 2
Stone 36 43 43 39 35 6 202
Taney 16 20 24 29 22 10 121
Vernon 6 0 11 3 8 0 28
Webster 23 38 58 57 32 26 234
Wright 10 34 11 9 28 15 107
* Region Total * 407 493 499 496 501 224 2,620
Kansas City Jackson 241 274 241 282 296 165 1,499
* Region Total * 241 274 241 282 296 165 1,499
St. Louis St Louis City 71 57 40 55 48 30 301
St Louis County 75 81 91 104 118 68 537
* Region Total * 146 138 131 159 166 98 838
Other Icama 5 1 1 2 1 0 10
* Region Total * 5 1 1 2 1 0 10
State Total 1,316 1,536 1,602 1,748 1,825 1,026 9,053
79Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 16.
Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody
During January 2020
Total Entries Total Re Entries
12,000
12,200
12,400
12,600
12,800
13,000
13,200
13,400
13,600
13,800
14,000
Jan
-18
Feb
-18
Mar
-18
Ap
r-1
8
May
-18
Jun
-18
Jul-
18
Au
g-1
8
Sep
-18
Oct
-18
No
v-1
8
De
c-1
8
Jan
-19
Feb
-19
Mar
-19
Ap
r-1
9
May
-19
Jun
-19
Jul-
19
Au
g-1
9
Sep
-19
Oct
-19
No
v-1
9
De
c-1
9
Jan
-20
Figure 17.
Children Active in Children's Division Custody
on the Last day of the MonthJanuary 2018 Through January 2020
80Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis
Figure 18.
Children Closing from Alternative Care During January 2020
by Reason for Case Closing and Region
Returned Home Other
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
Jan
-18
Feb
-18
Mar
-18
Ap
r-1
8
May
-18
Jun
-18
Jul-
18
Au
g-1
8
Sep
-18
Oct
-18
No
v-1
8
De
c-1
8
Jan
-19
Feb
-19
Mar
-19
Ap
r-1
9
May
-19
Jun
-19
Jul-
19
Au
g-1
9
Sep
-19
Oct
-19
No
v-1
9
De
c-1
9
Jan
-20
Figure 19.
Adoptions Finalized by Month
January 2018 Through January 2020
81Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0 - 3 4 - 7 8 - 11 12 - 15 16 +
Figure 20.
Children in Children's Division Custody as of January 2020
by Age and Placement Category
Foster Home Other Relative Home Residential Care Adoptive Home
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
Jan
-16
Mar
-16
May
-16
Jul-
16
Sep
-16
No
v-1
6
Jan
-17
Mar
-17
May
-17
Jul-
17
Sep
-17
No
v-1
7
Jan
-18
Mar
-18
May
-18
Jul-
18
Sep
-18
No
v-1
8
Jan
-19
Mar
-19
May
-19
Jul-
19
Sep
-19
No
v-1
9
Jan
-20
Figure 21.
Children in Children's Division Custody
as of the Last Day of the MonthJanuary 2016 Through January 2020 by Placement Category
Foster Home Other Relative Home Residential Care Adoptive Home
82Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
20
15
-2
20
15
-3
20
15
-4
20
16
-1
20
16
-2
20
16
-3
20
16
-4
20
17
-1
20
17
-2
20
17
-3
20
17
-4
20
18
-1
20
18
-2
20
18
-3
20
18
-4
20
19
-1
20
19
-2
20
19
-3
20
19
-4
20
20
-1
Exit
s p
er
10
0 C
hild
ren
inFo
ste
r C
are
Po
pu
lati
on
Figure 22.
Children Exiting Children's Division Custody
by Quarter and Subsequent Disposition2nd Quarter 2015 Through 1st Quarter 2020
Adoption Child Independence Other Legal Status Relative Home Other Closing Return Home
83Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 84 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures
Table 14.
• This table includes children entering Legal Status 1 for the first time.
• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH
Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
• Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.
• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 15.
• This table includes children re-entering Legal Status 1 who have had prior Out-of-Home Placements.
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH
Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
• Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.
• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 16.
• This data includes children (re)entering (entering and/or re-entering) Legal Status 1.
Table 17. and Table 18.
• Length of Stay is computed for the last continuous period in Legal Status 1 during the
month. Table values, for the length of stay, indicate the average number of months in custody.
Table 19.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
Children’s Services Management Report 85 Research and Data Analysis
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP
Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG
Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May
19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.
• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Table 20.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Placement Types are:
ADF Adoption (by foster parent) ADO Adoption (by other)
ADR Adoption (by relative) CFP Career Foster Parent
CTO Non-Licensed/Court Ordered Placement DET Detention
FAH Foster Adoptive Home
FGB Behavioral Foster Family Group Home FGH Foster Family Group Home
FGM Medical Foster Family Group Home FHB Behavioral Foster Home
FHE Emergency Foster Home
FHM Medical Foster Home FHO Foster Home
ILA Independent Living Arrangement JHO Juvenile Court Home
KHB Kinship Behavioral Home
KHM Kinship Medical Home KHO Licensed Kinship Home
KHU Unlicensed Kinship Home LGS Legal Guardianship Subsidy
MMD Medical Facility MMF Mental Health Facility
MMH Mental Health Home
MMW Mental Health Medicaid Waiver RFA Residential Treatment Facility
RFP Residential Treatment Facility- Initial Placement - No Level RF2 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 2
RF3 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 3
RF4 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 4 RFE Residential Treatment Facility- Emergency
RFH Residential Foster Home RFI Residential Treatment Facility- Infant
RFM Residential Treatment Facility-Maternity RFT Residential Treatment Facility-Transitional/Aftercare
RHB Behavioral Relative Home
RHM Medical Relative Home
Children’s Services Management Report 86 Research and Data Analysis
Table 20 (contd).
RHO Relative Home
RHU Unlicensed Relative Home RUN Runaway
SCH School
TLA Transitional Living Arrangement TLG Transitional Living Group
TLS Transitional Living Scattered Site
Table 21.
• This table includes children exiting Legal Status 1 only.
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP
Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Table 22.
Table includes children closing from all legal status categories.
• Closing categories include the following closing reasons:
Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s), CYAC child, Returned Child to sending state)
Achieved Independence - Goal Achieved (Child Independence) Living with Other Relatives – Goal Achieved (Placement with a fit and willing relative)
Other Agency - Care and Custody with other Agency
Other - Married, Runaway, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Guardianship and Other
Table 23.
• Legal Status 1, TPR (Termination of Parental Rights) Incomplete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and no completed TPR (TPR is not completed for the mother and the putative
and/or legal father).
• Legal Status 1, TPR Complete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and TPR has been
completed (TPR is completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father).
• Temporary Adoptive Custody includes Legal Status 2 children.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal
Status 5.
• No Identified Adoptive Resource includes Legal Status 1 children with a Goal of 'AD' and no
pre-adoptive placement marked.
Children’s Services Management Report 87 Research and Data Analysis
Table 24.
• This table includes vendor types of – CF, FA, FG, FH, LA, RH, and KH.
• Existing vendor types RH and KH were added to this table in October 2015 and are shown
under the heading Relative Home.
• Newly Licensed Vendors includes vendors which are licensed during the month and have
either no previous license or one which ended more than five years ago.
• The categories “Current # of Licensed Vendors” and “Licensed Vendors Twelve Months Ago” represent unduplicated vendor counts.
Table 25.
• Legal Status Definitions: LS 1 - Care and custody with Children’s Division (includes temporary custody)
LS 2 - Temporary custody with adoptive parents
LS 3 - Supervision only by Children’s Division LS 4 - Care and custody with juvenile court/other agency
LS 5 - Final custody awarded to adoptive parents LS 7 - CYAC Child (Children of Youth in Alternative Care)
LS 8 - Chafee Independent Living Program LS 9 - Subsidized Guardianship
LS V – Voluntary Placement Agreement
Table 26.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Goals are: 01 - Return child to parent(s)/caretaker(s)
AD - Adoption 05 - CYAC Child
06 - Child Independence/Independent Living
07 - Guardianship 08 - Live with Other Relatives
09 - Case Plan Goal Not Yet Established / Missing
Table 27.
• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.
• Table values are children active at the end of the month categorized by the number of
placements experienced in their most recent stay in Legal Status 1.
• The number of placements represents the movement of children among distinct vendors.
• Short term temporary settings are not counted when the child returns to the previous
vendor.
Children’s Services Management Report 88 Research and Data Analysis
Table 28.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children
are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.
Figure 18.
• Closing categories includes the following closing reasons: Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s)
Other - Achieved Independence, Living with other Relatives, Other Agency , Married, Runaway, Returned Child to Sending State, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated,
Deceased, Children of Youth in Alternative Care (CYAC) Child and Other.
Figure 19.
• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children
are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal
Status 5.
Figure 20.
• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH
Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP
Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG
Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
• Age is calculated as of the last day of the month.
Figure 21.
• Placement categories include the following placement types:
Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH
Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS
Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other
Intensive In-Home Services
Table 29.
Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During January 2020
Grouped by Referral County
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clinton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Platte 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 10 76.92% 3 23.08% 13
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Audrain 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Boone 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Callaway 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Cole 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Franklin 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4
Gasconade 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Howard 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Knox 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lewis 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lincoln 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Monroe 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 0 0.00% 7 46.67% 8 53.33% 15
Warren 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 37 68.52% 17 31.48% 54
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1 50.00% 2
Butler 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 2 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
for Screening
Referrals Accepted
Accepted
Referrals
Accepted
Referrals Not
90
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 29.
Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During January 2020
Grouped by Referral County
Total
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Iron 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Jefferson 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 5
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Perry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Phelps 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Pulaski 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Texas 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 3 8.33% 27 75.00% 6 16.67% 36
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3
Barton 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2
Greene 0 0.00% 6 54.55% 5 45.45% 11
Henry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Hickory 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Jasper 0 0.00% 6 46.15% 7 53.85% 13
Laclede 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 5 83.33% 6
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Taney 0 0.00% 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 5
Vernon 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1
Wright 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 35 52.24% 32 47.76% 67
Kansas City Jackson 8 34.78% 8 34.78% 7 30.43% 23
* Region Total * 8 34.78% 8 34.78% 7 30.43% 23
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 9 75.00% 3 25.00% 12
St Louis County 2 10.00% 11 55.00% 7 35.00% 20
* Region Total * 2 6.25% 20 62.50% 10 31.25% 32
State Total 13 5.78% 137 60.89% 75 33.33% 225
Referrals Accepted Referrals Referrals Not
for Screening Accepted Accepted
91
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 30.
Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During January 2020
Grouped by Household County
Families Children Average # At-Risk Average # At-Risk
Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family
Northwest Andrew 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Atchison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Buchanan 2 4 2.00 2 1.00
Caldwell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Carroll 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cass 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Chariton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Clay 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Clinton 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Cooper 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Daviess 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
De Kalb 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Gentry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Grundy 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Harrison 1 3 3.00 1 1.00
Holt 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Johnson 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Lafayette 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Linn 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Livingston 1 4 4.00 4 4.00
Mercer 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Nodaway 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pettis 1 7 7.00 1 1.00
Platte 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Putnam 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ray 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Saline 2 6 3.00 2 1.00
Sullivan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Worth 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
* Region Total * 10 30 3.00 16 1.60
Northeast Adair 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Audrain 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Boone 3 7 2.33 4 1.33
Callaway 4 8 2.00 8 2.00
Clark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cole 3 7 2.33 6 2.00
Franklin 3 10 3.33 10 3.33
Gasconade 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Howard 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Knox 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Lewis 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Lincoln 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Macon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Marion 1 4 4.00 4 4.00
Monroe 2 3 1.50 2 1.00
Montgomery 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Osage 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pike 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Ralls 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Randolph 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Schuyler 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Scotland 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Shelby 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
St Charles 7 17 2.43 16 2.29
Warren 4 13 3.25 12 3.00
* Region Total * 37 82 2.22 74 2.00
Southeast Bollinger 1 4 4.00 4 4.00
Butler 5 19 3.80 18 3.60
Cape Girardeau 2 3 1.50 2 1.00
Carter 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
92
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 30.
Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During January 2020
Grouped by Household County
Families Children Average # of At-Risk Average # of At-Risk
Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family
Southeast Crawford 1 5 5.00 5 5.00
Dent 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dunklin 1 3 3.00 1 1.00
Howell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Iron 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Jefferson 3 10 3.33 9 3.00
Madison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Maries 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Mississippi 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
New Madrid 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Oregon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pemiscot 3 6 2.00 6 2.00
Perry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Phelps 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Pulaski 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Reynolds 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Ripley 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Scott 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Shannon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
St Francois 3 6 2.00 3 1.00
Ste Genevieve 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Stoddard 2 4 2.00 4 2.00
Texas 2 6 3.00 5 2.50
Washington 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Wayne 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
* Region Total * 26 69 2.65 60 2.31
Southwest Barry 2 2 1.00 2 1.00
Barton 2 5 2.50 5 2.50
Bates 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Benton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Camden 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Cedar 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Christian 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Dade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Dallas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Douglas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Greene 4 12 3.00 10 2.50
Henry 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
Hickory 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Jasper 5 22 4.40 21 4.20
Laclede 1 3 3.00 3 3.00
Lawrence 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
McDonald 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Miller 1 6 6.00 6 6.00
Moniteau 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Morgan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Newton 2 10 5.00 6 3.00
Ozark 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Polk 1 2 2.00 1 1.00
St Clair 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Stone 1 2 2.00 2 2.00
Taney 5 13 2.60 10 2.00
Vernon 1 1 1.00 1 1.00
Webster 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Wright 1 5 5.00 5 5.00
* Region Total * 29 87 3.00 75 2.59
Kansas City Jackson 13 31 2.38 26 2.00
* Region Total * 13 31 2.38 26 2.00
St. Louis St Louis City 6 26 4.33 14 2.33
St Louis County 12 31 2.58 29 2.42
* Region Total * 18 57 3.17 43 2.39
State Total 133 356 2.68 294 2.21
93
Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 31.
Exit Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During January 2020
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Chariton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clay 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Platte 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 6 66.67% 3 33.33% 0 0.00% 9
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Boone 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Callaway 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Franklin 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4
Gasconade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Macon 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Marion 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ralls 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Randolph 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Warren 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
* Region Total * 21 80.77% 5 19.23% 0 0.00% 26
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Family Intact Family Not Intact Other
94Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 31.
Exit Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During January 2020
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5
Madison 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ste Genevieve 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Stoddard 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 12 80.00% 3 20.00% 0 0.00% 15
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Henry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
Laclede 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Ozark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Polk 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 17 68.00% 8 32.00% 0 0.00% 25
Kansas City Jackson 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
* Region Total * 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2
St. Louis St Louis City 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
St Louis County 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8
* Region Total * 9 90.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10
State Total 66 75.86% 21 24.14% 0 0.00% 87
Family Not Intact Family Intact Other
95Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 32.
Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During July 2019
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Macon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
96Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 32.
Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During July 2019
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Southwest Barry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3
Laclede 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lawrence 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Vernon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Webster 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Wright 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
* Region Total * 14 87.50% 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 16
Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Louis County 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
State Total 20 90.91% 2 9.09% 0 0.00% 22
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
97Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 33.
Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During January 2019
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cooper 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
98Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Table 33.
Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting
Intensive In-Home Services During January 2019
Families
Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting
Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jefferson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
New Madrid 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1
Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Camden 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Dallas 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Greene 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Laclede 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3
Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Miller 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Clair 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1
Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
Webster 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2
Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 9 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9
Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
St Louis County 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0
State Total 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13
Other Family Intact Family Not Intact
99Children's Services Management Report
Research and Data Analysis
Children’s Services Management Report 100 Research and Data Analysis
Notes: Intensive In-Home Services Tables
Table 31., Table 32., and Table 33.
• Tables include only those families with an exit date during the month in question
and an exit status which is not missing.
• Exit status includes the following status codes:
Family Intact
10 Family Intact
Family Not Intact
12 Child Ran Away 13 Child Moved out of Home (not placed)
14 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (not Court Ordered) 15 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (Court Ordered)
16 In Foster Home or Group Home
17 In Residential 18 With DYS (Division of Youth Services)
19 In Juvenile Justice 20 In In-Patient Psychiatric
Other
11 Can't Locate Family
21 Information Not Available 99 Other
Table 32. and Table 33.
Tables include only those families which responded to follow-up requests. These do not
equal the numbers for Table 31. for the corresponding table six or twelve months prior.