children's services management report...children’s services management report i research and...

106
Department of Social Services Children's Division Children's Services Management Report June 2020 Missouri Department of Social Services Research & Data Analysis 221 W. High Street Jefferson City, MO 65101

Upload: others

Post on 23-Aug-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Department of Social Services Children's Division

Children's Services Management Report

June 2020

Missouri Department of Social Services Research & Data Analysis

221 W. High Street Jefferson City, MO 65101

Page 2: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report

I Research and Data Analysis

State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement:

“We will lead the nation in building the capacity of individuals, families, and communities to secure and sustain healthy, safe, and productive lives." The Department of Social Services is an equal opportunity employer. Services provided by the Department of Social Services are offered on a non-discriminatory basis.

Page 3: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report II Research and Data Analysis

Table of Contents

Unless otherwise indicated, information contained in this publication is intended for monthly use only.

Although the information presented is the best available at the time of publication, because of delays in processing, data may be incomplete. Accordingly, data should NOT simply be summed from one month

to the next to obtain 3 month, 6 month or 12 month (etc.) values.

Figure 1. Map – Department of Social Services Regions ...............................................................V

Child Abuse and Neglect (CA/N)

Table 1. Incidents and Children Reported During the Month Compared to Those

Reported for the Same Month Last Year ....................................................................... 2

Table 2. Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed During the Month ....................................................................................... 4

Table 3. Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed by Conclusion During the Month .................................................................. 6

Table 4. Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month .................................. 8

Table 5. Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed in the Month ................................ 10

Table 6. CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During the Month .......................................... 12

Figure 2. CA/N Reports for Four Years Through the Current Month ............................................ 14

Figure 3. CA/N Reports Comparing the Last Two Years.............................................................. 14

Figure 4. Percentage Change in CA/N Reports Made Twelve Months Apart ................................. 15

Figure 5. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 15

Figure 6. CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed During the Month by Conclusion.............. 16

Figure 7. Time Between Report and Child Contact for Investigations/Assessments

Completed in the Month ............................................................................................ 16

Figure 8a. CA/N Investigations Completed During the Month ....................................................... 17

Figure 8b. CA/N Assessments Completed During the Month ......................................................... 17

Notes Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures ............................................................... 18

Family-Centered Services (FCS)

Table 7. FCS Cases Open at the End of the Month by Reason for Opening ................................. 22

Table 8. FCS Cases Active During the Month by Reason for Opening ......................................... 24

Table 9. Persons in Family-Centered Services During the Month ............................................... 26

Table 10. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 28

Page 4: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report III Research and Data Analysis

Table 11. FCS Cases By Region Closed During the Month by Close Reason .................................. 30

Table 12. FCS Cases Active During the Month Which Have Had Court Involvement ...................... 32

Table 13. FCS Cases By Region Active During the Month Which Have Had No Court Involvement . 34

Figure 9. FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month Over the Previous Four Years .................. 36

Figure 10. Percentage Change in FCS Cases by Region Active as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months Apart ................................................................................................ 36

Figure 11. FCS Cases by Region Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ....................... 37

Figure 12. FCS Cases Opened During the Month by Reason for Opening ...................................... 37

Figure 13. FCS Cases by Region Closed During the Month by Reason for Closing .......................... 38

Figure 14. FCS Cases Active During the Month With Court Involvement

By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 38

Figure 15. FCS Cases Active During the Month With No Court Involvement By Number of Months Open ....................................................................................... 39

Notes Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures .............................................................. 40

Out-of-Home Placement

Table 14. Children Entering Children’s Division Custody for the First Time During the Month By Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ................................... 44

Table 15. Children Re-Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category ............................................... 46

Table 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Last Two Years ............... 48

Table 17. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Length of Stay and Region ........................................................................................ 49

Table 18. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month

By Length of Stay and Case Manager County .............................................................. 50

Table 19. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case

Manager County and Placement Category ................................................................... 52

Table 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month by Case Manager County and Placement Type......................................................................... 54

Table 21. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody During the Month Grouped by Placement Category and Case Manager County........................................................... 64

Table 22. Children Closed from the Alternative Care System During the Month

Grouped by Reason for Case Closing .......................................................................... 66

Page 5: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report IV Research and Data Analysis

Table 23. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody ................................................................................ 68

Table 24. Currently Licensed Children’s Division Foster Homes by Vendor Type ........................... 70

Table 25. Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of the Month Grouped By Case Manager County and Legal Status ................................................................. 72

Table 26. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped

By Case Manager County and Goal ............................................................................. 74

Table 27. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month Grouped

By Case Manager County and Number of Previous Placements..................................... 76

Table 28. Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year .............................................................................. 78

Figure 16. Children (Re)Entering Children’s Division Custody During the Month ............................ 80

Figure 17. Children in Children’s Division Custody on the Last Day of the Month During

the Last Two Years ................................................................................................... 80

Figure 18. Children Closing from Alternative Care During the Month by Reason for Case Closing and Region ...................................................................................... 81

Figure 19. Adoptions Finalized During the Last Two Years ........................................................... 81

Figure 20. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last of the Month by Age and Placement Type ........................................................................................... 82

Figure 21. Children in Children’s Division Custody as of the Last Day of the Month By Placement Category for Four Years ........................................................................ 82

Figure 22. Children Exiting Children’s Division Custody by Quarter and

Subsequent Disposition ............................................................................................. 83

Notes Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures ............................................................... 84

Intensive In-Home Services (IIS)

Table 29. Families Referred to IIS During the Month Grouped by Referral County ........................ 90

Table 30. Families and Children Accepted in IIS During the Month Grouped by Household County ................................................................................................ 92

Table 31. Exit Status of Families Exiting IIS During the Month .................................................... 94

Table 32. Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ...................................................... 96

Table 33. Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting IIS ................................................ 98

Notes Intensive In-Home Services Tables ......................................................................... 100

Page 6: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report V Research and Data Analysis

Figure 1. Department of Social Services Regions

Northeast

Northwest

Kansas City

St. Louis

Southwest

Southeast

Page 7: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Child Abuse and Neglect

Page 8: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 1.

Incidents and Children Reported During June 2020

Compared to Those Reported During June 2019

Current Incidents Current Children

Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage

Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change

Northwest Andrew 6 9 -33.33% 10 9 11.11%

Atchison 2 2 0.00% 2 7 -71.43%

Buchanan 85 108 -21.30% 137 146 -6.16%

Caldwell 4 4 0.00% 9 4 125.00%

Carroll 2 13 -84.62% 2 17 -88.24%

Cass 56 55 1.82% 64 70 -8.57%

Chariton 1 1 0.00% 1 1 0.00%

Clay 103 104 -0.96% 136 126 7.94%

Clinton 12 8 50.00% 16 10 60.00%

Cooper 10 7 42.86% 22 9 144.44%

Daviess 5 6 -16.67% 6 7 -14.29%

De Kalb 3 10 -70.00% 7 14 -50.00%

Gentry 6 6 0.00% 14 6 133.33%

Grundy 7 8 -12.50% 11 11 0.00%

Harrison 9 5 80.00% 15 5 200.00%

Holt 1 3 -66.67% 1 5 -80.00%

Johnson 28 30 -6.67% 47 42 11.90%

Lafayette 15 18 -16.67% 23 20 15.00%

Linn 10 7 42.86% 14 13 7.69%

Livingston 15 6 150.00% 18 7 157.14%

Mercer 2 2 0.00% 2 2 0.00%

Nodaway 11 12 -8.33% 20 14 42.86%

Pettis 32 31 3.23% 40 40 0.00%

Platte 40 45 -11.11% 45 60 -25.00%

Putnam 2 4 -50.00% 2 4 -50.00%

Ray 15 13 15.38% 19 20 -5.00%

Saline 23 18 27.78% 39 24 62.50%

Sullivan 7 2 250.00% 12 2 500.00%

Worth 0 1 -100.00% 0 1 -100.00%

* Region Total * 512 538 -4.83% 734 696 5.46%

Northeast Adair 18 18 0.00% 25 29 -13.79%

Audrain 25 14 78.57% 45 22 104.55%

Boone 74 96 -22.92% 108 128 -15.63%

Callaway 27 30 -10.00% 41 48 -14.58%

Clark 8 5 60.00% 12 7 71.43%

Cole 39 44 -11.36% 47 59 -20.34%

Franklin 55 77 -28.57% 83 111 -25.23%

Gasconade 12 12 0.00% 15 19 -21.05%

Howard 8 4 100.00% 10 6 66.67%

Knox 1 1 0.00% 4 1 300.00%

Lewis 11 6 83.33% 12 6 100.00%

Lincoln 46 51 -9.80% 65 69 -5.80%

Macon 7 20 -65.00% 9 32 -71.88%

Marion 18 21 -14.29% 24 32 -25.00%

Monroe 5 3 66.67% 6 3 100.00%

Montgomery 6 14 -57.14% 8 20 -60.00%

Osage 4 4 0.00% 5 5 0.00%

Pike 7 9 -22.22% 10 11 -9.09%

Ralls 1 2 -50.00% 1 2 -50.00%

Randolph 21 28 -25.00% 27 42 -35.71%

Schuyler 3 3 0.00% 4 5 -20.00%

Scotland 2 3 -33.33% 3 5 -40.00%

Shelby 4 4 0.00% 10 6 66.67%

St Charles 103 126 -18.25% 146 175 -16.57%

Warren 16 30 -46.67% 24 38 -36.84%

* Region Total * 521 625 -16.64% 744 881 -15.55%

Southeast Bollinger 5 8 -37.50% 5 13 -61.54%

Butler 34 44 -22.73% 45 65 -30.77%

Cape Girardeau 46 31 48.39% 64 48 33.33%

Carter 5 4 25.00% 7 7 0.00%

Crawford 15 28 -46.43% 22 38 -42.11%

Dent 11 10 10.00% 17 12 41.67%

2Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 9: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 1.

Incidents and Children Reported During June 2020

Compared to Those Reported During June 2019

Current Incidents Current Children

Month One Year Percentage Month One Year Percentage

Incidents Prior Change Children Prior Change

Southeast Dunklin 16 32 -50.00% 29 56 -48.21%

Howell 33 50 -34.00% 50 73 -31.51%

Iron 7 8 -12.50% 11 11 0.00%

Jefferson 77 129 -40.31% 100 178 -43.82%

Madison 5 9 -44.44% 7 11 -36.36%

Maries 4 6 -33.33% 5 8 -37.50%

Mississippi 12 9 33.33% 16 11 45.45%

New Madrid 11 16 -31.25% 15 26 -42.31%

Oregon 6 13 -53.85% 6 21 -71.43%

Pemiscot 14 15 -6.67% 17 28 -39.29%

Perry 12 12 0.00% 17 22 -22.73%

Phelps 31 29 6.90% 40 38 5.26%

Pulaski 31 31 0.00% 48 45 6.67%

Reynolds 7 11 -36.36% 10 16 -37.50%

Ripley 13 12 8.33% 19 16 18.75%

Scott 30 37 -18.92% 38 59 -35.59%

Shannon 8 9 -11.11% 13 14 -7.14%

St Francois 65 53 22.64% 82 72 13.89%

Ste Genevieve 16 5 220.00% 22 7 214.29%

Stoddard 19 39 -51.28% 29 56 -48.21%

Texas 14 21 -33.33% 14 33 -57.58%

Washington 13 21 -38.10% 19 31 -38.71%

Wayne 10 13 -23.08% 17 16 6.25%

* Region Total * 570 705 -19.15% 784 1,031 -23.96%

Southwest Barry 37 19 94.74% 56 28 100.00%

Barton 7 6 16.67% 7 6 16.67%

Bates 8 11 -27.27% 14 19 -26.32%

Benton 7 10 -30.00% 10 19 -47.37%

Camden 26 34 -23.53% 39 58 -32.76%

Cedar 21 7 200.00% 34 10 240.00%

Christian 55 49 12.24% 82 75 9.33%

Dade 2 4 -50.00% 2 5 -60.00%

Dallas 13 10 30.00% 21 13 61.54%

Douglas 4 9 -55.56% 5 13 -61.54%

Greene 280 289 -3.11% 376 407 -7.62%

Henry 26 21 23.81% 41 27 51.85%

Hickory 5 6 -16.67% 6 7 -14.29%

Jasper 110 109 0.92% 145 155 -6.45%

Laclede 40 42 -4.76% 52 59 -11.86%

Lawrence 30 36 -16.67% 45 48 -6.25%

McDonald 16 16 0.00% 25 30 -16.67%

Miller 21 26 -19.23% 31 47 -34.04%

Moniteau 8 11 -27.27% 10 12 -16.67%

Morgan 16 17 -5.88% 29 24 20.83%

Newton 36 32 12.50% 45 42 7.14%

Ozark 6 9 -33.33% 13 17 -23.53%

Polk 29 33 -12.12% 43 41 4.88%

St Clair 8 4 100.00% 11 5 120.00%

Stone 23 23 0.00% 26 31 -16.13%

Taney 42 51 -17.65% 54 70 -22.86%

Vernon 20 15 33.33% 32 23 39.13%

Webster 25 25 0.00% 33 35 -5.71%

Wright 17 26 -34.62% 20 39 -48.72%

* Region Total * 938 950 -1.26% 1,307 1,365 -4.25%

Kansas City Jackson 468 526 -11.03% 681 731 -6.84%

* Region Total * 468 526 -11.03% 681 731 -6.84%

St. Louis St Louis City 178 207 -14.01% 261 307 -14.98%

St Louis County 318 335 -5.07% 448 493 -9.13%

* Region Total * 496 542 -8.49% 709 800 -11.38%

Other Out Home Inv 90 125 -28.00% 143 163 -12.27%

Out Of State 15 9 66.67% 21 13 61.54%

Stat Unit 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0.00%

* Region Total * 105 134 -21.64% 164 176 -6.82%

State Total 3,610 4,020 -10.20% 5,123 5,680 -9.81%

3Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 10: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 2.

Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed During June 2020

Substan- Total

tiated Children

Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per

tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand

Northwest Andrew 1 0 1 8 0 10 0.24 2.40

Atchison 1 0 0 3 0 4 0.85 3.38

Buchanan 8 2 33 59 2 104 0.38 4.96

Caldwell 1 1 0 2 0 4 0.42 1.66

Carroll 0 0 0 5 0 5 0.00 2.28

Cass 4 1 12 46 0 63 0.15 2.39

Chariton 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.57

Clay 1 6 19 60 1 87 0.02 1.52

Clinton 1 1 3 3 0 8 0.20 1.57

Cooper 0 0 3 14 0 17 0.00 4.27

Daviess 0 0 0 7 0 7 0.00 3.11

De Kalb 0 0 1 1 2 4 0.00 1.73

Gentry 1 0 1 0 0 2 0.60 1.21

Grundy 1 0 2 2 0 5 0.41 2.03

Harrison 0 0 0 8 1 9 0.00 4.05

Holt 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 1.03

Johnson 0 1 12 25 0 38 0.00 3.16

Lafayette 3 0 0 3 0 6 0.37 0.73

Linn 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.00 0.32

Livingston 0 0 3 2 1 6 0.00 1.80

Mercer 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00 2.08

Nodaway 0 0 3 7 0 10 0.00 2.35

Pettis 9 0 9 25 0 43 0.83 3.99

Platte 1 0 5 32 2 40 0.05 1.82

Putnam 1 0 0 8 0 9 0.86 7.76

Ray 2 0 3 12 0 17 0.34 2.90

Saline 0 3 10 9 0 22 0.00 4.08

Sullivan 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.00 0.62

Worth 1 0 0 0 0 1 2.25 2.25

* Region Total * 36 16 121 345 9 527 0.17 2.43

Northeast Adair 4 4 0 13 0 21 0.80 4.22

Audrain 0 1 4 9 1 15 0.00 2.36

Boone 13 2 34 79 8 136 0.38 3.97

Callaway 4 1 13 25 0 43 0.40 4.30

Clark 1 0 0 4 0 5 0.58 2.91

Cole 5 1 8 29 0 43 0.28 2.40

Franklin 10 2 16 61 6 95 0.40 3.78

Gasconade 1 0 4 10 0 15 0.30 4.46

Howard 0 0 1 9 0 10 0.00 4.59

Knox 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.00 2.91

Lewis 0 2 1 4 0 7 0.00 2.92

Lincoln 15 1 19 39 0 74 1.02 5.03

Macon 5 0 0 5 0 10 1.32 2.65

Marion 6 4 0 18 2 30 0.87 4.36

Monroe 0 1 2 2 1 6 0.00 2.91

Montgomery 3 0 3 11 0 17 1.05 5.96

Osage 0 0 1 1 0 2 0.00 0.58

Pike 7 0 4 18 0 29 1.70 7.06

Ralls 1 0 0 2 0 3 0.42 1.26

Randolph 1 1 7 11 1 21 0.17 3.57

Schuyler 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.00 1.75

Scotland 2 0 3 0 0 5 1.47 3.67

Shelby 0 0 1 2 0 3 0.00 1.88

St Charles 28 3 32 65 2 130 0.30 1.40

Warren 3 2 10 14 2 31 0.37 3.81

* Region Total * 109 27 163 434 23 756 0.42 2.90

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 14 0 14 0.00 4.80

Butler 5 4 27 40 2 78 0.50 7.82

Cape Girardeau 7 1 2 17 0 27 0.42 1.63

Carter 1 0 1 3 0 5 0.66 3.30

Crawford 1 1 1 13 0 16 0.17 2.67

Dent 0 0 8 19 3 30 0.00 8.21

4Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 11: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 2.

Status of Children by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed During June 2020

Substan- Total

tiated Children

Substan- Unsubstan- Unsubstan- Family Children Per Per

tiated tiated PSI tiated Assessment Other Total Thousand Thousand

Southeast Dunklin 0 0 7 25 0 32 0.00 3.96

Howell 3 2 11 33 2 51 0.30 5.07

Iron 3 0 2 9 0 14 1.25 5.83

Jefferson 10 6 19 140 4 179 0.18 3.26

Madison 2 0 7 4 0 13 0.68 4.44

Maries 1 0 1 6 0 8 0.46 3.71

Mississippi 1 0 3 8 0 12 0.31 3.76

New Madrid 1 0 4 8 0 13 0.22 2.88

Oregon 4 0 4 10 4 22 1.65 9.07

Pemiscot 4 0 5 7 0 16 0.79 3.18

Perry 0 0 0 6 0 6 0.00 1.26

Phelps 1 1 6 18 5 31 0.10 3.17

Pulaski 1 5 5 22 0 33 0.08 2.63

Reynolds 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.00 1.96

Ripley 0 0 2 14 1 17 0.00 5.14

Scott 3 2 0 19 0 24 0.30 2.44

Shannon 1 0 1 4 0 6 0.51 3.04

St Francois 4 1 15 48 0 68 0.28 4.72

Ste Genevieve 0 0 6 14 1 21 0.00 4.98

Stoddard 4 0 2 16 2 24 0.59 3.51

Texas 3 5 6 3 0 17 0.52 2.97

Washington 5 2 3 17 0 27 0.82 4.45

Wayne 0 1 1 6 0 8 0.00 2.85

* Region Total * 65 31 149 546 24 815 0.30 3.70

Southwest Barry 2 3 13 37 5 60 0.23 6.94

Barton 4 0 0 7 0 11 1.24 3.42

Bates 3 7 0 13 0 23 0.71 5.41

Benton 4 0 0 12 1 17 1.16 4.95

Camden 1 0 3 17 0 21 0.12 2.50

Cedar 2 0 2 10 2 16 0.60 4.84

Christian 1 0 13 24 0 38 0.05 1.79

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dallas 1 0 6 6 1 14 0.24 3.36

Douglas 0 0 1 2 0 3 0.00 0.98

Greene 23 1 97 249 4 374 0.39 6.41

Henry 0 0 4 7 0 11 0.00 2.22

Hickory 0 0 0 3 0 3 0.00 1.80

Jasper 4 1 24 65 6 100 0.13 3.30

Laclede 6 5 15 29 0 55 0.67 6.17

Lawrence 2 0 17 35 0 54 0.20 5.31

McDonald 0 7 5 14 0 26 0.00 4.02

Miller 4 1 2 6 0 13 0.65 2.12

Moniteau 1 0 2 9 0 12 0.25 3.06

Morgan 0 1 4 10 0 15 0.00 3.31

Newton 0 3 7 15 1 26 0.00 1.76

Ozark 0 2 1 6 0 9 0.00 4.62

Polk 0 1 8 31 1 41 0.00 5.35

St Clair 1 0 1 3 0 5 0.51 2.55

Stone 1 0 9 18 0 28 0.17 4.64

Taney 3 1 10 37 2 53 0.26 4.64

Vernon 7 0 7 16 5 35 1.33 6.65

Webster 2 3 7 47 2 61 0.20 6.08

Wright 2 0 13 14 0 29 0.41 5.95

* Region Total * 74 36 271 742 30 1,153 0.28 4.42

Kansas City Jackson 33 14 137 311 34 529 0.20 3.19

* Region Total * 33 14 137 311 34 529 0.20 3.19

St. Louis St Louis City 13 5 52 76 13 159 0.19 2.35

St Louis County 45 16 248 632 73 1,014 0.19 4.33

* Region Total * 58 21 300 708 86 1,173 0.19 3.89

Other Out Home Inv 11 0 79 21 6 117 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 11 0 79 21 6 117 0.00 0.00

State Total 386 145 1,220 3,107 212 5,070 0.27 3.56

5Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 12: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 3.

Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed by Conclusion During June 2020

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Northwest Andrew 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 8

Atchison 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Buchanan 3 4.84% 1 1.61% 21 33.87% 37 59.68% 0 0.00% 62

Caldwell 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cass 2 4.35% 1 2.17% 12 26.09% 31 67.39% 0 0.00% 46

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clay 1 1.49% 4 5.97% 15 22.39% 46 68.66% 1 1.49% 67

Clinton 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 20.00% 8 80.00% 0 0.00% 10

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3

Gentry 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Grundy 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Johnson 0 0.00% 1 4.55% 6 27.27% 15 68.18% 0 0.00% 22

Lafayette 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 1 16.67% 6

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6

Pettis 7 24.14% 0 0.00% 7 24.14% 15 51.72% 0 0.00% 29

Platte 1 3.23% 0 0.00% 5 16.13% 24 77.42% 1 3.23% 31

Putnam 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 5

Ray 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 3 23.08% 8 61.54% 0 0.00% 13

Saline 0 0.00% 1 6.67% 7 46.67% 7 46.67% 0 0.00% 15

Sullivan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 27 7.48% 10 2.77% 91 25.21% 228 63.16% 5 1.39% 361

Northeast Adair 1 9.09% 3 27.27% 0 0.00% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11

Audrain 0 0.00% 1 9.09% 3 27.27% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 11

Boone 10 9.17% 2 1.84% 29 26.61% 62 56.88% 6 5.51% 109

Callaway 4 12.12% 1 3.03% 11 33.33% 17 51.52% 0 0.00% 33

Clark 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Cole 5 13.89% 1 2.78% 6 16.67% 24 66.67% 0 0.00% 36

Franklin 6 9.52% 1 1.59% 15 23.81% 39 61.91% 2 3.18% 63

Gasconade 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 8

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 7 87.50% 0 0.00% 8

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 6

Lincoln 12 22.22% 1 1.85% 13 24.07% 28 51.85% 0 0.00% 54

Macon 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 6

Marion 4 22.22% 3 16.67% 0 0.00% 10 55.56% 1 5.56% 18

Monroe 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Montgomery 3 23.08% 0 0.00% 2 15.39% 8 61.54% 0 0.00% 13

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Pike 4 26.67% 0 0.00% 2 13.33% 9 60.00% 0 0.00% 15

Ralls 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Randolph 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 5 31.25% 8 50.00% 1 6.25% 16

Schuyler 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Scotland 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

St Charles 16 16.50% 3 3.09% 21 21.65% 55 56.70% 2 2.06% 97

Warren 3 15.00% 1 5.00% 5 25.00% 10 50.00% 1 5.00% 20

* Region Total * 74 13.60% 21 3.86% 122 22.43% 314 57.72% 13 2.39% 544

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 7

Butler 4 8.00% 3 6.00% 15 30.00% 26 52.00% 2 4.00% 50

Cape Girardeau 3 16.67% 0 0.00% 2 11.11% 13 72.22% 0 0.00% 18

Carter 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Crawford 1 8.33% 1 8.33% 1 8.33% 9 75.00% 0 0.00% 12

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 33.33% 12 66.67% 0 0.00% 18

Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated OtherFamily Assessment

6Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 13: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 3.

Status of Incidents by County, Based Upon Investigations/Assessments

Completed by Conclusion During June 2020

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Southeast Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 28.57% 15 71.43% 0 0.00% 21

Howell 3 8.82% 1 2.94% 6 17.65% 22 64.71% 2 5.88% 34

Iron 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6

Jefferson 6 4.58% 4 3.05% 16 12.21% 102 77.86% 3 2.29% 131

Madison 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 8

Maries 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5

Mississippi 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 3 37.50% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 8

New Madrid 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 2 20.00% 7 70.00% 0 0.00% 10

Oregon 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 2 18.18% 6 54.55% 1 9.09% 11

Pemiscot 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 3 30.00% 5 50.00% 0 0.00% 10

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4

Phelps 1 4.76% 1 4.76% 3 14.29% 13 61.91% 3 14.29% 21

Pulaski 1 4.55% 4 18.18% 4 18.18% 13 59.09% 0 0.00% 22

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 14.29% 11 78.57% 1 7.14% 14

Scott 3 18.75% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 12 75.00% 0 0.00% 16

Shannon 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5

St Francois 4 8.33% 1 2.08% 11 22.92% 32 66.67% 0 0.00% 48

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 45.46% 6 54.55% 0 0.00% 11

Stoddard 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 2 12.50% 10 62.50% 2 12.50% 16

Texas 2 13.33% 4 26.67% 6 40.00% 3 20.00% 0 0.00% 15

Washington 3 18.75% 2 12.50% 2 12.50% 9 56.25% 0 0.00% 16

Wayne 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 7

* Region Total * 44 8.02% 23 4.19% 107 19.49% 361 65.76% 14 2.55% 549

Southwest Barry 1 2.78% 2 5.56% 10 27.78% 21 58.33% 2 5.56% 36

Barton 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8

Bates 2 12.50% 4 25.00% 0 0.00% 10 62.50% 0 0.00% 16

Benton 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10 76.92% 1 7.69% 13

Camden 1 5.26% 0 0.00% 3 15.79% 15 78.95% 0 0.00% 19

Cedar 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 2 15.39% 8 61.54% 1 7.69% 13

Christian 1 3.13% 0 0.00% 12 37.50% 19 59.38% 0 0.00% 32

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 6 46.15% 6 46.15% 0 0.00% 13

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Greene 18 6.79% 1 0.38% 67 25.28% 175 66.04% 4 1.51% 265

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 8

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Jasper 4 4.94% 1 1.24% 22 27.16% 49 60.49% 5 6.17% 81

Laclede 5 14.71% 2 5.88% 9 26.47% 18 52.94% 0 0.00% 34

Lawrence 1 2.86% 0 0.00% 12 34.29% 22 62.86% 0 0.00% 35

McDonald 0 0.00% 2 13.33% 4 26.67% 9 60.00% 0 0.00% 15

Miller 4 33.33% 1 8.33% 2 16.67% 5 41.67% 0 0.00% 12

Moniteau 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 8

Morgan 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 2 25.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 8

Newton 0 0.00% 1 4.35% 7 30.44% 14 60.87% 1 4.35% 23

Ozark 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 4

Polk 0 0.00% 1 5.00% 5 25.00% 13 65.00% 1 5.00% 20

St Clair 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5

Stone 1 4.55% 0 0.00% 4 18.18% 17 77.27% 0 0.00% 22

Taney 3 7.50% 1 2.50% 6 15.00% 29 72.50% 1 2.50% 40

Vernon 5 25.00% 0 0.00% 4 20.00% 9 45.00% 2 10.00% 20

Webster 2 5.41% 2 5.41% 4 10.81% 27 72.97% 2 5.41% 37

Wright 2 10.53% 0 0.00% 10 52.63% 7 36.84% 0 0.00% 19

* Region Total * 60 7.40% 20 2.47% 197 24.29% 514 63.38% 20 2.47% 811

Kansas City Jackson 24 6.70% 9 2.51% 99 27.65% 207 57.82% 19 5.31% 358

* Region Total * 24 6.70% 9 2.51% 99 27.65% 207 57.82% 19 5.31% 358

St. Louis St Louis City 11 9.24% 4 3.36% 35 29.41% 58 48.74% 11 9.24% 119

St Louis County 37 4.88% 10 1.32% 193 25.43% 474 62.45% 45 5.93% 759

* Region Total * 48 5.47% 14 1.60% 228 25.97% 532 60.59% 56 6.38% 878

Other Out Home Inv 6 8.45% 0 0.00% 52 73.24% 13 18.31% 0 0.00% 71

* Region Total * 6 8.45% 0 0.00% 52 73.24% 13 18.31% 0 0.00% 71

State Total 283 7.92% 97 2.72% 896 25.08% 2,169 60.72% 127 3.56% 3,572

Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstantiated Family Assessment Other

7Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 14: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 4.

Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During June 2020

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Northwest Andrew 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

Atchison 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Buchanan 58 93.55% 4 6.45% 0 0.00% 62

Caldwell 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Carroll 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cass 44 95.65% 2 4.35% 0 0.00% 46

Chariton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clay 63 95.46% 1 1.52% 2 3.03% 66

Clinton 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Cooper 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Daviess 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

De Kalb 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Gentry 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Grundy 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Harrison 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Holt 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Johnson 20 90.91% 2 9.09% 0 0.00% 22

Lafayette 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Linn 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Livingston 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Mercer 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Nodaway 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Pettis 29 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 29

Platte 27 90.00% 3 10.00% 0 0.00% 30

Putnam 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Ray 13 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13

Saline 15 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15

Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 341 95.79% 13 3.65% 2 0.56% 356

Northeast Adair 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Audrain 10 90.91% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11

Boone 75 72.82% 28 27.18% 0 0.00% 103

Callaway 31 93.94% 2 6.06% 0 0.00% 33

Clark 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cole 34 94.44% 2 5.56% 0 0.00% 36

Franklin 46 75.41% 13 21.31% 2 3.28% 61

Gasconade 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 8

Howard 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Knox 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Lincoln 49 90.74% 5 9.26% 0 0.00% 54

Macon 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Marion 16 94.12% 1 5.88% 0 0.00% 17

Monroe 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Montgomery 11 84.62% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 13

Osage 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Pike 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15

Ralls 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Randolph 13 86.67% 2 13.33% 0 0.00% 15

Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Scotland 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Shelby 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

St Charles 85 89.47% 7 7.37% 3 3.16% 95

Warren 14 73.68% 5 26.32% 0 0.00% 19

* Region Total * 453 85.31% 73 13.75% 5 0.94% 531

Southeast Bollinger 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Butler 44 91.67% 4 8.33% 0 0.00% 48

Cape Girardeau 15 83.33% 3 16.67% 0 0.00% 18

Carter 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Crawford 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12

Dent 13 72.22% 5 27.78% 0 0.00% 18

0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact

8Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 15: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 4.

Time From Receipt of a Report to the Initial Child Contact

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During June 2020

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Southeast Dunklin 20 95.24% 1 4.76% 0 0.00% 21

Howell 30 93.75% 2 6.25% 0 0.00% 32

Iron 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

Jefferson 103 80.47% 24 18.75% 1 0.78% 128

Madison 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Maries 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 5

Mississippi 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

New Madrid 10 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Oregon 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10

Pemiscot 8 80.00% 2 20.00% 0 0.00% 10

Perry 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Phelps 14 77.78% 4 22.22% 0 0.00% 18

Pulaski 18 81.82% 3 13.64% 1 4.55% 22

Reynolds 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Ripley 12 92.31% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Scott 15 93.75% 1 6.25% 0 0.00% 16

Shannon 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

St Francois 46 95.83% 2 4.17% 0 0.00% 48

Ste Genevieve 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Stoddard 13 92.86% 1 7.14% 0 0.00% 14

Texas 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15

Washington 14 87.50% 1 6.25% 1 6.25% 16

Wayne 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

* Region Total * 468 87.48% 64 11.96% 3 0.56% 535

Southwest Barry 32 94.12% 2 5.88% 0 0.00% 34

Barton 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Bates 13 81.25% 1 6.25% 2 12.50% 16

Benton 9 75.00% 2 16.67% 1 8.33% 12

Camden 15 78.95% 4 21.05% 0 0.00% 19

Cedar 12 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12

Christian 29 90.63% 3 9.38% 0 0.00% 32

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 12 92.31% 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 13

Douglas 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Greene 225 86.21% 34 13.03% 2 0.77% 261

Henry 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Hickory 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Jasper 71 93.42% 5 6.58% 0 0.00% 76

Laclede 27 79.41% 7 20.59% 0 0.00% 34

Lawrence 32 91.43% 3 8.57% 0 0.00% 35

McDonald 14 93.33% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15

Miller 10 83.33% 2 16.67% 0 0.00% 12

Moniteau 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Morgan 7 87.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

Newton 22 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 22

Ozark 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Polk 14 73.68% 5 26.32% 0 0.00% 19

St Clair 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Stone 21 95.46% 1 4.55% 0 0.00% 22

Taney 38 97.44% 1 2.56% 0 0.00% 39

Vernon 18 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 18

Webster 30 85.71% 5 14.29% 0 0.00% 35

Wright 18 94.74% 1 5.26% 0 0.00% 19

* Region Total * 707 89.38% 78 9.86% 6 0.76% 791

Kansas City Jackson 276 81.42% 50 14.75% 13 3.84% 339

* Region Total * 276 81.42% 50 14.75% 13 3.84% 339

St. Louis St Louis City 61 56.48% 47 43.52% 0 0.00% 108

St Louis County 417 61.14% 232 34.02% 33 4.84% 682

* Region Total * 478 60.51% 279 35.32% 33 4.18% 790

Other Out Home Inv 68 95.78% 3 4.23% 0 0.00% 71

* Region Total * 68 95.78% 3 4.23% 0 0.00% 71

State Total 2,791 81.78% 560 16.41% 62 1.82% 3,413

0 - 24 Hours Over 24 Hours No Contact

9Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 16: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 5.

The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During June 2020

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Northwest Andrew 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Atchison 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Buchanan 18 31.03% 7 12.07% 33 56.90% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 58

Caldwell 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cass 12 27.91% 3 6.98% 28 65.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 43

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clay 20 31.25% 1 1.56% 43 67.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 64

Clinton 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Cooper 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 5 50.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 10

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

De Kalb 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Gentry 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Grundy 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Harrison 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Johnson 6 31.58% 1 5.26% 12 63.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19

Lafayette 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Livingston 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Mercer 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Nodaway 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Pettis 8 28.57% 6 21.43% 6 21.43% 6 21.43% 2 7.14% 28

Platte 5 16.67% 1 3.33% 24 80.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 30

Putnam 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Ray 5 38.46% 0 0.00% 8 61.54% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13

Saline 6 40.00% 2 13.33% 6 40.00% 1 6.67% 0 0.00% 15

Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 102 29.65% 29 8.43% 200 58.14% 10 2.91% 3 0.87% 344

Northeast Adair 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Audrain 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 7 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Boone 18 18.18% 24 24.24% 35 35.35% 4 4.04% 18 18.18% 99

Callaway 9 29.03% 7 22.58% 15 48.39% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 31

Clark 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cole 7 21.21% 5 15.15% 21 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 33

Franklin 13 22.03% 9 15.25% 36 61.02% 1 1.70% 0 0.00% 59

Gasconade 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Howard 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 6 85.71% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lewis 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 4 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Lincoln 20 38.46% 6 11.54% 24 46.15% 0 0.00% 2 3.85% 52

Macon 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Marion 6 33.33% 1 5.56% 11 61.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 18

Monroe 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Montgomery 3 25.00% 2 16.67% 7 58.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12

Osage 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Pike 5 33.33% 1 6.67% 9 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15

Ralls 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Randolph 6 37.50% 2 12.50% 8 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16

Schuyler 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Scotland 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Shelby 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

St Charles 32 33.68% 9 9.47% 54 56.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 95

Warren 8 40.00% 1 5.00% 11 55.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20

* Region Total * 150 28.96% 70 13.51% 272 52.51% 6 1.16% 20 3.86% 518

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Butler 12 25.53% 11 23.40% 15 31.92% 8 17.02% 1 2.13% 47

Cape Girardeau 4 22.22% 1 5.56% 11 61.11% 2 11.11% 0 0.00% 18

Carter 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Crawford 1 9.09% 2 18.18% 3 27.27% 3 27.27% 2 18.18% 11

Dent 4 25.00% 2 12.50% 8 50.00% 2 12.50% 0 0.00% 16

Investigations Assessments

0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days 0 - 45 Days 46 - 90 Days Over 90 days

Note: Investigations and Assessments reported

separately beginning July 2016. 10Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 17: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 5.

The Number of Days Required to Complete Investigations/Assessments,

Based Upon Investigations/Assessments Completed During June 2020

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total

Southeast Dunklin 3 15.00% 3 15.00% 10 50.00% 4 20.00% 0 0.00% 20

Howell 8 24.24% 2 6.06% 23 69.70% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 33

Iron 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Jefferson 8 6.25% 18 14.06% 45 35.16% 41 32.03% 16 12.50% 128

Madison 4 50.00% 1 12.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Maries 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Mississippi 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 4 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

New Madrid 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 7 70.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Oregon 5 55.56% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Pemiscot 3 33.33% 2 22.22% 4 44.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Phelps 3 15.00% 3 15.00% 9 45.00% 3 15.00% 2 10.00% 20

Pulaski 8 40.00% 1 5.00% 10 50.00% 1 5.00% 0 0.00% 20

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Ripley 0 0.00% 2 15.39% 6 46.15% 4 30.77% 1 7.69% 13

Scott 3 21.43% 1 7.14% 10 71.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14

Shannon 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

St Francois 16 35.56% 0 0.00% 29 64.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 45

Ste Genevieve 3 27.27% 2 18.18% 6 54.55% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Stoddard 5 33.33% 1 6.67% 9 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 15

Texas 11 78.57% 1 7.14% 2 14.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14

Washington 4 30.77% 3 23.08% 6 46.15% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13

Wayne 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7

* Region Total * 120 23.12% 59 11.37% 244 47.01% 74 14.26% 22 4.24% 519

Southwest Barry 12 34.29% 2 5.71% 20 57.14% 1 2.86% 0 0.00% 35

Barton 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Bates 6 37.50% 0 0.00% 10 62.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 16

Benton 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 10 76.92% 1 7.69% 0 0.00% 13

Camden 4 23.53% 0 0.00% 11 64.71% 1 5.88% 1 5.88% 17

Cedar 4 30.77% 0 0.00% 9 69.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 13

Christian 12 40.00% 1 3.33% 17 56.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 30

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 6 50.00% 1 8.33% 5 41.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12

Douglas 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Greene 67 27.13% 20 8.10% 147 59.51% 13 5.26% 0 0.00% 247

Henry 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Jasper 27 35.07% 2 2.60% 47 61.04% 1 1.30% 0 0.00% 77

Laclede 14 43.75% 2 6.25% 13 40.63% 0 0.00% 3 9.38% 32

Lawrence 12 34.29% 1 2.86% 22 62.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 35

McDonald 6 42.86% 0 0.00% 8 57.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 14

Miller 5 45.46% 2 18.18% 4 36.36% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Moniteau 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 5 62.50% 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 8

Morgan 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 5 62.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Newton 8 36.36% 0 0.00% 14 63.64% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 22

Ozark 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Polk 5 26.32% 2 10.53% 12 63.16% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19

St Clair 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Stone 5 23.81% 0 0.00% 16 76.19% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 21

Taney 10 26.32% 0 0.00% 28 73.68% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 38

Vernon 11 55.00% 0 0.00% 9 45.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 20

Webster 9 25.71% 1 2.86% 25 71.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 35

Wright 12 63.16% 0 0.00% 7 36.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 19

* Region Total * 251 32.60% 35 4.55% 462 60.00% 18 2.34% 4 0.52% 770

Kansas City Jackson 110 32.16% 28 8.19% 184 53.80% 18 5.26% 2 0.59% 342

* Region Total * 110 32.16% 28 8.19% 184 53.80% 18 5.26% 2 0.59% 342

St. Louis St Louis City 46 40.00% 11 9.57% 52 45.22% 6 5.22% 0 0.00% 115

St Louis County 91 12.40% 159 21.66% 141 19.21% 36 4.91% 307 41.83% 734

* Region Total * 137 16.14% 170 20.02% 193 22.73% 42 4.95% 307 36.16% 849

Other Out Home Inv 48 67.61% 10 14.09% 13 18.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 71

* Region Total * 48 67.61% 10 14.09% 13 18.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 71

State Total 918 26.90% 401 11.75% 1,568 45.94% 168 4.92% 358 10.49% 3,413

0 - 45 Days Over 45 Days 0 - 45 Days 46 - 90 Days Over 90 days

Investigations Assessments

Note: Investigations and Assessments reported

separately beginning July 2016. 11Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 18: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 6.

CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During June 2020

CA/N CA/N Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N

CA/N Family Juvenile Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality

Investigations Assessment Assessment Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total

Northwest Andrew 2 4 0 0 0 3 0 9

Atchison 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 4

Buchanan 35 46 4 9 9 28 0 131

Caldwell 2 2 0 1 0 1 0 6

Carroll 1 1 0 0 0 2 0 4

Cass 27 26 3 7 4 15 0 82

Chariton 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 4

Clay 42 59 2 20 12 36 0 171

Clinton 2 10 0 3 0 4 0 19

Cooper 2 6 2 1 1 1 0 13

Daviess 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 6

De Kalb 1 2 0 0 1 2 0 6

Gentry 0 5 1 0 1 3 0 10

Grundy 2 5 0 0 2 1 0 10

Harrison 6 3 0 1 0 3 0 13

Holt 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Johnson 12 16 0 5 3 16 0 52

Lafayette 5 10 0 0 4 3 0 22

Linn 4 6 0 0 0 4 0 14

Livingston 8 5 2 1 0 7 0 23

Mercer 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 3

Nodaway 2 9 0 2 0 2 0 15

Pettis 8 21 3 0 2 6 0 40

Platte 13 25 2 2 4 14 0 60

Putnam 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 4

Ray 4 9 2 3 1 6 0 25

Saline 7 14 2 0 3 11 0 37

Sullivan 3 4 0 0 0 2 0 9

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 195 294 23 55 48 178 0 793

Northeast Adair 6 9 3 0 0 7 0 25

Audrain 12 11 2 2 3 5 0 35

Boone 21 52 1 14 5 27 0 120

Callaway 7 19 1 3 2 13 0 45

Clark 5 3 0 0 3 2 0 13

Cole 19 20 0 5 2 7 0 53

Franklin 20 32 3 8 4 18 0 85

Gasconade 4 7 1 1 0 4 0 17

Howard 4 4 0 0 0 2 0 10

Knox 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Lewis 4 7 0 1 0 4 0 16

Lincoln 16 27 3 2 6 17 0 71

Macon 1 6 0 0 1 1 0 9

Marion 5 12 1 2 0 9 0 29

Monroe 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 6

Montgomery 2 3 1 1 1 4 0 12

Osage 1 3 0 2 0 1 0 7

Pike 3 4 0 3 0 2 0 12

Ralls 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 5

Randolph 9 9 3 2 1 11 0 35

Schuyler 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 3

Scotland 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 4

Shelby 3 1 0 0 0 1 0 5

St Charles 45 56 2 11 9 41 0 164

Warren 4 11 1 2 4 12 0 34

* Region Total * 195 304 22 63 42 190 0 816

Southeast Bollinger 1 4 0 1 1 3 0 10

Butler 16 17 1 1 5 14 0 54

Cape Girardeau 16 27 3 3 4 11 0 64

Carter 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 6

Crawford 8 6 1 5 0 4 0 24

Dent 5 5 1 1 2 4 0 18

12Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 19: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 6.

CA/N Hotline Unit Reports and Referrals During June 2020

CA/N CA/N Newborn Non- Preventive Non CA/N

CA/N Family Juvenile Crisis Caretaker Service Fatality

Investigations Assessment Assessment Assessment Referral Referral Referral Total

Southeast Dunklin 4 10 2 1 4 8 0 29

Howell 10 21 2 2 1 22 0 58

Iron 2 4 1 1 1 4 0 13

Jefferson 23 52 2 20 9 43 0 149

Madison 1 3 1 1 0 1 0 7

Maries 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 4

Mississippi 5 5 2 0 2 6 0 20

New Madrid 3 8 0 2 0 5 0 18

Oregon 2 4 0 1 0 2 0 9

Pemiscot 5 7 2 2 2 2 0 20

Perry 5 7 0 1 1 2 0 16

Phelps 7 22 2 5 2 11 0 49

Pulaski 16 13 2 3 6 18 0 58

Reynolds 1 6 0 0 1 5 0 13

Ripley 5 8 0 2 1 3 0 19

Scott 13 16 1 3 4 11 0 48

Shannon 4 4 0 1 0 4 0 13

St Francois 29 33 3 9 6 24 0 104

Ste Genevieve 4 12 0 0 0 4 0 20

Stoddard 8 11 0 2 0 8 0 29

Texas 8 5 1 2 1 8 0 25

Washington 3 7 3 6 1 10 0 30

Wayne 5 5 0 1 0 3 0 14

* Region Total * 214 326 30 77 54 240 0 941

Southwest Barry 16 21 0 4 5 6 0 52

Barton 4 3 0 2 2 2 0 13

Bates 2 6 0 1 1 4 0 14

Benton 3 3 1 0 0 3 0 10

Camden 9 17 0 1 2 7 0 36

Cedar 10 10 1 0 0 6 0 27

Christian 17 35 3 3 8 20 0 86

Dade 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 3

Dallas 4 9 0 2 0 13 0 28

Douglas 1 2 1 1 0 5 0 10

Greene 86 185 9 42 22 102 0 446

Henry 11 12 3 5 0 9 0 40

Hickory 2 3 0 1 0 2 0 8

Jasper 31 73 6 9 9 39 0 167

Laclede 15 24 1 2 6 12 0 60

Lawrence 9 21 0 4 2 15 0 51

McDonald 4 11 1 2 3 12 0 33

Miller 8 9 4 4 0 11 0 36

Moniteau 6 2 0 2 0 2 0 12

Morgan 7 8 1 1 3 9 0 29

Newton 14 20 2 4 2 13 0 55

Ozark 2 4 0 0 0 4 0 10

Polk 12 17 0 5 6 15 0 55

St Clair 5 3 0 0 0 4 0 12

Stone 5 18 0 3 3 7 0 36

Taney 14 26 2 7 4 27 0 80

Vernon 8 12 0 3 1 6 0 30

Webster 7 16 2 1 1 12 0 39

Wright 6 10 1 2 3 10 0 32

* Region Total * 318 581 39 111 83 378 0 1,510

Kansas City Jackson 194 241 33 114 60 183 0 825

* Region Total * 194 241 33 114 60 183 0 825

St. Louis St Louis City 78 94 6 48 17 52 0 295

St Louis County 127 166 25 62 25 86 0 491

* Region Total * 205 260 31 110 42 138 0 786

Other Out Home Inv 88 2 0 0 5 27 0 122

Out Of State 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 15

Stat Unit 0 0 0 0 0 0 56 56

* Region Total * 95 10 0 0 5 27 56 193

State Total 1,416 2,016 178 530 334 1,334 56 5,864

13Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 20: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

0% 0%

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

7,000

7,500Ju

n-1

6

Sep

-16

De

c-1

6

Mar

-17

Jun

-17

Sep

-17

De

c-1

7

Mar

-18

Jun

-18

Sep

-18

De

c-1

8

Mar

-19

Jun

-19

Sep

-19

De

c-1

9

Mar

-20

Jun

-20

Figure 2.

Child Abuse & Neglect Reports

June 2016 Through June 2020

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

7,000

Jul

Au

g

Sep

Oct

No

v

De

c

Jan

Feb

Mar

Ap

r

May Jun

Figure 3.

Child Abuse & Neglect Reports

July 2018 Through June 2020

Jul 2018 to Jun 2019 Jul 2019 to Jun 2020

14Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 21: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

0% 0%

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 4.

Percentage Change in CA/N Reports

Made Twelve Months ApartJune 2019 and June 2020

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 5.

CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed

During June 2020 by Conclusion

Substantiated Unsubstantiated-PSI Unsubstianted Family Assessment Other

15Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 22: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

0% 0%

Substantiated8%

Unsubstantiated P S I3%

Unsubstantiated24%

Family Assessment61%

Other4%

Figure 6.

CA/N Investigations/Assessments Completed

During June 2020 by Conclusion

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 7.

Time Between Report and Child Contact

For Investigations/Assessments Completed in June 2020

Within 24 Hours After 24 Hours No Contact

16Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 23: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 8a.

CA/N Investigations Completed

During June 2020

Within 45 Days More Than 45 Days

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 8b.

CA/N Assessments Completed

During June 2020

Within 45 Days Within 46-90 Days More Than 90 Days

17Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 24: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report 18 Research and Data Analysis

Notes: Child Abuse and Neglect Tables and Figures

Table 1.

• Based upon incidents and children reported during the month.

• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents

during any given month).

Table 2.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.

• Counts of children may be duplicated (i.e., children may be victims on multiple incidents

during any given month).

• Conclusions are as follows:

Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence, Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified

Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated

Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-

Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-cooperative/Child Safe,

Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days, Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,

Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed

Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State, Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation),

Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School Investigation)

• Population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

Table 3.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.

• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence,

Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated

Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated

Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-

cooperative/Child Safe, Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days,

Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,

Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed

Page 25: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report 19 Research and Data Analysis

Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State,

Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School

Investigation)

Table 4.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include

information on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G-

Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already Investigated.

Table 5.

• Based upon incidents concluded during the month.

Table 6.

• Based upon incidents and referrals reported during the month.

• Administrative referrals are not included.

Figure 2. and Figure 3.

• Based upon incidents reported during the month.

Figure 4.

• Based upon incidents reported during the month compared to incidents reported during the same month of the previous year.

Figure 5. and Figure 6.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month.

• Conclusions are as follows: Substantiated -> Court Adjudicated and Preponderance of Evidence,

Child Abuse/Neglect Present but Perpetrator Unidentified

Unsubstantiated-PSI -> Unsubstantiated-Preventive Services Indicated Unsubstantiated -> Unsubstantiated

Family Assessment -> Family Assessment-Services Needed, Family Assessment-Services Not Needed, and Family Assessment-Non-

cooperative/Child Safe,

Assessment-Services Needed-Linked Initial 45 Days, Assessment-Services Needed-Family Declined,

Agency Responded-Concerns Addressed

Page 26: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report 20 Research and Data Analysis

Other -> Unable to Locate, Inappropriate Report, Located Out of State,

Home Schooling, Unsubstantiated (School Investigation), Substantiated (School Investigation), and Unresolved (School

Investigation)

• Figures do not include Out-of-Home Investigation, STAT Unit, or Out of State categories.

• Figures do not include information on expunged reports and reports where the only

alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G- Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already

Investigated.

Figure 7.

• Based upon investigations/assessments completed during the month. Does not include

information on expunged reports and reports where the only alleged category of abuse/neglect was educational neglect, or reports concluded as E- Unable to Locate, G-

Inappropriate report, H- Located out of state, or R-Already Investigated.

Figure 8a. and Figure 8b.

• Based upon investigations and assessments completed during the month.

Page 27: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Family-Centered Services

Page 28: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 7.

Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of June 2020

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 2 1 0 3

Atchison 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Buchanan 11 3 1 11 14 1 41

Caldwell 1 0 0 0 2 0 3

Carroll 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Cass 0 6 8 0 2 3 19

Chariton 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Clay 1 10 4 3 8 0 26

Clinton 0 2 1 0 2 0 5

Cooper 0 1 0 1 2 0 4

Daviess 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Grundy 0 3 0 0 7 0 10

Harrison 1 3 0 0 3 0 7

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 1 0 0 3 0 4

Lafayette 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Linn 0 0 1 0 3 0 4

Livingston 0 1 0 1 3 0 5

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 1 0 0 2 1 4

Pettis 2 2 1 1 10 0 16

Platte 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

Putnam 0 1 1 0 2 0 4

Ray 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Saline 0 3 1 2 1 0 7

Sullivan 0 1 1 0 2 0 4

Worth 0 0 1 0 1 0 2

* Region Total * 16 44 20 21 78 5 184

Northeast Adair 0 1 0 0 5 0 6

Audrain 1 1 1 2 6 1 12

Boone 9 6 0 3 26 7 51

Callaway 2 0 1 0 21 4 28

Clark 0 2 0 0 5 0 7

Cole 0 1 1 0 11 0 13

Franklin 0 8 0 5 19 0 32

Gasconade 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Howard 0 1 0 1 5 0 7

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Lincoln 0 2 4 1 20 0 27

Macon 0 2 1 0 1 0 4

Marion 1 1 3 0 8 0 13

Monroe 0 3 0 0 1 0 4

Montgomery 1 0 0 0 5 0 6

Osage 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Pike 2 2 1 2 4 0 11

Ralls 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Randolph 0 5 2 3 13 0 23

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

St Charles 0 1 2 4 22 0 29

Warren 0 5 0 1 12 0 18

* Region Total * 17 44 16 22 192 12 303

Southeast Bollinger 1 0 0 1 5 0 7

Butler 2 27 2 3 17 0 51

Cape Girardeau 2 5 1 4 44 2 58

Carter 2 0 0 1 2 0 5

Crawford 0 3 0 1 6 0 10

Dent 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

22Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 29: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 7.

Family-Centered Services Cases Open at the End of June 2020

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Southeast Dunklin 0 2 1 2 8 0 13

Howell 5 6 1 7 18 1 38

Iron 0 0 1 1 1 0 3

Jefferson 0 5 1 2 28 2 38

Madison 0 0 0 1 5 0 6

Maries 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Mississippi 0 0 0 2 3 0 5

New Madrid 0 1 0 2 13 0 16

Oregon 1 3 0 0 4 0 8

Pemiscot 0 3 0 2 12 0 17

Perry 0 2 0 0 8 0 10

Phelps 0 5 5 3 23 0 36

Pulaski 0 3 2 0 20 0 25

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 7 0 7

Ripley 0 1 1 1 3 1 7

Scott 2 1 0 7 23 0 33

Shannon 0 3 0 1 2 1 7

St Francois 0 9 0 1 20 0 30

Ste Genevieve 0 3 0 0 3 0 6

Stoddard 0 0 0 1 24 1 26

Texas 0 0 1 0 8 0 9

Washington 0 1 0 0 4 1 6

Wayne 0 2 0 2 11 0 15

* Region Total * 15 87 16 45 325 9 497

Southwest Barry 0 4 0 0 6 0 10

Barton 0 0 0 1 2 0 3

Bates 0 1 2 0 5 0 8

Benton 0 2 0 2 2 0 6

Camden 0 3 0 0 8 1 12

Cedar 0 2 1 0 2 0 5

Christian 0 6 1 3 15 0 25

Dade 0 2 0 0 1 0 3

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 1 0 5 0 6

Greene 1 2 0 0 75 1 79

Henry 0 3 0 1 12 0 16

Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Jasper 0 15 3 2 78 0 98

Laclede 1 5 3 2 16 0 27

Lawrence 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

McDonald 0 1 0 0 11 0 12

Miller 1 2 0 0 18 0 21

Moniteau 1 0 0 0 5 0 6

Morgan 0 2 0 0 7 0 9

Newton 0 3 0 0 8 1 12

Ozark 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

Polk 0 1 1 0 3 0 5

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 1 0 0 6 0 7

Taney 0 4 2 3 44 1 54

Vernon 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Webster 4 0 1 2 9 0 16

Wright 0 1 2 0 12 0 15

* Region Total * 8 63 18 16 358 4 467

Kansas City Jackson 0 5 13 16 132 42 208

* Region Total * 0 5 13 16 132 42 208

St. Louis St Louis City 1 2 1 2 52 1 59

St Louis County 8 8 18 1 23 5 63

* Region Total * 9 10 19 3 75 6 122

State Total 65 253 102 123 1,160 78 1,781

23Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 30: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 8.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During June 2020

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 3 1 0 4

Atchison 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Buchanan 12 4 1 11 17 1 46

Caldwell 1 0 0 0 3 0 4

Carroll 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Cass 0 8 9 0 4 3 24

Chariton 0 1 0 0 3 0 4

Clay 1 10 5 3 8 0 27

Clinton 0 2 1 0 3 0 6

Cooper 0 2 0 1 3 0 6

Daviess 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Grundy 0 3 0 0 7 0 10

Harrison 1 4 1 0 4 0 10

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 1 0 0 3 0 4

Lafayette 0 2 0 0 2 0 4

Linn 0 1 1 0 3 0 5

Livingston 0 3 0 1 3 0 7

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 1 0 1 6 1 9

Pettis 2 2 1 1 10 0 16

Platte 0 2 0 0 4 0 6

Putnam 1 2 1 0 2 0 6

Ray 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Saline 0 4 1 2 4 0 11

Sullivan 0 1 2 0 2 0 5

Worth 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

* Region Total * 18 55 24 23 99 5 224

Northeast Adair 0 1 0 0 5 0 6

Audrain 1 2 1 2 7 1 14

Boone 9 7 0 3 32 8 59

Callaway 2 0 1 0 21 4 28

Clark 0 2 0 0 5 0 7

Cole 1 1 1 1 12 1 17

Franklin 0 9 0 5 21 0 35

Gasconade 0 2 0 0 3 0 5

Howard 0 1 0 1 5 0 7

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Lincoln 0 3 4 1 25 0 33

Macon 0 2 1 0 1 0 4

Marion 1 1 3 0 8 0 13

Monroe 0 3 0 0 1 0 4

Montgomery 1 0 0 0 5 0 6

Osage 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Pike 2 2 1 3 4 0 12

Ralls 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Randolph 0 5 2 3 13 0 23

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

St Charles 0 3 2 4 27 0 36

Warren 0 6 0 1 13 0 20

* Region Total * 18 52 16 24 215 14 339

Southeast Bollinger 1 0 1 1 7 0 10

Butler 2 28 2 3 19 0 54

Cape Girardeau 2 5 1 4 48 2 62

Carter 2 0 0 1 4 0 7

Crawford 0 3 1 1 6 0 11

Dent 0 1 0 0 3 0 4

24Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 31: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 8.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During June 2020

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Southeast Dunklin 0 2 1 3 14 0 20

Howell 5 7 1 8 25 1 47

Iron 0 0 1 1 1 0 3

Jefferson 0 5 1 3 40 2 51

Madison 0 1 0 1 7 0 9

Maries 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Mississippi 0 0 0 2 5 0 7

New Madrid 0 1 0 2 14 0 17

Oregon 1 3 0 0 4 0 8

Pemiscot 0 3 0 2 14 0 19

Perry 0 2 0 0 10 0 12

Phelps 0 6 6 3 24 0 39

Pulaski 0 4 2 0 23 0 29

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 7 0 7

Ripley 0 2 1 1 3 1 8

Scott 2 1 0 7 25 0 35

Shannon 0 4 0 1 4 1 10

St Francois 0 11 0 1 24 0 36

Ste Genevieve 0 3 0 0 4 0 7

Stoddard 0 0 0 1 27 1 29

Texas 0 0 1 0 14 0 15

Washington 0 1 0 0 9 1 11

Wayne 0 2 0 2 12 0 16

* Region Total * 15 96 19 48 398 9 585

Southwest Barry 0 4 0 0 7 0 11

Barton 0 0 0 1 2 0 3

Bates 0 1 2 0 5 0 8

Benton 0 2 0 2 2 0 6

Camden 0 4 0 0 10 1 15

Cedar 0 3 1 0 3 0 7

Christian 0 7 1 3 16 0 27

Dade 0 2 0 0 1 0 3

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 1 0 5 0 6

Greene 2 4 0 0 80 1 87

Henry 0 3 0 1 13 0 17

Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Jasper 0 18 3 3 85 0 109

Laclede 1 6 3 2 16 0 28

Lawrence 0 2 0 0 6 0 8

McDonald 0 1 0 0 12 0 13

Miller 1 2 0 0 19 0 22

Moniteau 1 0 0 0 5 0 6

Morgan 0 2 0 0 9 0 11

Newton 0 3 0 0 9 1 13

Ozark 0 0 1 0 3 0 4

Polk 0 1 1 0 4 0 6

St Clair 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Stone 0 1 0 0 6 0 7

Taney 0 5 2 3 44 1 55

Vernon 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Webster 4 0 1 2 9 0 16

Wright 0 2 2 0 14 0 18

* Region Total * 9 74 18 17 388 4 510

Kansas City Jackson 0 5 14 22 156 48 245

* Region Total * 0 5 14 22 156 48 245

St. Louis St Louis City 1 2 2 2 65 1 73

St Louis County 8 8 21 2 27 5 71

* Region Total * 9 10 23 4 92 6 144

State Total 69 292 114 138 1,348 86 2,047

25Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 32: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 9.

Persons in Family-Centered Services During June 2020

Child Total Persons with

Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action

Northwest Andrew 8 6 0 14 0

Atchison 6 3 0 9 3

Buchanan 100 97 0 197 9

Caldwell 11 13 0 24 0

Carroll 5 3 0 8 0

Cass 45 42 0 87 23

Chariton 9 11 1 21 2

Clay 71 59 0 130 6

Clinton 10 11 0 21 3

Cooper 14 10 0 24 1

Daviess 1 3 0 4 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 2 6 0 8 0

Grundy 23 23 0 46 9

Harrison 14 31 0 45 9

Holt 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 10 13 0 23 1

Lafayette 6 12 0 18 1

Linn 8 14 0 22 2

Livingston 19 13 0 32 2

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 14 17 0 31 6

Pettis 30 37 0 67 8

Platte 17 16 0 33 5

Putnam 13 13 0 26 6

Ray 2 1 0 3 0

Saline 23 20 0 43 3

Sullivan 9 10 0 19 1

Worth 6 4 0 10 2

* Region Total * 476 488 1 965 102

Northeast Adair 8 14 0 22 2

Audrain 34 32 0 66 8

Boone 99 110 1 210 52

Callaway 62 59 0 121 18

Clark 19 21 0 40 3

Cole 42 43 0 85 22

Franklin 102 81 0 183 23

Gasconade 11 15 0 26 3

Howard 13 11 0 24 4

Knox 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 5 6 0 11 0

Lincoln 51 80 0 131 21

Macon 6 11 0 17 8

Marion 22 35 1 58 6

Monroe 8 10 0 18 1

Montgomery 14 13 0 27 1

Osage 6 5 0 11 2

Pike 22 26 0 48 11

Ralls 1 2 0 3 0

Randolph 41 49 0 90 20

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 7 8 0 15 4

Shelby 1 2 0 3 2

St Charles 77 55 0 132 11

Warren 44 42 0 86 4

* Region Total * 695 730 2 1,427 226

Southeast Bollinger 17 26 0 43 8

Butler 92 112 0 204 22

Cape Girardeau 111 122 0 233 28

Carter 15 14 0 29 0

Crawford 19 28 0 47 10

Dent 10 17 0 27 3

26Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 33: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 9.

Persons in Family-Centered Services During June 2020

Child Total Persons with

Adults Children Caretakers Persons Court Action

Southeast Dunklin 33 47 0 80 12

Howell 99 98 0 197 6

Iron 7 7 0 14 2

Jefferson 118 110 1 229 34

Madison 17 21 0 38 3

Maries 4 3 0 7 3

Mississippi 15 25 0 40 10

New Madrid 25 29 0 54 2

Oregon 18 23 0 41 5

Pemiscot 30 44 0 74 7

Perry 22 32 0 54 8

Phelps 75 78 0 153 16

Pulaski 57 73 0 130 11

Reynolds 19 11 0 30 6

Ripley 15 19 0 34 5

Scott 61 75 0 136 11

Shannon 22 18 0 40 3

St Francois 68 81 0 149 10

Ste Genevieve 12 15 0 27 3

Stoddard 57 59 0 116 17

Texas 34 30 0 64 2

Washington 23 24 1 48 4

Wayne 43 35 0 78 11

* Region Total * 1,138 1,276 2 2,416 262

Southwest Barry 18 24 0 42 9

Barton 6 7 0 13 3

Bates 15 19 0 34 5

Benton 10 13 0 23 0

Camden 24 36 0 60 10

Cedar 11 16 0 27 7

Christian 55 62 0 117 17

Dade 5 5 0 10 0

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 13 15 0 28 5

Greene 186 180 3 369 41

Henry 28 36 3 67 6

Hickory 1 1 0 2 0

Jasper 203 232 0 435 54

Laclede 63 67 0 130 12

Lawrence 16 21 0 37 4

McDonald 30 35 0 65 4

Miller 56 48 0 104 3

Moniteau 14 16 0 30 0

Morgan 23 25 0 48 0

Newton 26 34 0 60 12

Ozark 7 9 0 16 4

Polk 11 14 0 25 4

St Clair 3 3 0 6 2

Stone 11 13 0 24 0

Taney 102 107 0 209 20

Vernon 3 3 0 6 0

Webster 30 29 0 59 3

Wright 36 41 0 77 13

* Region Total * 1,006 1,111 6 2,123 238

Kansas City Jackson 471 510 0 981 201

* Region Total * 471 510 0 981 201

St. Louis St Louis City 145 189 1 335 29

St Louis County 134 155 0 289 46

* Region Total * 279 344 1 624 75

State Total 4,065 4,459 12 8,536 1,104

27Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 34: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 10.

Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During June 2020

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 1 0 2

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 2 0 3 5 0 10

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 4 0 0 0 0 4

Clinton 0 2 1 0 2 0 5

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Grundy 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Harrison 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Lafayette 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Linn 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Livingston 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 0 1 1 2

Pettis 1 0 0 0 6 0 7

Platte 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Putnam 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

* Region Total * 1 16 2 4 28 1 52

Northeast Adair 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Audrain 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Boone 3 2 0 1 3 1 10

Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clark 0 2 0 0 3 0 5

Cole 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Franklin 0 1 0 1 2 0 4

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Lincoln 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Marion 0 0 0 0 4 0 4

Monroe 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Montgomery 1 0 0 0 3 0 4

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ralls 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Randolph 0 0 1 1 0 0 2

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

St Charles 0 1 0 1 4 0 6

Warren 0 2 0 1 1 0 4

* Region Total * 6 10 1 5 29 1 52

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 5 0 1 5 0 11

Cape Girardeau 0 2 1 2 8 0 13

Carter 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Crawford 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

28Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 35: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 10.

Family-Centered Services Cases Opened During June 2020

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance Preventive Court Newborn Crisis Family AC Closed/ Total

of Evidence Services Order Only Assessment Assessment FCS Reopen Cases Active

Southeast Dunklin 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Howell 0 3 0 1 0 1 5

Iron 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Jefferson 0 1 0 0 6 0 7

Madison 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Maries 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Oregon 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Pemiscot 0 0 0 1 1 0 2

Perry 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Phelps 0 0 1 1 3 0 5

Pulaski 0 0 0 0 4 0 4

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 0 0 1 1 0 2

Scott 1 0 0 0 3 0 4

Shannon 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

St Francois 0 2 0 1 4 0 7

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 0 0 0 5 0 5

Texas 0 0 0 0 2 0 2

Washington 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Wayne 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

* Region Total * 1 17 3 10 51 1 83

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Benton 0 0 0 1 1 0 2

Camden 0 0 0 0 2 1 3

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 0 1 1 1 0 3

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 1 0 0 0 1

Greene 0 0 0 0 8 0 8

Henry 0 1 0 0 2 0 3

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 0 1 1 0 10 0 12

Laclede 0 1 0 0 3 0 4

Lawrence 0 2 0 0 1 0 3

McDonald 0 0 0 0 4 0 4

Miller 0 0 0 0 4 0 4

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 0 0 0 4 1 5

Ozark 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Polk 0 1 1 0 1 0 3

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 1 0 0 1 0 2

Taney 0 0 0 0 3 0 3

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Webster 0 0 1 0 2 0 3

Wright 0 1 1 0 3 0 5

* Region Total * 0 8 6 2 52 2 70

Kansas City Jackson 0 2 0 1 17 1 21

* Region Total * 0 2 0 1 17 1 21

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 0 10 0 10

St Louis County 0 1 1 0 3 0 5

* Region Total * 0 1 1 0 13 0 15

State Total 8 54 13 22 190 6 293

29Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 36: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 11.

Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During June 2020

by Close Reason

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed

Northwest Andrew 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5

Caldwell 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Carroll 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cass 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 5

Chariton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Clay 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clinton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Cooper 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Harrison 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lafayette 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Linn 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Livingston 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 5

Pettis 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Sullivan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Worth 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

* Region Total * 28 65.12% 15 34.88% 43

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Audrain 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Boone 3 37.50% 5 62.50% 8

Callaway 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4

Franklin 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Gasconade 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 6

Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pike 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 7

Warren 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

* Region Total * 24 60.00% 16 40.00% 40

Southeast Bollinger 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Butler 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Cape Girardeau 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Carter 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Crawford 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Dent 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Goal Achieved Other

30Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 37: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 11.

Family-Centered Services Cases Closed During June 2020

by Close Reason

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Cases Closed

Southeast Dunklin 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 7

Howell 9 69.23% 4 30.77% 13

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 9 69.23% 4 30.77% 13

Madison 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

New Madrid 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Perry 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Phelps 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Pulaski 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Scott 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Shannon 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

St Francois 3 42.86% 4 57.14% 7

Ste Genevieve 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Stoddard 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Texas 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 6

Washington 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 5

Wayne 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 55 59.14% 38 40.86% 93

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Cedar 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Christian 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 3 37.50% 5 62.50% 8

Henry 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 4 36.36% 7 63.64% 11

Laclede 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lawrence 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

McDonald 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Miller 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Newton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ozark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Polk 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

St Clair 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wright 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

* Region Total * 20 46.51% 23 53.49% 43

Kansas City Jackson 34 87.18% 5 12.82% 39

* Region Total * 34 87.18% 5 12.82% 39

St. Louis St Louis City 4 23.53% 13 76.47% 17

St Louis County 2 25.00% 6 75.00% 8

* Region Total * 6 24.00% 19 76.00% 25

State Total 167 59.01% 116 40.99% 283

Goal Achieved Other

31Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 38: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 12.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During June 2020

Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Buchanan 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 2 14.29% 6 42.86% 3 21.43% 3 21.43% 14

Chariton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Clay 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Clinton 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cooper 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Harrison 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lafayette 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Linn 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Livingston 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Pettis 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Platte 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Putnam 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Sullivan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Worth 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

* Region Total * 36 55.39% 20 30.77% 4 6.15% 5 7.69% 65

Northeast Adair 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Audrain 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 1 20.00% 5

Boone 13 43.33% 5 16.67% 7 23.33% 5 16.67% 30

Callaway 1 9.09% 5 45.46% 1 9.09% 4 36.36% 11

Clark 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Cole 3 33.33% 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Franklin 3 37.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 2 25.00% 8

Gasconade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 4 36.36% 1 9.09% 2 18.18% 4 36.36% 11

Macon 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Marion 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 4

Monroe 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Montgomery 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Osage 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pike 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 6

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 4 44.44% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 4 44.44% 9

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Shelby 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

St Charles 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 4 57.14% 7

Warren 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

* Region Total * 44 37.29% 32 27.12% 12 10.17% 30 25.42% 118

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Butler 5 38.46% 6 46.15% 2 15.39% 0 0.00% 13

Cape Girardeau 11 57.90% 4 21.05% 3 15.79% 1 5.26% 19

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Crawford 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Dent 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months

32Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 39: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 12.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During June 2020

Which Have Had Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Southeast Dunklin 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Howell 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 1 25.00% 4

Iron 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Jefferson 5 23.81% 6 28.57% 1 4.76% 9 42.86% 21

Madison 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Maries 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

New Madrid 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Oregon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pemiscot 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Perry 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Phelps 6 60.00% 2 20.00% 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 10

Pulaski 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 7

Reynolds 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Ripley 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Scott 5 83.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6

Shannon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

St Francois 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Ste Genevieve 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Stoddard 6 54.55% 5 45.46% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Texas 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Washington 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Wayne 2 40.00% 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

* Region Total * 71 49.65% 34 23.78% 20 13.99% 18 12.59% 143

Southwest Barry 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

Barton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Bates 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Cedar 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Christian 3 42.86% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 3 42.86% 7

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Greene 7 29.17% 3 12.50% 11 45.83% 3 12.50% 24

Henry 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 9 28.13% 13 40.63% 4 12.50% 6 18.75% 32

Laclede 2 28.57% 4 57.14% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Lawrence 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

McDonald 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Miller 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Ozark 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Polk 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

St Clair 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 4 30.77% 2 15.39% 2 15.39% 5 38.46% 13

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Wright 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 6

* Region Total * 46 37.10% 35 28.23% 20 16.13% 23 18.55% 124

Kansas City Jackson 30 23.81% 35 27.78% 18 14.29% 43 34.13% 126

* Region Total * 30 23.81% 35 27.78% 18 14.29% 43 34.13% 126

St. Louis St Louis City 5 33.33% 3 20.00% 3 20.00% 4 26.67% 15

St Louis County 9 30.00% 11 36.67% 4 13.33% 6 20.00% 30

* Region Total * 14 31.11% 14 31.11% 7 15.56% 10 22.22% 45

State Total 241 38.81% 170 27.38% 81 13.04% 129 20.77% 621

0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months

33Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 40: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 13.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During June 2020

Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Northwest Andrew 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 34 79.07% 7 16.28% 0 0.00% 2 4.65% 43

Caldwell 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Carroll 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Cass 7 70.00% 3 30.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 10

Chariton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Clay 14 58.33% 8 33.33% 1 4.17% 1 4.17% 24

Clinton 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cooper 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 3 60.00% 1 20.00% 5

Daviess 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Grundy 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Harrison 4 66.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Lafayette 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Linn 3 75.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 4

Livingston 3 60.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 1 20.00% 2 40.00% 2 40.00% 0 0.00% 5

Pettis 7 58.33% 2 16.67% 3 25.00% 0 0.00% 12

Platte 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Putnam 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Ray 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Saline 5 62.50% 3 37.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Sullivan 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Worth 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 110 67.90% 34 20.99% 13 8.03% 5 3.09% 162

Northeast Adair 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Audrain 4 44.44% 3 33.33% 2 22.22% 0 0.00% 9

Boone 22 75.86% 4 13.79% 1 3.45% 2 6.90% 29

Callaway 8 47.06% 5 29.41% 2 11.77% 2 11.77% 17

Clark 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Cole 8 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 8

Franklin 10 37.04% 14 51.85% 1 3.70% 2 7.41% 27

Gasconade 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Howard 0 0.00% 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 6

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Lincoln 12 54.55% 6 27.27% 2 9.09% 2 9.09% 22

Macon 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Marion 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Monroe 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Montgomery 4 80.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Osage 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pike 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 1 16.67% 6

Ralls 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Randolph 5 33.33% 6 40.00% 3 20.00% 1 6.67% 15

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 24 82.76% 4 13.79% 1 3.45% 0 0.00% 29

Warren 14 77.78% 4 22.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 18

* Region Total * 140 62.50% 58 25.89% 16 7.14% 10 4.46% 224

Southeast Bollinger 2 25.00% 3 37.50% 2 25.00% 1 12.50% 8

Butler 19 46.34% 10 24.39% 5 12.20% 7 17.07% 41

Cape Girardeau 22 51.16% 13 30.23% 4 9.30% 4 9.30% 43

Carter 3 42.86% 3 42.86% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 7

Crawford 2 33.33% 3 50.00% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

Dent 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months

34Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 41: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 13.

Family-Centered Services Cases Active During June 2020

Which Have Had No Court Involvement by Number of Months Open

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Cases

Southeast Dunklin 8 61.54% 4 30.77% 0 0.00% 1 7.69% 13

Howell 17 39.54% 14 32.56% 6 13.95% 6 13.95% 43

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Jefferson 16 53.33% 10 33.33% 3 10.00% 1 3.33% 30

Madison 5 71.43% 1 14.29% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 7

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 1 25.00% 2 50.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

New Madrid 6 37.50% 4 25.00% 4 25.00% 2 12.50% 16

Oregon 4 57.14% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 1 14.29% 7

Pemiscot 8 47.06% 5 29.41% 2 11.77% 2 11.77% 17

Perry 5 50.00% 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 1 10.00% 10

Phelps 13 44.83% 10 34.48% 2 6.90% 4 13.79% 29

Pulaski 12 54.55% 6 27.27% 2 9.09% 2 9.09% 22

Reynolds 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 0 0.00% 5

Ripley 2 33.33% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 2 33.33% 6

Scott 14 48.28% 11 37.93% 1 3.45% 3 10.35% 29

Shannon 2 22.22% 2 22.22% 4 44.44% 1 11.11% 9

St Francois 15 48.39% 12 38.71% 2 6.45% 2 6.45% 31

Ste Genevieve 2 40.00% 3 60.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Stoddard 14 77.78% 2 11.11% 2 11.11% 0 0.00% 18

Texas 6 42.86% 5 35.71% 2 14.29% 1 7.14% 14

Washington 6 85.71% 1 14.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Wayne 1 9.09% 5 45.46% 4 36.36% 1 9.09% 11

* Region Total * 211 47.74% 136 30.77% 52 11.77% 43 9.73% 442

Southwest Barry 6 75.00% 0 0.00% 1 12.50% 1 12.50% 8

Barton 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Bates 2 28.57% 5 71.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7

Benton 4 66.67% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Camden 6 60.00% 3 30.00% 1 10.00% 0 0.00% 10

Cedar 1 20.00% 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Christian 12 60.00% 3 15.00% 5 25.00% 0 0.00% 20

Dade 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3

Greene 31 49.21% 19 30.16% 9 14.29% 4 6.35% 63

Henry 8 61.54% 2 15.39% 1 7.69% 2 15.39% 13

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Jasper 33 42.86% 33 42.86% 9 11.69% 2 2.60% 77

Laclede 9 42.86% 8 38.10% 3 14.29% 1 4.76% 21

Lawrence 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

McDonald 5 45.46% 5 45.46% 1 9.09% 0 0.00% 11

Miller 14 73.68% 3 15.79% 1 5.26% 1 5.26% 19

Moniteau 3 50.00% 2 33.33% 0 0.00% 1 16.67% 6

Morgan 6 54.55% 3 27.27% 2 18.18% 0 0.00% 11

Newton 8 88.89% 1 11.11% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 9

Ozark 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Polk 4 80.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 20.00% 5

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 4 57.14% 0 0.00% 2 28.57% 1 14.29% 7

Taney 18 42.86% 8 19.05% 8 19.05% 8 19.05% 42

Vernon 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Webster 8 53.33% 4 26.67% 2 13.33% 1 6.67% 15

Wright 7 58.33% 5 41.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 12

* Region Total * 203 52.59% 112 29.02% 46 11.92% 25 6.48% 386

Kansas City Jackson 81 66.94% 28 23.14% 4 3.31% 8 6.61% 121

* Region Total * 81 66.94% 28 23.14% 4 3.31% 8 6.61% 121

St. Louis St Louis City 32 55.17% 23 39.66% 3 5.17% 0 0.00% 58

St Louis County 20 48.78% 11 26.83% 4 9.76% 6 14.63% 41

* Region Total * 52 52.53% 34 34.34% 7 7.07% 6 6.06% 99

State Total 797 55.58% 402 28.03% 138 9.62% 97 6.76% 1,434

0 - 3 Months 4 - 7 Months 8 - 11 Months 12 + Months

35Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 42: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Note: FCS cases with associated AC functions opened were automatically closed March 1, 2017 due to a policy change.

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

Jun-1

6

Aug-1

6

Oct

-16

Dec-

16

Feb-1

7

Apr-

17

Jun-1

7

Aug-1

7

Oct

-17

Dec-

17

Feb-1

8

Apr-

18

Jun-1

8

Aug-1

8

Oct

-18

Dec-

18

Feb-1

9

Apr-

19

Jun-1

9

Aug-1

9

Oct

-19

Dec-

19

Feb-2

0

Apr-

20

Jun-2

0

Figure 9.

FCS Cases Active as of the End of the Month

June 2016 Through June 2020

-25%

-20%

-15%

-10%

-5%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 10.

Percentage Change in FCS Cases Active

as of the End of the Month, Twelve Months ApartJune 2019 and June 2020

36Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 43: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 11.

FCS Cases Opened During June 2020

by Reason for Opening

Preponderance of Evidence Preventive Services Court Ordered

Newborn Crisis Assessment Family Assessment AC Closed/FCS Reopen

Court Ordered4%

Preponderance of Evidence

3%

Newborn Crisis Assessment

8%

Family Assessment65%

AC Closed/FCS Reopen2%

Preventive Services18%

Figure 12.

FCS Cases Opened During June 2020

by Reason for Opening

37Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 44: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 13.

FCS Cases Closed During June 2020

by Reason for Closing

Goal Achieved Other Reason

0 to 3 Months39%

4 to 7 Months27%

8 to 11 Months13%

12+ Months21%

Figure 14.

FCS Cases Active During June 2020

With Court Involvement by theNumber of Months Open

38Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 45: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

0 to 3 Months55%

4 to 7 Months28%

8 to 11 Months10%

12+ Months7%

Figure 15.

FCS Cases Active During June 2020

With No Court Involvement by theNumber of Months Open

39Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 46: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report 40 Research and Data Analysis

Notes: Family-Centered Services Tables and Figures

Table 9.

Counts of persons are unduplicated.

Child caretakers are persons under legal age who are also parents.

Table 11.

Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;

function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist;

all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved;

services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and family can/will access such resources;

no child under age 18 is still in the home;

Close reason of "Other" includes;

client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;

client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified;

referred to other appropriate resource;

other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;

family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;

progress no longer being made; resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;

Table 12.

All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.

Figure 9.

On March 1, 2017, memorandum CD17-16 was issued and informed staff they will no longer

open FCS functions on families when children are placed in alternative care. When the change

was implemented on March 1, 2017, all FCS cases with associated AC functions opened wereautomatically closed. The closure of the FCS cases associated with AC functions explains the

large decline in the number of FCS cases.

Page 47: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report 41 Research and Data Analysis

Figure 13.

Close reason of “Goal Achieved” includes;

function plan achieved and/or the reasons for needed services no longer exist;

all contracted services completed and risk factors are sufficiently reduced; case goals have been achieved;

services can be provided by other resource without intervention of the Division and

family can/will access such resources; no child under age 18 is still in the home;

Close reason of "Other" includes;

client not making progress but there are no legal grounds for court intervention;

client moved-unable to locate; client moved-other state notified;

referred to other appropriate resource;

other; family is unwilling to cooperate with the service plan;

family moved out of state; family requests that the case be closed;

progress no longer being made;

resources have been exhausted and are no longer available to assist the family;

Figure 14.

All court activities/actions are considered as court involvement except for court reports.

Page 48: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We
Page 49: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Out-of-Home Placement

Page 50: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 14.

Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During June 2020

by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category

Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.24 17.00

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Buchanan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Carroll 0 0 4 0 0 4 1.82 8.25

Cass 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.11 11.67

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clay 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.02 0.00

Clinton 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.39 1.00

Cooper 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.25 9.00

Daviess 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.44 2.00

De Kalb 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.43 0.00

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Harrison 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.90 16.00

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Johnson 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.33 2.00

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Nodaway 0 1 4 0 0 5 1.17 9.40

Pettis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Putnam 0 0 2 0 0 2 1.72 5.00

Ray 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.17 0.00

Saline 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.19 15.00

Sullivan 0 1 3 0 0 4 2.46 11.50

Worth 0 0 1 0 0 1 2.25 11.00

* Region Total * 0 5 27 1 1 34 0.16 7.85

Northeast Adair 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.40 14.00

Audrain 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.16 11.00

Boone 0 0 8 1 0 9 0.26 4.44

Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cole 0 4 2 1 0 7 0.39 6.14

Franklin 0 3 2 0 1 6 0.24 6.00

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Howard 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.46 13.00

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lincoln 0 3 3 0 0 6 0.41 3.33

Macon 0 2 0 1 0 3 0.79 6.33

Marion 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.29 11.50

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Osage 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.29 0.00

Pike 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.24 0.00

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Randolph 0 4 0 0 1 5 0.85 1.80

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Charles 0 2 3 0 0 5 0.05 5.60

Warren 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.49 5.75

* Region Total * 0 18 28 3 4 53 0.20 5.53

Southeast Bollinger 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.69 7.50

Butler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.12 15.50

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

44Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 51: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 14.

Children Entering Children's Division Custody For the First Time During June 2020

by Case Manager County and the Most Recent Placement Category

Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Southeast Crawford 0 1 7 0 0 8 1.33 3.00

Dent 0 1 1 1 0 3 0.82 12.00

Dunklin 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.12 0.00

Howell 0 0 5 0 0 5 0.50 7.00

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Jefferson 0 2 7 0 0 9 0.16 4.33

Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mississippi 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.31 16.00

New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pemiscot 0 1 3 2 1 7 1.39 3.14

Perry 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.42 5.00

Phelps 0 3 2 0 1 6 0.61 1.83

Pulaski 0 0 2 0 1 3 0.24 6.00

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ripley 0 0 6 0 0 6 1.81 3.33

Scott 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.10 0.00

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Francois 0 3 1 1 0 5 0.35 5.40

Ste Genevieve 0 2 0 1 0 3 0.71 13.67

Stoddard 0 2 7 0 1 10 1.46 5.70

Texas 0 0 0 4 0 4 0.70 10.00

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 18 45 11 4 78 0.35 5.67

Southwest Barry 0 3 1 0 2 6 0.69 3.17

Barton 0 4 0 0 0 4 1.24 6.25

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Camden 0 0 4 0 0 4 0.48 10.50

Cedar 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.60 7.00

Christian 0 0 5 0 0 5 0.24 6.60

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dallas 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.24 3.00

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Greene 0 2 5 7 3 17 0.29 5.18

Henry 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.61 2.00

Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.60 4.00

Jasper 0 2 3 0 0 5 0.17 4.20

Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lawrence 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.10 16.00

McDonald 0 2 2 0 0 4 0.62 4.00

Miller 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.16 1.00

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Morgan 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.22 6.00

Newton 0 1 3 0 0 4 0.27 7.00

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Polk 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.13 0.00

St Clair 0 0 0 0 1 1 0.51 10.00

Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Taney 0 3 8 1 0 12 1.05 5.00

Vernon 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.19 16.00

Webster 0 4 5 0 1 10 1.00 7.40

Wright 0 4 0 1 0 5 1.03 5.60

* Region Total * 0 27 44 10 8 89 0.34 5.73

Kansas City Jackson 0 10 32 8 6 56 0.34 5.55

* Region Total * 0 10 32 8 6 56 0.34 5.55

St. Louis St Louis City 0 7 3 0 1 11 0.16 6.73

St Louis County 0 8 16 1 3 28 0.12 7.00

* Region Total * 0 15 19 1 4 39 0.13 6.92

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

State Total 0 93 195 34 27 349 0.24 6.00

45Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 52: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 15.

Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During June 2020

by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category

Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Buchanan 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.10 13.00

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cass 0 3 0 0 1 4 0.15 7.75

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Johnson 0 1 0 0 1 2 0.17 16.50

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Linn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Nodaway 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.47 8.50

Pettis 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.09 14.00

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ray 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.17 2.00

Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 6 4 0 2 12 0.06 10.25

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Boone 0 0 3 0 0 3 0.09 6.33

Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cole 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Franklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Macon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Marion 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.15 14.00

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Randolph 2 0 2 0 0 4 0.68 10.00

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Charles 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.02 9.00

Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 2 1 7 0 0 10 0.04 9.10

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Butler 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.10 7.00

Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Carter 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.66 16.00

46Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 53: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 15.

Children Re-Entering Children's Division Custody During June 2020

by Case Manager County and Most Recent Placement Category

Entries

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Entries Thousand Age

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Howell 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.10 4.00

Iron 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.83 2.50

Jefferson 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Madison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Maries 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.46 10.00

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Pemiscot 0 0 2 0 0 2 0.40 7.00

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Phelps 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.10 15.00

Pulaski 0 1 0 2 0 3 0.24 13.33

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Scott 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.10 16.00

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Francois 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Stoddard 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 4 4 5 0 13 0.06 9.77

Southwest Barry 0 2 0 2 0 4 0.46 9.50

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Christian 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.09 5.00

Dade 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.56 14.00

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Greene 0 2 1 0 0 3 0.05 5.33

Henry 0 0 0 1 0 1 0.20 16.00

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Jasper 0 1 1 0 0 2 0.07 9.50

Laclede 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Lawrence 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

McDonald 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Newton 0 2 0 0 0 2 0.14 6.50

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Clair 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.51 15.00

Stone 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Taney 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

Webster 0 0 1 0 0 1 0.10 4.00

Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

* Region Total * 0 11 3 3 0 17 0.07 8.53

Kansas City Jackson 0 1 12 2 2 17 0.10 11.47

* Region Total * 0 1 12 2 2 17 0.10 11.47

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

St Louis County 0 0 6 1 0 7 0.03 14.29

* Region Total * 0 0 6 1 0 7 0.02 14.29

State Total 2 23 36 11 4 76 0.05 10.28

47Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 54: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 16.

Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody

June 2018 Through May 2020

Total

Month/Year Entries Reentries (Re)Entries

Jun-2018 480 74 554

Jul-2018 404 73 477

Aug-2018 557 118 675

Sep-2018 487 83 570

Oct-2018 489 78 567

Nov-2018 428 78 506

Dec-2018 451 82 533

Jan-2019 498 98 596

Feb-2019 396 92 488

Mar-2019 456 86 542

Apr-2019 625 85 710

May-2019 492 100 592

Jun-2019 408 88 496

Jul-2019 474 91 565

Aug-2019 583 133 716

Sep-2019 554 111 665

Oct-2019 583 110 693

Nov-2019 455 66 521

Dec-2019 490 78 568

Jan-2020 563 108 671

Feb-2020 515 103 618

Mar-2020 474 96 570

Apr-2020 326 49 375

May-2020 424 58 482

Total 11,612 2,138 13,750

48Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 55: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 17.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During June 2020

by Length of Stay and Region

Average

Length of Average

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age

Northwest 11 27.50% 9 22.50% 20 50.00% 40 29.85 10.00

Northeast 23 34.85% 24 36.36% 19 28.79% 66 25.83 9.55

Southeast 33 22.60% 57 39.04% 56 38.36% 146 24.57 9.38

Southwest 21 19.44% 52 48.15% 35 32.41% 108 25.12 9.38

Kansas City 14 40.00% 8 22.86% 13 37.14% 35 22.60 7.63

St. Louis 14 31.82% 7 15.91% 23 52.27% 44 29.64 9.32

Other 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00 0.00

State Total 116 26.42% 157 35.76% 166 37.81% 439 25.73 9.32

0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More

49Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 56: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 18.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Length of Stay and Case Manager County

Average

Length of Average

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age

Northwest Andrew 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 3.00 0.00

Atchison 2 28.57% 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 7 21.57 5.71

Buchanan 37 40.66% 31 34.07% 23 25.28% 91 17.96 8.30

Caldwell 6 66.67% 0 0.00% 3 33.33% 9 12.89 9.33

Carroll 8 57.14% 3 21.43% 3 21.43% 14 13.14 10.79

Cass 71 38.17% 59 31.72% 56 30.11% 186 21.82 10.28

Chariton 4 28.57% 0 0.00% 10 71.43% 14 51.14 13.79

Clay 55 36.18% 44 28.95% 53 34.87% 152 23.25 7.99

Clinton 12 26.09% 13 28.26% 21 45.65% 46 31.78 8.30

Cooper 8 47.06% 2 11.77% 7 41.18% 17 20.00 11.47

Daviess 7 46.67% 4 26.67% 4 26.67% 15 29.73 9.13

De Kalb 6 25.00% 17 70.83% 1 4.17% 24 19.25 6.29

Gentry 9 56.25% 1 6.25% 6 37.50% 16 18.56 6.56

Grundy 19 57.58% 11 33.33% 3 9.09% 33 14.24 6.09

Harrison 17 54.84% 6 19.36% 8 25.81% 31 16.81 9.42

Holt 7 33.33% 5 23.81% 9 42.86% 21 22.90 9.57

Johnson 52 42.62% 44 36.07% 26 21.31% 122 19.24 7.60

Lafayette 19 40.43% 13 27.66% 15 31.92% 47 20.70 8.64

Linn 20 25.32% 30 37.98% 29 36.71% 79 27.52 10.58

Livingston 23 39.66% 23 39.66% 12 20.69% 58 19.74 8.43

Mercer 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3 9.00 2.33

Nodaway 32 53.33% 8 13.33% 20 33.33% 60 18.15 8.33

Pettis 25 32.90% 27 35.53% 24 31.58% 76 25.92 9.61

Platte 23 63.89% 7 19.44% 6 16.67% 36 16.06 8.89

Putnam 6 28.57% 8 38.10% 7 33.33% 21 25.38 10.10

Ray 10 66.67% 3 20.00% 2 13.33% 15 11.47 6.93

Saline 19 38.00% 19 38.00% 12 24.00% 50 22.76 7.34

Sullivan 12 37.50% 10 31.25% 10 31.25% 32 19.00 10.59

Worth 7 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 7 3.29 3.57

* Region Total * 520 40.53% 391 30.48% 372 29.00% 1,283 21.55 8.79

Northeast Adair 42 44.68% 32 34.04% 20 21.28% 94 17.74 8.70

Audrain 13 29.55% 7 15.91% 24 54.55% 44 31.45 9.93

Boone 121 39.29% 79 25.65% 108 35.07% 308 23.79 9.94

Callaway 58 34.12% 46 27.06% 66 38.82% 170 22.06 9.00

Clark 12 37.50% 10 31.25% 10 31.25% 32 19.66 7.81

Cole 76 48.41% 43 27.39% 38 24.20% 157 17.91 7.90

Franklin 122 39.10% 61 19.55% 129 41.35% 312 25.86 8.44

Gasconade 12 40.00% 6 20.00% 12 40.00% 30 20.27 9.07

Howard 23 51.11% 13 28.89% 9 20.00% 45 17.91 10.82

Knox 4 30.77% 8 61.54% 1 7.69% 13 15.46 9.15

Lewis 10 66.67% 2 13.33% 3 20.00% 15 29.33 8.20

Lincoln 59 40.14% 37 25.17% 51 34.69% 147 19.10 8.42

Macon 47 51.65% 24 26.37% 20 21.98% 91 15.03 8.87

Marion 47 24.61% 56 29.32% 88 46.07% 191 26.43 9.31

Monroe 9 28.13% 13 40.63% 10 31.25% 32 18.81 8.38

Montgomery 15 33.33% 10 22.22% 20 44.44% 45 27.44 8.24

Osage 2 28.57% 3 42.86% 2 28.57% 7 17.00 4.86

Pike 26 61.91% 6 14.29% 10 23.81% 42 18.19 9.24

Ralls 2 10.53% 9 47.37% 8 42.11% 19 35.11 10.95

Randolph 63 46.67% 42 31.11% 30 22.22% 135 15.45 9.21

Schuyler 5 38.46% 4 30.77% 4 30.77% 13 22.00 9.46

Scotland 3 23.08% 8 61.54% 2 15.39% 13 18.54 10.77

Shelby 7 41.18% 5 29.41% 5 29.41% 17 24.00 11.24

St Charles 97 38.49% 80 31.75% 75 29.76% 252 23.85 9.26

Warren 44 50.00% 17 19.32% 27 30.68% 88 18.49 9.10

* Region Total * 919 39.75% 621 26.86% 772 33.39% 2,312 22.04 9.04

Southeast Bollinger 41 55.41% 18 24.32% 15 20.27% 74 14.95 7.47

Butler 74 35.07% 75 35.55% 62 29.38% 211 23.06 8.39

Cape Girardeau 91 40.81% 82 36.77% 50 22.42% 223 18.22 7.99

Carter 8 66.67% 3 25.00% 1 8.33% 12 14.67 6.08

0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More

50Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 57: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 18.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Length of Stay and Case Manager County

Average

Length of Average

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Stay Age

Southeast Crawford 84 66.14% 22 17.32% 21 16.54% 127 15.17 8.56

Dent 28 45.16% 11 17.74% 23 37.10% 62 21.71 8.44

Dunklin 67 58.26% 32 27.83% 16 13.91% 115 16.31 7.61

Howell 57 44.19% 42 32.56% 30 23.26% 129 20.39 9.05

Iron 16 51.61% 11 35.48% 4 12.90% 31 15.13 7.13

Jefferson 194 31.14% 250 40.13% 179 28.73% 623 21.09 7.67

Madison 7 17.07% 19 46.34% 15 36.59% 41 27.37 8.71

Maries 9 47.37% 9 47.37% 1 5.26% 19 11.32 10.68

Mississippi 26 50.98% 19 37.26% 6 11.77% 51 16.16 8.04

New Madrid 38 29.46% 41 31.78% 50 38.76% 129 23.36 9.05

Oregon 23 44.23% 15 28.85% 14 26.92% 52 21.92 9.52

Pemiscot 79 61.72% 18 14.06% 31 24.22% 128 21.25 9.50

Perry 18 33.96% 25 47.17% 10 18.87% 53 16.34 7.34

Phelps 105 46.67% 56 24.89% 64 28.44% 225 18.64 8.80

Pulaski 89 54.27% 35 21.34% 40 24.39% 164 18.10 8.37

Reynolds 13 44.83% 11 37.93% 5 17.24% 29 19.00 7.59

Ripley 19 39.58% 12 25.00% 17 35.42% 48 29.27 9.38

Scott 58 43.28% 45 33.58% 31 23.13% 134 17.20 7.35

Shannon 2 14.29% 3 21.43% 9 64.29% 14 22.00 11.29

St Francois 91 35.00% 93 35.77% 76 29.23% 260 21.60 8.25

Ste Genevieve 12 36.36% 9 27.27% 12 36.36% 33 22.09 9.15

Stoddard 100 71.43% 23 16.43% 17 12.14% 140 12.68 8.64

Texas 34 36.17% 29 30.85% 31 32.98% 94 18.43 8.04

Washington 37 23.42% 53 33.54% 68 43.04% 158 26.25 8.98

Wayne 27 37.50% 27 37.50% 18 25.00% 72 22.53 9.88

* Region Total * 1,447 41.93% 1,088 31.53% 916 26.54% 3,451 19.95 8.34

Southwest Barry 66 36.67% 56 31.11% 58 32.22% 180 20.73 8.01

Barton 12 38.71% 6 19.36% 13 41.94% 31 27.26 10.48

Bates 11 44.00% 3 12.00% 11 44.00% 25 25.92 9.48

Benton 9 37.50% 8 33.33% 7 29.17% 24 22.63 10.58

Camden 44 47.31% 28 30.11% 21 22.58% 93 19.37 9.32

Cedar 12 38.71% 11 35.48% 8 25.81% 31 20.61 11.10

Christian 77 48.43% 43 27.04% 39 24.53% 159 17.12 8.26

Dade 5 50.00% 5 50.00% 0 0.00% 10 9.50 9.60

Dallas 28 60.87% 7 15.22% 11 23.91% 46 18.41 7.96

Douglas 16 50.00% 13 40.63% 3 9.38% 32 13.22 10.00

Greene 386 54.83% 175 24.86% 143 20.31% 704 19.00 7.90

Henry 44 61.11% 9 12.50% 19 26.39% 72 18.10 8.42

Hickory 1 12.50% 0 0.00% 7 87.50% 8 49.75 8.00

Jasper 207 42.51% 137 28.13% 143 29.36% 487 20.66 9.02

Laclede 56 35.90% 38 24.36% 62 39.74% 156 23.42 7.67

Lawrence 73 44.51% 42 25.61% 49 29.88% 164 21.93 8.80

McDonald 47 68.12% 10 14.49% 12 17.39% 69 13.32 9.28

Miller 25 38.46% 10 15.39% 30 46.15% 65 25.18 7.95

Moniteau 10 40.00% 12 48.00% 3 12.00% 25 14.40 10.44

Morgan 29 42.65% 24 35.29% 15 22.06% 68 18.74 7.56

Newton 92 61.75% 32 21.48% 25 16.78% 149 14.31 8.62

Ozark 9 45.00% 5 25.00% 6 30.00% 20 16.80 11.35

Polk 21 36.84% 15 26.32% 21 36.84% 57 23.86 8.88

St Clair 17 65.39% 6 23.08% 3 11.54% 26 13.54 9.88

Stone 26 27.37% 28 29.47% 41 43.16% 95 23.21 9.19

Taney 140 44.03% 84 26.42% 94 29.56% 318 19.88 7.94

Vernon 8 38.10% 6 28.57% 7 33.33% 21 30.57 10.33

Webster 53 60.23% 14 15.91% 21 23.86% 88 16.11 8.64

Wright 48 46.60% 24 23.30% 31 30.10% 103 19.09 8.82

* Region Total * 1,572 47.26% 851 25.59% 903 27.15% 3,326 19.73 8.51

Kansas City Jackson 691 40.08% 512 29.70% 521 30.22% 1,724 21.69 8.34

* Region Total * 691 40.08% 512 29.70% 521 30.22% 1,724 21.69 8.34

St. Louis St Louis City 220 35.14% 167 26.68% 239 38.18% 626 27.38 8.22

St Louis County 416 36.02% 303 26.23% 436 37.75% 1,155 23.35 8.12

* Region Total * 636 35.71% 470 26.39% 675 37.90% 1,781 24.77 8.15

Other Icama 3 37.50% 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 8 27.75 8.75

* Region Total * 3 37.50% 1 12.50% 4 50.00% 8 27.75 8.75

State Total 5,788 41.69% 3,934 28.33% 4,163 29.98% 13,885 21.23 8.52

0 - 11 Months 1 Yr. - 23 Months 2 Yrs. or More

51Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 58: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 19.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Category

Children

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age

Northwest Andrew 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.24 0.00

Atchison 0 0 7 0 0 7 5.92 5.71

Buchanan 0 42 29 16 4 91 4.34 8.30

Caldwell 0 2 7 0 0 9 3.74 9.33

Carroll 0 2 11 1 0 14 6.39 10.79

Cass 0 54 96 22 14 186 7.05 10.28

Chariton 0 5 1 7 1 14 7.91 13.79

Clay 0 37 87 20 8 152 2.65 7.99

Clinton 0 20 17 7 2 46 9.03 8.30

Cooper 0 4 7 5 1 17 4.27 11.47

Daviess 0 4 8 1 2 15 6.66 9.13

De Kalb 0 13 7 3 1 24 10.39 6.29

Gentry 0 4 11 1 0 16 9.67 6.56

Grundy 0 13 18 0 2 33 13.38 6.09

Harrison 0 8 18 4 1 31 13.96 9.42

Holt 0 3 15 3 0 21 21.63 9.57

Johnson 0 47 51 14 10 122 10.13 7.60

Lafayette 0 17 22 5 3 47 5.74 8.64

Linn 0 30 29 13 7 79 25.03 10.58

Livingston 0 17 33 5 3 58 17.42 8.43

Mercer 0 0 3 0 0 3 3.12 2.33

Nodaway 0 13 41 4 2 60 14.07 8.33

Pettis 0 37 28 5 6 76 7.05 9.61

Platte 0 13 13 10 0 36 1.64 8.89

Putnam 0 8 9 2 2 21 18.10 10.10

Ray 0 5 9 1 0 15 2.56 6.93

Saline 0 10 34 2 4 50 9.27 7.34

Sullivan 0 10 16 5 1 32 19.69 10.59

Worth 0 0 7 0 0 7 15.77 3.57

* Region Total * 0 419 634 156 74 1,283 5.93 8.79

Northeast Adair 0 33 42 15 4 94 18.91 8.70

Audrain 0 21 15 4 4 44 6.91 9.93

Boone 0 76 159 55 18 308 8.99 9.94

Callaway 0 56 93 12 9 170 16.99 9.00

Clark 0 9 19 3 1 32 18.64 7.81

Cole 0 47 79 21 10 157 8.75 7.90

Franklin 0 104 154 28 26 312 12.43 8.44

Gasconade 0 11 15 4 0 30 8.92 9.07

Howard 0 12 22 7 4 45 20.66 10.82

Knox 0 7 5 0 1 13 12.60 9.15

Lewis 0 4 8 0 3 15 6.26 8.20

Lincoln 0 50 83 9 5 147 9.98 8.42

Macon 0 39 37 10 5 91 24.08 8.87

Marion 0 68 97 20 6 191 27.73 9.31

Monroe 0 13 16 3 0 32 15.53 8.38

Montgomery 0 11 28 2 4 45 15.77 8.24

Osage 0 2 4 0 1 7 2.04 4.86

Pike 0 11 24 5 2 42 10.23 9.24

Ralls 0 10 6 2 1 19 7.99 10.95

Randolph 1 40 72 18 4 135 22.96 9.21

Schuyler 0 0 12 1 0 13 11.40 9.46

Scotland 0 3 6 3 1 13 9.54 10.77

Shelby 0 6 5 2 4 17 10.65 11.24

St Charles 2 67 140 24 19 252 2.71 9.26

Warren 0 31 45 9 3 88 10.83 9.10

* Region Total * 3 731 1,186 257 135 2,312 8.87 9.04

Southeast Bollinger 0 7 58 5 4 74 25.37 7.47

Butler 2 63 109 26 11 211 21.16 8.39

Cape Girardeau 0 60 119 33 11 223 13.43 7.99

Carter 0 6 4 2 0 12 7.92 6.08

52Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis Unit

Page 59: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 19.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Category

Children

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total Per Average

Home Home Home Care Other Children Thousand Age

Southeast Crawford 1 44 54 22 6 127 21.16 8.56

Dent 0 21 25 9 7 62 16.98 8.44

Dunklin 0 23 68 19 5 115 14.23 7.61

Howell 0 43 51 20 15 129 12.82 9.05

Iron 0 11 16 2 2 31 12.90 7.13

Jefferson 0 171 403 33 16 623 11.33 7.67

Madison 1 11 21 6 2 41 13.99 8.71

Maries 0 4 13 2 0 19 8.82 10.68

Mississippi 0 18 27 6 0 51 16.00 8.04

New Madrid 0 19 92 16 2 129 28.58 9.05

Oregon 0 24 16 7 5 52 21.43 9.52

Pemiscot 0 29 66 19 14 128 25.43 9.50

Perry 0 14 32 6 1 53 11.13 7.34

Phelps 2 63 110 41 9 225 22.98 8.80

Pulaski 0 44 77 36 7 164 13.08 8.37

Reynolds 0 5 21 1 2 29 18.93 7.59

Ripley 0 8 25 8 7 48 14.51 9.38

Scott 0 18 102 11 3 134 13.60 7.35

Shannon 0 4 5 3 2 14 7.10 11.29

St Francois 3 74 134 30 19 260 18.05 8.25

Ste Genevieve 0 9 10 10 4 33 7.82 9.15

Stoddard 0 32 70 31 7 140 20.49 8.64

Texas 0 19 59 14 2 94 16.43 8.04

Washington 0 30 102 19 7 158 26.06 8.98

Wayne 0 24 34 11 3 72 25.66 9.88

* Region Total * 9 898 1,923 448 173 3,451 15.67 8.34

Southwest Barry 2 75 81 16 6 180 20.83 8.01

Barton 0 15 12 2 2 31 9.65 10.48

Bates 0 10 10 1 4 25 5.88 9.48

Benton 0 6 9 6 3 24 6.98 10.58

Camden 0 38 46 6 3 93 11.08 9.32

Cedar 0 5 19 2 5 31 9.37 11.10

Christian 0 50 86 18 5 159 7.51 8.26

Dade 0 7 2 0 1 10 5.60 9.60

Dallas 0 16 21 7 2 46 11.03 7.96

Douglas 0 5 21 2 4 32 10.45 10.00

Greene 4 245 338 69 48 704 12.06 7.90

Henry 0 32 29 5 6 72 14.53 8.42

Hickory 0 4 2 1 1 8 4.80 8.00

Jasper 3 137 249 73 25 487 16.08 9.02

Laclede 0 55 82 10 9 156 17.51 7.67

Lawrence 0 58 76 20 10 164 16.12 8.80

McDonald 0 18 42 6 3 69 10.66 9.28

Miller 0 30 23 8 4 65 10.58 7.95

Moniteau 0 2 20 3 0 25 6.37 10.44

Morgan 0 29 29 6 4 68 15.00 7.56

Newton 1 46 71 21 10 149 10.09 8.62

Ozark 1 6 9 3 1 20 10.26 11.35

Polk 0 26 25 2 4 57 7.44 8.88

St Clair 0 14 7 2 3 26 13.27 9.88

Stone 0 25 54 10 6 95 15.75 9.19

Taney 1 151 124 27 15 318 27.83 7.94

Vernon 0 4 10 4 3 21 3.99 10.33

Webster 0 43 29 11 5 88 8.77 8.64

Wright 1 41 50 6 5 103 21.14 8.82

* Region Total * 13 1,193 1,576 347 197 3,326 12.75 8.51

Kansas City Jackson 11 615 837 121 140 1,724 10.41 8.34

* Region Total * 11 615 837 121 140 1,724 10.41 8.34

St. Louis St Louis City 0 239 260 75 52 626 9.27 8.22

St Louis County 4 398 571 117 65 1,155 4.93 8.12

* Region Total * 4 637 831 192 117 1,781 5.90 8.16

Other Icama 1 5 1 0 1 8 0.00 8.75

* Region Total * 1 5 1 0 1 8 0.00 8.75

State Total 41 4,498 6,988 1,521 837 13,885 9.74 8.52

53Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis Unit

Page 60: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Chariton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Clinton 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

Linn 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Pettis 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Platte 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 38 9 0 0 0 0

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Audrain 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Boone 0 0 0 12 1 1 0 0 0

Callaway 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0

Clark 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Cole 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

Franklin 0 0 0 7 4 0 0 0 0

Gasconade 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0

Macon 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Marion 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

St Charles 0 0 0 13 1 0 2 0 0

Warren 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 1 0 0 72 9 3 2 0 0

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Butler 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

54Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 61: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

ADF ADO ADR CFP CTO DET FAH FGB FGH

Southeast Crawford 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0

Howell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Iron 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 0 0 0 21 3 0 0 0 0

Madison 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

Maries 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 2 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0

Pulaski 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scott 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Texas 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 6 0 2 39 13 2 1 0 0

Southwest Barry 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Benton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Christian 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 2 0 2 24 5 0 0 0 0

Henry 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 0 2 1 18 5 0 0 0 0

Laclede 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0

Lawrence 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0

McDonald 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Miller 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0

Newton 1 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0

Ozark 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0

Taney 1 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 0

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Webster 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Wright 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 5 2 6 87 19 6 0 0 0

Kansas City Jackson 6 0 5 116 13 1 0 0 0

* Region Total * 6 0 5 116 13 1 0 0 0

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 24 1 2 0 0 0

St Louis County 0 0 0 55 1 1 4 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 79 2 3 4 0 0

Other Icama 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

State Total 18 3 13 431 65 15 7 0 0

55Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 62: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB KHM

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 1 2 3 32 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 4 2 0 45 3 0 0 0

Chariton 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 1 0 3 31 1 0 0 0

Clinton 0 1 0 1 17 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 1 0 0 12 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 2 11 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 5 1 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 0 0 1 40 3 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 0 0

Linn 0 0 0 1 27 0 0 0 0

Livingston 0 2 0 2 12 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0

Pettis 0 2 0 0 32 2 0 0 0

Platte 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 1 0 0 7 1 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 16 5 16 344 11 0 0 0

Northeast Adair 0 2 2 0 27 0 0 0 0

Audrain 0 2 0 1 15 1 0 0 0

Boone 0 4 0 1 59 4 0 0 0

Callaway 0 1 0 1 46 1 0 0 0

Clark 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0

Cole 0 1 0 3 42 1 0 0 0

Franklin 0 3 1 9 84 9 0 0 0

Gasconade 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 1 0 3 42 3 0 0 0

Macon 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0

Marion 0 4 2 4 57 0 0 0 0

Monroe 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 10 2 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 1 0 2 6 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 2 0 1 5 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 1 0 1 35 0 0 0 0

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 1 5 1 0 0 0

St Charles 0 5 0 2 47 4 0 0 0

Warren 0 0 4 1 23 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 31 11 30 587 26 0 0 0

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0

Butler 0 0 0 1 61 0 0 0 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0 1 7 51 2 0 0 0

Carter 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0

56Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 63: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

FGM FHB FHE FHM FHO ILA JHO KHB KHM

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 1 43 1 0 0 0

Dent 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 0 0 2 20 0 0 0 0

Howell 0 2 0 0 41 0 0 0 0

Iron 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0

Jefferson 0 11 2 4 133 4 0 0 0

Madison 0 0 0 2 9 1 0 0 0

Maries 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 2 0 0 16 1 0 0 0

Oregon 0 1 0 3 20 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 27 5 0 0 0

Perry 0 0 0 2 12 1 0 0 0

Phelps 0 3 0 1 57 1 0 0 0

Pulaski 0 1 3 0 40 1 0 0 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0

Scott 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 0 0

Shannon 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

St Francois 0 1 2 2 69 9 0 0 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 1 8 1 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 0 3 5 21 0 0 0 0

Texas 0 0 0 1 16 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 0 3 1 25 0 0 0 0

Wayne 0 0 0 1 23 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 21 15 35 788 28 0 0 0

Southwest Barry 0 4 0 4 65 0 0 0 0

Barton 0 0 0 0 15 1 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 3 1 6 0 0 0 0

Benton 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 2 0 0 36 0 0 0 0

Cedar 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 5 0 1 38 1 0 0 0

Dade 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0

Douglas 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0

Greene 0 25 0 15 181 6 0 0 0

Henry 0 1 0 2 28 3 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Jasper 0 6 0 11 102 4 0 0 0

Laclede 0 0 0 1 49 2 0 0 0

Lawrence 0 2 0 3 49 1 0 0 0

McDonald 0 1 0 1 15 0 0 0 0

Miller 0 1 0 1 27 2 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 1 0 1 26 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 0 0 1 42 1 0 0 0

Ozark 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 2 0 0 24 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 3 1 4 5 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 3 0 1 19 0 0 0 0

Taney 0 6 1 12 120 3 0 0 0

Vernon 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0

Webster 0 3 0 3 35 0 0 0 0

Wright 0 0 0 6 33 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 66 5 69 966 25 0 0 0

Kansas City Jackson 0 52 6 52 389 23 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 52 6 52 389 23 0 0 0

St. Louis St Louis City 0 27 0 20 168 6 0 0 0

St Louis County 0 35 4 40 264 6 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 62 4 60 432 12 0 0 0

Other Icama 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0

State Total 0 248 46 263 3,510 125 0 0 0

57Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 64: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

KHO KHU LGS MMD MMF MMH MMW RFA RFP

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 1

Chariton 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 1 0

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 1 0

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

Linn 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Pettis 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 1 11 25 8 2 2

Northeast Adair 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0

Audrain 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0

Boone 0 0 0 1 0 4 1 0 0

Callaway 0 0 0 0 1 6 1 0 0

Clark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Cole 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0

Franklin 0 0 0 2 1 6 4 0 0

Gasconade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0

Lincoln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Macon 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 1

Marion 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0

Monroe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

St Charles 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 0 1

Warren 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 10 9 31 24 2 3

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 0 0 0 0 8 1 0 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0 0 2 1 3 2 0 0

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

58Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 65: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

KHO KHU LGS MMD MMF MMH MMW RFA RFP

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 1 1

Dent 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 0

Dunklin 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0

Howell 0 0 0 0 0 12 3 0 1

Iron 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

Jefferson 1 1 0 1 1 5 0 0 1

Madison 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0

Perry 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 0

Pulaski 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 2 0

Reynolds 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

Ripley 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 0 0

Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

St Francois 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0

Stoddard 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 5

Texas 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 1

Wayne 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0

* Region Total * 1 1 4 13 12 70 10 7 9

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 0 1

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Bates 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0

Camden 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0

Cedar 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0

Christian 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3

Dade 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1

Douglas 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 0 0 0 2 2 16 6 1 1

Henry 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0

Jasper 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 3 0

Laclede 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0

Lawrence 0 0 0 0 1 7 0 0 1

McDonald 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1

Newton 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 5

Ozark 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0

Stone 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0

Taney 0 0 0 0 2 7 0 0 1

Vernon 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0

Webster 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 1

Wright 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 1 8 15 73 17 8 16

Kansas City Jackson 0 0 0 3 6 41 5 3 10

* Region Total * 0 0 0 3 6 41 5 3 10

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0 0 9 2 2 0 1 3

St Louis County 0 0 0 6 2 9 1 2 3

* Region Total * 0 0 0 15 4 11 1 3 6

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

State Total 1 1 5 50 57 252 65 25 46

59Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 66: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RF2 RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 1 12 0 3 0 0 0 0

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carroll 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 2 14 0 1 1 0 3 1

Chariton 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 1 4 13 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clinton 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1

Gentry 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1

Johnson 0 2 8 0 1 0 0 0 0

Lafayette 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

Linn 0 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 0

Livingston 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pettis 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Platte 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 2 0

Putnam 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Saline 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 2 18 110 2 5 2 0 6 3

Northeast Adair 1 1 7 0 2 0 0 2 0

Audrain 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Boone 0 7 29 1 13 1 0 0 1

Callaway 0 2 4 0 5 0 0 0 1

Clark 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cole 0 2 12 2 4 0 0 0 1

Franklin 0 5 19 0 4 0 0 0 2

Gasconade 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Howard 1 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 0 6 0 1 0 0 0 1

Macon 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 2 0

Marion 0 2 17 0 1 0 0 0 2

Monroe 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0

Montgomery 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ralls 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 0 1 12 1 1 0 0 0 1

Schuyler 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Charles 0 0 14 1 5 0 0 1 0

Warren 0 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 3 32 150 6 39 1 0 6 9

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0

Butler 0 4 17 0 1 0 0 2 1

Cape Girardeau 0 18 13 1 0 0 0 1 0

Carter 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

60Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 67: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RF2 RF3 RF4 RFE RFH RFM RFI RFT RHB

Southeast Crawford 0 5 8 1 6 0 0 0 0

Dent 0 1 4 0 3 0 0 0 0

Dunklin 0 4 12 1 1 0 0 0 0

Howell 1 6 4 4 3 0 0 0 3

Iron 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0

Jefferson 0 3 19 0 9 0 0 0 4

Madison 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0

Maries 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 1 0

New Madrid 0 4 9 0 0 0 0 1 0

Oregon 0 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 3 7 5 3 0 0 1 0

Perry 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0

Phelps 0 12 15 3 8 0 0 2 0

Pulaski 0 8 9 3 6 0 0 2 0

Reynolds 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ripley 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0

Scott 0 1 9 1 0 0 0 0 0

Shannon 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 0 14 11 1 1 0 0 3 0

Ste Genevieve 0 3 4 0 2 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 10 11 0 1 0 0 4 0

Texas 0 4 2 4 2 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 12 5 0 0 0 0 1 0

Wayne 0 4 5 1 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 1 129 185 28 51 0 0 20 8

Southwest Barry 0 3 7 2 1 0 0 2 0

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Benton 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 1 0

Cedar 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 3 8 0 3 0 0 0 0

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 1 0

Douglas 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 0 5 35 4 15 0 3 3 7

Henry 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0

Hickory 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 0 10 39 3 15 0 0 1 3

Laclede 0 2 3 0 5 0 0 0 1

Lawrence 1 6 8 1 2 0 0 1 0

McDonald 0 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0

Miller 1 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 4 9 0 1 0 0 1 0

Ozark 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0

Stone 1 3 5 0 1 0 0 0 0

Taney 1 3 8 1 9 0 0 1 0

Vernon 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0

Webster 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0

Wright 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 4 56 162 14 55 0 3 11 11

Kansas City Jackson 1 19 47 14 11 2 5 3 11

* Region Total * 1 19 47 14 11 2 5 3 11

St. Louis St Louis City 0 4 42 1 21 0 0 2 4

St Louis County 1 11 62 1 32 2 0 1 5

* Region Total * 1 15 104 2 53 2 0 3 9

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

State Total 12 269 758 66 214 7 8 49 51

61Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 68: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Atchison 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7

Buchanan 0 23 6 1 0 0 0 0 91

Caldwell 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 9

Carroll 0 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 14

Cass 0 62 33 1 0 2 0 3 186

Chariton 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 14

Clay 4 57 26 1 0 0 1 0 152

Clinton 0 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 46

Cooper 0 6 1 0 0 0 1 0 17

Daviess 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 15

De Kalb 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 1 24

Gentry 0 8 3 0 0 0 0 0 16

Grundy 0 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 33

Harrison 0 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 31

Holt 0 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 21

Johnson 1 35 15 0 0 0 2 0 122

Lafayette 0 15 7 0 0 0 0 0 47

Linn 0 24 5 0 0 0 0 0 79

Livingston 1 23 9 0 0 0 1 0 58

Mercer 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

Nodaway 0 25 16 0 0 0 0 0 60

Pettis 0 20 8 0 0 0 0 0 76

Platte 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 36

Putnam 0 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 21

Ray 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 15

Saline 7 25 2 0 0 0 0 0 50

Sullivan 1 4 11 0 0 0 1 0 32

Worth 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 7

* Region Total * 14 437 180 3 0 2 7 4 1,283

Northeast Adair 2 27 13 0 0 0 2 1 94

Audrain 0 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 44

Boone 4 103 51 3 0 0 4 3 308

Callaway 3 82 7 0 0 0 1 0 170

Clark 0 15 4 1 0 0 0 0 32

Cole 0 47 31 2 0 0 1 1 157

Franklin 2 112 38 0 0 0 0 0 312

Gasconade 1 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 30

Howard 0 5 17 0 0 0 0 0 45

Knox 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 13

Lewis 0 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 15

Lincoln 3 50 29 1 0 0 2 0 147

Macon 0 26 11 0 0 0 1 0 91

Marion 5 62 28 0 0 0 0 0 191

Monroe 0 14 2 0 0 0 0 0 32

Montgomery 0 23 5 0 0 0 0 0 45

Osage 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 7

Pike 0 10 14 0 0 0 0 0 42

Ralls 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 19

Randolph 0 51 20 0 0 0 1 1 135

Schuyler 0 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 13

Scotland 0 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 13

Shelby 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 17

St Charles 2 94 44 4 0 0 2 3 252

Warren 1 34 10 1 0 0 1 0 88

* Region Total * 23 818 336 14 0 0 15 9 2,312

Southeast Bollinger 3 31 24 0 0 0 0 0 74

Butler 1 82 25 1 0 0 2 1 211

Cape Girardeau 7 68 44 0 0 0 0 0 223

Carter 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 12

62Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 69: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Type

RHM RHO RHU RUN SCH TLA TLG TLS TOTAL

Southeast Crawford 0 41 13 0 0 0 0 1 127

Dent 1 17 7 0 0 0 0 1 62

Dunklin 1 38 29 0 0 0 1 1 115

Howell 0 30 18 0 0 0 1 0 129

Iron 1 10 5 0 0 0 0 0 31

Jefferson 9 263 125 2 0 0 1 0 623

Madison 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 41

Maries 0 11 2 0 0 0 0 0 19

Mississippi 0 18 9 0 0 0 0 0 51

New Madrid 2 74 16 0 0 0 1 0 129

Oregon 0 10 6 1 0 0 0 1 52

Pemiscot 1 49 16 0 0 1 0 1 128

Perry 3 17 12 0 0 0 1 0 53

Phelps 0 79 31 0 0 0 1 1 225

Pulaski 1 45 31 1 0 0 6 1 164

Reynolds 2 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 29

Ripley 0 15 10 0 0 0 1 1 48

Scott 1 66 35 0 0 2 0 0 134

Shannon 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 14

St Francois 1 92 41 2 0 0 0 1 260

Ste Genevieve 0 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 33

Stoddard 0 35 35 0 0 1 0 2 140

Texas 1 48 10 0 0 0 2 1 94

Washington 2 82 16 0 0 0 0 1 158

Wayne 0 21 13 0 0 0 1 0 72

* Region Total * 37 1,294 578 7 0 4 18 14 3,451

Southwest Barry 2 60 19 0 0 0 0 0 180

Barton 0 6 6 0 0 0 1 0 31

Bates 0 8 2 0 0 1 0 1 25

Benton 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 24

Camden 1 30 15 0 0 0 0 1 93

Cedar 0 9 10 0 0 0 0 1 31

Christian 0 65 21 0 0 0 1 1 159

Dade 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 10

Dallas 0 12 9 0 0 0 1 0 46

Douglas 1 17 3 0 0 0 0 0 32

Greene 9 244 78 0 0 0 2 11 704

Henry 0 6 23 0 0 0 0 0 72

Hickory 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 8

Jasper 2 206 38 1 0 1 2 3 487

Laclede 3 63 15 0 0 0 0 2 156

Lawrence 0 48 28 0 0 1 0 0 164

McDonald 1 25 15 0 0 0 0 1 69

Miller 0 21 2 0 0 0 1 1 65

Moniteau 0 14 6 0 0 0 0 0 25

Morgan 1 21 7 0 0 0 0 0 68

Newton 0 44 27 1 0 0 1 0 149

Ozark 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 20

Polk 1 23 1 0 0 0 1 1 57

St Clair 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 26

Stone 2 44 8 0 0 0 0 0 95

Taney 0 83 41 1 0 0 3 1 318

Vernon 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 21

Webster 0 10 19 1 0 0 3 1 88

Wright 7 40 3 0 0 0 1 2 103

* Region Total * 31 1,124 409 4 0 3 18 27 3,326

Kansas City Jackson 12 377 437 34 1 0 6 13 1,724

* Region Total * 12 377 437 34 1 0 6 13 1,724

St. Louis St Louis City 3 149 104 19 0 0 1 11 626

St Louis County 15 326 225 18 0 0 2 21 1,155

* Region Total * 18 475 329 37 0 0 3 32 1,781

Other Icama 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

* Region Total * 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

State Total 135 4,526 2,269 99 1 9 67 99 13,885

63Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 70: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 21.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total

Home Home Home Care Other Exits

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 1 0 1

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 0 2 0 1 0 3

Caldwell 0 0 2 0 0 2

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 0 1 2 0 1 4

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 0 1 4 2 0 7

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 0 0 5 0 0 5

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 0 0 2 0 0 2

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 0 1 2 0 1 4

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0

Linn 0 1 0 0 0 1

Livingston 0 0 1 0 0 1

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 1 3 0 0 4

Pettis 0 2 2 1 0 5

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 1 0 0 1

Saline 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 9 24 5 2 40

Northeast Adair 0 3 0 1 0 4

Audrain 0 1 0 0 0 1

Boone 0 1 1 0 1 3

Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clark 0 0 2 0 0 2

Cole 0 1 0 0 0 1

Franklin 0 3 1 0 3 7

Gasconade 0 0 1 0 0 1

Howard 0 0 3 0 0 3

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 0 2 0 1 3

Macon 0 2 2 0 0 4

Marion 0 1 5 0 1 7

Monroe 0 1 0 0 0 1

Montgomery 0 2 0 0 0 2

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 0 0 2 0 0 2

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 1 1 3 0 1 6

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 4 0 1 5

St Charles 0 3 5 0 3 11

Warren 0 1 2 0 0 3

* Region Total * 1 20 33 1 11 66

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 1 0 0 1

Butler 0 0 9 2 1 12

Cape Girardeau 0 0 5 1 0 6

Carter 0 1 0 0 0 1

64Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 71: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 21.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody During June 2020

by Case Manager County and Placement Category at Time of Exit

Adoptive Foster Relative Residential Total

Home Home Home Care Other Exits

Southeast Crawford 0 4 4 2 0 10

Dent 0 1 1 1 0 3

Dunklin 0 1 0 1 1 3

Howell 0 3 5 0 1 9

Iron 0 0 0 1 0 1

Jefferson 0 1 24 1 1 27

Madison 0 0 1 0 0 1

Maries 0 1 1 0 0 2

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 2 0 0 2

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 0 4 0 0 4

Perry 0 0 1 0 0 1

Phelps 0 2 6 2 0 10

Pulaski 0 4 11 1 0 16

Reynolds 0 0 4 0 0 4

Ripley 0 0 1 0 1 2

Scott 0 4 4 0 0 8

Shannon 0 1 0 0 0 1

St Francois 0 4 7 0 0 11

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 0 1 3 1 0 5

Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 0 1 0 1 2

Wayne 0 0 4 0 0 4

* Region Total * 0 28 99 13 6 146

Southwest Barry 0 0 2 1 1 4

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 0 0 1 0 0 1

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 0 2 0 0 0 2

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 4 0 5 0 0 9

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 0 0 3 0 0 3

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 0 10 3 2 3 18

Henry 0 1 5 1 0 7

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 1 7 8 0 1 17

Laclede 0 1 1 1 0 3

Lawrence 0 2 0 1 1 4

McDonald 0 0 0 0 0 0

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 0 4 6 0 0 10

Ozark 0 0 1 1 0 2

Polk 0 0 2 0 0 2

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 0 2 1 1 0 4

Taney 0 5 3 0 0 8

Vernon 0 3 0 0 1 4

Webster 0 5 5 0 0 10

Wright 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 5 42 46 8 7 108

Kansas City Jackson 0 19 11 1 4 35

* Region Total * 0 19 11 1 4 35

St. Louis St Louis City 0 7 14 2 0 23

St Louis County 0 9 8 1 3 21

* Region Total * 0 16 22 3 3 44

Other Icama 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 0 0 0 0 0 0

State Total 6 134 235 31 33 439

65Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 72: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 22.

Children Closed from Alternative Care During June 2020

by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing

Returned Other Living with Achieved Total

Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings

Northwest Andrew 1 0 0 0 0 1

Atchison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Buchanan 2 0 0 0 4 6

Caldwell 0 0 0 0 2 2

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 1 0 0 1 8 10

Chariton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clay 4 0 0 0 0 4

Clinton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooper 0 0 0 0 0 0

Daviess 0 0 0 0 0 0

De Kalb 1 0 0 0 1 2

Gentry 0 0 0 0 0 0

Grundy 2 0 0 0 0 2

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 0

Holt 0 0 0 0 0 0

Johnson 1 0 0 1 3 5

Lafayette 0 0 0 0 0 0

Linn 1 0 0 0 0 1

Livingston 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 2 0 1 0 0 3

Pettis 3 0 0 0 0 3

Platte 0 0 0 0 0 0

Putnam 0 0 0 0 1 1

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 0 0 0 0 2 2

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 18 0 1 2 21 42

Northeast Adair 3 0 0 1 0 4

Audrain 0 0 0 0 0 0

Boone 0 0 0 1 0 1

Callaway 0 0 0 0 0 0

Clark 2 0 0 0 0 2

Cole 1 0 0 0 3 4

Franklin 0 0 0 1 3 4

Gasconade 1 0 0 0 0 1

Howard 0 0 0 0 0 0

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 0 0 0 1 2 3

Macon 3 0 0 1 0 4

Marion 5 0 0 2 0 7

Monroe 1 0 0 0 0 1

Montgomery 0 0 0 0 0 0

Osage 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pike 2 0 0 0 0 2

Ralls 0 0 0 0 0 0

Randolph 1 3 0 0 0 4

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 5 0 0 0 0 5

St Charles 6 0 0 3 4 13

Warren 2 0 0 0 0 2

* Region Total * 32 3 0 10 12 57

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0 0 0 0

Butler 4 0 0 1 0 5

Cape Girardeau 5 0 0 0 0 5

Carter 1 0 0 0 0 1

Crawford 7 0 0 1 0 8

66Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 73: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 22.

Children Closed from Alternative Care During June 2020

by Case Manager County and Reason for Case Closing

Returned Other Living with Achieved Total

Home Agency Other Relatives Independence Other Closings

Southeast Dent 1 0 0 0 1 2

Dunklin 3 0 0 0 0 3

Howell 4 0 3 0 0 7

Iron 1 0 0 0 0 1

Jefferson 7 0 0 0 4 11

Madison 1 0 0 0 0 1

Maries 1 0 0 0 0 1

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 0 0 0 1 0 1

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 3 0 0 0 1 4

Perry 1 0 0 0 0 1

Phelps 4 0 0 1 3 8

Pulaski 3 0 0 0 2 5

Reynolds 3 0 0 0 0 3

Ripley 0 0 0 1 0 1

Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shannon 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Francois 1 0 0 0 7 8

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stoddard 3 0 0 0 0 3

Texas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Washington 0 0 0 1 1 2

Wayne 0 0 0 0 6 6

* Region Total * 53 0 3 6 25 87

Southwest Barry 1 0 0 1 0 2

Barton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Bates 1 0 0 0 0 1

Benton 0 0 0 0 0 0

Camden 2 0 0 0 0 2

Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0

Christian 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dade 3 0 0 0 0 3

Dallas 2 0 0 0 0 2

Douglas 0 0 0 0 0 0

Greene 2 0 0 3 3 8

Henry 2 0 0 0 1 3

Hickory 0 0 0 0 0 0

Jasper 10 0 0 2 1 13

Laclede 2 0 0 0 3 5

Lawrence 2 0 0 1 2 5

McDonald 0 0 0 0 0 0

Miller 0 0 0 0 0 0

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newton 4 0 0 0 1 5

Ozark 2 0 0 0 0 2

Polk 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 2 0 0 1 2 5

Taney 0 0 0 0 1 1

Vernon 4 0 0 0 0 4

Webster 7 0 0 0 0 7

Wright 0 0 0 0 1 1

* Region Total * 46 0 0 8 15 69

Kansas City Jackson 17 0 1 3 1 22

* Region Total * 17 0 1 3 1 22

St. Louis St Louis City 8 0 0 2 5 15

St Louis County 14 0 0 3 3 20

* Region Total * 22 0 0 5 8 35

Other Icama 0 1 0 0 39 40

* Region Total * 0 1 0 0 39 40

State Total 188 4 5 34 121 352

67Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 74: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 23.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of June 2020

With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody

Temporary Adoptions No Identified

Legal Status 1 Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total Adoptive

TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children Resource

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 0 0 0

Atchison 3 2 0 0 5 3

Buchanan 21 4 0 4 29 15

Caldwell 2 0 0 2 4 0

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 10 3 0 1 14 11

Chariton 2 1 0 0 3 2

Clay 2 3 0 1 6 1

Clinton 19 2 0 0 21 2

Cooper 2 0 0 0 2 0

Daviess 2 0 0 0 2 1

De Kalb 3 0 0 2 5 0

Gentry 3 2 0 0 5 5

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 1 1 0 0 2 1

Holt 4 4 0 0 8 2

Johnson 5 0 0 0 5 3

Lafayette 4 1 0 0 5 3

Linn 12 6 0 0 18 3

Livingston 6 2 0 0 8 1

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 6 0 0 1 7 6

Pettis 10 6 0 0 16 6

Platte 0 1 0 0 1 1

Putnam 4 1 0 0 5 1

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 8 2 0 0 10 2

Sullivan 6 0 0 0 6 2

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 135 41 0 11 187 71

Northeast Adair 7 1 0 0 8 6

Audrain 13 2 0 0 15 8

Boone 33 9 0 4 46 21

Callaway 17 4 0 0 21 13

Clark 4 1 0 0 5 2

Cole 37 3 1 1 42 17

Franklin 50 19 0 3 72 35

Gasconade 7 3 0 0 10 4

Howard 3 0 0 0 3 1

Knox 3 1 0 0 4 1

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 18 22 0 0 40 14

Macon 7 2 0 0 9 8

Marion 12 11 0 0 23 2

Monroe 11 0 0 0 11 5

Montgomery 18 0 0 2 20 4

Osage 1 1 0 0 2 1

Pike 5 1 0 0 6 4

Ralls 3 0 1 0 4 1

Randolph 28 0 0 2 30 21

Schuyler 0 0 0 0 0 0

Scotland 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shelby 0 0 0 0 0 0

St Charles 37 14 0 1 52 18

Warren 15 2 0 0 17 5

* Region Total * 329 96 2 13 440 191

Southeast Bollinger 1 0 0 1 2 0

Butler 31 22 0 6 59 37

Cape Girardeau 7 3 0 0 10 7

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0

Crawford 12 2 0 0 14 9

Note: Column "No Identified Adoptive Resource" added July 2016 68

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 75: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 23.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of June 2020

With a Goal of Adoption or in Adoptive Custody

Temporary Adoptions No Identified

In Legal Status 1 In Legal Status 1 Adoptive Finalized Total Adoptive

TPR Incomplete TPR Complete Custody During Month Children Resource

Southeast Dent 8 8 0 0 16 14

Dunklin 10 0 0 0 10 8

Howell 4 0 1 3 8 4

Iron 3 2 1 1 7 4

Jefferson 88 25 0 5 118 78

Madison 1 6 0 0 7 3

Maries 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mississippi 0 0 0 0 0 0

New Madrid 1 5 0 0 6 4

Oregon 0 1 0 0 1 1

Pemiscot 5 3 1 0 9 4

Perry 5 0 0 0 5 1

Phelps 12 4 0 2 18 12

Pulaski 16 4 0 0 20 17

Reynolds 3 4 0 0 7 4

Ripley 2 6 1 1 10 6

Scott 0 0 0 0 0 0

Shannon 4 0 0 1 5 4

St Francois 15 29 0 7 51 24

Ste Genevieve 5 3 0 0 8 8

Stoddard 6 1 4 1 12 6

Texas 17 1 0 0 18 7

Washington 5 18 0 0 23 10

Wayne 10 10 0 0 20 17

* Region Total * 271 157 8 28 464 289

Southwest Barry 47 13 2 0 62 15

Barton 10 1 0 0 11 7

Bates 6 0 0 0 6 1

Benton 7 0 0 0 7 0

Camden 12 2 0 0 14 10

Cedar 10 0 0 0 10 2

Christian 17 9 0 4 30 12

Dade 0 0 0 0 0 0

Dallas 10 2 0 0 12 8

Douglas 1 1 0 0 2 1

Greene 131 73 0 7 211 95

Henry 17 0 0 0 17 7

Hickory 5 1 0 0 6 1

Jasper 107 6 4 2 119 63

Laclede 19 6 1 0 26 18

Lawrence 25 22 0 1 48 14

McDonald 8 2 0 0 10 8

Miller 6 2 0 0 8 2

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 6 0 0 0 6 0

Newton 12 6 0 6 24 8

Ozark 5 1 0 0 6 5

Polk 13 0 0 0 13 7

St Clair 0 0 0 0 0 0

Stone 18 5 0 1 24 7

Taney 49 23 0 5 77 27

Vernon 2 1 0 0 3 3

Webster 7 0 1 0 8 3

Wright 29 1 0 0 30 16

* Region Total * 579 177 8 26 790 340

Kansas City Jackson 259 139 1 12 411 288

* Region Total * 259 139 1 12 411 288

St. Louis St Louis City 121 18 0 4 143 111

St Louis County 194 39 0 4 237 196

* Region Total * 315 57 0 8 380 307

Other Icama 2 0 32 0 34 1

* Region Total * 2 0 32 0 34 1

State Total 1,890 667 51 98 2,706 1,487

Note: Column "No Identified Adoptive Resource" added July 2016 69

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 76: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 24.

Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of June 2020

by Vendor Type and County

Large Current Licensed

Level B Foster Family Newly Number of Vendors

Foster Adoptive Resource Foster Relative Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage

Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0 15 1 1 12 13 14 -7.14%

Atchison 0 0 0 1 3 0 4 4 1 300.00%

Buchanan 4 0 0 40 24 0 43 57 52 9.62%

Caldwell 0 0 0 3 2 0 5 5 10 -50.00%

Carroll 0 0 0 2 4 0 5 6 2 200.00%

Cass 3 0 0 40 37 1 52 70 70 0.00%

Chariton 0 0 0 1 5 1 4 6 7 -14.29%

Clay 3 0 0 100 61 4 105 149 153 -2.61%

Clinton 0 0 0 16 4 1 10 17 17 0.00%

Cooper 1 0 0 5 7 1 9 9 7 28.57%

Daviess 0 0 0 3 4 0 7 7 9 -22.22%

De Kalb 1 0 0 6 3 1 6 9 10 -10.00%

Gentry 0 0 0 2 4 0 4 5 9 -44.44%

Grundy 0 0 0 3 7 0 6 10 9 11.11%

Harrison 0 0 0 2 9 2 9 11 12 -8.33%

Holt 0 0 0 3 9 0 10 10 7 42.86%

Johnson 1 1 0 24 25 4 36 48 43 11.63%

Lafayette 3 0 0 12 11 0 18 20 22 -9.09%

Linn 1 0 0 14 9 0 20 21 14 50.00%

Livingston 0 0 0 9 11 0 12 18 18 0.00%

Mercer 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 3 3 0.00%

Nodaway 0 0 0 8 15 1 13 22 26 -15.39%

Pettis 2 0 0 18 12 1 21 24 32 -25.00%

Platte 1 0 0 27 22 0 32 47 36 30.56%

Putnam 0 0 0 4 5 0 6 9 8 12.50%

Ray 1 0 0 5 6 2 9 10 7 42.86%

Saline 2 0 0 5 11 0 13 14 13 7.69%

Sullivan 0 0 0 3 5 0 6 7 2 250.00%

Worth 1 0 0 2 5 0 5 6 3 100.00%

* Region Total * 24 1 0 373 324 20 485 637 616 3.41%

Northeast Adair 2 0 0 21 17 3 29 34 39 -12.82%

Audrain 0 0 0 13 14 1 19 25 33 -24.24%

Boone 4 0 0 37 37 5 51 69 72 -4.17%

Callaway 0 0 0 12 40 2 45 51 47 8.51%

Clark 0 0 0 2 10 1 7 12 10 20.00%

Cole 1 0 0 39 20 3 42 52 45 15.56%

Franklin 3 0 0 41 54 1 79 91 121 -24.79%

Gasconade 0 0 0 6 6 0 11 12 18 -33.33%

Howard 1 0 0 5 3 0 7 7 11 -36.36%

Knox 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 2 1 100.00%

Lewis 1 0 0 8 7 2 11 14 12 16.67%

Lincoln 5 0 0 41 26 1 47 60 60 0.00%

Macon 0 0 0 17 14 2 23 30 31 -3.23%

Marion 4 0 0 27 24 0 43 47 59 -20.34%

Monroe 1 0 0 12 7 0 15 18 16 12.50%

Montgomery 0 0 0 7 12 1 13 19 21 -9.52%

Osage 0 0 0 2 5 2 7 7 7 0.00%

Pike 0 0 0 8 11 0 16 19 17 11.77%

Ralls 0 0 0 10 12 0 19 21 28 -25.00%

Randolph 5 0 0 14 27 3 31 39 38 2.63%

Schuyler 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 6 7 -14.29%

Scotland 0 0 0 3 4 0 5 6 11 -45.46%

Shelby 0 0 0 6 6 0 6 11 10 10.00%

St Charles 14 0 0 93 56 2 103 137 145 -5.52%

Warren 1 0 0 20 17 0 26 36 44 -18.18%

* Region Total * 42 0 0 448 435 29 663 825 903 -8.64%

Southeast Bollinger 0 1 0 2 20 0 21 23 19 21.05%

Butler 1 0 0 43 44 0 69 80 78 2.56%

Cape Girardeau 1 0 0 31 51 0 65 81 94 -13.83%

Carter 0 0 0 4 5 0 7 8 8 0.00%

70Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 77: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 24.

Licensed Children's Division Resource Homes on the Last Day of June 2020

by Vendor Type and County

Large Current Licensed

Level B Foster Family Newly Number of Vendors

Foster Adoptive Resource Foster Relative Licensed Vendors in Licensed 12 Months Percentage

Home Home Home Home Home Vendors Use Vendors Ago Change

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0 9 28 1 30 37 27 37.04%

Dent 1 0 0 10 12 0 16 22 23 -4.35%

Dunklin 0 0 0 19 22 0 37 41 42 -2.38%

Howell 0 0 0 21 22 0 33 41 53 -22.64%

Iron 0 0 0 8 10 2 15 18 22 -18.18%

Jefferson 4 0 0 56 96 6 126 147 144 2.08%

Madison 0 0 0 6 12 1 12 17 23 -26.09%

Maries 0 0 0 4 7 0 6 10 9 11.11%

Mississippi 0 0 0 7 16 0 21 23 19 21.05%

New Madrid 1 0 0 17 35 0 46 51 42 21.43%

Oregon 0 0 0 4 4 0 8 8 9 -11.11%

Pemiscot 1 0 0 15 19 0 28 34 41 -17.07%

Perry 0 0 0 7 15 0 22 22 27 -18.52%

Phelps 3 0 0 22 37 1 50 58 51 13.73%

Pulaski 0 0 0 18 15 1 29 33 41 -19.51%

Reynolds 0 0 0 5 13 0 14 18 14 28.57%

Ripley 0 0 0 16 16 0 24 28 30 -6.67%

Scott 0 0 0 17 43 0 51 59 63 -6.35%

Shannon 1 0 0 6 2 1 6 8 10 -20.00%

St Francois 1 0 0 42 45 5 73 84 90 -6.67%

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0 5 9 1 10 14 16 -12.50%

Stoddard 0 0 0 16 17 1 27 33 42 -21.43%

Texas 0 0 0 14 18 1 28 32 32 0.00%

Washington 0 0 0 8 34 3 38 42 35 20.00%

Wayne 0 0 0 8 11 0 14 18 22 -18.18%

* Region Total * 14 1 0 440 678 24 926 1,090 1,126 -3.20%

Southwest Barry 0 0 0 17 23 0 32 38 43 -11.63%

Barton 0 0 0 14 6 0 15 18 24 -25.00%

Bates 1 0 0 13 9 2 14 20 24 -16.67%

Benton 0 0 0 8 6 0 12 14 15 -6.67%

Camden 1 0 0 11 17 0 24 27 30 -10.00%

Cedar 0 0 0 6 4 0 6 10 15 -33.33%

Christian 12 0 0 100 41 4 90 132 118 11.86%

Dade 1 0 0 4 2 0 5 5 7 -28.57%

Dallas 0 0 0 9 6 0 14 14 16 -12.50%

Douglas 0 0 0 18 10 1 17 26 26 0.00%

Greene 14 0 0 221 110 8 207 283 266 6.39%

Henry 1 0 0 18 5 0 14 21 36 -41.67%

Hickory 0 0 0 2 4 0 4 6 12 -50.00%

Jasper 11 0 0 79 107 10 145 170 156 8.97%

Laclede 2 0 0 22 23 3 33 42 45 -6.67%

Lawrence 2 0 0 33 25 0 42 49 58 -15.52%

McDonald 1 0 0 13 10 0 18 21 27 -22.22%

Miller 0 0 0 7 11 2 17 18 22 -18.18%

Moniteau 0 0 0 9 4 0 11 11 16 -31.25%

Morgan 0 0 0 7 11 0 18 18 22 -18.18%

Newton 5 0 0 35 42 2 64 73 72 1.39%

Ozark 0 0 0 2 6 0 6 8 7 14.29%

Polk 3 0 0 24 15 1 25 36 46 -21.74%

St Clair 1 0 0 5 3 0 6 8 11 -27.27%

Stone 4 0 0 29 19 1 30 38 37 2.70%

Taney 7 0 0 59 28 1 54 85 97 -12.37%

Vernon 0 0 0 15 3 1 8 18 20 -10.00%

Webster 2 0 0 24 12 1 21 33 42 -21.43%

Wright 0 0 0 20 20 2 28 38 40 -5.00%

* Region Total * 68 0 0 824 582 39 980 1,280 1,350 -5.19%

Kansas City Jackson 50 0 0 361 207 18 361 474 534 -11.24%

* Region Total * 50 0 0 361 207 18 361 474 534 -11.24%

St. Louis St Louis City 15 0 0 62 53 4 81 107 137 -21.90%

St Louis County 51 3 0 192 183 7 255 329 409 -19.56%

* Region Total * 66 3 0 254 236 11 336 436 546 -20.15%

State Total 264 5 0 2,700 2,462 141 3,751 4,742 5,075 -6.56%

71Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 78: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 25.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Legal Status

Total

LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children

Northwest Andrew 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 4

Atchison 7 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 13

Buchanan 91 0 0 1 123 0 0 74 0 289

Caldwell 9 0 0 0 142 0 0 64 0 215

Carroll 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14

Cass 186 0 0 2 283 1 1 75 0 548

Chariton 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15

Clay 152 0 0 10 482 0 0 132 0 776

Clinton 46 0 0 0 8 0 0 16 0 70

Cooper 17 0 0 0 4 0 0 58 0 79

Daviess 15 0 0 0 13 0 0 6 0 34

De Kalb 24 0 0 0 177 0 0 79 0 280

Gentry 16 0 0 0 5 0 0 14 0 35

Grundy 33 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 34

Harrison 31 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 32

Holt 21 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 32

Johnson 122 0 0 3 143 1 1 56 0 326

Lafayette 47 0 0 1 3 0 0 4 0 55

Linn 79 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 87

Livingston 58 0 0 0 10 0 0 9 0 77

Mercer 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

Nodaway 60 0 0 0 33 0 0 38 0 131

Pettis 76 0 0 0 148 0 0 20 0 244

Platte 36 0 0 6 154 0 0 28 0 224

Putnam 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21

Ray 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 16

Saline 50 0 0 3 144 0 2 45 0 244

Sullivan 32 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 37

Worth 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 0 18

* Region Total * 1,283 0 0 27 1,904 2 4 733 0 3,953

Northeast Adair 94 0 0 0 78 0 0 46 0 218

Audrain 44 0 0 1 69 1 0 44 0 159

Boone 308 0 1 3 373 0 0 260 0 945

Callaway 170 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 0 180

Clark 32 0 0 0 6 0 0 22 0 60

Cole 157 1 0 20 198 0 0 110 0 486

Franklin 312 0 0 0 394 0 0 137 0 843

Gasconade 30 0 0 0 16 0 0 4 0 50

Howard 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 64

Knox 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13

Lewis 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 18

Lincoln 147 0 0 3 138 2 2 81 0 373

Macon 91 0 0 0 49 0 0 33 0 173

Marion 191 0 0 0 110 0 0 59 0 360

Monroe 32 0 0 0 15 0 0 10 0 57

Montgomery 45 0 0 0 18 0 0 24 0 87

Osage 7 0 0 0 2 0 0 9 0 18

Pike 42 0 0 0 28 0 0 17 0 87

Ralls 19 1 0 0 9 0 0 3 0 32

Randolph 135 0 0 1 119 0 0 98 0 353

Schuyler 13 0 0 0 10 0 0 3 0 26

Scotland 13 0 0 0 5 0 0 12 0 30

Shelby 17 0 0 0 28 0 0 9 0 54

St Charles 252 0 0 8 485 0 0 184 0 929

Warren 88 0 0 2 106 0 0 55 0 251

* Region Total * 2,312 2 1 38 2,261 3 2 1,247 0 5,866

Southeast Bollinger 74 0 0 0 20 0 1 16 0 111

Butler 211 0 0 1 18 0 0 4 0 234

Cape Girardeau 223 0 0 3 164 0 1 207 0 598

Carter 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 18

Crawford 127 0 0 3 26 0 0 24 0 180

72Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 79: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 25.

Children in Alternative Care on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Legal Status

Total

LS 1 LS 2 LS 3 LS 4 LS 5 LS 7 LS 8 LS 9 LS V Children

Southeast Dent 62 0 0 0 13 0 2 3 0 80

Dunklin 115 0 0 0 10 0 0 14 0 139

Howell 129 1 0 4 134 0 0 39 0 307

Iron 31 1 0 1 113 0 0 70 0 216

Jefferson 623 0 0 6 530 3 0 523 0 1,685

Madison 41 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 46

Maries 19 0 0 0 22 0 1 15 0 57

Mississippi 51 0 0 0 9 0 0 48 0 108

New Madrid 129 0 0 0 5 0 0 38 0 172

Oregon 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 58

Pemiscot 128 1 0 0 96 0 0 141 0 366

Perry 53 0 0 0 36 0 0 14 0 103

Phelps 225 0 0 0 90 1 3 80 0 399

Pulaski 164 0 0 4 234 0 0 123 0 525

Reynolds 29 0 0 0 12 0 1 11 0 53

Ripley 48 1 0 0 267 0 0 190 0 506

Scott 134 0 0 1 76 0 0 205 0 416

Shannon 14 0 0 0 8 0 0 15 0 37

St Francois 260 0 0 0 518 0 1 146 0 925

Ste Genevieve 33 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 34

Stoddard 140 4 0 0 247 0 0 258 0 649

Texas 94 0 0 0 53 0 0 31 0 178

Washington 158 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 166

Wayne 72 0 0 4 110 0 0 67 0 253

* Region Total * 3,451 8 0 28 2,822 4 12 2,294 0 8,619

Southwest Barry 180 2 0 0 115 1 0 34 0 332

Barton 31 0 0 0 80 0 0 17 0 128

Bates 25 0 0 3 17 0 0 10 0 55

Benton 24 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 26

Camden 93 0 0 0 13 0 0 17 0 123

Cedar 31 0 0 0 37 0 0 9 0 77

Christian 159 0 0 1 402 0 0 52 0 614

Dade 10 0 0 2 27 0 0 3 0 42

Dallas 46 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 48

Douglas 32 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 35

Greene 704 0 0 10 1,278 4 3 182 0 2,181

Henry 72 0 0 0 138 1 1 75 0 287

Hickory 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8

Jasper 487 4 0 4 683 3 4 148 0 1,333

Laclede 156 1 0 0 428 1 0 119 0 705

Lawrence 164 0 0 0 35 0 1 9 0 209

McDonald 69 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 70

Miller 65 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 68

Moniteau 25 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 26

Morgan 68 0 0 1 7 0 0 1 0 77

Newton 149 0 0 2 452 0 1 100 0 704

Ozark 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20

Polk 57 0 0 0 8 0 0 6 0 71

St Clair 26 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 0 37

Stone 95 0 0 0 318 0 0 78 0 491

Taney 318 0 0 1 201 2 0 94 0 616

Vernon 21 0 0 0 35 0 0 4 0 60

Webster 88 1 0 0 437 0 0 140 0 666

Wright 103 0 0 0 146 1 0 85 0 335

* Region Total * 3,326 8 0 25 4,875 14 11 1,185 0 9,444

Kansas City Jackson 1,724 1 0 38 2,617 25 7 522 0 4,934

* Region Total * 1,724 1 0 38 2,617 25 7 522 0 4,934

St. Louis St Louis City 626 0 0 4 855 5 0 487 0 1,977

St Louis County 1,155 0 1 28 1,170 8 7 627 0 2,996

* Region Total * 1,781 0 1 32 2,025 13 7 1,114 0 4,973

Other Icama 8 32 0 30 2,021 0 0 40 0 2,131

* Region Total * 8 32 0 30 2,021 0 0 40 0 2,131

State Total 13,885 51 2 218 18,525 61 43 7,135 0 39,920

73Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 80: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 26.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Goal

Total

01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children

Northwest Andrew 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Atchison 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 7

Buchanan 56 25 0 4 4 2 0 91

Caldwell 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 9

Carroll 8 0 0 0 2 0 4 14

Cass 138 13 0 14 13 1 7 186

Chariton 3 3 0 4 4 0 0 14

Clay 120 5 0 11 15 0 1 152

Clinton 16 21 0 3 5 0 1 46

Cooper 11 2 0 3 1 0 0 17

Daviess 10 2 0 2 1 0 0 15

De Kalb 15 3 0 1 4 0 1 24

Gentry 9 5 0 0 2 0 0 16

Grundy 31 0 0 0 1 1 0 33

Harrison 23 2 0 1 5 0 0 31

Holt 11 8 0 0 2 0 0 21

Johnson 104 5 0 6 3 0 4 122

Lafayette 37 5 0 4 1 0 0 47

Linn 48 18 0 4 9 0 0 79

Livingston 43 8 0 5 1 0 1 58

Mercer 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3

Nodaway 33 6 0 4 9 1 7 60

Pettis 46 16 0 4 8 2 0 76

Platte 32 1 0 2 0 0 1 36

Putnam 6 5 0 1 7 1 1 21

Ray 12 0 0 0 1 0 2 15

Saline 31 10 0 1 7 0 1 50

Sullivan 13 6 0 2 2 5 4 32

Worth 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 7

* Region Total * 873 176 0 76 107 13 38 1,283

Northeast Adair 68 8 0 6 6 1 5 94

Audrain 14 15 0 8 6 0 1 44

Boone 195 42 0 35 34 0 2 308

Callaway 128 21 0 7 14 0 0 170

Clark 19 5 0 3 4 1 0 32

Cole 83 40 0 9 10 3 12 157

Franklin 173 69 0 26 34 5 5 312

Gasconade 18 10 0 1 1 0 0 30

Howard 26 3 0 5 6 1 4 45

Knox 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 13

Lewis 11 0 0 3 1 0 0 15

Lincoln 77 40 0 15 15 0 0 147

Macon 70 9 0 7 1 1 3 91

Marion 122 23 0 11 24 2 9 191

Monroe 17 11 0 3 1 0 0 32

Montgomery 18 18 0 5 4 0 0 45

Osage 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 7

Pike 25 6 0 7 2 0 2 42

Ralls 8 3 0 5 3 0 0 19

Randolph 70 28 0 7 22 1 7 135

Schuyler 8 0 0 0 5 0 0 13

Scotland 8 0 0 1 4 0 0 13

Shelby 11 0 0 5 1 0 0 17

St Charles 141 51 0 32 23 0 5 252

Warren 43 17 0 8 14 3 3 88

* Region Total * 1,366 425 0 210 235 18 58 2,312

Southeast Bollinger 67 1 0 1 5 0 0 74

Butler 93 53 0 23 31 6 5 211

Cape Girardeau 185 10 0 10 15 0 3 223

Carter 11 0 0 1 0 0 0 12

74Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 81: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 26.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and Goal

Total

01 AD 05 06 07 08 09 Children

Southeast Crawford 67 14 0 9 26 9 2 127

Dent 29 16 0 4 10 0 3 62

Dunklin 82 10 0 5 13 5 0 115

Howell 89 4 0 16 13 4 3 129

Iron 13 5 0 0 8 0 5 31

Jefferson 334 113 0 40 113 17 6 623

Madison 30 7 0 4 0 0 0 41

Maries 14 0 0 2 3 0 0 19

Mississippi 37 0 0 3 11 0 0 51

New Madrid 92 6 0 3 21 7 0 129

Oregon 45 1 0 6 0 0 0 52

Pemiscot 67 8 0 15 36 0 2 128

Perry 43 5 0 3 1 0 1 53

Phelps 177 16 0 11 18 0 3 225

Pulaski 108 20 0 13 17 1 5 164

Reynolds 16 7 0 0 6 0 0 29

Ripley 19 8 0 10 10 1 0 48

Scott 95 0 0 2 37 0 0 134

Shannon 6 4 0 4 0 0 0 14

St Francois 170 44 0 28 11 3 4 260

Ste Genevieve 18 8 0 3 1 0 3 33

Stoddard 97 7 0 13 20 0 3 140

Texas 48 18 0 7 20 0 1 94

Washington 111 23 0 12 6 5 1 158

Wayne 41 20 0 4 4 0 3 72

* Region Total * 2,204 428 0 252 456 58 53 3,451

Southwest Barry 90 60 0 10 17 0 3 180

Barton 9 11 0 5 0 0 6 31

Bates 12 6 0 4 3 0 0 25

Benton 8 7 0 7 1 1 0 24

Camden 67 14 0 5 4 3 0 93

Cedar 10 10 0 2 9 0 0 31

Christian 104 26 0 8 15 1 5 159

Dade 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10

Dallas 29 12 0 3 1 1 0 46

Douglas 26 2 0 1 3 0 0 32

Greene 405 204 0 55 28 3 9 704

Henry 44 17 0 5 3 0 3 72

Hickory 1 6 0 1 0 0 0 8

Jasper 297 113 0 37 36 2 2 487

Laclede 111 25 0 16 3 0 1 156

Lawrence 83 47 0 16 15 0 3 164

McDonald 47 10 0 6 3 0 3 69

Miller 41 8 0 7 8 1 0 65

Moniteau 19 0 0 0 6 0 0 25

Morgan 60 6 0 1 0 0 1 68

Newton 105 18 0 11 12 0 3 149

Ozark 12 6 0 2 0 0 0 20

Polk 29 13 0 7 7 0 1 57

St Clair 21 0 0 3 1 0 1 26

Stone 52 23 0 3 17 0 0 95

Taney 195 72 0 20 23 3 5 318

Vernon 14 3 0 3 1 0 0 21

Webster 64 7 0 8 8 0 1 88

Wright 62 30 0 7 4 0 0 103

* Region Total * 2,027 756 0 253 228 15 47 3,326

Kansas City Jackson 1,007 398 0 116 113 21 69 1,724

* Region Total * 1,007 398 0 116 113 21 69 1,724

St. Louis St Louis City 322 139 0 58 71 22 14 626

St Louis County 654 233 0 90 113 30 35 1,155

* Region Total * 976 372 0 148 184 52 49 1,781

Other Icama 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 8

* Region Total * 2 2 0 1 2 0 1 8

State Total 8,455 2,557 0 1,056 1,325 177 315 13,885

75Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 82: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 27.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous

Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell

Number of Placements Average

Total Number of

1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements

Northwest Andrew 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1.00

Atchison 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 7 2.57

Buchanan 30 16 20 2 2 9 2 10 91 5.16

Caldwell 1 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 9 2.44

Carroll 5 2 5 1 0 0 1 0 14 2.79

Cass 45 58 30 10 11 19 5 7 186 4.38

Chariton 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 7 14 22.57

Clay 60 39 13 4 7 9 6 14 152 4.54

Clinton 12 13 8 4 0 5 0 4 46 4.37

Cooper 7 1 1 1 1 5 0 1 17 6.24

Daviess 6 4 1 1 0 2 1 0 15 3.27

De Kalb 5 12 0 0 2 4 1 0 24 3.21

Gentry 7 8 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 2.19

Grundy 11 10 10 0 0 2 0 0 33 2.33

Harrison 17 3 6 0 0 2 2 1 31 4.19

Holt 14 2 0 0 0 1 1 3 21 5.71

Johnson 42 27 12 8 8 15 5 3 122 3.57

Lafayette 12 18 3 3 0 7 0 4 47 5.32

Linn 16 22 11 9 4 6 7 4 79 5.32

Livingston 11 22 13 3 3 5 0 1 58 3.16

Mercer 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1.00

Nodaway 34 6 3 3 7 4 2 1 60 3.13

Pettis 35 13 8 4 4 6 2 4 76 4.25

Platte 7 11 3 3 0 7 1 4 36 6.89

Putnam 5 5 4 2 3 1 1 0 21 3.24

Ray 3 7 4 0 0 0 0 1 15 3.13

Saline 21 16 3 1 4 1 0 3 50 3.70

Sullivan 16 5 3 1 0 5 0 2 32 3.94

Worth 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 1.00

* Region Total * 435 327 169 61 57 116 40 74 1,283 4.40

Northeast Adair 27 30 9 8 5 7 3 5 94 4.15

Audrain 8 3 9 0 1 11 3 8 44 10.75

Boone 90 69 33 20 13 41 19 23 308 5.65

Callaway 60 31 21 11 6 27 7 7 170 4.35

Clark 9 7 2 4 4 2 2 2 32 5.41

Cole 52 26 29 7 11 20 8 3 157 4.05

Franklin 122 48 35 24 23 35 11 13 312 3.95

Gasconade 8 8 3 1 2 4 2 2 30 4.80

Howard 13 4 7 5 2 9 2 3 45 6.04

Knox 0 5 4 2 1 1 0 0 13 3.15

Lewis 5 5 1 1 0 0 3 0 15 4.07

Lincoln 55 33 20 15 5 12 3 4 147 3.46

Macon 41 18 14 4 3 7 1 3 91 3.32

Marion 76 36 25 15 11 10 9 9 191 3.91

Monroe 12 5 4 3 3 2 2 1 32 4.53

Montgomery 16 8 9 7 2 2 0 1 45 3.49

Osage 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 7 1.71

Pike 23 11 2 0 0 3 1 2 42 3.02

Ralls 7 4 2 0 0 3 1 2 19 4.58

Randolph 46 25 15 11 9 15 5 8 135 4.24

Schuyler 7 2 0 0 0 3 0 1 13 5.31

Scotland 3 1 1 3 0 2 2 1 13 6.92

Shelby 4 4 1 2 1 1 1 3 17 9.06

St Charles 89 54 34 23 5 31 11 5 252 3.60

Warren 26 22 15 2 7 10 5 1 88 3.90

* Region Total * 801 462 295 169 114 258 101 107 2,312 4.38

Southeast Bollinger 28 20 8 5 6 2 1 3 74 3.49

Butler 85 40 30 15 5 16 9 11 211 4.27

Cape Girardeau 81 54 26 17 11 15 10 7 223 3.67

Carter 2 4 1 2 0 3 0 0 12 3.42

76Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 83: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 27.

Children in Children's Division Custody on the Last Day of June 2020

by Case Manager County and the Number of Previous

Placements. Most Current Legal Status 1 Spell

Number of Placements Average

Total Number of

1 2 3 4 5 6 - 10 11 - 15 16 + Children Placements

Southeast Crawford 49 36 10 6 8 7 4 6 127 3.89

Dent 15 18 10 4 0 7 5 3 62 4.94

Dunklin 56 26 12 3 5 7 1 5 115 3.30

Howell 34 34 26 6 4 12 3 10 129 4.56

Iron 14 8 2 4 0 0 1 1 31 2.84

Jefferson 280 130 62 44 26 48 15 17 623 3.21

Madison 12 8 4 3 6 2 1 5 41 6.12

Maries 9 6 2 1 1 0 0 0 19 1.89

Mississippi 23 9 7 5 0 3 2 2 51 3.73

New Madrid 50 28 11 16 3 10 5 6 129 3.70

Oregon 15 12 8 2 2 8 3 2 52 4.08

Pemiscot 45 24 10 11 5 14 8 10 128 5.24

Perry 22 18 6 1 0 3 0 3 53 4.28

Phelps 89 56 24 13 7 20 7 8 225 3.57

Pulaski 56 39 19 8 9 20 7 4 164 3.57

Reynolds 14 7 3 3 0 0 2 0 29 2.69

Ripley 16 8 2 8 1 4 6 3 48 5.85

Scott 70 17 13 7 6 16 2 3 134 3.19

Shannon 2 3 3 1 0 4 0 1 14 5.21

St Francois 88 62 29 14 14 30 8 14 260 4.70

Ste Genevieve 7 9 8 0 1 4 1 3 33 4.97

Stoddard 34 50 21 6 6 13 4 5 140 3.48

Texas 46 15 3 9 3 13 2 2 94 3.35

Washington 40 34 20 24 3 14 9 14 158 5.70

Wayne 13 18 13 5 1 15 5 2 72 4.51

* Region Total * 1,295 793 393 243 133 310 121 150 3,451 3.94

Southwest Barry 67 42 34 12 6 8 4 5 180 3.24

Barton 19 2 0 4 1 2 1 2 31 5.77

Bates 7 8 4 3 1 1 1 0 25 2.80

Benton 4 10 2 2 1 2 2 1 24 4.46

Camden 39 19 13 7 1 7 0 7 93 3.94

Cedar 8 8 3 4 1 1 2 3 31 6.55

Christian 60 32 22 16 14 11 2 2 159 2.96

Dade 2 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 10 2.00

Dallas 16 11 6 2 1 5 2 3 46 4.78

Douglas 15 7 6 1 1 0 0 1 32 2.50

Greene 322 154 61 35 31 52 20 26 704 3.41

Henry 26 15 9 9 2 5 2 3 72 3.65

Hickory 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 8 11.25

Jasper 151 114 62 26 30 55 27 22 487 4.23

Laclede 56 37 16 10 10 19 3 5 156 3.70

Lawrence 69 24 18 12 11 12 10 8 164 4.24

McDonald 24 16 12 5 0 8 2 2 69 3.64

Miller 18 18 3 9 2 10 1 4 65 5.26

Moniteau 9 8 4 0 1 2 0 1 25 3.12

Morgan 28 13 7 8 5 6 1 0 68 2.78

Newton 53 37 27 7 5 14 2 4 149 3.17

Ozark 6 8 2 1 0 1 2 0 20 3.20

Polk 24 14 2 2 2 10 1 1 57 3.68

St Clair 13 1 4 2 1 1 2 1 26 4.27

Stone 37 20 11 6 7 7 2 5 95 3.78

Taney 134 65 32 26 21 24 4 12 318 3.63

Vernon 10 3 1 0 0 2 2 3 21 6.90

Webster 35 26 12 3 1 2 3 5 88 3.77

Wright 39 28 12 9 1 3 1 8 103 3.96

* Region Total * 1,293 746 389 221 159 270 99 136 3,326 3.76

Kansas City Jackson 676 339 197 113 98 153 66 72 1,724 3.77

* Region Total * 676 339 197 113 98 153 66 72 1,724 3.77

St. Louis St Louis City 205 135 63 43 40 69 30 36 626 4.72

St Louis County 427 271 145 75 68 99 33 33 1,155 3.58

* Region Total * 632 406 208 118 108 168 63 69 1,781 3.98

Other Icama 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 8.13

* Region Total * 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 8.13

State Total 5,135 3,076 1,651 925 669 1,275 490 610 13,885 4.00

77Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 84: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 28.

Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County

(FY 2020 Adoptions are Year to Date June 2020)

Total

FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Adoptions

Northwest Andrew 0 0 2 0 0 1 3

Atchison 0 1 3 2 0 0 6

Buchanan 5 4 16 20 25 12 82

Caldwell 11 10 3 3 2 7 36

Carroll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cass 18 25 32 36 22 24 157

Chariton 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Clay 43 41 46 59 53 33 275

Clinton 1 2 3 0 0 2 8

Cooper 0 0 1 0 1 0 2

Daviess 0 0 3 3 7 2 15

De Kalb 10 24 21 43 33 42 173

Gentry 0 2 0 1 0 0 3

Grundy 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Harrison 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Holt 0 2 2 0 0 3 7

Johnson 12 7 15 12 16 23 85

Lafayette 0 0 1 0 0 2 3

Linn 0 0 0 0 3 3 6

Livingston 0 4 0 0 4 2 10

Mercer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nodaway 0 4 2 0 4 2 12

Pettis 8 5 7 20 15 12 67

Platte 17 12 21 17 13 10 90

Putnam 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Saline 20 6 20 11 17 6 80

Sullivan 0 0 0 0 1 4 5

Worth 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

* Region Total * 145 150 198 227 216 191 1,127

Northeast Adair 10 6 15 8 6 9 54

Audrain 13 10 15 8 7 5 58

Boone 29 42 40 42 47 46 246

Callaway 0 1 2 1 5 2 11

Clark 0 3 1 0 2 1 7

Cole 10 33 24 19 19 17 122

Franklin 36 23 29 57 54 58 257

Gasconade 2 0 2 6 3 1 14

Howard 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Knox 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lewis 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lincoln 13 15 10 30 14 14 96

Macon 8 4 3 4 2 7 28

Marion 15 12 13 10 16 11 77

Monroe 2 1 0 2 8 1 14

Montgomery 0 1 0 2 2 6 11

Osage 0 0 2 0 0 0 2

Pike 2 1 0 2 12 3 20

Ralls 2 1 3 1 1 1 9

Randolph 1 9 10 16 23 15 74

Schuyler 0 2 0 1 0 1 4

Scotland 0 2 1 0 1 0 4

Shelby 2 6 2 2 0 0 12

St Charles 35 42 42 48 51 58 276

Warren 3 3 15 12 9 11 53

* Region Total * 183 217 229 272 282 267 1,450

Southeast Bollinger 5 0 3 2 3 1 14

Butler 1 4 1 0 1 16 23

Cape Girardeau 3 16 24 22 32 33 130

Carter 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Crawford 0 0 0 10 11 4 25

78Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 85: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 28.

Adoptions Finalized by Fiscal Year and Case Manager County

(FY 2020 Adoptions are Year to Date June 2020)

Total

FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 Adoptions

Southeast Dent 1 0 2 1 10 0 14

Dunklin 0 0 1 2 4 2 9

Howell 7 6 5 15 13 29 75

Iron 3 4 16 8 23 28 82

Jefferson 43 46 41 59 59 39 287

Madison 1 0 0 2 1 0 4

Maries 0 5 2 8 0 7 22

Mississippi 0 0 4 2 1 1 8

New Madrid 0 3 0 0 1 3 7

Oregon 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pemiscot 0 1 16 9 15 12 53

Perry 3 2 6 4 9 1 25

Phelps 9 16 17 9 18 17 86

Pulaski 13 24 14 19 16 22 108

Reynolds 0 0 5 4 4 0 13

Ripley 27 56 43 30 13 24 193

Scott 8 8 9 9 4 5 43

Shannon 0 0 1 0 0 8 9

St Francois 34 29 34 52 74 105 328

Ste Genevieve 1 0 1 0 0 0 2

Stoddard 18 17 24 31 35 19 144

Texas 8 10 21 3 10 3 55

Washington 0 1 1 2 1 0 5

Wayne 1 14 14 8 8 2 47

* Region Total * 186 262 305 311 366 381 1,811

Southwest Barry 2 1 0 0 3 4 10

Barton 16 3 2 9 8 5 43

Bates 0 1 0 8 4 4 17

Benton 1 0 2 0 0 0 3

Camden 1 0 0 2 0 8 11

Cedar 8 1 5 0 7 2 23

Christian 23 39 48 42 40 49 241

Dade 2 3 2 6 6 0 19

Dallas 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Douglas 2 0 0 0 0 2 4

Greene 84 133 136 117 137 91 698

Henry 13 14 9 20 8 10 74

Hickory 1 0 0 0 0 0 1

Jasper 73 68 55 62 57 35 350

Laclede 43 29 45 59 59 13 248

Lawrence 2 6 11 4 5 13 41

McDonald 0 3 2 0 0 0 5

Miller 0 0 0 0 2 1 3

Moniteau 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Morgan 0 0 0 0 0 7 7

Newton 46 57 34 28 37 33 235

Ozark 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Polk 0 0 1 1 0 7 9

St Clair 0 0 1 0 2 2 5

Stone 36 43 41 39 36 11 206

Taney 16 20 25 29 22 26 138

Vernon 6 0 11 3 8 4 32

Webster 23 38 58 57 32 39 247

Wright 10 34 11 9 27 23 114

* Region Total * 408 493 499 495 500 390 2,785

Kansas City Jackson 241 274 241 281 296 258 1,591

* Region Total * 241 274 241 281 296 258 1,591

St. Louis St Louis City 71 57 40 55 48 49 320

St Louis County 77 82 89 105 117 116 586

* Region Total * 148 139 129 160 165 165 906

Other Icama 5 1 1 2 1 0 10

* Region Total * 5 1 1 2 1 0 10

State Total 1,316 1,536 1,602 1,748 1,826 1,652 9,680

79Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 86: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 16.

Children (Re)Entering Children's Division Custody

During June 2020

Total Entries Total Re Entries

13,000

13,200

13,400

13,600

13,800

14,000

14,200

14,400

14,600

14,800

15,000

Jun

-18

Jul-

18

Au

g-1

8

Sep

-18

Oct

-18

No

v-1

8

De

c-1

8

Jan

-19

Feb

-19

Mar

-19

Ap

r-1

9

May

-19

Jun

-19

Jul-

19

Au

g-1

9

Sep

-19

Oct

-19

No

v-1

9

De

c-1

9

Jan

-20

Feb

-20

Mar

-20

Ap

r-2

0

May

-20

Jun

-20

Figure 17.

Children Active in Children's Division Custody

on the Last day of the MonthJune 2018 Through June 2020

80Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 87: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Northwest Northeast Southeast Southwest Kansas City St. Louis

Figure 18.

Children Closing from Alternative Care During June 2020

by Reason for Case Closing and Region

Returned Home Other

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

Jun

-18

Jul-

18

Au

g-1

8

Sep

-18

Oct

-18

No

v-1

8

De

c-1

8

Jan

-19

Feb

-19

Mar

-19

Ap

r-1

9

May

-19

Jun

-19

Jul-

19

Au

g-1

9

Sep

-19

Oct

-19

No

v-1

9

De

c-1

9

Jan

-20

Feb

-20

Mar

-20

Ap

r-2

0

May

-20

Jun

-20

Figure 19.

Adoptions Finalized by Month

June 2018 Through June 2020

81Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 88: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

0 - 3 4 - 7 8 - 11 12 - 15 16 +

Figure 20.

Children in Children's Division Custody as of June 2020

by Age and Placement Category

Foster Home Other Relative Home Residential Care Adoptive Home

0

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

Jun

-16

Au

g-1

6

Oct

-16

De

c-1

6

Feb

-17

Ap

r-1

7

Jun

-17

Au

g-1

7

Oct

-17

De

c-1

7

Feb

-18

Ap

r-1

8

Jun

-18

Au

g-1

8

Oct

-18

De

c-1

8

Feb

-19

Ap

r-1

9

Jun

-19

Au

g-1

9

Oct

-19

De

c-1

9

Feb

-20

Ap

r-2

0

Jun

-20

Figure 21.

Children in Children's Division Custody

as of the Last Day of the MonthJune 2016 Through June 2020 by Placement Category

Foster Home Other Relative Home Residential Care Adoptive Home

82Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 89: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

20

15

-3

20

15

-4

20

16

-1

20

16

-2

20

16

-3

20

16

-4

20

17

-1

20

17

-2

20

17

-3

20

17

-4

20

18

-1

20

18

-2

20

18

-3

20

18

-4

20

19

-1

20

19

-2

20

19

-3

20

19

-4

20

20

-1

20

20

-2

Exit

s p

er

10

0 C

hild

ren

inFo

ste

r C

are

Po

pu

lati

on

Figure 22.

Children Exiting Children's Division Custody

by Quarter and Subsequent Disposition3rd Quarter 2015 Through 2nd Quarter 2020

Adoption Child Independence Other Legal Status Relative Home Other Closing Return Home

83Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 90: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report 84 Research and Data Analysis

Notes: Out-of-Home Placement Tables and Figures

Table 14.

• This table includes children entering Legal Status 1 for the first time.

• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH

Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

• Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Table 15.

• This table includes children re-entering Legal Status 1 who have had prior Out-of-Home Placements.

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH

Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

• Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May 19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Table 16.

• This data includes children (re)entering (entering and/or re-entering) Legal Status 1.

Table 17. and Table 18.

• Length of Stay is computed for the last continuous period in Legal Status 1 during the

month. Table values, for the length of stay, indicate the average number of months in custody.

Table 19.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

Page 91: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report 85 Research and Data Analysis

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP

Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG

Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

Entries Per Thousand population data is based upon the US 2010 census released on May

19, 2011 by The US Census Bureau, www.census.gov.

• Average age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Table 20.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

• Placement Types are:

ADF Adoption (by foster parent) ADO Adoption (by other)

ADR Adoption (by relative) CFP Career Foster Parent

CTO Non-Licensed/Court Ordered Placement DET Detention

FAH Foster Adoptive Home

FGB Behavioral Foster Family Group Home FGH Foster Family Group Home

FGM Medical Foster Family Group Home FHB Behavioral Foster Home

FHE Emergency Foster Home

FHM Medical Foster Home FHO Foster Home

ILA Independent Living Arrangement JHO Juvenile Court Home

KHB Kinship Behavioral Home

KHM Kinship Medical Home KHO Licensed Kinship Home

KHU Unlicensed Kinship Home LGS Legal Guardianship Subsidy

MMD Medical Facility MMF Mental Health Facility

MMH Mental Health Home

MMW Mental Health Medicaid Waiver RFA Residential Treatment Facility

RFP Residential Treatment Facility- Initial Placement - No Level RF2 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 2

RF3 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 3

RF4 Residential Treatment Facility- Level 4 RFE Residential Treatment Facility- Emergency

RFH Residential Foster Home RFI Residential Treatment Facility- Infant

RFM Residential Treatment Facility-Maternity RFT Residential Treatment Facility-Transitional/Aftercare

RHB Behavioral Relative Home

RHM Medical Relative Home

Page 92: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report 86 Research and Data Analysis

Table 20 (contd).

RHO Relative Home

RHU Unlicensed Relative Home RUN Runaway

SCH School

TLA Transitional Living Arrangement TLG Transitional Living Group

TLS Transitional Living Scattered Site

Table 21.

• This table includes children exiting Legal Status 1 only.

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP

Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

Table 22.

Table includes children closing from all legal status categories.

• Closing categories include the following closing reasons:

Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s), CYAC child, Returned Child to sending state)

Achieved Independence - Goal Achieved (Child Independence) Living with Other Relatives – Goal Achieved (Placement with a fit and willing relative)

Other Agency - Care and Custody with other Agency

Other - Married, Runaway, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated, Deceased, Guardianship and Other

Table 23.

• Legal Status 1, TPR (Termination of Parental Rights) Incomplete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and no completed TPR (TPR is not completed for the mother and the putative

and/or legal father).

• Legal Status 1, TPR Complete includes children with a Goal of 'AD' and TPR has been

completed (TPR is completed for the mother and the putative and/or legal father).

• Temporary Adoptive Custody includes Legal Status 2 children.

• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal

Status 5.

• No Identified Adoptive Resource includes Legal Status 1 children with a Goal of 'AD' and no

pre-adoptive placement marked.

Page 93: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report 87 Research and Data Analysis

Table 24.

• This table includes vendor types of – CF, FA, FG, FH, LA, RH, and KH.

• Existing vendor types RH and KH were added to this table in October 2015 and are shown

under the heading Relative Home.

• Newly Licensed Vendors includes vendors which are licensed during the month and have

either no previous license or one which ended more than five years ago.

• The categories “Current # of Licensed Vendors” and “Licensed Vendors Twelve Months Ago” represent unduplicated vendor counts.

Table 25.

• Legal Status Definitions: LS 1 - Care and custody with Children’s Division (includes temporary custody)

LS 2 - Temporary custody with adoptive parents

LS 3 - Supervision only by Children’s Division LS 4 - Care and custody with juvenile court/other agency

LS 5 - Final custody awarded to adoptive parents LS 7 - CYAC Child (Children of Youth in Alternative Care)

LS 8 - Chafee Independent Living Program LS 9 - Subsidized Guardianship

LS V – Voluntary Placement Agreement

Table 26.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

• Goals are: 01 - Return child to parent(s)/caretaker(s)

AD - Adoption 05 - CYAC Child

06 - Child Independence/Independent Living

07 - Guardianship 08 - Live with Other Relatives

09 - Case Plan Goal Not Yet Established / Missing

Table 27.

• This table includes children in Legal Status 1 only.

• Table values are children active at the end of the month categorized by the number of

placements experienced in their most recent stay in Legal Status 1.

• The number of placements represents the movement of children among distinct vendors.

• Short term temporary settings are not counted when the child returns to the previous

vendor.

Page 94: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report 88 Research and Data Analysis

Table 28.

• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children

are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal Status 5.

Figure 18.

• Closing categories includes the following closing reasons: Returned Home - Goal Achieved (Returned child to parent(s)

Other - Achieved Independence, Living with other Relatives, Other Agency , Married, Runaway, Returned Child to Sending State, Adoption, Adoption Subsidy Terminated,

Deceased, Children of Youth in Alternative Care (CYAC) Child and Other.

Figure 19.

• Finalized Adoptions includes children entering Legal Status 5 during the month. Children

are counted as adopted only if they were in Legal Status 1 prior to their entry into Legal

Status 5.

Figure 20.

• Placement categories include the following placement types: Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH

Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP

Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG

Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

• Age is calculated as of the last day of the month.

Figure 21.

• Placement categories include the following placement types:

Adoptive Home - ADF, ADR, ADO and FAH

Foster Homes - FHO, FHB, FHE, FHM, FGH, FGB, FGM and CFP Relative Home – KHU, KHO, KHM, KHB, RHO, RHB, RHM, RHU and LGS

Residential Care – RFA, RFP, RF2, RF3, RF4, RFE, RFH, RFM, RFI, RFT and TLG Other - JHO, CTO, ILA, MMD, MMF, MMH, MMW, DET, RUN, SCH, TLA, TLS and Other

Page 95: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Intensive In-Home Services

Page 96: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 29.

Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During June 2020

Grouped by Referral County

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clinton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Lafayette 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Linn 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Livingston 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pettis 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 14 87.50% 2 12.50% 16

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Audrain 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Boone 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clark 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Cole 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Franklin 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Lincoln 0 0.00% 1 25.00% 3 75.00% 4

Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Marion 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Warren 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 1 3.33% 19 63.33% 10 33.33% 30

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 100.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 1 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

for Screening

Referrals Accepted

Accepted

Referrals

Accepted

Referrals Not

90

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 97: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 29.

Families Referred to Intensive In-Home Services During June 2020

Grouped by Referral County

Total

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Referrals

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Jefferson 0 0.00% 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 4

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Pulaski 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Reynolds 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scott 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 0 0.00% 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 3

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

Stoddard 0 0.00% 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 3

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Wayne 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 1 3.23% 20 64.52% 10 32.26% 31

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Camden 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 0 0.00% 4 36.36% 7 63.64% 11

Henry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 0 0.00% 8 72.73% 3 27.27% 11

Laclede 0 0.00% 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 4

Lawrence 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

McDonald 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Miller 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 3

Ozark 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Polk 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 1

Taney 0 0.00% 2 50.00% 2 50.00% 4

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 2

Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

* Region Total * 1 1.85% 33 61.11% 20 37.04% 54

Kansas City Jackson 6 33.33% 12 66.67% 0 0.00% 18

* Region Total * 6 33.33% 12 66.67% 0 0.00% 18

St. Louis St Louis City 2 18.18% 5 45.45% 4 36.36% 11

St Louis County 3 17.65% 8 47.06% 6 35.29% 17

* Region Total * 5 17.86% 13 46.43% 10 35.71% 28

State Total 14 7.91% 111 62.71% 52 29.38% 177

Referrals Accepted Referrals Referrals Not

for Screening Accepted Accepted

91

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 98: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 30.

Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During June 2020

Grouped by Household County

Families Children Average # At-Risk Average # At-Risk

Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family

Northwest Andrew 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Atchison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Buchanan 2 3 1.50 3 1.50

Caldwell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Carroll 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Cass 2 4 2.00 4 2.00

Chariton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Clay 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Clinton 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

Cooper 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Daviess 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

De Kalb 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Gentry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Grundy 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Harrison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Holt 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Johnson 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Lafayette 1 5 5.00 1 1.00

Linn 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Livingston 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Mercer 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Nodaway 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Pettis 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Platte 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Putnam 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Ray 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Saline 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Sullivan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Worth 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

* Region Total * 11 22 2.00 16 1.45

Northeast Adair 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Audrain 3 6 2.00 5 1.67

Boone 3 10 3.33 7 2.33

Callaway 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Clark 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Cole 2 7 3.50 6 3.00

Franklin 2 3 1.50 2 1.00

Gasconade 1 4 4.00 1 1.00

Howard 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Knox 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Lewis 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Lincoln 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Macon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Marion 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Monroe 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Montgomery 1 2 2.00 1 1.00

Osage 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Pike 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Ralls 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Randolph 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Schuyler 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Scotland 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Shelby 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

St Charles 4 11 2.75 10 2.50

Warren 1 2 2.00 1 1.00

* Region Total * 20 52 2.60 40 2.00

Southeast Bollinger 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Butler 3 15 5.00 9 3.00

Cape Girardeau 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Carter 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

92

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 99: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 30.

Families and Children Accepted Into Intensive In-Home Services During June 2020

Grouped by Household County

Families Children Average # of At-Risk Average # of At-Risk

Accepted Accepted Children per Family Children Accepted Children per Family

Southeast Crawford 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Dent 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Dunklin 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Howell 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Iron 1 2 2.00 1 1.00

Jefferson 4 14 3.50 10 2.50

Madison 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Maries 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Mississippi 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

New Madrid 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Oregon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Pemiscot 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Perry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Phelps 2 4 2.00 3 1.50

Pulaski 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Reynolds 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Ripley 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Scott 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Shannon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

St Francois 2 5 2.50 3 1.50

Ste Genevieve 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Stoddard 3 9 3.00 9 3.00

Texas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Washington 2 3 1.50 2 1.00

Wayne 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

* Region Total * 21 57 2.71 42 2.00

Southwest Barry 1 4 4.00 1 1.00

Barton 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Bates 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Benton 2 2 1.00 2 1.00

Camden 1 3 3.00 3 3.00

Cedar 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Christian 1 7 7.00 1 1.00

Dade 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Dallas 1 2 2.00 2 2.00

Douglas 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Greene 3 5 1.67 5 1.67

Henry 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Hickory 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Jasper 7 12 1.71 12 1.71

Laclede 3 7 2.33 7 2.33

Lawrence 2 7 3.50 3 1.50

McDonald 2 8 4.00 4 2.00

Miller 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Moniteau 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Morgan 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Newton 1 1 1.00 1 1.00

Ozark 1 5 5.00 5 5.00

Polk 1 3 3.00 1 1.00

St Clair 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Stone 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Taney 2 3 1.50 3 1.50

Vernon 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

Webster 1 2 2.00 1 1.00

Wright 0 0 0.00 0 0.00

* Region Total * 29 71 2.45 51 1.76

Kansas City Jackson 12 20 1.67 19 1.58

* Region Total * 12 20 1.67 19 1.58

St. Louis St Louis City 6 16 2.67 12 2.00

St Louis County 12 27 2.25 21 1.75

* Region Total * 18 43 2.39 33 1.83

State Total 111 265 2.39 201 1.81

93

Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 100: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 31.

Exit Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During June 2020

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clinton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cooper 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 5 71.43% 2 28.57% 0 0.00% 7

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Audrain 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Boone 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Callaway 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 1 33.33% 3

Franklin 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Macon 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ralls 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Warren 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

* Region Total * 17 80.95% 3 14.29% 1 4.76% 21

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Family Intact Family Not Intact Other

94Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 101: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 31.

Exit Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During June 2020

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 5 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 5

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 11 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 11

Southwest Barry 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Camden 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cedar 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Christian 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Laclede 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Lawrence 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Newton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 2

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 17 73.91% 4 17.39% 2 8.70% 23

Kansas City Jackson 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

* Region Total * 4 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 4

St. Louis St Louis City 3 50.00% 3 50.00% 0 0.00% 6

St Louis County 5 83.33% 1 16.67% 0 0.00% 6

* Region Total * 8 66.67% 4 33.33% 0 0.00% 12

State Total 62 79.49% 13 16.67% 3 3.85% 78

Family Not Intact Family Intact Other

95Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 102: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 32.

Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During December 2019

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Clinton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 3 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 3

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Boone 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Callaway 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Marion 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Osage 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ralls 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Randolph 0 0.00% 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 2

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 2 66.67% 1 33.33% 0 0.00% 3

Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 7 53.85% 6 46.15% 0 0.00% 13

Southeast Bollinger 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Butler 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Other Family Intact Family Not Intact

96Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 103: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 32.

Six Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During December 2019

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 6 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 6

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pulaski 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 9 75.00% 3 25.00% 0 0.00% 12

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Barton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Camden 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cedar 2 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2

Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dade 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Dallas 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 1 50.00% 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 2

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 1 33.33% 2 66.67% 0 0.00% 3

Laclede 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wright 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

* Region Total * 13 76.47% 3 17.65% 1 5.88% 17

Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Louis County 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

State Total 32 71.11% 12 26.67% 1 2.22% 45

Other Family Intact Family Not Intact

97Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 104: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 33.

Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During June 2019

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Northwest Andrew 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Atchison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Buchanan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Caldwell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carroll 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cass 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Chariton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clay 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clinton 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Cooper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Daviess 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

De Kalb 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gentry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Grundy 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Harrison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Holt 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Johnson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lafayette 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Linn 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Livingston 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mercer 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Nodaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pettis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Platte 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Putnam 1 50.00% 0 0.00% 1 50.00% 2

Ray 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Saline 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Sullivan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Worth 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 1 33.33% 3

Northeast Adair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Audrain 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Boone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Callaway 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Clark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cole 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Franklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Gasconade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Knox 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lewis 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Lincoln 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Macon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Marion 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Monroe 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Montgomery 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Osage 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pike 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ralls 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Randolph 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Schuyler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scotland 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shelby 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Charles 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Warren 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Southeast Bollinger 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Butler 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Cape Girardeau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Carter 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Other Family Intact Family Not Intact

98Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 105: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Table 33.

Twelve Month Follow-Up Status of Families Exiting

Intensive In-Home Services During June 2019

Families

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Exiting

Southeast Crawford 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dent 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dunklin 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Howell 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Iron 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jefferson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Madison 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Maries 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Mississippi 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

New Madrid 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Oregon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Pemiscot 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Perry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Phelps 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Pulaski 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Reynolds 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ripley 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Scott 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Shannon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Francois 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ste Genevieve 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stoddard 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Texas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Washington 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Wayne 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

Southwest Barry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Barton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Bates 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Benton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Camden 3 75.00% 1 25.00% 0 0.00% 4

Cedar 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Christian 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dade 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Dallas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Douglas 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Greene 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Henry 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Hickory 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Jasper 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Laclede 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Lawrence 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

McDonald 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Miller 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Moniteau 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Morgan 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Newton 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Ozark 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Polk 0 0.00% 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 1

St Clair 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Stone 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Taney 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Vernon 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Webster 1 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1

Wright 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 6 75.00% 2 25.00% 0 0.00% 8

Kansas City Jackson 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St. Louis St Louis City 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

St Louis County 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

* Region Total * 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

State Total 7 58.33% 4 33.33% 1 8.33% 12

Other Family Intact Family Not Intact

99Children's Services Management Report

Research and Data Analysis

Page 106: Children's Services Management Report...Children’s Services Management Report I Research and Data Analysis State of Missouri Department of Social Services Mission Statement: “We

Children’s Services Management Report 100 Research and Data Analysis

Notes: Intensive In-Home Services Tables

Table 31., Table 32., and Table 33.

• Tables include only those families with an exit date during the month in question

and an exit status which is not missing.

• Exit status includes the following status codes:

Family Intact

10 Family Intact

Family Not Intact

12 Child Ran Away 13 Child Moved out of Home (not placed)

14 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (not Court Ordered) 15 Child Living with Relative or Guardian (Court Ordered)

16 In Foster Home or Group Home

17 In Residential 18 With DYS (Division of Youth Services)

19 In Juvenile Justice 20 In In-Patient Psychiatric

Other

11 Can't Locate Family

21 Information Not Available 99 Other

Table 32. and Table 33.

Tables include only those families which responded to follow-up requests. These do not

equal the numbers for Table 31. for the corresponding table six or twelve months prior.