characterisation of chemical waste from illegal...

1
Introduction 1 Methods 2 Conclusion 5 Results 4 Synthesis 3 0.4 +/-0.12 17.7 +/-0.48 1.3 +/-0.14 7.3 +/-0.21 18.3 +/-0.42 0 5 10 15 20 APAAN N-FA 4M5PP BMK AMP conc. [g/L] Saturation concentrations in water Characterisation of chemical waste from illegal amphetamine synthesis to support forensic assessment of clandestine drug laboratories Frank M. Hauser 1,2 ; Thorsten Rößler 1 ; Diana Weigel 1 ; Ralf Zimmermann 2 ; Michael Pütz 1 1 KT 45 - Toxicology, Bundeskriminalamt, Wiesbaden, Germany 2 Institute of Chemistry, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany Waste was diluted up to 1:50000 Simultaneous separation of anions and cations was performed from both capillary ends External calibration with mixed anion/cation standard was used for quantification Separation buffer was made of 8mM L-histidine and 2.8mM 2-hydroxyisobutyric acid at pH 4.25 Contactless conductivity measurement (C4D) was used for detection 1.3 million (1%) young adults (15 - 34) have used amphetamine-type-stimulants in Europe during 2015. [1] Clandestine production of amphetamine takes place mainly in Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland and the Baltic States but also in Germany. [1] 6.7 tonnes of amphetamine were seized in the EU (2013) and more than half of it was accounted by Germany, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. [1] One of the most common synthesis approaches for amphetamine is the Leuckart method. Large quantities of potentially hazardous chemicals like solvents, acids and bases are used for this synthesis. Aqueous synthesis waste is often disposed into the environment or the sewage system. This disposal can have serious environmental impacts [2] but can also aid forensic investigations. In order to use waste discharges for scale and frequency estimation of a production during a forensic investigation, it is important to characterise it first. 1. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. European drug report 2015. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2015. 2. Pal R, Megharaj M, Kirkbride KP, Naidu R. Illicit drugs and the environment - a review. The Science of the total environment. 2013; 463-464: 107992 Aims Controlled amphetamine synthesis and characterisation of aqueous waste Measurement of pH and conductivity Determination of key compounds in synthesis waste using SPE and GC/MS Determination of solubility of key compounds in pure water using HPLC/DAD Quantification of ions in aqueous synthesis waste using CE/C4D conditioning MeOH/H 2 O 3 mL sample 1:2 diluted washing H 2 O drying vacuum elution 2 mL MeOH Aqueous waste samples were taken after each step of an amphetamine synthesis SPE sample preparation was performed using Oasis HLB cartridges as shown above 1 μL of methanolic extract was directly injected into GC system without dilution GC runtime was 34 minutes with a temperature gradient from 65 300 °C Mass spectra were used to identify key compounds which show a high intensity and cover the whole synthesis procedure Five key compounds were identified and references of them were either bought or synthesised Deionised water was saturated with these compounds by adding a small amount to a vial with water Three replicates were prepared and analysed using a HPLC-DAD method Mobile phase was a mixture of ammonium formate buffer (pH 6.8) and acetonitrile Using an external calibration the solubility of the key compounds was calculated N CH 3 O CH 3 O CH 3 NH 3 + O CH 3 N H Cl - CH 3 NH 2 CH 3 NH 3 + 2 SO 4 2- T, H + , H 2 O -NH 3 , -CO 2 H 2 SO 4 HCl -HCOOH HCONH 2 , HCOOH -CO 2 , -H 2 O NaOH -NaCl, -H 2 O 1 2 3 4 APAAN is converted to BMK under acidic conditions. BMK then undergoes the Leuckart reaction. The formed amphetamine base is finally precipitated as sulphate. Steps where waste was collected are numbered from 1 4. Physical parameters were determined using pH and conductivity electrodes Parameters were measured directly in undiluted waste samples after collection GC/MS HPLC/DAD CE/C4D pH/cond. Controlled amphetamine synthesis following the Leuckart route was conducted pH and conductivity measurements were performed showing highly conductive and strongly alkaline or acidic behaviour Aqueous waste samples were prepared by SPE and methanolic extracts were measured directly by GC/MS Key compounds were: benzyl methyl ketone, a- phenylacetoacetonitrile, N-formylamphetamine, amphetamine and 4-methyl-5-phenylpyrimidine Solubilities of key compounds using a HPLC/DAD method were found to be between <1 and 18 g/L Ions found were ammonium, sulphate, chloride, sodium and formate with concentrations from 0.03 - 6.2 mol/L Results could be used to support forensic investigations in case aqueous synthesis waste is available as evidence SPE a-phenylacetocetonitrile benzyl methyl ketone N-formyl- amphetamine amphetamine This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 653626. The contents of the poster are the sole responsibility of the authors. chloride sulphate ammonium sodium zinc formate 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 0.2 0.7 1.2 1.7 2.2 2.7 signal [mV] time [min] Electropherogram 100 μM standard AMP BMK APAAN 4M5PP 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 time [min] GC/MS chromatogram of waste sample 3 Waste 1 Waste 2 Waste 3 Waste 4 BMK; APAAN N-FA; 4M5PP Benzylnitrile AMP; BMK APAAN; 4M5PP BMK; 4M5PP APAAN SO 4 2- [6.2] Na + [4.9] NH 4 + [2.3] HCOO - [5.0] Cl - [3.6] Na + [5.8] NH 4 + [1.1] HCOO - [1.9] Cl - [0.06] SO 4 2- [0.07] HCOO - [0.03] > 200 35 - 60 35 - 130 - pH < 1 10 - 12 12 - 14 4 - 6 Saturated concentrations in deionised water ranged from <1 up to 18 g/L Calibration was performed from 0.1 20 g/L Absorbance of APAAN was too high and only lower concentrations were used (0.1 1 g/L) Calibration curves showed squared correlation coefficients of >0.998 (except APAAN) Values will be used as starting point for the quantification utilising real waste samples and the standard addition approach Key compounds were benzyl methyl ketone (BMK), a-phenylacetoacetonitrile (APAAN), N- formylamphetamine (N-FA), amphetamine (AMP) and 4-methyl-5-phenylpyrimidine (4M5PP) These five compounds were chosen because they either showed a high signal intensity and /or were present in wastes from different steps (see table below) BMK and AMP were difficult to separate but mass spectra allowed for differentiation Identification of peaks was done by comparing the mass spectra with our database Ion concentrations ranged from 0.03 6.2 M Calibration was performed from 10 300 μM Correlation coefficients were above 0.999 Total analysis time is 7.5 min including a capillary washing step before each run Method could be used to quickly differentiate between wastes from different synthesis steps (see table below) and get information about the synthesis process Co-funded by the Organic compounds (main signal) Ions [conc. in mol/L] Conductivity [mS/cm]

Upload: vanduong

Post on 11-Feb-2018

232 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Characterisation of chemical waste from illegal ...micromole.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/WP3-BKA... · Controlled amphetamine synthesis following the ... Ions found were ammonium,

Introduction 1

Methods 2

Conclusion 5

Results 4

Synthesis 3

0.4 +/-0.12

17.7 +/-0.48

1.3 +/-0.14

7.3 +/-0.21

18.3 +/-0.42

0

5

10

15

20

APAAN N-FA 4M5PP BMK AMP

con

c. [

g/L

]

Saturation concentrations in water

Characterisation of chemical waste from illegal

amphetamine synthesis to support forensic

assessment of clandestine drug laboratories

Frank M. Hauser1,2; Thorsten Rößler1; Diana

Weigel1; Ralf Zimmermann2; Michael Pütz1

1 KT 45 - Toxicology, Bundeskriminalamt, Wiesbaden, Germany 2 Institute of Chemistry, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany

Waste was diluted up to 1:50000

Simultaneous separation of anions and cations

was performed from both capillary ends

External calibration with mixed anion/cation

standard was used for quantification

Separation buffer was made of 8mM L-histidine

and 2.8mM 2-hydroxyisobutyric acid at pH 4.25

Contactless conductivity measurement (C4D) was used for detection

1.3 million (1%) young adults (15 - 34) have used

amphetamine-type-stimulants in Europe during 2015.[1]

Clandestine production of amphetamine takes place mainly in

Belgium, the Netherlands, Poland and the Baltic States but also

in Germany.[1]

6.7 tonnes of amphetamine were seized in the EU (2013) and

more than half of it was accounted by Germany, the United

Kingdom and the Netherlands.[1] One of the most common

synthesis approaches for amphetamine is the Leuckart method.

Large quantities of potentially hazardous chemicals like

solvents, acids and bases are used for this synthesis. Aqueous

synthesis waste is often disposed into the environment or the

sewage system. This disposal can have serious environmental

impacts [2] but can also aid forensic investigations. In order to

use waste discharges for scale and frequency estimation of a

production during a forensic investigation, it is important to

characterise it first.

1. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. European drug report 2015.

Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2015.

2. Pal R, Megharaj M, Kirkbride KP, Naidu R. Illicit drugs and the environment -

a review. The Science of the total environment. 2013; 463-464: 1079–92

Aims

Controlled amphetamine synthesis

and characterisation of aqueous waste

Measurement of pH and conductivity

Determination of key compounds in

synthesis waste using SPE and GC/MS

Determination of solubility of key

compounds in pure water using

HPLC/DAD

Quantification of ions in aqueous

synthesis waste using CE/C4D

conditioning MeOH/H2O

3 mL sample 1:2 diluted

washing H2O

drying vacuum

elution 2 mL MeOH

Aqueous waste samples were taken after each step of an amphetamine synthesis

SPE sample preparation was performed using Oasis HLB cartridges as shown above

1 µL of methanolic extract was directly injected into GC system without dilution

GC runtime was 34 minutes with a temperature gradient from 65 – 300 °C

Mass spectra were used to identify key compounds which show a high intensity and cover the

whole synthesis procedure

Five key compounds were identified and references of them were either bought or synthesised

Deionised water was saturated with these compounds by adding a small amount to a vial with water

Three replicates were prepared and analysed using a HPLC-DAD method

Mobile phase was a mixture of ammonium formate buffer (pH 6.8) and acetonitrile

Using an external calibration the solubility of the key compounds was calculated

N

CH3

O

CH3

O

CH3

NH3

+

O

CH3

NH

Cl-

CH3

NH2

CH3

NH3

+

2

SO4

2-

T, H+, H2O

-NH3, -CO2

H2SO4

HCl -HCOOH

HCONH2, HCOOH

-CO2, -H2O

NaOH

-NaCl, -H2O

1 2

3 4

APAAN is converted to BMK under acidic conditions. BMK then undergoes the Leuckart reaction.

The formed amphetamine base is finally precipitated as sulphate. Steps where waste was collected are

numbered from 1 – 4.

Physical parameters were determined using pH and conductivity electrodes

Parameters were measured directly in undiluted waste samples after collection

GC

/MS

HP

LC/D

AD

C

E/C

4D

p

H/c

on

d.

Controlled amphetamine synthesis following the

Leuckart route was conducted

pH and conductivity measurements were performed

showing highly conductive and strongly alkaline or acidic

behaviour

Aqueous waste samples were prepared by SPE and

methanolic extracts were measured directly by GC/MS

Key compounds were: benzyl methyl ketone, a-

phenylacetoacetonitrile, N-formylamphetamine,

amphetamine and 4-methyl-5-phenylpyrimidine

Solubilities of key compounds using a HPLC/DAD method

were found to be between <1 and 18 g/L

Ions found were ammonium, sulphate, chloride, sodium

and formate with concentrations from 0.03 - 6.2 mol/L

Results could be used to support forensic investigations

in case aqueous synthesis waste is available as evidence

SPE

a-phenylacetocetonitrile

benzyl methyl ketone N-formyl-

amphetamine

amphetamine

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon

2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No

653626. The contents of the poster are the sole responsibility of the

authors.

chlo

rid

e

sulp

hat

e

amm

on

ium

sod

ium

zin

c

form

ate

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

0.2 0.7 1.2 1.7 2.2 2.7

sign

al [

mV

]

time [min]

Electropherogram 100 µM standard

AMP

BMK

APAAN 4M5PP

15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 time [min]

GC/MS chromatogram of waste sample 3

Waste 1 Waste 2 Waste 3 Waste 4

BMK; APAAN N-FA; 4M5PP

Benzylnitrile

AMP; BMK

APAAN; 4M5PP

BMK; 4M5PP

APAAN

SO42- [6.2]

Na+ [4.9]

NH4+ [2.3]

HCOO- [5.0]

Cl- [3.6]

Na+ [5.8]

NH4+ [1.1]

HCOO- [1.9]

Cl- [0.06]

SO42- [0.07]

HCOO- [0.03]

> 200 35 - 60 35 - 130 -

pH < 1 10 - 12 12 - 14 4 - 6

Saturated concentrations in deionised

water ranged from <1 up to 18 g/L

Calibration was performed from 0.1 – 20

g/L

Absorbance of APAAN was too high and only

lower concentrations were used (0.1 – 1 g/L)

Calibration curves showed squared correlation

coefficients of >0.998 (except APAAN)

Values will be used as starting point for the

quantification utilising real waste samples and the

standard addition approach

Key compounds were benzyl methyl ketone (BMK), a-phenylacetoacetonitrile (APAAN), N-

formylamphetamine (N-FA), amphetamine (AMP) and 4-methyl-5-phenylpyrimidine (4M5PP)

These five compounds were chosen because they either showed a high signal intensity and /or

were present in wastes from different steps (see table below)

BMK and AMP were difficult to separate but mass spectra allowed for differentiation

Identification of peaks was done by comparing the mass spectra with our database

Ion concentrations ranged from 0.03 – 6.2 M

Calibration was performed from 10 – 300 µM

Correlation coefficients were above 0.999

Total analysis time is 7.5 min including a capillary

washing step before each run

Method could be used to quickly differentiate

between wastes from different synthesis steps (see

table below) and get information about the synthesis

process

Co-funded by the

Organic compounds

(main signal)

Ions

[conc. in mol/L]

Conductivity [mS/cm]