chapter 12a/25 microeconomics
DESCRIPTION
Chapter 12A/25 Microeconomics. Monopolistic Competition Prof. Charles Fusi. Introduction. Why do so many rock bands today adopt names that involve odd combinations of everyday words? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
12A/25-1
Monopolistic Competition
Prof. Charles Fusi
Chapter 12A/25 Microeconomics
12A/25-2
Introduction
Why do so many rock bands today adopt names that involve odd combinations of everyday words?
After all, what you care about is the quality of a band’s songs, its style, and the musical talents of the band members.
To find out the answer to this question, you must learn about the market structure in which today’s rock bands interact, known as monopolistic competition.
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-3
Learning Objectives
Discuss the key characteristics of a monopolistically competitive industry
Contrast the output and pricing decisions of monopolistically competitive firms with those of perfectly competitive firms
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-4
Learning Objectives (cont'd)
Explain why brand names and advertising are important features of monopolistically competitive industries
Describe the fundamental properties of information products and evaluate how the prices of these products are determined under monopolistic competition
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-5
Chapter Outline
Monopolistic CompetitionPrice and Output for the Monopolistic
CompetitorComparing Perfect Competition with
Monopolistic Competition Brand Names and AdvertisingInformation Products and Monopolistic
Competition
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-6
Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Two separately developed models of monopolistic competition resulted
At Harvard, Edward Chamberlin published Theory of Monopolistic Competition in 1933
That same year, Joan Robinson of Cambridge published The Economics of Imperfect Competition
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-7
Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Monopolistic Competition
A market situation in which a large number of firms produce similar but not identical products
Entry into the industry is relatively easy
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-8
Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Characteristics of monopolistic competition
1. Significant numbers of sellers in a highly competitive market
2. Differentiated products
3. Sales promotion and advertising
4. Easy entry of new firms in the long run
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-9
Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Implications of the large number of firms
1. Small market share
2. Lack of collusion
3. Independence
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-10
Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Product Differentiation
The distinguishing of products by brand name, color, and other minor attributes.
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-11
Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Product differentiation and price
The firm has some control over the price it charges
Unlike a perfect competitor, it faces a downward sloping demand curve
Consider the abundance of brand names for many productsThe more successful the firm is at
differentiation, the more control it has over price
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-12
Example: Is Punxsutawny Phil Hogging Too Much Attention?
Since 1887, Punxsutawny Phil, the groundhog residing in the Pennsylvania town of that name, has been used to predict the weather on February 2—the official Groundhog Day.
Today, there are at least 17 “groundhog lodges” in Pennsylvania and nearby states, each of which promotes its own groundhog’s weather-forecasting talents in an effort to attract tourists to their communities.
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-13
Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
What do you think about advertising?
Would a perfect competitor have any incentive to advertise?
Why would a monopolistically competitive firm advertise?
Can advertising lead to efficiency?
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-14
Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Sales promotion and advertising
Can increase demand for a firm
Can differentiate a firm’s product
Can result in increased profits
12A/25-15
Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Question
How much advertising should be undertaken?
Answer
It should be carried to the point at which the additional revenue from one more dollar of advertising just equals that one dollar of additional cost
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-16
Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Ease of entry
For any current monopolistic competitor, potential competition is always lurking in the background
The easier—that is, the less costly—entry is, the more a current competitor must worry about losing business
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-17
Price and Output for the Monopolistic Competitor
The individual firm’s demand and cost curves
Demand curve slopes downward
Profit maximized where MC intersects MR from below
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-18
Price and Output for the Monopolistic Competitor (cont'd)
Short-run equilibrium
In the short run, it is possible for a monopolistic competitor to make economic profits—profits over and above the normal rate of return, or beyond what is necessary to keep that firm in the industry
Losses in the short run are clearly also possible
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-19
Price and Output for the Monopolistic Competitor (cont'd)
The long run: zero economic profits
The rate of return will tend toward normal
Economic profits will tend toward zeroSo many firms produce substitutes, any
economic profits will disappear with competition
Reduced to zero either through entry of new firms seeking to earn a higher rate or return, or by changes in product quality and advertising outlays by existing firms
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-20
Figure 12A/25-1 Short-Run and Long-Run Equilibrium with Monopolistic Competition, Panel (a)
• Price (P1) > ATC• Economic profit
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-21
Figure 12A/25-1 Short-Run and Long-Run Equilibrium with Monopolistic Competition, Panel (b)
•Price (P1) < ATC•Economic loss
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-22
Figure 12A/25-1 Short-Run and Long-Run Equilibrium with Monopolistic Competition, Panel (c)
•Price (P1) = ATC•Normal rate of return
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-23
Comparing Perfect Competition with Monopolistic Competition
QuestionIf both a monopolistic and perfect
competitor make zero economic profit in the long run, how are they different?
AnswerDemand curve for individual perfect
competitor is perfectly elastic
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-24
Figure 12A/25-2 Comparison of the Perfect Competitor with the Monopolistic Competitor
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-25
Comparing Perfect Competition with Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
In perfect competition, the long-run equilibrium occurs where average total cost is minimized (this does not occur in monopolistic competition)
Some have argued that this is not necessarily a waste of resources—as the added cost arises from product differentiation
Chamberlin argued it is rational for consumers to have a taste for differentiation; consumers willingly accept the resultant increased production costs in return for more choice and variety of output
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-26
Brand Names and Advertising
Because “differentness” has value for consumers, monopolistically competitive firms regard their brand names as valuable private (intellectual) property
Firms use trademarks, words, symbols, and logos to distinguish their product brands from goods or services sold by other firmsA successful brand image contributes to a
firm’s profitability
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-27
Brand Names and Advertising (cont'd)
Brand names and trademarks
A company’s value in the marketplace depends largely on current perceptions of future profitability
We can see it in the market value of the world’s most valuable product brands
Valuation depends on the market prices of shares of stock of a company times the number of shares traded
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-28
Table 12A/25-1 Values of the Top Ten Brands
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-29
Methods of Advertising
Direct MarketingAdvertising targeted at specific
consumers: e-mail, regular mail
Mass MarketingAdvertising intended to reach as many
customers as possible: radio, TV, newspaper
Interactive MarketingPermits consumer to follow up directly by
searching for more informationLecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-30
Figure 12A/25-3 Distribution of U.S. Advertising Expenses
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-31
Informational Versus Persuasive Advertising
Search GoodA product with characteristics that
enable an individual to evaluate the product’s quality in advance of a purchase
Experience GoodA product that an individual must
consume before the product’s quality can be established
Credence GoodA product with qualities that consumers
lack the expertise to assess without assistance
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-32
Brand Names and Advertising
Examples of search goods
Clothing and music evaluated prior to purchase
Examples of experience goods
Soft-drinks, restaurants, movies
Examples of credence goods
Health care, legal advice
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-33
Brand Names and Advertising (cont'd)
Informational Advertising
Advertising that emphasizes transmitting knowledge about the features of a product
Persuasive Advertising
Advertising that is intended to induce a consumer to purchase a particular product and discover a previously unknown taste for an item
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-34
Brand Names and Advertising (cont'd)
Advertising as a signaling behavior
Individual companies can explicitly engage in signaling behavior
They do so by establishing brand names or trademarks and promoting them
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-35
Why Not … outlaw persuasive advertising?
Because the purpose of persuasive advertising is more to attract consumers’ attention and less to provide product information, many people think that persuasive advertising offers no clear benefits to society at large.
A company’s persuasive ads may demonstrate that it intends to expand its customer base and thereby perpetuates its operations for years to come.
In this way, even persuasive advertising offers some information to consumers.
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-36
Information Products and Monopolistic Competition
Information products, such as computer operating systems, software, and digital music and videos, have a unique cost structure
Product development entails high fixed costs, but the marginal cost of producing a copy for one more customer is low
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-37
Information Products and Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Information Product
An item that is produced using information-intensive inputs at a relatively high fixed cost but distributed for sale at a relatively low marginal cost
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-38
Figure 12A/25-4 Cost Curves for a Producer of an Information Product
• TFC is $250,000• Producer sells 5,000 copies
AFC falls to $50 per copy• What is AFC if producer sells
50,000 copies?
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-39
Information Products and Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Short-Run Economies of Operation
A distinguishing characteristic of an information product arising from declining short-run average total cost as more units of the product are sold
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-40
Information Products and Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Consider how computer game manufacturers operate in a monopolistically competitive market.
In monopolistic competition, marginal cost pricing results in losses for the firm, even though it creates efficiencies for the economy as a whole.
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-41
Information Products and Monopolistic Competition (cont'd)
Providing an information product entails incurring relatively high fixed costs, but a relatively low per-unit cost for additional units of output
The ATC for a firm that sells an information product slopes downward, meaning the firm experiences short-run economies of operation
In a long-run monopolistically competitive equilibrium, price adjusts to equal ATC; the firm earns sufficient revenues to cover total costs, including the opportunity cost of capital
Consumers thereby pay the lowest price necessary to induce sellers to provide the item
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-42
Figure 12A/25-5 The Infeasibility of Marginal Cost Pricing of an Information Product
Firm cannot behave as if it were a perfect competitor setting price at $2.50
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-43
You Are There: Stimulating Candy Sales by Adding Caffeine
Vroom Foods differentiates its “energy candy” products—Buzz Bites and Foosh Energy Mints—as “the most caffeinated products out there.”
Vroom’s competitors in the energy candy market include Crackheads, Extreme Sport Beans, Ice Breakers Energy Mints, and Snicker Charged candy bars.
In addition to including caffeine, Vroom is increasingly seeking to differentiate its energy candy products from the products of its competitors.
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-44
Issues & Applications: Finding a Band NameBetween ABBA and ZZ Top
The industry or rock music is monopolistically competitive as most bands seek to differentiate themselves by writing their own novel songs, and developing their own styles.
Another key product characteristic is a band’s name, as evidenced by names such as the Beatles, Grateful Dead, Led Zeppelin, Metallica, and Pink Floyd.
Thus, one of the first agenda items for a band after its formation is to find a unique name and obtain a legal trademark for it.
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-45
Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives
Key characteristics of a monopolistically competitive industry
Large number of small firms
Differentiated products
Easy entry and exit
Advertising and sales promotion
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-46
Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives (cont'd)
Contrasting the output and pricing decisions of monopolistically competitive firms with those of perfectly competitive firms
Monopolistically competitive firm in short runProduces output to point MR = MC in short
runPrice set on demand curve, can be less than
MC and ATC in short run, firm earns economic profits
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-47
Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives (cont'd)
Contrasting the output and pricing decisions of monopolistically competitive firms with those of perfectly competitive firms
Monopolistically competitive firm in the long runPrice = ATC in the long run as firms enter
industryLike perfectly competitive firms, earns zero
economic profits in long runPrice exceeds MC in long run
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi
12A/25-48
Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives (cont'd)
Monopolistically competitive firms attempt to boost demand for their products through product differentiation
They engage heavily in advertising and marketing
Providing an information product entails incurring relatively high fixed costs but low marginal costs
In the long run equilibrium, price adjusts to equality with average total cost
Lecture by Prof. Charles Fusi