challenges and solutions kaare press-kristensen senior adviser, air quality the danish ecological...
TRANSCRIPT
- Slide 1
- Challenges and solutions Kaare Press-Kristensen Senior adviser, air quality The Danish Ecological Council [email protected]@env.dtu.dk / (+45) 22 81 10 27
- Slide 2
- The engineer approach 1) Identify the air quality challenges. 2) Identify and quantify pollution sources. 3) Find the most cost-efficient reductions.
- Slide 3
- Air quality challenges Legal challenges: NO 2 (PM 10 until 2008). Health challenges: PM 2.5 (to a minor degree NO 2 and PM 10 ). Ultrafine soot particles (PM 0.1, BC or EC).
- Slide 4
- Identify pollution sources H.C. Andersen Boulevard in central Copenhagen. 51,000 vehicles (week day) and 4.7 % HDV.
- Slide 5
- Quantify pollution sources
- Slide 6
- Cost efficient reductions New Low emission zone (LEZ) requiring: 1) Closed particulate filters on diesel vehicles. 2) City-SCR (or similar) for all heavy duty vehicles. 3) Light vehicles must be newer than Euro 3. Congestion charge (CC) or satellite-based road pricing
- Slide 7
- Potentials of new LEZ and CC Copenhagen can fulfill all air quality limits just by implementing a stricter LEZ and get far below the limits values by further implementing congestion charge (CC).
- Slide 8
- Effects of the present LEZ 2008: Closed filters at HDV < EURO III 2010: Closed filters at HDV < EURO IV
- Slide 9
- Effects of cyclists In Copenhagen 37 % of all trips are cycling trips.
- Slide 10
- Conclusion Air quality limits in most EU cities can be met by a combination of LEZs, congestion charge, satellite- based road pricing and/or more cycle traffic. These actions will provide more people with a longer and much healthier life and at the same time solve other traffic related problems. The solutions are ready but we are still waiting for the politicians...
- Slide 11
- But we are getting impatient ! Headline: The state is sued due to air pollution
- Slide 12
- Publication: Clean air Copenhagen Will be on webpage together with the presentations. Funded by: The European Campaign: Soot free for the climate & The European Commission: LIFE11 ENV/DE/495: Clean Air Europe
- Slide 13
- This project is co-funded by The European Campaign: Soot free for the climate & The European Commission: LIFE11 ENV/DE/495: Clean Air Europe
- Slide 14
- Questions
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Definition: Particles in air Human hair diameter: 100 micrometers
- Slide 18
- Mass versus number Exhaust particles
- Slide 19
- Key air quality limits a) May not be exceeded more than 35 times in a calendar year. b) Under revision due to new recommendations from the WHO. c) May not be exceeded more than 18 times in a calendar year.
- Slide 20
- CC is efficient in Milan In Milan the main pollution inside the congestion charge (CC) area is from buses, scooters etc.
- Slide 21
- The right indicator Fine particles (PM 2.5 ) are an inappropriate indicator of pollution from road traffic ! Elementary Carbon
- Slide 22
- Paradox of traffic pollution Traffic-related excess mortality among people living close to roads in Copenhagen: 300-500 deaths/year. Fine particles from local traffic cause 20 deaths/year. Exhaust gasses, traffic noise and traffic accidents from local traffic cause 20-40 deaths/year. So what causes the observed excess mortality ?
- Slide 23
- Ultrafine soot particles Ultrafine soot particles seem to cause the observed excess mortality among people living close to roads in central Copenhagen.
- Slide 24
- Traditionel vs. city-SCR
- Slide 25
- Crystalline urea in traditional SCR. City-SCR solves this.
- Slide 26