certify sustainable aquaculture?
DESCRIPTION
What impact is eco-certification having on sustainable aquaculture? It certainly makes an important contribution, but is also has its limits as a tool for governing sustainability. Take a look at what we think these limits are as well as what we think some of the future of eco-certification holds for the fastest growing global food sector.TRANSCRIPT
Certify Sustainable Aquaculture?
Simon R. Bush, Ben Belton, Derek Hall, Peter Vandergeest, Francis J. Murray, Stefano Ponte, Peter Oosterveer, Md SaidulIslam, Arthur P.J. Mol, Maki Hatanaka, Froukje Kruijssen, Tran
Thi Thu Ha, David C. Little and Rini Kusumawati
World Aquaculture Adelaide7-10 June 2014
The rise of eco-certification
Around nearly 20 years; currently 30 plus schemes relevant for aquaculture
An sophisticated (voluntary) private-led system of environmental governance:
● Setting standards
● Coaching compliance
● Assessing compliance
● Attaching labels
● Coordination of these activities
CABs
LABEL
PRODUCER
Product
CERTIFICATIONCHAIN
ACTORS
CONSUMER
Hatanaka and Busch 2005, Food Policy
Drivers of private eco-certification
Industry perception ofover regulation by
Northern states
NGO perception of under regulationby Southern states
Reputational risk of downstream chain actors in response to
ENGOs.
THIRD PARTY CERTIFICATION
Consumer demand and market
differentiation (?)
Market drivers
State drivers
AIPs and conformity assessment market (?)
Bene 2005, Dev. Pol. Rev.; Ponte et al. 2011
Questions
So what lessons have we learnt
about aquaculture certification?
What are the future prospects for
certification as a form of environmental and
social regulation?
LOOKING BACK LOOKING FORWARD
1. Inclusion/Exclusion
Standard development
● Danger of ‘performativity’ in standard development stage
● Farmers 6% attendees at PAD; “Industry capture” in TAD
● (Ongoing transparency also differs)
(Anh et al 2010)
Who has resources to attend?
Who has skills to contribute?
Who speaks on whose behalf?
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
% o
f p
arti
cip
ants
Pangasius Aquaculture Dialogue
1. Inclusion/Exclusion
At certification –Who makes the grade?
● CapabilitiesCost; literacy; organisational issues for small scale farmers
● Self-selectionDanger of not focusing on those with larger sustainability gains
● Clustering (?)Addressed largely through farmer, association or processor-led groups
(Khiem et al. 2010; Ha et al. 2013; Kusumawati and Bush In press)
GRASP
IntegratedOperating
Module
1. Inclusion/Exclusion
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2004 2005 2008
Number of cooperatives Joint capital (mil. VND)
Concentration and intensification ofshrimp co‐operatives in Ca Mau, Vietnam
Ha et al 2012 Aquaculture
Mill
ion
VN
D
# C
oope
rativ
es
Intensification
1. Inclusion/Exclusion
Ha et al 2012 Aquaculture
What is the structure of the chain?What are the terms of incorporation into the chain?
2. Narrow farm-level focus
Landscape issues difficult to take upFragmentation of water, forest management
Inputs only starting to be includedFeed and transport
Area-based certification?Greater role for the state
3. Market demand
Difference between certifiable volume and (current) market demand
4.6 4.67.8 7.9
29.2
61.0
58.4
26.5
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Species specific standards Multi-species standards
Currently non-certifiableproduction
Certifiable productionwith no current marketdemand
Remaining potentialglobal demand forcertified products
Certified production
73.5
41.6
4.6 4.6
37
68.9
7.8 7.9
61
29.2
} }
~12.5%See Bush et al 2013,Science 341: 1067‐68
What does the future hold?
A greater role for government? The suspicion that states are unable to regulate does not hold true everywhere.
Leverage to vulnerabilityEU import 65% and US 91% of what is consumed.Gives leverage – but also makes these markets vulnerable.
FAO 2014
Convergenceof import volumes
A post-(global)certification world?
National standards (VietGAP, Thai GAP TAS 7401)Lower cost, greater inclusion, a ‘local’ social contract?
Industrial coalitions (GSI, ISSF) Will they go for certification or claim sustainability otherwise?
Industry-led benchmarking (GSSI)Driving harmonisation or equivalency? What will be the consequences for national standards?
Conclusion
Aquaculture certification makes an important but only partial contribution
But, we need to be clear that it is one tool in a wide variety of private and public approaches to governing aquaculture
Research and practice needs to focus on complementarities between private and public forms of regulation