central elementary school - townnewsbloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/helenair.com/... · ·...
TRANSCRIPT
SCHLENKER & McKITTRICK ARCHITECTS, P.C.
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLRenovation vs. Rebuild Analysis
June 25th, 2013
all
imag
es c
ourt
esy
of w
ww
.get
tyim
ages
.com
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
RENOVATION VS. REBUILD ANALYSIS
· Central School Site Advantages
· Project Criteria VISION
· Existing Building Renovation Advantages & Disadvantages
· New Construction Advantages & Disadvantages
· Cost Of Construction Comparison
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
om
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
CENTRAL SCHOOL SITE ADVANTAGES
· Location
· History
· Community
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
omw
ww
.get
tyim
ages
.com
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CENTRAL SCHOOL SITE ADVANTAGES LOCATION
June 25th, 2013
EXPLORATION WORKS
DOWNTOWN HELENA
CARROLL COLLEGE
HOLTER MUSEUM
SUGARLOAF & MEATLOAF
MONTANA STATE CAPITALMT HELENA PARK
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Goo
gle
Eart
h Im
age
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CENTRAL SCHOOL SITE ADVANTAGES LOCATION
June 25th, 2013
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
JEFFERSON SCHOOL
HELENA MIDDLE SCHOOLHAWTHORNE SCHOOL
C.R. ANDERSON MIDDLE SCHOOL
BROADWATER ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
BRYANT SCHOOL
SMITH SCHOOL
LINCOLN SCHOOL
FRONT STREET LEARNING CENTER HELENA HIGH SCHOOL
DISTRICT OFFICES
Goo
gle
Eart
h Im
age
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CENTRAL SCHOOL SITE ADVANTAGES
June 25th, 2013
HISTORY
Helena Public Schools
–C
entral Elementary School Seism
ic Retrofit O
verview
CTA Architects Engineers
Page 7
GEN
ERAL BUILDIN
G DESCRIPTIO
N / ALTERATIO
N HISTO
RY
Highlights of the history of Central Elementary School include :
Ca 1884 Original School :
The original school building was
constructed on or just before 1884 on the
same site as the current structure.
The high school was located just to the
north and is visible at the right hand side of
the photo at right.
w
ww
.helenahistory.org
1914-15 Original Building :
George Carsley, Architect and Ralph Adams, Engineer
In 1914-1915, a new, larger structure w
as built just west of
the original school, presumably to m
inimize disruption
and/or relocation of the students during construction. The
new elem
entary school was built to coordinate w
ith the
adjacent high school, gymnasium
, and auditorium buildings.
Together these four structures were to serve as a central
education area for the comm
unity.
The 1914 building is constructed as a load-bearing masonry
wall w
ith concrete floor structures. It is a three-story
building and primarily resem
bles a Type III-B structure, as
the entire structure is resistant to fire except for the roof
framing, w
hich is wood over the top of a concrete deck. The
basement is daylit to the w
est, south, and north, and the
main corridor w
as established to run North-South betw
een
the original school and the 1914 building.
1892 Map.
Helena P
ublic Schools
–C
entralElem
entary School S
eismic R
etrofit Overview
CTA
Architects E
ngineers
Page 8
1921 Addition George H Carsley, Architect
Follow
ing completion of the three-story 1914 structure, the
original school was presum
ably taken down to allow
room for the
remainder of the elem
entary school to be constructed. Construction draw
ings date from 1921 and detail the east half of
what w
e now know
as Central Elementary School.
Similar to the first construction period, the construction m
ost closely resem
bles Type III-B construction. The roof is wood
framing over concrete deck. Further interior stairs w
ere developed as part of this addition, and the stair access points to the north and south w
ere redeveloped to be more cohesive as
part of this addition. Exterior detailing is similar to the original
building, but there are areas where detailing w
as minim
ized and construction m
aterials changed, presumably to m
inimize cost.
1935 Repair and Reinforcement
Hugenin and Dekay, Architects Som
etime after the substantial earthquake in 1935, Hugenin and DeKay Architects w
ere comm
issioned to perform
seismic stabilization for the building. Brick shear w
alls were added to the interior portions of the
building in four areas on each floor, attempting to transfer the seism
ic load from the roof to the ground
plane. At som
e point following the 1935 seism
ic upgrades, a steel column support system
was installed in six of the
classrooms. It is presum
ed that these columns w
ere installed to help with the sag of concrete slabs in the
classrooms.
1993 Heating System Replacem
ent In 1993, the Heating System
was replaced, rem
oving the original steam heat system
and replacing it with a
hot-water system
, complete w
ith new boilers located in the penthouse above the top floor.
Historical Significance Contrary to popularly-held belief, neither Central Elem
entary School nor the 7th Avenue Gym
nasium are on
the National Historic Register for Historic Places. It is understood that in 1972, vast areas of the
neighborhood were docum
ented for inclusion on the National Historic Register, but that the Central School
building was not yet of enough age to qualify for inclusion.
However, due to the current age of the building and depending on funding sources, the State Historic
Preservation Office m
ay need to be consulted and their recomm
endations followed to successfully finalize
the construction scope.
1900
1910
1920
1930
1890
1880
2020
1960
1970
1980
1990
1950
1940
2000
2010
West Addition Built1914-15 East Addition Built1921
Original Central School Demolished
7th Avenue Gymnasium Built
1908
Heating System Replacement
1993
Repair & Reinforcement
1935
Original Central School Built
1884
Central Elementary School Seismic Retrofit OverviewCTA Architects
Central Elementary School Seismic Retrofit OverviewCTA Architects
ww
w.li
felik
echa
rm.c
om
ww
w.h
elen
ahis
tory
.org
ww
w.h
elen
ahis
tory
.org
Study by CTA2013
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
CENTRAL SCHOOL SITE ADVANTAGES
June 25th, 2013
COMMUNITY
en.w
ikip
edia
.org
· Community Involvement
· Community Enhancement
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
om
CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
HELENA
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
PROJECT CRITERIA RENOVATION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION
· Provide 21st Century Learning Environment
· Increase Facility Capacity to Allow for Consolidation of District Programs
· 75 Year Building Lifespan
· Respect Historical Context of Site & Neighborhood
· Environmental Responsibility & Sustainability
· Fiscal Responsibility
· Set a Precedent
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
om
VISION
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
PROJECT CRITERIA PROVIDE 21ST CENTURY LEARNING ENVIRONMENTRENOVATION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION
21st Century Classroom Pods for Individual & Team TeachingHelena School Facility Planning
This is primarily a Middle School model - where students are more able to work alone or in small groups away from the rest of the class.
Individual 21st Century classroom
Flexible learning environment within
each classroom
Team teaching andindividual learningarea outside theclassroom
Corridor connection to otherpods and other areas of theschool facility
Teacher control over eachclassroom environment
Sharedarea
4 to 6 classrooms per pod, maximumSmartboard
Public address
Central clockTall storageunits (some
lockable)
Wall cabinets
Base cabinets (some lockable) with counter
Large sink withwater bubbler
Ample windowsfor natural light
At least one operablewindow for emergencyegress situations
Window coverings for lightcontrol and lock down security
Simpler teacher desk(storage and records elsewhere in room)
Approx. 950 square feetfor adequate multiple
learning scenarios
Good sound control fromadjacent classrooms
Multiple lightinglevels
Hard surface flooring(non-allergenic surface)
Individual classroomtemperature control
Good interioracoustic control
Secure entry door withkeyed lock from inside
21st Century Elementary Classroom - A Customized Learning ToolHelena School Facility Planning
Rectangular shapefor better group breakout options
Flexible seating arrangementsfor multiple learning strategies
Mutiple IT hard-wired jacks or wireless connectivity
Smartboard
Public address
Central clockTall storageunits (some
lockable)
Wall cabinets
Base cabinets (some lockable) with counter
Large sink withwater bubbler
Ample windowsfor natural light
At least one operablewindow for emergencyegress situations
Window coverings for lightcontrol and lock down security
Simpler teacher desk(storage and records elsewhere in room)
Approx. 950 square feetfor adequate multiple
learning scenarios
Good sound control fromadjacent classrooms
Multiple lightinglevels
Hard surface flooring(non-allergenic surface)
Individual classroomtemperature control
Good interioracoustic control
Secure entry door withkeyed lock from inside
21st Century Elementary Classroom - A Customized Learning ToolHelena School Facility Planning
Rectangular shapefor better group breakout options
Flexible seating arrangementsfor multiple learning strategies
Mutiple IT hard-wired jacks or wireless connectivity
graphics courtesy of Kent Kultgen Ed. D.
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
PROJECT CRITERIA
INCREASE FACILITY CAPACITY TO ALLOW FOR CONSOLIDATION OF DISTRICT PROGRAMS
RENOVATION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION
75 YEAR BUILDING LIFESPAN
Community CenterOther District Programs
Performance SpaceGymnasium
Multipurpose SpaceAdult EducationMeeting Space
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
om
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
PROJECT CRITERIA RESPECT HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF SITE & NEIGHBORHOODRENOVATION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION
ww
w.h
elen
ahis
tory
.org
ww
w.h
elen
aslit
tlem
ansi
on.c
om
ww
w.h
elen
air.c
om
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
PROJECT CRITERIA
ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY & SUSTAINABILITY
RENOVATION OR NEW CONSTRUCTION
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
om
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
om
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
om
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
om
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
om
INVESTMENT - Social - Capital - Political - Life Cycle Costs
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION
ADVANTAGES· Maintain Central School Identity· Maintain Historical Neighborhood Fabric· Opportunity to Restore Original Character· Embodied Energy of Existing Materials· Quality/Durability of Existing Materials· No Construction Phasing Required
DISADVANTAGES· Spatial & Programming Limitations· Extent & Cost of Renovation Required· Useful Lifespan of Existing Materials· Non-sustainable Existing Construction
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
omw
ww
.get
tyim
ages
.com
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION ADVANTAGES
· Maintain Central School Identity · Maintain Historical Neighborhood Fabric
ww
w.w
este
rnm
inin
ghis
tory
.com
ww
w.d
ownt
ownh
elen
a.co
m
ww
w.w
este
rnm
inin
ghis
tory
.com
ww
w.b
illin
gsga
zett
e.co
mw
ww
.hel
enah
isto
ry.c
om
ww
w.h
elen
ahis
tory
.org
· Opportunity to Restore Original Character
ADVANTAGES· Maintain Central School Identity· Maintain Historical Neighborhood Fabric· Opportunity to Restore Original Character· Embodied Energy of Existing Materials· Quality/Durability of Existing Materials· No Construction Phasing Required
DISADVANTAGES· Spatial & Programming Limitations· Extent & Cost of Renovation Required· Useful Lifespan of Existing Materials· Non-sustainable Existing Construction
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
· Embodied Energy of Existing Materials
EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION ADVANTAGES
· Quality/Durability of Existing Materials
Transportation/Distribution
ManufacturingTransportation
Processing
Mining/Extraction
Disposal
Use
Recycling
ADVANTAGES· Maintain Central School Identity· Maintain Historical Neighborhood Fabric· Opportunity to Restore Original Character· Embodied Energy of Existing Materials· Quality/Durability of Existing Materials· No Construction Phasing Required
DISADVANTAGES· Spatial & Programming Limitations· Extent & Cost of Renovation Required· Useful Lifespan of Existing Materials· Non-sustainable Existing Construction
· No Construction Phasing Required
Transportation
LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF BUILDING MATERIALS
Reuse
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
· Spatial & Programming Limitations
EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION DISADVANTAGES
· Extent & Cost of Renovation Required
UPDN
DN
SUB BASEMENTDETAIL
UPTUNNEL
TUNNEL
TUNNEL
UP
DN DN
PENTHOUSEBOILERROOM
SECONDFLOOR
GIRL'SBATHROOM-2
BOY'SBATHROOM-2
BASEMENTLEVEL
FIRSTFLOOR
GIRL'SBATHROOM-1
BOY'SBATHROOM-1
BATHROOM
1
8
TEACHER'SLOUNGE
CONFERENCEROOM
PRINCIPAL'SOFFICE
WORKROOM
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
HEALTH
3
6
4
5
9
17
10
16 15
11
14
4
13
12
STUDYROOM
20
17
19
16 15
18
21
H.O.S.T.S.
PROJECTPROMISE
SPEECH
18A
19A
BATHROOM
21A
CAFETERIAKITCHEN
ALL SPACES SQUARE FOOTAGEINDICATED BY BOLD FACE NUMBER
738
84
180
22
408 315
35
84 84
35
272
28
180726
22
2566 91
74552
25104
594
282202
64113
195
262
10590737
93
1001
205
178
729 729
205
57 70
886
61 66 72
550
665
90
639 250
1649
378
81
112
625
103 103
425
738
112
259
86
742
22
180
697 7006796
3915 29
180
22
736
91
258
93
737731
68933756
76
1690
318
334
73
8520 20
20 20
147
SECOND FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 11,916SECOND FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 10,307
FIRST FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 11,984FIRST FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 10,250
GROUND FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 12,017GROUND FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 9,684
PENTHOUSE GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE = 343PENTHOUSE NET SQUARE FOOTAGE = 318
15
7 9
40
5
19 19
49
10
UPDN
DN
SUB BASEMENTDETAIL
UPTUNNEL
TUNNEL
TUNNEL
UP
DN DN
PENTHOUSEBOILERROOM
SECONDFLOOR
GIRL'SBATHROOM-2
BOY'SBATHROOM-2
BASEMENTLEVEL
FIRSTFLOOR
GIRL'SBATHROOM-1
BOY'SBATHROOM-1
BATHROOM
1
8
TEACHER'SLOUNGE
CONFERENCEROOM
PRINCIPAL'SOFFICE
WORKROOM
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
HEALTH
3
6
4
5
9
17
10
16 15
11
14
4
13
12
STUDYROOM
20
17
19
16 15
18
21
H.O.S.T.S.
PROJECTPROMISE
SPEECH
18A
19A
BATHROOM
21A
CAFETERIAKITCHEN
ALL SPACES SQUARE FOOTAGEINDICATED BY BOLD FACE NUMBER
738
84
180
22
408 315
35
84 84
35
272
28
180726
22
2566 91
74552
25104
594
282202
64113
195
262
10590737
93
1001
205
178
729 729
205
57 70
886
61 66 72
550
665
90
639 250
1649
378
81
112
625
103 103
425
738
112
259
86
742
22
180
697 7006796
3915 29
180
22
736
91
258
93
737731
68933756
76
1690
318
334
73
8520 20
20 20
147
SECOND FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 11,916SECOND FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 10,307
FIRST FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 11,984FIRST FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 10,250
GROUND FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 12,017GROUND FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 9,684
PENTHOUSE GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE = 343PENTHOUSE NET SQUARE FOOTAGE = 318
15
7 9
40
5
19 19
49
10
UPDN
DN
SUB BASEMENTDETAIL
UPTUNNEL
TUNNEL
TUNNEL
UP
DN DN
PENTHOUSEBOILERROOM
SECONDFLOOR
GIRL'SBATHROOM-2
BOY'SBATHROOM-2
BASEMENTLEVEL
FIRSTFLOOR
GIRL'SBATHROOM-1
BOY'SBATHROOM-1
BATHROOM
1
8
TEACHER'SLOUNGE
CONFERENCEROOM
PRINCIPAL'SOFFICE
WORKROOM
OFFICE
OFFICE
OFFICE
HEALTH
3
6
4
5
9
17
10
16 15
11
14
4
13
12
STUDYROOM
20
17
19
16 15
18
21
H.O.S.T.S.
PROJECTPROMISE
SPEECH
18A
19A
BATHROOM
21A
CAFETERIAKITCHEN
ALL SPACES SQUARE FOOTAGEINDICATED BY BOLD FACE NUMBER
738
84
180
22
408 315
35
84 84
35
272
28
180726
22
2566 91
74552
25104
594
282202
64113
195
262
10590737
93
1001
205
178
729 729
205
57 70
886
61 66 72
550
665
90
639 250
1649
378
81
112
625
103 103
425
738
112
259
86
742
22
180
697 7006796
3915 29
180
22
736
91
258
93
737731
68933756
76
1690
318
334
73
8520 20
20 20
147
SECOND FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 11,916SECOND FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 10,307
FIRST FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 11,984FIRST FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 10,250
GROUND FLOOR GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE= 12,017GROUND FLOOR NET SQUARE FOOTAGE= 9,684
PENTHOUSE GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE = 343PENTHOUSE NET SQUARE FOOTAGE = 318
15
7 9
40
5
19 19
49
10
FIRST FLOOR SECOND FLOOR
BASEMENT LEVEL ADVANTAGES· Maintain Central School Identity· Maintain Historical Neighborhood Fabric· Opportunity to Restore Original Character· Embodied Energy of Existing Materials· Quality/Durability of Existing Materials· No Construction Phasing Required
DISADVANTAGES· Spatial & Programming Limitations· Extent & Cost of Renovation Required· Useful Lifespan of Existing Materials· Non-sustainable Existing Construction
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
· Useful Lifespan of Existing Materials
EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION DISADVANTAGES
· Non-sustainable Existing Construction
ADVANTAGES· Maintain Central School Identity· Maintain Historical Neighborhood Fabric· Opportunity to Restore Original Character· Embodied Energy of Existing Materials· Quality/Durability of Existing Materials· No Construction Phasing Required
DISADVANTAGES· Spatial & Programming Limitations· Extent & Cost of Renovation Required· Useful Lifespan of Existing Materials· Non-sustainable Existing Construction
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
NEW CONSTRUCTION
ADVANTAGES· Program & Spatial Flexibility· Maximize Site Utilization· Energy Efficient Design & Construction· Lifespan of New Construction Materials· No Construction Phasing Required
DISADVANTAGES· Loss of Neighborhood Icon· Loss of School Identity· Disposal of Existing Building Materials· Cost of Demolition & Site Preparation
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
omw
ww
.get
tyim
ages
.com
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
NEW CONSTRUCTION ADVANTAGES
· Program & Spatial Flexibility · Maximize Site Utilization
WrkstnAdmin.
Prof.
WrkstnAdmin.
Prof.
WrkstnAdmin.
Prof.
WrkstnFuture - E & C
Support
OfficeFull Time
OfficeFull Time
OfficeFull Time
Storage
WrkstnSupport Staff
OfficeFuture -
Executive
OfficeFuture -
Standard Office
OfficeFuture MHREF
OfficeFuture MHREF
OfficeVice President
OfficePresident
OfficeOffice
Manager
OfficeInformation Technology
Restrooms
OfficeInfo Services Coordinator
OfficeVice President
StaffEntry
Board Room | Break Room
Conference Room
Kitchen
Restrooms
Restrooms
Reception
Waiting / Lobby
Conference Room
Copy | Work Room | Storage
Entry
Elevator
Restrooms
OfficeEducation & Conferences
OfficeVice President
OfficeFlex Director
OfficeCare Transitions
| Nurse Res. Programs
OfficeQuality &
Patient Safety Proj. Director
OfficeNew H.E.N.
OfficeHospital
Preparedness Coordinator
WrkstnFlex
Coordinator
Admin.Prof.
Admin.Prof.
Goo
gle
Eart
h Im
age
ADVANTAGES· Program & Spatial Flexibility· Maximize Site Utilization· Energy Efficient Design & Construction· Lifespan of New Construction Materials· No Construction Phasing Required
DISADVANTAGES· Loss of Neighborhood Icon· Loss of School Identity· Disposal of Existing Building Materials· Cost of Demolition & Site Preparation
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
· Energy Efficient Design & Construction
NEW CONSTRUCTION ADVANTAGES
· Lifespan of New Construction Materials
ww
w.in
berg
-mill
er.c
om
www.carboun.com
· No Construction Phasing Required
ADVANTAGES· Program & Spatial Flexibility· Maximize Site Utilization· Energy Efficient Design & Construction· Lifespan of New Construction Materials· No Construction Phasing Required
DISADVANTAGES· Loss of Neighborhood Icon· Loss of School Identity· Disposal of Existing Building Materials· Cost of Demolition & Site Preparation
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
· Loss of Neighborhood Icon
NEW CONSTRUCTION DISADVANTAGES
· Loss of School Identity
ww
w.b
illin
gsga
zett
e.co
m
ww
w.li
felik
echa
rm.c
om
ADVANTAGES· Program & Spatial Flexibility· Maximize Site Utilization· Energy Efficient Design & Construction· Lifespan of New Construction Materials· No Construction Phasing Required
DISADVANTAGES· Loss of Neighborhood Icon· Loss of School Identity· Disposal of Existing Building Materials· Cost of Demolition & Site Preparation
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
· Disposal of Existing Building Materials
NEW CONSTRUCTION DISADVANTAGES
· Cost of Demolition & Site Preparation
OLD HELENA HIGH SCHOOL DEMOLITION, 1976
ww
w.h
elen
ahis
tory
..comw
ww
.fs.fe
d.us
Disposal
ADVANTAGES· Program & Spatial Flexibility· Maximize Site Utilization· Energy Efficient Design & Construction· Lifespan of New Construction Materials· No Construction Phasing Required
DISADVANTAGES· Loss of Neighborhood Icon· Loss of School Identity· Disposal of Existing Building Materials· Cost of Demolition & Site Preparation
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
COST OF CONSTRUCTION COMPARISON
· Renovation · New Construction· Renovation vs. New Construction
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
omw
ww
.get
tyim
ages
.com
all cost information has been provided by the Helena School District’s Educational Planning Operational/Implementation Plan, 2013 and CTA Architects’ Central Elementary School Seismic Retrofit Overview, 2013
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
COST OF CONSTRUCTION COMPARISON
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLCONSTRUCTION COST ONLY
Site Improvements: $1,599,330
Life/Safety Codes: $396,893
Roofing: $143,560
Heating & Ventilation: $1,184,328
Structural Upgrades: $2,245,000
Electrical: $418,500
Plumbing: $529,500
ADA Upgrades: $680,000
Building Envelope: $420,000
Flooring: $125,000
7TH AVENUE GYMNASIUMCONSTRUCTION COST ONLY
Life/Safety Codes: $181,964
Roofing: $46,900
Heating & Ventilation: $312,000
Structural Upgrades: $680,000
Interior Renovations: $1,200,000
ADA Upgrades: $185,000
RENOVATION
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $7,742,111SQUARE FOOTAGE: 36,260 SFCOST / SQUARE FOOTAGE: $214/SF
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $2,605,864SQUARE FOOTAGE: 12,988 SFCOST / SQUARE FOOTAGE: $201/SF
all cost information has been provided by the Helena School District’s Educational Planning Operational/Implementation Plan, 2013 and CTA Architects’ Central Elementary School Seismic Retrofit Overview, 2013
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $10,347,975Includes All Renovation Construction Costs
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
COST OF CONSTRUCTION COMPARISON
NEW CONSTRUCTION:CONSTRUCTION COST ONLY
Building Removal: $473,000
New Construction: $9,600,000
Building Removal: $304,000
New Construction: $3,450,000
NEW GYMNASIUMCONSTRUCTION COST ONLY
NEW CONSTRUCTION
all cost information has been provided by the Helena School District’s Educational Planning Operational/Implementation Plan, 2013 and CTA Architects’ Central Elementary School Seismic Retrofit Overview, 2013
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $10,073,000SQUARE FOOTAGE: 40,190 SFCOST / SQUARE FOOTAGE: $251/SF
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $3,754,000SQUARE FOOTAGE: 15,016 SFCOST / SQUARE FOOTAGE: $250/SF
Total square footage of new gym was not provided in CTA repor t. Square footage and cost/s.f. are based on assumptions.
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $13,827,000Includes All New Construction Costs
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLJune 25th, 2013
TOTAL COMPARISONCOST OF CONSTRUCTION COMPARISON
RENOVATION:CONSTRUCTION COST ONLY
NEW CONSTRUCTION:CONSTRUCTION COST ONLY
all cost information has been provided by the Helena School District’s Educational Planning Operational/Implementation Plan, 2013 and CTA Architects’ Central Elementary School Seismic Retrofit Overview, 2013
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $13,827,000Includes All New Construction Costs
TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS: $10,347,975Includes All Renovation Construction Costs
Central School: 36,260 sq ft
7th Avenue Gym: 12,988 sq ft
New Central School: 40,190 sq ft
New Gymnasium: 15,016 sq ft
June 25th, 2013
SCHLENKER & McKITTRICK ARCHITECTS, P.C.
Either way, there is an opportunity for something great. a
ll im
ages
cou
rtes
y of
ww
w.g
etty
imag
es.c
om
- Quality Education- Community Service- Environmental Stewardship- Central School’s Legacy
What is the right answer? ...with the vision upheld, whichever choice is made.