ceds 2012 annual update

June 2012 Annual Update

1~ Communities ~~Naugatuck Valley Corrid~~Comprehensive Econorr~~

Development Strategy(CEDS~

~~~~n [r~~~C~ ̀ ~O~~~ o ~ o i~ c~~~~ ~i~,~-~~~~~~~ o~~ ~ommerc~,

coo ~ c~ ~r-~~ o C~ - ~~~ ~

~ ~i° ~~~~ ~~`i~~C~ ~~~~

Shelt~»~~~ ~=economic Develop~me~~Corpora~~uo~ ~

Waterbury development Corp~~r.~~~~

2012 Comprehensive Economic Development StrategyNaugatuck Valley Corridor Annual Update

~ortter~~~

Section PageIntroductionGoals/Work Plan and Accomplishments 2010/2011 1District Designation 1Tier 1 Project Advancements 2Public Forum on Transportation 3Administration 3Regional Profile 4Financial Assistance 5Organization 6Goals for the NVC —Five Year Document 2010-2015 6Work Plan 2012 7Local Infrastructure Capital Improvement Projects 9Business &Employment Changes 10Demographics — NVC — 18 Communities 10Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics — NVC 11Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment RateOver Time 11Lessons Learned 11Priorities 2012/2013 Action Plan 12Future Plans 13The CEDS Process 13Work Plan 2012/2013 Outcomes 142011 /2012 Action Items 14

Demographic Updates 18 Communities

Charts: Business &Employment Changes (2012)Population in NVC Based on Sex and Age 2010 CensusPopulation in NVC 2000 to 2009 to 2010Employment April 2000 to April 2011 to April 2012Employment April 2000 to April 2012Unemployment April 2011 to April 2012Median Household Income

NVC Capital Investment Projects — Ranking and Rating —June 19, 2012

Organization and Management

Brownfields

CEDS Implementation/Coordination of Partners Chart

Exhibits: Committee Meeting Minutes/Agenda

* * * 2012 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy~~ , ~+ Naugatuck Valley Corridor Annual Update* *~`

Introduction — CEDS Annual Update June 2012

Goals/Work Plan and Accomplishments for 2011/2012

The Shelton Economic Development Corporation (SEDC) submitted the Annual Reportto EDA for the period of July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012 in accordance with the EDArequirement of the 5-year Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)approval granted on December 1, 2010. EDA commended all who have contributed tothe successful preparation and approval of the 2010 documents in accordance withEDA guidelines. The 2011/2012 activities focused on the designation of the NVC CEDSas an Economic Development District (EDD). The following sections depict the variousactions taken.

Economic Development District (EDD) Designation

As noted in the June 2011 Annual CEDS Report to EDA, the NVC CEDS 18communities began the process of seeking EDA approval and designation of the Regionas a Federal Economic Development District (EDD).

Governor Dannel P. Malloy on June 6, 2011 requested in writing to EDA's PhiladelphiaRegional Office, their approval of the NVC as a Regional Economic DevelopmentDistrict (EDD).

The Governor's request was based on the Connecticut Legislation and the NVC'spetition to the state for the EDD designation for the NVC CEDS area. The ConnecticutDepartment of Economic and Community Development (DECD) and the Office of Policy& Management (OPM) determined the following:

DECD findings:

a The CEDS is generally consistent with the statewide comprehensive economicdevelopment strategy.The region has sufficient size and represents 18 Connecticut municipalities.The NVC region has four municipalities that meet the minimum distress criteriafor unemployment. These include Ansonia, Naugatuck, Thomaston andWaterbury.

• The NVC CEDS is organized within the Central Naugatuck Valley and the ValleyCouncils of Government borders.DECD acknowledged that they will recommend approval of the NVC CEDSapplication to Governor Malloy.

Page 1

'` * 2012 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy,:,,~:,+. ~~ :~' Naugatuck Valley Corridor Annual Update*' ~'*

OPM findings:

• The State of Connecticut Office of Policy and Management per the Secretarydetermined that the NVC CEDS was generally consistent with the StateConservation and Development Plan and granted its approval as an EDD.

The Strategy Committee (Board of Directors) of the NVC on June 13, 2011 unanimouslyapproved a resolution requesting the undersecretary of the U.S. Department ofCommerce, EDA to designate the NVC as an EDA EDD, which will be one of the firstdistricts within the State of Connecticut.

EDA acknowledged on January 25, 2012 the NVC EDD submission and request, andasked for additional information and/or clarification of some administrative functions ofthe proposed District. EDA requested 8 items be addressed. The NVC CEDSChairperson, Sheila O'Malley and James E. Ryan, President of the Shelton EconomicDevelopment Corporation responded in writing to EDA on February 17, 2012, providingthe necessary clarifications and/or support data.

One clarification request was to provide letters of support from a majority of therepresentative communities within the 18 NVC municipalities. SEDC requested from all18 communities a letter of support. To date, 15 of the community's I~llayors, FirstSelectmen and/or Chief Administrative Officers have endorsed in writing the designationof the NVC as one of Connecticut's first EDDs. That is 83%. No negative responseshave been received. The Strategy Committee continues to work with the other 3communities to seek their input to the formation of the EDD.

Certified Resolutions were signed and sealed regarding the approval of the formation ofthe District and were provided to EDA. The resolutions were unanimously authorized.

The Strategy and Advisory Committees along with the chairperson and administrativestaff and consultant continue to work with EDA's Regional Office regarding the EDDdesignation.

Tier 1 Project Advancements

Currently two public works type projects are under construction. The two grants exceed$2,140,000 in EDA funding. Without the CEDS approval, these projects would not havebeen funded by EDA. The grants are further supported by DECD funds in the amount of$1,350,000. Waterbury has received $550,000 and Derby has received $800,000.Additionally, the Cities of Derby and Waterbury are also providing financial support.

Page 2


The City of Derby prepared plans and specifications for the construction of an AccessRoad including all public utilities for the construction of the Derby Commerce Park. Thisinfrastructure project will open up 20+ acres for private development, creating bothtemporary and permanent jobs; improve the local, state and federal tax base. TheDerby project resulted in 9 bids being received out of 14 potential bidders. The contractwas awarded to the lowest responsible bidder. Construction has commenced and theproject is expected to be completed by December 2012.

The City of Waterbury —Cherry Street Industrial Park -The Waterbury DevelopmentCorporation is the implementing agency for these improvements, which includes thedemolition of a vacant rundown older industrial complex, environmental clean up of thesite, site and public improvements for conveyance of the property to a privatedeveloper. These improvements will permit a local company to expand within the Cityand create new jobs and retain existing jobs. The Waterbury Development Corporationcontinues to work with its design firm on the overall Cherry Street Industrial Parkpreliminary design for the public works infrastructure improvements. The first phase ofthe project is proceeding with the demolition of the industrial complex, while the designprocess continues.

The project is expected to have a separate public works infrastructure bid during the fallof 2012 and the planned improvements are expected to be completed by December2013.

Public Forum on Transportation

The Advisory and Strategy Committees voted at one of the quarterly workshop sessionsto hold a Transportation Summit, this is in keeping with Goal IV: Improve overallTransportation and Communications systems. The Greater Valley Chamber ofCommerce, one of the members of the Advisory Committee, has agreed to host thesummits once the final plans are in place. The Advisory Committee will coordinate theevent with the two Councils of Government, as they represent the overall transportationneeds of the NVC including the development of the Transit Oriented District (TOD).Further coordination for the summit will be based on Congress passing a new five-yeartransportation act including the budget to support many of the overall projects outlinedin the CEDS five-year plan.

Administration

The Chairperson for the NVC Economic Development District (CEDS), Sheila O'Malley,the Derby Director of Economic and Community Development, has consented tocontinue in that position for the coming year, for the CEDS District Committees. JamesE. Ryan, President of the Shelton Economic Development Corporation provides thelead administrative services required for the maintenance of the CEDS process, underthe Naugatuck Valley Corridor Economic Development District.

Page 3


During the preparation of the new five-year CEDS in 2010 a Stakeholder's Survey wasconducted to determine the administration and direction of the CEDS process.

The Stakeholder's Survey indicated a very strong support for the continuation of theCEDS particularly with the current administration of the CEDS under the direction of theAdvisory Committee and its membership, the Strategy Committee and its make up withthe administrative element to be led by SEDC in conjunction with WDC.

The CEDS Governing/Partnering Committee manages and oversees the CEDS processand is made up of the Advisory Committee membership, which meets quarterly and theStrategy Committee membership made up of community and business leaders, alsomeets quarterly or as needed. Minutes of these meetings are located within theExhibits section of this submission. See organizational chart at the end of this section.

The Advisory Committee make up consists of the Chairperson, the Shelton EconomicDevelopment Corporation, the Waterbury Development Corporation, Valley Council ofiGovernments, Central Naugatuck Valley Council of Governments, Greater ValleyChamber and Greater Waterbury Chamber.

The Strafiegy Committee includes Mayors, First Selectmen and/or Town Managers fromeach of the 18 communities plus representatives from banking, business, communityorganizations, education, finance, government, higher education, industry, labor,minorities, professional, public health, public safety and women. The StrategyCommittee monitors and revises the CEDS document.

Regional Profile

The Naugatuck Valley Corridor (NVC) is made up ofeighteen Connecticut communities that have been apart of the historic fabric of the Connecticut economyfor 375 years. Today, the NVC is positioned to be anactive region in support of the 21ST Century economyincluding the Governor and State Agency's support ofthe NVC as one of ConnecticuYs new EconomicDevelopment Districts. The State of Connecticutinvestment decisions will be made a part ofResponsible Growth Initiatives under the ConnecticutEconomic Strategy dated 2009.

The NVC is a Region of 18 communities that are bestserviced from a transportation means by Interstate 84serving the East to West, Cheshire on the East and Newtown on the Wesf,North to South from Thomaston to Shelton on the South.

and Route 8

Page 4


The rail service for passengers is provided by ConnDOT/MetroNorth via the Waterburyto Bridgeport line. The CEDS process encourages and supports the upgrading of thispassenger service. The region is further supported by the ever expanding OxfordAirport, which was just designated by the 2011 Connecticut General Assembly underSpecial Legislation as the Oxford Airport Zone. This designation is intended to createjobs and encourage private investment.

Population:403,578 (2010 US Census)

Land ~4rea:432 square miles

Median Household Income:NVC: $74,286New Haven County: $58,719Litchfield County: $68,682Fairfield Count : $77,620

Total Employment April 2012:192, 799Unemployed:17,863

Labor Force:210,662NVC Rate: 8.5%State Rate: 7.6%US Rate: 7.7%

Regional Airport:Waterbury/Oxford Airporfi

Largest Population:Waterbury 110,366

Smallest Population:Bethlehem 3,607

Employment in the NVC is based on fourindustries, ranking very close to one another,which comprise over sixty percent (62.49%)of NVC employment. These four industriesare Wholesale and Retail Trade (16.44%),Education and Health Services (16.33%),Manufacturing (15.02%), and Government(14.70%). The University of ConnecticutWaterbury branch and other highereducational systems and students areworking to prepare for and support the futureNVC economy. Higher education is workingwith the public-private partnership focusing onnew technology transfer capabilities to reachthe 21St Century.

Financial Assistance

SEDC as the lead agency for implementingthe CEDS on an annual basis has submittedand received financial assistance from theKatharine Matthies Foundation, the ValleyCommunity Foundation, the UnitedIlluminating Company, and NaugatuckSavings and Loan Association. Without thisfinancial support and continued financialsupport the CEDS process can not continue.

Page 5

Organization


SEDC acts as the lead administrative agent providing the staff necessary to administerand implement the CEDS, with assistance from WDC as necessary. This includescontact with all the Chief Elected Officials, or administrative staff, assembly of theAdvisory and Strategy Committee, outreach to the community organizations,stakeholders survey, and development of community forums for the processing andexchange of information and programs that will be included or carried over fromprevious CEDS. The current economic recession has been very difficult for most of thecommunities in the NVC. All of the 18 communities have seen a drop in the totalunemployment rate from a year ago. The NVC unemployment rates indicated 10communities are at or below the state average with 8 above the national average.Currently, 8 communities (Ansonia, Beacon Falls, Derby, Naugatuck, Seymour,Thomasfion, Waterbury and Wolcott) are in excess of the national average.

As further outlined in the CEDS document the NVC is a Tale of Two NVCs. Thecommunities in the Naugatuck Valley Corridor represent the strengths and weaknessesof Connecticut. Some of the municipalities perform quite well either as a place toconduct business, a residential area, or both. By contrast, other cities struggleeconomically and provide less than optimal living conditions for current and potentialresidents. The municipalities that thrive maintain a stake in those cities ghat strugglebecause their success depends in part on the condition of towns that border them.

Goals for the NVC —Five Year Document 2010-2015

Goal I: Continue to develop local infrastructure that supports economic expansionwhile maintaining and protecting the environment.

Goal II: Utilize the Connecticut Economic Strategic Plan 2009 (DECD) to provideopportunities for job growth, advancement, and jo,6 training.

Goal III: Sustain economic expansion while reinforcing and complimenting the regionalland use and quality of life of the NVC.

Goal IV: Improve overall Transportation and Communications systems.

Goal V: Continue the implementation and reclamation of Regional BrownfieldsPartnership (RBP) and to support the management, capacity and financial resources forthe municipal members.

Goal VI: Support and encourage the designation of the NVC as a Nafional HeritageArea under the National Park Service, which will capitalize on the history, culture andnatural attraction of the NVC.

Page 6

1 y~


Goal VII: Encourage growth and participation in the Philanthropy efforts in fihe NVC,through the private sector, individuals and other stakeholders' efforts and contributions.

Work Plan 2012

The State of Connecticut starting with Governor Malloy and the Department ofEconomic Development and Office of Policy &Management support the designation ofthe NVC as an Economic Development District (EDD), and have requested the variousregions to include Brownfield redevelopment priorities and strategies in each of theannual updates.

CEDS Brownfield topics could include:

1. Assembly, update and consolidation of Brownfield property inventories.2. Identification of critical Brownfield properties where redevelopment will have a

significant impact on the state and regional economy and create jobs.3. Assembly of a list of Brownfields requiring environmental assessments.4. Assembly of a list of Brownfields requiring environmental remediation.5. Proposed land use strategies for Brownfields including: housing, alternative

.energy, urban agriculture, "shovel-ready" sites for economic development,commercial development, and open space/park space.

6. Ufilize DECD Brownfield Remediation Financing Programs.

Attached is a list of EDA Brownfields projects either submitted by the communities, theEPA or the DEEP and/or the Naugatuck Valley Brownfields program.

One of the top work program activities of the new 5-year CEDS will be to re-evaluatethe previous approved CEDS action plans and to reflect on changes in the 18-townCEDS area. Concentration will be on job retention for our existing businesses withassistance as appropriate. Attached is the state list of pending or actual businesseswith a reduction in their workforce. Also, based on availability of federal and/or statefunds, assist those communities that have been impacted with plant shutdowns orrelocation of businesses including Municipal Development Plan (MDP), BrownfieldRemediation, and improve access to local and major arteries.

The 2010 CEDS will continue to examine the NVC needs, problems, and resources;establish goals and objectives, select amulti-year plan of action; and establish aprocess for evaluating its achievements and illustrating changing conditions.

Capital Needs/Infirastructure Program will be implemented with a new e-mail only surveykeeping with green standards, which will be ranked and rated by the StrategyCommittee on a rolling time frame, and incorporated as the building bloc{< of the new

Page ~

public works infrastructure programs.


The Planning Organization for the compilation of a CEDS for the 18-town IVVC is madeup the Shelton Economic Development (SEDC) and the Waterbury DevelopmentCorporation (WDC). DeCarlo &Doll will assist the Planning Organization with thefollowing key activities of the CEDS:

• Review and revise as appropriate the existing Strategy Committee.• Maintain a CEDS that complies with 13 C.F.R. § 303.7.• Revise and/or replace the approved CEDS and have available for review and

comment by the public at all times, which is always posted on the SEDCwebsite.

0 The NVC Committee will submit an annual report to EDA (performance report) byJune 30t" of each year.Submit a revised or replacement CEDS to EDA at least every 5 years (or asnecessary based on available funding.)

The Strategy Committee, also acting as the Board of Directors, is responsible fordeveloping, implementing, revising, or replacing the CEDS for the "PlanningOrganization". The Strategy Committee will consist of broad-based representatives ofthe main economic interests of the region including private sector representatives,public officials, community leaders, and representatives of workforce developmentboards, representatives of institutions of higher education, minority and labor groupsand private individuals who have an interest in the economic development activities ofthe 18-town NVC CEDS.

The Advisory Committee will continue to implement the new 5-year CEDS and willupdate and modify as necessary and appropriate the following:

• Background of the economic development situation of the 18-towns that paints arealistic picture of the NVC including a narrative on the economy, population,geography, workforce development and use, transportation access, resources,environment and other pertinent information.

o Analysis of Economic Development Problems and Opportunities identifyingstrengths and weaknesses in the 18-town NVC.

• Incorporate relevant material from other government-sponsored plans anddemonstrate consistency with other state and local workforce investmentstrategies.

s Identify past, present and projected future economic development investments inthe region.

o Goals and Objectives — monitor the existing goals and objectives necessary toevaluate the economic problems and/or capitalize on the resources of the regionover the 5 year time frame of the CEDS, and modify as conditions mandate.

* 2012 Com rehensive Economic Develo ment Strate~, ~w` ,,~~' Naugatuck Valley Corridor Annual Update***

• Community and Private Sector Participation — discuss in narrative form therelationship between the community in general and the private sector in thedevelopment and implementation of the CEDS.

0 Strategic Projects, Programs and Activities — Identify regional projecfis, programsand activities designed to implement the Goals and Objectives of the CEDSincluding suggested projects and vital projects including projects that have beenlisted as potential Brownfield redevelopment project or zones.CEDS Plan of Action — A narrative/guide necessary to implement the goals andobjectives of the CEDS promoting economic development and opportunity,fostering effective transportation access, enhance and protect the environment,maximize effective development and use of the workforce consistent with anyapplicable state or local workforce investment strategies, promote the use oftechnology, including the use of Green Building Council standards andtechnology to foster the use of the State Energy Program (SEP) with LEED andpartner with utilities (CL&P and UI) to conserve energy, balance resourcesthrough sound management of physical development, and obtain and ufiilizeadequate funds and other resources.

o Methodology for cooperating and integrating the CEDS with the State's economicdevelopment priorities, including clusters and Brownfield redevelopment projects.Performance Measures — a list of performance measures used to evaluate thePlanning Organization's successful development and implementation of theCEDS, such as number of jobs created after implementation of a CEDS activity,number and types of investments undertaken in the region, number of jobsretained in the region, amount of private sector investment.

Loral Infrastructure Capital Improvements Projects

The CEDS Advisory Committee notified all the 18 communities that they wereencouraged to submit new or revised Capital Improvement Projects.

All 18 communities received two requests from SEDC during the year to submit orrevise as needed their capital project requests for review or modification including anylisting of Brownfields Remediation projects per the state's request. As of the June 19,2012 Strategy Committee meeting 13 communities have indicated no changes in theirsubmissions, which are included in the current approved CEDS. Two new projects havebeen included in the June 30, 2012 annual report. The matrix attached lists 33 projectsin the 2012 report. Eleven projects were ranked as Tier I, six were ranked as Tier II, onewas ranked as a Tier III, seven were ranked and supported as Technical Assistanceand need further study, and eight were not ranked as Economic Development Activities.Communities may submit at any time during the year for consideration of incorporatinga project into the CEDS. Overall the NVC Capital Investment Priority Project Lisp nowhas a total of 33 projects. A project must be submitted and ranked in order to beconsidered for future EDA funding. All projects are included in the Annual Report toEDA due June 30th (matrix attached).

Page g

Business &Employment Changes


Based on sudden and severe economic conditions of higher unemployment rates andplant closings or a reduction in business employment changes as incorporated with theannual report, EDA has made the entire NVC area eligible to receive funding providingthe communities have submitted projects that have been ranked and rated by theStrategy and Advisory Committees. The two corporations have contacted each of thechief elected officials in the 18 communities, highly recommending that they review theircapital improvement projects relative to job growth, economic development andBrownfield Redevelopment needs.

Attached is a list of businesses that are registered with the State Labor Department fora possible reduction in their workforce.

As reported earlier, Ansonia, Naugatuck and fVewtown had interest in submittingapplications to the EDA Philadelphia Regional office. However, EDA has advised allcommunities of its new quarterly funding round application process. Currently, EDA ison a continuing funding resolution until Congress authorizes a new federal fiscal budget.EDA is the only agency in the federal government with the exclusive mission to helpcreate and retain jobs and leverage private investment in the nation's regions. EDArecently announced several important changes to its grant application and reviewprocess to ensure it is as efficient, transparent and competitive as possible.

Local officials have become more aware of the CEDS process and their participation inthe quarterly meetings improves from quarter to quarter pertaining to attendance andsubmission of recommendafiions for inclusion.

Demographics — NVC —18 Communities

The demographics have been revised to show the expansion of the CEDS to 18communities. The 18 communities of the NVC CEDS population in 2000 was 382,125and in 2010 per the US Census the population increased to 403,578, a difference of21,453 a 5.6% change. The Connecticut population in 2000 was 3,405,565 and in 2010increased to 3,574,097, a difference of 168,532 a 4.9% change.

Eleven of the eighteen communities grew at a rate equal to or higher than the state (seechart 2). All of the eighteen communities had an increase in population from 2000 to2010 per the US Census. Oxford had the largest percentage increase of 29.1 %.

Page to


Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics - NVC

The Connecticut unemployment rate for the year from April 2011 to April 2012decreased from 8.9% to 7.5°/o. The average unemployment rate for the eighteen NVCcommunities decreased from 9.9% to 8.5%. Ten of the eighteen communities were ator below the state average with Newtown the lowest at 5.2%. The United Statesadjusted rate for the same period was 7.7%. Eight of the NVC communities were abovethe national average of 7.7%. The labor force for the NVC increased to 210,662 people.Waterbury had the largest workforce with Shelton second. Bethlehem had the smallestwork force.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rate Over Time

The labor force in the NVC and the State of Connecticut had a modest increase of16,842 and 162,700 respectively from April of 2000 to April of 2012. All of thecommunities in the NVC except Shelton had an increase in the labor force from April2011 to April 2012.

Connecticut's labor force increased from April 2011 to April 2012 by 15,700 peopleaccording to the CT Labor Department. The NVC increased by 991 people during thesame period.

All of the communities in the NVC had an increase in the labor force from April 2000 toApril 2012 with Waterbury, Oxford and Newtown showing the largest changes.Waterbury had an increase of 3,406, Oxford had1770 followed by Newtown with 1,557people. (see Employment Chart April 2000 to April 2012).

Lessons Learned

The Advisory and Strategy Committees under the leadership of its Chairperson, SheilaO'Malley of the City of Derby has continued to develop a partnership with governmentand business leaders through the CEDS Outreach process. The results of the publicforums have drawn more than six hundred parfiicipants.

SEDC/WDC continues to utilize the CEDS process to develop economic partners withthe eighteen communities and prepare data and information to support one ofConnecticut's eight EDDs. Governor Malloy has recognized the efforts and supportedthe NVC designation to EDA. The Advisory Committee will focus its attention onobtaining EDA approval of the EDD, which will further regional projects and provide foradditional financial opportunities. The partnering committees continue to oversee theCEDS document, maintain, update and adjust, prepare and submit reports, monitorsignificant changes in the economy, coordinate all committees, outsource information by

Page 11


communicating with all the partners, all of which are reported in detail throughout theannual update.

Implementation and monitoring of the CEDS will have direct impacts on each of thecommunities with some communities having a greater economic benefit througheconomic growth, job expansion, new businesses and/or relocation than others, but theentire region will have the benefit because job opportunities will be available for allresidents of the corridor. The demographics show thaf fourteen communities hadincreases in the labor force while four communities had decreases in their labor forceduring the past year. The NVC labor fiorce showed and increase of 991 workers and 17of the 18 communities had a reduction in their unemployment rate. This is a positivesign concerning the economy future as we set our vision for 2012/2013. The CEDSprocess is also to be used as a measuring stick for improving transportation, which isthe bloodline for economic growth since the majority of our residents and/or businessesuse our highways to commute and to deliver their products and services. As per thestakeholders survey improved rail services on the Waterbury to Bridgeport line willassist with the traffic congestion by reducing car usage.

CT Congressional representatives are aware of the NVC CEDS and have participated inour public forums and assisted with economic development grants for our communities.Their assistance in procuring additional grants in aid for our individual communities or aregional organization will have an overall economic benefit.

Priorities — 2012/2013 Action Plan

o EDA approval of the NVC as an EDDTransportation Summit fall of 2012Brownfields Remediation/Redevelopment — creating and identifying sites

o Infrastructure Investments Action on pending Pre-Applications from EDAJob retention and growth through various approachesNational Heritage designation — continued supportPhilanthropy —the philanthropic movement is a long term activity thatcontinuously educates the public about the needs for time and financing to betterserve our various communities.

o Current major foundations and current major ED organizationso Role that foundations are playing with economic developmento Role that foundations might play in economic developmento Role thaf economic development organizations can play with philanthropic

effortso Maintain and update the 5-year CEDS:

o Implement the new CEDS plan for the next 3-year periodo Work Force development priorities

Next Steps

Page 12


o Review the priorities in the 2012/2013 CEDS work plan includingBrownfield Remediation.

o Final acceptance of the NVC/CEDS as one of Connecticut's first EDDs.

Future Plans

The two corporations will focus on the implementation of the EDA accepted 5-yearstrategy. Continued commitment from EDA for financial assistance and the approval ofthe NVC area as an EDD is required. Other funding partners are in place or anapplication for assistance has been made for continued participation. Based on theapproval of the CEDS, the two corporations continue to monitor, amend and report onthe progress of the goals and objectives of the overall strategy. Applications have beenmade to EDA, The Community Foundation for Greater New Haven, the ValleyCommunity Foundation, The Naugatuck Valley Savings and Loan Association and theKatharine Matthies Foundation, fhe various utility companies that service the CEDSdistrict, and any other organization in order to support the implementation of the CEDS.The funding from all of the organizations is vital in order to permit the successfulimplementation of the CEDS. Without full financial aid some activities will be reduced oreliminated and the future of the CEDS process could be in jeopardy.

The CEDS Process

The CEDS process has permitted SEDC/WDC to reach out to the 18 municipalities, theCouncils of Government and the private sector through the Chambers of Commerce toprovide them with a framewor{< for a planning process that incorporates all segments foreconomic development and growth within the region. The municipalities in the NVCrepresent the strengths and weaknesses of Connecticut. The NVC (SWOT) story wasoutlined in the Strategy, which was reviewed and accepted by EDA on the federal sideand on the state side with Governor Malloy recommending the creation of the NVCEDD. Some of the municipalities perForm quite well either as a place to conductbusiness, a residential area, or both. By contrast, other cities struggle economically andprovide less than optimal living conditions for current and potential residents. Themunicipalities that thrive maintain a stake in those cities that struggle because theirsuccess depends in part on the condition of towns that border them. The CEDS hasfocused on industry clusters, transportation needs, Brownfields remediation,environmental awareness and community development activities, and encouragedinformation technology zones like the one currently existing in downtown Waterbury.Based on the Transportation Summit, the Economic Development Summit and theRegional [3rownfields Partnership Summit, the CEDS leaders are planning on follow-upsummits to further explore "new development" opportunities for the NVC CEDS area.The summits have the support of the Councils of Government, the Regional PlanningAgencies and the two Chambers of Commerce. Through the ongoing planning processthe corporations will attempt to identify new funding sources to benefit the continuedplanning thafi is necessary for the modification of the CEDS. Continued support of local

Page 13


community foundations similar to the excellent support provided by the CommunityFoundation for Greater New Haven and the Matthies Foundation have beeninstrumental in the continued success of the CEDS process for the region.

Work Plan 2012-2013 Outcomes

1. Receive EDA designation of the NVC as an EDD.2. Continue the Implementation the NVC CEDS Strategy.3. Improve overall transportation infrastructure through capital projects.4. Improve local infrastructure through capital projects listed in the CEDS.5. Brownfield's land/building reclamation/remediation.6. Increase philanthropic activities and efforts.7. Increase awareness of National Heritage Corridor.8. Economic recession continues to have an impact on the 18 communities, while

some improvement in the unemployment statics have been noted there arecontinued —loss of jobs, planting closings or relocations, housing slow downs,and foreclosures continue at an all time high. The 2010 census indicate most ofthe communities have show an increase in their population, please refer to thepopulation chart for the actual changes.

The SEDC/WDC will with the assistance of its financial partners continue theinvolvement of the eighteen communities and all its leaders to monitor amend andstrengthen the overall CEDS strategy. Encourage all the economic developmentpartners to actively participate in the planning process, attend seminars and submitvarious capital projects, identify and monitor the remediation of Brownfields, utilize state(DECD/Office of Brownfield Remediation and Development) financial program for returnof Brownfields to productive use, monitor the current jobs/employment status, and assistbusinesses with visions of expansion into the CEDS market area:

2012/2013 Action Items

o Designation of NVC as an EDDo Inventory Brownfield reclamation/development sites in NVCo Access Brownfield Financial Program through DECD Loan Programo Job training, retraining efforts to reduce unemploymento Philanthropic investmento Improved transportation networks via highway and railo Expand and improve public infrastructureo Establishment of the Area as a National Heritage Park.

Page 14

Ansonia's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010. Ansonia'spopulation for 2010 was 19,249 a difference of 695 people from the 2000 population of 18,554.Ansonia's population, the eighth largest population in the NVC, increased from 2000 to 2010 by 3.7%.The population in the NVC increased by 5.6% from 2000 to 2010. Connecticut's population grew by4.9% during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteen communities grew at a rate equal to orhigher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period. Ansonia had an increase of 3.7%. Ansonia'srate was lower than the State and NVC averages.

Population by Sex/Age: Ansonia had 9,265 males, 9,984 females, 4,579 people were under age 18,and 14,670 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Ansonia: In April of 2012, the unemploymentrate was 9.9% in Ansonia, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and 7.7% in the US. Ansoniapossessed the second highest unemployment rate among NVC towns. Waterbury had the highestunemployment rate (12.3%) whereas Newtown possessed the lowest unemployment rate at 6.2%followed by Cheshire and Woodbury at 5.6%.

The unemployment and labor force have changed during the past years because of thenational/worldwide economic crisis. Most of the communities in the NVC reflect an increase in thelabor force and a decrease in the unemployment percentages.

In April of 2012, Ansonia possessed 5% of the labor force in the NVC. Its total labor force of 10,458was the seventh largest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highest share of the NVC'slabor force at 24.4% whereas Bethlehem possessed about one percent of the NVC's labor force in2012.

Despite its small labor force, Ansonia had more than 1,038 people of the unemployed labor force inthe NVC in April of 2012. Ansonia maintained the fourth largest number of the NVC's total number ofunemployed in April of 2012. Waterbury possessed the highest number of unemployed (6,308)whereas Bethlehem possessed the smallest number (132) of the NVC's unemployed in April of 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rate Over Time: Ansonia's labor forceincreased by 962 people from April 2000 to April of 2012. The employed labor force in the NVC andin the state increased by 16,842 people, and 162,700, respectively.

Ansonia's percent of unemployed went from 2.5% in 2000 to 10.9% in 2011 and down in 2012 to9.9%. The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployedwent from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Ansonia $49,794, County/ New Haven$58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.

Naugatuck Valley Corridor June 2012Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy

~~~~~~~~~or~~ec9~~cu~~

Governme~zt

~_,( /~_~ \ ~ .;tart here

Co~rnee-ticiit Econo»aic Resource Center I~1c;

Government Form: Mayor-Board of Aldermen~u of Debt Service (2009) $8,934,708

As /o of Expenditures 15.6 /o

Total Revenue (2009) $58,164,892Total Expenditures (2009) $57,203,675

Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $1,675,945,517

Tax Revenue $28,644,425Education $31,520,992

per Capita $88,768

Non-taac Revenue $29,520,467Other $16,747,975

As % of State Average 53%

Intergovernmental $26,302,924 Total Indebtness (2009) $2g~4g0,079 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2007

Per Capita Tax (2009) $1,556As % of Expenditures 49.8% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) A3

As % of State Average 63.9%Per Capita $1,547 Actual Mill Rate (2007) 32.30As % of State Average 73.0% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 14.98

of Grand List Com/Ind (2007) 10.8%

Hocrsing/Real Estate

Housi~ag Stock (2009) Tow» County Stnte

Existing Units (total) 8,026 352,042 1,452,007

%Single Unit 48.5°/a 59.5°/a 64.8%

New Permits Auth. (2009) 2 509 3,786

As %Existing Units 0.02% 0.14% 0.26%

Demolitions (2009) 2 212 1,219

House Sales (2009) 63 3,553 14,696

Median Price $228,000 $246,000 $265,000

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 49.5% 33.2% 31.5%

Owner Occupied Dwellings (2009)

As %Total Dwellings

Subsidize Housing (2008)

Dish•ib:~tion of Horse Sales (2009)

Number of Sales

Less than $100,000

$100,000-$199,999

$200,000-$299,999

$300,000-$399,999

$400,000 or MoreLabor Force

Place of Residence Connnuters (2000)

(2009) Town Cormty S1nte Commuters into Town from:

Labor Force 10,126 450,421 1,889,947 Ansonia 1,335

Employed 9,142 410,346 1,734,291 Seymour 357

Unemployed 98~t 40,075 155,656 Derby 324

Unemployment Rate 9.7% 8.9% 8.2% Shelton 259

Place of YYoek (2009) Oxford 163

# of Units 318 22,428 104,.314 Waterbury 154

Total Employment 3,623 349,363 1,615,355 New Haven 130

2000-'09 Growth AAGR -2.2% -0.6°/a -0.4% Beacon Falls 94

Mfg Employment n.a. Milford 90

Orange 90I~fIf ON TN fnYNfOf1nN......... ~. J ... ..........~

Town Sinte

Banks (2007) 5 1,029

Crime Rate (2009) Distance to A~ajo~• Cities Miles

Per 100,000 Residents 188 298 Hartford 35

Boston 126

Library (2010) TotivrrNe~v York City 6~

Total Volumes 97,011Providence 92

Circulation Per Capita 5.6

3,687 185,400 812,964

48% 53% 57%

1,147 41,649 149,355

Town Corutty Stnte

80 346

24 953 3,539

31 1,347 4,847

8 6~5 2,510

528 3,454

Town Residents Commuting to:

Ansonia 1,335

Shelton 849

Derby 721

Bridgeport 645

New Haven 639

Stratford 533

Milford 503

Seymour 387

Trumbull 339

Stamford 212

Residential Utilities

Electric Provider

The United Illuminating Co.

(800) 257-0141

Gas Provider

Yankee Gas Company

(800)-989-0900

Water Provider

Birmingham Utilities

(203)735-1888

Cable Provider

COMCAST/SEYMOUR

(800)266-2278

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 wtivw.cerc.cont No representalron a• tirarranties, expressed or implied, are girenregardi»g the accuracy of dzis it formation.

~~fll ~~I111Il~1~ ~~1~11~11 ~~1~;11~1U~

CERC Town Profile 2011

Town Hall Belongs to

253 Main Street New Haven County

Ansonia, CT 06401 LMA Bridgeport - Stamford

(203) 736-5900 Valley Economic Dev. Region

Valley Planning Area

DemographicsRace/Ethnicity (2010) Toiv~r Cormty Stnte

Po crlation 2010P ( ) Toxi: Comity State White 15,169 647,897 2,786,7611990 18,403 804,219 3,287,116 Black 1,845 105,120 337,2992000 18,554 824,008 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 397 30,934 128,6512010 18,531 849,161 3,511,137 Native American 44 1,551 6,4182015 18,132 858,824 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 1,071 63,659 252,008

' 10-' 15 Growth / Yr -0.4% 0.2% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 1,834 109,864 411,629

Land Area (sq. miles) 6 606 5,009 Poi~erty Rate (2009) 9.7% 10.7% 8.7%

Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 3,073 1,402 701 Ed:icational Atlairnnent (2010)

Median Age (2010) 38 39 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Toit~ir % Stnte

Households (2010) 7,359 322,963 1,337,758 High School Graduate 5,311 42% 684,864 29%

Med HH Inc. (2010) $49,794 $58,719 $65,686 Some College 3,267 26% 585,203 25%

Bachelors or More 2,477 20%a 842,517 35%Age Disb~ibution (2010)

0-4 5-17 18-24 25-49 SO-64 65+ Totnl

Male 619 3% 1,508 8% 840 5% 3,116 17% 1,653 9% 1,150 6% 8,886

Female 580 3% 1,491 8% 885 5% 3,257 18% 1,799 10% 1,633 9% 9,645

County Total 51,376 6% 141,420 17% 82,147 10% 287,846 3~% 165,112 19% 121,260 14% 849,161

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20°/a 500,114 14% 3,511,137

F~ns~nss~i~c

ofBusiness Profrle (2005) % of Toinl Top Five Grand List (2009) Amos~rt Net

Sector Eslnblislrt~re~rts Emvlovr~re~rtTarget $14,347,730 1.2%

Ansonia Shopping Center $10,966,900 0.9%Agriculture 2.1°/a 0.5% p~sonia E & A LLC $8,945,900 0.8%Coast. and Mining 15.2°/a 5.6% United Illuminating Co. $6,823,547 0.6%

Manufacturing 4.4% 16.5% 445 Beaver Brook LLC $6,168,800 0.5%

Trans. and Utilities 2.0% 4.1% Net Grand List (2009) $1,164,619,962

Trade 23.2% 19.7% Top Five ~Yfajor Enrplo~~ers (2006)

Finance, Ins. and 5 g% 2 4~~a

Ansonia Copper &Brass Farrell CorporationReal Estate Big Y Supermarket Hilltop Health CenterServices 42.6% 40.8% Birmingham Group Health SeivicGovernment 4.6% 10.3% Town State

Retail Sales (2007) $121,023,935 $136,936,194.241Ald Outlets

- Education

2009-2010 School Year Town Sinte

Total Town School Enrollment 2,855 552,782

Most public school students in Ansonia attend Ansonia SchoolDistrict, ~~~hich has 2,674 students.

For more education dataplease see:http://www.state.ct.us/sde/

Students per Computer Town

Elementary: 6.3

Middle: 4.2

Secondary: 4.0

Co~vzectictrt ~1laste~y Test Percent Above Goal

Graded Grade 6 Grade 8

Taiv~r State Town S/nte Tower Sfnte

Reading 54 61 51 69 49 69

Math 81 64 70 69 50 65

Writing 53 64 43 62 45 67A>>erage SAT Sco1•e

Sfnfe Ave~•age Class Size Tow~t Stn1e

4.1 Grade K 20.5 Grade 2 23.Q Reading 481 503

2.8 Grade 5 20.6 Grade 7 19.0 Writing 470 506

2.7 High School 18.6 Math 445 508

To~~m Profiles Ma ~, 2011. Pa e 1 No representation or irarranlies, eipressed or rmplred, are5 g 1V1V1V.Cet'C.COVt given regarding the accia•acy of this i~ for~uatio~i.

2010 Census Interactive Population Search

I`Vii~ll~ View: 2010 Census Interactive Population Mai

~~~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~r~~~r~~.c~~~~ ~~~~o~~~~~i~,~~r~ ~~~r~~~

~c~ ~ ~~Il~~~Il~~ ~~~y

Page 1 of 3

Population

Total Population 19,249

Housing Status( in lousing units unless noted )

Total 8,148

Occupied 7,510

Owner-occupied 4,356

Population in owner-occupied11,604

(number of individuals)

Renter-occupied 3,154

Population in renter-occupied 7,526(number of utdividuals )

Vacant 638

Vacant: for rent 285

Vacant: for sale 64

Vacant: for seasonaUrecreationaUoccasional use 22

Population by Se~Age

Male

Female

Under 18

18 &over

20 - 24

25 - 34

35-49

50-64

65 &over

Population by Ethnicity

Hispanic or Latino

Non Hispanic or Latino

Population by Race

White

African American

Asian

American Indian and Alaska Native

9,265

9,984

4,579

14,670

1,173

2,629

4,177

3,629

2,592

3,212

16,037

14,942

2,230

371

50

http://2010.census.gov/2010census/popmap/ipmtext.php?fl=09 4/3/2012

Beacon Falls' Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010. BeaconFalls' population for 2010 was 6,049 a difference of 803 additional people from the 2000population of 5,246. Beacon Falls' population, the second smallest population in the NVC, grewby 15.3% from 2000 to 2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6% from 2000 to 2010.Connecticut's population grew by 4.9%during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteencommunities grew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period.Beacon Falls had the 3rd highest increase at 15.3% or 803 people during this period. BeaconFalls' rate was higher than the State and NVC averages.

Population by Sex/Age: Beacon Falls had 3,020 males, 3,029 females, 1,377 people wereunder age 18, and 4,672 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Beacon Falls: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 8.1% in Beacon Falls, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and8.7% in the US. Beacon Falls possessed the seventh highest unemployment rate among NVCtowns. Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3%) whereas Newtown possessedthe lowest unemployment rates at 5.2.7%.

The unemployment and labor force have changed during the past years because of thenational/worldwide economic crisis. Most of the communities in the NVC reflect an increase inthe labor force and a decrease in the unemployment percentages.

In April of 2012, Beacon Falls possessed 1.6 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its totallabor force of 3,452 was the second smallest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained thehighest share of the NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem only about morethan one percent of the NVC's labor force in 2012.

Beacon Falls had 279 unemployed in the labor force in the NVC in 2012. Beacon Fallsmaintained the 2~d smallest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterburypossessed the largest number of unemployed (6308) whereas Bethlehem possessed thesmallest number (132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates Over Time: Beacon Falls' laborforce increased by 472 workers from April of 2000 to April of 2012 whereas the employmentforce in the NVC and the state increased by 16,842 and 163,700, respectively.

Beacon Falls' percent of unemployment went from1.8% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011, to 8.1 % in2012. The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut'sunemployed went from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 21012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Beacon Falls $66,901, County/NewHaven $58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


1~~~~~~ ~ ~~11~~ CC~~r~rnc~~~~c~l~~.~CERC Town Profile 2011

Town Hall Belongs ~o

10 Maple Avenue New Haven County

Beacon Falls, CT 06403 LMA Waterbury

(203) 729-4340 Naugatuck Valley Economic Dev. Region

Central Naugatuck Valley Planning Area

DemographicsRace/Etivricity (2010) Totivn Couirty Stn1e

Po illation 2010p ~ ~ Town Counry Stnte White 5,262 647,897 2,786,7611990 5,083 804,219 3,287,116 Black 180 105,120 337,2992000 5,246 824,008 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 114 30,934 128,6512010 5,708 849,161 3,511,137 Native American 4 1,551 6,4182015 5,916 858,824 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 148 63,659 252,008

'10-'15 Growth / Yr 0.7% 0.2% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 181 109,864 411,629

Land Area (sq. miles) 10 606 5,009 Poverty Rate (2009) 3.8% 10.7% 8.7%

Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 584 1,402 701 Educational Attainment (2010)Median Age (2010) 38 39 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Toiv~r % StnteHouseholds (2010) 2,165 322,963 1,337,758 High School Graduate 1,193 30% 689,864 29%Med HH Inc. (2010) $66,901 $58,719 $65,686 Some College 1,174 30% 585,203 25%

Bachelors or More 1,194 30% 842,517 35%Age Dish~ibtrtioi~ (2010)

0-4 S-]7 Y8-14 ZS-49 SO-64 65+ TotnlMale 203 4% 519 9% 233 4% 1,084 19% 583 10% 266 5% 2,888Female 154 4% 480 8% 202 4% 1,090 19% 586 10% 308 5% 2,820County Total 51,376 6% 141,420 17% 82,147 10% 287,846 34% 165,112 19% 121,260 14% 849,161State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

F~nrons~ni~c

ofB:isiness Profrle (2005) % of Totol Top Fire Grand List (2009) Antotntt Net

BMV Assoc I $9,829,400 1.8%Sector Estnblis/tme~rts Enm/ov~rrentCT Light &Power Co. $7,284,180 1.4%

Agriculture 3.8% 1.4% Chatfield Farms Communict Assoc $4,047,470 0.8%Const. and Mining 18.8% 10.7% Murtha Enterprises Inc. $3,946,270 0.7%Manufacturing 11.3% 38.6% SMSP - Connecticut LLC $3,150,000 0.6%

Trans. and Utilities 5.6% 4.9% Net Grand List (2009) $531,822,271

Trade 18.3% 12.3% Top Five Major Entploye~s (2006)Finance, Ins. and Baker's Choice Knapp Container ManufacturerReal Estate

6 ~% 2 6%Ideal Manufacturing Automated Mailmen Inc.

Services 31.5°/a 24.4% Frai~zus Company Inc.Government 4.7% 5.1% Toiv~r Sinfe

RetnilSn/es (2007) $28,095,686 $136,936,194,241All Outlets

- Educatio~z

2009-2010 Schoo( Year Town Stnte


Most public school students in Beacon Falls attend Regional SchoolDistrict 16, which has 2,568 students.

For more education dataplease see:http:/hnv~v.state.ct.us/sde/

St:rde~Tts per Conrp:rter Toiv~i

Elementary: 2.8

Middle: 1.8Secondary: 2.0

Stnte

4.1

2.82.

Cav~ectic:rt Mastery Test Percent Above Goal

Grade 4 Grade 6 Grade 8

Tower Stnte Tow~t Stnte Tarn StateReading 64 61 76 69 76 69

Math 64 64 75 69 71 65Writing 71 64 75 62 74 67

Average SAT Scae

Average Class Size Toivit S/nfe

Grade K 16.8 Grade 2 19.0 Reading 516 503

Grade 5 21.1 Grade 7 24.1 Writing 522 506

7 High School 19.1 Math 533 508

Town Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 No representation or irarranlies, e.~~ressed or tarp/tell, arey $ 1VtiV1V.CePC.CO~)t

giren regarding the accurac,7~ of this i~ fornrallon.

~~1~°Q~1~ ~i~~1~~

~c~~~~~~~~~~.~~Government

l---' ~ ~---__~~ ~. ~~ .f/rJl't ~)C1'C

Cnnncetic-~~t Eco»omicR~co~irieCc»tc~r, Lac:

Govermnent Form: Selectman-Town MeetingAnnuol Debt Service (2009)

As /o of Expenditures


Eq. Net Grand List (2007)

Tas Revenue $12,873,095Education $12,655,947

per Capita

Non-tax Revenue $4,899,946Other $4,724,802

As % of State Average

Intergovernmental $4,475,600 Total Indebtness (2009) $13,330,631 Date of Last Revaluation (2009)

Per Capita Tax (2009) $2,256As % of Expenditures 74.6% Moody's Bond Rating (2009)

As % of State Average 92.6%Per Capita $2>337 Actual Mill Rate (2007)As % of State Average 110.2% Equalized Mill Rate (2007)

of Grand List Com/Ind (2007;

Housing/Real Estate

Horsing Sock (2009) Toiv~r Corutty Strafe O~~~ner Occupied Dwellings (2009)

E~sting Units (total) 2,355 352,042 1,452,007 ~ %Total D~e~ellings

%Single Unit 73.6% 59.5% 64.8% Subsidize Housing (2008)

New Permits Auth. (2009) 28 509 3,786 Disd•ib:rtion of House Sales (2009)As %Existing Units 1.19% 0.14% 0.26% Number of Sales

Demolitions (2009) 0 212 1,219 Less than $100,000House Sales (2009) 39 3,553 14,696 $100,000-$199,999

Median Price $234,000 $246,000 $265,000 $200,000-$299,999

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 25.7% 33.2% 31.500 $300,000-$399,999$400,000 or More

Labor Force

Place of Residence Comnuders (2000)

(2009) Torvit Corurty Stnte Commuters into Town from:

Labor Force 3,346 450,421 1,889,947 Waterbury 308

Employed 3,053 410,346 1,734,291 Beacon Falls 145

Unemployed 293 40,075 155,656 Naugatuck 137

Unemployment Rate 8.8% 8.9% 8.2% Seymour 42

Place of 6l~a~k (2009) Southbury 37

# of Units 108 22,428 104,314 Middlebury 36

Total Employment 887 349,363 1,615,355 Torrington 32

2000-'09 Growth AAGR -0.9% -0.6% -0.4% Prospect 25

Mfg Employment n.a. Hamden 23

Watertown 20nil,,,.. 1..t .. ,.s;.,..Vl/I G/ 1/{f VI ~/(UL[V/L

Tow~t Stnte

Banks (2007) 0 1,029

G•inte Rafe (2009) Distance to Major Cities Miles


Boston 122

Library (2010) To►vitNew York City 71



$485,626

2.7%

$738,923,414

$137,015

82%

2006

34.06

14.05

8.1%

1,574 185,400 812,964

66% 53% 57%

31 41,649 149,355

Toi~~n County Sfnte

9 80 346

5 953 3,539

15 1,347 4,847

8 .645 2,510

2 528 3,454


Shelton 245

Waterbury 230

Naugatuck 149

Beacon Falls 145

Seymour 144

Bridgeport 138

Trumbull 125

New Haven 123

Stratford 119

Southbury 115

Reside~7tial Utilities

Electric Provider

Connecticut Light & Power

(800)286-2000

Gas Provider

Yankee Gas Company

(800)989-0900

Water Provider

CT Water Company/Aquazion Water Compan

(800)286-5700

Cable Provider

COMCAST/SEYMOUR

(800)266-2278

Totvn Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 www.cerc.cmn n'o,•ep,•esenrar;on or•,~~arra~~ries, expressed or implied, are girenregardi~rg dte accur•ac~~ of this it forn~atroii.


IVi[~ll~ ~IIl~~~: 2010 Census Interactive Population MaU

~C'1[' ~ IE~~~~~~~ lia ~~➢~ ~~vv~u

Page 1 of 5

Population

Total Population 6,Q49

Housing Statusin housing units unless noted )

Total 2,509

Occupied 2,360


Population in owner-occupied 5,144( number of individuals )

Renter-occupied 445

Population in renter-occupied 905( number of individuals )

Vacant 149

Vacant: for rent 21

Vacant: for sale 39

Vacant: for seasonaUrecreational/occasional use 19

Population by Sex/.4~e

Male

Female

Under 18

18 &over

20 - 24

25 - 34

35 - 49

50 - 64

65 &over


Hispanic or Latino


Papulation by Race

White

African American

Asian


3,020

3,029

1,377

4,672

302

635

1,487

1,339

783

300

5,749

5,741

95

70

2

http://201 O.census.gov/2010census/popmap/ipmtext.php?fl=09 4/3/2012

Bethlehem's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010.Bethlehem's population for 2010 was 3,607 a difference of 185 additional people from the 2000population of 3,422. Bethlehem's population, the smallest in the NVC, grew by 5.4% from 2000to 2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6% from 2000 to 2010. Connecticut'spopulation grew by 4.9% during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteen communitiesgrew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period. Bethlehem'spopulation increased by 5.4% or 185 residents. Bethlehem's rate was higher than the State andequal to the NVC average.

Population by Sex/Age: Bethlehem had 1,779 males, 1,828 females, 747 people were underage 18, and 2,860 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Bethlehem: In April of 2012 theunemployment rate was 5.6% in Bethlehem, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and7.7% in the US. Bethlehem possessed the third lowest unemployment rate among NVC towns.Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3%) whereas Newtown possessed thelowest unemployment rate (5.2%).

The unemployment and labor force have changed during the past years because of thenational/worldwide economic crisis. Most of the communities in the NVC reflect an increase inthe labor force, and a decrease in the higher unemployment percentages.

In April of 2012, Bethlehem possessed about 1 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its totallabor force of 1,925 was the smallest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highestshare of the NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem possessed about 1 percentof the NVC's labor force in 2012.

Bethlehem maintained less than 1 percent of the unemployed labor force in the NVC in 2012.Bethlehem maintained the smallest number of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 20121.Waterbury possessed the largest number of unemployed (6,308) whereas Bethlehempossessed the smallest number (132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates Over Time: Bethlehem's laborforce increased by 86 workers from April 2000 to April 2012, whereas the employment force inthe NVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700 respectively.

Bethlehem's percent of unemployed went from 1.6% in 2000 to 7.5% in 2011 to 6.4 % in 2012.The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. ConnecticuYs unemployedwent from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Bethlehem $85,096, County/Litchfield $68.682 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


~'~~~~~~I'r~~r~9 CC~:~Ir~~r~~c~~ll~u1~;CERC Town Profile 2011

Town Hall Belargs to

P.O. Box 160 Litchfield County

Bethlehem, CT 06751 LMA Torrington



DemographicsRace/Ethnicity (2010) Town Cornrty Slnte

Po trlation 2010P ( ~ Toxnr Corntry Stn/e White 3,391 176,854 2,786,7611990 3,071 174,092 3,287,116 Black 9 1,872 337,2992000 3,422 182,193 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 44 3,453 128,6512010 3,523 187,467 3,511,137 Native American 1 170 6,4182015 3,444 186,535 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 78 5,118 252,008

']0-'15Gro~vth/Yr -0.5% -0.1% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 42 7,071 411,629


Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 182 204 701 ECI2lCQl%077QI A//QI171)TC771 ~ZOIO~

Median Age (2010) 46 43 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Toivrr % S1nteHouseholds (2010) 1,308 74,767 1,337,758 High School Graduate 641 2S°/a 689,864 29%

Med HH Inc. (2010) $85,096 $68,682 $65,686 Some College 769 30% 585,203 25%Bachelors or More 999 39% 82,517 35%

Age Dish~ib:rtion (2010)

0-4 5-17 18-24 25-49 SO-64 65+ TotnlMale 84 2% 276 8% 116 3% 550 16% 468 13% 226 6% 1,720Female 69 2% 315 9% 116 3% 556 16% 472 13% 275 8% 1,803County Total 9,511 5% 28,722 15% 15,958 9% 60,867 32% 43,128 23% 29,281 16°/a 187,467State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

F~nNnrr~irc

ofBusiness Profile (2005) % ojTotnl Top Fire Grand Lisl (2009) Antornrt Net

CT Light &Power Co. $2,558,000 0.6%Sector Estnblish»rents Enrplovrnenl

Watertown Fire District $1,378,400 0.3%Agriculture 11.0% 6.8% Ruane Mt Remainder Trust $1,147,860 0.3%Const. and Mining 21.1°/a 19.4% Millspaugh Fred $1,116,000 0.3%

Manufacturing 4.5% 2.6% Dufur John & Rosemanry $1,104,060 0.3%

Trans. and Utilities '3.9% 43% Net Grand List (2009) $401,680,457

Trade 13.8% 18.9% Top Five Major Employers (2006)Finance, Ins. and

3 3% 1 g~~aWellspring Foundation Inc. Connecticut Wells Inc./SDS Water

Real Estate painted Pony Restaurant Woodhall School Inc.Services 33.7% 44.9% Regina Laudis AbbeyGovernment 7.7% 1.2% Toiv~r Sfnte

Retnil Snles (2007) $21,810,754 $136,936,194,241All Outlets

Filu~nfinri

2009-2010 School Year Town Slnle

Total Town School Enrollment 499 552,782

Most public school students in Bethlehem attend Regional SchoolDistrict 14, which has 2,127 students.

I'or more education dataplease see:http://www.statc.ct.us/sde/

Students per Conrp:rler Toivn

Elementazy: 4.9


Conneclictr! Mastery Tes[ Percent Above Goal


Town State Town S/rate Totivn Strafe

Reading 70 61 85 69 81 69

Math 82 64 90 69 74 65

Writing 72 64 82 62 80 67Average S~iTScore

Stnte Average Class Size Town Stnte

4.1 Grade K 16.9 Grade 2 20.4 Reading 525 503



Town Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 No represerrtallon or irarraniies, expressed w• iinp/ied, areY g wiv~v. cerc.COt)t given regarding the acc:n•acy of d7is i~ foruration.

.-r ~__~ t._~ i

.rtn~•t here~

~~~~YllYfleCtlCYll~ ~.~• ~ U ~Coitncctruit Ecouaiiic 2esniirieCei~ter, l~n:

Governme~rt

~ua~l Debt Service (2009) $169,599Government Form: Selectman-Town MeetingAs /o of Expenditures 1.8 /o


Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $663,369,368Tax Revenue $8,192,774

Education $6,984,949 pe►• Capita $181,100


As % of State Average 109%Intergovernmental $1,601,535 Total Indebtness (2009) $x,670,104 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2003

Per Capita Tax (2009) $2,362As % of Expenditures 17.8% Moody's Bond Rating (2009)

As % of State Average 96.9%Per Capita $481 Actual Mill Rate (2007) 21.82As % of State Average 22.7% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 12.02


Housing/Real Estate

Housing Stock (2009) Town Cotntry Stnte Owner Occupied Dwellings (2009) 1,199 52,087 812,964

Eacisting Units (total) 1,482 83,929 1,452,007 As %Total Dwellings 74% 63% 57%

%Single Unit 91.9% 77.7% 64.8% Subsidize Housing (2008) 24 4,303 149,355

New Permits Auth. (2009) 7 163 3,786 Disiribulion of House Sales (2008) Town Cou~►ty StnteAs %Existing Units 0.47% 0.19% 0.26% Number of Sales

Demolitions (2009) 0 48 1,219 Less than $100,000 26 273House Sales (2008) 25 1,152 16,606 $100,000-$199,999 2 250 2,797

Median Price $379,900 $273,500 $290,000 $200,000-$299,999 7 376 5,622

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 27.9°/a 36.3% 31.5% $300,000-$399,999 4 221 3,083$400,000 or More 12 279 4,831

Labor Force

Place of Residence Comm:de~s (2000)(2009) Tow~t County Stnte Commuters into Town from: To~~m Residents Commuting to:

Labor Force 2,035 105,588 1,889,947 Bethlehem 295 Bethlehem 295

Employed 1,883 96,928 1,734,291 Waterbury 68 Waterbury 237

Unemployed 152 8,660 155,656 Woodbury 55 Southbury 194

Unemployment Rate 7.5% 8.2% 8.2% Torrington 46 Watertown 115

Place of Y~'a•k (2009) Bridgewater 35 Woodbury 101

# of Units 112 6,066 104,314 Watertown 34 Washington 91Total Employment 656 59,332 1,615,355 Thomaston 29 Litchfield 562000-'09GrowtUAAGR 2.8% -1.2% -0.4% O~ord 20 Torrington 54

Mfg Employment n.a. Naugatuck 15 New Milford 45

Litchfield 11 Danbury 43Other Information

Reside~alial Utilities

Toiv~r Stnte Electric ProviderBanks (2007) 1 1,029 Connecticut Light &Power

(800)286-2000Crime Rale (2009) Distance to ~llajor Cities Mi/es

Gas ProviderPer 100,000 Residents 0 298 Hanford 29 na

Boston 123 naLibrary (2010) Town Water Provider

Ne~v York City ~~ Municipal ProviderTotal Volumes 26,408

Providence 93 local ContactCirculation Per Capita 7.5

Cable Provider

Charter Conununications of Western Connect800 827-8288

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 www.CeJ'C.COflt n~o represenlalion or warrrn~ties, expressed or implied, are girenregal ding the accm ac~~ of this i~ formation


Map View: 2010 Census Interactive Population Mai

~~~~ ~~rr~~~~ ~r~~~r~~~t~~~ ~~'~~o~~l~~i~:~~r~ ~~~~r~~~

(C'~' ~ l}~~tt~~~~Il~~r~ ~~env~Il

~'opitlaYia~~

Page 1 of 16


Housing Status( u~ hoasing units unless noted )

Total 1,575

Occupied 1,411



Renter-occupied 212

Population in renter-occupied 413( number of individuals)

Vacant 164

Vacant: for rent 8

Vacant: for sale 17


Population by Sex/Age

Male 1,779

Female 1,828

Under 18 747

18 &over 2,860

20 - 24 158

25 - 34 227

35 - 49 785

50 - 64 1,068

65 &over 539


Hispanic or Latino 61

Non Hispanic or Latino 3,546

Population by Race

White 3,532

African American 16

Asian 18

American Indian and Alaska Native 4

http://2010.census.gov/2010census/popmap/ipintext.php?fl-09 4/3/2012

Cheshire's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010.Cheshire's population for 2010 was 29,261 a difference of 718 people from the 2000 populationof 28,543. Cheshire's population, the fourth largest in the NVC, grew by 2.5%from 2000 to2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6%from 2000 to 2010. Connecticut'spopulation grew by 4.9%during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteen communitiesgrew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period. Cheshire had anincrease of 2.5% or 718 residents. Cheshire's rate was lower than the State and NVC average.

Population by Sex/Age: Cheshire had 15,189 males, 14,072 females, 7,093 people wereunder 18 and 22,168 were 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Cheshire: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 5.6% in Cheshire, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and 7.7%in the US. Cheshire possessed the second lowest unemployment rate amongst NVC towns.Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (112.3%) whereasNewtown had the lowest unemployment rate among NVC towns (5.2%).

The unemployment and labor force have changed during the past years because of thenational/worldwide economic crisis most of the communities in the NVC reflect an increase inthe labor force and a decrease~in unemployment percentages.

In April of 2012, Cheshire possessed nearly 7.0 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its totallabor force of 14,721 was the fourth largest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained thehighest share of the NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem possessed onlyabout 1 percent of the NVC's labor force in 2012.

Cheshire had 822 unemployed in the labor force in the NVC in 2012. Woodbury had the lowestnumber of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterbury possessed the largestnumber of unemployed (6,308) whereas Bethlehem possessed the smallest number (132) of theNVC's unemployed in 20121.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates Over Time: Cheshire's laborforce increased by 900 workers from April 2000 to April 2012, whereas the employment force inthe NVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700, respectively.

Cheshire's percent of unemployed went from 1.6% in 2000 to 7.5% in 2011 t 6.4% in 2012. TheNVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployed wentfrom 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Cheshire $101,392, County/ NewHaven $58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


C~~~~~~r~~~ C~'~~~~~C~~~1~~CERC Town Profile 2011


84 South Main Sheet New Haven County

Cheshire, CT 06410 LMA New Haven



DemographicsRace/E[h~Ticity (2010) Town Comity State

PopzJation (2010) Town County State White 24,977 647,897 2,786,7611990 25,684 804,219 3,287,116 Black 1,922 105,120 337,2992000 28,543 824,008 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 1,198 30,934 128,6512010 29,411 849,161 3,511,137 Native American 51 1,551 6,4182015 29,124 858,824 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 1,263 63,659 252,008

' 10-' 15 Growth / Yr -0.2% 0.2% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 1,563 109,864 411,629

Land Area (sq, miles) 33 606 5,009 Pover/y Rate (2009) 2.5% 10.7% 8.7%

Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 894 1,402 701 Ed:icalional Attai»ment (2010)Median Age (2010) 40 39 40 Persons Age 25 or Older ToH~n % State

Households (2010) 9,459 322,963 1,337,758 High School Graduate 4,19 21°/a 689,864 29%


Bachelors or More 10,095 51% 842,517 35%Age Disb~ib:ttion (2010)

0-4 5-17 18-24 ZS-49 SO-64 65+ Totnl

Male 831 3% 2,786 9% 1,929 7% 5,516 19% 3,118 11% 1,584 5% 15,764

Female 764 3% 2,472 8% 6~4 2% 4,622 16% 2,944 10% 2,191 7% 13,647

County Total 51,376 6% 141,420 17% 8Z,1~17 10% 287,846 34°/a 165,112 19% 121,260 14% 849,161

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

Frnv~n~i~c

Btisif~ess Profile (2005) % aJTota!

Secfor Estnblislane~rts Emplovme~rt

Agriculture 3.5% 2.2%

Coast. and Mining 10.3% 2.9%

Manufacturing 5.8% 13.9%

Trans. and Utilities 3.2% 2.4%

Trade 21.1% 20.7%

Finance, Ins. andReal Estate

~ go~a 4.1%

Services 43.9% 47.0%

Government 4.4% 6.9%

Education

2009-2010 Scl7aol Yenr Town Sfnfe


Most public school students in Cheshire attend Cheshire SchoolDistrict, which has 4,982 students.

For more education dataplease see:http://www.state.cf.us/sde/

Sittdents per Contpttter Toiv~t

Elementary: 3.3


of

Top Five Grand List (2009} Antou~tt Net

Industrial Ave, LLC $40,586,710

CT Light &Power Co. $31,941,842

CT Indy CH LLC $21,550,440

CheshireBioTechAcquistionLLC $18,417,697

Macy's Coip $16,004,450

Net Grand List (2009)

Top Fire A~ajor Employers (2006)

Bozzuto's Inc. Elim Park Place

Pratt &Whitney Eagle Service U BAE Systems

Cheshire DirectT014~I1 State

RetnilSales(2007) $1,591,343,652 $136,936,191,241All Outlets

Cav~ecticut Mastery Test Percen[ Above GoalGrade ~l G~•ade 6 Grade 8

TOIU/i St!!lC T01471 Sl!!1C TO1VI1 .SfQ1C

Reading 78 61 91 69 85 69Math 84 64 90 69 89 65Writing 79 64 8~ 62 89 67

Average SAT Scw~e

State Average Class Size Tower Stnfe




Town Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 No represe~vtation or irai~~anties, expressed or inrplred, areY g 1Vw1U. Ce1'C. Coat given regardhtg the accuracy of dais i~ formation.

~~ ~(~ ~ stn~'t l~e~'e

~~Y~Y1~~C~ll~Y~~

~

~~_~ ~_~ ~~~,~_~ ~..) U (.~ 1G011I1CClJC1lJ ECOIJOlI1IC KL'SO!/)'CG GCIJrGI~ ~NG

Go :...........:: ~

Annual Debt Service (2009) $10,774,110Govermnent Form: Council-Manager o 0As /o of Expenditures 11.1 /o


Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $4,354,132,463Tax Revenue $71,546,221

EducationOther

$63,051,443$22,988,540

per Capita $147,763Non-tar Revenue $24,978,167 As % of State Average 89%Intergovernmental $22,600,186 Total Indebtness (2009) $1,537,604 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2003

Per Capita Ta~c (2009) $2421As % of Expenditures 73.9% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) Aa2



Housing/Real Estate

Ho:~sii~g Stock (2009) Tows: Cornrty~ Stnie Owner Occupied Dwellings (2009) 7,093 185,400 812,964

E~sting Units (total) 9,978 352,042 1,452,007 As %Total D~a~ellings 74% 53% 57%


New Permits Auth. (2009) 17 509 3,786 Distribution of House Sales (2008) Town Couirty StnteAs %Existing Units 0.17% 0.14% 0.26% Number of Sales

Demolitions (2009) 6 212 1,219 Less than $100,000 36 273House Sales (2008) 178 3,566 16,606 $100,000-$199,999 4 533 2,797

Median Price $328,450 $275,000 $290,000 $200,000-$299,999 59 1,504 5,622

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 13.9% 33.2% 31.So~o $300,000-$399,999 64 861 3,083$400,000 or More 51 632 4,831

- Labor Force

Place of Residence Comnnders (2000)(2009) Town Cornrty State Commuters into Town from: Town Residents Commuting to:

Labor Force 14,790 450,421 1,889,947 Cheshire 3,162 Cheshire 3,162

Employed 13,854 410,346 1,734,291 Waterbury 1,797 New Haven 1,343

Unemployed 936 40,075 155,656 Southington 851 Waterbury 1,105

Unemployment Rate 6.3°/a 8.9% 8,2% Meriden 831 Wallingford 966

Place of !-Va•k (2009) Wallingford 696 Hamden 750

# of Units 939 22,428 104,314 Hamden 488 Meriden 579Total Employment 15,209 349,363 1,615,355 Bristol 456 Hartford 4612000-'09 Growth AAGR 0.6% -0.6% -0.4% Naugatuck 448 North Haven 35~

Mfg Employment n.a Wolcott 401 Southington 257

Ne~m Haven 389 West Haven 220- OtIlBF IIIfOYiltQt%O/t

Reside~tlial Utilities

Town State Electric ProviderBanks (2007) 10 1,029 Connecticut Light &Power

(800)286-2000Crime Rate (2009) Distance to Major Cities Miles

Gas ProviderPer 100,000 Residents 44 298 Hanford 21 Yankee Gas Company

X800) 989-0900Boston 112

Library (2010) Totivn Water ProviderNewYork City 8~ South Central CT Regional Water Auth.

Total Volumes 120,220Providence 79 (203)562-4020

Circulation Per Capita 16.8Cable Provider

Cox Conununications NEW ENGLAND/ME800 955-9515

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 www, cerc.cotn No represenlatiwr or u~a»•anties, expressed or implied, are girenregarding the accts acy of 1I17S H7fOl7/1Qh017


Map View: 2010 Census Interactive Population Map

~~~~ ~~~su~ ~r~te~~~~~~~ I~~~ov~Il~~:~lc~~ ~~~r~~l~

~'~' ~ ~~~~~~u~e~ ~~~vIlIl

Page 1 of 6

Population


Housing Status( in lousing units wiles noted

Total 10,424

Occupied 10,041


Population in owner-occupied 24,170(number of individuals )


Population in renter-occupied 2,550(number of individuals )

Vacant 383

Vacant: for rent 75

Vacant: for sale 109



Male

Female

Under 18

18 &over

20 - 24

25 - 34

35-49

50-64

65 &over


Hispanic or Latino


Population by Race

White

African American

Asian


15,189

14,072

7,093

22,168

1,442

2,443

6,768

6,556

4,102

1,375

27,886

25,503

1,461

1,489

30


Derby's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010. Derby'spopulation 2010 was 12,902 a difference of 511 additional people from the 2000 population of12,391. Derby's population, the eleventh smallest in the NVC, grew by 4.1 %from 2000 to 2010.The population in the NVC increased by 5.6%from 2000 to 2010. ConnecticuYs populationgrew by 4.9% during the 2000 to 2010 period. Derby was below the state average of 4.9% andthe NVC of 5.6%. Eleven of the eighteen communities grew at a rate equal to or higher than thestate during the 2000 to 2010 period. Derby had an increase of 4.1%. Derby's rate was lowerthan the State and NVC average.

Population by Sex/Age: Derby had 6,192 male, 6,710 females, 2,708 people were under age18 and 10,914 were 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Derby: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 8.6% in Derby, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and 7.7% inthe US. Derby possessed the fifth highest unemployment rate among NVC towns. Waterburyhad the highest unemployment rate (12.3%) whereas Newtown possessed the lowestunemployment rate (5.2%).

The unemployment and labor force have changed during the past years because of thenational/worldwide economic crisis. Most of the communities in the NVC reflect an increase inthe labor force and a decrease in the higher unemployment percentages.

In April of 2012, Derby possessed 3.4 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its total labor forceof7, 154 was the twelfth largest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highest share ofthe NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem only possessed about 1 percent ofthe NVC's labor force in 2012.

Derby had more than 616 unemployed in the labor force in the NVC in 2012. Derby had thetenth largest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterbury possessedthe largest share of number on unemployed (6,308) whereas Bethlehem possessed thesmallest number (132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rate Over Time: Derby's labor forceincreased by 577 workers from April 2000 to April 2012, whereas the employment force in theNVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700, respectively.

Derby's percent of unemployed went from 2.7% in 2000 to 9.8% in 2011 to 8.6% in 2012. TheNVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployed wentfrom 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Derby $54,185, County/New Haven$58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


I~~~l~~~ C~~r~rrll~~~~~~~CERC Town Profile 2011


35 Fifth Street New Haven County

Derby, CT 06418 LMA Bridgeport - Stamford



DemographicsRace/Ethnicity (2010) Town Corntty Stote

Population (2010) Toivrr Cou~ety Stnte White 10,809 647,897 2,786,7611990 12,199 804,219 3,287,116 Black 706 105,120 337,2992000 12,391 824,008 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 366 30,934 128,6512010 ]2,598 849,161 3,511,137 Native American 17 1,551 6,4182015 12,313 858,824 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 700 63,659 252,008

'10-'15 Growth / Yr -0.5% 0.2% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 1,280 109,864 411,629


Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 2,530 1,402 701 Edarcatio»al Aitainnaerzt (201 Q)Median Age (2010) 40 39 40 Persons Age 25 or Older To»sir % Stnte



Bachelors or More 2,034 23% 842,517 35%Age Dish•ibutio» (2010)

0-4 S-17 I8-24 25-49 50-69 65+ Tatnl

Male 385 3% 977 8% 509 4% 2,295 18% 1,153 9% 814 6% 6,133

Female 344 3% 882 7% 533 4% 2,207 18% 1,298 10% 1,201 10% 6,465County Total 51,376 6% 141,420 17% $2,147 10% 287,846 34% 165,112 19% 121,260 14% 849,161

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

Frn~~nr»i~c

ofBusiness Profrle (2005) % of Tota/ Top Five Grand List (2009) Antou~rt Net

Sector Estnb/ishn►enfs Enmlovment49 Pershing Drive LLC $13,.500,000 1.5%

Derby Shopping CenterLLC $13,234,900 1.5%Agriculture 1.8% 0.4% ~tinozzi Peter ET AL $12,481,630 1.4%Const. and Mining 12.9% 4.3% United Illuminating Co. $10,266,570 11%Manufacturing 4.7% 7.6% Home Depot USA Inc $9,010,120 1.0%

Trans. and Utilities 1.8% 2.0°fo Net Grand List (2009) $908,690,081

Trade 27.4% 26.9% Top Five Alajor Employers (2006)Finance, Ins. and o

x•4/0o

2.6/0Griffin Health Services George Hegyi Industries

Real Estate Birmingham Health Center Home DepotServices 40.3%a 38.2% Derby Cellular Products, IncGovernment 3.6°/a 18.0% Toii>>r S1nfe

Retail Sales (2007) $186,362,498 $136,936,194,241All Outlets

F.d»rntinr~

2009-2010 School fear Totivrr Stnte

Total Town Sohoal Enrollment 1,569 552,782

Most public school students in Derby attend Derby School District,which has 1,462 students.

For more education dataplease see:http:/hvww.s tate.c t.us/sde/

Students per Coi~~pi~ter

Elementary:

Middle:Secondary:

T'ois~n Sfnle

4.7 4.1

2.83.0 2.7

Co~v7ectictrt ~llaste~y Tesl Perce~a! flbove Goal


Town State Town Stnie Toivir StnteReading 42 61 56 69 55 69Math 35 64 47 69 34 65

Writing 38 64 50 62 73 67Arerage SHIT Score

Average Class Size Toiv~r Stnte

Grade K 22.0 Grade 2 18.8 heading 436 503


High School 21.3 Math 423 508

Town Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 , No 1~epreserttation or iran•anties, expressed or implied, areY g W Wlt CCl'C.COAt gireri regarding llte accia•ac~~ of Jhis fr forixalion.

Q.OY~~I~~C~YCY~IIL

Governynent

Government Form: Mayor-Board of Aldermen

Total Revenue (2009) $37,271,196Total Expenditures (2009)

Ta~c Revenue $23,586,413Education

Non-taac Revenue $13,684,783Other

Intergovernmental $12,310,056 Total Indebtness (2009)

Per Capita Tam (2009) $l~gg2As %of Expenditures

As % of State Average 77,2o/a Per Capita


Housing/Real Estate

Housing Slock (2009)

E~sting Units (total)

%Single Unit

New Permits Autl~. (2009)

As %Existing Units

Demolitions (2009)

House Sales (2009)

Median Price

Built Pre 1950 share (2000)

Labor Force

Place of Reside~ace

(2009)

Labor Force

Employed

Unemployed

Unemployment Rate

Place of IVork (2009)# of Units

Total Employment

2000-'09 Growth AAGR

Mfg Employment

Town Cornrty

5,629 352,042

47.7% 59.5%

7 509

0.12% 0.14%

13 212

42 3,553

$222,070 $246,000

44.3% 33.2%

Totvn County

6,990 450,421

6,340 410,346

650 40,075

9.3% 8.9%

316 22,4284,928 349,363-0.3% -0.6%

n.a

~ Other Info~~mation ~

Banks (2007)

Crime Rate (2009)

Per 100,000 Residents

Tower Stnte

2 1,029

195

Library (2010) ToH~~t

Total Volumes 131,225


State

1,452,00764.8%

3,786

0.26°/a

1,219

14,696

$265,000

31.5%

( mart here'\~~UUV~

Co~tirecticnt Eca~onrii R<:rorirceCenter, Inc.

Annual Debt Service (2009) $2,262,919As % of Expenditures 5.8%

$38,788,369Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $1,380,321,088

$19,873,813per Capita $107,804

$16,651,637As % of State Average 65%

$13,320,988 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 200534.3% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) A2

$1,063 Actual Mill Rate (2007) 24.8050.1% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 17.28

°/a of Grand List Com/Ind (2007) 153%

Owner Occupied D~mellings (2009)

As %Total D~~~ellings


Dish•iG:rtior7 of House Sales (2009)

Number of Sales

Less than $100,000

$100,000-$199,999

$200,000-$299,999

$300,000-$399,999

$400,000 or More

Covrm:de~s (2000)

Stnte Convnuters into Town from:

1,889,947 Derby 987

1,734,291 Ansonia 721

155,656 Shelton 390

8 2o~a Seymour 389

Oxford 204

104,314 Naugatuck 157

1,615,355 Waterbury 145

-0.4% New Haven 132

Milford 111

West Haven 94

Distance to ~ITajor Cities Miles

298 Hartford 37

Boston 128

New York City 64

Providence 93

2,638 185,400 812,964

48% 53% 57%

587 41,649 149,355

T01VIJ Corrnry Stnte

80 34613 953 3,53924 1,347 4,8474 645 2,5101 528 3,454

To«m Residents Commuting to:

Derby 987

Shelton 905

Bridgeport 419

Milford 399

Stratford 348

New Haven 335

Ansonia 324

Orange 232

Norwalk 181

Trumbull 158


Electric Provider

The United Illuminating Co.

(800)257-0141

Gas Provider

Yankee Gas Company

(800)989-0900

Water Provider

Birmingham Utilities

(203)735-1888

Cable Provider

COMCAST/SEYMOUR

(800)266-2278

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 ~vtiviv. ce~'c. cof►t No represenlalion or tivarranfies, expressed or implied, are girenrega~ ding tl~e acc:n•acy ofThis infor•maiio~t.


I~V~a~~~ View: 2010 Census Interactive Population Mai

~~~~ ~'~r~~~~ ~r~~~r~~~~;~~~ ~'~~0~1~~~~~~~ ~~~~r~~~

~~ ~ ~~~~~~ ~Il~~

Population

Page 1 of 4


Housing Statusin housing units unless noted )

Total 5,849

Occupied 5,388


Population in owner-occupied x'832( number of individuals)


Population in renter-occupied 4,837(number of individuals)

Vacant 461


Vacant: for sale 55

Vacant: for seasonal/recreationaUoccasional use 38


Male 6,192

Female 6,710

Under 18 2,708

18 &over 10,194

20 - 24 803

25 - 34 1,777

35 - 49 2,811

50 - 64 2,524

65 &over 2,015


~ Hispanic or Latino 1,830


Population by Race

White 10,681

African American 980

Asian 332



Middlebury's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010.Middlebury's population for 2010 was 7,575 a difference of 1,124 additional people from the2000 population of 6,451. Middlebury's population, the third smallest in the NVC, however grewby 17.4% from 2000 to 2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6%from 2000 to 2010.Connecticut's population grew by 4.9% during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteencommunities grew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period.Middlebury had the 2~d highest increase to 17.4%. Middlebury's rate was higher than the Stateand NVC average.

Population by Sex/Age: Middlebury had 3,663 males, 3,912 females, 1,863 people were underage 18, and 5,712 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Middlebury: In April of 2012 theunemployment rate was 6.0% in Middlebury, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and7.7% in the US. Middlebury possessed the forth lowest unemployment rate among NVC towns.Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3%) whereas Newtown possessed thelowest unemployment rate (5.2%).

The unemployment and labor force have changed during the past years because of thenational/worldwide economic crisis. Most of the communities in the NVC reflect an increase inthe labor force and a decrease in the unemployment percentages.

In April of 2012, Middlebury possessed 1.9 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its total laborforce of 3,762 was the third smallest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highestshare of the NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem possessed about 1 percentof the NVC's labor force in 2012.

Middlebury had 241 of the unemployed labor force in the NVC in 2012. Middlebury had thesecond smallest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterburypossessed the largest number of unemployed (6,308), whereas Bethlehem possessed thesmallest share (132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates Over Time: Middlebury's laborforce increased by more than 548 workers from April 2000 to April 2012, whereas theemployment force in the NVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700,respectively.

Middlebury's percent of unemployed went from 1.6% in 2000 to 7.5% in 2011 to 6.0% in 2012.The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployedwent from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data - Middlebury $91,990, County/NewHaven $58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


1V1I~o1o~]1~~~~~r~~ ~~~r~~~~^~~~v1CERC Town Profile 2011


P.O. Box 392 Ne~v Haven County

Middlebury, CT 06762 LMA Waterbury


Central Naugatuck Valley Plamling Area

~ DemographicsRace/Ethnicity (2010) Tow~t Corntty Sfate

Po tdatior~ 2010P ( ) Tow~t Corrnty Stnie White 6,553 647,897 2,786,7611990 6,145 804,219 3,287,116 Black 196 105,120 337,2992000 6,451 824,008 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 174 30,934 128,6512010 7,108 849,161 3,511,137 Native American 0 1,551 6,4182015 7,101 858,824 3,545,169 OtherlMulti-Race 185 63,659 252,008

' 10-'15 Growth / Yr 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 144 1Q9,864 4ll,629


Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 400 1,402 701 Edtrcatrona/Attarnn7ent (2010)

Median Age (2010) 45 39 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Toiv~r % Stnte



Bachelors or More 2,295 45% 842,517 35%Age Disb~ib:rtion (2010)

0-4 5-17 18-24 25-49 SO-64 65+ Toin!

Male 185 3% 635 9% 202 3% 1,086 15% 899 13% 474 7% 3,481

Female 179 3% 621 9% 162 2% 1,149 16% 893 13% 623 9% 3,627

County Total 51,376 6% 141,x}20 17% 82,147 10% 287,846 34% 165,112 19% 121,260 14% 849,161

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

Rnnronrr~irc

ofBusi~~ess Profile (2005) % of Totnl Top Five Grand List (2009) Anrorrnt Net

Preston Park 2004 $24,611,900 2.3%Sector EslablisGnrents Eiunlovmerrt

Timex Group $14,563,192 1.3%Agriculture 2.2% 1.1% Chemtura USA Corporation $9,760,177 0.9%Const. and Mining 13.1% 7.0°/a Ridgewood at Middlebury $9,209,997 0.9%

Manufacturing X1.9% 18.6% Middlebury Edge $8,533,426 0.8%


Trade 15.8% 17.6% Top Five Major Employers (2006)

Finance, Ins, and 11.9% 6.8%

Crompton Corporation Tiines CorporationReal Estate Regional School Distric #15 PIC Design CorporationServices X5.0% 44.0% Quassy Amusement Park Inc.Government 5.4% 1.8% Town Slnte

Retail Sales (2007) $98,215,893 $136,936,194,241All Outlets

Fd~irntin»

2009-2010 School I ear Toivr~ Slate


Most public school students in Middlebury attend Regional SchoolDistrict 15, which has 4,544 students.

I'or more education dataplease see:http://www. state.ct.us/sde/

Sludei7ts per Conrptder Town

Elementary: 3.4

Middle: 2.6

Secondary: 3.9

Conr7ectictrt Mastery Test Pe~~cent Above Goal


Towrr State Tow►t Sfnte Town State

Reading 79 61 85 69 83 69

Math 81 64 91 69 81 65

Writing 84 64 80 62 79 67Av¢rage SPITScore

State Average Class Size Toivrt Stn1e


2.8 Grade 5 233 Grade 7 22.4 Writing 531 506


Town Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 No representation or ~rarrm~ties, e.~pressed or implied, areY g wtivty. cerc.CO))1 given regarding the accuracy+ of this it formation.

l~Vllla~ol~~;~~~rr~~~

~.~llIlTC11~C~~CY~~~

Gove~~nment E

j---• ,= -~ ~,~~_. ~ ~~ ~ ..

~ ~ (~ ~taf't {~ey'e

~~ ~~~ ~~~1Co~t~lectic~it Ecatomic Resoirrc-e Ce~ttef; Lrc.

~u Debt Service (2009) $1,011,519Goverimient Form: Selectman-Town Meeting

of



Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $1,528,310,895

Tax Revenue $24,723,207Education $16,817,011

per Capita $223,666

Non-taz~ Revenue $1,902,485Other $8,039,068


Intergovernmental $888,114 Total Indebtness (2009) $1,403,376 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2006

Per Capita Tax (2009) $3,504As % of Expenditures 55.7% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) Aa3



Housing/Real Estate

Housing Stock (2009) Town Comity Stnte Owner Occupied Dwellings (2009)

Existing Units (total) 2,901 352,042 1,452,007 As %Total D«~ellings


New Permits Auth. (2009) 6 509 3,786 Dish~ibutior~ of House Sales (2009)As %Existing Units 0.21% 0.14% 0.26% Number of Sales


Median Price $305,000 $246,000 $265,000 $200,000-$299,999

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 30.2% 33.2% 31.5% $300,000-$399,999


Place ofReside~zce Conrntute~s (2000)

(2009) Tow~t Counfy Stnte Commuters into Town from:

Labor Force 3,928 450,421 1,889,947 Waterbury X74

Employed 3,653 410,346 1,734,291 Middlebury 441

Unemployed 275 40,075 155,656 Watertown 367

Unemployment Rate 7,0% 8.9% g,2% Naugatuck 333

Place of Yi'ork (2009) Southbury 221

# of Units 262 22,428 104,314 New Haven 89

Total Employment 3,321 349,363 1,615,355 Danbury 75

2000-'09 Growth AAGR -1.0% -0.6% -0.4% Prospect 72

Mfg Employment n.a Woodbury 64

Wolcott 59~~{1CY Ii1fOY171QtlOil

Towrr State

Banks (2007) 4 1,029

G~i~ne Rate (2009) Distance to hfajor Cities Miles

Per 100,000 Residents 45 298 Hanford 28

Boston 122

Library (2010) TownNew York City 73



2,182 185,400 812,964

82% 53% 57%

95 41,649 149,355

Tow~t Cou~tty State

80 346

7 953 3,539

17 1,347 4,847

12 645 2,510

14 528 3,454


Waterbury 747

Middlebury 441

Southbury 207

Naugatuck 181

Watertown 121

Woodbury 87

Danbury 84

New Haven 70

Newto~m 69

Southington b6


Electric Provider

Connecticut Light &Power

(800)286-2000

Gas Provider

Yankee Gas Company

(800)989-0900

Water Provider

Connecticut Water Company

(800)286-5700

Cable Provider

COMCAST/WATERBURY

(800)266-2278

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 1V1V1V. cerc, cof)1 No representation or Iran anties, expressed or i~~rplied, are girenrega~ ding tTre accea acy ofthis i, fo,v,anon.


PV~[~~~ ~Iiew: 2010 Census Interactive Population Map

~Q~~1~ CC~'~r~~~~ ~~nte~~.~~~~~ ~~~0~1~~~~~~ ~~~~r~~~

(C~ ~ PV1[Il~l~~~~u~rr~ ~~~~un

Population

Page 1 of 7

Total Population

Housing Status( iu housing units unless noted )

7,75 i

Total 2,892

Occupied 2,748



Renter-occupied 299

Population in renter-occupied 614(mm~ber of individuals )

Vacant 144

Vacant: for rent 5

Vacant: for sale 29


Population by Ses/Age

Male 3,663

Female 3,912

Under 18 1,863

18 &over 5,712

20 - 24 287

25 - 34 514

35 - 49 1,764

50 - 64 1,701

65 &over 1,302




Population by Race

White 7,096

African American 73

Asian 287



Naugatuck's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on new US Census data for 2010. Naugatuck'spopulation for 2010 was 31,862 a difference of 673 additional people from the 2000 populationof 30,989. Naugatuck's population, the third largest in the NVC, grew by 2.8% from 2000 to2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6% from 2000 to 2010. Connecticut'spopulation grew by 4.9% during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteen communitiesgrew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period. Naugatuck hadan increase of 2.8%. Naugatuck's rate was lower than the State and NVC average.

Population by Se~c/Age: Naugatuck had 15,623 males, 16,239 females, 7,380 people under 18and 24,482 18 andover.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Naugatuck: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 9.2% in Naugatuck, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and7.7°/o in the US. Naugatuck possessed the third highest unemployment rate among NVC towns.Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3%) whereas Newtown possessed thelowest unemployment rate (5.2%).

The unemployment and labor force have changed during the past years because of thenational/worldwide economic crisis. Mostl of the communities in the NVC reflect an increase inthe labor force and a decrease in the higher unemployment percentages.

In April of 2012, Naugatuck possessed 8.1 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its total laborforce of 17,004 was the third largest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highestshare of the NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem possessed 1 percent of theNVC's labor force in 2012.

Naugatuck has 1,567 people of the unemployed in the labor force in the NVC in 2012.Naugatuck had the third largest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012.Waterbury possessed the largest number of unemployed (6,308), whereas Bethlehempossessed the smallest number (132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Labor Force Over Time: Naugatuck's labor forcedecreased by 1,086 workers from April 2000 to April 2012, whereas the employment force in theNVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700, respectively.

Naugatuck's percent of unemployed went from 2.6% in 2000 to 10.7% in 2011 to 9.2% in 2012.The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployedwent from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Naugatuck $59,472, County/NewHaven $58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


~~~~1~v1~~~, ~;~~n~n~~~~~~v:~^CERC Town Profile 2011


229 Church Street New Haven County

Naugatuck, CT 06770 LMA Waterbury



DemographicsRace/Ethnicit~~ (2010) Tower Cormty Stnte

Pop:rlalion (2010) Town Ca~itt~~ Stnte White 27,496 647,897 2,786,7611990 30,625 804,219 3,287,116 Black 1,556 105,120 337,2992000 30,989 82,008 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 892 30,934 128,6512010 31,488 849,161 3,511,137 Native American 66 1,551 6,4182015 30,818 858,824 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 1,478 63,659 252,008

' 10-'15 Growth / Yr -O.~l% 0.2°/a 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 1,922 109,864 411,629

Land Area (sq. miles) 16 606 5,009 Poverty Rate (2009) 71% 10.7% 8.7%

PopJ Sq. Mile (2010) 1,921 1,402 701 Educational Attainme~it (2010)Median Age (2010) 37 39 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Town % State


Med ICI Inc. (2010) $59,472 $58,719 $65,686 Some College 6,073 29% 585,203 25%

Bachelors or More 4,901 23% 842,517 35%Age Distribzdion (2010)

0-9 5-17 18-24 25-49 SO-64 65+ Total

Male 1,050 3% 2,997 10% 1,375 4% 5,680 18% 2,813 9% 1,535 5% 15,450

Female 993 3% 2,841 9% 1,268 4% 5,809 18% 2,9'36 9% 2,181 7% 16,038

County Total 51,376 6% 141,420 17% 82,147 10% 287,86 34% 165,112 19% 121,260 14% 849,161

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

Economics

Business Profile (2005) %of Totnl

Sector Esfnblislrments En~nlovmeitt


Const. and Mining 17.0% 6.8%



Trade 22.6% 24.9%

Finance, Ins, andReal Estate

~ 6o~a 6 go/a



Educatio~i

of

Top Five Grand List (2009) Anroru~t Nei

Connecticut Water Company $.17,788,030

CT Light &Power Co. $12,619,560

Gazden Homes Naugatuck/Horizon Hom $11,807,630

Wal-Mart Real Estate $8,795,380

Yankee Gas $7,970,760

Net Grand List (2009)

Top Five Alajor Emplo~~er•s (2006)

Peter Paul Division of Hershey Fo USCO Logistics Service/kuehne &

Wal Mart Glendale Center/Genesis Health C

Big Y FoodsTown Sfnte

RetnilSnles(2007) $451,306,455 $136,936,194,241All Outlets

2009-2010 Schoo! Year Town Stnte

Total To«~n School Enrollment 5,050 552,782

Most public school students in Naugatuck attend Naugatuck SchoolDistrict, which has 4,815 students.

For more education dataplease see:http: //www.state. ct.us/sde/

Sttrderats yer Comprrtel•

Elementary:

Middle:Secondary:

Town Sfate

4.2 4.1

4.2 2.83.5 2.7

Cor~»eeticutlLlaste~y Test Percent Above Goal


Town Stnte Town Sfate Toiv~r Sta(e

Reading 50 61 65 69 67 69

Math 57 64 64 69 55 65

Writing 55 64 55 62 61 67Average SAT Score

average Class Size Tower Stnte




Town Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 No represe~ztnliat or irarrai7iies, expressed or implied, areY g 1vtvlv.CeYC.CO11t

gfver7 regarding the accrn•acy of this i~ foruralion.

~~T~U.1~~~~u1~~~ J/ ~ ~ i-==, ~ ~ .dart he~~e

~C~fl~~~ec~YC~~ ~ ~~ ~.. ~ ~ ~Gon~teitie-ut Ecn»omic 2etonrce Ce»ter Gre:

(~nvornrs~nnt - -

Annual Debt Service (2009) $10,020,957Government Form: Mayor-Council o 0

As /o of Expenditures 9.5 /oTotal Expenditures (2009) $105,257,094

Total Revenue (2009) $108,126,932 Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $2,913,509,729Ta~c Revenue $63,038,783

Education $62,215,605 per Capita $92,890

Non-tar Revenue $45,088,149 Other $33,020,532

As % of State Average 56%Intergovernmental $37,181,315 Total Indebtness (2009) $97,205,599 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2007

Per Capita Tax (2009) $2 p~ g As % of Expenditures 92.4% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) Al

As %of State Average 82,g% Per Capita $3,111 Actual Mill Rate (2007) 38.80As % of State Average 146.7% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 17.99


Housing/Real Estate -

Housi~ag Stock (2009) Toiv~t Cormty Stnle Owner Occupied Dwellings (2009)

E~cisting Units (total) 12,833 352,042 1,452,007 As %Total Dwellings


New Permits Auth. (2009) 9 509 3,786 Dish•ibtttio» of Hotrse Sales (2009)As %Existing Units 0.07% 0.14% 0.26% Number of Sales


Median Price $199,500 $246,000 $265,000 $200,000-$299,999

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 32.0% 33.2% 31.5% $300,000-$399,999

$400,000 or MoreLnbor Force

Place of Residence Conrm:rters (2000)

(2009) To►i>>t Corntty S1nte Commuters into Town from

Labor Force 17,171 450,421 1,889,947 Naugatuck 3,084

Employed 15,501 410,346 1,734,291 Waterbury 1,449

Unemployed 1,670 40,075 155,656 Prospect 313

Unemployment Rate 9.7% 8.9% 8.2% Wolcott 198

Place of I~'ork (2009) Middlebury 181

# of Units 548 22,428 104,314 Watertown 179


2000-'09 Growth AAGR -1.9% -0.6% -0.4°/a Beacon Falls 149

Mfg Employment n.a West Haven 145

Meriden 100nfl~or 1»fnrr»nfinN

Town StrafeBanks (2007) 7 1,029

Crane Rate (2009) Distance to Major Cities Miles


Boston 120

Library (2010) ToivirNew York City 73


Circulation Per Capita 2,(

7,253 185,400 812,964

56% 53% 57%

1,129 41,649 149,355

Toiv~t Corarty Stnte

9 80 346

65 953 3,539

65 1,347 4,8477 645 2,5102 523 3,454

Town Residents Commuting to:Naugatuck 3,084

Waterbury 2,162

Ne~~ Haven 657

Southbury 524

Waterto~a~n 508

Bridgeport 470

Cheshire 448

Shelton 433

Stratford 426

Danbury 400

Residential U[i(ities

Electric Provider

Connecticut Light & Po«~er

(800)286-2000

Gas Provider

Yankee Gas Company

(800)989-0900

Water Provider

Connecticut Water Company(800)286-5700

Cable Provider

COMCAST/SEYMOUR

(800)266-2278

To~vtt Profiles May, 201 1. Page 2 ~UfyW.CerC.COt)t No rep~•esentation orirarranties, expressed or implied, are girenrega~ ding Hie accts acy of phis i~ formation.


Map View: 2010 Census Interactive PoUulation Mai

~~~~ ~~r~~~~ ~r~~~r~~~~~~~ P~~oU1~~~~~r~ ~~~~~~~~n

(C~ ~ l~Taa~~~t~a~~~~ ii~~ll°~a~g~~

Page 1 of 9

Population


Housing Status( ui lousing waits unless noted )

Total 13,061

Occupied 12,339


Population in owner-occupied 22,741( number of individuals


Population in renter-occupied8,854(number of individuals)

Vacant 722



Vacant: for seasonal/recreationaUoccasional use 33


Male

Female

Under 18

18 &over

20-24

25 - 34

35-49

50-64

65 &over


Hispanic or Latino


Population by Race

White

African American

Asian


15,623

16,239

7,380

24,482

2,001

4,504

7,156

6,281

3,806

2,929

28,933

27,700

1,575

969

62


Newtown's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on new US Census data for 2010. Newtown'spopulation for 2010 was 27,560 a difference of 2,529 additional people from the 2000 populationof 25,031. Newtown's population, the fifth largest in the NVC, grew by 10.1% from 2000 to2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6% from 2000 to 2011. Connecticut'spopulation grew by 4.9%during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteen communitiesgrew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period. Newtown had anincrease of 2,529 residents or 10.1 %. Newtown was above the NVC and State averages.

Population by Sex/Age: Newtown had 13,907 males, 13,653 females, 7,605 people under 1~and 19,955 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Newtown: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was5.2% in Newtown, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and76.7% in the US. Newtown possessed the lowest unemployment rate among NVC towns.Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3%).


In April 2012, Newtown possessed 6.9 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its total laborforce of 14,526 was the fifth largest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highestshare of the NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem possessed about 1 percentof the NVC's labor force in 2012.

Newtown had 759 people of the unemployed labor force in the NVC in 2012. Newtown had theninth largest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterbury possessed thelargest number of unemployed (6,308) whereas Bethlehem possessed the smallest number(132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates Over Time: Newtown'semployment work force increased by 1,557 workers from April 2007 to April 2012 to 14,526workers. Whereas the employed labor force in the NVC and the state increased by 16,842people and 162,700, respectively.

Newtown's percent of unemployed went from 1.4% in 2000 to 6.7% in 2011 to 5.2% in 2012.The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployedwent from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data - Newtown $105,744, County/Fairfield $68,682 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


~`~T~~v~~~vv~~~ C~rr~U~~~~~~~~ir,CERC Town Profile 2011

Town Hall Belo~~gs !o

45 Main Street Fairfield County

Ne~~~town, CT 06470 LMA Bridgeport - Stamford

(203) 270-4201 Housatonic Valley Economic Dev. Region

Housatonic Valley Planning Area

DemographicsRnce/Etlmicity (2010) Town Cornrty Stnte

Po ldalio~r 2010P ( ) Tox~~r Cou~rry Sinie White 24,435 696,534 2,786,7611990 20,779 827,645 3,287,116 Black 681 91,016 337,2992000 25,031 882,567 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 593 40,545 128,6512010 26,331 898,137 3,511,137 Native American 18 907 6,4182015 26,680 908,999 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 604 69,135 252,008

'10-'15 Gro~~~th / Yr 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 908 137,979 411,629

Land Area (sq. miles) 58 626 5,009 Po>>erty Rate (2009) 2.2% 7.5°/a 8.7%

Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 456 1,435 701 EducationalAttainnrent (2010)Median Age (2010) 40 40 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Tow~t % Stnte



Bachelors or More 9,201 53°/a 842,517 35%Age Dish•ib:~tioiT (2010)

0-4 5-17 l 5-24 25-49 SO-64 65+ Totnl

Male 971 4% 2,803 11% 1,004 4% 4,779 18% 2,868 11% 1,224 5% 13,649

Female 875 4% 2,535 10% 728 3% 4,395 17% 2,655 10% 1,494 6% 12,682

County Total 57,382 6% 160,277 18% 81,440 9% 291,013 32% 183,490 20% 124,535 14% 898,137

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

Frnnnrr~i~c

Business Profrle (2005) % of Totnl

Sector Esfnblisk»tents E~~rnlovnterrt





Trade 16.8% 18.6%

Finance, Ins. andReal Estate 6.2% 5.9%



Education

Of

Top Five Grand List (2009) An~otrut Net

CT Light & Po~~~er Co. $20,735,920 0.5%

E&A/I&G Sand Hill Plaza $18,944,980 0.5%

Iroquois Gas Transmission System $18,783,060 0.5%

New~to~vi~ Shopping Village Limited $11,651,660 0.3%

Ne~~~town Senior Living LLC $10,629,540 0.3%

Net Grand List (2009) $3,918,669,368

Top Five ATajor Emplo~~ers (2006)

To~~n ofNe~vtown-Board ofEduc Hubbell Wiring Divices-Kellems

Pitney Bowes, Inc. Taunton Press

State of Connecticut -Dept. of CoTown Stnte

Retni/Soles (2007) $2'7'7,g6~1,322 $136,936,194,241A7J Outlets

2009-2010 School Year Town State


Most public school students in Newtown attend Newtown SchoolDistrict, which has 5,602 students.

For more education dataplease see:http:/hvww.state.ct.us/sde/

Siude~~ls per Computer Town

Elementary: 4.0


Co~r»eclicut Mastery Test Perce»t Above Goal


Town Stnte Toiv~t Sfnle Toiv~t Stnte

Reading 84 61 89 69 91 69

Math 89 64 93 69 89 65

Writing 83 64 77 62 85 67Arerage SAT Score

Stnte Average Class Size Tower Stnte




Town Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 No representation or iran•artlies, eipressed or irnp/ied, areY g 1V1vIV.Ce~'GCOnt given regarding dre accuracy of this i~ for~nalion.

~~ \~ V ~ V ~ V ~ 1111

F'_-t /-^^-~ J/~--i .,

~~_) ~~

hereC~ rtrrr•t~...cC~p~u~~~~g~a~~

-_

~~J ~ c~ ~CO111JC'CflC//d E[01J0/Illf R(JOl11'CCG211t6i~ IIIC:

n., .,s

Goverrunent Forni: Selectman-Town MeetingAnnual Debt Service (2009) $9,243,400As % of Expendihzres 8.6%



Education $70,846,082 per Capita $213,744


As % of State Average 128%Intergovernmental $13,238,745 Total Indebtness (2009) $3,259,419 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2007

Per Capita Tax (2009) $3,466As % ofExpenditures 68.1°/a Moody's Bond Rating (2009) Aa2

As % of State Average 142.2%Per Capita $2>816 Actual Mill Rate (2007) 27.30As % ofState Average 132.8% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 14.51


Nnucino/Ronl Fctnta~ __.. _..,..a, _.... ...»... ~

Housing Stock (2009) Toivii Cotmty State Owner Occupied Dwellings. (2009) 7,150 201,640 812,964

Existing Units (total) 9,386 352,621 1,452,007 As %Total D~~~ellings 78°/a 58% 57%


New Permits Auth. (2009) 9 1,199 3,786 Disb~ibutio» of House Sales (2009) Town Cor~ntp StnteAs %Existing Units 0.10% 0.34% 0.26% Number of Sales

Demolitions (2009) 4 384 1,219 Less than $100,000 4 24 346House Sales (2009) 149 3,045 14,696 $100,000-$199,999 3 89 3,539

Median Price $438,500 $495,000 $265,000 $200,000-$299,999 27 452 4,847

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 19.3% 31.5% 31.5% $300,000-$399,999 29 561 2,510$400,000 or More 86 1,919 3,454

T nhnr Fnr~n

Place of Residence Comnurters (2000)(2009) Toivi~ Corntty Stnte Commuters into Town from: Town Residents Commuting to:

Labor Force 14,398 471,964 1,889,947 Newtown 2,998 Newtown 2,998

Employed 13,485 435,361 ],734,291 Danbury 861 Danbury 1,606

Unemployed 913 36,603 155,656 Bridgeport 385 Norwalk X363

Unemployment Rate 6.3°/a 7 8% g 2% Southbury 364 Bridgeport 450

Place of Work (2009) Waterbury 285 Stamford 449

# of Units 772 32,886 104,314 New Milford 257 Bethel 361

Total Employment 7,516 399,983 1,615,355 Bethel 233 Trumbull 324

2000 '09 Growth AAGR 0.0°/a -0.7% -0.4°/a Naugatuck 223 Brookfield 323

Mfg Employment n.a. Monroe 200 Fairfield 319

Brookfield 187 Ridgefield 314nthar Ts~finrrr~nfinn

Town Stnte

Banks (2007) 10 1,029

Crime Rate (2009)

Per 100,000 Residents 31

Library (2010) Toiv~t



Distance to 1Yfajor Cities Miles

298 Hanford 40

Boston 133

New York City 61

Providence 100


Electric Provider


(800)286-2000

Gas Provider

Yankee Gas Company

(800)989-0900

Water Provider

Municipal Provider

local Contact

Cable Provider

Charter Communications of Western Connect(800)827-8288

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 ~v~v~v. cerc, coin No representation or irarrantfes, expressed or implied, are gi>>enrega~ ding the accts acy of this ir~/ornration.


I`Vi[~~~View: 2010 Census Interactive Population Map

~,~1~~ C~r~~~s ~r~~;~r~~~~~~~ ~~~~o~~~ ~~~~r~ ~~~r~ch

~ 1T ~ I`~~e~~~~~~~ ~r~~n~~~

Population

Page 1 of 18


Housing Status( iu housing units unless noted

Total 10,061

Occupied 9,459


Population in owner-occupied 24,685( number of individuals)

Renter-occupied 993

Population in renter-occupied 2,093( number of individuals )

Vacant 602

Vacant: for rent 95



Population by Seat/Age

Male

Female

Under 18

18 &over

20 - 24

25 - 34

35-49

50-64

65 &over


13,907

13,653

7,605

19,955

1,050

1,767

7,086

6,049

3,509

Hispanic or Latino 1,033


Population by Ibace

White 25,914


Asian 648



Oxford's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010. Oxford'spopulation for 2010 was 12,683 a difference of 2,862 additional people from the 2000 populationof 9,821. Oxford's population, the twelfth largest in the NVC, grew by 29.1% from 2000 to 2010,the largest percent of growth in the NVC and the state. The population in the NVC increased by5.6% from 2000 to 2010. Connecticut's population grew by 4.9%during the 2000 to 2010period. Eleven of the eighteen communities grew at a rate equal to or higher than the stateduring the 2000 to 2010 period. Oxford had the largest percent increase in the NVC. Oxford'srate was substantially higher than the State and NVC average.

Population by Sex/Age: Oxford had 6,307 males, 6,376 females, 3,085 people were under age18, and 9,598 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Oxford: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 5.7% in Oxford, 8.5°/o in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and 7.7% inthe US. Newtown possessed the lowest unemployment rate among NVC towns.(5.2%).Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3%).

The unemployment and labor force have changed during the past years because of thenafional/worldwide economic crisis. Most of the communities in the NVC reflect an increase inthe labor force, and a decrease in the higher unemployment percentages.

In April of 2012, Oxford possessed 3.5% of the labor force in the NVC. Its total labor force of7,021 was the seventh smallest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highest share ofthe NVC's labor force at 24.4% whereas Bethlehem only possessed about 1 % of the NVC'slabor force in 2012.

Oxford has4225 persons of the unemployed labor force in the NVC in 20121. Oxford had theninth smallest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterbury possessedthe largest number of unemployed (6,308) whereas Bethlehem possessed the smallest number(132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates Over Time: Oxford's labor forceincreased by 1,770 workers from April 2000 to April 2012, whereas the employment force in theNVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700 respectively.

Oxford's percent of unemployed wenfi from 1.8% in 2000 to 6.7% in 2011 to 5.7% in 2012. TheNVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployed wentfrom 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.55 in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data — Oxford $90,190, County/ NewHaven $58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


~~`~i~arc~1~ C~r~l~~ctll~~~i~;CERC Town Profile 2011


486 Oxford Road New Haven County

O~'ord, CT 06478 LMA Bridgeport - Sta►nford



DemographicsRace/Ethnicity (2010) Toivrr Corurty Stn/e

Po :elation 2010P ( ) Toirn Corrnty Stnte White 11,780 647,897 2,786,7611990 8,685 804,219 3,287,116 Black 376 105,120 337,2992000 9,821 824,008 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 199 30,934 128,6512010 12,678 849,161 3,511,137 Native American 18 1,551 6,4182015 14,372 858,824 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 305 63,659 252,008

'10-'15 Grotvtli / Yr 2.5% 0.2% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 360 109,864 411,629


Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 385 1,402 701 Educational Atlairvnent (2010)

Median Age (2010) 40 39 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Town % S~nte



Bachelors or More 3,011 35% 842,517 35%Age Disb~ib:dior~ (2010)

Od S-l7 18-24 25-49 SO-64 65+ Totn!

Male 378 3% 1,269 10% 510 4% 2,327 18% 1,397 11% 553 4% 6,434

Female 409 3% 1,135 9% 367 3% 2,406 19% 1,296 10% 631 5% 6,244

County Total 51,376 6% 141,420 17% 82,147 10°/u 287,846 34% 165,112 19% 121,260 14% 849,161

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

Fnns~n»~i~c

OfBusiness Profile (2005) % of Totnl Top Fire Grand List (2009) Anronrtf Net

Firstlight Hydro Generating Co. $5,173,200 0.4%Sector Establishments Emnloviueirt

Timberlake Golf Partners $3,830,720 0.3%Agriculture 5.8% 2.9% HF Industrial Park Limited Partnership $3,745,650 0.3%Coast. and Mining 26.5% 17.5% Algonquin Gas Transmission LLC $3,745,650 0.3%

Manufacturing 7.2% 14.8% Pulte Home of Ne~v England $3,017,180 0.2%

Trans. and Utilities 6.4% 13.9% Net Grand List (2009) $],468,537,107

Trade 16.6% 15.9% Top Five A1ajo~• Employers (2006)

Finance, Ins. and 4.8% 4.0%

Joyce Van Lines Oakley Plumbing &HeatingReal Estate PTA Corporation Morse Watchman Inc.Services 27.3°~a 2g•2% DeSantisGoveriuuent 5.4% 2.7% Town State

Retail Saes (2007) $162,009,784 $136,936,194,241All Otrtlels

Fd~irntinr~

2009-2010 Sd~ool I ear Town Stn[e

Total To~mn School Enrollment 2,206 552,782

Most public school students through grade 8 attend O~'ord SchoolDish•ict, which has 2,014 students. Students then go to multipleschool districts including Seymour School District, Regional SchoolDistrict 14.

For more education dataplease see:http:/1www.state.ctus/sde/

Shrdents per Computer Town State

Elementary: 7.8 4.1

Middle: 0.0 0.0Secondary: 0.0 0.0

Co~v~ectic:rt Mastery Test Perce~al Above Goal


Toiv~r State Town S/n!e Tofvn State

Reading 65 61 75 69 85 69

Math 72 64 74 69 78 65


Avera e Class Size Toiv~t Stn/eS

Grade K 21.6 Grade 2 21.3 Reading n.a.

Grade 5 25.3 Grade 7 21.5 Writing n.a.

High School 21.4 Math n.a.

To~v~t Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e I No representation a• irarranties, expressed or• implied, arey g lvlvw.Cel'C.CO1)1

gii~ett regarding dte acctn•acy of this ii formation.

~~`~~1~T~~1

~~~h~~~~flCYYY

Govern~rrent

/- -, - -,.~ L ~

.,!m7 here

~vEJiCat~recticnt Ee-o~tomic Reroii~ ce Center, lire:

Annual Debt Service (2009) $2,895,234Government Form: Selectman-Town Meeting

As % of Expenditures 7.5%


Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $2,122,957,162

Ta~c Revenue $27,949,703Education $26,840,609

per Capita $196,679

Non-taY Revenue $11,030,607Other $9,052,643


Intergovernmental $9,400,486 Total Indebtness (2009) $31,384,000 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2005

Per Capita Tax (2009) $2225As % of Expenditures 80.9% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) Al

As % of State Average 91.3%Per Capita $2 499> Actual Mill Rate 2007~ ~ 1937As % of State Average 117.8% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 13.55

of Grand List ComJInd (2007) ~.9%

Hoarsii7g/Re~il Estate

Horsing Stock (2009) Toiv~~ Cou»ry Stnte Owner Occupied Dwellings (2009) 3,692 185,400 812,964

E~sting Units (total) 4,493 352,042 1,452,007 As %Total Dwellings 84% 53% 57°/a


Ne~v Permits Auth. (2009) 31 509 3,786 Dish•ibution of House Sales (2009) Town Corurty StateAs %Existing Units 0.69% 0.14°/a 0.26% Number of Sales

Demolitions (2009) 2 212 1,219 Less than $100,000 80 346

House Sales (2009) 72 3,553 14,696 $100,000-$199,999 1 953 3,539

Median Price $362,500 $246,000 $265,000 $200,000-$299,999 14 1,347 4,847

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 18.9% 33.2% 31.So~o $300,000-$399,999 29 645 2,510

$400,000 or More 28 528 3,454

Labor Force

Place of Residence Commuters (2000)

(2009) Toiv~t County Stnte Commuters into Town from: Town Residents Commuting to:

Labor Force 7,620 450,421 1,889,947 Orford 749 Oxford 749

Employed 7,117 410,346 1,734,291 Seymour 154 Shelton 472

Unemployed 503 40,075 155,656 Waterbury 148 Stratford 325

Unemployment Rate 6.6°/a 8.9% g.2% Southbury 127 Bridgeport 307

Place of Y~'orlc (2009) Naugatuck 123 Southbury 251

# of Units 317 22,428 104,314 Derby 73 Seymour 249

Total Employment 2,637 349,363 1.,615,355 Ne~~town 63 Milford 205

2000-'09 Gro«~th AAGR 3.9% -0.6% -0.4% Shelton S9 Waterbury 205

Mfg Employment n.a. Ansonia 58 Derby 204

Woodbury 38 New Haven 17ZOuter Information


Tow~i Stnte Electric Provider

Baiaks (2007) 2 1,029 Connecticut Light &Power

(800)286-2000

G~ime Rate (2009) Distance to Afajor• Cities Miles Gas Provider

Per 100,000 Residents 0 298 Hartford 33 Yankee Gas Company

Boston 126 X800) 989-0900

Librmy (2010) Towf: Water ProviderNew York City 68 Aquarion Water Company

Total Volumes 33,002Providence 93 (800)732-9678


COMCAST/SEYMOUR

800 266-2278

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 www.cerc.co~n No representation or warrm~ties, expressed or invplied, are girenrega~ ding the accuracy of this information


I~V~[~a~~ View: 2010 Census Interactive Population Map

~~~~ ~e~~~~ ~r~terac~~~~ P~~o~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~r~~~r~

~~ ~ ~~~u~~m~ ~~~~~

Page 1 of 8

Population

Total Population 12,683 ~

Housing Status( in lousing iuiits w~less noted )

Total 4,746

Occupied 4,504



Renter-occupied 373

Population in renter-occupied802( number of individuals)

Vacant 242

Vacant: for rent 18

Vacant: for sale 54



Male

Female

Under 18

18 &over

20 - 24

25 - 34

35-49

50-64

65 &over


Hispanic or Latino


Population by Race

White

African American

Asian


6,307

6,376

3,085

9,598

478

993

3,113

3,054

1,712

468

12,215

12,106

145

195

13


Prospect's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010.Prospect's population for 2010 was 9,405 a difference of 698 additional people from the 2000population of 8,707. Prospect's population, the fifth smallest in the NVC, grew by 8.0% from2000 to 2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6% percent from 2000 to 2010.Connecticut's population grew by 4.9% during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteencommunities grew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period.Prospect had an increase of 8.0%. Prospect's rate was higher than the State and NVC average.

Population by Sex/Age: Prospect had 4,533 males, 4,872 females, 2,124 people were underage 18, and 7,281 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Prospect: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 6.6% in Prospect, 8.59% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and7.7% in the US. Prospect possessed the eleventh lowest unemployment rate among NVCtowns. Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3%) whereas Newtown possessedthe lowest unemployment rate (5.2%).


In April of 2012 Prospect possessed 2.5% of the labor force in the NVC. Its total labor force of5,233 was the 5th smallest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highest share of theNVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem possessed about 1 percent of the NVC'slabor force in 2012.

Prospect had 344 people of the unemployed labor force in the NVC in 2012. Prospect had thefourteenth smallest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterburypossessed the largest number of unemployed (6,308) whereas Bethlehem possessed thesmallest number (132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates Over Time: Prospects laborforce increased by 338 workers from April 2000 to April 2012, whereas the employment force inthe NVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700, respectively.

Prospect's percent of unemployed went from 1.7% in 2000 to 9.2% in 2011 to 6.6% in 2012.The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5 in 2012. Connecticut's unemployedwent from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Prospect $83,866, County/ NewHaven $58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


I~r~~~~o~~~~ C~'~rr~rn~~~~ll~u1~~CERC Town Profile 2011


36 Center Street New Haven County

Prospect, CT 06712-1699 LMA Waterbury



DemographicsRace/Ethnicity (2010) Toiv~t Cotntty Sfaie

Po trlalio~t 2010p ~ ~ Toiv~r Couirty Stnte White 8,431 647,897 2,786,7611990 ~,'7~5 804,219 3,287,116 Black 343 105,120 337,2992000 g,707 824,008 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 154 30,934 128,6512010 9,203 849,161 3,511,137 Native American 7 1,551 6,4182015 9,552 858,824 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 268 63,659 252,008

' 10-'15 Growth / Yr 0.7% 0.2% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 270 109,864 411,629


Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 643 1,402 701 Educational Attainnrer~t (2010)

Median Age (2010) 42 39 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Toiv~: % Stnte


Med ICI Inc. (2010) $83,866 $58,719 $65,686 Some College 2,018 31% 585,203 25%

Bachelors or More 1,728 27% 842,517 35%Age Distribution (2010)

0-4 5-17 18-24 25-49 SO-64 65+ Totnl

Male 276 3% 806 9% 317 3% 1,607 17% 1,003 11% 526 6% 4,535

Female 273 3% 775 8% 285 3% 1,616 18% 1,032 11% 687 7°/a 4,668

County Total 51,376 6% 141,320 17% 82,147 10% 287,846 34% 165,112 19% 121,260 14°/a 849,161

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

F~nnnr~~i~e

Of

Business Profile (2005) % of Totn/ Top Five Grand List (2009) Anmmtt Net

Toll Ct Limited Paztnership $4,252,460 0.5%Sector Estnb/isltmenls Enrnlovf~rent

' CT Light &Power Co. $4,216,857 0.5%Agriculture 4.4% 5.2% Paulmar Associates $3,768,470 0.5%Const. and Mining 18.3% 11.0% Prospect Medical LLC $3,745,950 0.5%

Manufacturing 5.9% 13,5% Connecticut Water Company $3,240,980 0.4%


Trade 14.3% 15.7% Top Five Major Eir~ployeis (2006)

Finance, Ins. and o6.2 /0

o5.3 /o

Regional School District 16- Lon Townof ProspectReal Estate 2350 Marathon Health Center DLJRA FormServices 40.5% 43.5% Olivers SupermarketGovernment 5.5% 0.9% Town Sinte

Relnil Sn/es (2007) $93,616,067 $136,936,194,241All Outlets

Filurnfins~

2009-2010 Sc17oo1 Year Toiv~t Stafe


Most public school students in Prospect attend Regional SchoolDish~ict 16, which has 2,855 students.

I'or more education dataplease see:http://www.state. ct. us/s V e/

Students per Conrptrter Town

Elementary: 2.8

Middle: 1.8

Secondary: 2.0

Con~zecticut Mastery Test Percent Above Goal


Town Stnte Town Sfnte Town Sfnte

Reading 64 61 76 69 76 69

Math 64 64 75 69 71 65

Writing 7l 64 75 62 74 67Average SAT Score

Sfate Average Class Size Town Stnte




Town Profiles Ma 2011. Pa e 1 No represerrlation or iran•anties, e~pr•essed or i»rplied, areY~ g tivwtiv.eere.COt)t girenregardingtlveaccmacyafthisi~rforn~a~ion.

~JT~~~10~(~^

(C~~fl~e~.~c~~:a~~

Government

Government Form: Mayor-Council

Total Revenue (2009) $26,185,187

Tax Revenue $20,066,563

Non-tax Revenue $6,118,624

Intergovernmental $5,691,962

Per Capita Ta~c (2009) $2,199

As % of State Average 90.2%

~ L----~

l~~ ~~~ -1 ~ ~, ~ .ftdl'l ~JCi'B

G01111eG'I1Cl/t EC01J0/JIlC RPJ01/J CC CCJI/Cl, 111[;

Annual Debt Service (2009) $788,767

As % of Expenditures 3.0%Total Expenditures (2009) $26,499,110

Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $1,291,438,333Education $19,460,041

per Capita $143,302Other $6,250,302

As % of State Average 86%Total Indebtness (2009) $18,609,482 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2005As % of Expenditures 70.2% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) A3Per Capita $2,039 Actual Mill Rate (2007) 23.98As % of State Average 96.2% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 16.72


Housing/Real Estate

Housi»g Stock (2009) Tolvir Coru:ty S(nle Omer Occupied Dwellings (2009)

Existing Units (total) 3,388 352,042 1,452,007 As %Total Dwellings


New Permits Auth. (2009) 36 509 3,786 Disb•rbcdion of House Sales (2009)As % Existing Units 1.06% 0.14% 0.26% Number of Sales


Median Price $246,750 $246,000 $265,000 $200,000-$299,999

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 13.7% 33.2% 31.5°/a $300,000-$399,999$400,000 or More

Labor Force

Place ofReside~~ce Commuters (2000)

(2009) Tower County Stnte Commuters into Town fiom:

Labor Force 5,284 450,421 1,889,947 Prospect 566

Employed 4,872 410,346 1,734,291 Waterbury 444


Unemployment Rate 7.8o~a g 9o~a g 20~o Wolcott 103

Place of I~i'a•k (2009) Cheshire 61

# of Units 240 22,428 104,314 Watertown 57


2000-'09 Growth AAGR -1.4% -0.6% -0.4% Han~den 48

Mfg Employment n.a Beacon Falls 33

Wallingford 32nt/oor Ir~fm•vr~ntinr~

Town Stnte

Barks (2007) 4 1,029

Crime Rate (2009) Distance to ~llnjor Cities Miles


Boston 116

Library (2010) Toi~~nNew York City 77



2,623 185,400 812,964

80% 53% 57%

20 41,649 149,355

Toiv~r County Stnte

5 80 346

10 953 3,539

36 1,347 4,847

10 645 2,510

11 528 3,454


WaterUuiy 1,003

Prospect 566

Naugatuck 313

Cheshire 285

New Haven 174

Meriden 134

North Haven 100

Torrington 98

Wallingford 95

Bridgeport 86


Electric Provider


(800)286-2000

Gas Provider

Yankee Gas Company

(800) 989-0900

Water Provider


(800)286-5700

Cable Provider

COMCAST/WATERBURY

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 1V1V1U.CerC.COVt No representation or ira~ranties, expressed or i~uplied, are girenregarding the acctu•ac~~ of this it fw•rnatiwt.


Map View: 2010 Census Interactive Population Map

~~~1~ ~:'~rr~~~~ ~r~ter~~~~~~~ '~ ~~0~1~~~ ~~~rr~ ~~~r~~~

Page 1 of 9

Population


Housing Status( in housing units unless noted )

Total

Occupied

Owner-occupied

Population in owner-occupied(number of individuals )

Renter-occupied

Population in renter-occupied(number of individuals )

Vacant

Vacant: for rent

Vacant: for sale

Vacant: for seasonalh~ecreational/occasional use


3,474

3,357

3,102

8,689

255

578

117

22

30

5

Male 4,533

Female 4,872

Under 18 2,124

18 &over 7,281

20 - 24 506

25 - 34 702

35 - 49 2,224

50 - 64 2,219

65 &over 1,425

Popul~fion by Ethnicity



Population by Race

White 8,964


Asian 73



Seymour's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010.Seymour's population for 2010 was 16,540 a difference of 1,086 additional people from the2000 population of 15,454. Seymour's population, the tenth largest in the NVC, grew by 7.0%from 2000 to 2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6% from 2000 to 2010.Connecticut's population grew by 4.9% during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteencommunities grew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period.Seymour has the eighth highest percent increase at 7.0%. Seymour's rate was higher than theState and NVC average.

Population by Sex/Age: Seymour had 8,041 males, 8,499 females, 3,618 people were underage 18, and 12,922 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Seymour: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 8.0% in Seymour, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and 7.7%in the US. Seymour possessed the eighth lowest unemployment rate among NVC towns.Waterbury had fihe highest unemployment rate (12.3%) whereas Newtown possessed thelowest unemployment rate (5.2%).


In April of 2012, Seymour possessed 4.5 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its total laborforce of 9,491 was the eighth largest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highestshare of the NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem possessed about 1 percentof the NVC's labor force in 2012.

Seymour had 760 people of the unemployed labor force in the NVC in 2012. Seymour had theeighth highest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterbury possessedthe largest number of unemployed (6,308) whereas Bethlehem possessed the smallest number(132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates over TimeSeymour's labor force increased by 990 workers from April 2000 to April 2012, whereas theemployment force in the NVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700,respectively.

Seymour's percent of unemployed went from 2.1 % in 2000 to 9.2% in 2011 to 8.0 in 2012. TheNVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployed wentfrom 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Seymour $61,705, County/ NewHaven $58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


~c~~rr~~t~~~ C~'~~nr~~~i~~~uif;CERC Town Profile 2011

Totim Hall Belongs to

1 First Street Ne~v Haven County

Seymour, CT 06483 LMA Bridgeport - Stamford


Valley Planning?.rea

~ DemographicsRace/Ethnicity (2010) Town Coratty Stnte

Popidation (2010) Tower Co[urry Stnte White 14,448 647,897 2,786,7611990 14,288 804,219 3,287,116 Black 581 105,120 337,2992000 15,454 824,008 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 477 30,934 128,6512010 16,059 849,161 3,511,137 Native American 29 1,551 6,4182015 1b,202 858,824 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 524 63,659 252,008

' 10-' 15 Growth / Yr 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 6$8 109,864 411,629


Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 1,102 1,402 701 Educational Attainn~e»t (2010)Median Age (2010) 40 39 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Town % Stnte

Households (2010) 6,282 322,963 1,337,758 High School Graduate 3,897 35% 689,86~t 29%


Bachelors or More 2,679 24% 842,517 35%~lge Disfi•ibtttior~ (2010)

0-4 5-17 I8-24 25-49 50-64 65+ Total

Male 461 3% 1,361 8% 607 4°/u 2,932 18% 1,562 10% 938 6% 7,861

Female 434 3% 1,359 8% 575 4% 2,950 18% 1,559 10% 1,321 8% 8,198

County Total 51,376 6% 141,420 17% 82,147 10% 287,846 34% 165,112 19% 121,260 14% 849,161

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33°/a 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

F~nr~nr»irc

/ ~f&rsi~tess Profile (2005) % of Totn/ Top Fine Grand Lisf (2009) AfitOlOTt Net

Sector Establishments EnplovntentThe Kerite Company $14,575,550 1.1%

Baker Residential Limited Partnership $7,997,570 0.6%Agriculture 3.5% 1.2% CT Light &Power Co $7,630,330 0.6%Const. and Mining 17.5% 7.9% Klarides Family Associates $6,793,010 0.5%

Manufacturing 6.3% 22.6°fo Thule Sweden $6,665,600 0.5%


Trade 19.9% 15.8% Top Five Major Employers (2006)Fuiance, Ins. and

6.1% 3.6%aKerite Co. R & RManufacturing Co.

Real Estate Basement Systems RAF Electric Hardware Corp.Services 39.0% 2~•4% Microboard Processing Inc.Government 5.1% 14.8°/a Toivir Stnte

Retnil Sn/es (200 $365,746,242 $136,936,194,241,ill Outlets

F.d~irntim~

2009-2010 School Year Toiv~t Strafe


Most public school students in Seymour attend Seymour SchoolDistrict, which has 2,568 students.

For more education clat~please see:http://~vw.state.ct. u s/sd e/

Students per Computer Town

Elementary: 5.1


Connecticut Mastery Test Percent Above Goal


Toiv~t Stnte Toifm Sinle Toiv~► Stnte

Reading 60 61 72 69 70 69

Math 76 64 73 69 64 65

Writing 76 64 76 62 70 67Average SATScore

State Average Class Size Town Stnte




To~vtt Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 No representation or tt~an•anties, e~~ressed or implied, areY g iV1V1V.C2PC.007tt gn+en regarding the accta~acy of dais i~tfornration.

~~~I~[1~1lQDU.11~

~o~~~~~Il~;u~~

Goveri:mei:t

Goveriunent Form: Selectman-Town Meeting


Tax Revenue $35,225,188Education

Non-tax Revenue $14,082,194Other


Per Capita Tax (2009) $2~2pgAs % of Expenditures

As % of State Average 90.6%Per Capita


(__ C =-

\ ~- -, .

~ start he►'e

Cn~t~recticirt Ee-o»oi~ricReroi~rceCe»ter, Ire:

Annual Debt Service (2009) $4,787,112As °/a of Expenditures 9.6%

$49,610,755Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $2,121,453,505

$30,293,597per Capita $133,981


$36,345,911 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 200573.3% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) A2

$Z>2~g Actual Mill Rate (2007) 24.16107.4% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 16.82


Housing/Real Estate

Ho:rsi»g Stock (2009) Toivu Cornrty Stnte O~~mer Occupied Dwellings (2009)


%Single Unit 71.7% 59.5% 64.8°/a Subsidize Housing (2008)

New Permits Auth. (2009) 15 509 3,786 Disd~ibution of House Sales (2009)As %Existing Units 0.22% 0.14% 0.26% Number of Sales

Demolitions (2009) 212 1,219 Less than $100,000House Sales (2009) 90 3,553 14,696 $100,000-$199,999

Median Price $248,000 $246,000 $265,000 $200,000-$299,999

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 27.7% 33.2% 31.So~o $300,000-$399,999


Place of Residence Conrnlute~s (2000)

(2009) Town Cormt~~ Stnte Commuters into Townfrom:Labor Force 9,421 450,421 1,889,947 Seymour 1,419

Employed 8,661 410,346 1,734,291 Ansonia 387

Unemployed 760 40,075 155,656 Waterbury 258

Unemployment Rate 8.1% 8.9% 8.2% Oxford 249

P/ace of 1-fork (2009) Shelton 188

# of Units 343 22,428 104,314 Naugatuck 144

Total Employment 4,160 349,363 1,615,355 Beacon Falls 144

2000-'09 Gro~~~th AAGR -0.8% -0.6% -0.4% Milford 118

Mfg Employment n.a Derby 116

Bridgeport 92n}l~nr Tv~fnvs~r~ntinri

Towrt Stnte

Banks (2007) 5 1,029

Crime Rale (2009) Distance to A~ajor Cities Miles


Boston 126




4,500 185,400 812,964

65% 53% 57%

365 41,649 149,355

Town County Stnte

80 346

18 953 3,539~0 1,347 4,84715 645 2,5107 528 3,454

Town Residents Commuting to:Seymour 1,419

Shelton 878

Bridgeport 483

Milford 452

Derby 389

New Haven 388

Ansonia 357

Stratford 332

Waterbury 215

Stamford 192


Electric Provider


(800)286-2000

Gas Provider

Yankee Gas Company(800)-989-0900

Water Provider

Aquarion Water Company(800)732-9678

Cable Provider

COMCAST/SEYMOUR

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 ww1y, cerc. colt No rep~•esentation or ivarranfies, expressed or rrnplied, are girenregal ding the accw•ac~~ of this i~ fa~naBo~7.


Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander

Other

Identified by two or more

C'I' ° ~~~Il1C~~DAIl° f~~~JIrn

Population

Page 2 of 11

4

74

237


Housing Status( i~~ housing units unless noted )

Total 6,968

Occupied 6,654




Population in renter-occupied 3,406( number of individuals)

Vacant 314


Vacant: for sale 69

Vacant: for seasonal/recreational/occasional use 24


Male 8,041

Female 8,499

Under 18 3,618

18 &over 12,922

20 - 24 861

25 - 34 1,852

35 - 49 3,870

~I 50 - 64 3,615

65 &over 2,350


~ Hispanic or Latino 1,064

~ Non Hispanic or Latino 15,476

Population by Race

~', White 15,287


Asian 365

i American Indian and Alaska Native 26


Shelton's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010. Shelton'spopulation for 2010 was 39,559 a difference of 1,458 additional people from the 2000 populationof 38,101. Shelton's population, the second largest in the NVC, grew by 3.8% from 2000 to2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6%from 2000 to 2010. Connecticut'spopulation grew by 4.9% during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteen communitiesgrew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period. Shelton had thetwelfth highest increase at 3.8%. Shelton's percentage was lower than the state the NVCaverage.

Population by Sex/Age: Shelton had 19,184 males, 20,375 females, 8,338 people were underage 18, and 31,221 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Shelton: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 7.1 % in Shelton, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and78.7%in the US. Shelton possessed the tenth lowest unemployment rate among NVC towns.Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3) whereas Newtown possessed the lowestunemployment rate (5.2%).


In April of 2012, Shelton possessed 10.8 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its total laborforce of 22,783 was the second largest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highestshare of the NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem possessed about 1 percentof the NVC's labor force in 2012.

Shelton had 1,625 people of the unemployed labor force in the NVC in 2012. Shelton had thesecond highest of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterbury possessed thelargest number of unemployed (6,308) whereas Bethlehem possessed the smallest number(132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates Over Time: Shelton's labor forceincreased by 1545 workers from April 2000 to April 2012, whereas the employment force in theNVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700, respectively.

Shelton's percent of unemployed went from 2.0% in 2000 to 8.1.9% in 2011 to 7.1 % in 2012.The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployedwent from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.55 in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Shelton $76,084, County/Fairfield$77,620 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~^~~~~1~~~CERC Town Profile 2011

Town Hall Belongs fo

54 Hill Street Fairfield County

Shelton, CT 06484 LMA Bridgeport - Stamford



DemographicsRace/Efhniciry (2010) Town County Sfate

Populnlion (2010) Town Co~nety Stnte White 36,024 696,534 2,786,7611990 35,418 827,645 3,287,.116 Black 839 91,016 337,2992000 38,101 882,567 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 1,203 40,545 128,6512010 39,261 898,137 3,511,137 Native American 31 907 6,4182015 40,880 908,999 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 1,164 69,135 252,008

'10-'15 Growth / Yr 0.8% 0.2% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 1,939 137,979 411,629

Land Area (sq. miles) 31 626 5,009 Po>>erry Rate (2009) 3.1% 7.5% 8.7%

Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 1,285 1,435 701 Educa~io~zal Attai~antent (2010)

Median Age (2010) 43 40 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Town % State



Bachelors or More 9,282 34% 842,517 35%Age Disb•ibtdion (2010)

0-4 S-l7 I8-24 25-49 SO-64 6S+ Total

Male 1,122 3% 3,426 9% 1,596 4% 6,251 16% 4,345 ll% 2,500 6% 19,240

Female 1,064 3% 3,245 8% 1,483 4% 6,224 16% 4,471 11°/a 3,534 9°/a 20,021

County Total 57,382 6% 160,277 18% 81,440 9% 291,013 32°/u 183,490 20% 124,535 14% 898,137

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

Frns~nra~inc

of

Business Profrle (2005) % of Totn/ Top Five Grad List (2009) A~nom~t Net

Seclor Eslnblislvner~ts Eu~nloynrentScinto Robert $245,362,320 X4.7%

Pitney Bowes Inc. $58,057,120 1.1%Agriculture 2.5% 0.6% CRE Ivy Brook LLC $55,200,170 L 1°foConst. and Mining 17.1°/a 5.0% United Illuminating Co. $43,179,030 0.8%

Manufacturing 7.1% 23.4% Aquarion Water Co $37,069,820 0.7%


Trade 18.1% 18.3% Top Five rlajor Emplo~~el•s (2006)Fuiance, Ins. and

g,0% 8.3% Health Net of the Northeast Prudential FinancialReal Estate Perkin Elmer Instruments Ray Tech Corp.Services 40.5% 39.0°/a Pitney BowesGovernment 3.6% 1.7°/a Toiv►r Sinte

Retail Snles (2007) $908,156,.653 $136,936,194,241All Outlets

Fi/u~nfin»

2009-2010 School I ear Tox~tt Stnte


Most public school students in Shelton attend Shelton SchoolDistrict, which has 5,547 students.

For more education dataplease see:http://w~nv. state. c t. uslsde/

Students per Cornptiter Town

Elementary: 3.9


Cor7necticut Mastery Test Percent dbove Goal


Toiv~t Stnte Town S1nfe Town State

Reading 69 61 82 69 74 69

Math 71 64 80 69 74 65


Stnte Average Class Size Toiv~r Slnte




To~~~n Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 No representatio~i or irar•rartfies, e~yressed or implied, areY g 1V1UlU.CC1'C.COIft giren regarding the acc:nac~~ of this i~ formation.

L.-~_ ~'~~ ~ ~( ~ .rtrrrt here

Q~ ~ Y~ Y~ ~~ Y ~~ llll t~ ~,__._,Connectic~rt Eio~tonucReroi~~reCenter, Ln:

('nvnrtf taaar~ t

Annual Debt Service (2009) $11,099,697Government Form: Mayor-Board of Aldermen ps % of Expenditures 9.8%

Total Expenditures (2009) $113,136,326Total Revenue (2009) $I 10,671,832 Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $7,412,846,768

Tax Revenue $94,018,435 Education $69,732,133

per Capita $189,538

Non-tax Revenue $16,653,397 Other $32,304,496


Intergovernmental $12,843,959 Total Indebtness (2009) $50,250,000 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2006

Per Capita Taac (2009) $2,436 As % of Expenditures 44.4% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) Aa3

As % of State Average 100.0% Per Capita $1 302 Actual Mill Rate (2007) 24.31As % of State Average 61.4% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 10.11


Housing/Real Estate

Hotrsi~~g Stock (2009) Toiv~r Cornrry Stnte Owner Occupied D~~~ellings (2009) 11,354 204,640 812,964

Existing Units (total) 15,951 352,621 1,452,007 As %Total Dwellings 73% 58% 57%

%Single Unit 76.8% 65.1% 64.8% Subsidize Housing (2008) 431 28,3.82 149,355

New Permits Auth. (2009) 17 1,199 3>786 Disb~ib~rtion of House Sales (2009) Tnivn Cormty SlnteAs %Existing Units 0.11% 0.34% 0.26% Number of Sales

Demolitions (2009) 10 384 1,219 Less than $100,000 3 24 346House Sales (2009) 166 3,045 14,696 $100,000-$199,999 11 89 3,539

Median Price $332,000 $495,000 $265,000 $200,000-$299,999 49 452 4,847

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 19.9% 31.5% 31.5% $300,000-$399,999 51 X61 2,510

$400,000 or More 52 1,919 3,454Labor Force

Place ofReside~~ce Cotntnttters (2000)

(2009) Town Comity Stnte Commuters into Town from: Town Residents Comnmtingto:

Labor Force 23,287 471,964 1,889,947 Shelton 5,237 Shelton 5,237

Employed 21,596 435,.361 1,734,291 Bridgeport 2,205 Bridgeport 2,563

Unemployed 1,691 36,603 155,656 Stratford 1,366 Stratford 1,600

Unemployment Rate 7.3% 7.8% 8.2% Milford 1,146 Trumbull 1,089

Place of Work (2009) Derby 905 Norwalk 1,020

# of Units 1,283 32,886 104,314 Seymour 878 Fairfield 944

Total Employment 22,340 399,983 1,615,355 ~sonia 849 Milford 932

2000-'09 Growth AAGR 0.6% -0.7% -0.4% Trumbull 844 Staniford 804

Mfg Employment n.a Stamford 562 Monroe 615

West Haven 553 New Haven 462~tl1CP IItfOYi'I1QtlOK


Towv~~ State Electric Provider

Ba~~lcs (2007) 14 1,029 The United Illuminating Co.

(800) 257-0141

Crime Rate (2009) Distance to Major Cities Miles Gas Provider

Per 100,000 Residents 81 298 Hartford 40 Yankee Gas Company

~g00) 989-0900Boston 131

Libraiy(2010) Town Water ProviderNe~v York City 60 Aquarion Water Company

Total Volumes 153,649Providence )~ (800)732-9678


COMCASTJSEYMOUR

800 266-2278

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 WWW.CeYC.COt)t ~~o ~'~p~'ese~itafion or tirarranties, expressed or implied, are gii~eraregal ding the aeon acy of t)tis ii formation



Other

Identified by two or mare

~c~ ~ ~~~ll~~~~ ~ll~y

Page 3 of 9

12

16

Population



Total 16,146

Occupied 15,325


Population in owner-occupied 33 115'(number of individuals)


Population in renter-occupied 5,942( number of individuals )

Vacant 821




Populatio~i b3~ Sex/Age

Male

Female

Under 18

18 &over

20 - 24

25 - 34

35 - 49

50-64

65 &over

I'opulaYion b~~ ethnicity

19,184

20,375

8,338

31,221

1,901

3,844

8,814

9,020

6,903



Population by Race

White 35,904


Asian 1,529



Southbury's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010.Southbury's population for 2010 was 19,904 a difference of 1,271 additional people from the2000 population of 18,567. Southbury's population, the seventh largest in the NVC, grew by7.2%from 2000 to 2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6% from 2000 to 2010.ConnecticuYs population grew by 4.9% during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteencommunities grew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period.Southbury had an increase of 7.2% or 1,337 people. Southbury's rate was higher than theState and NVC averages.

Population by Sex/Age: Southbury had 9,300 males, 10,604 females, 4,050 people wereunder age 18, and 15,854 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Southbury: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was6.18% in Southbury, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and7.7% in the US. Southbury possessed the fourth lowest unemployment rate among NVC towns.Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3%) whereas Newtown possessed thelowest unemployment rates (5.2%).

The unemployment and labor force have changed during tie past years because of thenational/worldwide economic crisis. Most of the communities in the NVC reflect an increase inthe labor force and a decrease in the higher unemployment percentages.

In April of 2012, Southbury possessed nearly 4.3 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its totallabor force of 9,160 was the tenth largest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained thehighest share of the NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent, whereas Bethlehem only possessedabout 1 percent of the NVC's labor force in 2012.

Southbury had 558 people of the unemployed labor force in the NVC in 2012. Southbury hadthe eleventh lowest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2013. Waterburypossessed the largest number of unemployed (6,308) whereas Bethlehem possessed thesmallest number (132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rate Over Time: Southbury's laborforce increased by 832 workers from April 2000 to April 2012, whereas the employment force inthe NVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700, respectively.

Southbury's percent of unemployed went from 1.6% in 2000 to 7.8% in 2011 to 6.1 % in 2012.The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. ConnecticuYs unemployedwent from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Southbury $79,194, County/NewHaven $58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


~~L~1~~~1'~~rr~r~ CC~~n~~~~~c~~~~~CERC Town Profile 2011


501 Maiu Street South New Haven County

Southbury, CT 06488 LMA Bridgeport - Stamford


Central Naugatuck Valley Planning .Area

Demographics

Pop:rlatio~~ (2010)Race/Eth»icity (2010) Town Cornrty Stn1e

Totivn Co~rrrty S1nte White 18,335 647,897 2,786,7611990 15,818 804,219 3,287,116 Black 566 105,120 337,2992000 18,567 824,008 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 443 30,934 128,6512010 19,838 849,161 3,511,137 Native American 11 1,551 6,4182015 19,676 858,824 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 483 63,659 252,00&

'10-'IS Gro«~th / Yr -0.2% 0.2% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 486 109,86 411,629

Land Area (sq, miles) 39 606 5,009" Porerty Rate (2009) 5.5% 10.7% 8.7%

Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 508 1,402 701 Edarcntional Attaimnent (2010)Median Age (2010) 48 39 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Town % S1nfe


Med HH Inc. (2010) $79,194 $58,719 $65,686 Some College 3,652 25% 585,203 25%0

Bachelors or More 6,743 46°/a 842,517 35%Age Dislributron (2010)

0-4 5-17 IS-24 25-49 50-64 65+ Totnl

Male 497 3% 1,636 8% 491 2% 2,782 14% 2,048 10% 1,837 9% 9,291

Female 499 3% 1,571 8% 377 2% 2,915 15% 2,085 11% 3,100 16% 10,547

County Total 51,376 6% 141,420 17% 82,147 10% 287,846 34% 165,112 19% 121,260 14°/a 849,161

State Total 211,807 6% X86,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

Fnnr~nrr~in~

°fo of&~si~~ess Pr•ofrle (2005) % of Totnl Top Five Gra~7d List (2009) A»~ou~rt Net

Secfor Estnblishmeitts EinU(ovnreirtKettletown LLC $81,900,000 3.2%

south Haven Associates $21,798,560 0.8%Agriculture 3.4°/a 1.1% Watermark East Hill Woods $21,280,000 0.8%Const. and Mining 14.1% 4.4% First Light Hydro Generating Co $17,281,720 0.7%

Manufacturing 4.1% 4.1% Southbury 84 Assoc $17,250,420 0.7%

Trans. and Utilities 3.4% 2.7% Net Grand List (2009} $2,589,622,975

Trade 19.6% 51.8% Top Five Major• Employers (2006)Finance, Ins. and 9 300 ~ ~o~o Mediples of Southbury The HeritageReal Estate International Business Machines ( East Hill Woods, Inc.Services 40.8% 25.5% Southbury HiltonGovernment 5.3% 2.7% Town Stnte

Retnil Snles (Z00~ $335,367,009 $136,936,194,241All O:dlets

Fdurntin»

2009-2010 School fear Toiv~e State


Most public school students in Southbury attend Regional SchoolDistrict 15, which has 4,544 students.

For more education dataplease see:http://www. state.ct. us/sde/

Students pei~ Computer Town

Elementary: 3.4


Connecticut ~llaste~y Tesl Percent Above Goal


Toiv~r Stnte TO1Vl1 Sfnfe Town State

Reading 79 61 85 69 83 69

Math 81 64 91 69 81 65

Writing 84 64 80 62 79 67A>>erage SAT Score





To~~~n Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 No representation or irarrarilies, expressed or implied, areY g 1VWW. CeYC. Col~1

gn~en regarding tJre accm ac~~ of this i~rformafion.

(~D t~Jl ll; ]'~1 l(~ U~l 1~~~_'

~~ C~

CC Opllllll ~~~Y6; Ut

` ~_, ~ .rtn~•t here~~~ ~~~ ~ ~U~~Co~tnecticnt Eco~ion~ic Rc:ronrce Ce»tey; lnc.

Government

Annual Debt Service (2009) $1,296,955Government Form: Selectman-Town Meeting



Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $3,721,949,969

Taa Revenue $54,580 261Education $41,080,048

per Capita $193 821Other $13,798,480

Non-ta~c Revenue $4,967,030 As % of State Average 116%Intergovernmental $3,339,621 Total Indebfiess (2009) $34,860,562 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2007

Per Capita Tax (2009) $2,751As % ofExpenditures 62.1% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) Aa3

As % of State Average 112.9°/aPer Capita $1,757 ~ ~Actual Mill Rate 2007 25.10As % ofState Average 82.8% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 13.02


Anucis~a/Rnnl Fctnfn

Ho:rsi~Tg Stock (2009) Toivu Corulry Stnte Owner Occupied Dwellings (2009) 6,003 185,400 812,964

E~sting Units (total) 8,322 352,042 1,452,007 ~ %Total Dwellings 79% 53% 57%

%Single Unit 81.4% 59.5% 64.8°/a Subsidize Housing (2008) 102 41,649 149,355

New Permits Auth. (2009) 6 509 3,786 Dish•ibution of House Sales (2009) Town County S1nleAs %Existing Units 0.07% 0.14% 0.26% Number of Sales

Demolitions (2009) 2 212 1,219 Less than $100,000 1 80 346House Sales (2009) 74 3,553 14,696 $100,000-$199,999 2 9~3 3,539

Median Price $383,750 $246,000 $265,000 $200,000-$299,999 17 1,347 4,847

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 13.5% 33.2% 31.So~a $300,000-$399,999 22 645 2,510$400,000 or More 32 528 3,454

T~hnr Fnr~o


(2009) Tow~t Cornrty State Conmmters into Town from: Town Residents Commuting to:Labor Force 9,238 450,421 1,889,947 Southbury 2,140 Southbury 2,140

Employed 3,597 410,346 1,734,291 Waterbury 1,389 Danbury 833

Unemployed 641 40,075 155,656 Woodbury 575 Waterbury 600

Unemployment Rate 6.9% 8.9% 8,2°/a Naugatuck 524 Newto~e~n 364

Place of I-Vork (2009) Watertown 396 Middlebury 221

# of Units 633 22,428 104,314 Danbury 333 Woodbury 203

Total Employment 8,829 349,363 1,615,355 Oxford 251 Ridgefield 201

2000-'09 Gro~~~th AAGR -0.9% -0.6°/a -0.4% New Haven 228 Bethel 178

Mfg Employment n.a. Middlebury 207 Shelton 159Newtown 206 Stamford 133

/lil. .... T,. f:,.. ..s....,.Vl/!G/ lIIf V/~/~U![l/1[ -

Toit~n Stnte

Banks (2007) 13 1,029

Crime Rate (2009)

Per 100,000 Residents X12

Library (2010) Toivrt



Distance to ~llajor Cities Miles

298 Hartford 35

Boston 129

New York City 67

Providence 97


Electric Provider

Connecticut Light & Po~~~er

(800)286-2000

Gas Provider

Yankee Gas Company

(800)989-0900

Water Provider

Aquarion Water Company(800)732-9678

Cable Provider

Charter Communications of Western Connect

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 tiV1V1v.Ce/'C. co»t No representation a~ tivarranties, e~p~essed or implied, are girettregarding llre accea•acy of!)tis i~ formation.


MapVIl~~v: 2010 Census Interactive Population Map

~~11~ ~~r~s~~ ~nt~r~~~~~ve ~'~~~o~~~~^~~~r~ ~~~~r~~~

~C'~' ~ ~~an~~i G~a~i~°~ ~~~rvr~

Population

Page 1 of 11



Total 9,091

Occupied 8,213





Vacant 878





Male

Female

Under 18

18 &over

20 - 24

25 - 34

35-49

50 - 64

65 &over


Hispanic or Latino


Population by Race

White

African American

Asian


9,300

10,604

4,050

15,854

650

1,077

3,897

4,686

5,235

523

19,381

18,871

166

531

21


,,.~bt

Thomaston's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010.Thomaston's population for 2010 was 7,883 a difference of 384 additional people from the 2000population of 7,503. Thomaston's population, the fourth smallest in the NVC, grew by 5.1 %from2000 to 2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6%from 2000 to 2010. Connecticut'spopulation grew by 4.9% during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteen communitiesgrew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period. Thomaston hadthe eleventh highest increase at 5.1 %. Thomaston's rate was higher than the State and NVCaverage.

Population by Sex/Age: Thomaston had 3,821 males, 4,066 females, 1,815 people wereunder age 18, and 6,072 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Thomaston: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 8.2% in Thomaston, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and7.7% in the US. Thomaston possessed the sixth highest unemployment rate among NVCtowns. Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3) whereas Newtown possessed thelowest unemployment rates (5.2%).

The unemployment and labor force have changed during the past years because of thenational/worldwide economic crisis. Most the communities in the NVC reflect an increase in thelabor force and a decrease in the higher unemployment percentages.

In April of 2012, Thomaston possessed 2.2 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its total laborforce of 4,332 was the forth smallest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highestshare of the NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem possessed about 1 percentof the NVC's labor force in 2012.

Thomaston had 386 people of the unemployed labor force in the NVC in 2012. Thomaston hadthe sixth lowest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterbury possessedthe largest number of unemployed (6,308) whereas Bethlehem possessed the smallest number(132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates Over Time: Thomaston's laborforce increased by 441 workers from April of 2000 to April of 2012, whereas the employmentforce in the NVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700, respectively.

Thomaston's percent of unemployed went from 2.1 % in 2000 to 7.9% in 2011 to 8.2 % in 2012.The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployedwent from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Thomaston $62,898,County/Litchfield $68,682 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


~11~Ir~~~r~~~~~ll7~ ~~U~rr~~~~~~~~CERC Town Profile 2011


158 Main Street Litchfield County

Thomaston, CT 06787 LMA Hartford



DemographicsRace/Ethnicih~ (2010) Tow~t Coru~ty Stnte

Poptdatiwi (2010) Town County Stn1e White 7,598 176,854 2,786,7611990 6,947 174,092 3,287,116 Black 47 1,872 337,2992000 7,503 182,193 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 65 3,453 128,6512010 ~,g3~ 187,467 3,511,137 Native American 4 170 6,4182015 7,721 186,535 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 123 5,118 252,008

' 10-' 15 Growth / Yr -0.3% -0.1% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 205 7,071 411,629

Land Area (sq. miles) 12 920 5,009 Po>>erry Rate (2009) 2.9% 5.3% 8.7%

Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 653 204 701 Educational Attai~rmen~ (2010)Median Age (2010) 40 43 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Torv~t % State

Households (2010) 3,108 74,767 1,337,758 High School Graduate 2,159 40°/a 689,864 29%


Bachelors or More 1,217 22% 842,517 35%Age Dish~ibtrtion (2010)

0-4 5-17 IS-24 25-49 50-64 65+ Totn!

Male 209 3% 642 8% 371 5% 1,396 18% 804 10% 466 6% 3,888

Female 191 3% 623 8% 360 5% 1,356 17% 835 11% 584 7% 3,949

County Total 9,511 5% 28,722 15% 15,958 9% 60,867 32% 43,128 23% 29,281 16% 187,467

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

Fnnnns~~i~c

ofBusiness Profile (2005) % of Totnl Top Fine Grand List (2009) A»tonnt Net

Rexam Cosmetic Packaging $14,693,820 2.4%Sector Es/nblishnrents Enrnlov»re~rt

Sunvnit Corporation $6,007,410 1.0%Agriculture 2.8% 0.8% CT Light &Power Co. $5,633,080 0.9%Const. and Mining 18.2% 8.1% Stewart EFI CT Inc. $3,361,480 0.5%

Manufacturing 13.1% 43.9% Conecticut Water Co. $3,039,300 0.5%


Trade 22.6% 14.9% Top Five Major• Employers (2006)Finance, Ins. and

5 g% 3 4~~aRexam Dispensing System Summit Corporation of America

Real Estate Whyco Technologies, Inc. Stevens Company, Inc.Services 28.3% 16.8% Stewart EFIGovernment 4.1% 8.3% Town Stnte

Retnil Sales (2007) $163,345,010 $136,936,194,241All Otdlets

Rdnrnfinri

2009-2010 School I ear Totivn Stnte

Total To~~m School Enrollment 1,328 552,782

Most public school students in Thomaston attend Thomaston SchoolDistrict, which has 1,219 students.

For more education dataplease see:h t tp ://www. s t a te. c t. u s /s d e/

Students per Conrpuier

Elementary:

Middle:Secondary:

Town Stnte

4.2 4.1

2.82.5 2.7

Connecticut A~aste~y Test Percent Above Goa(


Toivrt Stnte Toivu SIn1e Toiv~r Stnte

Reading 58 61 77 69 63 69

Math 62 64 74 69 62 65

Writing 52 64 73 62 65 67A>>erage SAT Score

Average Class Size Torvir State




Town Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 No represer7/ation or irarraitlies, expressed or implied, arey g lVlvtV.cerC.COt7t

g~renregardhrg lheaccuracyofthisi~rformaliw~.

F-~J~ ~rr~~1~~:~ro~~or~~iec~C~~;~G

Governmeirt

Government Form: Selectman-Town Meeting


Tax Revenue $16,138,322Education

OtherNon-taY Revenue $8,033,228


Per Capita Tax (2009) $2 pq~ As % of Expenditures

As %of State Average 86.1%Per Capita


Housii~g/Real Estate

Housi»g Stock (2009)

Existing Units (total)

%Single Unit

New Perniits Auth. (2009)

As %Existing Units

Demolitions (2009)

House Sales (2009)

Median Price


Labor Force

Place of Resideirce

(2009)

Labor Force

Employed

Unemployed

Unemployment Rate

Place of YVork (2009)# of Units

Total Employment

2000-'09 Gro~~4h AAGR

Mfg Employment

Tofvn Coru:ty3,185 83,929

72.8% 77.7%

6 163

0.19% 0.19%

2 48

46 677

$168,500 $222,000

35.5% 36.3%

~ Offer Information

Stale

i,asz,00~64.8%

3,786

0.26%1,219

14,696

$265,000

31.5%

.mart here

Con~tcitii~it Ec~nontic Re~oi~rceCenter, Lx:

Amival Debt Service (2009) $2,570,603As % of Expenditures 10.6%

$24,149,697Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $927,513,409

$14,780,948per Capita $114,324


$18,666,948 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2006

77.3% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) A2$2426 Actual Mill Rate (2007) 39.62114.4% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 15.50


Owner Occupied D~a~ellings (2009)As %Total Dwellings


Distribution of House Sales (2009)Number of SalesLess than $100,000

$100,000-$199,999$200,000-$299,999$300,000-$399,999$400,000 or More

Conrmtders (2000)

T01471 Corurty St~fe Commuters into Town from

4,746 10,588 1,889,947 Thomaston 877

4,279 96,928 1,734,291 Waterbury 536

467 8,660 155,656 Torrington 280

q.go~o g 2o~a g 2o~a Watertown 205

Plymouth 174

249 6,066 104,314 Bristol 117

2,62 59,332 1,615,355 Litchfield 103

-2.7% -1.2% -0.4°/a Han~inton 68

n.a. Wolcott 64

Naugatuck 56

Town StnteBanks (2007) 3 1,029

Crime Rate (2009) Distance to Major Cities Miles


Boston 116Libi•a~y (2010) Totivn

New York City 82Total Volumes 47,109

Providence 87Circulation Per Capita 12.2

2,131 52,087 812,96468% 63% 57%

198 4,303 149,355

Town County Stnte

1 15 34629 277 3,53910 180 4,8475 100 2,5101 105 3,454

Town Residents Commuting to:Thomaston 877

Waterbury 623

Watertown 432

Torrington 300

Bristol 146Plymouth 145

Hartford ll 8

Litchfield 114

Cheshire 101

Southbury 81


Electric ProviderComiecticut Light &Power(800)286-2000

Gas ProviderYankee Gas Company(800)989-0900

Water ProviderConnecticut Water Company(800)286-5700

Cable ProviderCABLEVISION OF LITCHFIELD, INC.(860) 567-3103

Towtt Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 1V1V1V.cerc.CO)11 No r•epreseirtatioir w•ira•ra~rlies, expressed or implied, are gii~er7regarding IJ~e accm~acy of this i~ fa i»ation.


I`v1~~~ ~Iiew: 2010 Census Interactive Population Map

~~1 ~ C~r~s~~ ~r~ter~~~~~~e ~~~~ot~1~~L~~rr~ ~~~r~~~

(CT1 ~ 'I~~~~u~rn~~ti~r~ ~~~vll~

Popnlatiou

Page 1 of 5


Housing Status( in housing units unless rioted )

Total 3,276

Occupied 3,108


Population in owner-occupied 6,401( number of nidividuals)

Renter-occupied 745

Population in renter-occupied 1,475( number of individuals)

Vacant 168

Vacant: for rent 52

Vacant: for sale 31

Vacant: for seasonalhecreational/occasional use 20


Male 3,821

Female 4,066

Under 18 1,815

18 &over 6,072

20 - 24 368

25 - 34 745

35 - 49 1,935

50 - 64 1,814

65 &over 1,047




Population by Race

White 7,631

African American 34

Asian 60

American Indian and Alaska Native 2f


Waterbury's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010.Waterbury's population for 2010 was 110,366 an increase of 3,095 people from 2000 populationof 107,271. Waterbury's population increased by 2.9% from 2000 to 2010. The population inthe NVC increased by 5.6% from 2000 to 2010. Connecticut's population grew by 4.9% percentduring the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteen communities grew at a rate equal to orhigher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period. Waterbury had the third lowest percentchange at 2.9%. Waterbury's rate was lower than the State and NVC average.

Population by Sex/Age: Waterbury had 52,517 males, 57,849 females, 28,265 people wereunder age 18, and 82,101 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Waterbury: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 12.3% in Waterbury, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and7.7% in the US. Waterbury possessed the highest unemployment rate (12.3) among NVCtowns whereas Newtown possessed the lowest unemployment rates at (5.2%) of the NVC.

The unemployment and labor force have changed during the past year because of thenational/worldwide economic crisis. Most of the communities in the NVC reflect the recessionand loss of jobs and a decrease in the unemployment numbers.

In April of 2012, Waterbury possessed 24.4 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its total laborforce of 51,374 was the largest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highest share ofthe NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem possessed about 1 percent of theNVC's labor force in 2012.

Waterbury had the highest number of the NVC's total number of unemployed 6,308 in 2012whereas Bethlehem possessed the smallest number 132 (1%) of the NVC's unemployed in2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates Over Time: Waterbury's laborforce increased by 3,406 workers jobs from April of 2000 to April 2012, whereas theemployment force in the NVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700,respectively.

Waterbury's percent of unemployed went from 3.4% in 2000 to 14.4% in 2011 to 12.3% in 2012.The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployedwent from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5°/a in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data — Waterbury $38,714, County/NewHaven $58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


~J~~i~:~rr~o~rry~ C~~r~~r~~c~~~~~~CERC Town Profile 2011


235 & 236 Grand Street New Haven County

Waterbury, CT 06702 LMA Waterbury



DemographicsRace/Ethnicity (2010) Toiv~r Cotutty~ State

Pop:dalion (2010) Totivrr Co[ntty Stnte White 70,188 647,897 2,786,7611990 108,961 80,219 3,287,116 Black 18,080 105,]20 337,2992000 107,271 824,008 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 2,713 30,934 128,6512010 107,460 849,161 3,511,137 Native Amerioan 326 1,551 6,4182015 108,489 858.,824 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 16,153 63,659 252,008

' 10-' 15 Growth / Yr 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 30,1 I S 109,864 411,629

Land Area (sq. miles) 29 606 5,009 Poi~erty Rate (2009) 20.3% 10.7% 8.7%

Pop.! Sq. Mile (2010) 3,763 1,402 701 Edircarional Attai»n~ent (2010)Median Age (2010) 37 39 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Town % State


Med HH Inc. (2010) $38,714 $58,719 $65,686 Some College 18,034 26°fo 585,203 25%

Bachelors or More 13,658 19°/a 842,517 35%Age Disb~ibtrtio~z (2010)

0-4 5-17 18-24 25-49 50-64 65+ Totnl

Male 3,839 4°/a 9,388 9°/a 5,238 5% 17,426 16% 8,922 8%a 6,484 6% 51,297

Female 3,759 4% 9,303 9°/a 5,428 5% 18,121 17% 10,126 9% 9,426 9% 56,163

County Total 51,376 6% 141,420 17% 82,147 10% 287,846 34% 165,112 19% 121,260 14% 849,161

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17°/a 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

Fnnwnsr~inc

ofBtrsir~ess Profile (2005) % oJTofal Top Five Grand List (2009) Atnon~rt Nei

G G P Brass Mill Inc $116,911,530 2.2%Sector Esfnblislr»tenfs Emplovmeitt

CT Light & Po~~~er Co. $61,410,700 1.2%Agriculture 1.1°/a 0.4°/a DDRTC Naugatuck Valley SC LLC $45,971,937 0.9%Const. and Mining 8.3% 3.7% Yankee Gas Co $42,468,520 0.8%

Manufacturing 5.6% 14.3% Waterbury Partners $27,680,450 0.5%

Trans. and Utilities 2.'l% 3.7% Net Grand List (2009) $5,280,973,988

Trade 29.3% 23.0% Top Fine rlajor Employes (2006)Finance, Ins. and

'7 6% 4.4%Webster Bank - Corporate headqu Webster Bank - regional branch

Real Estate St. Mary's Hospital Connecticut Light &PowerServices 42.4% 39.4% The Waterbury HospitalGovernment 3.3% 11.1% Town S/nfe

RefailSa/es (2007) $1,589,986,940 $136,936,194,241All Outlets

Fil~i~ntint~

2009-2010 School Year Toivrr Slnfe


Most public school students in Waterbury attend Waterbury SchoolDistrict, which has 18,057 students.

For more education dataplease see:http:/hvww.s tate.ct.us/sde/

Sltrc~ents per Computer Town

Elementary: 3.~

Middle: 4.6Secondary: 2.~3

Strafe

4.1

2.8

2.7

Con~~ecticut Mastery Test Percent Above Goal

Grade 4 Grnde 6 Grade 8

Town Sinte Toiv~r SIaIe Taiv~r State

Reading 37 61 37 69 37 69

Math 45 64 35 69 ZS 65


Average Class Size Town Stnte



High School 18.6 Math 41~ 508

To«~n Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 No represe~ttation or iran•anties, e.~pressed or implied, areY g W1VW.CC/'C.00711 given regarding fhe acctnac~~ of this i~tfon~ralion.

j ~_ „

~~ st~r~•t here

~~---~(~~~Ti11~tC~Y~~~~ \`~--~ ~~ ~ ~ ~Co~tnectici<t Economic Reroir~ieCeutej; l~tc,

('n~~or;~ ss~onf

Government Form: Mayor-CouncilAnnual Debt Service (2009) $I 1,582,000As % of Expenditures 31%



Education $169,099,000per Capita $70,047

Non-taY Revenue $176,071,000Other $187,245,000

As % of State Average 42%Intergovernmental $155,571,000 Total Indebtness (2409) $g9,138,000 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2007

Per Capita TaY (2009) $1,964As %o of Expenditures 24.2% ~oody's Bond Rating (2009) Baal

As % of State Average 80.6%Per Capita $833 Actual Mill Rate (2007) 55.9As % of State Average 39.3% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 24.32


Housing/Iteal Estate

Housi~tg Stock (2009) Toivir Cou~rty Sfnfe Owner Occupied Dwellings (2009)



New Permits Auth. (2009) 37 509 3,786Disb~ib:rtion of House Sales (2009)

As %Existing Units 0.08% 0.14% 0.26% Number of SalesDemolitions (2009) 20 212 1,219 Less than $100,000House Sales (2009) 312 3,553 14,696 $100,000-$199,999

Median Price $149,250 $246,000 $265.,000 $200,000-$299,999

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 40.0% 33.2% 31.5% $300,000-$399,999

$400,000 or MoreLabof• Force

Place ofReside~zce Com~ntders (2000)

(2009) Town County Stnte Commuters into To~~m from

Labor Force 50,568 450,421 1,889,947 Waterbury 18,170

Employed 43,792 410,346 1,734,291 Watertown 2,385

Unemployed 6,776 40,075 155,656 Naugatuck 2,162

Unemployment Rate 13.4% 8.9% 8.2% Wolcott 1,978

Place of GT'ork (2009) Cheshire 1,105

of Units 2,290 22,428 104,314 New Haven 1,075

Total Employment 39,070 349,363 1,615,355 Prospect 1,003

2000-'09 Growth AAGR -1.0% -0.6% -0.4% Middlebury 747

Mfg Employment n.a Southington 704

Meriden 685nfhnr Ti~fnrrs~ntinn.~.,..., s. ~....,~»....,.

Toiv~~ Strafe

Banks (2007) 24 1,029

Crime Rate (2009) Distance to Major Cities Miles


Boston 117



Circulation Per Capita 1.9Providence 85

17,350 185,400 812,964

37% 53% 57%

10,142 41,649 149,355

Toiv~r Corrnty S1nte

27 80 346

243 953 3,539

38 1,347 4,847

3 645 2,510

1 528 3,454


Waterbury 18,170

Watertown 2,604

Cheshire 1,797

Naugatuck 1,449

Southbury 1,389

New Haven 1,380

Wolcott 1,080

Danbury 773

Meriden 729

Hanford 696


Electric Provider


(800) 286-2000

Gas Provider

Yankee Gas Company

(800)989-0900

Water Provider


(800) 286-5700

Cable Provider

COMCAST/WATERBURY

(800)266-2278

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 1V1vW.Ce1'C. Coast No representation or ivarran~ies, ejpressed or implied, are girenregarding the acc~n•acy of this i~ forrotatron.



Other

Identified by two or more

C71' ° ~J~~i~rr~mu~l~°y ~ll~l

Total Population

Population


Page 5 of 9

0

31

33

110,366

Total 47,991

Occupied 42,761





Vacant 5,230

Vacant: for rent 2,635




Male 52,517

Female 57,849

Under 18 28,265

18 &over 82,101

20 - 24 7,771

25 - 34 15,600

35 - 49 22,413

50 - 64 19,050

65 &over 13,943




Population by ~~ce

White 64,864

African American 22,138

Asian 1,989


http://201 O.census.gov/2010census/popmap/ipmtext.php?fl=09 4/3!2012

Watertown's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010.Watertown's population for 2010 was 22,514 a difference of 853 additional people from the2000 population of 21,661. Watertown's population, the sixth largest in the NVC, grew by 3.9%from 2000 to 2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6%from 2000 to 2010.Connecticut's population grew by 4.9% during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteencommunities grew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period.Watertown had the thirteenth lowest increase percent change at 3.9%. Watertown's rate waslower than the State and NVC average.

Population by Sex/Age: Watertown had 10,909 males, 11,605 females, 4,859 people wereunder age 18, and 17,655 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Watertown: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 7.3% in Watertown, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticutand7.7% in the US. Watertown possessed the ninth highest unemployment rate among NVCtowns. Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3%) whereas Newtown possessedthe lowest unemployment rates (5.2%).


In April of 2012, Watertown possessed 5.8 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its total laborforce of 12,236 was the sixth largest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highestshare of the NVC's labor force at 24.4% whereas Bethlehem possessed about 1 percent of theNVC's labor force in 2012.

Watertown had 888 people of the unemployed labor force in the NVC in 2012. Watertown hadthe fifth highest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterbury possessedthe largest number of unemployed (6.308) whereas Bethlehem possessed the smallest number(132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates Over Time: Watertown's laborforce increased by 451 workers from April of 2000 to April of 2012, whereas the employmentforce in the NVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700, respectively.

Watertown's percent of unemployed went from 1.8% in 2000 to 8.6% in 2011 to 7.3% in 2012.The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployedwent from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Watertown $72,257, County/NewHaven $58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


~~I~~~~~~~~~vvrn~ C~'~r~~~~~~~~~1CERC Town Profile 2011

Town Hall Be%ngs to

37 DeForest Street Litchfield County

Watertown, CT 06795 LMA Waterbury


Cenhal Naugatuck Valley Planning Area

DemographicsRaceStlmicity (2010) Totivii Cotntty Stnte

Pop:dalio~a (2010) Taw» Cmurty Stnte White 21,610 176,854 2,786,7611990 20,456 174,092 3,287,116 Black 158 1,872 337,2992000 21,661 182,193 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 460 3,453 128,6512010 ZZ,729 187,467 3,511,137 Native American 16 170 6,4182015 22,461 186,535 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 485 5,118 252,008

'10-'IS Growth / Yr -0.2% -01% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 750 7,071 411,629


Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 779 204 701 Edzrcalional ~lttai~vnent (2010)Median Age (2010) 42 43 ~0 Persons Age 25 or Older Toting % State


Med HH Inc. (2010) $72,257 $68,682 $65,686 Some College 4,492 28°/a 585,203 25%

Bachelors or More 4,760 30% 842,517 35%Age Disb•ibution (2010)

0-4 5-17 18-24 25-49 SO-64 65+ Totnl

Male 559 2% 1,710 8% 1,102 5% 3,652 16% 2,450 11% 1,4&8 7% 10,961

Female 577 2°/a 1,789 8% 1,069 5% 3,756 17% 2,548 ll% 2,029 9% 11,768

County Total 9,511 5% 28,722 15°/a 15,958 9% 60,867 32% 43,128 23% 29,281 16% 187,467

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

F~nnnrs~r~a

of&~siness Profile (2005) % of Totnl Top Five Grand Lrst (2009) Amount Net

Sector Esfnblisll»te►ris EirrplovntentCT Light &Power Co. $23,772,218 1.2%

Siemon Company $19,347,446 1.0°/aAgriculture 3.8% 1.0% Siemon Realty Company $8,137,200 0.4%Const. and Mining 17.5% 4.9% JSD Partners LLC $7,836,100 0.4%

Manufacturing 8.7°/a 39.4% Straits Commercial Assoc $6,930,000 0.4%


Trade 20.6% 23.5°/a Tod Five Major Employers (20Q6)Finance, Ins. and 6 2a/o 3 ~a~o The Siemon Company BristolBabock, Inc.Real Estate United Parcel Service Eyelematic Manufacturing CompaServices 36.3% 24.3% T'he Torrington CompanyGovernment 4.3% 1.4% Toiv~t Stnte

RetnilSales(2007) $883,109,899 $136,936,194,241~lll Outlets

Fdii~nfinr~

2009-2010 School Year Town Stnte


Most public school students in Waterto~~vn attend Watertown SchoolDistrict, which has 3,336 students.

For more education dataplease see:http:/hv~nv. state.ct.us/sd e/

Students peg• Cwnpuler Town

Elementary: 5.7


Stnte

4.1

2.2.

Connecticut Mastery Test Perce~at Above Goal


Totvn Stnte Tower Stnte Totv~r Stnte

Reading 63 61 74 69 80 69

Math 60 64 67 69 66 65

Writing 73 64 79 62 83 67Ai~erage SAT Score

Average Class Size Toiv~t Stnie


8 Grade 5 23.4 Grade 7 22.3 Writing 491 506

7 High School 20.0 Math 486 508

Town Profiles Ma 2011. Pa e 1 Ago represe~Ttation or iva~~•ar7ties, expressed or iinpJied, a~eY~ g W1VW. cerc.COHt

give~i regarding the acc:uacy of lITlS Tl fOP/)IgllOp.

~~~1~~]I ~ CCDVJI111

~o~~~ec~YC~ti

Government

Government Forn~: Council-Manager

Tota] Revenue (2009) $61,046,769

Taac Revenue $41,428,222

Non-tai Revenue $19,618,547


Per Capita Tax (2009) $1,855

As % of State Average 76.1

Housii~g/Real Estate

Housing Stock (2009)

Existing Units (total)

%Single Unit

New Permits Auth. (2009)

As %Existing Units

Demolitions (2009)

House Sales (2008)

Median Price


Labor Force

Place of Reside~rce

(2009)

Labor Force

Employed

Unemployed

Unemployment Rate

Place of FVorlc (2009)# of Units

Total Employment


Mfg Employment

Total Expenditures (2009)

Education

Other

Total Indebtness (2009)

As % of Expenditures

Per Capita


Town Couury

8,745 83,929

80.4°/a 77.7%

25 163

0.29% 0.19%

3 48

144 1,152

$250,000 $273,500

30.3% 36.3%

~ Other Information

Sfnte

1,452,007

64.8°/a

3,786

0.26%

1,219

16,606

$290,000

31.5%

$61,554,403

$38,620,195

$17,374,694

$64,730,122

105.2%

$2,898

136.7°/a

\\ /,i

L_ _) \ ~-y

' ~ ~ ~ ~~ .rfn~'t l.~ere~ ~ ~~ ~____ ~,- a c~ ►Con~re~ticirt E~ouoiurcRr;ronrceCenter, lnc:

Annual Debt Service (2009) $5,559,514

As °/a of Expenditures 9.0%

Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $2,970,805,102

Per Capita $131,063As % of State Average 79%

Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2003

Moody's Bond Rating (2009) Aa3

Actual Mill Rate (2007) 22.72

Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 11.98


Owner Occupied D~~~ellings (2009)As %Total D~~~ellings


Dish~ibtdion of Kouse Sales (2008)Number of SalesLess than $100,000$100,000-$199,999$200,000-$299,999$300,000-$399,999$400,000 or More

com~n:rrers (2000)Town Cormty S1nte Commuters into Townfrom:12,207 105,588 1,889,947 Watertown 3,072

11,159 96,928 1,734,291 Waterbury 2,604

1,048 8,660 155,656 Naugatuck 508g,6o~o g Zoo g 2o~a Thomaston 432

Torrington 422

562 6,066 104,314 Plymouth 176

x,873 59,332 1,615,355 Litchfield 169

-3.3% -12% -0.4°/a Bristol 164

n.a Wolcott 157

Southington 155

Town Slnte

Barks (2007) 9 1,029

Crime Rate (2009) Distance !o Major' Cities Miles


Boston 119

Library (2010) TOlV11New York City 79



6,103 52,087 812,964

71% 63% 57%

360 4,303 149,355

Toiv~t Cormty Stn1e

3 26 27328 250 2,79762 376 5,62234 221 3,08317 279 4,831

Town Residents Commuting to:Waterto~~~n 3,072

Waterbury 2,385

Southbury 396

Cheshire 375

Middlebury 367

Torrington 316

New Haven 302

Danbury ~ 234

Thomaston 205

Hanford 184


Electric ProviderConnecticut Light &Power(800)286-2000

Gas ProviderYankee Gas Company(800)989-0900

Water ProviderMunicipal Providerlocal Contact

Cable ProviderCABLEVISION OF LITCHFIELD, INC.

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 1v1v1V.Ce/'c.cont No represe~rta~iorl w• irm•ranties, expressed or• ii~tp/red, are gii~e~rrega~ ding dte accuracy of this ii formation.


1~ap View: 2010 Census Interactive Population Map

~~1~ ~~~~~~ ~~terac~t~~e I~~~ou1~~~~~~r~ ~~~.r~~~

(C 1~[' ~ V~JQ~~i~u°~~e~~~~ ~~re~v~u

Total Population

Population


Page 1 of 14

22,514

Total 9,096

Occupied 8,672


Population in owner-occupied 18,721( number of individuals)


Population in renter-occupied3,532


Vacant 424


Vacant: for sale 68



Male

Female

Under 18

18 &over

20 - 24

25 - 34

35-49

50-64

65 &over


10,909

11,605

4,859

17,655

1,107

2,186

4,923

5,311

3,637



Population by Race

White 21,249


Asian 376



Wolcott's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010. Wolcott'spopulation for 2010 was 16,680 a difference of 1,465 additional people from the 2000 populationof 15,215. Wolcott's population, the ninth largest in the NVC, grew by 9.6%from 2000 to 2010.The population in the NVC increased by 5.6%from 2000 to 2010. Connecticut's populationgrew by 4.9%during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of the eighteen communities grew at arate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010 period. Wolcott has the fifthhighest percent increase in the NVC at 9.6%. Wolcott's rate was higher than the State and NVCaverage.

Population by Sex/Age: Wolcott had 8,074 males, 8,606 females, 3,908 people were underage 18, and 12,772 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Wolcott: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 8.7 % in Wolcott, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and 7.7%in the US. Wolcott possessed the forth highest unemployment rate among NVC towns.Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3) whereas Newtown possessed the lowestunemployment rate (5.2%).

The unemployment and labor force have changed during the past years because of thenational/worldwide economic crisis. Most of the communities in the NVC reflect an increase inthe labor force and a decline in the higher unemployment percentages.

In April of 2012, Wolcott possessed 4.4 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its total laborforce of 9,192 was the ninth largest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highestshare of the NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem only possessed 1.0 percentof the NVC's labor force in 2012.

Wolcott had 801 people of the unemployed labor force in the NVC in 2012. Wolcott had theseventh highest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterbury possessedthe largest number of unemployed 6,308 whereas Bethlehem possessed the smallest number132 of the NVC's unemployed in April 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rafes Over Time: Wolcott's labor forceincreased by 921 workers from April of 2000 to April of 2012, whereas the employment force inthe NVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700, respectively.

Wolcott's percent of unemployed went from 1.9°/a in 2000 to 9.1 % in 2011 to 8.9% in 2012. TheNVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployed wentfrom 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

Median Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Wolcott $74,018, County/ NewHaven $58,719 and the NVC $74,286 and Connec4icut $65,686.


v~Ia~~~~~.~~~ C~~~n~ri~c~~~~~u1~~CERC Town Profile 2011


10 Kenea Avenue New Haven County

Wolcott, CT 06716 LMA Waterbury



DemographicsRace/Ethnicity (2010) Toinn County Slnte

Pop:dation (2010) Town Cou~ery Stnte White 14,786 647,897 2,786,7611990 13,700 804,219 3,287,116 Black 585 105,120 337,2992000 15,215 824,008 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 275 30,934 128,6512010 16,141 849,161 3,511,137 Native American 21 1,551 6,4182015 16,064 858,824 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race X74 63,659 252,008

' 10-' 15 Growth / Yr -0.1% 0.2% 0.2°/a Hispanic (any race) 448 109,864 411,629


Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 790 1,402 701 Edtrcalio~ra/Attainment (2010)Median Age (2010) 40 39 40 Persons Age 25 or Older To►vn % Stnte



Bachelors or More 2,600 23% 842,517 35%Age Dish•ibution (2010)

0-4 S-17 18-24 25-49 SO-64 65+ Totn!

Male 483 3% 1,488 9% 571 4% 2,849 18% 1,640 10% 900 6% 7,931

Female 470 3% 1,454 9% 505 3% 2,835 18% 1,724 11% 1,222 8% 8,210

County Total 51,376 6% 141,420 17% 82,147 10% 287,846 34% 165,112 19% 121,260 14% 849,161

State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

F~nr~n~i~c

ofBusiness Profile (2005) % of Totnl Top Fine Grand List (2009) A~nonnt Net

~stro Manufacturing Inc $15,641,220 1.1%Sector Estnblislr»rents E111D/OVIIIC/tl

CT Light &Power Co. $7,354,280 0.5%Agriculture 3.5% 1.3% ITW Highland Manufacturing Co $5,456,460 0.4%Const. and Mining 17.5% 9.6% Beach Building $4,183,560 0.3%

Manufacturing 7.0% 24.3% Buell Industries $3,067,900 0.2%


Trade 22.3% 15.9% Top Fine Major Employers (2006)Finance, Ins. and Devon Precision Industries, Inc. Highland ManufacturingReal Estate 4.9% 3.2%

Wolwtt View Manor Inc. Anstro ManufacturuigServices 37.7% 37.5% B&C Medical ServicesGovernment 3.6% 4.9% Torv~t State

RetnilSnles(2007) $182,053,224 $136,936,194,241All Outlets

- Education

2009-2010 School fear Toivir State


Most public school students in Wolcott attend Wolcott SchoolDistrict, which has 2,855 students.

For more education dataplease see:http:/hvww.stTte.ct. us/sde/

Students per Computer To►vuElementary: 3.0


Connecticut Mastery Test Percent Abore Goal


Town State Toiv~t S1nte Town Stnte

Reading 77 61 83 69 86 69

Math 81 64 88 69 88 65

Writing 85 64 81 62 85 67Ai~erage SAT Score





Town Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 No representalron or ma~~•anties, expressed or implied, nreY g lvlvw.Cel'C.COnt

given regarding the nccarac~~ of this i~ forivation.

~~Yfl➢11~C~ YC1~~

Government E

Government Form: Mayor-Council

Total Revenue (2009) $51,293,437

Taac Revenue $31,148,703

Non-tax Revenue $20,144,734


Per Capita Tar (2009) $1,944

As % of State Average 79.8%

` ~ ~ -~~~ / ~ S/x117 ~9C1'C

Co~t~tee-tic~it Eco~tontic Re:rot~rce Ce~itey, Lu:

Annual Debt Service (2009) $5,109,100As % of Expenditures 9.7%

Total Expenditures (2009) $52,520,970Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $2,032,777,268

Education $34,412,326per Capita $127,160

Other $12,999,544As % of State Average 76%

Total Indebtness (2009) $32,840,655 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 2006As % of Expenditures 62.5% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) A3Per Capita $2,050 Actual Mill Rate (2007) 31.77As % of State Average 96.7% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 13.75

%of Grand List Com/Ind (2007) 5.6%

Housi~zg/Real Estate

Housn~g Stocic (2009) Town Cointty Stnte O~~mer Occupied Dwellings (2009)

E~sting Units (total) 6,039 352,0'#2 1,452,007 As %Total Dwellings


New Permits Auth. (2009) 18 509 3,786 Dish~ib:rlion of House Sales (2009)As %Existing Units 0.30% 0.14% 0.26% Number of Sales

Demolitions (2009) 212 1,219 Less than $100,000House Sales (2009) 56 3,553 14,696 $100,000-$199,999

Median Price $250,000 $246,000 $265,000 $200,000-$299,999

Built Pre 1950 share (2000) 16.9% 33.2% 31.5% $300,000-$399,999$400,000 or More

Labor Force


(2009) Town Cotnrty Stnte Commuters into Townfrom:Labor Force 9,054 450,421 ],889,947 Wolcott 1,346

Employed 8,284 410,346 1,734,291 Waterbury 1,080


Unemployment Rate 8.5% 8.9% 8.2% Plymouth 104

Plnce of ~~'ork (2009) Waterto~m 93

# of Units 329 22,428 104,314 Bristol 79

Total Employment 3,009 349,363 1,615,355 Meriden 53

2000-'09 Gro«~th AAGR -0.5% -0.6% -0.4% Southbury 49

Mfg Employment n.a Southington 43

New Haven 41nH~ar Tnfnrmntinn

Town Stote

Barks (2007) 4 1,029

Crime Rate (2009) Dista~zce to Major Cities Miles


Boston 113Library (2010) Tofvrr

New York City 82Total Volumes 60,630

Providence 82Circulation Per Capita 5.2

4,639 185,400 812,964

77% 53% 57%

442 41,649 149,355

Town County Stnte

SO 346

9 953 3,539

32 1,347 '3,847

12 645 2,510

3 528 3,454


Waterbury 1,978

Wolcott 1,346

Cheshire X101

Bristol 392

Hartford 300

Naugatuck 198

New Haven 173

Farn~ington 163

Watertown 157

Southington 153

Residertlial Utilities

Electric Provider

Connecticut Light & Po~~~er

(800)286-2000

Gas Provider

Yankee Gas Company

(800)989-0900

Water Provider

Municipal Provider

local Contact

Cable Provider

COMCAST/WATERBURY

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 www.CeYC.COi11 No ~•ep~•esentation or tirarranties, eap~essed or implied, are girenregrn ding the accin acy of dtis i~ formation.


Map View: 2010 Census Interactive Population Mai

20~1~ ~c~r~~~~~ ~r~te~~~~:~~~ ~'~~~ou~~~ ~Il~~ ~~~~r~~cUl~

~~ ° ~J~~E~U U ~1~~7JIlIl

Population

Page 1 of 12


Housing Statusin housing units w~less noted )

Total 6,276

Occupied 6,007


Population in owner-occupied14,990


Renter-occupied 768


Vacant 269

Vacant: for rent 33

Vacant: for sale 87



Male

Female

Under 18

18 &over

20 - 24

25 - 34

35-49

50-64

65 &over


Hispanic or Latino


Populatio~~ by Race

White

African American

Asian


8,074

8,606

3,908

12,772

870

1,363

4,020

3,547

2,540

611

16,069

15,758

293

210

26


Woodbury's Demographics

Population: The population findings are based on the new US Census data for 2010.Woodbury's population for 2010 was 9,975 a difference of 832 additional people from the 2000population of 9,198. Woodbury's population, the thirteenth smallest in the NVC, increased by8.4%from 2000 to 2010. The population in the NVC increased by 5.6% from 2000 to 2010.Connecticut's population grew by 4.9% percent during the 2000 to 2010 period. Eleven of theeighteen communities grew at a rate equal to or higher than the state during the 2000 to 2010period. Woodbury had the sixth highest percent change at 8.4%. Woodbury's rate was higherthan the State and NVC average.

Population by Sex/Age: Woodbury had 4,837 males, 5,138 females, 2,099 people were underage 18, and 7,876 were age 18 and over.

Unemployment and Labor Force Characteristics in Woodbury: In April of 2012, theunemployment rate was 5.6% in Woodbury, 8.5% in the NVC, and 7.5% in Connecticut and7.7% in the US. Newtown possessed the lowest unemployment rate among NVC towns at5.2%. Waterbury had the highest unemployment rate (12.3%).

The unemployment and labor force have changed during the past years because of thenational/worldwide economic crisis. Most of the communities iri the NVC reflect an increase inthe labor force and a decrease in the higher unemployment percentages.

In April of 2012, Woodbury possessed 2.7 percent of the labor force in the NVC. Its total laborforce of 5,342 was the forth smallest in the NVC in 2012. Waterbury maintained the highestshare of the NVC's labor force at 24.4 percent whereas Bethlehem possessed about 1 percentof the NVC's labor force in 2012.

Woodbury had 317 people of the unemployed labor force in the NVC in 2012. Woodbury hadthe fourth smallest share of the NVC's total number of unemployed in 2012. Waterburypossessed the largest number of unemployed (6308) whereas Bethlehem possessed thesmallest number (132) of the NVC's unemployed in 2012.

Changes in Employment Force and Unemployment Rates Over Time: Woodbury's laborforce increased by 355 workers from April of 2000 to April of 2012, whereas the employmentforce in the NVC and the state increased by 16,842 people and 162,700, respectively.

Woodbury's percent of unemployed went from 1.5% in 2000 to 6.7% in 2011 to 5.6% in 2012.The NVC went from 2.3% in 2000 to 9.9% in 2011 to 8.5% in 2012. Connecticut's unemployedwent from 2.2% in 2000 to 8.9% in 2011 to 7.5% in 2012.

IVledian Household Income: based on CERC 2010 data -Woodbury $83,649,County/Litchfield $68,682 and the NVC $74,286 and Connecticut $65,686.


~~J c~ c~ ci~11 u~ v1 pry ~ C~' ~ rn rr1,, ~ ~ ~ ~ u1CERC Town Profile 2011

Town Hall Be%ngs !o

P.O. Bos 369 Litchfield County

Woodbury, CT 06798 LMA Torrington



DemographicsRace/Ednticity (2010) Toivir Cmntry Stnte

Po :elation 2010P ( ) Town Corurry S1nte White 8,964 176,854 2,786,7611990 8,131 174,092 3,287,116 Black 48 1,872 337,2992000 9,198 182,193 3,405,565 Asian Pacific 167 3,453 128,6512010 9,316 187,467 3,511,137 Native American 11 170 6,4182015 9,093 186,535 3,545,169 Other/Multi-Race 126 5,118 252,008

' 10-' 15 Growth / Yr -0.5% -0.1% 0.2% Hispanic (any race) 276 7,071 411,629

Land Area (sq. miles) 36 920 5,009 Poverty Rnte (2009) 3.2% 5.3% 8.7%

Pop./ Sq. Mile (2010) 255 204 701 Edtrcalio~aal Attairune~7t (2010)Median Age (2010) 45 43 40 Persons Age 25 or Older Toivit % StnteHouseholds (2010) 3,815 74,767 1,337,758 High School Graduate 1,544 23% 689,864 29%Med HH Inc. (2010) $83,649 $68,682 $65,686 Some College 1,781 26% 585,203 25%

Bachelors or More 3,136 46% 842,517 35%Age Distribution (2010)

0-4 5-17 18-24 25-49 SO-64 65+ Totn/Male 227 2% 731 8% 320 3% 1,478 16% 1,226 13% 598 6% 4,580Female 249 2% 652 7% 291 3% 1,549 17°/a 1,279 14% 716 8% 4,736County Total 9,511 5% 28,722 15% 15,958 9% 60,867 32% 43,128 23% 29,281 16% 187,467State Total 211,807 6% 586,571 17% 330,532 9% 1,173,203 33% 708,910 20% 500,114 14% 3,511,137

L {.V/[Vl/l{l.J

of

6usi~tess Profile (2005) % of ToJn! Top Five Grand List (2009) Anrouirt ~'~'et

Grand list dataSector Esfablislrnrents Eiiiplovnrent

not providedAgriculture 5.8% 4.2%



Trans. and Utilities 1.7% 4.6°/a Net Grand List (2009)

Trade 23.9% 30.7% Top Fine Majo~~ Employers (2006)Finance, Ins. and Nonnewaug Rgionai Schl Dst 14 Carmen Anthony Fishhouse LlcReal Estate 6.1% 3.8%

Town of Woodbury The Woodbury Telephone CoServices 39.1% 39.0% West ChevroletGovermneut 4.8% 2.2% Town Stnle

Retni/Soles (2007) $220,305,118 $136,936,194,241All Outlets

Education

2009-2010 School3 ear Toivir Stnte


Most public school students in Woodbury attend Regional SchoolDistrict 14, which has 2,127 students.

For more education dataplease see:http:/hvww.state.ct.us/sd e/

Students per Comp:der Tow~t Stnte

Elementary: 4.9 4.1Middle: 2.8 2.8Secondary: 2.6 2.7

Connecticut ~ltaste~y Test Perce»t Above Goa!Grade 4 Grade 6 Grade 8

Totivu State Town Stnte Tower Stn1eReading 70 61 85 69 81 69Math 82 64 90 69 74 65Writing 72 64 82 62 80 67

Average SAT Score

Average Class Size Toiv~r Stnte




Town Profiles Ma , 2011. Pa e 1 ~ Ago r•epresentalion or irarranlies, et~ressed or implied, arey g lvyvlt CeYC. Co71t

given regarding the accra•ac~~ oft/ris ii formatio~t.

V~~I ~ ~ of lr~ t~.~ ~r'~cc~~~~~~~r~~ut

GovefiTntent

Goveriunent Fonn: Selectman-Town Meeting


Tai: Revenue $25,978,412Education

Non-tai Revenue $3,248,499Other

Intergovernmental $1,336,615 TotalIndebtness(2009)

Per Capita Tax (2009) $2 84~ As % of Expenditures

As % of State Average 116.6%Per Capita


~ Housing/Real Estate ~

Housing Stock (2009)E~usting Units (total)

%Single Unit

New Permits Auth. (2009)

As %Existing Units

Demolitions (2009)

House Sales (2008)

Median Price


Labor Force

Place of Residence

(2009)Labor Force

Employed

Unemployed

Unemployment Rate

Place of FVork (2009)# of Units

Total Employment


Mfg Employment

TO1VA COI/11/f~

4,176 83,92980.6% 77.7°/u

10 163

0.24% 0.19%0 48

50 1,152

$404,375 $273,500

23.1% 36.3%

I OlI1BP I/1fOY1YtQt1011

Stnte

1,452,007

64.8%

3,786

0.26%

1,219

16,606

$290,000

31.5%

~ (~.r~crr•tbere

Co~tnee-ticnt Eioi~omic Re ro~irie Center, Iuc.

Annual Debt Service (2009) $361,380As % of Expenditures 1.2%

$28,945,127Eq. Net Grand List (2007) $1,914,051,565

$19,489,236per Capita $198,677


$7,140,833 Date of Last Revaluation (2009) 200324•x% Moody's Bond Rating (2009) Aa3$781 Actual Mill Rate (2007) 22.7936.8% Equalized Mill Rate (2007) 12.]0

of Grand List Con~/Ind (2007) 6.0%

Owner Occupied D~e~ellings (2009)As %Total D«~ellings


Disb~ib:~tion of Ho:ise Sales (2008)Number of SalesLess than $100,000$100,000-$199,999$200,000-$299,999$300,000-$399,999$400,000 or More

Conrnrulers (2000)Town Cormty State Commuters into Town from:5,488 105,588 1,889,947 Woodbury 1,193

5,121 96,928 1,734,291 Southbury 203

367 8,660 155,656 Waterbury 179

6.7% 8.2% 8.2% Watertown 156

Bethlehem 101

350 6,066 104,314 Naugatuck 92

2,101 59,332 1,615,355 Middlebury 87

-1.2% -12% -0.4% Torrington 79

n ~ Oxford 63

Danbury 47

Town S1nte

Ba~~ks (2007) 4 1,029

G•irne Rate (2009) Distance to ~llajor Cities Mi/es

Per 100,000 Residents 32 298 Hanford 30

Boston 125

Libr•a~y (2010) TownNew York City 73



2,916 52,087 812,96471% 63% 57°/u

80 4,303 149,355

Town County Stnte

26 273

3 250 2,797

7 376 5,622

12 221 3,083

28 279 4,831


Woodbury 1,193

Southbury 575

Waterbury 518

Danbury 406

Watertown 154

Ridgefield 138

Torrington 122

Ne~~~to~~m 102

New Milford 96

Washington 94

Resideiatial Utilities

Electric ProviderConnecticut Light & Po~~~er(800)286-2000

Gas ProviderYankee Gas Company(800) 989-0900

Water ProviderMunicipal Providerlocal Contact

Cable ProviderCharter Commm~ications of Western Connect i(800)827-8288

Town Profiles May, 2011. Page 2 wWw.Cerc.COl7t No representation or i~~arrnnties, expressed or iruplied, are girenrega~ ding Jhe accm acy of this information.


1~1[~~r ~Tiew: 2010 Census Interactive Population Mai

~~~~ C.~r~~us ~~~~:~r~~~~;~~~ ~~~~0~1~~^~~~r~ ~~~~r~~~r~

c~'IC ~ ~J~~~l~~au~y ~~~~vn

Population

Page 1 of 19


Housing Status( in lousing units unless noted )

Total 4,564

Occupied 4,214


Population in owner-occupied 8,376number of individuals )

Renter-occupied 932

Population in renter-occupied1,576

( number of individuals)

Vacant 350

Vacant: for rent 74

Vacant: for sale 68

Vacant: for seasonal/recreational/occasional use 13


Male 4,837

Female 5,138

Under 18 2,099

18 &over 7,876

20 - 24 386

25 - 34 759

35 - 49 2,188

50 - 64 2,675

65 &over 1,7031




Population by Race

White 9,547

African American 57

Asian 168


http://2010.census.gov/201 Ocensus/popmap/ipmtext.php?fl=09 4/3/2012

h~~9F%~ ~~~~' ~~~a~~~~~ ~r~~3 ~r~~~fl~~rr~~r~~~ ~G~~~~~~~~ ~~[~o~ o ~~O~r~r~u~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~i ~

9 he Sraie Labor Dep~r'[men'~, his lisfiec~ 35 bL~sin~s~es in the f~VC CEDE area ~ihai hive

or plan ro hive, a reduction in Their worl:rorce. ~?~,272 -Tull and/or ~~asonal jobs have

f~~en or will be lost. (See lisi below).

~~j/~~~~i~~~

~~c~~a~~o~~ ~~~~~~6'~i~~~jf ~~lff~~ ~~~

! ~~~~~or~`k'9~➢~9c~~10 ~~'~~~9~~; ~~G'~~U'~ Bb""~~~i~~~C~

January 2012 AT2 I Area wide I elephone u'[iliiy 45

January 2012 Perking and ElmerShel-ion

I echnology 75

February 2012 Expeci Stores/Derby Super. Marl:efi 58

February 2012 Waterbury HospitalWaterbury

Medical Services 75

March 2012 W.E. BassettShelton

I rirn insirumen'~s 300

Ocfob~r 2011 SiE:ors~cy AircraftValley Wide

Aircraii Industry 419

February 2011 BordersSouthbury

Bookstore 300

January 2011 Pr~ti and WhitneyCheshire

Engine Repair ~~69

December 2010 Ninefiy NineResfiaurantW~terc~ury

Resra~~r~n ~: Pub 43

October 207 0 Pocl:ef WirelessWaterbury

Wireless Phones 100

October 2009 Cre~ceni ManorWaterbury

I Health Care 10

May 2009 F9ousafonic LumberDerby

Lumber 100

April 2009 Derby Cell~~larProductsDerby

Car Parts 98

March 2009 U.S. PostalWaterbury

Posf Office 20

March 2009 Drivesol WorldwideW~teriown

SfieErinc~ Company 2~'i

Ma~~ch 2009 Illinois I ool WorksWaterbu ry

M~nui~c~uring 20

March 2009 Protocol Iniegr~fed iVlarkefiinc~ 160

~~~~~°n~~~~~n~~~ ~~~u~~~rr~yy ~~~r~u~ ~r~~~ C~r~~~~~6~~9 P~°~~~~~~~ ~9~6°i~~i°j 9~~6~~~~~~~

G'~~:,~~~'~~OG~i ~~la° ~~~~1~D~~i

Direc~ MarketingCheshire

January 2009 Protocol Inregrafed Direcf Markefiing ~ 61Cheshire

December 2008 Waterbury Garmen'~ Clothing ~?~0Waterbury

December 2008 Dosserfi Corporation Electrical Parts 30Waterbury

DecernbLr 2000 Drive Sol Global 24-'iSteering, inc.

Ociober 2008 Platt ~rofhers iVleial S'ar'is 20Wafierbury

Fall 2008 Wachovia Waterbury Financial Services 63July 2008 Citi Group Waterbury Financial Services 120

and OihersJuly 2008 Ansonia Copper & Copper &Brass 86

Brass Ansonia MillingJune 2008 Lifefouch /Derby Photography 36 fiuli and 185

seasonal (221 total)

J~~ne 2008 Pitney Bowes Postage Meters 67Newiown

Summer 2008 Whyco Finishing Eleciropla~iing ~ 7r homaston

Summer 2005 Websfier Bank Financial 100Waierbu

Summer 2008 Peoples Unirecl Financial 170 closing1/1/~~er~ury and orh~rcornmunifies

Spring 2008 Home Fabric Milli I exfiile 13 closingCheshire

May 2008 Firsfi Studenfi 13us 110Waterbury

fV~~rch 2008 F&S Oil Corno~~~y I Oil Delivery 70Wa~erbuj-y

February 2008 Webster Financial Ban6< 165Group Cheshire

January 2008 Blew Haven Copper Copper Mill 55Se rnour

Copulation by Sex and Age 2010 Census Dana

l~n~a~~i~ 'i9,2~'9 9,?G~ 9,98' ~?~,~79 12,07 2,595% `~8% 52% 24'% G3% "i3%

Q~acon ~ail~ G,O~?-J 3,O~D 3,029 'i,377 3,~~9 7031% 50% 50% 23% 64% ~3%

{3e~ihleh~rn 3,607 '~ ,~79 ~ ,825 7~'~7 2,321 5391 % ~~9% 51 % 2"I % 6~% 7 5%

~I~~Shir~ X9,261 '15,189 ~4,0~2 x,093 18,0 6 ~?~,'102

DQrby 12,90? 6,192 6,7'i 0 2,10 o,'i 2~J 2,015J% 4~8% 52% 2'I % G3% 16%

Middl~b~ry 7,575 3,663 3,9'13 1, 63 ~!-,x'10 1,3022% ~8% 52% 25% 58% 17%

i~~uc~~~~~~cl~ 3'i ,862 'i 5,G23 'i 6,23 7,380 20,676 3,806~i% 4~9% 5~% 23% 65% 12%

f~l~v~r~own ?7,560 13,~0`l 13,653 7,605 'i6,~~?~6 3,097% 50% 50% 28% GO°/a ~ v%

O~òrcl ì2,6o3 6,307 G,376 3,085 7,g86 'i,2'l~3% 50% ~0% 2~!•% 62% 13%

f~ros~eci - 9,~'~Q5 F',-,533 ~,~7~ 2,~I~2~!. 5,85 1;252% 4~3% `~2% 23% 62% 15%

Sey~~~tour~ 16,5 0 ~,G~'!'! 8,G'99 3,61 10,57 x,3504% 4~9% ~1% 22% r~~!•% 1~i%

Sh~l~~o~ 39,5~~J 19,13~~ 20,315 8,33a ~~~,3'i~ 6,Q03'~ 0% ~?$% ~2% 2 I % 0'1 % 17%

~ou~inbury 19,90?• 9,300 10,6Q~< <!~,0~0 10,6'i 9 5,355% ~7% 53% 20% 53% 26%

T~or~a~ion 7,837 3,5 1 4-,066 'i,~1~ x,025 ~1,0~',-22% ~!~8% 52% 23% E~% 13%

W~~eib~ry' '110,366 52,517 ~7,0~?9 ~?F~,2Gj 68,'i5~ ~3,9G?~327% ~o% 52% 26% 62% 13%

W~ieriovv~t 2~,51~' 'i0,~09 ì ~,60~ ~!~,05~ i~?~,01c~ 3,6376% ~!8% 52% 22% 6?% ~6%

Wolco't 16,680 2,97 ?~ ~,6~6 3,°02 'iQ,23~ 2,50~% 5J•% ~2% 23% 6'~ % 15%

111fQOC~h~I~j 9,97 ~?~,83~ x,'130 2,099 C7,'i l3 ì,7C~32% ~~8% 52% 2'i% G2% ~ l%

To~ai~ ~103,5~8 197,Oe~'i 2a~,~,'i8 ~~,J'!3 ~~~3,922 ~9,'i~'.-3

ruoP i ~

X000 2009 2010 DIFFERENCE UIFFE°EI~lCE %Change %Change

CEP.0 2000-2010 2009-?010 2000-2010 2009-2010

Connecticut 3,405,565 3,497,398 3,574,097 168,532 76,699 ~.9% 2.1

U.S. {Adjusied)

hi~IC I ot~~~~~s 382,125 392,197 403,578 21,453 11,381 5.6% 2.8%

Ansonia 18,554 18,408 19,249 695 841 3.7% 4.4%

Beacon Falls 5,246 5,705 6,049 803 34~ 15.3% 5.7%

Bethlehem 3,422 3,469 3,607 185 138 5.4% 3.8%

Cheshire 28,543 29,554 29,261 718 -293 2.5% -1.0%

Derb 12,391 12,532 12,902 511 370 4'.1% 2.9%

Middlebu 6,451 7,056 7,575 1,124 519 17.4% 6.9%

Nau atuck 30,989 31,244 31,862 873 618 2.8% 1.9%

Newtown 25,031 26,011 27,560 2,529 1,549 10.1 % 5.6%

OxfoPd 9,821 12,559 12,683 2,862 124 29.1% 1.0%

Pros ecf 8,707 9,126 9,405 698 279 8.0% 3.0%

Seymour 15,454 15,957 16,540 1,086 583 7.0% 3.5%

Shelton 38,101 38,593 39,559 1,458 °66 3.8% 2.4%

Southbu 18,567 19,842 19,904 1,337 62 7.2% 0.3%

homaston 7,503 7,695 7,887 384 192 5.1% 2.4%

Waterbur 107,271 106,949 110,366 3,095 3,17 2.9% 3.1

Watertown 21,661 22,334 22,514 853 180 3.9% 0.8%

Wolcoti 15,215 16,020 16,680 1,465 660 9.6% 4.0%

Woodtiu 9,198 9,143 9,975 777 832 8.4% 8.3%

otals 382,125 392,197 403,578 21,453 11,381 5.6% 2.8%

~-, ,-

-p~

a~LYf ~Y.Y~ uVr L~i~

L 4.d' x'A.0 ~4Y~ Gn FJ~

,L E%

~~~n

r~fa

vm~~

'~ i~

r ~o

nE~E

e~~i

c~€i

. ~i[~~ ~4V~ ~nc~'~~ze 6~~

fC B owF~

s. 20Q0-

20'i

2

~~

€~-00

LaE~o~

~=orcc

~rr~

~lay

~c~

~nem~ioyed

f~,~

~r- e 2

La~oE-

~=or

c~

~E~~

~a[o

yc-d

~nem~~fo~ieo~ ~~f~

Co~~

~le~

fi~~

'z1,735,200

~,697,80~

37,x

.00

2.2%

1,897,QQ0

~,75

4~,9

Q0~

'ia.

3,OQ

07.5~%

~.~.

(/~o

f,p~

,6s~

~eo~

)14~,230,OQ0~

135,76,000

5,52~'~,000

3.,9

%~53,9Q5,000

'141

,995

,OQ0

►1,9

10,0

007.70%

R~1,

~'~ I ~w~~

s'1

93,8

22789,355

x,467

2.3%I

210,G6!~

186,

659

17,8

638.50%

/-~~tsob~l~

9,4°6

9,259

237

2.~%

10,4.58

9,4~2Q

7,03

83.9%

4~~~co~~ ~~f

fs~3e'Lhleh~m

I 2,

979

1,971

2,926

1,94

053

3~7.8%

1.5%

3,50

2,057

3,171

1,925

279

132

~. h%

C.~~

%

Cheshire

~ 13,82

a3,59~

222

1.G%

1~?,

72~

13,8°9

822

5.6%

D~Uf

~y6,77

6,40

175

2.7%

7,15

6,538

6~6

8.~%

Gill

idc~

6G[o

~i3,455

3,39

.857

~ .6%

~,OQ3

3,762

24-

16.0%

6V~Ug~%l~cl:

76,31!

15,8

9?~-20

2.6%

17,O

Q4~

15,37

1,56

79.2%

6ti9ew'tow~''` ~2

00~>

X2,969

12,7

58~S~

1.4%

14,526

13,7

67759

5.2%

Ox'ia~'~

5,673

5,57

~0~

~.S%

~,~~a3

7,02

Q~22

5.7%

k~E~s~o~ce

4,3951

~,8~0

~5

~.7%

5,233

~r,889

3~Q

6.6%

Se~~1a~a~-

Sf~cf'ioB~

I 8,50

I 27,238

8,324

20,823

~ l7

~?~~5

2.7%

2.0%I

9,~9

~22

,783

18,

731

2,158

Z60

~i,6

25~

8.0%

7.~%

~o~EeGlIo9~V~!

8,32

~I8,

~94~

13~

~.6%

,~i, E6~I

8,60

2558

6.~%

~hOl

Y9~S

'I:C

?6`1

4,277

~,~ 86

9~2.

1 %`~

,7~ 8

4-,332

3~6

8.2%

W~ierbt~ry'

~ a~7,968

46,330

~,G38

3.~'

%5~,37~~

45,OG6

6,308

1~.3%

~.~V

~'~~

riow

~~ 1

,785

~ ~ ,563

2~ 7

~ .8%

~ 2,236

~ 1 ~ ,348

888

Z.3%

1/lYolco't'e

8,27

8,11

5X 56

'd .9%

9,19

28,39

80~

8.7%

V~/o

odbu

~5,30!

5,227

77

~.5%~

5,65a

5,34~2~

3 ~7

5.C%

To'[

~Is

193,822

189,355

4~,~

!~67

2.3%

- 27 U,6G2

192,

799

17,863

8.5%

Ehkli~ L~

?1'i

~:tE

V~7"o

.~f'I~1~ 2000 r CD !a6

'~1~

2tl'

Z'3

I C7 1-~PF:~? w0•i2

Empl

ovme

rri in Conneciicuf, the RIVC and •the NVC Towns, 2000-2012

npr-00

Labo

rFo

rce

Employed

Uner

nnlo

ed

Apr-11

Labo

rFo

rce

employed

Uner

nnlo

yecl

Air-12

Labo

rFo

rce

Employed

Unemployed I'.~~ie

Connecticut

1,735,200

1,69

7,80

0 37, 00

2.2%

1,882,200

1,713,900

768,300

8.9%

1,89

7,90

01,t5~,900

'14.3,0007.50%

U.S. (A

d~usted)

141,230,000

135,706,000

5,524,000

3.9%

153,059,000

137,792,000

15,2

67,0

0010.0%

153,905,000

14.1

,995

,000

11,910,000

7.70%

NVC Towns

193,

822

189,355

4,~;

~67

2.3%

209,

673

188,

906

20,7

679.9%

2'10,66;

186,

689

17,8

638.50%

/~nsonia

9,496

9,25

9237

2.5%

10,077

8,980

'1,097

10.9%

10,4

589,420

1,03

89.9%

l3~a

con Falls

2,97

92,926

53

1.8%

3,09

3,071

338

9.9%

3,50

3,171

27~J

8.1%

13ethlehern

'1,9

711,

940

31

1.6 °

/a1,97

'1,826

148

7.5 °

/a2,057

1,92

5132

6.4•%

Cheshire

'13,821

13,599

222

1.6%

'14,803.

13,725

1,078

7.3%

1,721

13,899

822

5.6%

Derby

6,577

6,<<02

175

2.7%

6,898

6,221

677

9.8%

7,'154

6,538

616

8.6%

Middlebu

3,455

3,398

57

1.6%

3,962

.°i,

663

299

7.5%

x,003

3,762

2L11

6.0%

Naug

a~tu

cic

16,314

15,8

9 }

420

2.6%

17,326

95,4.78

'1,848

10.7%

17,00'

15,437

1,567

92%

~lew

'~ow

n~` ~zoo~>

12,969

'12,788

181

1.4~%

1~,244~

13,290

954

6.7%

14,526

13,767

759

5.2 °

/a

O;c~'ord

5,673

5,572

107

1.8%

7,577

~ 7,072

505

6.7%

7,x43

7,021

4.22

5.7%

Prospect

x},8

95x,810

85

1.7%

5,34

8~1,92~1•

42~

7.9%

5,233

~1~,889

3~4•

6.6%

Seymour

8,501

8,324

9 ~7

2.1 %

~J,~

018,

539

862

9.2%

9,49

18,731

760

8.0%

Sllel'(on

21,238

20,8

23415

2.0%

23,245

21,3

671,

878

8.1%

22,7

8327,158

'1,625

7.1%

Southbury

8,32

88,194

134

'1.6%

9,155

8,4~~~2

713

7.8%

9,160

8,60

2558

6.'1%

Thomason

x,27

7x,186

912.1%

x,61

6x,252

36n

7.9°

/ax,718

4,332

386

8.2%

Wafierbuiy

X7,9

6846,330

1,63

83.

~1%

51,001

~'~3,650

7,35

11~.4%

51,3

74~'

~5,O

o66,

308

12.3%

W~'cer~own

'11,785

11,568

217

1.8%

12,2

2411

,173

1,051

8.6%

'12,236

11,3

'8888

7.3%

Woicoi~t

8,27

18,'115

156

1.9%

~J,086

8,26

282~

9.1%

9,192

8,39

1801

8.7%

Woodbun~

5,30~~

5,227

77

1.5%

5,327

4•,9

71356

6.7%

5,659

5,32

317

5.6%

Toils

193,

822

189,355

4, 67

2.3%

209,

673

188,

906

20,7

679.9%

210,662

192,

799

17,86.3

8.5%

~~~[~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~ '~~

~~V~D~~~~i~

~~~

LAQOf~

L~L30R

TOWN

~FORCE

I EMPLOYED

~ UNEMPLOYED

IRATEIFORCE

I EMPLOYED

I UNEMPLOYCD

! RAI E

Ansonia

10,077

8,950

1,097

10.9%

'10,458

9,420

1,03

89.9%

a~~~

o~, r-~iis~I

3,40

93,

071

338

9.9%

3,450

3,17

1279

8.1%

L3ef

hleh

em1,974

'1,8

26148

7.5%

2,057

1,925

132

G.4~%

Ches

hire

I1 ,8

0313

,725

1,07

87.3%

14,7

2113

,899

822

5.6%

Derb

yG,898

6,22

1G77

9.8%

7,15

46,

538

G16

8.6%

Mici

dleb

ury

3,96

23,GG3

299

7.5°

/ax,

003

3,76

22a

'IG.0%

Naug

~tuc

ic17

,326

15,4

781,8 8

10.x%

17,004

15,a~37

1,567

9.2%

Newtown

14,2

4413

,290

954

6.7%

14,526

13,767

759

5.2%

Oxforc~

Pros

peci

I

7,57

7

5,348

7,07

2

4,92

505

42~

G.7%

7.9%

7,443

5,233

7,021

4,889

422

'

344

5.7%

G.G%

Seymour

I9,

401

8,53

9862

9.2%

9,x9

1I

8,73

1I

760

8.0%

Shel

ion

23,245

2'1,367

~

I 1,

878

8.1%

I22

,733

21,158

1,625

7.1%

Soul

'hbu

~'y

9,155

8,4 2

I 713

7.8%

9,160

8,602

558

G.1%

Thomaston

Wa[C~'bur~

~,G1

G

51,0

0'1

x,252

X3,6

50

36~

7,351

7. J.%

14.~

1~%

~1~,718

51,374

x,33

2

~~5,066

l 386

6,30

8

I 8.2%

12.3%

Wate

rtow

n12,224

11,173

I '1,051

8.6%

'12,

236

11,3

488~8

7.3%

VVolcoii

~ I

9,086

x,262

82~

9.1°'/0

9,19

28,

391

801

8.7%

Woocibur;~

5,327

4,971

35G

G.7%

5,G59

~ 5,

342

317

5.6%

~'Q~

"~~.

2~~J

,~~~

'V~3II,~~~

2,767

9.9%

Z~i~,~~G

'V92

,~99

'~~,

~0~~

8.5%

NVC~

209,

673

188,906

20,7

G79.9.%

210,662

192,

799

17,863

8.5%

CT

I1,

882,

200

1,71

3,90

0168,300

8.9%

1,89

7,90

01,

754,

900

13,000

7.5%

U.S.

~152,898,000

139,661,000

13,2

37,0

008.7%

153,

905,

000

141,

995,

000

11,910,000

7.7%

~~~c~o~~r~ C~o~~~~G~o~c~ D~c~o~r~,~°~ ~~G~~ ~ OG~v~~ ~~~~~00~ s~

~ow~~ i i ~~~o~~i

Ansonia ~9,~94-Beacan ~all~ 66,901Bethlehem 85,Oa6Cheshire ~ 101,392Derr ~ ~~,185Middlebu ~ 91,990Naug~~uck X9,472fVewcown 105,74Oxord ~ 90,190Prop eci X3,566~eymo~r ~ ~ ~ -61,70Shelton ~ 76,OS~~Sou~hbu ~~ 79, ̀l9~Thornasfia~ ~ 62,898Waierhu ~ 38,71~-Waieriown ~~ 72,2~~WolcoE~ ~ ~ ~~,018Waodbu ~ 83,6ar9New {--fav~n Count 5,719Fairiiefd Goun~y ~ 77,620Liichiield Gou~~~ 6582NVC ~ 74,256C I ~ ~ 65,686

~~ ~c~~~1c~ C—~o~~~~ G~c~Qc~~ D ~~~o~~ ~~

G~~~ ~' ~= G~~ ~ o~~~n '~ ~°o~o0c~~

TOWN ~ ~ INCOME

~levutown 105,74~-

Cheshire 101,392

Middlebury 91,990

Oxford 90,190

Bethlehem 85,096

Pros eci 83,866

Woad~u~ 83,69

Southbury 79,19

Shelton ~ 76,08

Wolcoi~ ~ 74,018

Watertown ~ ~ ~ ~ 72,257

Beacon Falls ~ 66,90'1

Thomaston n 62,898

Se mour 61, t05

Nau aiuck 59,472

New Haven Count ~ 58,719

Der~Y ( ~ X4,'185

Ansonia ~9,79~'-

Wai~r~OUi ~ 38,714Fair~ield County 77,620

Li~chfiefd CounE 68582f~IVC 74,286

CT 65,686

~Pw~ne fl

9~, ~

~Il~ ai~

ee~~

2012 I+

/Iat

a nx

l~d~

rrga

4~n~

~~ F~

~uIl

~ey Co

rc~o

~crn

• CT}

~nt~

.H Imv~st~n~~n1 FIl-a,~eet~

Faye 1

Mrnrn4eE~~Iet~/~'roject

R/S

Cosg

Requested

Related

iyes~D0Fd5IlRDICIl~

~~~cYuB~

.doG~s

Jo1~s

'Y'nffc~~'iarne

Namc

4/6/10

Amount

Goal

~'ac-~u¢u'

Cast.

Cn•e~tesP/

~e~ai~e~fl

AmS~~nfra

Fountain Lake

TI

2,400,000

1,~i00,000

1-2-3-4-

Ansonia

Private/City/

100

300

Shovel ready immediately. Plamiin~, Design Developmeiit—

Commerce Center

SS6 .

Development

~Db1.

,Complete.Bid 45 days. Undertoiistrucfion

~n+ithui 90 days.

Access Road

Coi

oration

Armory ADA

TII

1,200,000

1,000,000

2-3

Ansonia

City, FDA,

25

10

Sho~~el ready inunediately. P

lanning phase comi~lete Uy 7/1/10.

Improvements

6G

Develo1~ment

PuUlic \corks

Cansh•uction in 2010.

Coy

oration/P~~V

Riverwalk &Park:

TI

605,000

450,000

1-2-3-4-

Ansonia

City, SYaYe,

50

N/A

Shovel ready unmediaYely. Plaiuiin~ &Conceptual Design Phase lave

Trails Phase I

I71

6Development

~DA/L'ederal

Ueen com1~leted. Final Design Develof~ conil~lete 12/31/11.

Corporation

~e~eon ~~llds

Downtown Village

T.A.

5,400,000

1,500,000

1-2-3-4

deacon falls

To~~~n, State,

25

~5

Shovel Ready 1-2 years. Planning ~. Conceptual Design Complete.

Develo ment

64

ADC

DOT, FI~VJA

~~n ~O~

Downtown

TI

1,300,000

1,000,000

1-2-3-4-

Towu LDC

Private, St

ate,

250

300

Shovel Ready 1-2 years. P

lanning &Conceptual Desi~ i are

Revitalization

73

6Federal,

underway. Under consh~uction in less than 2 years.

Local

Fountain Lake

T.A.

TBD

200,000

1-2-3-4

City Dev. Corp,

DECD, ~D[-1

100

325

YRevised Jaae ZOfl4. 12 months Yo 18 moufihs new plazmiuj a

nd

Regional Industrial

56

Private

engiueerin~ concept to support development of ci

ty o«~ned laud.

Park Ex a

nsion

~°Rev.

Developer

1~[1 i

cIl~Eleueti

Communication

N/R

2,729,000

$2,514,00

2,3

Town

Local,

25

Shovel Ready immediately-3 months to 1 year.

System Police

Deparhuent

De artment

ofJustice

J~aume fl

ry, 201

' ~E~~u~

~a~e 2

Pr3u

unie

i~r~

9iiy

/Pro

ject

R / S

Cori

Requested

Related

~es~

roff

sibi

6i~

~'~casumg

.fobs

~o~r

s~pctie IF

~~zte~e

Name

4/6/10

Amount

Goal

P~a-t~nea•

~o~as~.

~~e~nte~/

1'~e

~ana

c~R

Energy Conservation

N/R

y~10

0,00

02,3

Towe

lLo

cal

25Sh

ovel

Rea

dy imm

edia

tely-3 mon

ths to

1 year.

Town Hal

l &

Communit Center

Road Resurfacin

N/R

$350,000

1,2,

3,4

Town

Local

25Shovel Read

intinediatel — 3 mon

ths to

1 ea

r.

Sign Ref

lect

ivit

yN/R

$16,000

2,4

Town

Local,

25Sh

ovel

Rea

dy inunediaYely-3 mon

ths to

1 year.

Com liance

PI~~

JA

Pda~^~at~ne~~

Renaissance Pl

ace —

TI35,000,000

1,500,000

1-2-3-4

Boroujl~,

DECD= DOT,

150

100

Appl

icat

ion to Ue suUmitted fo

r fall ?011.

Phase 1

73Priva4e

SPA

Developer

PIe`;~4a~vn

Fairfield Hills

TI1,320,000

660,000

1-2-3-4

Dust Selectman

Town, St

ate,

100

200

Appl

icat

ion to

be suUmitted for f

a112011.

Campus Uti

lity

Loop

73DECD, LDA,

Private

E-Commerce Drive

TI3,

u00,

000

1,400,000

1-2-3-4

Oxford ADC

Town,

50

150

Shovel Rea

dy inunediately. ~ngineerin~ &Pe

rmit

s are in place.

75Regional

Complete CBPA ~I~. Desi;n Development— co

mple

te to ro

ad pro

file

Plannin;,

cons

truc

tion

90 days.

State DOT

Commerce Drive to

TII

X166,000

256,000

1-2-3-4

Oxford ADC

Tovrn, Sta

te,

25

TBD

Shovel Ready innnediately. ~ii

giue

erin

~ 8c

Permits are

in pl

ace.

Jacks Hill Road

GS

DECD

Complete C PA ~I~. Design Developmen~—co

mple

te to road profile

co~i

sh•u

ctio

n drawings.

Sewer Capacity

T.A.

1,100,000

100,000

1-2 -3

Orford BDC

To~~s~n

~25

TBD

Project is

rea

dy for Engineering Cousultazit Bid, 60 days required to

Upgrade —

Industrial

49

~pr

oces

s bid and select vendor.

Zone

-84 Exit 16 Traffic

T.A.

1,7Q0,000

150,000

1-2-4

O:cford ADC

To~~n

25

TL'D

Project is ready for engineering Consultant Bid, 120 days required Yo

Ca acit U

rade

43

process Uid and select vendor.

Pl E'mS . e~fC

Business &

TI1,200,000

705,000

1,2,3,4

Town acid ADC

FDA

25

50

Bro~~mfeld site, vacant land. Plamling &Conceptual Desi;~z

Commerce Parcel

72

complete. Shovel ready in 60 days.

Waterline Extension

J~nm~ ~9, ~

~Il~ ~a4~t~5

P~.be 3

I°l1[u

~anefl

p~aflf

it~~/P

►•ojec

tY2

/ S

~ers4

Requ

este

cARelated

~¢sg~o~asn~rnIerty

~~na~nr~;

.~om~

,~oPa~

'Y'ni~e ~+ti•aauae

Name

4 /6/10

Amau~t

Goal

~'~.¢-4~en•

Coast.

Cbe~tea/

I~eEaunecIl

AP;n

eIlB

Qrn

Downtown

TI7,000,000

1,500,000

1-2-3-4

S~DC

City

, State,

100

200

Shovel Rea

dy immediately. P

lanning & Coi

icel

~tua

l Des

i~ i Ph

ase

Revitalization

SODECD,

Complete. Design Development 90%complete. Bi

d Summer 2010.

Canal Street

Federal,

SPA, FDA

Housatonic

T[1,700,000

1,400,000

1 -3

S~DC

State &

100

75Sh

ovel

Rea

dy immediately. P

lamiin~, Con

cept

ual azid Des

i~ i

Railroad— Rail

7GPrivate

Deve

lopm

ent Phases a~

•e complete.

Upgrades

~acn~l~~uu~ry

Southbury Corporate

T.A.

2,500,000

150,

000

1-2-3-4

SouthUuiy ADC

State/PederaU

25

Long

Technical assista~7ce f

or engineering study.

Park

~ 3Private.

Tenn

100/200

Southbury Corporate

T.A.

13,300,000

6,000,000

1-2-3-4

Southbury ADC

Town, St

ate,

100+

200+

Shov

el Rea

dy immediately. P

lami

in~ &C

once

ptua

l Ph

ase com~~lete

Park

53

Priv

ate

2Q09. ]

3iddina and ne~otiatioii —

within 120 da

s.

~~Il6~Il~3~OA&

NYSTROMS Park

T-II

2,453,000

2,400,000

1-2-3-5

first Selechnan

Towi~/Private

25

1~T/A

Shovel ready — plaimin~

P., design in place — requnes funding.

donation

Road Rehabilitation

T-II

16,700,000

6,000,000

1-3-5

First Selectman

Town

25

1V/A

Multi-year hasecl itn ~rovements.

Town-wide

N/R

2,204,246

1,653,155

1-4

Town

Federal

25

25

Shovel Ready 1 to 2 ye

ars.

Communications

Homeland

U

rade

TfaCk/AthletlC FaCllit

N/R

1,646,000

1,646,000

1-2

To~~,~n

Town ,

25

2~

Shovel Ready 1 to 2 ears.

Sidewalk

N/R

420,000

420,000

1-2

To~~~n

To`nm

25

25

Shovel Ready 1 to 2 ye

ars.

Construction

4T'aaeu•bu~~ry~

Mattaco

TI

2,700,000

300,000

1-2-3-4

WDC

City, ~

P,A,

75

100

Shovel Ready immediately. Pla.nnina, Conceptual Design, Design

S~DECD

Development and 13idding/Ne~otiation —all Complete. CaisYruction

FDA

summer 2010.

Cherry Street

TI

6,200,000

900,000

1-2-3-4-

V✓DC

City, DECD,

75

25

Puuded.

Industrial Parlc

S3

Est.

5FDA

,~~cae fl

:~, Zdfl~ ~t~taus

Pr'~~cteeo~~li4~y/Project

R / S

CQ~r~

Re guested

Related

~C.i~ Ot

~5Q~3fIL

{~,~

~'~n~.c~8~sg

Jobs

.~aGs

TnrEZe name

Name

4/6/10

An2ount

Goal

~'~n-tnti~a•.

Cm~as~.

Cn~¢a~eeIl/

Ret~.emetIl

Naugatuck River

T.A.

25,3II5,000

1,000,000

1-3-4-5

V✓DC

City,

75

65

Shovel Ready 1-2 years. Feasibility Study — Complete. Pl

aiiuin~ and

Greenway

63

CTDOT,

Design underway. Construction

sta~•t early 2012.

PIMA

Waterbury Industrial

T.li

56,745,450

2,000,000

1-2-3-4-

1~/aterUury

City, State,

100

2~Shovel Ready 1-2 years. P

hase 1 complete. Phase 2 partial — in

Commons (WIC)

63

5Develop~neilt

DECD;

projress. P

hase 3 in progress. Construction start 2011— in phases.

Public Works

Corporation

Federal

Com lex

(WDC)

(TBD)

Waterbury

TIII

30,000,000

-~-1,000,000

1-2 -3-4

~~IDC

DOT,

100

25

Shovel Ready 1-2 }e

ars. Plamzin;Phase —CIE/

CLP.~1/ NEPA

Transportation

60

~I'I-iWA,

Complete. Conceptual desi~ i in proms ess. Construciioti star 2012.

Center

Regional

Transit

Harper Leader

T1I

720,000

430,000

1-2 -3-4

WDC

City, DAP,

100

25Shovel Ready —1-

2 years. Pl

anuin~ and Conceptual Design Phases

66FDA

undei-~~~a .

h3an-P

rafe•~:.~

Greater Valley

N/R

250,000

250,000

1-3-6

GVCC

Peasibilit~~ Study in progress.

Chamber of

Commerce —

Herita e Parlc

- _

- -

-R/S =Rated and Scored

Tiers —Activities rated as Tier I —Ready to go score of 70+, Ti

er R —Needs fu

rther study and score below 69-61, or Tier III — Further pla~uiing needed score below 60, T.A: Technical Assistance,

N/R Not Raiilced/Other Sources

Sca•e Card: 33 Projects from 13 towns and /ornon-

profits

Tier 1:

11 projects

Tier II

: 6 projects

Tier II

I:1 project

T.A.:

7 projects

Not Rated:

~i projects


Organization and Management

ManagementlLeadership Continues

The NVC CEDS has been managed successfully over the past 10 years by the sametwo Economic Development Corporations the Shelton Economic DevelopmentCorporation (SEDC) and the Waterbury Development Corporation (WDC). TheNaugatuck Valley Corridor (NVC) has had 2 previous CEDS documents approved forthe NVC area. The 2012 Annual Report from the Shelton Economic DevelopmentCorporation (SEDC) demonstrates its leadership and commitment in continuing theNVC CEDS. The SEDC and the WDC accepted the management of the planningprocess for the eighteen-town area designated as the NVC. The two corporations(SEDC/WDC) created the original Advisory Committee consisting of the two regionalplanning agencies/councils of government and the Greater Waterbury Chamber ofCommerce and the Lower Naugatuck Chamber of Commerce.

The NVC CEDS approved by EDA recognizes the past and points to the future, with theintent of improving the Economic Development of the 18 communities in NVC. For thepurpose of this annual report we have chosen not to duplicate the history, but choose tohave a vision for continued success.

The NVC has distinct strengths, which include but are not limited to local governmentsthat care for business, a committed workforce and apre-existing infrastructure that isconducive for business. The prime location of this district, including its transportationnetwork Interstate I-84 on the North running East to West and CT Rt. 8 running North toSouth in the center of the Valley Corridor connects to the Merritt Parkway CT Rt. 15 andInterstate I-95.

The original Strategy indicated that the NVC needed to build upon past success anddevelop new strategies. For example, abandoned industrial sites, which contribute tothe image that the NVC is a depressed area, should be inventoried, targeted andprioritized for clean-up because they are excellent locations for new businessdevelopment. The Brownfields conference held on June 12, 2008 reconfirmed the needto reindustrialize our Brownfields to create new business opportunities for the privatesector creating both short and long term employment positions. This will remain apriority for 2012/2013 of the CEDS. Brownfield Redevelopment Remediation is apriority.

As the two lead corporations determined in 1999 more time is needed to educate thedistrict's business, civic, community, and political leaders. Example, projects that looktown specific have afar-reaching regional effect. The individual strength of each townis not nearly as powerful and productive as the strength of the entire district.

Page 1


CEDS Process 2012/2013 - Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy

The two corporations acting as the parents and/or governing bodies continue to acceptthe responsibility of building on the original CEDS documents and began the process toconvert to the CEDS program. EDA recognized their leadership and overall communityacceptance of the two corporations and commissioned SEDC and WDC to continuewith the new CEDS in a letter dated December 1, 2010.

All the partners outlined below accepted the responsibility of building on the Strategy.Based on the effort, experience and general acceptance of previous efforts the followingorganization and management team are in place for the implementation of the CEDS.

Advisory Committee

The Chairperson is Sheila O'Malley. Currently she is the Economic DevelopmentDirector for the City of Derby. The chairperson was familiar with the CEDS processbased on her previous government relationships. The chairperson accepted theresponsibility of running the Advisory Committee and the Strategy Committee.

Members of the Advisory Committee supported that the SEDC act as the leadadministrative role for the implementation of the CEDS with assistance from the WDC.Both of these corporations have been recognized as leading regional economicdevelopment and community development, planning and implementation orientedagencies.

Advisory Committee Calendar for 2012/2013

The Advisory Committee will meet quarterly in October, January, April and June on thethird Thursday of the month.

The Calendar for 2012/2013 for the Advisory Committee is as follows:

October 18, 2012April 18, 2013

January 17, 2013June 20, 2013

Page 2

NVC Advisory Committee:


Name &Title Association Re resentsSheila O'Malle ,Chairman Cit of Derb Government and MunicipalJames E. Ryan, President SEDC Community Organizations,

Municipalities &RegionalGovernment

Leo J. Frank, Chief WDC Community Organizations,Executive Officer Municipalities &Regional

GovernmentRichard Dunne, Executive VCOG Regional GovernmentsDirectorPeter Dorpalen, Executive CNV/COG Regional GovernmentsDirectorWilliam E. Purcell, Greater Valley Chamber of Business CommunityPresident and Chief CommerceExecutive OfficerLynn G. Ward, President & Greater Waterbury Commerce Business andChief Executive Officer Chamber of Commerce Retail

Strateav Committee

The SEDC and the WDC administrative staff have the responsibility, experience andknowledge to prepare the technical and administrative components of the overall CEDSimplementation. Based on the initial experience of preparing the EconomicDevelopment Strategy for the 18 towns an initial framework was created to establish thefoundation for a Strategy Committee. Building on the initial experience and working withEDA's Philadelphia Regional Office staff, the two corporations have during the annualprocess expanded their window of opportunity to include additional participation in thereview and implementation of the Strategy, the capital project investment survey anddevelopment process, but more importantly a framework for ongoing assistance andparticipation. Organizations being represented include local governments, businesses,industry, finance, the professionals, labor, utilities, community organizations, publicservice agencies, racial or ethnic minorities, and women.

Strategv Committee Calendar for 2012/2013

The Strategy Committee will meet quarterly on the first Tuesday in October, January,April and June of every year or as needed.

The Calendar for 2012/2013 for the Strategy Committee is as follows:

October 2, 2012 January 2, 2013 (Wednesday)April 2, 2013 June 4, 2013

Page 3


Members of our Strategy Committee (names, occupations and areas they arerepresenting are on file with both corporations.) The Committee members broadlyrepresent all interests of the 18 communities beginning with public leadershipcommencing with the two (2) Councils of Government that represent the 18communities in the NVC area. These elected officials that form the Valley Council ofGovernment and the Central Naugatuck Valley Council of Government are providedinformation regarding the preparation and content for the CEDS. Other membersinclude the Executive Committee of SEDC and WDC Board of Directors,representatives of the Lower Naugatuck Valley Chamber of Commerce, the GreaterWaterbury Chamber of Commerce, local Planning and Zoning Commissions, EconomicDevelopment Commissions, Insurance Agency, Social Services Agency, Boards ofEducation, Community Organizations, Women and Minorities, and the RegionalPlanning Agencies that govern the 18 communities including the Valley Council ofGovernments and the Central Naugatuck Valley Council of Government.

Working Relationships

The Strategy Committee at its quarterly meetings will monitor and review economicdevelopment trends (i.e. employment numbers), the status of capital projects, and othereconomic conditions, i.e. the closing of manufacturing or businesses that impact acommunity in the corridor. Review recommendations from the support staff of SEDCand WDC, and recommend as appropriate amendments to the implementationplans/CEDS document. Also, assist communities with submitting economicdevelopment grants to both federal and state agencies as the budget permits. Continueto work with community foundations that are located within the jurisdictional area of the18 communities that have supported and continue to support the CEDS process.

Where appropriate the Strategy Committee, because of its community involvement, maybe asked to contact local, state and federal legislators, either regarding implementationand/or legislation that will be beneficial to the corridor area.

Staff Support

SEDC/WDC will continue to provide the day-to-day administrative functions andresponsibilities for the overall strategy, working with chief elected officials of eachmunicipality and/or their economic development agents. Their involvement will includecollecting and disseminating information, assistance with establishing implementationpriorities and monitoring existing programs to aid the region. The staff of thecorporations and the consultant will provide both demographic and technical informationregarding the ever changing population, out migrations from our major cities, andincreased population in the rural communities within the NVC, economic and taxinformation provided as part of the overall planning and technical assistance aspect tothe various committees.

Page 4


The two corporations will annually submit to EDA requests for financial assistance tocontinue the CEDS process. Requests will also be made annually to other corporationsin the NVC area to assist with the implementation and updating process required by theCEDS guidelines. The success of our funding partners will determine the levels ofservice the Corporations can provide.

The Capital Needs Evaluation Assessment Team

The Committees continue to encourage all 18 communities to submit as available anytype of capital improvement program for the Committee to review and include in theCEDS document. The Strategy Committee at its various public forums and at all of itsquarterly meetings advises the participating communities of the "open enrollment"opportunity for submission of projects.

In addition, the Strategy Committee at its June 2012 meeting reviewed the matrix forNVC capital improvement projects. The modified ranking system better reflects projectsthat are "ready to go" as Tier I. Projects that are in final planning or design stage arereferred to as "mid-point" or Tier II. Projects that are not ready for implementation withplanning and design in conceptual or early phases will be considered Tier III. Also, theCommittee recognized that many communities have very desirable projects that requiremore time for planning and initial engineering. The Committee supports the ideas andconcepts of these communities and has established a Technical Assistance HighPriority (T.A.) category for this purpose. Therefore, the Strategy Committee has revisedthe projects into two categories: capital improvement and technical assistance projectseach with a high priority ranking:

Capital ImprovementsTier I —High Priority -ready for implementation 0-35 monthsTier II —Mid-point 36/59 monthsTier III —Long Term 60 months and beyond

Technical Assistance:T.A. —High Priority - Planning &Engineering

This new designation under T.A. are for projects that require additional planning andengineering needs that will result in short and long term jobs when implemented. Theseare Technical Assistance High Priority projects.

The Committee is not ranking the projects beyond placing them in a tier category asdefined above. See the overall matrix, which covers all projects received, ranked andrated to date. As of the June 19, 2012 meeting of the CEDS Strategy Committee, 13municipalities out of 18 have submitted a projects) for inclusion in the CEDS, and onenon-profit corporation. A total of 33 capital investment projects have been included inthe 2012 CEDS Annual Report.

Page 5


The Advisory Committee as of the June 19, 2012 meeting reviewed the capital projectresponses. All the projects previously rated and scored were carried over to the2012/2013 CEDS year. The Tiers are as follows:

Capital Improvements:Tier 1: 11 projects High PriorityTier II: 6 projectsTier III: 1 project

Technical Assistance:T.A. High Priority: 7 projects

Not Rated: 8 projects

Committee Work Program

The staff received the demographic and economic background information from theconsultant. The information was reviewed and analyzed by the staff and presented tothe Strategy Committee and other regional organizations that have an interest in theeconomic viability of the region.

The Committees have accepted this information including transportation, housing andeconomic development initiatives planning and/or additional engineering of the variouscommunities and began to analyze how the 'implementation plan would be phased overa period of time, and established a three tiered implementation designation for capitalproject:

Tier I —ready for implementation 0-35 monthsTier II —Mid-point 36/59 monthsTier III —Long Term 60 months and beyond

A separate category has now been developed for projects with good economicopportunity/benefit that require new or additional planning and engineering analysis.These are referred to as High Priority Technical Assistance projects.

The background information that was presented to the Strategy Committee allowed forreview, discussion and decision making predicated on local jurisdictional matters and/orregional concepts that have been considered and voted upon by the appropriateagencies.

Page 6


Brownfields

The NVC CEDS from its initial strategy has referred to the need to identify "Brownfields"and to redevelop the existing site and/or building. DECD requested that eachCEDS/EDD begin to include Brownfields Redevelopment Priorities in their strategies.This Annual Report is a small step in meeting this request. The attached matrixinventory of EPA, DEEP and the Naugatuck Valley Brownfields Partnership identifiesenvironmental issues. EPA identifies 115 projects, Naugatuck Valley BrownfieldsPartnership indicates 38 individual sites and 5 major clean-up projects. The DEEPmatrix identified 1,631 sites with some form of an environmental issue while many havebeen corrected the majority of the Brownfield Redevelopment activities are lagging.They are both public and privately owned properties. As the CEDS Advisory Committeeprepared for the 2012 Annual Report, along with requesting a Capital Project update,the Committee also requested a Brownfield Project Status Report from the 18municipalities. The Capital Project update included a section on Brownfields. As of thisreport no municipality has responded to the Brownfields Project Status request. Thesection regarding the Brownfield request is as follows:

lirowniield Yro,~ect status (lf applicable oi• skip to next section)L Is your project in a designated/define Brownfield? ❑yes ❑ no2. Is your project dependent on Envu~onmental Remediation? ❑yes ❑ no3. Is there an accepted Remediation Plan? ❑yes ❑ no4. Is a Remediation Plan needed? ❑yes ❑ no5. Has an EIE been initiated? ❑yes ❑ no Stage 1: ❑yes ❑ Il0 Stage 2: ❑yes ❑ no

6. Are you aware of the funding opportunities foc Brownfields offered by the Regional Brownfields Partnership? ❑

yes ❑ no7. Are you a member of the Regional Brownfield Partnership (RBP)? ❑yes ❑ no8. Have you accomplished an assessment? ❑yes ❑ no

Needs:9. Site Assessme~it Grant? ❑yes ❑ no10. Loans to Clean up? ❑yes ❑ no11.Anti-blight Management on Abandoned Site/Buildi~ig? ❑yes ❑ no

Technical Assistance Needs:12. Tax Foreclosure? ❑yes ❑ no13. Community Ouh~each? ❑yes ❑ no14. Regulatory Assistance? ❑yes ❑ no

The Naugatuck Valley Corridor has long been one of the Connecticut's leadingmanufacturing centers. In fact, Connecticut has been designated as one of its "cluster"areas for precision metals. It is also true that manufacturing jobs continue to decline inConnecticut and the Naugatuck Valley Corridor.

Page 1


Many of the jobs lost in manufacturing are directly related to change in technology andmanufacturing applications and processing. Many of the old manufacturers have failedto keep pace with technology, capital costs for new equipment, research anddevelopment funds were channeled elsewhere. Many of the NVC sites and buildingswere reduced in size; the major manufacturing communities in the NVC like Waterbury,Naugatuck, Seymour, Ansonia and Derby have lost their competitive edge. Worldeconomics, cost of doing business, and regional competition have left communities with"Brownfields".

Communities li{<e Waterbury, have very limited land to compete for new businessopportunities. Very few if any large tracts of land say 10+\- acres for "Businesses" areavailable. Therefore, business growth and sprawl spreads to other communities with"open" land for all forms of economic expansion.

Yet communities like Waterbury continue to provide extensive services to the region,education, governmental agencies/services, hospitals and associated health care,transportation hubs and a workforce of both skilled and unskilled workers.

Community Development

Community development activities affect the lives of all residents of the NVC CEDS aswell as the vitality of the businesses that operate there.

The Environment

■ Industrial waste and Brownfields are the most identifiable and pressingenvironmental problems confronting the Valley.The Brownfields Pilot project is an innovative and effective regional effort thatoffers considerable promise in addressing environmental issues in the Valley.■ Sprawl and the loss of open space is becoming a major concern, and with no

regional land use planning there is a threat to the long-term quality of life inthe region.■ A number of small environmental organizations in the region are focusing on

preserving farm land, open space, and the quality of rivers. However theyhave limited capacity and have not been very involved in regionalcollaborative organizations.

Industrial waste and brownfields are the most identifiable and pressingenvironmental problems confronting the Valley.

The Valley is not alone, of course, in coming to grips with an industrial past —abandoned factories, boarded up mills, and contamination of sites and waterways.Unfortunately, many of the problems are very visible and many are close to the

Page 2


downtowns of several communities. Cleaning up these visual eyesores and turningthem into a more productive use is a very serious challenge for the Valley. Someplanning and clean-up has begun, but much remains to be done.

The Brownfields Redevelopment is an innovative and effective regional effort thatoffers considerable promise in addressing environmental issues in the NVC.

The NVC CEDS Committees have begun the development of a matrix of identifyingenvironmental issues in the 18 communities. Many of the projects are completed, someare in the process and others await further financial aid from federal, state and local andthe private sector.

State of Connecticut Office of Brownfield Remediation and DevelopmentWebsite: www.ctbrownfields.gov /phone: 860-270-8095

Page 3

NVC CEDS AREA

BROWNFIELD INVENTORY

List

of Contaminated or Po

tent

iall

y Contaminated Sit

es (DEP) (individual li

sts ar

e in the

Town Pro

file

)

City

Site

UGST

I.D.

UGST

Complete

Voluntary

Remed.

Hazardous

Waste Sit

eCERCLIS

Prop

erty

Tran

sfer

III

Othe

r

Anso

nia

68

33

20

-2

229

2Beacon Falls

35

85

47

58

3Bethlehem

15

15

2-

--

--

Ches

hire

100

63

38

-9

10

17

1Derb

44

24

113

33

92

Middlebury

5137

28

21

011

0Nau at

uck

85

49

25

15

323

4Newtown

174

133

102

-9

723

2Ox

Ford

16

74

11

23

2Pr

ospe

ct25

2112

-1

12

-

Se mour

46

22

10

13

317

-

Shelton

155

88

56

610

741

2Southbury

56

42

25

22

18

1Thomaston

62

25

13

-14

419

-

Wate

rbur

y411

205

115

632

13

149

6Wa

tert

own

142

75

52

16

256

2Wo

lcot

t86

46

23

114

1113

1Woodbury

60

32

16

88

62

4

NVC CEDS AREA

BROWNFIELD INVENTORY

List of Contaminated or Po

tent

iall

y Contaminated Sites(individual Li

sts are in the

Town Pro

file

)

City

EPA Waste

Site

Cle

anup

and Reuse

Naugatuck

Valley

Brownfield

Part

ners

hip

Othe

r Sites

and Projects

Anso

nia

34

1Beacon Fal

ls7

5Bethlehem

N/A

Ches

hire

16

Derb

69

2Middlebu

1Naugatuck

72

1Newtown

7Ox

ford

3Pr

ospe

ct1

1Se mour

41

Shel

ton

14

4Southbury

1Thomaston

82

Waterbury

28

8Wa

tert

own

44

Wolc

ott

3Woodbu

2TOTAL

115

38

5

CEDS Imp

leme

ntat

ion/Coordination of Partners

18 Communities - Nougntuck Val

ley Corridor

Anso

nia

Beacon Fal

ls Bethlehem

Cheshire De

rby

Midd

lebu

ryNa

ugat

uck Newtown Oxford

Prospect Seymour S

helt

on So

uthb

ury

Thomaston

Waterbury

Wate

rtow

n Wo

lcot

t Woodbury

Gove

rnin

g/Pa

rtne

ring

Committee

Chai

rman

-Sh

eila

O'M

alle

y

Shel

ton Economic Development Corporation

Staff -James E. Ryan

Waterbury Development Corporation

Staf

f -Leo Frank

Stra

tegy

Com

mitt

ee Mem

bers

hip

Bank

ing

Indu

stry

Business

Community Organizations

Educ

atio

n

Fina

nce

Gove

rnme

nt

Higher Edu

cati

on

Labor

Minorities

Prof

essi

onal

•Oversee CEDS

•Maintain, Update an

d Adjust

•Pre

pare

&Submit Rep

orts

•Mon

itor

Significant Cha

nge

in the

Eco

nomy

•Coordinate Co

mmit

tees

•Outsource Information

•Com

muni

cate

with

All Pa

rtne

rs

•Qua

rter

ly Mee

ting

s or As-Ne

eded

•Mon

itor- Rev

iew Re

vise

d Do

cume

nts As Req

uire

d

•Bui

ld on Local Re

gion

al Pla

nnin

g Process -In

corp

orat

eRe

comm

enda

tion

s

•Mon

itor

Gonl Objectives and

Adjust to Insure Results ar

eSatisfied

Publ

ic Hea

lth

•Support Cluster Dev

elop

ment

Publ

ic Safety

•Support Funds -Seek Grants

as war

rant

ed

•Inc

orpo

rate

Adv

isor

y Co

mmit

tee -Capitol Pr

ojec

tsWomen

•Encourage through Membership fu

ll Citizen Par

tici

pati

on

Advi

sory

Committee Mem

bers

hip

Chairman

Chambers of Commerce

Nonprofit Corporations

Councils of Go

vern

ment

•Qua

rter

ly Mee

ting

s

•Rev

iew NVC Economic Conditions

•Coordinate and Update Capitol Improvement

Proj

ects

from NVC Towns

•Mon

itor

CEDS Pro

gres

s

ceds 2012 annual update

Documents

development strategyceds

nvc ceds area

demographics nvc

nvc cedsas

community development

annual ceds report

district designation

ceds process