case of pessary impacted within the vagina for two years
TRANSCRIPT
BMJ
Case of Pessary Impacted within the Vagina for Two YearsAuthor(s): Jesse LeachSource: Provincial Medical and Surgical Journal (1844-1852), Vol. 13, No. 7 (Apr. 4, 1849), pp.177-178Published by: BMJStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25500744 .
Accessed: 12/06/2014 19:25
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
BMJ is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Provincial Medical and SurgicalJournal (1844-1852).
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 185.44.77.82 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:25:06 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
PESSARY IMPACTED WITHIN THE VAGINA. 177
American vessel. They fell in with a vessel which
supplied them with fresh onions and potatoes, and these
speedily cured them. One man, in a most deplorable
condition, who could not chew the onions, had the
juice of the bruised raw potatoes and onions given him.
-" This course soon restored his appetite and strength, and ten days after we spoke the Solon, so rapid was
his recovery, that from lying helpless and almost
hopeless in his berth, he was at the mast head furling a royal." The writer says,-" This disease is not so
common now as formerly, and is attributed generally to salt provisions, want of cleanliness, the free use of
grease and fat, (which is the reason of its prevalence among whalemen,) and, last of all, to laziness. It was
probably from our having none but salt provisions, and
from our having run very rapidly into hot weather,
after having been so long in the extremest cold." He
says that medicines would have been of no use,-their's were exhausted,--' for nothing but fresh provisions, and terra firma, has any effect upon the scurvy." How striking a proof is this of the amount of ignorance still prevailing on this subject, even amongst those
most interested in being acquainted with it as most
subject to its evils; and it shows that the neglect of merchants to provide their ships' crews with the
Rpveentive of scurvy, is not peculiar to this country
W her If. Budd has animadverted on it, but extends to
America, and would really seem to arise, in some mea
sure, incredible as it may appear, from ignorance of it.
But may not the potato derive its great value partly from another circumstance ? I have long considered it
a stimulating food, and that it derived its value in a
great measure from this. Now, it belongs to the same
natural order as the capsicum; and if the doctrine of
homomorphism be true, "that plants, having similar structures, havesimilar properties likewise."-Burnett's
Botany, p. 985.) May it not possesssome of the stimu
lating properties of the capsicum ? " It is a fact," says De Candolle, " which should never be lost sight of,
thatkall ouWfalimeats contain a small proportion of an
exciting principle, which, should it occur in a greater quantity, might become injurious, but which is neces
sary as a natural condiment; and that, when this
stimulating principle is naturally in very small propor tion, we increase it by art, or supply its place by the
addition of spice'-Burnett's Botany.
There is a way in which the potato is used which V nUotieave been thought of, but which I think may
l, inA.t-od. do in preserving public health,-I mean
mixed with wheaten flour in bread; I believe very few bakers omit to ue it, and perhaps we may have acted
unwisely in condemning this adulteration. One of the
questions I put to my correspondents was, "Do you consider that the potato, as an article of diet, may be
safely dispensed with ?-or can you suggest any suffi
cient substitute? Do you consider that rice would
be " Mr. Gore says, that the impression left on his
mind was, that vegetable food is indispensable to health, and that the potato is one of the best or most
convenient forms. The inmates of the Union House
soon absolutely loathed rice. And his observations on
these circumstances strongly confirmed a previous opinion, that rice is a very poor and inadequate article of diet. Mr. Lloyd says, that potatoes cannot be safely dispensed with, there is no good substitute for them; rice is a bad substitute, and produces disease of the
mucous membrane of the bowels. Dr. Tunstall looks on bread and cheese as the best substitute for potatoes. Dr. Lindoe thinks that in warm climates rice might be
found a useful substitute for the potato, but in England he is not aware of any vegetable that could supply its
place. Mr. Hutchins does not consider that rice would
be a safe substitute for the potato; thinks bread would
suit the English constitution; finds peas, and grits, and salted meats, readily induce obstinate skin-disease; and carrots and parsnips do not well agree as a work
house diet without some bread. Rice, with broth or
soup, and a small quantity of bread, he finds makes a
very wholesome and palatable meal. Rice, even with
treacle, is seldom liked; suet pudding, or bread and
cheese, is always preferred. Mr. Perrin considers
parsnips nearly as good as potatoes, though not near so
palatable; rice will never be used, from the strong aversion the poor have to it. My brother believes that
potatoes may be dispensed with, provided in their place we use some fresh succulent vegetables, as turnips,
carrots, celery, cabbage, &c. In the Tisbury Union
House, when the potatoes were becoming scarce, and
the diet table was altered, he requested that turnips,
carrots, or greens, might be given twice a-week, and
potatoes once, and not a single symptom of land scurvy
occurred to any inmate. He also found that those in
his district who had the first symptoms of the disease,
were speedily relieved from them by a vegetable diet.
Rice he believes to be useless as a preventive of land
scurvy, because in the Crediton Union, where it was an
article of diet, several, cases of land scurvy occurred.
The same weight of boiled rice had been substituted for
potatoes in that Union House. Mr. Shorland considers
it most unadvisable that the potato should constitute,
as heretofore, the general diet of the lower orders, but
as an adjunct considers it preferable to rice.
(To be continued.)
CASE OF PESSARY IMPACTED WITHIN THE
VAGINA FOR TWO YEARS.
TO THE EDITOR OF THE PROVINCIAL MEDICAL AND
SURGICAL JOURNAL.
SIR,
Conceiving the following ease of impacted oval box
wood pessary within the vagina for the space of two
years, with the singular and simple method employed
This content downloaded from 185.44.77.82 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:25:06 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
178 CASE OF PLACENTA PRiEV1A.
for its removal, after every other means had been
resorted to, possesses a peculiar claim for publication, I will briefly give you the particulars in order that you
may allow it a space in your Journal, should you, upon
perusal, think it merits one.
Mrs. W., aged 60, married, but without children, about two years ago consulted a practising empiric, with symptoms of general debility and tenesmus during urination, for which he advised the use of a pessary, and prevailed upon her to allow him to introduce one, which he did with some difficulty. Her existing symp toms became subsequently much aggravated, with additional weight, heat, pain and uneasiness about the
loins and vagina, with a constant dribbling away of
urine. She applied again to her adviser and requested him to remove the pessary. He tried to do so by
adopting different expedients, but after fruitless efforts for the space of two hours, he gave up the task and
coolly assured her, she need be under no apprehension, as the pessary in a short time would rot away, without
the slightest injury to her. She still consoled herself with the belief that time would remove what her adviser
could not. However, her general health became more
alarming, and among other practitioners, she con
sulted my brother, Mr. R. H. Leach, of Cowlishaw, near Oldham, who carefully examined the vagina, and
found a pessary so firmly wedged therein that he
could not remove it with his fingers. The other
medical gentlemen whom she had consulted prior to
my brother, had likewise failed to relieve her of it.
On the 1st of September, I went with my brother
armed with every little invention calculated to dis
lodge such a foreign body from the vagina, and found
the case exactly as he had described it; the woman
had a care-worn countenance, was dejected in spirits.
cough, disordered digestion, incontinence of urine, much emaciation of body and general debility. The
sphincter ani was paralysed, most probably from long continued pressure of a large foreign body upon the
muscular nerve supplying it with motion. The mucous
folds of the rectum were relaxed and much congested. The pessary could be distinctly felt through the rectum
in the vagina. The perineum was rigid, and though I could move the pessary within the vagina, the rigid
perineum prevented an extraction. The lower orifice
of the vagina was very small. The woman was now
placed upon her left side and her shoulders slightly
elevated; the vagina was well lubricated with lard.
Two fingers of the left hand were passed into the rectum
behind the pessary and traction thereby made, whilst
the index finger of the right hand, which was with
difficulty passed within the vagina behind the pessary, acted as a second traction. In this way the pessary could be brought to the lower part of the vagina, but
the small outer orifice and rigid perineum would not
allow its broad diameter to pass. Scoops, a small
vectis, and various other means were then tried without
success. Perforation or crushing were now the only
expedients, and being distant some miles from town, we thought it probable that the best perforator would
be the joiner's gimlet; and as the pessary was hollow
and made of box wood, perforating with a gimlet
would most probably fracture the sphere of the pessary into different segments, which would then be readily removed by a forceps. My brother now brought the pessary as low as he could in the vagina by using traction with two fingers, introduced behind the pessary within the rectum, and steadily held it fixed against the perineum and outer orifices of the vagina with his right hand, protecting the soft parts by means of a towel, whilst I perforated the pessary with a.
gimlet. On the groove of the gimlet, behind the
worm, passing within the hollow of the pessary, its walls fractured into three segments, the parts of which were now readily brought away with a forceps, and
the operation completed. We found that granulations had formed on the
cervix uteri, which had passed within the opening
usually left for a pessary tape, and were torn away with the extraction and found within the hollow of
the pessary after extraction. The woman has since
done very well and nearly recovered her wonted
strength and spirits. Such cases as the one I have described are rarely met
with in practice. I have only heard of two, one was
in the practice of Mr. Jesse, of Frodsham, who is a
practical and very intelligent surgeon, and the other
case was in Liverpool. I am not aware the gimlet has
been tried before in such a case, but as it effectualy answered my purpose, after more complicated instru
ments had failed, I can with confidence recommend
it to the profession, as an instrument always near at
hand, and calculated to realize the best wishes of the
operator in such a case. Should you deem the case
worthy a space in your practical Journal, you will
much oblige, Sir, your obedient servant,
JESSE LEACH. Heywood, Lancashire,
March 10, 1849.
CASE OF PLACENTA PRXEVIA.
TO THE EDITOR OF THE PROVINCIAL MEDICAL AND'
SURGICAL JOURNAL.
SIR, If your valuable Journal has not already been inun
dated to too great an extent with cases of placenta
praevia, I beg to submit to the notice of your readers
the following case, which occurred in my practice, and was attended by my friend Mr. William Peck, of
Bedford. The case appears to me to be confirmatory of the
plan first practised by Mr. Kinder Wood, of Manchester, and since, so prominently brought before the notice of the profession by the writings of Dr. Radford, of
Manchester, and Professor Simpson, of Edinburgh. If you think the case worthy of insertion, I forward it to you as concisely sketched by Mr. Peck himself.
I am, Sir, your obedient servant, T. HERBERT BARKER, M.D.
Bedford, March 14, 1849.
This content downloaded from 185.44.77.82 on Thu, 12 Jun 2014 19:25:06 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions