42A15KE8813 63.1584 TEEFY 010

Canadian Javelin Limited

Report On The

J - 11 Claim Group

Edwards Township. Ontario

Introduction:

This report considers the work conducted by and for

Canadian Javelin Limited on a group of 58 unpatented mineral

claims located in the southwest quarter of Edwards Township,

Larder Lake Mining Division, District of Cochrane, Ontario.

This group of claims was staked by Canadian Javelin Limited't

during the month of May 1964, and has been designated the J- 11

claim group by the company.

Purpose:

The objective of this report is to describe and evaluate

the field work conducted on the J-'l l claim group during the 1964

field season.

- 2 -

Location and Access:

The J- 11 claim group i s composed of the following

58, forty acre claims:

L- 79956 - 59 inclusiveL- 80156 - 60 "L- 80168 - 72 "L- 82632 -51 "L- 82656 - 59 "L-82662 - 71 "L- 82807 - 08 "' L- 83153 -onlyL- 83530 -33 - "L- 84589 - 91 "

which are registered in the name of Canadian Javelin Limited,

100 Bronson Avenue, Ottawa 4, Ontario, with the Ontario Depart

ment of Mines, Kirkland Lake Recording Office.

p *

The sub-division of Edwards Township has been annulled;

however, if the township was sub-divided, the J- 11 claim group

would lie in the west half of Lot 10, Lot 11, and Lot 12, north

half of Concession II and all of Concession III; and the east half of

Lot 10, north half of Concession II and the south half of Concession

III; Lots 8 and 9, Concession II and the south half of Concession

III; and the west half of Lot 7, south half of Concession III. An 80

acre parcel of ground in the west half of Lot 11 and the east half

of Lot 12, northern 3/4 of Concession III, is not held in the J- 11

claim group.

The centre of Edwards Township is situated approxi

mately 6 miles north-northeast of Iroquois Falls.

An excellent gravel road belonging to the Abitibi Power

and Paper Company traverses the western half of the claim group

in a general north-easterly direction. The private Abitibi road

extends from,Iroquois Falls to near Stimson station on the C. N. R.

northern line, and provides excellent access to all of the Javelin

claim groups in Edwards Township. A daily or monthly permit

from the Abitibi Company is required to use this road, however.

'i Topography and Coyer

The ground on the J - 11 claim group is generally flat

and moderately well drained, thus there are no extensive swamp

areas. It is heavily forested and the trees consist mainly of

spruce and jack pines, with scattered birches, poplars and alders.

The surface rights are held as forest reserve by the Abitibi

Company,

- 4 -

Field Program:

The J- 11 claim group was staked by Canadian Javelin

Limited in April and May 1964, hence no previous field work has

been performed on this property by or for that company.

In June 1964, an airborne combined magnetometer and

electromagnetic survey, was conducted over the property, and

this activity indicated the presence of only two questionably con

ductive zones (see C. A. M. S. map). Consequently, an actual

field program consisting of line cutting, ground geophysical work

and diamond drilling was deferred to a later date in favour of more

promising anomalies in the J- 10 group.

'*

Airborne Survey;

A total of 29 line-mile s of airborne magnetic and electro

magnetic survey was flown within the confines of the J- 11 claim

group by Canadian Aero Mineral Surveys Limited, Hunt Club

Road, Ottawa, during the month of June 1964. A DeHaviland Otter,

carrying the appropriate geophysical equipment, flew north-south

lines at 1/8 mile intervals at a 150 - 200 foot altitude.

" 5 "

The geophysical data was interpreted by A. R. Rattew,

author of the report titled, "Airborne Geophysical Survey of

The Edwards, Reid and Thorburn Township Areas for Canadian

Javelin Ltd. by Canadian Aero Mineral Surveys Ltd. , Project No.

4026, dated 28 July, 1964. This report bears the Canadian

Javelin file number 312 .

The airborne survey indicated two possibly significant

( 'x 1 type) electromagnetic responses (T-6A k T-24A) within the

claim group. The magnetic data was recorded and the magne

tometer tapes have been interpreted and the results plotted by

. Canadian Javelin personnel.

The foregoing procedure and the final map have been'i

approved by Canadian Aero Mineral Surveys Limited.

The magnetic information has been plotted on the enclosed

map at a scale of one quarter mile to the inch. The recorded

magnetic values range from 1200 gammas to 3600 gammas. This

is in contrast to values of 700- 900 gammas as presented on the

Canada Department of Mines and Technical Surveys Aero Magnetic

Map, number 302-G, The Iroquois Falls Sheet.

T- 6 -

The magnetics suggest that Lots 11 and 12 are under

lain by a north-south trending diabase zone, which outcrops to

the north in the J- 10 claim group (Concession IV). The north-

south trending magnetic features of the eastern portion of the

property (lots 7, 8 fe 9) are also quite probably due to the presence

of north-south trending diabase dikes associated with gabbros and

metamorphic rocks, as evidenced by outcrop information.

Geology:

Based upon magnetic and outcrop information in both

the J- 11 and J- 10 claim groups, it is possible to make a probable

interpretation of the geology in the J- 11 claim group. The western

portioni of the property is probably underlain by a north- south

trending diabase zone, which cross-cuts a complex of north

easterly trending acid and basic volcanics and meta sediments.

As there are no outcrops in the central portion of the

property, it is not possible to identify the underlying rocks. They

could, however, be composed of acid and intermediate volcanics

and meta sediment e . The low magnetic values recorded in this

•r.

- 7 -

area strongly suggest that there are no diabase or gabbroic

zones present.

The eastern portion of this claim group is quite likely

underlain by a gabbroic zone, traversed by a series of northward

trending diabase dikes.

Since the J- 11 claim group has not been drilled, it is

not possible to state the depth of overburden in the areas barren

of outcrop.

Conclusions:

The J- 11 claim group has been subjected to an airborne

geophysical survey, and limited ground outcrop examination.

The geophysical program provided general magnetic information

which aids in geologic interpretation, and indicated that there

are only two possibly significant conductive zones within the claim

group. On this basis, a ground geophysical program was deferred

to a later date. In view of the results obtained by the airborne

geophysical survey, it is anticipated that the results of a ground

survey would be almost identical. In other words, there is little

chance of outlining additional conductive zones.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that a reconnaissance ground elect

romagnetic survey be conducted in the northwestern and south

eastern portions of the claim group to determine the nature andt

extent of the two small anomalies outlined by the airborne survey.

If the proposed program indicates that the two small

anomalous zones warrant testing with a diamond drill, the drilling

should be undertaken; if not, the property should be dropped.

Respectfully Submitted,

f - ~ w, -* ~ — '. B . Blakeman,Geologist (B. A. Geol. )

April 20, 1965

m

*AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

OF THE EDWARDS, REID AND THORBURN TOWNSHIP AREAS,

FOR CANADIAN,JAVELIN LTD.

1. INTRODUCTION42A15NEM13 63.1584 TEEFY 020

A combined airborne EH and magnetometer survey

has been completed for Canadian Javelin Ltd* over three blocks of

ground in the Timmins area of Ontario. The aircraft employed was

the Canadian Aero Mineral Surveys Limited geophysically-equipped

de Havilland Otter, registration CF-IGM*

The areas surveyed are described as the Edwards

Township, Reid Township and Thorburn Township blocks. The final

areas laid out by Canadian Javelin field personnel differ somewhat

from the original areas described inthe contract of May 12, 1964,

especially the Edwards block which was enlarged appreciably* The

final line*mileage flown totals 700*2 line-miles, distributed as'' , - - - ; ' ' '-.'' '.'-.'-' - '..'. ''''. ;

follows?

Edwards Township block - 358,8 line-roiles

Reid Township block - 225,7 line-miles

Thorburn Township block ** 115.7 line-miles

In all three areas, the line*spacing was 1/8-mile

and the mean terrain clearance, 150 feet*

CANADIAN AEROilMITIt

*The survey began on May 16, 1964, and was completed

on July 11, 1964* ,

Canadian Aero Mineral Surveys Limited field

personnel associated with this project were as follows:

Electronic Technician and Project Managerpilot:''"V.:-'"' - : " ' ;i

G. A. Curtis

E. Jensen

D. Sipijth

T. Appleton

J* D. Lloyd

R. Sarsfield

K, McLeod

D. Graham

D. J, Sarazin

G* Granger: l . v ' ' ' 'f " '

' *

The project was supervised by A* R. Rattew, P.Eng.,

author of this report*' ' . \. :.' . ''' i - , ..'

Details of the equipment carried on the Otter and

an explanation of the recorder charts are provided in Appendix H*

Appendix III describes our anomaly rating and anomaly listing

procedures*

Pilot

Aircraft Mechanic

Aircraft Mechanic

Navigator

Electronic Operator ,1 '.' ' -. -.' ',.' ' '' -;. ' - ' ' , ' -

Data Analyst ^ ,

Draftsman

CANADIAN AEROilMITI*

i"

The alrbornd EM data are presented on three

separate sheets at the scale of one Inch equals fc-mlle. An air-

photo laydown provides the base for the EH maps.

CANADIAN AEROUMITIP

. 4 -

t

*H. GEOLOGX

Geological Information on these areas is scarce.

They are deeply covered by drift for the most part*

The Reid and Thorburn areas are covered by the

Ontario Department of Mines preliminary map P. 139 at the scale of

one Inch equals two miles. Most of the Edwards Township block Is

covered by D* D* M* preliminary maps P* 152 and P. 153 at one Inch

equals j

In the few outcrops which do exist a wide variety

of Precambrian rocks have been mapped* They include acidic to

basic volcanics, acidic and basic intrusive s, quartzite,

amphibolite and various gneissic rocks*

One sulphide showing with minor chalcopyrite is* . ' 'reported in the 'western part of Edwards Township*

CANADIAN AEROUNITS*

'. 5 *III. - RESULTS , ; , . . . ;. . .,. . ,. ,:.. .., ...: . .. ;.,..,, ,, . .; ,.... i'..,-, , :

All EM anomalies have been assigned numbers which

are shown on the maps and in the anomaly list, Appendix Z. These

numbers consist of the line upon which the anomaly occurs, plus

letters A, B, C, etc*, from south to north or from east to west.

Additionally, the main zones of conductivity are assigned reference

numbers on the map sheets to facilitate discussion in this report

(numbers l, 2, 3, etc*)*

The "x" category of anomaly rating is reserved

for questionable anomalies and for anomalies which are suspected

of being due to surface conductors* Because the Timmins area has

great economic potential, we include on the maps, any feature from

the EH charts which has a reasonable chance of being a legitimate

anomaly*'i '

c-

In many parts of the Timmins area, the overburden

has a fairly high conductivity, yielding substantial quadrature

anomalies* Most of these quadrature anomalies are broad and smooth

and many correlate clearly with swamps; these are readily discarded.

The sharper quadrature anomalies could derive from either low*

conductivity bedrock conductors or narrow, conducting swamps*

CANADIAN AERO _ ....._.^. ,...___kIMITI*

, 6 -~

i* - Many of these features are included on the maps, and attention

j is drawn to the possibility of a surface conductor in the "Comments"

column of the anomaly listing or in the text of this report*

Edwards Township Area ;'' ;; ' ";"' i! "' ' v ; '"' ' ;; '" J '. ;! ' ••'- ' " '' ' ' : '- '•'••'•'•' -- ;

Seven zones of anomalous conductivity have been

numbered on this sheet* All of them but one, (zone 3), consist

of single-line anomalies. Additionally, there are eleven "x-type"

anomalies designated only by their anomaly numbers*

Zone l is a triple-peaked anomaly occurring in the

vicinity of known sulphide mineralization. The direct magnetic

correlation on the centre anomaly suggests an appreciable pyrrhotite

content, and there may be a slight magnetic anomaly on the northern

peak as well.

2ona 2 is a very weak, multiple anomaly, but it is

probably legitimate* The O.D.M, geology map shows a north-easterlyJ.'. v . ',. \ -

strike in this vicinity, suggesting that l and 2 may, in fact, be. - ' - ' \

the eaae conductive zone.

The only extensive zone of bedrock conductivity is

zone 3, a 3/4-mile-long, multiple-conductor belt* The width ofi ' - :, ' , ' ' ' ' . " ' '. ' ' ' \

the zone changes drastically from line to line and there is

CANADIAN AERO _ ....._.... ^..___TlHITC*

(f

magnetic correlation with many of the EM anomalies. Chances are

good that sulphides will be found in this belt, probably in

combination with graphite. The strongest EM response within

zone 3 is anomaly 6B.

Zones 4, 5, 6, and 7 consist of single-line,

broad, quadrature anomalies* The possibility exists that surface

conductors are the source of one or all of these anomalies, but in

all cases, there are reasons to suspect some bedrock conductivity

contrast* Therefore, in a thorough follow-up programme, these

conductors should be explored.

Any of the eleven questionable, "x-type", anomalies

could warrant exploration if the geological environment is

sufficiently encouraging,' Strictly on the basis of the anomaly

characteristics, our preference among the questionable featuresf , .

is for anomalies FA, 6A, 24A, 24B, and 34A*

Reid Township Area

Hine zones of anomalous conductivity have been

numbered and there are four other "x-type" anomalies shown*

Zones l, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 are definite bedrock

conductors4 Of these, 5, 6, and 9 appear to be related. Note

CANADIAN AEROkIMITtt

8 -

that information on zone 9 is incomplete and its position Is some

what uncertain, because it occurs at the end of the lines outside

the Job boundary*

Zone 8 is a good sulphide prospect, a localized

feature of high conductivity with a coincident magnetic anomaly.

Although zone 2 consists of a single, questionable

anomaly, we consider that it has a fair chance of being a legitimate

bedrock conductor*

Zone 3 is a definite anomaly, but it could derive

from a surface conductor rather than a bedrock source*" ' "

Zone 4, consisting of strong, broad, quadrature

anomalies, is probably a surface conductor* It is stronger than

most, however, and is therefore included on the map*'i

' * ' H ". l ,

,J~I ' ' '

the three "x-type" anomalies 52A, 53A, and 55A, all

have similar characteristics: they are in-phase anomalies related

to terrain. We consider them poor prospects for bedrock conductivity

Anomaly 60A is also a probable surface effect*

CANADIAN AERO

Thorburn Township Area i;

Five zones bf anomalous conductivity have been*

numbered on this sheet* Of these, we consider zones l, 2, and 3

definite bedrock conductors, and zones 4 and 5 good possibilities.

Although both the anomalies in zone 4 are

questionable, they tend to support each other*

The characteristics of zone 5 are such that it is

questioned as a possible surface conductor*

The remaining ten "x-type" anomalies plotted on

this sheet are all strongly suspected of being surface effects

or noise effects* Our preference among these is anomaly 10A.

CANADIAN AEROunites

* 10 *

IV; ' SUMMARY AND RECOMMEflDAtlONS

DUB to the economic potential of this area, all ,

definite bedrock conductors warrant exploration. Furthermore,

if the local geological environment is considered sufficiently

encouraging, any of the questionable anomalies' could be worth

.examination*'' ' v/'^vy' '^'^J^^' vl^^ : :-.', -^^l'

The definite bedrock conductors are as follows:

M' 1 '^';'";' '' ; \' : v' ;: ' v"-': 1 :' : 'Edwards :;v .'* : .. 1 '' l 6nd .-3* . . : ,, .. ; ,- ; ;; ,....;

. .. -'' i ,:i,v^,;:i;6 t;'.7 l ^8, and 9*,, J . .,. ,{ p ' ' -- '' ' -' "'"' ' - ! '' ' ' ' "- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' " ' " '- ' '"

, . .,. y. . .-. ;1 :. Thorburn * ; ,l,;.2^\and. 3. ;;; ..;. . it ' ; ., . : -, 1|..,:;.. i' , ' " ' - .' -' : .' ' '' ; -. : ; '.'' ' -{ - :''.' ' [" ' ' ' ''' "' '' ' ' ' ' ' ' : '' - . ' i ." ' -

1 '- ' ''

' A number pf^ other zones haye - a; good, chance of l feeing

bedrock conductor IB and we 'recommend , t^t ; they; be included on

list for; raandatpry fo],ipwup ? They, ar^^as fpllpwsi ;. ' ...Ai-'

.-^--^ ' :

. . . .

Thorburn. .

4)and 5*

among the mor* questionable anomalies which we include on the maps *

CANADIAN AERO

11

Strictly on the basis of their geophysical properties, we prefer

the following from this group! H ; : ; '. ' ' " "! * L ' '' - ' '

Edwards anomalies PA,6A, 24A, 24B, and 34A.

Thorbum anomaly lOA i ;:;

Respectfully submitted.

OTTAWA, Ontario, July 28, 1964.

A. R. Rattew, P.Kng., Oeophysicist. M

CANADIAN AERO

-^

cm

at1

r

'. . ;. ' ; ,

Anomaly

FA

DA

DB

CA

BA

BB

AA

AB

1 A

1 B

2 A

2 B

3 A

i

PROJECT Np

Fiducial s

5974/7

5334/8

5391/7

5127/33

5011/3

5028/34

6582/94

6543/7

2857/61

2851/5

3018/22

3024/9 "

3343/7 ^,

1 i

i

--•—— -- — --

.4026 *

Irv-PhaseQuad T L

^80

-/50

V601 ;

./70

-/40

-/50

-/ioo

-/60

120/60

40/50'''1-

60/120

**770

30/60 ',''Vf V ' '

' * ' : M i;X-v' , . i

...,,.. ——— , ————— L__

' ; ; r'' . : ' ." ' - .' i : ,' .' .'.''-..-'.. .^ ' . - '

EDWARDS TOWNSHIP AREA

;, i : : i -i .:... ''•;, i ';;' : ; ; ;;;. :s;

Altitude Magnetics

130 nil

135 nil- - ' .' ' :. , .'

140 nil. - -' ;.- ; i'- ; i

1 ' n . . ..' -

125 nil

145 , nil

140 Assoc?40g

135 Assoc?broad 200g

140 nil

140 Dir?: : ii: \, i: i5g...-

135 v Dir. broad•:v ;,: ; 30g;X ' \^

140 Dir,t 40g•V. 1 - ' '; ' ' ; .\' :'-.\ L . : ..'•', y^; ; -.'v-^: : -, : '

150 'Dir tt' toz125 Dir, i to H

;;:-. i .-, I30g

" i!; ' ;' : : '' '//.CANADIAN AERO iMw

•' ; ' - i i ; :

APPENDIX I

pRate Comments

x

x Probableswampeffect

x Probableswampeffect

3 Double, orepeak sharp

x Probableswamp effect

3 Possibleswamp effect j

3 ' '•'•' : -. ;.

X ; ^ ' ' ' - ;:

3 Double,strong

3 Broad -Broader quad

3 Double,strong broadquad

3 Broad quad -Double ?

3 , - ; ; - ;. ' -

\^dl pfu/MWIlA* *y L 1W1TI9

[

.^.-.. - . ,.-..,.-,...,...,,-.. .J...-.....^ ...,.:.. .... : . t-

APPENDIX X

PROJECT KO. 4026 - EDWARDS TOWNSHIP AREA

'••'

''"' ' ' '••,'

'

*

(9

Anomaly Fiducials

3 B 3340/3

3 C 3336/40

3D 3333/6

4 A' 3508/12 ;' V . ' '

4 B 3654/65,

5 A 3828/32

6 A 3978/84

-i

6 B 3992/6

6 C 3996/400

7 A 4317/31

11 A 5451/5 :u

20 A 8053/60

21 A 8261/4

In-Phase Quad

40/200

./180

-/no-/90

-/ISO

50/40

60/-

120/220

40/40 1

40/70

4Q/- :''..;:'

60/*

140/20?

-

Altitude

135

135

140

150

145

140

150

145

150

150

130

120*160

150

CANADIAN

. - -f ' , i ' ~ . i,.

Magnetics Rate.

Dir i 150g 3' ' - : ' ' ' ' \

Dir. broad 3 120g - '-1Dir? 70g 3

N. F lank 3 80g

nil 3

Dir? 20g 3nil x

Dir, 15g 2A

Dir* 230g 3

S* edge 3 180g Possibly some directmag*,

Dir. 25g x

Dir* C x 80g

S. F lank 2B lOOg-*. ; :

AERO tMin&wU

Comments -

Strong quad

Strong quad

Broad;- No IP

Multiple quad, surface conductor ?

Double ?

Probable manoeuvre noise -

Broad, weak

Poor IP, ' Double ? j

Probable turbulence noise

No quad. Broad multiple

-

' -*-*-

APPENDIX I

PROJECT NO, 4026 - EDWARDS TOWNSHIP AREA

In-Phase Anomaly Fiduciala' Quad Altitude Magnetics

21 B

21 C

23 A

24 A

24 B

34 A

8264/6

8266/8

8881/4

9063/6

8938/41

2126/9

80/20?

50/20?

30/-

40/-

40/*

-/50

150

150

150

150

150

140

Dirs 300g

Dirt 15g

nil

S. F lank 20g

N.Flank 60g

nil

CANADIAN AERO

Rate Comments

3 Sharp mag*

3

x Doubtful

x

x

Possiblesurfaceeffect*

UMIttO

;, 1

(f

'

9'

*Anomaly

39 A

40 A

40 B

50 A

52 A

53 A

53 A3

54 A

54 B

54 C

55 A

55 B

PROJECT NO,

Fiducial s

4677/80

4526/9

4523/6

2602/5

2357/64

2051/6

1995/9

1741/4: .

1814/9

1861/6

1524/30

1501/12,' f- . ' .

4026 -

In-Phasa Quad

20/30

30/30

3Q/*

40/*

100/*

90/-

"/80

-/120

-/80

60/201.

80/*

*A40

.' .' . i ' ',R \,

' - '. ' - ~-''"

REIp TOWNSHIP AREA' ;

Altitude

160

155

150

155

145

140

135

145

135

145

140

125

CANADIAN

Magnetics

N.side 80g

1 i : T ; ,:' i .',:''.

N.edge 60g

Dirt 40g

Dir. broad 300g

Assoc? lOOg

nil

N. Flank 600g

nil

nil

N. Flank 200g

nil

nil

AERO t/fU,

APPENDIX I

Rate Comments.•^••MBMHMf* •MMMMMMMMMMMMW**

x Weak: ,..-i, t,

3 Weak

x IPonly, weak

x Good shape

x Probable surface effect

x Probable surface effect

3 Possible surface conductor

3 Possible surface conductor

3 Probable , surface conductor

3 Double ?

x Probable surface ' effect

3 Probable surface conductor

•w -*-n-

'PROJECT NO, 4026 " REID TOWNSHIP AREA

: APPENDIX I

Anomaly

57 A

57AA

57AB

58 A

58 B

59 A

60 A

60 B

65 A

66AA

66 A

67 A

Fiducial s

930/3

3313/8

3256/60

533/6

520/3

447/50

0050/3

0024/9

i 8867/76

7492/5

3035/8

7481/5

In- Phase Quad

20?AO

•/12Q

60/20?

60/20

40/40

40/30

10/30

•/40

40/40

80/20

60/20

70/40

Altitude

125

140

165

125

130

125

130

125

140

135

155

135

Magnetics

N. Flank 120gWU ; '-' '

nil.nil- .v

Dir? broad 25g

it. edge 60g

nil

nil

Dir, 120g

N. Flank 80g

Dir* 60g

N, Flank *0S^

Rate

3

3

x

3

33

3

x

3

3

3

3

Comments

Weak

Possible surface conductor

Double?

Broader and weak quad

Broader quad

Weak

Probable surface effect

Weak

-

Strong

CANADIAN AEROLIMIT!*

(*

o

Gfc '.

*

Anomaly

1 A ;

2 A

4 A

5 A

6 A

6 B

7 A

8 A,' \

9 A

10 A

10 B

li A

12 A

17 A

18 A

PROJECT No

Fiducial s .

0137/41,

i . .

0211/5

0479/82

0544/7

. 4026..-.,

In- PhaseQuad

•/50u.v' --

," i \ ,'i

' ''t I - '-

-/50

./2o';::: ; v-/40

0697/0701 -/40

0712/5

0754/7

987/90

1013/6

1220/3 '

1289/92i , ,

1394/7

" y7495/8

2648/51;

2953/6

•/30

107/40

50/20•'•' : -'.'.

20/50, -,

60/*;-/40

-/50

f- '. ,Y '- 1 ' ,"'

90/-

40/40

40/70

. ' :

THORBURN

Altitude

110,

' ' i

140

130

130

140

145

145

160

140

135

160

115

150•..•'•'•:

140

140

CANADIAN

APPENDIX I

TOWNSHIP AREA

. . ,. ' , iMa^ttetics Rate; Comments

Dir.'lOOg x Probable;.-; surface

•, :.', - ! •.. : -', .,, /: effect1 '1 . ; , . - , -

iV l ; t ' i 1 ' l ' - ' . . . . '

nil x Possiblesurfaceconductor ;

Dir. 15g x j'

;Dir*-150g -3 . : ;: -; 'V".' :i ' ' ^ " l

Dir?'.30g - .. x.. - ;'.: ; ::r^ i ^-.:: ;- .' . i : ': :. ; . . ' v . .. .

N.Flank x150g

nil' x " : 'v ;: ' v;: \ ' '. : '.:!'.:.'' ''i i . j 1 '

Dirt broad 315g •'•••,v1 ,:,-. : v\''':''' ; '''' ; ' . ;'

E. Flank 3 - :-M, V -' : -;::;^.-,30g

nil ,. 1 '' X . •r;.-,::^!.:.;...' , ' - . . :/ . - \ ';: ' :.' - . i - : , ' . j

nil x•. "'i .', . . ' " ' ; '- ' - 1 - '

nil x Possiblesurface i

: ' ...,: .-:.-.'.. effect ' Bi ; . ,: '. - v- ' . ' - i '

Dir*'50g x Probablemanoeuvre j

,.;;: : ' noise . ;'

E*edge 3 !1508 ' ' - .,-:,:, ii :'- i.E. edge 3 i70g

i,AERO dwn&ittl j2w44wy4^ ite ;

; l 1-. . : . . "^ ' - '-.- J t'

APPENDIX l

PROJECT NO. 4026 * THORBURN TOVTNSHIP AREA

" .'.'v ' In-Phase - ^ ,xy 'X;,.',v.; .-.,.'- ••..,,\ •.-.. .... . ..Anomaly Flduclals ' Ouad : Altitude Magnetics Rate Comments

19 A 8270/3 20/30

22 A 8875/8 40/-

23 A .8945/8

29 A 4796/4800 -/40

29 B 4834/7

30 A 4900/3

32 A 5148/51

/40

155v. ' :: ••.160'

'

150v : 150

.

!,; ••'

140;v

135•-140

Dlrt-lOg x

Dit? b*oad

CANADIAN AERO

x

50g x

E.Flank x

Possiblesurfaceconductor"Possible^:surfaceconductor

Possiblesurfaceeffect*

LIMITIt

,, "^X^;'.;^',.t^

*!.' '• ll-f !1 *iSkV(^! JcV !;'\-.- ..-t ' , .;W •'?;' f-'Jt; 2'-:;''-^. ~ ,' - -. '' - r

g^&^wji

rC^B^ffi"'

PYNE

728GO

SEE DETAIL.GEOLOGICAL MAP N0.355A

— O—— Q-/—— o 7 ' inAU RORA

SEE DETAILGEOLOGICALMAP NO 355C

NTERPRETATION OF REGIONAL GEOLOGY

GEOLOGYMAGNETIC INTERPRETATION

CANADIAN JAVELIN LIMITEDAERIAL E MAcid fn/rifsiOts

Basic jrt/rt/s/fes; Gahbro

rocks : Amphfbolitf. (Maj Hornb/end'-re/dspargneiss(Mqn.-Q.)

c/afa. from N-5 f/tyht /itt&s at /^ m i fa

magnetic reduction by Javelin staff ofmagnetic, data coll&ctect by Canadian dero Mtffirat Surveys 2 Magnetic interpretation is based on k sg. mtl e-

mactnstic iJatvzs u/ifh 5OO Gamma contour LnT&rdais

rocks ' Qua rt? iff (So.)

Vo/cantc rocks: Andesite and/or basalt , pif/ouJfd (fop/.) a AURORA. M ORTIMER e EDWARDS TWPSJ-13

GROUPS*-.-M&ta sedimentary rocks, with hornbt&nde. and feldspar porphyroblast.

Si/tsfom (Ss) ; Greytfackt, f Sp.)DATE April

42A15NEM13 63.1584 TEEFY 200

T-44

JOB BOUNDARY

PYNE

AURORA

JOB BOUNDARY

-M.OR-TJ M E R

LEFROY LAKE

LEGEND

l A ANOMALY................

1 B ANOMALY., . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2 A ANOMALY . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .^

2 B ANOMALY .. , .. . . . . . . . .. K\\S\N

3 ANOMALY. ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l———l

X TypeANOMALY..

MEAN TERRAIN CLEARANCE, . .. .150 FEET

FLIGHT LINE SPACING . . . . . . . . . 1/8 M ILE

RIVERS AND LAKES

HORIZONTAL CONTROL... . . . ..BASED ONPHOTO LAYDOWN

AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY

EDWARDS TOWNSHIP AREAONTARIO

CANADIAN JAVELIN LIMITEDSCALE : l INCH = 1 /4 MILE (APPROX.)

CANADIAN AERO

OTTAWA ft TORONTO , ONTARIO

APPROX.

42A15NE0013 63.1584 TEEFY aioC.A.M.S. 4 026