c e n t r e d e f o r m a c i Ó learning with ict a conversational approach nick kearney forestur...
TRANSCRIPT
C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Learning with ICTA conversational approach
Nick KearneyFORESTUR 16th November 2006
2C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
LEARNING THROUGH ICT
“E-LEARNING”
Evolved out of distance learning
Content focus
Self study vision, suits only a few
Failure for many, demotivation and isolation
Contrast with richness of online communities
Transmission paradigm – passive learner
3C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Conversational learning – Social context
Learning as a social processDewey (1938)- learning takes place in a social
context. Garrison and Archer (2000) - Need for education
to take into account both the process of indivudual construction of meaning and social acculturation.
We could also cite Bandura (1977) – social learning, Lave (1988) - situated learning, Resnick (1991) – social cognition or Rogoff (1991) - social construction of knowledge
4C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Conversational Learning – Interaction as key
Palloff y Pratt (1999) describe interactions between students, teachers and students and the resulting collaboration as a key element in the learning process.
Laurillard (2000) emphasises the importance of interaction with others as an integral part of the gradual development of individual comprehension.
Interaction with others reveals other perspectives, thus enriching the learner’s emerging comprehension.
“
5C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Conversational Learning – Learning through interaction
Kaplún (2000):
“only in the act of expression, of externalising and transforming one’s thought into a communicable message, is it shaped, organised and constructed...true understanding of knowledge is only reached when there is a requirement – and an opportunity- to communicate it to others...”
6C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Conversational Learning - Background
Furthermore, it has been observed that the asynchronous nature of online contexts favours support and promotion of interaction, and facilitates learning.
Garrison y Anderson (2003): the unique characteristics of online asynchronous communication “have a significant impact on the facilitation of critical thinking and the achievement of higher-level learning outcomes”
7C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
LEARNING THROUGH ICT
Fenicia and Ikarus projects
Development of a conversational approach that takes into account these considerations
Change of focus from learning content to learning activity
Activities embedded in conversations
Not a revolution but a reorganisation
8C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
FENICIA PROJECT
Focus on providing temporal access to learning
Target group: Retail workers marketing and management
Isolated, each in his her shop, unable to reach class, due to opening times
Vocational training, not “natural” students
Need for contact and support
9C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
FENICIA PROJECT
Development of methodology for these students, based on interaction.
Learning conversations, a variety of activities of different types aimed at promoting the active discovery by the students of the different concepts involved in the subject.
Instead of giving them the knowledge (passive) we create the conditions in which they construct it actively.
10C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
FENICIA PROJECT
Successful project, students felt involved with and part of the group with which they learned. Active participation was highly valued.
11C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
IKARUS PROJECT
Further development of the methodology in an e-learning course
Collaborative groupwork activities in inter and intra disciplinary groups
International (30 countries)
Large scale up to 300 students
Facilitating geographical access
12C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
IKARUS PROJECT
The content debate, the fish or the rod?!!The role of the teacher...from fount of all
wisdom to VirgilTeacher knows the field they are exploring
(importance of definition of objectives) but allows students to find their own way, giving guidance and support (use of checklists)
6 years 1500 students
13C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
From content to activity
From passive to active....
a change of emphasis that makes more appropriate use of the communications capabilities provided by the technology.
Learning is about developing autonomy
Autonomous participation in the target community, learning should rehearse this
14C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Key ICT tools
The forum, where all the conversation happens
The download area, resources repository
15C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Key elements
Activity, anything you can imagine from a reading to a treasure hunt
Resource, an article, a glossary, a website, a video, a sound file etc
People, when interaction is central, you need to know the other participants
16C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Key teaching tools
Activity description
Systematization of teaching/learning activity
Facilitates reflection on the work of teaching
Definition of learning objectives
Facilitates transfer to other contexts
Centred on what the students are going to do, and why
Easily sequenced
17C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Key teaching tools
Activity Description TemplateTitle
Objectives
Timing ( duration, student time needed)
Procedure (from students point of view)
Assessment
Resources
18C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Key teaching tools
Activity Guide Template (2)Extra information for the teacher:
Teacher time needed
Procedure from teacher’s point of view
Reference material for the teacher (checklists, etc)
Comments and evaluation of the activity for future reference
19C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Key teaching tools
Learning unit (sequence of activities)TitleDescription
Brief description of unit putting it in contextDescription of learning objectives and sub-objectives
ProgrammeSubject area of unitSchedule of the unit
General resourcesRelevant bibliographic and other support and reference material
20C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Key teaching tools
Learning unit (sequence of activities) 2
Activities
List of the activities planned in order to achieve the objectives of the unit and estimated schedule (in tabular form)
21C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Example of sequence
Ikarus Pedagogy course Unit 1General objectivesThe two poles of debateExploring student assumptions as they articulate themLooking at different approaches
An introductory sequenceUsing students own words as basis for exploration, a
start message.Basically three activities that make up a structured
discussion that lead students to the issues they need to be aware of, instead of telling them
22C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Example of activity
Ikarus tools activity
General objectives
Discover types of tools available
Discover variety of activities available
Raise awareness of the importance of tenchnological design and its effects on what you can and can’t do online
Introduction to collaborative work
23C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Example of activity
Ikarus tools activityA discovery activity (basically a kind of scavenger
hunt)
Promoting evaluation by students of tools and activities, and explration of the possibilities. Content instead of given is “out there” and in the students reflections about what they have found.
Each (individual or group) becomes relative expert on chosen tool, and shares this expertise with others in the larger group, importance of this process of articulation in consolidating what has been learned
24C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Advantages
Student autonomy Participation, commitment of studentsTeaching processVisibility of learning processes, as they are
articulated through conversation, facilitates intervention
Flexibility of activity based approach Lends itself to hybrid and distance
approaches
25C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Possibilities in FORESTUR
1.Local Group activities
Similiar objectives, similiar processes (comparability) local content.
2.International online activities
Students in small international groups compare contrast and comment, feedback to local
26C E N T R E D E F O R M A C I Ó
Possibilities in FORESTUR
1. Data collection activity - several groups 2. Inventory activity3. Design of indicators.... cross compare
internationally4. Field work5. Reports presentations (national/international)
All run/organised by students? Self-paced? Asynchronous gives time to overcome language issues