bridge preservation: evaluation, repair and protection

49
4 Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection Webinar Wednesday Series

Upload: others

Post on 14-Jan-2022

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

4

Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and ProtectionWebinar Wednesday Series

Page 2: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

CONCRETE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE

The Concrete Preservation Alliance is a growing coalition of organizations committed to advancing best practices in the field of concrete preservation and infrastructure renewal.

Working together to promote education and awareness of concrete repair industry standards, new and innovative corrosion prevention technologies and sustainable construction practices.

WeSaveStructures.info

Page 3: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

OUR MEMBERS

vector-corrosion.com vcservices.com

ndtcorporation.com vector-construction.com

Page 4: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

WESAVESTRUCTURES.INFO• The construction industry is the

largest user of resources and raw materials.

• Approx. 40% of solid waste comes from construction and demolition.

• Making new structures last longer and the rehabilitation and reuse of existing structures saves money compared to the cost of premature failure, demolition and rebuilding.

• In addition to economic benefits, repairing and extending the service life of structures reduces the consumption of natural resources, pollution and construction waste.

https://www.wesavestructures.info/environmental-impact-calculator

Page 5: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

WESAVESTRUCTURES.INFO

Page 6: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Dr. Brian Pailes, Ph.D., P.E., NACE Specialist

Brian is the Principal Engineer with Vector Corrosion Services, a professional engineer and certified NACE Cathodic Protection Specialist (CP4).

Brian has extensive experience in the field of nondestructive evaluation (NDE), material testing, structural evaluation and corrosion assessment of reinforced concrete structures.

He earned a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from Rutgers University, an M.S. in Civil Engineering from the University of Virginia and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Northeastern University. Brian has also obtained a Graduate Certificate in Engineering Geophysics.

Page 7: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Corrosion Assessments for Concrete Bridge Elements

• Understanding the causeand effect of reinforcingsteel corrosion in concrete

• Quantifying the magnitudeand extent of corrosion risk.

• Many destructive and non-destructive test methods forassessing corrosion risk.

Page 8: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

What is Corrosion Reaction• Electrochemical Reaction

• Anode – where rust is formed

• Cathodic – no section loss

Page 9: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Concrete Protects Steel

• Concrete is naturally alkaline• pH of about 13

• Steel is naturally passive at this alkalinity

• Formation of passive layer

• Passive layer can be destroyed by;• Chlorides• Carbonation

Page 10: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Corrosion Induced Damage

• Damage resulting from

• Metal section loss and

• Formation of iron oxide (rust)

• Expansive properties of iron oxidecreate tensile stresses in concrete

• Leads to cracking, delamination,and eventual spalling

0 2 4 6 8Relative Size

Fe

FeO

Fe3O4

Fe(OH)2

Fe(OH)3*3H2O

Page 11: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Corrosion Damage

Conventional Mild Reinforcing Bar

In most cases loss of steel section not primary concernTypically damage to concrete becomes significant and observable prior to severe section loss

High Strength Strands

Minor section loss of steel can have significant effect on strength

Steel can have significant section loss without significant concrete damage

Page 12: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Concrete Preservation Process

Page 13: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

ACI 562: Concrete Repair Code

• Being adopted in states throughout the US

• Requires that an evaluation take place prior to designing repairs

Page 14: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Delamination Survey

• Hammer sounding located areaswhere concrete has debonded

• Is there more going on here?

• Yellow – extent of delaminationthat cannot be heard throughhammer sounding

• Red – extent of activate corrosionthat will be a delamination in thenear future

Page 15: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Why use NDT in Evaluation?

• We need to more accuratelydetermine location and extent ofdeterioration?

• Sounding and visual inspectionsare known to underestimate truerepair area

• Impacts of underestimating repairquantities?

• Costly change orders

• Increased project duration

• Time from inspection toconstruction can be long

• Deterioration will have grown fromlast inspection

NOT JUST FOR DECKS!

Page 16: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Corrosion Deterioration and NDTREBAR CORROSION DELAMINATION SPALLING

IMPACT ECHO

CHAIN DRAG

VISUAL INSPECTION

BRID

GE

DEC

K C

ON

DIT

ION

TIME

HALF-CELL POTENTIAL

ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY

GROUND PENETRATING RADAR

CHLORIDE AND MOISTURE

PENETRATION

Rei

nfor

ced

Con

cret

e C

ondi

tion

Page 17: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Visual Inspection

Identify areas of visual deterioration

• Rust Staining• Cracking• Spalling• Exposed Reinforcement• Water Seepage• Efflorescence

Page 18: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Sounding Survey

• Hammer sounding or chain drag

• Locates areas of large nearsurface delaminations

• Incipient delaminations cannot beidentified

• False positives are rare

• False negatives are common

Page 19: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Collection of Cores

Page 20: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Chloride Sampling

• Chloride Threshold - Between 1 to 2 lbs of chloride per cubic yardof concrete

• 350 ppm of chloride in concrete is about 1.5 lbs per cubic yard

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

Chl

orid

e C

once

ntra

tion

(ppm

)

Depth (in)

Chloride Concentration with Depth

Sample 1

Sample 2

Sample 3

Sample 4

Sample 5

Threshold

Page 21: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Carbonation Depth

• Carbon dioxide permeates intoconcrete

• Reduces pH of concrete

• CO2 reacts with free lime, Ca(OH)2, resulting in CaCO3 and H2O

• Reduced pH de-passivates steel

• Often seen when

• Concrete permeability is high

• Industrial sites

• Very old structures – carbonationis a result of time and exposure

Page 22: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Corrosion Potential Measurements

• ASTM C876

• Most people refer to it as the “half-cell” method

• Determines the probability ofactive corrosion of embeddedmetals

Page 23: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Corrosion Potential – Bridge Deck

Page 24: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Corrosion Potential – Substructure

Page 25: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Ground Penetrating Radar

• Electromagnetic evaluation of concrete

• Reinforcement layout

• Location of embedded metals

• Cover Depth

• Qualitative condition of reinforced concrete

• Chlorides, moisture, and concrete deterioration attenuate GPR signal

Page 26: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

GPR Locating Existing Reinforcement

Page 27: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

GPR Locating Existing Reinforcement

Manufactured

Void

Bituminous Overlay/Waterproof Membrane4.9 inches to 6.2 inches thick (roadway)

3.3-3 .6 inches overlay with 4-14 inches of fill (median)

6" 6"8"7"7"8"3" 3"

6"4"8"4"4"4"8"4"6"

5"4" 4" 4" 3" 4" 4" 3" 5" 4" 4" 4"

12

2727

118

7

Page 28: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Cover Depth Survey

• Cover depth is an important factorin the service life of a structure

• Reduced cover depths allow forchlorides and carbonation to reachsteel faster

−=

tDxerfCC

cotx 2

1),(

2

,12

1

−×

=

o

txc

CC

inverf

xD

t 𝑡𝑡 =𝑑𝑑𝐴𝐴

2

Chloride Diffusion

Concrete Carbonation

Page 29: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

GPR Cover Survey

Page 30: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

GPR Amplitude Survey

Page 31: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Acoustic Methods – Impact Echo

Page 32: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Acoustic Method – Pulse Velocity

Page 33: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Relationship between Compressive Strength and Wave Velocity

Page 34: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Acoustic Testing

Page 35: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Acoustic Testing

1)

2)

3)

4)

Deck delaminations impact echo measurements at sensor #1

Longitudinal partial deck cracking measurements at sensor #2

Longitudinal full deck cracking measurements at sensor #3

Transverse deck cracking measurements at sensor #4

#1#2#3

#4

Page 36: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Acoustic Deck Testing

Page 37: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Acoustic Substructure Testing

Page 38: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Delaminations Found by Sounding

Page 39: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Delaminations Found by Impact Echo

Page 40: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Acoustic In-Situ Compressive Strength

Page 41: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Repair Area

Page 42: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Infrared Thermography• Delaminations have different thermal properties than sound

concrete

• Result of air-gap caused from the separation of the concrete• In the morning sun, delaminations heat up faster than sound

concrete section

• During evening cooling, delaminations cool down faster thansound concrete section

• Allows for very quick assessment of large areas• Results are similar to chain drag and hammer sounding

Page 43: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

IR of Arch Bridge

• Hammer sounding surveydone several years prior

• Wanted to know growth ofdeterioration from lastsurvey

• IR provided a quick methodto resurvey the concrete

Page 44: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Petrography

Page 45: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

QUESTIONS?

Page 46: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

Contact Dr. Pailes

Dr. Brian PailesPrincipal EngineerVector Corrosion ServicesTampa, FL

Office: 813-501-0050 [email protected]

Page 47: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT HOURS

• PDH certificates available

• Complete webinar evaluation

• Evaluation form link available:• In webinar chat• Via E-mail• QR code here

Page 48: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

WEBINAR RECORDING & FUTURE EVENTS

Page 49: Bridge Preservation: Evaluation, Repair and Protection

52

CONCRETE PRESERVATION ALLIANCE

WESAVESTRUCTURES.INFO